Bejewled blitz cheats

Yun's timeskip side story - part 3

2024.05.19 00:01 shironi777 Yun's timeskip side story - part 3

First of all thanks for even's help
Now enjoy!
{Next day}
Yumeko: "wakey wakey its time for our date, come on, wake up"
Yun: "ah good morning... Date?"
Yumeko: "yes pookie, you're going with me today≈"
Yun: " I DO NOT WANT TO"
Yumeko: "why did your personality change overnight..."
Yun: "change..?"
Then he gets a flashback of what happened last night and unlocked tomato mode again
Yumeko: "ara ara you get me laughing everytime you make this expression"
Yun: "seriously stop your ara ara and NO I'm not going with you on a date..."
Yumeko: "ara ara if you say so I'm not gonna stop at all, and are you sure you don't want to go on a date with a pretty girl like me..?"
Yun: "seriously n-"
Yumeko shows him a picture of both of them sleeping and hugging each other "should I show this picture to my dad and tell him what happened≈"
Yun says while panicking "wh- what happened.. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!"
Yumeko: "well, nothing happened but I can just lie y'know≈"
Yun: "you won't be able to anymore"
Yumeko: "wha-" until she notices his phone recording
"You seriosly..."
Yun: "well, bye no-"
"What the fuck was that"
Yumeko: "don't overestimate yourself"
Yun: "you also did this last time, are you some kind of an assassin?"
Yumeko: "maybe? Now let's go≈"
Yun: "since I'll have to go anyway then cook breakfast for me"
Yumeko: "you're taking the chance I see, don't try taking the phone since you won't be able to and I don't wanna hurt you..."
Yun: "why should I even escape when I'm with someone as beautiful as you≈"
Yumeko: "you trynna flirt with me now? If you keep doing that I'll treat you better≈"
{After a few minutes}
Yun: "woah you're surely good at cooking, now let's ea-"
Yumeko: "you can only eat the food I cook by my own hands≈"
Yun: "... Fine, just feed me quickly..."
Yumeko: "you're really falling for me, aren't you?"
Yun: "whatever let's just eat"
Yumeko: "you really wanna eat it huh? Sure I'll keep cooking for you if you co-"
Yun: "I'm not going stop trying, I have responsibilities left here..."
The room went silence...
Yun: "damn, this is what happens when you say that, stop ruining the mood!"
Yumeko: "so its my fault, yeah its always been my fault, since I was a little child, everything I did was wrong" sob sob
Yun: "wait are you crying...? I'm sorry for saying that so stop..."
Yumeko: pfft "seriously you can't deny it anymore just accept the fact you fell for me≈"
Yun: 💢💢💢
{A while later}
Yumeko: huff "we finally got outside, I thought we won't be able to at all"
Yun: "so where do you wanna go?"
{At the same time in gangseo}
Adrienne: "if you don't come with me on a date I'll tell Adrian you acknowledged he was much stronger than you"
Chin: "huh let's just go to the gy-"
Adrienne: "NO! I want a normal date for once!"
Chin: "fine, where do you wanna go?"
Adrienne: "Yang-Cheong!"
Chin: "why can't we just go on a date here in gangseo?"
Adrienne: "shut up and follow me!"
{Back to Yun and Yumeko}
"that looks good too..." Yun says in an exhausted state
Yumeko: "hmm are you sure?"
Yun: "I don't know, if you buy more I'm gonna die" (he's lifting a ton of clothes)
???: "I don't think that dress suit you"
Yumeko: "do you think so? Wait, who are you?"
???: "oh forgot to introduce myself, my name is Adrienne!"
Yun: "Adrienne? Are you Adrian's sister or something?"
Adrienne: "do you know my brother?"
Yun: "wait, you really are siblings?!"
Adrienne: "ye-"
Chin: "huh did you finish your shopping yet? I'm tired of waiting"
Adrienne: "stop ruining the introduction bitch"
Chin: "what intr-"
"Wait, Yun...? And..."
Yumeko: "the name is Yumeko"
Chin: "I didn't know you changed your simping target"
Yumeko: "changed what? You gotta E X P L A I N T H I S T O M E"
Yun: "Chin you motherfucker!"
Chin: "didn't mean to do that"
Adrienne: "I think this one will suit you more, and its like the one I bought so we'll look like besties, Yumeko"
Yumeko: "you really got a good taste in clothes"
Yun and Chin: (thanks Adrienne!)
Adrienne: "do you wanna go on a double date?"
Chin: N-
Adrienne: "I wasn't asking you"
Yumeko: "never tried one before, I'd like to do that!"
Adrienne: "me too"
Chin: "you girls seriously see us as pets"
Adrienne: "I don't know about him but you definitely are"
Yumeko: "both are our pets"
Yun thinks: (why am I even here?)
Adrienne: "should we try bowling?"
Yumeko: "2v2 couples bowling battle"
{In conclusion, Yun gets the win by throwing the ball with his six fingers}
Yumeko: "your fingers are really amazing and helpful, let me bite them≈"
Yun trynna get her away but she keeps following him while Chin and Adrienne were watching
Chin "I like her, she seems like one of my people"
Adrienne after punching Chin in the nose: "shut the fuck up you cheater!"
Chin: "you are the only person that made me cheat
Adrienne: "that's exactly the reason why you can't be trusted, once a cheater, always a cheater"
After the long and funny day these four had together, there bond became stronger.
Yun: "hey Yumeko where are you going now?"
Yumeko: "of course I'm going home"
Yun: "can I go with you today too..."
Yumeko: "my≈ my≈ it looks like I fell for you first but you fell for me harder≈"
Yun: "yes... I wanna enjoy every moment with you before you return to Japan... I wish I could come with you but as I said I have responsibilities left here..."
Yumeko: "wait, did you just confess to me right now?"
Yun: "yeah I did" then he hugs her
???: "Y U M E K O how dare you do something like this with a random korean boy" then he blitz them and knocks Yun out
???
Strength: ??
Speed: ??
Potential: ??
Intelligence: ??
Endurance: ??
submitted by shironi777 to OCism_official [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 14:55 ivanphilipov Viih Sou post - chess, math, geek and cheater perspective

Viih Sou post - chess, math, geek and cheater perspective
Controversial (for our reddit bubble) opinion.
As most chess fans, the Viih Sou opening and drama is interesting to me. I will try to keep it short (at least shorter than GM Brendan Johnson posts :P) - for me, the Viih Sou account was cheating.
My credentials: playing a lot of chess, my top rating is about 2000 FIDE (I live in UK, which uses ECF), I analyse data for a living, and im generally interested in truth, lying, cheating, motives, etc.
So, for me, that single 1 thing that convinces me is the 0% likelihood based on their past experience. Under normal circumstances, that result is extremely unlikely, so why would a bad opening make it happen?:
  • Others who covered the drama mention he had a 28% win rate vs Danya before. In their match, Viih Sou achieves 40/69 - statistically, when you win about 1 of 4 games, this is nigh impossible all things being equal.
  • For context - between 2 equally good players (i.e. probability of 50% to win, you would still get only 4% chance to win a match 40-29). Let alone playing 69 times a bogus, if well prepared, opening.
  • Here is a chart:
https://preview.redd.it/dygomhzfrz0d1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=aeff42b464c238136a9109068daa2667e3d17cdd
For me, that seals the deal on its own, and i imagine the chess com anti-cheating definitely has an attribute to indicate when a top GM gets absolutely smacked as a red flag, even if there are 0 suspicious moves.
But lets explore:
  • So, there must be something else going on. It doesn't seem that Danya was drunk/high/affected by anything to play an extremely subpar level of chess during the match.
  • We have a new opening, which we can assume Viih Sou has prepared in a lot of depth, probably in some lines over 15 moves, in others at least 5-10 - obviously a GM is a very strong chess player and has prepared very well. But it is a terrible opening objectively, which a top GM would learn to counter quickly.
  • Many of the games were lost by Danya after he has achieved a great position, and in complexities that have nothing to do with the opening anymore
  • People who want absolute proof, don't forget that good cheaters (not a bozo who just plays top engine move):
  1. play suboptimal moves when having a time advantage,
  2. know opponent style to exploit what suboptimal moves would be especially safe to play,
  3. play complex moves over simple moves, with the same evaluation, having the security that he wouldnt blunder since engine will save him from total blunders
  4. lose some games, but didnt realise that 40-29 is an absolutely ridiculous score for such an opening. etc etc... also, this is blitz, i dont know the mechanics of cheating but I imagine using 2nd laptop, or a helper, for this time control i would imagine it is a hell of a multitasking experience. So probably some mistakes can happen
The type of proof people want to see doesn't exist and is such thinking enables cheaters.
  • Playing a lot of chess, i feel like chess com algo doesn't catch majority of cheaters. I assume it also does false positives all the time, but the vast majority of time, cheaters who are not extremely greedy, get away with it. If i was a bit better at chess, i'm sure i can cheat my way up to 2500 rapid, but i just suck too hard for that level
  • and finally, the posts i've seem from the GM have so many red flags. There was a time where i cheated at StarCraft when i was 15 - and when my account got banned, i was making exactly the same sob stories. In particular the "Kramnik, notice me" is very on the nose and a very funny self-own.
Some counter-arguments: I see arguments such as "Magnus played it and scored lower than usual so it doesn't work", indicating cheating. For me, these are not strong arguments even though they support my position, as clearly the Viih Sou account has prepared extremely well, and Magnus was doing it on the fly. Also I don't think he's comparable to anything.
obvs i would prefer if the truth is there is no cheating, I'm happy to edit my post if there is contradicting evidence.
submitted by ivanphilipov to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 04:05 Money-Caregiver6562 Finally beat 4.1 - sun team

