2018.03.18 01:38 lmaomitchs fortnite vbucks free tools
2014.10.10 12:32 IceBreak Xbox Live Gold (XBLG)
2014.09.15 22:55 frescani Microsoft Excel Help & Support with your Formula, Macro, and VBA problems A Reddit Community
2024.05.18 15:20 throwmeaway232312 I need help figuring this out
2024.05.18 15:18 Novel-Investment-130 Nodepay crypto Announcement phase Airdrop Guide Early Access
2024.05.18 15:17 No_Bid_4986 Xbox Mastercard rewards vs. Microsoft point rewards
Just curious to know if these points will ever sync up or will they always live separately? .. can't seem to find any answers on this any help is appreciated! submitted by No_Bid_4986 to MicrosoftRewards [link] [comments] |
2024.05.18 15:15 lam_GDI_8442 ĂȘ vĂ o dc thĂŹ pháșŁi
submitted by lam_GDI_8442 to TroChuyenLinhTinh [link] [comments]
2024.05.18 15:14 CoDEvents Call of Duty League (2024) Major III - Toronto Day 3 Official Discussion Thread
Seattle Surge - Carolina Royal Ravens | |||
---|---|---|---|
Game 1 (TBD - Hardpoint) | Seattle Surge | - | Carolina Royal Ravens |
Game 2 (TBD - S&D) | Seattle Surge | - | Carolina Royal Ravens |
Game 3 (TBD - Control) | Seattle Surge | - | Carolina Royal Ravens |
Game 4 (TBD - Hardpoint) | Seattle Surge | - | Carolina Royal Ravens |
Game 5 (TBD - S&D) | Seattle Surge | - | Carolina Royal Ravens |
Atlanta FaZe - New York Subliners | |||
---|---|---|---|
Game 1 (TBD - Hardpoint) | Atlanta FaZe | - | New York Subliners |
Game 2 (TBD - S&D) | Atlanta FaZe | - | New York Subliners |
Game 3 (TBD - Control) | Atlanta FaZe | - | New York Subliners |
Game 4 (TBD - Hardpoint) | Atlanta FaZe | - | New York Subliners |
Game 5 (TBD - S&D) | Atlanta FaZe | - | New York Subliners |
Toronto Ultra - OpTic Texas | |||
---|---|---|---|
Game 1 (TBD - Hardpoint) | Toronto Ultra | - | OpTic Texas |
Game 2 (TBD - S&D) | Toronto Ultra | - | OpTic Texas |
Game 3 (TBD - Control) | Toronto Ultra | - | OpTic Texas |
Game 4 (TBD - Hardpoint) | Toronto Ultra | - | OpTic Texas |
Game 5 (TBD - S&D) | Toronto Ultra | - | OpTic Texas |
ATL/NYSL - CASEA | |||
---|---|---|---|
Game 1 (TBD - Hardpoint) | ATL/NYSL | - | CASEA |
Game 2 (TBD - S&D) | ATL/NYSL | - | CASEA |
Game 3 (TBD - Control) | ATL/NYSL | - | CASEA |
Game 4 (TBD - Hardpoint) | ATL/NYSL | - | CASEA |
Game 5 (TBD - S&D) | ATL/NYSL | - | CASEA |
TOOPT - Miami Heretics | |||
---|---|---|---|
Game 1 (TBD - Hardpoint) | TOOPT | - | Miami Heretics |
Game 2 (TBD - S&D) | TOOPT | - | Miami Heretics |
Game 3 (TBD - Control) | TOOPT | - | Miami Heretics |
Game 4 (TBD - Hardpoint) | TOOPT | - | Miami Heretics |
Game 5 (TBD - S&D) | TOOPT | - | Miami Heretics |
Winner G11 | 0 | |||
Winners Final [16] | - | |||
Winner G12 | 0 | Winner WF | 0 | |
Grand Final [18] | - | |||
Loser WF | 0 | Winner LF | 0 | |
Losers Final [17] | - | |||
Winner G15 | 0 |
ATL | Atlanta FaZe | BOS | Boston Breach | CAR | Carolina Royal Ravens | LVL | Las Vegas Legion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA | aBeZy | USA | Pentagrxm | USA | Clayster | USA | Attach |
USA | Cellium | USA | Priestahh | USA | FeLo | USA | Gio |
USA | Drazah | ENG | Beans | USA | Gwinn | USA | Nero |
USA | Simp | MEX | Snoopy | USA | TJHaLy | USA | oJohnny |
LAG | Los Angeles Guerrillas | LAT | Los Angeles Thieves | MIA | Miami Heretics | MIN | Minnesota RĂKKR |
USA | Estreal | USA | Ghosty | ESP | Lucky | USA | Accuracy |
USA | Fame | USA | JoeDeceives | ESP | MettalZ | USA | Standy |
USA | Flames | USA | Kremp | ESP | ReeaL | FRA | Lynz |
CAN | Diamondcon | ENG | Nastie | ESP | Vikul | CAN | Gunless |
NYS | New York Subliners | TEX | OpTic Texas | SEA | Seattle Surge | TOR | Toronto Ultra |
USA | KiSMET | USA | Kenny | USA | 04 | USA | Envoy |
USA | Skyz | USA | Shotzzy | USA | Huke | USA | Scrappy |
USA | Sib | CAN | Dashy | BEL | Abuzah | DEN | CleanX |
FRA | HyDra | AUS | Pred | FRA | Breszy | ENG | Insight |
2024.05.18 15:13 raramygame1 The last of us part 1 DLSS fsr3 frame gen mod latest version issue.
