hi, ive been using an oil cleanser for a while (couple weeks) and i just wanted to ask if its normal to feel a bit oily after ive emulsified and rinsed it off? like when i rinse it off and it dries (before i use my water based cleanser) and i run my fingers acorss my cheeks i can feel kind of like an oily residue on my fingers afterwards. is this normal?
im asking because it seems ive been breaking out a bit after starting the oil cleanser (normally i use a micellar water) so idk if im doing it right.
ps- i use the bioderma micellar cleansing oil and always follow up with the inley list hyaluronic acid cleanser

Background: 30 year old female competitive long course triathlete. First tore that meniscus in April 2022. Returned to racing September 2022. Pain onset this time June 2023. Stopped running October 2023. I've had pain ever since June. The scan I attached was from November 2023 - I had one in April 2024 which says much the same but adds large areas of full thickness articular cartilage loss. My knee pretty ok to walk and cycle, but never really feels "normal", and the moment I hop or try to run, or go up stairs, I have instant pain anterior medially. Tried a hyaluronic acid which did nothing for me... I'm a nurse for work, so on my feet a decent amount.
Do you think I'll ever be pain free? Do you think my knee can get better? Do you think I'll ever run again? Or compete again? Or now that the meniscus has torn, the cartilage has worn down, the bone is therefore exposed to higher loads and I'm doomed to be on the one-way road of irreversible knee degeneration and pain?
I've pushed my body hard over the years, and expected to have to retire from sport at some point, just not this soon. Or I thought there would be cures for this stuff by the time I started having problems...
Yes I have seen a sports physician, ortho, and currently see a physiotherapist. Sports Dr and physio say it should improve. Physio says I should 100% get better and will be able to return to competing. While I appreciate his belief and optimism, and I need that, it's just weighing on my mind that after almost a year it's not gotten better :( I'm wondering if I need to adjust my expectations/goals...
What do you guys make of all this? I realise it's near impossible to make accurate diagnosis/predictions based on the information I've given you, and I will be taking responses with a grain of salt. But I'm getting desperate and am keen to hear anyone's opinion nowadays (especially if it can give me some hope).
Thanks for reading

I’ve taken multiple antibiotics and Fluconazole/Diflucan buy my symptoms would come back in just a matter of a few days. When I first sought out treatment, I was unaware of how important it is to take probiotics and didn't know that we need Lactobacillus bacteria the vagina. However, once I learned the important of probiotics, I started with the Nature's Bounty probiotic tablets that have 100 million CFU. They help my gut health a bit but weren’t enough to combat the infections, also the only have one strain and for vaginal health we need multiple strains to obtain optimal health.
-Probiotics I recommend are: Renew Life Womens Probiotics, Double Wood Vaginal Probiotics (oral supplement and contains L. Crispatus).
Next helpful thing was the Candida diet which tells you to refrain from all forms of sugar including fruits and carbohydrates. Carbs were something I didn’t expect to be a contributor with an active yeast infection but the convert into sugar during digestion. Candida feeds on sugar I cut out white bread completely and minimized consuming flour-based foods and started to consume antifungal foods like garlic, onion, cinnamon, and coconut oil to name a few.
Lastly, I looked into treatments to combat the infections directly. Intravaginal prescribed medications were effective when I used them, but the infections came back a few days after use. Then I learned that I shouldn’t use medications that much because I can develop an antibiotic resistance which isn’t good. I then looked into alternative treatments and saw that many women found boric acid to be very effective. I have found boric acid to be effective and gives me a “fully cleaned out” feeling due to its antiseptic capabilities.
-Boric Acid suppositories I recommend: NewLife Naturals 60 Capsules, Double Wood 60 Capsules, My Frenemy Flora 40 Capsules (Also contains PROBIOTICS).
Lastly, I used a supplement called Monolaurin which a coconut derived antimicrobial and helps reduce pathogens in the body.
For anyone dealing with a stubborn infection or recurring infections please note that you should work on a treatment plan to follow for at least 3 months. You don’t have to do so but you want to make sure that you have successfully treated the issue and helped your body get back on track. I hope some of the things I mentioned help you guys the way they’ve helped me.

1. Corn - Almost all corn, specifically in the US and Canada is produced by Monsanto seed. This is a man-made corn, which has been genetically modified and/or is a hybrid corn. It’s been processed. This corn was specifically developed by Monsanto to be fed to cows for them to put on fat quickly and grow fast. The more corn you eat, the fatter you get. It’s not the original, as nature intended it to be food. It causes allergic reactions to all degrees. Avoid anything with the word corn in it “Corn syrup solids”, “high fructose corn syrup”, “cornflower”, “corn starch”, “cornflakes”, etc. Look at the ingredients, if it has the word corn then avoid it. Monsanto is an American agricultural biotechnology and agrochemical company that was founded in 1901 by John Francis Queeny in St. Louis, Missouri. The company's products include glyphosate herbicides, crop seeds, and vegetables. Monsanto is best known for its herbicide Roundup, which is based on glyphosate. The company also produces genetically modified seeds, such as those that can tolerate glyphosate, which kills weeds without affecting the crop. What happened to Monsanto? Ethical Consumer
2. Artificial Sweeteners - 2 main ones: Aspartame(nutrasweet) & Sucralose. Stay away from these two. These are found in diet sodas. These fall into a category called exito-toxins. They are chemically addictive. It’s the “new crack”. It affects the neuro-transmitter activity and the serotonin levels in your brain. This means these artificial sweeteners make you anxious, stressed, and depressed. They are in any diet product. If you see “no sugar”, it may be a marketing ploy - they want to convince you it has lower calories and some type of artificial sweetener. You find these. The actual foods or drinks taste horrible, but the aspartame and sucralose make it taste better. Fast food study
   
3. Pork - A pig will eat anything. Scientists now know that whatever the pig eats turns to meat on its bones. The meat you eat puts toxicity in your body.
   
4. Shellfish - More people get sick and/or die from eating “bad” shellfish than any other food group. Many people are also allergic to it more than any other food group. Shellfish isn't just a fish that comes in a shell like a scallop, mussel, lobster, clam, crab. It’s any fish in water that does not have scales and fins. Stay away from anything that comes out of the water with no scales and fins. Catfish has fins but no scales, stay away. Squid/Octopus stay away from. These non-scale/fin animals are called “filters”. They absorb whatever toxins that are in the water and they keep that in their flesh, which is eaten. This is also the law of kashra, the kosher laws - pork and shellfish fall into the kosher law category. It states that you can eat anything on the ground that has a split hoof and chews to cut. Which is why you don’t eat pork. Also, don’t eat anything that doesn’t have a split hoof and chews to cut like a bear(has a paw). States you should eat fish with fins and scales. The Kashrut Laws
   
5. Hydrogenated Oils (Trans fats) - Look on the label. It says hydrogenated oil. These scar your arteries and lead to heart attack. It messes with hormones and affects sleep. Makes you hungrier and fatter. Affects immune system.
   
6. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) - Buy foods that say no GMO’s. The majority of the ingredients have not been modified. With GMO, foods are modified.
   
7. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) - Falls into the same category as artificial sweeteners, it is an exito-toxin. Messes with neuro-transmitter activity, makes you hungrier, makes you thirsty, makes the body store extra fluid in fat cells making you gain weight, bloady, and fat. It increases fat cells and makes them bigger. KFC, Taco Bell, etc all have this.
   
8. Wheat - If you live in Italy, this doesn't apply. Youdon’t want wheat that's come from Canada or USA because it's only been fermented for 48 hours. This is tough because how can you determine that? Duran-wheat means it's from Italy. This is trustworthy. If you can reduce the amount of wheat you consume, you’ll be better off because the majority of wheat hasn't been fermented for 48 hours. Its high gluten wheat, causes types of gas, bloating, allergic reactions, weight gain, etc. Make sure all your pasta comes from Italy (Organic product of Italy). If you make your own pasta, buy flour from italy. Same goes for bread in USA.
   
9. Soy - All over the world. Almost all soy now comes from Monsanto seed. It’s been genetically modified and causes all types of intestinal problems and reduces testosterone. Same with corn, soy is everywhere - “soybean oil”. Soy-bean oil is very cheap. Even if it’s organic,it can still be genetically modified.
   