Finally beat 4.1 - sun team
Original comp had Chlorophyll Venusaur and Leafeon but they got seriously walled at lance.
Pawmot iron fist punch glove max Speed and Atk - jolly ice, thunder, drain and mach punch -
Talonflame gale wings Sharp beak max Atk and speed - adamant dualwingbeat - u turn - flare blitz and taunt
Torkoal- named supernova Drought Heat rock Max HP and Def - bold Stealth rock - will o wisp - weather ball - rapid spin
Mega Zard Y Drought Mega stone Max SpA and Speed - modest Solar beam - flamethrower - air slash - dragon pulse/scorched earth
Fluttermane Protosynthesis Expert belt Max SpA and Speed - modest (oversight, I wanted to max speed) Moonblast - shadow ball - thunderbolt - power gem
Donphan - named Dumbo Sturdy Weakness policy Max Atk, half max def, half max HP - adamant Rapid spin Ice shard Ice spinner Bonemerang/earthquake
Thanks for the advices in previous posts.
Donphan with ice shard and ice spinner made Cerulean Giovanni look like a joke compared to it's normal power. The elephant did so much for this run I couldn't even begin to say.
Talonflame with priority acrobatics/dualwingbeat made Bruno look like a random trainer.
Torkoal was my go to switch in to take physical hits and set up drought, poor turtle tanked so many untankable hits.
Pawmot with the supreme 106 power elemental punches coverage and nice speed was just irreplaceable.
The other 2 were there only for the utility. Fluttermane feels like cheating and zard Y is a glass canon.
Venusaur and leafeon did lots of work throughout the run but at the e4 their tipyng and move puddle became simply unbearable. There was so many grass resistant mons and earth powebad tantrum were simply not enough damage to maintain their relevance, I really wanted to carry on with Venusaur as a fast special attacker with chlorophyll but now I think it only works as a bulky special attacker with moderate speed.
Another thing I found is that is sooo much better to play with EVs. MgM is nice and all but changing the mons nature doesn't make so much difference. Tanks dont tank enough because they can't invest in HP and attackers dont do enough damage because their attack stat is not that much bigger than the other Mon defense stat.
submitted by Money-Caregiver6562 to pokemonradicalred [link] [comments]


2024.05.14 22:50 FrankTheBoxMonster [PBE datamine] 2024 May 14 (Patch 14.11): Ornn upgrades overhaul

General reminder that many changes cannot be easily datamined, such as functionality changes or bugfixes, and are not always final.
 

Champions

Ornn
 

ARAM

submitted by FrankTheBoxMonster to leagueoflegends [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 12:34 Kind_Stranger_weeb If you are finding Redacted too hard, consider using god mode.