2024.05.18 15:09 TrueMinecraftAlex Escapists from escapists
2024.05.18 15:08 AlphamonOuryuken24 Frontiers/IDW Amy is the best version of her character since SA2
2024.05.18 15:07 Odd-Hotel9359 Need architecture assistance with a game bot
2024.05.18 15:06 setwocks ---> EASY SETUP FOR GRASS, GET STARTED HERE! <---
2024.05.18 15:05 Ozzylogic Savings Screenshots to OneDrive option removed
2024.05.18 15:04 MGK_2 Changing Gears
"The study will be conducted by lead principal investigator, John L. Marshall, M.D., Director, The Ruesch Center for the Cure of GI Cancers Frederick P. Smith Endowed Chair, Chief, Hematology and Oncology Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C."I wasn't around at the time to know for sure, but I believe this trial was set up by Nader. Eventually, this study would be withdrawn for reasons which I am about to disclose.
"Nader Pourhassan, Ph.D., CytoDynâs President and Chief Executive Officer, said, âWe anticipate this study will further evaluate the immunomodulatory effects of leronlimab in the tumor microenvironment. We are excited about the possibilities for leronlimab to offer a potential new treatment option for breast cancer patients. This could be an additional indication for which we are pursuing approval for leronlimab. We are also very grateful to Dr. Scott Kelly for arranging for this study to be conducted by Dr. Jangsoon Lee, assistant professor of Breast Medical Oncology Research at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center."Cyrus Arman comes onboard as President effective July 9, 2022. During that summer of 2022, the CYDY share price ran up as high as $1.26 per share for some unknown reason. In the past, I attributed it to NASH. I give a breakdown of my thinking here in I Tell You A Mystery. In the commotion of Cyrus' hiring and the mass fluctuations of the share price, the MD Anderson Study had already been completed and the results were looking good to those privileged enough to have been granted rights to actually see the data. Coincidentally, it was about this time that the CRC with Regorafenib was withdrawn. Hmmm, Why was this trial withdrawn? Just because the MD Anderson results looked great or because there was something even more profound and substantial built upon those results?
"We can apply the same logic in the Oncology study being run by MD Anderson using Merck's Keytruda in combination with Leronlimab. We had all been waiting to find out what had happened with the results of the MD Anderson study, and Cyrus threw us this line: "Leronlimab is currently being trialed in combination with Keytruda (pembrolizumab) in a breast cancer xenograft model in partnership with MD Anderson Cancer Center." From here, he gave us a hint of what is to come."Soon following his hiring, Cyrus presented his Vision & Plan for the Company:
"17:09: And we're also still committed to HIV, but we're really looking at it more through the lens of developing longer-acting agents. And Dr. Sacha will be talking about that at the end of our discussion today.The FDA made it truly tough for Cyrus to meet his goals as the Company's main devotion was to get the hold lifted, so Rules had to be followed. Also, Cyrus unfortunately made NASH a focus and then subsequently became sick and then found himself taking a demotion. His focus really should have been on Oncology as #1 target as it finally is today. Here though is a revealing statement he made:
17:21: So, within oncology, we're interested in studying what would be referred to as immunologically colder tumors. And Dr. GlĂŒck will present on what those -- what we mean by that later. But we think that these are areas where more recent advancements from checkpoint inhibitors have yet to really have a large impact in those markets. And so, we think that there's a unique opportunity based on the data we already have in some of these colder tumors to make an impact.
17:51: Within NASH, we're particularly excited about the data that we have there, and NASH will be our primary focus going forward. We'll also talk a little bit about a unique opportunity to study and look for the treatment effect of leronlimab in people living with HIV who also have NASH. And we think that we might be in a unique position to address that population."
"18:22: So, going forward, we're focusing on NASH, oncology and earlier-line HIV indications through longer-acting agents that inhibit CCR5. Again, we've already generated promising clinical signals in both NASH and oncology. And within NASH, we're exploring the opportunity to study a segment of patients of those NASH patients who are also living with HIV.
18:50: Within oncology, we want to pursue colorectal cancer and breast cancer specifically. Within the colorectal cancer population, we want to focus on a micro-satellite stable group, which represents about 85% of all diagnosed colorectal cancers. And within breast cancer, we want to focus on the hormone receptor positive HER2-negative population, which is about 70% of all diagnosed breast cancers, and the TNBC population since we have data in that space. All of these are quite large markets."
