Psychobiology theories

Axonal Conduction Time and Human Cerebral Laterality 1st Edition (A Ps

2024.03.25 18:55 EREADHUB Axonal Conduction Time and Human Cerebral Laterality 1st Edition (A Ps

Axonal Conduction Time and Human Cerebral Laterality 1st Edition (A Ps submitted by EREADHUB to Readwithus [link] [comments]


2024.02.11 22:42 thinkoftheall Hear me out: any supplement/herbs to extend cognitive competence during all-nighters?

Before I get the myriad of comments calling me out, yes I'm aware sleep is a foundational, pertinent piece of our lives and it's important to have enough sleep to optimize human functions.
But hear me out: I can't be the only one whom has work pile up quickly. It seems with school, at work, they have some skewed expectations of how much work anyone can realistically complete in any week. Oh well, I have tons of work to complete is the main point here.
A habit I've been reinforcing lately is blocking an entire day to complete schoolwork & research work. Yes, an entire day. I come from poor habits; I would tout my horn for being the greatest procrastinator in history, successfully completing assignments minutes before it was due in high school. The quality was so awful looking back, but hey I completed it. In reality, I struggled (still struggle) to successfully strike balance combining work and a social life in one day. It feels like I can only do either or without sacrificing quality.
No more! I know looming deadlines were my trigger to complete work, as I couldn't find urgency to do anything if I wasn't pressured. Now I'm attempting the opposite. Rather than saving all my work until the end of a deadline, I'm saving my work for the beginning of a deadline. At least that's the working theory.
The few times I've been trying this recently, it has subtly improved quality of life. I'm learning the material above all. I'm completing most -- if not all -- my work for the week in one go, I'm not emotionally chained to anxious sensations of leaving work until the end when out with friends, I can spend more time with friends, and if I do this time block on Monday, that'll still leave 4-6 days to revise, iterate, expand on some work without it being procrastinated-motivated.
The sensation of "spending an entire day put at my lab office or at our great (24/7) library at school without any temptations, distractions, just me and my work to learn and complete" seems to elicit an analogous urgency I feel when completing work before the deadlines. If I'm dedicating an entire day, it feels "significant" enough to complete is the closest thing I can think of.
The only hurdle to jump over left is a reasonable one anyone whom stays awake all day would expect: sleep and declining cognitive performance after a while. Caffeine is the first product I went with to keep myself up. I have some 200mg packets I throw into a water bottle, the first one definitely helps and I notice a spike in concentration.
What I've observed in this quasi-experiment is I begin any work requiring memorization, creative methodology, critical thinking first, since I know lack of sleep later into the day will hinder these. Any "busy work" without a signifcant need to memorize or think critically I leave last. If I wake up with 7-8 hours of sleep headed to the work, I can last around 18 hours without feeling exhausted.
Around the 18 hour mark, I will notice my mind begins to taper off and I'll seriously feel tired, but not enough to fall sleep. After the 22 hour mark, I'll struggle to stay awake, and have taken 3-4 hour naps unintentionally. It doesn't seem caffeine works after the 18 hour mark. I've taken a 200mg packet and fell asleep within the hour (this could be due to my adhd, but I'm not too aware of the Psychobiology nuances behind it).
Caffeine is a dud after a extended day. I would love to have a 24-36 hour block of time to dedicate solely for work. Thus, finding a product that can stimulate my mind-body to at least stay strong enough to complete busy work if it cannot think critically would be my golden goose. If I can perfect this theory, I can seriously see my grades improve drastically, and still have time to attend parties and watch games on the weekend when the weekends have historically been for catching up on work and stressing. I know this is far from healthy. I promise to reward myself every time with a 9-10 hour naps right after successfully completing a day's worth of work.
submitted by thinkoftheall to herbalism [link] [comments]


2024.01.16 18:33 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023


UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
submitted by Contactunderground to UFOs [link] [comments]


2024.01.16 18:33 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
submitted by Contactunderground to ufo [link] [comments]


2024.01.16 18:30 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
submitted by Contactunderground to Experiencers [link] [comments]


2024.01.16 18:29 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
submitted by Contactunderground to CE5 [link] [comments]


2024.01.16 18:28 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
submitted by Contactunderground to AnomalousEvidence [link] [comments]


2024.01.16 18:27 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
submitted by Contactunderground to aliens [link] [comments]


2023.07.13 22:30 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/08/29/disclosure-versus-confirmation-preparing-the-foundation-for-a-cosmic-peace-campaign/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/dueling-paradigms-perhaps-a-counterintelligence-model-is-better-than-a-scientific-one-to-study-ufos/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-leadership-crisis-in-ufology/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/science-counterintelligence-and-ufos/
submitted by Contactunderground to UFOs [link] [comments]


2023.07.13 22:29 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/08/29/disclosure-versus-confirmation-preparing-the-foundation-for-a-cosmic-peace-campaign/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/dueling-paradigms-perhaps-a-counterintelligence-model-is-better-than-a-scientific-one-to-study-ufos/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-leadership-crisis-in-ufology/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/science-counterintelligence-and-ufos/
submitted by Contactunderground to aliens [link] [comments]


2023.07.10 14:43 gotestbank_8 Test Bank for Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 3rd Edition by Varcarolis

Test Bank for Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 3rd Edition by Varcarolis

Test Bank for Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 3rd Edition by Varcarolis
Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 3rd Edition by Varcarolis – Test Bank
Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 3rd Edition by Varcarolis

Table of Contents

Unit I: Essential Theoretical Concepts for Practice 1. Practicing the Science and the Art of Psychiatric Nursing 2. Mental Health and Mental Illness 3. Theories and Therapies 4. Biological Basis for Understanding Psychopharmacology 5. Settings for Psychiatric Care 6. Legal and Ethical Basis for Practice
Unit II: Tools for Practice of the Art 7. Nursing Process and QSEN: The Foundation for Safe and Effective Care 8. Skills: Medium for All Nursing Practice 9. Therapeutic Relationships and the Clinical Interview
Unit III: Caring for Patients with Psychobiological Disorders 10. Stress and Stress-Related Disorders 11. Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders 12. Somatic Symptom Disorders and Related Disorders 13. Personality Disorders 14. Eating Disorders 15. Mood Disorders: Depression 16. Bipolar Spectrum Disorders 17. Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Other Psychotic Disorders 18. Neurocognitive Disorders 19. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders
Unit IV: Caring for Patients Experiencing Psychiatric Emergencies 20. Crisis and Mass Disaster 21. Child, Partner, and Elder Violence 22. Sexual Violence 23. Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors 24. Anger, Aggression, and Violence 25. Care for the Dying and Those Who Grieve
Unit V: Age-Related Mental Health Disorders 26. Children and Adolescents 27. Adults 28. Older Adults

Product details

Language: English ISBN-10: 0323389651 ISBN-13: 978-0323389655 9780323389655
submitted by gotestbank_8 to u/gotestbank_8 [link] [comments]


2023.04.04 16:20 Educational_Fox_7159 Waitlisted

Waitlisted
The waitlist is only 5 and I’m in 2nd place. What are my chances of being able to take the class?
submitted by Educational_Fox_7159 to ufl [link] [comments]


2023.03.08 10:30 kerry_lusignan The Top Five Relationship Books For Couples In Crisis

The Top Five Relationship Books For Couples In Crisis


Let’s face it, our media and culture are awash in self-help, be-happy, romanticized relationship advice; knowing where to go to get support and research-backed tools can be daunting. So this week (as promised), I sat down and compiled a list of my favorite top five resources for couples in crisis. Again and again, these are the materials I steer people to when their heart is hurting and they’re longing for more. Because while your relationship is unique, specific issues that you struggle with are probably not.
My field, marriage and family therapy, is in the middle of a renaissance, with thinkers like John Gottman, Stan Tatkin, and Brent Atkinson paving the way for deeper connection, secure functioning (regardless of your past), and healing from betrayal.
And given the current national shortage of couples therapists, it’s more important than ever that you have some tools that you can turn to independently.
So if I was stranded on a desert island with my partner (or at home locked down in the throws of a pandemic) and we were steeped in gridlock and negative sentiment, here are the top five resources I’d want to have packed in my bag, to set things right:
5) Codependent No More, Melody Beattie
https://preview.redd.it/knh4oo8ohhma1.jpg?width=321&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0277db5039ac1ef982186145c8f4a311418834cf
It took me decades to finally crack the cover of this modern classic and New York Times bestseller. As a professional, I was skeptical and wrongly assumed it was another pop-psychology self-help book. But when I finally got around to reading it, I was blown away by how helpful, practical and vital this book is. If you struggle with setting compassionate but firm boundaries, if you wonder whether someone else’s problem is your problem and have lost sight of your own life in the face of their struggles, this book will offer you immense guidance and support.
4) The Three Faces of Victim, Lynn Forest
https://preview.redd.it/2mklvqayhhma1.png?width=375&format=png&auto=webp&s=334bbd7361858b1a00a047cabf1d4202f86097d2
This online article is required reading for all new couples beginning therapy with me. Based on a diagram developed by a well-respected psychiatrist and teacher of Transactional Analysis named Stephen Karpman, it explains the “Victim Triangle.” In a nutshell, this article will help you determine your default position when navigating relationship challenges. Are you prone to rescuing? Do you collapse into victimhood? Or are you more likely to resort to blame and persecutory actions? Regardless of where you start, what is essential to comprehend is that we all are vulnerable to inhabiting each of these roles and that they have the propensity to become “shame generators” and perpetuate dysfunctional dynamics.
3) Your Brain on Love, Stan Tatkin
https://preview.redd.it/c8y1jyi2ihma1.jpg?width=234&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d0e334b38f09670dbadfdf2ad4dae4babe438d6e
An in-depth audio romp on attachment theory and brain science as seen through the lens of Stan Tatkin, Founder of the Psychobiological Approach to Couples Therapy (PACT). In this fantastic audiobook, Tatkin guides us through his proven principles and practices for building enduring security and commitment between couples, family members, and others that we love. His ideas are a welcome reprieve from our me-centered and autonomy-focused culture. Touting values, social justice, and interconnection, no relationship library is complete without this audiobook.
2) Daring Greatly, Brené Brown
https://preview.redd.it/71zclfv9ihma1.jpg?width=333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b4d91fc5a3c3bd653d9e2747c4220b0c176b1e37
Yes, this book is not a “relationship” book. Yes, this book is not written explicitly for couples. But I wholeheartedly love this book, and for me, it was a game-changer. Perhaps more than anyone, Brown has taught me how to love well. That “clear is kind.” That values and courage are indispensable tools in the psychotherapy office. That the wholehearted sit side-by-side Gottman’s Masters of Marriage. And it was my certification in Brown’s Daring Way™ curriculum that inspired me to write John Gottman and Brené Brown on Running Headlong Into Heartbreak, the Gottman Institute’s number 1 blog in 2019. This book should be required reading for all humans.
1) Developing Habits for Relationship Success, Brent Atkinson
https://preview.redd.it/uo2dtb3bihma1.jpg?width=234&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7b077edba3b08c8d20a962aad714648d03dfc636
If I had to pick one book to give all couples, it would be Developing Habits for Relationship Success by Brent Atkinson. As the Founder of the PEX method (Pragmatic Experiential Method for Improving Relationships), Atkinson has created a manual that will give you everything you need to get unstuck and move forward regardless of your circumstances. This book is required reading for all NCCT clients, and we consider it so essential we give a copy of it to every couple that attends NCCT for a private retreat or intensive. What makes the PEX approach so unique is that even one member of a couple can make use of it. So if you have a partner who refuses to go to couples therapy or won’t accept influence from you regardless of how skillful you are, the tools offered in this book are critical. Atkinson was the first to teach me about the importance of standing up skills. And not just why they are essential, but how to stand up well. He normalizes core differences. He proposes that we can always get further when we avoid defaulting to a perception of overall blame of our partner. In this sense, his ideas align beautifully with Brené Brown, who encourages us to assume people are doing the best they can, even when what they offer up is inadequate. And if that is not enough, this book, more than any other resource I know, will give you a plethora of exercises, concrete tools, and even audio clips (to listen to when you are freaking out). There is no other book comparable to it, and again and again, our clients tell us it is the most helpful thing they have ever read.
In summary, you can access many excellent tools from home with the click of a few keys on your laptop, and in turn, acquire an abundance of skills to shift problematic relationship dynamics without ever setting foot in a therapist’s office. Don’t get me wrong, couples therapy can be beneficial, and often it is the best way to move things along farther and faster. But having just finished offering my signature digital course, Crisis to Connected, I can assure you that we are all capable of growing and changing and that there are myriad ways to accomplish that.
Click here to schedule an appointment.
submitted by kerry_lusignan to u/kerry_lusignan [link] [comments]


2023.02.20 07:59 Natural_Grocery4786 Wikipedia Outline of knowledge - Antinet friendly - part 1 of 2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_academic_disciplines#
---
OUTLINE