Im seeing a lot of people posting that Chronos is too op. People suggesting methods of nerfing him or adjusting. But as someone who is beating him over and over fairly easily on high fear i have this to say, learn his moves in god mode. His moves are punishing, dealing large amounts of damage in a single hit as a titan should. To really master him you need to learn him enough to do large sections hitless, learning where his blind spots are and the tells for his moves. If you keep failing at that he doesn't need to be weaker, you just need to learn.
Its situations like this that god mode was made for. A flat damage reduction is not cheating. The mode is there for a reason. It will give you the leeway to lean his moves to the point you don't need it and can then beat him without it. Mel and Zag after all are gods, there is no reason they cant use that birth right.
https://preview.redd.it/7wdldbu9s50d1.png?width=1014&format=png&auto=webp&s=b405015546991404f661961d828eafe12ccbc8f8
For my first few runs of underworld and Olympus i used god mode. Turning it off when i stopped loosing or struggling. It's a great tool for learning movesets and mechanics and if you are ignoring it out of pride i implore you to give it a try. The point of games after all is to have fun and if you are having such a bad time you are begging the devs to make the game easier in reddit, make it easier yourself first with the tools they already gave you.
That to the side, strategies i use to get easy wins. These fall under two categories, add management and burst damage.
Add Management
You need a quick mana efficient way to kill the satyrs, hourglasses and other adds he brings to the fight. This is also the reason i always choose the hades boon that kills half of them for you. (though the darkness boon he offers is also amazing, 10 seconds of invulnerability after hitting one of Chronos's orbs is really OP)
The only henchman you need to divert your attention to are the banners, use your main attack to kill them as soon as you see them in phase one, or they will create barriers over the adds that makes them tougher to ignore, but there is a large gap between the banners appearing and them casting their first barrier.
For all other mobs i like to ignore them and focus on Chronos, while i passively kill them.
To do this you want your passive damage to do around 300 hp of damage. This is your aoe cast or your dash.
There are multiple casts that can do it but i recommend Hestia and Demeter.
https://preview.redd.it/kfqerlfcr50d1.png?width=1204&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b09ef75b00b87b60362eaeb2c75db53fd416a6e
https://preview.redd.it/yhe9isefr50d1.png?width=1195&format=png&auto=webp&s=66ec3e8cdd10011f7f167f840764537808e30427
https://preview.redd.it/pngxfu93s50d1.png?width=1002&format=png&auto=webp&s=c8a5380ad2eabaaed9653d35376a87a712fcbd96
As their basic cast deals the damage over time not their omega cast. Combined with Zeus or Hestia's casting boon, which either fires a fireball or lightning bolt and lets you target your cast. Aiming at the adds without needing to move near them.
https://preview.redd.it/midkkvsjr50d1.png?width=1196&format=png&auto=webp&s=f6028a6ecbb5fb6e8218f518ae1a151727db5ff8
https://preview.redd.it/a9epj6tmr50d1.png?width=1209&format=png&auto=webp&s=08bb13adaf7bee52b768585e6592c5a3c56f61b5
For this you get a burst (fireball or bolt) of damage and sustained dps by just tapping cast allowing you to focus your attention on chronos. Both dont waste your time charging your attack which is deadly in this encounter as the titan of time is immune to the omega attack charge time slowing.
The second method of dealing with adds passively is a high dps dash attack. The best for this is posidon. Getting his dash to heroic makes it deal 200 plus damage and has knockback cc. Allowing you to dodge chronos and move in to attack him while killing his adds in the process without thinking about it.
https://preview.redd.it/un3obwirr50d1.png?width=1201&format=png&auto=webp&s=900c8f4b2ae1cc838f208565b143541b42e5b418
Heroic Breaker Sprint does 200+ damage with no poms, but this one i got as a trade for another sprint has enough damage to kill all the adds in two hits for just 10 mana This sprint was doing 360 damage per hit.
Chronos himself, burst damage and placement
Every weapon has a way to deal reliable burst damage, to beat Chronos you want one of your attacks, special or main, to be able to deal a combo of around 1k damage in a few second, the gap you have to punish him when he uses his boomerang or scythe slice attack - but if you are struggling the highest single attack damage belong to the Argent Skull and the Moonstone Axe. Both can very easily get over 300 damage per attack,
The best axe strategy i learnt from a chaos trial in the pitch black stone. The hammer ability Hell Chop which turns your basic attack into a 300+ damage chop is amazing vs bosses with the Mel aspect Axe, as it allows you to dive, do a large burst attack and then dash right out, hopefully dealing some damage in the same time. The basic strategy is to have a good damage skill, like Nova Attack on the axe, lay your cast on top of Chronos for the bonus damage and attack with the axe, using this method ive gotten the axe to 1300 damage per attack with a very wide AOE range. allowing you to take your chance, attack once for a big burst and then bug out of his range.
If you arent lucky enough to get this specific hammer, the axe is a slow but reliable way to deal 5% of Chronos's health in a single attack. Just hit him with its full combo while he uses the two punishable moves, use Mels aspect as it allows the axe to attack fast enough. The spin omega attack is great for dps and picking off adds and is how i got my first win.
The Skull is good in that it deals its damage from a range, doing 80-100 damage with a decent attack boon you can blast chronos with 300 damage per reload, much more if he is in your cast or you have extra damage boons like Hestia, Zeus or Hephestus, then move into one of his safe zones. There are two must have hammers that boost this to the next level. The one which adds two skulls, giving you 500 base damage per wave, and the one which creates the omega attack effect when you collect the skull creating a combo where you hit him for 300, dash into him, then blast him for 300 damage per skull, so another 900 burst, this is a simple 1300 damage combo that keeps you at range and mobile most of the time and will burn the titans health in no time.
https://preview.redd.it/c2naaiwx760d1.png?width=1235&format=png&auto=webp&s=5a5498752237320c01f508e52882f0d994c64b8b
Any weapon can have reliable burst added by using Hephaestus's explosion boon, which is a long cool down 300-400 burst, around 5% of his HP, that can be boosted with furnace blast to double the damage- if you are lucky with Poms you can get the cooldown of volcanic strike as low as 2 seconds, which makes this very reliable.
https://preview.redd.it/xn88yrsm360d1.png?width=1192&format=png&auto=webp&s=3ee0e7a5e5b945cc67d8e4a684e97c534934a7eb
Through the Poseidon and Hestia duo boon which creates high damage DPS on slipped and burned enemies (Which you may have from the two quick attack methods above)
As well as through Zeus blitz effect, on fast weapons like the sister blades, for example Blitz on the special could be triggered by Hephaestus's attack causing the combo to trigger for 100 damage blitz+200-300 volcanic strike and 300 furnace strike, creating a 600 damage combo by pressing 2 buttons using 3 common boons. The Zeus/Aphrodite duo boon also allows you to instant trigger blitz turning these into very reliable burst damage boons.
There are too many of these combos to mention and part of the fun will be finding ones that work for you
Placement
For phase one Chronos is pretty simple to avoid.
His scythe whirlwind attack is slower than your dash, if you are using the dash method to passively kills adds this is a good time to run into them and kill them. Dropping your cast on the big guy as you are behind him
Boomerang scythe move is easy to avoid, its blind spot is right in front of Chronos allowing you to hit with your slowest highest dps moves easily.
His wide swing and dash attack both leave a black scar in the ground, these are the only places that are hit by the attack, you can continue attacking him close up through the swing, as the blind spot is again right in front of him, for the dash, he curls his back and shakes, your signal to dodge to the side
Golden Balls/ Bullet hell attacks, at some point Chronos will start teleporting, and generating a round shield of balls, as well as leaving a time stop barrier where he was, this is clearly signposted by a gold magic circle at his feet so easy to dodge the time freeze and these balls are low DPS for him (dealing just 13 damage for me), and can be soaked if you want, but the best way to deal with them is stand near a wall, when he next teleports the balls will hit the wall and burst. However if you have revenge attacks like Zeus's bolt, maybe 13 damage is worth taking those hits for the revenge effects. a 100 damage bolt in return for a 13 damage ball seems fair to me, though ive not done this strategy it occurred to me while recording the damage it took for this post. He also creates a vortex of balls around him. These, just ignore, they have a low range, dash out of it near the styx, take a moment to recover your mana if you have a wait to regen skill or kill some of his adds.
Thats phase one, dodge around ball and vortex attack, punish his boomerang and scythe swing attack by standing in front of him in the blind spot damaging him. Looking for the arched back and shake that indicates is is about to dash.
Phase 2 - Instant death effects and you
The first attack is an instant death or damn near it, whole field wipe. One of the clock numbers will glow, that is your safe zone, you have enough time to get from the other side of the arena if you dash but the second you see a glowing number go for it.
Ticking Clock: A clock hand appears that moves around in order, if hit by the golden hand it will stun you for a second as well as damage you, but this is easy enough to dodge.
Closing circle: If the middle of the clock glows, a circle of damage is about to come, you need to dash outside of the magic circle as it closes in. Sometimes there are two circles.
Time grasp: He will reach at you and slow your time, this is pretty ok, you cant do anything about it but he doesnt do anything to hurt you while slow, just avoid hitting one of the AOE effects already on field. When testing he only ever did this once to me each battle so feels more like a flex than a real attack.
His second instant death attack is creating a black circle on the outside and middle with a range of no colour
Notes provided by Microsoft snipping tool
Time bubbles, he creates many gold circles on the ground, getting caught in one when it goes off punishes you by freezing you. For me this catches me when im escaping the closing circle and he goes right in for the freeze, but otherwise easy to dodge
https://preview.redd.it/6b323wjsz50d1.png?width=1209&format=png&auto=webp&s=50c9f00c2e504881cd301dbfa3db1c724c77a72c
Bullet hell rings, he creates three rings of low damage golden balls, easy to dodge and position so they dont hurt you. I find my little froggy buddy usually negates an entire ring just sitting there. The warning for this is red circles on the ground. The 3rd ring is too far out to ever damage you, the inner ring is a shield and will probably need to be soaked, the middle ring is far enough away you can wait in the gap and hit him with ranged attacks and still be close enough to dodge boomerang and slice.
https://preview.redd.it/2fyvphlw160d1.png?width=1582&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b88cb489e7e10e5708f266ad8c2c243b854bdfd
At half health he summons hourglasses and puts a shield around himself, you dont need to kill the glasses, but since hes shielded and bullet covered himself may as well until he moves back to a normal pattern.
The whole time he is using his three core attacks, the dash, the slice and the boomerang, All three have wider arcs meaning a bigger safe zone for the boomerang and the slice.
After 50% health there is less of a delay between all his attacks, but it stays much the same with golden balls added to the rotation more,
Just keep dodging the AOEs, stay in front of him when hes not casting those and hit hard and often.
https://preview.redd.it/8hekgdn8260d1.png?width=1615&format=png&auto=webp&s=52e6462a71ba9df580cd3ff3276b7dcb8093085a
Finally General run advice
Boon rarity, heroic boons are an amazing investment, an increase from 80 to 200 damage on posidons dash attack? insane, there are 3 methods i use.
Rare crop from Demeter, considering that this is the most reliable way taking Demeter's keepsake at the start of a run is a good call. Will take 1-3 of your boons and make them heroic over the next 12 encounters, so if you are going to take it take it early, it also helps to do that so it chooses the core boons you want to boost. Getting this as my 4th boon in order to make my main attack cast and dash heroic is something i will happily waste my hammers onThis can be supplemented by switching to Narcissus's keepsake after first boss to turn one more of your early boons heroic, just make sure to change keepsake before drinking from the fountain.
https://preview.redd.it/d2ztqte4660d1.png?width=1087&format=png&auto=webp&s=e5af945426eb7027b70e37da2b7276c79f14ead9
The opposite of this is Heras skill Bridal Glow, which makes all your boons heroic but slowly downgrades them. Only safe to take right before the final boss, but i did once get it in the final Charon shop and had fun. If not willing to take the risk on this Hera has one of the most powerful skills in the game IMO, Proper Upbringing infusion which makes all your boons rare
https://preview.redd.it/aeqkwoai660d1.png?width=1256&format=png&auto=webp&s=9e95b879774cb458b7136c71baaa8bcd1176c81c
And then combos of another of her boons for a flat damage increase to everything
https://preview.redd.it/ceexx3wl660d1.png?width=1186&format=png&auto=webp&s=2a99e6cad714c2e47cd64e19f6683eb2f60f98e0
Hera and Hestia both offer means to trade offerings for higher versions also, so running either of these goddesses will leave you with more rare and heroic than not.
Hope this has helped if anyone has a 1k plus combo not mentioned here let me know :) And before you complain the game is too hard, use god mode.
Update: For fun after this i went back to 34 fear and tried using my least favourite weapon, the torches, i wound up getting 3 hammers this run which boosted my special, an echo double and 2 normal, so my blitz special became my burst damage and my passive damage, as the circling yellow orbs took out the adds, and as i surmised above, having two vengeance effects and soaking the golden balls was an effective way to damage Chronos. I wasnt quite doing enough damage to hurt chronos, but my hex ability came in clutch for bursts of DPSFor more fun the vows i used :)
https://preview.redd.it/flganyf4w70d1.png?width=1333&format=png&auto=webp&s=f69e5ee492134889e967c2a1d5a3eee21f3be196
https://preview.redd.it/uuxeqbz8w70d1.png?width=408&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf4461ef438ce9891ae46790d846a1f437aa2924
https://preview.redd.it/ltsqsg0ts70d1.png?width=696&format=png&auto=webp&s=0649f1024d0803a6b71e2de78de72950e33101ef
Vow of blood and dominance - Opponents having more health and damage is standard of increased difficulty
Vow of fury - Honestly a buff, enemies being faster means they move into my attacks faster
Vow of commotion - More mobs isnt a problem as you can see i build up AOE damage for the end battle adds, rather than single target damage
Vow of wandering - never really feel the impact of this one, its three vow points for nothing, am i the only one who finds the zone 1 mobs harder than the zone 2 and 3?
Vow of scars, no healing, this hurts, honestly a run ender - not one to choose lightly
Vow of destitution, this seems bad, but not really, the vow of commotion adds enough mobs that you get enough gold to counter it.
Vow of panic - i leave this on for my low heat runs, it changes the way you play a little 0 mana at start of a round makes you think about and use your gain boons more effectively.
Vow of bitterness - I hate it i hate it i hate it. I lost a Hera boon when i chose her keepsake to get it! I lost a boss Zeus boon! Ah i hate this one. But in the end 3 less boons isnt that bad of a cost.
Vow of arrogance - this costs you primed mana for rare boons, but since i used rare crop and narcissus's keepsake to boost my boons to heroic it didnt have much impact at all on this run.
Vows i hate and will never use -
Rebuke - Just annoying having to chip all enemies before hurting them, it forces fast weapon styles and just annoys me enough to avoid
Haunting - maybe i suck, but battles just go forever and ever with this one
Forsaking - The FOMO of loosing a boon you wanted upsets me a lot so dont pick this one
Desperation - look i think i made good time sub 20 min here, but ive never won a game with this (or the hades equivalent on)
Abandon - 5 fear is a lot, but loosing my arcana cards is way too big a cost.
I think i could have activated vow of suffering and gone for 38 fear here, might try that one some time.
submitted by Kind_Stranger_weeb to HadesTheGame [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 02:23 GregName Unit-a-Day Challenge, Native English Speaker Learning Spanish (but any language will do)

