Nilda roman perez

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 04/29/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Javier Sanoja 2/5 -- [SS, 21, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .331 BA .384 OBP .162 ISO 130 AB 2 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 6 K%
Jonatan Clase 0/3 2BB 2K 2 SB -- [CF, 22, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .200 BA .373 OBP .138 ISO 80 AB 2 HR 12 SB 21 BB% 25 K%
Jordan Walker 2/4 K SB -- [RF, 22, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .268 BA .305 OBP .130 ISO 123 AB 1 HR 3 SB 5 BB% 17 K%
Luisangel Acuña 2/5 3B 3K SB -- [CF, 22, INT - NYM] - [F] [T] .255 BA .309 OBP .081 ISO 149 AB 1 HR 13 SB 6 BB% 14 K%
Angel Martínez 2/4 2B BB -- [SS, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .368 BA .520 OBP .211 ISO 19 AB 1 HR 20 BB% 4 K%
Orelvis Martinez 1/3 HR -- [2B, 22, INT - TOR] - [F] [T] .191 BA .301 OBP .226 ISO 115 AB 8 HR 9 BB% 27 K%
Victor Mesa Jr. 1/4 HR BB -- [CF, 22, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .261 BA .342 OBP .187 ISO 134 AB 6 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 24 K%
Chase Meidroth 1/3 2BB SB -- [SS, 22, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .292 BA .435 OBP .100 ISO 120 AB 1 HR 6 SB 17 BB% 11 K%
José Tena 3/5 2B -- [DH, 23, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .343 BA .403 OBP .179 ISO 140 AB 6 HR 6 SB 8 BB% 19 K%
BJ Murray Jr. 2/3 HR -- [3B, 24, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .208 BA .339 OBP .187 ISO 96 AB 5 HR 16 BB% 23 K%
Nathan Hickey 1/3 HR BB -- [DH, 24, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .212 BA .314 OBP .202 ISO 99 AB 5 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 33 K%
Spencer Torkelson 2/4 HR -- [1B, 24, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .438 BA .500 OBP .312 ISO 16 AB 1 HR 11 BB% 11 K%
Ben Rice 3/5 2 2B HR -- [C, 25, INT - NYY] - [F] [T] .636 BA .692 OBP 1.000 ISO 11 AB 3 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 7 K%
Carlos Narvaez 3/4 2B HR BB -- [DH, 25, INT - NYY] - [F] [T] .301 BA .400 OBP .215 ISO 93 AB 4 HR 2 SB 13 BB% 28 K%
Niko Kavadas 2/3 2 HR K -- [1B, 25, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .257 BA .411 OBP .277 ISO 101 AB 7 HR 17 BB% 34 K%
🔥​ Riley Tirotta​ 3/4 2 HR SB -- [1B, 25, INT - TOR] - [F] [T] .414 BA .514 OBP .379 ISO 29 AB 3 HR 2 SB 14 BB% 14 K%
 

AA Standouts

🔥🔥​ Nelson Rada​​ 3/4 HR SB -- [CF, 18, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .235 BA .290 OBP .042 ISO 119 AB 1 HR 12 SB 7 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Samuel Basallo​ 2/3 2B HR BB K -- [C, 19, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .314 BA .386 OBP .220 ISO 118 AB 7 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 18 K%
Roman Anthony 1/2 2B SB -- [CF, 20, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .281 BA .420 OBP .202 ISO 89 AB 2 HR 3 SB 17 BB% 22 K%
Moises Ballesteros 2/4 2K SB -- [C, 20, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .291 BA .353 OBP .154 ISO 117 AB 4 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 15 K%
Brady House 3/4 2B K -- [3B, 21, EAS - WSH] - [F] [T] .252 BA .328 OBP .207 ISO 111 AB 7 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 31 K%
Hao-Yu Lee 2/3 BB -- [2B, 21, EAS - DET] - [F] [T] .282 BA .362 OBP .252 ISO 131 AB 8 HR 1 SB 11 BB% 18 K%
James Triantos 2/4 2B SB -- [DH, 21, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .282 BA .306 OBP .103 ISO 117 AB 1 HR 10 SB 3 BB% 12 K%
Alex Ramírez 1/3 2B 2BB K -- [LF, 21, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .188 BA .264 OBP .071 ISO 112 AB 1 HR 7 SB 9 BB% 23 K%
Joe Mack 1/3 HR -- [C, 21, SOU - MIA] - [F] [T] .256 BA .324 OBP .232 ISO 125 AB 6 HR 6 BB% 27 K%
Eddinson Paulino 1/3 2B BB SB -- [3B, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .239 BA .325 OBP .101 ISO 109 AB 6 SB 9 BB% 22 K%
Yohendrick Pinango 1/3 2B BB K SB -- [LF, 22, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .222 BA .300 OBP .083 ISO 72 AB 2 SB 10 BB% 25 K%
Robert Moore 2/3 2 2B BB -- [SS, 22, EAS - PHI] - [F] [T] .240 BA .315 OBP .177 ISO 96 AB 3 HR 5 SB 8 BB% 16 K%
Dylan Crews 1/2 2BB 2 SB -- [CF, 22, EAS - WSH] - [F] [T] .290 BA .371 OBP .187 ISO 107 AB 2 HR 9 SB 9 BB% 20 K%
🔥🔥​ Agustin Ramirez​​ 3/5 3 HR -- [C, 22, EAS - NYY] - [F] [T] .296 BA .371 OBP .252 ISO 115 AB 6 HR 8 SB 10 BB% 15 K%
A.J. Vukovich 3/3 3B -- [CF, 22, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .257 BA .331 OBP .174 ISO 109 AB 3 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 28 K%
Spencer Jones 2/4 HR BB K -- [CF, 23, EAS - NYY] - [F] [T] .185 BA .275 OBP .108 ISO 130 AB 3 HR 10 SB 10 BB% 38 K%
Chandler Simpson 2/4 HR BB -- [LF, 23, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .377 BA .400 OBP .098 ISO 61 AB 1 HR 14 SB 4 BB% 6 K%
Keyber Rodriguez 2/5 HR -- [3B, 23, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .295 BA .347 OBP .205 ISO 88 AB 3 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 11 K%
🔥​ Jaylen Palmer​ 2/3 2 HR BB -- [CF, 23, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .255 BA .387 OBP .353 ISO 51 AB 4 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 37 K%
Dru Baker 2/3 BB 2 SB -- [CF, 24, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .333 BA .381 OBP .018 ISO 114 AB 10 SB 7 BB% 17 K%
Carlos De La Cruz 2/3 HR 2BB -- [CF, 24, EAS - PHI] - [F] [T] .248 BA .345 OBP .188 ISO 101 AB 3 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 36 K%
Liam Hicks 3/5 2 HR -- [C, 25, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .299 BA .431 OBP .113 ISO 97 AB 2 HR 1 SB 16 BB% 7 K%
Braxton Fulford 3/4 2 2B HR K -- [C, 25, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .231 BA .344 OBP .244 ISO 78 AB 3 HR 10 BB% 25 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Ethan Salas 1/5 -- [C, 18, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .188 BA .274 OBP .111 ISO 117 AB 1 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 18 K%
Sebastian Walcott 1/4 -- [SS, 18, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .214 BA .341 OBP .146 ISO 103 AB 3 HR 5 SB 15 BB% 23 K%
Anthony Gutierrez 2/4 -- [CF, 19, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .406 BA .444 OBP .219 ISO 32 AB 4 SB 5 BB% 5 K%
William Bergolla 2/4 BB K -- [2B, 19, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .304 BA .365 OBP .076 ISO 92 AB 3 SB 9 BB% 14 K%
Samuel Zavala 1/4 BB SB -- [RF, 19, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .172 BA .316 OBP .161 ISO 93 AB 4 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 21 K%
Victor Acosta 2/3 2B BB -- [2B, 19, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .216 BA .319 OBP .124 ISO 97 AB 2 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 23 K%
Luke Adams 1/2 2B BB -- [3B, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .220 BA .419 OBP .099 ISO 91 AB 1 HR 8 SB 16 BB% 20 K%
Leonardo Bernal 1/3 BB K SB -- [C, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .306 BA .370 OBP .163 ISO 98 AB 3 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 25 K%
Christopher Suero 3/3 2BB -- [LF, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .239 BA .382 OBP .113 ISO 71 AB 2 HR 4 SB 17 BB% 24 K%
Luis Baez 3/5 2B HR 2K -- [RF, 20, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .312 BA .348 OBP .211 ISO 128 AB 6 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 22 K%
Mikey Romero 1/4 HR K -- [SS, 20, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .236 BA .263 OBP .200 ISO 55 AB 2 HR 3 BB% 24 K%
Sal Stewart 2/3 2B HR -- [3B, 20, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .282 BA .376 OBP .145 ISO 110 AB 3 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 13 K%
🔥​ Emaarion Boyd​ 3/3 2BB SB -- [LF, 20, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .212 BA .326 OBP .013 ISO 80 AB 6 SB 9 BB% 16 K%
🔥​ Carter Jensen​ 3/5 HR BB -- [DH, 20, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .276 BA .389 OBP .195 ISO 123 AB 4 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 17 K%
Gavin Conticello 1/3 BB SB -- [RF, 20, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .248 BA .321 OBP .154 ISO 117 AB 1 HR 6 SB 9 BB% 22 K%
Jhostynxon Garcia 1/3 HR -- [RF, 21, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .241 BA .353 OBP .310 ISO 29 AB 3 HR 5 BB% 23 K%
Jay Allen II 2/3 HR 2BB K -- [RF, 21, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .280 BA .433 OBP .226 ISO 93 AB 5 HR 10 SB 14 BB% 23 K%
Kyle Karros 3/4 HR -- [3B, 21, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .285 BA .359 OBP .100 ISO 130 AB 3 HR 2 SB 7 BB% 22 K%
Cole Carrigg 2/4 HR -- [CF, 22, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .293 BA .380 OBP .195 ISO 123 AB 3 HR 11 SB 9 BB% 19 K%
Jake Gelof 1/2 2BB K 3 SB -- [3B, 22, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .195 BA .298 OBP .149 ISO 87 AB 3 HR 7 SB 13 BB% 26 K%
Spencer Nivens 2/5 2B HR K -- [LF, 22, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .141 BA .256 OBP .113 ISO 71 AB 1 HR 3 SB 13 BB% 30 K%
Jared Sundstrom 2/4 BB 2 SB -- [RF, 22, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] .312 BA .387 OBP .147 ISO 109 AB 1 HR 9 SB 9 BB% 27 K%
Josh Hood 3/5 2B K 2 SB -- [SS, 23, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] .256 BA .308 OBP .149 ISO 121 AB 3 HR 9 SB 6 BB% 21 K%
Maxwell Costes 4/4 HR -- [1B, 24, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .227 BA .345 OBP .068 ISO 44 AB 1 HR 12 BB% 20 K%
 

