Key codes seca canal digitaal
27 [M4F] #Central Europe - "Love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward together in the same direction"
2024.05.19 15:10 Yogurt68 27 [M4F] #Central Europe - "Love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward together in the same direction"
Hey there!
I'm a 27-year-old from the UK, currently living in Central Europe for work. I'm looking for a long-term relationship with someone who clicks with me, ideally in a similar time zone, but I'm open to making it work at distance ir we connect.
I work as a project manager at a software company, and although I studied communications at uni, I enjoy programming and try to incorporate it into my job whenever possible, usually to make my work easier. In my free time, you'll find me enjoying football and F1, working on coding projects, playing badminton, hiking (I'm really looking forward to more outdoor adventures this summer), hanging out with friends, gaming, and practicing my art skills to add some flair to my coding projects. My music taste is pretty varied, though I tend to lean towards pop.
I'm hoping to find someone who shares some of my interests, values personal growth, and has an ambitious spirit. It's important to me to have a partner who can challenge me to be better and whom I can support in return. It might sound lofty, but I believe having a shared mindset is key to mutual support and achieving goals together. I am also happy to gaze at each other.
For a quick snapshot: I'm slim, of average height, with light brown hair. I think I'm fairly attractive, and while I try to dress well, you'll often find me in a football shirt when I'm at home. Physical attraction is important in a relationship, so feel free to ask for a picture—I'm happy to share!
If something in my post caught your eye, drop me a message and let me know what stood out to you. Let's see where the conversation takes us!
submitted by Yogurt68 to r4r [link] [comments]
I'm a 27-year-old from the UK, currently living in Central Europe for work. I'm looking for a long-term relationship with someone who clicks with me, ideally in a similar time zone, but I'm open to making it work at distance ir we connect.
I work as a project manager at a software company, and although I studied communications at uni, I enjoy programming and try to incorporate it into my job whenever possible, usually to make my work easier. In my free time, you'll find me enjoying football and F1, working on coding projects, playing badminton, hiking (I'm really looking forward to more outdoor adventures this summer), hanging out with friends, gaming, and practicing my art skills to add some flair to my coding projects. My music taste is pretty varied, though I tend to lean towards pop.
I'm hoping to find someone who shares some of my interests, values personal growth, and has an ambitious spirit. It's important to me to have a partner who can challenge me to be better and whom I can support in return. It might sound lofty, but I believe having a shared mindset is key to mutual support and achieving goals together. I am also happy to gaze at each other.
For a quick snapshot: I'm slim, of average height, with light brown hair. I think I'm fairly attractive, and while I try to dress well, you'll often find me in a football shirt when I'm at home. Physical attraction is important in a relationship, so feel free to ask for a picture—I'm happy to share!
If something in my post caught your eye, drop me a message and let me know what stood out to you. Let's see where the conversation takes us!
2024.05.19 14:41 tensorphobia I need some guidance on how to build a Terminal Virtual Keyboard with ability to change system configuration to switch current keyboard layout
So the idea came to me when first attempted to install Arch Linux , I was a beginner back then and I had some overhead to search for suitable commands via wiki to display current keyboard layout and switch between available layouts.
I was wondering If I can build some visual utility TUI that can be merged to arch install or be used by people who have missing or broken keys to do the above, plus maybe the ability to write to the TUI app then having whats written be copied to the clipboard to be used outside the app..
that's the draft of the idea, now the problem is that i'm totally ignorant of how linux work under the hood, I need help understanding what files it uses to store current keyboard layout and possible a map of characters for that particular layout so I dont have to hard code it myself..
I might be missing more puzzle piece , if you have any information that can help me or idea please comment bellow
Tl;DR: would you kindly explain to me how linux manages and stores keyboard layout and their corresponding keys..
submitted by tensorphobia to linux4noobs [link] [comments]
I was wondering If I can build some visual utility TUI that can be merged to arch install or be used by people who have missing or broken keys to do the above, plus maybe the ability to write to the TUI app then having whats written be copied to the clipboard to be used outside the app..
that's the draft of the idea, now the problem is that i'm totally ignorant of how linux work under the hood, I need help understanding what files it uses to store current keyboard layout and possible a map of characters for that particular layout so I dont have to hard code it myself..
I might be missing more puzzle piece , if you have any information that can help me or idea please comment bellow
Tl;DR: would you kindly explain to me how linux manages and stores keyboard layout and their corresponding keys..
2024.05.19 14:31 karaposu Cofounders' Codes
I recently parted ways with my cofounder. It was due to skillset difference and how we approach to the overall project. And I noticed that it was easily avoidable since my partner is a really cool person and we were unprepared for such conflicts.
This is why I thought it is a good idea to have a set of compact codes/rules to go over together at the beginning of the partnership (Preferably before starting any actual work or design). These are my drafts from my previous experiences. It would be cool if you guys add your set of rules and we can combine them to something really useful.
Cofounders' Codes (Not finalized yet, but still useful)
1. Business First Mindset: Friendship and business are different things. It should be clear as day that we do business to create a successful running business (referred to as "project"). This is the essential goal, and all other rules are based on this. It is not about having fun, gaining experience, or giving it a try. We are here to make money in the most efficient and impactful way.
2. Resilience in Partnership: Partnership is like marriage; there will be problems for sure. There will be unexpected battles of egos, habits, etc. Both sides should understand that the business will be successful to the extent that we overcome these handicaps. Overcoming these problems is part of what is called "doing business."
3. Technical Learning and Growth: For technical matters, there is usually a common way of doing things or there are industry standards or coding conventions. It is the responsibility of the less experienced person to learn and level up to these standards, and it is the responsibility of the more experienced person to help their partner grow to these standards. Ensure each partner knows their duties and respects the other's domain of expertise.
4. Thorough Documentation: Keep thorough documentation of all agreements, decisions, and processes. This helps avoid misunderstandings and provides a reference if disputes arise.
5. Commitment to Decisions: Once a common decision is made, you must stick with it. Doing things your own way might be tempting, but this is detrimental to the project.