"...these are areas where more recent advancements from checkpoint inhibitors have yet to really have a large impact in those markets. And so, we think that there's a unique opportunity based on the data we already have in some of these colder tumors to make an impact."Keeping that escalation in share price to $1.26 in mind, when did CA know about this data? He got the data on the MD Anderson results either before or shortly after his hire. Remember, shortly after NP was terminated, Cyrus was at CytoDyn working at least for a few months prior to his hire giving opportunity to the BOD to assess his work ethic and ways about him. In this time, CA saw the MD Anderson results and they were looking mighty good. Where are these results today? They still reside with MD Anderson. Why don't we have them right now? Too many $millions to buy it, but we saw the results and those results are the impetus for the change in gears of the Company's priorities. Surely Scott Kelly, who was responsible for securing the MD Anderson study has seen them as well.
"What also happened in August? Only the removal of the first management player whoâs experience was in Negotiation and Partnerships, Brendan P. Rae. No longer any necessity for Negotiation? I guess not. As time went quickly by, without any word of what was taking place, the share price began to fall. It became uncomfortably obvious that by mid November, Recknor had been let go. He was CytoDyn's most experienced scientific, medical and managerial player for NASH, but in the game of a collaboration, anyone and everyone is a commodity and all are replaceable. On the same topic, a significant stock bonus was paid to the president in September of last year after only two months on the job. Was a deal struck? Also, our very own CMO, Scott Kelly who coined the phrase: âThere are many ways to structure a partnership.â himself gets terminated in December 2022."Just like that bonus, (which was based on his obtaining a partnership), the short-lived share price rise also assumed that a deal had been struck. Scott Kelly was privy to the MD Anderson results just as Cyrus was. Why didn't Kelly put a deal together like Cyrus did? I don't want to diminish the fact that Kelly was wholly responsible originally for getting the MD Anderson murine study going. The fact is that a deal had been made and justifies Cyrus' bonus payment.
"25: 25 Kelly: We are excited about the Basket Trials. I'll start by saying I just presented at San Antonio Conference December 10th. That was in results wrt mTNBC in combination with carboplatin, CCR5 positive, mTNBC and I tell you, the reason why we are excited about the Basket Trial is that they think that there is a growing acceptance that the Tumor Micro Environment is the next Frontier for Immunotherapy. And I mean this amongst practicing physicians, the academic world, probably as well as big pharma, and I think we are more advanced than this. We've been looking at the mechanism of action in the tumor micro environment and see Leronlimabs impact across multiple different oncologic indications and we also think that we can pair this with a check point inhibitor, chemo, radiation, antibody zero conjugates, as well as maybe even a potential monotherapy in certain patients that don't qualify for other treatments. We think the MOA, with T-Regs. When T-Regs come in, they turn off the immune system. We know that they have a high prevalence of CCR5. We can block that. We can actually maybe leverage the immune system. If we look at macrophage re-polarization, that's another potential opportunity. Our animal studies showed a significant reduction in angiogenesis. I think it was 62% in total vessillary and 80% reduction in small vessel area. But, we know that tumors need a blood supply to grow and if we can help limit that, then we think we can have benefit for patients. And last, we know that normal cells, CCR5 is only present on an immune cell, but we know that when cells under go malignant transformation, that they start sprouting up CCR5, and we believe that is a contributor to metastasis. So, we have multiple different mechanisms of action and we continue to find more as we go along that we will be evaluating."He remembers Dr. Gluck's discussion in the 12/7/22 R&D Update Dr. Stefan Gluck; MicroEnvironment.
"So, as you saw, very small studies, but extremely promising, and the signal for an oncologist like myself is so strong that I'm enthusiastic about it. We, as oncologists, need to be positive because otherwise, we cannot treat patients and tell them something better is coming. The leronlimab decrease of these tumor cells actually did relate both in mTNBC and in colorectal with improved survival. That's amazing."Cyrus turns to our 3rd party AI collaborator and requests an assessment on the effect of a CCR5/L5 axis blockade in mCRC. Their AI engines get to work and compile all that is known and understood regarding the pertinent Biomarkers in combination with all the pertinent journal articles on the blockade of the CCR5/L5 axis in the disease to finally determine that it works like a charm, like no other.
