Syllabication rules

ثِتونج ځوېٓسِنہ ⟨th'Tundj Gwýsene⟩ — How Did We Get Here?

2024.05.15 17:23 very-original-user ثِتونج ځوېٓسِنہ ⟨th'Tundj Gwýsene⟩ — How Did We Get Here?

=BACKGROUND=

Gwýseneثِتونج ځوېٓسِنہ⟫ ⟨th'Tundj Gwýsene⟩ /θɛˈtund͡ʒ ˈʝyːzɛnɛ/ (or "the least Germanic Germanic language") is a Germanic language descendant from Old English spoken in Nabataea (modern-day Jordan, Sinai, and northwestern Saudi Arabia). It takes place in a timeline where the Anglo-Saxons get kicked out of Britain by the Celts, therefore they sail all the way to Nabataea (I pride myself on my realism here) and settle there. Most of them eventually convert to Islam, and, as a consequence, Arabic becomes elevated to the language of academia, nobility, and poetry.
"English" as we know it still survives in-timeline as Engliscbasically Middle English with some modifications — spoken as a minority language in southeastern Britain (or Pritani as the Celts call it in-world).
==ETYMOLOGY OF GWÝSENE==
Gwýsene⟩ ⟪ځوېٓسِنہ⟫ is derived from ځوېٓسِن (Gwýsen) + ـہ- (-e, adjectival suffix), the former from Middle Gwýsene جِٔويسّمَن (ɣewissman), a fossilization of جِٔويسّ (ɣewiss, "Geuisse") + مُن (mon, "man"), from Old Gwýsene יוש מן (yws mn, yewisse monn), from Old English Ġewisse monn.
Tundj⟩ ⟪تونج⟫ is loaned from an Arabized pronunciation of Old Gwýsene תנג (tng, tunge) (from which descends the doublet ⟨Togg⟩ ⟪تُځّ⟫ /toɣ(ː)/, "tongue")
The Englisc exonym is ⟨Eizmenasisc⟩ /ɛjzmɛˈnaːsɪʃ/, From Brithonech (in-world Conlang) Euuzmenasech /ˈøʏzmə̃næsɛx/, from Middle French Yœssmanes /ˈjœssmanɛs/ (hence modern in-world French Yœssmanes /jœsman/ and Aquitanian (in-world) ⟨Yissmanes⟩ /ˈiːsmans/), from Middle (High) German \jewissmaneisch (hence modern in-world German *Jewissmännisch** /jəˌvɪsˈmɛnɪʃ/, Saxon Jewissmannisch /jɛˌvɪsˈma.nɪʃ/, and Hollandish Iweesmanis /iˈʋeːsmanɪs/), Ultimately from Middle Gwýsene جِٔويسّمَن (ɣewissman). Doublet of Englisc ⟨iwis mon⟩ /ɪˈwɪs mɔn/ + ⟨-isc⟩ /-ɪʃ/

=PHONOLOGY=

Consonants Labial Dental Alveolar Post-Alveolar Palatal Velar
Nasal /m/ /n/
Plosive/Affricate /p/ /b/ /t/ /d/ /t͡ʃ/ /d͡ʒ /k/ (/g/)²
Fricative /f/ /v/ /θ/ /ð/ /s/ /z/ /ʃ/ /ʒ (/ç/)³ (/ʝ/)³ /x/ /ɣ/
Tap/Trill /ɾ/ /r/
Approximant /w/ /ɹ/ (/l/)⁴ /j/ /ɫ/
Vowels Front Central Back
Close /i/ // /y/ // /u/¹ /
Near-Close (/ɪ/)⁵ (/ʏ/)⁵
Mid /e/ // /ø/ /øː/ /o/ //
Open-Mid (/ɛ/)⁵ (/ɐ/)⁵ (/ɔ/)⁵
Open /æ/ /æː/ /ɑ/ /ɑː/
  1. Nonnative phonemes
  2. allophone of /k/ inter-vocalically & /ɣ/ before /ɫ/
  3. allophones of /x/ /ɣ/ near front vowels
  4. allophone of /ɫ/ when not near any back vowels and/or velar consonants.
  5. allophones in unstressed syllables
These are the phonemes of Standard Gwýsene, and, expectedly, they differ from dialect to dialect.
==EVOLUTION FROM OLD ENGLISH==
The Phonological evolution from Old English to Old Gwýsene are as follows:
From Old Gwýsene to Middle Gwýsene:
From Middle Gwýsene to Modern Gwýsene:
==DIALECT GROUPS==
Gwýsene has 4 main dialect groupings:
1- Southern Dialects
Spoken around in-world Áglästrélz /ˈɑːɣɫɐˌstɾeːɫz/ [ˈɑːʁɫ(ə)ˌsd̥ɾeːɫz]. Speakers of these dialects tend to pronounce:
Regarded as the oldest dialect by Gwýsens as it encompasses the original "homeland" (if we don't count the Anglo-Saxons that is). They're also considered the most "posh", and the standard accent is loosely based on the southern dialects.
2- Central Dialects
Spoken around in-world Keü-Nüvátra /keʏ ˌnʏˈvɑːtɾɐ/ [kɛɨ ˌnɨˈvɒːtɾɐ]. Speakers of these dialects tend to pronounce:
Central Dialects are considered posh by northerners and westerners, but not by southerners.
3- Western Dialects
Spoken in in-world Ettúr /ɛtˈtuːɻ/ [ətˈtuːɽ]. Speakers of these dialects tend to pronounce:
4- Northern Dialects
Spoken in in-world Ämma̋n /ɐmˈmæːn/ [(ʕ)ɐmˈmæːn]. Speakers of these dialects tend to pronounce:
==LEXICAL DOUBLETS==
The differing analyses of the Old English sequences /xe͜o xæ͜ɑ/ & /je͜o jæ͜ɑ/ when the change from /e͜o æ͜ɑ/ to /iɔ̯ iɐ̯/ was taking place led to:
For example, Old English heofon & geofon evolved into:

=ORTHOGRAPHY=

Gýsene uses the Arabic script natively alongside a romanization
==SCRIPT BACKGROUND==
Since Gýsen use of the Nabataean & then Arabic script preceded the Persians by centuries, the Gýsen Arabic script differs quite a bit from the Indo-Persian system:
  1. Rasm: Gýsens writing in Nabataean (& carrying over to Arabic) tended to follow Aramaic & Hebrew convention for representing consonants, while the Persian convention was derived from the most similar sounding preexisting Arabic consonants, leading to drastic differences in pointing convention (i‘jām). As Islam spread, the 2 conventions spread in their respective halves of the Muslim World: The Indo-Persian-Derived Eastern convention, and the Gýsen-Derived Western convention:
(Loose) Consonant ↓ Western ↓ Eastern ↓
//v// پ و⟫ ǀ ⟪ڤ
//// ڝ چ
//p// ڢ پ
//f// ڧ ف
  1. Vowel Notation: The western convention has a definitive way of expressing vowels when diacritics are fully written, while in the eastern convention diacritics often serve dual-duty due to limitations of Arabic short vowel diacritics.
==Script keys==
Romanization ↓ Arabic ↓ Standard Phoneme ↓
ä ǀ a ◌َ /æ/ (stressed) ǀ /ɐ/ (unstressed)
e ◌ِ /e/ (stressed) ǀ /ɛ/ (unstressed)
o ◌ُ /o/ (stressed) ǀ /ɔ/ (unstressed)
ǀ ◌́ ◌ٓ /æː/ (standalone) ǀ /◌ː/ (coupled with other vowels)
a ا /ɑ/ (stressed) ǀ /ɐ/ (unstressed)
b ب /b/ ǀ /v/ (intervocalically)
g ځ /ɣ/ ǀ /ʝ/
d د /d/ ǀ /z/ (intervocalically)
h ھ /ç/
w ǀ u و /w/ (glide) ǀ /u/ (vocalic)
z ز /z/
ch خ /x/
t ¹ط /t/
y ǀ i ي /j/ (glide) ǀ /i/ (vocalic)
k ک /k/ ǀ /g/ (intervocalically)
l ل /ɫ/
m م /m/
n ن /n/
tj ڝ /t͡ʃ/
- ¹ع /Ø/ ǀ /◌ː/ (post-vocalically)
p ڢ /p/ ǀ /b/ (intervocalically)
s ¹ص /s/
k ¹ق /k/
r ر /ɾ/ ǀ /r/ (geminated) ǀ /ɹ/ (post-vocalically)
s س /s/ ǀ /z/ (intervocalically)
t ت /t/ ǀ /d/ (intervocalically)
y ې /y/ (stressed) ǀ /ʏ/ (unstressed)
f ڧ /f/ ǀ /v/ (intervocalically)
ö ۊ /ø/ (stressed) ǀ /œ/ (unstressed)
- ء ǀ ئـ initial vowel holder
v پ /v/
th ث /θ/ ǀ /ð/ (intervocalically)
tj ¹چ /t͡ʃ/
dj ¹ج /d͡ʒ/
dh ذ /ð/
j ¹ژ /ʒ/
sj ش /ʃ/
dh ¹ض /ð/
dh ¹ظ /ð/
g ¹غ /ɣ/ ǀ /ʝ/
v ¹ڤ /v/
a ǀ ä ²ـى /æ/ (stressed) ǀ /ɐ/ (unstressed)
e ²ـہ /e/ (stressed) ǀ /ɛ/ (unstressed)
'l- لٔـ /‿(ə)ɫ-/
th'- ثِـ /θɛ-/
  1. nonnative
  2. only occur word-finally

