2015.03.19 14:39 redditorguy Tuta
2017.10.25 23:44 Holycowzer M1
2012.07.05 17:06 Loloisme Stick them to your face - /r/FreeStickers đ
2024.06.09 23:43 Joanie_loves_chachie [NV] VP of HR unhappy with me
2024.06.09 23:38 Thermal-Matches Can Cal Poly give me my paycheck from last year?!?
2024.06.09 23:37 jargoned Applied for a job I REALLY want. Want to know if I should follow up with HR.
2024.06.09 23:31 chickyparmyarn My house listed for rent on FB Marketplace
2024.06.09 23:23 Prior_Ad_8406 Chime Checking Account $345 Bonus ($100 Refer bonus+$245 Swagbucks)
2024.06.09 23:22 Honeysyedseo How Our Solo Sales Rep Closed 45 Clients in 6 Months
2024.06.09 23:21 kmrniqbl UPSTOX - Do not Invest, Worst Customer Support.
2024.06.09 23:15 Vaguy1993 Mohela did not follow through with Opt Out
2024.06.09 23:05 ArabRising Complicated discrimination EEOC Case Can't find Attorney EEOC dropped inquiry for whichever reason appealing to no avail
2024.06.09 23:04 kmrniqbl UPSTOX - Do not Invest, Worst Customer Support.
2024.06.09 23:04 decembrist11 Docusign Email Question
2024.06.09 23:01 sisterwilderness Difficulty recovering from confusing/bad therapy (long read)
2024.06.09 23:00 chickyparmyarn My house up for rent on FB Marketplace
2024.06.09 22:57 Additional_Mark_8917 Quitting first job post grad- Advice needed!
2024.06.09 22:56 HardcoreHenryLofT [5e][Online][English][AST][Homebrew] No Small Quest for the Big of Heart! Low/Dark Fantasy, mix of lighthearted roleplay and fantastic horror!
2024.06.09 22:51 theCavemanV Personal finance book recommendation - No Worries by Jared Dillian
2024.06.09 22:49 Wide-Ardz 2024 XSE w/ PP, 'current' prices and a couple questions
MSRP: $50,829 Delivery, processing and handling fee: $1,350 Sticker total: $52,179After test drive, gave a number and after the 'talk with manager' was accepted. (shoulda offered less I guess). $50k. We all just talked that it would be leased for the $6500 incentive. Lease was for 36 months, 10k miles/yr.
Gross Cap Cost Itemization and Other Items (section 13) Agreed value: $50,000 Acquisition Fee: $ 650 Vehicle Service Agreement: $ 1,575 Prepaid Maintenance: $ 1,194 Reckledge - Theft: $ 499 Gross Capitalized Cost: $53,918.00Now, the incentive and down payment page: (I put $5,000 down on a credit card, willing to take collision risk for the money back) Federal Consumer Leasing Act Segregated Disclosures box: (I don't think this box is important, is it?) 3. Amount Due at Lease Signing or Delivery: $11,500 4. Monthly Payments: $784.94 Total of your Monthly Payments (36 total): $28,257.84 5. Other Charges: Disposition fee (if you do not purchase the vehicle): $350 6. Total of Payments: $39,322.90
7 Amount Due at Lease Signing or Delivery: a. Capitalized Cost Reduction $ 9,208.09 b. First Monthly Payments $ 784.94 c and d: N/A e. Registration Fees $ 332.00 f. License Fees $ 328.00 g. Tax on Capitalized Cost Reduction: $ 713.63 {that's tax on the 9208.09} h. Acquisition Fee N/A i. Document Processing Fee (not a gov't fee) $ 85.00 j. DMV Electronic Filing Fee (not a gov't fee) $ 33.00 k. California Tire Fee $ 8.75 l. Upfront Tax on Fees $ 6.59 {that's tax on $85} p. Total $11,500.00 8 How the Amount Due at Lease Signing or Delivery will be Paid: a. Net Trade-In Allowance N/A b. Rebates and Noncash Credits $ 6,500.00 c, d, e: N/A f. Amount to be Paid in Cash $ 5,000.00 g. Total $11,500.00Now: "Your Monthly Payment is determined as shown below" section
9 Payment Determination: a. Gross Capitalized Cost, see section 13 {above} $ 53,918.00 b. Capitalized Cost Reduction - $ 9,208.09 c. Adjusted Capitalzied Cost = $ 44,709.91 d. Residual Value - $ 29,742.00 e. Depreciation and any Amoritized Amoiunts = $ 14,967.91 f. Rent Charge + $ 11,257.20 g. Total of Base Monthly Payments = $ 26,225.11 h. Lease Payments / 36 i. Base Monthly Payment = $ 728.48 j. Monthly Sales / Use Tax + $ 56.46 k. N/A l. Total Monthly Payment ("Monthly Payment") = $ 784.94Now, something different than most: There was a mistake and the $499 for security should not have been charge. After a discussion, dealer sent Toyota Financial (TFS) $537.68 (which is the $499 plus tax). So, my payment with TFS is listed as $247.26 (the $784.94-537.68) .