A Standouts

Juan Flores 2/4 -- [C, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .298 BA .374 OBP .149 ISO 94 AB 1 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 14 K%
Yophery Rodriguez 2/4 3B BB -- [CF, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .264 BA .369 OBP .157 ISO 121 AB 2 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 23 K%
John Cruz 2/5 HR 2K -- [RF, 18, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .168 BA .250 OBP .071 ISO 113 AB 1 HR 5 SB 8 BB% 33 K%
Adrian Santana 3/4 BB -- [SS, 18, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .239 BA .317 OBP .037 ISO 109 AB 13 SB 10 BB% 14 K%
George Lombard Jr. 1/3 2B 2BB SB -- [3B, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .195 BA .302 OBP .085 ISO 82 AB 6 SB 12 BB% 20 K%
Jesus Lopez 2/4 3B -- [C, 19, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .319 BA .351 OBP .130 ISO 69 AB 1 HR 5 BB% 27 K%
Jaison Chourio 2/4 2 2B -- [RF, 19, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .311 BA .384 OBP .104 ISO 106 AB 1 HR 9 SB 12 BB% 16 K%
Capri Ortiz 3/5 2B 2K -- [SS, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .284 BA .344 OBP .114 ISO 88 AB 1 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 30 K%
Leiker Figueroa 1/2 2BB -- [2B, 19, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .156 BA .269 OBP .022 ISO 45 AB 1 SB 9 BB% 34 K%
Robert Gonzalez 2/4 K SB -- [CF, 19, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .161 BA .262 OBP .054 ISO 93 AB 1 HR 8 SB 11 BB% 40 K%
Ronny Hernandez 1/2 2BB -- [DH, 19, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] .284 BA .400 OBP .057 ISO 88 AB 1 HR 15 BB% 10 K%
Jeral Perez 1/3 2BB -- [2B, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .269 BA .409 OBP .125 ISO 104 AB 3 HR 2 SB 18 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Ricardo Cabrera​ 4/5 BB 2 SB -- [SS, 19, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .283 BA .348 OBP .192 ISO 120 AB 4 HR 5 SB 8 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Michael Arroyo​ 3/4 HR BB K -- [2B, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .256 BA .373 OBP .186 ISO 129 AB 5 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 21 K%
Narciso Polanco 1/2 3BB -- [DH, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .270 BA .351 OBP .087 ISO 115 AB 8 SB 9 BB% 25 K%
Kendall George 3/4 BB K -- [CF, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .277 BA .358 OBP .025 ISO 119 AB 14 SB 10 BB% 19 K%
🔥🔥​ Lazaro Montes​​ 3/4 2 HR BB -- [RF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .375 BA .462 OBP .242 ISO 128 AB 8 HR 1 SB 14 BB% 17 K%
Samuel Munoz 2/3 2B 2BB K -- [LF, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .196 BA .293 OBP .175 ISO 97 AB 2 HR 11 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Roderick Arias​ 3/6 3B HR 2K -- [SS, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .214 BA .308 OBP .119 ISO 126 AB 1 HR 10 SB 10 BB% 34 K%
🔥​ Cooper Pratt​ 3/4 HR BB -- [SS, 19, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .295 BA .419 OBP .124 ISO 105 AB 2 HR 9 SB 16 BB% 24 K%
Kevin McGonigle 3/4 2B BB -- [2B, 19, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] .345 BA .420 OBP .145 ISO 110 AB 2 HR 7 SB 12 BB% 12 K%
Willy Montero 3/5 HR -- [LF, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .235 BA .299 OBP .104 ISO 115 AB 2 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 21 K%
Aneudis Mordán 1/4 HR 2K -- [DH, 19, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .206 BA .306 OBP .227 ISO 97 AB 7 HR 2 SB 11 BB% 22 K%
Manuel Beltre 5/6 2B K -- [SS, 20, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .282 BA .357 OBP .153 ISO 124 AB 3 HR 5 SB 9 BB% 19 K%
Logan Wagner 1/2 HR 2BB -- [1B, 20, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .230 BA .412 OBP .164 ISO 61 AB 1 HR 17 BB% 27 K%
Wesley Zapata 0/1 3BB K SB -- [2B, 20, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .233 BA .333 OBP .067 ISO 30 AB 2 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Jefferson Pena 1/3 BB 2 SB -- [LF, 20, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .194 BA .337 OBP .045 ISO 67 AB 2 SB 13 BB% 19 K%
🔥​ Anderson De Los Santos​ 3/4 HR SB -- [1B, 20, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .217 BA .351 OBP .207 ISO 92 AB 5 HR 7 SB 15 BB% 26 K%
Hans Montero 2/5 K 2 SB -- [DH, 20, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .232 BA .318 OBP .126 ISO 95 AB 2 HR 3 SB 11 BB% 30 K%
Isaac Pena 1/2 2BB SB -- [3B, 20, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .197 BA .342 OBP .066 ISO 61 AB 1 HR 2 SB 17 BB% 15 K%
Ariel Almonte 1/3 HR 2BB K -- [RF, 20, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .188 BA .306 OBP .214 ISO 112 AB 6 HR 13 BB% 28 K%
Carlos Colmenarez 1/3 2BB K SB -- [3B, 20, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .237 BA .348 OBP .066 ISO 76 AB 4 SB 11 BB% 31 K%
Erick Peña 3/4 2 2B -- [RF, 21, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .176 BA .250 OBP .059 ISO 102 AB 3 SB 8 BB% 47 K%
Ismael Mena 2/3 HR SB -- [LF, 21, CAR - CHC] - [F] [T] .233 BA .365 OBP .117 ISO 60 AB 1 HR 3 SB 14 BB% 20 K%
Ryan Lasko 1/4 HR BB -- [CF, 21, CAL - OAK] - [F] [T] .228 BA .347 OBP .126 ISO 127 AB 3 HR 6 SB 14 BB% 28 K%
Jordan McCants 3/5 3B K SB -- [2B, 22, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .192 BA .241 OBP .046 ISO 130 AB 10 SB 4 BB% 31 K%
Jeremy Celedonio 1/2 HR BB K 2 SB -- [DH, 22, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .250 BA .455 OBP .375 ISO 8 AB 1 HR 2 SB 18 BB% 27 K%
Carlos Aguiar 2/3 2 HR BB K -- [LF, 22, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .391 BA .517 OBP .478 ISO 23 AB 2 HR 20 BB% 20 K%
Daury Arias 2/3 HR 2BB -- [RF, 22, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .160 BA .250 OBP .120 ISO 50 AB 1 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 30 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Pablo Guerrero 1/3 HR BB K -- [1B, 17, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .278 BA .354 OBP .153 ISO 72 AB 2 HR 1 SB 9 BB% 23 K%
German Ramirez 1/5 2B SB -- [SS, 17, GCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .259 BA .318 OBP .074 ISO 81 AB 1 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 25 K%
Andres Valor 2/5 2B HR -- [CF, 18, GCL - MIA] - [F] [T] .235 BA .297 OBP .148 ISO 81 AB 2 HR 6 SB 6 BB% 31 K%
Alfredo Alcantara 2/3 HR BB K -- [SS, 18, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .194 BA .342 OBP .177 ISO 62 AB 3 HR 2 SB 15 BB% 39 K%
Yirer Garcia 1/4 HR -- [1B, 18, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .239 BA .384 OBP .104 ISO 67 AB 1 HR 2 SB 16 BB% 12 K%
🔥​ Eduardo Quintero​ 3/4 2B BB K 2 SB -- [CF, 18, AZL - LAD] - [F] [T] .366 BA .490 OBP .183 ISO 82 AB 3 HR 9 SB 16 BB% 18 K%
Yoeilin Cespedes 2/4 2B HR K SB -- [SS, 18, GCL - BOS] - [F] [T] .300 BA .383 OBP .300 ISO 70 AB 4 HR 1 SB 11 BB% 16 K%
Angel Nieblas 3/5 2 2B -- [2B, 18, GCL - ATL] - [F] [T] .185 BA .247 OBP .062 ISO 65 AB 2 SB 6 BB% 23 K%
Camilo Diaz 0/3 2BB 2K 2 SB -- [3B, 18, GCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .220 BA .313 OBP .186 ISO 59 AB 1 HR 8 SB 11 BB% 46 K%
Lisbel Diaz 2/4 HR BB 2K -- [RF, 18, AZL - SF] - [F] [T] .351 BA .432 OBP .270 ISO 37 AB 3 HR 11 BB% 13 K%
🔥🔥​ Junior Garcia​​ 3/4 2B HR BB K 2 SB -- [RF, 18, GCL - ATL] - [F] [T] .292 BA .395 OBP .181 ISO 72 AB 3 HR 6 SB 10 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Bernard Moon​ 4/4 2 2B BB 2 SB -- [2B, 19, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .313 BA .425 OBP .090 ISO 67 AB 1 HR 5 SB 6 BB% 24 K%
Kelvin Hidalgo 4/5 2B BB SB -- [SS, 19, AZL - COL] - [F] [T] .273 BA .343 OBP .023 ISO 88 AB 6 SB 8 BB% 25 K%
Yordany De Los Santos 2/3 2B 3B BB SB -- [2B, 19, GCL - PIT] - [F] [T] .367 BA .436 OBP .144 ISO 90 AB 2 HR 15 SB 9 BB% 20 K%
Jose Sanabria 2/5 HR 3K SB -- [CF, 19, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .161 BA .267 OBP .065 ISO 62 AB 1 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 26 K%
Nolan Beltran 2/2 2 HR -- [LF, 19, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .214 BA .312 OBP .214 ISO 28 AB 2 HR 12 BB% 25 K%
Kyle Henley 2/5 3B K SB -- [CF, 19, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .259 BA .341 OBP .136 ISO 81 AB 1 HR 14 SB 6 BB% 36 K%
Joan Delgado 2/4 HR K SB -- [CF, 19, AZL - CHC] - [F] [T] .333 BA .424 OBP .298 ISO 57 AB 2 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 36 K%
Frederik Jimenez 1/2 HR BB K SB -- [1B, 19, GCL - BOS] - [F] [T] .348 BA .483 OBP .130 ISO 23 AB 1 HR 1 SB 20 BB% 27 K%
Jhonny Severino 2/4 2B BB K SB -- [SS, 19, GCL - PIT] - [F] [T] .296 BA .392 OBP .284 ISO 81 AB 5 HR 8 SB 13 BB% 21 K%
Alexander Albertus 3/5 3 2B K -- [3B, 19, AZL - LAD] - [F] [T] .361 BA .500 OBP .145 ISO 83 AB 2 HR 3 SB 19 BB% 16 K%
Abrahan Ramirez 1/3 3B 2BB -- [3B, 19, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .344 BA .488 OBP .172 ISO 64 AB 2 HR 3 SB 21 BB% 14 K%
Franyer Noria 0/1 2BB 2 SB -- [RF, 19, GCL - BOS] - [F] [T] .242 BA .432 OBP .030 ISO 33 AB 8 SB 20 BB% 20 K%
Nicolas Perez 3/4 2B BB K SB -- [2B, 19, AZL - LAD] - [F] [T] .235 BA .316 OBP .235 ISO 34 AB 2 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 26 K%
Nicandro Aybar 2/3 2BB K 2 SB -- [DH, 19, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .308 BA .430 OBP .092 ISO 65 AB 7 SB 16 BB% 13 K%
Miguel Tamares 1/4 2BB 2 SB -- [RF, 19, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .209 BA .404 OBP .070 ISO 43 AB 5 SB 19 BB% 29 K%
Demetrio Crisantes 4/5 2 SB -- [1B, 19, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .344 BA .439 OBP .151 ISO 93 AB 1 HR 8 SB 14 BB% 15 K%
Anyelo Encarnacion 4/5 2B K SB -- [SS, 20, GCL - STL] - [F] [T] .344 BA .462 OBP .312 ISO 32 AB 3 HR 3 SB 17 BB% 33 K%
Joel Mendez 3/3 HR 2BB -- [LF, 21, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .269 BA .356 OBP .173 ISO 52 AB 1 HR 11 BB% 25 K%
Jarrod Belbin 3/4 2 3B BB SB -- [1B, 23, AZL - SEA] - [F] [T] .329 BA .427 OBP .195 ISO 82 AB 1 HR 5 SB 12 BB% 13 K%
 

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 04/28/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Deyvison De Los Santos 3/4 -- [3B, 20, PCL - ARI] - [F] [T] .311 BA .344 OBP .180 ISO 61 AB 1 HR 4 BB% 18 K%
Jasson Domínguez 3/4 2B -- [CF, 21, INT - NYY] - [F] [T] .364 BA .364 OBP .182 ISO 11 AB 0 BB% 18 K%
Javier Sanoja 2/4 HR -- [CF, 21, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .326 BA .379 OBP .163 ISO 129 AB 2 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 6 K%
Nick Yorke 3/5 2B -- [2B, 22, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .444 BA .500 OBP .111 ISO 9 AB 1 SB 10 BB% 10 K%
Bryan Ramos 1/3 2B BB -- [DH, 22, INT - CWS] - [F] [T] .300 BA .389 OBP .067 ISO 30 AB 11 BB% 13 K%
Colson Montgomery 1/2 2BB -- [SS, 22, INT - CWS] - [F] [T] .243 BA .348 OBP .165 ISO 115 AB 4 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 23 K%
Orelvis Martinez 1/4 HR BB -- [2B, 22, INT - TOR] - [F] [T] .184 BA .296 OBP .202 ISO 114 AB 7 HR 10 BB% 27 K%
🔥​ Juan Brito​ 2/5 2B 2BB SB -- [3B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .264 BA .371 OBP .225 ISO 129 AB 6 HR 3 SB 14 BB% 13 K%
Victor Mesa Jr. 1/3 2B BB -- [LF, 22, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .276 BA .355 OBP .164 ISO 134 AB 5 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 24 K%
Chase Meidroth 0/3 2BB SB -- [3B, 22, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .289 BA .429 OBP .099 ISO 121 AB 1 HR 5 SB 16 BB% 11 K%
Jhonkensy Noel 4/6 2B K -- [1B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .323 BA .396 OBP .308 ISO 133 AB 11 HR 8 BB% 19 K%
Matthew Lugo 2/4 2B HR BB -- [RF, 23, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .364 BA .500 OBP .727 ISO 11 AB 2 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 7 K%
George Valera 2/5 HR BB K -- [RF, 23, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .231 BA .339 OBP .192 ISO 104 AB 4 HR 1 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Jace Jung 1/4 HR BB -- [3B, 23, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .307 BA .424 OBP .248 ISO 101 AB 5 HR 16 BB% 20 K%
Tyler Black 2/5 2B HR BB K -- [1B, 23, INT - MIL] - [F] [T] .270 BA .375 OBP .258 ISO 89 AB 6 HR 7 SB 11 BB% 13 K%
Tyler Black 1/3 2B 2BB -- [1B, 23, INT - MIL] - [F] [T] .270 BA .375 OBP .258 ISO 89 AB 6 HR 7 SB 11 BB% 13 K%
🔥🔥​ Johnathan Rodriguez​​ 3/7 3 HR K -- [LF, 24, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .303 BA .388 OBP .202 ISO 89 AB 5 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 24 K%
Spencer Torkelson 3/5 2 2B -- [1B, 24, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .417 BA .500 OBP .167 ISO 12 AB 14 BB% 14 K%
Eguy Rosario 4/5 2 SB -- [3B, 24, PCL - SD] - [F] [T] .315 BA .435 OBP .326 ISO 89 AB 5 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 20 K%
Ben Rice 2/2 HR 2BB SB -- [C, 25, INT - NYY] - [F] [T] .667 BA .750 OBP 1.000 ISO 6 AB 2 HR 1 SB 25 BB% 12 K%
Justice Bigbie 2/4 2B HR BB -- [DH, 25, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .252 BA .358 OBP .117 ISO 103 AB 1 HR 6 SB 13 BB% 17 K%
Drew Waters 3/5 2B HR -- [CF, 25, INT - KC] - [F] [T] .248 BA .315 OBP .202 ISO 109 AB 4 HR 6 SB 8 BB% 28 K%
🔥​ Bryan Lavastida​ 3/5 2 HR BB -- [C, 25, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .250 BA .321 OBP .197 ISO 76 AB 4 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Blake Hunt 3/5 2B HR K -- [C, 25, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .273 BA .319 OBP .364 ISO 66 AB 7 HR 4 BB% 19 K%
 

