Updates:

1. Thank you for those that upvoted and shared the post! It is heartwarming to see the support! I was going to move on to other projects but I'll stay and implement some new feature like todo/reminders :)
2. I've added some H2 Chem topical & prelim papers I got into the platform!
3. I received DMs on tutoring, unfortunately I am not taking anymore students. Sorry :( but I'll answer math questions if u have! I accidentally deleted the message of one of ya'll so I didn't reply you sorry (fat fingers)

Hello future valedictorians!
I'm here to share a website I created with the only goal in mind, that is to give you an epic academic glow up! If you are very slay already, it might catapult you to supermodel fame so tread cautiously 😜.
The only commitment is your ambition and attendance is measured by your determination. All for the price of $0 because you should unlock your potential, not your parents' wallet!
https://preview.redd.it/pcehzykjcyyc1.png?width=1027&format=png&auto=webp&s=00c4f75254a7df227108cbb0258326e805543e2f
🙋‍♂️ A** bit about me**
I'm a part-time math tutor & full time drowning cs student who is barely keeping afloat with his mods. This meant less time for tutoring and a stockpile of awesome practice papers lying around collecting dust! Thus born My Academic Weapon where I share this to more people so my efforts spent compiling them are more meaningful 🥳
🌟 Features

• Unlimited Practice Paper Downloads & Bookmarks

You can bookmark and revisit any materials with ease with just 1 tap. So if you're the type that loves hugging Buddha's legs at midnight, you can now spend more time hugging Budha's legs productively practicing papers and less time finding where are your materials!

• Goal Setting & Progress Tracking

You can set goals on how many papers you target to complete and track your scores! Every time you complete a paper, you can mark the paper as completed and save your scores (optional)

• Video Solutions

I've made a few solution recordings and walkthroughs for some of my materials where I share my problem solving techniques. They are denoted by a video icon. These same techniques are how I score my As in my E/A/H2 Math and me being an average student is testament you don't need to be a genius to excel in math, you just need the right approach to solve problems!

• Made for students by student

I built this platform with the skills I've picked up in CS where it will ideally make your academic journey a bit more smooth sailing! Most of you are younger than me here 😢 (I think) and possess something incredibly valuable — Time! Time flies but you are the pilot. Use it to fuel your academic comeback and reach new heights!

• Free Indefinitely:

No paywalls, no hidden fees. There is 0 restriction stopping you from downloading my entire collection! Honouring PM Lee Hsien Loong's statement in his recent May Day Rally: "Your postal code does not determine your destiny." Education should be accessible to everyone regardless of your financial status and this is my way of contributing!
🤝 Expanding the collection
I’m open to include more subjects materials, especially common ones like Chemisery Chemistry. If you want to contribute or collaborate, feel free to reach out via PM!
🚀 Quick Guide
Note step 6 onwards will require you to create an account to explore all features

1. Go to https://www.myacademicweapon.com
2. Click on Study Resources (on mobile it will be the 2nd icon from left)
3. Navigate to your level
4. Click on the relevant material you are interested in
   • Topical - Topical practice (some questions might cross topics)
   • Yearly - Basically full papers such as prelims
5. Click on the underlined links to open the material (links open in google drive)
   • You can download after opening the material, button is at top right area usually
   • You can open the solutions by clicking on the bulb icon
   • You can open video solutions (not all have) by clicking on the video icon
6. If you have yet to create an account, sign up for one first before proceeding from here on
7. Click the leftmost icon to bookmark the material
8. Click the checkbox to mark material as completed
   • You will be prompted to record your marks optionally. Others cannot see your marks
9. To view your bookmarks/completed papers, you can go to your profile page
   • Click on your profile picture (you only see it if you are signed in)
10. In your profile page, you can set goals, personalise your profile etc !

💬 Feedbacks
If you find any bugs or issues such as broken links, feel free to PM me here!
If you have any feature that you think would be great to add into the site, don't hesitate to lmk too, if it's something reasonable that I can implement I'll try 😋
If you read till here, thank you! Here's a fun fact for you ~ When I initially heard of this term "Academic Weapon", I thought it referred to a student's secret arsenal of tuition resources or study strategies that help them ace exams*. So I named my website "My Academic Weapon" where I envisioned it as YOUR secret weapon for your academic success! Turns out, "Academic Weapon" actually refers to the student themselves and not their toolkit 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️. Well just like in most exam questions, it’s all about interpretation. So let’s interpret this to mean your secret arsenal for your academic success! Shhh

Is this happening to anyone else?

Simplify Your Document Signing Process with BreezeDoc
​

Simplify Your Document Signing Process with BreezeDoc

Waiting for contracts and agreements to be signed can slow business progress to a halt. Juggling paper forms and chase emails is inefficient and frustrates clients. Thankfully, modern solutions now exist to streamline digital signing.
In this comprehensive review, we will examine BreezeDoc - an all-in-one electronic signature tool for simplifying document signing. From signing features to pricing plans, we'll cover everything you need to know.

Introduction to BreezeDoc

BreezeDoc is a cloud-based document signing platform that allows users to create, send, sign and manage documents from any browser or mobile device. Founded in 2020, the company aims to provide an easy and affordable solution for businesses, freelancers and individuals to collect legally-binding electronic signatures.
With over one million users worldwide, BreezeDoc has proven effective for a wide range of use cases from consulting agreements to NDAs. Users praise its intuitive interface and 24/7 customer support. Let's delve deeper into the key features.

Upload and Manage Templates

One of the biggest headaches of document signing is preparing contracts and agreements. With BreezeDoc, upload your existing template files or try premium verified templates covering common legal forms.
Templates simplify document creation. Modify fields, fonts and styles directly in the editor. Save variants as reusable templates for efficiency. Assign tag metadata to templates for easysearching.
The dashboard provides a centralized hub to manage all your document templates. Sort, filter and bulk-edit templates as needed. Preview and test templates before sending.
BreezeDoc also automatically tracks document activity. View signature status, download completed files and monitor signing in real-time from any device. Stay on top of outstanding documents to close more loops.

Intuitive Digital Signature Workflow

After uploading a template, designing the document for signature is simple. Mark fields requiring signature, initials or datestamps. Customize field labels and orders.
Sending signed documents for approval is one-click. Add recipients, set reminder notifications and expiration dates. BreezeDoc handles sending documents, collecting signatures and notifications.
Signers receive a personalized signing link by email. They can electronically sign or initial with a click using a computer or mobile device. No software installation needed.
Real-time notifications keep everyone informed as documents progress. Administrators see visible signatures, timestamps and audit trails ensuring security and compliance. Completed documents auto-download for records.

Affordable Pricing Plans

BreezeDoc offers four versatile pricing tiers to suit all signing needs and budgets:

• Free Plan: Includes basic signing for up to 2 documents and 2 recipients per month. Great for occasional use.
• Standard Plan: US$9/month billed annually. Raises limits to 5 documents, unlimited recipients and templates. Best value entry-level option.
• Premium Plan: US$19/month billed annually. Provides 15 document limit, advanced custom branding and multi-user access. For busier signers.
• Enterprise Plan: Custom tailored plans for high-volume teams or enterprises. Contact BreezeDoc for a customized quote.

All plans support unlimited sending, signing and storage. No per-document or per-signature fees. Cancel anytime with a full refund within 60 days if unsatisfied.

Lifetime Deal for One-Time Payment

For a limited time, BreezeDoc is also available through a lifetime deal on AppSumo for a one-time payment. This removes ongoing subscription fees for perpetual access at steep discounts off regular pricing:

• Tier 1: FREE membership with limited features.
• Tier 2: US$108 for unlimited use equivalent to Standard Plan. 92% lifetime savings.
• Tier 3: US$228 for unlimited use equivalent to Premium Plan. 90% lifetime savings.

As an introductory offer, buyers get 60 days to test and a full money-back guarantee. Future plan updates and all new extra features are automatically included for life. A powerful low-cost signing solution.

Key Benefits of BreezeDoc

• Simplify signatures: Eliminate printing, scanning and postal delays. Easily share, sign and archive documents digitally.
• Save time and money: Accelerate contract execution. No more courier fees or waiting days for physical signatures to be returned.
• Increase efficiency: Streamline workflows and approvals. Customizable multi-user access for teams. Track activity in real-time.
• Ensure compliance: Legally-valid signatures secure audit trails with secure encryption and timestamping. Regulatory compliant (E-Sign Act).
• Build trust: Send personalized signing links from a professional branded experience. Signers complete securely on any device for convenience.
• Flexible pricing: Free hobbyist plan. Affordable monthly/yearly plans. Best value is a lifetime deal purchase providing perpetual access.
• Satisfaction guaranteed: 60-day refund period removes risks. friendly 24/7 support always available to help.

In summary, BreezeDoc offers an affordable, user-friendly and compliant digital signature solution ideal for freelancers, small businesses and professionals of any size.

How to Use BreezeDoc

To begin, you'll need to sign up for a free BreezeDoc account at breezedoc.com. This provides access to all core features, though some functions like document limits apply.
Once logged in, simply upload a template document using the file browser or by starting fresh with a blank template. BreezeDoc supports all major file formats like Word, PDF and images.
Customize the document by marking signature, initial, date and text fields that need to be completed. Add or remove fields by dragging and dropping as required. Modify styles and text as needed directly in the editor.
When ready, send the document for signature. Enter recipient emails and customize messages as you see fit. Choose whether individual or bulk sending is preferred for multiple recipients.
From there, BreezeDoc handles distribution, reminders and collecting signatures. All activity is tracked in real-time and documents are automatically delivered back once complete. Monitor signing statuses and download finished documents as required.
For teams, advanced options like multi-user access, LDAP integration and user management can be tailored to your specific workflow needs when upgrading plans. BreezeDoc is easy to adopt for both individuals and large enterprises alike.

Pros and Cons of BreezeDoc

Like any service, BreezeDoc has its advantages as well as a few limitations that are worth considering:

Pros:

• User-friendly, modern interface that's intuitive to use for beginners
• Wide platform support for any browser or mobile device
• Real-time signing tracking and notifications included
• Robust template and document management features
• Valid legally binding e-signatures provided
• Flexible free plan tier and affordable premium upgrades
• Excellent 99.9% uptime reliability backed by 24/7 support

Cons:

• Limited custom branding options on lower cost plans
• Free version has some usage restrictions on features

Overall satisfaction for BreezeDoc remains very high according to user reviews. While not perfect, it strikes an ideal balance for capability and value that compares well against competitors. The pros clearly outweigh the minor limitations for most signers.

BreezeDoc Lifetime Deal Deep Dive

For a limited time, BreezeDoc is available through a special lifetime access deal exclusively on the discount marketplace AppSumo.
This deal removes the need for ongoing subscription payments by upgrading your account forever with a single low one-time fee. It provides immense savings off the regular monthly/annual pricing model.
There are currently three tiers available as part of the lifetime deal:

Tier 1 (FREE)

This maintains the existing free membership features for up to 2 documents and 2 recipients per month. Ideal for occasional ad-hoc usage.

Tier 2 ($108)

For unlimited use equivalent to BreezeDoc's Standard Plan, regularly priced at $9/month or $108 annually. You save 92% versus subscriptions.
Includes 5 document limit, private templates, unlimited recipients and reminders. Best entry-level option.

Tier 3 ($228)

Unlocks Premium Plan functions usually $19/month or $228 annually. 90% lifetime savings gained.
Raises limit to 15 documents, further customization and multi-user access ideal for business teams.
All future application updates and new features are automatically included at no extra cost for life under this deal. Additionally, a full 60-day refund is offered in case you change your mind.
For most individual and small business signers, this represents phenomenal value that's difficult to reasonably pass up given the perpetual access and thousands saved over time. Simply put, it may be the best and most cost effective way to use BreezeDoc long term.

Pricing Comparisons and Profitability

To better understand how affordable BreezeDoc truly is compared to competitors, let’s analyze typical signing volumes and associated costs:

• Low Volume (25-50/year): Free plan suffices. Or Tier 2 ($108/lifetime) saves big versus $12-24/year competitors. Pays off in <1 year.
• Medium Volume (50-100/year): Tier 2 again best value at just $1-2/document versus $600-1200/year alternatives. Break-even in months versus ongoing fees.
• High Volume (100+/year): Tier 3 ($228/lifetime) charges only $2-3/document and nothing more. Big cost leader against $1000+/year expenses elsewhere.

Many alternative providers charge $5, $10 or even $25 per sent document. BreezeDoc's monthly caps are waived by upgrading lifetime plans where fees are calculated as low as $1-3 per contract - if even that due to the one-time purchase.
We can conclude that once signing volumes exceed a few dozen documents annually, BreezeDoc delivers immense cost savings over time versus paying ongoing subscription rates elsewhere. The investment pays for itself extremely quickly.

Money Back Guarantee

As digital purchases carry intangible risks, BreezeDoc protects buyers further with an unconditional 60-day money back guarantee on all plans and lifetime access deals.
If after two months of use you still feel BreezeDoc does not meet your signing needs or you want to discontinue service for any reason, simply request a full refund. No questions asked.
This takes much of the hesitation out of committing to a solution when trying something new. Buyers can rest assured knowing they have adequate time to put BreezeDoc through its paces rent-free before the purchase is finalized.
Combined with fast support response times, 24/7 availability and an overall happy user base reported, BreezeDoc's approach builds considerable confidence in both product quality and customer satisfaction policies. Risk is virtually eliminated in giving it an honest try.