=GRAMMAR=

Gwýsen grammar is extremely divergent from the Germanic norm, having been brought about by extremely harsh standardization efforts by the ruling class while backed by academia & scholars. It's heavily influenced by Arabic — being the encompassing liturgical, academic, and aristocratic language during the Middle to Early Modern Gwýsen periods.
==PRONOUNS==
\this entire segment will use the romanization only]) The Pronouns themselves have remained relatively true to their Germanic origins, apart from the entire set of Arabic 3rd person pronouns & the genitive enclitics. Gwýsene still retains the Old English dual forms, but they're only used in formal writing:
1st Person Singular Dual Plural
Nominative ih // wi /wi/ wi /wi/
Accusative mih /miç/ án /ɑːn/ ós /oːs/
Standalone Genitive min /min/ ág /ɑːɣ/ ór /oːɹ/
Enclitic Genitive -min /-mɪn/ -ag /-ɐɣ/ -or /-ɔɹ/
2nd Person Singular Dual Plural
Nominative thách /θɑːx/ gi /ʝi/ gi /ʝi/
Accusative thih /θiç/ in /in/ iw /iw/
Standalone Genitive thin /θin/ ig // iwar /ˈiwɐɹ/
Enclitic Genitive -thin /-θɪn/ -ig /-ɪʝ/ -iwar /-ɪwɐɹ/
3rd Person Masculine Singular Dual Plural
Nominative chá /xɑː/ chama̋ /xɐˈmæː/ chám /xɑːm/
Accusative hin /çin/ chama̋ /xɐˈmæː/ chám /xɑːm/
Standalone Genitive his /çis/ chama̋ /xɐˈmæː/ chám /xɑːm/
Enclitic Genitive -his /-çɪs/ -chama /-xɐmɐ/ -cham /-xɐm/
3rd Person Feminine Singular Dual Plural
Nominative hi /çi/ chana̋ /xɐˈnæː/ chán /xɑːn/
Accusative hi /çi/ chana̋ /xɐˈnæː/ chán /xɑːn/
Standalone Genitive hir /çiɹ/ chana̋ /xɐˈnæː/ chán /xɑːn/
Enclitic Genitive -hir /-çɪɹ/ -chana /-xɐnɐ/ -chan /-xɐn/
==NOUNS==
Middle Gwýsene inherited the Old English nominal declension, but due to merging & reduction of (final) unstressed vowels, all endlings were dropped except for the accusative & dative plurals which were later generalized. Middle Gwýsene also dropped the neuter gender, merging it with the masculine & feminine genders based on endings
Regular Noun Declension Singular Plural
Masculine - -an /-ɐn/
Feminine - -as /-ɐs/
This has been standardized to all nouns, with some ablaut irregulars:
"Man" (man) ǀ "Bách" (book) Singular Plural
Masculine man /mɑn/ menan /ˈmenɐn/
Feminine bách /bɑːx/ bitjas /ˈbit͡ʃɐs/
...and some nouns retain colloquial plural forms more reminiscent of their Old English counterparts:
"Tjylz" (child) ǀ "Chänz" (hand) Singular (Standard) Plural (Common) Plural
Masculine tjylz /t͡ʃyɫz/ tjyldan /ˈt͡ʃyɫzɐn/ tjylro /ˈt͡ʃyɫɾɔ/
Feminine chänz /xænz/ chändas /ˈxænzɐs/ chända /ˈxændɐ/
===Possession===
Gwýsene has two distinct methods of indicating possession dur to the dropping of the genitive case:
1. A loaned version of the Arabic construct state (present in the standard language, urban areas, and most of the Northern and Western dialects). the Arabic definite article (-الـ) was loaned with its use in the construct state into Late Early Modern Gwýsene as a separate "letter form" [-لٔـ] and prescribed by Grammarians ever since as a "genitive" maker. This method also assumes definiteness of the noun it's prefixed to; it must be prefixed to eneg ("any") for indefinite nouns.
Bách 'lgörel /bɑːχ‿ɫ̩ˈʝøɹɛɫ/ ("the boy's book")
bách 'l - görel book ɢᴇɴ.ᴅғ - boy 
2. Use of a prefixed fär (equivalent to English "of", cognate with English "for") (present in rural areas and is generally viewed as a rural or "Bedouin" feature). This method does not assume definiteness, and a definite article is required.
Bách färth'görel /bɑːχ ˌfɐɹðəˈʝøɹɛɫ/ ("the boy's book")
Bách fär - th' - görel book of - ᴅғ - boy 
==ADJECTIVES==
Much like Nouns, adjectives decline for number and gender:
Regular Adjective Declension Singular Plural
Masculine - -an /-ɐn/
Feminine -e //* -as /-ɐs/
\due to its similarity with the common adjectival suffix* -e, adjectives derived that way would not decline for gender in the singular
==VERBS==
Gwýsen verbs are the most mangled, both by Arabization and regular phonological development. Gwýsen word order is VSO. Due to pronouns coming after the verb, they merged with the preexisting endings and formed unique endings that were later generalized to standard verb declension (rendering Gwýsene a pro-drop language)
Present Verb Conjugation ---
Infinitive -en /-ɛn/
Present Participle -enz /-ɛnz/
Past Participle ge- -en /ʝɛ- -ɛn/
Singular Imperative -
Plural Imperative -on /-ɔn/
1ˢᵗ singular -i /-ɪ/
1ˢᵗ plural -swe /-swɛ/
2ⁿᵈ singular -tha /-θɐ/
2ⁿᵈ plural -gge /-ʝʝɛ/
3ʳᵈ singular masculine -scha /-sxɐ/
3ʳᵈ dual masculine -schama /-sxɐmɐ/
3ʳᵈ plural masculine -scham /-sxɐm/
3ʳᵈ singular feminine -sche /-sxɛ/
3ʳᵈ dual feminine -schana /-sxɐnɐ/
3ʳᵈ plural feminine -schan /-sxɐn/
the subjunctive is formed with a prefixed les- (if the verb is consonant-initial) or let- (if the verb is vowel-initial)
As a consequence to the fusional suffixes, the preterite suffixes completely merged with the present ones, so weak verbs need an auxiliary to indicate simple past, which segways us to-
===Auxiliary Verbs===
Most auxiliaries have 2 conjugations: an auxiliary conjugation & a standalone conjugation:
Sőn ("to be") Conjugations Auxiliary Standalone
Singular Imperative ső /søː/ ső /søː/
Plural Imperative sőn /søːn/ sőn /søːn/
Singular Subjunctive ső /søː/ les-... /ɫɛs-../
Plural Subjunctive sőn /søːn/ les-... /ɫɛs-.../
1ˢᵗ singular ém /eːm/ émi /ˈeːmɪ/
1ˢᵗ plural synz /synz/ synzwe /ˈsynzwɛ/
2ⁿᵈ singular érs /eːɹs/ értha /ˈérðɐ/
2ⁿᵈ plural synz /synz/ syngge /ˈsynʝ(ʝ)ɛ/
3ʳᵈ singular masculine ys /ys/ ysscha /ˈyssxɐ/
3ʳᵈ dual masculine synz /synz/ synzchama /ˈsynzxɐmɐ/
3ʳᵈ plural masculine synz /synz/ synzcham /ˈsynzxɐm/
3ʳᵈ singular feminine ys /ys/ yssche /ˈyssxɛ/
3ʳᵈ dual feminine synz /synz/ synzchana /ˈsynzxɐnɐ/
3ʳᵈ plural feminine synz /synz/ synzchan /ˈsynzxɐn/
There are 4 tense-related auxiliaries: Wesan (past auxiliary, "was"), Sőn (participle auxiliary, "be"), Bín (participle auxiliary, "be"), and Víden (future auxiliary, "will"):
Auxiliary Declensions Wesan ↓ Sőn ↓ Bín ↓ Víden ↓
1ˢᵗ singular wes /wes/ ém /eːm/ bí /biː/ va̋ /væː/
2ⁿᵈ singular wir /wiɹ/ érs /eːɹs/ bys /bys/ vés /veːs/
3ʳᵈ singular wes /wes/ ys /ys/ byth /byθ/ véth /veːθ/
dual/plural wiran /ˈwiɹɐn/ synz /synz/ bíth /biːθ/ va̋th /væːθ/
Singular Imperative wes /wes/ ső /søː/ bí /biː/ víz /viːz/
Plural Imperative weson /ˈwezɔn/ sőn /søːn/ bín /biːn/ vídon /ˈviːzɔn/
Singular Subjunctive wir /wiɹ/ ső /søː/ bí /biː/ víz /viːz/
Plural Subjunctive wiren /ˈwiɹɛn/ sőn /søːn/ bín /biːn/ víden /ˈviːzɛn/
===Stong Verbs===
Most of the strong classes remain in Gwýsene, albeit with completely unorthodox ablaut patterns. They've been re-sorted based on patterns that I've Grammarians have found. Strong verbs also never need the past auxiliary.
Type (Gwýsene) Corr. Type in Old English Present stem vowel Past singular stem vowel Past plural stem vowel Past participle stem vowel
I VII.c é /eː/ í /iː/ í /iː/ é /eː/
II IV e /e/ e /e/ i /i/ a /ɑ/
III.a I ý /yː/ a̋ /æː/ y /y/ y /y/
III.b III.a y /y/ ä /æ/ o /o/ o /o/
IV.a II.a í /iː/ í /iː/ o /o/ a /ɑ/
IV.b II.b a/á /ɑ(ː)/ í /iː/ o /o/ a /ɑ/
IV.c III.b é /eː/ é /eː/ o /o/ a /ɑ/
V.a VI ä /æ/ á /ɑː/ á /ɑː/ ä /æ/
V.b VII.a a̋ /æː/ i /i/ i /i/ a̋ /æː/
V.c VII.e á /ɑː/ í /iː/ í /iː/ á /ɑː/

=TRANSLATIONS=

==NUMBERS==
Number Cardinal Ordinal Adverbial Multiplier
1 A̋n /æːn/ Föress /ˈføɹɛss/ Mer /meɹ/ A̋nfélz /ˈæːnˌveːɫz/
2 Twin /twin/ Áther /ˈɑːðɛɹ/ Merdén /mɛɹˈdeːn/ Twýfélz /ˈtyːˌveːɫz/
3 Thrý /θɾyː/ Thryzz /ˈθɾyzz/ Thrémra̋s /ˌθɾeːˈmɾæːs/ Thryfélz /ˈθɾyˌveːɫz/
4 Fíwar /ˈfiːwɐɹ/ Fíradh /ˈfiːɹɐð/ Fírmra̋s /ˌfiːɹˈmɾæːs/ Fíwarfélz /ˈfiːwɐɹˌveːɫz/
5 Fýf /fyːf/ Fýfedh /ˈfyːvɛð/ Fýfmra̋s /ˌfyːvˈmɾæːs/ Fýffélz /ˈfyːfˌfeːɫz/
6 Sysj /syʃ/ Sysjedh /ˈsyʃɛð/ Sysmra̋s /ˌsysˈmɾæːs/ Sysjfélz /ˈsyʃˌfeːɫz/
7 Sévan /ˈseːvɐn/ Sévadh /ˈseːvɐð/ Sévmra̋s /ˌseːvˈmɾæːs/ Sévanfélz /ˈseːvɐnˌveːɫz/
8 Éht /eːçt/ Éhtadh /ˈeːçtɐð/ Éhmra̋s /ˈeːçˈmɾæːs/ Éhtafélz /ˈeːçtɐˌveːɫz/
9 Nygan /ˈnyʝɐn/ Nygadh /ˈnyʝɐð/ Nygamra̋s /ˌnyʝɐˈmɾæːs/ Nyganfélz /ˈnyʝɐnˌveːɫz/
10 Tőn /tøːn/ Tődh /ˈtøːð/ Tőmra̋s /ˌtøːˈmɾæːs/ Tőnfélz /ˈtøːnˌveːɫz/
==THE COLD WINTER IS NEAR==
‎‫بېث نيٓھ ثِوېٓنتِر ڝِٓلز، پِٓث ڝۊٓمسخى ستارم سنِوى. ڝۊم وِثنَن خُٓمسمين وِٓرم، برآثَرمين. سَلٓم! ڝۊم ھېذ، سېځّ ءَنز شّيٓڧ، ڧرِس ءَنز درېھّ. بېثِّس خُطَّمين. ھِپّسوى وِتِر، ءَنز زۊٓثِن، ءَنز مِٓلخ، بېثِّس ڧِرش ءُٓسڧرى ثِکآ. ءوٓ، ءَنز براث وِٓرم!‬
Byth ních thʼwýnter tjélz, véth tjőmscha starm snewe. Tjöm withnän¹ chósmin wérm, bráthärmin². Säläm³! Tjöm hydh, sygg ænz ssjíf⁴ ⁶, fres⁵ änz dryhh⁶. Bytthes⁷ chottämin⁸. Hevvswe weter, änz zőthen⁹, änz mélch, býtthes fersj ósfrä¹⁰ thʼká. Ó, änz brath!
be.3.ꜱɢ.ᴘʀᴇꜱ near ᴅꜰ-winter cold , ꜰᴜᴛ.3.ꜱɢ come-3.ꜱɢ.ᴍᴀꜱᴄ storm snowy . come.ɪᴍᴘ.ꜱɢ in house-1.ꜱɢ.ɢᴇɴ.ᴄʟ warm , brother-1.ꜱɢ.ɢᴇɴ.ᴄʟ . Welcome ! come.ɪᴍᴘ.ꜱɢ hither , sing.ɪᴍᴘ.ꜱɢ and dance.ɪᴍᴘ.ꜱɢ , eat.ɪᴍᴘ.ꜱɢ and drink.ɪᴍᴘ.ꜱɢ . be.3.ꜱɢ.ᴘʀᴇꜱ-that plan-1.ꜱɢ.ɢᴇɴ.ᴄʟ . have-1.ᴘʟ water , and beer , and milk, be.3.ꜱɢ.ᴘʀᴇꜱ-that fresh from ᴅꜰ-cow . Oh , and soup !
/byθ niːç θə‿ˈyːnzɛɹ tʃeːɫz veːθ ˈtʃøːmsxɐ stɑɻm ˈsnewɛ/
/tʃøm wɪðˈnæn ˈxoːsˌmɪn weːɹm ˈbɾɑːðɐɹˌmɪn/
/sɐˈɫæm tʃøm çyð syʝʝ‿ɐnz ʃʃiːf fres‿ɐnz dɾyçç/
/ˈbyθθɛs ˈxottɐˌmɪn/
/ˈçevvswɛ ˈwedɛɹ ɐnz ˈzøːðɛn ɐnz meɫχ ˈbyθθɛs feɹʃ ˈoːsfrɐ θəˈkɑː/
/oː ɐnz bɾɑθ/
  1. the words for “in” and “on” merged to än, which was kept for “on”.‬
  2. Gwýsens tend to use “brother” as an informal form of address‬.
  3. Säläm is only used by Muslim Gwysens. Christian Gwysens prefer Pastos /pɐsˈtos/ (from Ancient Greek ‬ἀσπαστός).
  4. comes from Old English hlēapan.
  5. comes from old English fretan.
  6. Drykken & Ssjípan are within a class of verbs that have a differing imperative stems than the usual inflected stems due to sound changes. In this case the usual stems are Drykk- & Ssjíp-, while the imperatives are Dryhh & Ssjíf. In the central and Low Northern dialects this particular /k/ => /ç/ is not present, and the imperative stem is also Drykk.
  7. contracted from of Byth thäs (“that is”)‬.
  8. from Arabic خُطَّة.
  9. from Latin zȳthum.
  10. contraction of old English ūt fra (“out of”).
submitted by very-original-user to germlangs [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 01:48 Myster-Mistery Reverse Phonological Evolution

This is my first time posting here so let me know if I'm doing anything wrong, should give more info, etc.
I've been working on my first (so-far unnamed) conlang for the past two years for a worldbuilding project. I recently had the idea that it would be good to create a family of languages around the one I currently have. Since my Conlang is still in the relatively early stages (I have most of a phonology and a handful of simple words, very little actual grammar besides for planned features) and I'd rather not start completely from scratch (it did take a two years to get to this point after all), I figured it'd be easiest to "reverse-evolve" what I already have to get a proto-lang, and then normal-evolve that to get multiple conlangs that I could actually use. One of my main goals is naturalism, so I would greatly appreciate feedback on how to improve what I have, but my main question is as to how I might go about constructing a Proto-lang based on my current work, so that I can flesh both of them out to point where they're actually usable.
The phonology (or what there is of it) of my conlang is mostly based on Old Norse and Icelandic, and is as follows:

Phonology

Phonemes

Consonants

Labial Dental Alveolar Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal m (n̥) n (ŋ)
Stop p b t d k (ɡ)
Fricative f v θ ð s (z) (ç) x ɣ (h)
Approximant (ʍ) w j (ʍ) w
Rhotic (ɾ̥) ɾ
Lateral (ɬ) l (ɫ)
Symbols in parentheses represent allophones
I'm a little on the fence about including /v/

Vowels

Monophthongs

Front Unrounded Front Rounded Central Back
High i iː y yː u uː
Mid e eː ø øː o oː
Low æ æː a aː ɒ ɒː
I'm also on the fence about including /ɒ ɒː/

Diphthongs

/ai̯ au̯ ei̯ oi̯ øi̯/ (idk how you're supposed to organize diphthongs in a table)

Gemination

Some consonants can be geminated in syllables codas (especially word-final) or cross syllabically. The consonants that can geminate in coda positions are /m n p t k f s ɣ ɾ l/. All of these, as well as /b d θ ð/, can also be geminated over a syllable boundary, i.e. when one syllable ends with the same consonant the next syllable begins with.

