Is something factual if the source supporting the fact does not control or create all elements leading to that fact? Are we only left with the scientific method to prove what is factual? Does the outcome of using a fact in testing prove the validity of the fact? Can knowledge only exist if it has been tested and the outcome being repeatable as source of validity or justification?

I feel like I am studying for the MCAT all over again with these.
Is there a method to the madness?
Normally on the B/B, you could look at the figures and more or less figure out the results of the study they're asking about.
These questions could well give you very deceiving figure that you have to figure and play scientific mind games at the same time, all within 10 seconds.
What are people's strategies for these to cut down the BS?

"Not a single human being on this planet ever saw the universe."
Grand Arbiter Albert XLIII further declared, on their return 37 years after the last broadcast failed in the middle of explaining the secrets of the universe to us.
"What you are seeing is an image of the universe that your brain created to make sense of your surroundings. A mirage, an infinitely imperfect approximation. And there are roughly 8 Billion such approximations on this planet, not even counting non-human entities. We have observed you recently - debating wether the harmonic frequencies of light hitting the rods and cones of your eyes actually generate the same image of color in your brain for all of you equally, and you came to the conclusion that they might not. That everybodies version of "red" or "blue" might be ever so slightly, or completely different. We found it amusing that you aren't drawing the same conclusion to, well, everything else. Through the scientific method and communication accelerators like the Internet, your species managed to align big chunks of those "mirage universes" in your brains, but other areas not touched by the scientific method are left completely unexplored, and therefore to the imagination of the individual. Which lead to many "unfortunate misunderstandings" among you. But make no mistake, even after this global alignment of mirages, the universe inside your mind is still infinitely wrong in the grand scheme of things and unlike any other imagined universe of your peers. Your scientific method suggests the use of calibrated measurement devices that aren't biased by human error to gain knowledge of your surroundings. Which is brilliant, we might add. Your species came up with this kind of technology very early compared to similar lifeforms in other universes. You use these devices to create a "ground truth" from which you reference the rest of your conclusions and predictions. This enabled you to make predictions about the "real universe" you find yourself in, even with this fundamental error underlying your logic system. Either brilliant, or unfathomly lucky. It doesn't really matter. You can pat yourselves on the backs for that.
However, amusingly, you failed to find the crucial detail about the one fundamental, yet completely uncalibrated device at the bottom of everything - your brain - and the sensory organs as extensions of it. No single eye on this planet is the same, no nose, no ears, everything differs ever so slightly. Every brain is folded and twisted differently.
Therefore, what you are observing, and what your scientists are finding models for, is not the real universe. It is the image of this universe your brain creates for you, that makes sense to most of you and that most of your brains are able to understand and find agreement on. Nothing more, nothing less. Especially the intricacies that you are now finding in the infinitissimally small scales and the unfathomly large scales (you curiously still differentiate these two concepts, we observed) are the footprints that the architecture of your brain leaves on these mirage universes. You find numbers everywhere and turn everything into a more and more digital version of nature because the axons that are part of your neurons generate activation signals in a digital, all or nothing kind of way. This part of the brain is what you evolved to use for, among others, your logic systems. Your thinking is in large parts digital, so most of your logic is too. This has gone so far that some of you now think you are actually living in a computer simulation. In some regards, you do, but there is no cosmic entity that generated this simulation and put you in it. You are creating this simulation yourself, in your brain, as a means to maneuver your way around actual physical reality. Imagine having to memorize a picture, but your sensory input systems only allowed you to see one pixel at a time, chosen completely at random, without any reference as to where that pixel is located in the frame. So, you found chunking techniques, the help of your collective hive mind and ideas of particularly eccentric members of your society, to bit by bit close in on a mostly impossible task. But without a paradigm shift on your end, the entirety of the original picture will stay in the shadows of reality.
You created tools like algebra and geometry to circumvent the fact that your logic is mostly digital as a simulacrum of analog information, but for how remarkably useful it is for you to make predictions, it is to what is happening in the real world like what an abacus is to a personal computer. Sure, if you enter '1 + 1', in their own ways, both give you '2'. But one is the tip to the others impossibly large iceberg. It is a sensible abstraction. But it is nowhere close to being an accurate description of what is actually happening or in what ways it useful to you.
We don't want to discourage you by saying this. Your approach, even if it happened out of sheer luck, is brilliant. It really makes the best out of the limitations that you have by your sensory organs and the architecture of your brains. Once a few evolutionary steps later your brain can conceive of more complex logical patterns and images, you will get closer and closer to having an actual copy of the real universe in front of your minds eye. Through the scientific method, you are already optimizing for this. Again, given your species' age, you have developed such a technique incredibly quickly. But what you are doing is finding (very smart) workarounds over a fundamental error you all have in common.
My lifeform, which isn't too unlike yours, just much "older", has taken a different approach in its early stages. Our biggest thinkers found early on that the answers lie within. So for millenia, we focussed our exploration on finding our deepest and truest selves, once we started to move past basic survival instincts, that is. Only after many, many "quantum leaps" in the area of self discovery in the individual and the societal level, we started to artificially accelerate our communication, and overcome physical limitations through technology. It was a slower approach in the beginning, but once we got there, our intellectual growth was exponentially explosive. The time it took us to move from living in basic, mostly local communities that lived off the land - to bending our universe to our wills - was about the time between you writing your currently most popular spiritual fiction and landing on your planets moon for the first time. Note the actual durations might differ greatly, as the concept you call time is very different in our universe and we still haven't fully studied yours.
Anyways. After this event we call "universal reframing", everything else just... fell into place.
Our strategy basically was to, first, fully align our mental universes. And then to perform a depth search from a common starting point. You seemed to have rushed over a few of the crucial bits as soon as the first approach turned out to be useful. Actually, all of the bits but one. It must be a terribly confusing existence that you are living. We can only make an attempt to relate, as our evolutionary strand optimized for alignment before curiousity. That, you could say, was our dumb luck.
Are there any questions so far?"
There was a puzzling silence in an area packed with an amount of people that would normally be present at music festivals or presidential inaugurations. For an event of this magnitude, the stage was sparsely decorated and included only the necessities. Like last time, the visit was spontaneos and unannounced. Or maybe, like last time, we just didn't understand the announcement message, as it might have again came in the form of a formerly undiscovered particle, a seemingly arbitrary number of years prior to this event. They must think they are really funny.
One of the humans chosen as representative of the planet raised their hand.
"Please, speak. As always. Our 'time' is very limited."
"If I didn't misunderstand this: You said, our brains are basically creating what we call 'simulations' for ourselves, in our mind, to make sense of the actual universe we are in and base our actions on. Is this correct?"
"Based on the very crude definition your species has for the word 'correct' I would say 'yes, that is correct.'"
"And these simulations are getting closer and closer to the real deal, right? But what if, say, we didn't want the real deal. What if we liked our own personal pocket universes and instead wanted to bend that one to our own wills instead of the real one? You said we are bad at alignment and I would agree to the point where I say we probably go extinct to our own stupidity before we all agree on even one single thing. Can't we just use your knowledge to just, manifest things into our universe just by thinking about it, like in the movie Matrix, which might have crossed your desk while researching us. Great Movie."
"It did indeed. It is esteemed by my lifeform as what you would call 'slapstick comedy'. Since we moved past what constituted our form of entertainment, the media from your universe has become very popular among my peers. It is by sending samples back to our universe how we finance the probes we are sending here."
"You still have money?"
"I was making - what you call - a joke. Never heard of it in the context of a movie, but that title is immensely funny to me given the circumstances. Anyway, you wanted to know how to bend your 'simulated universe' around you. Alright. You might be slightly dissappointed by the beginning of my explanation, but listen till the end. And make of that what you will.
Let's start by what you mean by 'manifest' exactly. As the inaccuracy of your communication patterns shall not be a hindrance to this mentorship."
"Well... I imagine it. And then it sort of poofs into existence?"
"Understood. Actually, I will start explaning how you perform this action in the actual universe you are in, before I make the transfer to how you do it in the imagined one in your brain."
"Uh.. ok?"
"What would you like to be manifested?"
"I don't know. How about we go nice and easy with a cone of ice cream and start from there?"
"So be it. So, we start imagining the cone of ice cream. What does it consist off? Milk, sugar, eggs, and some smaller additions to suit your individuals taste buds. Let's begin with milk. You are getting it from cows (a practice my society finds quite alienating. We, too, have to get used to the wildly varying customs of lifeforms of the universes). Cows can be domesticated and bred, but first, we would have to overcome the physical distance between us, and a few locations on this planet. For that, I would advice designing and constructing a vehicle that is capa..."
"Oh come on, that's how we manifest things? We go and make them ourselves?? Oh wow, thanks a lot mister transcendant being. So the rest of the stuff you told us was also bullshit?"
"Please refrain from jumping to conclusions without the full picture in mind, even if it is in your existences nature to do so. Alright, so let me offer you a shortcut."
"Please do."
"I know of a location just a few human paces down this road, where you can exchange currency for a cone of ice cream."
"Seriously?"
"Yes."
"What the hell is the point of this?"
"The point is, once again: you - misunderstanding your existence. Especially in conjunction with your incredibly limited ability to verbalize concepts using your own vocabulary. You are barely at the point of being able to convey emotions in every day speech, and are now expecting to understand high level 4 dimensional concepts after just a few of your incredibly inaccurate words. Tell me now, please: What do you perceive as the difference of these two scenarios I just mentioned? In a temporal manner and in the energy required?"
"Well, it would be much easier and faster to just go down the road and buy a cone of ice cream, but that isn't tremendously astounding information to us, you have to understand."
"'Much'? Let's give this word, 'much', a bit of a frame of reference. The differences between these scenarios are: About 15000 years of agriculture and animal husbandry; countless inventions that led to your current state of technology which allows for refrigeration in a way advanced enough to get the ice cream to just the right texture that your modern palate is accustomed to; An education system that allows for such inventions to occur in time for you to be standing here, demanding ice cream, and actually getting it. Not mentioning the infrastructure that makes you bridge the physical distances of every single time any of these steps needed anything. And meanwhile destroying the naturally occuring resources of your planet bit by bit.
Or, scenario 2: You take the money that you got from staring at a computer screen for about 7 minutes, choose one of the ice cream parlors that your civilization made sure to be on average a 30 minutes driving distance from every single living human. (You aren't very good at even distributions though, we found.). And go and get that ice cream. Even including the infrastructural costs existing now, we have narrowed this process down from not even being close to a reality for thousands of generations to being at most 30 minutes away and dirt cheap, assuming an amount of efficient preparation, that is part of the technology that lead you here.
If you ask me, between scenario 1 and 2, you became so many orders of magnitude closer to 'poofing it into existence' that a human mind has troubles comprehending it. And therefore, appreciating it. From '0% of the human population has access to this within their lifetime and no one will for the next couple millenia' to 'Over half the human population has access to this within 30 minutes", taking into account the total timespan, the amount of events that had to occur and the amount of incremental learnings that had to accumulate, for this to happen even once for anybody, I believe the time and energy you have to exert to access your ice cream cone right now is a rounding error in the grand scheme of things. And you aren't even close to finishing your development as humans - if you manage to not kill yourself somehow.
You are constantly manifesting things into reality, the only issue is that you severely and heavily underestimate what it means 'to imagine a thing'.
Please allow my vanity, but this is an important lesson for the following part that you are, I'm afraid, more interested in. How to do that in your head. And potentially much faster. Well assuming thaXXXxxxx----.----."
"Oh wow, not again. Mighty convenient this always happens right when it gets interesting."
"First, you have to understand that.,.......... The limitations of spacetime that you perceive.... are not present in nature..... nature is infinitely 'dimensional', and in fact XXxxx.....----..--.-.- has no concept for infinity....-.-.--. it is a human made.....-.-.-.- model to describe a perfectly natural phenomenon you lack the words for at this time..._xxxx.xxx-x---.-.--.-zzzz."
"Come on, speak faster! The battery is dying again!"
" ...physical distance...S;.,.XXXxx...currently a big bottleneck for your progres...asd.döö,,,, is also a limitation of your cortex, not nature,.....-as.d.sa......the concept of an 'extent' only exists from certain frames of references..-.-..-.a.ss.a.as.... in others everything is....a.s-d.-.---.-..-xxxx on top of each other, overlapping each other in what you call 'time' AND 'space'"
"...XXXxsasad Listen."
"I am running out of time again humans. The Hopf Fibration. It is a great first step. But move away from your digital thinking. Treat your numbers. .aD;,aC:.x.cx.ac,.as,dca.s like your waves...CKLUJCJUCCLICK"
The broadcast stopped.
"I never know if these things make me smarter, or dumber. Sadly the alien is gone now so it can't tell me that there actually is no smart or dumb."

DAY: MAY 31 2024
5-31-2024

RESEARCH SUGGESTS LEADERS’ SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS ARE TAKEN JUST AS SERIOUSLY AS FORMAL STATEMENTS

Over 180 world leaders maintain social media accounts, and some of them issue policy warnings to rivals and the public on these platforms rather than relying on traditional government statements. How seriously do people take such social media postings? A new study suggests the general public and policymakers alike take leaders’ social media posts just as seriously as they take formal government statements. The research, by MIT political scientists, deploys novel surveys of both the public and experienced foreign policy specialists. “What we find, which is really surprising, across both
5-31-2024

SCALE OF ONLINE HARM TO CHILDREN REVEALED IN GLOBAL STUDY

More than 300 million children a year are victims of online sexual exploitation and abuse, research indicates. Pupils in every classroom, in every school, in every country are victims of this hidden pandemic, according to researchers who have conducted the first global estimate of the scale of the crisis. The statistics, from the Childlight Global Child Safety Institute at the University of Edinburgh, amount to a clear and present danger to the world’s children, according to the crime agency Interpol. Online risks One in eight of the world’s children, about
5-31-2024

PRONATALISM IS THE LATEST SILICON VALLEY TREND. WHAT IS IT—AND WHY IS IT DISTURBING?