Founders and History

BreezeDoc was founded in 2020 in Austin, Texas by entrepreneurs David Kelly and Brad Smuck. Both experienced prior successes scaling software as a service applications.
They identified the need for a streamlined digital signature tool accessible to all - from freelancers working remote to large enterprises handling contracts globally. Their goal was to develop an affordable solution without compromising features or usability.
After over 18 months of product research and development involving multiple beta rounds, BreezeDoc officially launched on AppSumo in 2021 where it quickly gained widespread popularity and over a million registered signups to date.
An energetic team now oversees continuous innovation and improvements based directly on user feedback. Having proven itself, BreezeDoc continues broadening capabilities while focusing on their core mission of simplifying document signing worldwide.
Get BreezeDoc Lifetime Deal Here

Summary and Conclusion

In evaluating electronic signature solutions, ease of use, affordability and capability are major factors for both individuals and businesses. BreezeDoc emerges as a top contender delivering across all categories.
The interface excels in intuitiveness proven by its ability to engage non-technical profiles. Templates, advanced customization and complete ecosystems for creating and managing documents set it apart from simpler alternatives.
Pricing proves highly competitive when matching typical signing volumes and team needs against subscription or pay-per-use models. The lifetime deal especially delivers immense long term value that's hard to ignore.
Backed by round-the-clock support, money-back guarantees, and consistently positive user reviews, risk is further reduced in trusting BreezeDoc as a primary signature provider.
In conclusion, for freelancers, small businesses or enterprises requiring proficient e-signing at reasonable prices, BreezeDoc stands as a top recommendation. It has earned acclaim for simplifying the document signing process above nearly all competitors globally.
Get BreezeDoc Lifetime Deal Here

BreezeDoc FAQs

Is BreezeDoc free to use?

BreezeDoc offers a free Basic plan for occasional signing needs up to 2 documents per month. For full-featured usage, low-cost paid plans starting from as little as $9/month provide higher sending limits and additional functions.

What file formats can be signed?

Nearly all common document types can be electronically signed with BreezeDoc including Word, Excel, PDF, JPG/PNG images and more.

Are signatures legally binding?

Yes, when applied using BreezeDoc signatures carry the same legal weight as handwritten signatures according to U.S. Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act and most jurisdictions globally. Audit trails provide non-repudiation.

Is there a mobile app?

While dedicated mobile apps are not currently offered, the BreezeDoc website is fully optimized for signing on any mobile device using the browser. Most core functions are supported on iPhone/iPad and Android.

Are there templates included?

Yes, BreezeDoc provides a selection of industry-relevant templates covering common forms like NDAs, invoices, contracts and more. Users can also upload their own templates or create new ones.

Does it support electronic IDs?

At present BreezeDoc uses industry-standard electronic signatures which are legally binding but do not involve two-factor authentication or advanced digital ID verification. This functionality may be added in future.
Get BreezeDoc Lifetime Deal Here

FTC Affiliate Disclaimer

This review provides fact-based analysis of BreezeDoc for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. While we aim to deliver honest opinions, views expressed are our own and derived from first-hand experiences with the product.
As an affiliate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases which do not influence editorial content. All pricing and data was accurate at the time of writing but may change over time due to currency fluctuations or retail provider adjustments. Readers are advised to confirm all details directly with BreezeDoc before making a purchase.
Get BreezeDoc Lifetime Deal Here

An Act of Flying Saucer Sabotage at the Department of Energy Laboratory in the Santa Susana Pass
Contact Network History Project.
Joseph Burkes MD 2019
​
The Department of Energy Lab was just a few miles from our high desert CE5 research site.
SPRING 2006 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
It was a slow day in ambulance area. The patient and I were alone in an examining room. I was serving as “admitting officer.” I had been asked by the ER crew to evaluate a possible admission to the hospital.
The patient was an elderly African American man. The chart indicated that he was suffering from a kidney aliment. We were crammed into a tiny private exam room. There was barely enough space to squeeze a hospital stretcher on which the patient sat. Standard patient monitoring equipment covered two walls. A tall hospital swivel tray served as my desk for the evaluation. Decades before I had been an industrial toxicology medical consultant. As part of my special interest in occupational diseases I had acquired the habit of taking a detailed work history. I asked him what was his occupational status.
HE HAD WORKED FOR THE “GOVERNMENT.”
He told me that he was retired.
From what kind of occupation?” I asked.
“I worked for the government, “was his answer.
That somewhat vague reply got me interested. From countless evaluations. I had learned that people who worked for the postal office, the FAA or US Forrest Service almost never used the cryptic expression, “government work.” However, this is a designation sometimes used by those that worked in classified projects or for defense/intelligence agencies.
I asked him what specifically his job was. He replied that he had been a physical plant engineer at the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratory in Chatsworth, a high desert suburban town in the Northwest corner of LA County’s San Fernando Valley. The DOE has a wide range of responsibilities including developing nuclear weapons. The Chatsworth DOE facility understandably was kept under high security. It was originally constructed after World War Two and had carried out top secret research in space propulsion systems. It just so happened to be located a few miles away from the desolate high desert fieldwork site that my CE-5/HICE contact team had used when we started staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) in 1992. Our field laboratory was just a few hundred yards south of the Santa Susana Pass which connects Los Angeles to Ventura County.
The DOE lab was rumored to be the place where an anti-ballistic missile defense system known back in the 1980s as “Star Wars” had been developed. The installation was built south of the Santa Susana Pass which separates the suburb of Chatsworth from another “bedroom” community called Simi Valley. Most of the people who live in the area commute to the San Fernando Valley and other parts of Los Angeles to find employment. Many of our Kaiser medical group’s patients came from these towns.
Back in the 1990s, one of the investigators on my UFO contact team was also a colleague from our med group’s Family Medicine Department. His name is Dr. David Gordon. He is a contact experiencer. Without knowing of one another’s interest in flying saucers, he and I joined both MUFON and CSETI within a month of one another in the spring of 1992. He was so well respected by his patients and colleagues alike that he had received permission from his Family Medicine Chief to do an informal survey of UFO sightings. His patients and the Woodland Hills Kaiser Medical Center staff served as the study population.
Having a much respected family practice physician on my team turned out to be a bonanza when it came to acquiring intelligence concerning ongoing UFO sightings in the area. Whenever patients of Dr. Gordon heard about local sightings, they checked out the information and then passed it on to their personal physician. He then dutifully gave the sighting reports to me, his contact team coordinator.
One of Dr. Gordon’s patients was a retired carpenter who reportedly had been employed building the DOE base in the early 1950s. His patient said that they had literally “emptied out the mountain” to construct the lab. Apparently, this was done to make it secure from aerial attack. So much dirt had to be moved, that for 3 months according to the retired carpenter, a line of dump trucks several miles long were filled with earth removed from inside the hillside. To convey how strategically important this base was during the Cold War, I share the following additional information.
BASE HAD BEEN TARGETED FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK IN CASE OF ALL OUT WAR
During the 1980s, I was an activist in the Physicians anti-nuclear weapons group called “Physicians for Responsibility (PSR). Our mission was to raise public awareness about the medical consequences of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race. We were part of an umbrella organization called “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 for bringing Soviet and Western physicians together in our educational peace campaign. When the Soviet Union fell apart in the 1990s, thus ending the Cold War, our Los Angeles PSR office held a photographic exhibition called “Nuclear Los Angeles.” We showed pictures of the nuclear artifacts in Southern California, such as missile bases and fallout shelters from the 1950s and 60s. One of the photos was an image a Soviet strategic map used to designate targets in Southern California for nuclear attack if war broke out. There was a target located in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. In clear Cyrillic letters it phonetically spelled out the name “Santa Susana.” It was the DOE lab in Chatsworth.
Another story told to Dr. Gordon by the retired carpenter that helped build the base reflects the strategic nature of the laboratory. His patient told my colleague that he required a security clearance to work underground at the base. He reportedly was only allowed to build labs and offices down to the eight floor underground. Below that level, a higher clearance was required. He wasn’t sure how far down the base went. That information was secret, but he guessed that it was at least another ten levels down inside the mountain.
I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS BASE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
The Department of Energy research facility was a dirty and dangerous place to work. Press reports in the 1980s identified this site as one where several serious environmental accidents had occurred. Back in the 1950s a nuclear reactor at the base had a partial meltdown and plutonium was leaked into the surrounding environment. One isotope of plutonium (Pu-239) has a half-life of over 24,000 years, thus making it one of the most feared environmental contaminants. Over the years, the DOE lab was cited for many safety violations with the release of other toxins. Our LA chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility was very aware of these problems with DOE installation and worked in a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups attempting to force the government to clean up the site.
Given this background information, when I evaluated the retired plant engineer from the base in 2006, I was eager to learn more about what went on there. He explained to me that his team of engineers kept the facility running properly by carrying out routine maintenance on the infrastructure at the facility. This included plumbing, electrical, and outdoor repairs.
AN AMAZING ENCOUNTER NEAR WHERE OUR TEAM OPERATED
Things were really slow in the ER that day so I thought there would be no harm if after my medical evaluation I told him about my special interest in UFOs. I asked him whether he had ever seen a UFO. His reaction was telling. With a concerned expression on his face, he turned his head from side to side to look around. I imagined that he was checking to see if anyone else besides me might be able might to hear what he was about to say.
“Yes I saw a UFO once,” was his answer. I asked him where the sighting had occurred. He replied, “It was at the base.”
We were totally alone in the tiny room, the glass sliding door was closed and a curtain allowed us privacy. Despite this, the patient had turned his head and looked around before he dared to the answer my question. I was eager to find out more about his sighting.
I mentioned to retired plant engineer that back in the 1990s I had been part of an investigative team that had a number of UFO sightings in the Santa Susana Pass. Our fieldwork site was about a few thousand yards from the DOE base perimeter. This information seemed to set him more at ease. He paused for a few moments and then I guess he decided it was safe to tell me his story.
ALARMS WENT OFF IN THE CONTROL ROOM
He wasn’t sure of the exact year that it happened. He knew that it was about fifteen years before our interview in 2006. It might have been in 1989 or 1990. He was on duty at the research lab when the alarms went off. It was late afternoon and the monitors indicated that there was a sudden loss of water pressure in the lines that supplied a several of the labs.
The facility had been built deep underground into the side of a mountain, but there were many structures on the surface as well. The retired engineer explained that on the top of the base enormous water towers supplied the entire complex. Pipes several feet across ran down from the storage towers along steep hillsides to the various labs. The mountain was composed of loose sedimentary rock, sandstone. Occasionally rockslides damaged one of these pipes. Given the distant history of a partial meltdown in a reactor with the release of plutonium, I surmised that keeping the labs supplied with coolant might be of great importance.
The plant engineer told me that a sudden loss of water pressure could only be addressed one way and he knew the drill. He and a co-worker grabbed machetes and a weed-whacker and went outside to check on the status of the water lines. Starting at the water towers, they followed the lines down the steep mountainside looking for a busted pipe. This was not an easy task. It was late afternoon, but it was still very hot outside. The water mains were partially covered with rocks and dirt. Desert plants with sharp nettles were everywhere and to top if off this was rattlesnake country.
SABOTAGE!
The maintenance engineers moved slowly because the loose sedimentary rock didn’t provide secure footing. Finally as the sun was setting, they found the busted pipe. Water was shooting upwards like a geyser. To their amazement the large conduit had been cleanly cut as if by a power tool! They had expected to see a jagged break in the water line, the kind that might come from simple corrosion or from falling rocks. The engineer stated that there was no doubt in his mind that damage had been done deliberately. It was sabotage!
As the engineers inspected the water main, they noted a strange soft humming sound. They looked up and not more than two hundred feet away was a rotating disc hovering close to the ground. It was metallic and about twenty-five feet across. My patient told me that he and his buddy were shocked. They stared at it in amazement.
They called security on the radio and explained the situation. They were told, “not to approach the UFO.” The retired engineer stated that getting any closer to the spinning saucer was the last thing he wanted to do. Armed security officers reportedly informed the men that they were coming down to check out the situation. However before they arrived, the saucer departed. I was told that from a hovering mode it pointed one side upwards and then started to climb slowly. After just a few seconds with a roar, the UFO accelerated at a tremendous speed and disappeared into the twilight.
The next day government security officials arrived and interviewed him at length. He could not recall what federal agency they said that they were from. Both men were required to make drawings of what they had seen. My patient and his co-worker were sworn to secrecy and were advised not to discuss the event.
When my interview with DOE engineer took place, he had been retired from the DOE for over a decade. He told me that his fellow witness had also retired and was living in Las Vegas. My patient said he was certain that his buddy would corroborate his sighting report. I thanked him and made final preparations for him to be admitted to the hospital.
DOE WAS LIKELY INVOLVED IN STAR WARS PROJECTS
Given the conflict-laden history of our planet’s military with UFOs, one can speculate why a flying saucer might penetrate a high security facility to carry out an act of sabotage. It should be remembered that in 1967, according to USAF missile personnel, over ten nuclear tipped rockets went “off line” (i.e. the missile could not be fired) while a red glowing UFO hovered over the front gate of the launch facility. In 2008 investigator Robert Hastings published the book “UFOs and Nukes.” In this detailed study he documents dozens of similar events from the testimony of service men that witnessed them. The event described to me in 2006 was not an isolated occurrence. It was one of many similar incidents in which UFOs penetrated secure US defense facilities.
The DOE lab in the Santa Susana Pass is known to have developed key technology in the US space program. Over four decades ago the space shuttle engines were reportedly tested at the Chatsworth DOE site. One of my patients told me that the rockets’ red glare could be seen across the entire San Fernando Valley when the tests were conducted at the crest of the Santa Susan Pass. The anti-ballistic missile program, rumored to have been developed at the DOE lab, theoretically could have been used to target and destroy flying saucers operating outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. A video taken by a US Space Shuttle mission suggests that this capability was more than just theoretical.
In his 1998 book “Confirmation”, author Whitley Strieber analyses the controversial NASA videotape made on space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-48. This video has been featured several times on national television. It displays what appears to be an unidentified flying object maneuvering outside of the Earth’s atmospheric envelope. Suddenly the UFO changes direction and few seconds later something dramatic occurs. What appears to be some sort of particle beam shoots up from below streaking by the exact location where the craft had been before it carried out its evasive maneuver. The incident transpired on September 15, 1991. The Space Shuttle Discovery was flying above Australia, approximately 1500 miles northwest from a secret US military base located at Pine Gap near Alice Springs. Strieber has provided a thorough analysis of the videotape by physicist Dr. Jack Kasher and imaging specialist Dr. Mark Carlotto. Their conclusion was that the prosaic explanation provided by NASA, that the UFO seen in the video was an ice chip, is simply not credible.
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT WAS NOT TAKING NEW WITNESSES AT THAT TIME.
In 2006, I thought that the maintenance engineer’s account was of considerable value. I asked him if he would be willing to give public testimony about what he had observed. He told me that since he was retired and no longer worked for DOE, he thought that there should be no problem. I contacted Dan Willis of the Disclosure Project. I offered my help to bring forward what I believed was important new information from a witness that had encountered a UFO in the course of his work for the federal government. Dan informed me however that no new witnesses were being interviewed at that time.
I debated whether I could on my own videotape this retired engineer. In 2006, every two weeks I commuted between my ER job in LA and Northern California where my wife resided. Although I knew my patient’s narrative provided dramatic information concerning an act of sabotage allegedly done by a flying saucer, my personal situation didn’t allow me to produce a video of his testimony. I regret not being able to better document what I consider to be an important piece of UFO history. The incident had special significance for me. The flying saucer’s alleged act of sabotage occurred in the Santa Susana Pass approximately two years before our Los Angeles CE-5 team initiated contact work during the summer of 1992.
At that time, I was convinced that our fieldwork sightings in the Santa Susana Pass of red orbs, a golden globe, and other anomalous aerial phenomena, were all the results of using the CSETI protocols. The term Dr. Greer used was “primary vectoring.” However, I am now convinced that my assessment was mistaken. We didn’t attract flying saucers to Santa Susana Pass. This is because they had already been there in force for some time. The surveillance that our team experienced from men in civilian clothing with an obvious military bearing were likely triggered by a very reasonable security concern for the safety of the base. In addition, our team was buzzed by two powerful Blackhawk helicopters during a nighttime hike towards Rocky Peak that overlooked the DOE lab.
During the five years (1992-1997) of intensive field investigations involving staging HICE/CE5s, we repeatedly found ourselves in UFO hotspots adjacent to military instillations. Why did this happen? Were these merely coincidences, or was the intelligence behind flying saucers using us as part of some kind of larger plan? These are some of the questions I hope to address in further installments of “The Contact Network History Project.”
For additional Reports from the Contact Underground, the following links are provided:
Staging Human Initiated Contact Events adjacent to a high security research lab involved challenges of surveillance for my team. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/19/did-a-fateful-phone-call-trigger-the-appearance-of-blackhawk-helicopters-during-contact-work/
What if flying saucer intelligences had access to every witness’ full treasure chest of memories?
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/do-uap-intelligences-have-full-telepathic-access-to-every-witness-storehouse-of-memories/
My human initiated contact team had immediate results when we started fieldwork, but they were not what I expected.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/mystery-lights-in-the-santa-susana-pass/