# Humanities 1000
## Performing arts 1100
Music 1110
Accompaniment 1111
Chamber music 1112
Church music 1113
Conducting 1114
Choir 1114/1
Orchestra 1114/2
Concert band 1114/3
Early music 1115
Jazz 1116
Musical composition 1117
Music education 1118
Music history 1119
Musicology 1120
Music history 1121
Systematic musicology 1122
Ethnomusicology 1123
Music theory 1124
Orchestra 1125
Organology 1126
Organ (music) 1126/1
Piano 1126/2
String instrument 1126/3
Singing 1126/4
Woodwind instrument 1126/5
Sound recording and reproduction 1127
Dance 1128
Choreography 1129
Dance notation 1130
Ethnochoreology 1131
History of dance 1132
Television (Outline of television broadcasting 1133
Television studies 1134
Theatre (Outline of theatre) 1135
Acting 1135/1
Theatre director 1135/2
Dramaturgy 1135/3
History of theater 1135/4
Musical theatre 1135/5
Playwrighting 1135/6
Puppetry 1135/7
Scenography 1135/8
Scenic design 1135/9
Ventriloquism 1135/10
Film studies 1136
Animation 1136/1
Film criticism 1136/2
Filmmaking 1136/3
Film theory 1136/4
Live action 1136/5
## Visual arts 1200
Applied arts 1201
Animation 1201/1
Calligraphy 1201/2
Decorative arts 1201/3
Mixed media 1201/4
Printmaking 1201/5
Studio art 1201/6
Architecture (Outline of architecture) 1201/7
Interior architecture 1201/7/1
Landscape architecture 1201/7/2
Landscape design 1201/7/2/1
Landscape planning 1201/7/2/2
Architectural analytics 1201/7/3
Historic preservation 1201/7/4
Interior design (interior architecture) 1201/7/5
Technical drawing 1201/7/6
Fashion 1202
Fine arts 1203
Graphic arts 1203/1
Drawing Outline of drawing and drawings 1203/1/1
Painting Outline of painting 1203/1/2
Photography Outline of photography 1203/1/3
Sculpture Outline of sculpture 1203/2
## History 1300
African history 1301
American history 1302
Ancient history 1303
Ancient Egypt 1303/1
Carthage 1303/2
Ancient Greece 1303/3
Ancient Rome 1303/4
Assyria 1303/5
Bronze Age 1303/6
Historicity of the Bible 1303/7
Indus Valley Civilisation 1303/8
Preclassic Maya 1303/9
History of Mesopotamia 1303/10
The Stone Age 1303/11
Yangtze civilization 1303/12
Yellow River civilization 1303/13
History of Asia 1304
History of India 1304/1
Mahabharata 1304/2
History of Indonesia 1304/3
History of Iran 1304/4
History of China 1304/5
History of Australia 1305
Cultural history 1306
Ecclesiastical history of the Catholic Church 1307
Economic history of the world 1308
Environmental history 1309
History of Europe 1310
Intellectual history 1311
Jewish history 1312
History of Latin America 1313
Modern history 1314
History of philosophy 1315
Ancient philosophy 1315/1
Contemporary philosophy 1315/2
Medieval philosophy 1315/3
Humanism (Outline of humanism) 1315/3/1
Scholasticism 1315/3/2
Modern philosophy 1315/4
Political history 1316
History of political thought 1316/1
Pre-Columbian era 1317
-Prehistory 1317/1
Public history 1318
History of Russia 1319
History of science 1320
History of Technology 1321
World history 1322
## Languages and literature 1400
Linguistics (Outline of linguistics) 1401
Applied linguistics 1401/1
Composition studies 1401/2
Computational linguistics 1401/3
Discourse analysis 1401/4
English studies 1401/5
Etymology 1401/6
Grammar 1401/7
Grammatology 1401/8
Historical linguistics 1401/9
History of linguistics 1401/10
Interlinguistics 1401/11
Lexicology 1401/12
Linguistic typology 1401/13
Morphology (linguistics) 1401/14
Natural language processing 1401/15
Philology 1401/16
Phonetics 1401/17
Phonology 1401/18
Pragmatics 1401/19
Psycholinguistics 1401/20
Rhetoric 1401/21
Semantics 1401/22
Semiotics Outline of semiotics 1401/23
Sociolinguistics 1401/24
Syntax 1401/25
Language Usage 1401/26
Word usage 1401/27
Comics studies 1402
Comparative literature 1403
Creative writing 1404
Fiction Outline of fiction 1404/1
Non-fiction 1404/2
English literature 1405
History of literature 1406
Ancient literature 1406/1
Medieval literature 1406/2
Post-colonial literature 1406/3
Post-modern literature 1406/4
Literary theory 1407
Critical theory 1407/1
Literary criticism 1407/2
Poetics 140/7/3
Poetry 1408
World literature 1409
African-American literature 1409/1
American literature 1409/2
British literature 1409/3
## Law 1500
Administrative law 1501
Canon law 1502
Civil law (common law) 1503
Admiralty law 1503/1
Animal law/Animal rights 1503/2
Civil procedure 1503/3
Common law 1503/4
Contract law 1503/5
Corporations 1503/6
Environmental law 1503/7
Family law 1503/8
Federal law 1503/9
International law 1503/10
Public international law 1503/11
Supranational law 1503/12
Labor law 1503/11
Property law 1503/12
Tax law 1503/13
Tort law 1503/14
Comparative law 1504
Competition law 1505
Constitutional law 1506
Criminal law 1507
Criminal justice 1507/1
Criminal procedure 1507/2
Forensic science 1507/2/1
Police science 1507/2/2
Sharia 1508
Jewish law 1509
Jurisprudence (Philosophy of Law) 1510
Legal management 1511
Commercial law 1511/1
Corporate law 1511/2
Procedural law 1512
Substantive law 1513
## Philosophy 1600
Aesthetics 1601
Philosophy 1602
Philosophy and economics 1602/1
Philosophy of education 1602/2
Philosophy of engineering 1602/3
Philosophy of history 1602/4
Philosophy of language 1602/5
Philosophy of law 1602/6
Philosophy of mathematics 1602/7
Philosophy of music 1602/8
Philosophy of psychology 1602/9
Philosophy of religion 1602/10
Philosophy of science 1602/11
Philosophy of biology 1602/11/1
Philosophy of chemistry 1602/11/2
Philosophy of physics 1602/11/3
Philosophy of social science 1602/12
Philosophy of technology 1602/13
Systems philosophy 1602/14
Epistemology 1603
Theory of justification 1603/1
List of fallacies#Informal fallacies 1603/2
Ethics 1604
Applied ethics 1604/1
Animal rights 1604/1/1
Bioethics 1604/1/2
Environmental ethics 1604/1/3
Meta-ethics 1604/2
Moral psychology, Descriptive ethics, Value theory 1604/3
Normative ethics 1604/4
Virtue ethics 1604/4/1
Logic 1605
Mathematical logic 1605/1
Philosophical logic 1605/2
Meta-philosophy 1606
Metaphysics 1607
Action (philosophy) 1607/1
Determinism and Free will 1607/2
Ontology 1607/3
Philosophy of mind 1607/4
Pain (philosophy) 1607/4/1
Philosophy of artificial intel ligence 1607/4/2
Philosophy of perception 1607/4/3
Philosophy of space and time 1607/5
Teleology 1607/6
Theism and Atheism 1607/7
Philosophical movement 1608
African philosophy 1608/1
Analytic philosophy 1608/2
Aristotelianism 1608/3
Continental philosophy 1608/4
Eastern philosophy 1608/5
Feminist philosophy 1608/6
Platonism 1608/7
Social philosophy and political philosophy 1609
Anarchism 1609/1
Feminist philosophy 1609/2
Libertarianism 1609/3
Marxism 1609/4
## Theology 1700
Biblical studies 1701
Biblical Hebrew, Koine Greek, Aramaic 1701/1
Religious studies 1702
Buddhist philosophy 1703
Pali language 1703/1
Christian theology 1704
Anglican theology 1704/1
Baptist theology 1704/2
Catholic theology 1704/3
Eastern Orthodox theology 1704/4
Protestant theology 1704/5
→ Hindu theology 1705
Sanskrit language 1705/1
Vedas studies 1705/2
Bhagavad gita 1705/2/1
Srimad Bhagavatam 1705/2/2
Jewish theology 1706
Muslim theology 1707
Arabic language 1707/1
# Social science 2000
## Anthropology 2100
Biological anthropology 2101
Linguistic anthropology 2102
Cultural anthropology 2103
Social anthropology 2104
## Archaeology 2200
Biocultural anthropology 2201
Evolutionary anthropology 2202
Feminist archaeology 2203
Forensic anthropology 2204
Maritime archaeology 2205
Palaeoanthropology 2206
## Economics 2300
Agricultural economics 2301
Anarchist economics 2302
Applied economics 2303
Behavioural economics 2304
Bioeconomics (biophysical) 2305
Complexity economics 2306
Computational economics 2307
Consumer economics 2308
Development economics 2309
Ecological economics 2310
Econometrics 2311
Economic geography 2312
Economic sociology 2313
Economic systems 2314
Education economics 2315
Energy economics 2316
Entrepreneurial economics 2317
Environmental economics 2318
Evolutionary economics 2319
Experimental economics 2320
Feminist economics 2321
Financial econometrics 2322
Financial economics 2323
Green economics 2324
Economic growth 2325
Human development theory 2326
Industrial organization 2327
Information economics 2328
Institutional economics 2329
International economics 233
Islamic economics 2331
Labor economics 2332
Law and economics 2333
Macroeconomics 2334
Managerial economics 2335
Marxian economics 2336
Mathematical economics 2337
Microeconomics 2338
Monetary economics 2339
Neuroeconomics 2340
Participatory economics 2341
Political economy 2342
Public economics 2343
Public finance 2344
Real estate economics 2345
Resource economics 2346
Social choice theory 2347
Socialist economics 2348
Socioeconomics 2349
Transport economics 2350
Welfare economics 2351
## Geography 2400
Physical geography 2401
Water vapour (In Earth's atmosphere) 2401/1
Biogeography 2401/2
Climatology 2401/3
Coastal geography 2401/4
Emergency management 2401/5
Environmental geography 2401/6
Geobiology 2401/7
Geochemistry 2401/8
Geology 2401/9
Geomatics 2401/10
Geomorphology 2401/11
Geophysics 2401/12
Glaciology 2401/13
Hydrology 2401/14
Landscape ecology 2401/15
Lithology 2401/16
Meteorology 2401/17
Mineralogy 2401/18
Oceanography 2401/19
Palaeogeography 2401/20
Palaeontology 2401/21
Petrology 2401/22
Quaternary science 2401/23
Pedology 2401/24
Human geography 2402
Behavioural geography 2402/1
Cognitive geography 2402/2
Cultural geography 2402/3
Development geography 2402/4
Economic geography 2402/5
Health geography 2402/6
Historical geography 2402/7
Language geography 2402/8
Mathematical geography 2402/9
Marketing geography 2402/10
Military geography 2402/11
Political geography 2402/12
Population geography 2402/13
Religion geography 2402/14
Social geography 2402/15
Strategic geography 2402/16
Time geography 2402/17
Tourism geography 2402/18
Transport geography 2402/19
Urban geography 2402/20
Integrated geography 2403
Cartography 2404
Celestial cartography 2404/1
Planetary cartography 2404/2
Topography 2404/3
## Political science 2500
Politics of the United States 2501
Politics of Canada 2502
Civics 2503
Comparative politics 2504
European studies 2505
Geopolitics (Political geography) 2506
International relations 2507
International organizations 2508
Nationalism studies 2509
Peace and conflict studies 2510
Policy studies 2511
Theories of political behavior 2512
Political culture 2513
Political economy 2514
Political history 2515
Political philosophy 2516
Public administration 2517
Public law 2518
Psephology 2519
Social choice theory 2520
Singapore politics 2521
## Psychology 2600
Abnormal psychology 2601
Applied psychology 2602
Biological psychology 2603
Clinical neuropsychology 2604
Clinical psychology 2605
Cognitive psychology 2606
Community psychology 2607
Comparative psychology 2608
Conservation psychology 2609
Consumer psychology 2610
Counseling psychology 2611
Criminal psychology 2612
Cultural psychology 2613
Asian psychology 2613/1
Black psychology 2613/2
Developmental psychology 2614
Differential psychology 2615
Ecological psychology 2616
Educational psychology 2617
Environmental psychology 2618
Evolutionary psychology 2619
Experimental psychology 2620
Group dynamics 2621
Journal of Family Psychology 2622
Feminine psychology 2623
Forensic developmental psychology 2624
Forensic psychology 2625
Health psychology 2626
Humanistic psychology 2627
Indigenous psychology 2628
Legal psychology 2629
Mathematical psychology 2630
Media psychology 2631
Medical psychology 2632
Military psychology 2633
Moral psychology and Descriptive ethics 2634
Music psychology 2635
Neuropsychology 2636
Occupational health psychology 2637
Occupational psychology 2638
Industrial and organizational psychology 2639
Parapsychology 2640
Pediatric psychology 2641
Pedology (children study) 2642
Personality psychology 2643
Phenomenology (psychology) 2644
Political psychology 2645
Positive psychology 2646
Psychoanalysis 2647
Psychobiology 2648
Psychology of religion 2649
Psychometrics 2650
Psychopathology 2651
Child psychopathology 2651/1
Psychophysics 2652
Quantitative psychology 2653
Rehabilitation Psychology (journal) 2654
School psychology 2655
Social psychology 2656
