Dating in tucson

TucsonDating

2022.01.26 04:52 TucsonDating

This is a subreddit for someone who wants to meet people in the area and even find a date. Let’s make this a safe place!
[link]


2019.04.25 22:38 lightnh DatingInIndia

Dating disucssion, tips, guides, experience and whatnot. We know dating or online dating or any form of courting is itself a daunting task in India. Hope this sub will make it easier.
[link]


2022.08.25 07:22 DatingInMumbai

A subreddit for people in/around Mumbai looking to date/date suggestions.
[link]


2024.05.18 21:20 Battery_Strong Just found this sub and looking for advice ...

I realize that no advertising here and maybe marginally BayAreaRealEstate related, but I have a question ...
We have property in Barrio Viejo, Tucson AZ and would like to advertise the sale in the Bay Area.
You all probably know of locations with a 'closed shop' attitude. Us being San Diegans, welcome to our world, too. This is the market that chased Diann Keaton out of town with what I affectionately call 'pitchforks and torches'.
The most recent sale and rehab came from outside Oakland ... and hence the interest with finding some place to up there to post the sale.
The buildings are adobe, some brick construction and have been in my in-laws family since 1951 ... Chinese American grocery store owners, my SO was born and raised there ... buildings date back to 1890. All zoned HC-3: two stores and eight apartments.
And the location is here, same street as the Teatro just one street south:
https://www.cntraveler.com/story/best-places-to-go-in-north-america-and-the-caribbean-2024
Any information would be appreciated ...
submitted by Battery_Strong to BayAreaRealEstate [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:13 Throwaway01170915 Just sharing my thoughts as someone who knows Julie Rowe and the Daybells personally.

Warning: LONG POST (Also, apologies in advance for LDS church jargon and terminology)
I have a unique perspective that I thought maybe some on this sub would find interesting. I am LDS and for those of you who are unfamiliar with the church but are just interested in this case, just know that life as members of our church can be a VERY small world, even across state lines. So I personally knew Julie Rowe when she lived in Arizona, and I now live in Rexburg and my husband and his family are local so I have a LOT of personal connections to Chad and his kids.
That said, here's my experience with these individuals. First- Julie Rowe. I was in her ward in Oro Valley (northern suburb of Tucson) Arizona in 2011 and 2012. She lived in our neighborhood and was my sister's Activity Days leader. I was a senior in high school and babysat her kids 2-3 times. My mom was nice to her because my mom is the sweetest, and felt bad for Julie. One day she asked my mom to go on a walk with her and she did. On that walk, Julie started talking to my mom about her out of body experience and said a few things that made her uncomfortable. My mom distanced herself from Julie pretty immediately. Soon thereafter, Julie was asked by the bishopric to not speak in church, comment in classes, or give prayers anymore because she had begun saying some wacko stuff in testimony meetings and comments in class. Everyone kinda started noticing how weird she was after that. Around that time was the last time I babysat her kids. She dropped them off at my house and when she came to pick them up I DISTINCTLY remember this strange encounter: She was talking to me about college because I had recently gotten accepted to BYU-Idaho and would be moving there in the fall. She went on a rant with my mom, sister, and I telling us how one day we would all need to move to Rexburg because it would be protected. She was talking so crazy and we couldn't get out of the conversation so I called our home phone with my cell phone to have an excuse to make her leave. Shortly after that, her family and her disappeared. Like, overnight they moved and house was empty. Super weird.
Fast forward a few years and I meet my husband who is from the area but also lived in Springville as a kid. Chad is friends with his dad and was in the process of helping him publish a book about mental health when all of this came out. Tammy worked as a librarian in my little brother in law's elementary school. Emma even went on a double date with me and a family friend on the night I got engaged and was literally there, in some of our pictures. When all of this came out, I realized I lived down the street from Lori and their townhouses. Also, Rob Wood was my bishop for about two years before he took the case (and don't quote me, but I believe was released as bishop because of it).
PHEW I know that was a lot. But I just have a lot of strange connections and this case has just hit SO close to home for me. Way too close for comfort. And I have a theory:
My theory is that Julie Rowe and Chad were going to be the "it" couple in Chad's mind originally. I see Chad as a guy who grew up kind of a loser, always wanting attention and the limelight, but being boring and not the greatest looking guy, he ended up with a woman like Tammy who has many amazing qualities but who wasn't necessarily the "beautiful blonde bombshell" type that he saw Lori as. (nothing against Tammy!) He always secretly wanted attention and praise, which is why I think he was so tempted by manipulating other women to get what he wanted. Julie Rowe was perfect for that. Julie already had the theology and following, and Chad was both looking for women to manipulate and had his own religious weirdness as well.
Here's why I think they were flirting with an affair before he met Lori: I was talking to my husband’s family member who knows the Daybells well. We were just casually talking about the story I told above about Julie Rowe. She told me that she and her husband went to a farm of a friend of theirs. When they got there, it was later in the evening and Chad and Julie were alone walking around the farm property very close. They ended up running into each other and having to speak and Chad seemed very uncomfortable (this family member is in Chad’s ward so they knew he was married etc). He introduced the woman as Julie Rowe. They quickly got in Chad’s car and drove away. The family member talked later to the owner of the farm and she said that they had been there for a while just looking at areas to keep animals or whatever. That experience plus the claims Julie made.... yeah... I think Chad was trying to manipulate her in the beginning and it didn't work out. He probably assaulted her which is terrible, but she was putting herself with him alone wayy to much for a married woman and I think she got spooked and distanced herself. Just a theory.
Anyway. I know this was extremely long. I just had to dump all of this somewhere and this was the right audience!! I have so many more thoughts on this case that I'd love to discuss too, and I have even more connections to this case than I have shared here but out of concern for privacy I omitted them. Please feel free to ask any questions.
submitted by Throwaway01170915 to LoriVallow [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 21:11 manoSB999 Is anything going to beat Boulder for me?

Looking for my next landing spot and have come to the conclusion that Boulder is the best spot for me, after a lot of research/reading. Would now like to put that thinking to the test here...I'm a single, 30 year old male, btw. Work remote.
Why Boulder?
-Love that it is 30-60 min from Denver, which means you have reasonable proximity to all the cultural items and big city amenities Denver is able to offer - professional sports, adult sports leagues (both of these are huge for me) - arts, events, food, Denver International Airport, etc. I'm not a huge fan of Denver's sprawl, so having proximity to Denver but getting a smaller and maybe more tight knit community in Boulder is a great balance on paper.
-Active, well-educated populace and tech/startup/entrepreneurial scene. I'm huge into health/fitness and being active (cycling, lifting, running, golfing, sports, etc) - Boulder seems like a great place to be to find others like that, as well as the secondary effects this has (farmers markets and farm-to-table food scene, for instance). At the same time, it's a city with a lot of educated people, which is a nice to have, and also has some tech/entrepreneurial activity going for it, which I definitely value.
-Mild weather & lots of sun. Big perk for me, love being outside so sun is key for me, at the same time Colorado's Front Range area has pretty mild weather year round.
-Mountain access. I know there is driving/traffic involved, but it's still there if you want it. I snowboard/ski, I love mountains as a visual aesthetic, and I road bike.
-Visually/aesthetically appealing. This is a weird one but big for me - I like urban areas that are well maintained and clean, with a touch of either class or modernity - something like Pearl Street fits well, haven't seen the rest of Boulder so TBD on this one at least for the urban setting...and I really like to have beautiful nature in & around the city, which I think Boulder is not short of. It's a very pretty city from the stuff I have seen/watched.
Just feels like my type of people/place between the active culture + the educated populace + the tech friendly scene.
Cons of Boulder and my thoughts/questions on them:
-COL. It's higher, but I'm OK with it - I have some good savings from living frugally and make about $200K per year, so it's not an issue for me and I'm fine paying up for a quality of life that suits/benefits me.
-Male/female ratio. This sucks, not sure what else to say. Boulder trends at like 1.3 male to female for 20-35 year olds, which is bad for dating as a straight single male.
-Homeless issue. This is something I really hate to see - it's sad on the one hand, and then can also be deterring when it's someone drugged out going crazy disturbing the peace, or trash and litter on the road or around encampments. That being said, it seems almost unavoidable in any mid/large sized US city.
-Dry weather. I feel like I get nosebleeds every time I'm in Colorado, likely just because I'm coming from humid environments. Will I adapt to this?
-Wildfires. Not sure the relative risk here - I'm renting, not buying, so moreso the inconvenience of smoke and hopefully not property damage risk for me.
-Air quality. This surprised me, but apparently really bad? Is that a year round thing or influenced by things like wildfire smoke? Can you escape the bad times if needed?
-Diversity - I'm not 100% sure on how this affects my day to day quality of life, but can understand how it gets listed as a con. Curious to hear some perspectives on this.
-Traffic/overcrowding - is what it is IMO. It's not LA or anything like that, it's just a byproduct of most US city design combined with attractive places to be/live.

Other places I have considered are:
San Diego (feels a bit too sprawly, and huge issues with homelessness/crime while I was there, also really expensive for low quality housing IMO + California COL/taxes)
Seattle (sunlight makes this a no-go)
Austin (lacks a bit of charm IMO, construction/traffic everywhere, meh airport connectivity and weak activities outside of Austin - FWIW I don't mind brutal summers actually, as I can just travel then)
San Francisco (SD problems but even costlier for what you get, that being said the access to nature and the startup ecosytem & tech scene here cannot be matched)
Raleigh (just seems too boring to me, candidly)
Boise, Flagstaff, Tucson, Burlington, Madison (just don't know enough here, but none of them leap off the page for me compared to some of the other picks)
Would love any thoughts/feedback!
submitted by manoSB999 to SameGrassButGreener [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 19:52 Then_Marionberry_259 MAY 15, 2024 SVE.V SILVER ONE DISCOVERS NEW SILVER VEIN FRAGMENTS AND OUTLINES NEW COPPER SHOWINGS ON ITS PHOENIX SILVER PROJECT IN ARIZONA

MAY 15, 2024 SVE.V SILVER ONE DISCOVERS NEW SILVER VEIN FRAGMENTS AND OUTLINES NEW COPPER SHOWINGS ON ITS PHOENIX SILVER PROJECT IN ARIZONA
https://preview.redd.it/2jbw2tx4pm0d1.png?width=3500&format=png&auto=webp&s=edbb5b2123bdea1b0064614d481dbe4c04064377
VANCOUVER, BC , May 15, 2024 /CNW/ -- Silver One Resources Inc. (TSXV: SVE) (OTCQX: SLVRF) (FSE: BRK1) ("Silver One" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the discovery of additional large silver vein fragments along the major east-west 417 vein structure, immediately to the west of the large angular and unabraded 417 pound (189 kg) silver vein fragment that was estimated to contain over 70% silver (see February 5, 2020 , January 11, 2021 company's news releases and Figure 1). The distribution of these newly discovered vein fragments, one weighing up to 6+ pounds (2.7 kg), extends the area of potential mineralization 600+ metres to the west of the 417 pound silver vein fragment (see Figure 2 below), significantly expanding the area of potential high-grade silver prospectivity.
https://preview.redd.it/o3ialc15pm0d1.jpg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ff1a54b8890bd08c95bccd0b9c845e3280aae0c3
Geological reconnaissance on the new claims staked in October and December, 2023 (see company's news releases of October 23 and December 19, 2023 ) has also uncovered several new copper and silver prospects with up to 1,785 g/t Ag and 2.74 % Cu in selected samples (Table 1, Figure 3, and Figure 5 below). The southern portion of the Phoenix Silver property has numerous copper and silver showings and hosts potential for the discovery of porphyry related copper mineralization. The southern part of the project is immediately northeast of the Freeport McMoRan Miami copper mine and the recently discovered Ocelot porphyry project being actively explored by BHP (see Figure 4 below).
Highlights:
  • New silver fragments discoveries extend the area of potential silver vein mineralization for 600+ metres to the west of the previously discovered 417 lb (189 kg) angular and unabraded vein fragment that was estimated to contain over 70% silver and an 18.7 lb (8.5 kg) specimen assaying 459,000 g/t (14,688 oz/t) silver (see news release dated February 5, 2020 ).
  • The project is permitted for drilling on the potentially high-grade silver targets (See Figure 2).
  • New copper showings on recently acquired claims highlight the potential for porphyry copper mineralization immediately along strike from the Freeport McMoRan Miami copper mine and the recently discovered Ocelot porphyry project being actively explored by BHP
    • Copper values in selected samples range between 0.1% to 2.7% and silver between 10.9 g/t and 1,785 g/t containing locally abundant lead and zinc in veins, breccias and bed planes.
Greg Crowe , President and CEO of Silver One commented: "The Phoenix Silver project continues to evolve, not only in the size and distribution of mineralized areas, but also in the very nature of the mineralized systems. What started as a rare opportunity in potentially identifying areas of extremely rich silver vein mineralization, has now expanded to include large areas of copper-silver porphyry potential.
Large angular and unabraded silver vein fragments were detected by metal detectors and uncovered in overburden within a metre of the surface. These have been interpreted as being near their original source, as silver is very soft and large fragments break apart easily upon transport over even small distances. One vein fragment weighed 417 lb (189 kg) and was estimated by specific gravity methods to contain 70% silver. Assays of smaller fragments returned up to 459,000 g/t (14,688 oz/T) silver (see Company News Release of February 5 , 2020). The recently discovered silver vein fragments have extended the known area of mineralization along the 417 vein structure for an additional 600+ metres to the west of the 417 pound vein fragment. This illustrates the significant potential for outlining additional high-grade silver targets.
A drill permit has been secured to test structures believed to be the host to these very high-grade vein fragments (see Company News Release of March 2 , 2023). Emphasis will be placed on the 417 vein structure.
The southern portion of the project also hosts regional northeast-trending veins, alteration and breccia zones, with several selected samples returning over 1% copper. Recent sampling has uncovered more copper mineralization on the claims acquired in October and December of 2023. The property lies to the northeast of Freeport McMoRan's copper producing Miami Complex and BHP's Ocelot porphyry copper exploration project. Phoenix Silver lies at the northeast margin of a 30+ km long porphyry copper and silver belt and has excellent potential to host high-grade silver mineralization as well as porphyry related copper-silver mineralization.
The Phoenix Silver project is truly a unique and exceptional exploration opportunity."
Table 1: Selected assays in new claims staked in the Phoenix Silver Project ( October 23 , and December 19, 2023 news releases). All samples are rock chip samples. Selected copper assays are shown in Fig. 3
https://preview.redd.it/3u9b7f35pm0d1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=e4be62b486680662bfe949cbd2b4a486e959ef66
Elevated copper and silver values with abundant manganese, iron oxides and local base metals (lead and zinc) shown in Table 1 above, are representative of the mineralization in veins, hydrothermal breccias, and fracture systems that are widespread throughout the southern part of the property. These values along with elevated molybdenum (to 44 ppm) and local chlorite hydrothermal alteration suggest the presence of intrusive centered hydrothermal systems and are distal manifestations potentially related to the margins of porphyry copper deposits. Examples of these manifestations can be seen at the Silver Queen and Silver King mines and the Old Dominion vein, which are the surface expression of the Magma copper deposits and Ocelot porphyry copper discovery, respectively.
Silver One plans to continue the geologic reconnaissance and sampling of the new claims staked in October and December 2023. Assays of 30 samples currently at Skyline laboratories in Tucson AZ are expected within 30 days.
Analytical and QA/QC
Chip samples were collected by geologists during a recent property visit and varied in size from approximately 1 kg to 5 kg. Samples were submitted to ALS USA Inc. ("ALS") in Reno, NV , USA for sample preparation and analyzed at ALS in North Vancouver, BC , Canada (ISO accredited Laboratory, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ISO 9001:2015). Samples were analyzed for fifty-one elements by four acid digestion on a 0.25 g sample and ICP-MS finish (ME-MS61L). Over limit silver, copper, manganese, lead and zinc were analyzed by ore-grade four acid digestion (0.4 g sample) and ICP-AES (OG62). Gold was analyzed by 30 g FA/ICP-AES (Au-ICP21). Chromium, niobium, silica, tantalum, titanium, yttrium, zircon, and niobium were also semi-quantitatively analyzed at ALS by portable XRF (pXRF) on sample pulps. ALS inserts blanks, standards and includes duplicate analyses to ensure proper sample preparation and equipment calibration.
Qualified Person
The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Robert M. Cann , P. Geo, a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 and an independent consultant to the Company.
About Silver One
Silver One is focused on the exploration and development of quality silver projects. The Company owns a 100%-interest in its flagship project, the past-producing Candelaria Mine located in Nevada. Potential reprocessing of silver from the historic leach pads at Candelaria provides an opportunity for possible near-term production. Additional opportunities lie in unmined historic resources as well as in previously identified high-grade silver intercepts down-dip, which can potentially increase the substantive silver mineralization along-strike from the two past-producing open pits.
The Company owns 636 lode claims and five patented claims on its Cherokee project located in Lincoln County, Nevada , host to multiple silver-copper-gold vein systems, traced to date for over 11 km along-strike.
Silver One also owns a 100% interest in the Silver Phoenix Project. The Silver Phoenix Project is a very high-grade native silver prospect, recently permitted for drilling, which lies within the "Arizona Silver Belt," immediately adjacent to the prolific copper producing area of Globe , Arizona.
For more information, please contact:
Silver One Resources Inc.
Gary Lindsey
  • VP, Investor Relations
Phone: 604-974–5274
Mobile : (720) 273-6224
Email : [gary@strata-star.com](mailto:gary@strata-star.com)
Forward-Looking Statements
Information set forth in this news release contains forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions as of the date of this news release. These statements reflect management's current estimates, beliefs, intentions and expectations. They are not guarantees of future performance. Silver One cautions that all forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and that actual performance may be affected by a number of material factors, many of which are beyond Silver One's control. Such factors include, among other things: risks and uncertainties relating to Silver One's limited operating history, ability to obtain sufficient financing to carry out its exploration and development objectives on the Candelaria Project, obtaining the necessary permits to carry out its activities and the need to comply with environmental and governmental regulations. Accordingly, actual and future events, conditions and results may differ materially from the estimates, beliefs, intentions and expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking information. Except as required under applicable securities legislation, Silver One undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking information.
NEITHER TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
Logo -
https://preview.redd.it/h7dito45pm0d1.jpg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=19db96a49419179b224d0ca99fc0498119e88534
Photo -
Processing img 8jpu4o55pm0d1...
Photo -
Processing img wuh83m65pm0d1...
Photo -
Processing img j8whfm75pm0d1...
Photo -
Processing img mlbonq85pm0d1...
Photo -
Processing img u0pngo95pm0d1...
https://preview.redd.it/rbxk1ka5pm0d1.jpg?width=309&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4e90935a53ec8532f2f7479f28234fb6ce234ca4
https://preview.redd.it/y5u5lcb5pm0d1.jpg?width=309&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5ae3ec0957e3b8a1dd9f370e7138084a6ed09b8a
https://preview.redd.it/edjjvdc5pm0d1.jpg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=754dd0b76d9185ee4c0b9bec17e71cd636d3bbb1
https://preview.redd.it/6s0ykid5pm0d1.jpg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=100bacdb08576d52d775f26cddcc10e63f27019e
https://preview.redd.it/azq4oee5pm0d1.jpg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6f7385375ddcd78cbf272141554c0989d2267096
View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/silver-one-discovers-new-silver-vein-fragments-and-outlines-new-copper-showings-on-its-phoenix-silver-project-in-arizona-302145696.html
SOURCE Silver One Resources Inc.