10. Corn-fed beef & anything dairy that doesn't come from grass fed cows - Stay away from homogenized dairy. Cows eat grass. But in the industry, cows are fed Monsanto genetically altered corn to make them fat and get them to the supermarket quicker. Cows don't eat grain in real life, they eat grass. When a cat is fed corn and grain it will get fatter faster. In the commercial feed that's fed to cows, there is ground up dead cows, horses, other animals that were so diseased they couldn't be put into the food chain. But they'll feed it to a cow which is supposed to be a vegetarian only eating grass. This cow gets diseased as well. Those animals were injected with bovine growth hormones and massive amounts of antibiotics. When you eat beef, your testost. score goes down, you put your body in toxic shock, because of the growth hormone, which makes you fatter. These beefs don't have much CLA which is the acid in the beef that increases testosterone. Buy 100% organic grass fed beef and dairy. Buy raw cheese that comes from France or switzerland.
    

How can we stop going around in circles with these corrupted nihilists? (basically an extreme religious-nut but in reverse; no meaning, no value, no good/bad, nothing matters) I've compiled some of my thoughts/comments.

But first If you are not caught up yet:
1 Re: Vegan Gains ...The Militant Vegan Raffaela Interview - (May 12, 2024)
2 Vegan Gains is a sub-Jerkivest [5/11/24]
3 Moral Realism Debate w/ Inmendham - (May 16, 2024)
4 WTF #899: The vegan gains debate ... Value realism - (May 19, 2024)
5 Vegan Gains ...Denialism is the only nihilism [5/19/24]
also saw this Controversial Topics with Vegan Gains (Horse Riding, Bivalves, Depression, and much more!) - (May 11, 2024) ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ (he thinks in terms of some dogmatic religious brain-rot morality source of right/wrong, but a kind of reversed/opposite conclusion of it's absence, nihilism)
the very reason religion was invented in the first place was because humans by nature had a value-engine driving them & NEED for meaning, that's the irony. value gave rise to religion, religion never needed to grant value. The fact people can't grasp this. 🤦 ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

Now onto the various arguments, sorry how long and out of order it is But the idea is to provoke you coming up with better ideas/arguments, and if you can critic and strenghen my and ultimately inmendham's arguments. The GOAL should be to Create a formal argument AKA a syllogism, modus ponens. Something clear and concise that can't be taken out of context or misinterpreted, as happened with the debate...