Sport psychology 2657
Traffic psychology 2658
Transpersonal psychology 2659
## Sociology 2700
Analytical sociology 2701
Applied sociology 2702
Leisure studies 2702/1
Political sociology 2702/2
Public sociology 2702/3
Social engineering (political science) 2702/4
Architectural sociology 2703
Area studies 2704
African studies 2704/1
American studies 2704/2
Appalachian studies 2704/2/1
Canadian studies 2704/2/2
Latin American studies 2704/2/3
Asian studies 2704/3
Central Asian studies 2704/3/1
East Asian studies 2704/3/2
Indology 2704/3/3
Iranian studies 2704/3/4
Japanese studies 2704/3/5
Korean studies 2704/3/6
Pakistan studies 2704/3/7
Sindhology 2704/3/8
Sinology 2704/3/9
Southeast Asian studies 2704/3/10
Thai studies 2704/3/11
Australian studies 2704/4
European studies 2704/5
Celtic studies 2704/5/1
German studies 2704/5/2
Sociology in Poland 2704/5/3
Scandinavian studies 2704/5/4
Slavic studies 2704/5/5
Middle Eastern studies 2704/6
Arab studies 2704/6/1
Assyriology 2704/6/2
Egyptology 2704/6/3
Jewish studies 2704/6/4
Collective behavior 2705
Collective behavior 2706
Social movements 2706/1
Community informatics 2707
Social network analysis 2707/1
Comparative sociology 2708
Conflict theories 2709
Criminology/Criminal justice 2710
Critical management studies 2711
Critical sociology 2712
Cultural sociology 2713
Cultural studies/ethnic studies 2714
Africana studies 2714/1
Cross-cultural studies 2714/2
Culturology 2714/3
Deaf studies 2714/4
Ethnology 2714/5
Utopian studies 2714/6
Whiteness studies 2714/7
Demography/Population 2715
Digital sociology 2716
Dramaturgical sociology 2717
Economic sociology 2718
Educational sociology 2719
Empirical sociology 2720
Environmental sociology 2721
Evolutionary sociology 2722
Feminist sociology 2723
Figurational Sociology 2724
Futures studies 2725
Gender studies 2726
Men's studies 2726/1
Women's studies 2726/2
Historical sociology 2727
Human ecology 2728
Humanistic sociology 2729
Industrial sociology 2730
Interactionism 2731
Interpretive sociology 2732
Ethnomethodology 2732/1
Phenomenology (philosophy) 2732/2
Social constructionism 2732/3
Symbolic interactionism 2732/4
Jealousy sociology 2733
Macrosociology 2734
Marxist sociology 2735
Mathematical sociology 2735a
Medical sociology 2736
Mesosociology 2737
Microsociology 2738
Military sociology 2739
Natural resource sociology 2740
Organizational studies 2741
Phenomenologic al sociology 2742
Policy sociology 2743
Psychoanalytic sociology 2744
Science studies/Science and technology studies 2745
Sexology 2746
Heterosexism 2746/1
Human sexual activity 2746/2
Human sexuality 2746/3
Queer studies/Queer theory 2746/4
Sex education 2746/5
Social capital 2747
Social change 2748
Social conflict theory 2749
Social control 2750
Pure sociology 2751
Social economy 2751
Social philosophy 2752
Social policy 2753
Social psychology 2754
Social stratification 2755
Social theory 2756
Social transformation 2757
Computational sociology 2757/1
Economic sociology/Socioeconomics 2757/2
Economic development 2757/2/1
Social development theory 2757/2/2
Sociobiology 2758
Sociocybernetics 2759
Sociolinguistics 2760
Gerontology (Social gerontology) 2761
Rural sociology 2762
Sociology of art 2763
Societal and cultural aspects of autism 2764
Sociology of the family (Sociology of childhood) 2765
Social conflict 2766
Sociology of culture 2767
Sociology of the Internet 2768
Development theory 2769
Deviance (sociology) 2770
Sociology of disaster 2771
Sociology of education 2772
Sociology of emotions 2773
Sociology of the family (Sociology of fatherhood) 2774
Social studies of finance 2775
Sociology of food 2776
Sociology of gender 2777
Theory of generations 2778
World-systems theory 2779
Political sociology 2780
Sociology of health and illness 2781
Sociology of human consciousness 2782
Sociology of immigration 2783
Sociology of knowledge 2784
Sociology of language 2785
Sociology of law 2786
Sociology of leisure 2787
Sociology of literature 2788
Economic sociology 2789
Sociology of the family (Sociology of marriage) 2790
Sociology of the family (Sociology of motherhood) 2791
Sociomusicology 2792
Natural resource management 2793
Organizational behavior 2794
Sociology of peace, war, and social conflict 2795
Sociology of punishment 2796
Sociology of race and ethnic relations 2797
Sociology of religion 2798
Risk (Sociology of risk) 2799
Sociology of science 27100
Sociology of scientific knowledge 27101
Social change 27102
Social movement 27103
Sociology of space 27104
Sociology of sport 27105
Science, technology and society 27106
Sociology of terrorism 27107
Sociology of the body 27108
Sociology of the family 27109
Sociology of the history of science 27110
Sociology of the Internet 27111
Industrial sociology 27112
Sociomusicology 27113
Structural sociology 27114
Theoretical sociology 27115
Urban studies or Urban sociology/Rural sociology 27116
Victimology 27117
Visual sociology 27118
## Social work 2800
Clinical social work 2801
Community practice 2802
Mental health 2803
Psychosocial rehabilitation 2804
Person-centered therapy 2805
Family therapy 2806
Financial social work 2807
# Natural science 3000
# Biology 3100
Aerobiology 3101
Anatomy 3102
Comparative anatomy 3102/1
Human anatomy 3102/2
Biochemistry 3103
Bioinformatics 3104
Biophysics 3105
Biotechnology 3106
Botany 3107
Ethnobotany 3107/1
Phycology 3107/2
Cell biology 3108
Chronobiology 3109
Computational biology 3110
Cryobiology 3111
Developmental biology 3112
Embryology 3112/1
Teratology 3112/2
Ecology 3113
Agroecology 3113/1
Ethnoecology 3113/2
Human ecology 3113/3
Landscape ecology 3113/4
Endocrinology 3114
Epigenetics 3115
Ethnobiology 3116
Anthrozoology 3116/1
Evolutionary biology 3117
Genetics 3118
Behavioural genetics 3118/1
Molecular genetics 3118/2
Population genetics 3118/3
Histology 3119
Human biology 3120
Immunology 3121
Limnology 3122
Linnaean taxonomy 3123
Marine biology 3124
Mathematical biology 3125
Microbiology 3126
Bacteriology 3126/1
Protistology 3126/2
Molecular biology 3127
Mycology 3128
Neuroscience 3129
Behavioral neuroscience 3129/1
Nutrition 3130
Paleobiology 3131
Paleontology 3131/1
Parasitology 3132
Pathology 3133
Anatomical pathology 3133/1
Clinical pathology 3133/2
Dermatopathology 3133/3
Forensic pathology 3133/4
Hematopathology 3133/5
Histopathology 3133/6
Molecular pathology 3133/7
Surgical pathology 3133/8
Physiology 3134
Human physiology 3134/1
Exercise physiology 3134/1/1
Structural Biology 3135
Systematics (Taxonomy) 3136
Systems biology 3137
Virology 3138
Molecular virology 3138/1
Xenobiology 3139
Zoology 3140
Animal communications 3141
Apiology 3142
Arachnology 3143
Arthropodology 3144
Batrachology 3145
Bryozoology 3146
Carcinology 3147
Cetology 3148
Cnidariology 3149
Entomology 3150
Forensic entomology 3151
Ethnozoology 3152
Ethology 3153
Helminthology 3154
Herpetology 3155
Ichthyology 3156
Invertebrate zoology 3157
Mammalogy 3158
Cynology 3158/1
Felinology 3158/2
Malacology 3159
Conchology 3159/1
Limacology 3159/2
Teuthology 3159/3
Myriapodology 3160
Myrmecology 3161
Nematology 3162
Neuroethology 3163
Oology 3164
Ornithology 3165
Planktology 3166
Primatology 3167
Zootomy 3168
Zoosemiotics 3169
## Chemistry 3200
Agrochemistry 3201
Analytical chemistry 3202
Astrochemistry 3203
Atmospheric chemistry 3204
Biochemistry 3205
Chemical biology 3206
Chemical engineering 3207
Cheminformatics 3208
Computational chemistry 3209
Cosmochemistry 3210
Electrochemistry 3211
Environmental chemistry 3212
Femtochemistry 3213
Flavour (taste) 3214
Flow chemistry 3215
Geochemistry 3216
Green chemistry 3217
Histochemistry 3218
Hydrogenation 3219
Immunochemistry 3220
Inorganic chemistry 3221
Marine chemistry 3222
Mathematical chemistry 3223
Mechanochemistry 3224
Medicinal chemistry 3225
Molecular biology 3226
Molecular mechanics 3227
Nanotechnology 3228
Natural product chemistry 3229
Neurochemistry 3230
Oenology 3231
Organic chemistry 3232
Organometallic chemistry 3233
Petrochemistry 3234
Pharmacology 3235
Photochemistry 3236
Physical chemistry 3237
Physical organic chemistry 3238
Phytochemistry 3239
Polymer chemistry 3240
Quantum chemistry 3241
Radiochemistry 3242
Solid-state chemistry 3243
Sonochemistry 3244
Supramolecular chemistry 3245
Surface chemistry 3246
Synthetic chemistry 3247
Theoretical chemistry 3248
Thermochemistry 3249
## Earth science 3300
Edaphology 3301
Environmental chemistry 3302
Environmental science 3303
Gemology 3304
Geochemistry 3305
Geodesy 3306
Physical geography 3307
Atmospheric science / Meteorology 3307/1
Biogeography / Phytogeography 3307/2
Climatology / Paleoclimatology / Palaeogeography 3307/3
Coastal geography / Oceanography 3307/4
Edaphology / Pedology or Soil science 3307/5
Geobiology 3307/6
Geology 3307/7
Geostatistics 3307/8
Glaciology 3307/9
Hydrology 3307/10
Landscape ecology 3307/11
Quaternary science 3307/12
Geophysics 3308
Paleontology 3309
Paleobiology 3309/1
Paleoecology 3309/2
## Space science 3400
Astrobiology 3401
Astronomy 3402
Observational astronomy 3402/1
Gamma ray astronomy 3402/1/1
Infrared astronomy 3402/1/2
Timeline of cosmic microwave background astronomy 3402/1/3
Optical astronomy 3402/1/4
Radio astronomy 3402/1/5
UV astronomy 3402/1/6
X-ray astronomy 3402/1/7
Astrophysics 3403
Gravity 3403/1
Black holes 3403/1/1
Cosmology 3404
Physical cosmology 3404/1
Interstellar medium 3405
Direct numerical simulation 3406
Astrophysical plasma 3406/1
Galaxy formation and evolution 3406/2
High-energy astronomy 3406/3
Hydrodynamics 3406/4
Magnetohydrodynamics 3406/5
Star formation 3406/6
Star 3407
Helioseismology 3407/1
Stellar evolution 3407/2
Stellar nucleosynthesis 3407/3
Planetary science 3408
## Physics 3500
Acoustics 3501
Aerodynamics 3502
Applied physics 3503
Astrophysics 3504
Atomic, molecular, and optical physics 3505
Biophysics 3506
Computational physics 3507
Condensed matter physics 3508
Cryogenics 3509
Electricity 3510
Electromagnetism 3511
Elementary particle physics 3512
Experimental physics 3513
Fluid dynamics 3514
Geophysics 3515
Mathematical physics 3516
Mechanics 3517
Medical physics 3518
Molecular physics 3519
Newton's laws of motion 3520
Nuclear physics 3521
Optics 3522
Plasma physics 3523
Quantum physics 3524
Solid mechanics 3525
Solid state physics 3526
Statistical mechanics 3527
Theoretical physics 3528
Thermal physics 3529
Thermodynamics 3530
# Formal science 4000
## Computer science 4100
Logic in computer science 4101
Formal methods (Formal verification) 4101/1
Logic programming 4101/2
Multi-valued logic 4101/3
Fuzzy logic 4101/3/1
Formal semantics of programming languages 4101/4
Type theory 4101/5
Algorithms 4102
Computational geometry 4102/1
Distributed algorithms 4102/2
Parallel algorithms 4102/3
Randomized algorithms 4102/4
Artificial intelligence 4103
Cognitive science 4103/1
Automated reasoning 4103/1/1
Computer vision 4103/1/2
Machine learning 4103/1/3
Artificial neural networks 4103/1/3/1
Natural language processing (Computational linguistics) 4103/1/4
Expert systems 4103/2
Robotics 4103/3
Data structures 4104
Computer architecture 4105
Computer graphics 4106
Image processing 4106/1
Scientific visualization 4106/2
Computer networking 4107
Cloud computing 4107/1
Information theory 4107/2
Internet, World Wide Web 4107/3
Ubiquitous computing 4107/4
Wireless computing (Mobile computing) 4107/5
Computer security and High availability 4108
Cryptography 4108/1
Fault-tolerant system 4108/2
Computing in mathematics, natural sciences, engineering, and medicine 4109
Symbolic computation 4109/1
Computational biology 4109/2
Computational chemistry 4109/3
Computational mathematics 4109/4
Computational neuroscience 4109/5
Computational number theory 4109/6
Computational physics 4109/7
Computer-aided engineering 4109/8
Computational fluid dynamics 4109/8/1
Finite element analysis 4109/8/2
Numerical analysis 4109/9
Scientific computing 4109/10
Computing in social sciences, The arts 4110
Community informatics 4111
Computational economics 4112
Computational finance 4113
Computational sociology 4114
Digital humanities (Humanities computing) 4115
History of computer hardware 4116
History of computer science 4117
