Proxy anonymizer for chat roulette

videochatting

2021.09.20 19:53 videochatting videochatting

Hello guys, enjoy a hassle free Random Video Chat with girls online, directly from our official website for free. You can search post here, orelse, you can directly chat with girls on Roulette Chat link (https://videochatting.co) below.
[link]


2017.01.14 21:27 AndThusThereWasLight All things related to The Chat Roulette Interview Show

Fan-Moderated subreddit for The Chat Roulette Interview Show on Youtube.
[link]


2008.06.11 19:17 Tennis News & Discussion

Professional tennis discussion. Feel free to visit our sister sub for more information on technique, 10s.
[link]


2024.05.17 23:03 SamsungGalaxyPlayer Deanonymization of the Dero Network: Sender, Receiver, Amounts, and Messages

Full thread: https://twitter.com/kayabaNerve/status/1791485161013694565
Just the technical writeup: https://gist.github.com/kayabaNerve/b754e9ed9fa4cc2c607f38a83aa3df2a
Proof following challenge: https://twitter.com/techleaks24/status/1791512329722442045
Copy of the full technical writeup:

The Dero Protocol

The protocol uses a pair of rings, one for the senders, one for the receivers, represented as a singular ring. With each transfer, a list of ElGamal ciphertexts is provided for all accounts within the joint ring. This ElGamal ciphertext is formed as r * G, (r * K) + (a * G), where r is some randomness, K is the key for the account the ciphertext is for, and a is the amount.

The Dero Wallet Protocol

Dero offers an 'encrypted message' with every transaction. Even if the user does not explicitly provide one, a message will exist (either with internally provided values or left empty). For the only defined type of message, the message is encoded as the index of the sender, a CBOR-encoded object, and zero-padding. The message is encrypted with the Chacha20 stream created by a key of H(H(r * K) K) where r is some randomness and K is the key for the account the ciphertext is for.

The Issue

Dero reuses the randomness for the ElGamal ciphertexts and the message encryption. This means, if the amount is 0, the second part of the ElGamal ciphertext is the shared key and the message can be decrypted (also revealing the receiver, as the ElGamal ciphertext used is for a specific receiver). If the amount isn't 0, one can subtract 1 * G until the amount term has a 0 coefficient. When the message does decrypt, the amount of subtractions performed is the amount, breaking amount privacy.
Since the first byte of the message is the sender index, this also reveals the sender. In total, this compromises sender, amount, receiver, and message privacy.

Technical Notes

Since the encryption isn't authenticated (as far as the author of this work can tell), we cannot explicitly know if a decryption is valid or invalid. Practically, we can. The last 16 bytes of the message will be zeroes, with very high statistical probability, if the message doesn't fill those bytes and the decryption key is correct. A random decryption key should produce random noise there instead.
If the message does fill those bytes, then it's a long stream of CBOR for which it's unlikely to be valid once further bounds are added. Dero encodes all keys with an additional byte for the type (forcing said byte to be one of a few options and the corresponding value to be of that type). While not a strict limitation, all pre-defined keys are one letter, potentialy practically offering the bound of keys being two-byte ASCII (though that assumes no callers defined their own keys which are either non-ASCII or longer than one letter). With only the certain additional bounds, a CBOR object which takes up the entire space will match random noise approximately once out of every 2**40 trials. It'd be sane to flag CBOR objects which look incorrect (despite passing the trial), and if so, continue brute forcing (the sanest result being the likely one with drastically increasing probability as it appears saner, any result shorter than 129 bytes being effectively certain).
In summary, the trial decryption algorithm is checking if the result is a valid sender index (less than the ring length, for one of the potential senders), checking there's a valid CBOR object with the certain additional bounds, and finally checking the remaining bytes are all zeroes. Distinctly, since there's a lack of authentication (other than setting the sender ring length to 1, its own issue in this context), it's presumed possible for a transaction's sender to claim to be someone else (impersonating them). This is a distinct vulnerability in the messaging protocol, at least as it's being advertised for usage (in place of existing encrypted messengers).
The byte intended for the sender index was historically mistakenly used for the receiver index. This was only patched six months ago in https://github.com/deroproject/derohe/pull/147. Accordingly, sender privacy specifically was only broken for transactions made with wallet software updated to include the patch.
The amount does need to be brute forced. Dero amounts take 41 bits (due to only using 5 decimals and a supply in the low tens of millions), and with the maximum joint ring size of 128 (leaving 64 receivers, or 2**6 candidates), takes 47 bits of effort at most (which is quite feasible for computers). Due to most transactions having smaller than larger amounts, most transactions can be cracked faster than the max time brute force, and statistical analysis could be used to prioritize certain receivers (reducing the average time for any algorithm which is even slightly more right than wrong).
Because this is an attack on the wallet protocol, it can decrypt any message (as the message is part of the wallet protocol). The recovery of the amount, receiver, and sender assume the transaction was made in accordance with the Dero wallet protocol. Theoretically, someone could have their own non-compliant Dero wallet, which either could not have its privacy broken or could provide false readings (depending on if it was programmed to use distinct encryption keys in explicit preparation for a work such as this, making this vulnerability prior discovered). While no such wallets are known to the author of this to work, and are extremely unlikely to exist, that must be noted.

Disclosure Timeline

This issue was found on May 14th, with a proof of concept built the same day. The proof of concept will be released in a week (leaving those affected a bit of time to prepare, though this post is detailed enough to enable independent development of such tools in practice). It isn't optimized to the degree necessary to crack every single transaction on the network now (as it'd need to be rebuilt for GPUs, or potentially ideally FPGAs) yet suffices as a proof of concept.
Dero offers a 50,000 USD bug bounty for vulnerabilities which affect the financial integrity of the blockchain. It includes no details on how to disclose bugs however. The author anonymously reached out to the maintainer of the Dero Project ("Captain Dero") over Matrix to inquire if the bug bounty would still apply and to report their findings. Due to:
1) Not receiving a reply from the maintainer within two days (a fair time to have the initial message acknowledged, per the author's opinion and the opinion of a leading Web3 security platform) 2) Contacting a developer successfully who said "Whatever you're looking at is likely a misunderstanding on your part" (with no context other than there being a critical privacy issue attempting to be disclosed), who then said to submit a PR with my "proposal" (despite it being a security disclosure?), and when emphasized the desire to privately disclose to the maintainer before going public, being told the options were to go public or simply wait until the maintainer gets around to it. When following up a day later to again attempt to cause a successful connection with the maintainer, noting the lack thereof thus far, "Then just disclose it, no need to harass me over it" 3) Deciding users should be made aware as soon as possible so they no longer expect privacy for what would inevitably not have privacy
The author decided to publish this without achieving successful communication with the maintainer. While that does make these findings unconfirmed by the Dero project, the proof of concept establishes the theory works.

Moving Forward

If such a vulnerability was found in Signal, the author of this work would not be able to decrypt all sent messages on the network as they would not have access. By placing messages on a highly replicated ledger, it's trivial for any adversary to obtain the ciphertexts of any message ever sent. This means a wallet compromised years after use can still have all its messages read, and since Dero doesn't use a post-quantum key exchange, any adversary with a discrete log oracle (such as one with a quantum computer) would eventually be able to decrypt all messages. Highly replicated ledgers should not be used for storage of extremely sensitive information in general, even if encrypted. If such a ledger is used regardless, it should be in a forward-secret manner with only a bounded subset of messages being readable on compromise.
The immediate fix for this specific issue is to use distinct randomness for the message encryption key. That alone does not fix the variety of issues with this design (when posited as a secure messaging protocol). For context on the difficulty of secure messaging protocols, please see https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/376 (a 94-page analysis of Signal), Signal's post-quantum protocol https://signal.org/docs/specifications/pqxdh/, the SimpleX documentation and specifications https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplexmq/blob/stable/protocol/overview-tjr.md (which argues themselves a notable improvement upon Signal), and iMessage's extensive work on Contact Key Verification https://security.apple.com/blog/imessage-contact-key-verification. This is an extensive field of theory for a reason.
The Dero (wallet) protocol has largely been undocumented and without peer review. Its proofs for a transfer use a Bulletproofs inner-product at the end, yet the higher-level constructions aren't documented other than one or two incredibly vague comments, such as how they're forming 'one-out-of-many' proofs (which are an explicit thing and it's not contested that the intent of these proofs is to implement one. The question is which it intends to implement). Hopefully, the Dero developers start formalizing their protocol and develop better relations with the wider cryptographic community as to cause peer review and help prevent issues such as this in the future.
To the members of the Dero community, and people in general, the recommendation is to only use secure messengers which have a peer-reviewed protocol and FOSS clients, such as Signal (with Molly being the leading FOSS client). This same line of reasoning also applies to privacy protocols in general, including those which apply to financial transactions. For a private, verifiable protocol for financial transactions, please see Monero or Zcash Orchard (the latter achieves stronger privacy in theory yet has only been deployed on a network which doesn't require all transactions be private).
Finally, the Dero community frequently has very grandiose marketing which claims their technology the best. While it's understandable for fans of a project to believe their project is the best, every project has hard limits. With this effective full-loss of privacy (except for sender privacy on transactions made by wallet software older than ~6 months), may they hopefully acknowledge no one is perfect, and especially not Dero.
submitted by SamsungGalaxyPlayer to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 22:55 Useful-Ad-6285 Pls help with a problem hosting a dynamic web app developed with ReactJs (Vite/React Router) using VPS, Docker, and NGINX.

I'm new to web development and I've had a huge headache trying to understand how I can make all this work.
I'm running an Ubuntu VM with Docker and I'm trying to create some containers running different things (like Node.js in one container, MySQL in another container, and NGINX hosting a static site in another one) using a Docker-compose file. I thought about having one container with an NGINX-bridge to make a reverse proxy (and control the traffic) and the other containers being served by this bridge. I tried this idea and it worked great for static sites, but not for a dynamic web app (that uses React Router). So, what can I do to serve a dynamic web app?
version: "3"
services:
Port:
container_name: Port
image: nginx:latest
volumes:
ports:
restart: unless-stopped
nginx:
container_name: nginx-bridge
image: nginx
ports:
volumes:
restart: unless-stopped
certbot:
image: certbot/certbot
container_name: certbot
volumes:
command: certonly --webroot -w /vawww/certbot --email [your-email]@example.com -d example.com --agree-tos --deploy-hook "sleep 90d" --non-interactive --keep-until-expiring
restart: unless-stopped
mysql:
container_name: mysql-container
image: mysql:8.0
environment:
MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: [your-password]
ports:
volumes:
restart: unless-stopped
serverLiveNLoud:
container_name: serverLiveNLoud
image: ubuntu:latest
ports:
networks:
volumes:
command: ["sleep", "inf"]
restart: on-failure
live:
container_name: live
image: nginx:latest
networks:
volumes:
ports:
restart: unless-stopped
networks:
livenloud:
volumes:
mysql_data:
serverLiveNLoud_data:
To this example I had anonymized the data
submitted by Useful-Ad-6285 to nginx [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 22:26 SokkuUwU [FC] [Light] [Alpha] Aki no Arashi are recruiting, you should join us!