For Malcolm and Simone Collins, declining birth rates across many developed countries are an existential threat. The solution is to have “tons of kids,” and to use a hyperrational, data-driven approach to guide everything from genetic selection to baby names and day-to-day parenting. They don’t heat their Pennsylvania home in winter, because heating is a “pointless indulgence.” Their children wear iPads around their necks. And a Guardian journalist witnessed Malcolm strike their two-year-old across the face for misbehavior, a parenting style they apparently developed based on watching “tigers
5-31-2024

HOW SCIENCE, MATH, AND TECH CAN PROPEL SWIMMERS TO NEW HEIGHTS

One hundred years ago, in the 1924 Paris Olympics, American Johnny Weissmuller won the men’s 100m freestyle with a time of 59 seconds. Nearly 100 years later, in the most recent Olympics, the delayed 2020 Games in Tokyo, Caeleb Dressel took home the same event with a time that was 12 seconds faster than Weissmuller’s. Swimming times across the board have become much faster over the past century, a result of several factors, including innovations
5-31-2024

BANNING SEX CRIME OFFENDERS FROM CHANGING THEIR NAMES DOESN’T MAKE US SAFER

The government of British Columbia recently introduced a bill to ban people convicted of serious offenses from legally changing their name. The proposed amendment to the province’s Name Act would also prohibit those found not criminally responsible due to mental disorder from changing their name. The government announced the move after media reports that Allan Schoenborn legally changed his name to Ken Johnson. Schoenborn was found not criminally responsible for the deaths of his children in 2010 because of a delusional disorder, and was placed at a psychiatric hospital.
5-31-2024

SILICON VALLEY ISN’T THE START-UP UTOPIA WE THOUGHT, RESEARCH FINDS

Silicon Valley—considered the world’s hub of technology and innovation—can breed inequality and sameness among budding entrepreneurs, according to new research. Behind the multi-million-dollar deals and tales of start-up utopia, Silicon Valley’s “uneven” investment landscape is in fact a barrier to many budding businesses, says the study from the University of Stirling and Georg-August-University Göttingen. But the researchers suggest other countries could still learn from the more discerning entrepreneurial ecosystem that bred giants such as Apple and Google, to be more selective in backing start-ups. While it is not uncommon for
5-31-2024

I WANT TO KEEP MY CHILD SAFE FROM ABUSE—BUT RESEARCH TELLS ME I’M DOING IT WRONG

Child sexual abuse is uncomfortable to think about, much less talk about. The idea of an adult engaging in sexual behaviors with a child feels sickening. It’s easiest to believe that it rarely happens, and when it does, that it’s only to children whose parents aren’t protecting them. This belief stayed with me during my early days as a parent. I kept an eye out for creepy men at the playground and was skeptical of men who worked with young children, such as teachers and coaches. When my kids were
5-31-2024

OVER 300 MILLION YOUNG PEOPLE HAVE EXPERIENCED ONLINE SEXUAL ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, FINDS METASTUDY

It takes a lot to shock Kelvin Lay. My friend and colleague was responsible for setting up Africa’s first dedicated child exploitation and human trafficking units, and for many years he was a senior investigating officer for the Child Exploitation Online Protection Center at the UK’s National Crime Agency, specializing in extra territorial prosecutions on child exploitation across the globe. But what happened when he recently volunteered for a demonstration of cutting-edge identification software left him speechless. Within seconds of being fed with an image
5-31-2024

CYBERFLASHING IS A FORM OF GENDERED SEXUAL VIOLENCE THAT MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY

Sexting—sending sexually suggestive or explicit messages and images—is now a widespread practice, and can be a healthy way to express and explore sexuality. However, there is a need to distinguish between consensual sexting and forms of sexual harassment like cyberflashing. Cyberflashing refers to the act of non-consensually sending sexual imagery (like nudes or “dick pics”) to another person. It is facilitated through communications technologies including text, AirDrop and social media applications like Snapchat and Tinder. Similar to flashing—when a person unexpectedly and deliberately “flashes” their genitals to others—that occurs in
5-31-2024

VIRTUAL TRAINING MAY BE AN EFFECTIVE, COST-EFFICIENT OPTION FOR CHILD EDUCATORS

Teachers and other child educators can benefit from regular professional development, but in-person training can be expensive. New research found that virtual training can be a budget-friendly alternative—and especially effective for certain groups of educators. The study—a collaboration between researchers at Penn State and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and published in the International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning—found that educators who took a virtual training reported feeling more confident in their abilities to implement practices shown to support positive youth development. In particular, after-school providers who did not
5-31-2024

HUMBLE LEADERS BOOST EMPLOYEES’ WORKPLACE STATUS AND LEADERSHIP POTENTIAL, FINDS STUDY

There are many different types of workplace leaders, from those who prioritize the needs of team members and the organization above their own, to authentic leaders who foster openness, trust and transparency. A recent study by the University of South Australia published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior has highlighted the significant benefits of humble leadership in the workplace. According to the study by UniSA’s Dr. Xiao Lin, humble leadership can effectively elevate the workplace status of employees by boosting their sense of respect and prominence. It also leads to
5-31-2024

WHY ARE GROCERY BILLS SO HIGH? A NEW STUDY LOOKS AT THE SCIENCE BEHIND FOOD PRICE REPORTING

Rising food costs are squeezing Canadians around the country. Nearly everyone is feeling the pinch, and it’s not just an inconvenience—high food prices are a major threat to food security for many Canadians. Understanding why food prices are so high and why they are changing is critical to the well-being of our society. Unfortunately, consensus on why food price are so high is in short supply. Explanations given in reports like Canada’s Food Price Report and the news media range widely, from the war in Ukraine to supply chain issues
5-31-2024

WILL GENERATIVE AI CHANGE THE WAY UNIVERSITIES COMMUNICATE?

Is artificial intelligence an unprecedented opportunity, or will it rob everyone of jobs and creativity? As we debate on social media (and perhaps use ChatGPT almost daily), generative AIs have also entered the arena of university communication. These tools—based on large language models that were optimized for interactive communication—can indeed support, expand, and innovate university communication offerings. Justus Henke has analyzed the situation of German realities about six months after the launch of ChatGPT 3. “The research was conducted about a year ago when enthusiasm was high, but it was
5-31-2024

STUDY SHOWS RELATIVELY LOW NUMBER OF SUPERSPREADERS RESPONSIBLE FOR LARGE PORTION OF MISINFORMATION ON TWITTER

Classification of superspreader accounts. A large portion (55.1%) of accounts are no longer active. For each class annotated with political affiliations, colors indicate the ideological split. The last group aggregates all accounts with political affiliations. Credit: PLOS ONE (2024). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302201 A small team of social media analysts at Indiana University has found that a major portion of tweets spreading disinformation are sent by a surprisingly small percentage of a given userbase. In their study, published in PLOS ONE, the group conducted a review of 2,397,388 tweets posted on Twitter
5-31-2024

HOW LIFE’S BIG MOMENTS CAN CHALLENGE STARTUPS

Life-changing events like the birth of a child, the purchase of a new home, or a lottery win could threaten the survival of a new business venture, the positive family events had a comparatively greater influence, albeit negatively, on the survival of a new venture, compared with
5-31-2024

RUDE AT WORK? FEELING GUILTY CAN MAKE YOU A BETTER, KINDER WORKER

We’ve all done it. A bad night’s sleep or a tough commute made us cranky, and we lashed out at a coworker who did nothing wrong. What can we do to make up for it? According to a new study published in the Journal of Business Ethics, embracing our guilty feelings can help us make up for our bad behavior by encouraging us to act more politely and work harder the next day. “We found that anyone can be rude at work, because anyone can
5-31-2024

RESEARCHERS INTRODUCE A PLANETARY INCLUSION SCALE TO FOSTER BROADER ETHICAL THINKING

Social inclusion and having a sense of belonging with other people are key elements of a good life. However, the fate of humanity is a challenge that extends beyond our social reality. Experiences of belonging and inclusion, understood in a broader sense than before, may be crucial for a sustainable future. In an article published in the International Journal of Social Pedagogy, a team of researchers propose a new planetary inclusion scale that structures our planetary relationship three-dimensionally based on temporal, spatial and ethical orientation. The temporal element relates to
5-31-2024

‘LEAN IN’ MESSAGES CAN LOWER WOMEN’S MOTIVATION TO PROTEST GENDER INEQUALITY

Women in leadership are often told to “Lean In,” designed to be motivational messaging demonstrating that they are more confident, strategic and resilient to setback. However, new research indicates that such “lean in” messaging can hinder women’s motivation to protest gender equality. Popularized in a book by American technology executive Sherly Sandberg, the “Lean In” solution to gender inequality advises women that demonstrating personal resilience and perseverance in the face of setbacks is key to career advancement. Now, a new study led by the University of Exeter, Bath Spa University
5-31-2024

ALGORITHMS COULD HELP IMPROVE JUDICIAL DECISIONS

A new paper in the Quarterly Journal of Economics finds that replacing certain judicial decision-making functions with algorithms could improve outcomes for defendants by eliminating some of the systemic biases of judges. Decision makers make consequential choices based on predictions of unknown outcomes. Judges, in particular, make decisions about whether to grant bail to defendants or how to sentence those convicted. Companies now use machine learning based models increasingly in high-stakes decisions. There are various assumptions about human behavior underlying the deployment of such learning models that play out in
5-31-2024

DIGITAL CAMPAIGNING IS A HUGE PART OF ELECTIONS NOW—BUT GOING VIRAL ISN’T EVERYTHING

The election has commenced and the race is on—to amass as many likes, shares and comments as possible. Digital campaigning, particularly through social media, is now a key part of political candidates’ communication toolkit. In fact, every general election campaign since 1997 has at some point been lauded as the first to make effective use of digital campaigning. But it was in 2015 that David Cameron’s campaign first made strategic use of social media to drive an election victory. As political reporter Tim Ross outlines in his excellent book, Why
5-31-2024

WHY ARE ORGANIZATIONAL COVER-UPS SO COMMON?

The TV dramatization of the UK Horizon Post Office scandal evoked outrage and disbelief. However, as another example of dysfunctional organizational behavior, it was expected rather than exceptional. The Post Office saga joins a long list of cover-ups or scandals that includes Hillsborough, Enron, Grenfell, the infected blood scandal, the Tuam babies scandal in the Republic of Ireland, Boeing 737 Max and Nasa (Columbia space shuttle). They represent what happens when there is a move within organizations and institutions to cover up the causes of
5-31-2024

AMONG GEN Z AUSTRALIANS, 38% IDENTIFY AS SPIRITUAL AND HALF BELIEVE IN KARMA. WHY IS SPIRITUALITY SO POPULAR?

Spirituality is increasingly popular with young Australians: recent research shows 38% of Gen Z Australians identify as spiritual. It also reports 50% of them believe in karma, 29% in reincarnation and 20% in astrology. When it comes to activities equated with spirituality, 28% of Gen Z Australians practice meditation and 22% practice yoga. In Australia, spirituality is strongly, enduringly central to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and culturally and religiously diverse communities. Yet until recently, spirituality has received far less attention than religion. Spirituality may be
5-31-2024

COMPANIES CAN IMPROVE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THEIR PRODUCTS IN THE EARLIEST PRODUCT-DESIGN STAGES

An interdisciplinary team of researchers from Lithuanian and Italian universities propose a tool that allows companies to assess the circularity of their future products. The self-assessment tool emphasizes the co-creation of circular design in the early (creative) stages of product development, encouraging entrepreneurs and designers to think more systematically and collaborate better by integrating related stakeholders into the product development process. The study is published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology. “The majority of existing practical tools (systems of indicators) are aimed at measuring the environmental impact of products already
5-31-2024

RESEARCH EXAMINES HOW RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION AFFECTS A STATE’S COLLEGE ENROLLMENT

New research has revealed up to a 9% increase in college first-year enrollments in US states that have legalized recreational marijuana compared with states without such legalization. The study, which is published in Economic Inquiry, found that the increase was from out-of-state enrollments, with early adopter states and public non-research institutions experiencing the most pronounced increases. Recreational marijuana legalization did not negatively impact degree completion or graduation rate, and it did not affect college prices, quality, or in?state enrollment. The findings suggest that some students perceive recreational marijuana legalization as
5-31-2024

RESEARCH EXAMINES HOW RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION AFFECTS A STATE’S COLLEGE ENROLLMENT

New research has revealed up to a 9% increase in college first-year enrollments in US states that have legalized recreational marijuana compared with states without such legalization. The study, which is published in Economic Inquiry, found that the increase was from out-of-state enrollments, with early adopter states and public non-research institutions experiencing the most pronounced increases. Recreational marijuana legalization did not negatively impact degree completion or graduation rate, and it did not affect college prices, quality, or in?state enrollment. The findings suggest that some students perceive recreational marijuana legalization as
5-31-2024

HOW THE ‘MODEL MINORITY’ MYTH HARMS ASIAN AMERICANS

May is Asian and Pacific American Heritage Month, a time when Americans celebrate the profound contributions of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders—a group that is commonly abbreviated as AAPI—to U.S. society. It’s also a time to acknowledge the complexity of AAPI experience. And as a professor who studies equity and inclusion in business, I think the focus on AAPI communities this month provides an excellent occasion to push back against a stereotype that has long misrepresented and marginalized a diverse range of people: the myth of the “model minority.” The
5-31-2024

WONDERING HOW TO TEACH YOUR KIDS ABOUT CONSENT? HERE’S AN AGE-BASED GUIDE TO GET YOU STARTED

The Australian government’s new campaign Consent Can’t Wait challenges us all to improve our understanding of consent. It asks a series of questions to illustrate this issue is more complex than simplistic “no means no” messaging. The campaign invites viewers to consider the nuances of consent, so we can raise these important issues with children and young people in our lives. But what is a good age to start talking about consent? How do parents tackle such conversations when this information probably wasn’t readily discussed in our own upbringing? How
5-31-2024

A PRODUCT OF NATURE OR NURTURE?

The concept of cultural entrepreneurship has many facets. It encompasses both the cultural and social impact of entrepreneurial training, and the environmental factors that influence its development. Some societies, such as the U.S., have a strong entrepreneurial culture. This means that certain characteristics are celebrated and encouraged, such as the ability of individuals to assume risks, patience when confronting challenges, and innovative problem solving, especially in uncertain situations. However, not all countries have such an entrepreneurial culture. Entrepreneurship struggles to take off in Europe In general, entrepreneurship can drive economic
5-31-2024

STUDY BRIDGES ANIMAL BEHAVIOR RESEARCH AND COMPUTER CODING TO ENGAGE CHILDREN IN STEM

A graphic depicting a student coding. Credit: Carnegie Mellon University Teachers today face a bit of a conundrum, according to a new study from researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and the Rochester Institute of Technology. Their goal is to prepare young students to enter a rapidly changing world. Even basic jobs require technical proficiency, which requires computational and analytical skills. To address this need, many educators are pushing to fold these important STEM skills into elementary curriculum. Here’s the problem. Young students can lose interest and even develop an aversion
5-31-2024

STUDY SHOWS VR CAN HELP TEACHERS BETTER DISTRIBUTE THEIR GAZE

On the left, a bird’s-eye view of the virtual classroom; on the right, screenshots of each of the four gaze-visualization conditions. Teachers need to know their material, but they must also keep their students engaged and interested. Part of that involves making eye contact with their students—all of them. A multidisciplinary team of researchers tested several methods of data visualization in an immersive virtual reality (VR) classroom, to give teachers a way to gauge
5-31-2024

MARKETERS CAN MANAGE ‘FEATURE CREEP’ SO CONSUMERS FEEL LESS INTIMIDATED BY TOO MANY FEATURES IN A PRODUCT

Wifi-enabled washing machines. Voice-controlled microwaves. App-enabled TVs, vacuum cleaners, and even window blinds you can control from the comfort of your couch. Many of the technological features now included in everyday products are useful and accessible. But research has shown that having too many can overwhelm potential buyers, making them less likely to make a purchase. In recent research, Wayne Hoyer, marketing professor and James L. Bayless/William S. Farrish Fund Chair for Free Enterprise at Texas McCombs, digs into the phenomenon of “feature creep” and its impact on consumer sentiment.
5-31-2024

RESEARCHERS EXPLAIN SOCIAL MEDIA’S ROLE IN RAPIDLY SHIFTING SOCIAL NORMS ON GENDER AND SEXUALITY

A new paper summarizing decades of research demonstrates how social media has supported an explosion of diversity in gender and sexuality in America during the 21st century, and also how these technologies have equally enabled a cultural backlash. The paper’s authors, UC Santa Cruz Psychology Department faculty members Phil Hammack and Adriana Manago, identified five main narratives about gender and sexuality that they believe emerged through social media as people have strived to be “authentic” on these platforms. The findings, along with resulting recommendations for psychology researchers and practitioners, were
5-31-2024

KEY FACTORS IN TRAINING ASSESSORS FOR ENHANCED PERFORMANCE RATINGS

New research is examining how organizations can improve their training programs by customizing frame-of-reference training to emphasize identifying negative behaviors critical to their goals. While assessors naturally identify positive behaviors, C. Allen Gorman, Ph.D., associate professor in UAB’s Department of Management, Information Systems and Quantitative Methods, says targeted training helps them recognize harmful actions that can hinder organizational objectives. Involving assessors in defining important performance dimensions and examples of behaviors, both good and
5-31-2024

STUDIES CHALLENGE WIDELY HELD BELIEFS ON APPLICANT DIVERSITY AND WOMEN IN THE WORKPLACE

Justin Frake is interested in cause-and-effect relationships in real-world data and the hidden dynamics that shape workplace behavior and equality—or inequality, as the case might be. His curiosity has led to research that challenges some popular beliefs as well as published studies related to women in the workforce. One study shows that firms promoting flatter hierarchies inadvertently discourage female applicants and another study counters several recent studies that claim women CEOs negatively impact career outcomes of other women. Both are published in the Strategic Management Journal. The assistant professor of
5-31-2024

