This is my Yankees lineup I also have like an Indians lineup that I'm working on and I'll go ahead and post that but this is mostly just the Yankees one the Indians one doesn't have a lot of hitters yet cuz I haven't hit like the Francisco lindor or the Jose Ramirez but I hit like basically every single pic so that's why I have like an Indians lineup

​
https://preview.redd.it/k6xyv6iplxlc1.png?width=2560&format=png&auto=webp&s=47bb377ca948b878ec4bbba69ec7990070a889c2

Can anyone help me to identify the reported parts (marked red in the Technical Inspection Report).
​
- 5.3.1c Schwingungsdämpfer 1. Achse links und rechts Anschlaggummi / Zusatzfeder fehlt
(5.3.1c Vibration damper 1st axle left and right Stop rubber / additional spring missing)
​
- DF5.3.1 Federteller Unterlage Achse2 links und rechts : beschädigt (Gummiring)
(DF5.3.1 Spring plate support axle2 left and right : damaged (rubber ring))
​
What other parts would I need in addition to repair this?
Thanks for any kind of tips or help!
​
TÜV Bericht Nissan 300zx z31
My 1986 z31 at the Technical Inspection
401 - FRONT SUSPENSION for Nissan 300ZX Z31
401 - FRONT SUSPENSION for Nissan 300ZX Z31 2
431 - REAR SUSPENSION for Nissan 300ZX Z31
431 - REAR SUSPENSION for Nissan 300ZX Z31 2

Unlock ultimate online security with Surfshark VPN, the award-winning choice! For a limited time, save a whopping 85% off and safeguard your digital world. Don't miss out!
Check out their huge discount on this link: https://get.surfshark.net/aff_c?offer_id=865&aff_id=12312
#SurfsharkVPN #awardwinning #OnlineSecurity #LimitedTimeOffer
https://preview.redd.it/3rryds22sytb1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=946d9546394793401cea68be8ff9c991ade8fa96

2020, 32k miles, sport trim, completely stock, and in love. Had it for about a month, so mileage is at about 33.5k.

“Only god makes living gears or perpetual motion.” [translator: Klaas Berkel]
“Only god 🪄 makes living 🌱 gears ⚙️ or perpetual motion.” [translator: LibbThims]
“Alleen godt maeckt levende raders of perpetuum motum.” [Dutch: original]
— Isaac Beeckman (329A/1626), “comment to Gerard Berckel, a prominent cloth manufacturer, warming him about some ‘inventor’, who had raised 40,000 ducats, from Nicolas Puyck, a fellow burgomaster, to build a new horse-driven mill, based on the principle of perpetual motion, that would grind three or four times as much malt as an ordinary mill, summer

Re: “god 🪄 makes living 🌱 gears ⚙️”, it always amazes me how much debate and discussion there has been on whether or not plants are “alive”?
The A36 (1991) article “Are Plants Alive?”, by John Morris, is one example, which I just found via first return of Google search. The classic example is Joseph MacNab’s 137A (1818) statement that: “a growing plant is NOT alive, neither is it dead”. In MacNab’s mind, it depends on what you believe about the “soul“, which leads us to Asoulism; another rabbit 🐇 hole 🕳️.
Firstly, we also note that Newton, in his personal notes, commented the same ideology:

“God who gave animals self motion beyond our understanding is without doubt able to implant other principles of motion in bodies which we may understand as little. Some would readily grant this may be a spiritual one; yet a mechanical one might be shown.”
— Isaac Newton (281A/1674), journal notes

In short, we see Beeckman and Newton chalking off the movement of humans to the either perpetual motion or self motion, aka “perpetual motion of the living kind” theory, which we see promoted up to the present day in the so-called “chemical perpetual motion” theories, e.g. auto-catalytic closure advanced by Stuart Kauffman.
This will, no doubt, confuse people who read the above accounts, but the above arguments or views expressed by Beeckman and Newton are at the ground floor of “abioism”, which holds that people do NOT move by “perpetual motion”, be it god-based as Beeckman stated, nor “self-motion“, be it spiritual or mechanical based as Newton ruminated on.
Vinci, in his personal notes, said as much: NO thing moves itself:

“No thing whatever can be moved by itself, but its motion is effected through another. There is no other force.”
— Leonardo Vinci (465A/1490), journal notes

In short, according to Vinci, if one ever found a “body” in the universe that “moved itself”, one would have to subvert the laws of motion, as we know them.
Etymology?
Wiktionary entry on “living” redirects to “live”, which gives the following:

From Middle English lyven, libben, from Old English lifian, libban (“to live; be alive”), from Proto-West Germanic \libbjan*, from Proto-Germanic \libjaną*, from Proto-Indo-European \leyp-* (“leave, cling, linger”).
Cognate with Saterland Frisian líeuwje (“to live”), West Frisian libje (“to live”), Dutch leven (“to live”), German Low German leven, lęven (“to live”), German leben (“to live”), Swedish leva (“to live”), Icelandic lifa (“to live”), Gothic 𐌻𐌹𐌱𐌰𐌽 (liban, “to live”).