"The majority of patients with CRC exhibit a microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) status, which is known as the âcold tumorâ with less mutated oncogenes and less inflamed tumor immune microenvironment, resulting in a limited efficacy of ICIs (2). The inadequate recruitment and activization of immune cells to the tumor microenvironment were considered to be fundamental mechanisms underlying the inefficacy of ICIs in MSS mCRC (4). Combination strategies to enhance the immunogenicity of the tumor microenvironment and exploit the benefit of ICIs in patients with MSS are urgently needed."He becomes even more convicted. Given all that I presented here in addition to the proven results of the MD Anderson, Keytruda study which Cyrus has laid his own eyes upon, he becomes whole heartedly supportive of the Priority switch to the mCRC Oncology Indication. I'm sure Richard Pestell was also 100% behind Cyrus in this decision to switch priorities. Also, by switching to Oncology, share price has a better chance of increasing as Oncology is favored by the public. Fund raising could happen much quicker with a higher share price resulting from a better indication. From the recent May 2024 Letter to Shareholders:
"Over the next six months, we expect to commence at least one, and potentially two clinical trials. The prospective clinical trials, in order of priority, are: (i) a Phase II study of leronlimab in patients with relapsed/refractory microsatellite stable colorectal cancer; and (ii) a Phase II study exploring leronlimabâs effects on inflammation. The Companyâs priority will be the oncology trial which, if successful, will put us on track towards a commercial approval of leronlimab in that indication. The inflammation study is aimed at clarifying certain provocative observations related to leronlimab, and to help define the dose and underlying mechanism of anti-inflammatory action. It is imperative that the Company generate unassailable results in the clinic and I believe the above trials can accomplish this. Starting the oncology study and related fundraising is the top priority of the Company at this time, but our current hope is that we can initiate both studies before the end of this calendar year."So straight from the CEO's mouth, related fundraising is the top priority of the Company at this time. Cyrus remains here at CytoDyn because of the need to pump up the value by switching to a more attractive Indication Priority. I repeat all of this, because with all of the peer reviewed and published Journal Articles that discuss the CCR5/L5 axis in the context of Colo-Rectal Cancer and given Keytruda's exceptional performance as a PD 1 blockade in only 15% of these CRC MSI tumors, leronlimab can open the door wide open to the remaining 85% MSS tumors. The trial starts this year. Also from the recent Shareholder Letter:
"Research and development partnership opportunities are important to the Company as we search for cost-effective ways to further build out our product development portfolio. We have identified several such opportunities that we believe are intriguing and anticipate finalizing agreements with these partners in the very near future. Such potential partnerships include an investigator-initiated pilot study of leronlimab in patients with Alzheimerâs Disease, and a project that will evaluate the use of leronlimab in patients living with HIV who are undergoing stem cell transplantation in a proof of cure study. Following lifting of the clinical hold, we have observed a significant increase in third parties that are interested in partnering with the Company. We will continue to review opportunities as they arise, given the potential for significant value return at little or no cost to the Company."The question I now have is with whom? Partners are incoming, but did leronlimab make it easier for the PD-1 blocker Keytruda to work in MSS mCRC tumors? If it did, (and Cyrus knows if it did or did not), then Merck certainly remains there in the bidding. If leronlimab did it all by itself and Keytruda was superfluous, then the partner might be someone like u/i__OBSERVER points to entities such as the NIH as the source of that funding.
2024.05.18 15:02 Parking-Gur8779 My first ever game
2024.05.18 15:01 playsirfootball Decision Time: How It Works
2024.05.18 14:59 BigImmunologyNerd Any issues with my Resolver structure?
import { DeleteResponse, MutationCreateUserArgs, MutationDeleteUserArgs, MutationResolvers, MutationUpdateUserArgs, QueryReadUserByIdArgs, QueryReadUsersArgs, QueryResolvers, ReadUserResponse, ReadUsersResponse, UserResolvers, } from "../../../__generated__/types"; import { UserModel } from "../User.model"; import { DiaryModel } from "../../index.model"; import { Logger } from "../../../utils/Logger.util"; import { AbstractResolver } from "../../common/AbstractResolver.resolvers"; export class UserResolver extends AbstractResolver { private readonly userModel: UserModel; private readonly diaryModel: DiaryModel; private readonly logger: Logger; constructor(userModel: UserModel, diaryModel: DiaryModel, logger: Logger) { super(); this.userModel = userModel; this.diaryModel = diaryModel; this.logger = logger; } private query: QueryResolvers = { readUsers: async ( _, { take, skip }: QueryReadUsersArgs ): Promise=> { try { const data = await this.userModel.readMany(take, skip); return { code: 200, success: true, message: `Succesfully read Users`, data: data.data, count: data.count, }; } catch (err) { return { code: 500, success: false, message: `Failed to read Users with an error of: ${err}`, data: null, count: null, }; } }, readUserById: async ( _, { id }: QueryReadUserByIdArgs ): Promise => { try { const data = await this.userModel.readById(id); return { code: 200, success: true, message: `Succesfully read User`, data, }; } catch (err) { return { code: 500, success: false, message: `Failed to read User with an error of: ${err}`, data: null, }; } }, }; private mutation: MutationResolvers = { createUser: async ( _, { authUserId, name, email, locale }: MutationCreateUserArgs ): Promise => { try { const data = await this.userModel.create({ authUserId: authUserId, name: name, email: email, locale, }); return { code: 200, success: true, message: `Succesfully created User`, data, }; } catch (err) { return { code: 500, success: false, message: `Failed to create User with an error of: ${err}`, data: null, }; } }, updateUser: async ( _, { id, name, email, active, points, locale, permissions, }: MutationUpdateUserArgs ): Promise => { try { const data = await this.userModel.update(id, { id, name, email, active, points, locale, permissions, }); return { code: 200, success: true, message: `Succesfully updated User`, data, }; } catch (err) { return { code: 500, success: false, message: `Failed to update User with an error of: ${err}`, data: null, }; } }, deleteUser: async ( _, { id }: MutationDeleteUserArgs ): Promise => { try { const data = await this.userModel.delete(id); return { code: 200, success: true, message: `Succesfully deleted User`, }; } catch (err) { return { code: 500, success: false, message: `Failed to delete User with an error of: ${err}`, }; } }, }; private user: UserResolvers = { diaries: async parent => { try { const diaries = await this.diaryModel.readByField({ field: "userId", stringValue: parent.id, }); return diaries; } catch (err) { this.logger.error("Error fetching diaries :", err); } }, }; public getResolvers() { return { Query: this.query, Mutation: this.mutation, User: this.user, }; } } // index.resolvers.ts import { DiaryResolver } from "./diary/graphql/diary.resolvers"; import { DiaryNotesResolver } from "./diary-notes/graphql/diaryNotes.resolvers"; import { UserResolver } from "./usegraphql/user.resolvers"; import { DataManager } from "../config/dataServices.service"; const { userModel, diaryModel, diaryNotesModel, logger } = DataManager.getInstance(); const userResolvers = new UserResolver( userModel, diaryModel, logger ).getResolvers(); const diaryResolvers = new DiaryResolver( diaryModel, diaryNotesModel ).getResolvers(); const diaryNoteResolvers = new DiaryNotesResolver( diaryNotesModel ).getResolvers(); export const resolvers = [ userResolvers, diaryResolvers, diaryNoteResolvers ];
2024.05.18 14:51 Asgar- Non-idle Tycoon Games?
2024.05.18 14:49 WalteeWartooth Windows 11 keeps waking from sleep at night - doesn't always start water pump
2024.05.18 14:47 Apprehensive-Sir7063 There will be a redistribution of money in the Tech sector and then back again
2024.05.18 14:44 ValenDrax Daily tuning reward: 155 downloads, 77 uses and... zero likes. Come on guys...
submitted by ValenDrax to ForzaHorizon [link] [comments] |
2024.05.18 14:41 Contactunderground âSeeing is Believing & Believing is Seeingâ The Consciousness Connection and the Virtual Experience Model This article is based on my chapter in Volume 2 of the 2022 book âA Greater Reality", a compendium published and edited by Rey Hernandez.
âSeeing is Believing & Believing is Seeingâ submitted by Contactunderground to HighStrangeness [link] [comments] The Consciousness Connection and the Virtual Experience Model Joseph Burkes MD 2019 edited 2023 A similar chopper, but with a bizarre paint job, buzzed me on the 405 Freeway/ INTRODUCTION This article is based on my chapter in Volume 2 of the 2022 book âA Greater Reality.â This compendium published and edited by Rey Hernandez can now be viewed without charge on the CCRI, Consciousness and Contact Research Instituteâs web site, links provided at the end of this narrative. A familiar statement by members of the public is, âIâll believe in flying saucers when I see one.â As the saying goes, âSeeing is believing.â During my many years of contact activism, I have learned that âbelievingâ can also lead to âseeing.â The aim of this report is to describe two important features of the contact experience. The first concerns how UAP intelligences shape encounters depending on the existing beliefs and expectations of contact experiencers. The second theme is that intelligences responsible for flying saucers employ what from a physicalist perspective is âillusionâ as a mechanism of contact. I present a case in which both mechanisms were likely employed. Readers of this blog please note the following: This narrative was originally conceived when I was writing about UFOs from within what can be called a âphysicalistâ or philosophical materialistâs perspective. This paradigm makes the metaphysical assumption that mass/energy is the wellspring of creation, and that mind/consciousness is merely a product of brain activity. More recently with the assistance of my friend and publisher Rey Hernandez, I have increasingly viewed this physicalist assumption as flawed. If Consciousness is primary, not mass/energy then the psi mediated mechanisms of contact might be viewed as being closer to the wellspring of creation (and therefore perhaps more ârealâ) than the construct of our senses that we call âphysical reality.â My changing metaphysical views have been propelled in part by the âsimulation hypothesisâ that has gained some popularity within professional scientific circles. My growing acceptance of Consciousness being primary, and that the physical world is an illusion therefore compels me to view technologically based psi technology as creating âillusionsâ within the physical realm that could very well be an illusory simulated reality as well. In Eastern mystical traditions, the illusory nature of the physical world is called âMaya.