We are a very small FC, looking to further grow a tight-knit, laid-back community to venture together into DT once it releases. This FC started as 2 groups of friends merged together and we hope we can grow into one big group together. We wish the FC will become an environment where members are more than welcome to socialise and participate, but without any pressure or obligation.
Our plan is to do a variety of content together such as:
• Duty roulettes
• Treasure map hunts
• Mount farms
• Minion farms
• Crafting and gathering
• Glamour farm
As we were created less than a month ago, we can't yet get a FC house, but we plan to buy ourselves one once we can! I hope you can join us on this journey to build a cosy FC where everyone can feel welcome.
We are currently recruiting new members, new and old players are equally welcome, as the FC has a mix of both and we'd be happy to offer any assistance you may require along your journey across Eorzea!
Join our discord so that we can chat and you can decide if this is the place for you!
https://discord.gg/yjhrfV5muH
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/community\_finde066fba52e60706601cfe594d9f0f45d2fed9c7a5/
submitted by SokkuUwU to FFXIVRECRUITMENT [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 22:23 kozmos81 Business titans privately urged NYC mayor to use police on Columbia protesters, chats show

Business titans privately urged NYC mayor to use police on Columbia protesters, chats show
A WhatsApp chat started by some wealthy Americans after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack reveals their focus on Mayor Eric Adams and their work to shape U.S. opinion of the Gaza war.
A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, according to communications obtained by The Washington Post and people familiar with the group.
A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, according to communications obtained by The Washington Post and people familiar with the group.
Business executives including Kind snack company founder Daniel Lubetzky, hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb, billionaire Len Blavatnik and real estate investor Joseph Sitt held a Zoom video call on April 26 with Mayor Eric Adams (D), about a week after the mayor first sent New York police to Columbia’s campus, a log of chat messages shows. During the call, some attendees discussed making political donations to Adams, as well as how the chat group’s members could pressure Columbia’s president and trustees to permit the mayor to send police to the campus to handle protesters, according to chat messages summarizing the conversation.
One member of the WhatsApp chat group told The Post he donated $2,100, the maximum legal limit, to Adams that month. Some members also offered to pay for private investigators to assist New York police in handling the protests, the chat log shows — an offer a member of the group reported in the chat that Adams accepted. The New York Police Department is not using and has not used private investigators to help manage protests, a spokeswoman for City Hall said.
The messages describing the call with Adams were among thousands logged in a WhatsApp chat among some of the nation’s most prominent business leaders and financiers, including former CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz, Dell founder and CEO Michael Dell, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman and Joshua Kushner, founder of Thrive Capital and brother to Jared Kushner, former president Donald Trump’s son-in-law.
People with direct access to the chat log’s contents supplied them to The Post. They shared the information on the condition of anonymity because the chat’s contents were meant to stay private. Members of the group verified the chat’s existence and their comments.
The chat was initiated by a staffer for billionaire and real estate magnate Barry Sternlicht — who never joined directly, instead communicating through the staffer, according to chat messages and a person close to Sternlicht. In an Oct. 12 message, one of the first sent in the group, the staffer posting on behalf of Sternlicht told the others the goal of the group was to “change the narrative” in favor of Israel, partly by conveying “the atrocities committed by Hamas … to all Americans.”
Israel estimates 1,200 people were killed in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. In the months since the war began, the death toll in Gaza has risen above 35,000, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.
The chat group formed shortly after the Oct. 7 attack, and its activism has stretched beyond New York, touching the highest levels of the Israeli government, the U.S. business world and elite universities. Titled “Israel Current Events,” the chat eventually expanded to about 100 members, the chat log shows. More than a dozen members of the group appear on Forbes’s annual list of billionaires; others work in real estate, finance and communications.
Overall, the messages offer a window into how some prominent individuals have wielded their money and power in an effort to shape American views of the Gaza war, as well as the actions of academic, business and political leaders — including New York’s mayor.
“He’s open to any ideas we have,” chat member Sitt, founder of retail chain Ashley Stewart and the global real estate company Thor Equities, wrote April 27, the day after the group’s Zoom call with Adams. “As you saw he’s ok if we hire private investigators to then have his police force intel team work with them.”
Sitt declined to comment through a spokeswoman. A half-dozen prominent members of the group confirmed on the record their participation in the chat. Multiple people familiar with the group confirmed the names of other members. Cypriot Israeli real estate billionaire Yakir Gabay, a chat member, wrote in a statement shared by a spokesperson that he joined the group because he wanted to “share support at a difficult and painful time,” to aid the victims of Hamas attacks and to “try and correct the false and misleading information intentionally spread worldwide to deny or cover up the suffering caused by Hamas.”
Asked about the Zoom meeting with chat group members, the mayor’s office did not address it directly, instead sharing a statement from deputy mayor Fabien Levy noting that New York police entered Columbia’s campus twice in response to “specific written requests” from university leadership. “Any suggestion that other considerations were involved in the decision-making process is completely false,” Levy said. He added, “The insinuation that Jewish donors secretly plotted to influence government operations is an all too familiar antisemitic trope that the Washington Post should be ashamed to ask about, let alone normalize in print.”
Adams demonstrated a willingness to send law enforcement to deal with campus protesters from the beginning. He sent police to Columbia’s campus to disperse pro-Palestinian demonstrators on April 18, at the university’s request — about a day after protesters erected their Gaza solidarity encampment. Officers arrested more than 100 protesters. The mayor has subsequently alleged student activists were affected by “outside influences” — and that police intervention was needed to prevent “children” from being “radicalized.”
Both he and Columbia’s president have since drawn criticism — but also support — for involving police, adding to a fraught stretch for Adams, who is up for reelection in 2025 and faces an FBI corruption investigation into whether his 2021 campaign received illegal donations from Turkey. Adams has defended that campaign, saying he held it to “the highest ethical standards.”
Four days after chat members held the video call with Adams, student protesters occupied a campus building and Columbia’s president invited police back to campus to clear the building. Officers removed and arrested dozens of protesters, pushing, striking and dragging students in the process, The Post reported. One officer accidentally fired his gun.
Months before the protests at Columbia this spring, some chat members attended private briefings with former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett; Benny Gantz, a member of the Israeli war cabinet; and Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael Herzog, according to chat records.
Members of the group also worked with the Israeli government to screen a roughly 40-minute film showing footage compiled by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) — titled “Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre” — to audiences in New York City. The film portrays killings committed by Hamas. A chat member asked for help from other members to show the film at universities; it was later screened at Harvard, a showing chat member Ackman helped facilitate, attended and promoted publicly. Sternlicht declined to comment on the record, although a person close to him — speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the chat group publicly — confirmed the real estate tycoon initiated the chat. Other members of the chat, including Ackman and Schultz, confirmed their membership.
A spokesman said Ackman had not participated in the chat since Jan. 10, adding Ackman never spoke to Adams about the Columbia protests or donated to Adams’s campaign, although Ackman “likes and is supportive of the Mayor.” Joshua Kushner declined to comment.
On Oct. 12, a staffer for Sternlicht relayed a message from his boss outlining the group’s mission: While Israel worked to “win the physical war,” the chat group’s members would “help win the war” of U.S. public opinion by funding an information campaign against Hamas. The campaign was referred to in the chat as "Facts for Peace.”
The news site Semafor reported in November that Sternlicht was launching a $50 million anti-Hamas media campaign with various Wall Street and Hollywood billionaires. The people involved, per Semafor’s reporting, include some members of the WhatsApp chat, a review by The Post found. The chat messages, the contents of which have never before been reported, appear to reveal the start of the campaign, as well as separate pro-Israel activities undertaken later by chat members. It is unclear to what extent the chat group and media campaign overlapped.