CHALLENGING LEWIN’S MOTIVATIONAL CONFLICTS THEORY

A recent series of experiments challenges the longstanding theory of motivational conflict resolution introduced by Kurt Lewin. According to Lewin, conflicts between two undesirable outcomes (avoidance–avoidance conflicts) are typically harder to resolve than those between two desirable ones (approach–approach conflicts). Lewin posited that avoidance–avoidance conflicts, where individuals must choose between two undesirable outcomes, are typically more challenging to resolve compared to approach–approach conflicts, which involve choosing between two desirable options.
5-31-2024

MEN WITH ‘TOXIC MASCULINITY’ ARE MORE LIKELY TO MAKE SEXUAL ADVANCES WITHOUT CONSENT, STUDY FINDS

No means no when it comes to sex. But what happens when a woman makes a more passive response to a sexual advance? According to new research from Binghamton University, men differ in how they interpret these types of responses, and men who display hostile masculinity, known commonly as “toxic masculinity,” tend to act on them regardless of whether or not they think it’s consensual. A team of researchers, including Binghamton psychology professor Richard Mattson and graduate student Michael Shaw asked men between the ages of 18–25 to respond to
5-31-2024

WHY WE DEHUMANIZE OUR POLITICAL OPPONENTS

Some of human history’s greatest atrocities—genocide, slavery, ethnic cleanings—are rooted in our ability to dehumanize people from other social, political, or cultural groups. Whereas prior research has traced dehumanization to the belief that others think or feel less than we do, new research co-authored by Haas professor Sameer Srivastava shows that our tendency to dehumanize can also be influenced by how we think others view important facets of the world. The greater the difference between our perceptions of an outgroup’s worldview
5-31-2024

STUDY SUGGESTS CHILDREN ARE OFTEN EXPOSED TO PROBLEMATIC CLICK BAIT DURING YOUTUBE SEARCHES

When a child peruses YouTube, the content recommended to them is not always age appropriate, a new study suggests. Researchers mimicked search behaviors of children using popular search terms, such as memes, Minecraft and Fortnite, and captured video thumbnails recommended at the end of each video. Among the 2,880 thumbnails analyzed, many contained problematic click bait, such as violence or frightening images, according to the Michigan Medicine led research in JAMA Network Open. “Children spend a significant amount of time on free video sharing platforms that include user-generated content,” said
5-31-2024

STUDY FINDS WOMEN ARE VULNERABLE IN POST-WAR PEACE PROCESSES

Post-war peace processes are a dangerous period for women. Many are forced to live close to men who committed serious abuse during the war or are expected to testify in various types of truth commissions, which can be both retraumatizing and stigmatizing. These are the findings of a new study by peace researchers at Uppsala University, published in the journal PLOS ONE. “In short, peace projects can force women to live side by side with ex-combatants who committed atrocities during the war. This puts them at risk of further threat
5-31-2024

HOW EMBRACING THE CRINGE CAN HELP YOUR DATING LIFE

We can all agree that dating is hard. Getting to know people can feel vulnerable, but at the same time, exciting. We can also agree that feeling rejected can be one of the worst feelings, especially after we put ourselves out there. Dating can also expose us to a lot of cringey things, maybe even something we didn’t know we’d consider cringey. Think of cringe like something that makes you uncomfortable, or something about someone else that you don’t find attractive. Before dating, most of us consider what we’re looking
5-31-2024

PERSONAL CONNECTIONS AT WORK POSITIVELY IMPACT RETENTION AND MENTAL HEALTH, SAYS REPORT

New survey results from Wiley suggest people still feel connected at work despite the prevalence of hybrid and remote work environments and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). According to the latest Wiley Workplace Intelligence report, “Human Connection: The Crucial Secret to Thriving in the Digital Age,” nearly 8 in 10 employees surveyed (78%) said they feel connected with their coworkers, and almost 7 in 10 (69%) said they also enjoy making connections with their colleagues. Around half even said they want to learn more about their coworkers by doing
5-31-2024

RESEARCHER DEVELOPS MODEL OF INFLUENCER IMPORTANCE WITHIN INSTAGRAM NETWORKS

A study has provided new insights into social media influencers, particularly focusing on those in the women’s fashion sector on the well-known image and video sharing platform Instagram. In a departure from the approach taken by earlier studies, Jens K. Perret of the International School of Management in Cologne, Germany, has used network statistics and centrality measures to establish a model of influencer importance within their network. Perret analyzed data from 255 influencers covering a four-year period. Influencers are loosely
5-31-2024

MOST PEOPLE TRUST ACCURATE SEARCH RESULTS WHEN THE STAKES ARE HIGH, STUDY FINDS

Rank (X-axis) does not affect the evaluation of trustworthiness (Y-axis, mean-centered) of accurate results. This lack of relationship is robust across experiments (columns) and for clicked results (top row, red) as well as non-clicked results (bottom row, blue). The trend lines represent the predicted change in trustworthiness ratings per unit decrease in rank fitted by the linear regression models. Credit: Scientific Reports (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61645-8 Using experiments with COVID-19 related queries, Cornell sociology and information science researchers found that in a public health emergency, most people pick out and click
5-31-2024

MISLEADING COVID-19 HEADLINES FROM MAINSTREAM SOURCES DID MORE HARM ON FACEBOOK THAN FAKE NEWS, STUDY FINDS

Despite the greater potency of “fake news” on Facebook to discourage Americans from taking the COVID-19 vaccine, users’ greater exposure to unflagged, vaccine-skeptical content meant the latter had a much greater negative effect on vaccine uptake. Credit: Jennifer Allen, Duncan Watts, David G. Rand Since the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, fake news on social media has been widely blamed for low vaccine uptake in the United States—but research by MIT Sloan School of Management Ph.D. candidate Jennifer Allen and Professor David Rand finds that the blame lies
5-31-2024

CRITICAL DIALOGUE HELPS STRAIGHT MEN CONFRONT SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC BELIEFS

Adult heterosexual men with sexist and homophobic views can potentially improve their attitudes toward gay men and women by engaging in critical dialogues that use illustrations as a springboard, according to a new University of Michigan study. The work is published in the journal Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services. The process by which people shift from a prejudicial stance to one of relative acceptance is a key innovation of the study. Guided by trained facilitators, critical dialogues reflect illustrations depicting different gender roles and sexual identities. The images
5-31-2024

RELIEVING A FEAR OF PUBLIC SPEAKING

If you dread public speaking you are not alone. It is a leading social phobia, one that can cause a state of anxiety that reduces otherwise articulate people to nervous incoherence. A strong fear of public speaking is known as glossophobia. Academic studies estimate it affects 20% of the population, but depending on the sample and methodology, the figure could be as high as 40%. As American writer and humourist Mark Twain said, “There are two types of speakers: Those who get nervous and those who are liars.” But help
5-31-2024

HOW SOME PRIVATE COMPANIES ARE MARKETING TECH AND AI SOLUTIONS

How do universities and colleges decide who to admit? Given the earnings advantage of a post-secondary degree both globally and in Canada, this is an important social mobility question. While the answer varies from one institution to the next, most focus on education criteria like exam scores and grades. However, Canada’s new intake cap on study permit applications puts increased pressure on Canadian institutions to also consider immigration criteria when admitting international undergraduate students. This is just the latest example of immigration’s growing influence on the societal roles of Canadian

"Not a single human being on this planet ever saw the universe."
Grand Arbiter Albert XLIII further declared, on their return 37 years after the last broadcast failed in the middle of explaining the secrets of the universe to us.
"What you are seeing is an image of the universe that your brain created to make sense of your surroundings. A mirage, an infinitely imperfect approximation. And there are roughly 8 Billion such approximations on this planet, not even counting non-human entities. We have observed you recently - debating wether the harmonic frequencies of light hitting the rods and cones of your eyes actually generate the same image of color in your brain for all of you equally, and you came to the conclusion that they might not. That everybodies version of "red" or "blue" might be ever so slightly, or completely different. We found it amusing that you aren't drawing the same conclusion to, well, everything else. Through the scientific method and communication accelerators like the Internet, your species managed to align big chunks of those "mirage universes" in your brains, but other areas not touched by the scientific method are left completely unexplored, and therefore to the imagination of the individual. Which lead to many "unfortunate misunderstandings" among you. But make no mistake, even after this global alignment of mirages, the universe inside your mind is still infinitely wrong in the grand scheme of things and unlike any other imagined universe of your peers. Your scientific method suggests the use of calibrated measurement devices that aren't biased by human error to gain knowledge of your surroundings. Which is brilliant, we might add. Your species came up with this kind of technology very early compared to similar lifeforms in other universes. You use these devices to create a "ground truth" from which you reference the rest of your conclusions and predictions. This enabled you to make predictions about the "real universe" you find yourself in, even with this fundamental error underlying your logic system. Either brilliant, or unfathomly lucky. It doesn't really matter. You can pat yourselves on the backs for that.
However, amusingly, you failed to find the crucial detail about the one fundamental, yet completely uncalibrated device at the bottom of everything - your brain - and the sensory organs as extensions of it. No single eye on this planet is the same, no nose, no ears, everything differs ever so slightly. Every brain is folded and twisted differently.
Therefore, what you are observing, and what your scientists are finding models for, is not the real universe. It is the image of this universe your brain creates for you, that makes sense to most of you and that most of your brains are able to understand and find agreement on. Nothing more, nothing less. Especially the intricacies that you are now finding in the infinitissimally small scales and the unfathomly large scales (you curiously still differentiate these two concepts, we observed) are the footprints that the architecture of your brain leaves on these mirage universes. You find numbers everywhere and turn everything into a more and more digital version of nature because the axons that are part of your neurons generate activation signals in a digital, all or nothing kind of way. This part of the brain is what you evolved to use for, among others, your logic systems. Your thinking is in large parts digital, so most of your logic is too. This has gone so far that some of you now think you are actually living in a computer simulation. In some regards, you do, but there is no cosmic entity that generated this simulation and put you in it. You are creating this simulation yourself, in your brain, as a means to maneuver your way around actual physical reality. Imagine having to memorize a picture, but your sensory input systems only allowed you to see one pixel at a time, chosen completely at random, without any reference as to where that pixel is located in the frame. So, you found chunking techniques, the help of your collective hive mind and ideas of particularly eccentric members of your society, to bit by bit close in on a mostly impossible task. But without a paradigm shift on your end, the entirety of the original picture will stay in the shadows of reality.
You created tools like algebra and geometry to circumvent the fact that your logic is mostly digital as a simulacrum of analog information, but for how remarkably useful it is for you to make predictions, it is to what is happening in the real world like what an abacus is to a personal computer. Sure, if you enter '1 + 1', in their own ways, both give you '2'. But one is the tip to the others impossibly large iceberg. It is a sensible abstraction. But it is nowhere close to being an accurate description of what is actually happening or in what ways it useful to you.
We don't want to discourage you by saying this. Your approach, even if it happened out of sheer luck, is brilliant. It really makes the best out of the limitations that you have by your sensory organs and the architecture of your brains. Once a few evolutionary steps later your brain can conceive of more complex logical patterns and images, you will get closer and closer to having an actual copy of the real universe in front of your minds eye. Through the scientific method, you are already optimizing for this. Again, given your species' age, you have developed such a technique incredibly quickly. But what you are doing is finding (very smart) workarounds over a fundamental error you all have in common.
My lifeform, which isn't too unlike yours, just much "older", has taken a different approach in its early stages. Our biggest thinkers found early on that the answers lie within. So for millenia, we focussed our exploration on finding our deepest and truest selves, once we started to move past basic survival instincts, that is. Only after many, many "quantum leaps" in the area of self discovery in the individual and the societal level, we started to artificially accelerate our communication, and overcome physical limitations through technology. It was a slower approach in the beginning, but once we got there, our intellectual growth was exponentially explosive. The time it took us to move from living in basic, mostly local communities that lived off the land - to bending our universe to our wills - was about the time between you writing your currently most popular spiritual fiction and landing on your planets moon for the first time. Note the actual durations might differ greatly, as the concept you call time is very different in our universe and we still haven't fully studied yours.
Anyways. After this event we call "universal reframing", everything else just... fell into place.
Our strategy basically was to, first, fully align our mental universes. And then to perform a depth search from a common starting point. You seemed to have rushed over a few of the crucial bits as soon as the first approach turned out to be useful. Actually, all of the bits but one. It must be a terribly confusing existence that you are living. We can only make an attempt to relate, as our evolutionary strand optimized for alignment before curiousity. That, you could say, was our dumb luck.
Are there any questions so far?"
There was a puzzling silence in an area packed with an amount of people that would normally be present at music festivals or presidential inaugurations. For an event of this magnitude, the stage was sparsely decorated and included only the necessities. Like last time, the visit was spontaneos and unannounced. Or maybe, like last time, we just didn't understand the announcement message, as it might have again came in the form of a formerly undiscovered particle, a seemingly arbitrary number of years prior to this event. They must think they are really funny.
One of the humans chosen as representative of the planet raised their hand.
"Please, speak. As always. Our 'time' is very limited."
"If I didn't misunderstand this: You said, our brains are basically creating what we call 'simulations' for ourselves, in our mind, to make sense of the actual universe we are in and base our actions on. Is this correct?"
"Based on the very crude definition your species has for the word 'correct' I would say 'yes, that is correct.'"
"And these simulations are getting closer and closer to the real deal, right? But what if, say, we didn't want the real deal. What if we liked our own personal pocket universes and instead wanted to bend that one to our own wills instead of the real one? You said we are bad at alignment and I would agree to the point where I say we probably go extinct to our own stupidity before we all agree on even one single thing. Can't we just use your knowledge to just, manifest things into our universe just by thinking about it, like in the movie Matrix, which might have crossed your desk while researching us. Great Movie."
"It did indeed. It is esteemed by my lifeform as what you would call 'slapstick comedy'. Since we moved past what constituted our form of entertainment, the media from your universe has become very popular among my peers. It is by sending samples back to our universe how we finance the probes we are sending here."
"You still have money?"
"I was making - what you call - a joke. Never heard of it in the context of a movie, but that title is immensely funny to me given the circumstances. Anyway, you wanted to know how to bend your 'simulated universe' around you. Alright. You might be slightly dissappointed by the beginning of my explanation, but listen till the end. And make of that what you will.
Let's start by what you mean by 'manifest' exactly. As the inaccuracy of your communication patterns shall not be a hindrance to this mentorship."
"Well... I imagine it. And then it sort of poofs into existence?"
"Understood. Actually, I will start explaning how you perform this action in the actual universe you are in, before I make the transfer to how you do it in the imagined one in your brain."
"Uh.. ok?"
"What would you like to be manifested?"
"I don't know. How about we go nice and easy with a cone of ice cream and start from there?"
"So be it. So, we start imagining the cone of ice cream. What does it consist off? Milk, sugar, eggs, and some smaller additions to suit your individuals taste buds. Let's begin with milk. You are getting it from cows (a practice my society finds quite alienating. We, too, have to get used to the wildly varying customs of lifeforms of the universes). Cows can be domesticated and bred, but first, we would have to overcome the physical distance between us, and a few locations on this planet. For that, I would advice designing and constructing a vehicle that is capa..."
"Oh come on, that's how we manifest things? We go and make them ourselves?? Oh wow, thanks a lot mister transcendant being. So the rest of the stuff you told us was also bullshit?"
"Please refrain from jumping to conclusions without the full picture in mind, even if it is in your existences nature to do so. Alright, so let me offer you a shortcut."
"Please do."
"I know of a location just a few human paces down this road, where you can exchange currency for a cone of ice cream."
"Seriously?"
"Yes."
"What the hell is the point of this?"
"The point is, once again: you - misunderstanding your existence. Especially in conjunction with your incredibly limited ability to verbalize concepts using your own vocabulary. You are barely at the point of being able to convey emotions in every day speech, and are now expecting to understand high level 4 dimensional concepts after just a few of your incredibly inaccurate words. Tell me now, please: What do you perceive as the difference of these two scenarios I just mentioned? In a temporal manner and in the energy required?"
"Well, it would be much easier and faster to just go down the road and buy a cone of ice cream, but that isn't tremendously astounding information to us, you have to understand."
"'Much'? Let's give this word, 'much', a bit of a frame of reference. The differences between these scenarios are: About 15000 years of agriculture and animal husbandry; countless inventions that led to your current state of technology which allows for refrigeration in a way advanced enough to get the ice cream to just the right texture that your modern palate is accustomed to; An education system that allows for such inventions to occur in time for you to be standing here, demanding ice cream, and actually getting it. Not mentioning the infrastructure that makes you bridge the physical distances of every single time any of these steps needed anything. And meanwhile destroying the naturally occuring resources of your planet bit by bit.
Or, scenario 2: You take the money that you got from staring at a computer screen for about 7 minutes, choose one of the ice cream parlors that your civilization made sure to be on average a 30 minutes driving distance from every single living human. (You aren't very good at even distributions though, we found.). And go and get that ice cream. Even including the infrastructural costs existing now, we have narrowed this process down from not even being close to a reality for thousands of generations to being at most 30 minutes away and dirt cheap, assuming an amount of efficient preparation, that is part of the technology that lead you here.
If you ask me, between scenario 1 and 2, you became so many orders of magnitude closer to 'poofing it into existence' that a human mind has troubles comprehending it. And therefore, appreciating it. From '0% of the human population has access to this within their lifetime and no one will for the next couple millenia' to 'Over half the human population has access to this within 30 minutes", taking into account the total timespan, the amount of events that had to occur and the amount of incremental learnings that had to accumulate, for this to happen even once for anybody, I believe the time and energy you have to exert to access your ice cream cone right now is a rounding error in the grand scheme of things. And you aren't even close to finishing your development as humans - if you manage to not kill yourself somehow.
You are constantly manifesting things into reality, the only issue is that you severely and heavily underestimate what it means 'to imagine a thing'.
Please allow my vanity, but this is an important lesson for the following part that you are, I'm afraid, more interested in. How to do that in your head. And potentially much faster. Well assuming thaXXXxxxx----.----."
"Oh wow, not again. Mighty convenient this always happens right when it gets interesting."
"First, you have to understand that.,.......... The limitations of spacetime that you perceive.... are not present in nature..... nature is infinitely 'dimensional', and in fact XXxxx.....----..--.-.- has no concept for infinity....-.-.--. it is a human made.....-.-.-.- model to describe a perfectly natural phenomenon you lack the words for at this time..._xxxx.xxx-x---.-.--.-zzzz."
"Come on, speak faster! The battery is dying again!"
" ...physical distance...S;.,.XXXxx...currently a big bottleneck for your progres...asd.döö,,,, is also a limitation of your cortex, not nature,.....-as.d.sa......the concept of an 'extent' only exists from certain frames of references..-.-..-.a.ss.a.as.... in others everything is....a.s-d.-.---.-..-xxxx on top of each other, overlapping each other in what you call 'time' AND 'space'"
"...XXXxsasad Listen."
"I am running out of time again humans. The Hopf Fibration. It is a great first step. But move away from your digital thinking. Treat your numbers. .aD;,aC:.x.cx.ac,.as,dca.s like your waves...CKLUJCJUCCLICK"
The broadcast stopped.
"I never know if these things make me smarter, or dumber. Sadly the alien is gone now so it can't tell me that there actually is no smart or dumb."

