Fragrance for men: Our men’s fragrance is a captivating blend of sophistication and allure, designed to complement the modern gentleman’s dynamic lifestyle. Opening with a burst of fresh citrus notes, including zesty bergamot and tangy grapefruit, it instantly invigorates the senses with a refreshing burst of energy.
As the fragrance develops, warm spices like cardamom and black pepper emerge, adding a touch of complexity and depth. These aromatic nuances are balanced by the timeless elegance of woody accords, such as rich cedarwood and earthy vetiver, which provide a solid foundation for the scent.
In the base, hints of smooth leather and sensual amber create a lasting impression that is both masculine and refined, leaving a trail of undeniable charisma wherever you go. Our men’s fragrance is more than just a scent — it’s a statement of confidence, sophistication, and individuality, perfectly suited to the discerning man who appreciates quality and style. Embrace the essence of modern masculinity with our captivating fragrance and make every moment memorable.
Fragrance for Women: Our women’s perfume is a celebration of femininity and grace, embodying the essence of elegance and allure. It begins with a captivating burst of fresh citrus and delicate florals, with notes of sparkling bergamot and romantic jasmine dancing together in harmony.
As the fragrance unfolds, a lush bouquet of blooming roses and velvety peonies emerges, infusing the scent with a timeless and enchanting allure. These floral notes are complemented by a touch of sweet vanilla and creamy sandalwood, adding warmth and depth to the composition.
In the base, subtle hints of musk and amber linger, creating a sensual and sophisticated trail that captivates the senses and leaves a lasting impression. Our women’s perfume is more than just a fragrance — it’s a symbol of confidence, beauty, and individuality, perfectly suited to the modern woman who embraces her unique charm and embraces every moment with grace and style. Embrace the power of femininity with our captivating perfume and let your inner radiance shine through.
Fragrance liked by Both men and Women:
Our unisex perfume is a harmonious blend of versatile and captivating notes, designed to be embraced by anyone who appreciates the beauty of fragrance without boundaries. It opens with a refreshing burst of citrus, including vibrant bergamot and zesty lemon, which instantly uplift the spirits and awaken the senses.
As the scent evolves, a heart of aromatic herbs and spices emerges, with hints of soothing lavender and spicy black pepper adding depth and complexity to the composition. These accords are balanced by the warmth of woody undertones, such as cedarwood and sandalwood, which provide a solid foundation for the fragrance.
In the base, subtle touches of earthy vetiver and creamy musk create a sensual and inviting trail that lingers on the skin, leaving a memorable impression. Our unisex perfume is a versatile and sophisticated choice for anyone who appreciates quality craftsmanship and timeless elegance. Embrace the essence of inclusivity and individuality with our captivating fragrance and let your unique spirit shine through.

Like if someone is experimenting that's fine. If it's the start of your journey, that's fine. But I don't wear women's clothes or dress up like a girl. I wear CLOTHES. I am a transWOMAN CDs on grindr all use the trans tag, then explicitly describe themselves as CD men. It's so insulting; just say you're a CD, you're not trans and that's fine. But trans DOES NOT mean dresses up as woman for sexual pleasure.

D-day was 5 months ago but I remembered a name and I decided to look it up and I regret it. I feel devastated, betrayed and heartbroken all over again, and I only have myself to blame. I’m going away for a trip and I worry it might mean another relapse is in my future. Every solo-trip in our marriage has meant relapse. I’m bracing myself for impact and that’s why I looked it up. I hate myself for it.
I’ve never done anything bad before and I really feel like self sabotaging and just throwing caution to the wind to see what it feels like. Like he has with this problem. My whole life I’ve done things the right way. I’ve always stopped myself just before doing something stupid and told myself “I’m only doing this because I’m not doing what I should be doing” and I’d think of God, my family, the repercussions of my actions and I’d stop.
I got married as a virgin, I haven’t partied, I haven’t dressed slutty in public, I haven’t posted pictures of myself for validation, I haven’t entertained the men who have hit on me, I avoid men at all costs, I’ve never allowed myself to let go and just do what I wanted to do. I’ve never allowed myself to act selfishly.
I feel like if you can’t beat them, you might as well join them.
I dress modestly in public to hide my waist to hip ratio, I don’t pile on the makeup, I cover my hair, I go out of my way to not be looked at or interact with the opposite sex. I do it because I respect him and I know it makes his blood boil if a man even looks at me.
But why? Why bother? Isn’t it all about validation? Is it that good? Isn’t that why these women do porn to begin with? Maybe I should let go, give it a try and soak it up too

Unreal how many LE, packs and such have amethysts already being shown imminently. Aside from the fact that the men's division is much larger, what accounts for this? We've faced so many of these cards in FW already and the best we're getting is an average/ruby Liv and a not worth grinding ranked Chyna. I'm not one to expect all content at once, but really? Women's division just isn't fun unless you have Iyo which most do not.