6. Collaborative Development: Collaborate effectively by building upon each other's work. Development should be parallel yet cumulative, ensuring progress is integrated and builds on previous efforts.
7. Value Recognition: Do not overlook what your partner readily brings to the table. Just because something is done quickly doesn't mean it was easy. Recognizing the value in each other is key to maintaining resolve.
8. Experience and Innovation: Do not overlook experience. Experience will save you money and time in the long term, which are essential for success. Do not look down on "out of the box" thinking; it might be just what will save your business.
9. Conflict Resolution: Conflict resolution is straightforward. Always consider what is best for the project. If both partners are hardworking and committed to the business, maintaining the partnership will be most beneficial for the project's success. Therefore, be tolerant of each other's methods and ways, and communicate frequently.
10. Clear Communication: Establish clear and open channels of communication from the beginning. Regular check-ins and honest discussions about progress, concerns, and expectations are essential.
submitted by karaposu to EntrepreneurRideAlong [link] [comments]
This is why I thought it is a good idea to have a set of compact codes/rules to go over together at the beginning of the partnership (Preferably before starting any actual work or design). These are my drafts from my previous experiences. It would be cool if you guys add your set of rules and we can combine them to something really useful.
Cofounders' Codes (Not finalized yet, but still useful)
1. Business First Mindset: Friendship and business are different things. It should be clear as day that we do business to create a successful running business (referred to as "project"). This is the essential goal, and all other rules are based on this. It is not about having fun, gaining experience, or giving it a try. We are here to make money in the most efficient and impactful way.
2. Resilience in Partnership: Partnership is like marriage; there will be problems for sure. There will be unexpected battles of egos, habits, etc. Both sides should understand that the business will be successful to the extent that we overcome these handicaps. Overcoming these problems is part of what is called "doing business."
3. Technical Learning and Growth: For technical matters, there is usually a common way of doing things or there are industry standards or coding conventions. It is the responsibility of the less experienced person to learn and level up to these standards, and it is the responsibility of the more experienced person to help their partner grow to these standards. Ensure each partner knows their duties and respects the other's domain of expertise.
4. Thorough Documentation: Keep thorough documentation of all agreements, decisions, and processes. This helps avoid misunderstandings and provides a reference if disputes arise.
5. Commitment to Decisions: Once a common decision is made, you must stick with it. Doing things your own way might be tempting, but this is detrimental to the project.
6. Collaborative Development: Collaborate effectively by building upon each other's work. Development should be parallel yet cumulative, ensuring progress is integrated and builds on previous efforts.
7. Value Recognition: Do not overlook what your partner readily brings to the table. Just because something is done quickly doesn't mean it was easy. Recognizing the value in each other is key to maintaining resolve.
8. Experience and Innovation: Do not overlook experience. Experience will save you money and time in the long term, which are essential for success. Do not look down on "out of the box" thinking; it might be just what will save your business.
9. Conflict Resolution: Conflict resolution is straightforward. Always consider what is best for the project. If both partners are hardworking and committed to the business, maintaining the partnership will be most beneficial for the project's success. Therefore, be tolerant of each other's methods and ways, and communicate frequently.
10. Clear Communication: Establish clear and open channels of communication from the beginning. Regular check-ins and honest discussions about progress, concerns, and expectations are essential.
2024.05.19 14:29 fantastiskelars Supabase Auth with SSR: Now with AI Integration and More! 🚀
Hey everyone,
I’ve updated my project that integrates Supabase's SSR authentication with Next.js 14 and Material-UI. Here’s what’s new:
Key Features:
Feedback and contributions are welcome!
submitted by fantastiskelars to Supabase [link] [comments]
I’ve updated my project that integrates Supabase's SSR authentication with Next.js 14 and Material-UI. Here’s what’s new:
Key Features:
- Supabase for Authentication: Utilizing Supabase's robust authentication system to secure your web application.
- Server-Side Rendering with Next.js 14: Leveraging Next.js 14 for improved performance and SEO benefits through server-side rendering.
- Material-UI for Styling: Applying Material-UI to enhance the UI with a modern, responsive design.
- Latest AI Package: Updated to Vercel’s newest AI package.
- LangChain Upgrade: Better integration with the latest version.
- Chat History: Seamless user experience with Upstash/Redis.
- Mobile-Friendly Chat: Adjusts for better mobile use.
- Modern Styles: Updated styles for sign-in, sign-up, and password reset pages.
- AI Chat: Integrated with OpenAI’s ChatGPT for dynamic chat.
- Markdown Support: Enhanced with Perplexity and code highlighting.
- React Server Components: Optimized data fetching and rendering.
Feedback and contributions are welcome!
2024.05.19 14:28 confusedvexedperson The worst interview of my life was at this company called Nagarro
This did not happen recently but a few months back.
I was looking for a job (double digit years in experience) and a HR from Nagarro reached out on LinkedIn. I sent her my details, did a proctored online test and was selected for a 2nd round face to face. Since the interviewer was in US, the slot I had was Sunday at 9:45 PM IST [I was given a choice of slots but they were either 7 in the morning or 9-10 in the night, only weekends].
I joined the Teams meeting at 9:40 PM on a Sunday, turned on my camera, and waited 5 minutes for the interviewer. As soon as it became 9:45, I heard the Teams chime that I was let in, but before the sound ended, a voice started speaking. "Alright, so what things you take care?"
I looked up to see this Indian guy wearing a red hat (not THAT red hat) indoors, looking at me. I said, "Sorry, what?" And he said exasperatedly, "Your work. What. Is. It. that. You. Do." in clipped tones, as if I was not a mentally sound person.
My hand automatically moved my mouse over to the disconnect button and I almost clicked but stopped myself at the last moment. I decided to see how the interview went. I had not given an interview in a long time and wanted to get an experience.