2024.06.09 22:44 Bene-dict [Art][OC] My Triton Storm Herald Barbarian, Nami!
2024.06.09 22:41 adimanish Reception has lost my package
2024.06.09 22:39 Specialist-Flow-2591 Always CYA
2024.06.09 22:38 TempusCarpe The Confirmed Hoax Fallacy
The Confirmed Hoax Fallacy An Old Argument Raises Its Ignorant Head Yet Again TEMPORAL RECON JUN 8 submitted by TempusCarpe to JohnTitor [link] [comments] I was recently invited to write an essay by someone who I respect greatly in their own personal search for truth. He asked that, while an update to Conviction of a Time Traveler is not necessarily in the offing, he did wonder if I might be amenable to a friendly reminder of the evidence provided in COATT nearly a decade ago now. What spurred his request was that he had noticed recently that several people online had been echoing the âconfirmed hoaxâ trope when discussions would might around to the John Titor series of posts which occurred online back in 2000/2001. His noticing of this false argument was nothing new; I had also noticed it crop up from time to time over the last 20 years. I hold the âconfirmed hoaxâ argument in special and particular disdain. Why? Primarily because evidence exists and was provided in Conviction of a Time Traveler in 2009 that Titor was legitimate and, ironically enough, was read by many of the so-called experts espousing the âconfirmed hoaxâ lie. So when these fake experts tell you that the Titor story was a âconfirmed hoax,â they are lying to you. Conviction of a Time Traveler provided new and original evidence that has never, to date, been debunked since its publication; a full 14 years. The evidence provided (which many of these lazy forum participants are aware of) pointed to one, inexorable and inescapable conclusion: Titor was legit. But this evidence, while never disproven, is always ignored. Why is that? Weâll put a pin in that⊠Pledge your support Ironically, not only has the evidence documented in Conviction of a Time Traveler never been debunked, but it has also even been plagiarized by lazy authors who canât be bothered to do original research or, lacking the intellectual horsepower necessary to do even that, fail to provide appropriate attribution to their source material. So what of this, âConfirmed Hoaxâ claim? Is it true? HAS the John Titor episode actually been âconfirmedâ as a hoax? When someone in a position of pretend authority declares from their cardboard pedestal that the John Titor story is a âConfirmed Hoax,â have you ever noticed they never provide the person who did the confirming? âConfirmed hoax?â âConfirmedâ by whom, pray tell? When the term âConfirmed Hoaxâ is used, what imagery comes to mind? I dare say it implies that some sort of shadowy group of learned scholars sat around a big wooden table, carefully assessed and addressed the claims. All the evidence and counter-arguments were carefully measured while hidden away in some stone castle somewhere until a white puff of smoke curls over its stone-tiled rooftops, declaring to the world once and for all, âOur confirmation is complete. John Titor was a hoax!â Bullshit. Hereâs the dirty little secret of the âConfirmed Hoaxâ statements: they are actually shorthand for, âI donât have the intellectual capacity to argue in favor or against, so in order to come off like some sort of authority and maintain my fake position of authority, Iâll just take the safest position and simply declare that the Titor story is a hoax, that it was âconfirmedâ and letâs please just move on to some other topic.â âConfirmed Hoax,â is a cowardâs gambit, a bet, that there wonât be anyone to come along to rock the boat and topple these posers off their flimsy stage of pretend authority. This was the environment I walked into when I first published Conviction of a Time Traveler in 2010, and apparently, it hasnât changed in 15 years. When I first posted on Paranormalis (IIRC) announcing that I had written a book that documented the evidence in favor of Titorâs veracity, the then-reigning Titor authority (âDarbyâ) haughtily pronounced, âPresent your evidence and weâll discuss it.â Share It was in that moment that I chose a path that nobody before me had ever embarked upon. I said, âNo.â Nobody had ever said ânoâ before. There are pages and pages of forum posts by people before me who discovered some of the same bits and pieces that I discovered that pointed to Titorâs truth. And they were excited to show what they had discovered! And, owing to their excitement, and unfortunately, their naivete, they excitedly shared their evidence, wrongfully believing that the forumsâ leadership was interested in getting to the bottom of the Titor episode. Little did they suspect that âDarbyâ and others were acting as gatekeepers of truth, whose sole purpose was to establish and maintain a lid on the narrative that was the John Titor episode. He, and his ilk gaslighted and bullied these poor naifs into silence by using their fake authority to debunk and explain away the very real evidence they had discovered. That is, until COATT was published. Unfortunately for these enemies of Truth, the internet is forever. In my research leading up to the publication of Conviction of a Time Traveler, I had the benefit of not only studying Titorâs posts, but also all the follow-on discussions after their departure. I reviewed literally years of online forum content and, as I did so, I made a very curious observation: in all the years of discussion after Titor departed, not one piece of evidence ever (ever) caused âDarbyâ or any of the other fake authorities to question their âitâs a hoax!