Phonotactics

General Syllable Structure: (C/sP̥)(v)V(C)⁴
P̥ represents a voiceless plosive /p t k/
R represents a sonorant /m n w j ɾ l/
Syllabic consonants can only occur word-finally, and only /n ɾ l/ can be syllabic

Allophony

I've come up with a handful of rules for allophonic variation. Here are are a few of them:
x → h / #_
ɣ → ɡ / {#,n}_
n → ŋ / _{k,ɣ}
x{n,w,j,ɾ,l} → {n̥,ʍ,ç,ɾ̥,ɬ}
ɾɾ → rː

Grammar

Again, I don't really have much in the way of grammar, but these are some of the features I hope to include in this conlang:
Once again, I am mainly wondering how to "reverse" the state of my Conlang to get a Proto-language that I could flesh out more before evolving it into a more complete Conlang. Any advice or feedback on anything I have shared or mentioned would be immensely appreciated.
submitted by Myster-Mistery to conlangs [link] [comments]


2024.05.03 20:34 FelixSchwarzenberg How did modern scholars figure out the stress system of my long-extinct conlang? Help me decide.

Kihiṣer was spoken around 1300-1200 BC in what is now modern Syria and became extinct around the Late Bronze Age Collapse. In my conworld, modern scholars know of Kihiṣer from thousands of tablets excavated at the site of the Kihiṣer capital (mostly records from the royal palace and the temple of the chief god Sawwasír) and one tablet excavated from the Hittite capital Hattusa. Kihiṣer was written in cuneiform using a syllabic writing system similar to that of Hittite or Hurrian. Notably, marking stress in any way was NOT a standard part of Kihiṣer's writing system.
The stress and pitch accent rules:
  1. Stress falls on the penultimate syllable, UNLESS the penultimate syllable is open AND the final syllable is closed. In that case, it falls on the final syllable.
  2. In a few words - primarily borrowings from Proto-Indo-Iranian but also native words that speakers considered analogous to such borrowings - stress irregularly falls on the first syllable.
  3. The stressed syllable always carries a high tone. Within the same word, a syllable immediately before a stressed syllable carries a rising tone and a syllable immediately following a stressed syllable carries a falling tone.
  4. The dual suffix -w can cause stress to move because it makes an ultimate open syllable closed - if this happens, any /o/ in the newly-stressed syllable is raised to
How might scholars who have only the cuneiform text learn about any of this? That is the question I want to discuss here today. Some ideas:
  1. Writing errors. Maybe some writers have a habit of writing vowels in stressed syllables as long vowels even when we know they are short.
  2. Reverse engineering poetry. Much of the surviving corpus of Kihiṣer text consists of hymns. The hymns consists of 4-line stanzas of 10 or 11 syllables each. These syllables are divided into 4-4-3 or 4-3-3 segments and individual words cannot cross into another segment. Within each stanza, each 4-4-3 or 4-3-3 group of syllables has the same pitch accent pattern across its four lines. Within each line, two groups share a stress pattern. This could be figured out somehow.
  3. The Kihiṣer texts themselves actually tell us about stress and pitch accent. This seems like a cheap cop-out, but perhaps we come across tablets from a scribal school that mentions something - for example, a document pointing out that a particular word has irregular stress, "ráswasir not raswásir" and from that we learn both about the irregular stress and the expected stress. Or maybe we find a tablet with a poem to be read by young learners in which the pitch accent is somehow marked - though I know of nobody who marked stress in cuneiform that way so it might require me to simulate my speakers who borrowed everything about their writing system from other civilizations to have an original idea for once. Or music - we're able to reconstruct Sumerian music afaik so maybe a tablet with a song on it can give us a clue?
submitted by FelixSchwarzenberg to conlangs [link] [comments]


2024.04.10 16:58 JohannGoethe Knowledge of alphabetic 🔠 writing ✍️ was originally communicated by Moses to the Israelites ✡️ at the delivery of the law 📜 from Sinai Charles Davy (183A/1772)

Knowledge of alphabetic 🔠 writing ✍️ was originally communicated by Moses to the Israelites ✡️ at the delivery of the law 📜 from Sinai Charles Davy (183A/1772)
In 183A (1772), Charles Davy, in his Conjectural Observations on the Origin and Progress of Alphabetic Writing (pgs. 2-5)
“With regard to the principle upon which the Grecian alphabet is here supposed to have been altered from the Hebrew or Samaritan, however probable the writer thinks it, he is far from assuming it will appear as probable to others.
— Charles Davy (183A/1772), Conjectural Observations (pgs. 2-4)
Then:
“That writing, in the earliest stages of the world, was a delineation of the outlines of those things men wanted to remember, rudely graven either upon shells or stones, or marked upon the leaves or bark of trees; and that this simple representation of forms was next preceded by symbolic figures, will generally be allowed: if afterwards we add to these such contracted representations of them as the characters of the Chinese are said to be, together with syllabical marks (Kaempfer, 250A/1705) which still continue with their neighbors of Japan, we possibly may comprehend the whole that human unassisted wisdom contributed towards the completion of the art.“
We note here that Engelbert Kaempfer, in his The History of Japan (250A/1705), claimed that the Japanese have a separate ethnic origin from the Chinese and claims they descend directly from the builders of the Tower of Babel.
Davy continued:
“But to wave the determination of this at present; if the knowledge of alphabetic writing was not originally communicated by Moses to the Israelites at the delivery of the law from Sinai, by whom it was imparted to the nations around them, such is the confusion of historic evidence upon the subject.”
— Charles Davy (183A/1772), Conjectural Observations (pgs. 2-5)
Here, we note that yesterday (9 Apr A69/2023), at the launch of the new AlphabetOrigin sub, the following second rule was put into place on the first day, owing to learned experience in the alphanumerics sub in the previous 1.5-years of debate and argument:
https://preview.redd.it/7utg0uz81otc1.jpg?width=636&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=86c4c538142f96d8d1d29c66f1503eb28f20630d
In other words, objecting to the “ox head = A model” (Gardiner, 39A/1916) or the “illiterate Jewish slave miners invented the alphabet in Sinai” (Goldwasser, A55/2010), is equivalent to the defenders of this model, as objecting to the premise that Moses received the alphabet letters from god or YHWH while on Mount Sinai.
Visual, below left, of Moses, aka the “Hebrew Osiris”, going on Mount Sinai, i.e. the Hebrew pyramid, for 40-days:
https://preview.redd.it/tpz9pgqa3otc1.jpg?width=1103&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8a3a30054fb570b3b995a8a6c45d92f83e248b0b
Table which shows how Osiris (ΟΣΙΡΙΝ), whose name is number 440, which is the world value of Greek letter M or mu (μυ), value: 40, meaning letter M = Osiris, explains why Moses has to go on the pyramid (aka Sinai mountain):
Date Morality god Lawgiver Number Mountain
Egypt 4500A Osiris [440] Maat 𓌳 = 40 Pyramid [631] 👁️⃤
Greek 2900A Mu [440]; Dike [42] M = 40 Olympia [631] 🏔️
Hindu 2300A Osiris [14 pieces] Manu [14 types] Malaya 🏔️
Hebrew 2200A Moses 40-days Sinai 🏔️
Christian 1955A Mary → Jesus 40-days
Islamic 1400A Muhammad Age: 40 Jabal 🏔️
Posts
  • Osiris (Mu), Moses, Jesus (of Mary), Muhammad: the number 40 or letter M or 𓌳 as cut 🌱 food 🍱 law givers
References
  • Kaempfer, Engelbert. (250A/1705). The History of Japan: Together with a Description of the Kingdom of Siam, 1690-92 [265-263A], Volume Two. Publisher, 228A/1727.
  • Davy, Charles. (183A/1772). Conjectural Observations on the Origin and Progress of Alphabetic Writing. Wright.
submitted by JohannGoethe to Alphanumerics [link] [comments]


2024.03.24 16:01 Mage_Hand_Press Skathári, an Adaptive, Insectoid Sci-Fi Race - Mage Hand Press

Skathári, an Adaptive, Insectoid Sci-Fi Race - Mage Hand Press submitted by Mage_Hand_Press to UnearthedArcana [link] [comments]


2024.03.17 05:03 stlatos Uralic Relatives

PIE *(s)pi(H)no-

Most Uralic words for ‘tooth’ come from *piŋe (Mi. päŋ, Hn. fog), but Lappic has *-n-. Realistically, a cluster like -nx- or -xn- would be needed (*x or a similar sound has often been reconstructed in Uralic for other reasons, such as *Vx > *V: ). Not all languages have the primary meaning ’tooth’ (*piŋe > F. pii ‘thorn / prong / tooth of rake’), so it’s possible it first meant ‘sharp point(ed object)’. If so, it would correspond to PIE *(s)pi(H)no- (L. spīna ‘thorn / spine / backbone’, TA spin-, OHG spinela, etc.). The optional alternations of *nx \ *xn > ŋ \ n and *Hn \ *nH > _n \ n might then be related. The short i vs. long ī in spīna \ spinela and related words (L. spīca ‘ear (of grain)’, OIc spík ‘wooden splinter’, spíkr ‘nail’, G. pikrós ‘pointed/sharp’) could then all be due to optional HC / CH .

This is the same as Hamito-Semitic, in which supposed *sin- ‘tooth’ must really be *sCiHn- (with C and H of some type) to account for -nn- in Sem. *šinn-. H could have become assimilated in Hn > nn there, but H > pharyngeal in South Cushitic (Iraqw siḥino ). Also, some sC- is needed to explain (otherwise inexplicable, if traditional reconstruction were correct) *s- > *!- in Central Chadic *!yan(n)- (Mafa !EnnE ). There is no reason to think traditional reconstruction of tri- and biconsonantal stems makes sense when it would require changes of category like this to be wholly irregular; many C-clusters could have existed in the past. This !- could be from *sl- but, as in Uralic and many IE, a change of interdental > lateral seems possible. Thus, *sp- > *sf- > *sθ- > *s!- in Central Chadic (likely some or all of this in Proto-Hamito-Semitic too, but there’s no way to tell if all other branches had *sC- > *s-, etc.).

That IE has sp- where Uralic has p- and Hamito-Semitic s- or !-; Hn vs. n \ ŋ and n \ nn; seems odd enough by itself, but with no regular internal explanation for these alternations in any family, it’s hard to believe they’re unrelated. The semantics in Uralic show that the shift > ‘tooth’ was relatively recent, and there would be no good explanation for why the same occurred in Hamito-Semitic if their relation stretched back, say, 15,000 years. Since all elements needed to explain these are found within IE (ie. sp- > s- & p-), and the meaning shifted in both other families, it seems to give support to my idea that these families are really branches of IE. These apparently shared alternations could not have been retained for many thousands of years.

There are many other words fitting this pattern. Many support my reconstruction for other odd features within IE. For example, if Latin com-, cum, Greek (k)sun-, (k)sún came from IE *tsom / *ksom, a change of ks > xs > x > 0 would explain Uralic *amta-:
*(k)som-doH3- > IIr. *sam-da:- > K. šimdi ‘give’, Skt. saṃ-dā- ‘present / grant / bestow’; *amta- > F. anta-, Sm. vuow’de-
Also note that Kassite is not normally classified as IE, yet has the same primary meaning for *som-doH3- as ‘give’ that Uralic does. It would be extremely odd for -md- and -mt- to existe by chance in unrelated languages. Realistically, *ts- > s- vs. *ks- > *xs- > *x- > 0- is needed for this, yet the same in s- vs. ks- in Greek seems like yet another great coincidence. It also is added evidence that many currently unclassified languages are really closely related IE languages.