On the subject of Efilism, tread lightly, the philosophy and argument extends beyond merely focusing on suffering; it also includes the critical issue of consent violation. Its proponent and creator, Inmendham, argues for value realism, which contrasts starkly with the notion of subjective morality which I find illogical. While objective morality is full of baggage... often linked to outdated religious doctrine so on face value it's not fun or easy subject to broach... many contemporary non-religious ethicists ground it in realism. Personally me, inmendham and others see no use for the term "morality" as it's tainted. value-realism is the subject. Is it a value-laden universe or not?
it is not necessary to call TRUE/REAL right or wrong Objective, because if objective is defined as mind-independent than without minds there's nothing right/wrong to happen to, therefore THE discussion should be just regarding what is TRUE or NOT, subjective doesn't necessarily mean mere contrived opinion or preference but can be logical conclusion, e.g. you can conclude 2 + 2 = 4 as we understand these concepts of numbers to model reality but can you call it objective or mind-independent 2 + 2 = 4, or that math exists? Not really. As you require a modeler to model reality, an observer to make the observation, a mind to come to such accurate conclusions. To me, claiming there is no real right or wrong is akin to asserting that moral standards and ultimately the subject of Ethics is as fictitious as religion or Santa Claus, you just believe it cause you want to or have preference to. Why maintain this pretense if it's all a mere fabrication / contrivance?
Regarding subjective judgments such as determining "What's the tastiest potato chip or the most beautiful painting?", these are not factual assessments about the things themselves, The question itself is misleading, because the thing itself has none of those qualities objectively, Instead, such qualities are OUTPUTs generated by the interaction of our bodies and minds with these INPUT items, the input is quite arbitrary/irrelevant, unlike the highly meaningful & distinct output generated of positive or negative experiences. You might get off more on certain female body part than another, it doesn't matter, the output positives & negatives is more or less same among individuals and that's what's relevant... not what specific fun or hobby gets you or them off or pushes their buttons.
It can be TRUE that a certain food item is the tastiest to that personal individual, or gross to another, and we can talk about intersubjective truths with averages overall. But one's experience of what is tastiest for them doesn't contradict another's, they can both be true for them individually, as you are likely not even sharing the same exact experiences to judge differently. And one's very perception or framing of the experience changes the experience itself, no way around this truth. Some people find bricks tasty or edible, just how their brain is wired.
It's important to recognize that differing opinions of personal taste do not inherently conflict in the way ethical contradictions do. With ethical matters, asserting that two diametrically opposed views are equally valid is problematic, either one is right and the other wrong, or both might be based on flawed reasoning. Pretending 2 opposing ethical views can be both equally right/true/correct is utter contradictory mush, either one of them must be right / wrong, or both are contrived meaningless nothing opinions, just made up. you wouldn't say whether one believes in god or not IS mere personal opinion/preference and such 2 opposing views can be equally right at same time, that's utter contradictory nonsense, by saying 2 opinions that gRAPE is both good & bad at same time are equally right opinons, right loses all meaning and you might as well say neither is right and both are wrong, they each have their own contrived fairytale delusion.
Now with Ethics of right / wrong, it does not depend on one single individual's preference or opinion, but taken as the whole, if you violate one without consent you still have to account for that since you are seemingly putting the weight on the preference otherwise preferences are utterly meaningless and irrelevant.
ALSO, Do you call whatever you prefer what's right, or do you prefer to try to do what is right?
Do you prefer to seek out what is the right most accurate conclusion given all the facts of reality, or contrive right to be what's in your preference/interest or personal gain?
I don't think VG or most these talking heads understand value-realism (problematic events within subjectivity/a non-physical but REAL reality of the mind). Obviously there's no objective divine or otherwise prime-directive moral-rules we must follow. Unfortunately Religion has poisened the conversation so much with archaic ideas and mushy terms like 'Morality'. Understand there is no 'moral truth', let alone an objective one, ofc if you pigeon-hole me or all realists into defending such nonsense it's easy to refute them. What I'm interested in is subject of Ethics, and to start whether or not value/problematic events exist or do not exist.
Here's a silly question by nihilists: "why is suffering bad?"
Response: How do you identify suffering? Based on the fact that it feels bad. (Yes subjectively) Just as we can subjectively understand 2+2 = 4
Or this: "prove suffering bad, objectively"
Also question-begging, obviously it is subjective. If such badness cannot exist mind-independently by definition.
"Prove suffering is bad, objectively"
is begging the question, because...
It strawmans / assumes the badness must be bad mind-independently, it isn't therefore, it isn't bad.
Answer this, evolutionarily do animals PERCEIVE being tortured skinned alive nail in the eye as BAD, or does it impose torture which we RECOGNIZE and define as Bad by definition?
If true PAIN/torture isn't bad then why does it exist evolutionarily? Answer: (problem -> solution) mechanism which functions as ability to learn & improved survival, this mechanism was reinforced over time as it worked.
inmendham & realists like myself argue: it is the case Descriptively, Objectively evolution IMPOSED Prescriptive-value-judgements onto animals which function as a learning/problem solving mechanism. Fact is, the invention of 'PROBLEM' is something I/we/animals had nothing to do with... (no-free-will-choice) but are simply byproduct in observation of this fact.
If real PROBLEM(s) didn't truly exist then Arguably the word and conceptual understanding it points 👉 to wouldn't exist either. As if beings could be truly blind never seeing colors/vision yet pulling the idea out of thin air and conceiving of such a thing, how preposterous, that'd be giving human creativity/imagination way too much credit. The only nihilist argument then is that by evolution we & all feeling organisms are somehow ultimately deluded or have illusion of problem where there is none, which I find deeply implausible. Run the torture study/experiment a million times putting people's arm in the fire "yep still bad". Filtering out people who lack ability to feel pain of course.
As evolutionary biologists even states pain is a message to the animal "don't do that again". Can't get descriptively prescriptive more than that.
Are You Getting It?
The Ought is literally baked in as an IS. The is-ought gap to be bridged is a complete Red-Herring, yes you can't derive an Ought from an IS, because if you oughtn't do something, then it can never be BAD... problematic/BAD/torture can't mean anything if it doesn't scream OUGHT-not.
All you have to agree to is due to evolution it created torture which is decidedly negative/ inherently BAD, by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't feel bad or be torturous at all... THEN ask yourself, how can something be BAD yet it's not BAD to create that BAD?
This is Checkmate. These are irrefutable Facts & Logical deductions.
So much for it all being false-perception, the very fact placebo patients perceive an otherwise harmless laser as BAD/painful makes it so. It's the TRUE reality in their mind and you can't deny that fact. It's also a fact believing a pain isn't really all that bad can make it so, but this doesn't make these value-laden experiences NOT real/true.
As per evolution, your body/brain's mechanisms must generate & impose a prescriptive-value-judgement / problematic event within your mind,
It's nagging, complaining, telling you keeping your hand on the hot stove is a mistake/problematic/bad. (not in itself but as a consequence)
I believe this brain making me write all this... is making an accurate assessment when it observe certain events to be problematic/bad where it's happening which is within subjectivity, where's your evidence my perceptions are fooling me or I'm somehow deluded? I witnessed the crime take place and you were nowhere near the crime scene yet you have the authority to claim otherwise as fact? (You are not simply agnostic to my problem suffering but a De-nihilist)
Once one accepts this evolutionary fact we can move on to more complicated questions regarding ethics, like how do weigh the good & the bad, conflicting preferences, etc. Otherwise, it's all pointless & futile, like arguing bivalves or wild-suffering with a non-vegan. They're just not on that level yet and it's a waste of time.
revised version of my other comment: I believe that many discussions around morality miss a crucial point about value-realism, which acknowledges problematic events within subjectivity, a non-physical but real reality of the mind. It is evident that there are no objective, divine, or prime-directive moral rules we must follow. Unfortunately, religion has muddied the conversation with archaic ideas and terms like 'morality'.
There is no 'moral truth,' especially not an objective one. If critics pigeonhole realists into defending such notions, it becomes easy to refute them. My interest lies in ethics and whether value/problematic events exist.
Consider this question by nihilists: "Why is suffering bad?"
Response: Suffering is identified because it feels bad, subjectively. Just as we subjectively understand 2+2=4, we can recognize suffering through its unpleasant experience.
When asked to "prove suffering is bad, objectively," this is question-begging, as the question assumes that the badness must exist independently of minds, which it does not by definition. This question straw-mans the issue by requiring mind-independent badness, ignoring the subjective nature of suffering. As if the quality of it being BAD must be granted by something outside the experience itself.
Evolutionary Perspective: Animals perceive and react to torture (e.g., being skinned alive) as bad because evolution has imposed mechanisms that signal harm. Pain serves as a problem-solving mechanism, reinforcing behaviors that enhance survival. If pain and suffering weren't inherently problematic, they wouldn’t exist in the form they do.
Realists like myself argue that evolution has objectively imposed prescriptive-value judgments on animals. The concept of 'problem' or 'bad' arises from these evolutionary mechanisms, not from free will. The existence of these concepts indicates the reality of these problematic experiences.
If real problems didn’t exist, neither would the concepts describing them. This is akin to how beings blind from birth wouldn’t conceive of color. Suggesting that evolutionary processes have universally deluded all feeling organisms into perceiving problems where there are none is implausible.
As evolutionary biologists state, pain signals to the animal, "don't do that again," which is descriptively prescriptive. The 'ought' is embedded within the 'is.' Thus, the is-ought gap is a red herring because prescriptive judgments are evolutionarily ingrained.
Again, How do you identify suffering? Based on the fact that it feels bad. (Yes subjectively) Just as we can subjectively understand 2+2 = 4
All you have to agree to is due to evolution it created torture which is decidedly negative/ inherently BAD, by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't feel bad or be torturous at all... THEN ask yourself, how can something be BAD yet it's not BAD to create that BAD?
Conclusion: By acknowledging that evolution created inherently negative experiences like torture, we accept that these experiences are bad by definition. Denying the badness of creating bad experiences is contradictory. Therefore, once recognizing the true reality of subjective experiences, only then we can move on to complex ethical questions about weighing good and bad and addressing conflicting preferences.
playing devil's advocate let's try Steelman their position and then arrive at the logical conclusions of it and then perhaps refute it. If they say: "veganism = right" realize there is no contradiction IF by 'right' they just mean it's literally nothing but their preference...
There's no goal to prefer to know/do what's right, RATHER what's right is whatever matches our personal preferences, so unlike flat earther vs round earth beliefs/CLAIMs which can contradict/conflict with each other since either 1 is right or both are wrong. Individual tastes don't.
Whereas if VG says 9 people gRAPE the 1 kid for fun is WRONG because he's a threshold-deontologist but Also RIGHT to a hedonistic utilitarian, Those views only contradict/conflict if they are making VALUE-claims or recognizing a problematic event take place. However, with VG apparently he would have to say he's not claiming or labelling anything as TRULY problematic at all but merely describing his preferences like flavor of ice cream...
Now, of course, as the realist, I find such a view more deplorable/worse than if they were merely agnostic on right/wrong. Cause it's one thing to say there's a right answer to questions of Ethics but we have no objective scientific basis to determine it yet or lack knowledge VS saying they have knowledge there is absolutely no right or wrong.
Under Anti-realism nihilism, what they mean by wrong/right, is just their preference, if I understand correctly (which I'm quite sure) Anti-realism nihilism reduces the Subject of Ethics down to nothing but you or someone else pontificating/opining (i.e "me no like torture") . It defends some sort of expressivism, emotivism, normative, prescriptive reduction of Ethics. Which I find lubricious and has to be a mistake,
I don't see anyone playing any different game even the nihilists invest their money and plan ahead for self-interest, no one truly signs up for torture for fun like it's no problem, and runs away from pleasure happiness as bad. Further, it stands to reason... since we can recognize objectively evolution created a punishment mechanism to enforce learning and survival, BAD/PROBLEM as a concept is something I/WE/Animals had nothing to do with. We didn't invent it, we recognize it and respond accordingly. Even evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins stated that pain is a message to the organism 'don't do that again!'
We must address further the flawed logic of VG and other nihilists reducing Ethics down to mere arbitrary preferences like potato chip flavor, or how much salt you prefer in the soup. As it is completely disanalogous & dishonest upon reflection. QUOTE: "There's no arguing against Efilism, it's just personal opinion. Like arguing what tastes better... ice-cream or potato chips?"
Say if you believe that the mona-lisa is beautiful, and I personally find it ugly, this conflicts/contradicts nothing because it claims nothing in terms about that object or reality outside of our own minds.
such qualities are OUTPUTs generated by body/mind from these INPUTs, the input is quite arbitrary/irrelevant, unlike the highly meaningful & distinct output generated of positive or negative experiences.
it doesn't matter what specific fun or hobby gets them off or pushes their buttons in order for it MATTER, those differences don't make it any less real OR all mere subjective opinion. the output positives & negatives is more or less same among individuals and that's what's relevant...
It can be TRUE that a certain food item is the tastiest to some personal individual, or gross to another, one's experience of what is tastiest for them doesn't contradict another's, they can both be true for them individually because it is the reality in their mind, Some people find bricks tasty or edible, just how their brain is wired.
while one person may find a certain food delicious, another may find it repulsive, without invalidating each other's experiences because they are true for them individually. both experiences are valid/correct.
However, actions that disregard another's negative experience invalidate their reality. if you find being boiled alive problematic and I do it anyway believing it's ok, I am invalidating your experience as either not real, relevant, doesn't matter, or my preferences are more important (carry more weight) than yours. Or simply believe it's ALL equal or arbitrary and I just prefer to exploit you so I do that.
Positive or negative experiences are largely consistent among people, making them relevant, regardless of the specific stimuli. Individual truths about taste or preference coexist without contradiction, reflecting each person's value-generated reality.
This cannot honestly be applied to one's mere opinion it's fine to boil kids alive, as you are invalidating the fact that it matters to those victims. You saying it doesn't matter or your gain of pleasure outweighs their loss of pain, is a claim about the reality of events going on in their mind, so there is room for conflict/contradiction. They can't both be right/wrong at the exact same time.
A strong non-intuition argument/claim & facts presented render value-nihilism implausible:
It is Descriptively the case, that Evolution IMPOSED Prescriptive-ought statements... of 'PROBLEMATIC sensation/event' on organisms which functioned as a learning mechanism and improved survival.
Therefore, BAD/PROBLEM isn't mere subjective opinion but something I/we/animals had nothing to do with and are mere by-product reacting to an observation.
This is pretty much the only base-axiom needed to ground my own torture as mattering as the original actual value-currency at stake. That paired with the fact I sampled consciousness and know it matters to me whether or not I am tortured, the fact that I personally observe it as problematic makes it the true reality for my own mind...
...AND it's not mere opinion/proclamation / or idea humans creatively invented out of thin air... as if like everyone could be truly blind yet conceptualizing colovision, makes no sense. plus that's giving humanity way too much credit of imagination.
Can't really have thoughts about information that you don't have. The concept of bad/problem arguably wouldn't even exist if it never was so.
Yes, I agree very semantics. I am attempting to shed clarity on this topic. Looking at the word "BAD" purely in a descriptive sense (e.g., that which can be categorically applied to extreme suffering) it loses all meaning if it's not truly consequential (i.e., it matters whether one experiences bad or not). If it doesn't actually matter ("no problemo") then it can't be bad, only an illusion/delusion of it, yet it's an effective one evolution imposed on organisms as a learning/problem-solving mechanism. The value-realists like myself have every reason to believe evolution created the real thing, not some contrived pseudo-problem organisms feel compelled/obligated to solve.
One only requires the axiom of a Descriptive Bad to ground Ethics. Why? Because it can be argued that a descriptive statement of BAD/problem is prescriptive by it's very nature in the meaning the of word/language.(otherwise its psuedo-bad/fake langauge, redefines bad as aversion/mere preference against) Otherwise, it can't mean anything to be bad, torturously obnoxious, unwanted experiential events couldn't mean anything. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins even state pain is a punishment signal/message to the animal: "Don't do that again!" If those aren't prescriptions imposed, then I don't know what is. The animal doesn't simply decide/prefer to avoid the event and finds it bad, it's told/finds it bad and so prefers to avoid the event/problem. If god or there were some logically or physically possible way it were to be invented how else would it exist?, or what you think evolution's reward & punishment mechanism accomplished? If it didn't synthesize problematic sensations to force organisms to solve?
Evolution prescribes Needs/wants, at the same time imposes a PAIN/PROBLEM of starvation/hunger which by it's very nature is a prescription for solution (i.e. sustenance/relief/comfort.)
By the very nature of "PROBLEM" it prescribes -> "SOLUTION" not merely a contrived or trivial-like on paper math problem, but the origin of why the word even exists: the problem of pain, a true whip/punishment mechanism, real currency to play with, real loss. Idk how you can describe something categorically as a PROBLEM in the true sense of the word if it doesn't come with it a necessary prescription for its solution. Because if there is no NEED for a solution, then it turns into no longer a problem again...
I don't see how it could be any other way because if there's no real game to be playing with value baked into it, then money would be worthless/not even exist, animals wouldn't bother evade standing in the fire, etc.
Saying It is Descriptively the case, that Evolution IMPOSED Prescriptive-ought statements... of 'PROBLEMATIC sensation/event' on organisms which functioned as a learning mechanism and improved survival.
Is the same as saying Evolution IMPOSED torture/BAD, as that's what torture/bad is... a prescribed need for solution to a problem which is some form of relief/comfort.
The prescription arises as a result of accepting step 1. (which nihilists reject/deny) problem solution. The latter does not follow/exist without the former. basic 2+2 = 4 logic. There's no point figuring out the answer to the math equation, if we don't agree first and foremost a problem exists. Nor how to solve a disease, if we don't first and foremost recognize a disease exists. And so, Any debate with nihilists on step 2: of determining what is the most likely solution / right answer becomes irrelevent and a waste of time. Arguing about whether x or y IS the right answer to fixing/preventing diabetes is pointless when they don't even agree the really disease exists. They don't believe an actual real BAD / Problem exists.
VG reduces it down to mere preferences, his reasonings that even if universally sentience prefers not suffebe tortured... Well, just because it is the case descriptively we prefer to avoid suffering doesn't mean we ought/should prevent suffering. He hasn't bridged the IS-OUGHT gap. But he got it backwards,
the claim/argument... ISN'T that because descriptively, sentience universally has a preference to avoid suffering, it is therefore bad,
the claim/argument... IS that it's descriptively bad/problematic, therefore universally there's a deductively logically assigned preference to avoid it,
Again you can't classify/label something as a problem if it's inconsequential whether it is solved or not. The word loses all meaning. If something NEEDs solving/fixing it means there's a problem, if there's a problem it means there's something NEED solving/fixing. Evolution manufactures these needy problems in organisms to manipulate and control them.
Merely what our preferences are IS NOT relevant, preference "frustration" arguably IS. (if preferences couldn't be frustrated "i.e., no value" than it wouldn't matter which way things turned out)
You can have a preference for some art style over another, if we were just programmed non-feeling robots that preferred to avoid standing in the fire, but there was no real kernel of value/bad, then it wouldn't matter.
Let's imagine something was Objectively PROBLEMATIC, an IS statement. What would a real problem look like? something in NEED of a solution. Again, why? because If it doesn't matter whether or not it exists or is Solved or not, it could never be a problem in the first place. So either this problem exists or it doesn't. (NOTE: it doesn't need to be an objective problem to be REAL, "i.e mind-independent")
Next, if ASI or sentient beings were to sample this "problem", would it not be the case they would logically deduce it's in need of a solution? And assign their preferences accordingly to solving it? Cause again otherwise then you just see it as "no-problemo" again.
"If Inmendham's argument is that sentient beings create value, and that the universe has no value without the presence of a sentient being generating it, would it not follow that the ought is inherently built into sensation?" yes but the way VG unfairly reframes it is that we subjectively place value on it, THAT it's entirely subjective, like you prefer salty or sweet, or certain ice cream flavor. emphasizing that it's entirely subjective opinion. Take a look at his unfair silly example: "we can't say pineapple on pizza is objectively tasty or not..." this shows a complete ineptitude in grasping the subject and misrepresenting the argument like crazy, no one is arguing whether Mona Lisa is objectively beautiful or some such thing.
What is being argued: the positive or negative mind-dependent event produced in response to the sensual or perceptual stimuli, the input (object) is irrelevant, only the output (experience) matters and what the value-engine (BRAIN) produced. What pushes your buttons so to speak, blue jelly beans or green jelly beans, could differ between 2 individuals but the shared experience is the same more or less. Whether you wired to find pineapple on pizza tasty or gross is irrelevant, some people find bricks edible.
Main issue is they talking past each other: what inmendham is arguing for was either not expressed as best it could be, and/or VG does not quite comprehend what is being argued... inmendham claims/argues evolution created the real bad/PROBLEM and we respond in recognition of this fact/truth with preferences that follow accordingly, Logic cannot be escaped, once you know 2+2 = 4, you can't will or believe it to be 79. If you know the right answer "torture be Bad M'kay?" obviously you won't act or behave otherwise and say you love it. What could it mean to have a preference against experiencing torture... does such a statement even make any sense? All that is required is a real BAD to exist... and then the preference to avoid it logically follows, an inescapable truth. Unless he thinks I also choose or prefer to believe 2+2 = 4 ?
Essentially VG keeps counter-arguing that: "yes we want to avoid torture, but that's just your preference... just cause universally sentience has a preference against torture (a Descriptive / IS statement) doesn't logically follow some Normative/Prescriptive claim/statement. That just because something IS the case it doesn't follow that we OUGHT / should do X, like help others, prevent suffering, etc. That's a non-sequitur he says. Ultimately it's just a preference." sure but...
His argument only applies/counters a strawman position in his head: Because of this I and other realists can account for / side-step it completely, we aren't attempting to derive an OUGHT from an IS. e.g strawman: "we ALL have preference against torture, Therefore it's BAD." Or "we ALL have preference against torture, Therefore we OUGHT prevent it"
The actual argument is that it's Truly Bad/Problematic by the very nature of the word, Therefore first-hand observation follows universally a deductively logically assigned preference to avoid it. Not the other way around.
"If the only thing that can have meaning in the universe is the experience of a sentient being, ought we not maximize its value just by nature of its experience being the only thing that can matter?" yes the ought is a further logical extension of recognizing it to be a problem, which denotes/demands a solution, otherwise if it doesn't matter to solve it or not then you've turned it into a non-problem again. So it can only be categorically one or the other.
Issue of semantics, different terminology and definitions: as long as VG defines objective as "mind-independent" and sets the goal-post to the realist to find a mind-independent "wrong/bad" as if somehow we need some divine-command or absolute rule in the universe that declares it so... then there is no fruit to the discussion. suffering/bad takes place in the mind/experience, so of course it's unfair to ask one to present a mind-independent suffering/bad in the universe, it is begging the question. To be fair inmendham uses the term objective and could have done better job with defining/pushing his terms "e.g. objective as truth/real/fact" and not let VG impose in his own. However, I don't ascribe a requirement to demonstrate an Objective BAD to ground a BAD as real, valid, and true; it can be entirely based on Subjectivist grounds/axiomatic foundations.
Just because the BAD takes place within subjectivity doesn't make it any less real (non-physical/immaterial sure... but not unreal). VG and nihilists can't understand this. 2+2 = 4 is subjective as is all science ultimately as a root axiomatic-fact... as an observation requires an observer. This doesn't mean realism can't be proven/grounded, it can just like we can know 2+2=4 and the moon exists. If anti-realism is gonna deny subjective truths because it's subjective, then one can't know much of anything and reduces to solipsism. I am more certain I exist and the reality of "perceived" BAD I experience is actually a real BAD... THAN that the moon even exists or any other scientific empirical claim.
PROBLEM is something I/we/animals had Nothing to do with, we didn't invent it.
If Anti-realism nihilism was True and Real "PROBLEMS" didn't exist the word wouldn't exist. It is like being born never knowing or seeing or experiencing vision & color, it's impossible to contrive or imagine it. Some knowledge & information is only accessible through experience.
Even Richard Dawkins stated, "pain is a message to the animal Don't do that again!"
If the ought exists within subjectivity, as preferences, why would them being Subjective vs Objective determine whether or not their violation matters? If one experiences disgust looking at something AND another finds beauty... both are true realities for them, they don't conflict or contradict like empirical or fact claims, but instead both are correct and relevant, not one or the other, BECAUSE when someone says the mona Lisa is beautiful they are just saying it arises in them a sense of beauty, the thing/input is irrelevant whereas the output in mind is what is relevant and true for their reality.
Subjective =/= not true, I don't understand the dichotomy between objective vs subjective ethics, as if there isn't facts to glean about subjectivity.
There's also definition or semantic problems:
objective (mind-independent) vs subjective (mind-dependent)
Under such definition does it make sense to say Objectively evolution created feeling experiencing organisms having sense of taste, smell, sound, hunger, pain, to survive. So can we apply word objective to mind-dependent experiences or not?
And of course under such definition there is no objective mind-independent ethics as without minds there is no feeling subject of concern to even talk about in first place. So how silly...
Yet they take objective to mean True & Subjective made up or mere contrived opinion.
For me these are semantic word games that distract, I just care about what's fact/true. What many don't get is Even science, math is subjective invention, byproduct of subjective tool of language, doesn't mean we can't create an accurate model and picture of reality.
I believe the Is-Ought gap is a red-herring, sure it's true you can't contrive an Ought from just what IS, but with evolution the OUGHT statement is built-in, it's descriptively a prescriptive value statement imposed on me, I/we/animals literally have nothing to do with it, I'm just by-product an observer. This is key understanding.
There exists no objective or divine commandment "you OUGHT do X" written into the fabric of reality, and therefore if you don't that's Bad, No. That's nonsense/impossible logically.
Rather an Descriptive IS statement of X is a real bad/PROBLEM, denotes/demands a solution by it's very nature of the word, otherwise if it doesn't need solving then it becomes into a non-problem again, so either x categorically IS a PROBLEM or it's not.
The claim/argument... Is that it's Descriptively BAD/Problematic, therefore universally there's a deductively logically assigned preference to avoid it. Not the other way around. Our personal preference against torture forever doesn't make it therefore bad. The prescription is built in, forced onto us.
It's like "STOP!" & "GO" What do you say to a dog? "BAD dog!" This is saying it should or shouldn't do something. basically = "No!" "Stop!" That's a prescriptive statement/signal/conveyed message.
Or simply, alls required is Descriptively diagnose Torture as Problematic. Which implies Problem Solution Without necessity of solution there is no problem at all, likewise without problem solution means nothing.
​So you essentially boiled my position down to: "Evolution programmed preference to avoid torture." or "we evolved preference to avoid torture" Does that sound incoherent or what... as if I would make such a silly claim. Keep straw-manning.
Do you think animals have PREFERENCE by default to avoid being tortured burned alive and have sex, or logically preferences are born out of observing problematic negative / positive assigned accordingly through punishment & reward mechanisms aka prescriptions, think long and hard about this one...
This is why value or ethical nihilism is incoherent to me. IF torture be bad, how can it be NOT-bad/neutral to create BAD?
It either is truly BAD or it isn't. It's either real or it's an illusion/delusion and false perception.
Their position must reduce to there is no MEANINGFUL difference between Torture & Bliss. And evolution didn't create any problematic sensation or true punishment whatsoever. Instead, were somehow deluded to view being boiling alive as problematic sensation/BAD, and relief as good, we can't tell the difference or label which is which...
Vegan Gains or any anti-realist needs to substantiate these anti-realist nihilist claims & concede if he agrees with the statements below:
"The value-laden problematic BAD experience of being tortured boiled alive in a vat of acid indefinitely... isn't really bad, evolution didn't successfully impose a real negative punishment mechanism on animals, torture isn't something I/we/animals had nothing to do with and are just byproduct observing the imposition, NO! Instead our opinion has everything to do with it... what's problematic torture, one is merely subjectively interpreting/inventing/proclaiming it to be so! Evolution failed!"
"Animals run from fire cause they irrationally unreasonably subjectively interpret it to be bad/problematic sensation or experience, not cause DNA molecule made it so objectively for evolutionary reasons"
"It is all subjective preference like flavor of potato chips, problematic torturous experience isn't bad you just think it's bad or have preference against it."
"You don't logically recognize intrinsic problematic torturous experience then logically assign solution to problem which is preference to avoid that experience, No, you merely have subjective delusional preference against a nail in your eye and there is no logic to it"
"Good is Bad, and Bad is Good depending on opinion, no right or wrong, all subjective tho"
value anti-realism nihilism. INSANE! WORSE than a flat-earth theory!

