Question worksheet about esther in the bible

Subreddit for lovers and seekers of The Bible

2008.12.23 00:53 Subreddit for lovers and seekers of The Bible

The Subreddit is dedicated to the understanding, discussion of, and loving of The Bible in all its greatness and everything it has to offer. Join us to learn more about what makes The Holy Bible so great, ask questions about The Bible, and be part of a community of Bible lovers like us!
[link]


2014.11.20 00:25 JonasBrosSuck AnimalTextGifs = Cute Animals + Text + Gif

Animal Text Gifs is a subreddit for posts with superimposed text over moving images suggesting that the animal in question is speaking about the situation at hand.
[link]


2014.06.08 08:08 The friendlier part of Reddit.

The friendlier part of Reddit. Have a fun conversation about anything that is on your mind. Ask a question or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
[link]


2024.05.18 21:52 Jaded-Mycologist-831 Anyways here’s poems + History Boys

Tissue
Polysemous title- Tissue • Tissue- paper + skin (human life is fragile [criticises arrogance, encourages us to protect]) • Also paper (not alive) + skin (alive)- criticises monotony of life, not really living • Tissue paper- found in bibles and holy texts, but fragile (overinflated importance of identity causing wars and discrimination, really it’s very fragile and identity isn’t real, we’re all just people (tissue as in skin)) • Tissue- used to wipe away tears, togetherness can reduce suffering • Tissue- medical term for deep skin- poem shows deeper nature of humans and our potential for goodness, can be wounded and damaged by outside influences but can always heal
"Paper that lets the light shine through, this is what could alter things" - reference to religious texts paper, light as Jesus and Allah (power of religion) - or coexistence with nature (Dharker is a Muslim Calvinist)
Enjambment- freedom, lack of control of humans, rejecting constraints
Free verse- same thing
"Let the daylight break through capitals and monoliths" - power of nature, criticism of authority, weakness of humans- “break” violent personification, destroying authority, daylight + break = sunrise + hope
"The sun shines through their borderlines" - nature overcomes human segregation identity, criticism of war, power of nature) sibilance shows power, “their” still shows separation, criticise that
"fly our lives like paper kites" - childish metaphor, mocking control of money over life (criticism of authority)
"the back of the Koran" - “the” repetition shows importance, “back” shows it is hidden/shunned by society, still holding onto identity
"Transparent" - repetition, criticism of dishonesty of authority
Exposure
"Merciless iced east winds that knive us" - personification of wind shanking people (first line not about war but nature- more significant) (power of nature)- subtle sibilance (just as dangerous as bullets but most people don’t realise)- Germans were in the east, but the only thing from there is wind
ABBAC rhyme, structure is built only to be taken down (tension of soldiers expecting fight but let down)
Pararhyme- unsatisfying for reader, reflects how the soldiers are always nervous but never get to chill
“What are we doing here?” Rhetorical question to criticise authority, or actual question to show PTSD confusion, can be asking what they are DOING or why they are HERE
"For love of God seems dying" ok 1. The soldier's love of God is dying 2. God's love for the soldiers is dying 3. To show love of God, you should die
"forgotten dreams" - juxtaposition, loss of hope, forgotten dreams on purpose to be less sad? war made them forget? “forgotten” disassociated from PTSD, “dreams” as happiness from the past that seems unreal
“a dull rumour of some other war" reference to the Bible and Armageddon, metaphorical end of the world for the soldiers be suffering "sudden successive flights of bullets streak the silence" - sibilance represents sound of bullets, jolting reader out of relative lack of noises, feel like soldiers
Epistrophe "but nothing happens" cyclical structure, stuck in suffering
“we” “us” “our” collective pronouns, shared experience, comradeship, loss of identity, relatable to all soldiers
Kamikaze
Title- single word, only military rank- only seen as a kamikaze pilot by others
Structure- 6 lines per stanza but free verse and lots of enjambment- conflict between control and freedom (military/social expectations/duty vs love for family/nature/memories/life)
Constant shifts between first person and third person- disconnect from family due to shame
“Her father embarked at sunrise” -sunrise as power of nature + Japan’s military flag- conflict
“a shaven head full of powerful incantations” -incantations are deliberately vague- orders from military? prayers? inner conscience against it? It’s “powerful” tho and influences him, and it’s “full” showing his distress, shaved head like most kamikaze pilots
“green-blue translucent sea” beautiful imagery, “translucent” shows how things are unclear but getting clearer- nature helps him decide what to do
Describes fishes “like a huge flag”- patriotic semantic field shows brainwashing, but reduces as the poem goes on, simile shows how he is starting to disconnect and change his mind,
also as “a figure of eight”- shows thoughts of pride and prosperity-
“The dark shoals of fishes/flashing silver as their bellies/swivelled towards the sun” - • sibilance shows ocean noises and beauty, “dark” -> “flashing silver” things get brighter and easier to see- knows what to do thanks to nature • “Silver”- medals he would have gotten for being a kamikaze pilot, but true reward is in nature • “Sun”- represents beauty of nature and also Japanese flag- conflict but now there’s also nature in the mix • Belly up- death on his mind
“bringing their father’s home safe/-yes, grandfather’s boat- safe” repetition of “safe” shows reason to come back- wants to return to family, memories
“a tuna, the dark prince, muscular, dangerous.” • first mention of danger = power in the whole poem, danger to the mission as it causes the pilot to have doubts, true power is in nature and memory • First full stop in the poem and lots of commas- makes us stop and think like the pilot about what he’s abt to do
“laughed” “loved” at the end of the poem- all in past tense- nothing left for the soldier
“we too learned to be silent”- “learned” should be positive but contrasts with what they learnt- criticises how they were taught shame by the older generations- but it’s said in first person, the daughter is criticising this and teaching her children not to think that way
Poppies
Title- honours and grieves dead soldiers, short single word title shows full intent of the poem and how the mother’s life is consumed by grief
Dramatic monologue- emphasis on the domestic impact and how the soldier isn’t present in the poem
Free verse, enjambment- chaotic, lack of control over the son, distressed
Domestic + military semantic fields- life has been ruined by war
“Spasms of paper red, disrupting a blockade of yellow bias”- mix between war + domestic • “spasms” and “red” is injury and pain- mother is worried or is hurt by letting go (spasms is involuntary muscle action- involuntary letting go), • “paper” is the fragility of the son • “blockade” is military language showing her worry abt the conflict, how she wants to “block” her son from going into the military • “disrupting” the fabric - the son becoming a soldier disrupts the peace or she is trying to disrupt him from going to war
“The dove pulled freely against the sky, / an ornamental stitch”- dove represents peace and grief- she and her son is at peace with death, “pulled freely” is an oxymoron- inner conflict with grief or letting her son go, the comma shows a pause to reflect on the grief, the “ornamental stitch” metaphor for the mother (pretends to hold it together)
“I was brave”- takes down ideas of just the soldier’s bravery but also the mother’s, but past tense shows current weakness from grief
“Sellotape bandaged around my hand” • Bandage shows wounds • Sticks them together one last time- cat hairs are removed, no more reason to stay • Claustrophobic feeling- stuck in the domestic role, can’t go and protect the son
“Blackthorns of your hair”- religious connotations of Jesus on the cross, sacrificed for the country- metaphor for the son
History Boys
"Enemy of education" war metaphor and alliteration, opposition between true understanding of literature and grades only used shallowly “Cheat’s Visa”
"a fact of life" indisputable and unchangable, in opposition with Irwin's views on history (truth does not matter to him until now?)
Drummer Hodge: Intertextuality, Tom Hardy (the poet) represents Hector, sympathising with the ordeal of the youth, Drummer Hodge represents the Boys, thrown into the chaos of life without proper guidance
"She's my western front" war metaphor objectifies Fiona, personal pronoun further expresses how women were seen as objects to be owned
“... all the other shrunken violets you people line up" [you people] segregates gay people, [shrunken violets] derogatory language
"Some of the literature says it will pass" looking to literature for solace and comfort during a sexuality crisis
"All literature is consolation" Dakin changes his mind on literature symbolising him changing to Irwin's side. No need to look for solace in literature when he can pursue Irwin
Parallels with "all knowledge is precious" from Hector - A.E. Housman, one of the first intertextualities and used in the intro to establish his character
“cunt-struck” “a cunt”- Mrs Lintott repeats the colloquialism “cunt” twice, to describe Dakin as “cunt-struck” and Headmaster as “a cunt”. This is the hardest swear in the play and is used show that it wasn’t a slip of the tongue, and to break down stereotypes of women being gentle and passive
“history is women following behind with the bucket” - her big scene about women in history at the end of the play (which is typical for Alan Benett’s plays such as “Kafka’s Dick”) so it would be recent and stay in the audience’s mind when the show ended
Irwin intro as politician in the future "etc., etc." while talking abt freedom- that man gives no fucks about freedom really, just waffling on (first impression for the audience too!!)
Parallel with Holocaust debate- Lockwood uses the SAME EXACT PHRASE while talking abt how the holocaust was bad, (dismissiveness of mass genocide? in this education system? it’s more likely than you think) then goes on to argue that they should be unique with their arguments- Irwin passed on thr mindset even on such an important subject
Hector is set up to be looking cool and all (motorcycle scene dramaticness, greek name connotations, fav teacher) but is absolutely uncool when we get to know him- purposeful? "studied eccentricity" and all. clinging onto youth?
Posner is actually rather helpful as the "dictionary person" bc i doubt the audiences know what "otiose" means
SCRIPPS IS THE MOST RELIGIOUS ONE AND CLOSEST TO POSNER it can dismantle the idea that religion is against queerness
Irwin didnt know how nietzche was pronounced bc from what we know of him he would call Dakin out on that
submitted by Jaded-Mycologist-831 to GCSE [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 21:09 Dapple_Dawn All Christians should push for the rich to redistribute their wealth.