I'm trying to blitz out getting through Spanish on Duolingo. My trial for Duolingo Max is coming to an end, but it seems best to leave it in place with a subscription. My goal is to get through the 230 units in Spanish and see where that takes me in learning Spanish.
I've seen earlier posts about people trying to set a pace of a unit a day. I was using the free Duolingo when I started, but I quickly discovered that the ads just slow things down too much. Plus fighting for hearts was annoying. Somewhere with either Super or Max, I picked up the ability to drill with the little barbell icon. This is very valuable to me.
I've seen posts from people talking about people cheating in leagues. Some of the posts talked about how fast someone was making XP. To give away my secret, here we go. This last week, I hit over 20,000 XP during the week. In the week, I knocked out my unit-a-day goal. I'm on day 18 and on Unit 10 in Section 2. Moving through the lessons rapidly causes the opportunities for the x2 XP period of time, which is 15 minutes. Once I get in the x2 XP period, I move directly to drilling. The "biggest bang for the buck" in drilling is "Speak." It's actually wonderful that this is the best pick, because there are many that believe that the weakness of an online app is not getting to speak.
When drilling when not in the x2 XP period, I listen to what is said, and try again and again to get my speech correct using my own ear for feedback. I try to imitate even the tone of the character (e.g., I drone on like Lilly, I try to be a little kid, I talk really fast, I try to sound pompous, etc.). But during the x2 XP period, I take off immediately and read the sentence. If I'm moving, I can get through the 10 sentences in as low as 32 seconds, but mostly a bit higher (e.g., into the 40s and 50s). There is some turnaround overhead in getting going to the next round of speaking (perhaps 15 seconds), so if I am moving, in a 15 minute period, I can crank out over 1,000 XP, probably approaching 1,500 XP. If there was a real battle to win the league, I can spend 100 gems to get the 15 minute period extended. I have accidentally pressed this button to extend, only because the software on my iPad has this at right about the same spot as the Continue button. So, getting to 20,000 XP for the week is a pretty doable thing--no cheating required.
The voice recognition software is a little weak at times, so when drilling, I know I missed the pronunciation, but the system gives me credit anyway.
The little three-star games off to the side of the lesson trail helps me work on fast-matching my vocabulary. The software is set up just perfect for me to fail at the very end. The company wants be to spend 450 gems or buy a package of 1-minute extensions, but I'm not going that far. My gems would be all gone too quickly, causing a need to actually thrown down real money beyond the subscription to get that extra time boost.
So that's my league strategy. This website is about gamification, and gamification is going to be something I hope causes me to actively engage in a big way in order to compete at a high level. But the unit-a-day thing is just a whole other thing. People talk about immersion as the fastest way to learn a language, but I'm not leaving home anytime soon, so immersion is going to be more of a trick than a travel plan.
So, here is my immersion plan. No, I changed my mind. That will be some other post. I'll just keep this as the post about setting the challenge for doing a unit a day for my Spanish learning. It's likely I could fall off the path rather quickly. After all, Section 1 gives the student a false sense that progress won't be that difficult. Like doing something like the Pacific Crest Trail, there are many that sign their names up at the start, but a lot fewer that make it to the end.
So, if you want in on this challenge with me, send me a friend request in Duolingo. My handle is the same. Start from wherever you are, meaning if you are on 43 units in, and think you can take the challenge from there, you are committing to being at unit 50 a week later. Maybe we will all fail to reach this goal, but maybe just shooting for the stars will get us to the moon!
submitted by GregName to duolingo [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 14:10 AJ_NoSleep Players allowed phones at current Superbet Blitz tournament

Players allowed phones at current Superbet Blitz tournament
From what it seems, players are allowed to access their phones between the games at this OTB tournament. Magnus was last online on his chesscom account 14 or so minutes ago, and is currently playing a blitz game in the tournament :
Is this standard practise? From what I was aware, players at least at the World Rapid and Blitz weren't allowed to use phones between games.
Seems like again, another OTB tournament with poor anti-cheat regulations (this post isn't about Magnus but the fact that the players are seemingly allowed to use their phone).
https://preview.redd.it/8u7i9dhzfszc1.png?width=942&format=png&auto=webp&s=98f44faa89ae8fe36a9fcf2ab5a366cc1ae24294
submitted by AJ_NoSleep to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 23:16 StrawberryPillow424 People, there's NO BLITZ tomorrow!!!

People, there's NO BLITZ tomorrow!!!
No info on monopoly go wiki, in GoRewards app..
If there was, MoGo wiki would already post an info about that
submitted by StrawberryPillow424 to MonopolyGoTrading [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 17:50 SchighSchagh Addressing rating manipulation in chess

Rating manipulation has been at the heart of a lot of controversies in chess lately, often resulting in cheating accusations. What if we could better control how rating is gained so as to dis-incentivize activities that lead to controversy? I propose an adaptive k-factor scaling in Elo computation so that the seriousness of a chess game directly affects how much rating can be gained or lost.
Here's a few recent examples of rating manipulation that led to controversy:
So what's my solution? Let's scale the k-factor of each game proportional to the number of participants in the event. Casual online blitz? There's only the two players involved, so very small k-factor. If they play enough games together you can still gain some decent rating after a while, but you can't just boost your friend willy nilly. Titled Tuesday? Quite a high k-factor since there's a lot of people playing, which indicates that it's a serious event. Viewer arena organized by a streamer? Moderately sized k-factors in most cases with a few dozen participants; large streamers would probably be able to organize large events with large k-factors. Random Open tournament in Spain that happens to occur just before FIDE calculates ratings for the last Candidates spot? Moderately high k-factor because it's a serious established tournament, but just not a very big one. Grand Swiss? Hella big k-factor because that's very serious business with lots of players. A 4-player "tournament" where it's mostly 1 guy playing the rest in succession? Yeah, that gets the same tiny k-factor used for casual 1v1 games. Not a viable way to boost your Elo very much.
In short, the k-factor should be scaled by something like (# participants in the event / 100). There should be a cap on how big the scaling factor can be, probably around 2.0. I'm also flexible on what exactly that divisor should be. Maybe more like 20, maybe more like 200, I'm not sure.
What are the ramifications of all this?
All the weird things that I've mentioned above would be disincentivized and less likely to occur.
The most interesting ramification is what happens to open tournaments vs invitationals. Invitationals are generally very small, and would end up with moderate k-factors at best. That means top players who participate in them won't be able to change their ratings very much by just playing each other. But in the meantime, every big open tournament is going to have a big k-factor, and its winner will probably gaing a lot of rating. As such, I think this might give more people outside the top-20 more chances to break into the top-20 at least for a short time just because their rating would be more volatile. I think this would be great for chess.
So, yeah. Let's scale the k-factor by some measure of seriousness of each game. We can get sensible scaling ratios by just looking at the number of participants in the event. This would disincentivize a lot of rating manipulation behaviors that have led to controversy, and it would simultaneously incentivize a bit playing opens vs small invitationals. Adaptive k-factor scaling could improve chess quite a bit both online and in person.
What do you think?
submitted by SchighSchagh to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 00:50 evanisombooks Am I a bad sport?