‘Sun, Day’ and ‘Shadow’: Tocharian Oddities Clarified by Other Languages

  1. IE *sk^(e)HyaH- ‘shadow’
*sk^(e)HyaH- ‘shadow’ > TB skiyo, G. skiā́, Alb. hije, Skt. chāyā́-, Av. a-saya- ‘ shadowless’
The change of CHy > C(i)y is supposedly of PIE date, but if Toch. had any regularity in palatalization, it should have become *śćiyo. The simplest explanation is that CHy > Ciy happened after palatalization in Toch., which would require it to be late, even if essentially the same in most IE branches. If all syllabic H > a, there is no reason that a change of -ay- > -iy- wouldn’t work. The path CHy > Cay > Ciy would fit all other known changes (maybe only short unstressed a > i before y), which allows all syllabic H > a before C > palatal before front, then -ay- > -iy- of some type.

With this analysis of *sk^HyaH- ‘shadow’ > *skaya: > TB skiyo, it is hard not to notice the very similar word in Uralic:
*saja ‘shadow’ > F. suoja, Ud. saj, etc.
Since this most resembles PToch. *sk^aya:, a loan from PToch. is one possibility. A loan seems unlikely to me since it is such a basic word. A large number of IE loans certainly exist, mostly for tools and culture features, but many seem to go too far. Even ‘water’, ‘lead’, and ‘dig’ have been assumed as IE loans to avoid any genetic relation in words that look very obviously related (*wodo:r : *wete, *wedh(e\o)- : *wetä-, Skt. khan- : *kan-). A loan from Iranian is assumed here ( https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Iranian/caHy%C3%A1H ). Against the Iranian loan, I assume that Mikhail Zhivlov, who has analyzed the conditions of a-a > o:-e in Finnish, is correct in *saja, not *saaja ( https://www.academia.edu/8196109 ), which would specifically have favored Iranian (if Uralic had long V’s, it’s not clear when and how they were lost/changed). Av. a-saya- ‘ shadowless’ supposedly lost H in compounds, though this does not seem regular. If a loan from PToch., it would have to be at the very specific time when *sk^HyaH- > *sk^aya: but before any other changes (if sk^ > ss^ > s within Uralic). The many similar words in IE and Uralic have either been seen as loans or the result of common descent from a Nostratic, etc., stage. However, none of the changes needed to connect them require such a stage. Instead, a stage after the breakup of PIE can account for all Uralic data, often specifically Tocharian. This includes diagnostic changes like *-ur > *-ru (*počru ‘reindeer’), *e > *ï, *ï being influenced by neighboring C’s, etc.

  1. IE *kaH2uni-s ‘sun/day’
Adams:
>
kauṃ (n.[m.sg.]) (a) ‘sun’; (b) ‘day’
A koṃ and B kauṃ reflect PTch *kāun from a putative PIE verbal abstract *kauni-… a derivative of *kehAu- ‘burn’ [ie *keH2u-; Sean Whalen] [: Greek… kaûma ‘burning heat (of the sun)… The nom. sg. *kaunis, nom. pl. *kauneyes, and acc. pl. *kaunins would give kauṃ, kauñi, and kau(nä)ṃ respectively since a (PIE) *-i- was retracted before an *-s- and thus caused no palatalization (Adams, 1988c:15). The acc. sg. kauṃ is analogical… Not with Pedersen (1944:11, also VW:626-7) a borrowing from Turkish gün ‘sun.’ To have given both A koṃ and B kauṃ, the borrowing would have had to have been of PTch in date. So early a date might itself rule out the Turks on geographical grounds. In any case there is no reason *gün would have given anything but PTch **kin or **kun. Winter's suggestion of a borrowing in the opposite direction is no more plausible.
>

Is IE *kaH2uni-s > *kauni > TB kauṃ ‘sun/day’, pl. *kauñey-es > kauñi, related to Turkic *kün(eš) \ *kuñaš (Uighur kün ‘sun/day’, Dolgan kuńās ‘heat’, Turkish güneš ‘sun’, dia. guyaš, etc.)? Well, both show -n- vs. -ñ-, *-Vš vs. 0 (in nom. vs. other cases for TB). Adams explained non-palatalization in the nom. *kaH2uni-s as a specific change to *-is(-) (see below), as in *wi(H)so- ‘poison’ > *wäsö > TA wäs, TB wase, Skt. viṣá-, G. īós vs. ? > *w^äsā > TA wäs ‘gold’, TB yasa. If *-is > *-iṣ > *-iš was the cause of non-palatalization (see other following retro. C’s changing V’s that thus didn’t cause palatalization: *gWerH2won- ‘heavy stone’ > *gWerRwon- > *gWe.r.won- > TA kärwañ-, TB kärweñe ‘stone’; *gWerH2o- ‘praised / praiseworthy’ > Li. geras ‘good’, *gWerRo- > *gWe.r.o- > TA kär, TB kare), then the presence of -Vš vs. -0 in Turkic would be explained by Toch. changes alone. Since these changes are clearly of IE origin in TB and seen within the paradigm (instead of unexplained variants), the TB word seems clearly native. Why would a Toch. word for ‘sun’ ever be loaned into Turkic, let alone 2 variants (at least) based on nom. vs. acc.? I see no reasonable answer, and this is not the only IE word in Turkic that doesn’t seem like a loan.

For the variants with separate V-harmony (seen in several Turkic words, most certainly native), different cases could again account for things: *kauni vs. *kauñey-. If *au-i > *aü-i it would explain optional fronting by umlaut as the result of nom./acc. with *-iC (vs. gen., pl., etc.), then *aü > *äü > *ü, etc. A nom. *kauni-s > *küneš, acc. *kauñi-m > *küñ, pl. *kauñey- > *kunï- > *kuna-, then mixes > kün, *kuñaš, etc., seems likely. This could not show so many similarities that exist within Toch. from IE sources if a loan to or from Turkic. Again, all the TB alternation has a good IE source (*-nis > -n but *-neyes > -ñi supposedly from *-is- not palatalizing). It also would help in showing that (some) š > l in l-Turkic (I feel that both š > l and l^ > š existed in each branch). Others have seen these connections solely as loans, since they did not believe it was possible that Turkic was IE, or a close relative of TB. The relation between Uralic and Turkic does not require an ancient stage of Ural-Altaic: both languages are IE, close relatives of Tocharian. Obscuring sound changes have prevented clear direct cognates from being detected until now, but from examining these words that show such intricate and specific shared changes, a starting point has been established for future analysis.

  1. The Search for Gold
In *H2auso- > L. aurum, *wäsa: > TA wäs ‘gold’, TB yasa, the changes needed seem to include some *y or other front sound to cause *u / *w > *w^. Since there is also *H2ausyo- > OPr ausis (many words for metals contained *y vs. 0 ), it is likely:

*H2ausyo-H2-
*xawsyax
*wyasxax
*wyasxa:
*w^asxa:
*wäsa: > TA wäs, TB yasa

This can not help but remind one of F. vaski ‘copper’, *waskiyo- ? > Arm. oski ‘gold’; these could be created by a related metathesis :

*xawsyo-
*wasxyo-
*waskyo-
*waskiyo-

This *x-w > *w-x is probably the oldest, with later Toch. words the ones who had *w-y > *wy-. The insights each group provides for the details of the others should not be considered coincidence.
submitted by stlatos to language [link] [comments]


2024.03.13 22:35 PrideReading Strategies for Teaching Phonological Awareness

Phonological Awareness is the ability to hear and manipulate the sounds of spoken language. It is the foundation of reading and is a critical component to future reading skills, especially for children with language processing disorders, such as dyslexia, auditory processing, speech deficits, etc. Although many children’s brains are “wired” to learn this skill easily, a lot of children need direct teaching. On today’s post, I am going to give you tips and strategies for teaching phonological awareness.

Practice Rhyming

Rhyming is the first step in teaching phonological awareness and helps lay the groundwork for beginning reading development. Rhyming draws attention to the different sounds in our language and that words actually come apart. For example, if your child knows that jig and pig rhyme, they are focused on the ending ig.

Read Rhyming Stories and Poems

You can begin introducing rhymes by reading a lot of rhyming stories and poems together with your child . As you read, you can begin drawing attention to the sounds of the rhyme. For example you can say, “I hear rhyming words! Dog and Bog rhyme!
You can also ask your child to predict the next word in the rhyming story. For example you can say, “The cat sat on the ……” and wait for your child to fill in the blank.
As you read rhyming books and poems together with your child, really exaggerate the sounds of the rhyming words. Draw a lot of attention to the rhyme. Some examples of rhyming books are Llama Llama Red Pajama, Jamberry, Chicka Chicka Boom Boom, Sheep in a Jeep, etc.

Sing Rhyming Songs and Rhyming Chants

Sing rhyming songs and rhyming chants a lot with your child. Singing is so easy to fit into your daily schedule, as you can basically break out in song or chant any time of the day.
Some Examples of Rhyming Songs and Chants are: Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, 5 Little Monkeys, Down By the Bay, Baa, Baa, Black Sheep, I Know an Old Lady, etc.

Rhyming Practice

Once you have introduced rhyming, you can help your child to identify and practice rhymes by manipulating, adding, deleting or substituting sounds in words.
Some examples of doing this are:
“Tell me all the words you know that rhyme with the word “hat.”
“Close your eyes. I am going to say two words. If they rhyme, raise your hand. If they don’t shake your head.”
“Say the word hat. Good. Say the word hat again, but change the /h/ to /b/. Good! Hat and Bat rhyme!
“Listen to these three words – mop, plop, tag. Which of these does not rhyme?”
Rhyming is one of those reading skills that is really fun to work on and kids like doing it. If you want to learn more about how Children Learn to Read, please view our FREE Webinar: How Children Learn to Read

Practice Syllable Division

Breaking up words into syllables or chunks is the second step in teaching phonological awareness. Syllabication helps children learn to read and spell difficult words. When a child is stuck on a difficult word, they can use syllabication rules to figure it out.

Count the Syllables

One activity that helps a child pull apart the syllables in a word is to count them. This can be done by clapping each syllable.
You can start by counting (actually clapping) the number of syllables in your child’s own name. Ja-son (clap, clap). Jon-a-than. (clap, clap, clap).
You can also clap out the days of the week Tues-day, the months of the year, Sep-tem-ber, and fun words like cu-cum-ber or Cin-der-el-la.

Chin Dropping

If your child is having trouble understanding syllables, try using “chin dropping.” This technique will help your child really “feel” the syllables. Place your hand under your chin. Now, say a multisyllabic word aloud. Every time your chin drops, that is one syllable!

Phonemic Awareness

Phonemic Awareness is the most important step in teaching Phonological Awareness. Phonemic Awareness means that your child is able to manipulate the individual sounds in spoken language.

Sound Identification

You can begin working on sound identification by asking your child to match the very first sounds in words and then the final sounds. It is helpful to have a set of cards with pictures of everyday objects (man, boy, girl, cat, dog, house, book, etc.). You can also cut out pictures from magazines and use those. Once your child is successful at matching beginning sounds, work on ending sounds.
“Say the word bat. What is the first sound you hear in the word bat?” (b) What is the last sound you hear in the word bat?