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2024/15/c5417.html
https://preview.redd.it/gf82wkf5pm0d1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=2f328cb486b6ff9316fd6d08750b7482c4373c7a
Universal Site Links
SILVER ONE RESOURCES INC
STOCK METAL DATABASE
ADD TICKER TO THE DATABASE
www.reddit.com/Treaty_Creek
REPORT AN ERROR
submitted by Then_Marionberry_259 to Treaty_Creek [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 19:52 auasgirl Rescheduled N400 Interview

Howdy y’all. So I called USCIS to reschedule my interview at the Tucson field office because I couldn’t make it to the date they assigned me. Afterwards I got an email stating my interview was canceled/descheduled and I realized I messed up trying to reschedule. How badly have I ruined things? Based on other posts, some people get rescheduled in a week or so, some get listed as ‘no show’ on their original date because the local office didn’t get the memo and others get put back months before getting another appointment. Thanks for any insight or personal experience.
submitted by auasgirl to USCIS [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 17:57 beardedbrothers5280 BBM in Ft. Collins!

Bearded Brothers Moving Local/Regional Relocation Services “Movers with or Without the Truck” 72O.410.0024
Need Movers?
Trust our network of movers and packers to handle your projects at a rate that best suits your budget!
One quick call and we can tailor a solution to meet your expectations at a competitive price!
Full Supply/Pack/Load/Transport/Unload services available!!!
A-La-Carte the services YOU need! Inventory estimates available!
Local/Regional/Long Distance
📌 72O-410-0024
Box Truck Load Crews/Anything Unload Crews/Full-Service Packing and Transport/Long Distance Drivers
1st Floor, 2nd Floor, more??? ♾️
Manpower only rates starting at: $45/man/hr 💪
Clock starts at your door!
Clock ends when we drop the last item!
No service fees!
One call = your best moving value!!!
720-41O-0024
PayPal/CC/Venmo accepted.
BUY NOW PAY LATER???<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
**Payment installments available for pre-paid apartment moving services (1/2 day crew + 16' Box Truck for 4 hrs) via our website: www.bbm5280.com. Please see PayPal/Affirm terms and conditions. Does not include packing/packing materials. Furniture wrapping/padding standard. Guaranteed availability on your selected moving date or FULL REFUND in case of scheduling conflict. Questions?: 720-410-0024 call/text.
*Deposit required on all truck rental services. Truck services include shrink-wrap/1 dozen blankets for your furniture items. Fuel/mileage assessed from check out point, port to port. Need packing help/materials? Please request a supply order list from your booking agent. Manpower only crews assess a one-time travel offset fee based on required travel distance(s).
BBM is a Colorado registered small business, connecting qualified moving professionals and resources with clients seeking local, regional, and long distance relocation services for their household goods. Please see our website and service agreement for terms and conditions. All rates/quotes cover standard household furnishings at PUC regulated damage rates of .60/lb. Clients not utilizing our packing services should have their items in the condition they wish to have them shipped. Heavy items/special projects evaluated on a case by case basis. Long distance drivers for 26' box trucks to Anywhere, USA.
72O.41O.0024
Keywords: House Movers, Apartment Movers, Labor, Manpower, Local, Regional, Safes; Fitness Equipment; Movers, Moving; Local; Regional; Colorado; Long Distance Drivers; Out of State; Austin, San Antonio, El Paso, Las Cruces, Albuquerque, Abilene, Phoenix, Tucson, San Diego, San Francisco, Lincoln, Omaha, Cheyenne, Colorado Springs, Gunnison, Grand Junction, Aspen, Winter Park, Breckenridge, East Coast, West Coast, 3rd Coast, KC, Portland, Seattle, Boulder, Englewood, Castle Rock, Downtown, RiNo, City Park, Lowry, Wash Park, Loveland, Frederick, Elizabeth, Franktown, Parker, Westminster, Arvada, Broomfield, Superior, Longmont, Lafayette, Lonetree, Louisville, Aurora, Lakewood, Ken Caryl, Chatfield, Littleton, LoDo, RiNo. Erie, Monument, Anywhere, USA
Bearded Brothers Moving Denver, Colorado 80205 Est. 2016
Moving to Colorado?
Time to bounce?
Long distance box truck drivers available for out of state runs (inbound/outbound) + national referral network of trusted moving pros!
bbm5280.com
720.420.oo24
submitted by beardedbrothers5280 to coloradorelocation [link] [comments]


2024.05.14 16:08 RobYaLunch Billboard Chart Discussion - Week Of May 18, 2024

Billboard Hot 100 chart
Position Title Artist ▲/▼ Last week Weeks Charting Peak
1 Not Like Us Kendrick Lamar ▲+100 [FRESH] 1 1
2 Million Dollar Baby Tommy Richman - 2 2 2
3 Euphoria Kendrick Lamar ▲+8 11 2 3
4 Fortnight Taylor Swift Featuring Post Malone ▼-3 1 3 1
5 A Bar Song (Tipsy) Shaboozey ▼-2 3 4 3
6 Like That Future, Metro Boomin & Kendrick Lamar ▲+2 8 7 1
7 Family Matters Drake ▲+94 [FRESH] 1 7
8 Espresso Sabrina Carpenter ▼-4 4 4 4
9 Beautiful Things Benson Boone ▼-4 5 16 2
10 Lose Control Teddy Swims ▼-4 6 39 1
11 Too Sweet Hozier ▼-4 7 7 1
12 Meet The Grahams Kendrick Lamar ▲+89 [FRESH] 1 12
13 Saturn SZA ▼-1 12 11 6
14 We Can't Be Friends (Wait For Your Love) Ariana Grande ▲+5 19 9 1
15 I Can Do It With A Broken Heart Taylor Swift ▼-6 9 3 3
16 Down Bad Taylor Swift ▼-6 10 3 2
17 Push Ups Drake - 17 3 17
18 Lovin On Me Jack Harlow ▼-3 15 26 1
19 Stick Season Noah Kahan ▲+4 23 32 9
20 I Remember Everything Zach Bryan Featuring Kacey Musgraves ▲+4 24 37 1
21 Get It Sexyy Sexyy Red ▲+11 32 8 20
22 Feather Sabrina Carpenter ▲+7 29 23 21
23 I Like The Way You Kiss Me Artemas ▲+3 26 7 12
24 Cruel Summer Taylor Swift ▲+4 28 53 1
25 Greedy Tate McRae ▲+2 27 34 3
26 Who's Afraid Of Little Old Me? Taylor Swift ▼-13 13 3 9
27 Type Shit Future, Metro Boomin, Travis Scott & Playboi Carti ▲+4 31 7 2
28 So Long, London Taylor Swift ▼-14 14 3 5
29 Yeah Glo! GloRilla ▲+9 38 13 29
30 But Daddy I Love Him Taylor Swift ▼-12 18 3 7
31 My Boy Only Breaks His Favorite Toys Taylor Swift ▼-15 16 3 6
32 Agora Hills Doja Cat ▲+1 33 33 7
33 Florida!!! Taylor Swift Featuring Florence + The Machine ▼-13 20 3 8
34 Austin Dasha ▲+9 43 9 28
35 Guilty As Sin? Taylor Swift ▼-13 22 3 10
36 Texas Hold 'Em Beyonce ▼-11 25 13 1
37 Miles On It Marshmello & Kane Brown ▲+64 [FRESH] 1 37
38 The Tortured Poets Department Taylor Swift ▼-17 21 3 4
39 End Of Beginning Djo - 39 12 11
40 Wanna Be GloRilla & Megan Thee Stallion ▼-6 34 5 11
41 Whatever She Wants Bryson Tiller - 41 12 19
42 Cowgirls Morgan Wallen Featuring ERNEST ▲+59 -- 21 40
43 Redrum 21 Savage ▲+3 46 17 5
44 Never Lose Me Flo Milli ▲+1 45 21 15
45 Where It Ends Bailey Zimmerman ▲+5 50 19 32
46 Good Luck, Babe! Chappell Roan ▲+2 48 5 44
47 Act II: Date @ 8 4Batz Featuring Drake ▲+6 53 18 7
48 Gata Only FloyyMenor X Cris Mj ▼-4 44 8 27
49 Carnival ¥$: Ye & Ty Dolla $ign Featuring Rich The Kid & Playboi Carti ▼-7 42 13 1
50 Illusion Dua Lipa ▲+22 72 4 43
51 The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived Taylor Swift ▼-21 30 3 14
52 Slow It Down Benson Boone ▲+9 61 7 40
53 loml Taylor Swift ▼-17 36 3 12
54 Fresh Out The Slammer Taylor Swift ▼-19 35 3 11
55 Made For Me Muni Long ▼-1 54 17 20
56 The Alchemy Taylor Swift ▼-19 37 3 13
57 Wild Ones Jessie Murph & Jelly Roll - 57 31 35
58 FE!N Travis Scott Featuring Playboi Carti ▲+2 60 27 5
59 Obsessed Olivia Rodrigo ▲+8 67 7 14
60 Wildflowers And Wild Horses Lainey Wilson ▼-5 55 15 48
61 Get In With Me BossMan DLow ▲+12 73 14 49
62 imgonnagetyouback Taylor Swift ▼-13 49 3 26
63 I Can Fix Him (No Really I Can) Taylor Swift ▼-23 40 3 20
64 Bulletproof Nate Smith ▲+6 70 5 64
65 So High School Taylor Swift ▼-18 47 3 24
66 Tell Ur Girlfriend Lay Bankz ▼-8 58 4 58
67 The Black Dog Taylor Swift ▼-16 51 3 25
68 Back Then Right Now Tyler Hubbard ▼-3 65 8 62
69 Hell N Back Bakar Featuring Summer Walker ▼-1 68 5 53
70 Clara Bow Taylor Swift ▼-18 52 3 21
71 Tucson Too Late Jordan Davis ▲+20 91 10 71
72 Bandit Don Toliver ▲+20 92 13 38
73 Mmhmm BigXthaPlug ▲+6 79 20 63
74 Scared To Start Michael Marcagi ▲+3 77 12 54
75 Enough (Miami) Cardi B ▲+6 81 8 9
76 Halfway To Hell Jelly Roll ▲+7 83 5 76
77 The Prophecy Taylor Swift ▼-21 56 3 32
78 Cinderella Future, Metro Boomin & Travis Scott ▼-2 76 7 6
79 Training Season Dua Lipa ▲+22 -- 10 27
80 Wind Up Missin' You Tucker Wetmore - 80 6 75
81 How Did It End? Taylor Swift ▼-19 62 3 35
82 We Ride Bryan Martin ▲+11 93 5 82
83 Dirt Cheap Cody Johnson ▲+11 94 3 83
84 Belong Together Mark Ambor ▲+3 87 2 84
85 Outskirts Sam Hunt ▲+1 86 9 66
86 Si No Quieres No Luis R Conriquez x Neton Vega ▲+15 [FRESH] 1 86
87 Tu Name Fuerza Regida ▼-2 85 12 66
88 thanK you aIMee Taylor Swift ▼-29 59 3 23
89 The Albatross Taylor Swift ▼-25 64 3 30
90 23 Chayce Beckham ▼-2 88 19 45
91 Adivino Myke Towers & Bad Bunny ▼-28 63 2 63
92 Wine Into Whiskey Tucker Wetmore ▲+4 96 7 77
93 II Most Wanted Beyonce & Miley Cyrus ▼-4 89 6 6
94 I Hate It Here Taylor Swift ▼-28 66 3 34
95 Whatsapp (Wassam) Gunna ▲+6 [FRESH] 1 95
96 Spin You Around (1/24) Morgan Wallen ▲+2 98 15 24
97 One Of The Girls The Weeknd, Jennie & Lily Rose Depp ▼-7 90 20 51
98 Let's Go Key Glock & Young Dolph ▲+2 100 9 59
99 Take Her Home Kenny Chesney ▲+2 [FRESH] 1 99
100 Chloe Or Sam Or Sophia Or Marcus Taylor Swift ▼-31 69 3 36
Billboard Global 200 chart (most popular songs globally)
Position Title Artist ▲/▼ Last week Weeks Charting Peak
1 Not Like Us Kendrick Lamar ▲+100 [FRESH] 1 1
2 Million Dollar Baby Tommy Richman ▲+8 10 2 2
3 Espresso Sabrina Carpenter ▼-1 2 4 2
4 Euphoria Kendrick Lamar ▲+14 18 2 4
5 A Bar Song (Tipsy) Shaboozey ▲+1 6 4 5
6 Fortnight Taylor Swift Featuring Post Malone ▼-5 1 3 1
7 Beautiful Things Benson Boone ▼-3 4 16 1
8 I Like The Way You Kiss Me Artemas ▼-5 3 7 2
9 Too Sweet Hozier ▼-4 5 7 1
10 Gata Only FloyyMenor X Cris Mj ▼-3 7 13 4
Billboard 200 chart
Position Title Artist Sales Change Last week Weeks Charting
1 The Tortured Poets Department Taylor Swift 285,505 (51,028 pure) -36% 1 3
2 Radical Optimism Dua Lipa 83,814 (52,788 pure) -- [FRESH] 1
3 One Thing At A Time Morgan Wallen 71,563 (1,483 pure) +7% 2 62
4 We Don't Trust You Future & Metro Boomin 62,293 (188 pure) +4% 3 7
5 SEVENTEEN Best Album '17 Is Right Here' SEVENTEEN 54,465 (50,790 pure) -- [FRESH] 1
6 Vultures 1 ¥$: Ye & Ty Dolla $ign err err 52 13
7 Dangerous: The Double Album Morgan Wallen 42,315 (432 pure) +7% 6 174
8 Cowboy Carter Beyonce 42,201 (4,928 pure) -19% 4 6
9 Stick Season Noah Kahan 40,675 (3,588 pure) +1% 5 76
10 SOS SZA 39,353 (1,948 pure) +3% 9 74
Frequently Asked Questions:
Q: Why is X artist higher than Y artist on the 200 chart, even though X artist sold less?
A: This is because of a discrepancy between Billboard's ranking and the ranking from the website that the sales data is scraped from
Q: Where do you get the sales data from?
A: https://hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming
Q: What does "err" mean on the 200 chart?
A: If you are seeing "err", that means that the bot I use to gather chart data couldn't identify sales data for a particular album because of a difference in album naming between Billboard and HitsDailyDouble
submitted by RobYaLunch to hiphopheads [link] [comments]