For context, this is all relating to playing on chess.com. Background will be at the beginning, the meaty part will be at the end if you want to skip straight to it.
TL:DR I’ve been losing a lot of games to lower level players lately and I’m suspicious that cheating is becoming more prevalent.
Background: I joke around with my friends and tell them I have only three hobbies: drinking beer, reading books, and playing chess. But I’ve started having an issue with that last one.
According to chess.com, I was at the peak of my game at the beginning of 2022. I was rated 1898 in rapid (January 2022) and 1388 in blitz (February 2022). As of today, I’m 1572 in rapid (I rarely play rapid on chess.com these days) and 997 (?!) in blitz. I’m going to explain how I perceive this, and hopefully you guys can tell me why I’m wrong.
For starters, this is my daily schedule. Wake up, go for a run, get ready, play chess, go to work, come home, play chess, cook dinner, study chess while eating, read, go to bed. Chess obviously takes up a big part of my life. I play both online and over the board. For reference, my OTB ratings are 1534 for clasival, 1499 for quick, and 1419 for blitz. All of these are USCF ratings. Not the best, but it’s the top 1/3 of USCF players.
Today, I fell below 1000 on blitz. This came after 6 blitz games, of which I only won one. My opponent in my last game had a 90.5 accuracy and I had 77.3 (this is average for me on chess.com). I plugged the PGN into Stockfish 12.1 (I’m too lazy to upgrade) and frankly, I couldn’t find any faults in my opponent’s play. They weren’t choosing the best moves 100% of the time, but they were about 60% of the time, and the worst move they made all game was the fifth best, according to my engine.
The meaty part: I don’t normally evaluate chess.com games as in depth as this last one, but I’ve lost to sub-1000s on a fairly regular basis recently. Losing to people who are 400+ points lower than my OTB rating seems absurd. At first, I thought I only made foolish mistakes or blunders online, maybe because I never put the same thought and effort into it as I did OTB. But after diligently reviewing every OTB game lately, both rated and casual alike, I find that the mistakes are the same OTB as they are on chess.com, albeit equally foolish.
When I joined chess.com 8 years ago, my chess rating online was significantly higher than it was OTB. Has this changed? Is chess.com now lowballing the hell out of us?
The questions I’d rather get the answer to are these: is cheating running rampant on online chess right now? Or did I just turn idiot in the last two years? Should I give up? Is this happening because I don’t pay for the $100 version of chess.com? Should I move over to lichess? Should I just give up playing online altogether and just stick to my Sunday games in the park? Should I hang up the pieces and move to checkers or backgammon?
So many questions, such little answers. Honestly, I haven’t decided if I’d rather just be a poor sport about losing or if I’d rather chess.com be inundated with cheating. Let me know what you think and please tell me I’m wrong.
submitted by evanisombooks to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.08 20:27 Entire-Soup-9549 I got Banned twice for Bullish*t Reasons

I'm writing this here because Samay Raina is the reason I got into chess.
I started playing chess in June 2023. But in January 2024, I watched one of Samay's old streams, which piqued my interest in chess. I understood that this game has so much depth and is fun. I started playing it with some seriousness and reached a 1500 rating in Blitz. (before that I have played 1000+ bullets games on mobile without pre-move)
However, my rating wasn't rising after 1500 because I struggled with the mid-game and end-game. To address this, I started playing 10-minute Rapid Games, where I experimented with mid-games and end-games against lower-rated players(my rating was 800 then). I only played Rapid for two months until my account on Chess()com was banned for "CHEATING" i.e. Fair Play on May 2nd.
During this period, I also played on Lichess()org, where I have a rating of 1700 in Rapid, with my highest rating on Chess()com being 1500.
The question arises: Why would I cheat against players rated 1300?
I appealed the ban, but they denied it, accusing me of cheating without presenting any evidence. (Maybe I cheated in my sleep, who knows?) I decided to let bygones be bygones when they offered me a chance to retain my old username and email to create a "2nd account," which I made on May 8th.
Additionally, I created another account during the appeal process, where I reached almost a 1500 rating in four days. Butttt that account also got banned for "ABUSE." Let me explain what kind of abuse they accused me of: I wrote 'bye' to my opponent when they were losing or had lost, just to tease them, which I did most of the time. Apparently, this is considered abuse. I know full well that I haven't written a single bad word in any chat.
In the past on Lichess, I did engage in actual abuse towards an opponent who stalled the whole game after reaching a losing position for the entire 8 minutes. For this, I received a warning not an account closure. Since then, I haven't said a single bad word to anyone in the game chat.
To be honest, I feel like chess is a closed gated society where if they don't like you, they'll kick you out for no apparent reason. CHESS IS NOT A SPORT, and people wonder why such a fun game like chess is not popular. Just go to the Gotham Chess channel; he made a video of a GM who got banned because he defeated Danny with some bullshit opening. If Chess()com, the biggest and most well-known platform, does these things, maybe people will just stop playing chess.
(I AM ADDING MY ACCOUNT's IN THE REPLY)
submitted by Entire-Soup-9549 to SamayRaina [link] [comments]


2024.05.08 17:19 basementvalentine Riot has falsely banned my account a second time and I don't know what to do

Hello, I'd like to preface this post by saying no I do not cheat and I have never cheated in league. YES I use Porofessor and Blitz but I believe both are acceptable under riots terms and service. I am very desperate for a solution and from my experience I don't believe the support team will be able to help me. I have spend a couple hundred dollars on this account and it's the first account I have ever played on.
To start a few months ago I created a new account. I got that account up to level 19 only playing against bots I played two aram games and on the second game it got banned. I fought with support for about three messages of back and forth and every single one said the suspension was place correctly and I needed to deal with it. I told the support I could accept the bans but to please tell me what got my account flagged and what third party tool got me banned. Support refused and ended the ticket.
Now I play on multiple different accounts I have been playing on two recently and switched to play on that account to play arena with my friends. I haven't played on this account for probably 6 months and I return with a ban message for third party tools. I don't want to lose this account can anyone help me recover and get my account unbanned. I've just received a response from support saying that my account was correctly banned and that their was no unauthorized access to my account
I don't want to lose anymore accounts If it's possible could anyone tell me what's getting me flagged and banned. I'm really at a loss for what to do I want to keep playing the game but it's really frustrating to lose everything for no reason.
Edit I will also include the op.gg of the account that has been banned
https://www.op.gg/summoners/na/ColormeinKindnes-5407
submitted by basementvalentine to riotgames [link] [comments]


2024.05.08 06:05 Extreme-Ad-6490 Viih_Sou update

Hey guys, Brandon here again, just wanted to give a bit of an update since my original post: (https://www.reddit.com/chess/s/X4k3LC8cHq)
Firstly, I’d like to thank everyone for the incredible support. I certainly did not expect such positive feedback, and it absolutely means the world to me.
As the situation has blown up in the last few days among all platforms, I’ve been eagerly awaiting some sort of statement from chess.com. Privately, publicly, anything. Refreshing my email every few minutes. Complete dead silence.
While I’m still banned with my reputation on the line, they have time to joke around and make tweets about Magnus playing the opening in Titled Tuesday, yet somehow mysteriously doesn’t have time to give me a response? Not even a statement claiming that they were justified in their ban. Nothing.
What could take 5 days? Some new investigation of my games? One that was NOT done prior to my ban? Desperately trying to find any “evidence” against me they can? Clearly this is trying to be swept under the rug until the drama dies down, hoping people move on, forgetting about what they have done, but I refuse to stay silent, and I will never back down. I am owed an explanation, which they can’t seem to give as my ban was entirely unjustified, and it doesn’t seem that I’m ever going to get one.
Additionally, these last few days I’ve been working with some colleagues of mine and gathering countless examples of chess.com’s clear lack of competency when it comes to their cheat detection team, which I will be happy to share in due time.
Finally, please follow my new X account where I will be posting updates and more as they appear: https://www.x.com/gmbrandonj
Thanks again for all your support, and I certainly hope we get some answers soon.
EDIT: Okay so a lot of you guys are asking about my previous account history, I had planned to post about it on my personal X account which I will do as well, but to explain ASAP:
No, I have never cheated or been banned for cheating on any account.
https://www.chess.com/membeiamastraw is my account many people have referred to, and indeed it is shadow banned. If you scroll back a few pages of my games, you will see plenty of games against some troll accounts made by some of my friends in which we were messing around during COVID. The result of that led to a lot of boosting/sandbagging of my blitz rating, which was pointless and immature, but of course not remotely the same as using an engine. Attached in the screenshots are emails showing that it was indeed a closure for “rating manipulation” and nothing else- As you can see, the date in which the emails were sent was September 2020, and my last login to iamastraw was in May.
In between this time, I had created a similar troll account chess.com/membeimastraw. Not understanding the process which was necessary to create another title verified account, I had messaged the staff member involved with titled verifications privately on Facebook, in hopes of a quick verification for the upcoming titled Tuesday at the time, and attached is a screenshot of this as well. I was immediately banned, as I had drawn attention to the account, one which I was not supposed to have in view of the previous ban, which had gone under their radar previously. I then understood the necessary procedure of apologizing for rating manipulation before opening my new account, BrandonJacobson.
Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/TuIbIV6
A bit of a mess caused by stupidly messing around as a teenager, which of course was unnecessary, but again, I have never cheated nor have I been banned for cheating.
Finally, I see a lot of you guys don’t use twitteX, so I’ll be happy to post major updates on Reddit as well if need be.
Hope this helps clarify things!
submitted by Extreme-Ad-6490 to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.08 03:03 AliveSeaworthiness98 Is Osa a “shield op”

TLDR: Is Osa considered a shield op like fuse Monty and blitz?
My friends and I were running some custom matches and we agreed on a rule that we weren’t allowed to use shield ops, which was fine cause in my head that only removes blitz and Monty, and fuze as well however that was just because we agreed to ban fuse altogether. I played Osa one round, and my friend told me I cheated because I played a shield op. I argued that she’s not a shield op because her shield only covers her torso and head, and it can be shot around unlike the other ballistic shields. He still won’t agree with me, however I wanted some outside opinions on what makes a shield op and shield op.
submitted by AliveSeaworthiness98 to Rainbow6 [link] [comments]