AA Standouts

Nelson Rada 1/5 K SB -- [CF, 18, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .225 BA .280 OBP .017 ISO 120 AB 12 SB 7 BB% 27 K%
Samuel Basallo 1/4 HR K -- [1B, 19, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .319 BA .386 OBP .235 ISO 119 AB 8 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 17 K%
Roman Anthony 2/5 2B -- [CF, 20, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .261 BA .389 OBP .185 ISO 92 AB 2 HR 2 SB 17 BB% 23 K%
Denzer Guzman 1/4 2B -- [SS, 20, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .318 OBP .156 ISO 96 AB 4 HR 1 SB 9 BB% 27 K%
🔥​ Moises Ballesteros​ 3/5 2B HR 2K -- [C, 20, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .293 BA .361 OBP .155 ISO 116 AB 4 HR 9 BB% 14 K%
Cole Young 3/4 BB K -- [2B, 20, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .315 BA .402 OBP .176 ISO 108 AB 5 HR 5 SB 11 BB% 14 K%
Ryan Clifford 1/3 HR BB -- [RF, 20, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .167 BA .333 OBP .267 ISO 60 AB 4 HR 20 BB% 34 K%
Carson Williams 2/4 K SB -- [SS, 20, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .268 BA .376 OBP .241 ISO 112 AB 5 HR 11 SB 12 BB% 28 K%
Carson Williams 1/5 2B 3K SB -- [SS, 20, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .268 BA .376 OBP .241 ISO 112 AB 5 HR 11 SB 12 BB% 28 K%
Adael Amador 2/4 HR K -- [2B, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .212 BA .338 OBP .195 ISO 113 AB 7 HR 12 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Edgar Quero 2/4 2B BB -- [C, 21, SOU - CWS] - [F] [T] .244 BA .328 OBP .109 ISO 119 AB 3 HR 9 BB% 17 K%
Joe Mack 3/4 HR K -- [C, 21, SOU - MIA] - [F] [T] .246 BA .309 OBP .206 ISO 126 AB 5 HR 6 BB% 28 K%
🔥🔥​ Wilfred Veras​​ 3/4 2 HR BB 2 SB -- [LF, 21, SOU - CWS] - [F] [T] .275 BA .321 OBP .175 ISO 120 AB 5 HR 5 SB 5 BB% 26 K%
Max Acosta 2/3 BB SB -- [2B, 21, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .254 BA .306 OBP .075 ISO 67 AB 5 SB 5 BB% 13 K%
Eddinson Paulino 3/5 2B K -- [3B, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .245 BA .325 OBP .100 ISO 110 AB 5 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Kala'i Rosario 2/3 BB -- [LF, 21, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .243 BA .346 OBP .157 ISO 115 AB 3 HR 2 SB 13 BB% 25 K%
Brock Wilken 2/4 2B -- [3B, 21, SOU - MIL] - [F] [T] .230 BA .291 OBP .160 ISO 100 AB 4 HR 8 BB% 25 K%
Mike Boeve 4/4 -- [1B, 22, SOU - MIL] - [F] [T] .308 BA .350 OBP .062 ISO 130 AB 1 HR 6 BB% 16 K%
Robert Moore 2/3 BB K SB -- [SS, 22, EAS - PHI] - [F] [T] .237 BA .306 OBP .165 ISO 97 AB 3 HR 6 SB 7 BB% 16 K%
Milan Tolentino 3/4 2 2B BB -- [3B, 22, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .255 BA .300 OBP .170 ISO 94 AB 3 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 24 K%
C.J. Kayfus 3/5 3B K -- [1B, 22, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .583 BA .643 OBP .583 ISO 12 AB 1 HR 7 BB% 21 K%
🔥​ Tsung-Che Cheng​ 3/4 2B HR BB K SB -- [SS, 22, EAS - PIT] - [F] [T] .259 BA .344 OBP .204 ISO 108 AB 6 HR 6 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Daniel Mateo 1/3 2 SB -- [CF, 22, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .153 BA .231 OBP .051 ISO 59 AB 1 HR 6 SB 6 BB% 24 K%
Jorel Ortega 1/2 HR BB -- [SS, 23, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .217 BA .270 OBP .120 ISO 92 AB 2 HR 3 SB 6 BB% 25 K%
Sammy Siani 3/5 HR SB -- [LF, 23, EAS - PIT] - [F] [T] .253 BA .320 OBP .138 ISO 87 AB 2 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
Joe Lampe 3/5 2B K SB -- [LF, 23, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .338 BA .405 OBP .169 ISO 65 AB 1 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Chandler Simpson 2/5 3B SB -- [LF, 23, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .368 BA .383 OBP .053 ISO 57 AB 14 SB 3 BB% 6 K%
Javier Vaz 2/3 3B BB SB -- [2B, 23, TEX - KC] - [F] [T] .279 BA .411 OBP .090 ISO 122 AB 1 HR 7 SB 17 BB% 11 K%
Caleb Ricketts 2/5 2 HR K -- [C, 24, EAS - PHI] - [F] [T] .294 BA .400 OBP .162 ISO 68 AB 3 HR 12 BB% 18 K%
Ben Gobbel 2/4 2 HR K -- [3B, 24, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .236 BA .263 OBP .127 ISO 55 AB 2 HR 1 SB 3 BB% 32 K%
🔥​ Braiden Ward​ 3/4 2B HR 3 SB -- [CF, 25, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .388 BA .500 OBP .245 ISO 49 AB 2 HR 9 SB 8 BB% 21 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Ethan Salas 1/2 BB K -- [DH, 18, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .188 BA .277 OBP .116 ISO 112 AB 1 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 19 K%
Jefferson Rojas 1/4 K SB -- [SS, 19, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .237 BA .289 OBP .053 ISO 114 AB 7 SB 6 BB% 13 K%
Anthony Gutierrez 3/4 3B -- [RF, 19, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .333 BA .378 OBP .212 ISO 33 AB 4 SB 5 BB% 16 K%
William Bergolla 1/4 K SB -- [2B, 19, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .283 BA .340 OBP .076 ISO 92 AB 5 SB 8 BB% 14 K%
Victor Acosta 1/3 HR -- [SS, 19, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .194 BA .298 OBP .112 ISO 98 AB 2 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 25 K%
Angel Genao 2/3 2B BB -- [2B, 20, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .182 BA .250 OBP .091 ISO 11 AB 8 BB% 16 K%
Wilfredo Lara 2/2 BB -- [SS, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .213 BA .320 OBP .111 ISO 108 AB 2 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 18 K%
Pedro Ramirez 2/4 2B SB -- [3B, 20, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .331 BA .374 OBP .154 ISO 130 AB 3 HR 5 SB 6 BB% 13 K%
Leonardo Bernal 2/4 2B BB K -- [DH, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .316 BA .380 OBP .204 ISO 98 AB 4 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 24 K%
🔥​ Christopher Suero​ 2/3 2B HR 2BB K -- [1B, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .206 BA .345 OBP .118 ISO 68 AB 2 HR 4 SB 16 BB% 26 K%
Xavier Isaac 1/4 HR 2K -- [1B, 20, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .339 BA .417 OBP .322 ISO 115 AB 8 HR 8 SB 11 BB% 24 K%
Jadher Areinamo 3/3 BB SB -- [SS, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .312 BA .355 OBP .136 ISO 125 AB 3 HR 14 SB 7 BB% 9 K%
Joshua Baez 2/3 2B BB SB -- [LF, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .230 BA .299 OBP .172 ISO 87 AB 4 HR 9 SB 7 BB% 28 K%
Jefrey De Los Santos 3/6 HR K -- [3B, 21, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .238 BA .297 OBP .208 ISO 101 AB 4 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 27 K%
Allan Castro 2/3 3B BB -- [RF, 21, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .204 BA .353 OBP .115 ISO 113 AB 2 HR 4 SB 16 BB% 18 K%
Ryan Spikes 2/3 2B HR -- [3B, 21, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .231 BA .357 OBP .154 ISO 78 AB 3 HR 4 SB 15 BB% 25 K%
Cameron Cauley 2/4 HR K -- [SS, 21, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .181 BA .245 OBP .117 ISO 94 AB 2 HR 4 SB 7 BB% 34 K%
Maick Collado 1/1 3BB -- [1B, 21, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .239 BA .327 OBP .034 ISO 88 AB 1 SB 8 BB% 15 K%
Luis Encarnacion 1/3 HR BB -- [1B, 21, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .294 BA .338 OBP .132 ISO 68 AB 2 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 17 K%
Kevin Made 2/3 2 2B SB -- [SS, 21, SAL - WSH] - [F] [T] .207 BA .348 OBP .054 ISO 92 AB 4 SB 14 BB% 23 K%
Alex Mooney 0/2 2BB 2 SB -- [DH, 21, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .264 BA .343 OBP .124 ISO 121 AB 3 HR 15 SB 9 BB% 20 K%
Matthew Etzel 2/4 3B K 2 SB -- [CF, 22, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .296 BA .357 OBP .174 ISO 115 AB 3 HR 21 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
Hunter Haas 1/2 HR BB -- [SS, 22, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .213 BA .304 OBP .111 ISO 108 AB 3 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 20 K%
Jack Hurley 2/4 HR -- [LF, 22, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .266 BA .333 OBP .248 ISO 109 AB 6 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 21 K%
Charles McAdoo 1/3 HR BB -- [3B, 22, SAL - PIT] - [F] [T] .372 BA .434 OBP .257 ISO 113 AB 5 HR 7 SB 9 BB% 18 K%
Jonathon Long 1/3 HR BB -- [LF, 22, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .271 BA .345 OBP .167 ISO 96 AB 4 HR 1 SB 9 BB% 20 K%
Juan Guerrero 4/5 2B -- [LF, 22, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .317 BA .321 OBP .151 ISO 139 AB 3 HR 7 SB 0 BB% 14 K%
Kyle Nevin 2/4 2B HR K -- [DH, 22, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .227 BA .293 OBP .121 ISO 132 AB 3 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 33 K%
Chris Newell 2/2 2B 2BB 2 SB -- [CF, 23, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .252 BA .412 OBP .383 ISO 115 AB 12 HR 10 SB 18 BB% 30 K%
Jonah Advincula 2/2 HR BB -- [CF, 23, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .247 BA .347 OBP .099 ISO 81 AB 1 HR 5 SB 11 BB% 15 K%
Josh Hood 1/3 HR BB SB -- [3B, 23, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] .241 BA .297 OBP .147 ISO 116 AB 3 HR 7 SB 7 BB% 21 K%
 

A Standouts

George Wolkow 1/4 HR 2K -- [RF, 18, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] .143 BA .143 OBP .214 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 0 BB% 71 K%
Ralphy Velazquez 0/2 3BB -- [1B, 19, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .248 BA .388 OBP .183 ISO 109 AB 3 HR 3 SB 17 BB% 17 K%
🔥🔥​ Jaison Chourio​​ 3/4 3B HR BB -- [CF, 19, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .308 BA .381 OBP .093 ISO 107 AB 1 HR 9 SB 11 BB% 15 K%
Jesus Baez 1/3 HR BB -- [SS, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .284 BA .349 OBP .209 ISO 134 AB 7 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 18 K%
Jean Joseph 3/6 2 2B -- [LF, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .246 BA .318 OBP .167 ISO 114 AB 3 HR 2 SB 6 BB% 22 K%
Erick Torres 2/4 SB -- [CF, 19, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .274 BA .351 OBP .034 ISO 117 AB 7 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
Sammy Stafura 3/5 SB -- [DH, 19, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .294 BA .351 OBP .147 ISO 34 AB 1 HR 1 SB 5 BB% 13 K%
Michael Arroyo 2/4 K SB -- [2B, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .240 BA .355 OBP .168 ISO 125 AB 4 HR 4 SB 9 BB% 21 K%
Ricardo Cabrera 2/4 HR -- [SS, 19, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .252 BA .321 OBP .193 ISO 119 AB 4 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 27 K%
Samuel Gil 1/2 2BB -- [SS, 19, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] .291 BA .392 OBP .087 ISO 103 AB 2 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Natanael Yuten 3/4 HR K -- [LF, 19, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .264 BA .333 OBP .209 ISO 91 AB 3 HR 9 BB% 26 K%
Jonny Farmelo 1/4 2 SB -- [CF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .314 BA .455 OBP .171 ISO 105 AB 1 HR 12 SB 19 BB% 19 K%
Roderick Arias 2/5 2B 2K SB -- [SS, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .202 BA .299 OBP .081 ISO 124 AB 10 SB 11 BB% 33 K%
Blake Mitchell 2/4 2B SB -- [C, 19, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .252 BA .350 OBP .233 ISO 103 AB 6 HR 5 SB 11 BB% 33 K%
Willy Montero 3/4 2B -- [LF, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .218 BA .287 OBP .082 ISO 110 AB 1 HR 1 SB 9 BB% 22 K%
Manuel Beltre 2/5 2B BB 2K -- [SS, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .254 BA .333 OBP .148 ISO 122 AB 3 HR 5 SB 9 BB% 18 K%
Kevin Guerrero 2/2 2B BB -- [LF, 20, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .241 BA .290 OBP .126 ISO 87 AB 2 HR 3 SB 6 BB% 34 K%
🔥​ Esmerlyn Valdez​ 3/3 2 HR -- [1B, 20, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .245 BA .368 OBP .245 ISO 98 AB 6 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 35 K%
Anderson De Los Santos 1/2 2B BB SB -- [3B, 20, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .217 BA .357 OBP .174 ISO 92 AB 4 HR 6 SB 16 BB% 26 K%
Robert Lopez 2/3 2 2B -- [C, 20, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .247 BA .356 OBP .091 ISO 77 AB 1 HR 1 SB 14 BB% 21 K%
Ariel Almonte 1/3 HR BB -- [RF, 20, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .175 BA .278 OBP .184 ISO 114 AB 5 HR 12 BB% 29 K%
Carlos Colmenarez 2/3 2B 3B BB -- [3B, 20, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .224 BA .330 OBP .066 ISO 76 AB 3 SB 10 BB% 32 K%
Juan Benjamin 2/4 3B HR -- [3B, 21, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .198 BA .270 OBP .111 ISO 81 AB 1 HR 4 SB 7 BB% 33 K%
Javier Rivas 3/3 3B HR -- [3B, 21, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .250 BA .339 OBP .135 ISO 96 AB 2 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 34 K%
Wilber Sanchez 3/4 HR SB -- [3B, 22, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] .317 BA .362 OBP .159 ISO 63 AB 2 HR 6 SB 7 BB% 11 K%
Nelson Beltran 1/1 3BB 2 SB -- [LF, 22, CAL - OAK] - [F] [T] .267 BA .402 OBP .128 ISO 86 AB 2 HR 4 SB 16 BB% 28 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Eduardo Tait 2/6 3B 2K -- [DH, 17, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .259 BA .337 OBP .086 ISO 81 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 17 K%
Jonathan Martinez 1/2 2B 2BB SB -- [SS, 17, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .130 BA .382 OBP .043 ISO 23 AB 1 SB 26 BB% 29 K%
Brailer Guerrero 1/3 HR K -- [CF, 17, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .368 BA .484 OBP .184 ISO 76 AB 2 HR 11 SB 17 BB% 22 K%
John Gil 2/3 2B SB -- [SS, 18, GCL - ATL] - [F] [T] .279 BA .364 OBP .058 ISO 86 AB 10 SB 11 BB% 18 K%
Jose Pirela 2/4 3B K SB -- [CF, 18, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .178 BA .237 OBP .233 ISO 73 AB 4 HR 3 SB 5 BB% 36 K%
Juan Hernandez 3/6 HR -- [2B, 18, GCL - DET] - [F] [T] .233 BA .324 OBP .100 ISO 60 AB 1 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 27 K%
Starlyn Caba 0/3 3BB 2 SB -- [SS, 18, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .263 BA .434 OBP .105 ISO 76 AB 1 HR 16 SB 23 BB% 13 K%
Eric Bitonti 2/3 2BB SB -- [3B, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .295 BA .422 OBP .263 ISO 95 AB 4 HR 3 SB 18 BB% 30 K%
Camilo Diaz 0/3 BB K 3 SB -- [SS, 18, GCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .232 BA .306 OBP .196 ISO 56 AB 1 HR 6 SB 9 BB% 46 K%
Yahil Melendez 1/3 HR BB K -- [3B, 18, AZL - CHC] - [F] [T] .303 BA .376 OBP .197 ISO 76 AB 2 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 24 K%
Bryan Acuna 2/2 2BB -- [SS, 18, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .571 BA .714 OBP .214 ISO 14 AB 33 BB% 14 K%
Adan Sanchez 2/3 HR BB -- [DH, 19, AZL - CHC] - [F] [T] .262 BA .340 OBP .143 ISO 42 AB 1 HR 10 BB% 19 K%
Aroon Escobar 3/4 HR BB -- [2B, 19, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .352 BA .510 OBP .155 ISO 71 AB 3 HR 9 SB 20 BB% 7 K%
Enmanuel Tejeda 3/4 HR K SB -- [SS, 19, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .444 BA .500 OBP .333 ISO 9 AB 1 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 20 K%
Juan Villavicencio 3/5 2B 3B BB K -- [3B, 19, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .263 BA .333 OBP .158 ISO 57 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 22 K%
Elis Cuevas 2/2 2B BB SB -- [RF, 19, GCL - BAL] - [F] [T] .357 BA .486 OBP .196 ISO 56 AB 2 HR 11 SB 13 BB% 16 K%
Reylin Perez 1/3 3BB K SB -- [SS, 19, GCL - DET] - [F] [T] .211 BA .349 OBP .127 ISO 71 AB 1 HR 12 SB 17 BB% 31 K%
Alfredo Velásquez 2/3 2 SB -- [2B, 19, GCL - BAL] - [F] [T] .273 BA .333 OBP .045 ISO 22 AB 2 SB 4 BB% 16 K%
Hyungchan Um 2/4 2 HR K -- [DH, 20, AZL - KC] - [F] [T] .296 BA .398 OBP .254 ISO 71 AB 4 HR 2 SB 10 BB% 22 K%
Jerffson Pena 3/5 2 2B HR -- [CF, 20, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .222 BA .344 OBP .148 ISO 54 AB 2 HR 2 SB 10 BB% 39 K%
 

since i’m back at home i decided to watch some of my fave episodes on On Demand. however i have been learning German and i have always watched 911 with the German dub. those voices ARE their voices for me.
and tell me when i heard their real voices…. I WAS SHOCKED!!! i have always heard that sub is better than dub. so i guess if i continued to watch it in English I would get used to them…
but anyway! anyone else shocked at how different the characters are bc they voices do different? i checked out the French and Latinoamerican Dub (not Castellano) and their voices match the same ‘type’ as the german. however the american are in no way similar. such a higher pitch and word inflections. now i dont know how to categorize certain scenes. bc they sound one way in one language and COMPLETELY DIFFERENT in another
German is my best second language (that is dubbed for this show). so to tell me my head canons and generalizations are so different depending on the voice i hear
so yeah: for all those who watch it dubbed: do you find yourself characterizing them differently depending on which version you watch?
btw Eddie’s dub sounds the best imo. The german synchronisation are:
EDIT. i’ll put some other actors the dubbers have done :3 In germany, once a german actor has been chosen as the ‘voice’ of a famous person, they ALWAYS dub them

• Athena: Anke Reitzenstein
• Bobby: Peter Flechtner (bobby and athena voices are well known and numerous in germany. can’t even begin to list)
  
• Buck: Karim El Kammouchi (AS: Harry Melling & Taylor Zakhar Perez)
  
• Hen: Kathrin Gaube
  
• Chim: Patrick Schröder
  
• Maddie: Melanie Hinze (AS Jennifer Love Hewitt, Morena Baccarin, Holly Marie Combs)
  
• Eddie: Roman Wolko (AS Miles Teller, Kevin Jonas, & Michael Welch)
  