Humanistic informatics 4118
Databases 4119
Distributed databases 4119/1
Object databases 4119/2
Relational databases 4119/3
Data management 4120
Data mining 4121
Information architecture 4122
Information management 4123
Information retrieval 4124
Knowledge management 4125
Multimedia, hypermedia 4126
Sound and music computing 4126/1
Distributed computing 4127
Grid computing 4127/1
Human-computer interaction 4128
Operating systems 4129
Parallel computing 4130
High-performance computing 4130/1
Programming languages 4131
Compilers 4131/1
Programming paradigms 4131/2
Concurrent programming language 4131/2/1
Functional programming 4131/2/2
Imperative programming 4131/2/3
Logic programming 4131/2/4
Object-oriented programming 4131/2/5
Program semantics 4131/3
Type theory 4131/4
Quantum computing 4132
Software engineering 4133
Formal methods (Formal verification) 4133/1
Theory of computation 4134
Automata theory (Formal languages) 4134/1
Computability theory (computer science) 4134/2
Computational complexity theory 4134/3
Concurrency (computer science) # Theory 4134/4
Very-large-scale integration 4135
## Mathematics 4200
Mathematical logic and Foundations of mathematics 4201
Intuitionistic logic 4201/1
Modal logic 4201/2
Model theory 4201/3
Proof theory 4201/4
Recursion theory 4201/5
Set theory 4201/6
Algebra 4202
Associative algebra 4202/1
Category theory 4202/2
Topos 4202/2/1
Differential algebra 4202/3
Field theory (mathematics) 4202/4
Group theory 4202/5
Group representation 4202/5/1
Homological algebra 4202/6
K-theory 4202/7
Lattice theory (Order theory) 4202/8
Lie algebra 4202/9
Linear algebra (Vector space) 4202/10
Multilinear algebra 4202/11
Non-associative algebra 4202/12
Representation theory 4202/13
Ring theory 4202/14
Commutative algebra 4202/14/1
Noncommutative algebra 4202/14/2
Universal algebra 4202/15
Mathematical analysis 4203
Complex analysis 4203/1
Functional analysis 4203/2
Operator theory 4203/2/1
Harmonic analysis 4203/3
Fourier analysis 4203/3/1
Non-standard analysis 4203/4
Ordinary differential equations 4203/5
p-adic analysis 4203/6
Partial differential equations 4203/7
Real analysis 4203/8
Calculus 4203/8/1
Probability theory 4204
Ergodic theory 4204/1
Measure theory 4204/2
Integral geometry 4204/2/1
Stochastic process 4204/3
Geometry 4205
Affine geometry 4205/1
Algebraic geometry 4205/2
Algebraic topology 4205/3
Convex geometry 4205/4
Differential topology 4205/5
Discrete geometry 4205/6
Finite geometry 4205/7
Galois geometry 4205/8
General topology 4205/9
Geometric topology 4205/10
Integral geometry 4205/11
Noncommutative geometry 4205/12
Non-Euclidean geometry 4205/13
Projective geometry 4205/14
Number theory 4206
Algebraic number theory 4206/1
Analytic number theory 4206/2
Arithmetic combinatorics 4206/3
Geometric number theory 4206/4
Approximation theory 4207
Combinatorics 4208
Coding theory 4208/1
Cryptography 4209
Dynamical systems 4210
Chaos theory 4211
Fractal geometry 4212
Game theory 4213
Graph theory 4214
Information theory 4215
Mathematical physics 4216
Quantum field theory 4216/1
Quantum gravity 4216/2
String theory 4216/2/1
Quantum mechanics 4216/3
Statistical mechanics 4216/4
Numerical analysis 4217
Operations research 4218
Assignment problem 4218/1
Decision analysis 4218/2
Dynamic programming 4218/3
Inventory theory 4218/4
Linear programming 4218/5
Mathematical optimization 4218/6
Optimal maintenance 4218/7
Real options analysis 4218/8
Job shop scheduling 4218/9
Stochastic processes 4218/10
Systems analysis 4218/11
Statistics 4219
Actuarial science 4219/1
Demography 4219/2
Econometrics 4219/3
Mathematical statistics 4219/4
Data visualization 4219/5
Theory of computation 4220
Computational complexity theory 4220/1
# Applied science 5000
Agriculture 5100
Aeroponics 5101
Agroecology 5102
Agrology 5103
Agronomy 5104
Animal husbandry (Animal science) 5105
Beekeeping (Apiculture) 5105/1
Anthroponics 5106
Agricultural economics 5107
Agricultural engineering 5108
Biological systems engineering 5108/1
Food engineering 5108/2
Aquaculture 5109
Aquaponics 5110
Enology 5111
Entomology 5112
Fogponics 5113
Food science 5114
Culinary arts 5114/1
Forestry 5115
Horticulture 5116
Hydrology 5117
Hydroponics 5118
Pedology 5119
Plant science. 5120
Pomology 5122
Pest control 5123
Water purification 5124
Viticulture 5125
## Architecture and design 5200
Architecture 5201
Interior architecture 5201/1
Landscape architecture 5201/2
Architectural analytics 5202
Historic preservation 5203
Interior design (interior architecture) 5204
Landscape architecture (landscape planning) 5205
Landscape design 5206
Urban planning (urban design) 5207
Visual communication 5208
Graphic design 5208/1
Type design 5208/1/1
Technical drawing 5208/2
Industrial design (product design) 5209
Ergonomics 5209/1
Toy 5209/2
User experience design 5210
Interaction design 5211
Information architecture 5212
User interface design 5213
User experience evaluation 5214
Decorative arts 5215
Fashion design 5216
Textile design 5217
## Business 5300
Accounting 5301
Accounting research 5301/1
Accounting scholarship 5301/2
Business administration 5302
Business analysis 5303
Business ethics 5304
Business law 5305
Business management 5306
E-Business 5307
Entrepreneurship 5308
Finance 5309
Industrial relations 5310
Collective bargaining 5311
Human resources 5312
Organizational studies 5313
Labor economics 5314
Labor history (discipline) 5315
Information systems (Business informatics) 5316
Management information systems 5316/1
Health informatics 5316/2
Information technology 5317
International trade 5318
Management 5319
Marketing 5320
Operations management 5321
Purchasing 5322
Risk management and insurance 5323
Systems science 5324
## Divinity 5400
Canon law 5401
History of Christianity 5402
Field ministry 5403
Pastoral counseling 5403/1
Pastoral theology 5403/2
Religious education techniques 5403/3
Homiletics 5403/4
Liturgy 5403/5
Sacred music 5403/6
Missiology 5403/7
Hermeneutics 5404
Scriptural study and languages 5405
Biblical Hebrew language 5405/1
Biblical studies/Sacred scripture 5405/2
Vedic Study 5405/3
Koine Greek 5405/4
Latin 5405/5
Old Church Slavonic 5405/6
Theology 5406
Dogmatic theology 5406/1
Ecclesiology 5406/2
Sacrament 5406/3
Systematic theology 5406/4
Christian ethics 5406/5
Hindu ethics 5406/6
Moral theology 5406/7
Historical theology 5406/8
## Education 5500
Comparative education 5501
Critical pedagogy 5502
Curriculum and instruction 5503
Alternative education 5503/1
Early childhood education 5503/2
Elementary education 5503/3
Secondary education 5503/4
Higher education 5503/5
Mastery learning 5503/6
Cooperative learning 5503/7
Agricultural education 5503/8
Art education 5503/9
Bilingual education 5503/10
Chemistry education 5503/11
Counselor education 5503/12
Language education 5503/13
Legal education 5503/14
Mathematics education 5503/15
Medical education 5503/16
Military education and training 5503/17
Music education 5503/18
Nursing education 5503/19
Outdoor education 5503/20
Peace education 5503/21
Physical education/Coach (sport) 5503/22
Physics education 5503/23
Reading education 5503/24
Religious education 5503/25
Science education 5503/26
Special education 5503/27
Sex education 5503/28
Sociology of education 5503/29
Technology education 5503/30
Vocational education 5503/31
Educational leadership 5504
Educational philosophy 5505
Educational psychology 5506
Educational technology 5507
Distance education 5508
## Engineering and technology 5600
Bioengineering 5601
Biochemical engineering 5601/1
Biomolecular engineering 5601/2
Catalysis 5602
Materials engineering 5603
Molecular engineering 5604
Nanotechnology 5605
Polymer engineering 5606
Process design 5607
Petroleum engineering 5607/1
Nuclear engineering 5607/2
Food engineering 5607/3
Process engineering 5608
Reaction engineering 5609
Thermodynamics 5610
Transport phenomena 5611
Coastal engineering 5612
Earthquake engineering 5613
Ecological engineering 5614
Environmental engineering 5615
Geotechnical engineering 5616
Engineering geology 5616/1
Hydraulic engineering 5617
Mining engineering 5618
Transportation engineering 5619
Highway engineering 5619/1
Structural engineering 56202
Architectural engineering 5621
Structural mechanics 5621
Surveying 5622
Instructional design 5623
Distance education 5623/1
Instructional simulation 5623/2
Human performance technology 5624
Knowledge management 5625
Applied physics 5626
Computer engineering 5627
Computer science 5628
Control engineering 5629
Control theory 5629/1
Electronic engineering 5630
Instrumentation engineering 5631
Engineering physics 5631
Photonics 5631/1
Information theory 5632
Mechatronics 5633
Power engineering 5634
Quantum computing 5635
Robotics 5636
Semiconductors 5637
Telecommunications engineering 5638
Biomaterials 5639
Ceramic engineering 5640
Crystallography 5641
Nanomaterials 5642
Photonics 5643
Metallurgy 5644
Polymer engineering 5645
Polymer science 5646
Semiconductors 5647
Aerospace engineering 5648
Aeronautics 5648/1
Astronautics 5648/2
Acoustical engineering 5649
Automotive engineering 5650
Biomedical engineering 5651
Biomechanical engineering 5651/1
Neural engineering 5651/2
Continuum mechanics 5652
Fluid mechanics 5653
Heat transfer 5654
Industrial engineering 5655
Manufacturing engineering 5656
Marine propulsion 5657
Mass transfer 5658
Mechatronics 5659
Nanoengineering 5660
Offshore construction 5661
Optical engineering 5662
Robotics 5663
Thermodynamics 5664
Chaos theory 5665
Complex systems 5666
Conceptual systems 5667
Control theory 5668
Affect control theory 5668/1
Control engineering 5668/2
Control systems 5668/3
Dynamical systems 5668/4
Perceptual control theory 5668/5
Cybernetics 5669
Biocybernetics 5669/1
Engineering cybernetics 5669/2
Management cybernetics 5669/3
Medical cybernetics 5669/4
New Cybernetics 5669/5
Second-order cybernetics 5669/6
Sociocybernetics 5669/7
Network science 5670
Operations research 5671
Systems biology 5672
Computational systems biology 5672/1
Synthetic biology 5672/2
Systems immunology 5672/3
Systems neuroscience 5672/4
System dynamics 5673
Social dynamics 5673/1
Systems ecology 5674
Ecosystem ecology 5674/1
Systems engineering 5675
Biological systems engineering 5675/1
Earth systems engineering and management 5675/2
Enterprise systems engineering 5675/3
Systems analysis 5675/4
Systems psychology 5676
Ergonomics 5676/1
Family systems theory 5676/2
Systemic therapy 5676/3
Systems theory 5677
Biochemical systems theory 5677/1
Ecological systems theory 5677/2
Developmental systems theory 5677/3
General systems theory 5677/4
Living systems theory 5677/5
LTI system theory 5677/6
Mathematical system theory 5677/7
Sociotechnical systems theory 5677/8
World-systems theory 5677/9
Systems theory in anthropology 5678
## Environmental studies and forestry 5700
Environmental management 5701
Coastal management 5701/1
Fisheries management 5701/2
Land management 5701/3
Natural resource management 5701/4
Waste management 5701/5
Wildlife management 5701/6
Environmental policy 5702
Wildlife observation 5703
Recreation ecology 5704
Silviculture 5705
Sustainability studies 5706
Sustainable development 5706/1
Toxicology 5707
Ecology 5708
## Family and consumer science 5800
Consumer education 5801
Housing 5802
Interior design 5803
Nutrition 5804
Foodservice 5804/1
Textiles 5805
## Human physical performance and recreation 5900
Biomechanics / Sports biomechanics 5901
Coach (sport) 5902
Escapology 5903
Ergonomics 5904
Physical fitness 5905
Aerobics 5905/1
Personal trainer / Personal fitness 5905/2
Game design 5906
Exercise physiology 5907
Kinesiology / Exercise physiology / Performance science 5908
Leisure studies 5909
Navigation 5910
Outdoor activity 5911
Physical activity 5912
Physical education / Pedagogy 5913
Sociology of sport 5914
Sexology 5915
Sports / exercise 5916
Sports journalism / sportscasting 5917
Sport management 5918
Athletic Administration 5918/1
Sport psychology 5919
Sports medicine 5920
Athletic training 5921
Survival skills 5922
Batoning 5922/1
Bushcraft 5922/2
Scoutcraft 5922/3
Woodcraft 5922/4
Toy 5923
submitted by Natural_Grocery4786 to antinet [link] [comments]