2024.05.07 17:23 lonely-live Trying out Vii_Shou opening

Blitz rating around 1250s though rapid much higher because I mostly play rapid and I SUCK at blitz because of time management issue (both in chess and in life). So after hearing about the whole Vii_Shou scandal/banned, it got me interested in exploring what happened and of course their games and the post. And then a a few minutes ago I thought, actually why not try the opening and see if it actually works? It's not like I care about my blitz rating, I only care about rapid. Also I have some studying to do so I just want to do this for fun (basically too lazy to study so tricking my brain that playing chess is productive)
I don't even remember what's the exact opening sequence, all I remember is only a4 and Ra3 (are you supposed to take with knight or pawn? Have no idea). But now after I tried it for about 5 games and I somehow win all of them??
I know 5 games are not a big sample size so I will probably try to play more and update later but it just felt weird and insane to me that this really really bad opening could even allow me to win, let alone 5 games. I don't think I play that good too.
No opinion on the whether he cheated but I might actually have this as my opening for all my future blitz games. Until of course if people start noticing.
Also Chess.com if you see this please don't ban me 🙏
submitted by lonely-live to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.06 16:42 bardbrain Star Trek ReAction

I finally went in on these, including the TOS figures that I was missing. I know Flynn said the TNG stuff across the board hasn't performed the way they'd like and I thought I'd give feedback as someone who has both the TNG set and the TOS set from the Funko days.
First, while I appreciate the economical body reuse, the TNG torsos look puffy and the arms look noodle like with that rounded elbow bend. The Borg and Guinan are winners, relatively, and the women and Q are okay but it hurts to have a soft torso get reused 5 times. The more a sculpt gets reused, the more it will be scrutinized.
I don't want to harp on that because I know things will go a different direction going forward. So I'll focus on constructive ideas.
  1. I think the TOS buyers are still sore over the lack of a Chekov so I think a Chekov is an excellent place to start in terms of planning anything going forward, especially as Walter Koenig is getting a bit more love with his little media blitz for his final acting role and his minor Picard S3 cameo.
  2. Trek fandom is so splintered that it's pretty difficult to put all your eggs in any one basket. But I can see a way forward centering on TOS branding and sculpts that has a bit of fun and spreads the love around more.
With that in mind, I'd like to suggest the following figures:
Captain Kirk (Green wraparound)
Dr. Leonard McCoy (Short Sleeve)
Chekov (TOS)
Dr. M'Benga (TOS, Short Sleeve)
Nurse Chapel (TOS)
Yeoman Rand (TOS)
Lt. Marla McGivers (TOS)
Bashir (TOS Uniform, Trials and Tribble-ations)
O'Brien (TOS Uniform, Trials and Tribble-ations)
Dax (TOS Uniform, Trials and Tribble-ations)
Sisko (TOS Uniform, Trials and Tribble-ations)
Mirror Universe Archer (Green wraparound, In A Mirror Darkly)
Mirror Universe T'Pol (TOS Uniform variant, In A Mirror Darkly)
Captain Pike (Green wraparound, Strange New Worlds)
Those can all be done with largely the same three bodies. I'd propose the following as companions:
Khan Noonien Singh (TOS)
Worf (Trials and Tribble-ations)
Odo (Trials and Tribble-ations)
Cyrano Jones (TOS, he and Worf and Odo have identical jacket construction)
Mirror Hoshi Sato (In a Mirror Darkly, Midriff Jumpsuit)
Mirror T'Pol (Might as well get a second use of the Mirror Midriff Jumpsuit)
Spock (Strange New Worlds)
Una Chin-Riley (Strange New Worlds)
Pike, Hemmer, Sam Kirk, M'Benga, Scotty, Lt. Kirk (Strange New Worlds, Might as well reuse Spock's body)
Uhura (Strange New Worlds, literally the only female main character who also wears Una's skirt/pants combo in S2 aside from Carol Kane's Pelis, although Pelia and Uhura might warrant shorter legs)
Beckett Mariner (Strange New Worlds, Those Old Scientists)
Bradward Boimler (Strange New Worlds, Those Old Scientists)
Pike in Chair (The Cage)
Arex
M'Ress
Taking a cue from G.I. Joe ReAction, they could have "Army Builders" of varying ranks and ethnicities.
Now, taking all of this into account and looking to maximize goodwill, excitement, and fan enthusiasm while diversifying colors and looks, I'd suggest the following as a first 1-2 waves, again mostly in TOS uniforms:
Chekov
Bashir
O'Brien
Odo
Hemmer
Mirror T'Pol
Arex
Khan
Just laying out my strategy:
You're getting 2 of each division color (red/yellow/blue), a staple of the iconography.
You're getting two characters (Odo and Khan) out of uniform, essential to showing people there can be worldbuilding.
You're representing 5 different shows. (TOS, DS9, SNW, ENT, TAS)
You're getting 2 non-human skintones, establishing a sci-fi look. (Hemmer and Arex)
You're getting 6 different bodies in 8 figures, frontloading tooling that can be reused later. Essential to sparking imagination with a line.
These all inspire strong and DIFFERENT emotions. Chekov - Completion of the old line, reverence for Koenig. Bashir and O'Brien - Comedy, friendship. Odo - Comedy and nostalgia for Auberjonois. Hemmer - Sadness, nostalgia. T'Pol - Ambition, defiance, the well documented love of Jolene Blalock in a skirt. Arex - Wonder, whimsy, absurdity. Khan - Nostalgia, menace, a sense the line can have great villains.
Centering the line roughly on TOS with the ability to cheat back to Discovery and forward through Wrath of Khan era gives you the most crossover potential between shows, spreading the love. It's visually TOS based but not TOS centric AT ALL. TOS era, not actually that many TOS characters and those I have chosen have very deep ties elsewhere. There's 60s Trek as a play environment (which can have playsets) but not a sole focus on 60s nostalgia (because that's an older demo than the prime collecting demo). It's essentially TOS because everyone visits TOS and it's adjacent to SNW, not because there are lots of 70 year old toy collectors. Instead of thinking about crews, think of emotional sub-units like O'Brien/Bashir, Uhura/Hemmer, La'an/Kirk, Dax/Sisko. They don't need to share waves but the overall vibe is that there are all these great scene partners in the line but also characters who have never met.
I'd also suggest if S7 does go back to the TOS well that actual TOS versions of actual TOS characters be specific to performances.
Do Kirk with that demented Enemy Within scream, McCoy with that City on the Edge of Forever drugged paranoia or a look of post-surgery relief. Resist doing more definitive versions of the TOS main 7. First because these are characters you can keep revisiting and selling because everyone knows them (whereas Mariner or Arex get one shot). But also because the Funko/S7 line did them AND the main TOS guys are overexposed characters that we can be numb to and so giving them "performance choices" (even just skepticism from Spock or amusement from Kirk) humanizes them.
That's my $.02 and change, anyway!!!
submitted by bardbrain to Super7 [link] [comments]


2024.05.06 15:15 Roy_Gonzo Online Cheating 2200+

A recent 3/0 blitz opponent of mine with a rating around 2250 played three rather poor games (chess.com accuracy around 70%) and then proceeded to play three absouletly flawless games (chess.com accuracy around 95%).
I'm fairly certain that something was off in the last three games. However I also sometimes play individual games with a +90% accuracy (mostly if I know the theory and convert). So apart from my feeling is there any way to somehow differentiate variance from cheating without any added information (windows opened in browser etc)?
I feel like with the amount of online games played variance is always a reasonable explanation. But this is so incredibly dissatisfying. So since we're in the court of public opionion: Short of 100% proof what would make you believe that someone cheated?
submitted by Roy_Gonzo to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.06 06:58 Extreme-Ad-6490 It’s me. Viih_Sou