Can someone explain why most Christians are so unwilling to take the "camel through the eye of a needle" verse literally?
I'm referring to Matthew 19:23-24
23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
It certainly sounds like Jesus is saying that you can't get into heaven if you're rich. I've heard arguments against this but in context it is very clear. He is talking to a young man who has already successfully followed the commandments, but Jesus says it isn't enough: the man must sell his possessions and give the money to the poor.
We can argue back on forth here, but my question is this: why is this verse such a sticking point for people? Especially for people who interpret other parts of the Bible extremely literally?
It does not require you to reinterpret anything else in the Bible. It aligns perfectly with other things Jesus said about wealth. And all of Jesus's closest disciples seem to have followed it literally. The only one who values money is Judas Iscariot.
And it is not a difficult commandment to follow. It is inconvenient, sure, but a lot of Biblical teachings are convenient. Besides, most of us here are working class anyway, we're already pretty much there.
So, why are Christians okay will super wealthy people existing? Y'all spend a lot of time talking about homosexuality, extramarital sex, etc. Why aren't you spending your time telling rich people to redistribute their wealth?
You're clearly willing to try to convince people to live differently; as a queer person I have experienced that my whole life. And it would make a huge impact in terms of improving people's lives.
submitted by Dapple_Dawn to DebateReligion [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 20:03 disappointedbutnot I went to church again after 5 years

TW: religious abuse, eluding to self-harm, mental health issues, transphobia, homophobia, mention of conversion therapy (but don't worry, there is a happy ending.)
In my country, there are these masses called "rainbow masses" during Pride-weeks and in some cities, like mine, a few times a year. These are held by the country's evangelical lutheran church. I went to one of these masses 5 years ago, and again a few days ago. 5 years ago it didn't feel so emotional, but now it did. I cried during and afterwards. First, because I realized how bad the religious abuse was in my youth. Second, because I felt like I had rekindled a relationship with an old friend who was very dear to me but who I had to pull away from because the people around Him were so toxic.
When I was a kid, I used to feel so safe in Christian circles. The people I talked to weren't mean, they were kind, truly, and not in a weird way, like they wanted something from you. When I was in confirmation camp, a boy there prayed for me - he didn't say that it was me, but I knew, because he looked at my wrist that day and fell silent, and he said he prayed for his classmate. I knew that I was that classmate.
It all crumbled when I realized I wasn't straight - I had a crush on someone who was the same sex as me. My parents started to go to a fundamentalist church at this time. There, a priest very openly preached about how wrong it was to be gay, and trans, and non-binary, and all other things under the rainbow, and they hated that LGBTQ+ people used the rainbow as their symbol. Suddenly, people around me, my mother included, held very casual conversations about how awful it was to be a LGBTQ+ person, how sinful it was to get married, to even want to get married, with someone of the same sex, and how weird gay men looked and acted, and how ugly lesbians were, and how trans people were deluded. Many of them believed in conversion therapy.
I prayed a lot when I was 14. I prayed to Jesus and asked, many many times, "Why is it wrong? Why is it wrong if I feel attraction to people regardless of gender? My love isn't lustful, so why is it wrong?"
I felt I got an answer. The answer was, "Is it?"
I imagined myself hugging Jesus and crying in his arms. There, he told me, "I love you as you are - no matter who you love or who you become."
And that was my truth. The foundation of my faith. My relationship with Jesus was that of love and acceptance, regardless of what I looked like or what I did in my life and with whom.
Unfortunately, my family disagreed with my views. I became a loud supporter of queer rights in our household. I have 6 siblings. I was the only one who disagreed with our mother's views. I was told that gay people go to hell. No redemption. They didn't know that it would mean that I would be going to hell.
No redemption.
I was branded as an evil person. My mom used to say that I take my little sister and brother "to the path of evil" even before I was a teenager. But it got worse.
Because I realized I was transgender at age 17. At that time, I was completely lost. My identity and my faith were at odds, according to my parents and the church they go to. Me being able to love both boys and girls was something "easy" to hide from them, because I tended to be more attracted to feminine men. After you realize you're trans, it's really hard to hide. It becomes an obsession. You think about it every night and day, until you finally say it out loud. Then the weight gets lighter, but you still feel like there is something very heavy in your heart.
I went through a terrible depressive episode. I got on antidepressants and they made me psychotic. During this psychotic episode I became confused. What was real and what was not? I thought that my consciousness would transfer into a tree and I would just watch eternity go on forever until the world ended.
I had to choose. My faith, or my sanity?
I chose my sanity. I said to myself that nothing that can be proven real, isn't real. I was 17 then. I felt my mind become stable, but a cold feeling spread in my chest. It was both comforting and sad. My old friend, my first ally, my first safe adult, my only safe parent-figure, had left my heart. I said, "I need to find who I am without you and these people who claim to speak for you."
I wanted to transition. I couldn't do so without my parents' permission, so I told my mom. It went surprisingly well. She was quiet and asked a few questions. I thought that maybe she accepted me.
I was naïve.
When me and my parents met with the doctor who was supposed to make the referral to the gender clinic, they said that they don't accept my identity because they're Christians. I felt betrayed. I thought that they were okay with it since they didn't say anything. My mom told my other siblings. My big brother had said to her, "you have to force her to stay a girl", and, according to my mom, my big sister had also said something really awful but when I asked my sister about it later she denied it. Still, her husband had said that their kids shouldn't see me because I'm trans.
My mom told me there was a therapist specialized in gender-related stuff, recommended by the priest of the church she went to. The same priest that preached about how wrong it was to be gay and trans. I knew it was conversion therapy, which isn't illegal in my country, and my father doesn't believe in forcing people, so I refused to go. Then she told me there was a woman in that church, who felt she was a man inside, but who didn't do anything about it because of her faith. My mom asked, "Why can't you be like her?"
I went to the gender clinic at 18 and moved out at 19. I started transitioning at 21. I am now 24, living as a man. I feel no regret as to how I did things.
I was 19 when I went to a rainbow mass last time. It wasn't emotional then. It was just strange.
Earlier this year, I watched Netflix's Sex Education's last season. There were queer Christians. I'm not going to spoil this if you have yet to watch it, but this season made me cry so much. I had never even seen queer Christians before. It made me think about the time 10 years ago when I prayed and prayed to Jesus to accept me... and He did. Just as He would accept me now. And then I promised myself that if I become a Christian again, I will never, ever, ever, hate myself or be ashamed of myself for who I am or go into the closet. I will never become judgmental or hateful.
I went to another rainbow mass a few days ago. I cried before and afterwards. I was emotional as soon as I stepped into the church. Someone was playing the organ, and I picked up a hymn book from the back. I sat somewhere to the side by myself. I felt a warm sensation in my heart. Like I met an old friend after so many years. He had been waiting for me. I couldn't sing half of the hymns because a lot of them just made me tear up.
I'm still unsure of many things regarding the Bible and faith and Christianity. I don't feel a need to label myself at the moment. But I love Jesus. I believe in Jesus. I believe that He is kind, open-minded and loving, and that being kind, open-minded and loving is the greatest way to show my love for Him.
submitted by disappointedbutnot to OpenChristian [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 19:27 Yurii_S_Kh Monotheism. Part 2: Judaism