â THE CONSCIOUSNESS CONNECTION It has been said that UAP intelligences are able to access experiencersâ consciousness as readily as you and I access light by turning on a wall switch. Among contact experiencers it is common knowledge that the so-called âaliensâ are totally telepathic. In my opinion, such awesome power also allows them to readily access our entire storehouse of memories. This capability, when combined with their ability to create psi mediated âillusionsâ, enables them to co-create with us any kind of encounter that you and they can âco-imagine.â THE PHENOMENON IS âREFLECTIVEâ: THE RADICAL CONCEPTS INTRODUCED BY JOHN KEEL John Keel,(1930- 2008) was a legendary UFO and paranormal researcher and author. He published over a dozen books. These include the âThe Mothman Propheciesâ (1975), that was made into a successful film starring Richard Gere. In 1966, Keel entered into an intense investigation of the flying saucer phenomenon. As part of this study, he read thousands of local newspaper articles on UFO sightings provided by clipping services. He travelled across the United States interviewing hundreds of witnesses. Keel coined the term MIB (Men In Black). In 1967, after just one year of his intense field investigations, he abandoned the extraterrestrial hypothesis. He did so because of, âan astonishing overlap between psychic phenomena and UFOs...â Famous investigators like Dr. J. Allen Hynek and Dr. Jacques Vallee eventually came to similar conclusions. John Keel was one of ufologyâs most controversial writers and his work still influences current debates about the nature of the flying saucer phenomenon. Keel, in his classic book, âThe Mothman Propheciesâ discusses how flying saucer intelligence manipulated his own investigations in ways that reinforced his beliefs about what was going on. On page 111 he states, âI was being led to people and cases to support whatever theory I was working on at the time. I tested this by inventing some rather outlandish ideas. Within days I would receive phone calls, reports, and mail describing elements of those ideas. This was the feedback or reflective effect. Other investigators concerned with solving problems such as how flying saucers are propelled have automatically been fed, or led into, cases in which the witnesses supposedly viewed the interiors of the objects and saw things which confirmed the investigators' theories. If the phenomenon can produce any effect through hallucination, it can easily support any theory.â As a physician I prefer the term illusion rather than âhallucinationâ to describe the mechanisms involved in Close Encounters. Hallucinations, from the medical point of view, are manifestation of disease states and should not be applied to encounters with non-human intelligences in which the witnesses are generally not ill. According to my analysis, psi-mediated technologically induced illusions are being presented to human subjects. This noted, I cannot over emphasize the importance of Keelâs above quote from âThe Mothman Prophecies.â In addition, it is important to note that the reflective nature of the contact experience exists on both a societal as well as an individual level. Researchers John Keel, Dr. Jacques Vallee and others have aptly observed that the appearance of the UAPs reflect the cultural expectations of each historic period in which they have manifested. Thus, to the ancient Chinese, they appeared as âdragons.â During the 1890s airship wave in the USA, they took on the appearance of Zeppelins that would be built a few years later. For the last sixty years, as we have gotten out into space, they are now thought of as âextraterrestrial.â The following narrative is an example of an encounter that is both âillusoryâ as well as reflective of oneâs own beliefs about what the phenomenon is âsupposed to be.â Mystery Helicopters in the Sepulveda Pass During the mid 1990s, I was a Working Group Coordinator in Los Angeles for the CE-5 Initiative. This involved staging what I now call Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE). My contact team regularly travelled to remote locations in the high desert. There we used consciousness techniques such as meditation and thought projection to stage limited interactions with UAPs. To our surprise UFOs appeared not only during our fieldwork but also during everyday types of activities. These multiple data points helped me understand the psychic mechanisms used to engineer Close Encounters. During the five years that I was a contact team leader, my sightings occurred, not only during fieldwork, but also in my West Los Angeles neighborhood. Some of the sightings demonstrated a flat two-dimensional quality. This made me suspect that they were not physical objects at all. Instead they appeared to be visual displays that were being produced by some kind of holographic technology. As the result of these encounters, I developed a new model incorporating the role of illusion as a mechanism of contact. I call this theory, The Virtual Experience Model. The Virtual Experience Hypothesis Virtual Experiences of the First Kind (VE-1) are illusory visual displays of structured objects or âalienâ beings that typically convince witnesses that they are physical âcraftâ or âextraterrestrialsâ beings respectively. Other categories include the psychic creation of a kind of virtual reality that produces a full sensory illusion that is convincingly real to the human subject. I designate this type as a VE-2. The final major category is Virtual Experience of the Third Kind (VE-3). In this setting, artificial memories are implanted into the consciousness of the contact experiencer. Although the witness recalls seeing a non-human being or remembers going on-board an ET craft, according to this scenario no such event has actually transpired. The false memory does the job of convincing the witness that was happened was ârealâ, i.e., a physical event. A HIGH LEVEL CONTACTEE JOINS THE TEAM One member of our HICE/CE5 Los Angeles group was a high level contactee from the former Soviet Union. I refer to him as âMisha Goldmanâ, a pseudonym. He worked as an EKG tech in the Kaiser Hospital where I was employed. He was what you might describe as a âhuman UFO magnet.