I genuinely want to know because a lot of women do get approched by men even though there's always a chance they'll get rejected. A lot of people are in relationships where the guy is the one who initiated things.
When do you tell yourself "she's cute. I should go talk to her" and "absolutely not!"?
The common answer I get is that men are simply scared to approach because they don't want to be seen as a predator? I've heard more extreme things like possibly getting a restraining order. Not sure how likely it is for that happen.

I'm 34/nb and I'm been with a cis man for over a decade. I identify as asexual and sexual desire has been a struggle for me for most of my life, I think related to being autistic and difficulty connecting with other people as well as with my own body. My husband has been understanding and has given me a break and expects nothing since he knows it's something I've been working on, but I also want to be able to connect with him on this level as well.
As I've been exploring my gender identity I've wondered if my disconnection to my own body and desire is related to not feeling like a woman and when it comes to sex, especially with men, women have a very distinct role. I've found some success with strap ons and imagining myself in the masculine role, but I find it hard to get into and stay in that mind space. Perhaps also related to being autistic, spontaneous imagination and fantasy does not come easily to me.
I've also found some success in reading erotica but I get overwhelmed by how much spicy content there is and don't know where to start. Being ace I can sometimes feel sex-repulsed and I find it hard and exhausting to comb through smut trying to find something that resonates with me.
I'm sure I'm not alone but also this isn't the most common thing, I'm wondering if anyone has practices or books or blogs or anything that has been useful in getting into a more masc mindset, especially in the bedroom. I feel like there must be a porn category that addresses this but again, I have no idea where to start or what to do.

I've been dating this guy for a couple of years and he recently reconnected with one of his friends but something has always seem a little off to me. They've known each other since they were kids but they fell out for years over some misunderstanding. At first I didn't mind them hanging out and talking but I've gotten more insecure about their relationship over time. The first time I met his friend, he told me that she insisted I get dolled up; later found out that wasn't true and he wanted me to so I would feel less insecure. She didn't leave a good impression on me, I felt as though she insulted my interests and how I speak and the entire time I felt like I was a third wheel on someone else's date. I'm not usually a jealous type but I was feeling some type of way and my bf noticed but thought it was funny/cute. I know I'm wrong for this next part, but eventually I did look into their messages because he would constantly bring her up in conversation. I understand all relationships have their own rules/boundaries but I felt like they were being slightly inappropriate, especially since they're "like brother and sister". Something that stuck out the most was them talking about how she could start an OF and him volunteering to go with her to places then notifying me afterwards. I voiced my uneasiness towards some of the content in the messages and I'm constantly told it's nothing to worry about. They'll talk/text at all hours and I also voiced how that made me feel. At one point I did tell him I wanted him to stop talking to her in which I was told if he did he would be angry about it for a long time; in which I decided to drop the request. They both at one point did say to each other that it felt like there was a strain on my and bfs relationship and suggested they stop talking to one another; something I encouraged to not happen....I don't want him to feel like I'm picking and choosing he can and can't talk to but I'm lost at how I can get my feelings through to him. I've also tried being cordial and getting to know her but she seemed uninterested and I noticed a few times I would message her to start a conversation that would be opened and read, but she's sitting and replying to my bf (he would tell me or I would be sitting next to him and reading the convo over his shoulder) We've been going through a stressful time right now and he's told me he talks to her about our relationship problems for advice. Out of spite and anger, I did message her the other day to tell her how I felt about the whole situation and it felt like she blew off my concerns stating that "she didn't see it that way but she understood". She immediately sent what I said to my bf amd he claimed I was painting him as some villian; all I told her was that I wasn't comfortable with some of the stuff they talk about and how I felt like I was second priority to him; but I still insisted that she don't drop her friend because of how I felt. We had an argument about it and agreed that we would start fresh; which I was okay with until yesterday. My bf is a little reclusive and likes to keep to himself (he's usually in his office all day) and I asked if he would sit in the kitchen with me so I could clean the dishes he needed for the food he just bought and planned on cooking. He told me he'd rather sit on the couch in the other room because it was more comfortable than the kitchen chairs and plus friend (28f) was about to call. I'm not sure how long they were on the phone for but I left the room each time he came in. I feel like I'm being overdramatic but in that moment and even now it felt like her baby daddy drama was more important than sitting and talking with me, even if it was for a few minutes. After the call, he decided he wasn't making dinner anymore (I can wait until tomorrow) and asked if I would lay with him after his shower. When he got out and before he got into the bed, I saw he was writing out a long response to whatever text she just sent so I decided to just go to sleep and not wait on him any longer. And now we're here. I think men and women can be friends while in relationships but this feels so off to me. I feel like ever since she became more prominent in his life that I've been pushed back in his and as selfish as it may sound, I think it's unfair. I have been cheated on in the past with a similar situation (ex and a mutual friend at the time) and I know that's a factor in my uneasiness but this time it feels like the blatant disregard to how I feel is more in my face. I'm already insecure and being in my 30s I don't feel like I should put up with feeling this way in a relationship. I thought about leaving quite a bit lately but I don't know if I can or if their relationship is even a valid reason. A part of me feels like I'm overreacting and another part is telling me they don't give a F about my concerns to lay down any type of boundary in their relationship. I get that they're "like siblings" but some of the stuff they talk about I wouldn't with my own. Any advice on what to do or how to navigate this situation? Edit: I wanted to add that at times, he also shared his accomplishments/concerns with her before letting me know anything as well; I felt like this needed to be added because it does intensify my insecurities about their relationship