Monotheism. Part 2: Judaism
Part 1
Judaism: a Retreat from Biblical Monotheism
The history of the Jewish people is clearly divided into two periods: before and after the expiatory death of Jesus Christ. As the Sacrifice for the sins of the world had not yet been carried out, Old Testament history continued, the entire meaning of which consisted in waiting and preparation to meet the coming Savior. Messianic expectations were particularly pronounced during the last decades before the arrival of the Savior into the world. People not only in Jerusalem, but also in other cities and villages of Palestine, waited for the Messiah foretold in the Holy Scripture.
Christ and the Pharisees
Time was fulfilled. The Messiah came, but Jewish leaders, Pharisees, and Sadducees condemned him to death. But why were the Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes offended? Why was it enough for the Samaritan woman to reveal the secret side of her life for her to gladly believe that the traveler standing beside her, weary from the road and asking her for water, was Christ (see John 4:42)? Why did the Pharisees and scribes, who were witnesses to the magnificent miracles performed by Jesus and knew the Scriptures better than anyone else, stubbornly refuse to recognize Christ? Finally, one more question: why did they hate Him, despite the fact that he delivered many people from terrible disease and suffering?
The answer must be sought in the peculiarities and character of the spiritual life of the leaders of Israel. Religious life demands of a person self-attentiveness, moral sensitivity, humility, and pure intentions. Without this, the heart gradually hardens. A change inevitably occurs, the consequences of which are spiritual death.
Already before the beginning of our Savior’s Gospel of the Heavenly Kingdom, the Jews had begun to imagine the Messiah as a powerful earthly king, who would exalt them above all nations and make them wealthy and powerful. This concept of the Messiah corresponded to their spiritual and moral condition.
For a proper understanding of the prophecy inspired by the Holy Spirit, not doctrinal erudition, but pure, uncorrupted faith was necessary.
The consciousness of lawyers and scribes, corrupted by sin, did not notice the parts of the Old Testament in which the spiritual qualities of the promised Messiah are given: "behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass" (Zech. 9:9); " Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles. He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth" (Isa. 42:1-3; cf.: Matt. 12:20).
Despite all the seemingly multifaceted events preceding the trial of the Savior of the world, there is only one reason for such a grave sin to have been committed—the people were rooted in sin and loved it. They seethed with anger at He who had come to the world to conquer and destroy sin.
After Christ the Messiah, who came to save the world, was slandered, profaned, and put to death, the spiritual death of the chosen people began. The Lord Jesus Christ spoke to the Hebrews directly, "He that hateth me hateth my Father also" (John 15:23). This means that the monotheism of the Hebrew leaders became entirely formalistic.
In literature, Old Testament religion, which ends with the conclusion of the New Testament, and Judaism, are often confused. This association is completely wrong. The expectation of the Messiah, which permeated the centuries-long history of the religion of the descendants of the Prophet Moses, ended. The goals and aspirations of the Hebrews, led by the Pharisees and Sadducees, stayed on Earth. Earthly well-being, wealth, success, and power became core values. In keeping with these, they imagined the anticipated Messiah.
However, the prophets foretold the coming of another Messiah—the Suffering Messiah. The Prophet Isaiah, who is called the "Old Testament Evangelist" (see Saint Jerome, Letter to Paulinus) because of his many prophesies and the precision of their fulfillment in Jesus Christ, speaks about this with impressive clarity and precision.
What then is the true Messiah? "He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth… for the transgression of my people was he stricken. And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth. Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand" (Isa. 53:7-10).
Were the Jews familiar with this chapter of the great prophet? Not all of them. Usually during weekly readings at the synagogue this chapter is omitted. Here is an excerpt from the memoirs of Rosa Price, who survived the horrors of several Nazi concentration camps and accepted Jesus Christ. Her daughter became a follower of the Savior Jesus, but she adhered to old misconceptions. "I ran to the rabbi. He would tell me different Scriptures with which to challenge my family. In response, they would give me five more. At the urging of my family, I asked the rabbi about Isaiah 53. He said, “No Jew reads that, especially not a Jewish woman.” So I couldn’t read it. The same for Psalm 22. There are 328 prophecies of the coming of the suffering servant Messiah. I asked the rabbi about almost all of them. Finally, the rabbi told me not to come to the synagogue anymore because I had read him Isaiah 53" (Rosa Price. The Survivor // Sid Roth. They Thought for Themselves. WWP, 2007).
How did the lawyers, who knew many parts of the Old Testament Bible by heart, explain the chapter? In the period of the Talmud's formation, the scribes recognized that the 53rd chapter was a prophecy of the Messiah's coming. However, beginning with the famed Hebrew exegete Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki; 1040 - 1105), rabbis assert that the 53rd chapter speaks of the Jewish people. A simple reference to the text can refute this belief.
  • "Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows" (Isa. 53:4). Whose grief did the Jewish people take on and whose sorrows did they carry?
  • "With his stripes we are healed" (Isa. 53:5). Who has been healed by the wounds of the Jewish people?
  • "For the transgression of my people was he stricken" (Isa. 53:8). If it is speaking of the Jewish people, then who suffered punishment for the transgressions of the Jewish people?
  • "And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death" (Isa. 53:9). When and in which grave are the Jewish people buried?
In the holy Old Testament books there are signs of the appearance of Christ (the Messiah) and in it are described his chief characteristics. Of the prophecies on the coming of Christ into the world in the Old Testament, before all else it is necessary to note the vision of the prophet Daniel, foretelling even the year of the Savior's death. “Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined" (Dan. 9:24-26). Week (seven) is understood as 7 years, and 70 sevens consists of 490 years. It is the timeframe for the "end of sin." Here, we are talking about Christ the Savior's atonement for people who have violated the will of God and fallen from grace. In the prophecy, the Messiah is directly indicated ("to anoint the most Holy"). To calculate the amount of time given here, one must turn to historical sources, noting the reconstruction of the city of Jerusalem, which fell as a result of the Babylonian destruction in 586. The count of seventy sevens begins from the date of the reconstruction of Jerusalem. The decree for the restoration was given by Artaxerxes Longimanus in the 20th year of his reign. He came to the throne between December 18, 465 and December 18, 464 BC. The seventh year of his reign, from which the countdown of weeks begins, comes in 458 or 457. From this time period to the time of the appearance of Christ our Lord, 69 weeks (483 years) should pass.
The Forerunner of the coming of the Messiah is also mentioned in the Old Testament. "Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of hosts" (Mal. 3:1). Dwellers in Palestine knew the Holy Scripture and saw in John, who preached repentance, the Angel of the Covenant predicted by the prophets. Thus, people from all of Jerusalem and all the outskirts of the Jordan came to him (see Mark 1:5).
In the holy books of the Old Testament, there are prophecies of all of the main events in the life of Jesus the Messiah. The prophet Micah identified the place of birth: "But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting" (Mic. 5:2).
The Word of God demonstrated the great spiritual gifts of the future Anointed One. "And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots: And the spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord" (Isa. 11:1-2). All of this was fulfilled by Jesus: "... the people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes" (Matt. 7:28-29).
Through the prophets, the Holy Spirit indicated a special distinguishing feature of the Messiah, the extraordinary power of wonderworking: "He will come and save you. Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.
Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert" (Isa. 35:4-6). When the two men came to Jesus from John the Baptist to ask, "Art thou he that should come? or look we for another?" (Luke 7:20), the Lord before all else points to the miracles he has performed: "The blind see, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, to the poor the gospel is preached. And blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me" (Luke 7:22-23). The people knew that the Messiah would be characterized by the miracles he performed. "Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David?” (Matt. 12:22-23).
A mind corrupted by sin could not notice the parts of the Old Testament in which the spiritual qualities of the promised Messiah are given: "Behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass" (Zech. 9:9).
  1. The Jews, having rejected the Messiah as the incarnate Son of God, could not remain in the scope of the Revelation given in the Old Testament. Gradually, to the Law given by God, the Pharisees and scribes added 613 commandments: 365 positive commandments and 248 negative commandments.
The Lord rebukes the Hebrew teachers of the law. "For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men" (Mark 7:8). Faith in God as a real, absolute Person—this is monotheism—is replaced by ritualism. In Judaism, the authority of the Talmud is greater than the Torah (Pentateuch). The famed rabbi Adin Steinsaltz writes, "If the Torah is the foundation of Judaism, then the Talmud is the central pillar supporting the entire spiritual and philosophical edifice. In many ways, the Talmud is the most important book in Jewish culture, the backbone of creativity and of national life. No other work has had a comparable influence on the theory and practice of Jewish life. The Jews always recognized that as a people, their preservation and development depends on the study of the Talmud" ("What is the Talmud?").
What is this "central pillar" of Judaism? I will introduce an excerpt from the Tract Sabbath, with commentary from Rabbi Pinchas Kehati: "The cripple may go out with his wooden leg; such is the decree of Rabbi Meir, but Rabbi Jose prohibits it. If the wooden leg has a receptacle for pads, it is subject to defilement. Crutches are subject to defilement by being sat or trodden upon; but one may go out with them on Sabbath and enter the outer court (of the Temple). The chair and crutches of a paralytic are subject to defilement, and one must not go out with them on the Sabbath nor enter the outer court (of the Temple). Stilts are not subject to defilement, but nevertheless one must not go out with them on Sabbath."
Commentary: "The cripple, a man with one amputated leg, may go out on the Sabbath on his wooden leg, an artificial leg, made according to the size of his shin. Such is the decree of Rabbi Meir, who believes that an artificial leg corresponds to footwear, while Rabbi Jose forbids the cripple from going out with his wooden leg on the Sabbath. According to him, it does not correspond to footwear because the cripple stands primarily with his hands on a cane, while the artificial leg is only for appearance's sake so that his physical handicap would go unnoticed. Thus, the artificial leg on Sabbath is seen as an unnecessary load, and it is prohibited to enter with it. According to the other point of view, Rabbi Jose agrees that the artificial leg equates to footwear, however he is afraid that the man will detach it and will carry over 4 cubits into the public domain, but Rabbi Meir does not have this fear.
I risk fatiguing the reader, but I will introduce one more place from the Talmud to fully portray the spiritual deadness of ritualism. “There are two acts constituting the transfer (of things which are prohibited) on the Sabbath, which are in turn subdivided into four for a man who finds himself inside a private domain (reshut hayachid). The two acts are, however, increased to four for a man who finds himself outside in the public domain (reshut harabim). How so? For example, a mendicant stands outside (in reshut harabim) and the master of a house inside (in reshut hayachid). The mendicant passes his hand into the house (through for example a window) and puts something into the hand of the master (let's say a basket, so that he might give him a piece of bread), or (another variation) the mendicant reaches out and takes something from the master's hand (a piece of bread). In these two cases, the mendicant is breaking the law of the Sabbath, but the host is not. Or, if the master of the house (being inside) passes his hand through a window and puts, say, a piece of bread, into the hand of the mendicant, or, having put out his hand, he takes an object (a basket) from the hands of the mendicant, who is standing outside on the street, and brings it into the house, the master of the house would have broken the law of the Sabbath, but not the mendicant. This is the first part of the Mishna, which has demonstrated to us what the “two acts” of transferring objects mean, from the position of one who is inside, and from the position of one who finds himself outside. Carrying out any of these acts on the Sabbath is prohibited" (Tract Sabbath).[1]
Instead of a living faith in a merciful God and love towards one’s fellow man, entire volumes of the Talmud are filled with the sophistic disputes of various rabbinical schools over what to do with an egg laid by a chicken on the Sabbath, or about a host giving bread to a beggar, so that he does not break the Sabbath.
What a huge spiritual distance there was between the prophets and the scribes! The first to shine in the faith were those who participated in the source of heavenly wisdom, while others directed their extraordinary erudition to "solving" questions irrelevant to life. The lawyers occasionally thrashed out whether one may move a ladder from one dovecote to another on feast days.
It is obvious that religious life, in which ritualism is the determining principle, will become formalistic. "Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men" (Isa. 29:13).
Falling away from the living source of Truth will inevitably lead to dissolution and barrenness. In medieval European church art, the contrast between Christianity and Judaism was allegorically represented in the form of two female figures: the Church and the Synagogue. The south portal of the transept (cross aisle) of the cathedral in Strasbourg (approx. 1230) is decorated with such sculptures. The woman representing the Church, clearly and confidently carries a cross in her right hand as if resting on it. The straight folds of her cloak, flowing down to the ground, make her figure solid and firm. Her head is crowned. Her gaze is cast into the distance. The figure of the synagogue holds to her body a spear broken in several places. The bend of the figure repeats the broken line. Scrolls fall out of her left hand. Her head is downcast. Her eyes are blindfolded, a symbol of spiritual darkness.
  1. The next phase of Judaism's retreat from Biblical monotheism was the rise and expansion among the Jews of Kabbalah (in Hebrew qabbalah means acceptance or tradition) of mystical teachings and practices. This esoteric theosophical teaching is in spirit and letter absolutely foreign to the Holy Scripture. Two books initiate an exposition of Kabbalah: Sefer Yetzirah (the Book of Creation) and Zohar (Splendor of Radiance). The former was likely written in the sixth and seventh centuries B.C. Confirmation by the Kabbalists themselves of the existence of Sefer Yetzirah already during the time of patriarch Abraham is absolutely mythical and has no evidence. On the contrary, the presence in these books of philosophical ideas of late antiquity, such as Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, and others, completely refutes this view. The author of Zohar is believed to be the Spanish Kabbalist Moshe (Moses) de Leon. It was written in approximately 1300 A.D. The desire of modern Kabbalists to make the author of Zohar the disciple of rabbi Akiva Shimon Bar Yochai (Laitman, M. The Book of Zohar. M., 2003. p. 185)[2] , who lived in the second century A.D., contradicts the view of experts. "The Aramaic language of all eighteen of these sections is throughout the same, and throughout it displays the same individual peculiarities. This is all the more important because it is not in any sense a living language which Simeon ben Yohai and his colleagues in the first half of the second century A.D. in Palestine might have conceivably spoken. The Aramaic of the Zohar is a purely artificial affair, a literary language employed by a writer who obviously knew no other Aramaic than that of certain Jewish literary documents, and who fashioned his own style in accordance with definite subjective criteria. The expectation expressed by some scholars that philological investigation would reveal the older strata of the Zohar has not been borne out by actual research. Throughout these writings, the spirit of mediaeval Hebrew, specifically the Hebrew of the thirteenth century, is transparent behind the Aramaic facade" (Scholem, G. (1954). Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism. p. 163).[3]
Kabbalah is divided into the contemplative (Kabbalah Iyunit) and practical (Kabbalah Maasit). The central aspect of the Kabbalah is Ein Sof (The Infinite). In contrast to the God of the Holy Scriptures, Ein Sof has no name because he is without person, unknowable, and incomprehensible. No attributes can be ascribed to him. Ein Sof makes himself known in his manifestations (not to all, but to Jewish mystics). Ein Sof's chief manifestation is the original man, Adam Kadmon. Through his emanations (flows) the ten sefirot come into being, which are the attributes of God. Ten sefirot represent the mystical body of Adam Kadmon (heavenly Adam). He appears as a result of emanation and has no image or form. The earthly Adam was created in the image of heavenly Adam. The tenth sefirot is called "the Kingdom" or Malkuth. It unites all ten sefirot. In Zohar, Malkuth—or Kingdom—denotes how the Knesset (assembly) of Israel is a mystical prototype of the House of Israel (Shekhinah). In The Dialectics of Myth (XIV. 3), Aleksei Losev writes, “As a very well-educated Jew and great expert of Kabbalistic and Talmudic literature (from which I, with the nasty habits of a European observer, sought to learn exclusively about the Neoplatonic influences in Kabbalah) told me, the essence of all Kabbalah does not at all consist in pantheism, as liberal scholars think, who compare the doctrine of Ein Sof and the Sephirot with Neo-Platonism, but rather with pan-Israelitism: the Kabbalistic God needs Israel for His own salvation, He was incarnated in Israel and became it. Therefore the myth of the world domination by a deified Israel, which is forever contained in God.”
Kabbalists have established a correspondence among the different sefirot with parts of the human body. Becoming familiar with this primitive mythological arrangement of the structure of the universe, it becomes difficult to ignore the question that Kabbalists themselves do not ask: What is the source of this "knowledge"? How does one manage to conclude that the sefirot of the Crown (Keter) is the brow, the Tiferet is the chest, Victory (Netzach) and Majesty (Hod) is man's hip?
The esoteric teachings of Sefer Yetzirah and the Zohar are fundamentally incompatible with the biblical teaching on God, the world, man, and humanity's path to salvation. Contemplative Kabbalah represents a combination of elements of Gnosticism of the second and third centuries A.D. and Neo-Platonism. From the Gnostics, it borrows the teaching of the 10 eons, which comprise the pleroma (universal fullness). Dualism is the link between Gnostics and Kabbalists; the idea of eternal enmity began with good (light) and evil (darkness). Kabbalah's dualistic world view finds a direct expression in Sefer Yetzirah: "Also Elohim made every object, one opposite the other: good opposite evil, evil opposite good, good from good, evil from evil, the good delineates the evil and the evil delineates the good, good is kept for the good and evil is kept for the evil.” It is evident that the teaching, which ascribes evil an ontological status, leads to the justification of evil. In contrast, according to the Holy Scripture, evil was not created by God, but arose as a result of the abuse of the gift of freedom given by God to his creatures, Angels and mankind.
Kabbalistic teaching is an obvious expression of pantheism, a complete retreat from monotheism. God and the world are understood as one complete whole. The world is only a manifestation of God. Pantheism is fraught with internal contradictions. Its logical consequence is inevitably first the derogation of God, and next, denial of him, because all of the world's imperfections are attributed to him.
Kabbalists divide the world into male and female elements. The right and left spheres are respectively male and female. The world is presented as a loving union, as the unification of male and female elements. The relationship between the spheres is interpreted with the help of gender symbolism.
Kabbalah presents itself as a fantastical mix of esoteric occultism, blended with pagan religious and philosophical ideas. It attests to a complete regression from the great and saving teachings of the Bible with its deep and sustained monotheism.
Hieromonk Job (Gumerov)
[1] This appears not to be a direct quote from Tract Sabbath, but commentary based on Tract Sabbath: http://www.evrey.com/sitep/talm/index.php3?trkt=shabbat&menu=19. —Trans.
[2] This cite may not be accurate to the English version. —Trans.
[3] Page number may not be accurate to English version.—Trans.
submitted by Yurii_S_Kh to SophiaWisdomOfGod [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:51 parispai Reassessing the Resurrection: A Critical Reevaluation of the Bodily Resurrection of Jesus