Hello people of Reddit, this is going to be a long, comprehensive post so forgive me in advance but I think it’s crucial I don’t leave out any information so here goes:
To catch everyone up to speed, The other day I seem to have shaken up the chess world after defeating Daniel Naroditsky in a long blitz match on chess.com playing under my anonymous chess.com account Viih_Sou (chess.com/membeViih_Sou) starting every game with 1 a4 2 Ra3 with white, and 1 a5 2 Ra6 with black. Speculations have run wild about who could be behind this mysterious account, Could it be Magnus trolling? Hikaru? A young Indian prodigy? A Brazilian Grandmaster? Stockfish? Who would be strong enough to pull such a stunt, defeating such an amazing online blitz player, certainly one of the strongest in the world in peak form, with rook odds? Well, chess.com soon closed the account for a fair play violation, supposedly solving this mystery..
Well it’s me, hi, I’m the problem it’s me. GM Brandon Jacobson, but you can call me Brandon.
Before I get into what happened and how this all started, I’d like to share a little bit about myself.
Part 1: Who am I?
Ever since learning the game at the age of 5 wanting to imitate my older brother who learned from an after school program, I’ve always been fascinated with chess, being an extremely intuitive person and an over thinker combined with being extremely competitive, I’ve always found my purpose and comfort in chess. Coming from a family who didn’t even know the rules, as early as I can remember, being around 8 years old I would compile notebooks upon notebooks of openings I would attempt to teach myself using my Houdini program which I was absolutely enamored with. Playing at my local club every weekend was the highlight of my week. Slowly I kept improving and improving, and throughout the years I would be inspired time and time again by reading the classics (for example My System by Nimzowich). During difficult times in my childhood, chess would always be my escape, something with endless room to learn and become better at, and when I would analyze chess, nothing else in the world mattered. My approach to learning chess always made me stand out from other talented children I was surrounded by, who were all extremely tactically sharp from consuming puzzles prescribed by their coaches, meanwhile I always shocked coaches and grandmasters with my intuition and understanding for the game at such a young age. I can still vividly remember being 10 years old rated around 2100, attending a US Chess School camp, graciously run by IM Greg Shahade giving talented American kids an opportunity for a few days of free training. I was by far the youngest and the lowest rated player, there were many FMs and IMs attending as well. During the camp, we were given an “intuition test”: the idea being that we would have to look at a lot of positions of strategic nature in little time and write down our first instinct move, and in general the strongest players would perform the best, as it tests understanding more so than tactical patterns one can internalize. In the end, I had scored the highest of all the students, and gave me a huge confidence boost going forward, realizing I had what it took.
Fast forward a little while, and I was invited to the Kasparov Chess Foundation program, giving young American talents an opportunity to meet and work with none other than Garry Kasparov for a few days, and this is also where I had met, now a strong grandmaster in addition to being my best friend, Andrew Hong who you’ll hear more about shortly. As we were presenting our games to Kasparov, he quickly noticed my incredible chess understanding but carefree attitude, fooling around and causing trouble while the others would try to solve endgame studies, as difficult calculation never appealed to me the way it did others, and I could never bring myself to focus. At the end of the session, Kasparov had talked to my mother, telling her what was already clear: that I’m extremely talented but lazy, and I’m going to need to start working hard.
Well, I didn’t end up taking his advice, having fun through my teen years with my completely relaxed attitude at every tournament. Always being a streaky player, being unstoppable when I’m in form, but also having tilt streaks, one of my most memorable tournament experiences was being 15 years old, missing a round being hospitalized overnight during a tournament, sleeping maybe an hour with IV tubes stuck to me, going to play that same day, ending with a 2700 performance, and laughing about the whole experience. I’ve always performed my best enjoying doing what I loved, without any expectations or pressure.
Knowing how difficult professional chess life is, trying to make ends meet if you’re not an absolute top player, I had never planned a career in chess. I started attending University at the age of 15, and my improvement/motivation to study had stagnated. I became a grandmaster at 16, and for a while decided to focus partly on school partly on chess. Classical chess started to feel different than it used to. I would let my nerves get to me, get in my own head, start doubting myself, feeling guilty for taking time away from developing another career, and getting frustrated that I wasn’t achieving the results I had wanted despite knowing I was improving as a player.
Throughout these struggles, online blitz was always a huge confidence booster for me, being able to rely on my intuition and not having the pressure of over the board chess, I was able to show what I was capable of. It’s where I always felt at home. Improving over the years, and being competitive with top level players at times, I had started to realize that I have real potential that would be such a shame to waste, even though I was always overshadowed by juniors who have had more over the board success than I.
So finally, this past fall, I had taken the decision to take some time off school and give myself a fair shot at making it to the top, and committed to myself to working hard on chess. During this time, I had also played a lot of blitz online on my main account (chess.com/membebrandonjacobson), achieving 3100+ for multiple stretches, defeating many strong players in matches. Nevertheless, I would needlessly get in my own head as soon as I see Hikaru or Danya’s name pop up on my screen, always having awful results against them relative to my level against other opponents.
In any case, toward the end of 2023 I had travelled to Europe to play a few tournaments and see once and for all if I had it in me or I was just another hopeless dreamer. In the end, I did indeed gain some rating, having great experiences along the way, for example scoring 8/10 in the Sunway Sitges open, defeating the Russian prodigy Volodar Murzin in a blitz playoff, picking up 17 rating points for my efforts. I returned home to my current rating of 2575, and although the results were great on paper for me, I can’t say I was entirely happy with the outcome, knowing how my losses were entirely self inflicted with similar nerve issues I had previously been experiencing for years, realizing it’s the one thing holding me back.
So I return back home and make a commitment to myself that I’m going to reset and get my head together. After recovering from the string of tournaments, I finally decide to play a day of serious blitz where I’m totally focused, beginning with defeating Parham Maghsoodloo with a score of 10.5-2.5. Soon after I receive a challenge from Hikaru, and for the first time, I felt free. Completely free from nerves and expectations, allowing myself to just enjoy the opportunity to play. The score ended 8.5-4.5 in his favor, with every game being super close and competitive. Naturally I couldn’t help myself and watch the VOD of his stream afterwards, and I started laughing hysterically as he kept repeating (maybe slightly paraphrased) “I don’t know what’s going on today you guys, Brando normally sort of just rolls over and dies but today he’s really fighting hard and it irks me, I don’t know why he’s so motivated and playing well today!”. His assessment was completely true, only that I was not doing anything special, but simply allowing myself to play at my normal level rather than freezing up and shaking at the idea of playing a match against him.
Little did I know this high would be the last day I’d be able to seriously play chess in months. After I had finally made serious improvement and felt more motivated than ever, I was facing some serious health issues, which until now I hadn’t opened up about publicly, only explaining “burnout” to most of my friends/colleagues as a reason for disappearing from the chess world. During this difficult time, I would continue to work as hard as I could toward improving my ability for classical chess, but being advised not to play, with my body not being well equipped to handle any additional stress.
Part 2: the backstory
There for me to every step of the way throughout this slow recovery process was the above mentioned best friend/training partner GM Andrew Hong. Trying to give me a laugh, he had showed me some of his analysis on 1 a4 2 Ra3 (and 1a5 2 Ra6 for black). My immediate response was that of any sane person, telling him, using some colorful language, to please stop wasting my time and to talk to me about something else. Andrew insisted, telling me to play some logical moves against it, and if I can comfortably refute it he’d shut up about it. Well, sure enough not only was I unable to put him away, but I was struggling to survive against it, over and over and over again. I could not believe my eyes. He was prepared to every possible setup, and had such a wide array of ideas against all of them. He even joked to me that a chessable course on it might be on the way!
I joined team rook odds. We continued to analyze more ideas, seeing the power of the coordination of the 2 bishops, realizing that this could become a powerful blitz weapon.
This lasted a few weeks, until I urged him to try it in some blitz games of his own. He tested it on his anonymous account (chess.com/membePastaaontwitch) and I couldn’t believe what I was seeing, winning game after game against WFAFAF. Did he find a truly brilliant weapon, one which no one can take seriously?
Part 3: Viih_Sou
I had created my anonymous account, chess.com/membeViih_Sou many years ago, inspired by an inside joke I had with some Brazilian friends at the time as a way to fool around, test openings, etc. Ironically, as my rating had dropped a bunch on my main account due to trying to play while mitigating some of my focus in an unsuccessful attempt to keep my heart rate down, I had decided to play a few games here and there to ease myself back into blitz and avoid the pressure of potential cheating accusations due to the difference in level. This is the reality of the modern world of chess if you’re not a 2700+ player, being accused by everyone to your face and behind your back every time a good result is achieved. I’ve even had one prominent, well respected grandmaster write an entire article praising my talent as a teenager only to accuse me of cheating behind my back. Well, clearly this was no exception..
Finally beginning to feel myself again, and inspired my Andrew’s success with the opening, I dove right in, beginning on April 30. After a few warmup games, I decided to test my luck too. Having 0 expectations, in complete shock I soon realized what an incredible weapon this truly was. Feeling myself again, with pure confidence and totally in the zone, I went on many hour farming sessions as I always enjoyed in the past. How could I be crushing people with these ridiculous odds?
It soon started to click that I was barely giving odds at all. In online 3+0, all that matters is reaching familiar positions where you have the ability to play quick moves and continuously keep the pressure on your opponent, and in every single game that is exactly what was happening. Winning games left and right with similar themes and tricks, and although playing totally unsound throughout the whole game according to stockfish, having opponents eventually collapse under the pressure.
Soon enough, I get paired with none other than Daniel Naroditsky. Sure, I had gained confidence and was back to peak form, but how could I possibly get away with such utter stupidity against Danya?
Well, there was only one way to find out, and I was not going to back out now. With absolutely 0 pressure on me, and all of it on him to prove he can put me away, I had nothing to lose. Absolute madness ensued, with insanely wild games played from both of us throughout our nearly 70 game match through the night, I couldn’t believe I was pulling it off. With so many creative ideas from the both of us, for example this double exchange sacrifice which later turned out to be +7 for white but with outposts for my pieces and the queenside pawns marching down long term, my king slowly ran to the queen and won in incredible fashion: https://www.chess.com/game/live/108391163433?username=viih_sou
But of course, more often than not I would find tactical tricks from lost positions for example this game which was featured on one of the original Reddit posts about this match, and in Gotham chess’ video: https://www.chess.com/game/live/108382226803?username=viih_sou
Throughout the match, Danya undoubtedly had some streaks of tilt, and it can clearly be seen that the quality of his play he showed was far lower than his normal level and what he’s capable of, obviously annoyed and flabbergasted by what was happening, as anyone would be. But nevertheless, overall I thought it was an incredibly fun match for the both of us, and was elated to be winning by a score of (forgive me if I’m wrong) around 40-29 if I’m not mistaken: an unusual feat against him, who has historically gotten the better of me, but at the same time certainly not the first time I’d won a match. Completely unbeknownst to me at the time of course, this was going viral on Reddit, theories about who this anonymous GM could possibly be.
I could not believe what I was seeing next, as I was suddenly forced to resign by the server in the opening, and kicked out of live chess. Some type of glitch? Unsure of what had happened, I had logged on again soon after with a seemingly normal interface, so I had emailed support and asked what happened. I received a response the next day, stating that I was banned for a fair play violation with absolutely 0 explanation.
My jaw dropped, I could not believe what I was seeing. Confusion turned to anxiety turned to anger. I quickly submitted an appeal to which I still haven’t heard a response to.
Had I really played so well the algorithm flagged me for cheating? Well sure enough, I got my ego in check when I went through the games and saw just how low the quality of games actually were, with us both swinging the evaluation so much in almost every game. But this made the ban all the more confusing, what can even be seen as suspicious in any way?
And then the frustration ensued. Is the only way someone could defeat Daniel Naroditsky in a match being 2750+, and otherwise you must be a cheater? Firstly, our difference in strength in classical chess is negligible, if at all. It is well established, and for good reason, that he is among the best online blitz players in the world, despite his relatively low classical rating, but the same can’t be true about anyone else? Hikaru on his stream earlier that morning had thought it could have been Wesley So, as it seems he would pull off such a troll. If he played these games it would be all fun and games I suppose, but because it was me, it’s in no way possible. And of course we are discounting the fact that a little over a year ago I had beaten Wesley 9 games in a row on his anonymous account (that has been made public by Hikaru and others) dogsofwar. Or was I cheating then too, or any time I’ve performed well?
People were also speculating that it could be a young Indian prodigy, and jokingly suggested Gukesh. But again, blitz chess, especially without increment, and classical chess are extremely different and require different skill sets. I’ve always been gifted at making quick intuitive decisions, and if I were to play a classical match against Gukesh, I’d have a close to 0 chance of winning, however I think I’d be the heavy favorite in online 3+0, given that he doesn’t have much online chess experience.
Not only this, the day after our match, Andrew had played against none other than Hikaru himself in his viewer arena, winning in the exact same fashion! https://www.chess.com/game/live/108421876919?username=pastaaontwitch So I suppose he was cheating this game as well?
I apologize if I’m coming across as arrogant, and I’m in no way intending to, I’m trying my best to simply share as much information as possible, and as you can imagine I’m beyond confused and angry, and it goes to show the bigger problem with online chess as a whole.
When Jose Martinez Alcantara (Jospem) performs exceptionally well in some online events, the entire world accuses him of cheating behind his back like middle school children, until he’s backed into a corner and scores second place in titled Tuesday in front of a camera crew, and it still didn’t stop the accusations? Or of course we simply move past the mass harassment of the 17 year old Denis Lazavik. The chess world: the only place where it’s socially accepted for grown “men” to continuously attack a teenager and attempt ruin his career over being upset from losing a game, and nobody does or says anything about it.
I would assume the chess.com staff had simply seen Brandon Jacobson? Beating our Danya with “rook odds”? No way! And hit the ban button, that would explain their radio silence in response to my appeal. Who knows for sure, guess we never will. What’s also funny to me is the fact that Danya himself has pet lines he has played against me for years that are objectively equally as bad! Pircs with c6, Bg4, certain King’s Indian lines, and the list goes on.
I’m tired of it all, I’m tired of being assumed guilty until you’re proven innocent. I’m tired of being anxious every time I’m performing well that people will start harassing me too. And unfortunately, I don’t think any of us know what the true extent of the cheating problem in chess is, and I don’t even see a great solution to this. I hate cheaters as much as everyone else, and I believe it ruins the integrity of the game for hard working people.
These last few days have been a nightmare for me, countless people messaging me calling me a cheater among other names that I will not repeat, and as we stand right now I am also shadow banned (does not officially show the account is closed for privacy purposes but cannot log in) on my main account as well. Who knows what will happen going forward, but I knew I needed to share my story, obviously to properly defend myself, but also to bring attention to what I believe could be the real downfall of online chess: false accusations.
And for some final remarks, if you don’t believe a word I’ve written:
  1. Who would be stupid enough to cheat against Daniel Naroditsky and risk their reputation, my future, over meaningless blitz games.
  2. I could decide to stay anonymous forever, had I truly been a cheater, but I’m sharing my story publicly, without care how this may damage my reputation. The truth always prevails in the end.
I apologize again for the length of this post, but I really wanted to paint a full picture of not just this unfortunate event, but my story as a chess player as well.
I will be happy to reply to questions/comments and add any clarification to anything I’ve said.
Thanks for reading and have a great day!
submitted by Extreme-Ad-6490 to chess [link] [comments]