Some of the media campaign’s activities were public, including its website, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook and X accounts, which together attracted more than 170,000 followers.
High-level contacts, private briefings
At a moment of rising antisemitism, the staffer for Sternlicht wrote in one of the first chat messages that his boss was proud of his Jewish heritage and wanted to support Israel, but was also concerned about security. Anonymity, the staffer wrote Oct. 12 on Sternlicht’s behalf, “is a practical need and concern for safety of my family in an increasingly complex world.”
The staffer wrote that Sternlicht understood if other members felt similarly and promised that all contributions to the media campaign would remain anonymous. “I’m sensitive to concerns about being less effective if it appears that this is a Jewish initiative,” the staffer wrote, speaking for Sternlicht. From the start of the chat, members sought guidance and information from officials in the Israeli government.
Some of the WhatsApp chat members said in the chat they attended private briefings about the Gaza war with Israeli war cabinet member Gantz, former prime minister Bennett and Herzog, the ambassador. The chat log shows Zoom invites for these meetings.
“Most appreciative for the behind the scenes briefing by Naftali Bennett,” Schultz, the former CEO of Starbucks, wrote to the group on Oct. 16. “Quite extraordinary!”
Bennett did not respond to a request for comment. Gantz could not be reached for comment. A spokesperson for the Israeli Embassy in Washington said the briefing Herzog gave chat members was “one of dozens” the ambassador delivered that month, adding that “communities here in the U.S. understandably wanted to learn more about what was happening on the ground in Israel.”
A spokesperson for Schultz confirmed in a statement that he attended the briefing with Bennett, but said Schultz “did not participate in, or contribute financially to, any of the group’s work.” Schultz was neither involved in discussions about Adams and the Columbia protests nor screenings of the film, according to a spokesman.
In late October, the chat records show, chat members appear to have suggested to Israeli officials they should hold a private New York City screening for media of “Bearing Witness,” the IDF film featuring graphic footage recorded by Hamas gunmen on body cameras and cellphones as they attacked Israel. Sitt wrote in a message to the group on Oct. 27 that Israeli officials wanted to thank them “for coming up with the concept of the press event in NYC.”
The next month, the group showed the film in New York, records show. Sitt wrote on Nov. 10 that the Israeli government “arranged for us” to screen the film in Gotham Hall on Nov. 17, adding in a later message the showing “will be listed as a IDF event not affiliated to Facts for Peace to keep them separate.”
In ensuing months, group members wrote in the chat to flag news articles or social media posts about Israel, events in Gaza or, later, college campus protests.
‘So NYPD can return’ Columbia students first set up an encampment April 17, eventually leading some Jewish students to allege the protests had forged a hostile and harassing atmosphere. Police stepped in to clear the encampment at the Columbia president’s request on April 18, arresting more than 100 demonstrators.
In the chat, discussion of how Adams was handling the Columbia protests — and how group members could help — took off the following day, after student protesters built a new encampment to replace the demolished one.
Lubetzky, of the snack company Kind, posted in the chat sharing a link to an Instagram video showing an Israeli Arab journalist getting hit by a man the video caption claims is an “anti-Israel protester.” Not long after, billionaire Blavatnik posted a picture of Adams and wrote, “He needs help.”
Sitt responded that he had already “been helping but can use more support.” He asked if others were “open to giving” to Adams.
Gabay, the Cypriot Israeli real estate billionaire, replied: “Pls send the info. Thanks.” Then Blavatnik posted an ActBlue link allowing donations to the Eric Adams 2025 committee.
Lubetzky messaged: “If there is a group to contribute through, or a way to ensure our contributions are known to be related to his efforts to fight antisemitism and hate, pls let us know and I will support meaningfully alongside you guys.” Sitt replied that he was arranging a “code” for such donations; asked about this message, Vito Pitta, counsel to Adams’s 2025 campaign, said “there is no ‘special code’ for contributions.”
A spokeswoman for Blavatnik said he contributed $2,100 to Adams’s reelection campaign in April. She said the donation was given “to endorse Mayor Adams’ stalwart support of Israel and firm stand against antisemitism.”
Spokespeople for Lubetzky, Sitt and Gabay said they did not donate to Adams. Loeb declined to comment.
In the chat, discussion turned to the fact that Columbia had to grant Adams permission before he could send city police to the campus.
One member asked if the group could do anything to pressure Columbia trustees to cooperate with the mayor. In reply, former congressman Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), CEO of the American Jewish Committee, shared a PDF of a letter his organization had sent that day to Columbia President Minouche Shafik calling on her to “shut these protests down.”
“Also in touch with the board,” Deutch wrote to the chat group.
“So NYPD can return.”
Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for Deutch wrote in an email to The Post that the American Jewish Committee “values all opportunities to engage with various individuals and institutions who support the Jewish people and the State of Israel.” Asked about the chat group and its activities, a Columbia spokesperson wrote, “We have no knowledge of this.”
A Zoom video call with chat group members and Adams took place a little after 11 a.m. April 26, according to chat records.
It is unclear how many members attended the meeting, which lasted for roughly 45 minutes, chat records show. Those present included at least Blavatnik, Sitt, Loeb and Lubetzky, according to the chat logs.
Sitt wrote minutes after the call ended to summarize items “discussed today,” including donating to Adams, using group members’ “leverage” to help persuade Columbia’s president to let New York police back on campus and paying for “investigative efforts” to assist the city.
Lubetzky replied listing concrete actions group members should take. These included resharing a link to offer financial support to Adams, calling and writing to Columbia’s president and board of trustees, and “getting Black Leaders to condemn Anti-Semitism.” He named several people he would contact and asked if anyone in the group knew Jay-Z, LeBron James or Alicia Keys.
Asked about his comments, Lubetzky wrote in a statement to The Post that “building bridges between the Black and Jewish communities … is more important than ever.”
Blavatnik, through a spokeswoman, confirmed he attended the Zoom with Adams but said he did not “participate in a conversation about private investigators and is unaware of discussions related to that subject.” The spokeswoman noted other people on the Zoom said things Blavatnik “did not weigh in on or agree with.” She said the billionaire, a Columbia alumnus and donor, only joined the Zoom to understand how Adams “was thinking about the Columbia protests.”
The evening after the call, Sitt shared the ActBlue link for donations to Adams’s 2025 committee.
The chat does not record who donated money to Adams nor how much. The New York City Campaign Finance Board website shows donations sent only up to January of this year; more recent donations will not become public until July.
Pitta, the Adams campaign lawyer, said the campaign had not received donations from Lubetzky, Loeb, Sitt or Gabay. He confirmed Blavatnik had donated but did not respond to questions asking about the timing of Blavatnik’s donation.
A day after the April 26 Zoom with Adams, Loeb wrote the chat group to share reflections on what transpired during the call. He wrote that it was “a sad state that we feel the need to grovel to ask our elected officials to do their jobs.” He added, “I’ll be grateful when the perpetrators are dragged off campus.”
Police returned to Columbia on April 30, arresting dozens of demonstrators who had occupied a university building. Columbia President Shafik had requested law enforcement’s aid in a letter, writing that the takeover of Hamilton Hall raised “serious safety concerns.” She asked police to remain on campus at least through May 17.
The morning afterward, Adams gave a news conference summarizing the action. “We went in and conducted an operation,” he said, “to remove those who have turned the peaceful protests into a place where antisemitism and anti-Israel attitudes were pervasive.”
Pro-Palestinian students and other supporters gather outside Elmer Holmes Bobst Library at New York University in May. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images) In early May, seven months since its inception, the chat was shut down. A person close to Sternlicht said he decided to shutter the group because the activities were moving beyond the initial objectives and the people who started it — including himself — were no longer actively participating, and hadn’t been for months.
“We are incredibly grateful for the dialogue and support that this group has provided over the past 7 months,” wrote a staffer for Sternlicht. The staffer wrote that members should not hesitate to reach out if they needed anything.
“We are stronger together,” the staffer wrote in closing.
By Hannah Natanson Hannah Natanson is a Washington Post reporter covering national K-12 education.
By Emmanuel Felton Emmanuel Felton is the race and ethnicity reporter on the America desk at The Washington Post.
submitted by kozmos81 to chomsky [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 22:22 kozmos81 Business titans privately urged NYC mayor to use police on Columbia protesters, chats show