Here, we seem to see either an LIB or an LEV root?
We know that Greek B is pronounced as the sound “v”, e.g. library (English) is ”vivliothíki” (sound) or βιβλιοθήκη (letters) in Greek.
Looking at the Gothic spelling: 𐌻𐌹𐌱𐌰𐌽, a language dating to 1600A (c.355), we see, in precursor, the Greek: λ⦚βαν, Phoenician: 𐤍𐤀𐤁𐤉𐤋, and Egyptian: 𓍇(𓇰/𓅊)𓇯𓌹𐤍, or:

Pre	Number	Egyptian	Phoenician	Greek	Gothic
5500A?	5100A	4500A	3100A	2800A	1600A
𐃸⚡𓇯𓌹𐤍	42 + 51	𓍇(𓇰/𓅊)𓇯𓌹𐤍	𐤍𐤀𐤁𐤉𐤋	λ⦚βαν	𐌻𐌹𐌱𐌰𐌽

Whence, in short, over the last 5,500-years, we have, seemingly, the following root EAN etymology of the words: life, live, alive, and living:

• ⚙️🧲 𓇯𓌹𐤍
• 𓄘𓅊𓇯𓌹𐤍
• 𓍇(𓇰/𓅊)𓇯𓌹𐤍
• 𓍇⚡𓇯
• 𐃸⚡𓇯𓌹𐤍
• 𐤍𐤀𐤁𐤉𐤋
• λ⦚βαν
• 42-αν
• 𐌻𐌹𐌱𐌰𐌽
• Liban
• Live

Where 🧲 is the magnet, originally known as the lodestone 🪨, or the bone 🦴 of Horus 𓅊, conceptualized, at night, as the pole star ⭐️, and the gear ⚙️ icon is iron, originally conceptualized as the the bone 𓄘 or leg of Set, that was seen in the stars by what we know refer to as the Big Dipper 𐃸, rotating around Polaris, who in Greek became Apollo, aka the “Greek Horus”, e.g. as Newton defined things.
The following is a visual of this:
Visual of the Greek λιβ [42], pronounced: “liv”, as the etymology of the English word “live”.
The following is a more detailed etymology:
Tentative etymology of the word LIB (λ⦚β) [42], or “LIV” in phonetic translation, which seems to have become the root of the Gothis 𐌻𐌹𐌱𐌰𐌽, meaning: “live” or “living” or LIFE.
In short:

1. You die and your body is made into a mummy.
2. Horus, who is letter I, opens your mouth with a letter L tool.
3. Horus then takes you, or your spirit/soul body, into letter B, aka heaven, where the totality of your life, or rather the right and wrong actions of the movements of your body, over your existence span, are judged on a 42 law based scale, before Osiris, and 42 nome gods.

Whence, interestingly, from Greek root: λ⦚β [42], we have LIB, the seeming root of the word “live”:

42 = λ⦚β (lib) = 𓌳𓌹𓌹 (maa)

which is the number of negative confessions, the number of sins or rule breakings that the heart ❤️ of a person is supposed to confess to in the judgement hall of the after-existence.
Notes

1. The number 42, as shown in 42-αν, should actually be higher, in the bulleted list, as the number 42, in Egyptian numerals, namely: 𓎉𓏻, is a pre-Khufu pyramid logic, and 42 is an Arabic numeral, but I guess the above, gives the best rendition of things?
2. Beeckman, for those who don’t know, seems to have been the first to dismiss Parmenides’ theory that “vacuums are impossible” turned Aristotle’s “nature abhors a vacuum”, and to replace it with atmospheric pressure. He also tutored Descartes and, supposedly, was the first to introduce “mechanical philosophy“ to enlightenment.

References

• Berkel, Klaas. (A58/2013). Isaac Beeckman on Matter and Motion: Mechanical Philosophy in the Making (pg. 35). Johns Hopkins.
• Beeckman, Isaac. (329A/1626). Journal Notes of Isaac Beeckman, Volume Two (Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634: 1619-1627) (editor: Cornelius Waard) (pg. 358). Nijhoff, 8A/1942