The concept of Jesus' bodily resurrection from the dead stands as a central tenet of Christian faith. It signifies his victory over death, his divine status, and provides the foundation for Christian hope in eternal life. However, a critical historical and theological analysis necessitates a reevaluation of the evidence for this pivotal event. This essay argues that the historical reliability of the Gospel accounts, the nature of the purported prophecies, and the very concept of a physical resurrection warrant a more nuanced understanding.
Firstly, the Gospel narratives, our primary sources for the resurrection, present significant challenges for historical verification. Composed decades after the event by anonymous authors [Evans, Textual Criticism of the New Testament], they exhibit theological agendas and potential biases that may have shaped the narratives. Furthermore, discrepancies exist between the Gospel accounts themselves regarding the details of the resurrection appearances, raising questions about their historical accuracy [Gellerman, The Reliability of the New Testament].
Secondly, alternative explanations for the resurrection narratives require consideration. Psychological factors, such as profound grief and longing for their deceased leader, could have contributed to the disciples' experiences. Visions or hallucinations, common occurrences in ancient religious contexts, might also account for their belief in seeing the risen Jesus [Price, Religions of the Ancient World]. The nascent Christian community, facing persecution and seeking solace, might have found solace in the concept of a resurrected Christ, leading to the development of these narratives.
Thirdly, the concept of fulfilled prophecies as evidence for the resurrection requires reevaluation. Many prophecies cited as foreshadowing Jesus' life and death are demonstrably vague or open to interpretation. Prophecies in the Hebrew Bible often lack specificity, allowing for later application to fit a particular narrative [Van Biema, Does the Old Testament Predict the New Testament?]. Furthermore, the Hebrew Bible itself is steeped in metaphorical language, making literal interpretations of prophecies concerning the coming Messiah problematic.
The focus on a physical resurrection may also be theologically problematic. Overemphasis on the physical body can overshadow the transformative message of Jesus' teachings on love, justice, and compassion. A more symbolic understanding of the resurrection, emphasizing the continued presence of Jesus' spirit or message in the lives of believers, may offer a more enduring foundation for Christian faith.
This critical examination acknowledges the limitations of such an approach. Faith, by its very nature, transcends historical verification. For many Christians, the resurrection is a lived experience, a core tenet that provides solace and strength.
In conclusion, while the concept of Jesus' bodily resurrection remains central to Christian belief, a critical examination reveals significant challenges to its literal interpretation. Alternative explanations for the resurrection narratives exist, and the idea of fulfilled prophecies demands reevaluation. Focusing on the core message of Jesus' teachings may provide a more enduring foundation for Christian faith. Furthermore, ongoing dialogue between scholars and theologians can deepen our understanding of this transformative event and its enduring significance.
Author's Note:
As a Christian wrestling with faith and reason, I present this essay not as an assault on belief, but as an intellectual exercise. The resurrection of Jesus lies at the very heart of my faith, yet a sincere pursuit of truth compels me to examine it critically. I believe such exploration strengthens, rather than diminishes, faith. Therefore, I welcome feedback from the community, hoping for a fruitful dialogue that deepens our collective understanding of this cornerstone event.
submitted by parispai to Christianity [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:44 DonRedPandaKeys And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark—the name of the beast or the number of its name. - Rev. 13: 16, 17

[ Notice: Not my article. Link: https://4womaninthewilderness.blogspot.com/2012/08/a-question-i-read-in-one-of-your.html ]
A QUESTION: I read in one of your articles about some pledge that every witness will have to sign. How do you see that playing out? Thank you
REPLY: Hello again Daniel, If you would like to read about how this is already playing out, please read about "pioneering" and the application that is involved, at http://pearl-titles.blogspot.com/
I underestimated Satan. The pledge will not be as blatant as I had hoped. Already, all witnesses who stay in association with the Congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses are making that pledge. Every time a teaching comes through the magazines or talks, and it contradicts the Bible, yet the audience sits there in silence and accepts that false teaching, they have already taken their stand for the Organization, turning their backs on the Truth, YHWH, and Christ as the Head of the Congregation. They are no longer in the yoke of Christ (Matt.11:29), working alongside him for truth.
They are now under the yoke of the Beast [Rev.17:8,11- "and yet will be present", "and yet is", literally means "and yet is ALONGSIDE" (as being under the same yoke, in original Greek)]; working with the Beast instead of Christ (Gal.5:1). These are blind to the fact that they have exchanged their Leader from Christ to the "wicked steward" and its Beast Organization (Rom.1:25; 2Thess.2:10; Matt.24:48,49; 23:10; 1Cor.6:15; Gal.1:10; Rev.13:8,11) That work of the Beast is to teach lies and persecute Christ's brothers (Rev.13:7,5). Those in the yoke with the Beast do not realize it, nor see it. To them, that Idolatrous Beast of persecution, does not exist (Rev.17:8). Yet it does, and they are under its yoke with it!
Our decisions and actions can be made manifest without signing a piece of paper. The distinction between those who serve Jehovah and those who subject their thinking and/or power, to the Beast, is prophesied to be manifested (Mal.3:18; Rev.13:16). I had assumed that this would take place as blatantly as it does on the pioneer application. The lack of a clear manifestation of Satan's hidden trickery, does not change what is taking place, even if this overt detail is not fulfilled. Yet, it still may come to pass in the future. But it is not necessary to take place, in order for the object of each individual's worship to be made manifest. What one condones, obeys, and accepts already accomplishes that (Rev.2:20). All one has to do is remain asleep enough, to be lead along into error and death (Rev.3:1,2,3; 2Pet.3:17; Jude1:3,4; 1Cor.3:10,13,14; Matt.7:24,26). Only those who take an active stand for Truth, will be saved (Luke9:24; Rev.12:11), even though that salvation will require a stand against the Beast (Rev.13:8,15), and the "death" that ensues (Luke9:24).
submitted by DonRedPandaKeys to ExJwPIMOandPOMO [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:02 WabloPayne Brain Approves War Declaration ; Heart Vetoes