I spend a lot of time researching how our nervous system works and what may contribute to the development of Visual Snow and other symptoms. Remember that there is a lot of vital information that I do not know, and may greatly benefit our understanding of this condition. Visual snow is described as an "epileptic" firing in the visual system in the brain. (Tinnitus behaves very similarly but it is occurring in the auditory nerves) NMDA glutamate receptors, which are overexpressed after excitotoxic injury may well be the trigger of an increased spontaneous firing in the nerves. In turn, the brain would decode this increased firing as "visual snow" The idea is that remaining nerve endings have been damaged enough to overexpress NMDA Glutamate receptors, thus increasing their spontaneous firing.There are various factors that contribute to the development of this condition. Everybody first had an initial trigger, and this varies from person to person. Common causes include stress, trauma, recreational and prescription drugs, Lyme, mold, heavy metals, and other toxic exposures. But what they all result in is brain injury and neuronal damage. The severity varies from person to person. The consequences of such injury doesn't just cause break in communication between healthy neurons, but a cascade of events that can lead to further neuronal degeneration and cell death. That is where visual snow comes in. Think of a broken radio or a TV where it isn't able to receive and process incoming signals so the outcome is a lot of visual/auditory noise. Our brains behave in a similar manner when there is an interference with proper neuron function and communication.Another good example is a type of neuropathic pain called paresthesia where you experience tingling and pricking sensations in various parts of your body. When nerves are damaged, they can't communicate properly and that miscommunication causes symptoms such as pain, tingling or numbness.Medical researchers searching for new medications for visual snow often look to the connection between the nerve cells in the brain and the various agents that act as neurotransmitters, such as the central nervous system's primary excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. Visual snow can be caused when damaged brain cells emit an excess of glutamate. Many treatments use ingredients that work as glutamate antagonists, or inhibitors. Communication between nerve cells in the brain is accomplished through the use of neurotransmitters. There are many compounds that act as neurotransmitters including acetylcholine, serotonin, GABA, glutamate, aspartate, epinephrine, norpinephrine and dopamine. These chemicals attach to nerve cells at specific receptors that allow for only one type of neurotransmitter to attach.Some of the neurotransmitters are excitatory; leading to increased electrical transmission between nerve cells. Others are inhibitory and reduce electrical activity. The most common excitatory neurotransmitters are glutamate and aspartate while the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter is GABA. It is necessary for excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters to be in balance for proper brain function to occur.Communication over synapses between neurons are controlled by glutamate. When brain cells are damaged, excessive glutamate is released. Glutamate is well known to have neurotoxic properties when excessively released or incompletely recycled. This is known as excitotoxicity and leads to neuronal death.Excess glutamate opens the sodium channel in the neuron and causes it to fire. Sodium continues to flow into the neuron causing it to continue firing. This continuous firing of the neuron results in a rapid buildup of free radicals and inflammatory compounds. These compounds attack the mitochondria, the energy producing elements in the core of the neuron cell. The mitochondria become depleted and the neuron withers and dies.Excitotoxicity has been involved in a number of acute and/or degenerative forms of neuropathology such as epilepsy, autism, ALS, Parkinson’s, schizophrenia, migraines, restless leg syndrome, tourettes, pandas, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, Huntington's, seizures, insomnia, hyperactivity, OCD, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorders.(Doctors use two basic ways to correct this imbalance. The first is to activate GABA receptors that will inhibit the continuous firing caused by glutamate. The second way to correct the imbalance is use antogonists to glutamate and its receptor N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA). These are termed glutamate or NMDA antagonists. By binding with these receptors, the antagonist medication reduces glutamate-induced continuous firing of the neuron. This explains why some drugs like clonazepam and lamictal are able to help relieve symptoms in some patients. They help reduce excitatory action in the brain temporarily)Anxiety, depression, brain fog, depersonalization, visual disturbances (including visual snow, palinopsia, blue field entoptic phenomenon, photophobia, photopsia) headaches, tinnitus, are all common symptoms associated with increased excitatory activity in the brain. Excessive glutamate is the primary villain in visual snow.I strongly believe there are some genetic components that play a huge role in the development of Visual Snow and makes some individuals more susceptible to developing it. Normally, glutamate concentration is tightly controlled in the brain by various mechanisms at the synapse. There are at least 30 proteins that are membrane-bound receptor or transporter proteins at, or near, the glutamate synapse that control or modulate neuronal excitability. But in Visual Snow sufferers, my hypothesis is that we carry a faulty gene that results in dysregulation of the proteins that control and regulate glutamate excitability. They are unknown as more research will be needed.We live in a society where we are stressed emotionally, financially, physically and exposed to a range of toxins in our environment. Combining underlying genetic susceptibility with these other factors creates all the ingredients for a perfect storm.Stress + Infectious Agents (if any) + Toxins + Genetic Susceptibility = Health ConditionIncluded below is a list of things that can lead to excitotoxicity. The list includes trauma, drugs, environmental, chemicals and miscellaneous causes of brain cell damage. (Keep in mind everybody's bodies behave and react differently to various substances)-Severe Stress (Most people that are stressed out don’t realize that once the fight-or-flight response gets activated it can release things like cortisol and epinephrine into the body. Although these boost alertness, in major concentrations, the elevated levels of cortisol over an extended period of time can damage brain functioning and kill brain cells)-Free Radicals – Free radicals are highly-reactive forms of oxygen that can kill brain cells and cause brain damage. If the free radicals in your brain run rampant, your neurons will be damaged at a quicker rate than they can be repaired. This leads to brain cell death as well as cognitive decline if not corrected. (Common causes are unhealthy diet, lifestyle and toxic exposure)-Head Trauma (like concussion or contusion) MRI can detect damaged brain tissue BUT not damaged neurons. -Dehydration (severe)-Cerebal Hypoxia-Lyme disease-Narcolepsy-Sleep Apnea-Stroke-Drugs (recreational or prescription) -Amphetamine abuse-Methamphetamines-Antipsychotics-Benzodiazepine abuse-Cocaine-Esctasy -LSD-Cannabis-Tobacco-Inhalants-Nitrous Oxide-PCP-Steroids-Air Pollution-Carbon Monoxide-Heavy Metal Exposure (such as lead, copper and mercury)-Mold Exposure-Welding fumes-Formaldehyde-Solvents-Pesticides-Anesthesia-Aspartame-MSG (Monosodium Glutamate is found in most processed foods and is hidden under many various names)-Solvents-Chemotherapy-Radiation-Other toxic exposuresInside the Glutamate StormBy: Vivian Teichberg, and Luba Vikhanski"The amino acid glutamate is the major signaling chemical in nature. All invertebrates (worms, insects, and the like) use glutamate for conveying messages from nerve to muscle. In mammals, glutamate is mainly present in the central nervous system, brain, and spinal cord, where it plays the role of a neuronal messenger, or neurotransmitter. In fact, almost all brain cells use glutamate to exchange messages. Moreover, glutamate can serve as a source of energy for the brain cells when their regular energy supplier, glucose, is lacking. However, when its levels rise too high in the spaces between cells—known as extracellular spaces—glutamate turns its coat to become a toxin that kills neurons.As befits a potentially hazardous substance, glutamate is kept safely sealed within the brain cells. A healthy neuron releases glutamate only when it needs to convey a message, then immediately sucks the messenger back inside. Glutamate concentration inside the cells is 10,000 times greater than outside them. If we follow the dam analogy, that would be equivalent to holding 10,000 cubic feet of glutamate behind the dam and letting only a trickle of one cubic foot flow freely outside. A clever pumping mechanism makes sure this trickle never gets out of hand: When a neuron senses the presence of too much glutamate in the vicinity—the extracellular space—it switches on special pumps on its membrane and siphons the maverick glutamate back in.This protective pumping process works beautifully as long as glutamate levels stay within the normal range. But the levels can rise sharply if a damaged cell spills out its glutamate. In such a case, the pumps on the cellular membranes can no longer cope with the situation, and glutamate reveals its destructive powers. It doesn’t kill the neuron directly. Rather, it overly excites the cell, causing it to open its pores excessively and let in large quantities of substances that are normally allowed to enter only in limited amounts.One of these substances is sodium, which leads to cell swelling because its entry is accompanied by an inrush of water, needed to dilute the surplus sodium. The swelling squeezes the neighboring blood vessels, preventing normal blood flow and interrupting the supply of oxygen and glucose, which ultimately leads to cell death. Cell swelling, however, is reversible; the cells will shrink back once glutamate is removed from brain fluids. More dangerous than sodium is calcium, which is harmless under normal conditions but not when it rushes inside through excessively opened pores. An overload of calcium destroys the neuron’s vital structures and eventually kills it.Regardless of what killed it, the dead cell spills out its glutamate, all the vast quantities of it that were supposed to be held back by the dam. The spill overly excites more cells, and these die in turn, spilling yet more glutamate. The destructive process repeats itself over and over, engulfing brain areas until the protective pumping mechanism finally manages to stop the spread of glutamate."Recent research has confirmed that hypermetabolism has been primarily found in the right lingual gyrus and left cerebellar anterior lobe of the brain in individuals suffering from visual snow. The definition of hypermetabolism is described as "the physiological state of increased rate of metabolic activity and is characterized by an abnormal increase in metabolic rate." Hypermetabolism typically occurs after significant injury to the body. It serves as one of the body's strongest defence against illness and injury. This means that the brain is trying to compensate for the injured areas in the brain by increasing metabolism to meet it's high energy demands. It is trying to function to the best of it's ability under the circumstances. Normally the body can heal itself and regenerate under the right circumstances. But it is extremely difficult for the central nervous system - which includes the spinal cord and brain to be able to do so, due to it's inhibitory environment which prevents new neurons from forming. That is where stem cells come in. Stem cells are an exciting new discovery, because they can become literally any cell in the body including neurons. This is an amazing scientific breakthrough and has the potential to treat a whole host of conditions. Scientists are currently doing research and conducting trials.Excitotoxicity can trigger your "fight or flight" response, as this is the body's primary response to illness, injury or infection. If the brain and the body remain in the sympathetic fight or flight state for too long and too often, it is degenerative; it breaks us down. If this cycle continues, then eventually the system burns out. It is this cycle that results in autonomic nervous system dysfunction. The results are disastrous, digestion is shut down, metabolism, immune function and the detoxification system is impaired, blood pressure and heart rate are increased, circulation is impaired, sleep is disrupted, memory and cognitive function may be impaired, neurotransmitters are drained, our sense of smell, taste and sound are amplified, high levels of norepinephrine are released in the brain and the adrenal glands release a variety of hormones like adrenaline and cortisol.I believe in order to find a treatment or cure for VS and it's accompanying symptoms, we need to address the underlying cause, reduce the excess excitatory activity in the brain, repair the damaged neurons, regain proper communication between neurons, rebalance the autonomic nervous system and prevent further cellular damage. We also need to figure out what genes, if any come into play. There is still a lot we don't know about the brain because it is such an remarkably complex organ.FAQsWon't lowering the levels of glutamate solve the problem? Well, not necessarily. That is just one piece of the puzzle. You have to remember that Visual Snow is a multifactorial and complex condition in which it stems from a number of different causes and influences. Based on my knowledge and the information I have gathered, I can conclude that the overstimulation of glutamate plays a huge role in VS and some other symptoms we experience. But there is still so much we don't know. That's why more research will be needed.Why is my condition worsening over time?That is a very good question. It is because the physiology, biology and chemistry of your brain and nervous system has been altered and has become dysfunctional since the initial trigger set off a domino of effects that leads to further degradation in the body. This puts a huge strain on your body and is constantly activating your stress response system. This will wreak havoc on your entire body. The stress response system was designed to deal with brief emergencies that threaten survival. It isn't supposed to last very long because the body cannot sustain itself for very long in this state. When you remain in "fight or flight" sympathetic state for too long, it becomes degenerative and breaks our bodies down. This affects every system in the body. When you are constantly under stress, the stress response system never turns off resulting in an ongoing destructive cycle. Stress can also exacerbate all your symptoms and makes you susceptible to developing other chronic health conditions. How is the gut related to VS?Having increased intestinal permeability is very common in this modern world because we are constantly being bombarded by toxins and stress. Our bodies weren't designed to handle such a huge burden. So we end up getting sick and become susceptible to kinds of diseases. Common causes include:-Poor diet (from excessive consumption of foods such as grains, legumes, sugars, alcohol)-Chronic stress-Toxin overload-Gut dysbiosis (It means you have a lack of beneficial bacteria in your gastrointestinal (GI) tract. They are overpowered and outnumbered by pathogens such as pathogenic bacteria, yeast, viruses, parasites)-Overuse of antibiotics When you have increased intestinal permeability, the epithelium on the villi of the small intestine becomes inflamed and irritated, which allows metabolic, microbial and environmental toxins and undigested food particles to flood into the blood stream. This event compromises the liver, the lymphatic system, and the immune response including the endocrine system. It is often the primary cause of the following common conditions: asthma, food allergies, chronic sinusitis, eczema, urticaria, migraine, irritable bowel, fungal disorders, fibromyalgia, and inflammatory joint disorders including rheumatoid arthritis are just a few of the diseases that can originate from having poor gut health.This sets the stage for chronic systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired detoxification, gastrointestinal dysfunction and immune system dysregulation.Some toxins have the ability to damage and destroy neurons, myelin sheaths, synapses and even DNA. An overload of toxins that the immune system is not able to get rid of disrupts normal brain function. This eventually initiates an autoimmune response where the immune system attacks the brain and nerve cells as it tries it’s best to eliminate the toxins.The mitochondria are the energy producing section of your cells. When they are damaged by the toxic overload in the brain cells and are not able to produce energy to fuel the cell, the cell dies.In order to stop this vicious cycle, the underlying biological mechanisms of VS needs to be understood. That is the first step that needs to be taken. Any other stressors also needs to be addressed in order to reduce the overall stress load.It is important to know that VS is just a symptom of underlying physiological stress in the brain. Symptoms are your body's way of communicating with you, letting you know something is wrong in the body.I've come across some research indicating that microglial activation and elevated nitric oxide is involved in some neurological conditions. Basically the microglial cells are our brain's immune cells and when something triggers an inflammatory response, they activate and release harmful neurotoxic compounds (such as nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines) which results in neuronal injury/death. Microglial activation can also result in a loss of synaptic connections in different regions of the brain. It's basically an autoimmune response in the brain. The neuroinflammatory process appears to be an ongoing and chronic cycle of central nervous system dysfunction. This can deplete glutathione levels in the body. Glutathione is the body’s most important antioxidant which is capable of preventing oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species such as free radicals, peroxides, lipid peroxides, and heavy metals. This only further exaggerates the problem, which only leads to a cascade of increased inflammation.Nitric oxide plays a vital role in this process. Elevated nitric oxide levels reduces and impair natural killer cells which leads to a vulnerable immune system that is susceptible to a variety of systemic infections. -Phobe Zhang