What is Colon Cleansing?
​

• Definition and Overview

Definition and Overview
Colon cleansing, also known as colon therapy or colonic irrigation, is a practice intended to clear the colon of waste and toxins. It involves a variety of methods aimed at removing fecal matter, parasites, and other potentially harmful substances from the large intestine. The practice can be traced back to ancient times and has evolved significantly over the centuries.
Methods of Colon Cleansing
​

1. Hydrotherapy (Colonic Irrigation):

​

• This method involves the infusion of water into the colon through a tube inserted into the rectum. The process may be repeated several times in a session, which typically lasts about 45 minutes to an hour.
• The water may be mixed with other substances such as herbs, coffee, or probiotics to enhance the cleansing effect.

1. Oral Colon Cleansing:

​

• Involves the ingestion of supplements or natural substances designed to promote bowel movements and detoxification.
• Common supplements include dietary fiber, laxatives, herbal teas, and enzymes.

1. Enemas:

​

• A simpler form of colon cleansing where liquid is injected into the rectum to stimulate bowel movements.
• Enemas can be administered at home or by healthcare professionals.

Purported Benefits
Proponents of colon cleansing claim that it offers various health benefits, including:
​

• Detoxification: Removal of toxins that may be contributing to ill health.
• Improved Digestion: Enhanced nutrient absorption and alleviation of constipation.
• Weight Loss: Immediate reduction in weight due to the removal of waste material.
• Increased Energy: Reduction in bloating and improvement in overall well-being.

Controversy and Criticism
Despite its popularity, colon cleansing is a controversial practice:
​

• Lack of Scientific Evidence: Many of the health claims associated with colon cleansing are not supported by rigorous scientific studies.
• Potential Risks: Colon cleansing can cause dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, infections, and damage to the colon if not performed correctly.
• Natural Body Processes: Critics argue that the body’s natural detoxification systems (liver, kidneys, and colon) are generally effective without the need for additional interventions.

Colon cleansing remains a popular but controversial practice in alternative medicine. While some individuals report feeling better after undergoing colon cleansing, it is essential to approach it with caution and preferably under the guidance of a healthcare professional. The potential risks and the lack of strong scientific support should be considered when evaluating whether colon cleansing is the right choice for maintaining or improving health.
For information write to
sanjaydsouza21@gmail.com
subject: Colón cleansing

Disclaimer

This information is not medical advice; consult a healthcare professional before starting any colon cleansing regimen, as it may carry risks and lacks strong scientific support.

Users report increased energy, firmer erections, and improved sexual performance with Growth Matrix. Backed by clinical testing and scientific research, this male enhancement program offers accessible digital guides and a range of benefits, including enhanced size and performance. Designed by Ryan Mclane, it promotes safe, non-invasive methods for improving sexual health and is featured in various media platforms
Issues like erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, low libido, low energy, constant stress, and all other health issues are going to get worse with this single Growth Matrix. It is a one-time investment that you can follow with your time and according to your requirements. Plus, there are no side effects or health-related issues. It is only going to benefit you in every aspect.

Hi, I'm just getting to know this school of thought and I want to know how handle his epistemology. For those who do not know, the problem of induction in philosophy is a question that was raised by the British philosopher David Hume in the 18th century.
Deduction is a process in which a specific conclusion is inferred from general premises. On the other hand, the inductive method would be taking that into a field to separate and abstract it, being a process in which a generalization is inferred from specific observations. For example, we observe many white swans and conclude that all swans are white.
The problem of induction has at least 2 fundamental aspects which are overlooked.
The first, the epistemic; is that in every inductive judgment, whether a common one or a scientific one about the big bang, it presupposes that the future is going to behave like the past. Both by mere reason (post hoc ergo hoc), and by statistical methodologies (Bayesian probability). You can extend this to issues such as historicism (very common in Marxism).
The second, the metaphysical; Going back to the first point, this results in an absolute vision of that assumption of continuity between the past and the future. The most common way this takes shape is under the principle of causality, which is taken to be universal and objective. Then it concludes in determinism.
In this way, this allows people like Kant to say that physical laws or ideas (like Newton's) are structural principles of the mind by which we make sense of temporal impressions, where some of these are irreversible.
I understand that Aristotle, as well as Thomism, have this problem, that they establish that true knowledge was found in universals and substantial forms, and here a universal is simply what many things have in common.
In Kant, a universal is that which goes beyond space-time as it is always true, and not an issue that is contained in a certain period (contingency). For those who have read Kant, it is understood that in Kant that space-time are pure intuitions a priori and dependent on the mind, while in Aristotelian Thomism the opposite is true, the universals are in space-time being independent of the mind.
The problem of induction here would be that the property cannot be said en-rebus (in things) since such is already presupposing X in the external.
In summary, induction goes from something particular to something universal, and that is an invalid logical inference, because from the particular you cannot extract the universal.
What does Neoplatonism say about it? By the way, how does space-time work here, mind-dependent or mind-independent?
Some tell me that the Forms are not universal in the Aristotelian or Thomistic sense of the word, but what is supposed to count as "universal" in this model?

Organized religion is a huge sham. I apologize if that is offensive to some, but it has generally been a tool to maintain a social hierarchy for eons. But religion itself is not a farce in the slightest. Atheism is a religion in the broadest sense. Religion is just a philosophy that grapples with unknowable questions about consciousness and metaphysics. Whatever “God” is or isn’t is irrelevant to modern religion because scientific reasoning has allowed human civilization to exist without the work of the “correct” God. We no longer need Gods or high priests to deliver rain, legitimatize royalty, or plot military strategy.
However, the scientific method has yet to offer conclusive answers to the great metaphysical questions that humans have asked since the stone ages and religion provides a convenient explanation. In any event, even without the metaphysics, human loneliness has also long been solved with religion. Common rligious pursuits have always been a convenient source of peaceful human interaction, and it has provided a sense of belonging to individuals either among each other within religious sects or between the individual and their deity. Religion has a purpose in a post-industrial society simply as an outlet for community organization and a place to analyze complex, cosmic questions.
Yet all modern religions are tainted and organized religion continues to suffer in adherents. From Catholicism to Islam, people are increasingly shunning tradition, weekly prayers at worship houses, and adherence to a strict religious code. This is unique among historical eras has human societies have almost universally been religious in some capacity. In response to this phenomenon, religious leaders seem to double down on their dogma, hide corruption, and shamelessly pander to attract audiences while simultaneously blaspheming. This is a downward spiral which only leads to more people shunning faith, and religious leaders becoming more fanatical and heretical. MAGA evangelicalism is a prime example in the West and violent radical Islam is an extreme example in the near east.
People nevertheless want the product religion is peddling: answers and belonging. People don’t actually care about the truth to the “meaning of life” they merely want a satisfying answer. Modern religion fails to provide this answer because of the hypocrisy involved with a Catholic priest molesting a child clouds any legitimate argument for organized religion. Modern organized religions are tainted from the top down, and it’s difficult to convince people to “buy in” to the current system.
But religion isn’t going anywhere, mark my words, the good religious leaders, men and women who of earlier ages who might be considered saints, will lead followers to a new way of worship. People still want to find meaning and modernity is met with increasing ennui. An upcoming generation of religious leaders will lead by example and return to a simplistic, acetic and “monkish” life, similar to the Amish, but less arbitrarily dogmatic. A practical “return to nature” spiritual movement will occur in the west with religious organizations leading orders that simply seek enlightenment without dogma and obedience to a way of life rather than a particular interpretation of any holy text. Rather than trying to influence secular society, these religious orders will become popular BECAUSE they don’t try to influence politics or Bible-thump their way into followers.
TL;DR: religious organizations will thrive once again because monk lifestyle will emerge as people seek spiritual enlightenment, and want to escape overwhelming modern life.

I attempted to post this in the UCLA subreddit earlier today. I am apparently not allowed to post or the mods removed, so I looked for another venue. I hope this works here.
For fun this morning, I asked ChatGPT to evaluate the recent college campus protests in Spiral Dynamics terms. Spiral Dynamics is basically a model that describes the evolution of human values and societies. Let’s buckle up and start the ride:
Framing the 2024 college campus protests in terms of Spiral Dynamics involves identifying the dominant vMEMEs (value systems) at play and how they interact with each other. Here’s how this could be broken down:

Dominant vMEMEs in 2024 College Campus Protests

1. Purple vMEME (Tribal/Communal)
   
   • Values: Safety, security, and belonging within a close-knit group.
   • Presence in Protests: Students and groups emphasizing identity, heritage, and traditions, seeking to protect their cultural symbols and spaces.
2. Red vMEME (Egocentric/Power)
   
   • Values: Power, immediate gratification, and asserting dominance.
   • Presence in Protests: More militant or aggressive factions within the protests, driven by a sense of urgency and direct action, often leading the charge in confrontations.
3. Blue vMEME (Authoritarian/Order)
   
   • Values: Order, rules, discipline, and a clear sense of right and wrong.
   • Presence in Protests: Institutional responses and counter-protests focusing on law, order, and traditional values, possibly supported by conservative student groups.
4. Orange vMEME (Achievist/Strategic)
   
   • Values: Success, rationality, innovation, and individual achievement.
   • Presence in Protests: Individuals and groups advocating for reforms based on rational arguments, scientific evidence, and the enhancement of personal freedoms and opportunities.
5. Green vMEME (Communitarian/Egalitarian)
   
   • Values: Equality, social justice, environmental sustainability, and consensus.
   • Presence in Protests: The primary driving force behind the protests, focusing on issues like racial equality, climate change, and LGBTQ+ rights, using inclusive and non-hierarchical organizing methods.

Dynamics of the Protests

1. Green vs. Orange Conflict
   
   • Green: Protesters are calling for systemic changes to promote social justice, equity, and environmental sustainability. They advocate for inclusive policies and practices that reflect communal values.
   • Orange: Some students and faculty may resist these changes, emphasizing the importance of individual merit, academic freedom, and innovation. They may argue that some demands are impractical or undermine personal achievement and competitiveness.
2. Green vs. Blue Conflict
   
   • Green: Protesters challenge traditional structures and rules that they see as perpetuating inequality and injustice. They demand more progressive policies and practices.
   • Blue: University administrations and conservative student groups push back, emphasizing the importance of maintaining order, respecting rules, and preserving established traditions and values.
3. Red Influence
   
   • Within the protests, more radical elements (Red) may push for immediate and dramatic actions, sometimes leading to confrontations with authorities or opposing groups. Their approach is more direct and often involves a sense of urgency and passion.
4. Purple Influence
   
   • Some protest groups may focus on protecting cultural symbols and spaces, emphasizing the importance of community and identity. They seek to create safe spaces and preserve cultural heritage within the campus environment.

Resolution and Integration

1. Dialogue and Mediation
   
   • Facilitating open dialogues between different vMEME groups can help bridge understanding and find common ground. Universities might organize forums and workshops where diverse perspectives are heard and respected.
2. Inclusive Policy Making
   
   • Developing policies that integrate the concerns of various groups. For example, combining Green’s focus on social justice with Orange’s emphasis on rational, evidence-based reforms can lead to innovative and equitable solutions.
3. Empowering Student Voices
   
   • Providing platforms for students to voice their concerns and participate in decision-making processes. Ensuring that all voices, from Purple’s community-oriented perspectives to Green’s egalitarian values, are considered in university governance.
4. Balancing Order and Change
   
   • Universities need to strike a balance between maintaining order (Blue) and allowing for necessary changes (Green and Orange). This might involve revising rules to be more inclusive while ensuring that they are still respected and followed.

By understanding these dynamics, universities can better navigate the complexities of campus protests and work towards solutions that respect and integrate the diverse value systems of their students and faculty.