2024.05.14 13:49 Then_Marionberry_259 MAY 14, 2024 FDY.TO FARADAY COPPER INTERSECTS 0.41% COPPER OVER 42.02 METRES EXPANDING NEAR-SURFACE MINERALIZATION AT AREA 51 WITHIN THE COPPER CREEK PROJECT

MAY 14, 2024 FDY.TO FARADAY COPPER INTERSECTS 0.41% COPPER OVER 42.02 METRES EXPANDING NEAR-SURFACE MINERALIZATION AT AREA 51 WITHIN THE COPPER CREEK PROJECT
https://preview.redd.it/kexz4zycrd0d1.png?width=3500&format=png&auto=webp&s=684020fcf83866c3ff43bc87f3ac344b08fe8954
VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / May 14, 2024 / Faraday Copper Corp. ("Faraday" or the "Company") (TSX:FDY)(OTCQX:CPPKF) is pleased to announce the results of five drill holes from its Phase III program at the Copper Creek Project, located in Arizona, U.S. ("Copper Creek"). One hole was drilled to test a new target area 275 metres ("m") west of Keel and one hole was drilled to test the westward extension of Old Reliable. Three holes were drilled at Area 51 as a follow-up to the recent Starship and Eclipse breccia discoveries (announced on January 16, 2024 and March 4, 2024).
Paul Harbidge, President and CEO, commented "The Phase III drill program continues to demonstrate the exploration potential of the Copper Creek Project on a number of fronts. At Area 51, we continue to intersect and expand near-surface mineralization. At Old Reliable, mineralization is being further delineated outside of the mineral resource pit shell. Additionally, the first reconnaissance hole drilled at depth, west of Keel, confirms our thesis that there is the potential for significant mineralization to be discovered below the Old Reliable breccia complex. This new data will enable us to vector to high grade zones for further drill testing".
Highlights
  • At Area 51, intersected 42.05 m at 0.41% copper from 48.55 m in drill hole FCD-24-056 at the recently discovered Eclipse breccia.
    • This hole expands the known mineralization within the Eclipse breccia approximately 20 m to the east and 50 m to the north from previous intercepts**.**
  • Drilling 275 m west of Keel ("Keel West") intersected 51.45 m at 0.50% copper and 1.39 grams per tonne ("g/t") silver from 820.62 m in drill hole FCD-24-053. This intercept is within a longer intercept of 186.90 m at 0.32% copper from 820.62 m.
    • This hole is in a previously undrilled area outside the Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") and confirms that mineralization is open to the west of Keel and below the Old Reliable breccia.
  • Step-out to the west of Old Reliable intersected 70.35 m of 0.29% copper and 1.31 g/t silver from 55.53 m in drill hole FCD-24-054.
    • Mineralization is hosted in granodiorite porphyry and confirms that near-surface mineralization at Old Reliable remains open.
(For true width information see Table 1.)
Area 51 was identified as highly prospective by integrating airborne versatile time domain electromagnetic (VTEM) geophysical data and short wave infrared spectral data together with geological mapping and sampling. Area 51 encompasses a porphyry intrusion with nine mapped breccia bodies over an area of approximately 400 m by 400 m, including Starship and Eclipse. The breccias are interpreted to have been emplaced at a shallow crustal level in the hanging wall of the northwest trending Holy Joe thrust fault, which brought Proterozoic metamorphic rocks in contact with younger sedimentary rock units to the east of Area 51. This fault is also thought to have controlled the emplacement of the Paleocene Glory Hole volcanics and Copper Creek granodiorite which host the mineral resource.
Drill hole FCD-24-056 was collared northeast of the Eclipse breccia and drilled to the southwest to increase drill coverage for the Eclipse breccia (Figures 1 and 2). Mineralization is associated with chalcopyrite and minor bornite breccia cement. The hole started in granodiorite porphyry and intersected hydrothermal breccia from 28 m to 108 m followed by granodiorite porphyry to 131 m. The remainder of the hole to 187 m is in Glory Hole volcanics. The alteration in the breccia domain is quartz-sericite-pyrite with an interval from approximately 50 m to 70 m where tourmaline is abundant.
Drill hole FCD-24-051 was collared 250 m north of the Eclipse breccia and drilled to the southwest into the Ziltoid breccia (Figure 1). The hole intersected Glory Hole volcanics in the first 180 m, followed by 4 m of granodiorite porphyry. From 184 m to 247 m the dominant lithology is hydrothermal breccia. Alteration at the start of the breccia is sericitic but K-feldspar and biotite dominate from 190 m to the end of the hole.
Drill hole FCD-24-055 was collared southeast of the Eclipse breccia and drilled to the Northwest (Figure 1). The hole intercepted Glory Hole volcanics from surface to 49 m, followed by a series of granodiorite and monzogranite porphyries. From 136 m to 327 m the hole intersected hydrothermal breccia cemented by quartz, pyrite and specular hematite. Alteration within the breccia is intense quartz-sericite. Minor copper mineralization is associated with chalcocite near the upper contact of the breccia.
Keel West is the area between the Keel zone and Old Reliable. This area coincides with a prominent untested geophysical anomaly which extends westward from the known mineralization at the Mammoth breccia and Keel zone to below Old Reliable (Figure 3).
Drill hole FCD-24-053 was collared east of Old Reliable and drilled to the south-southeast (Figures 1 and 3). Mineralization is associated with bornite and chalcopyrite bearing veins with narrow sericite-biotite-K-feldspar alteration halos and the hole ends in mineralization. This type of bornite-rich, vein-hosted mineralization is known to be associated with high-grade mineralization and elevated gold grades at Keel and suggests the potential for other high-grade mineralized centers at depth below known near-surface mineralized breccias in the area.
Old Reliable was the site of small-scale underground mining for copper and molybdenum prior to World War II. Starting in the 1970s, an experimental in-situ leach operation recovered some of the near-surface copper oxide mineralization. The sulphide-hosted mineralization remains in place. During the 1990s, densely spaced vertical drilling led to resource definition to approximately 200 m below surface. Several of those drill holes end in mineralization and the resource is open at depth and laterally. Additional follow up drilling is planned for this area.
Drill hole FCD-24-054 was collared north of Old Reliable and drilled to the southwest (Figures 1 and 4). The hole was designed to test the westward extension of the mineralization outside of the open pit used to constrain the MRE. Mineralization is associated with disseminated and vein-hosted chalcopyrite within granodiorite porphyry. The drill hole intercepted Glory Hole volcanics from surface to 50 m and granodiorite porphyry to 208 m, returning to Glory Hole volcanics to 295 m and granodiorite for the last 12 m. Dominant alteration associated with the mineralization is sericite with kaolinite. Similar alteration is present in the Old Reliable breccia (as discussed in a news release dated April 10, 2024).
Figure 1: Plan View Showing Surface Geology and Location of Drill Holes
https://preview.redd.it/k3a8ev1drd0d1.jpg?width=1029&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1dd30f01638787c8d36ec0cde786c7170e0c6120
https://preview.redd.it/yskgh23drd0d1.jpg?width=997&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1948953710726727686ee4a97a698c90320972cb
https://preview.redd.it/n3zfl34drd0d1.jpg?width=1350&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6f37c03cbb7429067f229b5577f60951e8dac938
Figure 4: Cross Section Showing Drill Hole FCD-24-054 at Old Reliable
https://preview.redd.it/bxnpq85drd0d1.jpg?width=1126&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8dea1a1b8ef1b063acaf5d447be5f33f6ede0e7f
Table 1: Selected Drill Results from Copper Creek
https://preview.redd.it/srrqad6drd0d1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=ead50c719f4bf3668d40d845838c109a373787ca
Note: All intercepts are reported as downhole drill widths. Mineralization includes bulk porphyry style and breccia mineralization true widths are approximate due to the irregular shape of mineralized domains. N/A: Not analyzed.
Table 2: Collar Locations from the Drill Holes Reported Herein
https://preview.redd.it/f0ytu97drd0d1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c5414f5f4b43b473f4a6e70c62c81886462a098
Note: Coordinates are given as World Geodetic System 84, Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 12 north (WGS84, UTM12N).
Next Steps
Phase III drilling continues and is focussed on three objectives:
  • Reconnaissance drilling on new targets;
  • Expanding the MRE; and
  • Better delineating high-grade mineralized zones.
As part of the Phase III program, twenty-seven drill holes have been completed and results for nineteen have been released. Thirteen holes were drilled in Area 51, three in the Copper Prince-Copper Giant area, eight in the Bald-American Eagle area and three near Old Reliable. Current focus of drilling is on the near-surface breccias in the American Eagle area.
Sampling Methodology, Chain of Custody, Quality Control and Quality Assurance
All sampling was conducted under the supervision of the Company's geologists and the chain of custody from Copper Creek to the independent sample preparation facility, ALS Laboratories in Tucson, AZ, was continuously monitored. The samples were taken as ½ core, over 2 m core length. Samples were crushed, pulverized and sample pulps were analyzed using industry standard analytical methods including a 4-Acid ICP-MS multielement package and an ICP-AES method for high-grade copper samples. Gold was analyzed on a 30 g aliquot by fire assay with an ICP-AES finish. A certified reference sample was inserted every 20th sample. Coarse and fine blanks were inserted every 20th sample. Approximately 5% of the core samples were cut into ¼ core and submitted as field duplicates. On top of internal QA-QC protocol, additional blanks, reference materials and duplicates were inserted by the analytical laboratory according to their procedure. Data verification of the analytical results included a statistical analysis of the standards and blanks that must pass certain parameters for acceptance to ensure accurate and verifiable results.
Qualified Person
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Faraday's VP Exploration, Dr. Thomas Bissig, P. Geo., who is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
About Faraday Copper
Faraday Copper is a Canadian exploration company focused on advancing its flagship copper project in Arizona, U.S. The Copper Creek Project is one of the largest undeveloped copper projects in North America with significant district scale exploration potential. The Company is well-funded to deliver on its key milestones and benefits from a management team and board of directors with senior mining company experience and expertise. Faraday trades on the TSX under the symbol "FDY".
For additional information please contact:
Stacey Pavlova, CFA Vice President, Investor Relations & Communications Faraday Copper Corp. E-mail: [info@faradaycopper.com](mailto:info@faradaycopper.com) Website: www.faradaycopper.com
To receive news releases by e-mail, please register using the Faraday website at www.faradaycopper.com.
Cautionary Note on Forward Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this news release, other than statements of historical fact, are "forward-looking statements" and are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Faraday to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information specifically include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the exploration potential of the Copper Creek property.
Although Faraday believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements should not be in any way construed as guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include without limitation: market prices for metals; the conclusions of detailed feasibility and technical analyses; lower than expected grades and quantities of mineral resources; receipt of regulatory approval; receipt of shareholder approval; mining rates and recovery rates; significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in rates of exchange; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which Faraday does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, competition; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous peoples and other groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements, including those associated with the Copper Creek property; and uncertainties with respect to any future acquisitions by Faraday. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks as well as "Risk Factors" included in Faraday's disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedarplus.ca.
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. This press release is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, a prospectus, an offering memorandum, an advertisement or a public offering of securities in Faraday in Canada, the United States or any other jurisdiction. No securities commission or similar authority in Canada or in the United States has reviewed or in any way passed upon this press release, and any representation to the contrary is an offence.
SOURCE: Faraday Copper Corp.
View the original press release on accesswire.com

https://preview.redd.it/e730g88drd0d1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed3fd532b874b6f0b0d29bf7abceecfedba8b77d
Universal Site Links
FARADAY COPPER CORP
STOCK METAL DATABASE
ADD TICKER TO THE DATABASE
www.reddit.com/Treaty_Creek
REPORT AN ERROR
submitted by Then_Marionberry_259 to Treaty_Creek [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 20:19 MaryannSingleton 2019 Tucson P1326

My 2019 Tucson (33k miles) had the engine light start flashing this weekend. No noises, shaking, etc, noticed that all of the sudden I was losing speed on the highway and couldn’t get above 45mph. After pulling over I realized the AC had turned off as well. All maintenance is up to date. Next oil changed (ironically scheduled for today) wasn’t due for another ~150 miles and oil level was good when checked.
It’s at the dealer now waiting to be seen but the tow truck driver read the code for me—P1326. When I googled it seems that this is related to the recall I had fixed in September. Anyone else have this happen and have insight?
submitted by MaryannSingleton to HyundaiTucson [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 16:01 Fancy-Reflection6653 Hired in Phoenix

Been hired in Phoenix for train crew since February with a start date of June 10th for training in Tucson. Anybody know where I’ll actually be working? I saw another post saying “you’ll most likely be working out of Tucson.” I haven’t been able to get a response out of the recruiter.
submitted by Fancy-Reflection6653 to UnionPacific [link] [comments]