2023.01.18 08:41 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/08/29/disclosure-versus-confirmation-preparing-the-foundation-for-a-cosmic-peace-campaign/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/dueling-paradigms-perhaps-a-counterintelligence-model-is-better-than-a-scientific-one-to-study-ufos/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-leadership-crisis-in-ufology/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/science-counterintelligence-and-ufos/
submitted by Contactunderground to Experiencers [link] [comments]


2023.01.18 08:40 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/08/29/disclosure-versus-confirmation-preparing-the-foundation-for-a-cosmic-peace-campaign/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/dueling-paradigms-perhaps-a-counterintelligence-model-is-better-than-a-scientific-one-to-study-ufos/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-leadership-crisis-in-ufology/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/science-counterintelligence-and-ufos/
submitted by Contactunderground to ContactUnderground [link] [comments]


2023.01.18 08:39 Contactunderground WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT? Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023 UFO

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT UFOs ARE IMPORTANT?
Joseph Burkes MD 2014, reedited 2023
UFO historian Richard Dolan has described the initial reaction of many people to his passionate involvement with the subject. They express interest, might even describe something they saw on TV concerning the phenomenon, and then after a few minutes of his well-informed explanations, their eyes gloss over and they are clearly bored.
THE ROLE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES
Yes, it’s true; opinion polls indicate the public is interested in UFOs, now officially called UAPs. Advertising executives have long known this, but the fascination is for most part quite superficial. Why is this? I suspect that it is because prior to the winter of 2017 most authority figures have essentially said that there’s nothing to it.
After all, the world is terribly complex. Thus, we rely on authorities to use vast amounts of data to make what we hope are reasonable decisions. Most people have little understanding of the technological “miracles” that science has achieved, but they are grateful and trust the devices, like planes, autos and computers to work reliably.
Needing to trust leaders, I suspect, might be built into our psychobiology. For a million years before civilization was established, hunter-gatherers worked in small groups to survive. Shamans that could use primitive psi abilities combined with careful observations of nature played important roles. Leadership was a question of life and death. Those clans that had the best leaders, the “shamen” and “sha-women” that knew how to most successfully hunt animals, find healing herbs and deliver the babies, played critical roles in survival. Thus, most of us have a strong tendency to “follow the leader” and when this becomes extreme, “We the People” run the risk of becoming, “We the sheeple.”
LINKING UFOs TO SOLUTIONS FOR MAJOR PROBLEMS
For the UFO question to have a truly major impact on the mass consciousness, this subject will need to be transformed from an entertaining diversion and become a way of addressing the seemingly insurmountable problems our planet is facing. This is already being attempted by those within the UFO community that discuss the possibility of downloading into our technological culture the secrets of the energy propulsion systems of flying saucers. So-called “free energy” in one fell swoop might eliminate poverty and pollution, possibly even reversing global warming and ending world hunger.
Of course, for the so-called ETs to give us such devices, they might understandably insist on a peaceful transformation of our planet to replace what Ufologist Stanton Friedman called our perpetual state of “tribal warfare.” In the past such a proposition was an impossibly “hard sell” because military and political leaders, the mass media and academia all in service to ruling elites repeatedly insisted, “There is nothing to it.”
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
Clandestine forces determined to keep a lid on the UFO issue have been called “the control groups.” In the past, they employed a strategy of recruiting authority figures to block any significant discussion of flying saucers. Opinion makers that stepped out of line found that their access to funding would be cut off. This was done behind the scenes and has been quite effective in my opinion.
In the USA, the National Academy of Sciences made it perfectly clear that UFO studies are not part of the “legitimate” agenda for professional science. Scientists that stepped out of line could find themselves unable to secure grants thus ending their careers. This has now changed somewhat with the Galileo Project headed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. It should be mentioned, however, that Dr. Loeb’s UAP detection project is reportedly supported in such a way so as not to take money from traditional scientific financial backers. Heavens forbid a UAP investigation might divert funding for “real science.”
In broadcast journalism in the past, talk show hosts that might inform the public in a detailed way about flying saucers could find themselves without corporate sponsors. We should not forget that major newspapers are controlled through their editorial boards that in turn are dependent on commercial advertising to continue publishing.
This analysis of the social mechanisms of the “UFO Truth Embargo” is not a conspiracy theory. I merely describe the way power works. In the former Soviet Union, it was the political dictatorship of the Communist Party that attempted to regulate almost every aspect of people’s lives. That social experiment failed miserably. In the West, however, social control is far more sophisticated, decentralized and uses the knowledge of social psychology called “public relations” to effectively manipulate the masses.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE ALSO COMES FROM WITHIN
On the individual level, our tendency to identify with our thoughts leads to a profound attachments to old ideas. This resistance to changing one’s point of view flows from the ego itself. “Ego” in this context means identification with thought forms. People strive to defend their religion, political ideology, or moral customs to the point where some would even kill to maintain them. Just look at the present situation in Middle East, or at the millions killed centuries ago during the Spanish Inquisition and the Protestant Reformation in Europe.
Something similar in my opinion applies to acknowledging that an “ET” and/or interdimensional explanation for the flying saucer phenomenon might be true. Such a realization threatens to radically change the conceptual paradigm of our entire civilization. Since humans so strongly identify with their present beliefs, it is understandable that many reject such a brave new worldview in which we might have to accept a potent non-human presence.
UFO INTELLIGENCE HAS A TIGER BY THE TAIL.
What about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers? Could “they” (whoever they ultimately turn out to be) simply fill the sky with structured craft? Or stage the proverbial “landing on the Whitehouse Lawn?” Such actions would certainly convince the masses that flying saucers are of the greatest importance. In my judgment, this scenario is the least likely to ever take place. Given the militaristic mindset of our civilization, a sudden realization of the reality of UFOs could be catastrophic. My guess is that careful gradual efforts to alert us of their importance is the game plan of both the intelligences responsible for the phenomenon and some elements of the establishment as well. I highly recommend Grant Cameron’s book “Managing Magic.” He shows how the US Executive Branch has pursued a gradual acclimatization project which runs in parallel to the coverup.
So, what will it take to change mass public opinion on the flying saucer question? If the alleged “ETs” continue the present pattern of interactions, millions of individual sightings yearly interspersed with occasional massive waves, I imagine that there will be opportunities to slowly build public awareness by a responsible program of education.
RESPONSIBLE PROGRAM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
This will require UFO enthusiasts to discipline the crazies in our midst, think creatively and most importantly of all build stable, well-financed organizations to carry out the educational campaign. All this will need to be done in opposition to the control groups that have great experience in manipulating public opinion and putting their spin on the limited disclosure that has been going on.
“TURNING PAGES IN A PLAY BOOK”
Can we trust UFO intelligences to follow what we imagine is their existing “game plan” of gradually alerting humanity to their presence? I suppose not. UFO researcher Michael Lindemann once said that we should never assume that we can think like the so-called “aliens.” Nevertheless, the ever-changing pattern of interactions, as pointed out by UFO researcher Grant Cameron, appears to be as if the aliens have been turning the pages of a “play book.” This can be seen by the appearance of “Men in Black” in the 1950s, so called “alien abductions” starting in the 1960s and followed by crop circles reported in Southern England and then all over the world. While all this has been happening, tens of thousands of contact experiencers have described mental interactions with flying saucer intelligences. Many of these individuals are instilled with a sense of mission and are striving to convince their fellow “Earthlings” that we should look up and accept what our eyes are seeing.
In my judgment, UFO intelligences will continue to present us with new and creative ways of waking us up from our collective stupor concerning their “wonders in the sky.” I believe their presence is non-harmful and very likely beneficial for mankind. Bringing others to this hopeful perspective, I imagine, is a challenge that many contact and disclosure activists will continue to face for some time.
For Additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
This blog is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet's elites, but not the Earth's people.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/07/05/an-et-presence-threatens-terrestrial-elites-but-not-our-planets-people/
You can’ control a person who wants nothing
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/08/29/disclosure-versus-confirmation-preparing-the-foundation-for-a-cosmic-peace-campaign/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/dueling-paradigms-perhaps-a-counterintelligence-model-is-better-than-a-scientific-one-to-study-ufos/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-leadership-crisis-in-ufology/
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/science-counterintelligence-and-ufos/
submitted by Contactunderground to CE5 [link] [comments]


2022.10.06 14:14 kerry_lusignan The Top Five Relationship Books For Couples In Crisis

The Top Five Relationship Books For Couples In Crisis


Let’s face it, our media and culture are awash in self-help, be-happy, romanticized relationship advice; knowing where to go to get support and research-backed tools can be daunting. So this week (as promised), I sat down and compiled a list of my favorite top five resources for couples in crisis. Again and again, these are the materials I steer people to when their heart is hurting and they’re longing for more. Because while your relationship is unique, specific issues that you struggle with are probably not.
My field, marriage and family therapy, is in the middle of a renaissance, with thinkers like John Gottman, Stan Tatkin, and Brent Atkinson paving the way for deeper connection, secure functioning (regardless of your past), and healing from betrayal.
And given the current national shortage of couples therapists, it’s more important than ever that you have some tools that you can turn to independently.
So if I was stranded on a desert island with my partner (or at home locked down in the throws of a pandemic) and we were steeped in gridlock and negative sentiment, here are the top five resources I’d want to have packed in my bag, to set things right:
5) Codependent No More, Melody Beattie
https://preview.redd.it/pdacjl6bf6s91.jpg?width=321&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c06c3534dbbecdf059c7bd0cfe7d430ef6eaf2ac
It took me decades to finally crack the cover of this modern classic and New York Times bestseller. As a professional, I was skeptical and wrongly assumed it was another pop-psychology self-help book. But when I finally got around to reading it, I was blown away by how helpful, practical and vital this book is. If you struggle with setting compassionate but firm boundaries, if you wonder whether someone else’s problem is your problem and have lost sight of your own life in the face of their struggles, this book will offer you immense guidance and support.
4) The Three Faces of Victim, Lynn Forest
https://preview.redd.it/2pngakanf6s91.jpg?width=375&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=25c709df7e3eec1fa7a49eddf9c8404ddafd16d8
This online article is required reading for all new couples beginning therapy with me. Based on a diagram developed by a well-respected psychiatrist and teacher of Transactional Analysis named Stephen Karpman, it explains the “Victim Triangle.” In a nutshell, this article will help you determine your default position when navigating relationship challenges. Are you prone to rescuing? Do you collapse into victimhood? Or are you more likely to resort to blame and persecutory actions? Regardless of where you start, what is essential to comprehend is that we all are vulnerable to inhabiting each of these roles and that they have the propensity to become “shame generators” and perpetuate dysfunctional dynamics.
3) Your Brain on Love, Stan Tatkin
https://preview.redd.it/vtstp0eyf6s91.jpg?width=234&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=81354ad2865228374f575253b470eb6c3b43eb77
An in-depth audio romp on attachment theory and brain science as seen through the lens of Stan Tatkin, Founder of the Psychobiological Approach to Couples Therapy (PACT). In this fantastic audiobook, Tatkin guides us through his proven principles and practices for building enduring security and commitment between couples, family members, and others that we love. His ideas are a welcome reprieve from our me-centered and autonomy-focused culture. Touting values, social justice, and interconnection, no relationship library is complete without this audiobook.
2) Daring Greatly, Brené Brown
https://preview.redd.it/elpf65e1g6s91.jpg?width=333&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ffdc255b09f2a2d860fb7f384b088cc661d6e33
Yes, this book is not a “relationship” book. Yes, this book is not written explicitly for couples. But I wholeheartedly love this book, and for me, it was a game-changer. Perhaps more than anyone, Brown has taught me how to love well. That “clear is kind.” That values and courage are indispensable tools in the psychotherapy office. That the wholehearted sit side-by-side Gottman’s Masters of Marriage. And it was my certification in Brown’s Daring Way™ curriculum that inspired me to write John Gottman and Brené Brown on Running Headlong Into Heartbreak, the Gottman Institute’s number 1 blog in 2019. This book should be required reading for all humans.
1) Developing Habits for Relationship Success, Brent Atkinson
https://preview.redd.it/8vtusiz5g6s91.jpg?width=234&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e2341eaaef296891fe6c7034723e0716e3bb5da5
If I had to pick one book to give all couples, it would be Developing Habits for Relationship Success by Brent Atkinson. As the Founder of the PEX method (Pragmatic Experiential Method for Improving Relationships), Atkinson has created a manual that will give you everything you need to get unstuck and move forward regardless of your circumstances. This book is required reading for all NCCT clients, and we consider it so essential we give a copy of it to every couple that attends NCCT for a private retreat or intensive. What makes the PEX approach so unique is that even one member of a couple can make use of it. So if you have a partner who refuses to go to couples therapy or won’t accept influence from you regardless of how skillful you are, the tools offered in this book are critical. Atkinson was the first to teach me about the importance of standing up skills. And not just why they are essential, but how to stand up well. He normalizes core differences. He proposes that we can always get further when we avoid defaulting to a perception of overall blame of our partner. In this sense, his ideas align beautifully with Brené Brown, who encourages us to assume people are doing the best they can, even when what they offer up is inadequate. And if that is not enough, this book, more than any other resource I know, will give you a plethora of exercises, concrete tools, and even audio clips (to listen to when you are freaking out). There is no other book comparable to it, and again and again, our clients tell us it is the most helpful thing they have ever read.
In summary, you can access many excellent tools from home with the click of a few keys on your laptop, and in turn, acquire an abundance of skills to shift problematic relationship dynamics without ever setting foot in a therapist’s office. Don’t get me wrong, couples therapy can be beneficial, and often it is the best way to move things along farther and faster. But having just finished offering my signature digital course, Crisis to Connected, I can assure you that we are all capable of growing and changing and that there are myriad ways to accomplish that.
submitted by kerry_lusignan to u/kerry_lusignan [link] [comments]


2022.05.06 17:37 Leviosashes Relational Concepts collection

This post is a collection of links that explore common roadblocks couples may be facing unknowingly. As well as practical concepts that articulate complex issues.
While ADHD can be a very impactful contributing factor to relational distress, there are often other key elements that can be worked through alongside the diagnosis. Rather than repeatedly linking individual articles in replies, I thought it might be useful to keep them all in one place for easy accessibility.
Here are some concepts that may help you understand yourself and your partner better:
Personality and Behavioral models
  1. Do you know the importance of Attachment Styles?
  2. Are you an Overfunctioner or an Underfunctioner?
  3. What are youyour partner's maladaptive schemas?
  4. What's youyour partner's OCEAN?
  5. Could you be experiencing OTRS?
  6. The ADHD or CPTSD overlap & Narcissism vs Complex Trauma
Interpersonal Concepts
  1. Mindfulness - Respond vs React (When dealing with defensive, argumentative or manipulative people)
  2. Intent vs Impact
  3. Compassionate Detachment
  4. Codependency vs Interdependency
  5. Emotional Flooding
  6. Cognitive Distortions
  7. The Pursuer and Distancer pattern
  8. 5 Pillars of Attachment
  9. Signs of Subtle Abuse
Workbooks and questionnaires
  1. Gottman 'Sound Relationship House' assessment
  2. EFT Workbook for couples
  3. The Set Boundaries workbook
  4. DBT skills workbook
Evidence-based Couple Therapy modalities
Evidence-based Trauma Therapy modalities
These are not comprehensive topics but they can be a great starting point when addressing conflict or determining what to focus on in therapy.
submitted by Leviosashes to ADHD_partners [link] [comments]