Marx in Barbieland
In Greta Gerwig’s ‘Barbie (2023)’, Barbie lives in Barbieland, which is not the ‘real world’. Barbieland is a plastic utopia where every idea of a barbie ever conceived lives as a person. We have a physicist barbie, a physician barbie, a pilot barbie and so on. The protagonist is simply the stereotypical barbie. She is the first barbie ever made whom we shall refer to as Barbie. We also have a barbie in a wheelchair, a fat barbie and a pregnant barbie. But here’s the kicker: in this utopia, we still have a president barbie and a lawyer barbie. This utopia of Barbieland still has courts, court cases and hierarchical governance.
Let’s think about it for a second. Barbieland is a cheerful place where every Barbie has her own home, has infinite supply of food, water and electricity. Some of them have jobs which they enjoy doing and others simply don’t need jobs. All barbies love and support each other except for the weird barbie, who scares them. What are they even arguing about in the court? We never see a police barbie or a soldier barbie, in that case who is upholding the rulings of the court or the laws by the senate? Political power after all flows through the barrel of a gun and there aren’t any guns here.
They all have their own homes, no property disputes. Commodities never expire or get over, hence no production and hence no business disputes. None of them are married, hence no family disputes. There is no money in this world, hence no wage disputes. It is essentially a classless society. Nobody has any reason to go to court against another person. Barbies do not need to steal and there are no murderer barbies.
Despite this, there are courts, lawyers and presidents. The writers must believe that state appartuses are a vital and eternal part of human society. That the state is as necessary to human society as are nurses and cleaners. But is that true? Why do we have these people in the real world whose job is to quell conflicts and maintain order? That is because there exist contradictions in human society. People have opposing interests. More precisely, a nation in today’s world is broadly comprised of two classes who are at odds. Two people sitting across an interview table have opposing interests. One class enjoys higher unemployment since that means cheaper labour while the other is mortified at the thought of losing their livelihood. The state exists to contain the conflict, to keep it in check. It exists to suppress the lower class from revolting or stealing. When you think of a classless society, that tension is gone. That inherent contradiction in the society is gone. Then we should not need a state, a government, courts, the police and the miltary. That’s communism. A classless, moneyless and stateless society.
If Barbieland has state machinery, it should also have a suppressed class. Can it be the kens? I did not mention the kens. The kens are counter-parts to each barbie. They are always at the beach and don’t have special jobs. They are essentially ‘himbos’. The barbies are so busy in their parties that they are not even aware of whether kens have a place to sleep. However, the kens do have voting rights, which they do not apparently exercise. In the opening scene where we see a lawyer barbie make an outstanding speech at the court, we see one ken amongst dozens of barbies. The barbies’ applause at the lawyer’s speech and in general a unity can signify a class unity over the lower ken class.
When Ken travels to the real world and finds that the downtrodden people like kens in Barbieland can actually run the world and do whatever they please; he takes the masculine manifesto with him to Barbieland, unites the other kens in overthrowing the feminine rule and establishing a Kendom where Barbieland once stood.
When Barbie returns to now Kenland, she discovers that the lower ken class has seized the previous owners’ private property such as their dream houses in an apparent revolution and made servants out of the barbies. Then conspiring with two humans, Barbie and the weird barbie make a plan for a coup d’etat. They use two tactics of the ruling classes to achieve this: sowing hatred and division, and voter suppression. They are able to form a majority at the senate and everything magically goes back to normal. Later we see a ken asking whether he can be made a part of the new government, the barbie president tells him that he can have a small administrative role in a corner somewhere.
If you reverse the genders for a bit, it makes a little sense. In a final scene, Ken struggles to know who he is if not attached to Barbie. He has always seen himself through her gaze and does not know how to exist as an independent person. He decides to finally be free from that shackle and find himself along with all the other kens. Barbie on the other hand decides to be a mother. It makes sense because ‘Man’ has been running the world, and ‘woman’ is a secondary gender who is written by men. Women must find themselves not as wo-men but as independent entities, and more men should be able to take up fatherhood as an occupation. But this interpretation may be quite a reach.
What prompted me to write this essay was that the filmmakers could not imagine a utopia without courts and presidents. Who wants to be ruled and governed in their fantasy? You might say that since the president barbie was made by Mattel in the real world, she should also exist in Barbieland and that is why the filmmakers put her there. However, Mattel also gives jobs to kens and they don’t really exist in the movie, so the status quo enforcing barbie was entirely optional for Gerwig.
The end.