Sound Deletion and Substitution

You can ask your child to repeat a word and give the first, middle, and last sounds of the word. Then you can change a sound in the word. By manipulating and playing with these sounds in words, the child begins to understand the concepts of language and build a strong reading foundation.
“Say rat. Say rat again but this time, instead of /t/, say /g/.” (rag)
“Say cab. Say cab again but this time, instead of /k/, say /l/.” (lab)
“Say jam. Say jam again but this time, instead of /j/, say /y/.” (yam)

In Summary

Phonological awareness skills are the basis for reading and without this important skill, potential reading difficulties might occur in the early reading stage. A child who has strong and solid phonological skills will have a strong reading foundation to develop with.
Please don’t leave without checking out the PRIDE Reading Program. The PRIDE Reading Program is an Orton-Gillingham curriculum that is used by teachers, tutors, and homeschooling parents worldwide with great success.
submitted by PrideReading to teachingresources [link] [comments]


2024.03.11 16:34 Green-File-430 My Analysis of the Zeffo Language Part 2

My Analysis of the Zeffo Language Part 2
In the newer star wars shows we see references to the Zeffo, such as with their language showing up on Peridea and being mentioned in Ur-Kittât outside the nightsister temple, along with their war machine in the Bad Batch. If you look at the first two images above, you will notice that one of the peridean zeffonian glyphs is a inverted reciprocal of the first one shown in the mural.
I personally believe that the Zeffo take the place of the Kwa in Filoni's expanding universe. It makes sense from the advanced technology that is shown in the Starmap and the astriums, to the fact they managed to get to peridea. We even know the rakata are canon though their terraforming of kashyyyk is not. We don't even see any signs of advanced starship technology. Why not say they created the infinity gates?
Any way onto the language part of this post. As previously stated in my last post, the zeffo language has 2-4 variants of each logogram and may have as many as 70 individual symbols. I also went over the fact that it has four vowels, A, E, I, and U. These vowels correspond to the four variants such as Ka, Ke, Ki, and Ku. I suggest you go see that post as it is under the same name but a different number of "part 1".
Since that post, I came up with a theory to show how the syllabic system would work. The names Kujet, Miktrull, and Eilraam all have two things in common. They have two syllables and writing it in a CV system (which most syllabaries are) would be catastrophic. So I came up with some rules to ease transliteration. First concerns the name Kujet. It is impossible to write with a 5 letter word in a two letter per syllable language and sure, you could put a dummy vowel in front of the K or a dummy vowel behind the T but I like to overthink things so instead, it would use a non-writen glottal stop to replace the J and would look like this Ku'et. Since the people reading and writing this would know his name, they would add a J or a Y or even a V. Second on the roster is Miktrull whose name features a consonant cluster that twist anyone's tongue. The best way to represent this is by having 1 of the logograms not be syllables but consonant clusters. So this name would be written Mi-ktr-ul as the second L is unnecessary. Finally we have Eilraam whose name is basically an accented version of El-ra-am.
If anyone actually cares, no, I don't know what type of R is used in the language or if they have rhotic vowels. They probably have one symbol that is flipped for the liquid (l) consonants. It probably isn't a trilled r because of how their mouth is shaped and how their tongues might not act like ours. I'm not even sure if they have teeth. If not then fricatives would be hard if not impossible. Their message to call is near impossible for them to pronounce given that they can't and they don't know galactic basic seeing as basic was derived from the rakatan language and the taunts if those are even Canon. Next post will show my list of potential syllables and potential language changes or influences.
submitted by Green-File-430 to StarWars [link] [comments]


2024.03.10 19:56 XVYQ_Emperator Most downvoted comment changes OUR conlang ep.5

Last time, u/Frodollino commented:
Nah, 97, its a prime number and its large af
...and got 31 downvotes. Clongratulations (?)
Consonants:
labio-dental invasive coarticulated
nasal [ɱ̊]
fricative [ɧ]
trill [�]
Syllabic consonants and semivowels:
palatal
ejective affricate [c̩͡ʎ̝̊ʼ]
Base system: 97 (31)

RULES:

  1. 1 comment = 1 sound / feature / etc.
  2. you can change things by acquiring upvotes set in regular brackets () - this is different from getting downwoted comment
  3. you can provide romanization, set amount of sounds and counting system
submitted by XVYQ_Emperator to conlangscirclejerk [link] [comments]


2024.03.07 18:01 Sorens_Groundhog Medial /d/ presenting different before syllabic /l/

When looking at a name or word like "dudley," the medial /d/ does something different that separates it from words like "muddy," "candle," or "birthday." Instead of its natural feature of flowing into the next sound, it stops before the syllabic /l/, almost like it turns alveolar. It feels like a tap but doesn't seem follow tap rules, as /d/ doesn't assimilate to /ɾ/ right? It's not quite an elision either like the /nd/ rule. The only other word I can think of with this idea is "candidly." My question is, what is going on here? What is the /d/ turning into and how would you transcribe it?
Based on those two words alone (as I can't think of any other examples), it seems like: /d/ _____ / V____ σ /l/
So what is the /d/ turning into? I guess this is also based on pronunciation, I'm sure some people pronounce that /d/ as [d], but I don't.
submitted by Sorens_Groundhog to asklinguistics [link] [comments]


2024.03.04 06:51 XVYQ_Emperator Most downvoted comment changes OUR conlang ep.4

Last time, u/Frodollino commented:
ɸ͜f͜θ͜s͜ʃ͜ʂ͜ç͜x͜χ͜ħ͜h
...and got 3 downvotes. SERIOUSLY !?
Consonants:
labio-dental invasive coarticulated
nasal [ɱ̊]
fricative [ɧ]
trill [�]
Syllabic consonants and semivowels:
palatal
ejective affricate [c̩͡ʎ̝̊ʼ]

Rules:

  1. 1 comment = 1 sound / feature / etc.
  2. you can't remove anything (at least for now)
  3. you can provide romanization, set amount of sounds and counting system
submitted by XVYQ_Emperator to conlangscirclejerk [link] [comments]


2024.03.02 22:31 XVYQ_Emperator Most downvoted comment changes my conlang ep.3

Last time, u/Belaus_ commented:
Add syllabic [cʎ̝̊ʼ]
...and got 31 downvotes. Clongratulations (?)
https://preview.redd.it/90wdo8jwnzlc1.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=52498edbdecd32260a96efc67d515fc00d4d2b65
Consonants:
labio-dental invasive
nasal /ɱ̊/
trill /�/
Syllabic consonants and semivowels:
palatal
ejective affricate /c̩͡ʎ̝̊ʼ/

Rules:

  1. 1 comment = 1 sound / feature / etc.
  2. you can't remove anything (at least for now)
  3. you can set amount of sounds and counting system
submitted by XVYQ_Emperator to conlangscirclejerk [link] [comments]


2024.03.02 18:14 Vaveli An introduction to Lozwŕ, my most developed conlang yet.

Lozwŕ is my best attempt at a naturalistic conlang so far. It's probably not fully naturalistic because of how I developed it by my (sometimes linguistically unnaturalistic) desires and because of my lack of conlanging experience (i've only tried to make a naturalistic conlang once before).

Phonology

The phonology might be unnatural. Or just unusual idk. I stuck with it because I liked it
Consonants
Bilabial Labiodental Dental Alveolar Post-alveolar Retroflex Palatal Velar Uvular
Nasal m n
Plosive p•b t•d k q
(sib.) fricative f•v s ʃ(š)•ʒ(ž) ɕ(ś)•ʑ(ź) ɣ(x) χ(h)
(lat.) affricate t͡θ(c)•d͡ð(đ) t͡ɬ(ċ) d͡z(z) ɻ͡ɽ(ř)*
Approximant & tap ɾ(r) j w
Lat. approximant ɫ(l) ʎ(ł)
*ɻ͡ɽ is not an affricate, right? what is it then?
Vowels
Front Central Back
Close i u
Close-mid e•ø(ė) o
Mid ᵊ(')
Near-open æ(ä)
Open a
Syllabic: r̩(ŕ) n̩(ń) j̩ʷ(y)

Allophony

If a syllable containing /a/ is stressed, /a/ becomes /ɑ/. This does not occur to secondary stress. If a plosive or affricate precedes a word-final vowel, the plosive/affricate becomes aspirated. This can also occur in the middle of compound words. If a plosive, affricate or /v/ becomes doubled due to compound words, the plosives/affricates become ejectives and /v/ becomes /ⱱ/

Accent

If a word has 3 or 4 syllables, the second to last syllable is accented. If it has 2, the last is accented. If there are 5 or more, its free. ' (/ᵊ/) does not undergo these rules, and is never accented(except when more than one are in a more-than-one-syllable word) If a word is not accented by the rules, the syllable's vowel gets a diacritic: {a, e, i, y, o, u} > {á, é, í, ý, ó, ú}, {ė} > {ë}, {ä} > {â}, {ń} > {ň}, {ŕ} > {rr}

Phonotactics

Sigh... they're undefined. Though I am using some sort of unwritten phonotactics in my mind when construcing words. Theyre probably something like (C)(C)(C)(V)(C)(C)(C) or a bit more in extreme cases

Vocabulary, etymology and the people

The location of the Lozwŕ nation is on a nonexistent island somewhere in the northern Adriatic(exact location not decided yet), so they have a little bit of Croatian, Slovenian, Italian and maybe Albanian vocabulary, but most of it is from Old Lozwŕ. Lozwŕ is a language isolate, maybe even a Paleo-European language. It's gone through some sound changes, but not many because I'm not that good yet, so Old Lozwŕ was most probably spoken about 700-500 years ago.
Some notable sound changes are:
-/ becoming /ɬ/ under some circumstances -affricates /t͡ʃ/, /t͡s/, /d͡ʒ/, /d͡z/ becoming /t͡ɬ/, /t͡θ/, /d͡z/, /d͡ð/ respectively*
-/y/ becoming /j̩ʷ/
-others
*are those affricate changes realistic?
Since modern Lozwŕ is spoken in the present day, I will also have to decide how life is there today. I'm thinking that they live similarly as in other European countries but with a more natural lifestyle, while keeping their culture alive and the architecture pretty, without giant skyscrapers and modern sharp-cornered buildings and a calm, pleasant to the eye and laid back infrastructure. I'm planning to create the Lozwŕ culture when the language is already developed/expanded enough. I've already been testing some musical concepts that could be used.

Grammar

Lozwŕ is a fusional language.
Nouns and adjectives decline by case, number and gender. Verbs conjugate by number, tense, gender, voice* and mood(only imperative for now but planning on adding more, like conditional, subjunctive, indicative) Verbs also have participles and verbal nouns, but both are underdeveloped for now. Numerals don't decline *voice in verbs is underdeveloped as well
There are three genders: animate, inanimate and abstract*. Animate is for living things and parts of them. Inanimate is for material objects and anything that is touchable and non-living. Abstract is for concepts, untouchable objects and godly/religious beings. There may be exceptions. There are also 2 types of gender prefixes, one for nouns and one for adjectives. Thes can sometimes change the definition of a word. *is this the right name for this type of gender?
There are 4 cases: nominative, genitive, accusative and vocative. The nominative is the usual, unmarked form. The genitive is used if a postposition modifies a noun or adjective and to express possessiveness. The accusative is used when a verb modifies a noun or adjective. The vocative is used for direct adress or calling someone. The cases function as prefixes which replace or put themselves in place of a gender-marking prefix(except for the vocative). There is also an indirect object marker, which functions as a suffix and eliminates the case. Is such a case system unrealistic?
There are 2 numbers, singular and plural.
There are 5 tenses: past, past continuous, present, future, future continuous. They function like expected, similar to English. The future continuous is rarely used unless the speaker wants to emphasize the action being done in the future.

Word order

Standard word order is SOV. If the speaker wants to emphasize something it can also be OSV and VSO. When asking a question, it's VSO + question particle vo. If a particle/modifier word(cant find an exact english translation) is present in the clause, it's SVO. Nouns precede adjectives. Verbs precede adverbs. Verbs precede subordinate verbs. These can also switch places if the speaker wishes to emphasize one of the words.