â As soon as he joined the group our level of contact, as measured by the appearances of UAPs, increased dramatically. I deemed it highly likely that he had direct telepathic communications with what contactees might call âfriends in high places.â Living just a few miles from Hollywood, âthe entertainment capital of the world,â I thought that perhaps Mishaâs boost to our contact efforts was analogous to how Hollywood describes climbing the ladder of success. âItâs not what you know, but who you knowâ that facilitates getting the next job as an actor, director or producer. MISHAâS PROBLEMATIC SIGHTING OF A FLYING SAUCER & MYSTERY HELICOPTERS IN THE SEPULVEDA PASS One Tuesday morning during Easter Week in 1994, Misha called me at home to describe a sighting that he had the previous evening. While driving on the 101 Freeway in the San Fernando Valley he reportedly saw a typical disc shaped UAP flying overhead. It was about 1000 feet up and approximately thirty feet across. Misha was not the only member of the team that was having sightings while driving, but what made this sighting highly unusual was that this saucer according to Misha was being chased by several military helicopters. Based on my growing suspicion that some UFO sightings are illusory in nature, I told Misha that there were features of his sighting that were problematic. It is important to point out that the San Fernando Valley had a population in 1994 of about one million people. In addition, there are no major US military facilities located nearby. I told him that his assessment that the military helicopters were chasing an âalien craftâ didnât make much sense. The flight characteristics of some UAPs include their ability to fly circles around top performance military aircraft. Slow moving helicopters in pursuit mode would never be able to keep up with a âreal flying saucer.â So, then what was going on? Reverse Engineered Craft was not a likely Explanation I suggested to Misha another possibility. What if the flying disc were a top-secret prototype military device? Then, perhaps the helicopters were escorting it rather than chasing it. This notion was reminiscent of the famous Cash-Landrum Incident in which supposedly a reverse engineered radioactive craft accompanied by US military helicopters injured several witnesses on the ground. However, there was a problem with this possible explanation. The densely populated San Fernando Valley was the least likely place for the authorities to test such a craft. Just imagine the uproar with thousands of witnesses if the saucer had to stage an emergency landing in a community of a million people. Prized government/corporate assets were better kept secure, way out in the desert where they might be secretly developed, and test flown. I told Misha that the entire sighting might have been a kind of âtheater of the mind production.â (This conversation occurred years before I coined the term Virtual Experience describing the role of illusion as a mechanism of contact.) Instead, I told Misha that the disc he had seen over the 101 might be the product of some kind of advanced alien âmind controlâ technology. âHelicoptersâ vs Bizarre Visual Displays After making this sweeping speculative analysis of Mishaâs encounter on the phone, and feeling quite proud of myself at that, I said good-bye to my contact team buddy. I set off to work, driving on the 405 Freeway. I didnât want to be late for the noon doctorsâ meeting. Back in 1994 my department was still offering fresh donuts at conference and I didnât want to miss my share. So, there I was, driving through a sea of cars, on what seemed like a normal Tuesday afternoon. Or was it? As I reached the middle portion of the Sepulveda Pass, I noticed something a bit strange. Above the eastern rim of the canyon, I saw two military helicopters. This in and of itself was strange. There are no major military bases located near the City of Los Angeles. What was even more bizarre was that both choppers were vintage aircraft. One was an old Sikorsky, the kind first used in the Korean War. I recognized its typical large rounded nose with the cockpit located high up above the main cabin. The other was a Huey, a Bell UH 205, the standard workhorse helicopter of the Vietnam War. I was immediately struck by the wild colors on both craft. The Sikorsky, instead of the standard military dark green was a brilliant candy color green. It looked like something out of a circus. The Huey appeared a bit more respectable. It was painted a darker olive color, but the bright green circle surrounded the US star insignia on the side of the craft just didnât look right. Both helicopters were slowly moving back and forth above the over the canyon. They appeared to be no more than 200 feet above the rim. This was several hundred feet below the minimum altitude required by government regulations when flying over densely populated areas. A Coincidence or an Example of what John Keel Would call the âReflective Factor.â I thought to myself, âThis is very strange.â I have a conversation with Misha about his sighting possibly being a simulated visual display and then I am witness to craft that were fit for a carnival. I had specifically mentioned to Misha the notion that helicopters might be used as props in his sighting. Now I was witness to not one, but two bizarre âidentified flying objects.