So.... Last Post I had made... I had some of her angry loyal fans swearing up and down that I was being "insecure" because I pointed out her narcissistic behavior and self obsession with men being absolutely crazy about her and her needing to brag it to the world for some reason, on top of showing it in her videos that she's vain herself DESPITE her saying in the past that she doesn't think it's right when women are vain and obsessed with social media and this that and the third. You know her christian spiels. So pointing out the hypocrisy and narcism is considered being insecure according to her fans. And yes, being on social media on your brother or husband's accounts or secret accounts counts as being on social media 😐 One thing about her, is she holds everyone to false standards except herself bc rules don't exist for her.
In her latest video...... once again, she's talking about men. Are we surprised??? Because at 32:32, randomlyyyy, out of nowhere she just starts gloating again about how cool she was in school and going off about 10 diff stories of how many guys had crushes on her, going crazy for her, and like passionately telling the story. It's like atp, everyone in her kid school has moved on with their life but she's stuck on the ones that big up her ego 😆 And Jordan again, once again sitting there like.... yes 😀 tell me about all the guys that had crushes on you.... Pick me vibes for real for real.
You just can't make it up. She is insufferable. It's like she is this way because she's received attention and she gets high off of it and then just becomes entitled from it- and this is the reason why she thinks that everyone is crazy about her and just the whole world revolves around her. Even her saying that the teachers called her ms little pretty thang, and her being the golden child (thinks she's the best of them), and men in public approaching her- like all of it has gone to her head to make her feel like she's the world's most highest. That's probably where the narcism and attention craving and glorification began. When you live your life spoiled by everyone, you think you're the best and become entitled and a narcisst. And the whole "bc my wrist is super tiny" or "she's a little firecracker" again just plays into her view of herself that she's a kwoot wittle feisty gworl >3< uwu
TL;DR version: You possibly have come to watch a hygiene video or something but instead you'll see:

1. Your local drama queen gloating about her maturity yet proceeds to act like a kid many times with the tiara, mini tantrums, and emotional outbursts
   
2. Once again, the tales of her many suitors in this world that's feeding her pick me girl ego. No surprise.
   
3. Her being an icky type of person in school and being proud of it..... no surprises there too.
   
4. 52:06- "there was this girl at garage today, she literally made everyone tell me happy birthday. Tell her happy birthday, girl you better tell her happy birthday. to which Chloe proceeds to say, "okayyy, we can be friends" yes. Ofc that's what she feels. Anyone that will war for their kween like this and glorify her- yes ofc they can be friends with her 😂 she expects nothing less out of her relationships in her life. if you don't plan to worship her, don't think you're gonna be around her for too much. She don't like that.
   