â position. They NEVER saw a piece of evidence that they didnât dismiss, mock, ignore or explain away with contortions of logic that would make Wetzelâs Pretzels blush. This is in stark contrast to how someone who was truly in search of truth would act. If âDarbyâ and the others truly were curious, isnât this a little odd? Really? Not ONE piece of evidence ever caused âDarbyâ to pause and say, âhmm, thatâs interestingâŠâ Not once, ever. And there are years of forum posts to confirm this. So, when Darby commanded from his perch of fake authority that I âpresent my evidence so that we might discuss itâ I laughed in his face [paraphrasing], âNo. A real discussion of the evidence hasnât occurred here for years, and I do not recognize your so-called position as some sort of âexpertâ on the Titor story. LITERALLY EVERYTHING there is to learn, or study, is published in the Titor posts for all to read. You hold no special knowledge, no special position, no special nothing. I do not submit to your fake authority. You want to learn about Titor, read the book.â Or words to that effect, anyway⊠In the end, the evidence provided in COATT was so unassailable and the argument so solid that âDarbyâ and his ilk suddenly became more and more quiet as they slowly realized I wasnât going to wilt under their âauthoritay.â Eventually, they slinked away with their rhetorical tails tucked. But this was not the end of the story! Because âtime travelâ had become quite the pet interest of mine (owing to the further evidence I discovered after publication), that I continued to post online in various discussion forums. I even wrote numerous essays on a variety of topics, all spurred on by the âtime travelâ question and all its implications. Fast Forward Fast forwarding to today, weâre back at the âconfirmed hoaxâ argument again. What was once offered up (âHOAX!â) by Darby and others, is now cold soup served by the latest crop of fake authorities. And what happens when fake authority utters the âConfirmed Hoaxâ discussion-brake? The same thing that happened a decade ago: the earnest neophyte shrugs their shoulders secure in the false belief that others smarter than they have studied the topic and arrived at some irrefutable conclusion; no further discussion necessary (or allowed). They have no idea just how close they came to uncovering something truly fantastic, had they only relied on their own judgment instead of the know-nothing proclamations of others. Pledge your support Which brings me to why I wrote COATT in the first place. Instead of simply doing my research and arriving at my own (private) conclusion, I realized that too many people were believing fake authority and ignoring Titorâs warnings about our future. Once I realized that Titor was legitimate (caveated, of course), how could I NOT share my findings? The stakes were simply too high. IF what Titor said were true 24 years ago, that the world was heading for an upending change in the status quo, and that many people would die as a result of it, how could I remain silent and not inform others that his warnings were something to be listened to? Perhaps people with ears to hear might take heed and make the appropriate preparations. I know I did. But, as my friend has informed me, it appears that the fake experts have reared their ugly and useless heads once again telling us that there is ânothing to the Titor storyâ and that it is a âconfirmed hoax.â THIS was the reason that I was recently asked to provide my evidence once again. And THIS is the reason this essay is dragging on. These pretenders to authority are like roaches; as soon as the exterminator leaves, they come out of the woodwork intent on dismantling the Truth once again. Godâs work never ends, it seems, even with a 99% success rate⊠So, now that weâve got all THAT out of the way, and as a sort of transition, Iâd like to bring you up to speed on what Iâve been up to since I published Conviction of a Time Traveler in 2010. To be perfectly frank, after COATTâs publication, I thought I was done with the Titor story; I had said my piece and was perfectly willing to move on with my life and prepare for the event that causes the change in the status quo. But the annoying fact was that the Titor story itself didnât end with the cessation of Titorâs posts in 2001. As new evidence appeared in the months and years following publication, like dog shit on my shoe that I canât scrape off, I could never cleanly cleave myself from the Titor story. Not that I wanted to, mind you, it is a fascinating topic, regardless of your opinion. But what surprised me the most was that new evidence continued to appear, year after year. And, as more evidence appeared, my curiosity was consistently kept piqued and on alert. Trust me, it is exhausting. To give you a sense of what I discovered, I can tell you that your experts are wrong and that âtime travelâ is neither novel nor unusual; we are very literally awash in âtime travelers.