I composed myself and started to explain my resume. In the middle of it, he stopped me and said, "Are you using dual screens?" I said yes. He scolded me for using dual screens for an interview and made me turn one off. I was on camera the whole time and it was a face to face interview so not really sure what the concern was but I still did it. The funny part was, during the interview I could hear pings from his side and see him turn to his own second screen to reply to some chat/IM messages. Anyways, I asked, "should I continue explaining my resume" and he said, "no that's alright."
"Tell me about any recent deliverable you have worked on", he asked next. I had recently worked on implementing a customized DR system so I started to explain how it was implemented and the architectural changes done. He was distracted the whole time, replying to some ping, constantly muting and unmuting his audio and saying, "That's fine. Keep going." I completed my explanation and waited. He realized I had stopped talking and said, "All that is good but I do not see the architecture change you have done." I summarized the server re-organization, the load balancers, the customized back-up and archival, even some code level changes we had to do, but he said, "I still do not see the architecture design change." I said, "I can draw an architecture diagram to show it clearly", and he said, "no that's alright. Let's move on."
I come from a .NET background, so he asked me, "do you have experience with .NET core?" I said, I did. And this is where the most weird part of the interview starts. He spent 20 minutes on a single question and you will see why, in a minute.
He asked me, "Do you know the three types of dependency injection?" I answered the three - singleton, scoped and transient.
He said, "good, now tell me how do you decide which one to use." This is a standard interview question, I gave the standard answer. It was not good enough.
He did a "tch" sound of exasperation. "All that is good, but how do you decide?" I explained again, adding more details.
He did that "tch" sound again. "All that is good, but how do YOU decide?", stressing on the word "YOU". I explained again, this time with examples of when I would make which choice and why.
He did that "tch" sound again. "All that is good, but those are textbook examples. Tell me about an example that you have implemented in your system"
I explained how we had used a singleton for application level settings. He did that "tch" sound again. "All that is good, but what made you decide that the application settings need to be in singleton?"
I was confused at this point. What was he looking for! "The settings need to be the same throughout the application and so a singleton is a logical choice", I said.
He shook his head, this time not making the "tch" sound. "No, you are not getting it. I want to understand what made you decide to make the application settings class a singleton? Was it because of the name of the class or because somebody told you or because you got a feeling?"
I was angry at this point, so I repeated the same answer as before. He said, "Maybe I am making it complex. Why don't I give you an example and you can explain your choice." I said OK.
"Alright, so suppose that I created a class called "" and asked you how should I use it. What will you say?"
I stared at him for a moment, wondering if this was real. I asked him what was the functionality of the class, and he launched into the most unnecessarily complex (and to me, wildly unrelated) functionality regarding uploading documents from an API to an azure storage account involving Virtual Networks, Key Vault, different Blob types and an Azure SQL database to store blob metadata. I asked him, how the class is supposed to be used. He said, "I don't know. I am the author of the class. I have given it to other people to use. Ask me questions you would ask the author of the class."
My mind was hurting at this point so I repeated, in the most bored voice, the very first standard answer I had given. He must have realized my disinterest, for he said, "Alright, I get it. Let's move on. Do you have experience writing SQL?"
I said Yes. So he asked me to share my screen and gave me a written scenario for which to write a query.
While I was working on the query, he said, "I have your resume so let's take a look at that." He opened the resume, I could see that he actually did open it then, by the screen brightness reflected on his face change. And as I worked on the query, he kept going through my resume and making what I can only describe as "Passive-Aggressive comments" in a low voice in the background. E.g. "worked at So-and-so (one of the Big 4 companies)... In", "worked with XYZ technology... for ", "SME for ABC technologies... for DEF use case"
I was done at this point so I drafted out a query with as low effort as I could and then explained it quickly. It was wrong for sure, and not fulfilling the use case completely but I had stopped caring. He also realized it because he said, "Alright, I think that is it. Do you have any questions for me?", in a very smug voice.
I said, "No, thanks for the experience", and disconnected the call.
So, that was it. The most WTF interview of my life. So far. I am not really sure what was wrong with that dude or maybe I have been out of touch for a long time and this is how it is now, but damn, man. I sat in shock for a few minutes after the call. I did check out the interviewer's profile on LinkedIn, wondering if we had crossed paths before. But he was been with his company for a long, long time, first company since college and never switched. So I don't really know.
Anyways, so, yeah. Hope you are having a better experience than me.
submitted by confusedvexedperson to developersIndia [link] [comments]
I was looking for a job (double digit years in experience) and a HR from Nagarro reached out on LinkedIn. I sent her my details, did a proctored online test and was selected for a 2nd round face to face. Since the interviewer was in US, the slot I had was Sunday at 9:45 PM IST [I was given a choice of slots but they were either 7 in the morning or 9-10 in the night, only weekends].
I joined the Teams meeting at 9:40 PM on a Sunday, turned on my camera, and waited 5 minutes for the interviewer. As soon as it became 9:45, I heard the Teams chime that I was let in, but before the sound ended, a voice started speaking. "Alright, so what things you take care?"
I looked up to see this Indian guy wearing a red hat (not THAT red hat) indoors, looking at me. I said, "Sorry, what?" And he said exasperatedly, "Your work. What. Is. It. that. You. Do." in clipped tones, as if I was not a mentally sound person.
My hand automatically moved my mouse over to the disconnect button and I almost clicked but stopped myself at the last moment. I decided to see how the interview went. I had not given an interview in a long time and wanted to get an experience.
I composed myself and started to explain my resume. In the middle of it, he stopped me and said, "Are you using dual screens?" I said yes. He scolded me for using dual screens for an interview and made me turn one off. I was on camera the whole time and it was a face to face interview so not really sure what the concern was but I still did it. The funny part was, during the interview I could hear pings from his side and see him turn to his own second screen to reply to some chat/IM messages. Anyways, I asked, "should I continue explaining my resume" and he said, "no that's alright."
"Tell me about any recent deliverable you have worked on", he asked next. I had recently worked on implementing a customized DR system so I started to explain how it was implemented and the architectural changes done. He was distracted the whole time, replying to some ping, constantly muting and unmuting his audio and saying, "That's fine. Keep going." I completed my explanation and waited. He realized I had stopped talking and said, "All that is good but I do not see the architecture change you have done." I summarized the server re-organization, the load balancers, the customized back-up and archival, even some code level changes we had to do, but he said, "I still do not see the architecture design change." I said, "I can draw an architecture diagram to show it clearly", and he said, "no that's alright. Let's move on."