An Act of Flying Saucer Sabotage at the Department of Energy Laboratory in the Santa Susana Pass
Contact Network History Project.
Joseph Burkes MD 2019
​
The Department of Energy Research Lab was just a few miles from our high desert CE5 research site.
SPRING 2006 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
It was a slow day in ambulance area. The patient and I were alone in an examining room. I was serving as “admitting officer.” I had been asked by the ER crew to evaluate a possible admission to the hospital.
The patient was an elderly African American man. The chart indicated that he was suffering from a kidney aliment. We were crammed into a tiny private exam room. There was barely enough space to squeeze a hospital stretcher on which the patient sat. Standard patient monitoring equipment covered two walls. A tall hospital swivel tray served as my desk for the evaluation. Decades before I had been an industrial toxicology medical consultant. As part of my special interest in occupational diseases I had acquired the habit of taking a detailed work history. I asked him what was his occupational status.
HE HAD WORKED FOR THE “GOVERNMENT.”
He told me that he was retired.
From what kind of occupation?” I asked.
“I worked for the government, “was his answer.
That somewhat vague reply got me interested. From countless evaluations. I had learned that people who worked for the postal office, the FAA or US Forrest Service almost never used the cryptic expression, “government work.” However, this is a designation sometimes used by those that worked in classified projects or for defense/intelligence agencies.
I asked him what specifically his job was. He replied that he had been a physical plant engineer at the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratory in Chatsworth, a high desert suburban town in the Northwest corner of LA County’s San Fernando Valley. The DOE has a wide range of responsibilities including developing nuclear weapons. The Chatsworth DOE facility understandably was kept under high security. It was originally constructed after World War Two and had carried out top secret research in space propulsion systems. It just so happened to be located a few miles away from the desolate high desert fieldwork site that my CE-5/HICE contact team had used when we started staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) in 1992. Our field laboratory was just a few hundred yards south of the Santa Susana Pass which connects Los Angeles to Ventura County.
The DOE lab was rumored to be the place where an anti-ballistic missile defense system known back in the 1980s as “Star Wars” had been developed. The installation was built south of the Santa Susana Pass which separates the suburb of Chatsworth from another “bedroom” community called Simi Valley. Most of the people who live in the area commute to the San Fernando Valley and other parts of Los Angeles to find employment. Many of our Kaiser medical group’s patients came from these towns.
Back in the 1990s, one of the investigators on my UFO contact team was also a colleague from our med group’s Family Medicine Department. His name is Dr. David Gordon. He is a contact experiencer. Without knowing of one another’s interest in flying saucers, he and I joined both MUFON and CSETI within a month of one another in the spring of 1992. He was so well respected by his patients and colleagues alike that he had received permission from his Family Medicine Chief to do an informal survey of UFO sightings. His patients and the Woodland Hills Kaiser Medical Center staff served as the study population.
Having a much respected family practice physician on my team turned out to be a bonanza when it came to acquiring intelligence concerning ongoing UFO sightings in the area. Whenever patients of Dr. Gordon heard about local sightings, they checked out the information and then passed it on to their personal physician. He then dutifully gave the sighting reports to me, his contact team coordinator.
One of Dr. Gordon’s patients was a retired carpenter who reportedly had been employed building the DOE base in the early 1950s. His patient said that they had literally “emptied out the mountain” to construct the lab. Apparently, this was done to make it secure from aerial attack. So much dirt had to be moved, that for 3 months according to the retired carpenter, a line of dump trucks several miles long were filled with earth removed from inside the hillside. To convey how strategically important this base was during the Cold War, I share the following additional information.
BASE HAD BEEN TARGETED FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK IN CASE OF ALL OUT WAR
During the 1980s, I was an activist in the Physicians anti-nuclear weapons group called “Physicians for Responsibility (PSR). Our mission was to raise public awareness about the medical consequences of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race. We were part of an umbrella organization called “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 for bringing Soviet and Western physicians together in our educational peace campaign. When the Soviet Union fell apart in the 1990s, thus ending the Cold War, our Los Angeles PSR office held a photographic exhibition called “Nuclear Los Angeles.” We showed pictures of the nuclear artifacts in Southern California, such as missile bases and fallout shelters from the 1950s and 60s. One of the photos was an image a Soviet strategic map used to designate targets in Southern California for nuclear attack if war broke out. There was a target located in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. In clear Cyrillic letters it phonetically spelled out the name “Santa Susana.” It was the DOE lab in Chatsworth.
Another story told to Dr. Gordon by the retired carpenter that helped build the base reflects the strategic nature of the laboratory. His patient told my colleague that he required a security clearance to work underground at the base. He reportedly was only allowed to build labs and offices down to the eight floor underground. Below that level, a higher clearance was required. He wasn’t sure how far down the base went. That information was secret, but he guessed that it was at least another ten levels down inside the mountain.
I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS BASE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
The Department of Energy research facility was a dirty and dangerous place to work. Press reports in the 1980s identified this site as one where several serious environmental accidents had occurred. Back in the 1950s a nuclear reactor at the base had a partial meltdown and plutonium was leaked into the surrounding environment. One isotope of plutonium (Pu-239) has a half-life of over 24,000 years, thus making it one of the most feared environmental contaminants. Over the years, the DOE lab was cited for many safety violations with the release of other toxins. Our LA chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility was very aware of these problems with DOE installation and worked in a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups attempting to force the government to clean up the site.
Given this background information, when I evaluated the retired plant engineer from the base in 2006, I was eager to learn more about what went on there. He explained to me that his team of engineers kept the facility running properly by carrying out routine maintenance on the infrastructure at the facility. This included plumbing, electrical, and outdoor repairs.
AN AMAZING ENCOUNTER NEAR WHERE OUR TEAM OPERATED
Things were really slow in the ER that day so I thought there would be no harm if after my medical evaluation I told him about my special interest in UFOs. I asked him whether he had ever seen a UFO. His reaction was telling. With a concerned expression on his face, he turned his head from side to side to look around. I imagined that he was checking to see if anyone else besides me might be able might to hear what he was about to say.
“Yes I saw a UFO once,” was his answer. I asked him where the sighting had occurred. He replied, “It was at the base.”
We were totally alone in the tiny room, the glass sliding door was closed and a curtain allowed us privacy. Despite this, the patient had turned his head and looked around before he dared to the answer my question. I was eager to find out more about his sighting.
I mentioned to retired plant engineer that back in the 1990s I had been part of an investigative team that had a number of UFO sightings in the Santa Susana Pass. Our fieldwork site was about a few thousand yards from the DOE base perimeter. This information seemed to set him more at ease. He paused for a few moments and then I guess he decided it was safe to tell me his story.
ALARMS WENT OFF IN THE CONTROL ROOM
He wasn’t sure of the exact year that it happened. He knew that it was about fifteen years before our interview in 2006. It might have been in 1989 or 1990. He was on duty at the research lab when the alarms went off. It was late afternoon and the monitors indicated that there was a sudden loss of water pressure in the lines that supplied a several of the labs.
The facility had been built deep underground into the side of a mountain, but there were many structures on the surface as well. The retired engineer explained that on the top of the base enormous water towers supplied the entire complex. Pipes several feet across ran down from the storage towers along steep hillsides to the various labs. The mountain was composed of loose sedimentary rock, sandstone. Occasionally rockslides damaged one of these pipes. Given the distant history of a partial meltdown in a reactor with the release of plutonium, I surmised that keeping the labs supplied with coolant might be of great importance.
The plant engineer told me that a sudden loss of water pressure could only be addressed one way and he knew the drill. He and a co-worker grabbed machetes and a weed-whacker and went outside to check on the status of the water lines. Starting at the water towers, they followed the lines down the steep mountainside looking for a busted pipe. This was not an easy task. It was late afternoon, but it was still very hot outside. The water mains were partially covered with rocks and dirt. Desert plants with sharp nettles were everywhere and to top if off this was rattlesnake country.
SABOTAGE!
The maintenance engineers moved slowly because the loose sedimentary rock didn’t provide secure footing. Finally as the sun was setting, they found the busted pipe. Water was shooting upwards like a geyser. To their amazement the large conduit had been cleanly cut as if by a power tool! They had expected to see a jagged break in the water line, the kind that might come from simple corrosion or from falling rocks. The engineer stated that there was no doubt in his mind that damage had been done deliberately. It was sabotage!
As the engineers inspected the water main, they noted a strange soft humming sound. They looked up and not more than two hundred feet away was a rotating disc hovering close to the ground. It was metallic and about twenty-five feet across. My patient told me that he and his buddy were shocked. They stared at it in amazement.
They called security on the radio and explained the situation. They were told, “not to approach the UFO.” The retired engineer stated that getting any closer to the spinning saucer was the last thing he wanted to do. Armed security officers reportedly informed the men that they were coming down to check out the situation. However before they arrived, the saucer departed. I was told that from a hovering mode it pointed one side upwards and then started to climb slowly. After just a few seconds with a roar, the UFO accelerated at a tremendous speed and disappeared into the twilight.
The next day government security officials arrived and interviewed him at length. He could not recall what federal agency they said that they were from. Both men were required to make drawings of what they had seen. My patient and his co-worker were sworn to secrecy and were advised not to discuss the event.
When my interview with DOE engineer took place, he had been retired from the DOE for over a decade. He told me that his fellow witness had also retired and was living in Las Vegas. My patient said he was certain that his buddy would corroborate his sighting report. I thanked him and made final preparations for him to be admitted to the hospital.
DOE WAS LIKELY INVOLVED IN STAR WARS PROJECTS
Given the conflict-laden history of our planet’s military with UFOs, one can speculate why a flying saucer might penetrate a high security facility to carry out an act of sabotage. It should be remembered that in 1967, according to USAF missile personnel, over ten nuclear tipped rockets went “off line” (i.e. the missile could not be fired) while a red glowing UFO hovered over the front gate of the launch facility. In 2008 investigator Robert Hastings published the book “UFOs and Nukes.” In this detailed study he documents dozens of similar events from the testimony of service men that witnessed them. The event described to me in 2006 was not an isolated occurrence. It was one of many similar incidents in which UFOs penetrated secure US defense facilities.
The DOE lab in the Santa Susana Pass is known to have developed key technology in the US space program. Over four decades ago the space shuttle engines were reportedly tested at the Chatsworth DOE site. One of my patients told me that the rockets’ red glare could be seen across the entire San Fernando Valley when the tests were conducted at the crest of the Santa Susan Pass. The anti-ballistic missile program, rumored to have been developed at the DOE lab, theoretically could have been used to target and destroy flying saucers operating outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. A video taken by a US Space Shuttle mission suggests that this capability was more than just theoretical.
In his 1998 book “Confirmation”, author Whitley Strieber analyses the controversial NASA videotape made on space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-48. This video has been featured several times on national television. It displays what appears to be an unidentified flying object maneuvering outside of the Earth’s atmospheric envelope. Suddenly the UFO changes direction and few seconds later something dramatic occurs. What appears to be some sort of particle beam shoots up from below streaking by the exact location where the craft had been before it carried out its evasive maneuver. The incident transpired on September 15, 1991. The Space Shuttle Discovery was flying above Australia, approximately 1500 miles northwest from a secret US military base located at Pine Gap near Alice Springs. Strieber has provided a thorough analysis of the videotape by physicist Dr. Jack Kasher and imaging specialist Dr. Mark Carlotto. Their conclusion was that the prosaic explanation provided by NASA, that the UFO seen in the video was an ice chip, is simply not credible.
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT WAS NOT TAKING NEW WITNESSES AT THAT TIME.
In 2006, I thought that the maintenance engineer’s account was of considerable value. I asked him if he would be willing to give public testimony about what he had observed. He told me that since he was retired and no longer worked for DOE, he thought that there should be no problem. I contacted Dan Willis of the Disclosure Project. I offered my help to bring forward what I believed was important new information from a witness that had encountered a UFO in the course of his work for the federal government. Dan informed me however that no new witnesses were being interviewed at that time.
I debated whether I could on my own videotape this retired engineer. In 2006, every two weeks I commuted between my ER job in LA and Northern California where my wife resided. Although I knew my patient’s narrative provided dramatic information concerning an act of sabotage allegedly done by a flying saucer, my personal situation didn’t allow me to produce a video of his testimony. I regret not being able to better document what I consider to be an important piece of UFO history. The incident had special significance for me. The flying saucer’s alleged act of sabotage occurred in the Santa Susana Pass approximately two years before our Los Angeles CE-5 team initiated contact work during the summer of 1992.
At that time, I was convinced that our fieldwork sightings in the Santa Susana Pass of red orbs, a golden globe, and other anomalous aerial phenomena, were all the results of using the CSETI protocols. The term Dr. Greer used was “primary vectoring.” However, I am now convinced that my assessment was mistaken. We didn’t attract flying saucers to Santa Susana Pass. This is because they had already been there in force for some time. The surveillance that our team experienced from men in civilian clothing with an obvious military bearing were likely triggered by a very reasonable security concern for the safety of the base. In addition, our team was buzzed by two powerful Blackhawk helicopters during a nighttime hike towards Rocky Peak that overlooked the DOE lab.
During the five years (1992-1997) of intensive field investigations involving staging HICE/CE5s, we repeatedly found ourselves in UFO hotspots adjacent to military instillations. Why did this happen? Were these merely coincidences, or was the intelligence behind flying saucers using us as part of some kind of larger plan? These are some of the questions I hope to address in further installments of “The Contact Network History Project.”
For additional Reports from the Contact Underground, the following links are provided:
Staging Human Initiated Contact Events adjacent to a high security research lab involved challenges of surveillance for my team. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/19/did-a-fateful-phone-call-trigger-the-appearance-of-blackhawk-helicopters-during-contact-work/
What if flying saucer intelligences had access to every witness’ full treasure chest of memories?
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/do-uap-intelligences-have-full-telepathic-access-to-every-witness-storehouse-of-memories/
My human initiated contact team had immediate results when we started fieldwork, but they were not what I expected.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/mystery-lights-in-the-santa-susana-pass/