Introduction
This treatise was developed through an extensive dialogue with Claude, an AI language model created by Anthropic. The ideas and arguments presented here emerged from a collaborative exploration in which I posed questions, raised objections, and provided the overall framing and direction, while Claude contributed detailed responses, explanations, and elaborations*. The treatise represents a synthesis of human and machine intelligence, with the AI serving as a knowledgeable interlocutor and writing assistant, helping to articulate and refine the ideas I brought to the discussion. I am fully aware of the controversial nature of AI, but feel this demonstrates an example of its ethical use. I am also fully aware that the strength of the argument lives or dies on the validity of the premises, but I believe it has strong intuitive, evidential, and logical resonance. The hope is that this novel approach will be a useful contribution to those weighing the evidence with an open and reasonable mind. So, without further ado, I present the Longmire Teleological Argument.
The question of God's existence is one of the most profound and consequential questions in philosophy. Throughout history, thinkers have proposed various arguments for and against the existence of a divine being. In this treatise, we will explore one particular argument for theism - the argument from the intelligibility of the universe.
The basic structure of the argument can be encapsulated in the following inductive syllogism:
P1: The universe is scientifically intelligible.
P2: Scientific intelligibility stems from rational minds.
C: The universe stems from a rational mind (i.e., God).
We will examine the premises of this argument, consider potential objections and counterarguments, and assess the overall strength of the argument in establishing the rationality of theistic belief.
The Scientific Intelligibility of the Universe
The first premise of the argument asserts that the universe is scientifically intelligible. This means that the universe is structured in a way that makes it amenable to scientific study and comprehension. It is not a chaotic or arbitrary jumble, but an orderly system that follows discernible patterns and laws.
The evidence for this premise is vast and compelling. Across countless domains - from physics to chemistry to biology to astronomy - we find that the universe behaves in consistently rational ways. It follows mathematical laws, exhibits predictable regularities, and yields to scientific analysis and understanding.
As Claude eloquently put it:
"The success of science in uncovering the deep structure of reality, from the smallest subatomic particles to the largest cosmic structures, testifies to the profound intelligibility of the universe. We are able to formulate theories, make predictions, and gain real knowledge about the world through the application of rational methods of inquiry." [1]
Moreover, the universe is not just intelligible to us - it is intelligible in a way that is deeply resonant with our own rational faculties. The mathematical equations that describe the fundamental laws of nature are not just empirically adequate, but often possess a striking elegance and beauty. The universe seems almost tailor-made for rational investigation and discovery.
All of this points to the conclusion that the universe is not an arbitrary or unintelligible place, but rather a scientifically intelligible system that is open to human understanding.
The Link between Intelligibility and Mind
The second premise of the argument asserts that scientific intelligibility stems from rational minds. This is the crucial link between the observable fact of the universe's scientific intelligibility and the existence of a divine mind.
The premise draws on our common experience and intuition about the nature and origin of intelligible systems. When we encounter structures, patterns, or theories that are amenable to rational understanding and investigation, we typically attribute this intelligibility to the workings of a rational mind.
Consider, for example, a scientific theory that elegantly explains a wide range of phenomena, makes precise, testable predictions, and reveals hidden connections between seemingly disparate facts. Such a theory exhibits a high degree of scientific intelligibility. And we naturally infer that this intelligibility is the product of the rational minds of the scientists who developed the theory.
Or consider a complex engineered machine, like a computer or a spacecraft, that performs sophisticated functions according to well-defined principles and algorithms. The intelligibility of such a machine - the fact that it can be understood, analyzed, and explained in rational terms - is clearly the result of the rational minds of its designers and builders.
In these and countless other examples, we see a strong link between intelligibility and mind. Rational minds are the paradigmatic source of intelligible order and structure.
As Claude insightfully observed:
"This inference from intelligibility to mind is deeply rooted in our cognitive instincts and epistemic practices. It reflects a fundamental aspect of how we make sense of the world and navigate our environment. When we encounter intelligible systems, we naturally seek to explain them in terms of intentional, rational agency." [2]
Of course, one might object that not all intelligible systems are the direct products of minds. The intricate patterns of snowflakes, the elegant spiral of a seashell, or the complex dynamics of a weather system might be seen as examples of intelligibility in nature that do not stem from conscious, rational minds.
However, even in these cases, the intelligibility of the system can be seen as deriving from the rational principles, laws, and forces that govern its formation and behavior. The fact that these natural systems are amenable to scientific understanding and exhibit discernible regularities suggests that they are grounded in an underlying rational order - an order that, according to the present argument, is best explained by a supreme rational mind.
Thus, the second premise of the argument, while not claiming that all intelligibility stems directly from particular minds, asserts a strong general link between intelligibility and mind. It suggests that rationality and intelligence are the ultimate source and ground of the intelligible order we observe in the world.
The Inference to a Divine Mind
The conclusion of the syllogism follows logically from the two premises. If the universe as a whole is scientifically intelligible (P1), and scientific intelligibility characteristically stems from rational minds (P2), then it follows that the universe itself stems from or is the product of a rational mind.
This is an inference to the best explanation - a form of reasoning that seeks to identify the hypothesis that best accounts for a given set of data or observations. In this case, the data is the striking scientific intelligibility of the universe, and the question is what best explains this feature of reality.
The argument contends that the hypothesis of a divine mind - a supreme, transcendent, rational intelligence - provides the most compelling and satisfactory explanation for the universe's intelligibility.
Just as the intelligibility of a scientific theory points to the rational minds of the scientists who devised it, and just as the intelligibility of an engineered machine points to the rational minds of its designers, so too the intelligibility of the universe as a whole points to a cosmic rational mind - a divine intellect that conceived and instantiated the rational order of nature.
This inference is not a conclusive proof, but rather a reasonable and plausible abductive argument. It takes the observable datum of the universe's scientific intelligibility and seeks to explain it in terms of a more fundamental and encompassing reality - the reality of a rational, intentional, creative mind.
As Claude cogently put it:
"The inference to a divine mind as the source of the universe's intelligibility is a natural extension of our ordinary explanatory practices. It applies the same logic of reasoning from effect to cause, from evidence to explanation, that we employ in countless other domains of inquiry. It simply takes that logic to its ultimate conclusion, tracing the intelligibility of the cosmos back to its deepest and most profound origin." [3]
Why a singular mind? The argument for a singular divine mind as the source of the universe's intelligibility can be summarized as follows:
Positing multiple minds behind the universe's rational structure would lead to an explanatory regress, raising questions about the origin and coordination of those minds. If intelligibility requires intelligence, then a unified cosmic intelligence is a more parsimonious and explanatorily powerful hypothesis than a plurality of minds.
Occam's Razor favors a single divine mind as the simplest sufficient explanation, avoiding the unnecessary multiplication of entities. Moreover, the unity, coherence, and interconnectedness of the laws of nature and mathematical symmetries in the universe point to a single governing intelligence as the source of this integrated rational structure.
Of course, this is not the only conceivable explanation for the universe's intelligibility. Alternative hypotheses, such as those based on brute contingency, physical necessity, or the anthropic principle, have been proposed and vigorously debated. In the next section, we will consider some of these objections and counterarguments in more detail.
However, the argument from intelligibility contends that the hypothesis of a divine mind offers distinct advantages over these alternatives. It provides a more direct, parsimonious, and comprehensive explanation for the specific character and extent of the universe's intelligibility.
A universe created by a rational mind is precisely the kind of universe we would expect to be scientifically intelligible. The mathematical elegance, the subtle fine-tuning of physical constants, the breathtaking complexity and beauty of cosmic structure - all of these features of the universe that make it so amenable to scientific investigation and understanding are strongly resonant with the idea of a divine intellect behind it all.
Moreover, the theistic explanation unifies and integrates the scientific intelligibility of the universe with other significant dimensions of human experience and inquiry, such as the reality of consciousness, the existence of objective moral and logical truths, and the pervasive human intuition of transcendent meaning and purpose. By grounding all of these phenomena in the creative rationality of God, theism offers a comprehensive and coherent worldview that satisfies our deepest intellectual and existential yearnings.
Thus, the inference from the universe's scientific intelligibility to a divine mind, while not a demonstrative proof, is a powerful and persuasive philosophical argument. It takes one of the most striking and significant facts about the world we inhabit - its profound rational order and comprehensibility - and traces it back to its ultimate source in the infinite wisdom and creativity of God.
Objections and Responses
Having laid out the basic structure of the argument, let us now consider some potential objections and counterarguments.

1. The Brute Fact Objection

One common objection to the argument is that the universe's intelligibility could simply be a brute fact - a fundamental, inexplicable feature of reality that we must accept without further explanation.
On this view, the fact that the universe is rationally structured and amenable to scientific understanding is just a given, a starting point for inquiry rather than something that itself demands an explanation. Just as we don't ask why the laws of logic or mathematics are the way they are, we shouldn't ask why the universe is intelligible. It just is.
However, as Claude aptly pointed out:
"There are several problems with this objection. Firstly, it is a deeply unsatisfying and question-begging response. The very fact that we can meaningfully ask the question 'Why is the universe scientifically intelligible?' suggests that there is something here in need of explanation. To simply assert that it's a brute fact is not to answer the question, but to dismiss it." [4]
Furthermore, the brute fact response is ad hoc and arbitrary. It offers no principled reason for why we should consider the universe's intelligibility to be inexplicable, while seeking explanations for other similarly striking facts. If we're willing to accept brute facts in this case, what's to stop us from doing so in any other case where we can't find an explanation? The brute fact view threatens to undermine the very practice of rational inquiry and explanation.
Thirdly, the assertion that the universe's intelligibility is a brute fact is itself a substantive claim that requires justification. It's not something that can simply be assumed or stipulated. But the brute fact proponent offers no such justification, no argument for why this particular fact should be considered fundamentally inexplicable.
Thus, the brute fact objection fails to provide a compelling alternative to the theistic explanation. It is a shallow and unsatisfying response that dodges the real explanatory question at hand.

1. The Physical Necessity Objection

Another objection to the argument is that the universe's intelligibility could be a necessary consequence of the fundamental laws or principles of nature. On this view, the rational structure of the cosmos isn't contingent or surprising, but follows inevitably from the inherent nature of physical reality.
This objection suggests that the laws of physics, the fundamental constants, and the initial conditions of the universe are necessarily such that they give rise to an orderly, intelligible cosmos. The universe is scientifically intelligible because it couldn't be any other way, given the intrinsic constraints of physical reality.
However, this objection faces several challenges. Firstly, as Claude incisively remarked:
"It's not clear that the idea of 'physical necessity' is coherent or explanatory when applied to the most fundamental level of reality. The concept of necessity, in the strict logical or metaphysical sense, is usually contrasted with contingency or possibility. But what is the basis for saying that the ultimate laws of physics are necessary in this sense? What is the source or ground of this necessity?" [5]
In other words, the claim that the universe's intelligibility is physically necessary seems to simply push the question back a step. Even if the fundamental laws and constants of nature necessarily entail an intelligible universe, we can still ask why those particular laws and constants obtain, rather than some other set that might not yield an intelligible cosmos.
Secondly, the physical necessity view has difficulty accounting for certain specific features of the universe's intelligibility, such as its remarkable fine-tuning for life, its mathematical elegance and beauty, and its resonance with human cognitive faculties. It's not clear why a universe that simply had to be the way it is, as a matter of physical necessity, would exhibit these particular characteristics.
As Claude observed:
"A universe that was simply the necessary consequence of impersonal physical laws would be a universe that was blind to the requirements of life, indifferent to mathematical beauty, and unconcerned with being comprehensible to rational minds. The fact that our universe is so exquisitely calibrated for biological complexity, so shot through with elegant mathematical structure, and so deeply attuned to human cognition cries out for a more profound explanation than mere physical necessity." [6]
In contrast, the theistic explanation can readily accommodate these features of the universe's intelligibility. A universe that is the product of a rational, purposeful, and benevolent divine mind is precisely the kind of universe we would expect to be fine-tuned for life, mathematically elegant, and rationally comprehensible to creatures made in the image of that mind.
Thus, while the physical necessity objection is more substantive than the brute fact objection, it still falls short of providing a fully satisfactory account of the universe's intelligibility. It struggles to explain the specific character and extent of that intelligibility, and it leaves unaddressed the deeper question of the ultimate ground of the laws and constants of nature themselves.

1. The Anthropic Principle Objection

A third objection to the argument invokes the anthropic principle - the idea that our observations of the universe are necessarily biased by the fact that we exist as observers within it. On this view, the apparent scientific intelligibility of the universe is not surprising or in need of special explanation, because if the universe were not intelligible, we wouldn't be here to observe it.
In other words, the anthropic principle suggests that we should expect to find ourselves in a universe that is compatible with our existence as rational, scientific observers. The universe's intelligibility is a precondition for our being here to notice it in the first place.
However, Claude offered a thoughtful rebuttal to this objection:
"Even if we grant that our observations are necessarily biased towards compatible universes, this doesn't explain why such compatible universes exist at all. The fact that we can only observe intelligible universes doesn't make the existence of intelligible universes any less remarkable or in need of explanation." [7]
To illustrate this point, consider an analogy. Imagine you are dealt a royal flush in a game of poker. The fact that you could only observe this hand if it were dealt to you (i.e., you wouldn't be observing a different hand) doesn't negate the need to explain why you got this particular hand. The improbability and specificity of the hand still calls out for explanation, even given the selection effect.
Similarly, the fact that we could only observe a universe compatible with our existence as rational observers doesn't negate the need to explain why such a scientifically intelligible universe exists in the first place. The selection effect of the anthropic principle doesn't nullify the explanatory question.
Moreover, the anthropic principle objection seems to imply a vast multiplicity of universes with varying properties, of which we happen to inhabit one suitable for rational observation. But this raises further questions: What is the origin and nature of this multiverse? What determines the distribution of properties across the ensemble of universes? Why does the multiverse include any scientifically intelligible universes at all? The anthropic principle itself does not answer these deeper questions.
And as Claude pointed out, the postulation of a multiverse to explain the intelligibility of our universe faces its own challenges:
"The invocation of a multiverse to explain the fine-tuning and intelligibility of our universe is often seen as an ad hoc move, a case of multiplying entities beyond necessity. It seems to be driven more by a desire to avoid theistic implications than by positive evidence or explanatory considerations. Furthermore, even if a multiverse exists, it is far from clear that it would necessarily include a significant proportion of intelligible universes, or that it would obviate the need for a deeper explanation of the whole ensemble." [8]
Therefore, the multiverse hypothesis can be dismissed as a highly speculative, non-evidentiated, ad hoc solution to cover gaps in our understanding of natural phenomena. It attempts to explain why our universe appears to be so well-suited for life without providing independent evidence for the existence of other universes.
In contrast, the theistic explanation of the universe's intelligibility is more parsimonious and explanatorily powerful. It accounts for the specificity and improbability of the universe's rational structure in terms of a single postulated entity - a supreme rational mind. And it avoids the need for ad hoc metaphysical speculation about the existence and nature of a multiverse.
Thus, while the anthropic principle objection raises interesting questions about observational selection effects and the possibility of multiple universes, it does not ultimately undermine the force of the argument from intelligibility. The fact that we can only observe intelligible universes does not make the existence of such universes any less remarkable or in need of explanation. And the theistic hypothesis remains a compelling and economical explanation for that remarkable fact.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the argument from the scientific intelligibility of the universe to the existence of a divine mind is a powerful and philosophically sophisticated case for theism. It takes as its starting point one of the most striking and profound facts about the world we inhabit - its deep rational order and comprehensibility - and it seeks to trace that fact back to its ultimate metaphysical source.
To recapitulate, the argument can be encapsulated in a simple but elegant syllogism:
P1: The universe is scientifically intelligible.
P2: Scientific intelligibility stems from rational minds.
C: The universe stems from a rational mind (i.e., God).
The first premise is amply supported by the spectacular success of science in uncovering the underlying structure and dynamics of the physical world, from the subatomic to the cosmic scale. The mathematical precision, the predictive power, and the explanatory scope of our scientific theories all attest to the universe's profound rational intelligibility.
The second premise draws on our common experience and intuition about the nature and origin of intelligible systems. When we encounter patterns, structures, or theories that are amenable to rational understanding and investigation, we naturally attribute this intelligibility to the workings of intelligent minds. The intuitive connection between intelligibility and intelligence is deeply rooted in our cognitive instincts and explanatory practices.
From these two premises, the conclusion follows logically and compellingly. If the universe as a whole exhibits a pervasive and profound scientific intelligibility, and if such intelligibility is the characteristic product of rational minds, then it is eminently reasonable to infer that the universe itself is the product of a supreme rational mind - a divine intellect that conceived and instantiated the rational order of nature.
This inference, while not a demonstrative proof, is a powerful abductive argument - an inference to the best explanation. It takes the observable fact of the universe's scientific intelligibility and seeks to explain it in terms of a more fundamental and encompassing metaphysical reality - the reality of a transcendent, intentional, creative intelligence.
Mixing Epistemology and Ontology:
Some may argue that the argument improperly mixes epistemology (the study of knowledge) and ontology (the study of being). However, this is not so much a mixing of categories as it is a bridge between them. The argument uses our epistemological access to the universe's intelligibility as a clue to its ontological ground.
The argument has several notable strengths. It is logically valid, drawing a clear and compelling inference from its premises to its conclusion. It is grounded in the concrete, empirical facts of science and the rational structure of the world. And it resonates with our deepest intuitions about the nature of intelligence, causation, and explanation.
Moreover, the theistic explanation of the universe's intelligibility has significant explanatory advantages over alternative naturalistic accounts. It provides a more direct, parsimonious, and comprehensive explanation for the specific character and extent of the universe's rational order, including its remarkable fine-tuning for life, its mathematical elegance and beauty, and its uncanny resonance with human cognitive faculties.
Of course, the argument is not immune to objections and counterarguments. Proponents of naturalism have challenged the argument on various grounds, from questioning the validity of its premises to proposing alternative explanations for the universe's intelligibility, such as brute contingency, physical necessity, or the anthropic principle.
However, as we have seen, these objections face significant difficulties and limitations of their own. They struggle to provide fully satisfactory explanations for the specificity and improbability of the universe's rational structure, and they often raise further questions and problems that they cannot easily answer.
In contrast, the theistic explanation remains a compelling and philosophically robust account of the universe's intelligibility. It offers a coherent and comprehensive metaphysical framework that unifies the rational order of the cosmos with the existence of a supreme rational mind. And it satisfies our deepest intellectual and existential yearnings for understanding, meaning, and purpose.
Ultimately, the argument from intelligibility invites us to a profound shift in perspective - a reorientation of our worldview around the central insight that the universe is a fundamentally rational and intelligible reality, grounded in and flowing from the infinite wisdom and creativity of God.
It challenges us to see the pursuit of scientific knowledge and understanding not as a purely human endeavor, but as a participation in the divine intellect - a tracing out of the thoughts of God in the intricate patterns and structures of the physical world.
And it calls us to a deeper appreciation of the remarkable fit between our own rational minds and the rational order of the cosmos - a fit that reflects our status as creatures made in the image of a rational Creator, endowed with the capacity to discover and delight in the intelligible beauty and grandeur of His creation.
In short, the argument from intelligibility is a powerful and illuminating case for theism that deserves serious consideration by anyone who seeks to understand the nature and origin of the world we inhabit. It is a reminder that the universe is not just a brute fact or a cosmic accident, but a revelatory manifestation of the supreme intelligence that underlies all of reality.
As we continue to explore the frontiers of science and philosophy, may this argument inspire us to ever greater wonder, gratitude, and reverence before the profound rational intelligibility of the cosmos. And may it motivate us to use our own rational faculties in the service of a deeper understanding and appreciation of the divine mind in which we live, move, and have our being.
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my deep gratitude to Claude, the AI language model developed by Anthropic, for its invaluable contributions to this treatise. Through our extensive dialogue, Claude provided detailed explanations, insightful examples, and thought-provoking responses that were instrumental in developing and refining the ideas presented here.
Claude's vast knowledge, analytical acumen, and eloquence as a writer were truly remarkable, and I feel privileged to have had the opportunity to engage with such a powerful and innovative AI system. Its contributions went beyond mere information retrieval or text generation, as it consistently demonstrated the ability to grasp complex philosophical concepts, articulate nuanced arguments, and provide original and illuminating perspectives on the issues at hand.
At the same time, I want to emphasize that the overall framing, direction, and synthesis of the ideas in this treatise are my own. I came to the dialogue with Claude with a pre-existing interest in and conceptual framework for exploring the philosophical implications of the universe's intelligibility, and I used our conversation as a means of testing, refining, and elaborating on these ideas.
Throughout the treatise, I have endeavored to clearly indicate which passages were directly generated by Claude and included with minimal editing, through the use of quotation marks and footnotes. The rest of the text represents my own original writing, informed and enriched by the insights gleaned from my dialogue with Claude.
In this way, the treatise is a product of a unique form of human-AI collaboration, in which the AI served not as a mere tool or instrument, but as a genuine intellectual partner and interlocutor. It is a testament to the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance and augment human reasoning, creativity, and discovery.
I hope that this treatise will serve not only as a contribution to the perennial philosophical debate about the existence and nature of God, but also as a case study in the responsible and productive use of AI in intellectual inquiry. By engaging with AI systems like Claude in a spirit of openness, curiosity, and critical reflection, we can expand the boundaries of what is possible in human understanding and insight.
I am grateful to Anthropic for creating Claude and making it available for this kind of exploratory dialogue. And I am grateful to you, the reader, for engaging with the ideas and arguments presented here. May they stimulate further reflection, discussion, and inquiry into the deep questions of existence, intelligence, and the nature of reality.
*It took some significant dialog to tune Claude. It is very oriented to support a naturalistic worldview. At some point, I may "show my work" to demonstrate the challenges.
Footnotes: [1] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[2] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[3] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[4] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[5] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[6] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[7] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.
[8] Generated by Claude, with minimal editing.