2024.05.12 18:14 pumpkpie_chem Love letter to reapplicants

As the cycle comes to a close and some of you may not have gotten an acceptance and are preparing to reapply, I wanted to write the message I really wish I could have read last year when that was the place I was in. I’m happy to say I’m a reapplicant who came out of the other side with a successful second cycle. Sorry in advance this will be very long and disorganized, but I hope it can help some of you!
I applied last cycle with what I thought was a very strong application. I’m a CA resident, went to a solid UC school, graduated with a 3.85 GPA, had a 515+ MCAT, 4th quartile CASPER, and diverse/unique set of activities I accumulated over 5 years. My freshman year of college when I decided I was set on medical school, I did a ton of research on the process and what it takes to get in and very strategically planned my next 4 years. The pandemic threw a wrench into some of that, so I decided to take 2 gap years (applied during 1st gap year) to strengthen my app even more. So all in all, my app was what I felt was the culmination of 5 years of very, very, hard work and careful planning. I applied to 35 schools and had a reasonable secondary turn around time for at least 20 of them. I got 3 interviews to good schools (1 T20 CA, 1 T30 CA, and 1 ~T30 OOS), but all ended in waitlists then rejections. I was devastated and so so so unbelievably frustrated. The worst part was trying to explain to my family members and mentors that I had to reapply. My family already gave me a very hard time for taking 2 gap years. Everyone (all of whom had very little knowledge on med school admissions) seemed to have their own opinion, and I could tell they all thought something was wrong with my app or that I didn’t work hard enough. (Was your GPA bad? Should you retake the MCAT? Did you do bad on your interviews? Were your essays bad? What if your LORs had red flags? Etc, etc). While it sucked I ended with no acceptances, I’m really glad I got those interviews because it was the confirmation I needed that my app must have been strong enough for me to get those interviews. And while everyone kept trying to convince me my interviews must have gone badly, I truly felt they went well and that my interviewers validated a lot of my answers. Multiple people advised me not to reapply consecutive cycles so that I could make more major changes to my app, but I trusted my gut that it was just a matter of bad luck and that my app was good enough as is (and I am SO happy I trusted myself!)
This cycle, I made some minor changes, but overall had a pretty similar app and had a FAR more successful cycle. I got 10 interviews: 4 at schools I had not applied to the first time, 4 at schools I was a reapplicant to but didn’t get an interview at the first time (one is a T5 school I almost didn’t apply to since I thought I had no shot), and 2 at schools I had interviewed at the first time. I ended with 4 off the bat acceptances (1 is one of the schools I was waitlisted at last year, 1 is a school I applied to last year but didn’t get an interview at, and 2 were schools I was a first time applicant to), 6 waitlists (2 turned into As, 4 still pending). I’d consider it a very successful cycle and am extremely grateful for how everything worked out, and if I get into the T5 school off the waitlist it would be successful beyond my wildest dreams. Overall, lots of takeaways and strategies I’ve learned from being a 2x applicant:
  1. Shoot your shot. Trust your gut and the strength of your app. A lot of this process is luck, and some of my best interviews and the school I PTEd to as of now are schools I thought I had no shot at. In retrospect, maybe they are well deserved, but my unsuccessful last cycle made me seriously doubt my app and lose all confidence in myself. If you’re a reapplicant, your app can only be stronger this year as a result of whatever you did last year, so you deserve to aim for the same tier of schools or higher. (But ofc still apply to safeties and some schools you didn’t apply to last cycle!)
  2. Being a reapplicant is not a death sentence, if anything I think there’s a lot of inherent value in it. It is unbelievably emotionally taxing to reapply. I spent all of last spring crying, refreshing SDN and my email every 5 minutes praying I would get off a waitlist, and anxious about having no idea what I would do in my unplanned additional gap year. Amidst all of that, preparing a new primary app and going through the process of writing secondaries again while still holding out hopes for a waitlist to work out was grueling. But this cycle proved to me that schools do admire the drive it takes to be a reapplicant. It shows you are committed and truly want to pursue this career. And there are a couple of the schools I got interviews at I’m convinced just felt bad I’m a reapplicant lol.
  3. Make your school list and use MSAR wisely beyond just looking at avg gpa and MCAT. The second time I applied, I looked into more details about total number of applicants, OOS vs IS stats, demographics, etc to add 8 less popular safety schools that I thought I had a good shot at and didn’t apply to the first time. I turned in those 8 ASAP (<1 week turnaround) and got an interview at 4 of them. Some schools get 5000 total applicants, some get 12,000 - make sure you apply to some of those ones that get less.
  4. Secondaries are WAY more important than most people think in my opinion. I don’t think my secondaries were at all bad my first time, but I was unbelievably strategic and spent way longer on them the second time. I did a ton of research on each school before I started writing, and really tailored them to that school’s mission. For example, Creighton loves whole person care and non medical community service, a T20 school may value research way more, Rush is huge on community service hours, some schools are big on clinical hours, etc. I picked which activities I focused on in my secondaries very wisely based on what I felt that school would value most. I treated each school as if it was my dream school, really put time into each why us essay, and made subtle changes to wording of sentences to fit the “vibes” of each school. I extensively researched the patient population and community health needs of each school’s affiliate hospitals before writing the secondaries. And for schools I had no ties to, I tried to have a super quick secondary turnaround hoping that would be seen as a display of my interest. Med schools can only interview 500-1000 students. They are not going to just interview their best applicants, because those applicants would likely choose a different school. They will interview applicants who meet certain criteria AND have a very high likelihood of attending their school (whether that be because you have some sort of ties or are a great fit to their mission)
  5. “Why us” secondary essay tip - when applicants are picking schools, they often post on Reddit or SDN a school X vs Y post with pros and cons of each. I found these posts to be super helpful and have a lot of gems you wouldn’t find on a school website.
  6. A lot of schools offer feedback to reapplicants. I really regretted not doing this. Off the top of my head, I know UA Tucson, BU, and Indiana University do. I’m sure there are A LOT more I’m missing, and if a school doesn’t explicitly say in their rejection email that they can’t offer advice then why not just give it a shot and ask. At worst you get no advice but it shows them you care about their school and are a motivated individual looking for ways to improve, and at best you can get some useful tips.
  7. See what other ways you can show interest in schools. Do they have open houses? Do they have virtual info sessions? Do they have advisors you can reach out to and ask questions? Can you schedule a campus tour? Some secondaries even ask you to check boxes of what admissions events you’ve attended. But at least in your why us essay you can mention attending these events.
  8. Changing your Personal statement - Personally, I believe your core reasons for going into medicine aren’t going to change much in a year so no need to completely rework your PS. Obviously get it checked and get some opinions, but especially if you got interviews, your writing couldn’t have been that bad. All writing has room for improvement though, so definitely re write and make changes as needed but don’t feel pressured to completely change everything. I made only minor changes to my PS, kept 80% of my work and activity descriptions identical, and just re worded a few things and added in 1 additional activity that I gained. Trust your gut though and get some people to read your stuff. For me personally, I didn’t feel my PS and work/activities had any major issue bc of the 3 interviews I got, but for some people they could be.
  9. LORs - again, something like your college classes didn’t change so I don’t see why you need a new LOR. Get it redated if possible, but if you can’t don’t stress. 2/3 of my professor LORs I did not get re dated. I got one additional LOR the second time I applied, but my other 4 were identical (2 just re dated). For some people, LORs could be the reason you didn’t get interviews, but if you got interviews and were waitlisted, personally I think your LORs must have been fine (because I think most schools read your LOR before determining if you get an II, I could be wrong though?). Another thing I didn’t realize is that some schools only accept a few LORs and if you send too many they will randomly choose what to read. My first cycle, I sent all my LORS to every school through AMCAS. Second cycle, I looked up school specific policies and individually selected which letters to send to each school. For those that only accepted a few LORs, I was strategic in picking which one I felt would be valued more (in addition to my college professors, my research PI, or my letter from volunteer work with an underserved community supervisor, or from my clinical position)
  10. Interviews - I think what went wrong for me the first cycle is that all 3 of my interviews were at “reach” schools. For most schools, it’s not like the interview single-handedly determines whether or not you get in. You get a score for your interview, and that along with the rest of your app is reassessed. For my 3 schools, I think my interview was fine but I was just competing with a very competitive group of applicants I was already towards the bottom of because of the rest of my app. That’s why the second time I focused on trying to get interviews at “safety” schools. I was accepted to almost all those schools post interview this time. Again though, there is always room for improvement for everyone and everything, so keep working on your interview skills and doing mocks even if you are confident that wasn’t your issue.
  11. Applying DO - I didn’t the first time, but second time I did bc I knew I did not have it in me to apply a 3rd cycle and would much rather go DO at that point. I applied to 8 DO schools and got interview invites at 7 of them, attended the interview for 5 of them (other 2 were in person), and was accepted to all 5 I attended. So my takeaway from that was that DO schools don’t yield protect unlike a lot of MD schools. While I understand MD schools may be ideal, there are some amazing DO schools and ask yourself when you apply if you’d rather go to a DO school or be a reapplicant. And understand that your answer could change after a very frustrating app cycle. You don’t know how you’d feel from a year from now and if you would wish you had left that option open for yourself. Don’t stress about timing as much though, I submitted all my DO apps in September after my MD apps were completely finished.
  12. Changes to make for reapplication - while I feel like a lot of people had great apps and just got unlucky, really assess what you could do differently to improve your app or how you could market yourself better the second time. It’s kind of crazy when you think of it that 4+ years of your hard work will be read by an adcom member in a few minutes. Good writing and marketing yourself as best as possible are critical. For me, while I had a good amount of clinical hours, I felt that my clinical hours were weaker than my research hours so I started a new clinical position in April before reapplying. While I didn’t have that many hours by the time I submitted my primary, I was still able to write anticipated hours and write meaningfully about the impactful patient encounters I did have at that point. That was really my only tangible change I had. The rest of what I talked about in my reapplicant secondary essays were smaller things (ex. I learned a language during my gap year so spoke about that a lot, and talked about what I gained from continuing a lot of my existing activities for another year). But same MCAT, same GPA, identical LORs (except for the one additional one), mostly similar PS and Work/activities section, and improved secondaries.
  13. Rolling admissions are no joke! I really think 2-3 weeks could make the difference of an identical app getting an interview or not. And for some schools, interviewing earlier in the cycle really increases your chances of being accepted instead of waitlisted. Without compromising quality, get those secondaries in ASAP. Focus on your primary app now, but spend all of June pre writing. Einstein for example even says on their website that most of the people they interview submit their secondaries before the end of July. And again, I think a quick secondary turnaround time could be a great display of interest. It’s impossible to submit all your apps right away, but pick a strategic mix of which apps you want to have a 2-3 day turnaround for, which ones a 1 week, which ones a 2 week, which ones a 1 month, etc. this is especially important for schools you may be a great fit for but have no ties to.
  14. Update letters and continued interest letters - send them! personally I think October - December is a great time because that’s before the second wave of interviews will go out in Jan/feb. Don’t stress if you have no major updates. You really don’t need a publication or new position to write an update letter. It could simply be I continued X and Y activities and am still very interested in your school. Post interview too, look up school specific policies and see if an update letter could be useful. And of course, if you’re on a waitlist, see if an update letter of letter of intent would be appropriate.
  15. Get as much advice as possible. This process is so confusing and can truly be a crapshoot, the more tips you know the better. Talk to older students, other applicants, mentors, etc. I am shameless and will private message anyone and everyone on SDN. You’d be surprised at how friendly most premeds can be and how willing they are to share advice.
  16. You don’t have to retake PREVIEW, but you need a new CASPER each year. I found this out very late and wish I had known this earlier.
  17. Tip for saving money on reapplying if you don’t know if you’ll get off a waitlist- submit your primary application to just one school when it opens so you won’t face delays in verification. Give yourself til end of June to see if you get off a waitlist, and if you don’t, then add and pay for all of your other schools at the end of June or beginning of July. That way, if you get off a waitlist you only wasted money on applying to one school. If you don’t get off a waitlist, you would have zero delays in verification and submitting secondaries.
Trust me I know how much it sucks to be a reapplicant. I know how difficult it is to prep a new app while holding out hope for waitlists. I know how stressful it is to not know if you need to sign a new lease or get a new job or have no idea what the coming year you never planned for will look like. But- you unfortunately are in this place, it’s up to you now to make the most of it. While I hope each and every one of you that is on a waitlist can get off of it, you have to prepare as if you wont. You have to start prepping your new app ASAP. Don’t be like me and spend all of May crying and doom scrolling SDN and holding out hope then cram to finish everything end of May.
Do whatever you can to make this unplanned gap year the best year of your life. Religious/spiritual people call it fate when things don’t work out as they originally planned. But why can’t we all do whatever we can in our power to make active decisions and changes that will lead us to look back and say our setbacks were actually blessings in disguise? If possible, don’t let this year be as stressful as undergrad or your last few gap years. This WILL be your last gap year. Get 8+ hours of sleep each night, after you submit all your secondaries try to make life as chill as possible and cut out any activities you want to, if you can afford it travel, switch jobs if your current one sucks and you have the means to do so, pick up hobbies you’ve always wanted to do, work on your mental and physical health, etc. Once you submit your primary with your anticipated hours, and especially after you submit your secondaries, nothing actually matters that much. If you want to quit your shitty minimum wage lab tech or MA job with an abusive boss in October and be a barista, you can!! I was so fed up that I worked so freaking hard during my gap years and still had to reapply that I promised myself I’d do whatever was within my power and financial means to make this the best and least stressful year of my life. I worked very hard up until I submitted my last secondary, then I really looked into how I could streamline my activities, switch to a new and more fun job, and reduce my stress. I traveled, spent a ton of time with friends, worked on rebuilding relationships with friends I lost touch with, made new friends, slept the most I’ve ever slept in my life, went to the gym a ton, started cooking consistently for the first time ever, finally started the skincare routine I always complained I didn’t have time for, worked on my confidence and self esteem, addressed some of my social anxieties, read books, and picked up a few cool new hobbies. For the first year in a very long time, I did what truly made me happy and not what I felt I needed to do as a premed. In this present moment, I can say that I’m the healthiest, happiest, and most confident I’ve been in a long time. Whatever your dream year looks like that you can reasonably afford financially, do it! All the self work and things you’ve been putting off because you’ve never had enough time, do them! Obviously keep up with whatever premed stuff you see necessary and enjoy doing, but more than likely you don’t have to be as stressed as you were the year before. The way I see it, I now have the same exact end result I would have had if I had gotten into med school last year, but the universe just allowed me to have the most fun and wonderful “growth” year on top of that. 15 years from now, no one will care how many gap years you took or if you had to reapply, but this year of your life to come is so so precious. Maximize it and do whatever it takes so that you can look back a year from now like me and say you are so grateful everything worked out the way it did for you to still get into med school AND have had the best year of your life.
Being premed is tough, and for me the worst part was how isolated I felt being surrounded by people who didn’t understand what I was going through, but we have eachother! Random people on Reddit and SDN were the motivation and inspiration I needed to stay resilient and not give up. I hope I can be that for some of you. Keep your head up and keep grinding. I promise your hard work will pay off, and if you want to be a doctor, it WILL happen. The universe has plans for us beyond what we realize. And again, even if you’re not spiritual or religious, doesn’t mean you can’t do whatever is in your control to try and make the best of this very, very frustrating and difficult setback. This is a very long path and the only way to get through it is to make sure you enjoy the journey. Best of luck to each of you, and please feel free to dm me if you have any questions or just need to rant!
submitted by pumpkpie_chem to premed [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 17:07 Krom604 Warning email and notification

Warning email and notification
Any idea why I keep getting these notifications ? They randomly pop up while driving . I don't use the app to start the car or turn it off.
submitted by Krom604 to Hyundai [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 16:29 postvasectomy pvpskone: My husband was physically and mentally healthy, but on the day he had the vasectomy, his was broken. I miss the man he was over 3 years ago. He miss himself.