An Act of Flying Saucer Sabotage in the Santa Susana Pass
Contact Network History Project.
Joseph Burkes MD 2019
​
The Department of Energy Laboratory was just a few miles from our high desert CE5 research site/
SPRING 2006 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
It was a slow day in ambulance area. The patient and I were alone in an examining room. I was serving as “admitting officer.” I had been asked by the ER crew to evaluate a possible admission to the hospital.
The patient was an elderly African American man. The chart indicated that he was suffering from a kidney aliment. We were crammed into a tiny private exam room. There was barely enough space to squeeze a hospital stretcher on which the patient sat. Standard patient monitoring equipment covered two walls. A tall hospital swivel tray served as my desk for the evaluation. Decades before I had been an industrial toxicology medical consultant. As part of my special interest in occupational diseases I had acquired the habit of taking a detailed work history. I asked him what was his occupational status.
HE HAD WORKED FOR THE “GOVERNMENT.”
He told me that he was retired.
From what kind of occupation?” I asked.
“I worked for the government, “was his answer.
That somewhat vague reply got me interested. From countless evaluations. I had learned that people who worked for the postal office, the FAA or US Forrest Service almost never used the cryptic expression, “government work.” However, this is a designation sometimes used by those that worked in classified projects or for defense/intelligence agencies.
I asked him what specifically his job was. He replied that he had been a physical plant engineer at the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratory in Chatsworth, a high desert suburban town in the Northwest corner of LA County’s San Fernando Valley. The DOE has a wide range of responsibilities including developing nuclear weapons. The Chatsworth DOE facility understandably was kept under high security. It was originally constructed after World War Two and had carried out top secret research in space propulsion systems. It just so happened to be located a few miles away from the desolate high desert fieldwork site that my CE-5/HICE contact team had used when we started staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) in 1992. Our field laboratory was just a few hundred yards south of the Santa Susana Pass which connects Los Angeles to Ventura County.
The DOE lab was rumored to be the place where an anti-ballistic missile defense system known back in the 1980s as “Star Wars” had been developed. The installation was built south of the Santa Susana Pass which separates the suburb of Chatsworth from another “bedroom” community called Simi Valley. Most of the people who live in the area commute to the San Fernando Valley and other parts of Los Angeles to find employment. Many of our Kaiser medical group’s patients came from these towns.
Back in the 1990s, one of the investigators on my UFO contact team was also a colleague from our med group’s Family Medicine Department. His name is Dr. David Gordon. He is a contact experiencer. Without knowing of one another’s interest in flying saucers, he and I joined both MUFON and CSETI within a month of one another in the spring of 1992. He was so well respected by his patients and colleagues alike that he had received permission from his Family Medicine Chief to do an informal survey of UFO sightings. His patients and the Woodland Hills Kaiser Medical Center staff served as the study population.
Having a much respected family practice physician on my team turned out to be a bonanza when it came to acquiring intelligence concerning ongoing UFO sightings in the area. Whenever patients of Dr. Gordon heard about local sightings, they checked out the information and then passed it on to their personal physician. He then dutifully gave the sighting reports to me, his contact team coordinator.
One of Dr. Gordon’s patients was a retired carpenter who reportedly had been employed building the DOE base in the early 1950s. His patient said that they had literally “emptied out the mountain” to construct the lab. Apparently, this was done to make it secure from aerial attack. So much dirt had to be moved, that for 3 months according to the retired carpenter, a line of dump trucks several miles long were filled with earth removed from inside the hillside. To convey how strategically important this base was during the Cold War, I share the following additional information.
BASE HAD BEEN TARGETED FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK IN CASE OF ALL OUT WAR
During the 1980s, I was an activist in the Physicians anti-nuclear weapons group called “Physicians for Responsibility (PSR). Our mission was to raise public awareness about the medical consequences of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race. We were part of an umbrella organization called “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 for bringing Soviet and Western physicians together in our educational peace campaign. When the Soviet Union fell apart in the 1990s, thus ending the Cold War, our Los Angeles PSR office held a photographic exhibition called “Nuclear Los Angeles.” We showed pictures of the nuclear artifacts in Southern California, such as missile bases and fallout shelters from the 1950s and 60s. One of the photos was an image a Soviet strategic map used to designate targets in Southern California for nuclear attack if war broke out. There was a target located in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. In clear Cyrillic letters it phonetically spelled out the name “Santa Susana.” It was the DOE lab in Chatsworth.
Another story told to Dr. Gordon by the retired carpenter that helped build the base reflects the strategic nature of the laboratory. His patient told my colleague that he required a security clearance to work underground at the base. He reportedly was only allowed to build labs and offices down to the eight floor underground. Below that level, a higher clearance was required. He wasn’t sure how far down the base went. That information was secret, but he guessed that it was at least another ten levels down inside the mountain.
I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS BASE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
The Department of Energy research facility was a dirty and dangerous place to work. Press reports in the 1980s identified this site as one where several serious environmental accidents had occurred. Back in the 1950s a nuclear reactor at the base had a partial meltdown and plutonium was leaked into the surrounding environment. One isotope of plutonium (Pu-239) has a half-life of over 24,000 years, thus making it one of the most feared environmental contaminants. Over the years, the DOE lab was cited for many safety violations with the release of other toxins. Our LA chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility was very aware of these problems with DOE installation and worked in a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups attempting to force the government to clean up the site.
Given this background information, when I evaluated the retired plant engineer from the base in 2006, I was eager to learn more about what went on there. He explained to me that his team of engineers kept the facility running properly by carrying out routine maintenance on the infrastructure at the facility. This included plumbing, electrical, and outdoor repairs.
AN AMAZING ENCOUNTER NEAR WHERE OUR TEAM OPERATED
Things were really slow in the ER that day so I thought there would be no harm if after my medical evaluation I told him about my special interest in UFOs. I asked him whether he had ever seen a UFO. His reaction was telling. With a concerned expression on his face, he turned his head from side to side to look around. I imagined that he was checking to see if anyone else besides me might be able might to hear what he was about to say.
“Yes I saw a UFO once,” was his answer. I asked him where the sighting had occurred. He replied, “It was at the base.”
We were totally alone in the tiny room, the glass sliding door was closed and a curtain allowed us privacy. Despite this, the patient had turned his head and looked around before he dared to the answer my question. I was eager to find out more about his sighting.
I mentioned to retired plant engineer that back in the 1990s I had been part of an investigative team that had a number of UFO sightings in the Santa Susana Pass. Our fieldwork site was about a few thousand yards from the DOE base perimeter. This information seemed to set him more at ease. He paused for a few moments and then I guess he decided it was safe to tell me his story.
ALARMS WENT OFF IN THE CONTROL ROOM
He wasn’t sure of the exact year that it happened. He knew that it was about fifteen years before our interview in 2006. It might have been in 1989 or 1990. He was on duty at the research lab when the alarms went off. It was late afternoon and the monitors indicated that there was a sudden loss of water pressure in the lines that supplied a several of the labs.
The facility had been built deep underground into the side of a mountain, but there were many structures on the surface as well. The retired engineer explained that on the top of the base enormous water towers supplied the entire complex. Pipes several feet across ran down from the storage towers along steep hillsides to the various labs. The mountain was composed of loose sedimentary rock, sandstone. Occasionally rockslides damaged one of these pipes. Given the distant history of a partial meltdown in a reactor with the release of plutonium, I surmised that keeping the labs supplied with coolant might be of great importance.
The plant engineer told me that a sudden loss of water pressure could only be addressed one way and he knew the drill. He and a co-worker grabbed machetes and a weed-whacker and went outside to check on the status of the water lines. Starting at the water towers, they followed the lines down the steep mountainside looking for a busted pipe. This was not an easy task. It was late afternoon, but it was still very hot outside. The water mains were partially covered with rocks and dirt. Desert plants with sharp nettles were everywhere and to top if off this was rattlesnake country.
SABOTAGE!
The maintenance engineers moved slowly because the loose sedimentary rock didn’t provide secure footing. Finally as the sun was setting, they found the busted pipe. Water was shooting upwards like a geyser. To their amazement the large conduit had been cleanly cut as if by a power tool! They had expected to see a jagged break in the water line, the kind that might come from simple corrosion or from falling rocks. The engineer stated that there was no doubt in his mind that damage had been done deliberately. It was sabotage!
As the engineers inspected the water main, they noted a strange soft humming sound. They looked up and not more than two hundred feet away was a rotating disc hovering close to the ground. It was metallic and about twenty-five feet across. My patient told me that he and his buddy were shocked. They stared at it in amazement.
They called security on the radio and explained the situation. They were told, “not to approach the UFO.” The retired engineer stated that getting any closer to the spinning saucer was the last thing he wanted to do. Armed security officers reportedly informed the men that they were coming down to check out the situation. However before they arrived, the saucer departed. I was told that from a hovering mode it pointed one side upwards and then started to climb slowly. After just a few seconds with a roar, the UFO accelerated at a tremendous speed and disappeared into the twilight.
The next day government security officials arrived and interviewed him at length. He could not recall what federal agency they said that they were from. Both men were required to make drawings of what they had seen. My patient and his co-worker were sworn to secrecy and were advised not to discuss the event.
When my interview with DOE engineer took place, he had been retired from the DOE for over a decade. He told me that his fellow witness had also retired and was living in Las Vegas. My patient said he was certain that his buddy would corroborate his sighting report. I thanked him and made final preparations for him to be admitted to the hospital.
DOE WAS LIKELY INVOLVED IN STAR WARS PROJECTS
Given the conflict-laden history of our planet’s military with UFOs, one can speculate why a flying saucer might penetrate a high security facility to carry out an act of sabotage. It should be remembered that in 1967, according to USAF missile personnel, over ten nuclear tipped rockets went “off line” (i.e. the missile could not be fired) while a red glowing UFO hovered over the front gate of the launch facility. In 2008 investigator Robert Hastings published the book “UFOs and Nukes.” In this detailed study he documents dozens of similar events from the testimony of service men that witnessed them. The event described to me in 2006 was not an isolated occurrence. It was one of many similar incidents in which UFOs penetrated secure US defense facilities.
The DOE lab in the Santa Susana Pass is known to have developed key technology in the US space program. Over four decades ago the space shuttle engines were reportedly tested at the Chatsworth DOE site. One of my patients told me that the rockets’ red glare could be seen across the entire San Fernando Valley when the tests were conducted at the crest of the Santa Susan Pass. The anti-ballistic missile program, rumored to have been developed at the DOE lab, theoretically could have been used to target and destroy flying saucers operating outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. A video taken by a US Space Shuttle mission suggests that this capability was more than just theoretical.
In his 1998 book “Confirmation”, author Whitley Strieber analyses the controversial NASA videotape made on space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-48. This video has been featured several times on national television. It displays what appears to be an unidentified flying object maneuvering outside of the Earth’s atmospheric envelope. Suddenly the UFO changes direction and few seconds later something dramatic occurs. What appears to be some sort of particle beam shoots up from below streaking by the exact location where the craft had been before it carried out its evasive maneuver. The incident transpired on September 15, 1991. The Space Shuttle Discovery was flying above Australia, approximately 1500 miles northwest from a secret US military base located at Pine Gap near Alice Springs. Strieber has provided a thorough analysis of the videotape by physicist Dr. Jack Kasher and imaging specialist Dr. Mark Carlotto. Their conclusion was that the prosaic explanation provided by NASA, that the UFO seen in the video was an ice chip, is simply not credible.
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT WAS NOT TAKING NEW WITNESSES AT THAT TIME.
In 2006, I thought that the maintenance engineer’s account was of considerable value. I asked him if he would be willing to give public testimony about what he had observed. He told me that since he was retired and no longer worked for DOE, he thought that there should be no problem. I contacted Dan Willis of the Disclosure Project. I offered my help to bring forward what I believed was important new information from a witness that had encountered a UFO in the course of his work for the federal government. Dan informed me however that no new witnesses were being interviewed at that time.
I debated whether I could on my own videotape this retired engineer. In 2006, every two weeks I commuted between my ER job in LA and Northern California where my wife resided. Although I knew my patient’s narrative provided dramatic information concerning an act of sabotage allegedly done by a flying saucer, my personal situation didn’t allow me to produce a video of his testimony. I regret not being able to better document what I consider to be an important piece of UFO history. The incident had special significance for me. The flying saucer’s alleged act of sabotage occurred in the Santa Susana Pass approximately two years before our Los Angeles CE-5 team initiated contact work during the summer of 1992.
At that time, I was convinced that our fieldwork sightings in the Santa Susana Pass of red orbs, a golden globe, and other anomalous aerial phenomena, were all the results of using the CSETI protocols. The term Dr. Greer used was “primary vectoring.” However, I am now convinced that my assessment was mistaken. We didn’t attract flying saucers to Santa Susana Pass. This is because they had already been there in force for some time. The surveillance that our team experienced from men in civilian clothing with an obvious military bearing were likely triggered by a very reasonable security concern for the safety of the base. In addition, our team was buzzed by two powerful Blackhawk helicopters during a nighttime hike towards Rocky Peak that overlooked the DOE lab.
During the five years (1992-1997) of intensive field investigations involving staging HICE/CE5s, we repeatedly found ourselves in UFO hotspots adjacent to military instillations. Why did this happen? Were these merely coincidences, or was the intelligence behind flying saucers using us as part of some kind of larger plan? These are some of the questions I hope to address in further installments of “The Contact Network History Project.”
For additional Reports from the Contact Underground, the following links are provided:
Staging Human Initiated Contact Events adjacent to a high security research lab involved challenges of surveillance for my team. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/19/did-a-fateful-phone-call-trigger-the-appearance-of-blackhawk-helicopters-during-contact-work/
What if flying saucer intelligences had access to every witness’ full treasure chest of memories?
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/do-uap-intelligences-have-full-telepathic-access-to-every-witness-storehouse-of-memories/
My human initiated contact team had immediate results when we started fieldwork, but they were not what I expected.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/mystery-lights-in-the-santa-susana-pass/