Business titans privately urged NYC mayor to use police on Columbia protesters, chats show
A WhatsApp chat started by some wealthy Americans after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack reveals their focus on Mayor Eric Adams and their work to shape U.S. opinion of the Gaza war.
A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, according to communications obtained by The Washington Post and people familiar with the group.
A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, according to communications obtained by The Washington Post and people familiar with the group.
Business executives including Kind snack company founder Daniel Lubetzky, hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb, billionaire Len Blavatnik and real estate investor Joseph Sitt held a Zoom video call on April 26 with Mayor Eric Adams (D), about a week after the mayor first sent New York police to Columbia’s campus, a log of chat messages shows. During the call, some attendees discussed making political donations to Adams, as well as how the chat group’s members could pressure Columbia’s president and trustees to permit the mayor to send police to the campus to handle protesters, according to chat messages summarizing the conversation.
One member of the WhatsApp chat group told The Post he donated $2,100, the maximum legal limit, to Adams that month. Some members also offered to pay for private investigators to assist New York police in handling the protests, the chat log shows — an offer a member of the group reported in the chat that Adams accepted. The New York Police Department is not using and has not used private investigators to help manage protests, a spokeswoman for City Hall said.
The messages describing the call with Adams were among thousands logged in a WhatsApp chat among some of the nation’s most prominent business leaders and financiers, including former CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz, Dell founder and CEO Michael Dell, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman and Joshua Kushner, founder of Thrive Capital and brother to Jared Kushner, former president Donald Trump’s son-in-law.
People with direct access to the chat log’s contents supplied them to The Post. They shared the information on the condition of anonymity because the chat’s contents were meant to stay private. Members of the group verified the chat’s existence and their comments.
The chat was initiated by a staffer for billionaire and real estate magnate Barry Sternlicht — who never joined directly, instead communicating through the staffer, according to chat messages and a person close to Sternlicht. In an Oct. 12 message, one of the first sent in the group, the staffer posting on behalf of Sternlicht told the others the goal of the group was to “change the narrative” in favor of Israel, partly by conveying “the atrocities committed by Hamas … to all Americans.”
Israel estimates 1,200 people were killed in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. In the months since the war began, the death toll in Gaza has risen above 35,000, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.
The chat group formed shortly after the Oct. 7 attack, and its activism has stretched beyond New York, touching the highest levels of the Israeli government, the U.S. business world and elite universities. Titled “Israel Current Events,” the chat eventually expanded to about 100 members, the chat log shows. More than a dozen members of the group appear on Forbes’s annual list of billionaires; others work in real estate, finance and communications.
Overall, the messages offer a window into how some prominent individuals have wielded their money and power in an effort to shape American views of the Gaza war, as well as the actions of academic, business and political leaders — including New York’s mayor.
“He’s open to any ideas we have,” chat member Sitt, founder of retail chain Ashley Stewart and the global real estate company Thor Equities, wrote April 27, the day after the group’s Zoom call with Adams. “As you saw he’s ok if we hire private investigators to then have his police force intel team work with them.”
Sitt declined to comment through a spokeswoman. A half-dozen prominent members of the group confirmed on the record their participation in the chat. Multiple people familiar with the group confirmed the names of other members. Cypriot Israeli real estate billionaire Yakir Gabay, a chat member, wrote in a statement shared by a spokesperson that he joined the group because he wanted to “share support at a difficult and painful time,” to aid the victims of Hamas attacks and to “try and correct the false and misleading information intentionally spread worldwide to deny or cover up the suffering caused by Hamas.”
Asked about the Zoom meeting with chat group members, the mayor’s office did not address it directly, instead sharing a statement from deputy mayor Fabien Levy noting that New York police entered Columbia’s campus twice in response to “specific written requests” from university leadership. “Any suggestion that other considerations were involved in the decision-making process is completely false,” Levy said. He added, “The insinuation that Jewish donors secretly plotted to influence government operations is an all too familiar antisemitic trope that the Washington Post should be ashamed to ask about, let alone normalize in print.”
Adams demonstrated a willingness to send law enforcement to deal with campus protesters from the beginning. He sent police to Columbia’s campus to disperse pro-Palestinian demonstrators on April 18, at the university’s request — about a day after protesters erected their Gaza solidarity encampment. Officers arrested more than 100 protesters. The mayor has subsequently alleged student activists were affected by “outside influences” — and that police intervention was needed to prevent “children” from being “radicalized.”
Both he and Columbia’s president have since drawn criticism — but also support — for involving police, adding to a fraught stretch for Adams, who is up for reelection in 2025 and faces an FBI corruption investigation into whether his 2021 campaign received illegal donations from Turkey. Adams has defended that campaign, saying he held it to “the highest ethical standards.”
Four days after chat members held the video call with Adams, student protesters occupied a campus building and Columbia’s president invited police back to campus to clear the building. Officers removed and arrested dozens of protesters, pushing, striking and dragging students in the process, The Post reported. One officer accidentally fired his gun.
Months before the protests at Columbia this spring, some chat members attended private briefings with former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett; Benny Gantz, a member of the Israeli war cabinet; and Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael Herzog, according to chat records.
Members of the group also worked with the Israeli government to screen a roughly 40-minute film showing footage compiled by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) — titled “Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre” — to audiences in New York City. The film portrays killings committed by Hamas. A chat member asked for help from other members to show the film at universities; it was later screened at Harvard, a showing chat member Ackman helped facilitate, attended and promoted publicly. Sternlicht declined to comment on the record, although a person close to him — speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the chat group publicly — confirmed the real estate tycoon initiated the chat. Other members of the chat, including Ackman and Schultz, confirmed their membership.
A spokesman said Ackman had not participated in the chat since Jan. 10, adding Ackman never spoke to Adams about the Columbia protests or donated to Adams’s campaign, although Ackman “likes and is supportive of the Mayor.” Joshua Kushner declined to comment.
On Oct. 12, a staffer for Sternlicht relayed a message from his boss outlining the group’s mission: While Israel worked to “win the physical war,” the chat group’s members would “help win the war” of U.S. public opinion by funding an information campaign against Hamas. The campaign was referred to in the chat as "Facts for Peace.”
The news site Semafor reported in November that Sternlicht was launching a $50 million anti-Hamas media campaign with various Wall Street and Hollywood billionaires. The people involved, per Semafor’s reporting, include some members of the WhatsApp chat, a review by The Post found. The chat messages, the contents of which have never before been reported, appear to reveal the start of the campaign, as well as separate pro-Israel activities undertaken later by chat members. It is unclear to what extent the chat group and media campaign overlapped.
Some of the media campaign’s activities were public, including its website, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook and X accounts, which together attracted more than 170,000 followers.
High-level contacts, private briefings
At a moment of rising antisemitism, the staffer for Sternlicht wrote in one of the first chat messages that his boss was proud of his Jewish heritage and wanted to support Israel, but was also concerned about security. Anonymity, the staffer wrote Oct. 12 on Sternlicht’s behalf, “is a practical need and concern for safety of my family in an increasingly complex world.”
The staffer wrote that Sternlicht understood if other members felt similarly and promised that all contributions to the media campaign would remain anonymous. “I’m sensitive to concerns about being less effective if it appears that this is a Jewish initiative,” the staffer wrote, speaking for Sternlicht. From the start of the chat, members sought guidance and information from officials in the Israeli government.
Some of the WhatsApp chat members said in the chat they attended private briefings about the Gaza war with Israeli war cabinet member Gantz, former prime minister Bennett and Herzog, the ambassador. The chat log shows Zoom invites for these meetings.
“Most appreciative for the behind the scenes briefing by Naftali Bennett,” Schultz, the former CEO of Starbucks, wrote to the group on Oct. 16. “Quite extraordinary!”
Bennett did not respond to a request for comment. Gantz could not be reached for comment. A spokesperson for the Israeli Embassy in Washington said the briefing Herzog gave chat members was “one of dozens” the ambassador delivered that month, adding that “communities here in the U.S. understandably wanted to learn more about what was happening on the ground in Israel.”
A spokesperson for Schultz confirmed in a statement that he attended the briefing with Bennett, but said Schultz “did not participate in, or contribute financially to, any of the group’s work.” Schultz was neither involved in discussions about Adams and the Columbia protests nor screenings of the film, according to a spokesman.
In late October, the chat records show, chat members appear to have suggested to Israeli officials they should hold a private New York City screening for media of “Bearing Witness,” the IDF film featuring graphic footage recorded by Hamas gunmen on body cameras and cellphones as they attacked Israel. Sitt wrote in a message to the group on Oct. 27 that Israeli officials wanted to thank them “for coming up with the concept of the press event in NYC.”
The next month, the group showed the film in New York, records show. Sitt wrote on Nov. 10 that the Israeli government “arranged for us” to screen the film in Gotham Hall on Nov. 17, adding in a later message the showing “will be listed as a IDF event not affiliated to Facts for Peace to keep them separate.”
In ensuing months, group members wrote in the chat to flag news articles or social media posts about Israel, events in Gaza or, later, college campus protests.
‘So NYPD can return’ Columbia students first set up an encampment April 17, eventually leading some Jewish students to allege the protests had forged a hostile and harassing atmosphere. Police stepped in to clear the encampment at the Columbia president’s request on April 18, arresting more than 100 demonstrators.
In the chat, discussion of how Adams was handling the Columbia protests — and how group members could help — took off the following day, after student protesters built a new encampment to replace the demolished one.
Lubetzky, of the snack company Kind, posted in the chat sharing a link to an Instagram video showing an Israeli Arab journalist getting hit by a man the video caption claims is an “anti-Israel protester.” Not long after, billionaire Blavatnik posted a picture of Adams and wrote, “He needs help.”
Sitt responded that he had already “been helping but can use more support.” He asked if others were “open to giving” to Adams.
Gabay, the Cypriot Israeli real estate billionaire, replied: “Pls send the info. Thanks.” Then Blavatnik posted an ActBlue link allowing donations to the Eric Adams 2025 committee.
Lubetzky messaged: “If there is a group to contribute through, or a way to ensure our contributions are known to be related to his efforts to fight antisemitism and hate, pls let us know and I will support meaningfully alongside you guys.” Sitt replied that he was arranging a “code” for such donations; asked about this message, Vito Pitta, counsel to Adams’s 2025 campaign, said “there is no ‘special code’ for contributions.”
A spokeswoman for Blavatnik said he contributed $2,100 to Adams’s reelection campaign in April. She said the donation was given “to endorse Mayor Adams’ stalwart support of Israel and firm stand against antisemitism.”
Spokespeople for Lubetzky, Sitt and Gabay said they did not donate to Adams. Loeb declined to comment.
In the chat, discussion turned to the fact that Columbia had to grant Adams permission before he could send city police to the campus.
One member asked if the group could do anything to pressure Columbia trustees to cooperate with the mayor. In reply, former congressman Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), CEO of the American Jewish Committee, shared a PDF of a letter his organization had sent that day to Columbia President Minouche Shafik calling on her to “shut these protests down.”
“Also in touch with the board,” Deutch wrote to the chat group.
“So NYPD can return.”
Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for Deutch wrote in an email to The Post that the American Jewish Committee “values all opportunities to engage with various individuals and institutions who support the Jewish people and the State of Israel.” Asked about the chat group and its activities, a Columbia spokesperson wrote, “We have no knowledge of this.”
A Zoom video call with chat group members and Adams took place a little after 11 a.m. April 26, according to chat records.
It is unclear how many members attended the meeting, which lasted for roughly 45 minutes, chat records show. Those present included at least Blavatnik, Sitt, Loeb and Lubetzky, according to the chat logs.
Sitt wrote minutes after the call ended to summarize items “discussed today,” including donating to Adams, using group members’ “leverage” to help persuade Columbia’s president to let New York police back on campus and paying for “investigative efforts” to assist the city.
Lubetzky replied listing concrete actions group members should take. These included resharing a link to offer financial support to Adams, calling and writing to Columbia’s president and board of trustees, and “getting Black Leaders to condemn Anti-Semitism.” He named several people he would contact and asked if anyone in the group knew Jay-Z, LeBron James or Alicia Keys.
Asked about his comments, Lubetzky wrote in a statement to The Post that “building bridges between the Black and Jewish communities … is more important than ever.”
Blavatnik, through a spokeswoman, confirmed he attended the Zoom with Adams but said he did not “participate in a conversation about private investigators and is unaware of discussions related to that subject.” The spokeswoman noted other people on the Zoom said things Blavatnik “did not weigh in on or agree with.” She said the billionaire, a Columbia alumnus and donor, only joined the Zoom to understand how Adams “was thinking about the Columbia protests.”
The evening after the call, Sitt shared the ActBlue link for donations to Adams’s 2025 committee.
The chat does not record who donated money to Adams nor how much. The New York City Campaign Finance Board website shows donations sent only up to January of this year; more recent donations will not become public until July.
Pitta, the Adams campaign lawyer, said the campaign had not received donations from Lubetzky, Loeb, Sitt or Gabay. He confirmed Blavatnik had donated but did not respond to questions asking about the timing of Blavatnik’s donation.
A day after the April 26 Zoom with Adams, Loeb wrote the chat group to share reflections on what transpired during the call. He wrote that it was “a sad state that we feel the need to grovel to ask our elected officials to do their jobs.” He added, “I’ll be grateful when the perpetrators are dragged off campus.”
Police returned to Columbia on April 30, arresting dozens of demonstrators who had occupied a university building. Columbia President Shafik had requested law enforcement’s aid in a letter, writing that the takeover of Hamilton Hall raised “serious safety concerns.” She asked police to remain on campus at least through May 17.
The morning afterward, Adams gave a news conference summarizing the action. “We went in and conducted an operation,” he said, “to remove those who have turned the peaceful protests into a place where antisemitism and anti-Israel attitudes were pervasive.”
Pro-Palestinian students and other supporters gather outside Elmer Holmes Bobst Library at New York University in May. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images) In early May, seven months since its inception, the chat was shut down. A person close to Sternlicht said he decided to shutter the group because the activities were moving beyond the initial objectives and the people who started it — including himself — were no longer actively participating, and hadn’t been for months.
“We are incredibly grateful for the dialogue and support that this group has provided over the past 7 months,” wrote a staffer for Sternlicht. The staffer wrote that members should not hesitate to reach out if they needed anything.
“We are stronger together,” the staffer wrote in closing.
By Hannah Natanson Hannah Natanson is a Washington Post reporter covering national K-12 education.
By Emmanuel Felton Emmanuel Felton is the race and ethnicity reporter on the America desk at The Washington Post.
submitted by kozmos81 to Palestine [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 22:20 kozmos81 Business titans privately urged NYC mayor to use police on Columbia protesters, chats show