Jul 21, 2022
My husband underwent sterilization in 2019, he has luckily kept his erection. But insane pain with every ejaculation. Very painful with all physical activity. So sex drive is significantly reduced.
Now after a failed vasectomy reversal in Norway and a successful vasectomy reversal in Tucson in the USA, he has painless ejaculation. We were so relieved! But it is far from the same. He doesn't have the pleasure of jerking anything himself and now has to ejaculate every day or every other day so that it doesn't get clogged. So more "pressure" for sex or to jerk off yourself, which leads to less desire. But he has more desire now than before the vasectomy reversal in the USA.
He is not completely pain free, he hopes one day he will be. But the vasectomy reversal helped a lot. But he hasn't yet dared to try jumping on the trampoline with the children etc. Oh, he still can't run as much when we play football as a family.
He used a lot of medication before the vasectomy reversal and became mentally ill as well. So he has to see a psychologist one day to get rid of trauma and post traumatic stress disorder, but he is not ready for that yet. Right now he is using a type of medicine since he had surgery in April. So I really don't recommend sterilization. There are so many other birth control options. Anyway, I now have to use birth control.
Having a man who has changed a lot. If we hadn't had children, he would have committed suicide in 2020 and I would have given him permission, because it has been absolutely terrible. As I said, I'm not quite well yet and may never be quite well either physically or mentally. He has lost his relationship with his mother as well, as she was the one who recommended sterilization and he has been raised to believe that it is a good choice. Maybe there will be changes if post traumatic stress disorder goes away one day.
They cut the balls before the anesthetic worked, the anesthetic injected without telling (he said they had to tell first), then it was very painful when they cut the vas deferens on one side.
It was said that nothing should be changed, everything was changed. We know of several men who feel this way, some less bothered and some much more bothered. But it is little talked about. We just want to help others know, then people can make a choice. Our choice would have been easy if we knew about these complications. No doctors warned us. Chronic pain in the balls which in turn affects the psyche, sex life and the whole quality of life reduced.
NO to having legal sterilization, I think, even though I am a woman. But absolutely terrible to see your husband in so much pain etc.
https://www.reddit.com/Vasectomy/comments/w3p76s/thinking_about_getting_snipped_how_is_your_sex/ih20719/
Aug 15, 2022
In April 2022, he had a vasectomy reversal with Dr. Sheldon Marks at ICVR in Tucson in the USA. It took us 28 hours to travel there (We live in Norway). It's the best choice we've ever made. Expensive, but absolutely worth the good knowledge they have at ICVR and the follow-up afterwards. Some have said that you should wait 1 year after vasectomy before having vasectomy reversal. But it is Norwegian doctors who have said so, so it is wise to investigate it more. Norway knows far too little about pvps and nobody warned us about it.
Keep in mind that you can get worse from vasectomy reversal. But my husband got much better. Now he has painless ejaculation after 2.5 years of pain. And now he can be more active. He can go on mountain walks with me and the children without having to take painkillers and without having to walk slower than us. Vasectomy reversal was our salvation. But he is not yet healthy. He has to see a psychologist to get rid of post traumatic stress disorder since he got it after they cut him in Norway during a vasectomy before the anesthesia worked and various mistakes they made. It is very hard to be a relative to see your own husband in so much pain and his personality changing.
https://www.reddit.com/postvasectomypain/comments/w76f5h/bitter_and_regretful/ikdtipy/
Aug 19, 2022
Yes, sick how quickly life can change. My husband was also completely healthy both physically and mentally before the vasectomy. He still has a grudge against doctors and his mom. Fortunately not for me, then I don't think I would have lasted with him or vice versa. He was an active father to the children, and suddenly so much he didn't want and couldn't participate in. Not communicating as much at family birthdays and other social settings.
But after we did the vasectomy reversal, he became a new man. Not quite himself yet, but so much better than before the vasectomy reversal. So I really recommend you talk to Dr. Marks, because he is very good. It is exactly 4 months today since we were there, on Monday he will send in hopefully the last sperm cells for testing, then they will see if he still needs the medicine. Norway would not do this and certainly not other clinics in the USA. It's probably a good idea to talk to a psychologist, yes. My husband was on amitriptyline for depression for a while, but he more or less had to stop it before the vasectomy reversal.
https://www.reddit.com/postvasectomypain/comments/w76f5h/bitter_and_regretful/ikwlr1t/
Jan 06, 2023
Our life was good, had a healthy husband both physically and mentally. But now he is physically and mentally ill. Large parts of my husband disappeared in 2019 and I will never get the same again. Vasectomy reversal is not a miracle cure. But made it better, but far from great.
https://www.reddit.com/postvasectomypain/comments/104k32z/wife_is_pissed_her_husband_wont_get_a_vasectomy/j378ryn/
Jan 14, 2023
But many men do not dare to tell about it. Pvps can be painful ejaculation every time for the rest of your life, ejaculation faster or slower than you want, can lose erection forever, pain all the time, more pain with every physical activity you do, difficulty walking, maybe you need a walker, maybe you become disabled, post traumatic stress disorder, depressed, suicidal thoughts because it's hard to live like that, a lot of money you have to spend on medicines that can cause side effects, psychologist appointments, doctor appointments, physiotherapy and maybe vasectomy reversal.
Your Girlfriend may not be able to see you like this for so long and may leave you. For the time being, I have persevered with my husband, but I think few people have made it as far as I have with the problems he has had. But I think in good and bad days, this is over 3 years of bad days. But if he does not recover mentally and if it becomes too difficult for me to be happy etc. so that it affects the children and me as a mother, then I have to put the role of mother before my role of wife.
The sex drive is even much less than it was before the vasectomy. I feel less attractive since he is no longer interested. But he wants a sex life, so we have sex. And now he has to ejaculate every day or every other day in order not to get more pain.
We have spent over $23,985 and are not done with expenses. He needs a lot of psychologist sessions in the hope of getting his ptsd better, I don't think it will ever go away completely. But it affects our everyday life a lot. He can't handle seeing his mother without thinking about the operation and getting more self-hatred. She was the one who recommended the vasectomy.
He can't handle seeing spaghetti as the vas deferens are very similar in appearance, they talked about it during the operation and he saw the vas deferens with blood on a plate before he left the room. He cannot cope with seeing his doctor, the doctor's office and many other things that affect him. He has had a lot of bad sleep and I have been awake a lot because he hasn't been able to sleep properly.
We had a good life, now the life situation has completely changed. Had a perfectly healthy husband both mentally and physically, but not anymore. No doctor warned him, one doctor thinks he didn't know about pvps, the other we haven't been able to talk to, so she doesn't know that she has destroyed him. We have received a lot of anger, frustration, grief etc.
He has no confidence in the health care system. Terrified of the hospital he was in to have a vasectomy. You don't know if you are the next one to get pvps. You also don't know how much trouble you will get. Oh, if you go to a very good doctor to have a vasectomy, you can still get pvps. You can get it right away like my husband or you can get it years later. We have to use a condom now since he has sperm back after the vasectomy reversal.
We would never go through with the vasectomy again. If I were divorced now and found a new man, I would never let him have a vasectomy, I think I would rather choose to leave him or leave him if he got pvps. Wouldn't handle another round. I have talked a lot with a psychologist about these problems, because after all the worry about his suicidal thoughts, I am struggling to see him in such pain and his depression. Participating in giving him more pain since I helped him to orgasm.
https://www.reddit.com/postvasectomypain/comments/10b7f1t/im_going_for_a_consultation_for_a_vasectomy_next/j4auvd0/
Mar 25, 2023
Taken a break from sex
Are there more people here who have taken a break from sex with their wife? My husband is no longer horny at all. He has pvps, post traumatic stress disorder and is depressed. He has had a vasectomy reversal, has had less pain. But he still has aches and pains or discomfort with ejaculation. He is struggling to ejaculate now. He has to ejaculate every day or every other day because of the vasectomy reversal so that he still has sperm, so that there is no more pain because he can get a new granuloma. He manages to ejaculate quickly, in less than 5 minutes if he jerks off himself and watches porn. But he doesn't get any dopamine and pleasure from ejaculation, so he only does it because he has to.
But with me he struggles to ejaculate, the last time we had sex he jerked at the end. Now he wants a break from sex. He thinks it will be the easiest. I think he feels that I want to help and make sure that he ejaculates so that there is no more pain. Yes, it is, but it is also to have a sex life.
He was dependent on ejaculation 1-2 times per day before the vasectomy in 2019 it gave him dopamine, but now he don't like it. Sex is good for him, but it is no longer worth it to him. It feels like we are drifting further apart and I no longer feel attractive. I know it's not me that's wrong because he says it is him, but it hurts me. He is afraid that he will not be able to have ejaculations with me and that it will hurt me, it will hurt me, but so does not having sex.
He had intense pain with every ejaculation for over 2.5 years and has thought for over 3 years now that maybe it can be good and that he gets dopamine from it. But now he doesn't think he will get a good ejaculation, he has given up that hope now. He suffers a lot mentally because he misses ejaculation and horniness. Struggling with difference after vasectomy.
He is afraid that I will be unfaithful, which I will not be. But I wonder how long we'll be without sex if he's actually afraid I'll be unfaithful. He probably has no plan for how long we will be without sex, and probably wants to see what happens in the future. But I know I struggle a lot and I cry far too much because of this.
The hurtful thing for me is that he manages to ejaculate in less than 5 minutes alone with porn, but has to hold on for at least 40 minutes, but really think 1 hour or more. It was an hour last time. But I am happy that he is able to ejaculate on his own so that he can empty himself. Does anyone know if you have to ejaculate every day or every other for the rest of your life due to vasectomy reversal? I don't quite remember what the doctor said when we were there, because then we thought it would be easy to be able to have sex so often.
Oh, he's going to see a psychologist soon to try to get his ptsd better. He is very afraid to talk to them because he is afraid of getting worse since he no longer trusts the healthcare system since they did not warn him about pvps. The only reason he goes to a psychologist is because I want him to, because I know he won't recover without help.
https://www.reddit.com/postvasectomypain/comments/121ybfx/taken_a_break_from_sex/
Apr 18, 2023
My husband was physically and mentally healthy, but on the day he had the vasectomy, his was broken. I miss the man he was over 3 years ago. He miss himself.
https://www.reddit.com/Vasectomy/comments/12q3tic/do_you_regret_your_vasectomy_or_love_it/jgtbnrd/
Apr 19, 2023
My husband rarely woke up with an erection after the vasectomy. After vasectomy reversal, he got an erection in the morning again. So of course it has something to do with vasectomy. My husband had no idea that you could experience pain during ejaculation after a vasectomy. So why on earth would he suddenly get it after the vasectomy if it had nothing to do with the vasectomy?
https://www.reddit.com/Vasectomy/comments/12q3tic/do_you_regret_your_vasectomy_or_love_it/jgvihul/
Jul 23, 2023
He had pain all the time, more pain with ejaculation and all physical activity, such as going for a walk etc. 7-9 in pain. Now I think it's 3-4 at the most after vasectomy reversal. But now he can occasionally be pain-free. But he always has discomfort or pain when ejaculating. He hasn't dared to jump on the trampoline yet, almost 4 years since the last time he did it.
The pain was mostly on the left side, but it was/is on both sides. Before vasectomy reversal, they were in the balls, like really bad/heavy blue balls pressure. Now there is discomfort, so much better. But he suffers a lot mentally because of these years of pain. He miss the good ejaculations he had before. He got no dopamine after the vasectomy.
https://www.reddit.com/postvasectomypain/comments/14tz9bn/how_long_after_your_vasectomy_did_pvps_start/jt3u62l/
Metadata:
ID: 42c5adcb
Name: pvpskone
Vasectomy Date: 2019-10
Birth Year: 1985
Source: reddit
First Seen: 2022-04-30
Last Seen: 2023-08-09
Location: Norway
Storycodes: LTP,LL,DC,PSX,SGR,PAR,PYH,RDG,BDR,SDT
Reversal Date: 2022-04-22
Months: 46
Resolved: Partial
submitted by postvasectomy to postvasectomypain [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 20:12 Then_Marionberry_259 MAY 09, 2024 ALDE.V ALDEBARAN INTERCEPTS 649.60 M OF 0.81% CUEQ WITHIN 1,018.60 M OF 0.60% CUEQ, AT THE ALTAR PROJECT