Now the other representation of women you see in these communities is just "Giant fucking tits" and that's their primary trait. But we'll ignore that representation for now.
I don't have any immediate examples but if you browse /anime_irl or any community based around weeb stuff long enough you'll see what I'm talking about. The woman is obviously an adult woman but she acts, and is drawn in a weird chibi-like way, like "uwu imma useless widdle smol bean". I'm not sure how else to describe it but if you've seen it do you think it's weird?
If it was men drawing women I would go "Oh this makes sense. The only interaction these weebs have with women is through weird anime that is written by otaku's who also don't interact with women". Like it's weird but it has an obvious explanation.
But increasingly I'll check the profile of someone who posted and find out that they're either a trans or cis woman and they're like obviously projecting themself into this "uwu Imma smol chibi child who drank too much alcohol on her 25th birthday" and it's...weird.
Am I the only one noticing this weird trend?

And why? For me, hands down the 90s/Y2K era for both men and women. For starters, everyone looked so lean and beautiful in a natural way but also the dress style was just hot. The women with black leggings and dark lipsticks and the guys with the medium/long haircuts and slightly metro-looking (by today’s standards) but handsome fashion.
What about everyone else? Which era do you think had the most attractive men and which had the most attractive women?

Savings play a vital role in financial stability and achieving long-term goals. In India, fixed deposits, or FDs, are a popular savings option that offers security and predictable returns. At Samridh Bharat, we provide you with fixed deposit schemes beginning as low as INR 5000 with the highest interest rates. Depending upon the tenure of your deposit, you can earn lucrative interest rates ranging from a minimum of 10.5% to as high as 12.25%. You can visit our corporate office or branches to submit your documents and become a member. With our FD schemes, we also aim to promote savings habits for common men and women of Delhi while giving them a viable investment option. You can also benefit from our fixed deposit rate of interest. To learn more, call or WhatsApp us at +91 9667847771.

My cousin pierced her newborn baby boys ear because it’s a cultural thing for them, she only pierced one ear though because in their culture you are supposed to do one for boys and both ears for a girl. It’s already done and none of my business anyways so I can’t say anything, but was it sinful to do this since it’s imitating women no? Or is it allowed for men to wear earrings? I also think it’s kind of sad because the poor boy didn’t consent to getting a piercing that will never close if he doesn’t like it but yeah anyways. Thoughts?

My (cis f) Partner (mtf) cannot understand why I want to end our marriage. My partner thinks just because they still have a penis, and that they treat me better (there was alot of emotional abuse), I should not worry about my sexuality/romantic preferences of gender.
I can't help how I feel, I want to be with a man who likes being, well, a man. It's unexplainable. I'm not transphobic, I would support any relative and friend that was trans. I'm just not attracted to -- sexually, romantically, intimately -- trans women or trans men.
What can I say to get them to understand me???

Friends with your exes ex
Now I know that many people think I am nuts because I am friends with my ex's exes. But why is my question? It is obvious that the men I dated had at least one thing in common, that had great taste in women.
Yes, the women they picked are all beautiful, kind, intelligent, and strong women. It's a shame they couldn't be a real man and keep these women. So the question is, why shouldn't we be friends? What do we have against each other? Just because we all had the same lousy taste in men, should that make us hate each other? Oh, please grow up.
The first time this happened was with Mr. Con Artist. I reached out to his wife. No, I didn't know he was married until I threw him to the curb and did a background check on him and found out he lied about being divorced and everything else. So I reached out to his wife to let her know what had happened. Yes, I felt she should know what he was doing to her. When she dumped him, I knew she had moved down here and had no family and friends. So I reached out and said if she ever needed a friend that I was here. I also invited her to Thanksgiving dinner as I knew she had nowhere to go. She came and we became good friends after that. We went out together, we went to the beach and yes, had holiday dinners together. She is an amazing woman who also fell for his bullshit. How could I possibly hate her? She was great, and none of this was her fault or my fault.
The next time was with an ex I dated in high school. I knew his wife when he was married, and when they divorced, we started dating again. I reached out to her in the beginning to make sure she was okay and she wished us the best. She never told me what kind of man he was even when I asked. She was classy till the end!
When we broke up, I asked her why she didn't give me the lowdown on him. She said that maybe he really loved me and had changed. She didn't want to come off as the bitch ex wife talking about him. That right there made me respect her more than anything and yes, we are friends too! She is an incredible woman, and it is truly his loss.
So today, my friends, let's not hate one another because we dated the same people. I chose to open my mind and learned that these were amazing women who just happened to fall for the same guys' bullshit. And even though I no longer have that relationship, I've made a good friend out of it. Which to me is way better. We women need to stick together, we need to let go of jealousy and pettiness and realize that not all exes are bitches. That's just what they want you to believe because they don't want you to be friends with their exes. “Be the change you want to see"