I doubt you'll read this. And I know you and I will never really forgive me for what I said to you.
You could forgive another man probably, but not me. I understand why. So do you. Part of chess is pieces have different value.
That's not the point of what I'm trying to get at with you.
It is at it's nucleus, sure. But not the point I am trying to address.
First and most pressing- read, research, thoroughly understand time through Revelations. It's happening now.
Stupidity has always been more common than brilliance. Do not follow the crowd. That's the gambit.
I think you're falling for it. You have walked right onto dead land. Texas is not safe. The same wall that keeps you safe can also keep you prisoner.
War is upon us. And we gon lose. Big time. Already have. Hell, I helped but barely.
When I went to the desert, I know you know I wasn't no pencil pusher.
That's true. But what I was trained to do was to find things. Look for stuff. People.
Things like weapons, people buildin bombs, kidnappin, awful stuff, right?
We would stuff out of wood for them. They don't really have trees over there. And we would install things like water purification systems, stuff like that bc people out there use the same water to shit in as they do to drink. Make huts out of sand and trash. Anyway, folks'd try to sabotage critical infrastructure bc they understood we use it for regional control.
Truth be told, that's all they wanted to.
I'm sure you understand now that the news, both red and blue as they are still flavors of Kool Aid, does nothin but lie.
Anyway, I was diligent enough to start asking some important questions. Payin attention to what the grand design is.
I play chess. Chess and the Bible tells you everything I promise. Not some youtubin hipster.
So I splitttttttt. And they didn't like that one bit. Nope.
And I never killed anybody. I would only capture them. Chess. And many times, they did not like that.
In my life, I have killed an ungodly amount of insects and such, and they have hearts and ideas too, but maybe like 2 squirrels by gun, idk by tire, not much, 2 possums, a few birds, and a couple snakes. I told people I did when I was young. I was just tryin to be cool. I lied. But I absolutely would if somebody was a threat to someone I love or committing evil on others.
I told you I never done anything over there I had to hang my head about. That's true. Get a gun, learn to use it to protect your family, have a plan and somewhere very rural to go.
Anyway, onto us.
...
First, you and I both know I don't now nor have I ever really thought anything like that about you.
I said that to hurt you. Bc I could feel that you knew you were hurting me. Idk why you think that bc I was never mean to you that that is weakness in want. No. That is the strength in love. So small to think that's power. You know I would've made you feel powerful the right way, right?
I'm proud of you. And I'm sorry I said that to you.
You were my friend Devon.
I love you too. When you care about something, you just want what's best for them.
I don't think I'm the best thing for you or you for me anymore.
It doesn't change the fact that I love you. Probly nothin ever will bc you wont let it by giving me the chance.
Maybe I get it now.
Maybe that's it.
Bc we can hurt each other in ways that other people couldn't do to us.
Maybe that's why.
I don't know.
I don't think you love me anymore. And I don't think I love you anymore.
How could we?
I think it's our first nature to love each other. But we will always wind up in the loop we do.
I hope I broke us out by force.
I wanted to break us out gently.
I still want what's best for you.
I am going to find a girl and marry her and have a kid with her.
And I'm going to make it work.
That wouldn't have been something we would've had to do, it just would've worked on it's own.
Don't feel like I walked up and stuffed that money in your tits and spit on the ground. That's the way you make me feel anyway every time I'm nice to you. Your post said you were a single mom. Pssshh when? That's how you speak of the men you were with instead of me while you raised your son. Stuff like that hurts me girl. Seeing you proposed to with traffic goin by hurts me girl. You, your defense mechanisms only prove how deep and unresolved your feelings for me were.
That's not bc of me. It's just not.
It's bc of the way you see me.
As a vulnerability.
Same here girl. And you tiny. I hate that.
I don't hate you bc of that. I know your snapchat avatar was the last outfit you saw me in for years.
I know you kept my painting. Maybe up until recently.
I threw your leather jacket away. I made myself.
I made myself do those mean things to you so you would understand I would tolerate it no more.
I could feel your anger in the bottom of my heart when you saw I shared your post.
I forgave you Devon. Instantly, every time.
And you never even asked me. I am Milton fucking Bradley with the games at this point. Let's not.
I don't want to haunt you. I don't want you to haunt me.
I think that's common ground.
You went from I think you're annoyed it's not working to you refusing to tell me you didn't love me and we had no chance bc you didn't know the future in the span of 20 minutes or so. You told him you did know the future when you said til death do us part.
I don't want to fuck with you in an unhealthy way but I think mastering survival mode means there's nothing you're running from anymore and bein able to look everyone in the eyes.
I'm not bein poetic when I say I can feel you.
I mean, seriously, why else would I care to such a degree?
That has to stop. I can't be half the world away when all of a sudden I can feel you doin something. Got somethin goin on. Wanting me. Calls out to me like kids scream for help around Boe Jiden.
For whatever reason, I don't know. But it aint the one we was made for.
I'll leave you with this- of all the people I've ever been around anywhere on God's green Earth that HAARP and all that other shit are poisoning, you're the only one I never felt alone with. Even when you were gone. That mattered to me.
Don't ever let anybody talk to you like that ever again. If that husband of yours can't wipe someone's face off their head for treating you like that then you use some of this to get his ass karate classes and one of them mushrooms from super mario.
submitted by WabloPayne to aboutcrazy [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 17:42 Rauffenburg Email Template: Rejecting an Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) invitation

Email Template: Rejecting an Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) invitation submitted by Rauffenburg to exIglesiaNiCristo [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 17:09 sisma207 Is something being unnatural inherently sinful?

Hi everyone!
I am doing a deep dive into what the Bible says about homosexuality. The current passage I am on is Romans 1:26, “…For their women exchanged the natural function (natural use of the body) for that which is unnatural.” Including the title question, I had a few come up:
Would love to hear any responses or, if anyone has good readings about this, I’d love those as well.
submitted by sisma207 to Christianity [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 16:54 burkeangadfly Good, Evil and the Internet

What you think?
Good, Evil and the Internet
One of my favorite parts of the Bible is when God tells Adam, “You may freely eat of every tree of the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die.” Why would God say this? Shouldn’t we want to know what is good? How are we supposed to take action without knowing what is good and evil? Are we simply supposed to listen to those in charge? But how do those in charge know what is good and evil?
Later on, the serpent tells Eve, “You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” So, God knows what is good and evil, and somehow, this knowledge has been passed to us. If we are following God and not the serpent, we need not seek out the knowledge of good and evil; it is within us. So how do we know? If we were to watch someone be killed in front of us, intentionally and without justification, how would we feel? Would we feel repulsed? Most of us would, maybe even all of us. Therefore, we are born knowing murder is wrong, knowing good and evil. We can feel it in our being. It does not come from reasoning. We have a conscience. This is the teaching of the Bible. The question then becomes, is the teaching true? And why are people so bad if the knowledge of good and evil is within us?
Could it be that more time is needed for the knowledge to take hold? More time for the knowledge and the collective conscience to interact and develop. The universe was not made in a day. Might the internet, unwittingly, be the catalyst that revives the biblical teaching of an inherent good and evil? How so? The internet has connected us electronically. Information flows at the speed of light between us. We feel events across the world as if they are happening next to us. Deep moral questions about war, justice, good and evil, and so on are posed and answered overnight by popular opinion. Videos make us judges on the spot. The awakening is occurring, but the unjust push back. It is a slow, meandering process. If the Bible’s teaching that we are born knowing good and evil is true however, and information is allowed to flow freely, our lives will necessarily improve. Evil and injustice we be called out and remedied from within.
submitted by burkeangadfly to JordanPeterson [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 16:44 MDS_RN In a result that surprises no-one Conservative Christians oppose transgender rights until someone they love turns out to be trans.

It's a tale as old as time, conservative Christians are against something until either they, or one of their family members either are LGBT, or need a divorce, or need a abortion. Once someone they love is different, then they care about the issue.
Andrew and Debbie James defied their pastor’s advice to kick their daughter out of their house.
But Lilia moved out anyway, frustrated by her restrictions in the home. Her parents began reading, including books by Dr. Yarhouse and by David Gushee, a Christian ethicist who has argued for rethinking traditional Christian approaches to inclusion. They prayed. And they participated in a support group through Embracing the Journey, a network of small groups intended to “build bridges” among L.G.B.T.Q. people, their families and the church.
The group’s founders, Greg and Lynn McDonald, live near Atlanta and have a son who is gay. Their first reaction when he came out, informed by groups like Focus on the Family, was that his sexuality was a sin, and one that had been caused by a failure in the home — an absent father or an overbearing mother. They changed their approach after reading the gospels together, paying attention to the Bible’s accounts of how Jesus actually treated people.
“I felt I needed to choose: Choose God or choose my son,” Mrs. McDonald recalled. “God told me, ‘No, you get to do both.’”
The McDonalds said almost half of the families that participate in Embracing the Journey now come to them because they have children who are transgender or nonbinary, like the Jameses. Eventually the Jameses started leading groups for other parents; they have now led at least five groups, counseling more than 100 parents.
So my question is, why don't we look through every social issue as if it effects someone we love? It feels to me like that's what God tells us to do. What if someone you loved was a South American refugee who didn't have the resources to enter the country? What if someone you loved need an abortion? What if someone you loved needed a divorce? Were LGBT? Had committed a crime?
I feel like the Bible is very clear. Matthew, 7:12, states, "In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you." I feel like the right wing is forgetting verses like that.
submitted by MDS_RN to Christianity [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 16:21 UnDead_Ted Daily Dose of Scripture

Daily Dose of Scripture
John 14:1-3 NIV
  • 1 “Do not let your hearts be troubled. You believe in God; believe also in me. 2 My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am.
Daily Dose Verse

What I Believe....

John 14:1-3 is a passage from the New Testament of the Bible, where Jesus speaks to His disciples to provide them with comfort and assurance about the future.

