Automatic transmission s warehouse phoenix

I’m struggling after discovering that I’m severely underpaid in my sales role. When I was hired, my company had a policy in place that stated we would be up for a raise after two years of consistent performance. 6 months ago I got my best friend a job (same role) and they are paying him 17-20k more in base pay. 60k vs 77-80k.
I went out of my way to connect my friend with my manager to have him interviewed for the job. This role typically requires a degree to even be considered and he doesn’t have one. I also spend so much of my day helping him with learning the company and accomplishing smaller tasks he doesn’t know how to do. My manager can be an idiot when it comes to using more complex systems at our job which is why I’m helping him. Knowing that I’m so underpaid in comparison to him is eating me alive and makes me have bitter feelings towards a FRIEND.
Over time my friend realized that this was bothering me so he asked him if he would get a raise at two years too. I was told that our manager said they did away with the 2 year review after I was hired. That is supposedly the reason he started with a higher base pay.
I’ll be at two years in September and currently have a new sales manager I report to. My performance has gone WAY down after all of this became known to me. Also, I’ve heard it’s supposed to be a 15-20% bump in my base if I am performing. My friend automatically got this from day one. Even if I got a 20% pay bump I wouldn’t make what he’s making.
The job market scares me but I do have nearly a decade in logistics sales experience with the two biggest players in the US. If you were me would you leave?

After I sell an item, get rated, and receive my funds, my sold listing gets automatically deleted by Mercari and I’m not sure why. Is this normal? Does this happen to anyone else? My rating from the buyer stays, but not the sold listing. I understand if Mercari does this to declutter pages, so it’s easier to view items that are available; however, I have less than 10 listings up and my available items are all at the top of my page. Also, none of the sold listings that are deleted from my page are prohibited items. They’re all regular listings

This is a bit of a silly post but Im looking for advice about engine/transmission swapping my 2008 Toyota Sienna CE mom van.
Some people would find it weird to mod out a mom van but not me. Im looking mostly for the transmission to fit my sienna. I dont mind building the 3.5L V6 but I cant find a similar tranny that can hold more power so I might have to build one. The part number for the tranny is #30500-48440. It's a 5-speed automatic FWD.
Any ideas? I know if I engine swap it, I can just throw a new tranny on the engine but if I wanna build my V6 Im having a hard time finding a tranny that fits the bell housing adapter.

The last 2 days are a bit crazy. My partner crochets flowers and amigurumis for relaxing. Also, she has social media accounts for showing and selling these products. Anyway, she crocheted an order for a client and published a post about it two days ago. Then, The post blew up! 300 thousand people watched it, and some of them sent messages to buy. Even though very few have bought it, it is very important to us. Currently, I’m helping her to answer messages or help her crochet. The money will be useful to us which we earn these selling. However, the preparation process is very long and requires lots of hand labor. Besides, crochet is fun for my partner, but preparing the orders for money is not. We need to automatize the process, but It’s impossible. So, we need to think about different design products for selling.

I bought a 1996 Ranger 3.0, RWD about a month ago. 80k miles. 2 years ago the previous owner replaced a lot of parts under the hood after the truck had been sitting for a while. New radiator, spark plugs, wires, ignition coil, battery, alternator, just to name a few. It has the original engine and transmission.
The thing is, I've been hearing a metallic-like rattling sound when driving at high RPMs. I'll need to take my foot off the gas a bit to make it stop. I've read all around for what this might be. My heat shield seems secure, but just in case I put pipe clamps around it. Banging around with a mallet all over the exhaust and catalytic converter didn't reveal any sounds. The truck has a bit of a rough idle, nothing super bad, and a rough time accelerating, especially at lower RPMs. Speed maxes out around 75, which is fine for me, just takes a loooong time to get there. A smoke test revealed leaks at the IAC and EGR valves so I've replaced both. Also a slight leak at the throttle position sensor, but I haven't done anything with that yet. I've tested two out of the three O2 sensors with a multimeter (the passenger side upstream one was too difficult to get to for me), and they appear to be ok. I've also run Seafoam through the fuel tank.
Not sure what else it could be. As far as the acceleration, I've heard 3.0s are slow, but not sure if mine is normal slow or not. Not sure if the rattling is related to reduced engine power either. Any help or suggestions what the noise could be? It's driving me crazy, and I feel like the truck is about to fall apart.
Just to add, I've had a hard time finding a video showing predetonation sounds I can actually hear, but to my understanding it sounds a little like static. My sound only sounds metallic, and as I said earlier, plugs, wires, and coil were all replaced about 2yrs, 8k miles ago.
EDIT: Best video I could get of the sound https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UPK_MvHBfz9k-sVxWOPupXm9R-_URGNT/view?usp=drivesdk