An Act of Flying Saucer Sabotage in the Santa Susana Pass
Contact Network History Project.
Joseph Burkes MD 2019
​
The Department of Energy Laboratory was just a few miles from our high desert CE5 research site.
SPRING 2006 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
It was a slow day in ambulance area. The patient and I were alone in an examining room. I was serving as “admitting officer.” I had been asked by the ER crew to evaluate a possible admission to the hospital.
The patient was an elderly African American man. The chart indicated that he was suffering from a kidney aliment. We were crammed into a tiny private exam room. There was barely enough space to squeeze a hospital stretcher on which the patient sat. Standard patient monitoring equipment covered two walls. A tall hospital swivel tray served as my desk for the evaluation. Decades before I had been an industrial toxicology medical consultant. As part of my special interest in occupational diseases I had acquired the habit of taking a detailed work history. I asked him what was his occupational status.
HE HAD WORKED FOR THE “GOVERNMENT.”
He told me that he was retired.
From what kind of occupation?” I asked.
“I worked for the government, “was his answer.
That somewhat vague reply got me interested. From countless evaluations. I had learned that people who worked for the postal office, the FAA or US Forrest Service almost never used the cryptic expression, “government work.” However, this is a designation sometimes used by those that worked in classified projects or for defense/intelligence agencies.
I asked him what specifically his job was. He replied that he had been a physical plant engineer at the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratory in Chatsworth, a high desert suburban town in the Northwest corner of LA County’s San Fernando Valley. The DOE has a wide range of responsibilities including developing nuclear weapons. The Chatsworth DOE facility understandably was kept under high security. It was originally constructed after World War Two and had carried out top secret research in space propulsion systems. It just so happened to be located a few miles away from the desolate high desert fieldwork site that my CE-5/HICE contact team had used when we started staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) in 1992. Our field laboratory was just a few hundred yards south of the Santa Susana Pass which connects Los Angeles to Ventura County.
The DOE lab was rumored to be the place where an anti-ballistic missile defense system known back in the 1980s as “Star Wars” had been developed. The installation was built south of the Santa Susana Pass which separates the suburb of Chatsworth from another “bedroom” community called Simi Valley. Most of the people who live in the area commute to the San Fernando Valley and other parts of Los Angeles to find employment. Many of our Kaiser medical group’s patients came from these towns.
Back in the 1990s, one of the investigators on my UFO contact team was also a colleague from our med group’s Family Medicine Department. His name is Dr. David Gordon. He is a contact experiencer. Without knowing of one another’s interest in flying saucers, he and I joined both MUFON and CSETI within a month of one another in the spring of 1992. He was so well respected by his patients and colleagues alike that he had received permission from his Family Medicine Chief to do an informal survey of UFO sightings. His patients and the Woodland Hills Kaiser Medical Center staff served as the study population.
Having a much respected family practice physician on my team turned out to be a bonanza when it came to acquiring intelligence concerning ongoing UFO sightings in the area. Whenever patients of Dr. Gordon heard about local sightings, they checked out the information and then passed it on to their personal physician. He then dutifully gave the sighting reports to me, his contact team coordinator.
One of Dr. Gordon’s patients was a retired carpenter who reportedly had been employed building the DOE base in the early 1950s. His patient said that they had literally “emptied out the mountain” to construct the lab. Apparently, this was done to make it secure from aerial attack. So much dirt had to be moved, that for 3 months according to the retired carpenter, a line of dump trucks several miles long were filled with earth removed from inside the hillside. To convey how strategically important this base was during the Cold War, I share the following additional information.
BASE HAD BEEN TARGETED FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK IN CASE OF ALL OUT WAR
During the 1980s, I was an activist in the Physicians anti-nuclear weapons group called “Physicians for Responsibility (PSR). Our mission was to raise public awareness about the medical consequences of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race. We were part of an umbrella organization called “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 for bringing Soviet and Western physicians together in our educational peace campaign. When the Soviet Union fell apart in the 1990s, thus ending the Cold War, our Los Angeles PSR office held a photographic exhibition called “Nuclear Los Angeles.” We showed pictures of the nuclear artifacts in Southern California, such as missile bases and fallout shelters from the 1950s and 60s. One of the photos was an image a Soviet strategic map used to designate targets in Southern California for nuclear attack if war broke out. There was a target located in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. In clear Cyrillic letters it phonetically spelled out the name “Santa Susana.” It was the DOE lab in Chatsworth.
Another story told to Dr. Gordon by the retired carpenter that helped build the base reflects the strategic nature of the laboratory. His patient told my colleague that he required a security clearance to work underground at the base. He reportedly was only allowed to build labs and offices down to the eight floor underground. Below that level, a higher clearance was required. He wasn’t sure how far down the base went. That information was secret, but he guessed that it was at least another ten levels down inside the mountain.
I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS BASE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
The Department of Energy research facility was a dirty and dangerous place to work. Press reports in the 1980s identified this site as one where several serious environmental accidents had occurred. Back in the 1950s a nuclear reactor at the base had a partial meltdown and plutonium was leaked into the surrounding environment. One isotope of plutonium (Pu-239) has a half-life of over 24,000 years, thus making it one of the most feared environmental contaminants. Over the years, the DOE lab was cited for many safety violations with the release of other toxins. Our LA chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility was very aware of these problems with DOE installation and worked in a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups attempting to force the government to clean up the site.
Given this background information, when I evaluated the retired plant engineer from the base in 2006, I was eager to learn more about what went on there. He explained to me that his team of engineers kept the facility running properly by carrying out routine maintenance on the infrastructure at the facility. This included plumbing, electrical, and outdoor repairs.
AN AMAZING ENCOUNTER NEAR WHERE OUR TEAM OPERATED
Things were really slow in the ER that day so I thought there would be no harm if after my medical evaluation I told him about my special interest in UFOs. I asked him whether he had ever seen a UFO. His reaction was telling. With a concerned expression on his face, he turned his head from side to side to look around. I imagined that he was checking to see if anyone else besides me might be able might to hear what he was about to say.
“Yes I saw a UFO once,” was his answer. I asked him where the sighting had occurred. He replied, “It was at the base.”
We were totally alone in the tiny room, the glass sliding door was closed and a curtain allowed us privacy. Despite this, the patient had turned his head and looked around before he dared to the answer my question. I was eager to find out more about his sighting.
I mentioned to retired plant engineer that back in the 1990s I had been part of an investigative team that had a number of UFO sightings in the Santa Susana Pass. Our fieldwork site was about a few thousand yards from the DOE base perimeter. This information seemed to set him more at ease. He paused for a few moments and then I guess he decided it was safe to tell me his story.
ALARMS WENT OFF IN THE CONTROL ROOM
He wasn’t sure of the exact year that it happened. He knew that it was about fifteen years before our interview in 2006. It might have been in 1989 or 1990. He was on duty at the research lab when the alarms went off. It was late afternoon and the monitors indicated that there was a sudden loss of water pressure in the lines that supplied a several of the labs.
The facility had been built deep underground into the side of a mountain, but there were many structures on the surface as well. The retired engineer explained that on the top of the base enormous water towers supplied the entire complex. Pipes several feet across ran down from the storage towers along steep hillsides to the various labs. The mountain was composed of loose sedimentary rock, sandstone. Occasionally rockslides damaged one of these pipes. Given the distant history of a partial meltdown in a reactor with the release of plutonium, I surmised that keeping the labs supplied with coolant might be of great importance.
The plant engineer told me that a sudden loss of water pressure could only be addressed one way and he knew the drill. He and a co-worker grabbed machetes and a weed-whacker and went outside to check on the status of the water lines. Starting at the water towers, they followed the lines down the steep mountainside looking for a busted pipe. This was not an easy task. It was late afternoon, but it was still very hot outside. The water mains were partially covered with rocks and dirt. Desert plants with sharp nettles were everywhere and to top if off this was rattlesnake country.
SABOTAGE!
The maintenance engineers moved slowly because the loose sedimentary rock didn’t provide secure footing. Finally as the sun was setting, they found the busted pipe. Water was shooting upwards like a geyser. To their amazement the large conduit had been cleanly cut as if by a power tool! They had expected to see a jagged break in the water line, the kind that might come from simple corrosion or from falling rocks. The engineer stated that there was no doubt in his mind that damage had been done deliberately. It was sabotage!
As the engineers inspected the water main, they noted a strange soft humming sound. They looked up and not more than two hundred feet away was a rotating disc hovering close to the ground. It was metallic and about twenty-five feet across. My patient told me that he and his buddy were shocked. They stared at it in amazement.
They called security on the radio and explained the situation. They were told, “not to approach the UFO.” The retired engineer stated that getting any closer to the spinning saucer was the last thing he wanted to do. Armed security officers reportedly informed the men that they were coming down to check out the situation. However before they arrived, the saucer departed. I was told that from a hovering mode it pointed one side upwards and then started to climb slowly. After just a few seconds with a roar, the UFO accelerated at a tremendous speed and disappeared into the twilight.
The next day government security officials arrived and interviewed him at length. He could not recall what federal agency they said that they were from. Both men were required to make drawings of what they had seen. My patient and his co-worker were sworn to secrecy and were advised not to discuss the event.
When my interview with DOE engineer took place, he had been retired from the DOE for over a decade. He told me that his fellow witness had also retired and was living in Las Vegas. My patient said he was certain that his buddy would corroborate his sighting report. I thanked him and made final preparations for him to be admitted to the hospital.
DOE WAS LIKELY INVOLVED IN STAR WARS PROJECTS
Given the conflict-laden history of our planet’s military with UFOs, one can speculate why a flying saucer might penetrate a high security facility to carry out an act of sabotage. It should be remembered that in 1967, according to USAF missile personnel, over ten nuclear tipped rockets went “off line” (i.e. the missile could not be fired) while a red glowing UFO hovered over the front gate of the launch facility. In 2008 investigator Robert Hastings published the book “UFOs and Nukes.” In this detailed study he documents dozens of similar events from the testimony of service men that witnessed them. The event described to me in 2006 was not an isolated occurrence. It was one of many similar incidents in which UFOs penetrated secure US defense facilities.
The DOE lab in the Santa Susana Pass is known to have developed key technology in the US space program. Over four decades ago the space shuttle engines were reportedly tested at the Chatsworth DOE site. One of my patients told me that the rockets’ red glare could be seen across the entire San Fernando Valley when the tests were conducted at the crest of the Santa Susan Pass. The anti-ballistic missile program, rumored to have been developed at the DOE lab, theoretically could have been used to target and destroy flying saucers operating outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. A video taken by a US Space Shuttle mission suggests that this capability was more than just theoretical.
In his 1998 book “Confirmation”, author Whitley Strieber analyses the controversial NASA videotape made on space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-48. This video has been featured several times on national television. It displays what appears to be an unidentified flying object maneuvering outside of the Earth’s atmospheric envelope. Suddenly the UFO changes direction and few seconds later something dramatic occurs. What appears to be some sort of particle beam shoots up from below streaking by the exact location where the craft had been before it carried out its evasive maneuver. The incident transpired on September 15, 1991. The Space Shuttle Discovery was flying above Australia, approximately 1500 miles northwest from a secret US military base located at Pine Gap near Alice Springs. Strieber has provided a thorough analysis of the videotape by physicist Dr. Jack Kasher and imaging specialist Dr. Mark Carlotto. Their conclusion was that the prosaic explanation provided by NASA, that the UFO seen in the video was an ice chip, is simply not credible.
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT WAS NOT TAKING NEW WITNESSES AT THAT TIME.
In 2006, I thought that the maintenance engineer’s account was of considerable value. I asked him if he would be willing to give public testimony about what he had observed. He told me that since he was retired and no longer worked for DOE, he thought that there should be no problem. I contacted Dan Willis of the Disclosure Project. I offered my help to bring forward what I believed was important new information from a witness that had encountered a UFO in the course of his work for the federal government. Dan informed me however that no new witnesses were being interviewed at that time.
I debated whether I could on my own videotape this retired engineer. In 2006, every two weeks I commuted between my ER job in LA and Northern California where my wife resided. Although I knew my patient’s narrative provided dramatic information concerning an act of sabotage allegedly done by a flying saucer, my personal situation didn’t allow me to produce a video of his testimony. I regret not being able to better document what I consider to be an important piece of UFO history. The incident had special significance for me. The flying saucer’s alleged act of sabotage occurred in the Santa Susana Pass approximately two years before our Los Angeles CE-5 team initiated contact work during the summer of 1992.
At that time, I was convinced that our fieldwork sightings in the Santa Susana Pass of red orbs, a golden globe, and other anomalous aerial phenomena, were all the results of using the CSETI protocols. The term Dr. Greer used was “primary vectoring.” However, I am now convinced that my assessment was mistaken. We didn’t attract flying saucers to Santa Susana Pass. This is because they had already been there in force for some time. The surveillance that our team experienced from men in civilian clothing with an obvious military bearing were likely triggered by a very reasonable security concern for the safety of the base. In addition, our team was buzzed by two powerful Blackhawk helicopters during a nighttime hike towards Rocky Peak that overlooked the DOE lab.
During the five years (1992-1997) of intensive field investigations involving staging HICE/CE5s, we repeatedly found ourselves in UFO hotspots adjacent to military instillations. Why did this happen? Were these merely coincidences, or was the intelligence behind flying saucers using us as part of some kind of larger plan? These are some of the questions I hope to address in further installments of “The Contact Network History Project.”
For additional Reports from the Contact Underground, the following links are provided:
Staging Human Initiated Contact Events adjacent to a high security research lab involved challenges of surveillance for my team. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/19/did-a-fateful-phone-call-trigger-the-appearance-of-blackhawk-helicopters-during-contact-work/
What if flying saucer intelligences had access to every witness’ full treasure chest of memories?
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/do-uap-intelligences-have-full-telepathic-access-to-every-witness-storehouse-of-memories/
My human initiated contact team had immediate results when we started fieldwork, but they were not what I expected.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/mystery-lights-in-the-santa-susana-pass/