I come from a .NET background, so he asked me, "do you have experience with .NET core?" I said, I did. And this is where the most weird part of the interview starts. He spent 20 minutes on a single question and you will see why, in a minute.
He asked me, "Do you know the three types of dependency injection?" I answered the three - singleton, scoped and transient.
He said, "good, now tell me how do you decide which one to use." This is a standard interview question, I gave the standard answer. It was not good enough.
He did a "tch" sound of exasperation. "All that is good, but how do you decide?" I explained again, adding more details.
He did that "tch" sound again. "All that is good, but how do YOU decide?", stressing on the word "YOU". I explained again, this time with examples of when I would make which choice and why.
He did that "tch" sound again. "All that is good, but those are textbook examples. Tell me about an example that you have implemented in your system"
I explained how we had used a singleton for application level settings. He did that "tch" sound again. "All that is good, but what made you decide that the application settings need to be in singleton?"
I was confused at this point. What was he looking for! "The settings need to be the same throughout the application and so a singleton is a logical choice", I said.
He shook his head, this time not making the "tch" sound. "No, you are not getting it. I want to understand what made you decide to make the application settings class a singleton? Was it because of the name of the class or because somebody told you or because you got a feeling?"
I was angry at this point, so I repeated the same answer as before. He said, "Maybe I am making it complex. Why don't I give you an example and you can explain your choice." I said OK.
"Alright, so suppose that I created a class called "
I stared at him for a moment, wondering if this was real. I asked him what was the functionality of the class, and he launched into the most unnecessarily complex (and to me, wildly unrelated) functionality regarding uploading documents from an API to an azure storage account involving Virtual Networks, Key Vault, different Blob types and an Azure SQL database to store blob metadata. I asked him, how the class is supposed to be used. He said, "I don't know. I am the author of the class. I have given it to other people to use. Ask me questions you would ask the author of the class."
My mind was hurting at this point so I repeated, in the most bored voice, the very first standard answer I had given. He must have realized my disinterest, for he said, "Alright, I get it. Let's move on. Do you have experience writing SQL?"
I said Yes. So he asked me to share my screen and gave me a written scenario for which to write a query.
While I was working on the query, he said, "I have your resume so let's take a look at that." He opened the resume, I could see that he actually did open it then, by the screen brightness reflected on his face change. And as I worked on the query, he kept going through my resume and making what I can only describe as "Passive-Aggressive comments" in a low voice in the background. E.g. "worked at So-and-so (one of the Big 4 companies)... In
I was done at this point so I drafted out a query with as low effort as I could and then explained it quickly. It was wrong for sure, and not fulfilling the use case completely but I had stopped caring. He also realized it because he said, "Alright, I think that is it. Do you have any questions for me?", in a very smug voice.
I said, "No, thanks for the experience", and disconnected the call.
So, that was it. The most WTF interview of my life. So far. I am not really sure what was wrong with that dude or maybe I have been out of touch for a long time and this is how it is now, but damn, man. I sat in shock for a few minutes after the call. I did check out the interviewer's profile on LinkedIn, wondering if we had crossed paths before. But he was been with his company for a long, long time, first company since college and never switched. So I don't really know.
Anyways, so, yeah. Hope you are having a better experience than me.
2024.05.19 14:19 David_1276 Unihertz Jelly Pro cannot be seen in fastboot mode
Hey everyone! I've posted this on XDA too but I was wondering if you wonderful people could give me a hand. I hope I'm in the right sub.
So I have a Unihertz Jelly Pro that's been sitting in a drawer for a couple years and I want to install TWRP and a few other things onto it to make it more functional. However, whilst ADB works when the phone is on, and commands like "adb devices" and "adb reboot bootloader" work perfectly fine, I cannot get it to be seen in fastboot. It doesn't show any error codes, but when I send an "adb devices" command it shows a blank list and when I use "fastboot devices" it doesn't show anything at all.
Furthermore, when I try "fastboot flashing unlock" or "fastboot oem unlock" they both give a "waiting for any device" prompt and stay like that permanently. I've tried different cables, different ports, different PCs, booting into the bootloader using a key combination, but nothing has worked. I've installed the MTK drivers for it, installed the ADB driver using "Add legacy hardware" in device manager (both of which I think I've done correctly but I may have done wrong) but nothing seems to work. I have developer mode/ OEM unlocking/ USB debugging activated so it must be something I'm doing wrong on the desktop. I have installed quite a few custom ROMs and stuff in the past so I'm not terrible at this kind of thing and do have some basic knowledge that this should probably be working by now.
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David
submitted by David_1276 to androidroot [link] [comments]
So I have a Unihertz Jelly Pro that's been sitting in a drawer for a couple years and I want to install TWRP and a few other things onto it to make it more functional. However, whilst ADB works when the phone is on, and commands like "adb devices" and "adb reboot bootloader" work perfectly fine, I cannot get it to be seen in fastboot. It doesn't show any error codes, but when I send an "adb devices" command it shows a blank list and when I use "fastboot devices" it doesn't show anything at all.
Furthermore, when I try "fastboot flashing unlock" or "fastboot oem unlock" they both give a "waiting for any device" prompt and stay like that permanently. I've tried different cables, different ports, different PCs, booting into the bootloader using a key combination, but nothing has worked. I've installed the MTK drivers for it, installed the ADB driver using "Add legacy hardware" in device manager (both of which I think I've done correctly but I may have done wrong) but nothing seems to work. I have developer mode/ OEM unlocking/ USB debugging activated so it must be something I'm doing wrong on the desktop. I have installed quite a few custom ROMs and stuff in the past so I'm not terrible at this kind of thing and do have some basic knowledge that this should probably be working by now.