Am I the asshole for not wanting a relationship with my dad’s side of the family?
Me, 23F, have a pretty good relationship with my parents, but a point of conflict in our family ever since I was a child is my relationship with my dad’s side of the family.
My dad’s side of the family lives on another city so that automatically reduced the contact I had with them in comparison with the contact I had with my mom’s side of the family, most notably my grandma and my uncle.
My dad’s family has never really put into the effort to have a closer relationship. The most I would get from them were usually birthday and Christmas calls when I was a kid. Now, it’s, at best, a Christmas call from my grandmother and a DM from one of my aunts. At the same time, my grandparents often showed they cared more about my cousins than me. They would often be more affectionate towards them and give them rather expensive gifts and even help with paying for their eduction. One of them got a car recently and the other got help in affording their MBA.
I get it, they live closer to my grandparents so it’s understandable they’d be closer to them than to me, but these things weren’t as clear to me when I was about 6/7 I often wondered what I’d done to make them not like me.
My dad always insisted we visited them during summer break or other holidays when I was in school. I never felt like these people cared for me so I hated wasting my off time visiting them instead of spending time with my friends or doing other activities I enjoyed, especially given that I struggled with bullying in school so the summer break was always the time I had to just be left alone. Instead, almost every year I got dragged for a week or two to another city and forced to live under the same roof as my grandparents. They weren’t mean to me, but I often felt completely left out when I was there. My mom would often be the only one who tried to do something I’d enjoy.
Sometimes his family would come to visit and more than once he gave away some of my toys to my younger cousins. He’d hardly ask me in advance if it was okay, instead he’d ask in front of my cousins if they wanted it and if I was okay with giving it to them. I felt pressured to say yes, because I didn’t want to disappoint my dad nor upset my younger cousins.
His goal whenever he was with his family was to prove to them how successful he was. How he’d been the first to have higher education in the family and how he was a businessman when, in reality, my parents were somewhat struggling financially.
Over the years, I began to make my position more clear and tell my dad I didn’t want to visit them nor that I wanted them in our house. He often said I was being selfish and that I needed to put in the effort to be closer to his family. He also said I was close to my mom’s relatives and that it was unfair I didn’t have the same relationship with his family. It became an endless point of contention, including between my parents who’d often get into arguments over the situation. My mom always taking my side as she doesn’t really get along with them as well.
It also didn’t help that my grandmother and aunts seemed to dislike the way my parents were raising me and told my dad I was too spoiled. My dad told my mom about it and she told me about it once she felt I was old enough to know as she “didn’t want to hurt my feelings.”
Recently, things got worse. There was one person I liked in that family and that was my uncle, he too often felt left out by the family so we could relate in some ways. My family was actually pretty horrible to him as he struggled with mental health and they think that’s bs. He died during the COVID pandemic and now the family basically acts as if he’s never existed. I get it may be grief, but the way they never talk about him feels weird to me. He was the only person that made my family more tolerable and now he’s gone so there’s not much left.
More than that, my dad’s family is more on the conservative and religious side and I’m not. They post a bunch of fake news on their stories about the government (to the point one of my aunts often has her posts suspended) and supported a candidate who was openly lgbtphobic and I’m gay so you can imagine that did not land well with me. Still, I never tried to argue with them for the sake of my dad, but I would still post something about politics every now and then. In the end, one of aunts went into my DMs to say how stupid I was for supporting the other candidate. That escalated to a whole argument… my dad was not happy about it and said I should tone down on my posts.
More recently, my dad has begun to visit them on his own as my work schedule makes it harder to take me with him, but he keeps talking about how my grandparents are old and don’t have much time left and how the “whole family” should be there for them.
Still, I can’t bring myself to really care. I genuinely feel nothing for them. I expect nothing from them and I trust they expect nothing from me.
I do feel bad for my dad because it’s his parents and family so I don’t complain about them anymore, but I still don’t want any contact with them.
Am I the asshole?