After 23 years of research, $20M in NIH funding, & 25+ human clinical trials on muscle repair, recovery, and protein synthesis, Promino Nutritional Sciences is ready to disrupt the $51B protein supplement market.
Promino Nutritional Sciences has a ~$13M market cap & is sitting around $0.25 per share. They focus on science-based formulations to address muscle health through their 2 main products, Rejuvenate and PROMINO. The CEO Vito Sanzone is a 25yr vet in the health, wellness, and fitness industry who specializes in successful go-to-market product strategies & company turnarounds.
Rejuvenate is a daily muscle health drink proven to assist in muscle rebuilding and prevent age-related muscle loss. This drink has a large addressable market moving forward as it can assist the growing number of people who are taking GLP-1 drugs in getting their protein for the day & ensuring minimal muscle loss.
Promino’s protein powder is ranked No.1 in protein quality based on standards set by the World Health Organization & is 2x more effective than WHEY protein, which has athlete ambassadors like Jack Eichel backing them.
Last week it was announced that Promino & Dr. Patrick Gunning will start preclinical studies on nutritional supplementation for cancer patients, focused on testing the efficacy of the patented amino acid formula in addressing muscle loss. Promino could have a huge opportunity as there are ~17,113,494 cancer patients in the US that Promino could help.
Add this company to your watchlist & let me know your thoughts! Cheers.