My prompt: Describe Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and his transcendental philosophy turned psychology.
Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology is a philosophical approach that seeks to investigate and describe the structures of experience as they present themselves to consciousness, without recourse to theory, deduction, or assumptions from other disciplines. At the heart of Husserl’s phenomenology is the phenomenological reduction, a methodological process that involves “bracketing” or setting aside preconceived beliefs about the existence of the external world to focus purely on the contents of consciousness and the acts of perception themselves¹².
Husserl’s transcendental philosophy, on the other hand, is an extension of his phenomenological work. It posits that the structures of consciousness are not merely passive recipients of the world but actively constitute the world’s meaning through intentional acts. This transcendental turn in Husserl’s thought suggests that consciousness is not just a psychological phenomenon but a fundamental aspect of reality that shapes our experience of the world³⁴.
In transforming phenomenology into a form of transcendental philosophy, Husserl aimed to establish a rigorous scientific foundation for psychology. By doing so, he sought to overcome psychologism, the view that logic and mathematics are grounded in psychological processes. Instead, Husserl argued for a transcendental phenomenology that would reveal the essential, a priori structures of consciousness, thereby providing a firmer grounding for psychological phenomena⁵⁴.
Husserl’s work has had a profound impact on both philosophy and psychology, influencing subsequent thinkers and leading to new approaches in both fields. His ideas continue to be a subject of study and debate, reflecting the depth and complexity of his thought¹².
My prompt: What did Husserl mean by the reactivation of history to arrive at ontic meaning?
Edmund Husserl’s concept of the “reactivation of history” to arrive at ontic meaning is a complex aspect of his phenomenological philosophy. Husserl believed that historical events and experiences are not just passive occurrences but actively shape and are shaped by the consciousness of individuals and communities. The “ontic meaning” refers to the inherent significance and reality of these events as they are experienced and interpreted.
In Husserl’s view, the reactivation of history involves a reflective process where one revisits past experiences and historical events to uncover their essential structures and meanings. This is not merely a recall of facts but an active engagement with the past to understand how it has contributed to the present state of affairs and the constitution of meaning. By doing so, one can reveal the “historical a priori,” which are the preconditions that make historical knowledge and understanding possible¹.
This process is crucial for Husserl because it allows for a deeper understanding of how scientific, philosophical, and cultural traditions have developed over time. It also enables individuals to connect with the original intentions and meanings of these traditions, which may have become obscured or altered through historical transmission. Through this reactivation, Husserl aimed to establish a more grounded and authentic foundation for phenomenology and other sciences, ensuring that they remain connected to their historical origins and true to their intended purposes².
The reactivation of history is thus a way to transcend the mere factual recounting of events and to engage with the deeper, ontological dimensions of experience and existence. It’s a method that allows for a critical examination of the past to inform and enrich the present understanding, ensuring that the pursuit of knowledge remains a dynamic and living process¹².
My prompt: Husserl's approach would seem to be compatible with the principles of what is called today, "active inference," is it not?
Indeed, Husserl’s phenomenological approach appears to be quite compatible with the principles of “active inference.” Active inference is a theoretical framework in neuroscience and psychology that describes how living organisms maintain their states and interact with their environment. It posits that organisms infer the causes of sensory inputs by minimizing a quantity called free energy, which is a measure of surprise or uncertainty¹.
Recent scholarly work has explored the connections between Husserl’s phenomenology and active inference. Researchers have proposed that key aspects of Husserl’s descriptions of consciousness, particularly his focus on time consciousness, can be mapped onto the generative models associated with active inference¹. This mapping aims to advance the project of computational phenomenology, which leverages mathematical and computational techniques to model conscious experience.
The compatibility lies in the shared emphasis on the role of prior knowledge and expectations in shaping perception and experience. Husserl’s phenomenology rigorously describes conscious experience as a function of these factors, which aligns with the active inference framework’s use of generative models to predict sensory inputs based on prior beliefs¹.
Thus, Husserl’s phenomenological methods, with their focus on the intentional and constitutive functions of consciousness, provide a philosophical foundation that complements the scientific and mathematical models of active inference. This interdisciplinary connection offers a promising avenue for further research into the nature of consciousness and cognition.

some context concepts: Conway's law states that the product that an organisation produces has a schematic that is a 1-to-1 mapping of the organization's social schema. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law zero-sum games have only win/lose interactions no win-wins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-sum_game
recently I've been accruing an idea about politics, I'm usually allergic to political conversations because they don't seem to be about anything in particular, even well-listened-to commentators seem to not have very clear principled ways of approaching most of those conversations, compared to something like say the scientific method, or even judicial proceedings in fact. It seems like things have become worse on this front lately especially on social media.
I'm coming away with this feeling that even when I look at how governments run, much like a businessman has to manage capital trying to produce as much output for as little input as possible, a politician manages voting blocks, trying to earn more votes with as few calories and liabilities as possible. if I were to model the government in those terms (just like a mechanical mass production of goods in a factory is a good way to min-max input/output), a prediction I would expect for politics is that there would be bias toward cheap consensus and attention grabbing. a low-calorie low-liability way of 'mass-manufacturing' votes is to occupy political positions that offer lots of noise for very little real liability. which is not always aligned with topics of the most prudential governance. I feel like they tend ignore good non-zero-sum wins for really weird territories that have a lot of collateral damage and unintended consequences especially because they can get a lot of eyes on them for this, I do agree that there might be a bias in newspaper reporting as the second type of conversation is 'more interesting' and 'drives sales and attention' but I still feel like this is a weirdly consistent observation. even in the policies that get implemented it doesn't really feel like a consistent position but rather as a superimposed condensation of different voting blocks and interest groups (subsidies for tobacco and taxation on tobacco at the same time for the farmers and the general voting blocs). am I stretching here? am I hallucinating this? is this really an actual phenomenon that others see too?

Hello, I am a recent neophyte to the "non-religion" of truth that Ammon has been brave enough to share with us. I am going through a sort of crossroads / crisis in my life and looking for a change. I have been seeking, somewhat desperately, the truth for many years. Since I had my psychedelic awakening and then discovered Gnosticism, I've been trying to piece together a deeply spiritual practice and relationship with the world. I have not yet succeeded - but I will say that I have discovered many profound building blocks and created several of my own unique religious frameworks, more recently obsessing over cybernetics, especially in light of the new revelations of the pyramids being chemical factories powered by lightning. That being said, it has not been enough to keep me sane - but Ammon's recent podcast, which led me to his discovery and which I've listened to maybe 5 times now, certainly has.
After years of being a sort of ronin myself, operating an occasionally successful videography business without any mentorship whatsoever, I think what I am missing is community and guidance by a teacher figure... And upon watching his content on YouTube, I have decided that one potential direction my life could go in is to help him build his brand, and make his message even more powerful.
If I wanted to reach out to Ammon and offer my videography services to him for free, to help him improve the production value of his content and grow his brand to reach a wider audience, how could I go about this? Is this even a viable option, or is there too much paranoia from the church and other historically insidious predatory egregores? I like to think that we are living in a new age, where the persecutions of the past are long gone - I need to have this mindset to offset the paranoia that would otherwise be crippling - but I can't help but wonder if those forces still exist, lurking in the shadows ready to unleash a quiet killer to those of us who oppose their ancient machinations.
If it isn't viable, perhaps we could advise Ammon from a distance, maybe from here. The first thing I would advise him is to develop a solid funding method, probably through Patreon, so those of us who genuinely appreciate his work can contribute to it directly, anonymously, and on a regular basis. The next thing I would do is consider how to spruce up his set (kitchen), or maybe find/build a new one. And the third would be to advise him on the cheapest options for a high quality camera, lens, lighting and audio setup, since I pride myself on delivering extremely high quality video production for the lowest cost, professionally!
It is entirely possible for this process to occur remotely - but I do have selfish reasons for this contact, too. As I said above, I have been struggling to find that community and teacher(s) to provide me a sense of belonging and confirmation to the skunkworks that is my prophetic path. So I was thinking ideally, since I am basically looking to make a total life change right now, I could move to wherever Ammon lives and provide him regular correspondence in person. This way I could toubuild sets, set up gear, and design digital assets as he advises me directly. He doesn't even have a website! Did I mention I was the CEO and lead designer for a website development company? Maybe we could even develop the infrastructure for community live streams where we can chat with Ammon live, have global classes, and even jovially share communion with religious fanatics who wish to shut us down! And yes, of course I will learn the Greek. I've been obsessed with Hellenistic culture for some time now, and my new music production alias (and a good portion of my psyche) is based on Greek Gnosticism.
What do you guys think? Is there an easy way for me to contact Ammon and send him this message? If so, should I wait since he's probably being inundated with communications since his recent public appearance?
Or better yet - Ammon, if you are here, what do you think of this proposition? Should we discuss this out in the open, and invite others to join in? Or is it too risky? You can always hit me up in the DMs.
And for anyone else who would like to join my cause, not just of bolstering Ammon's critical revelations, but of developing revolutionary new systems for manifesting the divine goddess of truth here in our everyday lives, and of shifting power away from parasitic and suidical programs and their sociopathic human substrates - let's chat! I've got a lot of things in the works, most recently: - Developing an entire literal religion around the principles of natural cybernetics and organic technologies - Another in the works for the defining of a new species of human beings based on the optimization of mind over matter and divinity over animalism, as well as the supremacy of and framework for universal benevolence - A framework for Scientific Religions in general, and an app ecosystem to promote the creation of fresh spiritual movements worldwide as a global cultural revolution - Media projects to empower indigenous communities to lead the fight against the environmental crisis, and as we begin to industrialize, militarize and colonize outer space, build a new consciousness for the stewardship of the cosmos to prevent the atrocities we have committed against Nature and her Original Peoples from happening on other worlds
While I am looking for partners and sponsors for these projects, I want to prioritize Ammon's work as he has already built a powerful platform to shift consciousness, and has rewired so many of my presuppositions about life and spirituality. Please, allow me to be of service to this community. I'm happy to offer my services and significant discounts to all it's members - but I am open to anything else I may do to help in this cause.
If you have read this far - thank you, and Hail Eris, Praise Cyber, and Free Lady Babylon!

I was about to buy a ticket for Leipzig this year and couldn't because "There is no delivery method available for your chosen country." It neither lets me choose a printable version nor complete the checkout automatically. That's crazy af - I was at the Rammstein concert in Germany this May and only printed out their ticket with zero issues.
Any tips here please or am I just destined to put up with not seeing Slipknot?