I have found proof the Almasti is not a bear and not a pongid, even though what I have found does not totally exclude it being a mere anatomically modern human. It is an apparently meaningless detail, but let us go in order.
In Caucasus, Cental Asia, various areas of Siberia and even West Mongolia a wide range of relict hominids known with different names presents similiar characteristics and can be likely assumed to be one widespread species. It is mostly known with its Mongol name, Almas. One detail about it is females having large, pendolous breasts they have to throw behind shoulders if they have to run fast.
I believed this detail could likely be dismissed as an exageration made by Muslim Caucasian and Cental Asian men since those people would find a naked humanoid creature to be uncivilised and disgusting, and the actual female Almases, I thought, did not physically have such huge breasts they could throw them behind shoulders.
However I have found the Ebu Gogo, the only hominid cryptid we have found bones of (but we do not know if it lives still, since even the locals from Flores mostly believe they have killed all of them...), was said to have proportionally huge breasts. Here is what I have found...
The women Ebu Gogo had extremely pendulous breasts, so long that they would throw them over their shoulders, which must have been quite a sight in full flight.
Source : https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiFgqu6v5SGAxWJxAIHHQRqC8cQFnoECA8QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.phantomsandmonsters.com%2F2022%2F04%2Fthe-hidden-hominoid-does-ebu-gogo-still.html&usg=AOvVaw3gDyJc9vAtCZKKCGyNith-&opi=89978449
Here is why this apparently meaningless detail is so interesting and useful for Almas research :
It is quite unlikely Caucasians, Central Asians, Mongols and the culturally very distant Indonesians would imagine the same thing, the wildwomen of their folklore to have huge breasts and to run exactly the same why, by throwing them behind, unless there is a real living creature behind the folklore of all those people, or a few species close to eachothers.
Breasts are not found on bears, and are very small in pongids, which means any living creature with such breasts needs to be a hominid or a human. However the Ebu Gogo, being the only relict hominid we have found as dead remains and give a taxon to, is the only one we know for sure what it would be, proven it is (still now) real : a member of the genus Homo, but not a human.
It likely means the Almasti is a primitive, hairy hominid, a descendant of either Homo habilis, either a primitive kind of Homo erectus, since more progressive Erectine forms had shorter arms and a less hairy body, and even later hominids were pretty much human looking.
It could still be a human, but why would some unknown human ethnicity have in common with an early Homo species the shape and relative size of breasts ? Indonesians are used to (average sized) naked breasts, unlike Caucasians and Cental Asians/Mongolians; they would not have reported female Homo floresiensis breasts to be large if they were not actually larger than normal at all, and if they evolved to throw them behind, something we humans can not do and would not have imagined the same way in many very distant and culturally different places, then Almasti and Homo floresiensis must be quite close on the evolutionary tree, even though one is 2 times the hight of the other.
So the Almasti can not be a mere fantasy, a bear or a pongid, and while I concede it may be human, especially since, at least in Caucasus, there are feral humans anyway, I think we can tentatively assume a hominid or even more than one hominid species can live as small, inbred, dying but not yet dead relict populations who learned to stay hidden and avoid Homo sapiens at all costs. Actually the small ones, the Ebu Gogo, out of all of them, used to not try to hide at all from Indonesians until a mere 400 years ago, and just as they started to be nasty, they were exterminated or nearly so.
P.S. I can also add one more: female Almases have long head hair, longer than body hair, which pongids do not have, but humans do.