An Act of Flying Saucer Sabotage in the Santa Susana Pass
Contact Network History Project.
Joseph Burkes MD 2019
​
The Department of Energy Laboratory was just a few miles from our high desert CE5 research site.
SPRING 2006 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
It was a slow day in ambulance area. The patient and I were alone in an examining room. I was serving as “admitting officer.” I had been asked by the ER crew to evaluate a possible admission to the hospital.
The patient was an elderly African American man. The chart indicated that he was suffering from a kidney aliment. We were crammed into a tiny private exam room. There was barely enough space to squeeze a hospital stretcher on which the patient sat. Standard patient monitoring equipment covered two walls. A tall hospital swivel tray served as my desk for the evaluation. Decades before I had been an industrial toxicology medical consultant. As part of my special interest in occupational diseases I had acquired the habit of taking a detailed work history. I asked him what was his occupational status.
HE HAD WORKED FOR THE “GOVERNMENT.”
He told me that he was retired.
From what kind of occupation?” I asked.
“I worked for the government, “was his answer.
That somewhat vague reply got me interested. From countless evaluations. I had learned that people who worked for the postal office, the FAA or US Forrest Service almost never used the cryptic expression, “government work.” However, this is a designation sometimes used by those that worked in classified projects or for defense/intelligence agencies.
I asked him what specifically his job was. He replied that he had been a physical plant engineer at the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratory in Chatsworth, a high desert suburban town in the Northwest corner of LA County’s San Fernando Valley. The DOE has a wide range of responsibilities including developing nuclear weapons. The Chatsworth DOE facility understandably was kept under high security. It was originally constructed after World War Two and had carried out top secret research in space propulsion systems. It just so happened to be located a few miles away from the desolate high desert fieldwork site that my CE-5/HICE contact team had used when we started staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) in 1992. Our field laboratory was just a few hundred yards south of the Santa Susana Pass which connects Los Angeles to Ventura County.
The DOE lab was rumored to be the place where an anti-ballistic missile defense system known back in the 1980s as “Star Wars” had been developed. The installation was built south of the Santa Susana Pass which separates the suburb of Chatsworth from another “bedroom” community called Simi Valley. Most of the people who live in the area commute to the San Fernando Valley and other parts of Los Angeles to find employment. Many of our Kaiser medical group’s patients came from these towns.
Back in the 1990s, one of the investigators on my UFO contact team was also a colleague from our med group’s Family Medicine Department. His name is Dr. David Gordon. He is a contact experiencer. Without knowing of one another’s interest in flying saucers, he and I joined both MUFON and CSETI within a month of one another in the spring of 1992. He was so well respected by his patients and colleagues alike that he had received permission from his Family Medicine Chief to do an informal survey of UFO sightings. His patients and the Woodland Hills Kaiser Medical Center staff served as the study population.
Having a much respected family practice physician on my team turned out to be a bonanza when it came to acquiring intelligence concerning ongoing UFO sightings in the area. Whenever patients of Dr. Gordon heard about local sightings, they checked out the information and then passed it on to their personal physician. He then dutifully gave the sighting reports to me, his contact team coordinator.
One of Dr. Gordon’s patients was a retired carpenter who reportedly had been employed building the DOE base in the early 1950s. His patient said that they had literally “emptied out the mountain” to construct the lab. Apparently, this was done to make it secure from aerial attack. So much dirt had to be moved, that for 3 months according to the retired carpenter, a line of dump trucks several miles long were filled with earth removed from inside the hillside. To convey how strategically important this base was during the Cold War, I share the following additional information.
BASE HAD BEEN TARGETED FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK IN CASE OF ALL OUT WAR
During the 1980s, I was an activist in the Physicians anti-nuclear weapons group called “Physicians for Responsibility (PSR). Our mission was to raise public awareness about the medical consequences of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race. We were part of an umbrella organization called “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 for bringing Soviet and Western physicians together in our educational peace campaign. When the Soviet Union fell apart in the 1990s, thus ending the Cold War, our Los Angeles PSR office held a photographic exhibition called “Nuclear Los Angeles.” We showed pictures of the nuclear artifacts in Southern California, such as missile bases and fallout shelters from the 1950s and 60s. One of the photos was an image a Soviet strategic map used to designate targets in Southern California for nuclear attack if war broke out. There was a target located in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. In clear Cyrillic letters it phonetically spelled out the name “Santa Susana.” It was the DOE lab in Chatsworth.
Another story told to Dr. Gordon by the retired carpenter that helped build the base reflects the strategic nature of the laboratory. His patient told my colleague that he required a security clearance to work underground at the base. He reportedly was only allowed to build labs and offices down to the eight floor underground. Below that level, a higher clearance was required. He wasn’t sure how far down the base went. That information was secret, but he guessed that it was at least another ten levels down inside the mountain.
I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS BASE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
The Department of Energy research facility was a dirty and dangerous place to work. Press reports in the 1980s identified this site as one where several serious environmental accidents had occurred. Back in the 1950s a nuclear reactor at the base had a partial meltdown and plutonium was leaked into the surrounding environment. One isotope of plutonium (Pu-239) has a half-life of over 24,000 years, thus making it one of the most feared environmental contaminants. Over the years, the DOE lab was cited for many safety violations with the release of other toxins. Our LA chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility was very aware of these problems with DOE installation and worked in a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups attempting to force the government to clean up the site.
Given this background information, when I evaluated the retired plant engineer from the base in 2006, I was eager to learn more about what went on there. He explained to me that his team of engineers kept the facility running properly by carrying out routine maintenance on the infrastructure at the facility. This included plumbing, electrical, and outdoor repairs.
AN AMAZING ENCOUNTER NEAR WHERE OUR TEAM OPERATED
Things were really slow in the ER that day so I thought there would be no harm if after my medical evaluation I told him about my special interest in UFOs. I asked him whether he had ever seen a UFO. His reaction was telling. With a concerned expression on his face, he turned his head from side to side to look around. I imagined that he was checking to see if anyone else besides me might be able might to hear what he was about to say.
“Yes I saw a UFO once,” was his answer. I asked him where the sighting had occurred. He replied, “It was at the base.”
We were totally alone in the tiny room, the glass sliding door was closed and a curtain allowed us privacy. Despite this, the patient had turned his head and looked around before he dared to the answer my question. I was eager to find out more about his sighting.
I mentioned to retired plant engineer that back in the 1990s I had been part of an investigative team that had a number of UFO sightings in the Santa Susana Pass. Our fieldwork site was about a few thousand yards from the DOE base perimeter. This information seemed to set him more at ease. He paused for a few moments and then I guess he decided it was safe to tell me his story.
ALARMS WENT OFF IN THE CONTROL ROOM
He wasn’t sure of the exact year that it happened. He knew that it was about fifteen years before our interview in 2006. It might have been in 1989 or 1990. He was on duty at the research lab when the alarms went off. It was late afternoon and the monitors indicated that there was a sudden loss of water pressure in the lines that supplied a several of the labs.
The facility had been built deep underground into the side of a mountain, but there were many structures on the surface as well. The retired engineer explained that on the top of the base enormous water towers supplied the entire complex. Pipes several feet across ran down from the storage towers along steep hillsides to the various labs. The mountain was composed of loose sedimentary rock, sandstone. Occasionally rockslides damaged one of these pipes. Given the distant history of a partial meltdown in a reactor with the release of plutonium, I surmised that keeping the labs supplied with coolant might be of great importance.
The plant engineer told me that a sudden loss of water pressure could only be addressed one way and he knew the drill. He and a co-worker grabbed machetes and a weed-whacker and went outside to check on the status of the water lines. Starting at the water towers, they followed the lines down the steep mountainside looking for a busted pipe. This was not an easy task. It was late afternoon, but it was still very hot outside. The water mains were partially covered with rocks and dirt. Desert plants with sharp nettles were everywhere and to top if off this was rattlesnake country.
SABOTAGE!
The maintenance engineers moved slowly because the loose sedimentary rock didn’t provide secure footing. Finally as the sun was setting, they found the busted pipe. Water was shooting upwards like a geyser. To their amazement the large conduit had been cleanly cut as if by a power tool! They had expected to see a jagged break in the water line, the kind that might come from simple corrosion or from falling rocks. The engineer stated that there was no doubt in his mind that damage had been done deliberately. It was sabotage!
As the engineers inspected the water main, they noted a strange soft humming sound. They looked up and not more than two hundred feet away was a rotating disc hovering close to the ground. It was metallic and about twenty-five feet across. My patient told me that he and his buddy were shocked. They stared at it in amazement.
They called security on the radio and explained the situation. They were told, “not to approach the UFO.” The retired engineer stated that getting any closer to the spinning saucer was the last thing he wanted to do. Armed security officers reportedly informed the men that they were coming down to check out the situation. However before they arrived, the saucer departed. I was told that from a hovering mode it pointed one side upwards and then started to climb slowly. After just a few seconds with a roar, the UFO accelerated at a tremendous speed and disappeared into the twilight.
The next day government security officials arrived and interviewed him at length. He could not recall what federal agency they said that they were from. Both men were required to make drawings of what they had seen. My patient and his co-worker were sworn to secrecy and were advised not to discuss the event.
When my interview with DOE engineer took place, he had been retired from the DOE for over a decade. He told me that his fellow witness had also retired and was living in Las Vegas. My patient said he was certain that his buddy would corroborate his sighting report. I thanked him and made final preparations for him to be admitted to the hospital.
DOE WAS LIKELY INVOLVED IN STAR WARS PROJECTS
Given the conflict-laden history of our planet’s military with UFOs, one can speculate why a flying saucer might penetrate a high security facility to carry out an act of sabotage. It should be remembered that in 1967, according to USAF missile personnel, over ten nuclear tipped rockets went “off line” (i.e. the missile could not be fired) while a red glowing UFO hovered over the front gate of the launch facility. In 2008 investigator Robert Hastings published the book “UFOs and Nukes.” In this detailed study he documents dozens of similar events from the testimony of service men that witnessed them. The event described to me in 2006 was not an isolated occurrence. It was one of many similar incidents in which UFOs penetrated secure US defense facilities.
The DOE lab in the Santa Susana Pass is known to have developed key technology in the US space program. Over four decades ago the space shuttle engines were reportedly tested at the Chatsworth DOE site. One of my patients told me that the rockets’ red glare could be seen across the entire San Fernando Valley when the tests were conducted at the crest of the Santa Susan Pass. The anti-ballistic missile program, rumored to have been developed at the DOE lab, theoretically could have been used to target and destroy flying saucers operating outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. A video taken by a US Space Shuttle mission suggests that this capability was more than just theoretical.
In his 1998 book “Confirmation”, author Whitley Strieber analyses the controversial NASA videotape made on space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-48. This video has been featured several times on national television. It displays what appears to be an unidentified flying object maneuvering outside of the Earth’s atmospheric envelope. Suddenly the UFO changes direction and few seconds later something dramatic occurs. What appears to be some sort of particle beam shoots up from below streaking by the exact location where the craft had been before it carried out its evasive maneuver. The incident transpired on September 15, 1991. The Space Shuttle Discovery was flying above Australia, approximately 1500 miles northwest from a secret US military base located at Pine Gap near Alice Springs. Strieber has provided a thorough analysis of the videotape by physicist Dr. Jack Kasher and imaging specialist Dr. Mark Carlotto. Their conclusion was that the prosaic explanation provided by NASA, that the UFO seen in the video was an ice chip, is simply not credible.
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT WAS NOT TAKING NEW WITNESSES AT THAT TIME.
In 2006, I thought that the maintenance engineer’s account was of considerable value. I asked him if he would be willing to give public testimony about what he had observed. He told me that since he was retired and no longer worked for DOE, he thought that there should be no problem. I contacted Dan Willis of the Disclosure Project. I offered my help to bring forward what I believed was important new information from a witness that had encountered a UFO in the course of his work for the federal government. Dan informed me however that no new witnesses were being interviewed at that time.
I debated whether I could on my own videotape this retired engineer. In 2006, every two weeks I commuted between my ER job in LA and Northern California where my wife resided. Although I knew my patient’s narrative provided dramatic information concerning an act of sabotage allegedly done by a flying saucer, my personal situation didn’t allow me to produce a video of his testimony. I regret not being able to better document what I consider to be an important piece of UFO history. The incident had special significance for me. The flying saucer’s alleged act of sabotage occurred in the Santa Susana Pass approximately two years before our Los Angeles CE-5 team initiated contact work during the summer of 1992.
At that time, I was convinced that our fieldwork sightings in the Santa Susana Pass of red orbs, a golden globe, and other anomalous aerial phenomena, were all the results of using the CSETI protocols. The term Dr. Greer used was “primary vectoring.” However, I am now convinced that my assessment was mistaken. We didn’t attract flying saucers to Santa Susana Pass. This is because they had already been there in force for some time. The surveillance that our team experienced from men in civilian clothing with an obvious military bearing were likely triggered by a very reasonable security concern for the safety of the base. In addition, our team was buzzed by two powerful Blackhawk helicopters during a nighttime hike towards Rocky Peak that overlooked the DOE lab.
During the five years (1992-1997) of intensive field investigations involving staging HICE/CE5s, we repeatedly found ourselves in UFO hotspots adjacent to military instillations. Why did this happen? Were these merely coincidences, or was the intelligence behind flying saucers using us as part of some kind of larger plan? These are some of the questions I hope to address in further installments of “The Contact Network History Project.”
For additional Reports from the Contact Underground, the following links are provided:
Staging Human Initiated Contact Events adjacent to a high security research lab involved challenges of surveillance for my team. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/19/did-a-fateful-phone-call-trigger-the-appearance-of-blackhawk-helicopters-during-contact-work/
What if flying saucer intelligences had access to every witness’ full treasure chest of memories?
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/do-uap-intelligences-have-full-telepathic-access-to-every-witness-storehouse-of-memories/
My human initiated contact team had immediate results when we started fieldwork, but they were not what I expected.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/mystery-lights-in-the-santa-susana-pass/