I was reading up on vehicle construction rules. On page 182 under the Aerospace Unit Tables Type there is an asterisk stating that “All aerospace units except for conventional fighters automatically incorporate VSTOL capability.”
Yet on page 87 the lower left paragraph in Total War states that all aerodyne must make horizontal landings.
What is more confusing is that the unit type definition on page 183 does not call out that aerodyne are not excluded from VSTOL. I was also unable to find an entry in the books errata for aerodyne dropships. And the Total War errata matches the version of the book I am using.
So which is correct?
My first reaction is that Total Warfare is the go to on this as that was always my understanding for how aerodyne dropships worked.
But per the errata of Total Warfare there have been changes made to how the rule is handled in previous editions. So, has VSTOL capability been added in general to all aerospace units?
Lastly should the construction rule asterisk simply be changed to “aerospace fighter” from “aerospace unit”? That would change things to reflect the Total Warfare. So maybe it’s just a typo. But it doesn’t look like one as there is also no asterisk applied to a specific unit type.
Thoughts?

What do you think of the MiG-29 (USSR and GER’s first 29) being moved to 11.7 to help balance out REDFOR teams? I believe the 27E’s to be on par with the 530D and is outranged by Phoenixes. The Magic 2s I find to be slightly better than the R-60M and think the MiG would be matched well against the Mirage 2000S4/5 as well as Tomcat (if F-14 player flies to its strengths, IE BVR or slow rate fights with swept wings). I except to get some pushback on this, especially from US mains. But as someone who has all 3 aircraft mentioned I really think this would be a fun addition to 11.7. The radar would certainly be an advantage but then again the RWRs of the Mirage and Tomcat would also be an advantage which I feel balances things out. Thoughts?

Took my car in because for the last couple months I’ve been having acceleration issues. There’s times when I would press on the gas and it would take my car 3-4 seconds to actually respond. Noticed it’s getting more sluggish too. Ive had it for four years, it’s a 2017 Nissan rogue with 78k miles. I’ve never had an issue until now. Took it into Nissan and they told me my transmission needs to be replaced 😭
Apparently I missed the deadline for the extended warranty Nissan offers by two months. Do I buy a new transmission or should I just buy a new car. I’ve never had an issue with the vehicle until now and I have kept up regular maintenance. Heard bad things about Nissans so I don’t know which way to go.

Can I use this phrase in a context where I sweep the floor of e.g. a warehouse building with a broom but don’t do it thoroughly. I’d like to indicate that I only do it so the big parts of dirt are being swept away, what’s sufficient, and that afterwards it’s not as clean as it’d be if I would sweep e.g. my apartment.

Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in quantum mechanics, that when two or more particles are entangled, their properties can no longer be described individually. Instead, they can be only described as an entity with wavefunction. Derived from this simultaneity, nonlocality is a principle which is used to explain the simultaneity of quantum entanglement across spacetime. It means that objects may affect simultaneous event that is not adjacent to them. Action at distance is hence possible. In this process, the information may still be unable to be transmitted faster than speed of light, as quantum entangled pair would disentangle once it is observed and the information observed would be random. Nonetheless, nonlocality might still “cannot be made to peacefully coexist with special relativity”. For relativity theory, spacetime is a key concept. It is the four-dimensional entity that consists of three space dimensions and the dimension of time. Every particle’s position is presented by four parameters, three for space and one of time. The relativity theory and quantum mechanics are two fundamental theories that shape our current understanding of the physical world, yet they are not perfectly consistent. The author intends to find viable connections between spacetime and quantum entanglement, a field that has been studied in the last few decades, when some potential structures are found that can be used to describe the relation. Studies suggest that quantum entanglement is not the mere connection between different particles, but the connection of the degree of freedom of the spacetime where they are located. What is more, the connection between spacetime and quantum entanglement can draw a larger picture: a universe which is fabricated by entangled spacetimes. The concept of quantum entanglement originates from the famous EPR paradox, come up by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen. A quantum entangled particle pair can be only described with the same wave function, so their behaviors are interrelated. As one particle spins up, the other must be down. This process is immediate, so the information must be traveling with speed, greater than the speed of light if the behaviors of particles are at random. This odd property makes Einstein and the other two physicists draw the conclusion that there must be some hidden variables controlling their performance. Their conclusion is rooted in a simple idea: principle of locality. Principle of locality is that an object can only pass the influence of forces continuously through either field or space. This principle, nonetheless, had been disproved by the test of Bell’s inequality. If that energy/matter and information cannot be transmitted faster than speed of light is still an axiom in physics, the principle of locality must not be true. Bell’s inequality is the formula based on the assumption of hidden variable. Hidden variable means that the collapse of wavefunction does not have an action at distance among the entangled particles. Every behavior of the paired particles is predicted by hidden variables, so uncertainty is not required in this theory. Therefore, the transmission of information is local since there is no action at distance among entangled pairs. Bell’s inequality is a property predicted by this theory. Bell’s inequality predicts behavior of entangled particles different from that of quantum mechanics based on Copenhagen’s interpretation. According to the experimental examination of this inequality, this inequality is clearly violated. Therefore, nonlocality of quantum entanglement should be the only possible explanation that preserve the principle of constancy of light speed.
Many works had been done in discovering the relation between the frame of reference and quantum entanglement. It has been verified with experiments that Bell’s inequality is still violated under Lorentz Boost. This finding suggests that the correlations between entangled particles are preserve in all frames, even in those relativistic ones. Similar studies had been performed by other scholars, who mainly studied the cases of quantum entanglement between relativistic massive particles. This finding shows that degree of violation of Bell’s inequality is dependent on the relative velocity of the particle measured with respect to the laboratory, yet particle pairs do not disentangle as they reach a certain relative speed. Therefore, the finding further confirms conservation of nonlocality in all frame of reference. Whether quantum entanglement and spacetime are related is a profound question. A study made by Mark Van Raamsdonk finds that “emergence of classically connected spacetimes is intimately related to the quantum entanglement of degrees of freedom in a non-perturbative description of quantum gravity”. The disentanglement of two separate spacetime is similar to that of two entangled particles. In fact, if two regions of spacetime is disentangled, they “pull apart” from each other. Built on the non-perturbative description of quantum gravity, this finding can be applied to spacetime of the physical world. Raamsdonk extended the discussion to some examples of gauge theory/gravity duality. He found out that “in at least some cases, classically connected spacetimes may be understood as particular quantum superpositions of disconnected spacetimes”. As distance between two regions of spacetime increases, the entanglement of degree of freedom degreases. Disentanglement of two separated regions of spacetime should be considered no longer connected. These two studies rely on the non-perturbative description of quantum gravity and the gauge theory/gravity duality. Particularly, they rely on some particular cases of gauge theory/gravity duality. Therefore, if gauge theory’s prediction in this field is proved invalid, the results would also collapse. However, since the gauge theory well predict the behavior of quantum world, these examples might also be true. Yet they need further experimental verification. The fact that quantum entanglement might form spacetime is an exciting finding. Quantum entanglement has long been considered irrelevant to relativistic theory. Typically, researchers did not treat entanglement, namely nonlocality, relevant to spacetime. These studies suggest a deep connection between two seemingly distinct physical entity, that classically continuous spacetime can be described as an extended object of quantum entanglement.