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David
2024.05.19 14:19 luxactoR [STORE] $60,000 Inventory (7 Knives - 11 Gloves - 27 Rifles & more)
Trade URL - Steam Profile
//
submitted by luxactoR to Csgotrading [link] [comments]
- Buyouts valued as items in cash prices.
- Mainly interested in trading but taking offers through third party websites.
- Taking TF2 keys (Mann Co. Supply Crate Key) as well.
- Sending a trade offer is the fastest way to contact me, you can either dm or add me on steam.
//
| Type | Name | FV | Info | Tradable | SS | B/O ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💔Knife | ★ Karambit Case Hardened (BS) | 0.83 | #463 - red eye pattern | Yes | 📷 | 12345 |
| 💔Knife | ★ StatTrak™ M9 Bayonet Case Hardened (FT) | 0.16 | #503 - tier 1 pattern with scar | Yes | 📷 | 5555 |
| 💔Knife | ★ Karambit Case Hardened (WW) | 0.42 | #670 - blue ring & blue playside | Yes | 📷 | 4444 |
| 💔Knife | ★ Bayonet Case Hardened (WW) | 0.42 | #321 - p4 | Yes | 📷 | 2499 |
| 💔Knife | ★ Talon Knife Crimson Web (FT) | 0.29 | 5/22/2024 | 📷 | 446 | |
| 💔Knife | ★ Nomad Knife Case Hardened (BS) | 0.98 | decent amount of mixed blue | 5/22/2024 | 📷 | 303 |
| 💔Knife | ★ Huntsman Knife Autotronic (FT) | 0.35 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 212 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Sport Gloves Slingshot (FT) | 0.26 | 5/23/2024 | 📷 | 969 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Hydra Gloves Case Hardened (BS) | 0.77 | #829 - p1 | Yes | 📷 | 938 |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Driver Gloves King Snake (FT) | 0.19 | Yes | 📷 | 532 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Driver Gloves Snow Leopard (FT) | 0.20 | 5/23/2024 | 📷 | 521 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Driver Gloves Snow Leopard (FT) | 0.20 | 5/22/2024 | 📷 | 521 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Specialist Gloves Crimson Web (FT) | 0.22 | #89 - tier1 pattern with clean E | Yes | 📷 | 499 |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Specialist Gloves Field Agent (FT) | 0.16 | Yes | 📷 | 426 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Specialist Gloves Mogul (FT) | 0.16 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 218 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Moto Gloves Smoke Out (FT) | 0.19 | Yes | 📷 | 198 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Moto Gloves Turtle (FT) | 0.15 | 5/27/2024 | 📷 | 180 | |
| 💙Gloves | ★ Driver Gloves Diamondback (FT) | 0.31 | Yes | 📷 | 127 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 Slate (FN) | 0.00004 | x4 vox holo kato15 on super low float ak (1/2) | Yes | 📷 | 3999 |
| 💚Rifle | M4A1-S Cyrex (FN) | 0.04 | ibuypower holo kato14 above mag + x2 crown foil | Yes | 📷 | 3333 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 Fire Serpent (FT) | 0.18 | vox holo kato14 on wood + crown foil next position | Yes | 📷 | 3333 |
| 💚Rifle | AWP Asiimov (FT) | 0.29 | titan holo kato14 on the scope | Yes | 📷 | 3125 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 Black Laminate (FT) | 0.35 | x4 kato14 (ibuypower holo on wood, titan, lgb holo, reason) | Yes | 📷 | 2599 |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ M4A4 In Living Color (FN) | 0.042000 | x4 dignitas holo col14 (1/1) | Yes | 📷 | 2499 |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AWP Electric Hive (FN) | 0.03 | dignitas holo col14 on the scope + x3 holo kato14 (vp, dignitas, mystik) | Yes | 📷 | 1666 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 Case Hardened (FT) | 0.37 | ibuypower holo kato14 above trigger | Yes | 📷 | 1449 |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 Slate (FN) | 0.01 | x4 fnatic holo dh14 | Yes | 📷 | 749 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 The Empress (WW) | 0.39 | x4 gold krakow17 (dosia, pashabiceps, x2 nbk) | Yes | 📷 | 669 |
| 💚Rifle | M4A4 Eye of Horus (FN) | 0.06 | Yes | 📷 | 664 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 Phantom Disruptor (FN) | 0.05 | x4 navi holo dh14 (1/1) | Yes | 📷 | 549 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 Fuel Injector (FN) | 0.06 | x2 flammable Foil (wood and back) | Yes | 📷 | 549 |
| 💚Rifle | AWP Redline (MW) | 0.11 | titan kato14 on the scope | Yes | 📷 | 369 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 Asiimov (FN) | 0.06 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 201 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ M4A4 Faded Zebra (BS) | 0.78 | high float - x4 kato14 (3dmax, vox, ldlc, complexity) | Yes | 📷 | 199 |
| 💚Rifle | M4A4 Temukau (FN) | 0.06 | x4 c9 kato15 (1/1) | Yes | 📷 | 179 |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 Vulcan (BS) | 0.46 | Yes | 📷 | 164 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 Red Laminate (WW) | 0.38 | harp of war holo next to wood | Yes | 📷 | 149 |
| 💚Rifle | M4A1-S Hyper Beast (FN) | 0.03 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 129 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AWP Asiimov (BS) | 0.81 | Yes | 📷 | 120 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 The Empress (MW) | 0.13 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 119 | |
| 💚Rifle | StatTrak™ AK-47 Legion of Anubis (FN) | 0.06 | Yes | 📷 | 50,81 | |
| 💚Rifle | AWP Chrome Cannon (BS) | 0.69 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 37,7 | |
| 💚Rifle | M4A1-S Chantico's Fire (FT) | 0.26 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 28,13 | |
| 💚Rifle | AWP Worm God (MW) | 0.11 | x3 kato15 (envyus holo on scope * x2 clg) | Yes | 📷 | 22 |
| 💚Rifle | AK-47 Head Shot (FT) | 0.32 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 11,63 | |
| 💛Pistol | USP-S Stainless (WW) | 0.43 | titan holo kato14 above handle & x2 titan holo kato15 | Yes | 📷 | 2499 |
| 💛Pistol | USP-S Overgrowth (FN) | 0.06 | crown foil above handle (rare combo) | Yes | 📷 | 279 |
| 💛Pistol | P250 Mehndi (FN) | 0.04 | x4 kato14 (vp, mousesports, fnatic mystik) | Yes | 📷 | 222 |
| 💛Pistol | StatTrak™ Desert Eagle Conspiracy (FN) | 0.03 | x4 liquid mlg16 | Yes | 📷 | 36 |
| 💛Pistol | Desert Eagle Code Red (FT) | 0.31 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 20,03 | |
| 💜SMG | Souvenir UMP-45 Urban DDPAT (FT) | 0.35 | titan foil kato14 | Yes | 📷 | 169 |
| 💜SMG | StatTrak™ MP9 Airlock (FN) | 0.06 | 5/26/2024 | 📷 | 29,01 |
2024.05.19 14:19 Kinniken Attention is all you (should) need - a benchmark of LLMs on a proofreading task
Hi all,
For the past year, I've been using LLMs for many different types of tasks, both via chat and via APIs, often things that would be considered qualified work if done by a human - coding, translation, document synthesis, etc. On many of those tasks the LLMs' results were really impressive. Recently, I tried using LLMs (mainly GPT4 Turbo and Claude3) for simpler tasks, such as automated data entry from freeform documents, and got very poor results even though the tasks required no specialised knowledge or difficult reasoning, just being meticulous.