â My research suggests that âtime machinesâ have been present in our past going as far back as 850AD. But I digress. Share Suffice it to say that the Titor rabbit hole is but one example of a massively large group of programs from an unknown number of organizations from across time. The âtime travelâ question runs much deeper (and much farther back in time) and crosses over into more (so-called) esoteric topics than anyone gives it credit for. As I said, itâs exhausting. My whole point here is that, even after I published in 2009, my curiosity in the topic (and its implications of yet larger vistas) did not wane. And, because of this continued and unabating curiosity, I discovered yet more evidence, crafted more theories and came to more conclusions. A philosopher once described the acquisition of new information as an ever-expanding circle surrounding the man; a horizon where known and unknown meet where new answers only beget new questions which push the circle farther and farther out. This has been my experience over the last 15 years re the Titor narrative and the larger âtime travelâ question. How could it be otherwise? Unfortunately for you, you are being convinced by fools that the Titor episode is a âConfirmed Hoax.â You havenât even made the leap to the possibility that âtime travelâ is even possible. How can you explore the implications of âtime travelâ when you canât even consider its reality, a fundamental starting point? I have a very strong (ehem) conviction that our collective naĂŻvetĂ© on the subject will be violently revoked in the very near âfuture.â The Two Camps, The Two Mistakes During my research, I observed that within the Titor commentariat there are two basic camps: the Debunkers and the True Believers. The Debunking camp will provide any contortion of logic to maintain the âTitor was a hoaxâ narrative. The True Believers, on the other hand, will believe any contortion of logic that maintains their belief in The Gospel of John. What if I told you both camps were wrong? Now, the debunking camp will tell you that Titor must be a hoax because his predictions didnât come true. Oh, wellâŠhis predictions didnât come true? I guess weâre done then? Obviously, his whole purpose for posting was to make predictions like some Magic Eight Ball, right? And if those donât pan out, well, âCONFIRMED HOAX!â Get the Book On the other side of that coin, the True Believers out there, who never saw a confirmation bias they didnât love, will tell you that Titorâs predictions didnât come true because he changed the future. This of course is a recipe for explaining away literally any detracting evidence thus making Titor true no matter any evidence to the contrary. Letâs take the True Believers first: The concept of Divergence, while a handy explanation, does not/cannot explain all differences in histories away. In fact, were what Titor said was true (remember, we are True Believers for the moment and are taking Titorâs words as gospel) he absolutely must take measures to minimize divergence as much as possible and NOT allow it to span wildly. Otherwise, the entire power of the âtime machineâ is rendered moot. I accept that Divergence is likely a real measurement necessary for the efficient execution of âtime travelâ missions, but it should, by no means, be the magic skeleton key to explain away every question. In fact, while divergence is very likely a real âthingâ or artifact or measurement of difference between world lines, the Truth is that divergence must absolutely be kept to a minimum to make any practical use of the gravity engine sitting in the back seat of your old blue Geo Metro. So, no. Divergence cannot be the handy tool we need to contort ourselves into believing, as much as we might like to. Now for the debunkers: The debunkers have a variety of options available to them to argue that Titor was a âconfirmed hoax.