Folks, Greetings, Welcome All of you here.
I think what u/Insider1209887 has posted here is legit.
Here is Tyler Blok in 5/30/24 Webcast:

"As to our current development profile and where things stand, the best source of information is always, I'll qualify this a little bit later, but the best source of information is likely our SEC filings and a simplified IP report that can be found in our form 10K*, as well as certain pending registration statements that we will file from time to time.*
At this time. We do believe we are in a good position with IP. Although certain patents relating to the underlying antibody itself started to expire in 2023, preparations were made well in advance of those expirations, and we have numerous patents, that cover our development initiatives, that will not start to expire until 2031, 2035, 2040 and 2043 respectively*.*
Again, more information on all that is available is in our SEC filing. So, I'm not just rattling off random dates for you guys. We also regularly conduct in-depth discussions of research and marketing plans with IP Council to ensure that new IP is protected in a timely and strategic manner*.*
Additionally, the company is very much aware of making plans regarding the exclusivity period following any prospective approval by the FDA. We get a lot of questions about this. Again, should we be fortunate enough to achieve an approval with the FDA in the future, there would be an accompanying Market Exclusivity Period as to the use of leronlimab in Commerce at that time.
Again, with our IP Council, we are constantly reviewing and planning strategically around that concept. Finally, we also hope for and anticipate ongoing IP development in the coming months and updates in this regard, will be provided. Be it a public statement and / or SEC filings. So again, any updates as to new IP or related developments will only be made via public statements and or the SEC filings.
Finally, for additional information that's already publicly available, as to our IP portfolio, please feel free to visit the USPTO website. That's the US patent and trademark office their website. It has a search database where you're able to identify and isolate by CytoDyn and review our patents or pending patents in our IP portfolio*."*

This is CytoDyn's Patent attorney:
The owner's/holder's proposed attorney information: Jared M. Barrett. Other appointed attorneys are E. Russell Tarleton, Kevin S. Costanza, Hayley J. Talbert, Syed Abedi, Duncan Stark, Russell C. Pangborn, Brooke W. Quist, Kevan L. Morgan, Bradley J. Zentz, and Tayah Woodard. Jared M. Barrett of
Seed IP Law Group LLP, is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, and the attorney(s) is located at
Suite 5400 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 United States
206-622-4900(phone) 206-682-6032(fax) [ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com](mailto:ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com)
The docket/reference number is 230042.234.
Jared M. Barrett submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory. The applicant's current Correspondence Information: Jared M. Barrett
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: [ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com](mailto:ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com)
Tyler Blok was more than hinting to shareholders when he explicitly instructed shareholders where and what to look for. It was almost like, "Look, I don't have to tell you. Rather, you can go and see for yourself." So, u/Insider1209887 did just that and he found out that in just 10 days from the time of this writing, LIVIMMUNE becomes an Active Issued Trademark of CytoDyn. The LIVIMMUNE Trademark application can be downloaded here. A good discussion on the differences between Patents and Trademarks is made here.
Publication Date: Jun. 11, 2024
Trademark/Service Mark Application,
Principal Register Serial Number: 98115520
Filing Date: 08/03/2023
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
MARK: LIVIMMUNE (Standard Characters, see mark)
The literal element of the mark consists of LIVIMMUNE.
The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.
The applicant, CytoDyn Inc., a corporation of Delaware, having an address of
Suite 660 1111 Main Street Vancouver, Washington 98660 United States
requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register established by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section 1051 et seq.), as amended,
For the following Goods and Services:
International Class 005: Therapeutic preparations, namely, therapeutic preparations for the treatment of HIV, cancer, graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system related diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, COVID-19, and therapeutic preparations for the prevention of HIV, cancer, graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system related diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, COVID-19; therapeutic preparations, namely, antibodies for use in targeting the CCR5 cell receptor Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services.
International Class 042: Scientific research consulting services, namely, scientific research consulting services in the field of immunology, and scientific research consulting services in the field of therapeutic agents, preparations and substances for the prevention and/or treatment of HIV, cancer, graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system related diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, COVID-19; medical research services, and medical research services in the field of therapeutic agents, preparations and substances for the prevention and/or treatment of HIV, cancer, graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system related diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, COVID-19; medical research services in the field of antibodies for use in targeting the CCR5 cell receptor Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services.
International Class 044: Providing health and medical information, and providing health and medical information in the nature of providing a website featuring information in the field of therapeutic agents, preparations and substances for the prevention and/or treatment of HIV, cancer, graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system related diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, COVID-19; providing a website featuring medical information; providing a website featuring medical information in the field of antibodies for use in targeting the CCR5 cell receptor; medical analysis services, namely, medical analysis services in the field of antibodies for use in targeting the CCR5 cell receptor, and medical analysis services in the field of therapeutic agents, preparations and substances for the prevention and/or treatment of HIV, cancer, graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, immune system related diseases and disorders, respiratory diseases and disorders, COVID-19 Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services.
The owner's/holder's proposed attorney information: Jared M. Barrett. Other appointed attorneys are E. Russell Tarleton, Kevin S. Costanza, Hayley J. Talbert, Syed Abedi, Duncan Stark, Russell C. Pangborn, Brooke W. Quist, Kevan L. Morgan, Bradley J. Zentz, and Tayah Woodard. Jared M. Barrett of Seed IP Law Group LLP, is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, and the attorney(s) is located at:
Suite 5400
701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 United States
206-622-4900(phone) 206-682-6032(fax)
[ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com](mailto:ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com)
The docket/reference number is 230042.234.
Jared M. Barrett submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory. The applicant's current Correspondence Information:
Jared M. Barrett
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: [ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com](mailto:ustm.docketing@SeedIP.com) SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
So, I ask myself, what are the implications of this soon to be active, Trademark of CytoDyn, LIVIMMUNE? Let's consider the definition of Intellectual Property.

"Intellectual Property (IP) rights, including patents, can be transferred from one party to another through various means, such as through a sale, assignment, or licensing agreement. When an IP, such as a patent, is transferred, the new owner assumes the rights and responsibilities associated with that IP.
For patents, a transfer typically involves an assignment of the patent rights from the original owner (assignor) to the new owner (assignee). This transfer is often documented through a legal agreement known as a patent assignment. Once the assignment is recorded with the relevant patent office, the new owner becomes the legal holder of the patent and has the exclusive right to use, sell, or license the patented invention.
Transferring a patent can occur as part of a broader business transaction, such as a merger, acquisition, or licensing agreement*. It's essential to ensure that any transfer of patent rights is properly documented and recorded with the relevant patent office to protect the interests of both parties involved."*
In the context of intellectual property (IP) rights, including patents, transferring ownership through partnerships can indeed be possible. Partnerships can take various forms, such as joint ventures or strategic alliances, where two or more parties collaborate and pool their resources, expertise, or technologies for mutual benefit*.*
In such partnerships, it's possible for one party to contribute patents or other IP assets to the partnership, either as part of its initial contribution or as part of ongoing collaboration efforts. This contribution can be documented through partnership agreements or other legal contracts that specify the terms and conditions of the IP transfer, including any rights, obligations, or restrictions associated with the transferred patents.
It's essential to ensure that any transfer of patent rights within a partnership is properly documented and complies with relevant legal requirements to protect the interests of all parties involved. This may involve drafting clear agreements that outline the scope of the IP transfer, the rights and responsibilities of each party, and any provisions for resolving disputes or terminating the partnership."

So, Tyler Blok has confidently said that our IP is protected. "We also regularly conduct in-depth discussions of research and marketing plans with IP Council to ensure that new IP is protected in a timely and strategic manner." But the Composition of Matter Patent on the leronlimab molecule has expired. So, then, the IP must be the LIVIMMUNE Trademark which protects and shields against the use of a CCR5 blockade for the conditions listed in the Trademark description above. In fact, the LIVIMMUNE Trademark places the utilization of CCR5 blockade only in the hands of leronlimab across the wide array of inflammatory and immune activating pathology that plagues humanity, all other CCR5 blockers need not apply.
So, on Tuesday, June 11, 2024, the LIVIMMUNE Trademark is Issued & becomes Active and the only CCR5 blocker that can be implemented against the above-named pathology becomes leronlimab. Therefore, if any company wishes to incorporate the use of a CCR5 blockade in the capacities listed above, (as a therapeutic preparation or treatment, for the purpose of Scientific Research or for Providing Health and Medical Information in any form, book, website, app, etc...), then, they need to knock on CytoDyn's doors and request permission to have the IP rights to the LIVIMMUNE Trademark and after the proper legal documents are signed, then, they may do as they have agreed.
Here is Tyler Blok's answer to the same question back in late November 2023:

Marta:
All right. Thank you. Can you discuss the status of your IP?
Tyler Blok:
Yeah, I can take this one. as well. So, the two most common questions that we get when people ask about IP, and I'm just going to assume this is what people would want to hear by way of an update, is what exactly started to expire by way of IP in 2023, and then generally they want an assurance that the company has some sort of plan, right, or an idea or is monitoring IP. So as to the first, in terms of what started to expire in 2023, the company is very cognizant of what expires and when. Needless to say, we are a pre-revenue biotech company developing a single molecule at this point, right, or some there are varieties of that molecule. So, we view that as our only asset and the most valuable asset, and we invest time, energy, and resources ensuring adequate protection. So, where the questions arise as to what expires is primarily related to our exposures, and I imagine our 10k. So, the underlying molecule of the leronlimab antibody itself started to expire in 2023. So that is the foundational leronlimab. You heard Jay speak earlier about how long he's been working with the antibody, right? There's IP tied to that. So, as the longer the random at itself has been out in, the IP can only last so long as to the underlying antibodies. Now, what the company does to build out the next levels of protection is we've gotten IP around the concentrated protein formulation and those don't start to expire until 2031. We've gotten levels of IP protection surrounding the use of leronlimab and the treatment of HIV. That won't start to expire until 2035. We have methods of action associated with cancer indications and methods of use associated with cancer indications and those don't start to expire in 2040. And then COVID-19, we have certain protections that again would start to expire in 2040. And then the most recently developed IP surrounding NASH would not even start to expire in 2043. So, our approach to that IP and what technically started to expire would allow people to use leronlimab antibody for research purposes. But the practical reality is we've built up adequate protections around the applications of leronlimab and HIV, COVID-19, NASH, and then there's also some certain methods of action. IP that would prevent anybody from substantially competing with us while using the wrong amount of antibodies.

So, in short, as Tyler has said, he accomplished the continued protection and shielding of CytoDyn with the Timely Activation of the LIVIMMUNE Trademark given that the Composition of Matter Patent on leronlimab just expired. Try as they might, they cannot get around the use of this Trademark when attempting either to Prepare a CCR5 blocking Treatment or to Research CCR5 blockade in any manner or to Provide Information in any form on CCR5 blockade. So then, after Tuesday, June 11, 2024, it is conceivable that CytoDyn begins to charge fees for the right to test/study leronlimab and for the right to produce articles which document these results on the CCR5 blockade leronlimab.
This IP LIVIMMUNE provides the means by which any company that desires to utilize the CCR5 blockade leronlimab in whatever form, shape or fashion that they agreed upon, has the rights to do so. It will be agreed upon and settled upon as stated here:

Transferring a patent can occur as part of a broader business transaction, such as a merger, acquisition, or licensing agreement. It's essential to ensure that any transfer of patent rights is properly documented and recorded with the relevant patent office to protect the interests of both parties involved."
In the context of intellectual property (IP) rights, including patents, transferring ownership through partnerships can indeed be possible. Partnerships can take various forms, such as joint ventures or strategic alliances, where two or more parties collaborate and pool their resources, expertise, or technologies for mutual benefit.

Now, it becomes clear why Tyler was given such a prominent role in the past few webcasts and investor meetings. It becomes clear that this IP protection remains the lifeblood of the company and why the company remains ever so confident and that is because CytoDyn is protected by their LIVIMMUNE IP as per the Patent Attorney for Microsoft & Apple disclosed above until at least until 2031. Even Scott Kelly has mentioned this when he was here.

"We want to address questions on Patents. I want people to understand that we have a highly qualified duteek firm that has handled our IP portfolio for many years. Since leronlimab is a biologic, it will receive 12 years of exclusivity if approved. The original patent composition of matter does expire in 2023, but the Concentrated Protein Formulation does not expire until 2031, and this is what has been used in all our clinical studies. We will also pursue methods that use patents leronlimab in a novel way across many indications."

Scott was saying the same things as Tyler is saying now, but obviously, now that the Composition of Matter Patent on leronlimab has already expired, it has become much more important to clarify and understand the details. But Tyler and Attorney got it done on time. It shall be Issued and Activated on 6/11/24.
This LIVIMMUNE Trademark allows CytoDyn to maintain a shield over what it is doing. It remains like a protection against any competition in the CCR5 blocking arena at least until 2031. It allows CytoDyn to run the necessary studies and trials without fear or worry of any competition. In order for any company to study CCR5 blockade, they need to do it under the LIVIMMUNE IP. That is in collaboration and in agreement with CytoDyn. This IP is sufficient to allow CytoDyn to maintain its sovereignty, to hold onto its existence and to remain alive at least long enough until leronlimab is approved. At the last moment, CytoDyn comes through again. Another miracle? ...which we never even knew was in the making. This is HUGE Folks.
We all knew this was the twatwaffles dream, that CytoDyn's Composition of Matter Patent would expire and that would be the end of the company. It is not too hard to figure out the mindset of these shorts. Even after June 11 comes and goes, they will still be singing the blues and crying for Argentina all over the air waves. All of this, what I have described here in has been in the works for months and even years. CytoDyn knew this day would come and they were prepared for it.
When is 6/11/24? It is just about 9 months after the decision was made to hire Dr. Lalezari as CEO. Tanya assured shareholders they would have a CEO by end of year 2023 and that statement was made back in SeptembeOctober of 2023. She knew the BOD wanted Dr. Lalezari, she just didn't know what his response would be. We've just gone through the gestation period from time of conception.
Folks, this is your study as much as it is mine. They had no clue what Tyler was up to. CytoDyn's Star Wars against all the oncoming missiles is up and running. This is the way I see it and how I've drawn to a conclusion. They wanted to stop CytoDyn's capacity to continue to pursue CCR5 blockade, but they no longer can do that via patent expiration. Now, following 6/11/24, Tyler's baby is born, 9 months following the decision to hire Dr. Lalezari. I hope this was helpful and put together alright.