Meaning and Interpretation:

  1. Comfort and Reassurance:
    • “Do not let your hearts be troubled.” Jesus begins by addressing the anxiety and fear of His disciples. Knowing that His crucifixion is near, He seeks to comfort them and reassure them that their faith in Him will sustain them through the coming trials.
    • “You believe in God; believe also in me.” This statement links faith in God to faith in Jesus. Jesus encourages His disciples to trust in Him just as they trust in God, reinforcing His divine nature and the unity between Him and the Father.
  2. Promise of Eternal Dwelling:
    • “My Father’s house has many rooms.” This metaphorical language describes heaven as a vast and accommodating place, indicating that there is ample space for all who believe in Him. The "many rooms" suggest a prepared and personalized place for each believer.
    • “If that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you?” Jesus emphasizes the truthfulness and certainty of His promise. He reassures His disciples that His departure is purposeful and beneficial for them.
  3. Preparation and Return:
    • “And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me.” Jesus speaks of His ascension to heaven and His return. His departure is not permanent; He promises to return to gather His followers, ensuring they will be with Him forever.
    • “That you also may be where I am.” The ultimate promise is the eternal presence with Jesus. This conveys the intimate and personal relationship that believers will have with Christ in the afterlife.
    4. Theological Implications:
  • Faith in Christ: This passage underscores the necessity of faith in Jesus as integral to the Christian faith. It connects belief in God with belief in Jesus, highlighting His divine role and the importance of trusting in Him.
  • Eternal Hope: It provides Christians with a profound hope for the future. The imagery of “many rooms” in the Father’s house offers a vision of an inclusive and prepared heaven, where there is a place for every believer.
  • Christ’s Return: The assurance of Jesus’ return is a cornerstone of Christian eschatology. It gives believers the hope of reunion with Christ and the final fulfillment of God’s plan.
  • Jesus as the Way: Although not explicitly stated in these verses, the broader context of John 14 emphasizes Jesus as the way to the Father. This passage leads into Jesus’ declaration in John 14:6 that He is “the way and the truth and the life.”
In summary, John 14:1-3 offers profound comfort and assurance to believers, emphasizing faith in Jesus, the promise of an eternal home, and the certainty of His return to gather His followers to be with Him forever.
Reflection:
Life often brings uncertainty and fear. We face challenges that can shake our faith and trouble our hearts. In such times, the words of Jesus in John 14:1-3 offer profound comfort and assurance. Jesus, knowing the disciples' fears about the future, speaks directly to their hearts—and to ours. Jesus understands our anxieties and provides a remedy: belief in Him. Just as we trust in God, we are invited to trust fully in Jesus. He assures us that our faith in Him is not misplaced. Imagine a home with endless space, where each room is specially prepared for someone. This is the imagery Jesus uses to describe heaven.
There is a place for each of us, a place of belonging and eternal comfort. No one who believes is left out; there is room for everyone. Jesus' words remind us that His departure had a purpose. He went ahead to make ready a place for us, ensuring that our eternal home is prepared. This preparation is personal and loving, reflecting His deep care for each of His followers. The promise of Jesus' return is a cornerstone of our hope. We are not abandoned; He will return to bring us to be with Him forever. This promise assures us that no matter what we face, we have an eternal future with Christ.
Application:
  • Trust in Jesus: When fears and doubts arise, remember Jesus’ words. Place your trust in Him, knowing that He is faithful and has prepared a place for you.
  • Embrace Hope: Reflect on the promise of an eternal home in the Father’s house. Let this hope fill you with peace and joy, even in difficult times.
  • Live with Purpose: Knowing that Jesus has prepared a place for you, live each day with a sense of purpose and anticipation. Share this hope with others, offering them the same comfort you have received.
Prayer:
Heavenly Father, thank You for the comforting words of Jesus. Help us to trust in Him fully and to hold onto the hope of the place He has prepared for us. When our hearts are troubled, remind us of Your love and the promise of eternal life with You. Give us the strength to live with purpose and to share Your hope with those around us. In Jesus' name, we pray. Amen.
Reflection Questions:
1) What current fears or anxieties can you bring to Jesus, trusting in His promise of comfort and assurance?
Life is full of uncertainties and challenges that can cause fear and anxiety. Reflect on your personal concerns:
  • Health Issues: Are you or a loved one facing health problems? Bring your worries about illness, treatments, and the future to Jesus, trusting in His healing power and comforting presence.
  • Financial Struggles: Are you stressed about job security, debts, or financial stability? Trust Jesus to provide for your needs and guide you through financial difficulties.
  • Relationships: Are there conflicts or broken relationships causing you pain? Bring these to Jesus, asking for His wisdom, peace, and reconciliation.
  • Future Uncertainties: Are you anxious about major life decisions or the unknown future? Trust that Jesus has a plan for you and will guide your steps.
Bringing these anxieties to Jesus involves prayer, seeking His guidance, and resting in the assurance that He is in control and deeply cares for you.
2) How does the promise of a prepared place in heaven change your perspective on life's challenges?
The promise of a prepared place in heaven offers a transformative perspective on life's challenges:
  • Eternal Perspective: Knowing that there is an eternal home waiting for you can help you view current struggles as temporary. This eternal perspective can bring peace and reduce the weight of present troubles.
  • Hope and Assurance: The assurance that Jesus is preparing a place for you fills you with hope. This hope can sustain you through difficult times, giving you strength to persevere.
  • Purpose and Motivation: Understanding that your ultimate destination is with Jesus can motivate you to live a life that reflects His love and grace. It encourages you to focus on what truly matters and invest in eternal values.
  • Peace Amidst Trials: The knowledge that Jesus will return and you will be with Him forever can bring profound peace, even in the midst of trials. This peace allows you to navigate challenges with confidence and trust in God's plan.
3) In what ways can you share the hope and comfort of this passage with others who may be struggling?
Sharing the hope and comfort of John 14:1-3 with others can be a powerful way to offer support:
  • Listening and Empathy: Start by listening to their struggles with empathy. Understanding their situation allows you to offer appropriate and heartfelt comfort.
  • Sharing Your Story: Share how this passage has personally brought you comfort and peace. Personal testimonies can be powerful and relatable.
  • Scriptural Encouragement: Gently introduce them to John 14:1-3, explaining how Jesus’ promises can provide assurance and hope. Highlight the key points of comfort, preparation, and Jesus’ return.
  • Prayer: Offer to pray with and for them, asking Jesus to bring them peace and assurance. Praying together can be deeply comforting and uplifting.
  • Practical Support: Alongside spiritual encouragement, offer practical help. Sometimes showing the love of Christ through actions can be as impactful as words.
  • Inviting to Community: Encourage them to join a supportive faith community, such as a church group or Bible study, where they can find additional support and encouragement.
By sharing the hope of this passage, you can help others find comfort in Jesus’ promises and support them in their journey through difficult times.
May this devotional guide you in finding peace and assurance in the promises of Jesus, and may it inspire you to live with hope and purpose each day.
submitted by UnDead_Ted to TheDailyDose [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 16:20 Odd-Specific411 Way of understanding the bible

Since I started to be opened about this religion being a cult I also started to investigate the bible verses that was teach every WS and got more intrigued by it because they have this paper list of bible verses that was joint together with bible it self.
Though I started to have this list of verses which some made me really sus because what I've Seen had different understanding and illustration like this verse of 20:6-19 and 14:15 and I couldn't distinguish it because they don't have names with apostles as being said like isn't it supposed to be be said along with the verse? Like I wouldn't even know if it's a Rohn, Roma, Filipos, etc.
Because of this I started to question my parents about like if they wanted to explore the bible it self and not only following the basis same as the preacher's do on the daily teachings and kid you not they are RAGED by it telling me that my mind was fully of "devils thoughts" 😂 because exploring the bible it self means that you don't trust the teachings and beliefs and should always have this List of each topics that should be followed which means that it would be very limited to know the bible verses as it is always being repeated and should only do that nothing else. I replied "shouldn't we explore the bible as the preacher's also gets the informations in there? Is it that bad?" And My dad's answer are literally ridiculous 😭😔 he replied "it is not bad but you shouldn't read it anymore because YOU SHOULD ALREADY KNOW ABOUT IT" and "no matter how many times you search through it, they will be always right" I also had a beef w my grandma Abt it and her stand was I supposed to have specific topics and resources before reading bible like 'I would misunderstand and be lost on reading the bible and only the sugo and preacher's can teach it'
They sadly view reading the bible as "panguusig" because if your curious and in doubts you are AGAINST. Not only that they think that you would misunderstand and worse be lost because of reading the bible 😭 only can the sugo and preacher's can understand it😶‍🌫️. This makes me to hardly discuss with my parents and my patience was running out and I badly wanna say that I am against all this time.
submitted by Odd-Specific411 to exIglesiaNiCristo [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 16:13 Naive_Syrup1 24 hours for Jesus! Who is in ?

One of the most prominent figures in the Bible is the king David. He was hunted for a long time of his life, but in kings 15 verse 5 we read about him, that is heart was completely by god except for the thing with Uria the hetite. In psalm 37 verse 7 we can read the following words:
"Be still before the Lord and wait patiently for him; do not fret when people succeed in their ways, when they carry out their wicked schemes."
King David most likely wrote this psalm, when he was already older, and had already lived through a lot. He had lived through things most of us can't even imagine. And there he says wait patiently for the lord, don't be tempted when people live in the ways of the world. John R. Rice once said something along the lines of "If there is a hunger, that a human can feel, god wants to satisfy it"
Let us start with the next 24 hours, let us see which hungers, desires and urges are in our life, let's bring them to god.
Father in heaven, you see that I want this soo much, and the only way I can imagine how to quench that thirst now is through sinning against you and my fellow humans. Please help me to trust in you, that you'll give me exactly what I need when I need it. Amen
What is included ?
  1. stay pure
  2. fill your heart with god ( read his word. If you only have strength for one verse, Jesus can make a lot of that seed, it might grow into a big tree)
  3. meditate on it ask god questions, pray learn to understand him and hear what he is saying
  4. ask god to teach you how to love him (it’s key!)
submitted by Naive_Syrup1 to NoFapChristians [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 15:49 24KaratMemer360 What are your thoughts on Sami Ameri's arguments about the corruption of the Bible and the preservation of the Quran in "Hunting for the Word of God"? (Part 1)

While debating against a Muslim skeptic about the reliability and authenticity of the Gospels, he used the textual criticism angle to prove the "corruption" of the New Testament during its early transmissions. He gave me a book titled "Hunting for the Word of God" by Sami Ameri which discusses extensively the corruption of the Bible and the preservation of the Quran through a primarily textual-critical viewpoint. He cites a bunch of textual critics to demonstrate that we cannot trust the Bible but we can trust the Quran. It's a long book, unfortunately, so this post would be the first part in a I-don't-know-how-many-parts series of my hyper-focused dive into textual criticism of a potentially biased Muslim author. Please share your thoughts or any refutations or something. Thanks.
Key Points for the Corruption of the Bible (pp. 9-36)
TL;DR: Christian textual criticism is stoopid af that's why the Bible is not reliable
submitted by 24KaratMemer360 to Catholicism [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 15:14 Front_Ad_7618 Not an Ex jw yet but i could really use some advice..