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 04/27/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Jackson Holliday 2/4 BB -- [2B, 20, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .272 BA .428 OBP .176 ISO 125 AB 4 HR 4 SB 21 BB% 23 K%
Deyvison De Los Santos 1/5 2B -- [3B, 20, PCL - ARI] - [F] [T] .281 BA .317 OBP .193 ISO 57 AB 1 HR 5 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Owen Caissie​ 1/2 HR 3BB -- [LF, 21, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .310 BA .434 OBP .170 ISO 100 AB 4 HR 3 SB 17 BB% 23 K%
Jonatan Clase 1/4 2BB 2K SB -- [CF, 22, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .219 BA .380 OBP .151 ISO 73 AB 2 HR 10 SB 20 BB% 22 K%
Nick Yorke 1/4 BB K SB -- [2B, 22, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .250 BA .400 OBP .000 ISO 4 AB 1 SB 20 BB% 20 K%
Juan Brito 2/4 2B BB -- [2B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .258 BA .361 OBP .226 ISO 124 AB 6 HR 2 SB 13 BB% 13 K%
Chase Meidroth 3/6 2 2B -- [SS, 22, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .303 BA .431 OBP .098 ISO 122 AB 1 HR 4 SB 16 BB% 12 K%
Brenden Dixon 2/5 HR 2K -- [DH, 23, INT - PIT] - [F] [T] .222 BA .300 OBP .333 ISO 9 AB 1 HR 10 BB% 50 K%
Jace Jung 2/2 2B 2BB -- [3B, 23, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .330 BA .448 OBP .230 ISO 100 AB 4 HR 17 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Jordan Diaz​ 3/4 2 HR -- [2B, 23, PCL - OAK] - [F] [T] .298 BA .359 OBP .246 ISO 57 AB 3 HR 9 BB% 17 K%
Tyler Black 1/4 HR BB K -- [1B, 23, INT - MIL] - [F] [T] .247 BA .343 OBP .236 ISO 89 AB 6 HR 7 SB 9 BB% 14 K%
Alexander Canario 2/3 2B 2BB -- [CF, 24, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .270 BA .350 OBP .315 ISO 89 AB 7 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 27 K%
🔥​ Parker Meadows​ 3/4 2 HR BB K -- [CF, 24, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .287 BA .379 OBP .310 ISO 87 AB 6 HR 10 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
Xavier Edwards 3/4 2B SB -- [SS, 24, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .365 BA .411 OBP .115 ISO 52 AB 3 SB 7 BB% 7 K%
Riley Adams 4/4 2 HR BB -- [DH, 27, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .444 BA .500 OBP .667 ISO 9 AB 2 HR 10 BB% 20 K%
 

AA Standouts

Nelson Rada 0/3 BB K -- [CF, 18, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .220 BA .282 OBP .017 ISO 118 AB 11 SB 7 BB% 27 K%
Samuel Basallo 1/4 BB -- [C, 19, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .311 BA .379 OBP .210 ISO 119 AB 7 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 18 K%
Roman Anthony 1/3 HR BB -- [CF, 20, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .253 BA .389 OBP .176 ISO 91 AB 2 HR 2 SB 18 BB% 24 K%
🔥​ Denzer Guzman​ 3/4 HR K -- [SS, 20, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .320 OBP .152 ISO 92 AB 4 HR 1 SB 9 BB% 28 K%
🔥​ Ryan Clifford​ 1/2 HR 2BB K -- [1B, 20, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .158 BA .324 OBP .228 ISO 57 AB 3 HR 19 BB% 36 K%
🔥​ Adael Amador​ 2/5 HR BB SB -- [2B, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .204 BA .331 OBP .168 ISO 113 AB 6 HR 12 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Jeremy Rivas 3/4 SB -- [SS, 21, TEX - STL] - [F] [T] .330 BA .432 OBP .043 ISO 94 AB 1 HR 9 SB 14 BB% 18 K%
Emmanuel Rodriguez 2/2 2B -- [CF, 21, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .301 BA .457 OBP .274 ISO 73 AB 4 HR 21 BB% 26 K%
Hao-Yu Lee 1/5 HR -- [2B, 21, EAS - DET] - [F] [T] .279 BA .352 OBP .264 ISO 129 AB 8 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ James Triantos​ 3/4 2B HR SB -- [2B, 21, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .267 BA .293 OBP .095 ISO 116 AB 1 HR 8 SB 3 BB% 12 K%
Yanquiel Fernandez 2/6 HR K -- [RF, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .303 BA .325 OBP .119 ISO 109 AB 3 HR 1 SB 3 BB% 21 K%
Joe Mack 2/4 2B HR BB 2K -- [DH, 21, SOU - MIA] - [F] [T] .222 BA .288 OBP .183 ISO 126 AB 4 HR 6 BB% 28 K%
Frederick Bencosme 3/4 -- [SS, 21, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .196 BA .281 OBP .078 ISO 102 AB 1 HR 8 SB 10 BB% 16 K%
Yeiner Fernandez 2/4 2B -- [2B, 21, TEX - LAD] - [F] [T] .253 BA .365 OBP .092 ISO 87 AB 10 BB% 16 K%
Warming Bernabel 2/3 2B BB SB -- [DH, 22, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .276 BA .325 OBP .129 ISO 116 AB 3 HR 5 SB 5 BB% 15 K%
Dominic Pitelli 3/4 K 2 SB -- [SS, 22, SOU - CIN] - [F] [T] .302 BA .388 OBP .093 ISO 43 AB 6 SB 10 BB% 14 K%
Pascanel Ferreras 2/2 3B 2BB -- [2B, 22, TEX - HOU] - [F] [T] .270 BA .389 OBP .247 ISO 89 AB 3 HR 13 BB% 25 K%
Milan Tolentino 1/3 2B 2BB -- [DH, 22, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .228 BA .283 OBP .152 ISO 92 AB 3 HR 2 SB 6 BB% 24 K%
C.J. Kayfus 1/3 HR BB K -- [1B, 22, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .571 BA .667 OBP .714 ISO 7 AB 1 HR 11 BB% 22 K%
Agustin Ramirez 3/4 BB -- [C, 22, EAS - NYY] - [F] [T] .289 BA .371 OBP .202 ISO 114 AB 4 HR 8 SB 11 BB% 16 K%
Alexfri Planez 1/4 HR BB 2K -- [RF, 22, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .269 BA .293 OBP .222 ISO 108 AB 6 HR 3 SB 4 BB% 25 K%
Caeden Trenkle 3/5 2B -- [LF, 22, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .269 BA .372 OBP .134 ISO 67 AB 2 HR 14 BB% 29 K%
Joe Lampe 3/4 2B SB -- [LF, 23, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .297 BA .370 OBP .156 ISO 64 AB 1 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 24 K%
Jase Bowen 3/5 2B K SB -- [CF, 23, EAS - PIT] - [F] [T] .268 BA .322 OBP .134 ISO 112 AB 2 HR 5 SB 5 BB% 21 K%
Robert Perez Jr. 2/3 2B HR 2BB -- [RF, 23, TEX - SD] - [F] [T] .252 BA .333 OBP .155 ISO 103 AB 3 HR 2 SB 9 BB% 31 K%
Cal Conley 3/4 3 2B 2BB K SB -- [SS, 24, SOU - ATL] - [F] [T] .283 BA .355 OBP .081 ISO 99 AB 9 SB 9 BB% 14 K%
🔥​ Austin Beck​ 4/5 2B 2 HR K -- [RF, 25, TEX - LAD] - [F] [T] .256 BA .303 OBP .256 ISO 82 AB 6 HR 4 BB% 33 K%
Zach Kokoska 1/4 HR BB K 2 SB -- [1B, 25, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .191 BA .313 OBP .191 ISO 94 AB 5 HR 7 SB 13 BB% 24 K%
Quincy McAfee 2/4 2 HR -- [LF, 26, SOU - CIN] - [F] [T] .500 BA .500 OBP 1.500 ISO 4 AB 2 HR 0 BB% 0 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Ethan Salas 1/4 3B 2K -- [DH, 18, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .179 BA .277 OBP .116 ISO 112 AB 1 HR 4 SB 11 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Sebastian Walcott​ 2/3 HR K -- [SS, 18, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .220 BA .371 OBP .150 ISO 100 AB 3 HR 6 SB 18 BB% 23 K%
Jefferson Rojas 2/3 BB SB -- [SS, 19, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .237 BA .295 OBP .053 ISO 114 AB 6 SB 6 BB% 13 K%
Anthony Gutierrez 1/2 2B 2 SB -- [CF, 19, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .250 BA .306 OBP .156 ISO 32 AB 4 SB 5 BB% 19 K%
Cam Collier 0/1 3BB -- [3B, 19, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .202 BA .292 OBP .123 ISO 114 AB 3 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 26 K%
🔥​ Luis Lara​ 2/4 2B BB SB -- [CF, 19, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .269 BA .341 OBP .077 ISO 78 AB 9 SB 6 BB% 21 K%
🔥​ Samuel Zavala​ 3/4 2B HR -- [RF, 19, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .168 BA .304 OBP .158 ISO 95 AB 4 HR 3 SB 15 BB% 21 K%
Termarr Johnson 1/3 2B BB K -- [SS, 19, SAL - PIT] - [F] [T] .216 BA .383 OBP .180 ISO 111 AB 4 HR 5 SB 19 BB% 19 K%
🔥​ Leonardo Bernal​ 2/4 2 HR 2K -- [C, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .312 BA .383 OBP .198 ISO 96 AB 4 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Dylan O'Rae 1/4 BB K SB -- [2B, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .274 BA .443 OBP .080 ISO 113 AB 18 SB 17 BB% 14 K%
Manuel Pena 2/5 2B -- [2B, 20, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .303 BA .378 OBP .101 ISO 99 AB 1 HR 1 SB 9 BB% 19 K%
Thayron Liranzo 2/4 HR BB -- [C, 20, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .297 BA .426 OBP .225 ISO 111 AB 6 HR 1 SB 18 BB% 22 K%
Joshua Baez 2/4 HR K -- [DH, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .205 BA .268 OBP .159 ISO 88 AB 4 HR 8 SB 6 BB% 31 K%
🔥​ Gavin Conticello​ 2/4 3B HR -- [RF, 20, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .237 BA .311 OBP .144 ISO 118 AB 1 HR 5 SB 9 BB% 22 K%
Christian Cerda 3/4 2 2B BB K -- [C, 21, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .232 BA .308 OBP .061 ISO 82 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 10 K%
Noah Miller 2/4 HR BB -- [SS, 21, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .270 BA .337 OBP .128 ISO 148 AB 5 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 17 K%
Luis Encarnacion 4/5 -- [1B, 21, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .292 BA .329 OBP .092 ISO 65 AB 1 HR 1 SB 5 BB% 18 K%
Wes Kath 2/4 HR 2K -- [3B, 21, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .250 BA .386 OBP .141 ISO 92 AB 3 HR 2 SB 11 BB% 34 K%
Jay Harry 2/3 HR 2BB -- [2B, 21, MID - MIN] - [F] [T] .241 BA .303 OBP .111 ISO 108 AB 2 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 18 K%
Carson Roccaforte 2/4 2B HR -- [CF, 22, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .203 BA .279 OBP .143 ISO 133 AB 3 HR 11 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
🔥🔥​ Brice Matthews​​ 4/4 2 HR 2BB SB -- [SS, 22, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .545 BA .643 OBP 1.091 ISO 11 AB 4 HR 1 SB 21 BB% 28 K%
Jack Hurley 2/4 2 2B BB -- [LF, 22, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .248 BA .317 OBP .220 ISO 109 AB 5 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Jake Gelof 0/2 3BB 2 SB -- [3B, 22, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .185 BA .281 OBP .123 ISO 81 AB 2 HR 4 SB 12 BB% 27 K%
Juan Guerrero 3/4 3 2B -- [LF, 22, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .299 BA .304 OBP .149 ISO 134 AB 3 HR 7 SB 0 BB% 14 K%
Ryan Leitch 1/3 HR BB -- [DH, 22, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .167 BA .231 OBP .250 ISO 12 AB 1 HR 7 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Ryan Cermak​ 5/5 2B 3B SB -- [CF, 23, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .625 BA .600 OBP .375 ISO 8 AB 2 SB 10 BB% 30 K%
Jake DeLeo 2/3 HR BB -- [LF, 23, MID - MIA] - [F] [T] .234 BA .273 OBP .149 ISO 94 AB 2 HR 5 BB% 29 K%
Adam Retzbach 3/3 2B 3B BB -- [C, 23, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .179 BA .333 OBP .060 ISO 67 AB 2 SB 17 BB% 39 K%
🔥​ John Garcia​ 5/6 5 2B K -- [DH, 23, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .293 BA .358 OBP .152 ISO 99 AB 1 HR 3 SB 4 BB% 25 K%
Nick Biddison 2/3 HR BB SB -- [1B, 23, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .148 BA .325 OBP .115 ISO 61 AB 1 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 27 K%
Otto Kemp 3/4 2 HR K -- [3B, 24, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .321 BA .436 OBP .266 ISO 109 AB 4 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 13 K%
 

A Standouts

Leodalis De Vries 2/4 2B BB -- [SS, 17, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .219 BA .348 OBP .096 ISO 73 AB 1 SB 13 BB% 26 K%
🔥​ Juan Flores​ 3/6 2 2B SB -- [C, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .287 BA .364 OBP .149 ISO 94 AB 1 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 15 K%
Yophery Rodriguez 3/4 2B BB -- [CF, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .265 BA .368 OBP .145 ISO 117 AB 2 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 25 K%
J.D. Gonzalez 2/4 BB K -- [C, 18, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .164 BA .330 OBP .000 ISO 73 AB 16 BB% 35 K%
Adrian Santana 1/3 BB 2 SB -- [SS, 18, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .219 BA .291 OBP .044 ISO 114 AB 13 SB 9 BB% 15 K%
Isaiah Drake 1/3 K 2 SB -- [CF, 18, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .113 BA .130 OBP .057 ISO 53 AB 3 SB 1 BB% 48 K%
Jesus Lopez 2/5 2B HR K -- [DH, 19, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .319 BA .360 OBP .101 ISO 69 AB 1 HR 6 BB% 26 K%
🔥​ Myles Naylor​ 2/4 2B HR BB K -- [SS, 19, CAL - OAK] - [F] [T] .198 BA .321 OBP .138 ISO 116 AB 4 HR 1 SB 14 BB% 35 K%
Capri Ortiz 1/4 3B BB K -- [SS, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .267 BA .337 OBP .105 ISO 86 AB 1 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 30 K%
Walker Jenkins 2/4 2B BB -- [DH, 19, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .286 BA .375 OBP .143 ISO 7 AB 12 BB% 25 K%
Devin Saltiban 3/5 HR -- [2B, 19, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .257 BA .344 OBP .238 ISO 105 AB 6 HR 8 SB 9 BB% 22 K%
Max Clark 1/3 2BB K SB -- [CF, 19, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] .261 BA .380 OBP .078 ISO 115 AB 1 HR 12 SB 16 BB% 16 K%
Erick Torres 2/4 K SB -- [CF, 19, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .274 BA .356 OBP .043 ISO 117 AB 6 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
Brandon Winokur 1/4 BB SB -- [SS, 19, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .266 BA .350 OBP .128 ISO 109 AB 2 HR 8 SB 9 BB% 23 K%
Esmith Pineda 1/3 BB K SB -- [RF, 19, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .200 BA .296 OBP .153 ISO 85 AB 2 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Ronny Hernandez​ 3/4 HR BB -- [C, 19, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] .267 BA .371 OBP .056 ISO 90 AB 1 HR 13 BB% 10 K%
Marvin Alcantara 2/3 BB -- [2B, 19, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .240 BA .291 OBP .072 ISO 125 AB 1 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 25 K%
Narciso Polanco 2/4 2 2B -- [2B, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .278 BA .349 OBP .122 ISO 115 AB 1 HR 8 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Roderick Arias 1/3 3B BB 2K -- [2B, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .203 BA .306 OBP .098 ISO 123 AB 1 HR 9 SB 11 BB% 32 K%
Blake Mitchell 1/3 2B BB K SB -- [DH, 19, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .260 BA .355 OBP .240 ISO 104 AB 6 HR 4 SB 11 BB% 33 K%
Cristian Garcia 2/3 2 2B BB -- [1B, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .185 BA .309 OBP .098 ISO 92 AB 1 HR 1 SB 13 BB% 27 K%
Aidan Smith 2/4 HR BB -- [RF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .290 BA .418 OBP .178 ISO 107 AB 3 HR 9 SB 17 BB% 18 K%
Gleider Figuereo 3/4 BB -- [3B, 19, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .244 BA .333 OBP .227 ISO 119 AB 6 HR 11 BB% 31 K%
Chandler Pollard 3/4 2B K 2 SB -- [2B, 20, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .290 BA .333 OBP .043 ISO 69 AB 11 SB 4 BB% 25 K%
Jean Carlos Sio 1/3 HR BB K SB -- [2B, 20, CAL - SF] - [F] [T] .216 BA .364 OBP .102 ISO 88 AB 1 HR 8 SB 16 BB% 19 K%
Jesus Hernandez 2/5 HR K -- [SS, 20, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .218 BA .324 OBP .081 ISO 124 AB 2 HR 7 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Anthony Scull 3/4 2B BB -- [LF, 20, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .295 BA .331 OBP .129 ISO 139 AB 2 HR 5 SB 2 BB% 18 K%
Yohairo Cuevas 0/1 3BB K SB -- [1B, 20, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .194 BA .325 OBP .061 ISO 98 AB 3 SB 14 BB% 29 K%
Adrian Placencia 1/2 HR 4BB -- [2B, 21, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .307 BA .462 OBP .337 ISO 101 AB 9 HR 3 SB 20 BB% 25 K%
Cesar Quintas 2/5 2B HR 2K -- [RF, 21, CAL - SF] - [F] [T] .247 BA .300 OBP .204 ISO 93 AB 4 HR 1 SB 5 BB% 24 K%
Javier Mora 3/3 2B BB -- [DH, 21, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] .286 BA .389 OBP .071 ISO 14 AB 16 BB% 44 K%
🔥🔥​ Beycker Barroso​​ 4/4 3B HR BB SB -- [C, 21, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .353 BA .500 OBP .294 ISO 17 AB 1 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 16 K%
Angel Ortiz 3/3 HR BB -- [RF, 21, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .278 BA .372 OBP .194 ISO 72 AB 2 HR 9 BB% 20 K%
Modeifi Marte 2/3 2B 2BB -- [1B, 21, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .264 BA .338 OBP .139 ISO 72 AB 2 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 18 K%
Ryan Lasko 2/4 HR BB K -- [CF, 21, CAL - OAK] - [F] [T] .216 BA .342 OBP .104 ISO 125 AB 2 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 28 K%
🔥​ Jonah Cox​ 1/2 3BB 4 SB -- [CF, 22, CAL - SF] - [F] [T] .351 BA .456 OBP .105 ISO 114 AB 1 HR 20 SB 11 BB% 24 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