An Act of Flying Saucer Sabotage in the Santa Susana Pass
Contact Network History Project.
Joseph Burkes MD 2019
​
The Department of Energy Laboratory was just a few miles from our high desert CE5 research site.
SPRING 2006 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER
It was a slow day in ambulance area. The patient and I were alone in an examining room. I was serving as “admitting officer.” I had been asked by the ER crew to evaluate a possible admission to the hospital.
The patient was an elderly African American man. The chart indicated that he was suffering from a kidney aliment. We were crammed into a tiny private exam room. There was barely enough space to squeeze a hospital stretcher on which the patient sat. Standard patient monitoring equipment covered two walls. A tall hospital swivel tray served as my desk for the evaluation. Decades before I had been an industrial toxicology medical consultant. As part of my special interest in occupational diseases I had acquired the habit of taking a detailed work history. I asked him what was his occupational status.
HE HAD WORKED FOR THE “GOVERNMENT.”
He told me that he was retired.
From what kind of occupation?” I asked.
“I worked for the government, “ was his answer.
That somewhat vague reply got me interested. From countless evaluations. I had learned that people who worked for the postal office, the FAA or US Forrest Service almost never used the cryptic expression, “government work.” However, this is a designation sometimes used by those that worked in classified projects or for defense/intelligence agencies.
I asked him what specifically his job was. He replied that he had been a physical plant engineer at the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratory in Chatsworth, a high desert suburban town in the Northwest corner of LA County’s San Fernando Valley. The DOE has a wide range of responsibilities including developing nuclear weapons. The Chatsworth DOE facility understandably was kept under high security. It was originally constructed after World War Two and had carried out top secret research in space propulsion systems. It just so happened to be located a few miles away from the desolate high desert fieldwork site that my CE-5/HICE contact team had used when we started staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) in 1992. Our field laboratory was just a few hundred yards south of the Santa Susana Pass which connects Los Angeles to Ventura County.
The DOE lab was rumored to be the place where an anti-ballistic missile defense system known back in the 1980s as “Star Wars” had been developed. The installation was built south of the Santa Susana Pass which separates the suburb of Chatsworth from another “bedroom” community called Simi Valley. Most of the people who live in the area commute to the San Fernando Valley and other parts of Los Angeles to find employment. Many of our Kaiser medical group’s patients came from these towns.
Back in the 1990s, one of the investigators on my UFO contact team was also a colleague from our med group’s Family Medicine Department. His name is Dr. David Gordon. He is a contact experiencer. Without knowing of one another’s interest in flying saucers, he and I joined both MUFON and CSETI within a month of one another in the spring of 1992. He was so well respected by his patients and colleagues alike that he had received permission from his Family Medicine Chief to do an informal survey of UFO sightings. His patients and the Woodland Hills Kaiser Medical Center staff served as the study population.
Having a much respected family practice physician on my team turned out to be a bonanza when it came to acquiring intelligence concerning ongoing UFO sightings in the area. Whenever patients of Dr. Gordon heard about local sightings, they checked out the information and then passed it on to their personal physician. He then dutifully gave the sighting reports to me, his contact team coordinator.
One of Dr. Gordon’s patients was a retired carpenter who reportedly had been employed building the DOE base in the early 1950s. His patient said that they had literally “emptied out the mountain” to construct the lab. Apparently, this was done to make it secure from aerial attack. So much dirt had to be moved, that for 3 months according to the retired carpenter, a line of dump trucks several miles long were filled with earth removed from inside the hillside. To convey how strategically important this base was during the Cold War, I share the following additional information.
BASE HAD BEEN TARGETED FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK IN CASE OF ALL OUT WAR
During the 1980s, I was an activist in the Physicians anti-nuclear weapons group called “Physicians for Responsibility (PSR). Our mission was to raise public awareness about the medical consequences of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race. We were part of an umbrella organization called “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 for bringing Soviet and Western physicians together in our educational peace campaign. When the Soviet Union fell apart in the 1990s, thus ending the Cold War, our Los Angeles PSR office held a photographic exhibition called “Nuclear Los Angeles.” We showed pictures of the nuclear artifacts in Southern California, such as missile bases and fallout shelters from the 1950s and 60s. One of the photos was an image a Soviet strategic map used to designate targets in Southern California for nuclear attack if war broke out. There was a target located in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. In clear Cyrillic letters it phonetically spelled out the name “Santa Susana.” It was the DOE lab in Chatsworth.
Another story told to Dr. Gordon by the retired carpenter that helped build the base reflects the strategic nature of the laboratory. His patient told my colleague that he required a security clearance to work underground at the base. He reportedly was only allowed to build labs and offices down to the eight floor underground. Below that level, a higher clearance was required. He wasn’t sure how far down the base went. That information was secret, but he guessed that it was at least another ten levels down inside the mountain.
I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS BASE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
The Department of Energy research facility was a dirty and dangerous place to work. Press reports in the 1980s identified this site as one where several serious environmental accidents had occurred. Back in the 1950s a nuclear reactor at the base had a partial meltdown and plutonium was leaked into the surrounding environment. One isotope of plutonium (Pu-239) has a half-life of over 24,000 years, thus making it one of the most feared environmental contaminants. Over the years, the DOE lab was cited for many safety violations with the release of other toxins. Our LA chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility was very aware of these problems with DOE installation and worked in a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups attempting to force the government to clean up the site.
Given this background information, when I evaluated the retired plant engineer from the base in 2006, I was eager to learn more about what went on there. He explained to me that his team of engineers kept the facility running properly by carrying out routine maintenance on the infrastructure at the facility. This included plumbing, electrical, and outdoor repairs.
AN AMAZING ENCOUNTER NEAR WHERE OUR TEAM OPERATED
Things were really slow in the ER that day so I thought there would be no harm if after my medical evaluation I told him about my special interest in UFOs. I asked him whether he had ever seen a UFO. His reaction was telling. With a concerned expression on his face, he turned his head from side to side to look around. I imagined that he was checking to see if anyone else besides me might be able might to hear what he was about to say.
“Yes I saw a UFO once,” was his answer. I asked him where the sighting had occurred. He replied, “It was at the base.”
We were totally alone in the tiny room, the glass sliding door was closed and a curtain allowed us privacy. Despite this, the patient had turned his head and looked around before he dared to the answer my question. I was eager to find out more about his sighting.
I mentioned to retired plant engineer that back in the 1990s I had been part of an investigative team that had a number of UFO sightings in the Santa Susana Pass. Our fieldwork site was about a few thousand yards from the DOE base perimeter. This information seemed to set him more at ease. He paused for a few moments and then I guess he decided it was safe to tell me his story.
ALARMS WENT OFF IN THE CONTROL ROOM
He wasn’t sure of the exact year that it happened. He knew that it was about fifteen years before our interview in 2006. It might have been in 1989 or 1990. He was on duty at the research lab when the alarms went off. It was late afternoon and the monitors indicated that there was a sudden loss of water pressure in the lines that supplied a several of the labs.
The facility had been built deep underground into the side of a mountain, but there were many structures on the surface as well. The retired engineer explained that on the top of the base enormous water towers supplied the entire complex. Pipes several feet across ran down from the storage towers along steep hillsides to the various labs. The mountain was composed of loose sedimentary rock, sandstone. Occasionally rockslides damaged one of these pipes. Given the distant history of a partial meltdown in a reactor with the release of plutonium, I surmised that keeping the labs supplied with coolant might be of great importance.
The plant engineer told me that a sudden loss of water pressure could only be addressed one way and he knew the drill. He and a co-worker grabbed machetes and a weed-whacker and went outside to check on the status of the water lines. Starting at the water towers, they followed the lines down the steep mountainside looking for a busted pipe. This was not an easy task. It was late afternoon, but it was still very hot outside. The water mains were partially covered with rocks and dirt. Desert plants with sharp nettles were everywhere and to top if off this was rattlesnake country.
SABOTAGE!
The maintenance engineers moved slowly because the loose sedimentary rock didn’t provide secure footing. Finally as the sun was setting, they found the busted pipe. Water was shooting upwards like a geyser. To their amazement the large conduit had been cleanly cut as if by a power tool! They had expected to see a jagged break in the water line, the kind that might come from simple corrosion or from falling rocks. The engineer stated that there was no doubt in his mind that damage had been done deliberately. It was sabotage!
As the engineers inspected the water main, they noted a strange soft humming sound. They looked up and not more than two hundred feet away was a rotating disc hovering close to the ground. It was metallic and about twenty-five feet across. My patient told me that he and his buddy were shocked. They stared at it in amazement.
They called security on the radio and explained the situation. They were told, “not to approach the UFO.” The retired engineer stated that getting any closer to the spinning saucer was the last thing he wanted to do. Armed security officers reportedly informed the men that they were coming down to check out the situation. However before they arrived, the saucer departed. I was told that from a hovering mode it pointed one side upwards and then started to climb slowly. After just a few seconds with a roar, the UFO accelerated at a tremendous speed and disappeared into the twilight.
The next day government security officials arrived and interviewed him at length. He could not recall what federal agency they said that they were from. Both men were required to make drawings of what they had seen. My patient and his co-worker were sworn to secrecy and were advised not to discuss the event.
When my interview with DOE engineer took place, he had been retired from the DOE for over a decade. He told me that his fellow witness had also retired and was living in Las Vegas. My patient said he was certain that his buddy would corroborate his sighting report. I thanked him and made final preparations for him to be admitted to the hospital.
DOE WAS LIKELY INVOLVED IN STAR WARS PROJECTS
Given the conflict-laden history of our planet’s military with UFOs, one can speculate why a flying saucer might penetrate a high security facility to carry out an act of sabotage. It should be remembered that in 1967, according to USAF missile personnel, over ten nuclear tipped rockets went “off line” (i.e. the missile could not be fired) while a red glowing UFO hovered over the front gate of the launch facility. In 2008 investigator Robert Hastings published the book “UFOs and Nukes.” In this detailed study he documents dozens of similar events from the testimony of service men that witnessed them. The event described to me in 2006 was not an isolated occurrence. It was one of many similar incidents in which UFOs penetrated secure US defense facilities.
The DOE lab in the Santa Susana Pass is known to have developed key technology in the US space program. Over four decades ago the space shuttle engines were reportedly tested at the Chatsworth DOE site. One of my patients told me that the rockets’ red glare could be seen across the entire San Fernando Valley when the tests were conducted at the crest of the Santa Susan Pass. The anti-ballistic missile program, rumored to have been developed at the DOE lab, theoretically could have been used to target and destroy flying saucers operating outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. A video taken by a US Space Shuttle mission suggests that this capability was more than just theoretical.
In his 1998 book “Confirmation”, author Whitley Strieber analyses the controversial NASA videotape made on space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-48. This video has been featured several times on national television. It displays what appears to be an unidentified flying object maneuvering outside of the Earth’s atmospheric envelope. Suddenly the UFO changes direction and few seconds later something dramatic occurs. What appears to be some sort of particle beam shoots up from below streaking by the exact location where the craft had been before it carried out its evasive maneuver. The incident transpired on September 15, 1991. The Space Shuttle Discovery was flying above Australia, approximately 1500 miles northwest from a secret US military base located at Pine Gap near Alice Springs. Strieber has provided a thorough analysis of the videotape by physicist Dr. Jack Kasher and imaging specialist Dr. Mark Carlotto. Their conclusion was that the prosaic explanation provided by NASA, that the UFO seen in the video was an ice chip, is simply not credible.
THE DISCLOSURE PROJECT WAS NOT TAKING NEW WITNESSES AT THAT TIME.
In 2006, I thought that the maintenance engineer’s account was of considerable value. I asked him if he would be willing to give public testimony about what he had observed. He told me that since he was retired and no longer worked for DOE, he thought that there should be no problem. I contacted Dan Willis of the Disclosure Project. I offered my help to bring forward what I believed was important new information from a witness that had encountered a UFO in the course of his work for the federal government. Dan informed me however that no new witnesses were being interviewed at that time.
I debated whether I could on my own videotape this retired engineer. In 2006, every two weeks I commuted between my ER job in LA and Northern California where my wife resided. Although I knew my patient’s narrative provided dramatic information concerning an act of sabotage allegedly done by a flying saucer, my personal situation didn’t allow me to produce a video of his testimony. I regret not being able to better document what I consider to be an important piece of UFO history. The incident had special significance for me. The flying saucer’s alleged act of sabotage occurred in the Santa Susana Pass approximately two years before our Los Angeles CE-5 team initiated contact work during the summer of 1992.
At that time, I was convinced that our fieldwork sightings in the Santa Susana Pass of red orbs, a golden globe, and other anomalous aerial phenomena, were all the results of using the CSETI protocols. The term Dr. Greer used was “primary vectoring.” However, I am now convinced that my assessment was mistaken. We didn’t attract flying saucers to Santa Susana Pass. This is because they had already been there in force for some time. The surveillance that our team experienced from men in civilian clothing with an obvious military bearing were likely triggered by a very reasonable security concern for the safety of the base. In addition, our team was buzzed by two powerful Blackhawk helicopters during a nighttime hike towards Rocky Peak that overlooked the DOE lab.
During the five years (1992-1997) of intensive field investigations involving staging HICE/CE5s, we repeatedly found ourselves in UFO hotspots adjacent to military instillations. Why did this happen? Were these merely coincidences, or was the intelligence behind flying saucers using us as part of some kind of larger plan? These are some of the questions I hope to address in further installments of “The Contact Network History Project.”
For additional Reports from the Contact Underground, the following links are provided:
Staging Human Initiated Contact Events adjacent to a high security research lab involved challenges of surveillance for my team. https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/05/19/did-a-fateful-phone-call-trigger-the-appearance-of-blackhawk-helicopters-during-contact-work/
What if flying saucer intelligences had access to every witness’ full treasure chest of memories?
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/do-uap-intelligences-have-full-telepathic-access-to-every-witness-storehouse-of-memories/
My human initiated contact team had immediate results when we started fieldwork, but they were not what I expected.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/mystery-lights-in-the-santa-susana-pass/