2022.03.25 21:24 Straight-Stick-4713 Indicators, sort of, of stellar objects found whose origins could be from earlier cycles of expansion and contraction of the universe, as predicted by GUTCP

Bizarre space circle captured in unprecedented detail
Astronomers have sighted only a handful of odd radio circles, and are trying to pin down what causes them.:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00861-6?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=1cf0c44cbc-briefing-dy-20220325&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-1cf0c44cbc-46129034
The indicating phenomenon, is the very long wavelength of radio signals that are very far below the infra-red, which can be used in calculating the age of the universe. The point in time that correlates to, can be interpreted as a beginning point for the universe as in the Big Bang, which model of the cosmos has just recently been officially recognized by cosmologists as a mistake, or, as more accurately predicted by GUT-CP as being the point in time when the universe' current expansion phase changed from contraction or even as a similar point in an infinite series of earlier such cycles of expansion and contractions.
The farther down the electromagnetic spectrum that the light of a star seems to be changed by doppler effect, the farther back in time that signal can be interpreted as having been emitted by that star that much earlier, thereby indicating a much older age of the star. The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) has been used try and show that the universe has existed for about 13.8 billion years.
Stephen Hawking, in his last paper, 1981, concluded that the universe makes much more sense if its existence is considered to have no starting point, or is eternal. Mills theory, GUT-CP, predicted in 1995, that the universe has always exited. Now that the BB has been found to be in gross error, that moves the model of the universe having continuous existence, to be raised in priority over other models, to line up in priority with the model suggested by Hawking and with the model predicted in 1995, by GUT-CP. Another prediction of GUT-CP, that is derived together with this one, is that the expansion of the universe, is accelerating, a phenomena, that under the BB model, should not happen. That acceleration was "discovered" by academic cosmologists by observations made in 1998 and in 2012, of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
A corollary, due to extremes of difficulty of comprehending infinite time, the infinity term used as a definite value for the "t" variable, tends to drop out of formulas used in such calculations, to define time as having a zero or null value, or to define time to as an undefined term, essentially making time non-existent, to become one more indicator, here mathematics, that the universe is much more intuitively understood as, not only being eternal, but tending to have no such parameter or dimension as time associated with its existence.
This tends to indicate that time, as it has been understand, is not only very different from the three parameters or dimensions associated with space, but does not even exist, or that time is an illusion. That illusory aspect has its roots in human psychobiology, specifically our human based sense of endurance, making time an anthropomorphism, much like face recognition. That is a method, built into ones visual cortex to help one differentiate between those who are like us and those who are not. This can be seen in the effect of pareidolia, such as interpreting marks on Mars as canals, seeing shapes in clouds, or hearing hidden messages in music[, and seeing religious figures in on complex surfaces].
Basically, we humans have attributed human traits onto the cosmos and from there expect the cosmos to act how we want it to act, amenable to our human based prejudices, be that short lived as we are, or to have weird attributes just because we like magic and other stimulating effects. A conservative mind set helps to make it seem to be so.
That is exactly what has caused basic errors in how Standard Quantum Mechanics has been allowed to develop, that error being based on ego, such recognition of authority be it right or wrong, rather than strict application of the scientific method.
submitted by Straight-Stick-4713 to hydrino [link] [comments]


2022.03.09 11:02 kerry_lusignan The Top Five Relationship Books For Couples In Crisis

The Top Five Relationship Books For Couples In Crisis
https://preview.redd.it/t7ux5pv70cm81.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e30ecc5cdc32057ab9be2b48991f8fb025814e37
Let’s face it, our media and culture are awash in self-help, be-happy, romanticized relationship advice; knowing where to go to get support and research-backed tools can be daunting. So this week (as promised), I sat down and compiled a list of my favorite top five resources for couples in crisis. Again and again, these are the materials I steer people to when their heart is hurting and they’re longing for more. Because while your relationship is unique, specific issues that you struggle with are probably not.
My field, marriage and family therapy, is in the middle of a renaissance, with thinkers like John Gottman, Stan Tatkin, and Brent Atkinson paving the way for deeper connection, secure functioning (regardless of your past), and healing from betrayal.
And given the current national shortage of couples therapists, it’s more important than ever that you have some tools that you can turn to independently.
So if I was stranded on a desert island with my partner (or at home locked down in the throws of a pandemic) and we were steeped in gridlock and negative sentiment, here are the top five resources I’d want to have packed in my bag, to set things right:

5) Codependent No More, Melody Beattie


It took me decades to finally crack the cover of this modern classic and New York Times bestseller. As a professional, I was skeptical and wrongly assumed it was another pop-psychology self-help book. But when I finally got around to reading it, I was blown away by how helpful, practical and vital this book is. If you struggle with setting compassionate but firm boundaries, if you wonder whether someone else’s problem is your problem and have lost sight of your own life in the face of their struggles, this book will offer you immense guidance and support.

4) The Three Faces of Victim, Lynn Forest


This online article is required reading for all new couples beginning therapy with me. Based on a diagram developed by a well-respected psychiatrist and teacher of Transactional Analysis named Stephen Karpman, it explains the “Victim Triangle.” In a nutshell, this article will help you determine your default position when navigating relationship challenges. Are you prone to rescuing? Do you collapse into victimhood? Or are you more likely to resort to blame and persecutory actions? Regardless of where you start, what is essential to comprehend is that we all are vulnerable to inhabiting each of these roles and that they have the propensity to become “shame generators” and perpetuate dysfunctional dynamics.

3) Your Brain on Love, Stan Tatkin

An in-depth audio romp on attachment theory and brain science as seen through the lens of Stan Tatkin, Founder of the Psychobiological Approach to Couples Therapy (PACT). In this fantastic audiobook, Tatkin guides us through his proven principles and practices for building enduring security and commitment between couples, family members, and others that we love. His ideas are a welcome reprieve from our me-centered and autonomy-focused culture. Touting values, social justice, and interconnection, no relationship library is complete without this audiobook.

2) Daring Greatly, Brené Brown

Yes, this book is not a “relationship” book. Yes, this book is not written explicitly for couples. But I wholeheartedly love this book, and for me, it was a game-changer. Perhaps more than anyone, Brown has taught me how to love well. That “clear is kind.” That values and courage are indispensable tools in the psychotherapy office. That the wholehearted sit side-by-side Gottman’s Masters of Marriage. And it was my certification in Brown’s Daring Way™ curriculum that inspired me to write John Gottman and Brené Brown on Running Headlong Into Heartbreak, the Gottman Institute’s number 1 blog in 2019. This book should be required reading for all humans.

1) Developing Habits for Relationship Success, Brent Atkinson

If I had to pick one book to give all couples, it would be Developing Habits for Relationship Success by Brent Atkinson. As the Founder of the PEX method (Pragmatic Experiential Method for Improving Relationships), Atkinson has created a manual that will give you everything you need to get unstuck and move forward regardless of your circumstances. This book is required reading for all NCCT clients, and we consider it so essential we give a copy of it to every couple that attends NCCT for a private retreat or intensive. What makes the PEX approach so unique is that even one member of a couple can make use of it. So if you have a partner who refuses to go to couples therapy or won’t accept influence from you regardless of how skillful you are, the tools offered in this book are critical. Atkinson was the first to teach me about the importance of standing up skills. And not just why they are essential, but how to stand up well. He normalizes core differences. He proposes that we can always get further when we avoid defaulting to a perception of overall blame of our partner. In this sense, his ideas align beautifully with Brené Brown, who encourages us to assume people are doing the best they can, even when what they offer up is inadequate. And if that is not enough, this book, more than any other resource I know, will give you a plethora of exercises, concrete tools, and even audio clips (to listen to when you are freaking out). There is no other book comparable to it, and again and again, our clients tell us it is the most helpful thing they have ever read.
In summary, you can access many excellent tools from home with the click of a few keys on your laptop, and in turn, acquire an abundance of skills to shift problematic relationship dynamics without ever setting foot in a therapist’s office. Don’t get me wrong, couples therapy can be beneficial, and often it is the best way to move things along farther and faster. But having just finished offering my signature digital course, Crisis to Connected, I can assure you that we are all capable of growing and changing and that there are myriad ways to accomplish that.
Wholeheartedly,
Kerry
submitted by kerry_lusignan to u/kerry_lusignan [link] [comments]


2022.02.08 03:51 Mysterious_Flan_3394 In-depth research article on Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Michael Jackson.

Link to full article and citations (Some parts below cut due to Reddit character limits)

NPD – A Deeper Understanding

The diagnostic features of NPD as outlined in the DSM-IV_TR include selfishness; those with NPD are concerned with their own needs being met. Other key diagnostic features include constant compliment seeking, a sense of entitlement, and establishing friendships that will fulfill these needs. A key component to the diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of NPD is that “individuals with this disorder require excessive admiration. Their self-esteem is almost invariably very fragile…vulnerability in self-esteem makes individuals with Narcissistic Personality Disorder very sensitive to injury from criticism or defeat” (DSM-IV-TR, 2000, p. 714-715). With such fragility, it could be that other diagnostic criteria for NPD are included in the DSM as a means to protect persons with NPD from feelings of insecurity.
Etiology of NPD is not in any version of the DSM. Clinical staff of the Mayo Clinic have surmised that the cause may be connected to a dysfunctional childhood, excessive pampering, extremely high expectations, abuse or neglect, even possibly genetics or psychobiology (Mayo Clinic, 2012).

Michael Jackson – The Performer

Michael Jackson was “perhaps the most exciting performer of his generation” (Elber, 2009, para. 11). He would stand on stage for a full three minutes, motionless, no music playing, bringing the crowd to a frenzy. [...] The social induction such as those Michael Jackson elicited from his fans would essentially feed the needs of someone afflicted with NPD.

In-depth Look at Michael Jackson and NPD Features

It states as a diagnostic feature in the DSM-IV-TR (2000) that individuals with NPD “believe they are superior or unique and expect others to recognize them as such” (p. 714). Michael Jackson standing motionless on the stage for the first three minutes could be considered a means by which he defined himself as superior and unique, giving credence to his self-defined title as the King of Pop. As demonstrated in the initial moments of his 1992 Budapest concert, there was a brief second where a glimpse of what could be construed as a grandiose smile escaped Michael Jackson’s stoic stance. In watching the concert footage, it is apparent that every person in the stadium was affected as Jackson brought the crowd to an uncontrolled screaming, passionate frenzy. In essence, he brought the crowd of 70,000 to their knees.
Another diagnostic feature of NPD as stated in the DSM-IV-TR (2000) is that “these individuals may expect great dedication from others and may overwork them without regard for the impact on their lives” (p. 714). In the posthumous movie, This Is It (Bearden et al., 2010) , those who worked with Michael Jackson mention how he worked extremely hard and very long hours to achieve perfection. Jackson would obsess over one note for a considerable amount of time until the musician(s) could play it to his high expectations. He would also go through a similar routine with the dancers and singers. Those working on the This Is It tour commented on how many hours they would work in a given day and how many times they would rehearse one song or dance; and that they knew they would not have a personal life until the tour was completed (Bearden et al., 2010). Even the choreographeproducer of the tour mentioned that Michael would call him throughout the night with different ideas or changes (Bearden et al., 2010).
Publicly, Michael Jackson fit Freud’s classical analytic theory as it relates to narcissism in that he fit Freud’s definition of the ego ideal (Freud, 1914/1937): he was charming and assured in knowing that his talent was extraordinary. However, it seems Michael’s ego ideal was set up as a result of (and to protect) his fractured personality. This illustrates the reality of how difficult it is to treat those such as Michael Jackson – especially when consulting the DSM-IV-TR (2000). The DSM-IV-TR is structured in such a manner (i.e., a categorical classification system of which the patient must display a certain number of symptoms in a diagnostic criteria set that have great overlaps between and among the different PDs) that it would be easy to diagnose him with virtually any disorder (as there is a high degree of overlap and co-occurrence of Axis II PDs and Axis I mental disorders – described later in this article). This seems to not only validate Ronningstam’s (2005) previously stated view that, “narcissism represents a syndrome of relatively diverse behaviour” (p. 22), but also Livesley’s (1995) observation that NPD “is in fact particularly problematic in its overlap with other personality disorders” (p. 215). The DSM-IV-TR is also problematic in the sense that, “[p]eople with traits of pathological narcissism that range beyond the DSM-IV criteria set…will not be correctly identified” (Ronningstam, 2005, p. 27).
Joel Paris, a leading research psychiatrist on Personality Disorders (PDs), brings to the forefront the difficulty in effectively diagnosing and treating those with fractured personalities. He maintains that the difficulty lies not only with the diverse behaviours they exhibit, but also with the large number of fuzzy diagnoses, leading to a lack of understanding of any of the PDs (Paris, 2008, p. 40). The views of Ronningstam (2005), the observations of Livesley (1995), and the criticisms by Paris (2008) seem to suggest that had the DSM-IV and its contributors not been so focused on being respected by the medical community-at-large, perhaps the move toward reductionist theory (reducing behaviours to biological explanations rather than one comprised of multiple causes), as seems paramount in the DSM-IV, would have been debated more diligently and a more encompassing format would have been implemented. In other words, reducing behavioural observations to biological explanations based on fuzzy diagnoses rather than including them among other factors such as etiology marginalizes the importance of psychoanalysis.
Marginalizing psychoanalysis thwarts the ability of a diagnostician to discern the condition, resulting in treating it as though the neurosis is pathology. In other words, “symptoms are suggestive complaints” (Paris, 2008, p. 40) which can be psychologically based and, as such, it is through psychotherapy and not psychotropic therapy that the root cause could be effectively diagnosed and treated. What seems to have resulted is that “psychiatry rarely deals with causes of illness, only their signs and symptoms” (Paris, 2008, p. 39). In essence, Paris’ (2008) findings have brought to the forefront that how treatment is sought and provided is faultily superficial: therapy as a means of treating the biological component and not the underlying psychological issues that afflict the well-being of those such as Michael Jackson.
In accordance with the DSM-IV-TR (2000), Michael Jackson’s Non-Axial Format Assessment would present as follows:
ICD Code [3]
DSM-IV-TR Diagnoses