MAY 09, 2024 ALDE.V ALDEBARAN INTERCEPTS 649.60 M OF 0.81% CUEQ WITHIN 1,018.60 M OF 0.60% CUEQ, AT THE ALTAR PROJECT
https://preview.redd.it/9mkacn33zfzc1.png?width=3500&format=png&auto=webp&s=49c344bd00dcc26a9c20322d8ec28b3507a0b8de
VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / May 9, 2024 / Aldebaran Resources Inc. ("Aldebaran" or the "Company") (TSXV:ALDE)(OTCQX:ADBRF) is pleased to report results for four drill holes of the 2023/2024 field campaign at the Altar copper-gold project in San Juan, Argentina. The holes reported herein (ALD-24-074EXT, ALD-24-240, ALD-24-241, ALD-24-238, and ALD-24-242) were all substantial step-outs to the north or south of known mineralization. Hole ALD-24-074EXT was designed to extend mineralization in the Altar United trend. Hole ALD-24-241 was designed to achieve three goals: (1) infill a gap in our drilling at the Altar United discovery, (2) drill perpendicular to many of the previous holes within the United area to ensure there is no bias in grades because of hole orientation, and (3) to test for continuity in between the existing fences of drill holes. Hole ALD-24-240 was designed to fill a gap in the existing drilling, and hole ALD-24-242 was designed to test the southern extent of the mineralized footprint at the Altar project. All holes successfully hit mineralization and expanded the footprint of the mineralized system, while ALD-24-241 returned one of the highest-grade intercepts from the project to date. All four holes will provide valuable information for the upcoming mineral resource estimate, scheduled for H2 2024.
Highlights
ALD-24-241
  • 158.80 m of 0.45 g/t Au in oxide mineralization from 3.40 m depth
    • Including 90.60 m of 0.52 g/t Au from 3.40 m depth
    • This area requires follow-up work to see if this style of mineralization is open
  • 1,018.60 m of 0.60% CuEq from 277.40 m depth
    • Including 797.00 m of 0.71% CuEq from 499.00 m depth
      • Including 649.60 m of 0.81% CuEq from 646.40 m depth
  • The hole was lost due to operator error; the Company had intended to drill the hole deeper
  • Hole ended in mineralization with the final 7.00 m returning 0.80% CuEq
ALD-24-074EXT
  • 1,199.00 m of 0.38% CuEq from 128 m depth
    • Including 82.00 m of 0.71% CuEq from 130 m depth
  • Extension of a historic hole, originally terminated at 607.60 m and extended to 1,327.00 m depth
  • Hole ended in mineralization with the final 11.00 m returning 0.62% CuEq
ALD-24-240
  • 1,085.00 m of 0.34% CuEq from 187.70 m depth
    • Including 65.00 m of 0.55% CuEq from 701.00 m depth
ALD-24-242
  • 219.90 m of 0.28% CuEq from 779.50 m depth
    • Including 116.40 m of 0.36% CuEq from 883.00 m depth
John Black, Chief Executive Officer of Aldebaran, commented: "The Altar deposit continues to grow with each drill hole we complete. This batch of drill holes expands the mineralized footprint of the deposit and grows the higher-grade mineralization commonly found at Altar United. Hole 241, which targeted Altar United, represents one of the best holes we've drilled on the project to date, with long runs of very attractive-grade mineralization. All this information will be valuable as we move towards a mineral resource update, planned to be completed later this year."
Dr. Kevin B. Heather, Chief Geological Officer of Aldebaran, commented: "All of the holes have provided us with valuable geological information that will be beneficial to the growth of the mineral resource. The oxide hosted gold mineralization encountered at the top of hole 241 is very intriguing and may offer opportunities to expand this style of mineralization that could be amenable to low-cost heap leaching early in the operation. Holes 240 and 242 expand the known footprint of the mineralization. Hole 241, apart from being one of the better intercepts on the project to-date, it also, and importantly, confirms lateral continuity of the higher-grade mineralization perpendicular to the orientation of most of the previous drill holes in the Altar United area; not to mention filling in a large gap in the previous drilling."
Table 1 below shows detailed assays for all holes. Figure 1 displays a plan map of the completed and ongoing drill hole locations, while Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 display cross-sections of the holes reported herein.
https://preview.redd.it/ro86uz73zfzc1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d3ef2c96f3ec779eadea5933fe45e3f5b2ba5f3
Discussion of Results
ALD-24-074EXT
ALD-24-074EXT (Figure 2) is a historical hole collared in the western edge of the Altar United trend. It is a vertical hole originally drilled in 2010 to a depth of 607.60 m. ALD-24-074 was extended during the current campaign to a final depth of 1,327.00 m. The main purpose of this hole was to fill a gap in the previous drilling and test for the extension of mineralization at Altar United.
Lithology: Drillhole ALD-24-074EXT intersected diorite porphyry units from surface to the end of the hole (cutting a minor interval of rhyolite between 1,118 m and 1,160 m depth).
Alteration & Mineralization: ALD-24-074EXT encountered strongly oxidized and leached rocks from surface to 130 m depth, followed by a well-developed secondary copper enrichment zone until 220 m depth. Moderate quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite-molybdenite veining occurs along the entire hole, with increasing intensity over the last 500 m of the hole. Hypogene copper mineralization in ALD-24-074EXT consists of chalcopyrite and lesser amounts of bornite and hypogene chalcocite, which are intimately related with the occurrence of moderate to strong green sericite(-chlorite)-alteration that is overprinting earlier, biotite-k-feldspar-magnetite alteration, both of which increase in intensity down the hole. Weaker mineralization from 510 m to 840 m depth is a consequence of the overprinting by moderate to strong intensity "white sericite-pyrite" alteration which appears to be copper destructive on this portion of the hole.
ALD-24-240
ALD-24-240 (Figure 3) is collared at the eastern edge of Altar Central. This hole was drilled at -85 degrees dip to the north and to a final depth of 1,273.2 m. The main purpose of ALD-24-240 was to test an area with limited drilling to date.
Lithology: Drillhole ALD-24-240 intersected dominantly wall rock rhyolite and andesite volcanic rocks from top to bottom. The hole intersected rhyolite from surface until 620 m depth, before entering an intercalation of dominantly andesitic rocks and minor rhyolitic units. Two short intervals of diorite intrusive rocks (dykes) were encountered; the first of these from 922 m to 931 m depth and the second from 1,263 m until the bottom of the hole at 1,273.2 m.
Alteration & Mineralization: Drillhole ALD-24-240 encountered strongly oxidized and leached rocks over the initial 138 m, before entering a weakly developed secondary copper enrichment zone up to 320 m depth. Copper mineralization in the hypogene zone is mainly associated with the occurrence of chalcopyrite associated with moderate to strong "green sericite-(chlorite)" alteration and to "k-feldspar-biotite" potassic assemblages. These early alteration assemblages are overprinted in the upper portion of the hole by weak to moderate "white sericite-pyrite" alteration and by discrete structures with pyrite-enargite. Molybdenum mineralization is associated with the occurrence of moderate quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite-molybdenum veining from the initial meters of the hole and progressively increasing at depth.
ALD-24-241
ALD-24-241 (Figure 4) is collared in the Altar United trend. The hole was drilled at -85 degrees dip and to the southeast at 110-degree azimuth. Hole ALD-24-241 was designed to achieved three goals: (1) infill a gap in our drilling at the Altar United discovery, (2) drill perpendicular to many of the previous holes within the United area to ensure there is no bias in grades because of hole orientation, and (3) to test for continuity in between the existing fences of drill holes. The targeted depth for ALD-24-241 was at least 1,500 m depth, however the hole was lost prematurely at 1,296.0 m depth due to operator issues.
Lithology: From surface to 162 m depth, drillhole ALD-24-241 intersected diorite porphyry displaying intense quartz stockwork veining, followed underneath by a likely younger diorite porphyry displaying identical textural characteristics, but lower frequency of quartz veining. The nature of the contact between these two units is uncertain due to the strong oxidation and fracturing at those depths.
Alteration & Mineralization: ALD-24-241 displays strong oxidation from surface and until 300 m depth. Copper mineralization was completely leached in this upper portion of the hole due to weathering. On the other hand, gold mineralization occurs from surface to 162 m depth, spatially associated with strong to intense quartz stockwork veining present within that interval. A poorly developed supergene copper enrichment zone occurs from the base of oxidation until 375 m depth and is characterized by the occurrence of secondary chalcocite coatings on pyrite and chalcopyrite. Copper mineralization below 375 m depth is hypogene and consists mainly of chalcopyrite and locally bornite. A background of moderate intensity, early "biotite-k-feldspar-magnetite-chalcopyrite" potassic alteration is overprinted by variable amounts of hair-wide veinlets displaying several centimeter wide halos of "green sericite-(chlorite)-chalcopyrite>pyrite" alteration which are crosscut by younger "white sericite-pyrite" veins. A clear zonation is observed between these alteration events along ALD-24-241, with the upper portion of the hole dominated by "white sericite-pyrite" alteration which decreases in intensity until approximately 600 m depth. On the other hand, "green sericite-chlorite-chalcopyrite>pyrite" progressively increases towards the bottom, becoming dominant below 600 m depth and displaying strong intensity over the last 600 m of the hole. Molybdenum mineralization is associated with the occurrence of "molybdenite-quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite" veining. These veins crosscut the "green sericite-chlorite" halo veins, displaying also a remarkable spatial association with copper mineralization.
ALD-24-242
ALD-24-242 (Figure 5) was collared well south of any previous drill holes on the project. The hole was collared 285 m to the southeast from hole ALD-24-239 and 335 m away from hole ALD-23-222, the two closest holes in this area. ALD-24-242 was drilled at -75 degrees dip to the north and to a final depth of 999.4 m. The main objective of this hole was to test the extension of the mineralization encountered at depth in hole ALD-24-239. The hole was stopped due to hitting the depth capacity of the drill rig.
Lithology: Drillhole ALD-24-242 intersected a long interval of rhyolite until 768 m depth and thereafter encountered intercalations of dominantly andesitic volcanic rocks crosscut by minor rhyolite dykes.
Alteration & Mineralization: From surface to 770 m depth, alteration within the rhyolite is characterized by the occurrence of moderate "chlorite-hematite-magnetite-pyrite" and "white sericite-pyrite-tourmaline" assemblages crosscut by discrete high-sulphidation "pyrite-enargite" and intermediate-sulphidation base metal carbonate epithermal structures. Chalcopyrite increases steadily below 770 m depth, coincident with the occurrence of weak "biotite-k feldspar-magnetite" potassic alteration which increases towards the bottom of the hole.
Project Update
The Company is winding down the 2023/2024 field program with one drill rig currently active. Holes ALD-24-062EXT, ALD-24-129EXT, ALD-24-243, ALD-24-165EXT, ALD-24-150EXT, and ALD-24-244 are complete and were terminated at 1,161.00 m, 1,211.00 m, 1,842.00 m, 1,208.00 m, 1,239.50 m, and 1,061.00 m depth, respectively: all pending final assays. Holes ALD-24-062EXT, ALD-24-129EXT, ALD-24-165EXT, and ALD-24-150EXT are all historic drill holes that were originally terminated at 470.00 m, 513.00 m, 484.50 m, 548.00 m depth, respectively, but that were extended during the current drilling campaign to 1,161.00 m, 1,211.00 m, 1,208.00 m, and 1,239.50 m depths respectively. Hole ALD-24-243 deviated significantly from its originally intended target due to operator error, however, the Company elected to let the hole continue to a final depth of 1,842.00 m due to encouraging visuals. ALD-24-245 is currently active and at approximately 820 m depth and will be the final hole of this field season.
Webinar
For more context, please join the Company in a live event on Friday, May 10th at 11:00 am EDT / 8:00 am PDT. Q&A will follow the presentation. Click here to register: https://events.6ix.com/preview/aldebaran-resources-presents-exploration-update
Investor Day
Aldebaran will host an Investor Day in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on May 29th, 2024, at 10:30 am EDT. Analysts, Investors, and Investment Advisors who would like to attend in person please contact Ben Cherrington at +1 347 394-2728 or +44 7538 244 208, or email [ben.cherrington@aldebaranresources.com](mailto:ben.cherrington@aldebaranresources.com).
The event will be simultaneously webcast. To register for the webcast please use the following link: https://events.6ix.com/preview/aldebaran-resources-investor-day-livestream.
Qualified Person
The scientific and technical data contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Dr. Kevin B. Heather, B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc, Ph.D, FAusIMM, FGS, Chief Geological Officer and director of Aldebaran, who serves as the qualified person (QP) under the definitions of National Instrument 43-101.
ON BEHALF OF THE ALDEBARAN BOARD (signed) "John Black" John Black Chief Executive Officer and Director Tel: +1 (604) 685-6800 Email: [info@aldebaranresources.com](mailto:info@aldebaranresources.com)
Please click here and subscribe to receive future news releases: https://aldebaranresources.com/contact/subscribe/
For further information, please consult our website at www.aldebaranresources.com or contact:
Ben Cherrington Manager, Investor Relations Phone: +1 347 394-2728 or +44 7538 244 208 Email: [ben.cherrington@aldebaranresources.com](mailto:ben.cherrington@aldebaranresources.com)
About Aldebaran Resources Inc.
Aldebaran is a mineral exploration company that was spun out of Regulus Resources Inc. in 2018 and has the same core management team. Aldebaran holds a 60% interest in the Altar copper-gold project in San Juan Province, Argentina and can earn an additional 20% interest in the project by completing a further $25 million in expenditures at Altar over the next three years. The Altar project hosts multiple porphyry copper-gold deposits with potential for additional discoveries. Altar forms part of a cluster of world-class porphyry copper deposits which includes Los Pelambres (Antofagasta Minerals), El Pachón (Glencore), and Los Azules (McEwen Copper). In March 2021 the Company announced an updated mineral resource estimate for Altar, prepared by Independent Mining Consultants Inc. and based on the drilling completed up to and including 2020 (independent technical report prepared by Independent Mining Consultants Inc., Tucson, Arizona, titled "Technical Report, Estimated Mineral Resources, Altar Project, San Juan Province, Argentina", dated March 22, 2021 - see news release dated March 22, 2021).
Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Altar follows systematic and rigorous sampling and analytical protocols which meet and exceed industry standards. These protocols are summarized below and are available on the Aldebaran website at www.aldebaranresources.com.
All drill holes are diamond core holes with PQ, HQ or NQ core diameters. Drill core is collected at the drill site where recovery and RQD (Rock Quality Designation) measurements are taken before the core is boxed and transported to the Altar camp facilities, a short distance away, where the whole core is photographed under more optimum lighting conditions and geological quick log is produced. The whole-core is then marked and sampled into geological defined, systematic 1- to 2-metre sample intervals, unless the geologist determines the presence of an important geological contact, which should not be crossed. The whole-core is then cut-in-half with a diamond saw blade, with half the sample retained in the core box for future reference and the other half placed into a pre-labelled plastic bag, sealed with a two plastic security zip ties, and labeled with a unique sample number. The bagged samples are then placed into larger plastic sacks and those sacks are sealed with another plastic security zip tie and labelled for shipment. The sacks are then placed onto wooden pallets and wrapped in plastic shrink-wrap and stored in a secure area pending shipment to a certified ALS laboratory sample preparation facility located in Mendoza, Argentina, where the samples are dried, crushed, and pulverized. The resulting sample pulps are sent by batch to the ALS laboratory in Lima for geochemical assay analysis, including a 30g fire assay with an atomic absorption (AA) finish analysis for gold and a full multi-acid digestion (4-acid) with ICP-AES analysis for other elements. Samples with results that exceed maximum detection values for gold are re-analyzed by fire assay with a gravimetric finish and other elements of interest are re-analyzed using precise ore-grade ICP analytical techniques. Aldebaran independently inserts certified control standards (Super Certified Reference Materials (SCRM's), coarse field blanks, and duplicates into the sample stream to monitor data quality. These control samples represent 10-12% of the total samples submitted and are inserted "blindly" to the laboratory in the sample sequence prior to departure from the Aldebaran facilities.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements regarding Aldebaran, including management's assessment of future-plans and operations, may constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws and necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, most of which are beyond Aldebaran's control. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements or information can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate" or "believes" or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.
Specifically, and without limitation, all statements included in this press release that address activities, events or developments that Aldebaran expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including the proposed exploration and development of the Altar project described herein, and management's assessment of future plans and operations and statements with respect to the completion of the anticipated exploration and development programs, may constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws and necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, most of which are beyond Aldebaran's control. These risks may cause actual financial and operating results, performance, levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Although Aldebaran believes that the expectations represented in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and Aldebaran does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities law.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
https://preview.redd.it/aapz59e3zfzc1.jpg?width=1430&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f6776ff92c9ef94375f4c832eca754bcb75478c7
Figure 1 - Plan map showing drill holes from the 2023-2024 drill program
https://preview.redd.it/j1gwaik3zfzc1.jpg?width=1430&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e5aabdaf15f718af6e042c5f579be074cf64e12a
Figure 2 - Cross-section displaying CuEq (%) values in ALD-24-074EXT
https://preview.redd.it/ndr9cps3zfzc1.png?width=942&format=png&auto=webp&s=aafadf45472eaea04ff51552ce0b31ea921e0a6d
Figure 3 - Cross-section displaying CuEq (%) values in ALD-24-240
https://preview.redd.it/tcuy2w04zfzc1.jpg?width=1430&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aa824c9696efaeaf99abf471b6993d0dd4d16625
Figure 4 - Cross-section displaying CuEq (%) values in ALD-24-241
https://preview.redd.it/3ckuu394zfzc1.jpg?width=1430&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3dc347edc51a837edfb364a5e1fe79a580b07bbc
Figure 5 - Cross-section displaying CuEq (%) values in ALD-24-242
SOURCE: Aldebaran Resources Inc.
View the original press release on accesswire.com

https://preview.redd.it/4d99hbf4zfzc1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=f667c1c40dc37ad03c93e299be707f69c9bf4bc1
Universal Site Links
ALDEBARAN RESOURCES INC
STOCK METAL DATABASE
ADD TICKER TO THE DATABASE
www.reddit.com/Treaty_Creek
REPORT AN ERROR
submitted by Then_Marionberry_259 to Treaty_Creek [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 19:18 thefrankyes Hyundai Tuscon Hybrid N Line Lease Review

Hyundai Tuscon Hybrid N Line Lease Review
Upgrading from my Hyundai Kona Limited to a 2024 Hyundai Tuscon Hybrid N Line. Want to review the numbers on this. I want 12k miles instead.
MF - .00203
Residual .62
https://preview.redd.it/n6l7o5sspfzc1.jpg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=442a5904c9d0e438d411310741545aca18a9ffc1
submitted by thefrankyes to leasehackr [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 18:32 12-inch-LP-record Nail biter application for expedite

5/1 Applied at local county office. Paid for expedited shipping and expedited processing. Expired >5 years so full application, not renewal. 5/7 8PM received an email from State that it was in process 5/25 is my departure.
They say 2-3 weeks but I’m barely over 2 weeks out. Do they prioritize expedite based on the departure date I put in the application or can I not count on them getting it to me on time?
I’m planning on calling the 877 number for passport agency or center if one has already applied. Anything else I should do or be aware of? Will they print it out same day at the office if I can get an appointment?
[edit]======================
Update- full reverse timeline
5/25 - international flight scheduled
5/15 - passport received (yesterday) (Dallas)
5/15 - received USPS tracking for a package shipped on 5/14 from Tucson.
5/14 - received email from State Dept that they shipped back supporting docs (ie, old passport, birth certificate, etc). Passport would ship “separately and at a different time”. “If you don’t receive new passport in 2-3 weeks, call us then (!!!!!)”
[edit #2] checked my email again, there were 2 emails I somehow missed on 5/14. #1 passport was approved and was being printed. #2 passport was shipped. I only originally saw email #3 about return of supporting documents.
5/13 - called 800 number again to get appointment, told it is still too soon, call back again on 5/20.
5/11 - called 800 number to get appointment. Told it’s too soon (even though allowed to call 14 days before trip), told to call back on 5/13.
5/8 - check cashed
5/7 - received email from State Dept application received and “in process”
5/3 -signed up for email updates from State department.
5/2 -County office shipped to State department
5/1 -applied at county office, with both expedites. Told it will take 2-3 weeks from date check cashed, not from Today.
I’ve been so stressed over this, afraid I’d have to eat the cost of the tickets for my whole family as well as the resort.
All in all between 5/8 (check cashed) and 5/14 (shipped) they had it for 5 business days. Very pleased. I’d like to thank the passport division of the US State Department.
submitted by 12-inch-LP-record to Passports [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 03:04 GrandaddyCrunk Spending a couple weeks in the following cities - any you'd recommend adding/removing? Any specific areas to check out? And any tips as far as how to approach this if anyone has done something similar?