â Regardless, these arguments typically boil down to two primary classes: He has special training or knowledge, and/or Heâs just a lucky guesser. Unfortunately for the debunkers (and those who listen to them), these explanations make a very serious error: that predictions are a relevant metric to judge Titorâs truth at all. They are not. Serious question: Why should a âtime travelerâ be subject to the same metrics that a psychic is to determine if his claims of âtime travelâ are true? The point here is that you canât compare a horse to a whale and complain that the horse canât swim. They are two completely different animals, and the same goes for âtime travelersâ and psychics or tarot readers or any other domain whose reputation is dependent on the true-ness of the information they provide. Comparing Titorâs predictions to actual, experienced history is also an imperfect and inappropriate metric if one is to objectively assess Titor from a blank slate starting point. This points to a much deeper insight into the true purpose of the Titor posts, but thatâs for a different day. So, because of both these problems, any real researcher worth their salt would have to find some other way to determine the truth/falsity of the Titor narrative. Remember, when first approaching the Titor question as an objective investigator, Titor is both equally a hoax and legitimate. Imagine Schrodingerâs cat meets Columbo⊠Iâll give you this observation for free, just to get your juices flowing: Did you notice that absolutely none of Johnâs predictions (event + date) came true, but all his statements concerning conditions about our future did? Donât you find this interesting? Or hadnât you noticed, too blinded by the bright and shiny, attention-grabbing predictions of nuclear war? But I am getting ahead of myself; we still havenât provided the evidence that itâs simply more likely that Titor was an actual time traveler than some âhoaxer genius.â And so we finally get to the whole point of this essay in the first place, a reminder and summary of the evidence first provided in Conviction of a Time Traveler all the way back in those halcyon days of 2010:
â J. Titor, Nov 7, 2000
-J. Titor
â J. Titor, Nov 15, 2000
â J. Titor, Feb 15, 2001
-J. Titor, Feb 21, 2001
-J. Titor, Feb 25, 2001
-J. Titor, Feb 25, 2001
He predicts an optical measurement system for atomic clocks. He predicts the new system measures oscillation and not some other aspect. He predicts this new system increases measurement precision and not some other aspect. âThe C206 uses 6 cesium clocks but they use an optical system to check the oscillation frequency. This makes the worldline divergence confidence much higher.â â J. Titor, Nov 7, 2000
But, the middle question, ââŠwhat is GingerâŠâ did not violate either of those two questions so he acquiesced and answered it. He answered by saying, âIt looks like a sort of motorized scooter. What do you think IT is?â â J. Titor, Jan 29, 2001 This answer immediately got my attention because, in 2000 when the question was asked, the answer was truly unknown, thus Mr. Kolesnikâs question. However, in 2009 when I was first looking into the Titor narrative, I knew what Ginger was because I remembered it. Hindsight truly was 20/20. As a bit of background, during 1999 (the exact timing escapes me), a âviralâ marketing campaign was underway by an inventor named Dean Kamen. While never revealing what this new product was, the billboards merely asked, âWhat is IT?â or âWhat is Ginger?â That was all they said. It is obvious now, and was obvious even then, that Kamen was attempting to create a buzz for his new invention. Fair enough. It also explains why it was asked of Titor in 2000. Kamenâs ad campaign was working! People were truly wondering. Now understand, the hype (and I use that term specifically) surrounding the Ginger ad campaign was fairly strong. Kamen predicted that his invention would reinvent how people moved about cities; it would cause their utter redesign and how they were laid out and organized. Big claims, to be sure. So strong in fact that Kamen was able to land a spot on Good Morning America where he finally revealed what his invention was. In December of 2001, and live on the air, Kamen, with Katie Couric, revealed Ginger to the world. Ginger was none other than the Segway. And what did Titor say it was? âA type of motorized scooterâ And Stella says thereâs nothing more to learn⊠Get the Book Titorâs absolute spot-on declaration of what Kamenâs invention was nearly a year before it was unveiled hit me right between the eyes. Eight years later, I already knew that Ginger was the Segway because I remembered the event. Here was a maniac on the internet claiming to be a âtime travelerâ and he correctly âguessedâ what Ginger was a mere 2 Âœ hours after it was asked and 11 months before it was officially unveiled? It was Titorâs statement here that caused me to look deeper (much deeper, in fact) into the Titor narrative and, after exhaustive research and extensive supporting evidence, I concluded that Titor was in fact, legitimate. Now hereâs the truly interesting part of this piece of the Titor saga: you canât find this statement about Ginger online anywhere anymore. It has been scrubbed from online sources everywhere. Now, when I first discovered the Titor story, I saw that there appeared to be a couple different versions of the posts and I just, by chance, found a version of the posts with the Ginger reference in it. I saw that some versions had the Ginger reference, and some did not. At the time, I did not know how to understand this. But I do now. Revisiting Old Theories As I mentioned before, hindsight is 20/20, and that is especially true when discussing âtime travelâ and âtime travelers.â So, it seems oddly appropriate to provide a few examples of updated information that only revealed themselves with the fullness of time after publication. âleaderâ In Conviction of a Time Traveler, I found the following quote especially interesting: âThe President or âleaderâ in 2005 I believe tried desperately to be the next Lincoln and hold the country together but many of their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power base.â