Michael Jackson’s DSM-IV-TR Multi-Axial Format(GAF) Rating Scale would present as follows:

What Michael’s symptoms communicate is a pre-morbid condition of NPD. As a result, co-morbidity of Major Depressive Disorder and drug abuse came about, which brought on the psychosomatic symptoms of Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Sleep Disorder and Anorexia Nervosa. What the evaluation does not convey is what precipitated NPD and its subsequent symptoms. While the results of the DSM-IV evaluations are essential for statistical and other purposes (such as insurance claims), the fundamental and necessary features of how and why are missing. These two features are paramount to understanding fractured personalities and implementing successful treatment.
As stated by Dr. Darrel Regier, Director of the American Psychiatric Association:
Doctors in general are reductionist. A patient walks in and you have 10 minutes to find out what in their whole life story is significant. There is a tremendous screening process to cut out irrelevant material. (as cited in Vedantam, 2005, p. 2)
What seems essential is determining how and why someone’s personality becomes fractured. In other words, what is integral (and is not mentioned in the DSM-IV-TR) for well-being is the understanding of etiology, for “we have only one enduring weapon in our struggle against mental illness: the emotional discovery of the truth about the unique history of our childhood” (Miller, 1997, p. 1). To do this requires more than 10 minutes; it requires sessions of psychotherapy and an understanding that all material is relevant. Unfortunately, the trend in recent years has been to “ignore the merits of therapeutic talk and over-prescribe drugs in shotgun fashion” (Dufresne, 2009, p. 1). It is seemingly due to this trend as a consequence of the DSM-IV that the ability to truly heal a patient has been affected. It should be clearly stated that there are no shortcuts or scientific formulas to diagnosing and treating a patient; that in order to effectively treat a patient with a disorder such as NPD it is important to understand the patient from past to present, or, as stated by Kierkegaard (1843) “life must be lived forward but understood backward” (as cited in Ronningstam, 2005, p. xi). This is done via talk therapy and not the reductionist approach.
The public etiological history of Michael Jackson is such that, prior to 1993, Michael Jackson was thought of as having an idyllic life. His success and large family presented an image of love, support and unity – that together, the family rose from great poverty to success. On February 10, 1993, in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, that façade started to crack. During that interview, Michael spoke about his abusive father, Joe Jackson. Michael said of him, “I love my father, but I don’t know him” (Winfrey, 1993). He described what his father would do to him, say to him, and what he expected. Michael further explained to Winfrey that his mother was ‘perfect love’ and that he idolized his mother, saying, “I love my mother. To me she’s perfection” (Winfrey, 1993). This, because of Michael’s relationship with his father, could be diagnosed as Freud’s Oedipal Complex. What became clear during the interview was that Michael was an extremely disciplined and guarded, yet fractured person. What also became clear was Michael’s extraordinary intellect and intuition, but also his lack of comprehension about his own truth as it related to his childhood. In essence, Michael lacked the proper tools to heal the fractures in his personality.
In watching the 1993 Oprah Winfrey interview, it emerges that society in general, including the media, tends to gloss over the ills and magnify the successes of celebrities. In the case of Michael Jackson, this is evident from not only the interview with Oprah Winfrey but from his autobiography as well as the biographies of the majority of celebrities; from reading them, “one gains the impression that their lives began at puberty” (Miller, 1997, p. 3), that their early childhoods were virtually unimportant or irrelevant to their successes and emotional turmoil. This ideology seems to be influenced by all editions of the DSM in that it implies a hesitation to diagnose someone with a disorder before reaching the age of 18. It is as if childhood experiences have no bearing on a person’s mental well-being once they enter adulthood. Yet, even with the pervasive influence of Freudian theories outlining the effects of parents and early experiences on mental health in adulthood, childhood experiences – especially those of famous people – are afforded only cursory treatment.