Sample text

All human beings are born free with dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience, and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Śohŕvŕ ab riłaks weź rinraŝuzŕ si fäfšctojanstċy ävžxaž h fäžlanfŕ. Fänžxmant h fänšsvjest ëkŕweź, si žař sŕjänva bėx.
``` Śohŕv-ŕ ab ri-łak-s weź ri-nraŝuz-ŕ si fäfš-ctojanst-ċy ävž-xaž h fäž-lanf-ŕ. Fänž-xmant h fänš-svjest ëkŕ-weź, si žař sŕjän-va bėx.
human-ᴘʟ all give.birth-ᴘᴀss-ᴘᴀʀᴛɪc be-3ᴘʟ-ᴘsᴛ free-ᴘʟ and ɢᴇɴ-dignity.with ɢᴇɴ-same and ɢᴇɴ-right-ᴘʟ. ᴀcc-reason and ᴀcc-conscience have-3ᴘʟ-ᴘʀs and be-3ᴘʟ-ᴘʀs brotherly should ```
/ɕoˈχr̩ˑvr̩ ab ɾiˈʎɑˑks weʑ ɾinɾaˈɬuˑd͡zʰr̩ sĭ fæfʃt͡θtoˈjɑˑnstt͡ɬʰj̩ʷ ævʒˈɣɑˑʒ χ‿fæʒˈɫɑˑnfr̩ – fænʒˈɣmɑˑnt χ‿fænʃˈsvjeˑst ˈøˑkr̩weʑ sĭ ʒaɻ͡ɽ sr̩ˈjɑˑnva bøɣ/
I'll link my document, in which i have everything about it written and the dictionary. its not in english, so it wont help a lot, but it still might be interesting to look at.
Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jaF9mAVRF5-5HTwn6r-_UwIwOdXYYhz5jl3P2UTEZsU/edit?usp=drivesdk
Dictionary: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-LJLrYar8G3WhmuZLCn4F35j3kt7U1kJMArVQi6N_9k/edit?usp=drivesdk
submitted by Vaveli to conlangs [link] [comments]


2024.02.23 01:52 NotSteve1075 BOYD'S Summary and REASONS

BOYD'S Summary and REASONS submitted by NotSteve1075 to FastWriting [link] [comments]


2024.02.22 01:59 Imuybemovoko A brief introduction to Câynqasang

Alright. I'm very proud of this conlang and I want to properly introduce it here. I have a tumblr post where I kind of infodump about this conlang that covers all of its features to some degree, but I figured I'd do a proper post about it here. I'm very proud of it. This will be a pretty brief overview compared to that thing, but I think I can cover a good few of the key points here and in a manner that's less ...shouty, sarcastic, and laced with profanity. I'm fairly weird on Tumblr and I don't want to carry that energy over here.
Alright. Rad.

What is this, anyway?

Câynqasang (pronounced [ˈt͡sɐːjɴasaŋ]) is a naturalistic a priori conlang in which I explore a smaller phonemic inventory than I was previously accustomed to, quirky subject, articles with more distinctions than just definite/indefinite, and other features. Typologically it's nominative/accusative, leans head-initial, and shows a mix of fusional and agglutinative features. It's designed for a spacefaring future society in the Milky Way which I won't reveal too much about because I'm working on a novel centering a character from that society. Suffice it to say that this is the far future, and that Câynqasang's speakers live fairly near to the outer limits of the galaxy.

Phonology

Consonants:
/t͡s s/ [t͡ʃ ʃ] _i(ː) e(ː)
Vowels:
https://preview.redd.it/w1qv3rbsz0kc1.png?width=266&format=png&auto=webp&s=8626d1b8cf36c6a9ca62a757f6d12ac32fbe8c90
You may notice that this allows some rather wild initial clusters. Câynqasang's word-initial onsets don't really follow any kind of sonority hierarchy, so onsets like /ŋm rd ŋs tk lv/ are fairly common. In certain dialects some of these may surface with epenthetic vowels or with initial continuants realized as syllabic consonants, but this is far from universal. Also, t͡s~t͡ʃ > s~ʃ when it is the first element of a cluster (with some exceptions), but not the second.

Orthography

Câynqasang primarily uses the Latin alphabet, and shows considerable historical spelling (largely arising from a historical palatal series) and a couple of other sources of variation. The regular forms are:/m n ŋ ɴ t k d s~ʃ x ɣ v t͡s~t͡ʃ l j r i iː e eː o oː a aː/
A couple of rules that are basically hard and fast here include that long vowels are always written with circumflex and short vowels without and that /s~ʃ/ and /t͡s~t͡ʃ/ are written and respectively.
However, short /o/ is written with and in rather similar proportions, /ŋ/ sometimes appears as , /ɴ/ sometimes appears as , and /v/ is typically written as when it's realized [p].
Also, some instances of or represent a historical voiced fricative which is no longer pronounced due to sound changes, i.e. sumga [suˈma] "hormone".
And last, in some rare circumstances /m/ is written as . This is falling out of use, but there are some situations such as written-out numerals and some names where it remains common where historical *b was present, i.e. bong [mɔŋ] "five".

Grammar

Câynqasang is an ostensibly nominative-accusative language, but with extensive quirky subject. All seven noun cases sometimes appear as the subject of the sentence, and which ones appear are determined both by which of four "classes" of verb is present (motion, stative, sensory, or action) and by other factors, i.e. reflexive constructions, the unique things that motion and sensory verbs do, volition, and (in the informal register) imperatives. It also makes extensive use of converbs and auxiliary verbs. The imperfective was historically marked by a reduplication of the first syllable of the lexical verb stem, but that relationship has been heavily obscured by sound changes to the point where some verbs appear to simply have a second stem.
Primary word order is SVO with descriptors following, possessor preceding, and auxiliary verbs preceding. Placement of converb clauses varies but it's typically first, and relative clauses follow what they modify.
The Câynqasang article agrees in number (singular, paucal, plural) to the noun it marks and comes with definite vs indefinite and an additional distinction, specific vs nonspecific. The two specific articles are quite like the English definite and indefinite article, while nonspecific articles deal in related but distinct meanings. The definite nonspecific is analogous to "one/some of these (noun)", or for noncountable nouns forms a partitive construction along with the allative case, and the indefinite nonspecific is a bit like English "any" except that it behaves as an article.

Some basic vocabulary

I'll just provide a few nouns, two of each class of verbs, and a few descriptors here.

WORD IPA PART OF SPEECH MEANING(S)
ê [eː] stative verb to have (inalienable)
nyu [ŋo] action verb to have (alienable)
[ʃiː] sensory verb to see
galnyo [ɣalˈŋo] motion verb to swim
kîysi [ˈkɪːjʃi] stative verb to lie, to deceive
cdâny [t͡sdɐːŋ] action verb to give
tiptâ [tipˈtaː] sensory verb to learn
kuhîng [kuˈxɪːŋ] motion verb to disappear
[ʃeː] noun atmosphere
Rayel [raˈjɛl] noun a common given name; also "dawn"
ângy [ɐːŋj] noun machine
tongvin [tuˈŋɪn] noun a person of a gender neither male nor female
gla [ɣla] noun fish
doyray [dujˈrɐj] desc. flowing, clean
selmâr [selˈmɐːr] desc. temporary
lo [lo] desc. blue
gîd [ɣɪːd] desc. many, numerous
ngtûl [ŋtɪːl] desc. then, at that time

So, that feels like a fairly good overview of the basics. I may make future posts detailing more of the vocabulary (I quite like some things I've done there, whether it's the derivational strategies, metaphorical extensions, or loan words), diving further into some of these grammatical features, and so on, but those all feel somewhat beyond the scope of this post.
submitted by Imuybemovoko to conlangs [link] [comments]


2024.02.14 23:58 Filipuntik Weekly Design Competition #394: Downsizing (Submissions)

Hello, everybody! There's a lot going on, so, not to dilly-dally, here's the results of the previous round:

Weekly Competition

So, the new expansion as well as plans for Hearthstone's tenth year are upon us. And you know what that means for the weekly comps: we get to have ourselves some thematic rounds!
That said, we actually don't know too much about Whizbang's Workshop contents to make prompts from, so who knows how long these will last before it's back to winner-submitted prompts. For now, let's get the immediate one out of the way first!

Prompts

Your prompt this week is to design a Miniaturize minion. As you must've seen by now, Miniaturize is the upcoming set's new keyword. Minions with this keyword add a (1) 1/1 Mini copy of themselves to your hand when played (and no, this effect doesn't loop). While the actual Miniaturize cards are supposed to have special portraits for the tokens, don't feel pressured to submit one for this comp. That said, thought, this prompt asks you to make a Miniaturize card, not a card that mentions or interacts with the keyword!
The secondary prompt is best dual-type minion.

How to participate

Submit your card in the form of a comment on this post which includes a link to the image of your card. If you are submitting several pictures (e. g. a card and its tokens). Ideally, check that your links ends on a '.png' or a similar image format. Feel free to browse other entries and leave your feedback on them in the meantime!

Rules, FAQ, Tutorial:

HERE.

submitted by Filipuntik to customhearthstone [link] [comments]


2024.02.13 01:16 Yewoll A script i made out of boredom based on spanish lenguague.

A script i made out of boredom based on spanish lenguague. submitted by Yewoll to neography [link] [comments]


2024.02.11 03:20 umerusa Sibilization in Tzalu

Yorodusssk! [joˈɾodusːːkʼ]
yo -rod -u -sssk CAUS-give-IMP-???? 
Make give ???? (?)

A bit of context

This post is about a phonological rule I recently introduced to my animal conlang Tzalu. The basics of the phonology—consonant inventory, vowel inventory, stress rules—were more or less set in stone as much as 4 years ago, but the details have continued to grow and evolve.
An important thing to know is that fricatives in Tzalu do not have a voicing contrast: the phoneme s is voiceless [s] by default, but voiced [z] when it occurs between vowel sounds subsequent to the primary stress of the word: úlusa [ˈuluzə]. However, the sequence st is realized as [s] as long as the preceding syllable is subsequent to the primary stress; this creates a surface contrast between [s] and [z]. The phonological process I'm about to describe specifically affects the voiceless phone [s]. I call the process "sibilization," because it involves the replacement of phonological material with a sibilant. There's two types, minor sibilization and major sibilization.

Minor sibilization

The sequences /sa/ and /so/, when they are unstressed and come prior to the primary stress of the prosodic word, are realized as a syllabic [s̩ː]. This occurs primarily with the malefactive prefix so- and the 2s possessive determiner sa, both of which are quite common. So isoklaasîn "they are blinding" is [ˌi.s̩ːˈklaːzn̩] and sa tuna "your claws" is [s̩ːˈtunə]. /a/ and /o/ are already reduced to /ə/ in this context, so the sibilization is just making the reduction a little more extreme.

Major sibilization

Outside of slow or careful speech, the following rule roughly holds: if the phone [s] occurs subsequent to the primary stress, then all phonological material from that [s] until the end of the prosodic word is deleted, and the [s] prolonged by an amount roughly proportional to the quantity of deleted material. The way things shake out, this rarely affects words other than verbs, but it affects verbs quite frequently, especially imperative verbs. Verbs are regularly followed by a sequence of object pronouns, which are the primary victims of sibilization:
I, chamesss! [I, chames di pa!]
i Ø -chames-Ø [di] [pa] hey CAUS-eat -IMP 3s.INAN 1s.ACC 
Hey, give me some of that to eat!
[ˈtʃamesːː]
There is one exception to the rule that all phonological material after the [s] is deleted: there's a series of prosodic enclitics formed by the dative preposition ko combined with an object pronoun (kolî "to him/hethem," kopa "to me," etc.), and if one of these follows a sibilated form, it contributes a [kʰ] to the end. When the sibilated phrase is pronounced very emphatically, the [k] becomes ejective, which is how we arrive at the sentence (word?) that opened the post:
Yorodusssk! [Yorodu sa lî di kopa!] [joˈɾodusːːkʼ]
yo -rod -u s[a] [lî] [di] k[o]-[pa] CAUS-give-IMP 2s.ACC 3.AN.ACC 3.INAN DAT -1s.PREP 
Make her give it to me!

Doesn't deleting a bunch of pronouns make things confusing?

Not really. If you can't infer the deleted material from context, you can always just add more pronouns. Just for safety, let's add two of each:
I, idi paipai midi chamesss pai!
i i -di paipai mi -di Ø -chames-Ø [di] [pa] pai hey DEIC-3.INAN 1s.NOM.EMPH ABL-3.INAN CAUS-eat -IMP 3.INAN 1s.ACC 1s.NOM 
Hey, give me some of that to eat! ("Hey, that there, me, some of it, give it to me to eat, me!")
This is a normal number of pronouns for a sentence to contain in Tzalu, a normal language.

Grammaticalization

Once I came up with sibilization I quickly realized it provides a straightforward Watsonian explanation for an apparent irregularity in the verbal system. Check out this comparison of infinitive and imperative forms, with exemplars drawn from each major conjugation class:
stem loa- dab- yonobe- dames-
infinitive loastu dabu yonobestu damestu
imperative loastu dabu yonobes dames
Why is the imperative sometimes different from the infinitive and sometimes the same? Out of universe, it's because at some point I felt some imperatives were too long so I arbitrarily shortened them. In universe, it's now quite clear what happened: the imperatives in estu (realized [esu]) underwent sibilization so regularly that it was grammaticalized and the sibilated form became the only option for the imperative.

Sssk!

A final note: that nice hiss-pop [sːːkʼ] sound at the end of yorodusssk has taken on a life of its own as an interjection of contempt. Like any Tzalu interjection, it can be used quasi-verbally as an ideophone:
Im Toru i sssk! [im ˈtoɾu i ˈsːːkʼ]
im Tor -u i sssk then Toru-NOM.S COP.IDEO.3s sssk 
Then Toru spat right in their face!

Conclusion

And that's about it. I hope this write-up has been somewhat interesting, and a good example of how you can still find cool new things to do with your phonology even after you've been working with it for years.
submitted by umerusa to conlangs [link] [comments]


2024.02.01 13:41 Little_Acanthaceae87 What is the cause of stuttering? -> According to Chang & Guenther (PhD researchers) + tips (that I extracted from the research)

The curious PWS (person who stutters) in me read this research (pdf) (video). After finishing the 33 pages, I summed up the key points.
Goal
  • In this review, we utilize the Directions Into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) neurocomputational modeling framework to mechanistically interpret relevant findings from the behavioral and neurological literatures on developmental stuttering. We propose that the primary impairment underlying stuttering behavior is malfunction in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical (hereafter, cortico-BG) loop that is responsible for initiating speech motor programs
Intro
  • The DIVA model divides speech into feedforward and sensory feedback-based control processes. The feedforward control system is further sub-divided into an articulation circuit, which is responsible for generating the finely timed and coordinated muscle activation patterns (motor programs) for producing speech sounds, and an initiation circuit, which is responsible for turning the appropriate motor programs on and off at the appropriate instants in time
