Mitosis vs. meiosis venn diagram

Hoping to reach my fellow overlappers in this Venn diagram of fandoms

Hello and thanks for reading.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS POST
Recently, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna mentioned she was "men-in-blacked". I find the MIB to be fascinating as a peripheral phenomenon to UAPs. Not only do they produce absolute bangers, but they are also one of the most obscure elements of this whole thing. Everyone appears to disagree on what they are (which is by design), it's even more interesting when you consider how long MIB sightings have occurred and the fact that it's not a US centric phenomenon. Many others have done extensive (and grounded) research into the MIB phenomenon and have arrived at interesting conclusions (paraphrased):

It becomes evident that encounters with the Men in Black can be broadly categorized into two types. The first implies interest from government entities in gathering information from witnesses and ensuring silence. The second type of encounter tends to manifest promptly after a UFO sighting. Numerous documented cases substantiate this distinction, suggesting a blend of both types of encounters. Once again, the UFO phenomenon appears to highlight its connection with our consciousness.

I don't know what the MIB are, I've never met one. But I think OP of this post is probably correct in that it's many things all at once. Funny how our perception creates that conundrum in all areas of our lives huh?! A user asked an interesting question months ago:

Is it possible that these men are working for the DoE (Department of Energy)?

I thought this was a fascinating theory, especially since you have people like Jonathan Weygandt stating that DOE was present at the Peru 1997 Crash. I know some have pointed toward CIA Office of Global Access, they've also said it's ex-military members employed by private aerospace, others have said it's the US Airforce Special Operations, some say JSOC is involved, at this point, who isn't?
I DIDN'T KNOW THE MIB FRANCHISE WAS MARVEL IP
I don't purport to know who the MIB are, but I think we can arrive at a mutual conclusion. In reality, it could be any entity with the capability of purchasing suits and hired guns if a need arose? The boogieman already exists, why not use it if you needed to? Truthfully, it aligns with the tactic utilized most often in this topic: Hide things in plain sight by adding to the discourse.
I had no idea MIB was one of Marvel's first big successes. I find it fascinating that recent documentaries and rumblings have many parallels to Marvel's Hydra story about Nazi's running a shadow government in the US. This Netflix documentary is called the Octopus Murders. In the Marvel universe, this is the fictional evil Nazi org Hydra's logo:
https://preview.redd.it/wsx0ah0trz3d1.png?width=474&format=png&auto=webp&s=8393b40de2e2e4efc3717b649100fb615d89e5d1
POST WORLD WAR 2 AMERICA SAW NAZIS RISE TO POWER IN PROMINENT POSITIONS
Post WWII, Operation Paperclip injected Nazi scientists/military/businessman into many positions of great authority across America.
The easiest example to highlight is Werner Von Braun, one of the developers of the V-2 Rocket. He eventually got an awesome job at NASA, and helped design the Apollo Saturn V. According to his Wikipedia Page. He worked with Walt Disney on a series of films, which popularized the idea of human space travel in the U.S. and beyond from 1955 to 1957. Would it surprise you that the military and intelligence community consult on media projects from time to time?
I wonder if he ever shared any multiverse ideas that sat in Disney's idea vault until the Marvel purchase?
As I dug into the history of some institutions, there appeared to be a significant amount of overlap between individuals implicated in the UFO coverup and Nazism. I also find it interesting that some of the content creators close to the UFO/UAP/NHI topic are beginning to speak on this specific aspect: Nazism in the early days of America's Intelligence apparatus and MIC.
HOW CAN SOMETHING SO BIG BE HIDDEN
My first question when I began to look into this topic was, "How on earth could they fund this?" no pun intended. Then I remembered how ridiculous of a question that was. We may not know where the money is, but somebody does. And it's a lot of money. When I say "a lot," I mean literally tons and tons of money. When I began pondering the avenues for funding based on the implied economic scale, I felt that it would need to be more complex than just misappropriations of funds.
This would have to involve points in time where people knowledgeable of the program had total control over the legislation that's passed. This would enable smart people to alter the financial, legal, and tax environments over time in a way that facilitated this funding. Grusch said the Manhattan Project framework was used for the UFO reverse engineering program. The primary architects of the Manhattan Project seem to be in close proximity to UFO related incidents during that era. Read this post for more information on the tendrils the high-ranking members of the Manhattan Project had in all thing's nuclear development post WWII.
The Manhattan project is the easiest example to point to when people challenge the possibility of secrets at scale. It cost billions, employed hundreds of thousands, and was funded without the general populace knowing what was going on. Most people think of the Manhattan Project because of the bomb, but when I think about the Manhattan Project, I think about public utilities (TVA) declaring eminent domain on land that was identified as the build site for Oak Ridge National Laboratories.
FALSE CLAIMS ACTS ARE IMPORTANT
It's been long said that these secrets were buried in nuclear power legislation, but from my perspective, it appears that the government has actually been picking apart this onion from many angles. Alot of the fun stuff has been going on since the early 2000's. According to the Justice Department, False Claims Acts are a serious issue. There is quite the Venn diagram of companies implicated in UFO claims over the years, and some of the companies that have FCA settlements. Just last year, the Dept of Justice busted Booz Allen Hamilton in one of the largest procurement fraud cases ever.
Defense contractors' partner on business all the time. Defense contractors sometimes cheat the system when they partner like that. It's extra serious when government employees are involved, like the ones identified in that link. According to that article that was last updated September of 2014, The Justice Department's total recoveries in False Claims Act cases since January 2009 exceeded $7.8 billion.
That particular SAIC case changed the game:
"The SAIC case also raised the issue of how to apply the False Claims Act’s scienterstandard to corporate entities. A person can be liable under the statute for making false claims only if one has knowledge of their falsity. Under the False Claims Act"
Later in that link:
The False Claims Act does not impose liability on those who make innocent mistakes or are simply negligent. However, when dealing with corporate defendants, drawing the line between “negligence” and “deliberate ignorance” of information can be difficult. As the SAIC court recognized, there may be situations where corporate managers have intentionally structured their organizations so that certain employees will not learn certain information, allowing the corporation plausible deniability against charges of fraud.
Here's SAIC settling for 5.75 million in 2013. Here's 11.75 million more in 2013. It was a busy time, they had a lot going on with the company splitting into Leidos and SAIC. Here's SAIC getting dinged another 6 million in 2020. They have been involved in quite a few of these types of settlements. It certainly makes you wonder what the DOJ is investigating SAIC for this time.
SAIC IS AN INTERESTING COMPANY, KNOWN FOR IT'S AWESOME CEO AND FOUNDER
The company's first contract was to analyze nuclear weapons.
SAIC was founded in 1969 with less than half a dozen employees and a $10,000 capital injection. SAIC grew to be one of the largest employee-owned companies in America. Beyster revolutionized business by building a company based on a wild premise, it would be owned by it's employees, not it's investors. Allowing little external oversight in how funds we're being used. No earnings calls, no need to disclose what's being worked on. He even wrote the book on employee-ownership. He popularized terms like "radical transparency". Robert Beyster (SAIC's founder) was really interesting, he wasn't a traditional CEO in many ways. He didn't believe in long-term planning.