Michael Jackson – His Friendships, His Loves, His Life

“Michael heard that I had left halfway through [his concert], and called me the next day, and was like in tears because he had heard that I'd walked out. I hadn't walked out. I just couldn't see anything.” Elizabeth Taylor, May 31, 2006 Larry King Interview
Narcissists “tend to form friendships or romantic relationships only if the other person seems likely to advance their purpose or otherwise enhance their self-esteem” (DSM-IV-TR, 2000, p. 715). Michael Jackson’s friendships seem to fit this diagnostic feature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Present at the 1993 Winfrey interview was Elizabeth Taylor. Elizabeth spoke fondly of Michael, praising him for his abilities and complimenting him and admiring him for his intelligence, gifts, and intuition. Michael Jackson stood with hands clasped behind his back slightly behind a seated Elizabeth, frozen, gazing straight ahead – until Elizabeth started talking about him as though he were a perfect being. At that point, for a millisecond, the camera caught Michael’s expression. His expression (much like the one at his Budapest concert mentioned earlier) seemed to convey that Elizabeth was validating to Winfrey and the world what Michael really wanted them to hear. As noted in the DSM-IV-TR (2000), “those with Narcissistic Personality Disorder specifically need that attention to be admiring” (p. 716).
Not only did Michael Jackson’s friendships fit the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic feature of NPD, but also did his romantic relationships, such as that with Lisa Marie Presley – the daughter of Elvis Presley. Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie were married from 1994 to 1996. What the DSM-IV-TR does not expound upon is that narcissism is “also associated with indirect strategies for gaining status and esteem, such as “acquiring ‘trophy’ romantic partners” (Campbell & Baumeister, 2006, p. 423). During a March 2005 interview, Oprah asked Lisa Marie if she thought Michael loved her. Lisa Marie responded, “Yes, as much as he was capable of loving somebody” (Winfrey, 2005). Oprah then asked if Lisa Marie thought Michael Jackson used her. Lisa Marie responded, “All signs point to yes on that” (Winfrey, 2005). In the same interview, Lisa Marie’s mother, Priscilla, conveyed to Oprah that Michael wanted to meet Lisa Marie when she was 16 years old. Priscilla didn’t allow it. Then 10 years later, to Priscilla’s surprise, Lisa Marie married Michael. Priscilla Presley felt that Michael wanted to have a child with Lisa Marie because of who her father was, saying:
I was concerned and suspicious…there’s something very calculating and manipulative about how he does things…there’s a whole thread in everything that he does…to maintain his popularity…to be associated somehow to her and her father…I do believe he wanted her children. (Winfrey, 2005)
Lisa Marie agreed (Winfrey, 2005). As well, it seemed that Michael’s other motive for marrying Lisa Marie was to get in the good graces of his fans again, as the marriage happened during the plummet of his career. Essentially, Lisa Marie Presley was a trophy for Michael Jackson.
Fluctuating self-esteem is another aspect of NPD is. NPD has included in its diagnostic features that, “vulnerability in self-esteem makes individuals with Narcissistic Personality Disorder very sensitive to ‘injury’ from criticism or defeat” (DSM-IV-TR, 2000, p. 715). Michael’s physical experience was closely tied to his father’s criticisms. He conveyed that his father would tell him how ugly his nose and pimply his face was; that he was visually repugnant. Michael stated during the 1993 Oprah Winfrey interview that Joe Jackson’s nickname for his son was “Big Nose” (Winfrey, 1993). Seemingly, it is due to his father’s early statements about his looks that Michael was driven to seek physical perfection through plastic surgeries. However, even with all the physical changes, he forever struggled with his childhood demons. During the 1993 Oprah Winfrey interview, as well as in subsequent interviews, when Jackson was asked about his face and skin he became very uncomfortable, frequently denying the extent of his metamorphosis with disdain and defiance.
Those with NPD whose self-esteem has been threatened may also react with “disdain, rage, or defiant counterattack” (DSM-IV-TR, 2000, p. 715). In 2001, Michael Jackson’s album Invincible had poor record sales (Pulley, 2003, para 3). His earlier albums such as Thriller amassed sales of $115 million (Pulley, 2003, para 6). The sales of $15 million were “a poor return for the $25 million he spent to produce it” (Pulley, 2003, para. 3). Rather than taking responsibility for the quality of the album, Jackson personally attacked the Chairman of the record label, stating that the Chairman was “mean…a racist…and very, very devilish” (Vineyard, 2002, para. 5). Despite the amount of money spent on making and promoting the album, because it was not well received, Michael refused to promote the album and virtually went into hiding.
Michael Jackson’s morphing appearance – his continual striving for physical perfection – could be diagnosed as Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), which is considered a co-morbid condition of NPD. Michael’s ever-changing nose and facial features is indicative of BDD in the sense that those with BDD are preoccupied with the “…shape, size or some other aspect of the nose, eyelids, eyebrows…lips, teeth, jaw, chin, cheeks, or head” (DSM-IV-TR, 2000, p. 506). Michael Jackson’s dermatologist and friend, Dr. Arnie Klein, confirmed during an interview with TMZ.com on November 6 2009, that “Michael was freakish if he saw one line on his face. He would have to have it fixed immediately”.
Also included in the diagnostic features of NPD is anorexia nervosa. Symptoms of anorexia nervosa include self-starvation. On October 16, 2009, Jackson’s long-time friend and choreographeproducer for many of Jackson’s music videos and concerts, Kenny Ortega, appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show to discuss Michael Jackson and This Is It. Oprah commented of Michael Jackson’s weight: “He was really thin” (Winfrey, 2009). Ortega responded that he was concerned about Jackson’s weight, saying that he had asked him about it, to which Jackson responded, “This is my fighting weight” (Winfrey, 2009). In a separate interview, filmmaker and friend Bryan Michael Stoller stated that shortly before Michael’s death he was shocked by Michael’s weight and that when he “hugged him…it was like hugging bones” (Fleeman, 2009, para. 7). Michael Jackson’s autopsy states his weight at 136 pounds (Duke, 2010, para. 18).
Not only did Jackson’s physical appearance change drastically, but his skin color completely changed from that of his early years to his adult years. Michael mentioned in the 1993 Winfrey interview that the change was due to a skin condition known as vitiligo. When Oprah Winfrey asked whether Michael was taking anything to change the color of his skin, Michael responded:
Oh, God no, we tried to control it and using make-up evens it out because it makes blotches on my skin, I have to even out my skin. But you know what’s funny, why is that so important? That’s not important to me. I’m a great fan of art, I love Michelangelo, if I had the chance to talk to him or read about him I would want to know what inspired him to become who he is, the anatomy of his craftsmanship, not about who he went out with last night…what’s wrong with…I mean that’s what is important to me. (Winfrey, 1993)
Michael’s answer seemed evasive and somewhat nonsensical; he seemed distant, dissociated, and emotionally flat. As noted by Brosig, Möhring, Kupfer, & Beckmann (1998), even in the midst of a profound emotional issue, narcissists will be ‘strangely unmoved’. Regarding skin, it “possesses the expressive function of representing an unconscious conflict” (Brosig et al., 1998, p. 471). BDD can be considered akin to a rabbit in pain: the cry is so high-pitched that no one can hear the pain being expressed, even though the physical characteristics and demeanor are physiological reactions – metaphorical indicators – of the psychological pain. This is evidenced in Michael’s response to Oprah’s question regarding his skin. Michael’s issue with his emotional self transcended to his physical self. Yet, despite the vast change in his physical self, the public and his doctors did not seem worried about his wellbeing, nor about what his physical transformations and afflictions meant on a psychosocial level. Michael was a rabbit and society, family, friends and his doctors watched, only acknowledging what they wanted to acknowledge.
In recent years, it has emerged that the love Michael Jackson received from his father, Joe Jackson, was conditional. His father’s love was conditional on Michael meeting the obligations set for him. One could surmise that Michael’s mother’s emotions were predicated on his father’s emotions and her own issue with her inability to succeed at establishing a successful country music career, which in turn would affect the children of the relationship. Miller (1997) maintains, “[f]ar too many of us had to learn as children to hide our own feelings, needs, and memories skillfully in order to meet our parents’ expectations and win their ‘love’” (back book cover). Pinsky and Young (2009) stress that, “a secure attachment to a parent nurtures empathy, high self-esteem, and self-awareness” (p. 107). It seems evident that not only did Michael Jackson’s parents fail in providing psychological security, but also that Michael had to learn as a young child to hide his emotions, needs and memories in order to meet his parents’ expectations and win their love. Where Michael appeared happiest – where he could express his emotions – was the place he received his greatest accolades: on the stage singing and dancing. On stage is where Michael’s idealized self was reflected back onto his iconic mirrored glasses.
The DSM-IV-TR (2000) also puts forth that those with NPD “may profess a commitment to perfectionism and believe others cannot do things as well” (p. 716). Michael Jackson’s quest for perfectionism was apparent in every aspect of his life – especially his performances. This more than likely stems from the fact that Joe Jackson (as stated by Michael Jackson) “had a belt in his hand” as Michael and his brothers rehearsed and that “[if] you didn’t do it right, he would tear you up” (Taraborrelli, 2010, p. 612) Joe Jackson would demand perfection from Michael and his brothers; Joe Jackson is widely viewed as an abusive father who terrorized his children: “when they didn’t perform well or weren’t ‘trying hard enough’, he would beat and belittle them” (Hollywood, 2009, para. 2). On July 20, 2009, Joe Jackson was interviewed on CNN’s Larry King Live. During the interview, Larry King asked about physically abusing his sons (specifically Michael), Joe’s response was as follows:
The media keep hollering about saying that I beat Michael. That's not true. You know what this beat started -- beat started in the slavery days. Where they used to beat the slaves and then they used to torture them. That's where these beating started. These slave masters, and that's where that come from. But, hey, there's a lot of people in America, Larry, a lot of people in America spank their kids, you know? They say they don't, they're lying. They're lying. Now, Michael was never beaten by me, I've never beaten at all. (King, 2009)
In watching Joe Jackson, he presented as haughty. Joe Jackson also intimated during the Larry King interview that it was because of him that Michael experienced extraordinary success (King, 2009).
Joe Jackson’s personality characteristics impacted and influenced his family. Joe Jackson’s characteristics are not only characteristic of NPD, but they appear to display characteristics of a specific narcissistic type: phallic narcissistic character. This character is “self-confident, arrogant, vigorous…hard and sharp with masculine features. These individuals are haughty, cold, reserved, or aggressive with disguised sadistic traits in relation to others” (Ronningstam, 2005, p. 8). Not only does Joe Jackson have sharp, masculine features, but he displays each of these phallic narcissistic characteristics in virtually every interview this author watched – especially the 2009 Larry King interview. Not only did Joe Jackson treat his family in a sadistic manner (which included extra-marital affairs), but according to this author, his (re)actions during interviews were laced with symptoms associated with phallic narcissistic characteristics. If Joe Jackson was indeed NPD his notions of perfectionism would be hard to meet because he would always think he himself could do better. It is parental conditioning such as Joe Jackson’s that prompts children such as Michael Jackson to operate in the world the way they do as adults.
In the early years, we are all narcissistic. As a child develops, the ego and super-ego start to develop. Children’s traits and characteristics are influenced by their environment, which in turn influences neuronal pathways. Kolb and Whishaw (1998) found that experience (nurture) stimulates neuroplasticity. Essentially, how parents engage and treat their children is an experience that affects how neuronal pathways are mapped and, hence, how perception of reality is formed. For instance, because Michael Jackson’s parents were focused on their children achieving what they could not, they were somewhat militant in directing how their children rehearsed and acted. As such, Michael might have felt happiest when he was musically engaged, as “dopamine, the neurotransmitter associated with emotional regulation, alertness, and mood, is released when people hear or perform music, and the dopaminergic system aids in the encoding of the memory trace” (Levitin, 2007, p. 198). As a result of years of musical practice, Michael’s dopaminergic pathways would be acutely developed, which would create a somewhat euphoric state when singing or dancing because of the stimulation the dopamine would give to the pleasure centre (the limbic brain which is the regulator of emotions), hence recapturing positive memory traces.
Dopamine plays an important role in behaviour as well as mood, attention, learning and sleep. It has been found that dopamine is connected with mood disorders as “decreased dopamine activity is involved in depression, while increased dopamine function contributes to mania” (Diehl & Gershon, 1992, p. 417). Friedel (2004) hypothesized that dopamine dysfunction may play a role in BPD. This could be extended to NPD, for the DSM-IV-TR (2000) (as noted earlier in this paper) asserts that NPD may be associated with other disorders, including BPD (p. 716). The DSM-IV-TR (2000) outlines that NPD can also be associated with substance-related disorders. Michael Jackson presented differently off stage. He was quieter, he seemed less secure, which could connote a change in activity of the dopamine neurotransmitter. In essence, with regard to his personal life, his emotional brain engaged his dopaminergic pathways in a different manner. It was as if the avoidance of truly understanding his etiology was affecting his ability to function. Oxycontin, one of many prescription medications Michael Jackson was ingesting (Esposito, 2009), stimulates the pleasure centre by releasing dopamine, thereby likely staving off his emotional pain, protecting his inner self from his outer self.
Not only was Michael Jackson addicted to Oxycontin, but also he was, as stated by Dr. Arnie Klein, “totally addicted to Propofol” (as cited in Casarez, 2011), a short-acting hypnotic agent. Schulte et al. (2000) determined that Propofol has an effect on the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine. Michael’s dopaminergic pathways were in a constant flux, desperately trying to find balance. Seemingly, Michael Jackson used drugs as a means for “compensating narcissistic vulnerability and self-esteem fluctuations, for maintaining self-control…and for self-protection and strengthening boundaries between the internal and external world” (Ronningstam, 2005, p. 127). The ‘psychotropic treatment’, however, was proving ineffective.
Recently, Rabbi Boteach, a friend of Michael Jackson’s, wrote a one-page article titled, “The Myth that Michael Jackson was Happy and Healthy” (2009c). Boteach outlined how the media and public perceived Michael Jackson in a different light than actuality. Boteach (2009c) maintained that, “[t]he reason this misrepresentation is so destructive is that it would have us believe there is nothing to be learned from Michael’s tragic death” (Myth, para. 2). In response to Michael’s ‘relationship’ with psychotropics and other medications, Boteach (2009b) also stated that
Michael was a man in tremendous pain and his tragedy was to medicate his pain away rather than addressing its root cause. On many occasions when I visited him he would emerge from his room woozy and clearly sedated. Who were the doctors giving him this stuff? Was there no one to save him from himself? Was there no one to intervene? (Tragic, para. 3)
The reality is that, according to IMS Health Canada, since 1994, “the fastest rising diagnoses made by office-based physicians” (Currie, 2005, p. 3) are of depression and “[e]ighty-one percent of physician visits for depression … resulted in a recommendation for an anti-depressant” (Currie, 2005, p. 3). The increase of psychotropic treatment for disorders is indicative of how impactful the scientific psychiatric community, and by extension the DSM-IV, is on the medical profession and society. It is akin to the social induction Michael Jackson was able to elicit at his concert(s). In essence, the case of Michael Jackson brings to the forefront how the mental health profession’s fractured identity is affecting effective diagnoses and treatment. In other words, it seems that the effect of the DSM-IV is such that it is used by medical professionals to identify and treat disorders as being biologically based, and that the DSM-IV essentially influences medical practitioners into believing they understand how to treat psychological disorders. The belief that disorders are biologically based seems to anaesthetize society from mental and physical wellbeing, resulting in only focusing on the outer self rather than on healing the inner self. As noted by Pinsky and Young (2009), Miller (1997), and Svrakić (1984), especially as it relates to PDs, etiology has an effect on overall wellbeing.
It is important to recognize that psychotherapy, “heals faulty brain wiring and chemistry … [and] improves neurotransmitter levels” (Borel, 2008, para. 8). Dr. Deepak Chopra (2009) maintains that neurotransmitters are influenced by thoughts. By healing thoughts, well-being is affected. Both DeRubeis et al. (2005) and Erbaugh (1995) found in their studies that while psychotherapy may take longer than psychotropic treatment, the benefits of psychotherapy are more far reaching and longer lasting. Even in the event of relapse, Erbaugh (1995) determined that, “the interval between cessation of active treatment and subsequent episodes of depression appears to be lengthened after psychotherapeutic intervention” (p. 3). Erbaugh (1995) also noted that psychotherapy is beneficial in dealing with “impairments of social function and reactions to stress, disappointment, and other psychosocial issues that are common triggers or consequences” (p. 3). Had Michael Jackson participated in psychotherapy, his life may have turned out quite differently.
Experience with PDs and the co-morbid conditions that might present with PDs are paramount to understanding and helping those whose personalities are fractured. As noted in the DSM-IV-TR (2000), individuals with NPD “have a grandiose sense of self-importance…are often preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love” (p. 714). What the DSM-IV-TR (2000) seems to gloss over is that perhaps these are coping and defense mechanisms. As noted by Svrakić (1985), NPD is a two-level personality disorganization. The first level is the superficial level – the grandiose self. The second level is the inner level, which is sheltered by the grandiose self. It is the inner level that is, essentially, “frightened, frustrated, emotionally deprived, envious, and full of omnipotent rage” (Svrakić, 1985, p. 720). The DSM-IV-TR, while it outlines the features associated with NPD, seems to associate those with NPD as having fragile self-esteems, but equate them as being egotistical in nature without providing an understanding as to why grandiosity is a key diagnostic feature of NPD: to shelter the insecure self.
After Oprah Winfrey’s 1993 interview, it became clear how fragile Michael Jackson really was, how he had created his life in an effort to shield his inner level from the superficial level. Not only did Michael create a fantastical public world, but he did so privately as well. Such shielding seemed to include idealizing the fictional character Peter Pan. According to Neverpedia (n.d.) “Peter is mainly an exaggerated stereotype of a boastful and careless boy. He is quick to point out how great he is, even when such claims are questionable” (“Personality”, para. 1). During the Oprah Winfrey 1993 interview (as well as the July 2009 Larry King posthumous Michael Jackson special), Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch was showcased. Throughout Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch are pictures of Peter Pan. There are also portraits of Michael Jackson as Peter Pan. As well, Michael’s house (of which child actor Macaulay Culkin assisted with the design) was built with many secret passageways and the grounds were developed like a theme park.
In 1987, Michael Jackson met with Trevor Nunn, the Broadway director of Peter Pan. Michael’s reaction to Nunn was, “Could I play Peter, is it too late? Will you let me play Peter? All I ever want to do is play Peter Pan” (Nunn, 2009, para. 20). Nunn (2009) described in his article how Michael Jackson knew every minute detail of Peter Pan, how he could recite word for word text from the story, but mostly how he “became immensely vulnerable and childlike as the delight transformed him to some earlier moment in his life” (para. 21). It is evident how much Michael Jackson idealized and wanted to be Peter Pan – to remain and live in a grandiose childhood dream away from reality.
As noted in the DSM-IV-TR (2000), and as noted earlier, one of the diagnostic criteria for NPD is a preoccupation with ideal love (p. 717). Not only was Michael’s perception of his mother that of ‘perfect love’, but he was enraptured by the world of Peter Pan. Peter Pan presides over the Lost Boys who are “children who look to his leadership but who he needs as much as they need him. The Lost Boys live in the same big room as Peter and they all sleep in the same big bed” (Nunn, 2009, para. 33). During his 2003 interview with British journalist Martin Bashir, Jackson emphatically stated: “I am Peter Pan” (Anderson & Shaw, 2003).
Narcissism and NPD have negative connotations while the features of Peter Pan Syndrome include fantasy, protection and ideal love – ideas with positive connotations. Essentially, those with Peter Pan Syndrome, “simply feel a dreamy, imaginative comfort inside of their own minds – an attraction of introspection that is positive and well-meaning” (Bailyn, 2009, para. 1). There are aspects of Michael Jackson’s self that are fantastical and dreamy and very childlike. As Nunn (2009) intimated, and as observed in Bashir’s interview, Michael Jackson had an ideology of what perfectionism is, what a fantastical world should be, embracing and wishing to hold on to youth by surrounding himself with his own Lost Boys – this is all indicative of Peter Pan and Neverland (Anderson & Shaw, 2003). Jackson’s quest to make his fantastical world his reality seemed to be a catalyst for what was happening in his reality and what he was trying to protect: his inner self. It was an escape; the kind of escape which those with NPD seek: “the kind that is at the root of narcissistic disorders” (Pinsky & Young, 2009, p. 107).
NPD can only be formally diagnosed when the features of narcissism become pervasive. The DSM-IV-TR (2000) outlines the diagnostic features and criteria associated with NPD. What is greatly misunderstood, even with the diagnostic features put forth in the DSM-IV-TR (2000), is that those afflicted with NPD are not in love with themselves but, rather, with a reflection of what they perceive to be their real selves. For instance, Michael’s Jackson’s BDD was his attempt to reflect what he perceived to be his real self. This misperception was reinforced by his early experiences.
The effect of childhood trauma does not appear in the diagnostic features of the DSM-IV-TR. Yet, Miller (1997), Pinsky and Young (2009) determined that childhood trauma is associated with NPD. Another feature that is not present in the DSM-IV-TR is loneliness. Miller (1997), Pinsky and Young (2009), and Svrakić (1985) found that loneliness is a common symptom of those with NPD. Michael Jackson discussed his childhood trauma in various interviews. In June 2009, Deepak Chopra, a long-time friend, stated that Michael’s personal loneliness was intimately known to Chopra. “The greatest problem with narcissistic personality disorder is its lack of validation through such external criteria as a specific etiological pathway” (Livesley, 1995, p. 217); however, because loneliness cannot be externally validated via scientific research, it is not included in the DSM-IV-TR.
Based on the interviews and the posthumous movie This Is It, it is clear that the media and those around Michael Jackson painted him as quirky and weird; they avoided his mental health issues. Most notably, the Bashir interview did not venture into whether Michael Jackson was a fractured personality or explore why he was obsessed with Peter Pan (Anderson & Shaw, 2003). Simply, Bashir painted Michael Jackson as the stereotypical version of an eccentric, freaky and fantasy-like personality (Anderson & Shaw, 2003). By avoiding looking at what truly plagued Michael Jackson the media – and society in general – did not have to acknowledge the effects of childhood trauma. Instead, these interviews fostered the societal taboos as related to childhood experiences and enabled those around Michael Jackson (as well as Michael himself) to keep the effects of childhood trauma a secret. As Boteach (2009a) writes, “[o]ur culture, in which fortune and fame readily eclipse family and life nurturing values, is claiming an increasing number of casualties” (para. 2).
submitted by Mysterious_Flan_3394 to LeavingNeverlandHBO [link] [comments]


http://swiebodzin.info