So to make a long story short I’ve been a unbaptized publisher for probably about 15 years or so just doing Bible readings and nothing more (they’ve tried to get me to go under the water but each time I say I’m not ready)
Anyways I started this job and me and this girl have been talking for a while but she has a one year old and a boyfriend (He treats her like shit) and we’ve been flirting and basically telling each other the things we’d do if we got the chance.
So my question is should I just act on my feelings or wait it out for her to breakup and also how do I get my conscience to not feel awful for potentially having sex before marriage and hiding it from the family (All are deep in the org)
submitted by Front_Ad_7618 to exjw [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 15:06 chajell1 If God knows the future, can it still change?

foreknowledge

Wanted to open a discussion about this and gather different thoughts from others. My friends and I do a Bible study where we discussed whether God knows the future or not. It actually opened a heated debate within our church and some people became upset since we originally took the stance that God doesn’t know the future. But now that we have discussed it more, we can see that it was a misunderstanding between everyone.
I wanted to focus on points that everyone agrees on rather that disagree and I thought that we all agreed that God knows everything and even the future. So what’s the problem? A better question to ask is if the future is predetermined. From our discussion, we concluded that the future is contingent, a realm of possibilities that haven’t happened yet. God can know all of these possibilities but they can change depending on what He wants and on what we decide. This answer seemed to solve both problems: Now we’re not saying that God doesn’t know something and the future can change. Note: this doesn’t mean that nothing is set in stone and anything can happen in the future. If God’s made a promise, then we can expect that to happen no matter what but it’s not because the future is set in stone. It’s because God will keep His word and fulfill His promise.
I have some scriptures to discuss but I wanted to first present the topic and see what people respond with.
submitted by chajell1 to Bible [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 14:44 homebakedbreadd General support

I turned to god when I had given up on myself but the last few weeks I feel so discouraged. I actually feel worse than ever! I have been praying each morning and attended church, I ask for forgiveness every day for my sins and I read from the bible. I’m trying to feel closer to god? I don’t have religious friends and family around me and social anxiety is my whole personality! The journey just feels so lonely and if anyone wouldn’t mind I could really use some advice some hope please just a sign that I’m not going crazy and god will hear me he doesn’t hate me and everything I have been through is for a reason! I have an app which is great for a daily reminder each morning and prayer ect! How else can I make god a part of my every day life? I worry about asking questions in case I word things wrong as this is really new to me. Even when the vicar at church asked me if I had any questions sincerely I wasn’t sure what is acceptable to speak about so I just said no 🙂
submitted by homebakedbreadd to Christian [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 14:17 tomesandtea [Discussion] Leviathan Wakes by James S. A. Corey Chapters 34-40 (The Expanse Book #1)

Welcome to our fifth discussion of Leviathan Wakes. Hold onto your cool detective hats or your environment suits, because we finally get some answers to our mystery! This week, we will discuss Chapters 34-40. The Marginalia post is here. You can find the Schedule here.
The discussion questions are below. One note - this is a very popular book series and TV show, but please keep in mind that not everyone has read or watched already, so be mindful not to include anything that could be a hint or a spoiler! Please mark spoilers not related to this section of the book using the format > ! Spoiler text here !< (without any spaces between the characters themselves or between the characters and the first and last words).
Now brace yourselves: here comes the juice!
Chapter Summaries:
Chapter 34 - Miller: Detective Miller and the crew of the Roci board the hidden ship (the one that captured the crew of the Scopuli before destroying it), wearing environment suits because the ship has no atmosphere - someone left the doors open. They stick together at first as they move through the ship, discovering signs of a struggle, zombie vomit, and twelve torpedo tubes big enough to destroy capital ships like the Donnager or the Canterbury. Miller uses his detective skills to determine that everyone but Julie retreated to engineering. Once there, they discover a truly grisly sight: layers of human flesh and bones are sort of fused around the reactor, which has been shut down. Naomi and Holden gasp in shock and disgust, Miller turns on his cop brain to suppress emotion and view it as a crime scene, and Amos seems… calm and able to ignore the gore. The team splits up to look for more clues.
Amos stays in engineering to start up the computers and get the reactor back online. Naomi works on the ops deck to run diagnostics. Miller and Holden head to the bridge, which wasn’t affected by the fighting onboard. Miller reviews the internal feeds and finds footage showing the captured Scopuli crew being led onto the ship, stripped, and put in restraints. Julie fights back viciously but is knocked unconscious and stuffed in a locker with a jumpsuit (which is where we met her in the prologue). The crew is left in the galley for 132 hours before they decide to make a stand, but it is quickly suppressed. One of the crew is thrown out an airlock and the others are heavily restrained as they scream and cry. Just as Miller gets to the first appearance of a vomit zombie (at hour 160 of footage), Amos yells that he’s been exposed to some radiation because the human flesh blob had damaged the reactor shielding. He decides to keep working while Alex monitors his health status from the Roci.
Then Holden calls Miller over to view one of the last feeds Julie accessed. It’s a corporate presentation video created for a man named Dresden and the board of Protogen. It features a man Miller dubs “the sociopath” because of his cold, practiced smile…and because of the content. The sociopath tells the board (and us) the history of scientific discovery on Phoebe, which was thought to just be a moon and a source of water, but became a research station when a survey found complex silicon structures in the ice. Protogen was tasked with investigating and discovered that Phoebe is not a moon but evidence of a galactic biosphere: it is an alien weapon sent towards Earth 2 ⅓ billion years ago, which never made it because of orbital mechanics. Protogen has discovered that this weapon is not alive per se; rather, it is something they’ve termed the “protomolecule” which has the ability to maintain structure while replicating other systems and manipulating them at scalable rates. Of course, they alerted the proper authorities and made sure… just kidding, they’ve secretly been doing tests. The sociopath believes that whoever controls the protomolecule will gain control of all political and economic power going forward. Chillingly, the sociopath urges them to pursue large-scale testing to understand the protomolecule and its human applications. That large-scale testing is Eros.
TL;DR - Julie found evidence that Protogen has discovered an alien weapon, branded it the “protomolecule”, and secretly tested it on the people of Eros (and probably other smaller tests). The entire war has just been a distraction.
Chapter 35 - Holden: Naomi explains that most of the messages on the comm logs have been coded, but the last one is in plain text: the captain informed Thoth Station that the ship was contaminated, everyone was about to die, and the “materials” had been secured. He also planned to send vector data so they could find the ship. The Roci crew put two and alien-symbol-for-two together: they figure out that the captain has locked protomolecule samples in his safe. They also decide that the tightbeam messages were being sent to a secret research station Protogen was using to monitor the Eros experiment. Even though the fact “Naomi is the best” is a proven concept on par with “space is cold”, she is NOT able to open the captain’s safe, so they decide to cut it out of the wall and bring it with them on the Roci. They also scuttle the ship so no one can a) recover the stealth technology and alien weapons, or b) get exposed to the protomolecule-human soup inside. (Amos would have preferred to hack the frozen dead body goo off the reactor with a chainsaw and salvage such an impressive and expensive ship, which is… another way to go.)
It’s clear that someone else with stealth tech is searching actively for this ship, but the Roci won’t see them coming so they decide to get the hell out of Dodge. Naomi jokes that their options include turning the safe over to the OPA (they’d be heroes), selling out to Mars (they’d be rich), or starting their own biotech firm (just kidding, that’s evil). When Miller checks in with Holden about a decision on where to go next, he drops a figurative bomb on him regarding actual bombs in the news. Since Holden did his best Edward Snowden impersonation and leaked the data that the mystery ships are from Earth, Mars asked a few too many questions and in response, Earth has blown up a whole bunch of Martian ships and destroyed the Deimos deep radar station. Miller ruefully gives Holden credit for sticking to his guns about his belief in “free information”. He also points out that Holden’s principles make him responsible for all those deaths and the destruction of the Earth-Mars Coalition… and possibly the universe as they know it.
Chapter 36 - Miller: The war between Mars and the Belt seems like no big deal now that Earth and Mars are fighting. Miller watches the news feeds as the conflict turns into a blockade, and he realizes he is steeling himself for an announcement of a planetary attack on Earth or Mars, but it never comes. He and Amos deal with the stress by having beer for breakfast.
Miller meets up with Holden in the med bay for their routine blood flushes and cancer treatments, and they reopen their debate about what to do with the data files and who is to blame for the war(s).
Holden’s idealism starts to fade as he takes in Miller’s hard truths about humanity. To be fair, Miller loses a little idealism over his perceptions of the inner planets’ relationship which, to the Belt, seemed stable and friendly enough (and united against them). Miller encourages Holden to use Naomi’s judgment as a measuring stick for whether something is right (similar to how he uses illusion-Julie as his conscience and sounding board) and then he goes back to the news feeds to watch Ceres slowly collapse into chaos. Holden decides the only person and place he trusts - or at least doesn’t completely distrust - is Fred Johnson on Tycho Station, so they head there. Holden also wonders why they don’t just destroy the safe and make sure everyone stays away from Eros and Phoebe; Miller admits it’s because the protomolecule might just be the holy grail.
Chapter 37 - Holden: The crew of the Roci is taking a break from doom scrolling to cook fake space lasagna for dinner and bond over the food and conversation. As Holden watches the crew laugh at Amos’s belches and Miller’s wild story about cheese smuggling, he reflects that they represent all three prongs of the conflict: Naomi and Miller are Belters, Amos and he are from Earth, and Alex is from Mars. Yet they’re friends, and Holden knows this is what they have to fight for. The cheese smuggling makes no sense to Amos (why cheese and not drugs?), and Naomi points out that this illustrates how little people from the inner planets understand Belters. Earthers have free air and easy access to resources, while Belters know everything that sustains life is rare and their access to it is fragile. And this is why Protogen didn’t blink an eye before killing 1.5 million Belters on Eros: they’re “other”. Then Alex points out that this doesn’t make sense; it's a risky and unnecessarily complicated way to kill people just to satisfy prejudices. It becomes clear that Eros isn’t a hate crime, it’s a vacuum-sealed test tube to let the protomolecule learn how to do its job better by giving it access to a huge amount of biomass. The early transformations looked incomplete, as if it didn’t know how to work with human flesh yet, so Protogen was giving it a chance to train. Holden wants to know where they would even find enough people who would support an evil operation like this, and Miller promises to ask Dresden (the Protogen board member mentioned in the video) when they meet him. Something tells me that conversation won’t go well.
As the Roci approaches Tycho station, Holden and Miller take in the view of the Nauvoo, the partially constructed Mormon generation ship. When Miller says the Mormans may be in for a long and lonely death if they don’t find a habitable planet, Holden notes that this is the good kind of galactic exploration humans can accomplish (the protomolecule being the bad kind). Miller then asks Holden why he trusts Fred, and Holden explains that in addition to being the only person who hasn’t tried to jail them or blow them up since all this began, Fred is “real OPA”: he’s a politician and not part of the war-mongering factions who think they can survive indefinitely without the inner planets. When Miller points out that there isn’t a political solution to Protogen, Holden insists Fred has other skills, too. Later, Fred reads through all the information on the protomolecule and is incredulous that anyone could think to do this. Miller assures him that genocide is an old-school crime and it’s important that they stop it. Holden offers up the location of the observation station in exchange for enough OPA fighters to take down Protogen, and the right to retain custody of the safe and its contents. Fred agrees only after Holden points out that no one else can be trusted to do the right thing with a secret this big. Plus, he says Fred already knows what Holden will do with it.
Chapter 38 - Miller: It feels strange to Miller to explore the wide open spaces of Tycho Station, the fanciest place he has ever set foot on. He notices Naomi working on her hand terminal and letting her food get cold; she is too preoccupied with trying to figure out the location of the station to enjoy the amenities. As they talk, Miller is reminded of Havelock’s advice to just let go when he got pulled off a case, which jogs his memory that Havelock actually works for Protogen! (I’m surprised he didn’t get there faster; maybe everyone had a point that he was sort of a washed up detective.) He rushes off to make contact with his old buddy - probably his last real partner ever - in an encrypted drop site of a Ganymede server cluster. As he waits for a response, Miller is amused to realize he has started thinking like Holden: he feels like someone should warn the Mormans that they could potentially run into the alien creators of the protomolecule who may want to kill them. Havelock comes through, passing along the coordinates to a “very scary deep research and development lab” and asking Miller to be discreet never contact him again so he doesn’t get killed for betraying his employer. Miller sends him an encrypted warning to quit his job ASAP and not take postings at any black ops sites, before saying goodbye for the last time to the only person that still respected him as a cop. (I may or may not be sniffling a bit at this.)
Miller rounds up Naomi and Holden so they can bring Fred the coordinates. In Fred’s office, Miller starts lecturing him about the serious nature of the mission and the need to have a solid plan with adequate firepower, not the usual OPA shenanigans. Everyone’s a little confused until they realize that Miller doesn’t know that Fred is “the butcher of Anderson Station” and a former Colonel in the Earth Navy. Fred assures Miller he’s no amateur and will plan ahead. Miller then insists that he get to come along for the assault on Thoth Station. Eight days later, the plan is set in motion and Miller begins packing his meager belongings into a very small bag, figuring he’ll never see the Roci again. Even if he makes it off Thoth alive, he’ll have to figure out a way to make money and improvise a life plan of some sort. He tries to thank Holden and say goodbye, but the Roci’s captain interrupts Miller to ask where they’ll all meet up after the mission is complete. Miller is confused at first, then overcome with emotion when he realizes Holden considers Miller part of the crew! I’m not crying, you’re crying. Actually, it’s Miller who is weeping. But he pulls himself together so he can head to the assault ship.
Chapter 39 - Holden: The Rocinante needs to sneak up on Thoth Station, so they are pretending to be a loose cargo container that broke off the Guy Molinari (the Belter ship carrying the assault team, which is pretending to be a cargo ship). They fly with everything shut down so that it’s more convincing, hoping they can get close enough to the station to do some damage before Thoth starts firing back. As they approach and are able to reboot everything needed for battle, a stealth ship is spied hanging out near Thoth Station. Then, suddenly it becomes clear that there are two small stealth ships, which will be much harder to fight off. Everyone does their jobs efficiently on the Roci, but in the ensuing battle with the stealth ships, they start to take some damage. First, the Roci is hit by a gauss cannon that goes straight through the machine shop and galley. Holden mourns his coffee maker. Amos notices a leak in the maneuvering thrusters and heads to fix it between the inner and outer hulls, which isn’t an ideal place to be floating around during a battle. This stresses Naomi out, but Holden orders everyone to stay focused. They are able to take out one of the stealth ships, but the other gets close enough to do some impressive damage to the Roci. There is major hull damage as well as loss of four maneuvering thrusters, a PDC, their O2 storage, and the crew airlock. Alex is about to destroy the second stealth ship when the Roci’s point defense cannons (PDCs) detonate an enemy warhead up close. It knocks everyone out, punches holes throughout the Roci (narrowly missing Naomi), dislodges equipment, and fills the ship with debris. Holden marvels that they are alive at all, and Alex points out that is only because the ship’s anti-spalling webbing eliminates shrapnel. They make contact with Fred, who says he’ll find them a place to land, and the Guy Molinari prepares for the assault on Thoth Station. It’s Miller’s turn to shine!
Chapter 40 - Miller: On the Guy Molinari, Miller is talking to a Belter kid named Diogo as they wait for the assault to start. Miller realizes that while he has fancy Martian armor from the Roci and experience with gunfights in station corridors, he is surrounded by inexperienced young Belters with borrowed gear, and he will likely have to watch dozens of them die during the battle. But Diogo isn’t worried; he is confident and eager to get started. Fred announces that they are ready to start boarding since the Roci gave them the “all clear”, and Miller is happy to hear his friends have survived. The assault on the station starts off rough, with Protogen soldiers fighting them in the corridors and automatic defense lasers taking out some of the Belters in the first wave. But Fred knows how to command his OPA “troops” and keep them in line, and things start to go more smoothly as they slow down and maneuver carefully. Miller and Diogo are part of a group taking shelter at Fred’s direction and fending off Protogen counterattacks, and they start to talk during a lull. When two Protogen soldiers sneak up on them from behind, Diogo is hit and Miller chastises himself for chatting during a battle and not staying alert. He thinks Diogo is dead, but he pops up laughing and streaked with white goo from crowd suppression rounds, which Miller finds an odd choice of weapon. It’s the first sign that Thoth Station may not totally understand what’s happening. The OPA soldiers cut their way through the blast doors to get to the operations center, where they find Dresden (the dude mentioned in the sociopath’s Protogen video). Fred arrives to take command of the station, and Dresden offers to negotiate, clearly misunderstanding the reason for the assault. He offers to give the OPA whatever resources they need to go back to fighting their war (money, medical supplies, weapons, ordnance) if they’ll just leave and let the station get back to their very important work. Fred points out that they know about Eros, but Dresden insists no one knows what they did there, and there won’t be a better bargaining position for Fred when Earth sends its battleships. Fred basically calls Dresden Satan, but Dresden doesn’t understand the reference.
submitted by tomesandtea to bookclub [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 14:01 Zeraniiak Arknights or Honkai Star Rail? (Kinda long post)