After 23 years of research, $20M in NIH funding, & 25+ human clinical trials on muscle repair, recovery, and protein synthesis, Promino Nutritional Sciences is ready to disrupt the $51B protein supplement market.
Promino Nutritional Sciences has a ~$13M market cap & is sitting around $0.25 per share. They focus on science-based formulations to address muscle health through their 2 main products, Rejuvenate and PROMINO. The CEO Vito Sanzone is a 25yr vet in the health, wellness, and fitness industry who specializes in successful go-to-market product strategies & company turnarounds.
Rejuvenate is a daily muscle health drink proven to assist in muscle rebuilding and prevent age-related muscle loss. This drink has a large addressable market moving forward as it can assist the growing number of people who are taking GLP-1 drugs in getting their protein for the day & ensuring minimal muscle loss.
Promino’s protein powder is ranked No.1 in protein quality based on standards set by the World Health Organization & is 2x more effective than WHEY protein, which has athlete ambassadors like Jack Eichel backing them.
Last week it was announced that Promino & Dr. Patrick Gunning will start preclinical studies on nutritional supplementation for cancer patients, focused on testing the efficacy of the patented amino acid formula in addressing muscle loss. Promino could have a huge opportunity as there are ~17,113,494 cancer patients in the US that Promino could help.
Add this company to your watchlist & let me know your thoughts! Cheers.