I've decided to try and analyse this a little more by creating a "proofreading" benchmark that tests models' capacity to "pay attention" and little else. The core modalities are:
https://preview.redd.it/o0b1qn0ykd1d1.png?width=439&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ac210311c0cb520fe10aade347440de9f12341f
Obviously, very disappointing results. I'd love it if anyone can point out any mistakes in my procedure that would explain such bad results. In the meantime, I see it as a reminder that while LLMs can be very useful at a wide range of tasks, before using them for serious purposes you really need to be able to properly benchmark your use case. Also, what tasks LLMs are good at is not always intuitive and definitely does not always match what would be hard for a human. Something to keep in mind as we see LLMs pushed for more and more use cases, including helping blind people catch taxis!
Full data available as a comment on this post: https://www.reddit.com/ChatGPT/comments/1cvmnt5/attention_is_all_you_should_need_a_benchmark_of/
submitted by Kinniken to ClaudeAI [link] [comments]
For the past year, I've been using LLMs for many different types of tasks, both via chat and via APIs, often things that would be considered qualified work if done by a human - coding, translation, document synthesis, etc. On many of those tasks the LLMs' results were really impressive. Recently, I tried using LLMs (mainly GPT4 Turbo and Claude3) for simpler tasks, such as automated data entry from freeform documents, and got very poor results even though the tasks required no specialised knowledge or difficult reasoning, just being meticulous.
I've decided to try and analyse this a little more by creating a "proofreading" benchmark that tests models' capacity to "pay attention" and little else. The core modalities are:
- I generated (using Claude) stats and other infos about ten fictional countries (to ensure my benchmark did not test LLMs' existing knowledges)
- I then generated (using Claude again) four "articles" discussing the economy, society etc of the countries in question while using stats and infos from the reference data
- I edited the resulting articles to introduce three errors in each. No tricks, all blatant mistakes: wrong population figure, wrong name for the capital city, wrong climate, etc.
- I'd estimate that a meticulous human would find 90% of them in maybe 20-30 minutes of proofreading
- I then tested 7 LLMs on proofreading the articles based on the reference data, with a basic prompt (a few sentences with no specific tricks) and an advanced prompt (detailed instructions, with an example, a specified format, asking for CoT reasoning, highlighting the importance of the task etc), and tried each prompt with each LLM three times each.
- I expected LLMs to be bad... but not so horribly, terribly bad. With the basic prompt, the LLMs averaged 15% of errors detected, and 14% with the advanced prompt.
- GPT-4o performed the best, reaching 42% with the advanced prompt.
- On top of missing most of the errors, the LLMs typically reported "errors" that either they were instructed to ignore (such as rounded figures) or that were completely wrong. If I had taken out points for this almost all would have ended with a negative score.
- The same LLM with the same prompt gave very inconsistent results. For example, GPT-4o with the simple prompt found 3, 6 and 2 errors in its three attempts (and not always the same ones)
- While the "advanced" prompt helped GPT-4o get the best result, on average it made no difference, and at the cost of generating far more tokens
https://preview.redd.it/o0b1qn0ykd1d1.png?width=439&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ac210311c0cb520fe10aade347440de9f12341f
Obviously, very disappointing results. I'd love it if anyone can point out any mistakes in my procedure that would explain such bad results. In the meantime, I see it as a reminder that while LLMs can be very useful at a wide range of tasks, before using them for serious purposes you really need to be able to properly benchmark your use case. Also, what tasks LLMs are good at is not always intuitive and definitely does not always match what would be hard for a human. Something to keep in mind as we see LLMs pushed for more and more use cases, including helping blind people catch taxis!
Full data available as a comment on this post: https://www.reddit.com/ChatGPT/comments/1cvmnt5/attention_is_all_you_should_need_a_benchmark_of/
2024.05.19 14:18 Kinniken Attention is all you (should) need - a benchmark of LLMs on a proofreading task
Hi all,
For the past year, I've been using LLMs for many different types of tasks, both via chat and via APIs, often things that would be considered qualified work if done by a human - coding, translation, document synthesis, etc. On many of those tasks the LLMs' results were really impressive. Recently, I tried using LLMs (mainly GPT4 Turbo and Claude3) for simpler tasks, such as automated data entry from freeform documents, and got very poor results even though the tasks required no specialised knowledge or difficult reasoning, just being meticulous.