Instead of wasting time with multi-year roadmaps and PowerPoint presentations, Beyster relied on his instinct and that of his workforce. When a promising business opportunity came along, SAIC would open a temporary new office close to the clients to help a division win the business. If all went according to plan, the office would become permanent. If not, it would be dissolved, and its people would start hunting for new opportunities on fresh ground.
When Beyster left in 2004, the progressive culture went with him. Within 18 months, SAIC went for an IPO. It was transformed into public company; its entrepreneurial and ownership culture — the key driver of success for all those years — was dismantled.

BEYSTER WAS VERY FAMILIAR WITH ATOMIC ENERGY
Robert Beyster was a huge proponent for Nuclear Energy. The University of Michigan's Nuclear Engineering Laboratory facilities are dedicated to his legacy. It's difficult to find much online about his pre-SAIC days but maybe someone has time to visit these archives and see what's there. Here's a few paragraphs from this link.

As he prepared to graduate from high school, the United States entered World War II, and he enlisted in the Navy. He was sent by the Navy to the University of Michigan, where he was enrolled in the V12 Officer Training Program. He was commissioned as an ensign, and eventually served on a destroyer based in Norfolk, Virginia, before leaving the service six months later. He received his BSE in engineering and physics (1945), and master’s (1947) and doctorate (1950) degrees in physics, from the University of Michigan.
In the early 1950s, Dr. Beyster worked briefly for the Westinghouse Atomic Power Division on the company’s nuclear submarine program. He soon followed many of his college associates to New Mexico to work as a research physicist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, where he met his wife to be, Betty Jean Brock. The couple were married in Austin, Texas, in September 1955. In 1957, Bob joined General Atomic in La Jolla, as chair of the Accelerator Physics Department, where his research on neutron thermalization led him to co­author the book Slow Neutron Scattering and Thermalization (with D.E. Parks, M.S. Nelkin, and N.F. Wikner; Addison Wesley Longman, 1970).
In 1969 Dr. Beyster raised money to start SAIC by investing the proceeds from selling stock he had received from General Atomic, combined with funds raised from the early employees who bought stock in the young enterprise. Initially, the company’s focus was on projects for the US government related to nuclear power and weapons effects study programs. As SAIC grew, Dr. Beyster fought to preserve the values that had made the young company successful—employee ownership, entrepreneurship, a flexible and decentralized organizational structure, technical excellence, high standards of ethical conduct, and a firm belief in customer service.
He was a member of the National Academy of Engineering, a fellow of the American Physical Society, and served the US Strategic Command Strategic Advisory Group. He also served as chair emeritus of the board of directors of the UC San Diego Foundation. The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) designated Dr. Beyster an Honorary Program Manager for his distinguished contributions to the agency over his career.