I'm getting ready to move out of Austin - my lease here is done in a couple weeks and I think I'm due for something new. Don't hate it here, but this isn't the long term place for me and I have no interest in being here over summer anyways. Here is a little about me / what I'm looking for / the cities I have planned to explore:
30 years old, male. Single.
Make about $200K in salary, WFH - so pretty flexible. I'd like to keep rent below $2.2K for a 1BR, but recognize that won't be possible everywhere and I'm fine flexing up if I love an area and recognize that the quality of life improvement for me moving there justifies spending more on rent.
Looking for areas with a large amount of educated younger people. I am definitely seeking an active/healthy/fitness conscious community and culture. If there is a tech/entrepreneurial scene nearby then that is a huge plus as well. Good food, farmers markets, etc is nice too.
Weathelandscape wise - I can deal with most things. Have a preference for sun, like most people. Excessive cloud cover and gloom (like the PNW) is a big NO. Would prefer summers that are not disgustingly humid and/or winters that aren't brutal. With that being said, I grew up in FL and have lived in TX - I can deal with rough summers if I need to, and I don't mind traveling for a few months over summer to get away from that.
Having a major airport (or at least a strongly connected domestic one) is a plus.
I'd like to be near the action (5-15 minute drive) but not living right in the heart of it. Clean, safe cities that aren't dealing with huge homelessness/drug problems help - but sadly that second half seems to be pretty prevalent everywhere nowadays.
Tour plans:
Denver & Boulder - appeal here is having lots of sun, mountain/nature access, skiing nearby with manageable winters, COL isn't too bad in Denver and it checks a lot of my boxes above. Con is sprawl, air quality, and apparently the dating scene is pretty meh. I've read Boulder is VHCOL but apartments on Zillow seem reasonable, and I think I'll prefer it as it's a bit more scenic and more sprawled. Con for Boulder is it's not very diverse, might be a bit too college-y for me.
San Francisco - tech/entrepreneurial scene here is one of a kind and proximity to nature is amazing. COL is a definite con, and I don't know what to expect as far as the homeless problem goes. Reading that I just need to stay away from Tenderloin/Soma.
Orange County (Newport Beach/Costa Mesa area) - prime weather, great outdoors opportunities and the ocean right there - seems like a large concentration of really good looking and affluent people, which appeals - safe, clean, aesthetic area...close to LA amenities/opportunities (close enough) without being in LA...this may be a little bit sleepy (?) but I'm not big on drinking anymore so that's OK, other con is obviously COL. This feels like one where I'd be willing to spend up though if it ends up being a fit.
San Diego - feels like a biggeyounger version of the areas I've scoped out in Orange County, with more going on. I've visited before, weather and scenic beauty is obviously amazing. What I didn't like is that a lot of the housing was extremely old (especially for the price) which seems to be a general CA thing - new buildings were way more inland, and I'd prefer being near the water. Culturally it feels a bit more limited too.
St Pete (FL) - really think SP/Tampa area is on a sustained upward trend...one big appeal here is that I'd have a really strong social network right away, several friends living here...outside of that, weather is fantastic 8 months out of the year...COL has gone up but is still very reasonable for the combo of old FL beach charm SP offers and big city amenities Tampa offers. Cons are the summers, hurricane season, and that FL isn't spoiled with outdoor options outside of the ocean, and it's just so flat.
Few others I'm considering or have seen suggested - fairly straightforward pros/cons for each: Raleigh (NC), Asheville (NC), Providence (RI), Flagstaff (AZ), Tucson (AZ), Boise (ID), LA - specifically Santa Monica area (CA), Chicago (IL), Madison (WI)
...open to any thoughts on any cities mentioned above, any suggestions for adds/removals, etc.
Would appreciate any insight/suggestions! One good thing I read was from someone who did this and drove for DoorDash in every city in order to get a feel for the different areas.
submitted by GrandaddyCrunk to SameGrassButGreener [link] [comments]


2024.05.08 04:18 RayTaurus96 Gay in Tucson?

Hey everyone! I’m a 28 year old guy, and am planning to pull up stakes and head to southern Arizona this October from Chicago. I am coming alone and won’t know anyone, and am looking for some guidance.
Let me preface this with the things that really draw me to Tucson. It is roughly the same size as my hometown Milwaukee, which I love. I am desperate to have more access to nature for biking, off-roading, camping, hiking, etc. The food is amazing and the culture seems great. The weather is everything I’m looking for, and yes I understand what summer is like. Everyone I came across was friendly and warm.
I have (almost) committed to Tucson, but I am having some reservations around the gay community in town. When I visited, I didn’t see very many queer folk anywhere, even near the university. I saw more gay dudes in the Phoenix airport then I did my entire time in Tucson. I’m nervous it will be difficult to find queer community in town. I am not a drinker or partier, so a couple bars don’t really provide that community for me. Coming from a place like Chicago where there are groups and leagues of all kinds, I’m nervous.
Everyone keeps telling me I should just go to Phoenix, but it has a lot of the same qualities I am hoping to leave behind in Chicago. Do any gay people on this subreddit have any insight to what it’s like making friends, dating, and maybe being a bit of a whore?
I’ve mostly been looking in the foothills since that area really drew me in. Is that a bad idea? Is downtown the move? Is there any centralization of queer community? Is Phoenix really the better bet? Please be kind, and any advice would be greatly appreciated.
submitted by RayTaurus96 to Tucson [link] [comments]


2024.05.08 00:16 DecentLurker96 [Morgan] Thread: Here’s my understanding, per sources, of the Tucson Roadrunners situation after today’s AHL meeting. The AHL BOG did not vote on whether the Roadrunners could play games at Mullett Arena next season because they do not have enough information to vote...

The AHL BOG is still waiting to see if ASU & Oak View Group will/can squeeze the Runners dates in at Mullett Arena with the Suns G League team also a strong possibility to play at Mullett next season, eating up dates that Sun Devil isn't using in its 1st season in the NCHC. There is also the issue of the two remaining years on the team's lease at Tucson Arena. A source also said the Tucson lease permits the Runners to play as many as 5 games away from Tucson. Any more would be a breach of contract & would have to be renegotiated. Per source, the AHL needs to have this all ironed out by May 31 to allow a move to Mullett next season.
submitted by DecentLurker96 to hockey [link] [comments]


2024.05.07 19:48 Then_Marionberry_259 MAY 07, 2024 FDY.TO FARADAY COPPER REPORTS NEW GOLD ASSAY RESULTS FROM THE KEEL ZONE INCLUDING 0.28 G/T GOLD AND CONFIRMING 1.34% COPPER OVER 103.64 METRES AT THE COPPER CREEK PROJECT

MAY 07, 2024 FDY.TO FARADAY COPPER REPORTS NEW GOLD ASSAY RESULTS FROM THE KEEL ZONE INCLUDING 0.28 G/T GOLD AND CONFIRMING 1.34% COPPER OVER 103.64 METRES AT THE COPPER CREEK PROJECT
https://preview.redd.it/e2euhzo5l1zc1.png?width=3500&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd62df2f18f34ef07b3f49e44794e304103b2956
VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / May 7, 2024 / Faraday Copper Corp. ("Faraday" or the "Company") (TSX:FDY)(OTCQX:CPPKF) is pleased to announce the results of the Gold Program from the Keel Zone at the Copper Creek project in Arizona, USA. The results support the potential to unlock significant value through the contribution of payable gold in concentrate in future Mineral Resource Estimates ("MRE")1.
Paul Harbidge, President and CEO, commented "The results show that the Keel Zone hosts the largest gold-bearing domain on the property to date. For context, the Keel underground zone represents approximately 60 million tonnes of the 330 million tonnes in the current underground mineral resource. This newly acquired data, together with our recent metallurgical results, supports the potential for the addition of gold in concentrate as a significant source of by-product revenue that would increase the value of Copper Creek."
Highlights
  • Doubled the gold assay coverage in the Keel Zone with 1,017 new gold assays, in addition to the 1,062 historical gold assays.
  • Examples of intercepts with new gold assays and re-assayed copper from historical core include:
    • 103.64 m ("metres") at 1.34% copper and 0.28 grams per tonne ("g/t") gold from 667.51 m in drill hole LM-2;
    • 85.35 m at 0.91% copper and 0.11 g/t gold from 652.27 m in drill hole LM-1; and
    • 272.19 m at 0.47% copper and 0.05 g/t gold from 921.11 m in drill hole RMK-12-068.
  • Gold and copper are correlated on an intercept basis with an overall ratio2 of approximately 1:9 gold (g/t):copper (%) at the Keel Zone.
  • Recently completed metallurgical test work supports gold recoveries exceeding 80% to a payable grade in the copper concentrate from the Keel Zone.
  • As part of the gold program, copper was re-assayed and the results confirmed historical data, providing additional confidence in the database.
Keel Zone Overview
The Keel Zone (Figure 1 and 2) represents approximately 60 million tonnes of the 330 million tonnes of the current underground MRE. The Keel Zone contains several domains of mineralization with the dominant style including bornite and chalcopyrite that occur disseminated and in miarolitic cavities, as well as in porphyry-style veins. This is indicative of a high emplacement temperature near the apex of a magmatic intrusion and this environment is commonly referred to as a cupola zone (Figure 1). In addition, chalcopyrite-rich breccias crosscut the magmatic cupola mineralization. The Keel Zone is located below the Mammoth breccia and together these areas form the most continuous vertical mineralization (over 1,400 m) discovered on the project to date.
Gold mineralization within Keel is zoned, with the greatest enrichment occurring in the magmatic cupola associated with bornite (Figure 3). Metallurgical test work, reported in a news release dated February 26, 2024, on bornite-bearing samples from the Keel Zone suggests that gold recoveries average over 80% and gold has the potential to be payable in a copper concentrate.
Gold Program Overview
Historically, only a small portion of samples analyzed for copper were also analyzed for gold. The Company has been analyzing archived sample material for gold with the aim of increasing data coverage for potential inclusion in future MRE updates. In addition to gold assays, samples have been re-analyzed for copper, silver and molybdenum to further validate historical results. Assay results for Childs Aldwinkle, Copper Prince and the Keel Zone have been released.
Gold and copper results for the Keel Zone are presented in Table 1. Gold values were calculated for a total of 15 drill hole intercepts and the results improve spatial coverage (Figure 1).
Next Steps
Additional zones in the current MRE are being evaluated for gold assay data coverage as the Company intends to include gold in future MRE updates. Further, gold continues to be analyzed as part of the ongoing Phase III drill program which has the following objectives:
  • Expanding the MRE;
  • Better delineating high-grade, mineralized zones; and
  • Reconnaissance drilling on new targets.
The current focus of the Phase III drilling program is on shallow breccia-hosted mineralization at American Eagle. This follows the approval by the Bureau of Land Management of the Company's Notice of Intent, as reported in a news release dated May 2, 2024.
Figure 1: Cross section of the Keel and Mammoth domain with gold intercepts for the Keel Zone
https://preview.redd.it/6xg5wrr5l1zc1.jpg?width=957&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1363294e806e82ffba8e748a770a4aa7e477cd9f
Note: The underground footprint and open pit shell are based on constraints used in the MRE1.
Figure 2: Mineral Resource areas at the Copper Creek project
https://preview.redd.it/q3ntbrs5l1zc1.jpg?width=1400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a4dde5512879d84492cd9c32d0f9108c753c91ab
Figure 3: Example of magmatic cupola-style mineralization at 690.3 m from a core sample from 688.85 m to 691.90 m grading 1.43 g/t gold and 6.03% copper in drill hole LM-2
https://preview.redd.it/z623dot5l1zc1.jpg?width=627&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=732eb9a4ed3b9b33d7b591ab25e54c6f7b89585e
Table 1: Intercept Values at the Keel Zone
https://preview.redd.it/sncchpu5l1zc1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=e96d9261c065db8b3a6f5dc7904962b25acdebd4
Notes: Copper, silver and molybdenum columns indicate re-assayed metal values. Drill holes FCD-22-007, FCD-23-024 and RMK-07-015 were not re-assayed as part of this program. Mineralization is dominantly bulk porphyry and magmatic and cupola-style and lesser breccia mineralization. Drilled widths are interpreted to be the best available approximation to true widths.
Sampling Methodology, Chain of Custody, Quality Control and Quality Assurance
All sampling was conducted under the supervision of the Company's geologists and the chain of custody from Copper Creek to the independent sample preparation facility, ALS Laboratories in Tucson, AZ, was continuously monitored. The samples were taken from archived pulverized rock material (pulps). Pulps were re-blended and analyzed using industry standard analytical methods including a 4-Acid ICP-MS multielement package and an ICP-AES method for high-grade copper samples. Gold was analyzed on a 30-gram aliquot by fire assay with an ICP-AES finish. A certified reference sample was inserted every 15th to 20th sample. Blanks were inserted every 10th sample. In addition to the internal QA-QC protocol, additional blanks, reference materials and duplicates were inserted by the analytical laboratory according to their procedure. Data verification of the analytical results included a statistical analysis of the standards and blanks that must pass certain parameters for acceptance to ensure accurate and verifiable results.
Qualified Person
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Faraday's Vice President Exploration, Dr. Thomas Bissig, P. Geo., and Faraday's Vice President, Projects and Evaluations, Zach Allwright, P.Eng., both of whom are considered a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
Notes
1 The Mineral Resource Estimate is presented in the report titled "Copper Creek Project NI 43-101 Technical Report and Preliminary Economic Assessment" with an effective date of May 3, 2023 (the "Technical Report") available on the Company's website at www.faradaycopper.com and on the Company's SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.
2 The gold:copper ratio for the Keel Zone should not be applied to other mineralized domains. The gold occurrence has not undergone economic assessment and therefore it does not currently qualify as part of a mineral resource. Certain intercepts in holes FCD-22-007 and VIX24-2 with outliers in gold and copper concentrations were not considered for the calculation of this ratio.
About Faraday Copper
Faraday Copper is a Canadian exploration company focused on advancing its flagship copper project in Arizona, USA. The Copper Creek Project is one of the largest undeveloped copper projects in North America with significant district scale exploration potential. The Company is well positioned to deliver on its key milestones and benefits from a management team and board of directors with senior mining company experience and expertise. Faraday trades on the TSX under the symbol "FDY".
For additional information please contact:
Stacey Pavlova, CFA Vice President, Investor Relations & Communications Faraday Copper Corp. E-mail: [info@faradaycopper.com](mailto:info@faradaycopper.com) Website: www.faradaycopper.com
To receive news releases by e-mail, please register at www.faradaycopper.com.
Cautionary Note on Forward Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this news release, other than statements of historical fact, are "forward-looking statements" and are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Faraday to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information specifically include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the possibility of adding payable gold in future Mineral Resource Estimates, the thesis that precious metals are mineralogically associated with copper within the Copper Creek property and the areas to be included in the review of historical samples for increased assay coverage.
Although Faraday believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements should not be in any way construed as guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include without limitation: market prices for metals; the conclusions of detailed feasibility and technical analyses; lower than expected grades and quantities of mineral resources; receipt of regulatory approval; receipt of shareholder approval; mining rates and recovery rates; significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in rates of exchange; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which Faraday does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, competition; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous peoples and other groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements, including those associated with the Copper Creek property; and uncertainties with respect to any future acquisitions by Faraday. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks as well as "Risk Factors" included in Faraday's disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedarplus.ca.
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. This press release is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, a prospectus, an offering memorandum, an advertisement or a public offering of securities in Faraday in Canada, the United States or any other jurisdiction. No securities commission or similar authority in Canada or in the United States has reviewed or in any way passed upon this press release, and any representation to the contrary is an offence.
SOURCE: Faraday Copper Corp.
View the original press release on accesswire.com

https://preview.redd.it/mrojeov5l1zc1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=76a3462776943001e55d9c089b536183667adc15
Universal Site Links
FARADAY COPPER CORP
STOCK METAL DATABASE
ADD TICKER TO THE DATABASE
www.reddit.com/Treaty_Creek
REPORT AN ERROR
submitted by Then_Marionberry_259 to Treaty_Creek [link] [comments]