🔥​ Angel Arredondo​ 1/3 HR 2BB SB -- [SS, 17, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .239 BA .455 OBP .087 ISO 46 AB 1 HR 1 SB 19 BB% 19 K%
Luis Merejo 1/3 HR BB K -- [1B, 17, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .150 BA .316 OBP .133 ISO 60 AB 2 HR 2 SB 14 BB% 31 K%
Braylin Morel 2/5 3B -- [RF, 18, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .275 BA .346 OBP .232 ISO 69 AB 2 HR 5 SB 8 BB% 26 K%
Sheng-En Lin 1/3 BB K 2 SB -- [SS, 18, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .350 BA .476 OBP .167 ISO 60 AB 7 SB 21 BB% 24 K%
Jeffrey Mercedes 2/4 2B 3B -- [3B, 19, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .265 BA .327 OBP .163 ISO 49 AB 9 BB% 21 K%
Arfeni Batista 3/4 2B HR K -- [SS, 19, GCL - STL] - [F] [T] .179 BA .246 OBP .143 ISO 56 AB 2 HR 1 SB 4 BB% 45 K%
Anyelo Encarnacion 1/2 HR 3BB -- [3B, 20, GCL - STL] - [F] [T] .240 BA .367 OBP .360 ISO 25 AB 3 HR 16 BB% 36 K%
 

The World Tag Team Champions(Miz and R Truth) are cumulatively 35 years older than the WWE Tag Team Champions (Austin Theory and Grayson Waller). R-Truth signed with WWE when Austin Theory was just 1 years old.
Bray Wyatt (b. May 1987) is still the most recently born wrestler to win a men's WWE main roster world championship. However, 8 NXT Champions were born more recently than Bray including his little brother Bo Dallas.
Of the 19 current champions only the The North American and the United States Champions won their Titles before this years Wrestlemania. (Just 2 months ago)
Roman Reigns Universal Championship title reign(1,316 days) was longer than all current 15 championship title reigns combined(917+).
3 current champions in WWE wrestled for AEW. WWE Champion Cody Rhodes, Women's Tag Champ Jade Cargill and NXT Tag champ Nathan Frazier.
4 current Champions in WWE wrestled for ROH. Cody Rhodes, Sami Zayn, Damien Priest, and Roxanne Perez.
Cody Rhodes is the only multi generational wrestler to hold a championship in WWE right now. He is also the 10th multigenerational wrestler to be WWE Champion. (Not counting Vince McMahon)
R-Truth won his first championship in WWE over 23 years ago. None of the other current champions in WWE had even made their wrestling debut yet.
Jade Cargill and Logan Paul are the only 2 champions to not perform in NXT. R-Truth, Miz and Cody all appeared as mentors in early NXT.
Cody Rhodes NXT trainee won the WWE Championship before Cody Rhodes did. (Husky Harris/Bray Wyatt)
Women's tag team champs Bianca Belair(35) and Jade Cargill(32) are both older than Trish Stratus(30) and Lita(31) when they originally retired from professional wrestling.
Both current WWE men's world champions are in their first title reign as a world champion in WWE. Prior to them the most recent first time world champion was Big E in 2021.
Gunther is currently not a Champion in the WWE. Which is rare because he has been a champions for about 76% of the 5 1/2 years he has been in the WWE. 1,536 total days as a champion, including the longest Intercontinental Championship reign of all time. After winning King of the Ring, he may be champion once again very soon.

SUMMARY: UEFA has constantly fed referee crews from countries with a high degree of corruption into important Real Madrid CL knockout stage games. These referees and linesmen, mostly from low level Eastern European countries, have cheated on behalf of Real Madrid for nearly a decade.

1. Real Madrid is in financial trouble. The costs of the stadium renovation are spiraling out of control (€1.76bn and counting instead of €550m planned). Higher interest rates have made Real’s debt (€1.6bn) unsustainable. Real can not afford to be knocked out of the Champions League early.
2. UEFA assigns referee crews from countries with a high probability of corruption to important Real Madrid knockout stage games. Most commonly used are referee crews from Eastern Europe, followed by Italy. Scandinavian referee teams have not been assigned.
3. For no good reason the referee crews are assigned weeks in advance by UEFA. This leaves enough time for Real to contact, influence and bribe referee crews.
4. Due to the nature of the soccer game (few big moments decide games) and the vague and clumsy rulebook the impact of the referee crew is huge. Offside in particular is a complete mess: The Linesman might or might not wave the flag, the Referee might or might not stop play, the VaR might or might not overrule.
5. The last 4 knockout stage duels featuring Real Madrid and German Teams (3x Bayern, 1x Leipzig) have all been manipulated. „Offside“ has been the main tool.
6. The Linesmen situation is incomprehensible. They are not well known and not well paid. It is not even easy to figure out which side of the field they operated on. Yet these Linesmen, who in some cases may earn €50 a game working in their low level home league, regularly have been the difference maker with €50m or more on the line in early stage knockout games. Linesmen have misused their huge impact to swing at least 5 goals towards Real Madrid in the 4 duels mentioned above (Lewandowski 2017, 2x Ronaldo 2017, Sesko 2024, De Ligt 2024). The probability of these events (skewed referee crew assignments, mistakes and rule violations in games) occuring randomly over the course of a decade is zero.
7. There is no UEFA mechanism to systematically and transparently analyze referee crew decisions after the game. Compare that to the NBA: Even though the impact of the referee team is multiple times lower than in soccer, the NBA doesn‘t post referee teams until gameday and issues a report to analyze critical decisions afterwards.

UEFA Assignments of referee crews to Real Madrid CL Knockout stage games (2015-2024, 51 games)
20 x Eastern Europe
10 x Italy
0 x Scandinavia
Ranking of Champions League Countries using the Corruption Index
Tier 1: Scandinavia (Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway) Tier 2: Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany Tier 3: Belgium, France, UK
Tier 4: Portugal, Spain, Italy Tier 5: Slovenia, Poland, Slovakia Tier 6: Hungary, Bosnia, Serbia, Turkey
Wrong incentives and bad intentions within the rotten core (UEFA, Real) of the Champions League have led to a degradation in the quality of refereeing in general. It’s not the best referee teams that are selected. The referee crews working UEFA games are picked for different reasons.
UEFA Referee Committee
The extreme skew in assigning referee crews to games starts with the UEFA Referee Committee itself: The Chair is from Italy (Roberto Rosetti), 3 of the 4 Officers are from Spain (Carlos Carballo) and Eastern Europe (Dagmar Damkova, Czechia and Vladimir Sajn, Slovenia).
These UEFA referee crew pickers have ignored in excess of 80% of eligible referees all European Countries have put on the relevant FIFA list. Unsurprisingly 8 of the 14 most heavily used referee crews in this year’s Champions League are from Eastern Europe and Italy/Spain.
UEFA selects referee crews Real Madrid got the best handle on. The weakest link are Linesmen.
It gets even better: Rosetti, Carballo, Damkova and Sajn will also pick referees for EURO 2024.
some important Real Madrid Knockout stage CL Games / Eastern European Linesmen:
2016 Round of 16 AS Roma - Real Madrid
Linesmen: Slysko (Slovenia), Wilczek (Czechia) Referee: Kralovec (Czechia)
2017 Quarter-Final Real Madrid – Bayern München
Linesmen: Ring (Hungary), Toth (Hungary) Referee: Kassai (Hungary)
2018 Semifinal Real Madrid – Bayern München
Linesmen: Duran (Turkey), Ongun (Turkey) Referee: Cakir (Turkey)
2018 Final Real Madrid – Liverpool FC
Linesmen: Ristic (Serbia), Durdevic (Serbia) Referee: Mazic (Serbia)
2024 Round of 16 RB Leipzig – Real Madrid
Linesmen: Ibrisimbegovic (Bosnia), Beljo (Bosnia) Referee: Peljto (Bosnia)
2024 Semifinal Real Madrid – Bayern München
Linesmen: Listkiewicz (Poland), Kupsik (Poland) Referee: Marciniak (Poland)
The linesmen in particular are unfit to work games of this magnitude in general.
From a Champions League perspective: These are amateurs. Usually they work in very low level local leagues, refereeing in front of 2.500 visitors. Some countries they come from have a GDP per person and month under €1.000. They may work full time in a different job that has nothing (or too much) to do with soccer. For the most part these Linesmen also stay anonymous. No matter how big the mistake or rule violation they committed: In recaps they are referred to not by name, it’s „the linesman“. Crooked UEFA also won’t care. They’ll be there next time again.
The main underlying reason they got assigned to these games: To cheat on behalf of Real Madrid
The impact from all referee, linesman and VaR mistakes and rule violations on both sides over its last 50 knockout stage games has been worth a net 20 goals for Real Madrid.
Mistakes and rule violations have made the difference in a net 8 of the 23 knockout stage duels Real Madrid „won“ from 2015-2024.
With fair and proper refereeing, Real Madrid would not have won at least 2 of the CL titles awarded by UEFA over that time period.
Financially, the Linesmen and Referees have swung close to 200 Million €uro towards Real.
Best of Real Madrid Cheating
2017 Real - Bayern 1-2 (4-2 aET) Lewandowski (Bayern) was whistled back incorrectly for offside all alone in front of goal. Ronaldo (Real) scored from an offside position after using his arm to stop the ball (2-2), and later added another offside goal (3-2). Bayern played extra time short-handed after Vidal got a Red Card playing the ball.
2024 Real - Bayern 2-1 A Linesman prematurely and incorrectly signalled offside just before De Ligt (Bayern) scored (2-2), with the referee being complicit by immediately blowing his whistle. They had practiced this maneuver on Davies (Bayern). A few minutes earlier, in a similar situation on the other side, the referee crew let play continue to allow Joselu (Real) to score.
Red Cards (2015-2024)
Teams playing Real Madrid: 8 Real Madrid players: 2
Vázquez (2016 v ManCity), Ramos (2016 v Atlético), Casemiro (2017 v Bayern), Ramos (2018 v Liverpool) should all have been sent off in critical moments of close knockout games.
It’s all just a Joke
In a 2016 game, Ronaldo (Real) caught a cross that was high with both hands and threw it into the goal. After seeing it, the linesman signalled „Offside“. Ronaldo didn’t even get a Yellow Card.
Referee crew for the Champions League Final 2024 (Real Madrid - Borussia Dortmund)
Referee: Slavko Vinčić (Slovenia) Linesmen: Tomaž Klančnik and Andraž Kovačič (Slovenia)
Slavko Vinčić was arrested at a Serb/Bosnian Mafia party in 2020.
Q&A probability
You lost me when you said probability is zero. What exactly does it mean and show?
Say you had to assign a referee 30 times in a row, and chose Eastern European/Italians (countries from the bottom of the corruption ranking) with a probability of 70%, and Scandinavian referees from the top 30%. There is a probability of 0,002% to get to the 30-0 distribution that actually happened. So that’s the first zero.
Then these referees messed up the games big time, with the net effect in every single critical instance favoring Real. At least 8 times these violations made the difference for Real, and zero times for the other team. A sequence like that has a probability of 0,4%. That‘s the next zero. And you basically have to multiply these 2 zeros (assignments, outcome) to get to the probability of this chain of events.
You could also look at red cards. Real got 2 over these 50 games, but both didn’t matter as the games were already decided. We identified at least 4 no-doubter red cards Real should have gotten in crucial moments, with some ‚maybe’s“ (like Vinicius 2024) on top. There were 8 red cards issued against teams playing Real. Red cards another zero.
Taken together, the rule violations and mistakes had a net worth of 20 goals for Real. It should be zero, if referees are fair and unbiased. 20 goals is enourmos. Thats 0.4 goals per game, which is basically the expected goal value Leroy Sane produces. And as in some games nothing (needed) to happen, in other critical games the referees/linesmen impacted the game like a Lionel Messi playing as a 12th man for Real Madrid.
None of this is possible by chance. It’s cheating, proven by data basically 3 times over.
Also look at it from a practical viewpoint. Just 2 weeks ago, Eastern European Referees (who due to the low level of their home leagues and high probability of corruption should probably not be there in the first place) messed up the semifinal for Real. Thats after Eastern European Referees messed up the round of 16 for Real earlier this season.
No sensible, clean organization picks another Eastern European Crew, this time by all accounts featuring a serb/bosnian mafia guy, to referee in a CL Final next.
We mentioned the NBA, a true professional league. If they were asked to create a scenario in which the referee crew would have the same impact and level of competence as the Eastern Europeans for the CL Final, they would need to fly in a Sinaloa gang to referee the final minute of a tied game 7 of the NBA Finals.
PS: NBA would not do that.
An additional note regarding the UEFA Referee Committee: The husband of one of its Officers, Damkova (Czechia), is Roman Berbr. In 2023 he was charged with soccer match fixing and embezzlement, being the ring leader of an Eastern European Gang.
UEFA and Real are criminals, cheating right in front of our eyes. And with the Champions League Final and EURO 2024 coming up, it is worse than it has ever been.
To get the whole picture, you have to look at the data yourself. Don't jump to any conclusion. Forget about the comments. Dont even read the comments ! People will tell you what just popped into their minds. It's mostly noise and emotions. But nobody even remembers what he ate 2 days ago, let alone what happened over a decade in 50 Real Madrid CL games.
So please look at the main actors (Ceferin at UEFA, Perez at Real), the referee committee (Rosetti, Carballo from Italy,Spain and Sajn, Damkova with her husband Roman Berbr from Eastern Europe), the Eastern European linesmen and referees that got appointed, and what they did in these 50 Real Madrid knockout stage games over the last decade, yourself.