  • A (speech) motor program is the execution of coordinated movement commands of units (such as, the syllable "you") stored in memory. Each program contains parameters, such as, how the jaw, lips, tongue, larynx, etc should be moved (watch above YT video for a detailed explanation)
  • Phonemes are the smallest units of sound that correspond to a specific set of articulatory gestures, involving the coordinated movement of the tongue, lips, etc
The Cortico-Basal Ganglia-Thalamocortical Loop
  • The core deficit in persistent developmental stuttering (PDS) is an impaired ability (1) to initiate, sustain, or terminate motor programs for phonemic/gestural units within a speech sequence, and (2) sequencing of learned speech sequences, due to impairment of the left hemisphere cortico-BG loop
  • In the DIVA model, the initiation circuit is responsible for sequentially initiating phonemic gestures within a (typically syllabic) motor program by activating nodes for each phoneme in an initiation map in the supplementary motor area (SMA)
  • Early in development pre-SMA involvement is required to sequentially activate nodes in SMA for initiating each phoneme. Later in development, the basal ganglia motor loop has taken over sequential activation of the SMA nodes, thus making production more “automatic” and freeing up higher-level cortical areas such as pre-SMA
  • Potential impairments of the basal ganglia motor loop:
    • Basal ganglia impairment
    • Impairment of axonal projections between cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and thalamus
    • Impairment in cortical processing
  • Prolonging, blocks and repetitions:
    • Failure to recognize the sensory, motor, and cognitive context for terminating the current phoneme > prolongation stutter
    • Failure to recognize the context for initiating the next phoneme > block stutter
    • Initiation signal “drops out” > repetition stutter
  • Alm:
    • Initiation and termination signals for speech movements are timing signals
    • External timing cues (such as, choral reading, singing) > perceived by sensory cortical areas > relaying signals to SMA > reducing dependence on the basal ganglia motor loop for generating initiation/termination signals (cf. internal timing cues to initiate propositional speech)
Impairment in the Basal Ganglia
  • Levodopa treatment aimed at increasing dopamine levels in the striatum can exacerbate stuttering
  • Pathways within the basal ganglia:
    • direct pathway to excite cerebral cortex (activate the correct motor program)
    • indirect pathway to inhibit cerebral cortex (suppress competing motor programs)
  • Two subtypes of speech blocks:
    • underactive indirect pathway: excessive motor activity due to reduced inhibition of movement
    • underactive direct pathway: reduced level of motor activity due to reduced excitation of movement
Impairments in Projections Between Cerebral Cortex, the Basal Ganglia, and Thalamus
  • Root cause of stuttering: Impaired left hemisphere corticostriatal connectivity can result in poor detection of the cognitive and sensorimotor context for initiating the next sound by the basal ganglia motor loop, thereby impairing the generation of initiation/termination signals to SMA
Impairments in the Network of Cortical Regions That Process Cognitive and Sensorimotor Aspects
  • White matter structural changes correlate with learning/training
  • There is a very low rate of stuttering in congenitally deaf individuals

Discussion

Primary Deficits & Secondary Effects in Stuttering
  • Primary deficits: Anatomical and functional anomalies involving the left hemisphere premotor cortex, IFG, SMA, and putamen
  • Secondary effects: (1) auditory cortex deactivation, and (2) decreased compensation to auditory perturbations
Network Connectivity of the Cortico-BG Loop: Deficits
  • Stuttering is likely a system-level problem rather than the result of impairment in a particular neural region or pathway

Neural substrates:

Cerebral cortices
  • Somatosensory cortex: detect sensory information from the body regarding temperature, proprioception, touch, texture, and pain
  • Premotor cortex: planning and organizing movements
  • Motor cortex: generate signals to direct movements
  • Supplementary motor area (SMA): planning of complex movements that are internally generated rather than triggered by sensory events
  • posterior auditory cortex (pAC)
  • ventral motor cortex (vMC): vMC contains representations of the speech articulators
  • ventral premotor cortex (vPMC)
  • ventral somatosensory cortex (vSC)
  • posterior inferior frontal sulcus (pIFS)
  • anterior cingulate cortex (ACC): (1)
    • fundamental cognitive processes, including motivation, decision making, learning, cost-benefit calculation, emotional expression, attention allocation, and mood regulation (which is needed for empathy, and impulse control).
    • Stuttering-related: ACC is more activated in PWS during silent and oral reading tasks. ACC function: conflict & error monitoring, response preparation, and anticipatory reactions (particularly during complex stimuli and the need to select an appropriate response). ACC is less active in fluent speakers due to decreased silent articulatory rehearsal or decreased anticipatory scanning
Inferior frontal cortical regions and Rolandic cortical regions
  • inferior frontal gyrus (IFG): controlling articulatory coding—taking information our brain understands about language and sounds and coding it into speech movements
  • postcentral gyrus (PoCG)
  • precentral gyrus (PrCG)
  • Broca's area: (inside the frontal lobe); language production, language processing, understanding the meaning of words (semantics) + understanding how words sound (phonology), interpreting action of others; translation of particular (hand) gesture aspects such as its motor goal and intention (e.g., in sign language)
    • inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis (IFo): action recognition/understanding
    • inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis (IFt): language comprehension
Basal Ganglia:
  • Description: It performs a pattern matching operation in which it monitors the current cognitive context as represented by activity in prefrontal cortical areas including pre-SMA and the posterior inferior frontal sulcus (pIFS); motor context represented in ventral premotor cortex (vPMC), SMA, and ventral primary motor cortex (vMC); and sensory context represented in posterior auditory cortex (pAC) and ventral somatosensory cortex (vSC). When the proper context is detected, the basal ganglia signals to SMA that means it is time to terminate the ongoing phoneme (termination signal) and initiate the next phoneme of the speech sequence (initiation signal)
  • Striatum: utilization of sensory cues to guide behavior - to modulate cortical auditory-motor interaction relevant to motor control. It may detect a mismatch between the current sensorimotor context and the context needed for initiating the next motor program, thus reducing its competitive advantage over competing motor programs, which in turn may lead to impaired generation of initiation signals by the basal ganglia and a concomitant stutter
    • (1) Putamen: learning and regulating motor control (preparing & execution), motor preparation, specifying amplitudes of movement, and movement sequences, including speech articulation, language functions, reward, cognitive functioning
    • (2) Caudete:
    • (3) Nucleus Accumbens:
  • Internal Globus Pallidus (GPi): integrating information including movement activity from the striatum, GPe, and subthalamic nucleus (STN)
  • Substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) (inside BG): integrating information.
  • SNr and GPi: selectively exciting the correct motor program in the current context while inhibiting the competing motor programs
  • Subthalamic nucleus (STN):
  • Anterior thalamic radiation: sequence learning, rule-based categorization, attention-switching, working memory
Thalamus
  • VL thalamus: integrating information from the cerebellum, striatum, and cortex and projecting to the primary motor cortex
  • ventral anterior thalamic nucleus (VA)
  • ventral lateral thalamic nucleus (VL)

Tips:

  • Increase the efficacy of the indirect pathway by increasing the inhibition of competing actions
  • Improve the ability to maintain the chosen action over competing actions in the indirect pathway - to address the impaired initiation through sequences in the presence of competing tasks
  • Develop interventions involving better synchronizing and in turn inducing better communication across the basal ganglia, motor, and auditory regions to help achieve more fluent speech
  • Achieve normalized segregation among networks to resolve aberrant cues from the basal ganglia, and don't engage in auditory and motor areas
  • Address the malfunction in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loop that is responsible for initiating speech motor programs
  • Prioritize feedforward over sensory feedback control processes
  • Address the disruptions (e.g., heightened demands around triggers, physical arousal, not instructing to send motor commands, etc) when activating the initiation circuit, which is responsible for turning the appropriate motor programs on and off at the appropriate instants in time
  • Don't perceive a speech motor program as an anticipated (or feared) word - when executing speech movement commands stored in memory. And thus, don't link such motor programs with inhibiting/initiating motor programs
  • Don't perceive a phoneme (which is the smallest units of sound) as an anticipated (or feared) letter. And thus, don't link such phonemes with inhibiting/initiating motor programs
  • Address the impaired ability (1) to initiate, sustain, or terminate motor programs, and (2) to sequence learned speech sequences
  • Learn to initiate phonemes by involving pre-SMA to sequentially activate nodes in SMA, and with reduced involvement of the basal ganglia motor loop - to prevent speaking/stuttering on auto-pilot, and instead induce motor-learning - even if this leads to speaking less automatic, and overloading higher-level cortical areas such as pre-SMA
  • Address the impairment of axonal projections between cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and thalamus - to improve your ability to initiate motor programs
  • Address the impairment in cortical processing - to improve your ability to initiate motor programs
  • Learn to recognize the sensory, motor, and cognitive context for terminating the current phoneme or initiating the next phoneme
  • Implement internal timing cues for initiating/terminating speech movements (over external speech motor timing cues) e.g., by not relying anymore on excessive sensory cortical areas - to reduce dependence on the basal ganglia motor loop for generating initiation/termination signals to initiate propositional speech
  • Address the impairment of not exciting cerebral cortex (not activating the correct motor program) in the direct pathway - to increase competitive advantage of motor programs, resulting in less stuttering. So, address the reduced level of motor activity due to reduced excitation of movement
  • Address the impairment of not inhibiting cerebral cortex (not suppressing competing motor programs) in the indirect pathway - to increase inhibition to suppress competing motor programs, making it easier for the correct motor program to be chosen over incorrect alternatives, resulting in less stuttering. So, address the excessive motor activity due to reduced inhibition of movement
  • Address the impaired left hemisphere corticostriatal connectivity that result in poor detection of the cognitive and sensorimotor context for initiating the next sound by the basal ganglia motor loop, thereby impairing the generation of initiation/termination signals to SMA
  • Address the impairments in the Network of Cortical Regions That Process Cognitive and Sensorimotor Aspects
  • Engage in speech motor learning/training, such as suggested in this list of tips, to improve white matter structural changes. So, don't give up on developing clinical interventions to target neural impairments, and thus, don't give up for the reason that "it's genetic", because it's still unclear how mutations in genes affect (1) stuttering, or (2) the proposed basal ganglia circuitry
  • A compensatory mechanism involving left medial premotor cortex may contribute to recovery
  • Reduce the detection of errors in articulation that would otherwise reduce the match between expected and actual sensorimotor context for the next motor program in striatum
  • Develop clinical interventions associated with a shift toward more normal, left-lateralized frontal activation
To compensate for the primary deficits (such as, impaired basal ganglia function, left hemisphere premotor cortex, IFG, SMA, and putamen), avoid these maladaptive compensatory interventions:
  • forcing reliance on the right hemisphere, leading to increased right hemisphere white matter tract strengths due to additional use
  • correcting sensory errors by the right-lateralized auditory and somatosensory feedback control systems
  • correcting errors in auditory feedback of one’s own speech (i.e., when it does not match the expected pattern for the current sound) (e.g., due to subtle errors in articulation)
  • engaging in cerebellum-related mechanisms
  • auditory cortex deactivation
  • decreased compensation to auditory perturbations
  • excessively focusing on the articulation circuit (aka production system) to attempt to initiate speech programs
Employ clinical interventions to target neural regions:
  • the neural activity in the caudate nucleus - to reduce stuttering severity
  • increased gray matter volume in the left putamen
  • the deficit in the ability to perceive temporally structured sound sequences (in the atypical processing in corticostriatal circuits): the relationship between rhythm perception and timing-related brain network activity. Rhythm processing implies rhythm perception and speech perception and production
  • the anomalous functional connectivity including pathways between auditory cortical areas and putamen and thalamus, between thalamus and pre-SMA, and between thalamus and putamen
  • the less structural connectivity between left putamen and left hemisphere cortical regions (IFo, SMA)
  • decreased growth rate in white matter in the anterior thalamic radiation
  • the anomalies in the connections between prefrontal areas and the basal ganglia - to address the affected higher-order cognitive functions (e.g., attention), which help develop speech control automaticity via the cortico-BG loop
  • the lower white matter in the anterior and superior thalamic radiations (tracts) - which helps interface speech motor control and other cognitive functions
  • normalize structural connectivity among left premotor, motor, and auditory cortical areas which may play a role in natural recovery from stuttering
  • the deactivation of auditory cortex involving inhibition of auditory feedback of one’s own speech to avoid detection of minor errors in production - which is a compensatory mechanism developed after years of stuttering rather than a root cause of the disorder
  • structural differences in the left inferior frontal and premotor cortex regions