Business titans privately urged NYC mayor to use police on Columbia protesters, chats show
A WhatsApp chat started by some wealthy Americans after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack reveals their focus on Mayor Eric Adams and their work to shape U.S. opinion of the Gaza war.
A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, according to communications obtained by The Washington Post and people familiar with the group.
A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, according to communications obtained by The Washington Post and people familiar with the group.
Business executives including Kind snack company founder Daniel Lubetzky, hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb, billionaire Len Blavatnik and real estate investor Joseph Sitt held a Zoom video call on April 26 with Mayor Eric Adams (D), about a week after the mayor first sent New York police to Columbia’s campus, a log of chat messages shows. During the call, some attendees discussed making political donations to Adams, as well as how the chat group’s members could pressure Columbia’s president and trustees to permit the mayor to send police to the campus to handle protesters, according to chat messages summarizing the conversation.
One member of the WhatsApp chat group told The Post he donated $2,100, the maximum legal limit, to Adams that month. Some members also offered to pay for private investigators to assist New York police in handling the protests, the chat log shows — an offer a member of the group reported in the chat that Adams accepted. The New York Police Department is not using and has not used private investigators to help manage protests, a spokeswoman for City Hall said.
The messages describing the call with Adams were among thousands logged in a WhatsApp chat among some of the nation’s most prominent business leaders and financiers, including former CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz, Dell founder and CEO Michael Dell, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman and Joshua Kushner, founder of Thrive Capital and brother to Jared Kushner, former president Donald Trump’s son-in-law.
People with direct access to the chat log’s contents supplied them to The Post. They shared the information on the condition of anonymity because the chat’s contents were meant to stay private. Members of the group verified the chat’s existence and their comments.
The chat was initiated by a staffer for billionaire and real estate magnate Barry Sternlicht — who never joined directly, instead communicating through the staffer, according to chat messages and a person close to Sternlicht. In an Oct. 12 message, one of the first sent in the group, the staffer posting on behalf of Sternlicht told the others the goal of the group was to “change the narrative” in favor of Israel, partly by conveying “the atrocities committed by Hamas … to all Americans.”
Israel estimates 1,200 people were killed in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. In the months since the war began, the death toll in Gaza has risen above 35,000, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.
The chat group formed shortly after the Oct. 7 attack, and its activism has stretched beyond New York, touching the highest levels of the Israeli government, the U.S. business world and elite universities. Titled “Israel Current Events,” the chat eventually expanded to about 100 members, the chat log shows. More than a dozen members of the group appear on Forbes’s annual list of billionaires; others work in real estate, finance and communications.
Overall, the messages offer a window into how some prominent individuals have wielded their money and power in an effort to shape American views of the Gaza war, as well as the actions of academic, business and political leaders — including New York’s mayor.
“He’s open to any ideas we have,” chat member Sitt, founder of retail chain Ashley Stewart and the global real estate company Thor Equities, wrote April 27, the day after the group’s Zoom call with Adams. “As you saw he’s ok if we hire private investigators to then have his police force intel team work with them.”
Sitt declined to comment through a spokeswoman. A half-dozen prominent members of the group confirmed on the record their participation in the chat. Multiple people familiar with the group confirmed the names of other members. Cypriot Israeli real estate billionaire Yakir Gabay, a chat member, wrote in a statement shared by a spokesperson that he joined the group because he wanted to “share support at a difficult and painful time,” to aid the victims of Hamas attacks and to “try and correct the false and misleading information intentionally spread worldwide to deny or cover up the suffering caused by Hamas.”
Asked about the Zoom meeting with chat group members, the mayor’s office did not address it directly, instead sharing a statement from deputy mayor Fabien Levy noting that New York police entered Columbia’s campus twice in response to “specific written requests” from university leadership. “Any suggestion that other considerations were involved in the decision-making process is completely false,” Levy said. He added, “The insinuation that Jewish donors secretly plotted to influence government operations is an all too familiar antisemitic trope that the Washington Post should be ashamed to ask about, let alone normalize in print.”
Adams demonstrated a willingness to send law enforcement to deal with campus protesters from the beginning. He sent police to Columbia’s campus to disperse pro-Palestinian demonstrators on April 18, at the university’s request — about a day after protesters erected their Gaza solidarity encampment. Officers arrested more than 100 protesters. The mayor has subsequently alleged student activists were affected by “outside influences” — and that police intervention was needed to prevent “children” from being “radicalized.”
Both he and Columbia’s president have since drawn criticism — but also support — for involving police, adding to a fraught stretch for Adams, who is up for reelection in 2025 and faces an FBI corruption investigation into whether his 2021 campaign received illegal donations from Turkey. Adams has defended that campaign, saying he held it to “the highest ethical standards.”
Four days after chat members held the video call with Adams, student protesters occupied a campus building and Columbia’s president invited police back to campus to clear the building. Officers removed and arrested dozens of protesters, pushing, striking and dragging students in the process, The Post reported. One officer accidentally fired his gun.
Months before the protests at Columbia this spring, some chat members attended private briefings with former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett; Benny Gantz, a member of the Israeli war cabinet; and Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael Herzog, according to chat records.
Members of the group also worked with the Israeli government to screen a roughly 40-minute film showing footage compiled by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) — titled “Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre” — to audiences in New York City. The film portrays killings committed by Hamas. A chat member asked for help from other members to show the film at universities; it was later screened at Harvard, a showing chat member Ackman helped facilitate, attended and promoted publicly. Sternlicht declined to comment on the record, although a person close to him — speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the chat group publicly — confirmed the real estate tycoon initiated the chat. Other members of the chat, including Ackman and Schultz, confirmed their membership.
A spokesman said Ackman had not participated in the chat since Jan. 10, adding Ackman never spoke to Adams about the Columbia protests or donated to Adams’s campaign, although Ackman “likes and is supportive of the Mayor.” Joshua Kushner declined to comment.
On Oct. 12, a staffer for Sternlicht relayed a message from his boss outlining the group’s mission: While Israel worked to “win the physical war,” the chat group’s members would “help win the war” of U.S. public opinion by funding an information campaign against Hamas. The campaign was referred to in the chat as "Facts for Peace.”
The news site Semafor reported in November that Sternlicht was launching a $50 million anti-Hamas media campaign with various Wall Street and Hollywood billionaires. The people involved, per Semafor’s reporting, include some members of the WhatsApp chat, a review by The Post found. The chat messages, the contents of which have never before been reported, appear to reveal the start of the campaign, as well as separate pro-Israel activities undertaken later by chat members. It is unclear to what extent the chat group and media campaign overlapped.
Some of the media campaign’s activities were public, including its website, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook and X accounts, which together attracted more than 170,000 followers.
High-level contacts, private briefings
At a moment of rising antisemitism, the staffer for Sternlicht wrote in one of the first chat messages that his boss was proud of his Jewish heritage and wanted to support Israel, but was also concerned about security. Anonymity, the staffer wrote Oct. 12 on Sternlicht’s behalf, “is a practical need and concern for safety of my family in an increasingly complex world.”
The staffer wrote that Sternlicht understood if other members felt similarly and promised that all contributions to the media campaign would remain anonymous. “I’m sensitive to concerns about being less effective if it appears that this is a Jewish initiative,” the staffer wrote, speaking for Sternlicht. From the start of the chat, members sought guidance and information from officials in the Israeli government.
Some of the WhatsApp chat members said in the chat they attended private briefings about the Gaza war with Israeli war cabinet member Gantz, former prime minister Bennett and Herzog, the ambassador. The chat log shows Zoom invites for these meetings.
“Most appreciative for the behind the scenes briefing by Naftali Bennett,” Schultz, the former CEO of Starbucks, wrote to the group on Oct. 16. “Quite extraordinary!”
Bennett did not respond to a request for comment. Gantz could not be reached for comment. A spokesperson for the Israeli Embassy in Washington said the briefing Herzog gave chat members was “one of dozens” the ambassador delivered that month, adding that “communities here in the U.S. understandably wanted to learn more about what was happening on the ground in Israel.”
A spokesperson for Schultz confirmed in a statement that he attended the briefing with Bennett, but said Schultz “did not participate in, or contribute financially to, any of the group’s work.” Schultz was neither involved in discussions about Adams and the Columbia protests nor screenings of the film, according to a spokesman.
In late October, the chat records show, chat members appear to have suggested to Israeli officials they should hold a private New York City screening for media of “Bearing Witness,” the IDF film featuring graphic footage recorded by Hamas gunmen on body cameras and cellphones as they attacked Israel. Sitt wrote in a message to the group on Oct. 27 that Israeli officials wanted to thank them “for coming up with the concept of the press event in NYC.”
The next month, the group showed the film in New York, records show. Sitt wrote on Nov. 10 that the Israeli government “arranged for us” to screen the film in Gotham Hall on Nov. 17, adding in a later message the showing “will be listed as a IDF event not affiliated to Facts for Peace to keep them separate.”
In ensuing months, group members wrote in the chat to flag news articles or social media posts about Israel, events in Gaza or, later, college campus protests.
‘So NYPD can return’ Columbia students first set up an encampment April 17, eventually leading some Jewish students to allege the protests had forged a hostile and harassing atmosphere. Police stepped in to clear the encampment at the Columbia president’s request on April 18, arresting more than 100 demonstrators.
In the chat, discussion of how Adams was handling the Columbia protests — and how group members could help — took off the following day, after student protesters built a new encampment to replace the demolished one.
Lubetzky, of the snack company Kind, posted in the chat sharing a link to an Instagram video showing an Israeli Arab journalist getting hit by a man the video caption claims is an “anti-Israel protester.” Not long after, billionaire Blavatnik posted a picture of Adams and wrote, “He needs help.”
Sitt responded that he had already “been helping but can use more support.” He asked if others were “open to giving” to Adams.
Gabay, the Cypriot Israeli real estate billionaire, replied: “Pls send the info. Thanks.” Then Blavatnik posted an ActBlue link allowing donations to the Eric Adams 2025 committee.
Lubetzky messaged: “If there is a group to contribute through, or a way to ensure our contributions are known to be related to his efforts to fight antisemitism and hate, pls let us know and I will support meaningfully alongside you guys.” Sitt replied that he was arranging a “code” for such donations; asked about this message, Vito Pitta, counsel to Adams’s 2025 campaign, said “there is no ‘special code’ for contributions.”
A spokeswoman for Blavatnik said he contributed $2,100 to Adams’s reelection campaign in April. She said the donation was given “to endorse Mayor Adams’ stalwart support of Israel and firm stand against antisemitism.”
Spokespeople for Lubetzky, Sitt and Gabay said they did not donate to Adams. Loeb declined to comment.
In the chat, discussion turned to the fact that Columbia had to grant Adams permission before he could send city police to the campus.
One member asked if the group could do anything to pressure Columbia trustees to cooperate with the mayor. In reply, former congressman Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), CEO of the American Jewish Committee, shared a PDF of a letter his organization had sent that day to Columbia President Minouche Shafik calling on her to “shut these protests down.”
“Also in touch with the board,” Deutch wrote to the chat group.
“So NYPD can return.”
Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for Deutch wrote in an email to The Post that the American Jewish Committee “values all opportunities to engage with various individuals and institutions who support the Jewish people and the State of Israel.” Asked about the chat group and its activities, a Columbia spokesperson wrote, “We have no knowledge of this.”
A Zoom video call with chat group members and Adams took place a little after 11 a.m. April 26, according to chat records.
It is unclear how many members attended the meeting, which lasted for roughly 45 minutes, chat records show. Those present included at least Blavatnik, Sitt, Loeb and Lubetzky, according to the chat logs.
Sitt wrote minutes after the call ended to summarize items “discussed today,” including donating to Adams, using group members’ “leverage” to help persuade Columbia’s president to let New York police back on campus and paying for “investigative efforts” to assist the city.
Lubetzky replied listing concrete actions group members should take. These included resharing a link to offer financial support to Adams, calling and writing to Columbia’s president and board of trustees, and “getting Black Leaders to condemn Anti-Semitism.” He named several people he would contact and asked if anyone in the group knew Jay-Z, LeBron James or Alicia Keys.
Asked about his comments, Lubetzky wrote in a statement to The Post that “building bridges between the Black and Jewish communities … is more important than ever.”
Blavatnik, through a spokeswoman, confirmed he attended the Zoom with Adams but said he did not “participate in a conversation about private investigators and is unaware of discussions related to that subject.” The spokeswoman noted other people on the Zoom said things Blavatnik “did not weigh in on or agree with.” She said the billionaire, a Columbia alumnus and donor, only joined the Zoom to understand how Adams “was thinking about the Columbia protests.”
The evening after the call, Sitt shared the ActBlue link for donations to Adams’s 2025 committee.
The chat does not record who donated money to Adams nor how much. The New York City Campaign Finance Board website shows donations sent only up to January of this year; more recent donations will not become public until July.
Pitta, the Adams campaign lawyer, said the campaign had not received donations from Lubetzky, Loeb, Sitt or Gabay. He confirmed Blavatnik had donated but did not respond to questions asking about the timing of Blavatnik’s donation.
A day after the April 26 Zoom with Adams, Loeb wrote the chat group to share reflections on what transpired during the call. He wrote that it was “a sad state that we feel the need to grovel to ask our elected officials to do their jobs.” He added, “I’ll be grateful when the perpetrators are dragged off campus.”
Police returned to Columbia on April 30, arresting dozens of demonstrators who had occupied a university building. Columbia President Shafik had requested law enforcement’s aid in a letter, writing that the takeover of Hamilton Hall raised “serious safety concerns.” She asked police to remain on campus at least through May 17.
The morning afterward, Adams gave a news conference summarizing the action. “We went in and conducted an operation,” he said, “to remove those who have turned the peaceful protests into a place where antisemitism and anti-Israel attitudes were pervasive.”
Pro-Palestinian students and other supporters gather outside Elmer Holmes Bobst Library at New York University in May. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images) In early May, seven months since its inception, the chat was shut down. A person close to Sternlicht said he decided to shutter the group because the activities were moving beyond the initial objectives and the people who started it — including himself — were no longer actively participating, and hadn’t been for months.
“We are incredibly grateful for the dialogue and support that this group has provided over the past 7 months,” wrote a staffer for Sternlicht. The staffer wrote that members should not hesitate to reach out if they needed anything.
“We are stronger together,” the staffer wrote in closing.
By Hannah Natanson Hannah Natanson is a Washington Post reporter covering national K-12 education.
By Emmanuel Felton Emmanuel Felton is the race and ethnicity reporter on the America desk at The Washington Post.
submitted by kozmos81 to BadHasbara [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 21:09 FrowAwayNecklace WIBTA- if I kept asking for my necklace back?