â Was this just an amazing coincidence, or was I being given a rather theatrical visual display similar to Mishaâs? The sequence of events in retrospect suggests that the âreflectiveâ aspect of UFO intelligence as described by John Keel was in effect. I had formulated a âbeliefâ that the craft and helicopters from the previous night were illusory in nature, and as if to confirm my âpet theoryâ bizarre helicopters were flying overhead. Things got even stranger however. I wondered if Mishaâs sighting was a kind of a test as to whether I would choose to attempt to interact with UFO intelligence. On the chance that the choppers were psi mediated visual displays and not âphysically realâ and were produced by a telepathic non-human intelligence that might be able to communicate with me, I decided to âsend outâ a mental message of welcome. This, after all, was part of the contact protocols that I was employing during fieldwork. As my vehicle approached the top of the Sepulveda Pass, I was doing about 55 miles per hour. I watched the helicopters located now above me and to the right. They were still moving back and forth perpendicular to the freeway. Human Initiated Contact Event: Was a Consciousness Connection Evident? Not actually expecting a response from the craft overhead, I sent out a mental message of welcome. My 1983 Toyota Camry reached the crest of the Sepulveda Pass. The San Fernando Valley stretched out before me. As always, I took pleasure in the spectacular panoramic view. I accelerated as I headed down the hill into the Valley. To my surprise, I noticed that the Huey had broken away from the Sikorsky. It was headed my way! Just another coincidence? The Huey was now above my vehicle, and I noticed that it was descending rapidly. It kept pace with me, flying just a few dozen yards out front. I had a perfect view of its underbelly through my windshield. The chopper leveled out at less than 100 feet above the roadway. I could hear the chopperâs engines, but they seemed quite muffled. The roar should have been deafening, but it wasnât. My heart pounding, I continued to silently chant welcoming thoughts. For about one mile, we traveled together. As we passed the Sepulveda Basin Dam, the Huey moved off to the west. I looked towards the walls of the reservoir, (a favorite âshoot siteâ for film crews.) The large concrete plaza in front the dam was totally deserted. Apparently, the choppers were not part of a Hollywood action movie being filmed on the spillway of the reservoir. After the medical conference, I worked an evening shift in the ER. I then called Misha and told him about the helicopters in the Sepulveda Pass. Was the appearance of the helicopters an example of the âreflective aspectâ as described by John Keel? Did I really have a contact experience while driving through the Sepulveda Pass? I suppose skeptics would reject any positive interpretation of the events as nothing more than âUFO fan club wishful thinking.â Coincidence might explain all. I should point out however that prior to this experience, I had never been buzzed by a helicopter while driving, never before and never since for that matter. It all might have occurred by chance. But I donât think so! Addendum: A much expanded, footnoted version of this article appears in the anthology âA Greater Realityâ edited by Reinerio Hernandez. This multivolume work is published by the newly formed The Consciousness and Contact Research Institute (CCRI) and supports the concept that consciousness rather than mass/energy is the wellspring of creation. My chapter titled âReport from the Contact Underground: The Consciousness Connection and the Virtual Experience Modelâ can be accessed at: https://agreaterreality.com/downloads/articles/Burkes%20-%20Report%20from%20the%20Contact%20Underground.pdf Other chapters published by CCRI may be viewed at the organizationâs web site at: https://agreaterreality.com Form additional articles on the Virtual Experience Model, the following links are provided: This is an overview of the Virtual Experience Model (VEM) with a brief explanation of categories one, two and three. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/the-virtual-experience-model-an-overview/ I further develop the VEM by discussing the traditional Tibetan belief in âtulpas.â These are thought to be more than holographic projects, but rather physical objects and beings. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/20/the-interdimensional-vs-et-hypothesis-virtual-experiences-and-ufo-sightings-as-thought-forms/ American physician Andrija Puharichâs work with psychic Uri Geller gives a striking example of âvirtual memoryâ a Virtual Experience of the Third Kind. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/23/andrija-puharich-mds-work-with-uri-geller-supports-the-virtual-experience-model/ I describe field observations of anomalous shooting star visual displays that played an important role in the development of the VEM. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/01/20/why-might-ufo-intelligence-hoax-shooting-star-displays-reflections-on-the-virtual-experience-model/ Virtual Experience of the Third Kind: âVirtual Memoryâ is a concept explored here considering advances in memory science. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/22/virtual-memory-a-virtual-experience-of-the-third-kind-ve-3/ |
2024.05.18 14:41 TxRealestatemogul I need help with this business concept
2024.05.18 14:41 Plop40411 3 x 3 Lagu pilihan r/indowibu (atau r/indonesia)
Terinspirasi dari thread 3x3 Waifu/Husbando dan thread Peringkat Lagu Anime pilihan orang asing, jadi penasaran sama lagu2 Wibu pilihan users sini. submitted by Plop40411 to indowibu [link] [comments] Buat bikin 3x3, bisa ke https://gqgs.github.io/3x3-generato seperti waktu bikin 3x3 Waifu/Husbando (thank you u/mFachrizalr). Ketik judul, pilih gambarnya, terus tinggal download 3x3 nya. Kalo ga ada gambarnya dan niat, bisa upload sendiri gambarnya. Ukuran bisa diubah jadi 2x2 kalo 9 lagu kebanyakan. Kriterianya bebas, kalo gua, ini lagu2 yang membekas banget sekalian nostalgia. Gua urut berdasarkan taun gua nonton (seinget gua): https://preview.redd.it/f465a2r9g61d1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=b72ecd51996ebc8e31bb59094fadc30aed1cf69d
|