Of course, here we are 24 years after Titorâs statement and 12 years after I wrote COATT, and I have now come to a different conclusion about the quotation marks around the word âleaderâ. I now surmise that Titor was referring to Biden and not Obama when he wrote that. Because I personally didnât have a âtime machineâ at the time, I never could have expected the dementia patient currently âinâ the White House and supposedly âleadingâ the country. For anyone watching, it is patently obvious that Mr. Biden isnât âleadingâ anything. So, in the context of this and our current national situation, those quotation marks sure make a hell of a lot more sense now, donât you think? This reassessment obviously puts a giant bullseye on the 2024-2025 time period for what Titor commented upon in 2000. So, yes. I have reassessed this particular conclusion since publishing Conviction of a Time Traveler due to the slow passage of time and its equally slow revelation of Truth. Gates Another interesting comment by Titor had to do with Bill Gates. Recall that in 2000/2001, Bill Gates was âmerelyâ the CEO of Microsoft. He was among the richest men in the world and many news stories of the time commented upon this fact. Almost kind of like Elon Muskâs notoriety in both scope and scale. So, as such, a forum participant named âJoeâ asked Titor for any information regarding Bill Gatesâ future. Titorâs response? âThis I do know but I wonât discuss.â -J. Titor, Feb 23, 2001 An interesting, if not completely unhelpful, answer. Wouldnât you say? Considering we now know how Gates has morphed from Tech Titan selling mediocre products to Farmland baron, GMO mosquito breeder and mRNA advocate and (alleged) mass murderer in India and elsewhere in the third world, Titorâs statement that he does know about Gatesâ future rings true. In fact, what was also a bit interesting was when someone later pressed him on any information regarding Gatesâ future. To which he responded, Just curious, why is he of such interest? -J Titor, Mar 5, 2001 Considering what we know now about Gates and his predilections (his âwifeâ deserted him upon revelation of his visits to Epstein Island), Iâm willing to bet that John was naturally curious as to why Gates, of all people, was of such interest to the forum participants that they would ask twice about him. Coincidence? Or did Titor suspect a mole from a different program in the forum? Who knows. His curiosity about their curiosity in Gates is interesting, nothing more. Conclusion And there you have (some of) it. A summary of some of the evidence documented in Conviction of a Time Traveler written nearly 15 years ago. The evidence contained in that small book has never been debunked or disproven. It has been plagiarized by some and ignored by others. If you were unaware of COATT and are a regular participant in the online discussions about âtime travel,â you should ask yourself why the âleadershipâ on those forums never mention COATT. Curious, donât you think? The reason I wrote COATT in the first place was because, after I had done my own research to satiate my own personal curiosity, I realized that some people online were downplaying his postsâ importance in the hopes that they could dissuade people from believing in Titor and the possibility of âtime travel.â I saw this dishonesty and decided to fight back against it by merely providing the information I discovered. From my point of view, Titor was warning us about a very severe time in our future that would upend the status quo and was to be a highly dangerous one. Taken at face value (always a good starting point), Titorâs warnings merited being taken seriously. Had the naysayerâs deceit been left unanswered, how many of you would have failed to prepare for what is just around the corner? You have prepared, havenât you? And yes, as is readily obvious to many, those hard times are right around the corner. Looking at Titorâs statements 24 years later and simply looking around at the state of America and the world, do his statements seem so outlandish now? Johnâs âfinalâ words to the forum in March of 2001 ring eerily prescient now: Bring a gas can with you when the car dies on the side of the road. -J. Titor, Mar 23, 2001 It is my sincerest hope that my small book project (and the essays that followed) spurred you to think twice about the world we live in and take the necessary actions you feel you should to keep you and your family safe for the worldâs awakening and rebirth. As Ever, Temporal Recon Share As Ever |
2024.06.09 22:33 Own-Possibility3220 Need a lawyer in Bangalore. Please connect.