Lifetime - Staked: 921.15u, Profit/Loss: +14.81u, ROI: 1.61%, Parlay Suggestions: 177-69 Dog of the Week: 13-18, Picks: 8-3 (73% accuracy)
2024 - Staked: 274.05u, Profit/Loss: -18.55u
As always, scroll down for UFC Louisville Breakdowns. The following is just a recap of last event’s results.
~UFC 302 (PREVIOUS CARD)~
Staked: 12.5u
Profit/Loss: +7.64u
ROI: 61%
Parlay Suggestions: 3-0
Dog of the week: Cesar Almeida ❌
Picks: 8-3
Underwhelming card, but as expected it was a pretty easy one to predict. The favourites were mostly consistent, and most of the expected methods of victory landed. Nice profit made for once, but I think I had some fantastic reads on the card in spots that I didn’t bet. I said I expected Poirier to be competitive, and that Islam ITD wasn’t the lock people said it was. Matthews Decision was one I wanted to bet. I warned people that Hafez or Morono were the most likely bed-shitters. Basically, I think last week’s post would have been very useful to read.
✅ 2u Sean Strickland + Over 1.5 Rounds (-130) (won +1.54u)
✅ 2u Sean Strickland in R4, 5 or by Decision (+175) (won +3.5u) (accidentally edited this to 1u on the previous post, which wasn’t the intention. It’s was originally listed as 2u, and was tracked as such on my BetMMA record).
✅ 2u Kevin Holland + Grant Dawson (+110) (won 2.2u)
❌ 2u Cesar Almeida (+125)
❌ 1u Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos (+150)
✅ 2u Ailin Perez + Over 1.5 Rounds (-120) (won +1.66u)
✅ 1u Makhachev, Strickland, Holland, J. Almeida (+224) (won +2.24u)
❌ 0.5u Morono, Matthews, Hafez, Perez (+401)

~UFC Louisville~
Good to see more touring cards, and a slight step up in calibre from the usual Apex shit. Not a lot of spots I am confident in, I have to be honest…but I see a few underdogs that I’m sprinkling on.

~Jared Cannonier v Nassourdine Imavov~
Not another Nassourdine Imavov five rounder! I’m a fan of his skillset, but I think his cardio is suspect across 25 minutes, which ultimately makes his fights tricky to predict in spots like this. He’s not exactly a potent finisher, and I can’t trust him to win rounds four and five…so I think his path to victory is therefore limited by principal. A Nassourdine Imavov in a main event relies heavily on him winning R1, 2 and 3.
On the other side, Jared Cannonier is a guy I’ve never truly given the respect he deserves. A split decision win over Sean Strickland in a 25-minute fight is certainly impressive, as is the absolute beating he put on Marvin Vettori straight after* (* I believe Vettori has declined massively and is washed, so I won’t be going crazy in overreacting to that). Cannonier is a hard hitter, but he’s also gotten really comfortable in upping his volume across five round too, landing 141 and 241 significant strikes in those two aforementioned bouts respectively. The quantity didn’t dip in rounds 4 and 5 either, which is key considering my comments on Imavov’s cardio.
So I give Cannonier an advantage in R4 and 5, but what about across the other three? Well, the power advantage also goes to him, but the diversity with grappling and submission attempts falls with the Frenchman. Cannonier has started mixing takedowns into his game a bit more, which does present an opportunity for Imavov’s nasty front chokes…but other than that I’m not really sure where else I give Imavov a clear advantage outside of age and height. He’s the bigger fighter, but Cannonier is a strong dude and has looked just fine against other Middleweights (no one of Imavov’s size, to be fair).
Jared is now 40 years old, which is a bit of a dreaded number, which I think is the reasoning for this line being the way it is. People seem keen to blindly fade that age, regardless of whether it’s presented itself on tape. I see what they’re getting at, but Cannonier has put in two of his best performances of his career in his last two…I am not convinced it’s as simple as fading a 40 year old here.
So with that aside, I see far more merit to Cannonier’s side than Imavov’s, so the +100/-125 betting line feels off to me. I understand that Nassourdine just put in convincing performances against Roman Dolidze and Chris Curtis, but personally I think both of those fighters are a cut below Jared Cannonier (and I bet Nassourdine in both spots there). Cannonier would have looked good there too.
However, we have seen Imavov challenged against some of Middleweight’s common names, such as Sean Strickland and Joaquin Buckley…whilst Cannonier has looked good everywhere except against Izzy and Whittaker (he did drop a couple of rounds to Kelvin Gastelum, but it’s hardly raises alarm bells to me as Kelvin’s a tough guy to beat across 25 minutes of kickboxing).
I would personally make Cannonier the favourite here, anywhere between -125 and -150, and I assume the dreaded age of 40 is the reason for the odds here. I ask you this…if Jared Cannonier was 35, would the line be different? I believe it would be, and age is relative in MMA. It’s something to take seriously, of course, but I don’t think Cannonier even looked like he had started to decline in his most recent fight against Vettori last year.
I’ll be backing the underdog here at +100 or better. The line looks to be moving in Imavov’s favour so I will be patient.
How I line this fight: Jared Cannonier -137 (58%), Nassourdine Imavov +137 (42%)
Bet or pass: 1u Jared Cannonier to Win (+100 or better)
Prop leans: None
Live Betting Leans: If Cannonier looks to have won any of R1, 2, or 3 but is still a bettable price going into the championship rounds, I think he should be favoured to win those so could be a good entry in-play.

~Dominick Reyes v Dustin Jacoby~
This one should be fun for the live audience, but it’s an incredibly volatile fight for the bettors.
Very obvious to see why that’s the case for Dom Reyes – he’s got heaps of potential on a good day, but his chin is dust at this point. Seriously, he got knocked out cold by the jab of Ryan Spann. In a striking based fight at 205lbs, that’s all you need to know to decide that putting money on him is an uncomfortable idea.
Dustin Jacoby on the other hand is not the most potent finisher at Light Heavyweight, which immediately makes me think that Dustin isn’t the kind of guy you’d want to play executioner when he’s the favourite against someone with a flaw like Reyes’ chin. You want someone you can trust to put dudes to sleep in one punch – I don’t think that’s Jacoby (having gone the distance in seven of his 11 fights in this second UFC stint, and winning via leg kicks in one of the stoppages). Also, he’s not even particularly reliable to win rounds either, given that he was supposed to be the more technical fighter compared to Alonzo Menifield, Khalil Rountree, Azamat Murzakanov, and Maxim Grishin – where he was a moderate/big favourite every time, and never covered the price.
I still expect Jacoby to probably be the superior fighter across 15 minutes, but his -225 price tag definitely implies that a finish is expected by the oddsmakers…and I just have a whole lot less confidence that he lands it. From there, I also have less confidence that he’ll be the one winning rounds, given how easily he’s fumbled that in the past…so I just don’t see how you can have around 70% confidence in him winning here. Honestly I don’t really think Jacoby can ever justify that kind of pricetag at a UFC level when we have seen him shit the bed so many times.
On the other hand, I couldn’t trust Dominick Reyes’ chin to survive a strong gust of wind, so there’s no way I’d want to play him either. A very easy pass. I’ll pick Jacoby to win though, but I’d never bet him at this number.
In terms of thinking about props, I might be interested in looking at the Over 1.5 Rounds here, given that I disagree with the oddsmaker’s believe in Jacoby’s finishing ability. That’s going to be a horrible bet to sit through, so I’d probably need a decent price like +150 or better. We’ll see what they’re offering, but I doubt it’s that good
EDIT: The more I think about this, the more I think Reyes is value. I still can't really bring myself to play it at under +200, but I will be picking him instead. I just don't think Jacoby KO's him as likely as people think.
How I line this fight: Dominick Reyes +175 (36%), Dustin Jacoby -175 (64%)
Bet or pass: Over 1.5 Rounds (+150 or better…no idea if that’s anywhere near what we’ll get)
Prop leans: See above

~Julian Marquez v Zach Reese~
Julian Marquez is a really fun fighter to watch, I’m glad to see him back inside the cage. He’s never been the most talented, but he’s a C+ at everything and has A grade heart. To beat him, you need to be clinical or vastly superior in one area, or Marquez might surprise you and turn the fight into a war of attrition.
Zach Reese is a 6-1 fighter that lost his debut Cody Brundage (I actually bet Brundage there, haha). Talk about fumbling the bag. He just seems like a classic DWCS fighter, who scores quick finishes against taxi drivers and then is suddenly expected to be diverse and talented enough to take on an actual trained professional that’s been competing against a much higher level for years. The difference between the regionals and the UFC has always been vast, and DWCS proves that time and time again.
Zach Reese’s longest fight time is 4 minutes and 13 seconds. He has literally never been in a fight that’s hit the second round. Julian Marquez, on the other hand, has gone longer than that in five of his 6 UFC appearances to date – and his opponents have all competed in the organisation at least five times. I genuinely think that tells you all you need to know.
And the craziest part is that Zach Reese ain’t even an inexperienced young gun. Him fumbling the debut wasn’t like Tom Nolan, a 24 year old kid that believed his own hype and got sloppy in his debut. Reese is THIRTY YEARS OLD.
The gulf in experience is massive, and the difference in age isn’t. I know Julian Marquez’s UFC record isn’t pretty at all, but how well do you think Zach Reese would fare if he faced the same opponents at the time Marquez did? I reckon he’d be 0-6.
Maybe I’m crazy, but Julian Marquez deserves better than to be a + money underdog against a literal regional opponent. Reese has tall man’s defence, he got tagged in both fights in DWCS/UFC and they were on the feet about 20 seconds combined. Yes he’s clearly got a great submission game on bottom, but Marquez has never been submitted, is a BJJ purple belt and has trained at decent camps before. He’s currently at the MMA Lab and has been training with Cannonier for this one.
I’ll be rolling the dice on the more proven fighter at +100.
How I line this fight: Julian Marquez -150 (60%), Zach Reese +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: 1u Julian Marquez to Win (+100)
Prop leans: None
Live Betting Leans: R1 finishers often have bad cardio, so if we get to the stool then Marquez is definitely worth a bet to turn the tide.

~Brunno Ferreira v Dustin Stoltzfus~
I can’t figure Dustin Stoltzfus out. He’s always presented himself as a good but one-dimensional grappler, judging by performances against high level competition such as Rodolpho Vieira and Gerald Meerschaert…but the way he showed up against Punahele Soriano made him look like a completely different guy. He was supposed to be easily outgunned on the feet there, but he looked seasoned and composed in the striking, and ultimately ended up getting a finish that I think very few people saw coming.
Brunno Ferreira is a super explosive Brazilian powerhouse that hasn’t gone past the halfway point in a fight yet. He throws heat and has that madman style, but his fights are so short I’ve no idea if he actually has any redeeming qualities from a technical or minute-winning perspective. As you probably know by now, my least favourite fighting style is ‘big strike go brrrr’. Ferreira has also had some bizarre results himself, pulling off a huge upset against Gregory Rodrigues, and then getting starched by Nursulton Ruziboev.
The only thing I know about Brunno is that he’ll go to war with an opponent that wants to meet him in the middle…I’ve no idea if Dustin Stoltzfus really wants to do that. He handled himself really well against a similar kind of style in Puna Soriano…but he’s also the same guy that got womped in under 20 seconds by Abus Magomedov.
To conclude, I think I could easily see Brunno Ferreira scoring an easy KO inside a couple of minutes, but I could also see this one looking way more competitive and close than the betting line suggests if Stoltzfus makes it to the stool. Lots of different possibilities, not a lot of confidence in any one outcome.
Brunno Ferreira kind of presents similar red flags to Zach Reese in the last breakdown. The difference between the two, and the reason I am fading Reese and not Brunno, is that I have confidence and knowledge that Marquez can handle that early chaos. I can’t say the same about Stoltzfus, so I won’t be taking a stab on him. Personally I think he’s absolutely the value side though, so if you’re someone who wants to bet every fight then absolutely take him.
I will also be picking him to win, but not because I think he does so 51% or more of the time…just because Ferreira is only known to have a limited path to victory that could easily fall apart.
How I line this fight: Such a volatile fight, I have no idea.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

~Punahele Soriano v Miguel Baeza~
Speak of the devil!
Punahele Soriano is so, so overrated. I have no idea how he’s even still in the UFC, or how he even got there in the first place. He was hyped up by Dana and the promo team as this scary and lethal striker….but then he pussy’d out and grappled his way to a decision win against Jamie Pickett on DWCS. Surprisingly they rewarded him with a contract (but didn’t want Brendan Loughnane!). Since then, lethal KO artist Puna has scored just three knockouts…but in the four fights he hasn’t, he’s looked like absolute shit. Getting schooled on the feet by Dustin Stoltzfus and Brendan Allen is a really bad look when you’re being advertised as a striker…and losing a decision to Nick Maximov isn’t a good look either!
To their credit, this fight against Miguel Baeza is a genius pairing by the UFC matchmakers though, because Baeza’s career has kind of panned out the same as Soriano’s. A hard hitting DWCS graduate, Baeza got off to a decent start with three consecutive finishes, most notably against Matt Brown. He stepped up the level of competition to face Santiago Ponzinibbio, which resulted in a life and death decision that he narrowly lost. Unfortunately, the losses snowballed dramatically as he was later KO’d by Khaos Williams and Andre Fialho. The latter result the most shocking, given that Fialho is dogshit. Baeza has since taken two years off…and everyone forgot he existed.
Apologies for taking two massive paragraphs to give you both men’s life stories, but it really does paint the picture of this fight from a betting perspective. Both men are overhyped KO artists - with one lacking in durability, and the other lacking in brain cells.
Puna is probably more likely to walk away with the KO win due to Baeza’s declining durability, but he’s also the more likely to get out-struck and styled on if this one turns into a longer distanced fight. Who wins that kind of fight? I have absolutely no idea. I’m just glad that one guy gets to stick around after this fight is over, because I’d be keen to fade both guys in the future.
I have little confidence so it counts for nothing, but I’ll pick Baeza simply because I like to fade finish-reliant fighters, and Miguel seems to be the more technical. His leg kick should work nicely here.
How I line this fight: Punahele Soriano +125 (45%), Miguel Baeza -125 (55%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

~Raul Rosas Jr. vs Ricky Turcios~
I’ve copy/pasted my breakdown for this fight from the UFC Mexico event, and made some updated changes:
I’m still pretty gassed about hitting the fade on Raul Rosas Jr with Christian Rodriguez – definitely one of my favourite bets of 2023. I saw an untested 18 year old that was the beneficiary the UFC hype machine, and a then unknown opponent who had proven tricky to beat with the style Rosas Jr has. I saw it as a pick’em, and Rodriguez was +200. Easy bet to make.
In that fight, Rosas Jr kind of cardio-dumped and gave up once it was obvious that early finish wasn’t going to present itself, and that’s certainly a concern until we see him fight competently for 15 minutes at this level. I can think of countless UFC hype trains that hid their shocking minute winning ability behind dominant and exciting R1 finishes (Edmen Shahbazyan was my initial example, but since writing this Joe Pyfer has given another great recent example), and I therefore simply cannot trust Raul Rosas at this stage in his career when he’s still going to be sitting at -250 on the betting line due to his popularity.
Is Ricky Turcios worth the gamble as an underdog? I don’t really think so. He has been taken down seven and six times in two different UFC fights, has losses to Aimann Zahabi and Boston Salmon, and his wins were against Kevin Natividad and Brady Hiestand…which were both splits. The UFC are clearly treating this as a lay-up fight for Rosas Jr, but without feeding him a promotional newcomer or a fellow inexperienced guy. I don’t mean lay-up as if it’s a squash match, but it’s assumed that he SHOULD win here, instead of them throwing him to the wolves or making him go up against a fellow serious prospect.
Stylistically this one all revolves around the cardio for me, because I don’t think Turcios has what it takes to win this fight off the merit of his own skillset. He needs Rosas Jr. to gas out first, if he’s going to have any hope of having his way here. We have no way of knowing whether or not Rosas will gas, as it could have just been a one off and he’s so young that he could make the improvements quickly.
Personally, I’d be willing to give Rosas Jr the benefit of the doubt. The Rodriguez loss really should have opened his eyes, and it’s often the best thing for a young prospect to get that wake up call sometimes, as he was probably starting to believe his own hype. If the cardio is fixable, I assume he’s done all he can to fix it. He therefore deserves to be the favourite, but I won’t be betting on it.
How I line this fight: Raul Rosas Jr -200 (67%), Ricky Turcios +200 (33%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: I was originally going to bet the Over 2.5 rounds, but I’ll pass on that now.