The global vanillin market is witnessing significant growth due to its widespread applications in the food and beverage, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics industries. Understanding the production cost processes and conducting a detailed cost analysis is crucial for businesses to remain competitive and profitable. This press release delves into the vanillin production cost analysis, offering a thorough assessment of the production processes, market drivers, raw material requirements, and key cost factors. Additionally, we provide information on obtaining an exhaustive and personalized report tailored to substantiate your business needs.
Request For Free Sample: https://www.procurementresource.com/production-cost-report-store/vanillin/request-sample

Procurement Resource Assessment of Vanillin Production Process

Procurement Resource provides a meticulous assessment of the vanillin production process, considering various production methods, including the biosynthesis method, chemical synthesis method, and lignin-based method. Each method is analyzed for its efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and environmental impact. Our comprehensive evaluation encompasses the following steps:

• Biosynthesis Method: This method involves the use of microorganisms to convert ferulic acid into vanillin. It is considered environmentally friendly and sustainable. The cost analysis includes expenses related to fermentation, purification, and extraction processes.
• Chemical Synthesis Method: This traditional method involves the chemical conversion of guaiacol or lignin into vanillin. While this method is cost-effective, it has environmental implications due to the use of chemicals and solvents. Our analysis covers the costs of raw materials, catalysts, and waste management.
• Lignin-Based Method: Lignin, a by-product of the paper and pulp industry, is used as a raw material for vanillin production. This method promotes waste utilization and is considered sustainable. The cost assessment includes the procurement of lignin, conversion processes, and purification steps.