WIBTA- if I keep asking for my necklace back
I’m usually just a lurker here, so forgive me for any mistakes or missing information. I made a throwaway for this, for anonymity.
The short of it is that I have a BFF that I met a year ago. We hit it off instantly and constantly chat and hang out. Think … blended families, drinking around a fire, playing pool and darts, dinners together around once a week…
She asked me to be a bridesmaid for her wedding. I’ve never been a bridesmaid before so I felt really honored.
The “something borrowed” - I lent her a $3k string of pearls for her to wear at her wedding. I’m not rich, but this is the most expensive jewelry item I own. My husband gave it to me for one of our anniversaries.
After the wedding, I waited a while to ask for it back, as I didn’t want to come off as rude. Friend and her husband kept making excuses- “we haven’t unpacked yet”… “we’ll get to it later because we’re busy”… stuff like that over 3 weeks.
Eventually she claims that she ALREADY gave it back. Do I drop it for the sake of the friendship… or would I be the asshole if I push it and say she never gave them back…??
Everyone is mid to late 30s..ish.
submitted by FrowAwayNecklace to AmItheAsshole [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 19:59 shoesli_ Traefik + Cloudflare slow performance/errors

Hello,
I am having some problems with my Traefik setup. My current setup uses Cloudflare proxy + Traefik in Docker for access to all my web apps. The problem I am having is that some sites fail to load the first time, loads slowly or partially until i refresh them a couple of times. I have tried to disable the proxy in Cloudflare and that seems to fix the issue. I was just wondering if anyone has experienced similar issues with the Cloudflare proxy or if something can be done to improve performance. To me it seems like the problem is not with Traefik itself but the combination of CF+Traefik. I don't know if I have missed something in my config. When sites fail to load correctly I get alot of 522 errors in my browser, which just means that it failed to connect to the web server if I understand correctly.
Any tips would be much appreciated.
This is what my traefik config looks like:
``` traefik: container_name: 'traefik' image: 'traefik:v2.9' restart: 'unless-stopped' command: - '--api=true' - '--api.dashboard=true' - '--api.insecure=false' - '--pilot.dashboard=false' - '--global.sendAnonymousUsage=false' - '--global.checkNewVersion=false' - '--log=true' - '--log.level=DEBUG' - '--log.filepath=/config/traefik.log' - '--providers.docker=true' - '--providers.docker.exposedByDefault=false' - '--entryPoints.http=true' - '--entryPoints.http.address=:8080/tcp' - '--entryPoints.http.http.redirections.entryPoint.to=https' - '--entryPoints.http.http.redirections.entryPoint.scheme=https' - '--entryPoints.http.forwardedHeaders.trustedIPs=$CLOUDFLARE_IPS,$LOCAL_IPS,fc00::/7' - '--entryPoints.http.proxyProtocol.trustedIPs=$CLOUDFLARE_IPS,$LOCAL_IPS,fc00::/7' - '--entryPoints.http.forwardedHeaders.insecure=false' - '--entryPoints.http.proxyProtocol.insecure=false' - '--entryPoints.https=true' - '--entryPoints.https.address=:8443/tcp' - '--entryPoints.https.forwardedHeaders.trustedIPs=$CLOUDFLARE_IPS,$LOCAL_IPS,fc00::/7' - '--entryPoints.https.proxyProtocol.trustedIPs=$CLOUDFLARE_IPS,$LOCAL_IPS,fc00::/7'
 - '--entryPoints.https.forwardedHeaders.insecure=false' - '--entryPoints.https.proxyProtocol.insecure=false' - '--certificatesResolvers.dns-cloudflare.acme.email=$CLOUDFLARE_EMAIL' - '--certificatesResolvers.dns-cloudflare.acme.storage=/acme.json' - '--certificatesResolvers.dns-cloudflare.acme.dnsChallenge.provider=cloudflare' - '--certificatesResolvers.dns-cloudflare.acme.dnsChallenge.resolvers=1.1.1.1:53,1.0.0.1:53' - '--certificatesResolvers.dns-cloudflare.acme.dnsChallenge.delayBeforeCheck=90' networks: t2_proxy: ipv4_address: 10.23.99.254 ports: - '80:8080' - '443:8443' volumes: - '/varun/docker.sock:/varun/docker.sock' - '/opt/dockedata/traefik/config:/config' - '/opt/dockedata/traefik/acme/acme.json:/acme.json' labels: - 'traefik.enable=true' - 'traefik.http.routers.api.rule=Host(`[redacted]`)' - 'traefik.http.routers.api.entryPoints=https' - 'traefik.http.routers.api.tls=true' - 'traefik.http.routers.api.service=api@internal' - 'traefik.http.routers.api.middlewares=authelia@docker' 
```
submitted by shoesli_ to Traefik [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 19:23 Sudden-Job960 Caught my boyfriend on a hookup/dating app again.

I’m 90% sure I found my boyfriend on grindr again. For context Grindr is a gay dating app usually used for hookups.
I made an anonymous account on there before and catfished him to get info to be sure it was him. I confronted him about it, he swore it was a mistake and that he loves me. I feel very sure he made a new account very soon after, I saw this account at his location a few days ago and now I’m seeing an account with the same credentials at his new location 50 miles away. I may chat with this account to find out.
In the meantime time what should I send this account? If it is him… What’s the pettiest shit I can do? I’m tired of being played. I don’t know how long this has been happening but it seems safe to assume it’s been happening almost a year.
submitted by Sudden-Job960 to u/Sudden-Job960 [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 18:17 Sharky16x [SELLING]🦈Sharky's Boosting Team (SBT) Challenger S14 Jungle/Supp/ADC main/🔒 VANGUARD SAFE 🔒/ NEW SPLIT PRICE CUTS💰!!! Add on Discord: sbt5634 and let's discuss!!!💪

s14 split 1
Discord: sbt5634
Add me on discord and ask anything you want, the offer you got and maybe we make something work out. I don't bite!!!
🦈WE LOVE LOYAL CLIENTS SO WE GIVE DISCOUNTS FOR RECURRING CLIENTS🦈
🦈FREE GAMES AFTER THE BOOST IS DONE ON MULTIPLE RANKS BOOSTS🦈
🦈 WE USE VPN AND OFFLINE MODE AND DO NOT CHARGE EXTRA FOR IT!!!🦈
🦈CHAT DISABLED FOR SOLO BOOSTS AND SAME SUMMONERS AS THE CLIENT🦈
🕵️‍♀️We offer INCOGNITO BOOSTING which means that the booster will play on different accounts for MAXIMUM discretion. You can ask us on discord for more details. 🕵️‍♀️
🦈 At your request SOLO BOOSTS can be STREAMED on discord or twitch on anonymous accounts so that the client can LEARN and see everything we do on the account for MAXIMUM SECURITY 💯
🦈I boost all day long so we finish fast with high win rate🦈
Hello guys.
Me and a friend , both challenger solo queue monsters decided to give some help to those in need with climbing for a fair price. We can cover every role but preferably Jungle, Support and ADC. Also we offer duo boosting for those who want to play with the booster and learn from them. We offer general tips and tricks for an easier climb and a better time on the rift. For SOLO boost we disable chat and keep the summoner spells as the client and use vpn and offline mode if the client asks for it.
If you want to join as a BOOSTER in my team you need to have been challenger with proof and play 1-2 games in high elo live. Msg me on discord so we schedule it.
Just add us on discord and we will talk out what is a fair price for both you and me💰
Server: NA, EUW, EUNE
Discord: sbt5634
Vouch Post : https://www.reddit.com/Lolboosting/comments/11bfq6o/vouch_thread_for_usharky16x/
submitted by Sharky16x to Lolboosting [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 17:40 samdewon Therapy's telling me to "get back out there," but dating after a toxic relationship is HARD

Hey everyone,
I'm not really the type to spill my guts online, but after seeing someone else post about their toxic job, I figured it might help to get some stuff off my chest. Even though I can be as anonymous as possible, I know for sure my little brother is probably going to roast me for this, but it's worth the risk to hopefully get some peace of mind.
Long story short, I'm in therapy because my last relationship did a number on my mental health. It was manipulative and toxic, and I ended up losing most of my friends because of it. The worst part is that this person knew exactly how to push my buttons because I'm a bit of a softie. I don't like to hurt people or let go easily, so I put up with way more than I should have. I uprooted my entire life for this person, came back to Sri Lanka after more than a decade abroad, and gave up so much for her. I didn't realize how bad things were until it all fell apart and I found myself alone and broken.
Now, I'm dealing with major trust issues and haven't even thought about dating again until recently. My therapist keeps telling me to "get back out there," but it's been rough. I've chatted with a few girls, but I'm just not into the whole chase game anymore. If I don't feel a connection, I'm out. I'm too scared of getting attached and ending up in the same toxic cycle again.
I've been hitting the gym and burying myself in work to keep my mind busy, but even that's not healthy, according to my therapist. I just want to find someone who's shy and kind, someone who gets my sense of humor and accepts that I'm a bit clumsy and take my work seriously. I'm also really bad at reading minds, so please just tell me what you want! It seems like most girls these days expect you to read their minds and get offended easily, but I always make time for the people I care about, even if it means flirting a bit while I'm working (which some people apparently find rude if I don't respond right away because I'm busy, but hey, I did always keep things interesting and fun when I'm off the clock!).
I know the dating scene in Sri Lanka can be a bit of a mess. So, I guess I'll either keep trying until my parents push me into an arranged marriage, or I'll embrace the single life. Who knows, maybe I'll find someone special along the way.
Whew, sorry for the rambling. I guess I'm just feeling a bit lost and directionless right now. I love Sri Lanka, but after being treated so badly, I feel like a fool for uprooting my life and moving here. And honestly, I don't really want to go back either. Hopefully, getting this off my chest helps clear my head a bit.
And I'm sorry in advance if I don't reply back to your comments. I'm really bad at explaining myself, but I'll definitely upvote you!
Has anyone else gone through something similar? I'd love to hear any advice or words of wisdom.
submitted by samdewon to srilanka [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 17:20 aurorasveilffxiv [Light] [Twintania] [FC] Aurora's Veil

Hello! We are a small free company of friends looking for a fresh start with new members! We are specifically looking for active players who are looking to be social and make friends, and we welcome anyone regardless of whether you’re a veteran or a sprout :D
Veil is a casual and social FC where we do daily roulettes together, content that anybody is wanting to complete and more! We also hold a weekly map night to have some fun together. As well as this, we currently have a medium house in The Lavender Beds where we can hang out.
Additionally, we have a Discord server. This will be used for voice calls, sharing screenshots, posting memes and talking to each other. It is a requirement that you join for important announcements, however you don't have to actually talk or do anything in there if you don't want to!
In terms of the future, we are currently building up a static to complete the savage content in the game starting from Dawntrail, as well as extremes and ultimates.We have FC buffs (we usually use an experience buff and lower teleportation fees) as well as having experienced players frequently around to assist any sprouts, whether that is with MSQ content or general game knowledge :)
Overall, we want to be a small, positive free company full of friends who want to play the game together, complete various pieces of content and have a good time!
TO SUMMARISE:
If you would like to join, please add me on discord (username is lailahh) and I will get back to you. Thank you for reading!
https://eu.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/community_findef00c591bec32d02b9af15fe4520e51716ec12226/
submitted by aurorasveilffxiv to FFXIVRECRUITMENT [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 16:28 PetrZitskiy Diving Into Stake Casino Reviews

Diving Into Stake Casino Reviews
[ Diving Into Stake Casino Reviews ]
Online gambling has seen a significant rise in popularity, with numerous platforms vying for players’ attention. One of the standout names in this crowded space is Stake Casino. Known for its extensive game selection, innovative features, and strong community presence, Stake Casino has garnered a lot of attention and reviews from players worldwide. This article dives into the key aspects of Stake Casino, examining what players and reviewers are saying about this online gaming hub.

Game Selection

Variety and Quality

Stake Casino offers a comprehensive selection of games, catering to a wide range of preferences. Players can enjoy:
  • Slots: A diverse array of slots, including classic reels, video slots, and progressive jackpots. Popular titles from top providers like NetEnt, Microgaming, and Play’n GO are available, ensuring high-quality graphics and engaging gameplay.
  • Table Games: Traditional table games such as blackjack, roulette, baccarat, and poker. These games come in multiple variations, providing options for both casual players and high rollers.
  • Live Casino: Live dealer games that bring the authentic casino experience to your screen. Stake Casino partners with leading live casino providers like Evolution Gaming, offering real-time gaming with professional dealers.
  • Provably Fair Games: Stake Casino is known for its selection of provably fair games, ensuring transparency and fairness. These games allow players to verify the fairness of each outcome using blockchain technology.

User Experience

Website Design and Navigation

Reviewers consistently praise Stake Casino for its sleek, user-friendly interface. The website is designed for easy navigation, allowing players to quickly find their favorite games and features. The platform is optimized for both desktop and mobile use, providing a seamless experience across devices.

Registration and Verification

The registration process at Stake Casino is straightforward, with a quick sign-up procedure. Players appreciate the simplicity and speed, allowing them to start playing almost immediately. Verification is also hassle-free, ensuring security without unnecessary delays.

Bonuses and Promotions

Welcome Bonuses

Stake Casino offers attractive welcome bonuses for new players. These bonuses often include a match on the first deposit, free spins, or other incentives. Reviews highlight the generous nature of these bonuses, although players should be aware of the wagering requirements attached.

Ongoing Promotions

Regular promotions and tournaments keep the gaming experience exciting for existing players. Stake Casino frequently updates its promotional offers, providing opportunities to win cash prizes, free spins, and other rewards. The casino’s loyalty program is also well-regarded, offering perks and benefits to long-term players.

Payment Options

Deposits and Withdrawals

Stake Casino supports a wide range of payment options, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. This focus on digital currencies allows for fast, secure transactions with low fees. Traditional payment methods such as credit cards and e-wallets are also available, catering to a broader audience.