I've decided to try and analyse this a little more by creating a "proofreading" benchmark that tests models' capacity to "pay attention" and little else. The core modalities are:
https://preview.redd.it/o0b1qn0ykd1d1.png?width=439&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ac210311c0cb520fe10aade347440de9f12341f
Obviously, very disappointing results. I'd love it if anyone can point out any mistakes in my procedure that would explain such bad results. In the meantime, I see it as a reminder that while LLMs can be very useful at a wide range of tasks, before using them for serious purposes you really need to be able to properly benchmark your use case. Also, what tasks LLMs are good at is not always intuitive and definitely does not always match what would be hard for a human. Something to keep in mind as we see LLMs pushed for more and more use cases, including helping blind people catch taxis!
Full data available as a comment on this post: https://www.reddit.com/ChatGPT/comments/1cvmnt5/attention_is_all_you_should_need_a_benchmark_of/
submitted by Kinniken to MistralAI [link] [comments]
For the past year, I've been using LLMs for many different types of tasks, both via chat and via APIs, often things that would be considered qualified work if done by a human - coding, translation, document synthesis, etc. On many of those tasks the LLMs' results were really impressive. Recently, I tried using LLMs (mainly GPT4 Turbo and Claude3) for simpler tasks, such as automated data entry from freeform documents, and got very poor results even though the tasks required no specialised knowledge or difficult reasoning, just being meticulous.
I've decided to try and analyse this a little more by creating a "proofreading" benchmark that tests models' capacity to "pay attention" and little else. The core modalities are:
- I generated (using Claude) stats and other infos about ten fictional countries (to ensure my benchmark did not test LLMs' existing knowledges)
- I then generated (using Claude again) four "articles" discussing the economy, society etc of the countries in question while using stats and infos from the reference data
- I edited the resulting articles to introduce three errors in each. No tricks, all blatant mistakes: wrong population figure, wrong name for the capital city, wrong climate, etc.
- I'd estimate that a meticulous human would find 90% of them in maybe 20-30 minutes of proofreading
- I then tested 7 LLMs on proofreading the articles based on the reference data, with a basic prompt (a few sentences with no specific tricks) and an advanced prompt (detailed instructions, with an example, a specified format, asking for CoT reasoning, highlighting the importance of the task etc), and tried each prompt with each LLM three times each.
- I expected LLMs to be bad... but not so horribly, terribly bad. With the basic prompt, the LLMs averaged 15% of errors detected, and 14% with the advanced prompt.
- GPT-4o performed the best, reaching 42% with the advanced prompt.
- On top of missing most of the errors, the LLMs typically reported "errors" that either they were instructed to ignore (such as rounded figures) or that were completely wrong. If I had taken out points for this almost all would have ended with a negative score.
- The same LLM with the same prompt gave very inconsistent results. For example, GPT-4o with the simple prompt found 3, 6 and 2 errors in its three attempts (and not always the same ones)
- While the "advanced" prompt helped GPT-4o get the best result, on average it made no difference, and at the cost of generating far more tokens
https://preview.redd.it/o0b1qn0ykd1d1.png?width=439&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ac210311c0cb520fe10aade347440de9f12341f
Obviously, very disappointing results. I'd love it if anyone can point out any mistakes in my procedure that would explain such bad results. In the meantime, I see it as a reminder that while LLMs can be very useful at a wide range of tasks, before using them for serious purposes you really need to be able to properly benchmark your use case. Also, what tasks LLMs are good at is not always intuitive and definitely does not always match what would be hard for a human. Something to keep in mind as we see LLMs pushed for more and more use cases, including helping blind people catch taxis!
Full data available as a comment on this post: https://www.reddit.com/ChatGPT/comments/1cvmnt5/attention_is_all_you_should_need_a_benchmark_of/
2024.05.19 14:17 Salvatore-John What is the Difference between a Real Estate Agent and a REALTOR?
 | Realtors and real estate agents are both professional working in the real estate industry. A Realtor is a type of real estate agent: one who is a member of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and who must adhere to their rules and practices in real estate transactions. Both are licensed to help clients buy, sell, or rent property. submitted by Salvatore-John to mortgage101 [link] [comments] |
2024.05.19 14:08 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to cybersecurity_help [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 14:06 Geeero NewPass - secure your digital realm!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
If you're interested and/or you would like to contribute, you can visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to ProductivityApps [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
If you're interested and/or you would like to contribute, you can visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 14:05 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to software [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 14:03 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to SideProject [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 14:01 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to programming [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 14:00 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
 | Hey everyone, submitted by Geeero to opensource [link] [comments] I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions. Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it. I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo. Thanks in advance! |
2024.05.19 14:00 Kinniken Attention is all you (should) need - a benchmark of LLMs on a proofreading task
 | Hi all, submitted by Kinniken to ChatGPT [link] [comments] For the past year, I've been using LLMs for many different types of tasks, both via chat and via APIs, often things that would be considered qualified work if done by a human - coding, translation, document synthesis, etc. On many of those tasks the LLMs' results were really impressive. Recently, I tried using LLMs (mainly GPT4 Turbo and Claude3) for simpler tasks, such as automated data entry from freeform documents, and got very poor results even though the tasks required no specialised knowledge or difficult reasoning, just being meticulous. I've decided to try and analyse this a little more by creating a "proofreading" benchmark that tests models' capacity to "pay attention" and little else. The core modalities are:
https://preview.redd.it/slhd97tskd1d1.png?width=439&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca0b181a75ff85e8a8077929f1b624de6955a5b2 Obviously, very disappointing results. I'd love it if anyone can point out any mistakes in my procedure that would explain such bad results. In the meantime, I see it as a reminder that while LLMs can be very useful at a wide range of tasks, before using them for serious purposes you really need to be able to properly benchmark your use case. Also, what tasks LLMs are good at is not always intuitive and definitely does not always match what would be hard for a human. Something to keep in mind as we see LLMs pushed for more and more use cases, including helping blind people catch taxis! (Full data from the benchmark to follow in a reply) |
2024.05.19 13:59 Raven-mor Cat containment is needed in Ballarat for many reasons - good article - pls read
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-19/banning-pet-cats-roaming-native-animals-billions-dollars-council/103856000
If this doesn't happen here (And is actually enforced) I will definitely leave the region to another regional area that actually cares about pet health and wildlife that is for sure (And yes I have a cat - She is 28 years old this October and is not aloud outside! Hence her age)
I can verify from the Agr perspective of the costs of cats to the industry from a Horticulturist perspective re the Horticultural Code of Practice which some of us have to learn at a certain level/area of. I have brought up key points inc cost to human health to the Ballarat Council even to the dog catcher whom the latter had the gaul to say toxoplasma. was bunk lol. I have been calling and harassing the council about the points brought up in this article for nearly 2 years now. Maybe I should call again and point them to this article in one last effort.