2024.05.07 16:03 RobYaLunch Billboard Chart Discussion - Week Of May 11, 2024

Billboard Hot 100 chart
Position Title Artist ▲/▼ Last week Weeks Charting Peak
1 Fortnight Taylor Swift Featuring Post Malone - 1 2 1
2 Million Dollar Baby Tommy Richman ▲+99 [FRESH] 1 2
3 A Bar Song (Tipsy) Shaboozey ▲+24 27 3 3
4 Espresso Sabrina Carpenter ▲+18 22 3 4
5 Beautiful Things Benson Boone ▲+10 15 15 2
6 Lose Control Teddy Swims ▲+12 18 38 1
7 Too Sweet Hozier ▲+9 16 6 1
8 Like That Future, Metro Boomin & Kendrick Lamar ▲+9 17 6 1
9 I Can Do It With A Broken Heart Taylor Swift ▼-6 3 2 3
10 Down Bad Taylor Swift ▼-8 2 2 2
11 Euphoria Kendrick Lamar ▲+90 [FRESH] 1 11
12 Saturn SZA ▲+17 29 10 6
13 Who's Afraid Of Little Old Me? Taylor Swift ▼-4 9 2 9
14 So Long, London Taylor Swift ▼-9 5 2 5
15 Lovin On Me Jack Harlow ▲+13 28 25 1
16 My Boy Only Breaks His Favorite Toys Taylor Swift ▼-10 6 2 6
17 Push Ups Drake ▲+2 19 2 17
18 But Daddy I Love Him Taylor Swift ▼-11 7 2 7
19 We Can't Be Friends (Wait For Your Love) Ariana Grande ▲+14 33 8 1
20 Florida!!! Taylor Swift Featuring Florence + The Machine ▼-12 8 2 8
21 The Tortured Poets Department Taylor Swift ▼-17 4 2 4
22 Guilty As Sin? Taylor Swift ▼-12 10 2 10
23 Stick Season Noah Kahan ▲+14 37 31 9
24 I Remember Everything Zach Bryan Featuring Kacey Musgraves ▲+16 40 36 1
25 Texas Hold 'Em Beyonce ▲+6 31 12 1
26 I Like The Way You Kiss Me Artemas ▲+12 38 6 12
27 Greedy Tate McRae ▲+15 42 33 3
28 Cruel Summer Taylor Swift ▲+13 41 52 1
29 Feather Sabrina Carpenter ▲+21 50 22 21
30 The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived Taylor Swift ▼-16 14 2 14
31 Type Shit Future, Metro Boomin, Travis Scott & Playboi Carti ▲+12 43 6 2
32 Get It Sexyy Sexyy Red ▲+17 49 7 20
33 Agora Hills Doja Cat ▲+12 45 32 7
34 Wanna Be GloRilla & Megan Thee Stallion ▲+14 48 4 11
35 Fresh Out The Slammer Taylor Swift ▼-24 11 2 11
36 loml Taylor Swift ▼-24 12 2 12
37 The Alchemy Taylor Swift ▼-24 13 2 13
38 Yeah Glo! GloRilla ▲+21 59 12 32
39 End Of Beginning Djo ▲+17 56 11 11
40 I Can Fix Him (No Really I Can) Taylor Swift ▼-20 20 2 20
41 Whatever She Wants Bryson Tiller ▲+13 54 11 19
42 Carnival ¥$: Ye & Ty Dolla $ign Featuring Rich The Kid & Playboi Carti ▲+10 52 12 1
43 Austin Dasha ▲+17 60 8 28
44 Gata Only FloyyMenor X Cris Mj ▲+14 58 7 27
45 Never Lose Me Flo Milli ▲+16 61 20 15
46 Redrum 21 Savage ▲+11 57 16 5
47 So High School Taylor Swift ▼-23 24 2 24
48 Good Luck, Babe! Chappell Roan ▲+14 62 4 44
49 imgonnagetyouback Taylor Swift ▼-23 26 2 26
50 Where It Ends Bailey Zimmerman ▲+15 65 18 32
51 The Black Dog Taylor Swift ▼-26 25 2 25
52 Clara Bow Taylor Swift ▼-31 21 2 21
53 Act II: Date @ 8 4Batz Featuring Drake ▲+10 63 17 7
54 Made For Me Muni Long ▲+10 64 16 20
55 Wildflowers And Wild Horses Lainey Wilson ▲+16 71 14 48
56 The Prophecy Taylor Swift ▼-24 32 2 32
57 Wild Ones Jessie Murph & Jelly Roll ▲+11 68 30 35
58 Tell Ur Girlfriend Lay Bankz ▲+8 66 3 58
59 thanK you aIMee Taylor Swift ▼-36 23 2 23
60 FE!N Travis Scott Featuring Playboi Carti ▲+7 67 26 5
61 Slow It Down Benson Boone ▲+8 69 6 40
62 How Did It End? Taylor Swift ▼-27 35 2 35
63 Adivino Myke Towers & Bad Bunny ▲+38 [FRESH] 1 63
64 The Albatross Taylor Swift ▼-34 30 2 30
65 Back Then Right Now Tyler Hubbard ▲+8 73 7 62
66 I Hate It Here Taylor Swift ▼-32 34 2 34
67 Obsessed Olivia Rodrigo ▲+7 74 6 14
68 Hell N Back Bakar Featuring Summer Walker ▲+4 72 4 53
69 Chloe Or Sam Or Sophia Or Marcus Taylor Swift ▼-33 36 2 36
70 Bulletproof Nate Smith ▲+9 79 4 64
71 I Look In People's Windows Taylor Swift ▼-32 39 2 39
72 Illusion Dua Lipa ▲+6 78 3 43
73 Get In With Me BossMan DLow ▲+2 75 13 49
74 Okay JT ▲+27 [FRESH] 1 74
75 The Bolter Taylor Swift ▼-28 47 2 47
76 Cinderella Future, Metro Boomin & Travis Scott ▼-6 70 6 6
77 Scared To Start Michael Marcagi ▲+5 82 11 54
78 Peter Taylor Swift ▼-32 46 2 46
79 Mmhmm BigXthaPlug ▼-2 77 19 63
80 Wind Up Missin' You Tucker Wetmore ▼-4 76 5 75
81 Enough (Miami) Cardi B ▼-1 80 7 9
82 Cassandra Taylor Swift ▼-38 44 2 44
83 Halfway To Hell Jelly Roll ▲+10 93 4 83
84 La Diabla Xavi ▼-1 83 20 20
85 Tu Name Fuerza Regida ▲+2 87 11 66
86 Outskirts Sam Hunt - 86 8 66
87 Belong Together Mark Ambor ▲+14 [FRESH] 1 87
88 23 Chayce Beckham ▲+3 91 18 45
89 II Most Wanted Beyonce & Miley Cyrus ▼-5 84 5 6
90 One Of The Girls The Weeknd, Jennie & Lily Rose Depp ▼-1 89 19 51
91 Tucson Too Late Jordan Davis ▲+1 92 9 80
92 Bandit Don Toliver ▲+9 -- 12 38
93 We Ride Bryan Martin ▲+8 -- 4 93
94 Dirt Cheap Cody Johnson ▲+7 -- 2 92
95 Cry Benson Boone ▼-10 85 4 60
96 Wine Into Whiskey Tucker Wetmore ▲+1 97 6 77
97 Feel It d4vd ▼-2 95 3 94
98 Spin You Around (1/24) Morgan Wallen - 98 14 24
99 The Manuscript Taylor Swift ▼-48 51 2 51
100 Let's Go Key Glock & Young Dolph ▼-10 90 8 59
Billboard Global 200 chart (most popular songs globally)
Position Title Artist ▲/▼ Last week Weeks Charting Peak
1 Fortnight Taylor Swift Featuring Post Malone - 1 2 1
2 Espresso Sabrina Carpenter ▲+15 17 3 2
3 I Like The Way You Kiss Me Artemas ▲+7 10 6 2
4 Beautiful Things Benson Boone ▲+8 12 15 1
5 Too Sweet Hozier ▲+8 13 6 1
6 A Bar Song (Tipsy) Shaboozey ▲+27 33 3 6
7 Gata Only FloyyMenor X Cris Mj ▲+7 14 12 4
8 I Can Do It With A Broken Heart Taylor Swift ▼-3 5 2 5
9 Down Bad Taylor Swift ▼-7 2 2 2
10 Million Dollar Baby Tommy Richman ▲+91 [FRESH] 1 10
Billboard 200 chart
Position Title Artist Sales Change Last week Weeks Charting
1 The Tortured Poets Department Taylor Swift 445,206 (110,726 pure) -83% 1 2
2 One Thing At A Time Morgan Wallen 66,860 (1,281 pure) +6% 4 61
3 We Don't Trust You Future & Metro Boomin 59,997 (613 pure) -13% 2 6
4 Cowboy Carter Beyonce 51,830 (7,184 pure) -22% 3 5
5 Stick Season Noah Kahan 40,112 (4,620 pure) -14% 7 75
6 Dangerous: The Double Album Morgan Wallen 39,374 (370 pure) +9% 11 173
7 Fireworks & Rollerblades Benson Boone 39,372 (1,304 pure) +0% 8 4
8 We Still Don't Trust You Future & Metro Boomin 38,998 (145 pure) -29% 6 3
9 SOS SZA 38,164 (1,831 pure) +0% 9 73
10 PARTYNEXTDOOR 4 (P4) PARTYNEXTDOOR 37,722 (3,506 pure) -- [FRESH] 1
Frequently Asked Questions:
Q: Why is X artist higher than Y artist on the 200 chart, even though X artist sold less?
A: This is because of a discrepancy between Billboard's ranking and the ranking from the website that the sales data is scraped from
Q: Where do you get the sales data from?
A: https://hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming
Q: What does "err" mean on the 200 chart?
A: If you are seeing "err", that means that the bot I use to gather chart data couldn't identify sales data for a particular album because of a difference in album naming between Billboard and HitsDailyDouble
submitted by RobYaLunch to hiphopheads [link] [comments]


2024.05.05 19:26 exileondaytonst Schools That Could Start D-I Men’s Programs, pt 5: 2024 Offseason Update

An update from last year's offseason when I last wrote about this topic. I'll typically try to keep track of this throughout the year if there's any newsworthy items, then post an update at some point around or after the coach's meetings in FL. Which is why I'm publishing this now. Here goes...
News on Teams That Might Very Well Be Coming Soon Because They've Already Been Heavily Reported On, and In Some Cases Talked About Openly By College Hockey, Inc. Amongst Others But At This Point Who Knows If Or When Any Of It Would/Could/Will Happen But Hey We Can Dream
For the last year, it’s basically been radio silence on Utica, Binghamton, and the "NEMHA" (the remaining D-II programs that could theoretically just play up by declaring for the D-I championship, since there's no D-II championship).
Our latest news on Binghamton is still the AD's intention to add a team for next season, and… it’s a little late for that, one would imagine.
The "NEMHA"/Northeast-10 Saga was theoretically going to have a conclusion in the fall of '22, and that just never happened.
The last time it was discussed on CHN and USCHO's podcasts, they'd each said it was just a matter of having a conference home for Utica (looking at you, Atlantic Hockey and/or an AH-breakaway conference). Which is either good news, or terrible news for Utica
Updates From Stuff We Knew About Before
Robert Morris officially came back, and Augustana had their debut season. Stonehill finally won a game.
Tennessee State is definitely moving forward, at least with a club team due to play this fall. They even had their first commit this year. What I haven't seen is an actual comment on an arena for them... which... is a major line item. Their FAQ page only indicates a plan to figure it out with the Predators. The Preds practice at the Centennial Sportsplex which, as far as I know, just has a few token bleachers and low seating capacity. How serious they are about going varsity from a club team... well... time will tell.
Oakland University, reported by Tony Paul, Detroit News (h/t to u/nbryson625 for pointing this out to me in the comments in my last post about this). Evidently, the plan centered on buying The Palace of Auburn Hills, which... isn't the most insane arena plan that we've seen (that award, IMO, still goes to Indiana). In any case, the hope for that program is almost certainly well beyond dead. link 1 link 2
u/chn_adamw noted in a comment in part 4 that there was more meat on the bone to the Missouri-Kansas City rumor he reported on in 2021. This appears tied to a new arena UMKC is trying to develop, although those plans are paused as of Oct. '23 when initial quotes for development were higher than expected. If the arena project regains momentum, it'll be time to keep an eye on this more, but until then...
Arizona's potential home for their club team was initially planned to open this year, but only just recently got through some final approvals needed before construction begins. The Ice arena portion of the project won't see completion until before the 2026-27 season. If the Wildcats want to go varsity in hockey, they would likely play in the Tucson Convention Center (currently the club team's home as well as the home of the Tucson Roadrunners AHL team. Of course, we have literally nothing to indicate that they have intentions to go varsity, outside of the occasional exhibition game against ASU.
Georgia is probably in a similar situation to Arizona. The new arena for their club team (and ECHL FPHL team) is still in construction and that's the only "news" item to be concerned with here. But the parallels to Arizona are notable: a club team tied to an arena project from the get-go, a suitable size for D-I, a void left by a departed NHL franchise (albeit that wound is much more recent in Arizona).
Of course, much of the same could be said about Iowa and the construction of Xtream Arena. What they lack in lost NHL franchises, they gain in a varsity sport (volleyball) being tied to the arena and a much simpler conference scenario. And we've seen no indication that D-I hockey is on the horizon there. As you go on the path from about to begin construction (Arizona) to ongoing construction (Georgia) to open a few years with no hockey momentum (Iowa), it gets harder to think that it'll happen. I don't think there's any reason to call Iowa anything more than the dimmest of probabilities at this point, and Georgia and Arizona are increasingly reaching that stage as time goes on.
New-ish Stuff
University of Delaware adds women's program, hires coach, etc. No indication that they'll add a men's team (so file this next to Syracuse as far as the men's game is concerned). Maybe Michigan will join them, who knows.
LeMoyne College are thinking about it, but Mike McMahon called it a long shot in the same report as he noted it in. Not a lot else to go on here. They're in the NEC all sports conference (with LIU and Stonehill... Sacred Heart and Merrimack were in the conference but have since announced that they'll leave for the MAAC), for whatever that's worth.
Mike McMahon (CHN), noted in November that Simon Fraser is looking more seriously than any of us had presumed before, with their 2023-24 schedule allegedly being an indicator of this plan. Presumably, this is the best possible news for GNAC conference mates Alaska and Alaska-Anchorage. However, as of the publishing of that story, SFU was without an athletic director (as of the end of April 2024 they have not concluded their search for an AD), so the direction their next AD takes is to be determined. One known fact is that their football program has been terminated following a conference realignment issue.
There are also two schools that are reclassifying to D-II from NAIA, and each are joining an all sports conference alongside several D-I hockey schools. Both schools have ACHA club teams acknowledged on their athletic department's websites alongside "varsity" teams:
If There's Been Recent Updates About Any Of These or Any Other Random School You Can Think Of, I've Missed It (Or Dismissed It)
As per usual, it will be worth making notes on which of these schools end up having their club teams scheduling exhibitions against D-I programs for next season.
General disclaimer on what I typically try to loop into these posts
I don't pay much attention to "rumors" (i.e. stuff that randos on the internet say on reddit, or the old USCHO forums, twitter, etc.). And a club team performing (or even drawing) well doesn't necessarily mean a school is willing to pursue it. If I went by any of that, we'd be including Texas Tech and Louisville and Kentucky and all sorts of other schools with basically 0% chance of actually exploring hockey without a Pegula Investment.
BUT, the things that do make me take notice:
None of these actually mean all that much on their own. And clearly, having the donors is ultimately the only thing that matters. (Unless you’re LIU, I guess). But of the last 7 D-I additions dating back to Penn State (plus the confirmed attempts from Illinois, Utica, and Binghamton), everyone other than LIU and Arizona State met at least one of these criteria. There's usually still some level of "hey we need donors" before anything actually means something (again: outside of LIU), but we college hockey fans get bored in the offseason, so... whatever.
submitted by exileondaytonst to collegehockey [link] [comments]


http://rodzice.org/