Security and Fairness

Security is a top priority at Stake Casino. The platform uses advanced encryption technology to protect player information and transactions. Additionally, the provably fair system ensures that all games are conducted transparently, giving players confidence in the fairness of their gaming experience.

Customer Support

Availability and Responsiveness

Stake Casino offers 24/7 customer support through live chat and email. Reviews indicate that the support team is knowledgeable and responsive, providing timely assistance with any issues or queries. The comprehensive FAQ section on the website also helps address common questions and concerns.

Community and Social Features

Active Community

Stake Casino has cultivated a strong, active community of players. The platform includes social features such as chat rooms and forums, allowing players to interact, share tips, and discuss strategies. This sense of community enhances the overall gaming experience and fosters a loyal player base.

Responsible Gambling

Stake Casino promotes responsible gambling through various tools and resources. Players can set deposit limits, take breaks, or self-exclude if needed. The casino provides information on responsible gambling practices and offers support for players who may need help managing their gambling activities.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stake Casino has established itself as a reputable and popular online gaming platform, praised for its diverse game selection, user-friendly interface, and robust community features. The focus on cryptocurrencies and provably fair games sets it apart from many competitors, appealing to tech-savvy players and those seeking transparency. While the casino’s bonuses and promotions are attractive, players should always read the terms and conditions carefully. Overall, Stake Casino offers a compelling and enjoyable gaming experience, making it a top choice for online gamblers.
Whether you’re a seasoned player or new to online gambling, Stake Casino provides a reliable and entertaining environment to explore. As with any online gaming platform, remember to gamble responsibly and enjoy the experience.
submitted by PetrZitskiy to BestCryptoCasinosUS [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 16:01 AutoModerator Additional Sobriety Support Resources

1) WhatsApp Group for More Support
Try this link. If it doesn't work (it's been sketchy), in Reddit, direct message u/RaspberryFluffy1120, u/Enough-Till-8250, or u/brassmonkeyjunkey and we will manually add you to the group chat phone app.
2) Online Meetings
https://kratommeetings.com/
3) Podcast Quitting FF Episodes
https://kratomsobriety.podbean.com/
Savanna, John, Wes, Chad, Jan and Saydi.
Other resources: Narcotics Anonymous, SMART Recovery, Recovery Dharma, Refuge Recovery
submitted by AutoModerator to Quittingfeelfree [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 15:32 throwawaycat25 My Reddit experience so far...it started in Alasjuicy and I'm planning to end it here sa Offmychest Part 2

Part 1 here: https://www.reddit.com/OffMyChestPH/s/LpIdzlXbtD
Disclaimer na agad, baka mej surprising yung details netong Part 2 given sa context ko from Part 1)
What happened after my post in Alasjuicy...kwentong mejo may juicy parts
Uunahan ko na po kayo, di ako proud sa ilang mga nagawa ko. Di ko din kaya makwento sa iba kaya andito ako ngayon.
I'll be changing some info kahit anonymous pa din dito. Gusto ko lang mailabas this dark secret of mine, allowing and exposing myself to nsfw stuff. This is about sa ilan sa mga nakilala ko after my post in AJ. I explored a LOT and when I say a LOT I mean a LOOOOOOT, nsfw wise.
Guy from Makati: sya yung kauna-unahan na guy na nameet ko for a date from Reddit. We clicked agad sa chat convo namin, pero di nagtranslate yung chemistry nung date na. May halong nsfw na din yung usapan namin pero klaro saken na sfw date lang. Pero....sa part na pumayag ako sumama ako sa condo nya, maling-mali talaga. We only hugged but that's it. Di ko kaya to go beyond that. He respected naman my boundary, blessed pa din ako. After that date though, lukewarm na sya which di na ko nagulat.
Guy from Laguna: he's the second one I met and he's also the very first one na nakahalik sakin...and beyond. Memorable saken kasi halos lahat sa kanya ko una na experience, yung with consent ko. Pero no homerun pa din kasi ayoko pa talaga. We booked a hotel in Alabang. Pagpasok pa lang namin, dama ko na ang tension. We have been sexting for three weeks, may video calls din. And super turned on ako sa kanya kasi ang galing nya sa SOP. So imagine nung andun na kami sa hotel, sumunggab na si kuya para halikan ako. Literal na natigilan ako after kasi sabi ko sa kanya uyyy first kiss ko yun. Aba ang mokong tas eto naman daw ang second. We kissed a lot, we kissed torridly. Tinuruan nya pa ko pano humalik hahaha. He undressed me. He kissed my boobies. Sobrang turn on ako nung hinalikan na nya yung pussy ko with my panties on. Ang daming nangyari that night. Pinaranas nya saken makain pussy ko, kinain ko din sya. Tinuruan pa ko mag BJ. We even took a shower together. Endless sloppy kisses here and there. Nagkainan kami till mapagod at makatulog tas nung nagising na, kainan ulit. Gusto na nya ko i-sex nun, pero again, ayaw ko pa. Dama ko yung libog nya pero he respected me. Di nya ipinasok. Buti na lang. Still, memorable sya for me. We even continued chatting for a month after that till bigla na lang syang nawala. After ilang months, nagparamdam ulit. Nag sorry. Pinatawad ko pero klaro saken na ayoko na. Pero may isang gabi na naging intimate na naman kami. My karupukan led me sa online harutan. Pero after that, klaro din saken na ayoko na din talaga magreconnect kami saka ayoko ko sya gamitin or gantihan. So I cut it off.
Guy from Taguig: The third guy I met and ang pinakaayaw ko na experience. Nagmeet kami at a time na sobrang problemado ako sa family and very vulnerable ako, time na hindi ako wise magdecision. We met, vibe checked, then decided we want to continue it in a hotel. First time ko mag Sogo! We made out. To cut the story short, di ko pa rin sinuko ang bataan kahit pa pinipilit nyang ipasok. I really don't feel so good after. We chat pa after meeting pero sabi nya disappointed daw sya. Ang mali namin parehas, di kami nag set ng expectations. Dapat mas na reiterate ko din na di pa ako ready sa sex. Nag sorry naman. Tas ayun, nawala na din sya. Ayoko na din naman after ko mafeel na naviolate yung boundaries ko.
Guy from Baguio: Eto never ko nameet pero pinakapinagsisisihan ko. Oks kami in a way na sobrang vibes kami sa batuhan ng harutan at asaran na nauuwi lagi sa video call sex. It was good till nag goodbye sya, we ended things as mature adults would. Masaya ako kasi walang ghosting na nangyari. Pero yung saya ay napalitan ng galit at disappointment nang malaman ko na married na pala sya. I feel so bad na naging accessory ako sa cheating nang di ko alam. But I did not confront him. I chose to settle within myself about this sad info I learned. Pero bigla syang nagreconnect. At na confirm nya saken na kasal na nga sya. Nag sorry sya. The luka in me allowed na magusap pa din kami. Hinaharot nya pa din ako and it took so much willpower in me na wag pumatol. Pero...pumatol ulit ako. I know maling-mali. Sobrang mali. Christian pa kami parehas, pati asawa nya Christian din. Paano at bakit ko nagawa to ang di ko mabibigyan kelan man ng justification. I cut off all my communications with him. At hanggang ngayon, naaawa ako sa asawa nya, nagagalit ako sa sarili ko.
Guy from Pampanga: Fourth guy I met and ang una ko ding heartbreak kasi sya yung pinakagusto ko sa lahat. I like him because I found in him a safe space for validation and insights about me being one horny Christian. Sya din yung pinaka naging active ako for nsfw stuff. Parang sya yung height ng sexual awakening ko last year. Pero bukod sa nsfw, madami din kaming sfw connections. I enjoy his company, he even became my favorite notification sa phone. Naeexcite ako lagi sa kanya, makinig mga kwento nya. We met eight times, mostly Wednesdays. We call it our NSFW: No Sex For Wednesdays. Kasi I made it clear na ayoko pa din ng sex, ayaw din nya. Sabi nya kung ibibigay ko, sana daw to someone who is ready to accept my love. So we did NSFW our way. We still went to hotel, four times to be exact. Every single time, we would do things na dati sa sexts lang namin napapagusapan. We explored a lot, he ate me a lot down there. And he's way too gooood with his cunnilingus skills. Giver sya, so always satisfied ako, parehas naman kami. He's also kind and gentleman. Passenger princess ako. Most of our dates, sya ang may sagot. Despite all of these, I know deep inside me na he is not the one yet I gave it a shot. But I set a deadline for myself na if after six months of dating tas no label relationship pa din kami, I want an out. Though he made it clear naman at the onset na di pa talaga sya ready for commitment. Kahit I know I'm setting myself up for a heartbreak, itinuloy ko pa din. Tanga ko talaga sa part na to, kasi umasa ako baka naman may chance kami. Three months into face to face dating pero I'm afraid to ask difficult questions about us, kasi may pattern na sya before nung online pa lang kami connected na bigla syang nawawala kapag usapang commitment na. I'm already feeling something really special towards him, like I care for him a lot, mahal ko na ata. So nung nag hotel kami a day before his birthday, while I'm riding his dick (rub lang, bawal ipasok), na realize na teka wait mahal ko na ata tong taong to. Gusto ko na mag I love you sa kanya nun pero nagpigil ako. Feel ko takot ako sa magiging response nya, takot na maramdaman na di nya kaya mareciprocate yung feelings ko cos again di pa sya ready. So na nanahimik ako, still afraid to ask about us. Pero I made him feel that I'm here, that I care. Pero sya yung nanahimik, literal. Though nagsabi naman sya na busy sya pero nakikita ko na may time sya to post about gaming or to comment sa social media posts. So I expressed to him that I don't feel so good sa pananahimik nya. I feel abandoned. It made me question my worth kasi ah after all, di pala ako kasama sa priorities nya na mabigyan ng oras. I had expected him to explain himself pero I was so shocked that he had the audacity to block me. Mas lalo kong nafeel na nabalewala ako. Ang sakit. Pero ang pinakamasakit is kung paano nya pinili na mag end yung samin by blocking me. I feel disrespected. I feel awful. Di ko deserve yun. Para akong tanga na sinusuntok yung kama ko habang iyak nang iyak. Di ako nakatulog that night. Ganun pala yung heartbreak, gutom at puyat ako pero wala akong gana. Gising ako pero may times na natutulala ako. Maiiyak na lang ako randomly. Ang bigat sa pakiramdam. Ang sakit kasi bakit nya nagawa saken yun. Pero tinanggap ko na din, di nya ko pinili pero at least ako, kelangan kong piliin ang sarili ko. Piliin na magpatuloy...
(May Part 3 pa, last na)
submitted by throwawaycat25 to OffMyChestPH [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 15:30 th3cook1emaker Fall guys better, I'm switching (unfortunately)

I’ve had it up to here with Among Us. The game has become an absolute nightmare, riddled with issues that make it almost unplayable. Let’s start with the rampant cheating. It seems like every other game, there’s someone using hacks to ruin the experience for everyone else. Wall hacks, speed hacks, you name it—these cheaters are everywhere, making it impossible to trust any interaction or outcome. The developers can’t seem to get a handle on it, and it’s driving me insane. Why bother playing when the integrity of the game is constantly compromised?
Then there’s the atrocious matchmaking system. Trying to get into a game without it crashing or disconnecting is like winning the lottery. Even when you do manage to connect, you’re often thrown into lobbies with players who drop out at the first sign of trouble. It’s a miracle if you get through an entire game without someone rage quitting. The inconsistency is infuriating. I’m tired of wasting time just trying to start a game, only to have it fall apart before it even begins. The servers are a joke, and it’s clear that the infrastructure can’t handle the player base.
Let’s not forget the toxic community. The chat is a cesspool of accusations, insults, and downright abusive behavior. Every game turns into a shouting match, with players quick to throw around baseless accusations and personal attacks. The anonymity of online play seems to bring out the worst in people. Instead of strategizing and having fun, it’s a constant battle against trolls and bullies. It’s exhausting and takes all the enjoyment out of what should be a fun and strategic game.
That’s why I’m making the switch to Fall Guys. It’s a breath of fresh air compared to the stale, toxic environment of Among Us. The fun, vibrant levels and the sheer joy of bouncing through obstacle courses are exactly what I need. Fall Guys offers a sense of playfulness and excitement that Among Us has long since lost. No more dealing with cheaters, toxic players, or endless connection issues. It’s time for a change, and I’m embracing Fall Guys with open arms. Goodbye, Among Us—you’ve let me down for the last time.
submitted by th3cook1emaker to u/th3cook1emaker [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 15:25 notlikemostkarens 35 [F4F] South Carolina/Online, looking for some new online friends, I guess?