~Eduarda Moura v Denise Gomes~
Eduarda Moura’s UFC debut did not impress me at all. I didn’t bother researching her regional footage, and from what I saw in that debut she’s a size/weight bully that isn’t even that amazing at what she does. Yes she outgrappled and mauled that Mexican woman, but the size difference was comical and she couldn’t have found an easier opponent to beat if she tried.
I had one of my best bets of 2023 on Denise Gomes’ last fight against Angela Hill (big up Angie for winning a couple of weeks ago, she’s such a money train for me), opting to fade the scary finishing ability of a WMMA fighter for a more technical and historically durable veteran on the return. Not only did Angie school her, she even managed to mix in some grappling to make the win even more stylish. That gets the alarm bells ringing here, as Moura’s MO is definitely to grapple, and Angie’s no grappler. It's a huge piece of the puzzle to figuring out this fight.
I don’t have a strong opinion on this one, because both women give me very strong fraud vibes. I think Moura is absolutely going to be one to fade in the future, and Gomes has already been faded in the past. Personally I don’t think the equally limited Denise Gomes is the woman to give Moura her first L, because stylistically this looks like a tricky fight for her. Fingers crossed Moura wins and the fade opportunity is live next time.
EDIT: Since writing that, the price on Moura appears to have gotten a bit better. I wouldn't be able to resist the value if Moura moved down to -137, because WMMA grapplers are usually reliable when finishes on the feet are less likely. I don't feel great about it, but I'd have to play Moura for a unit if she was -137.
How I line this fight: No idea how much by, but Moura should be favoured.
Bet or pass: Pass, unless Moura becomes -137
Prop leans: None

~Puja Tomar v Rayanne Amanda (dos Santos)~
Some people believe in the narrative that you should try and fade Indian fighters. That worked pretty well last time Jeka Sarragih fought!
I bet on Rayanne dos Santos in her UFC debut, and she lost a split to an inexperienced opponent with bad cardio. I was impressed with her striking in Invicta, but she struggled to do anything meaningful stuff in that UFC debut. By the looks of the early line I’m seeing, she’s about -180 here. Who the hell is going to bet that!?
I obviously know nothing about Puja, but her record shows she’s fought two serious opponents. You know I love WMMA more than anyone else, but I have absolutely no interest in doing tape for this one. Pass.
How I line this fight: No idea
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

~Cody Stamann v Taylor Lapilus~
Very disappointed by the betting line here. When a fight like this gets announced, I immediately get excited because I think there’s a chance the books might get caught out and give a very bettable price on a fight that seems close on paper, but should be quite one-sided in reality, due to the stylistics.
Taylor Lapilus deserves to be -200 here, maybe even steeper. Reason being, he’s great where Stamann is average, but he’s also good where Stamann is good. The Frenchman is a slick striker that should certainly be expected to land the more eye-catching shots, when compared to Stamann’s T-Rex boxing. He will enjoy a 9-inch reach advantage, and should just be able to hit and not get hit. Stamann barely has any power either, so even if he does land a punch for every two he absorbs, I doubt it’s going to do much to convince the judges to credit him as the round winner.
Cody Stamann has veered away from his wrestling roots in recent fights, but you’d think it would serve him well here, given the reach and technical disadvantage he will find himself at. Whilst this would be true against another opponent, Taylor Lapilus has a very good anti-grappling game. His takedown defence is good, but even when he does get floored he works hard and effectively to get back to his feet, or at the very least nullify his opponent. His most recent fight was an exception to that as Farid Basharat made light work of him…but that was a very impressive performance that I don’t think many could replicate.
So in summary, I think Stamann is going to be shut out here, and I don’t think he’s going to really be able to find success anywhere in this fight. He will either stand at distance and clearly get outstruck by the fighter with the better footwork that will keep him at range…or he attempts to wrestle and likely has little luck at finding any real success. At the very least, the success he does have probably won’t be enough to erase the striking deficit he’s already accrued.
On a more narrative based note, Stamann also appears to have regressed a fair bit in recent years. He was once a gatekeeper to the top 15, drawing with the likes of Song Yadong and even winning a round against Merab…but since then losing decisions to 37-year-old Douglas Silva de Andrade and winning questionable decisions against Luan Lacerda. I’d say this is a tricky fight for Stamann in his prime, but Cody’s trending downwards too.
As I said in the opening paragraph, I’m disappointed that the books didn’t offer a better price on Lapilus, and the fact that money instantly seems to be coming in on Lapilus shows that the odds aren't quite wide enough. I've moved in for 2u on the Frenchman at -188.
How I line this fight: Cody Stamann +225 (31%), Taylor Lapilus -225 (69%)
Bet or pass: 2u Taylor Lapilus to Win (-188)
Prop leans: None

~Brad Katona v Jesse Butler~
The less time spent talking about this one, the better. Brad Katona is possibly the least intimidating MMA fighter to have ever graced the UFC, both in the way he fights, and his demeanour. The former is more important, because he can sometimes struggle to win rounds because he’s outgunned most of the time. He needs to put on a perfect defensive display to win striking fights, because if he gets wobbled he probably can’t get the round back.
Jesse Butler is a can with about as much of a right to be on the UFC’s roster as I do. He has no striking ability, as seen in his 23 second KO MASSACRE at the hands of 40-year-old Jim Miller (one of my favourite KOs of 2023 that one, definitely recommend if you didn’t see it!). That lack of striking ability, both offensively and defensively, means that he is very unlikely to get the better of a good point fighter like Brad Katona. But everyone has a puncher’s chance.
Katona is nearly -600 here. Mostly justified, but also eye-wateringly steep at the exact same time when you consider Katona’s path to victory is almost exclusively by decision! Pass.
How I line this fight: Brad Katona -400 (80%), Jesse Butler +400 (20%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: Me to fall asleep watching this one (+200 or better)

~Ludovit Klein v Thiago Moises~
Two guys I have historically had a very tricky time analysing. I was high on Klein when he made his debut, then I turned my back on him after the losses to Trizano and Landwehr – and since then he’s been pulling off upsets and continuing to prove he was worth the hype he entered the UFC with. The dude has some of the best high kicks I’ve ever seen from a fighter.
Thiago Moises has always been credentialed and talented, but he’s failed to deliver on the promises his abilities make on paper. Moises is capable of taking fighters down and submitting them early, but it’s genuinely taken nine UFC fights for him to actually go out there and do that. And then he did it twice in a row (against Giagos and Melq Costa).
So I think that does a good job of explaining why I am going to be non-committal and just leave this fight alone. Klein is great when he’s on form, but he’s shown himself to be capable of dropping the ball in fights he really should win. He’s proven himself to be a guy that you back as an underdog, but avoid as a favourite. He’s barely either here, but he does have a minus next to his name.
Moises is also too inconsistent to trust either. I think there’s a chance that this could be a winnable fight for him, as his grappling will definitely be superior if he can force things to the floor. That sounds like a great opportunity for a +100 fighter…but Moises definitely won’t look that number if he decides to stand and trade – and his 1.64 takedowns landed per 15 minutes statistic is enough to assume he won’t.
The oddsmakers are right in lining this one close, because both men have very legitimate paths to victory with only a few small factors landing in their favour. I’d argue that Klein is the rightful favourite (and therefore my pick) due to all fights starting standing and Moises’ track record…but this is a close one.
How I line this fight: Ludovit Klein -125 (55%), Thiago Moises +125 (45%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

~Charles Radtke v Carlos Prates~
If you’re a regular reader of my posts, you may know that historically I am someone who genuinely thinks Trevin Giles has some redeeming qualities. In fact, I claimed in his recent fight against Carlos Prates that the line was wide, and that Giles may be able to find a way to have some success. Having watched that fight back, I think I was justified to feel that way.
I liked what I saw from Prates on DWCS, with the way he mixed up volume, pressure and power…but ultimately that performance against Giles was a bit concerning. He definitely lost round one, and by the end of the fight he was outstruck almost two to one. Of course, he won via KO…but to expect a fighter to be bailed out by their raw power every time is a bit foolish.
Charles Radtke is ironically a fighter I’ve had nothing but bad things to say about. I slated his debut win against Mike Mathetha (the artist formally known as Blood Diamond), and tried to fade him when he faced Gilbert Urbina. Boy did he look great in that sophomore appearance, I was really impressed. His striking just seemed so tight, accurate and crisp, I couldn’t believe how easily he pieced up Urbina.
I’m obviously not super confident in my analysis here, simply due to the lack of tape we have on both guys…but I don’t really understand what we are supposed to have seen from Prates to justify a -200 pricetag? He was struggling against Giles, and had he not landed the precise punch that ended things…he could easily have lost that one! I get that he has a big size advantage…but Urbina was taller and Radtke approached the striking gameplan perfectly. He also has Belal Muhammad in his corner (or at least he did vs Urbina), who I rate as a pretty intelligent fighter.
This one feel like it could develop into a very competitive fight, and the finishing ability is strong on either side. Radtke has also shown a diverse game and an ability to mix in grappling when necessary, which could serve him well here. For those reasons, I’m happy to roll the dice on yet another underdog here, and back Charles Radtke for 1u at +150 or better. I’ll be waiting a little bit to see what the initial line movement does.
How I line this fight: Charles Radtke +100 (50%), Carlos Prates +100 (50%)
Bet or pass: 1u Charles Radtke to Win (+150 or better)
Prop leans: None

~Daniel Marcos v John Castaneda~
I’m quite high on Daniel Marcos. I just think he’s a really talented striker. I bet him heavily against Aoriqileng, and were it not for the unfortunate NC, I think that would have looked like a really smart bet (not the only time that’s even happened to me this year…thanks Piera Rodriguez). People still hate on him for potentially getting a robbery over Davey Grant…but Grant is a very tricky guy to look good against at the best of times. The likes of Jonathan Martinez, Adrian Yanez, and even Marlon Vera have all struggled to decisively beat Davey.
John Castaneda is certainly the more well-rounded martial artist here, as the way he’s mixed takedowns into his game has been really intelligent. He’s also shown much more dangerousness than Marcos, landing a knockdown in four of his six UFC performances, and even scoring a submission win over Miles Johns.
For as long as this one stays standing, I think it’s a close fight that’s hard to call. Whilst I give a slight minute winning edge to Marcos for his higher level of technicality to his striking, I think Castaneda’s power can be a great equaliser, as can his ability to mix in takedowns. I’ve not seen much of Marcos’ anti-grappling to believe he can fend off a takedown threat if Castaneda wants to force things there.
So yeah, a non-committal breakdown but I think this is a close fight to call. There certainly isn’t any betting value to a fight this close anyway. I’ll pick Castaneda and give him the slight edge on the betting line for his diversity and finishing upside.
How I line this fight: John Castaneda -125 (55%), Daniel Marcos +125 (45%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

~Andrea Lee v Montana De La Rosa~
It’s always tricky to navigate the fade when you see a fighter with a glaring deficiency that keeps taking losses. Andrea Lee is on a sharp downwards slope – she’s 35 years old, she cannot stop takedowns, and she’s got a 3-7 record in decisions in the UFC. Those are some pretty damning facts, but what’s worse is that Lee’s decline is really showing in her performances. I confidently bet Miranda Maverick against her at near pick’em due to her grappling superiority, but I was very surprised to see Maverick actually clearly outrstriking Lee across 15 minutes. That was a terrible look because Maverick’s striking really has never looked good. That should not have happened.
The reason I began by saying that it’s difficult fading a fighter in Lee’s position, is because there comes a time where the calibre of opponent clearly takes a downwards step. I’ve always been a big believer in Miranda Maverick, and I believe she’s top 10 in the division, so trusting her to feast on Andrea Lee’s carcass was easy. This time however, we’re being asked to trust Montana De La Rosa, a clearly inferior fighter, to do the same. Historically, Lee is certainly a cut above her, and Lee’s 30-27 victory over MDLR in 2019 demonstrated that perfectly.
Montana’s not bad bad, she’s just lacking in physicality to really be able to get her game going. She’s definitely a grappler, but a 31% takedown accuracy and poor top control means that she struggles to really find openings to do her best work...so she just kind of survives in fights if she can’t grapple you. Just looking through her UFC fights and it’s so obvious where her calibre lies…none of the girls she’s beaten apart from Ariane Lipski have been in the UFC for years, and even some of the names she’s beaten aren’t super elite either. And back when she fought Lipski, the Brazilian had some of the worst anti-grappling we’d seen in WMMA.
So this is clearly one of those fights where my predictions and probabilities for the fight weigh more on how either woman loses, as opposed to how they win. Right off the bat, that’s an awful premise to be considering a bet, so I can easily tell you this is one to avoid…and I haven’t even looked at the betting line yet.
Yep, Andrea lee sits around -130. I expected exactly that, as it’s a coin-toss as to which woman is inferior, but history is worth something and Lee does have a win over her opponent here. Andrea Lee is the pick because MDLR already landed five takedowns the first time and did fuck all with them. I think level of competition is worth something and this is too far of a step down for Lee, in my opinion. I was going to play Lee by Decision but I'm not a fan of the price, so I'll play her for 1u at -125.
How I line this fight: Andrea Lee -150 (60%), Montana De La Rosa +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

Bets (Bold = been placed)
✅ KSW - 2u Phil de Fries to Win (-200)
PFL - 1u Dylan Tuke to Win (-125)
1u Jared Cannonier to Win (+116)
1u Dominick Reyes to Win (+205)
2u Julian Marquez to Win (+100)
1u Charles Radtke to Win (+200)
2u Taylor Lapilus to Win (-188)
2u Eduarda Moura to Win (-150)
1u Andrea Lee to Win (-125)
0.5u Andrea Lee to Win by Decision (+140)
0.25u Parlay Pieces (+1034)
Parlay Pieces: Phil de Fries, Julian Marquez, Taylor Lapilus, Eduarda Moura, Andrea Lee
Dog of the Week: Jared Cannonier
Picks: Jared Cannonier, Dom Reyes, Julian Marquez, Dustin Stoltzfus, Miguel Baeza, Raul Rosas Jr, Eduarda Moura, Taylor Lapilus, Brad Katona, Ludovit Klein, Charles Radtke, John Castaneda, Andrea Lee
BETS FOR NEXT WEEK (Perez v Taira)
1u Alex Perez to Win (+150 or better)
2u Tagir Ulanbekov to Win (-167)
3u Garrett Armfield to Win (-175)
2u Asu Almabaev & Josefine Knutsson to Win (-110)
1u Josh Quinlan to Win & Under 1.5 Rounds (+150 or better)
0.5u Carli Judice to Win (+200 or better)
0.25u Parlay Pieces (Ulanbekov, Almabaev, Knutsson, Armfield) (+400)

Welcome to mma's discussion of UFC 302: Makhachev vs. Poirier, from Newark, New Jersey, United States! Please keep the fight discussions in here. We also have a fight thread in our Kbin community for those who would prefer not to use Reddit but would still like to talk about the fights.
If you do make a post about a fight remember to:

• Keep spoilers out of the title
• Tag your post as a spoiler
• Add [Spoiler] to the title

Card Info
Airing on PPV on Saturday 06.01.2024
Main Card @ 10PM ET

Division	Fighters
Lightweight	Islam Makhachev vs. Dustin Poirier
Middleweight	Sean Strickland vs. Paulo Costa
Middleweight	Kevin Holland vs. Micha\u0142 Oleksiejczuk
Welterweight	Niko Price vs. Alex Morono
Welterweight	Randy Brown vs. Elizeu Zaleski

Prelims @ 8PM ET

Division	Fighters
Middleweight	Roman Kopylov vs. C\u00e9sar Almeida
Heavyweight	Jailton Almeida vs. Alexandr Romanov
Lightweight	Grant Dawson vs. Joe Solecki
Welterweight	Phil Rowe vs. Jake Matthews

Early Prelims @ 6:15PM ET

Division	Fighters
Welterweight	Mickey Gall vs. Bassil Hafez
Bantamweight	Joselyne Edwards vs. Ailin Perez
Flyweight	Andr\u00e9 Lima vs. Mitch Raposo

^{Fight card order and start times may be inaccurate.}

Useful Links
Live Updates: Tapology,
Social Media: Facebook, Instagram, Ultimate Fighting Championship, Twitter, Youtube
Reddit: Reddit Stream, General Discussion, Flair bets

Keep it civil.
Do not ask for or supply streams. Your post will be removed and your ability to post will be suspended.
Enjoy the fights! Get HYPE!