Extract "The most widespread of these diseases is toxoplasmosis, a parasitic infection that can be passed to humans but must complete its life cycle in cats. Australian studies have reported human infection rates between 22 per cent and 66 per cent of the community.
Cat-borne diseases cause considerable community harm, with an estimated 8,500 hospitalisations and 550 deaths from acute infections and also from increased rates of car accidents, suicides and mental health issues in infected people.
Pet cats are crucial to the rates of these diseases in the community. In suburbs that do not require containment, you'll find up to 100 roaming pet cats per square kilometer."
submitted by Raven-mor to ballarat [link] [comments]
If this doesn't happen here (And is actually enforced) I will definitely leave the region to another regional area that actually cares about pet health and wildlife that is for sure (And yes I have a cat - She is 28 years old this October and is not aloud outside! Hence her age)
I can verify from the Agr perspective of the costs of cats to the industry from a Horticulturist perspective re the Horticultural Code of Practice which some of us have to learn at a certain level/area of. I have brought up key points inc cost to human health to the Ballarat Council even to the dog catcher whom the latter had the gaul to say toxoplasma. was bunk lol. I have been calling and harassing the council about the points brought up in this article for nearly 2 years now. Maybe I should call again and point them to this article in one last effort.
Extract "The most widespread of these diseases is toxoplasmosis, a parasitic infection that can be passed to humans but must complete its life cycle in cats. Australian studies have reported human infection rates between 22 per cent and 66 per cent of the community.
Cat-borne diseases cause considerable community harm, with an estimated 8,500 hospitalisations and 550 deaths from acute infections and also from increased rates of car accidents, suicides and mental health issues in infected people.
Pet cats are crucial to the rates of these diseases in the community. In suburbs that do not require containment, you'll find up to 100 roaming pet cats per square kilometer."
2024.05.19 13:59 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to androiddev [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 13:58 WhataMess2k23 Unable to open Administrative Center
Hi all,
I'm expecting some issues trying to open ADAC:
https://preview.redd.it/534hwy40hd1d1.png?width=742&format=png&auto=webp&s=df66a936b9593ad3bc11027ddefdca48c4e8dc48
From Event Viewer, I see this:
https://preview.redd.it/etf7vqsghd1d1.png?width=1396&format=png&auto=webp&s=93ba3b0e3b81b423172a7ca1463643e07eea1ebf
https://preview.redd.it/830fb2ghhd1d1.png?width=697&format=png&auto=webp&s=787f0aff2ce41c771b9073c3af26ea9649dc2b03
WS2022 (but also receive the error prior updating, original 2016), console launched also from other DC and a client with RSAT.
Already tried DISM commands and latest patches update.
Thanks
submitted by WhataMess2k23 to WindowsServer [link] [comments]
I'm expecting some issues trying to open ADAC:
https://preview.redd.it/534hwy40hd1d1.png?width=742&format=png&auto=webp&s=df66a936b9593ad3bc11027ddefdca48c4e8dc48
From Event Viewer, I see this:
https://preview.redd.it/etf7vqsghd1d1.png?width=1396&format=png&auto=webp&s=93ba3b0e3b81b423172a7ca1463643e07eea1ebf
https://preview.redd.it/830fb2ghhd1d1.png?width=697&format=png&auto=webp&s=787f0aff2ce41c771b9073c3af26ea9649dc2b03
WS2022 (but also receive the error prior updating, original 2016), console launched also from other DC and a client with RSAT.
Already tried DISM commands and latest patches update.
Thanks
2024.05.19 13:58 Geeero Looking for Feedback on My Open Source Password Manager App - NewPass!
Hey everyone,
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by Geeero to androidapps [link] [comments]
I've been working on an open-source Android app called NewPass, designed to provide a secure and user-friendly solution for managing passwords. After putting in a lot of effort, I'm excited to share it with you all and would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Key Features: - Secure Storage: Uses strong encryption to keep your passwords safe. - User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to use. - Open Source: The code is available on GitHub, so you can review, contribute, or fork it.
I’m looking for: - Feedback on features and interface - Suggestions for improvements - Bug reports
If you're interested, visit the website or the GitHub repo.
Thanks in advance!
2024.05.19 13:57 Expensive_Alarm_9470 Is using childrens' props as parent data an anti-pattern?
Let's say I have a Question component that needs 3 pieces of data -- Possible answers, an explanation for the correct answer, and a prompt/the actual question.
Working with JSX inside props is frustrating and prevents markdown parsing with MDX, so I've taken some inspiration from the compound component pattern and come up with this:
submitted by Expensive_Alarm_9470 to reactjs [link] [comments]
Working with JSX inside props is frustrating and prevents markdown parsing with MDX, so I've taken some inspiration from the compound component pattern and come up with this:
First, is this an antipattern? If it's not, why is it so poorly enabled by React? I need a way to differentiate children elements based on their type, but the type property of children changes in production (i.e. the name key just disappears). I've tried having a __TYPE optional prop, but default props are being deprecated soon, so what options do I have?The HTML code below uses incorrect syntax. What could you do to fix it? ```html I'm a paragraph ``` Remember that an **opening tag** demarcates the start of an element's inner content (i.e. text) and the **closing tag** indicates the end thereof. A slash (`/`) is needed to differentiate between an opening tag and a closing tag.