  • anomalous diffusivity of white matter in the left frontal aslant tract (FAT) (connecting SMA and pre-SMA with posterior inferior frontal cortical areas) - which is correlated with stuttering severity
  • intra-hemispheric tracts between inferior frontal cortical ROIs and sensorimotor (Rolandic) cortical ROIs, which is correlated with stuttering severity
  • anomalous functioning in left hemisphere inferior frontal cortex
  • suppression of right-dominant motor rhythms (over left dominant in fluent speakers)
  • hyperactivity in right hemisphere cerebral cortex
  • decreased cortical thickness in left ventral motor cortex (vMC) and ventral premotor cortex (vPMC) areas. Recovered children showed increased thickness, and decreased gyrification in the SMA and pre-SMA which may indicate better long-range connectivity with regions such as left IFG
  • decreased white matter affecting the frontal motor areas
  • reduced neural activity in left auditory cortex of the posterior superior temporal gyrus
  • deactivation in the left inferior frontal and premotor cortices
  • deficit in betweenness centrality of left vPMC
  • aberrant connectivity patterns involving the somatomotor network and its connectivity with frontoparietal and attention networks - to improve how attention mediates corticocortical and corticostriatal connectivities
  • aberrant connectivity involving the default mode network (DMN) [task-negative aka resting state] and its connections to attention and frontoparietal networks [task-positive aka during activities]. These results suggest that cognitive and higher-order functions could be involved in mediating recovery. Better segregation from task-negative networks to enable efficient functioning of the somatomotor, executive control, and attention networks could allow once-vulnerable children to recover from stuttering
submitted by Little_Acanthaceae87 to Stutter [link] [comments]


2024.01.24 17:44 graidan Thoughts on the Vowelness

(Posted 3 years ago to a sub that's going away, so moving it here for discussion)
One thing that nearly every book on numerology discusses is whether Y is a vowel or a consonant. And every single one of them, that I've seen (and I've seen most) gets it wrong. Well, IMHO, of course. I'm a trained linguist, speak a handful of languages, and numerology was my first love, divination wise, so I have a clue, but as I will always say, you do you. :)
So first off, specifically, Y is a letter and letters aren't vowels or consonants. Only SOUNDS can be vowels (or diphthongs) or consonants. Well, except we do use the words to describe letters that indicate those sounds. Hence the problem: y and w both represent a bunch of sounds, some of which are vowel sounds and some are consonant sounds. And in other languages, other letters can be vowels too - W is the oo sound (as in soon) in Welsh. Sometimes, even a letter like N can be a vowel, as we'll see in a moment.
Basically, think of a syllable in English. The core, or nucleus, of a syllable is always a vowel. That's enough, the minimum required, for a syllable - the word I is a single syllable, and a diphthong (a complicated "vowel"). A syllable can also have an onset - the consonants at the start of the syllable. The word to is a single syllable, with a T onset and a vowel indicated by O. They can also end with a consonant (in English, anyway - other languages have different rules about how syllables are put together), the coda, as in the word egg, which has the nucleus E and the coda G (represented by gg). In English, the onset and coda can get a lot more complicated (clusters!), as in the words true, eight, and strength. They have a complex onset or onset cluster, a coda cluster, and both onset and coda clusters respectively.
So, what does this foray into linguistics get us? Basically, the exact definition of what counts as a vowel. It's the letters that represent the sound at the heart of a syllable:
  • A in hat - vowel, obviously.
  • Y in yard - that's the onset (the beginning) of the syllable, so it's a consonant
  • Y in say - this one is tricky, and even linguists disagree exactly on whether the diphthong (two-sounds, literally) ends in a really short vowel or consonant. Generally though, a diphthong (like the i in tile, or ai in pain, or oi in soil) is considerend to be two vowels and the slide between them. In this case, those two vowels are eh (like in met) and i (like the ee in tree) so I treat these as vowels.
  • W in cow - another diphthong (au - a as in cat, u as in soon), so it's a vowel - actually, both the O and the W are vowels.
  • N in button - technically, that N is in a syllable all by itself. You don't say "butt-on" but something more like "butt-n" - it's what's called a syllabic or vocalic consonant, because it sits in the nucleus of the syllable. So both the O and N are vowels here, because they both represent vowel sounds / are the nucleus of the syllable.
  • Y in rhythym - they're both vowels. Technically , the m is a vowel too.
  • R in butter - another syllabic consonant i.e. vowel.
  • L in cycle - yep, another syllabic one / vowel!
Those are the only possible "consonant nuceluses" in English: l, m, n, and r.
And now you should be able to know pretty quickly if Y and W are vowels or not.
A quick cheat for Y and W:
  • between 2 Consonants: vowel (rhythym, cwm - the last is a borrowing from Welsh, so...)
  • after a vowel and before a consonant or end of the word: vowel (say, playtime, cow, crowd)
  • before a vowel: consonant (yes, web, away)
For L, M, N, and R:
  • is there another vowel SOUND in the syllable?
    • Yes: then it's a consonant (can)
    • No: it's the vowel (button)
Some other LMNR-Vowel words:
  • shovel, cattle, bottle, roman, bottom, nurse, bird - the E and L of shovel are BOTH vowels, because the letters represent a single vowel sound, and the same applies to the le, an, om, ur, and ir of the following words.
In vowel - the W is a consonant, because it starts the syllable 'WEL', and the E and L are the vowels of that syllable. VOWEL = CV.CVV (consonant, vowel, syllable boundary, consonant, vowel, vowel)
In word, the W is a consonant, the O and R are vowels, and the D is a consonant. WORD = CVVC
In bottle, it's CVC.CVV, with both the L and the E being vowels (because they represent the spelling of the one syllablic sound at the nucleus of the syllable).
That's MY take on it, anyway. I've also historically just always treated Y and W as vowels, because the difference is too slight. If you pronounce slower, they're just a kind of vowel-sound (hence why they're called glides or semi-vowels in linguistics), but I think this method I've given here, that I use nowadays, addresses the distinctions better.
What do you think?
submitted by graidan to numerology [link] [comments]


2024.01.20 16:29 F_Karnstein Non-standard tehtar-placement

Non-standard tehtar-placement
There are some tehtar that are as a rule placed below the tengwar (mostly silent vowels/markers of syllabic consonants, gemination and following ), but most other tehtar are of course placed on top of the tengwar after or before which they are pronounced (depending on the mode). While this poses no problem for the base tengwar the situation can get trickier with some of the additional tengwar, so let's have a look at those:
Tehtar can be placed on the very top of the stem of hyarmen, as fig. 1 shows. However, Tolkien seems not to have liked this very much (we only have this one example, I believe) - probably because the stem is so high that all tehtar placed there are far higher than anything else around them, which makes them look (at least to my eyes) a bit out of place. So where to put them? For base tengwar with raised stems (like formen or unque) this is not complicated: the tehtar fit next to the stem and it is obvious to where they belong.
With hyarmen, however, the diagonal stem is more or less in the middle of the letter, so that (similar to silme) small tehtar can be placed either left or right of it, which we see Tolkien do with the dot and the acute several times (fig. 2)
But what about larger tehtar like the curls for and or indeed the three dots for ? In the same document we see in fig. 1, and indeed for the same word, Tolkien made another draft where he chose not to face the whole situation at all but simply placed the tehta on a carrier before hyarmen (fig. 3), similarly to the title artwork for the LotR where Tolkien spelt his own name "John" as presumably to avoid the issue of having to place the tehta onto hyarmen (fig. 4).
Again in the document we see in figs. 1 and 3 Tolkien faced another word where would have to be placed on top of hyarmen, which he considered to solve with the tehta running right through the stem, or indeed placing an upside-down version of the tehta underneath instead (fig. 5), but he chose to go for a different tengwa (hwesta) in the end.
And interestingly enough the latter seems to have been a somewhat welcome alternative to whenever there wasn't enough room on the tengwa in general. Fig. 6 shows Tolkien's attempts to squeeze three tehtar on top of the letter ungwe, but also experimenting with simply putting an upside-down version of the three dots underneath instead (we cannot say which replaced the other, if they're not both equally valid).
In the case of hyarmen Tolkien seems to have liked this in general, because we have one example where he appears to have written even a dot below hyarmen (fig. 7). Something similar can be found where Tolkien attempted to write a word vertically (fig. 8): When there is enough room over the tengwar the tehtar are placed regularly: in the beginning with
on carrier, and where the tengwa above was far enough away because of the stem of umbar, with <ó> on rómen. But where this wasn't the case the tehtar were instead placed to the side of the tengwar - apparently on either side without change in meaning.
In theory we would expect the situation to be very similar with silmë and essë. After all, Tolkien refers to the inverted forms silmë/essë nuquerna to mainly function as alternatives to silmë/essë that tehtar can be placed upon more conveniently. However, we have loads of examples where Tolkien did place all kinds of tehtar on top of silmë and essë. This is mainly the case in orthographic English spelling (where indeed silmë nuquerna seems to represent alone), but not entirely so, with many examples from Sindarin, Quenya and Old English. Judging from our samples there seems to be some preference of the left side of the stem, but there are still plenty of examples of placing the tehta to the right as well (fig. 9, note also in the lower left the two-dot tehta with one dot on either side, and a lower variant form of essë with the dot more or less on top.).
Comments, suggestions and corrections welcome!
submitted by F_Karnstein to Tengwar [link] [comments]


2024.01.20 00:51 qronchwrapsupreme (WIP) Phonology of Nyannai

Here's my WIP phonological system for Nyannai. I wanted a small inventory that also included some interesting sounds. I also wanted to make a Polynesian-inspired phonotactics system that manages to not sound exactly like a Polynesian language.
I'm not too concerned about everything being too naturalistic, but I did think up some possible sound changes that explain the weird stuff.

Consonants
Labial Alveolar Palatal Pharyngeal Glottal
Stops t
Nasals m n
Fricatives f s ʕ (q) h
Liquids Oral (w) l j (y)
Nasal j̃ (ny)
/w/ is kind of a marginal phoneme, mostly showing up word-initially (as a variant of ) and very rarely word-medially.
Vowels
Front Mid Back
High i ɨ (e) u
Mid
Low a

Phonotactics
The maximum syllable structure of Nyannai is (C)V(V)(V)(C*).
A syllable can contain a monophthong, diphthong, or triphthong.
The following diphthongs are allowed:
  • ai, au
  • ia, ie, iu,
  • ua, ue, ui
  • ei, eu
The following triphthongs are allowed:
  • aia, aie, aiu, aua, aue
  • eie, eia, eiu, eua, eue, eui
  • iau, ieu, iua, iue
  • uai, uei, uia, uie
Two of the same vowel in sequence is not allowed.

All consonants except for /h/ can be geminated (this is what the C* stands for in the syllable description, there's probably a better way to do it lol). This is denoted by writing the letter twice (/t:/ = 'tt') except for (j̃:) which is written 'nyy'.
Geminates can't occur in all circumstances:
  • Can't appear word-initially
  • Can't appear word-finally (in fact no consonants can)
  • Can't appear directly following a diphthong or triphthong
The reasoning for the C* notation is that geminated consonants are counted as coda consonants for the purposes of the mora system. For instance, natta is syllabically /nat.ta/.

Stress
Nyannai uses a mora system for stress.
  • CV syllables get 1 mora
  • CVV and CVC* syllables get 2 morae
  • CVVV syllables get 3 morae.
Stress occurs on the third mora from the end of the word. In addition, if the stress occurs on a CV syllable, the vowel in that syllable is allophonically lengthened.
A few examples (the acute accent indicated the stressed syllable):
  • tíesa [ˈt͡ʃiɨ.sa]
  • náyyie [ˈnaʒ.ʒiɨ]
  • huyínei [hu.ˈʒiː.nɨi]

Allophony
I figured since Nyannai has a small phonemic inventory I should go for a good amount of allophony. Here are the rules:
  • /i/ and are lowered to /e/ and /o/ respectively after /ʕ/
  • /j/ /ʒ/ before /i/, geminated /j:/ /ʒ:/ before /i/
  • /j̃/ is a bit complex before /i/
    • word-initially, /j̃i/ /ʒĩ/
    • word-medially, /j̃i/ /ʒi/ and nasalizes the previous vowel
      • for example, nanyia is pronounced [nã:ʒia]
  • t has quite a bit going on, being the only stop. The following rules are applied in order from top to bottom:
    • Palatalization: /t/ /t͡ʃ/ before /i/
    • Dissimilation: in any sequence /t/ + V + (/t/, /t:/), the first /t/ dissimilates to /k/.
    • Flapping: short /t/ /ɾ/ between vowels
As an example, take the word titate. This is pronounced /t͡ʃikaɾe/ after the allophony rules apply.

Diachronic reasons for the 'weird' sounds
I was imagining Proto-Nyannai to have a palatal series /c/,/ɲ/. /c/ merges with /s/, and /ɲ/ gets turned into /j̃/ (it could probably also turn into /n/ in places). Proto-Nyannai also had /p/ and /k/. /p/ debuccalized into /h/ Japanese-style, and /k/ debuccalized into /ʔ/ Hawaiian-style, and then /ʔ/ lenites to /ʕ/ between vowels and vanishes elsewhere. This doesn't account for everything, but I think it's a good start.

Random Lexifer text (since I haven't made any grammar yet lol)
Tena usia itti nawie sa. Innia naha aila tieta wani, sayyi lanyitautia ei uhi siaha? Yinyya tanni nesua au na i. Qiyyi yiqena aya atueine inai, yia ninui nyiau anie. Nyiya nute lau unna? Wilia aitai ale ninai eqi? Tila inna ini siya yahi teyya. Teya ayya u asanau.Tialia yinna ayyianya siyyinai. Innua nata yunai yialie ai uyie, yunnii lellia laitinai. Lilai ittau enia netu te yilai.

Questions
  • Is the phonology reasonable to appear in a natural language?
  • Is there a better way to present the syllable structure and allophony?
  • Is the allophony for /t/ naturalistic? I wanted some shenanigans here, but I'm not sure if I really succeeded.
If you made it all the way down here, thanks for reading.

submitted by qronchwrapsupreme to conlangs [link] [comments]


http://swiebodzin.info