Dumb question but I've been wondering it for quite some time
When I saw Arknights for the first time I honestly had low expectations for it, until I saw videos calling it "the best gacha game" or "a masterpiece" so I got curious and wanted to play it, however life happened and 4 years have passed since then.
My only gacha is Honkai Impact atm, but lately I feel like I have more free time than usual, so I remembered that I wanted to try Arknights but Honkai Star Rail has piqued my interest... so who's better?
No I can't play the both of them
I know they look apparently two completely different games, but they have two similarities: the both of them have strategic gameplay, and both have really high quality story set in a vast world
Maybe you would think "well you play Honkai Impact naturally you should play Honkai Star Rail too", but you see, I'm more than happy to open my mind to new franchises
About the content:
I know it's unfair to compare them since AK is four years older than HSR, but comparing them in their first year of life is fine
Yes I know that Arknights has bibles worth of content to catch on, that's why I am hesitant to play it (and regret not playing it sooner)
What I know and don't know about them:
I know the basis of AK themes but know nothing about HSR's story, I trust in AK gameplay (from reviews) but I'm skeptical about how fun the gameplay in HSR is
One of the things that interests me the most in HSR is the depth of the characters so I was wondering if AK has that level of depth too
submitted by Zeraniiak to honkaiimpact3 [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 14:00 Zeraniiak Arknights or Honkai Star Rail? (Kinda long post)

Dumb question but I've been wondering it for quite some time
When I saw Arknights for the first time I honestly had low expectations for it, until I saw videos calling it "the best gacha game" or "a masterpiece" so I got curious and wanted to play it, however life happened and 4 years have passed since then.
My only gacha is Honkai Impact atm, but lately I feel like I have more free time than usual, so I remembered that I wanted to try Arknights but Honkai Star Rail has piqued my interest... so who's better?
No I can't play the both of them
I know they look apparently two completely different games, but they have two similarities: the both of them have strategic gameplay, and both have really high quality story set in a vast world
Maybe you would think "well you play Honkai Impact naturally you should play Honkai Star Rail too", but you see, I'm more than happy to open my mind to new franchises
About the content:
I know it's unfair to compare them since AK is four years older than HSR, but comparing them in their first year of life is fine
Yes I know that Arknights has bibles worth of content to catch on, that's why I am hesitant to play it (and regret not playing it sooner)
What I know and don't know about them:
I know the basis of AK themes but know nothing about HSR's story, I trust in AK gameplay (from reviews) but I'm skeptical about how fun the gameplay in HSR is
One of the things that interests me the most in HSR is the depth of the characters so I was wondering if AK has that level of depth too
submitted by Zeraniiak to arknights [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 14:00 AutoModerator Daily Feedback Thread (May 18, 2024)

Please post any and all [Feedback] or [Listen] type threads in this thread until the next one is created. Any threads made that should be a comment here will be removed.

Rules:

  1. Make an effort to comment on other people's tracks. By doing so, you will find that others will be more likely to help you with your tracks.
  2. Be specific when asking for help. Examples of specific questions: "What do you think about this kick sample?" "How's this mix?" "I need some help on this melody, the last measure comes off a little cheesy, any ideas?" etc.
  3. Be descriptive when giving feedback. Use timecodes to highlight certain parts.
  4. Please link to the feedback comments you've left in your top-level comment. This will show others the feedback you've left, and you're more likely to get feedback yourself! Also, please notice those who are leaving a lot of feedback and give them some, too. This is a cooperative effort! Update: Any comments that do not follow this format will be automatically removed.
    For example:
feedback for Esther: "link to feedback"
feedback for Fay: "link to feedback"
feedback for Minerva: "link to feedback"
Here's my track. I'm looking for ___
submitted by AutoModerator to edmproduction [link] [comments]


http://swiebodzin.info