CONCLUSION
Men in Black and Marvel
Operation Paperclip brought Nazis to America. They infiltrated high-level positions in the government, military, and intelligence apparatus, and then they used their authority to obfuscate information, consolidate power, and ultimately direct the development of technology, industry, and economy in this country. Disney and Werner Von Braun worked together to shape American understanding of space. I find it interesting that Marvel also founded the MIB franchise.
SAIC and False Claims Act Settlements
Employee-owned companies like SAIC allowed facilitation of R&D without exposing financial information that would raise eyebrows. ESOP would allow enough obfuscation to be able to hide things internally since the financials don't need to be reported, as a private company. They even admitted that design was intentional for that exact reason in court. When they went public, they started being hit with the FCA cases.

Hi all! I follow HG channel for almost a year and constantly learn and try new ideas from. Before I found his channel, I was diagnosed with depression from 17 (now I am 25). Did not took treatment for money reasons. Nowadays, I feel a lot better. Huge thanks to Dr. K to make a difference in my life!
I did not post much, but want to share with you my idea and understanding of Recent video on HG channel. Video about lack of adaptation in modern society. In simple words, he is talking that we are seeking for ideality because there are so much things or possibilities that may fit us, so we don't really need to adapt as we served with "ready food". And huge amount of it weakened our possibility to adapt for new things or actions. So... I made this small diagram explaining my thoughts. This is not science! It is for visualization of my own thoughts only!
Generalized diagram of comfort zone vs actions out of it
Why Comfort Zone and Comfort Shift Zone separate? Shift zone representing "I am ready to try / change", while possible zone is "try and see". Shift zone will eventually become a comfort and easy to do. Can Risk of giving up be grater than Fail risk? Yes, it can. In this situation it moves to danger zone, until it is lower than Fail risk. Than your decision on Fail risk + risk tolerance and take action if ready to. Fail risk is unpredictable / constant, while risk tolerance depends strongly on your mood, experience or knowledge in the moment of taking action and after it. Why Danger Zone is not 100%? It is very close to it. Did not reject, successfully take extremely difficult action and do not abandon it at the same time similar to winning two lottery tickets in a row. You can do it, but it soooo unreliable and may never happen (feeling lucky today?) What happens if direction of action is abandoned? For example, you tried a lot of times and failed? In this situation conclusion of "it is not for me" may be made. Fail chances are same, your tolerance is too low or may be blocked by this conclusion How to "unabandon" the direction? Simply try again and... adapt for this direction. You may also need to accept something
Basically, everything that we say we "cannot do" is in danger zone we are not ready for. Here is some examples from my life:

1. It was impossible to start learning because I cannot achieve what I see. So I've forced myself to take 5-15 minute-action every day and get around 3 months of mental pain, burn out and even lower self-esteem than it was in depression state. Now, I can see that what I want to achieve - in danger zone and moved very close to possible zone but not close enough to actually do. Not enough experience yet (high expectations, possibly)
2. Starting new games was really hard, so I've watched videos and gameplays, get familiar and than tried it. Now, its moderate ~ easy. Look for correlation of lines on graph to understand me better
3. I cannot find a job, rejected everywhere and time from time editing and adapting a CV to find more jobs. Expanding job hunt out of main career. Now I understood why and waiting for new listings

So. I slowly adapt myself for failure tolerance, difficulties of learning and possibility of success. Yes, removing 0 and 100% chances, represented in diagram and video
In conclusion, you cannot move "A" from danger zone, but you can move your zones to make "A" possible by trying and practicing. Simply, "A" will not move, but you can move towards it.
Sorry for bad english and feel free to ask if confused or give a correction. Do not take me too seriously and stay positive :p

Bottom text

https://preview.redd.it/5xthq309lo3d1.png?width=2940&format=png&auto=webp&s=6707f43b3d2c448caaf5c2a8070e984595151a22
first statement: I was thinking that even though 'all circuits with two or more paths are parallel circuits', doesn't mean 'a circuit with one path cant be a parallel circuit'. in a Venn diagram, 'parallel circuits' would be a big circle that could contain a circuit with only one path, as well as a circuit with two or more paths.
am I thinking of this in the wrong way?