Instead of forming spacetime from quantum entanglement, there are other studies suggest that quantum entanglement can be described in terms of spacetime connection. The first study derives from the coincidence of the maximum “probability of quantum entanglement of two particles” of 9.0169945% and “exactly the golden mean ϕ to the power of five ( )”. This theory is somewhat surprising, yet it is supported with valid calculation. Its conclusion shows that quantum entanglement can be a result of complex spacetime geometry. The emergence of quantum entanglement might not solely be explained in term of quantum mechanics, which ignores the effect of spacetime geometry. In addition, it might also be intrinsically linked to the structure of spacetime. Despite its exciting result, it is based on calculation of the coincidence of probability of quantum entanglement and golden mean to the fifth power. Whether it is a superficial coincidence or profound relation would greatly influence its validity. Besides, experimental verification is still needed. If the result is proven physical meaningless, it is also not a valid theory. Nonetheless, this study still provides some insights about how to describe quantum entanglement in terms of spacetime geometry. The relation between quantum entanglement and spacetime has a more prominent meaning: quantum entangled pair can be seen as a non-traversable wormhole. Researchers “construct holographic dual of two colored quasiparticles in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory entangled in a color singlet Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pair”. According to their research, entanglement is “encoded in a geometry of a non-traversable wormhole”. This finding is significant because it provides connection between the strangest predictions of quantum mechanics and that of relativistic theory. Wormhole is no less strange than quantum entanglement, yet they are the result of distinct mechanism. Worm hole is the result of severe torsion of spacetime, while quantum entanglement is relation between particle pairs. Combining these two phenomena is helpful to understand the properties of spacetime. Combined together, these studies suggest a larger picture of physics study: a spacetime intrinsically linked by entanglement. From the point of view of quantum entanglement, it is the entanglement between different regions that fabricates the classic continuous spacetime. From the stance of spacetime, it is the intrinsic property of the entity itself that embodies the emergence of entanglement. A larger picture is implied by the entangled spacetime. According to the study made by Chunjun Cao, Sean M. Carroll, and Spyridon Michalakis, the spacetime itself seems to self-emerge from the entanglement. They “examined how space can emerge from an abstract quantum state in Hilbert space, and how something like Einstein’s equation is a natural consequence of this bulk emergent gravity program”. What is more, the model allows classical wormhole to emerge as a result, which deepens the relation between quantum entanglement and spacetime, since this is an unexpected feature without putting the two entities together. “Lengths and other geometric quantities are determined by entanglement”, and “gravity appears to arise from quantum mechanics in a natural way”. Self-emergence of spacetime from quantum mechanics implies a new relation between gravity and quantum mechanics. The study combined and rebuilt the previous studies from a very solid basis, so that no semiclassical backgrounds like classical may have influenced the result. The rebuilt makes the result more convincing, in that it excluded assumptions of the previous studies that might be mistaken from this one. Starting from pure quantum state instead of “quantizing classical degree of freedom”, so the construction of spacetime from quantum entanglement would not be the result of those potentially mistaken assumptions. The self-emergence of spacetime from quantum entanglement is helpful in constructing a quantum gravity theory. This is a crucial insight to our understanding of gravity, the last uncovered fundamental force in Yang-Mills theory. Described as the result of spacetime geometry in relativity theory, gravity cannot be described like other forces. For relativity theory, gravity is not a force at all, but an illusion produced by the movement of objects and the distorted geodesic of spacetime near a massive object. If the spacetime geometry can be successfully described in quantum scale, the gravity may be described in terms of quantum mechanics. With the interesting connection that is newly found, this long existing gap may be filled out. The spacetime can self-emerge from quantum entanglement, which can be explained by spacetime geometry. This shows that spacetime is closely linked by some rules of quantum mechanics. In addition, the fact that quantum entanglement might be understood as wormhole or the result of spacetime geometry also suggests quantum entanglement itself is closely related to the mechanics of spacetime, a field which can be effectively explained by relativity theory. The studies of relations between quantum entanglement and spacetime are still restrained to hypotheses, nonetheless, meaning these results might still be invalidated by experimental verification. Despite these risks, studies in this field are still noteworthy because of the provision it brings. Besides, the failure of some predictions might show false understanding of some ideas in physics, so it can also lead to a new field of research even if these results are proven incompletely correct. From the studies of quantum mechanics and relativity theory, the relation between quantum entanglement and the spacetime seems intrinsic. Derived from the known example of gauge theory/gravity duality, the continuous spacetime can be fabricated by quantum superpositions of disconnected spacetimes. This implies a potentially crucial role of quantum entanglement in spacetime. In addition, the study of space and Hilbert space shows that the quantum state naturally produces space. On the contrary, Cantorian spacetime geometry can explain quantum entanglement in context of spacetime geometry. Moreover, the study of wormhole shows that quantum entanglement can be considered as non-traversable wormhole. In conclusion, all these studies imply that quantum entanglement and space can be mutually explained. These studies lack of direct evidence from experiment. Some further researches on the field might solve this problem, so the theory can make valid predictions.