I'm not actually sure what I'm here or what I'm looking for, but hey, here we go.
About me: 35, married, mother of two. I'm a stay at home mom, and between that and the pandemic, I feel like I've barely seen any other person except my husband and kids since... um. Well. 2019? Maybe earlier. I wasn't that social before that either.
I'm just looking for interesting people to chat with and get to know. Maybe make some new friends. Mostly looking to chat with other women about... I dunno. I find it interesting to hear about the relatively normal details of others' lives and how they differ from ours. It's also been a long time since I met someone new so it's fun to just remind myself that maybe some things in my life are interesting when shared with someone who hasn't already known me or been there for most of it.
So, message me? IM me I guess? I'll probably stay here on reddit. The only other messaging system I use is Messenger and I'm not ready to chat with people under my real identity. It's probably more fun to at least be a little anonymous to start.
submitted by notlikemostkarens to R4R30Plus [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 15:11 annie_m_m_m_m Upcoming meeting, Tuesday, May 21, from 12-1 pm Eastern US Time (5 pm Ireland/UK; 6 pm Europe). Topic: "Our biggest game changers and life hacks after diagnosis/identification". Zoom info and discussion materials here

Hi everyone,
Our upcoming Tuesday morning meeting will be on Tuesday, May 21, from 12 pm to 1 pm ET, on Zoom. Login information below.
The theme of the meeting is: "Our biggest game changers and life hacks after diagnosis/identification"
TIME ZONE INFO: The meeting takes place at 9:00 am Pacific US time 10 am US Mountain time 11 am Central US time 12 pm Eastern US time 5 pm UK-Ireland time 6 pm Central European time 4 am (Wednesday) in Sydney, Australia
Read on for information about the meeting format, discussion questions, Zoom login info, and FAQ.
If you would like to receive optional weekly email notifications about upcoming meetings, topics, and share questions, you can sign up at autisticwomensgroup (dot) com. You will receive one email each Sunday. Unsubscribe any time.
Hope to see you at the meeting!
Annie

Zoom information

Alas, Reddit is no longer letting me put the Zoom link in this event post. No worries though, you can find the Zoom link in any of three ways:
Contact me directly by chat or direct message to u/annie_m_m_m_m if you have trouble connecting. I will personally send you a link and make sure you get in.

Meeting format

The purpose of this meeting is to allow autistic women to share on our own experiences as we understand them. We come from a range of backgrounds and have many different ways of understanding and speaking about autism. When we join this meeting, we may hear others describing their own experience in different terms from what we would have used ourselves. But by taking part in the meeting, we agree to respect others' understanding as it stands today. And we can expect our own experience to be treated with the same respect. Rather than making it our business to change others' perceptions of their own lives and experiences, we agree to listen to each other where we are right now. We follow the motto, "Take what you like, and leave the rest."
The meeting will be guided with a slide show, with space for members of the group to share their personal experiences in response to discussion questions.
Opening: Reading the declaration of group purpose and ground rules for respecting others' shares and experience
Main reading: Anonymous shares from members. At this time, shares are still being collected. Check back before the meeting to see this week's shares.
Have a share on this week's topic? DM annie_m_m_m_m 4-6 sentences. It will be compiled into this week's group reading document and read anonymously at the meeting. Feel free to use a throwaway account for added anonymity.
Sharing on the following questions:
Closing: Reading the group affirmation

FAQ

Does my camera/mic have to be on?
You don't have to turn your camera or mic on! Please participate in the way that makes you feel most comfortable. For some, this will mean sharing with the camera off, sharing by writing in the chat, or not sharing at all but just listening. It's all good.
Do I have to read the materials beforehand?
You do not have to read the materials beforehand, though of course you can. Everything you need in order to participate in the meeting will be provided within the meeting itself.
Do I have to use my real name or share my contact info?
You don't have to use your real name or share your contact info, although you can if you want to. We respect everyone's privacy and ask that people only share what they feel comfortable with.
Do I have to stay for the whole meeting?
You only have to stay as long as you can/would like to. You can leave at any time with no judgment from others.
Do I have to come to every meeting?
You do not have to come to every meeting. You can be a full member of the group and come whenever you have time/feel like it.
Will people be telling me what to do? Will I be expected to solve anyone else's problems?
No one will be telling you what to do. You will not be expected to solve anyone else's problems. In this meeting, we share on our own experiences only. And we listen respectfully to other people's experiences, with no other response than to thank them for sharing what they have experienced in the world.
What if I am looking for feedback/advice?
Members who would like to look for or give feedback/advice are encouraged to exchange contact info for conversation, support, and friendship outside the meeting.
submitted by annie_m_m_m_m to autisticwomensgroup [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 15:03 Immediate-Owl5540 Exploring the Exciting Fusion: Casino Games in the Crypto Era

In the dynamic realm of online entertainment, casino games are asserting themselves as a dominant force, mirroring the trajectory of crypto trading. The fusion of crypto and casino games brings together the thrill of traditional casino gaming with the inherent advantages of cryptocurrencies, offering players enhanced privacy, security, and often provably fair gameplay. This innovative approach harnesses blockchain technology and cryptocurrency transactions to create a transparent and captivating gaming experience.
Key Aspects of Crypto Casino Games
Introducing HugeWin: A Leading Destination for Crypto Casino Games
HugeWin is a cutting-edge casino and betting site that launched in January 2024, with a bold vision to become the world's largest online casino. The platform is committed to providing a fun and reliable environment for its customers, ensuring an enjoyable gaming experience without any complications. Explore the exciting world of crypto casino games on HugeWin's website and discover the potential for significant profits.
www.Hugewin.com
submitted by Immediate-Owl5540 to CryptoDose [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 14:25 RamiRustom ANOTHER EXCITING UPDATE FOR THE 'UNITING THE CULTS' JUNE 14TH LIVESTREAM EVENT 28 DAYS TO GO! ✊✊✊ Dr. Wafa Sultan agreed to speak!!!!!!

If you missed the invitation post, see details below the progress update or here...

PROGRESS UPDATE AS OF 5/17/2024

📢 Don't miss our livestream event June 14th 2024 12PM CDT

I chose this date and time because its the 50th Anniversary of Richard Feynman's 1974 Caltech commencement speech titled 'Cargo Cult Science'. Feynman dedicated his speech to one thing, the biggest obstacle to progress worldwide. He coined the term Cargo Cult Science to refer to the pseudo-scientific methods people use, i.e. cult behaviors. Even physicists.
Our livestream will be a continuation of Feynman's speech. He explained the least of the harmful cult behaviors. We will explain the worst ones. Nations with apostasy laws. Nations treating whistleblowers as traitors. Nations and corporations creating fake science and other propaganda. Nations instituting compulsory education systems designed to make people smart enough to be economically productive but not smart enough to properly question the political status quo. Parents using the 'united front' concept and so many other things in the same vein. They're trying to discourage disobedience by sabotaging truth-seeking. They don't want us to talk, and that is what we must do!
Our livestream doubles as the launch of a non-profit organization called 'Uniting The Cults.' Its purpose is to be an agent of cultural change with a vision of a world without apostasy laws.. a world governed by scientific thinking, where people recognize love as the goal and rationality as the method to achieve it.
For details and to signup for email updates and reminders for the event, visit: www.UnitingTheCults.com

In uniting the cults, we cease to be a cult! 💘

Posted with permission. Questions? Comments? Criticisms?
submitted by RamiRustom to JordanPeterson [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 14:23 RamiRustom ANOTHER EXCITING UPDATE FOR THE 'UNITING THE CULTS' JUNE 14TH LIVESTREAM EVENT 28 DAYS TO GO! ✊✊✊ Dr. Wafa Sultan agreed to speak!!!!!!

If you missed the invitation post, see details below the progress update or here...

PROGRESS UPDATE AS OF 5/17/2024

📢 Don't miss our livestream event June 14th 2024 12PM CDT

I chose this date and time because its the 50th Anniversary of Richard Feynman's 1974 Caltech commencement speech titled 'Cargo Cult Science'. Feynman dedicated his speech to one thing, the biggest obstacle to progress worldwide. He coined the term Cargo Cult Science to refer to the pseudo-scientific methods people use, i.e. cult behaviors. Even physicists.
Our livestream will be a continuation of Feynman's speech. He explained the least of the harmful cult behaviors. We will explain the worst ones. Nations with apostasy laws. Nations treating whistleblowers as traitors. Nations and corporations creating fake science and other propaganda. Nations instituting compulsory education systems designed to make people smart enough to be economically productive but not smart enough to properly question the political status quo. Parents using the 'united front' concept and so many other things in the same vein. They're trying to discourage disobedience by sabotaging truth-seeking. They don't want us to talk, and that is what we must do!
Our livestream doubles as the launch of a non-profit organization called 'Uniting The Cults.' Its purpose is to be an agent of cultural change with a vision of a world without apostasy laws.. a world governed by scientific thinking, where people recognize love as the goal and rationality as the method to achieve it.
For details and to signup for email updates and reminders for the event, visit: www.UnitingTheCults.com

In uniting the cults, we cease to be a cult! 💘

Posted with permission. Questions? Comments? Criticisms?
submitted by RamiRustom to cults [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 14:19 RamiRustom ANOTHER EXCITING UPDATE FOR THE 'UNITING THE CULTS' JUNE 14TH LIVESTREAM EVENT 28 DAYS TO GO! ✊✊✊ Dr. Wafa Sultan agreed to speak!!!!!!

If you missed the invitation post, see details below the progress update or here...

PROGRESS UPDATE AS OF 5/17/2024

📢 Don't miss our livestream event June 14th 2024 12PM CDT

I chose this date and time because its the 50th Anniversary of Richard Feynman's 1974 Caltech commencement speech titled 'Cargo Cult Science'. Feynman dedicated his speech to one thing, the biggest obstacle to progress worldwide. He coined the term Cargo Cult Science to refer to the pseudo-scientific methods people use, i.e. cult behaviors. Even physicists.
Our livestream will be a continuation of Feynman's speech. He explained the least of the harmful cult behaviors. We will explain the worst ones. Nations with apostasy laws. Nations treating whistleblowers as traitors. Nations and corporations creating fake science and other propaganda. Nations instituting compulsory education systems designed to make people smart enough to be economically productive but not smart enough to properly question the political status quo. Parents using the 'united front' concept and so many other things in the same vein. They're trying to discourage disobedience by sabotaging truth-seeking. They don't want us to talk, and that is what we must do!
Our livestream doubles as the launch of a non-profit organization called 'Uniting The Cults.' Its purpose is to be an agent of cultural change with a vision of a world without apostasy laws.. a world governed by scientific thinking, where people recognize love as the goal and rationality as the method to achieve it.
For details and to signup for email updates and reminders for the event, visit: www.UnitingTheCults.com

In uniting the cults, we cease to be a cult! 💘

Posted with permission. Questions? Comments? Criticisms?
submitted by RamiRustom to UnitingTheCults [link] [comments]


http://swiebodzin.info