SUMMARY: UEFA has constantly fed referee crews from countries with a high degree of corruption into important Real Madrid CL knockout stage games. These referees and linesmen, mostly from low level Eastern European leagues, have cheated on behalf of Real Madrid for nearly a decade.

1. Real Madrid is in financial trouble. The costs of the stadium renovation are spiraling out of control (€1.76bn and counting instead of €550m planned). Higher interest rates have made Real’s debt (€1.6bn) unsustainable. Real can not afford to be knocked out of the Champions League early.
2. UEFA assigns referee crews from countries with a high probability of corruption to important Real Madrid knockout stage games. Most commonly used are referee crews from Eastern Europe, followed by Italy. Scandinavian referee teams have not been assigned.
3. For no good reason the referee crews are assigned weeks in advance by UEFA. This leaves enough time for Real to contact, influence and bribe referee crews.
4. Due to the nature of the soccer game (few big moments decide games) and the vague and clumsy rulebook the impact of the referee crew is huge. Offside in particular is a complete mess: The Linesman might or might not wave the flag, the Referee might or might not stop play, the VaR might or might not overrule.
5. The last 4 knockout stage duels featuring Real Madrid and German Teams (3x Bayern, 1x Leipzig) have all been manipulated. „Offside“ has been the main tool.
6. The Linesmen situation is incomprehensible. They are not well known and not well paid. It is not even easy to figure out which side of the field they operated on. Yet these Linesmen, who in some cases may earn €50 a game working in their low level home league, regularly have been the difference maker with €50m or more on the line in early stage knockout games. Linesmen have misused their huge impact to swing at least 5 goals towards Real Madrid in the 4 duels mentioned above (Lewandowski 2017, 2x Ronaldo 2017, Sesko 2024, De Ligt 2024). The probability of these events (skewed referee crew assignments, mistakes and rule violations in games) occuring randomly over the course of a decade is zero.
7. There is no UEFA mechanism to systematically and transparently analyze referee crew decisions after the game. Compare all that to the NBA: Even though the impact of the referee team is multiple times lower than in soccer, the NBA doesn‘t post referee teams until gameday and issues a report to analyze critical decisions afterwards.

UEFA Assignments of referee crews to Real Madrid CL Knockout stage games (2015-2024, 51 games)
20 x Eastern Europe
10 x Italy
0 x Scandinavia
Ranking of Champions League Countries using the Corruption Index
Tier 1: Scandinavia (Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway) Tier 2: Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany Tier 3: Belgium, France, UK
Tier 4: Portugal, Spain, Italy Tier 5: Slovenia, Poland, Slovakia Tier 6: Hungary, Bosnia, Serbia, Turkey
Wrong incentives and bad intentions within the rotten core (UEFA, Real) of the Champions League have led to a degradation in the quality of refereeing in general. It’s not the best referee teams that are selected. The referee crews working UEFA games are picked for different reasons.
UEFA Referee Committee
The extreme skew in assigning referee crews to games starts with the UEFA Referee Committee itself: The Chair is from Italy (Roberto Rosetti), 3 of the 4 Officers are from Spain (Carlos Carballo) and Eastern Europe (Dagmar Damkova, Czechia and Vladimir Sajn, Slovenia).
These UEFA referee crew pickers have ignored in excess of 80% of eligible referees all European Countries have put on the relevant FIFA list. Unsurprisingly 8 of the 14 most heavily used referee crews in this year’s Champions League are from Eastern Europe and Italy/Spain.
UEFA selects referee crews Real Madrid got the best handle on. The weakest link are Linesmen.
It gets even better: Rosetti, Carballo, Damkova and Sajn will also pick referees for EURO 2024.
some important Real Madrid Knockout stage CL Games / Eastern European Linesmen:
2016 Round of 16 AS Roma - Real Madrid
Linesmen: Slysko (Slovenia), Wilczek (Czechia) Referee: Kralovec (Czechia)
2017 Quarter-Final Real Madrid – Bayern München
Linesmen: Ring (Hungary), Toth (Hungary) Referee: Kassai (Hungary)
2018 Semifinal Real Madrid – Bayern München
Linesmen: Duran (Turkey), Ongun (Turkey) Referee: Cakir (Turkey)
2018 Final Real Madrid – Liverpool FC
Linesmen: Ristic (Serbia), Durdevic (Serbia) Referee: Mazic (Serbia)
2024 Round of 16 RB Leipzig – Real Madrid
Linesmen: Ibrisimbegovic (Bosnia), Beljo (Bosnia) Referee: Peljto (Bosnia)
2024 Semifinal Real Madrid – Bayern München
Linesmen: Listkiewicz (Poland), Kupsik (Poland) Referee: Marciniak (Poland)
The linesmen in particular are unfit to work games of this magnitude in general.
From a Champions League perspective: These are amateurs. Usually they work in very low level local leagues, refereeing in front of 2.500 visitors. Some countries they come from have a GDP per person and month under €1.000. They may work full time in a different job that has nothing (or too much) to do with soccer. For the most part these Linesmen also stay anonymous. No matter how big the mistake or rule violation they committed: In recaps they are referred to not by name, it’s „the linesman“. Crooked UEFA also won’t care. They’ll be there next time again.
The main underlying reason they got assigned to these games: To cheat on behalf of Real Madrid
The impact from all referee, linesman and VaR mistakes and rule violations on both sides over its last 50 knockout stage games has been worth a net 20 goals for Real Madrid.
Mistakes and rule violations have made the difference in a net 8 of the 23 knockout stage duels Real Madrid „won“ from 2015-2024.
With fair and proper refereeing, Real Madrid would not have won at least 2 of the CL titles awarded by UEFA over that time period.
Financially, the Linesmen and Referees have swung close to 200 Million €uro towards Real.
Best of Real Madrid Cheating
2017 Real - Bayern 1-2 (4-2 aET) Lewandowski (Bayern) was whistled back incorrectly for offside all alone in front of goal. Ronaldo (Real) scored from an offside position after using his arm to stop the ball (2-2), and later added another offside goal (3-2). Bayern played extra time short-handed after Vidal got a Red Card playing the ball.
2024 Real - Bayern 2-1 A Linesman prematurely and incorrectly signalled offside just before De Ligt (Bayern) scored (2-2), with the referee being complicit by immediately blowing his whistle. They had practiced this maneuver on Davies (Bayern). A few minutes earlier, in a similar situation on the other side, the referee crew let play continue to allow Joselu (Real) to score.
Red Cards (2015-2024)
Teams playing Real Madrid: 8 Real Madrid players: 2
Vázquez (2016 v ManCity), Ramos (2016 v Atlético), Casemiro (2017 v Bayern), Ramos (2018 v Liverpool) should all have been sent off in critical moments of close knockout games.
It’s all just a Joke
In a 2016 game, Ronaldo (Real) caught a cross that was high with both hands and threw it into the goal. After seeing it, the linesman signalled „Offside“. Ronaldo didn’t even get a Yellow Card.
Referee crew for the Champions League Final 2024 (Real Madrid - Borussia Dortmund)
Referee: Slavko Vinčić (Slovenia) Linesmen: Tomaž Klančnik and Andraž Kovačič (Slovenia)
Slavko Vinčić was arrested at a Serb/Bosnian Mafia party in 2020.
Q&A probability
You lost me when you said probability is zero. What exactly does it mean and show?
Say you had to assign a referee 30 times in a row, and chose Eastern European/Italians (countries from the bottom of the corruption ranking) with a probability of 70%, and Scandinavian referees from the top 30%. There is a probability of 0,002% to get to the 30-0 distribution that actually happened. So that’s the first zero.
Then these referees messed up the games big time, with the net effect in every single critical instance favoring Real. At least 8 times these violations made the difference for Real, and zero times for the other team. A sequence like that has a probability of 0,4%. That‘s the next zero. And you basically have to multiply these 2 zeros (assignments, outcome) to get to the probability of this chain of events.
You could also look at red cards. Real got 2 over these 50 games, but both didn’t matter as the games were already decided. We identified at least 4 no-doubter red cards Real should have gotten in crucial moments, with some ‚maybe’s“ (like Vinicius 2024) on top. There were 8 red cards issued against teams playing Real. Red cards another zero.
Taken together, the rule violations and mistakes had a net worth of 20 goals for Real. It should be zero, if referees are fair and unbiased. 20 goals is enourmos. Thats 0.4 goals per game, which is basically the expected goal value Leroy Sane produces. And as in some games nothing (needed) to happen, in other critical games the referees/linesmen impacted the game like a Lionel Messi playing as a 12th man for Real Madrid.
None of this is possible by chance. It’s cheating, proven by data basically 3 times over.
Also look at it from a practical viewpoint. Just 2 weeks ago, Eastern European Referees (who due to the low level of their home leagues and high probability of corruption should probably not be there in the first place) messed up the semifinal for Real. Thats after Eastern European Referees messed up the round of 16 for Real earlier this season.
No sensible, clean organization picks another Eastern European Crew, this time by all accounts featuring a serb/bosnian mafia guy, to referee in a CL Final next.
We mentioned the NBA, a truly professional league. If they were asked to create a scenario in which the referee crew would have the same impact, integrity and level of competence as the Eastern Europeans for the CL Final, they would need to fly in a Sinaloa gang to referee the final minute of a tied game 7 of the NBA Finals.
PS: NBA would not do that.
An additional note regarding the UEFA Referee Committee: The husband of one of its Officers, Damkova (Czechia), is Roman Berbr. In 2023 he was charged with soccer match fixing and embezzlement, being the ring leader of an Eastern European Gang.
UEFA and Real are criminals, cheating right in front of our eyes. And with the Champions League Final and EURO 2024 coming up, it is worse than it has ever been.
To get the whole picture, you have to look at the data yourself. Don't jump to any conclusion. Forget about the comments. Dont even read the comments ! People will tell you what just popped into their minds. It's mostly noise and emotions. But nobody even remembers what he ate 2 days ago, let alone what happened over a decade in 50 Real Madrid CL games.
So please look at the main actors (Ceferin at UEFA, Perez at Real), the referee committee (Rosetti, Carballo from Italy,Spain and Sajn, Damkova with her husband Roman Berbr from Eastern Europe), the Eastern European linesmen and referees that got appointed, and what they did in these 50 Real Madrid knockout stage games over the last decade, yourself.

UFC 302: Makhachev vs Poirier is an upcoming mixed martial arts event produced by the Ultimate Fighting Championship that will take place on June 1, 2024, at the Prudential Center, in Newark, New Jersey, United States. The event will mark the promotion's tenth visit to Newark and first since UFC 288 in May 2023.
🔴UFC 302: Makhachev vs Poirier Live Streams
🔴UFC 302: Makhachev vs Poirier Live Streams
A UFC Lightweight Championship bout between current champion Islam Makhachev and former interim champion Dustin Poirier is expected to headline the event.
A five-round middleweight bout between former UFC Middleweight Champion Sean Strickland and former title challenger Paulo Costa is expected to take place in a co-main event.
A heavyweight bout between former Bellator Heavyweight World Champion Alexander Volkov and Jailton Almeida was expected to take place at this event. However, the bout was scrapped for unknown reasons and Volkov was booked for UFC on ABC: Whittaker vs. Chimaev against former interim UFC Heavyweight Championship challenger Sergei Pavlovich. Almeida is now expected to face Alexander Romanov instead.
A women's strawweight bout between former Invicta FC Atomweight Champion Michelle Waterson-Gomez and Gillian Robertson was scheduled for the event. However, the bout was postponed to UFC 303 for unknown reasons.
Jeremiah Wells was expected to face Niko Price in a welterweight bout. However, Wells pulled out due to undisclosed reasons and was replaced by Alex Morono. Price and Morono previously met at UFC Fight Night: Bermudez vs. The Korean Zombie in February 2017, with the bout originally ending via second round knockout for Price, before ultimately being overturned to a no contest due to him testing positive for marijuana.
Su Mudaerji and Joshua Van were expected to meet in a flyweight bout at this event.[ However, Su pulled out in late April due to undisclosed reasons. He was replaced by Tatsuro Taira. In turn, both fighters were moved to UFC Fight Night: Perez vs. Taira in order to face different opponents.
A middleweight bout between Roman Dolidze and former LFA Middleweight Champion Anthony Hernandez was scheduled to take place at the event. However, Hernandez was forced out of the bout due to a torn ligament in his hand.
Road to UFC Season 2 flyweight winner Park Hyun-sung was expected to face André Lima. However, he pulled out due to a knee injury and was replaced by promotional newcomer Nyamjargal Tumendemberel. In turn, Tumendemberel was forced to withdraw from the event due to visa issues and was replaced by Mitch Raposo.

Welcome to this weekends live chat!
Please keep the discussions below cordial, we got a wild night of fights ahead of us so i'm sure a lot of us are quite invested in what transpires!

Weight Class	Bout
Lightweight	Islam Makhachev (155) v Dustin Poirier (155)
Middleweight	Sean Strickland (185) v Paulo Costa (185)
Middleweight	Kevin Holland (185) v Michal Oleksiejczuk (185)
Welterweight	Niko Price (170) v Alex Morono (170)
Welterweight	Randy Brown (170) v Elizeu Zaleski (170)
Middleweight	Cesar Almeida (185) v Roman Kopylov (185)
Heavyweight	Jailton Almeida (241) v Alexandr Romanov (265)
Lightweight	Grant Dawson (155) v Joe Solecki (155)
Welterweight	Phil Rowe (171) v Jake Matthews (170)
Welterweight	Mickey Gall (170) v Bassil Hafez (170)
Women's Bantamweight	Ailin Perez (135) v Joselyne Edwards (136)
Catchweight	Mitch Raposo (125) v Andre Lima (130)

Start Time:
Early Preliminary Card (ESPN2/ESPN+ at 6:30 p.m. ET)
Preliminary Card (ESPN2/ESPN+ at 8 p.m. ET)
Main Card (ESPN+ PPV at 10 p.m. ET)
(Information for start time was from verdictmma)

Thought it might be fun since this sub is new & small to invite people to make their picks for tonight's card. Copy & fill-in your card below.
First place gets a grand prize.
Grand prize is the major award of knowing you did a really good job.

• Andre Lima vs. Mitch Raposo
• Joselyne Edwards vs. Ailin Perez
• Mickey Gall vs. Bassil Hafez
• Niko Price vs. Alex Morono
• Phil Rowe vs. Jake Matthews
• Grant Dawson vs. Joe Solecki
• Roman Kopylov vs. Cesar Almeida
• Randy Brown vs. Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos
• Jailton Almeida vs. Alexandr Romanov
• Kevin Holland vs. Michel Oleksiejcyuk
• Sean Strickland vs. Paulo Costa
• (c) Islam Makhachev vs. Dustin Poirier

See you in the dopamine room soon.