https://preview.redd.it/2930vct5ckxc1.jpg?width=740&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1410d12938dcb58213e72d779998c9831d7eb377
Interstate removals are quite common in the UK. In fact, the majority of moves in the UK are interstate as people look to move to another city in search of better job opportunities, education, or to get close to their friends and family.
Interstate moving services in UK are quite popular as they help you shift from one state to another without breaking a sweat. But what about the tasks after the interstate move is done? No one talks about the numerous tasks that you have to do once the move is finished.
No need to worry, as here are the 7 essential tasks that you should do after completing an Interstate removal in the UK.

Unpacking and Organizing

The first task after you have reached your new home is to unpack your belongings. Removals will unload the belongings, but you are responsible for unpacking and organizing them. The unpacking process might look quite complicated but begin it room by room. Begin with essential items, such as kitchenware, bedding, and toiletries, to make your new space functional. Take your time to unpack systematically, room by room, and consider decluttering as you go to avoid clutter in your new home.

Furniture Assembly and Placement

Removal companies in the UK disassemble furniture items so they are easy to transport. Once you reach your new home, you have to deal with Furniture Assembly and placement. Decide on the layout of your furniture in each room before placing it, taking into consideration factors such as natural light, traffic flow, and functionality. Proper placement of furniture can significantly enhance the aesthetic appeal and functionality of your new home.

Utilities Setup and Connection

Living without basic utilities such as electricity, gas, water, and internet services is next to impossible. When you shift to your new house, the major responsibility is to set up the utility connection. Contact utility providers well in advance to schedule connections, transfers, or updates to avoid any disruptions in service. Verify that all utilities are functioning correctly before settling in completely.

Change of Address

A major step that most people forget when they shift to a new house is changing the address with relevant organizations, including banks, government agencies, insurance providers, and subscription charges. Submit a change of address request with the Royal Mail or the postal service in your area to ensure that your mail is forwarded to your new address. This step is crucial for staying connected and receiving important correspondence.

Updating Home Security Measures

We all worry about our belongings when we have to hire Agarwal Removal company as a reliable moving company like Agarwal Packers and Movers UK ensures the safety of belongings throughout the move. But when we shift to our new house, we don't pay much attention to the house's security measures.
Prioritize the safety and security of your new home by updating or installing home security measures. This may include changing the locks, installing a security system, and ensuring that all windows and doors are secure. Familiarize yourself with any security features or protocols specific to your new neighbourhood.

Exploring Neighborhood Amenities

Take some time to explore your new neighbourhood and familiarize yourself with nearby amenities, such as grocery stores, healthcare facilities, schools, parks, and recreational areas. Understanding the local amenities will help you settle in more comfortably and integrate into the community faster.

Establishing a Routine and Settling In

Finally, take the time to establish a routine and settle into your new surroundings gradually. Create a daily schedule that incorporates work, leisure, and household tasks, allowing yourself time to adjust to the new environment. Engage with neighbours, explore local attractions, and embrace the opportunities that your new location has to offer.
Completing an interstate removal in the UK is a significant milestone, but it's essential to follow through with these essential tasks to ensure a successful transition. Enjoy the journey and settle in your new house with full comfort and ease.

I received this jacket as a re-gifted gift a year ago, and it was brand new when I received it. I’ve worn the jacket twice, however the body shape doesn’t flatter me in the slightest. The jacket is made in Canada and in excellent condition but does have three small dark spots near the bottom of the front side of the garment, which are depicted in pictures 11 and 12 in the imgur gallery. Feel free to ask for more pictures if there’s a particular angle you’d like to see.
Asking $550 USD pre-shipping. I’m in Canada and would prefer to sell to a fellow Canuck out of ease, but I’m happy to work out shipping for all y’all southerners. Please comment or PM me your postal code for a complete quote. Transaction to be completed via PayPal Goods and Services.

My dad recently got hired as a PTF City Carrier and I’m trying to help him and my mom sign up for health benefits. He showed me this letter that he received but I don’t see his job position on there? Is PTF City Carrier the same as City Carrier Assistant? If so, that would mean that they’ll get 65 percent contribution for the Self Plus One?
He also showed me a different piece of paper that said he may be eligible for health insurance under FEHB. Where would I check to see if he’s eligible for sure? If I sign up my parents through the FEHB will there be any contributions?

Moving to a new home can be exciting, but also a bit overwhelming. To make sure nothing gets overlooked, here’s a comprehensive moving checklist to keep you organized and stress-free:

Before the Move

• Start Planning Early: Begin your moving preparations at least eight weeks before the big day. This gives you plenty of time to organize and manage tasks without rush.
• Declutter: Go through every room and decide what to keep, donate, or throw away. Moving is a great opportunity to get rid of items you no longer need.
• Hire Movers: If you're planning to use a moving company, book early. Compare prices and reviews to find the best fit for your needs.
• Gather Supplies: Make sure you have enough boxes, tape, bubble wrap, and markers. You can often find free boxes at stores or online.

​

One Month Before

• Notify Important Contacts: Tell your bank, employer, friends, and family about your move. Don’t forget to update your address with the postal service.
• Start Packing: Begin with items you use less frequently, like out-of-season clothes or books.
• Label Everything: Write the contents on each box and which room it belongs in. This will make unpacking much easier.

​

One Week Before

• Pack a Day Bag: Include essentials like clothes, toiletries, medications, and important documents that you'll need right away in your new home.
• Confirm Details with Movers: Double-check the moving date, costs, and other details with your moving company.

​

Moving Day

• Final Walkthrough: Check every room, closet, and cabinet one last time to make sure nothing is left behind.
• Guide the Movers: Be present to answer questions and give directions to ensure everything goes smoothly.
• Keep Valuables Safe: Carry personal and valuable items with you, like jewelry or legal documents.

​

After the Move

• Unpack Essentials First: Start with the essentials like your kitchen and bathroom. Setting up major appliances and beds can also make the first few days more comfortable.
• Register with Local Services: If you’ve moved to a new area, register with local authorities, find a new doctor, and transfer school records if necessary.

​

Enjoy Your New Home

• Take Your Time: Unpack at your own pace. First, set up areas that you use daily.
• Meet the Neighbors: Introducing yourself to your neighbors can help you settle in and feel more at home.

Moving doesn’t have to be stressful if you’re well-prepared. With this ultimate moving checklist, you’re ready to tackle your move with confidence and ease. Whether you're moving across town or to a new city, remember to take things one step at a time!
​

Effortless Relocation with Your Ultimate Moving Checklist

Ready to make your move as smooth as possible? Trust Stairhopper Movers - Merrimack to handle all your moving needs. From packing to transporting, we ensure every detail is managed with care. Contact us today to schedule your move and experience a stress-free relocation. Let's get moving!
Stairhopper Movers - Merrimack
256 Daniel Webster Hwy, Merrimack, NH 03054
https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/g/11stg74dt4
Call us: (603) 681-6000
Visit our website
https://stairhoppers.com/new-hampshire-movers/
https://preview.redd.it/1fdwz2pthsuc1.jpg?width=900&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3594584d641d7d6f2015144a0e74c704d2359c83