2024.05.04 22:19 dwags_24 What's the Most Money You've Achieved in Story Mode? (Guide)

What is the most money that you've made in story mode, without cheating, across all 3 characters? If you've ever done a max money run, let me know how much you made in the comments! I just made about $20.8 billion combined. That is not a typo... Michael ~$9.4B, Trevor ~$5.8B, Franklin ~$5.6B
This post is a guide on how to maximize your money at the end of the game. I know there's other guides out there sharing the same info, but I haven't seen one complete list. I've went through all the various guides and compiled every detail that was perhaps missed in one guide or another. Is it necessary to have infinite money? Absolutely not, but if you want to do it anyways, here's what you need to do:
Here is the exhaustive list of missions and events that earn you money and when you need to complete them by throughout the story. If a random event is available to all 3 characters, Michael won't need it as he ends up with the most money. You'll want to purchase the Sonar Collections Dock with either Franklin or Trevor (I chose Trevor), and whomever doesn't purchase this property will be the one that should collect the rest of random choice money. It's easier to earn money by targeting security vans (and you should hit all 10 at least once… and anytime when they appear) but if you're doing a completionist run like me, might as well collect the smaller money earnings too before The Hotel Assassination. Also, if something can be purchased to progress the story with any of the characters then choose Michael.
And that's it! Please note that the investment return percentages are approximate and reported from various max money guides. I actually received a higher percentage on some of the investments on the LCN market. No one knows how the stock market truly works, but by save scumming here are the return percentages I got (if not noted, I got the reported percentage listed above):
submitted by dwags_24 to GTAV [link] [comments]


2024.05.04 18:51 Apprehensive_Depth58 Arcade1Up - Green Bay Packers - Extreme Difficulty

I'm assuming this is a bug in the logic relating to the Arcade1Up versions, but let me know if it has occurred in other versions.
The problem is this. In the NFL Blitz 99 and 2000 Gold versions (not the original), when you are playing a season and you play the GB Packers, the difficulty goes from pretty easy to extremely hard. It changes the game from fun to completely unfair. They sack you everytime, take out your receivers, you fumble all the time, etc.
Are there are workarounds, cheats or other methods to get past this? It gets to the point to where I can't play 99 or 2000 Gold anymore because I can't get past Game 3 vs them.
submitted by Apprehensive_Depth58 to nflblitz [link] [comments]


2024.05.04 18:46 Apprehensive_Depth58 NFL Blitz 99/2000 - Green Bay Packers - Extreme Difficulty

I love my NFL Blitz cabinet (I modded it by selling the coin doors, removing the booster, built support raising it up to arcade height and using painted fiber board to give it a clean look).
Anyway, the NFL Blitz games are obviously not arcade ROMS as the NFL banned any sort of post-play tackles and I believe that there is a bug in the logic for the 99 and 2000 games. When you play the Green Bay Packers (can be anytime during the season), the difficulty goes from pretty easy to absolute insane. You'll be sacked everytime, fumble frequently, have receivers taken out, etc even on easiest settings. This doesn't happen in the original version just the 99/2000.
Has anyone found a way around this? It really makes the game not fun at all. I'm not some competitive player, I want to enjoy it. I know there are "cheats" but they are really 2-sided cheats and benefit the CPU as much as you do.
submitted by Apprehensive_Depth58 to Arcade1Up [link] [comments]


2024.05.01 08:15 futuredrseinfeld Frustration over Level of Cheating

Is their a reason Chess.com no longer takes any action on players that are clearly cheating? As one of numerous examples, in my last game on blitz +2 seconds, my opponent's first 28 moves were all the "best move", "great move", or "book move", yet the player's rating is 664.
In the game prior to me, over 34 total moves their accuracy was rated 91.2%.
The user name is even a variation of the word "Trickster Rick"
I've had players with near perfect overall accuracy scores close to 95% over a 10 game stretch whom I will report, yet never here anything back.
Is anybody else noticing a similar issue?
Perhaps it is not cheating, but some form of rating manipulation by others, but it's extremely frustrating. I am unsure if I am alone.
submitted by futuredrseinfeld to Chesscom [link] [comments]


http://swiebodzin.info