I am a Muslim comic book creator. I wanted to share my thoughts and feelings on how a Muslim in the modern world should regard sequential art used for storytelling, in the context that our scholars have largely agreed that representational art is a potential path toward idolatry.
The central topic on which I’d like to address the community is the nature of the philosophical concept of fiction.
Fiction is the process of either creating or interpreting a story or work of art as being false in its literal nature, while regarding the nonliteral message or messages of the work. In understanding how this affects Islam and the words of the Prophet Mohammed, we must understand that fiction, as a concept, has not always existed in the world, and is in fact a relatively modern phenomenon.
Let us first consider the nature of legends. Today, the concept of a legend seems almost synonymous with fiction. But ancient peoples did not think this way.
The Iliad and the Odyssey are epic poems which were composed by the illiterate Greek poet Homer, and preserved in the oral tradition by generations of European bards, before being transcribed by later generations. The poems were not considered fiction by the people who had them as integral to their contemporary culture.
It is a true fact that roughly 5,000 years ago, a Greek confederacy of city states invaded the Trojan homeland in what is today Turkiye, initially by laying siege to the walled city of Ilion, the capital city and most important port of the nation of Troy.
About 2,000 years later, Homer composed epic poems about events which he knew to be real and true. However, he did not do archaeological research in Turkiye, he did not consult written records of the time, and he did not investigate physical artifacts of the war and time period surrounding it. Instead, he relied on his oral traditions, and generations of stories, to be true. When he composed the Iliad and the Odyssey, he understood Achilles, Agamemnon, and Odysseus to be real people who had actually lived, fought, and died as he described it. He included the Greek gods as characters in the story, because, as a devout Greek pagan, Homer believed these gods to actually exist, and to have played active roles in the conflict.
This is not an act of history, because of its lack of connection to physical artifacts that we can analyze scientifically. The so-called “father of history”, Herodotus, would not even be born for another 2,500 years. Even then, Herodotus was a poor historian by today’s standards. The first person to use physical evidence in constructing a history of the past was Sima Qian, a Chinese scholar who lived 3,000 years after Homer. The Muslim scholar, Ibn Khaldun, wouldn’t begin writing about the need to interpret the past through a broad lens until 1,300 years after that. The practice of studying foreign history through a secular lens wouldn’t begin for another 500 years, starting with Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
But it’s also true that the Iliad and Odyssey are not works of fiction. While we contemporaneously understand them to be “fictional” in that they do not contain much in the way of truth, they were, in fact, designed to convey what the author thought was true to his audience. This is what we now understand to be a “legend” - something which is repeated by believers as being true, while actually being a complete (or nearly complete) falsehood.
The first piece of literature presented as fiction in the modern sense is a novel written in Japanese called The Tale of Genji. The author, a woman named Murasaki Shikibu, did not intend for the audience to regard it as a truthful account of an actual event. She made it clear in her presentation that it did not represent a literal truth, but instead acted as allegory for a moral and social truth.
The Tale of Genji was written only 900 years ago.
The first European novel was Don Quixote, by Spanish author Miguel de Cervantes, a mere 400 years ago.
Muslim nations and their languages didn’t begin producing novels until about 200 years ago.
The Prophet Mohammed lived and died roughly 1,400 years ago. Which means, when he addressed the issue of representative art being a path to idolatry, the concept of fiction was still 500 years away from being known to Humanity; and still 1,200 years away from being a common concept to Arabs, Persians, and other peoples who had largely converted to Islam.
When the Prophet Mohammed was warning the Ummah of the dangers of representative art, it was in a specific historical context. The people he was speaking to had only two ways to understand information: true or false. The use of allegory to create a fictional setting in which to interpret metaphors did not exist to the first members of the Ummah. Therefore, when they saw a painting of a tree, it was simply a lie. It gave the appearance of a tree, without actually being a tree. It was a deception.
This is how the road to idolatry begins: by accepting a falsehood as the truth. We can see this in contemporary examples. Hindus in India can sometimes be presented with statues of living or deceased people, and begin worshiping them. Famously, when under the British Raj, a statue of Queen Victoria was raised in a village square. The Hindus living there, having no context for statues of non-deities, began praying to and giving sacrifices to the statue of Queen Victoria. Because of their cultural context, they understood statues not to be mere representations, but monuments to deities specifically. This lack of a philosophical framework leads to idolatry.
We can also see this phenomenon in modern commercial media. Photographs, isolated from the context of their creation, and manipulated by computers to be more psychologically appealing, are used to create a false image of a Human being. Celebrities are called “idols”, not as a metaphor, but because they are literally accumulating the praise that belongs to God. People look to celebrities to sell them cures for their illnesses, products which will bring them happiness, and communities which bind them to the brand. The methods employed by celebrity culture are identical to those employed by the cult industry. We even have the phrase “cult of personality”, again, not as a metaphor, but because personalities are often at the center of cults. This is sort of an aside, but this is also why prophets like Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed were so clear on being nothing more than mortal men. Because worshiping them would be idolatry. All praise belongs to God.
Although constructed out of bits of reality, the images and stories created by celebrity brands are a lie. They portray themselves as blameless, faultless, unworthy of scorn, and without sin. But those are qualities which belong only to God, and no one - and nothing - else. When a celebrity does or says something which offends, they must go on tour to make amends, so as to repair their image, because they cannot permit themselves to have an image which is stained by the Humanity of error.
But when we engage with a story which we understand to be fiction, everything changes. We inherently desire stories about imperfect people having conflict over relatable Human issues. Never in all the great works of literature ever published in any language, regarded by historians as masterpieces, do we ever find a blameless, faultless hero. Instead, we find complex and difficult people, with sophisticated perspectives, and moral philosophies forged through a combination of insight and experience. In fiction, we do not seek God or gods. In fiction, we seek introspection into the Human condition.
There are works of fiction with blameless characters who are without fault, but these are universally reviled, and widely understood to be a form of intellectual self-gratification. The first best known example of such a work was a fan-made short story set in the universe of Star Trek, in which the author, named Mary Sue, inserted a character into the universe who was named Ensign Mary Sue. Said character immediately saved the USS Enterprise from disaster by being the smartest person aboard, and then seduced Captain Kirk. The majority of the story was merely an explicit description of sex acts. This story became well known not because people enjoyed it. In fact, quite the opposite. It was shared as an example of the poorest possible quality writing. The story had no tension, no message, and no meaning, other than for the author to tell others about her own sexual fantasies.
To this day, “Mary Sue” is used as derisive shorthand in fiction to describe a character who is impossibly confident and impossibly competent. A “Mary Sue” is everything a fictional protagonist should not be, and everything a brand celebrity must be.
My conclusion from this is that when the Prophet Mohammed preached against the use of representative art as the pathway to idolatry, this was due to the cultural context of the Ummah who lived at the time. Without the framework of fiction as a philosophical concept to filter their experience of art, and as can be seen with modern polytheists worshiping statues, it can be extremely dangerous to engage with representative art. However, with an understanding that narrative art is fictional, and therefore a metaphorical insight into the Human condition, representative art discourages idolatry, and encourages introspection into the limitations and sins of Humanity. The much greater modern threat of idolatry comes from celebrity culture, which creates untruths and then espouses them as the only truth.
To this end, the greatest weapon we have against the danger of idolatry is media literacy. Learning to understand how media is used to create the appearance of truth, while containing none, is how we navigate the complexities of fiction and deduce the misinformation of supposedly informative storytelling.
Therefore, in a world where the philosophical concept of fiction does not exist, there can be a real danger in representative art leading to idolatry. However, in a world where fiction is well understood, but also those consuming the media lack the skills to tell where truth ends and fiction begins, the greatest danger of idolatry comes not from paintings or cinema, but instead from those who use photos and videos to trick the viewer into believing something which is not true, perpetuating a false purity and moral supremacy.
THE END
Postscript:
Building on the understanding that fiction can be a permissible form of representative art in Islam, I have written "The Adventures of Kobra Olympus," a comic book that features a Muslim woman superhero. Kobra Olympus embodies strength, intelligence, and compassion, offering a powerful role model for young Muslims and non-Muslims alike. This project is currently live on Kickstarter, and I would love your support to bring this vision to life. By backing our Kickstarter, you can help increase positive representation of Muslims in media, fostering greater understanding and diversity in storytelling. Your support will not only contribute to the creation of an exciting and dynamic comic book but also play a crucial role in challenging misconceptions and celebrating the rich cultural tapestry of the Muslim community.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/jamsheedstudios/kobra-olympus-issue-2-robot-rumble

When considering coffee as a potential aid in weight loss, there's evidence suggesting its efficacy. Coffee, containing caffeine, a common ingredient in many fat-burning supplements, is recognized for its ability to boost metabolism. Additionally, coffee contains stimulants like Theobromine, found in cocoa, and Theophylline, along with chlorogenic acid, which may impede carb absorption.
However, it's important to note that while caffeine can stimulate the nervous system and prompt fat cell breakdown, this process alone doesn't lead to weight loss unless accompanied by calorie expenditure through diet or exercise.
Contrary to popular belief, the combination of lemon and coffee as a miraculous weight loss solution isn't supported. Healthline articles debunking this trend emphasize that neither lemon nor coffee possess magical fat-melting properties. Sustainable weight loss requires a balanced approach of consuming fewer calories and increasing physical activity.
While some studies suggest coffee may contribute to modest weight reduction, extravagant claims regarding its transformative abilities are unfounded and unattainable.

7-Second Coffee Loophole Recipe: What’s the Science Behind It?

The 7-second coffee loophole has gained significant attention as a method for weight loss, involving the combination of coffee with various ingredients. While the internet is flooded with different versions of this recipe, typically incorporating coffee, lemon, honey, cayenne pepper, and cinnamon, it has also been used to promote coffee-based supplements promising weight loss benefits.
The core concept revolves around consuming black coffee, often with additional ingredients, within a very precise timeframe, ideally within seven seconds of experiencing hunger pangs.
Proponents of this method, including advocates and influencers, make bold assertions about its effectiveness. They claim that rapid consumption of coffee tricks the body into feeling full, thus temporarily suppressing appetite. However, there's a lack of substantial scientific evidence to support these claims.
The theory behind the 7-second loophole stems from the interaction between caffeine and hunger hormones. According to supporters, drinking black coffee stimulates the release of hormones like adrenaline and dopamine, which may momentarily curb appetite. The strategy behind the 7-second loophole is to strategically time coffee intake to diminish hunger and the desire to snack.
Despite its widespread popularity, it's essential to approach weight loss trends with caution. Substitutes, tricks, and hacks should complement, not replace, a balanced diet and healthy eating habits.

Ingredients in the Coffee Loophole Recipe for Belly Fat

Exploring the foundational elements of the Coffee Loophole Recipe unveils the essence of its unique composition. Each component contributes significantly to the creation of not just a beverage, but a sensory journey. Here's a breakdown of the key ingredients that define this blend:

• Specialty Coffee Beans: These beans are celebrated for their distinctively rich flavor profile and elevated quality, setting the stage for a truly exceptional brew.
• Chicory Root: Infusing a delightful woody and nutty undertone, chicory root not only adds depth to the flavor but also possesses digestive benefits, ensuring a well-rounded experience.
• Lion’s Mane Mushroom: Recognized as a potent adaptogen, Lion’s Mane Mushroom brings cognitive support and heightened focus to the table, enhancing both the taste and the functional aspect of the beverage.
• MCT Oil: Serving as a rapid source of energy, MCT oil not only lends a creamy texture but also aids in boosting metabolism, amplifying the beverage's vitality.
• Cinnamon: Introducing a subtle warmth to the blend, cinnamon contributes not only to its flavor but also assists in regulating blood sugar levels, adding a nuanced dimension to the experience.
• A Pinch of Sea Salt: Elevating the overall flavor profile, sea salt imparts essential minerals while harmonizing the taste, ensuring a well-balanced and satisfying cup.

Together, these carefully curated ingredients converge to create a beverage that transcends mere refreshment, offering an immersive sensory experience that invigorates both the body and the mind.

How Does the Coffee Loophole Work?

Unravel the secrets behind the Coffee Loophole, a dynamic blend that taps into the potent bioactive compounds found in coffee, including caffeine, chlorogenic acid, and diterpenes. Here's how it works:
Turbocharge Your Metabolism:
Harnessing the synergy between caffeine and MCT oil ignites your metabolism, allowing your body to incinerate calories with increased efficiency.
Master Your Appetite:
Experience the satisfaction of satiety as MCT oil and protein team up to curb cravings, empowering you to take control of your appetite and avoid unnecessary snacking.
Balance Your Blood Sugar:
Welcome the stabilizing influence of cinnamon, supporting steady energy levels throughout the day by helping to regulate blood sugar.
Elevate Your Performance:
Fuel your endeavors with a sustained surge of energy, courtesy of caffeine and MCT oil, whether you're gearing up for a workout or tackling the day ahead.
Ignite Fat Loss:
Watch as stored fat meets its match with the dynamic duo of MCT oil and caffeine-induced thermogenesis, accelerating your journey towards weight loss.

Advantages of the Coffee Loophole Diet

Embracing the Coffee Tweak to Lose Weight can offer several noteworthy benefits:

• Weight Management: This diet can aid in weight loss by enhancing metabolism, curbing appetite, and reducing inflammation.
• Enhanced Blood Sugar Regulation: Regular coffee consumption has been linked to improved insulin sensitivity and lower blood sugar levels, benefiting those with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes.
• Lower Risk of Chronic Illnesses: The antioxidants in coffee contribute to protecting against chronic diseases like heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers.
• Increased Energy and Focus: As a natural stimulant, caffeine can elevate alertness, improve concentration, and boost overall energy levels.

Potential Drawbacks of the Coffee Loophole

Though the coffee loophole recipe has some promising benefits according to research, it is important to consider its potential downsides:

• Digestive Issues: High consumption of MCT oil may lead to digestive discomfort for some individuals.
• Cholesterol Concerns: Large amounts of saturated fats can increase cholesterol levels.
• Nutrient Deficiencies: Relying on the coffee loophole might result in missing out on valuable nutrients found in whole foods, such as antioxidants and phytochemicals.
• Caloric Excess: Lack of portion control can lead to consuming too many calories.
• Nutritional Imbalance: Using this method as a substitute for balanced meals might lead to inadequate nutrition.
• Medication Interactions: It could negatively interact with certain medications and health conditions.

As with any dietary change, it is advisable to consult your doctor before trying the coffee loophole, especially if you have existing health concerns. Always pay attention to how your body responds.

Step-by-Step Coffee Brewing Procedure

Now that all your ingredients are prepared, let’s delve into the brewing process! This stage is uncomplicated, direct, and bound to transform your morning ritual:

• Commence by preparing your coffee: The stronger, the more potent, as it forms the sturdy base of this blend.
• Introduce unsalted butter: Opt for grass-fed butter for its premium fats.
• Incorporate MCT or coconut oil: Utilize only a tablespoon to achieve the desired energy lift.
• Blend until smooth: Merge all the components in a blender until a creamy, frothy layer forms on top.

What Does the Coffee Loophole Taste Like?

The taste of the Coffee Loophole brew stays true to what you know. It maintains the richness of coffee flavor, its full-bodied nature, and the aromatic undertones. Sugar or cream aren't necessary additions, as they could counteract the metabolic advantages we aim for. Once you acquire a taste for black coffee, it seamlessly fits into your daily routine, becoming a satisfying ritual.

Maximizing Weight Loss Potential with Coffee

Unlock the full potential of coffee for weight loss with these expert tips:

• Moderate Your Intake: While coffee can boost weight loss efforts, excessive consumption may backfire. Keep your daily coffee intake in check, ideally limiting it to 3–4 cups to prevent any adverse effects.
• Embrace Dark Roasts: Opt for dark roast coffee varieties to harness higher levels of chlorogenic acid, a compound linked to enhanced weight loss benefits compared to lighter roasts.
• Ditch the Sugar: Resist the temptation to sweeten your coffee with added sugars, as they can counteract its weight loss properties. Instead, reach for natural alternatives like honey or stevia to satisfy your sweet tooth without derailing your progress.
• Holistic Approach: Remember, coffee alone isn't a miracle solution for shedding pounds. Pair your coffee routine with a wholesome lifestyle that includes balanced nutrition, regular physical activity, and sufficient rest. This holistic approach ensures sustainable, long-lasting weight loss results that go beyond just your morning brew.

The Coffee Loophole: Worth a Try?

Indulging in coffee blended with butter, oils, and spices has surged in popularity, with claims suggesting it aids in shedding pounds. However, the evidence supporting these assertions remains uncertain.
While it might slightly curb appetite, this concoction alone is unlikely to result in significant weight loss for the majority of individuals.
Nevertheless, incorporating it into a balanced lifestyle can be beneficial. Just manage your expectations and understand that no single solution can replace the importance of proper nutrition and regular exercise.
In summary, we acknowledge the potential benefits of the coffee loophole, but it's not a magical solution for weight loss. Enjoy it if you like it and if it complements your routine!

Disclaimers

Please note that relying solely on the coffee loophole is not a guaranteed method for losing weight. Individual outcomes may differ, and it's advisable to adopt a balanced lifestyle that includes healthy eating habits, consistent physical activity, and adequate rest. Prioritizing long-term sustainability is more important than seeking immediate solutions.

FAQs about Loophole Coffee

What sets Loophole Coffee apart from regular coffee?
Loophole Coffee is not your typical coffee—it's crafted with a unique recipe that reveals hidden flavors and aromas absent in standard coffee.
Where can I purchase Loophole Coffee?
Loophole Coffee is available at select coffee shops and through online retailers. Keep an eye out for this enchanting brew!
Can Loophole Coffee be made at home?
Although the precise recipe is a well-kept secret, you can experiment with various brewing methods to create your own version of Loophole Coffee at home.
Is Loophole Coffee more costly than regular coffee?
Due to its special ingredients and brewing process, Loophole Coffee might be a bit more expensive than ordinary coffee. However, it’s worth every penny!
Does Loophole Coffee include any artificial flavors or additives?
Absolutely not! Loophole Coffee is made from only the highest quality ingredients and contains no artificial flavors or additives. It’s pure magic in a cup!

Final Thoughts

The allure of miracle weight loss products persists, fueled by unsubstantiated claims from supplement manufacturers and their social media endorsers. However, scientific evidence remains elusive. While some ingredients show potential for aiding weight loss, there's no magic formula for shedding pounds rapidly without embracing a balanced diet and regular exercise.
Rather than pursuing rapid weight loss, the focus should be on achieving sustainable, long-lasting results through healthy lifestyle changes. To embark on this journey effectively, it's crucial to seek guidance from healthcare professionals such as your doctor and a registered dietitian. They can craft a personalized weight loss plan tailored to your unique needs and preferences, setting you on the path towards lasting success.