Product Definition

Vanillin, an organic compound with the molecular formula C8H8O3, is the primary component of the extract of the vanilla bean. It is widely used as a flavoring agent in the food and beverage industry, adding a distinctive aroma and taste to a variety of products, including ice creams, chocolates, and baked goods. In the pharmaceutical industry, vanillin is utilized for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, while in the cosmetics industry, it is used in perfumes and fragrances.

Market Drivers

The vanillin market is driven by several factors:

• Increasing Demand in Food and Beverage Industry: The growing consumer preference for natural and organic flavors in food products is driving the demand for vanillin. Its extensive use in confectioneries, bakery products, and beverages is a significant market driver.
• Rising Health Awareness: With increasing health consciousness among consumers, the demand for natural flavoring agents like vanillin is on the rise. Vanillin's antioxidant properties make it a preferred choice in health and wellness products.
• Expansion in Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Industries: The pharmaceutical industry's demand for vanillin is increasing due to its therapeutic properties. Similarly, the cosmetics industry is witnessing a surge in demand for vanillin-based fragrances and perfumes.
• Technological Advancements in Production Methods: Innovations in production technologies, such as biosynthesis and lignin-based methods, are making vanillin production more sustainable and cost-effective, further driving market growth.

Raw Materials Requirements

The production of vanillin requires specific raw materials, which vary depending on the production method:

• Ferulic Acid: Used in the biosynthesis method, ferulic acid is derived from agricultural waste products such as rice bran and wheat bran. The cost and availability of ferulic acid significantly impact the overall production cost.
• Guaiacol: A key raw material in the chemical synthesis method, guaiacol is derived from guaiacum or wood creosote. The procurement cost of guaiacol is a critical factor in the cost analysis.
• Lignin: In the lignin-based method, lignin is sourced from the paper and pulp industry. Utilizing lignin as a raw material promotes sustainability and waste reduction, but the cost of extraction and conversion processes needs to be considered.

Costs and Key Process Information

The cost analysis of vanillin production involves a detailed evaluation of various cost components, including raw materials, labor, energy, and overheads. Key process information includes:

• Fermentation and Extraction Costs: In the biosynthesis method, the costs associated with fermentation, including the cultivation of microorganisms and maintenance of optimal conditions, are critical. Extraction and purification steps also contribute to the overall cost.
• Chemical Conversion Costs: In the chemical synthesis method, the costs of raw materials, catalysts, and solvents play a significant role. Additionally, expenses related to waste management and environmental compliance are considered.
• Lignin Conversion Costs: For the lignin-based method, the extraction of lignin from industrial waste and its subsequent conversion into vanillin are key cost components. The sustainability aspect of this method may offer long-term cost benefits.

Looking for an Exhaustive and Personalized Report?

If you are looking for an exhaustive and personalized report that could significantly substantiate your business, Procurement Resource offers tailored vanillin production cost analysis reports. Our reports provide in-depth insights into production processes, cost structures, market trends, and competitive landscape. We work closely with clients to deliver customized solutions that align with their specific business needs and objectives. Contact us today to gain a competitive edge in the vanillin market with our comprehensive and personalized reports.

Contact Us:

Company Name: Procurement Resource Contact Person: Christeen Johnson Email: [sales@procurementresource.com](mailto:sales@procurementresource.com) Toll-Free Number: USA & Canada – Phone no: +1 307 363 1045 UK – Phone no: +44 7537 132103 Asia-Pacific (APAC) – Phone no: +91 1203185500 Address: 30 North Gould Street, Sheridan, WY 82801, USA

I'm finding it difficult to find a list of these things. Like limescale, mold, mildew, grease etc. I want to get scientific and use the best possible cleansers for each specific form of dirt. And create an easy guide for it.
For example, I've found that vinegar is great for cleaning limescale. (Like covering a shower head with a baggy filled with vinegar for an hour. Then it all comes off with a scour daddy.) And dish soap is great for removing grease.
But what types of dirt is acid or bleach based cleanser best for? Is there anything else I should know? Thank you!

Maintaining optimal blood sugar levels is a cornerstone of good health. Unstable blood sugar can lead to a myriad of health issues, from fatigue and mood swings to more serious conditions like diabetes. Enter Gluco 6, a revolutionary product designed to support healthy blood sugar levels naturally. Whether you're looking to prevent blood sugar spikes, improve your energy levels, or support overall wellness, Gluco 6 is your reliable partner on this journey.
What is Gluco6?
Gluco6 is a carefully formulated dietary supplement designed to support healthy blood sugar levels. It features a synergistic blend of natural ingredients known for their effectiveness in managing glucose. With a holistic approach, Gluco6 helps individuals maintain optimal blood sugar levels, promoting overall vitality and wellness.

Click Here To Order Gluco 6 Supplements From The Official Website

Ingredients Of Gluco 6
· Berberine: A bioactive compound found in several plants, including Berberis. Berberine has been shown to lower blood sugar levels, improve glucose metabolism, and enhance insulin sensitivity.
· Cinnamon Extract: Cinnamon is well-known for its blood sugar-lowering properties. It can improve insulin sensitivity and reduce fasting blood sugar levels.
· Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA): A powerful antioxidant that helps improve insulin sensitivity and reduce oxidative stress, which is often elevated in people with high blood sugar.
· Chromium Picolinate: An essential trace mineral that enhances insulin function, helping to regulate blood sugar levels.
· Gymnema Sylvestre: An herb used in traditional medicine that can help reduce sugar absorption in the intestines and improve glucose uptake by cells.
· Fenugreek: A herb that has been shown to lower blood sugar levels by slowing the absorption of carbohydrates and increasing insulin sensitivity.
How Does Gluco 6 Work?
Gluco 6 works through multiple mechanisms to support healthy blood sugar levels:
· Enhancing Insulin Sensitivity: Ingredients like berberine, chromium picolinate, and alpha lipoic acid improve the effectiveness of insulin, helping your cells absorb glucose more efficiently.
· Reducing Sugar Absorption: Gymnema Sylvestre and fenugreek can help reduce the amount of sugar absorbed from your diet, lowering the overall glucose load on your system.
· Improving Glucose Metabolism: Berberine and cinnamon extract help enhance the body's ability to metabolize glucose, ensuring it's used effectively for energy rather than accumulating in the blood.
· Combating Oxidative Stress: Alpha lipoic acid and other antioxidants in Gluco 6 help reduce oxidative stress, which is linked to insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels.
Benefits of Gluco 6
· Supports Healthy Blood Sugar Levels: Gluco 6 helps maintain blood sugar within a healthy range, reducing the risk of spikes and crashes.
· Enhances Energy and Vitality: By stabilizing blood sugar, Gluco 6 ensures a steady supply of energy throughout the day.
· Promotes Better Mood and Mental Clarity: Stable blood sugar levels can help improve mood, reduce irritability, and enhance cognitive function.
· Aids Weight Management: By reducing sugar cravings and supporting healthy metabolism, Gluco 6 can be a valuable tool in managing your weight.
· Natural and Safe: Made from natural ingredients, Gluco 6 is a safe and effective option for supporting blood sugar health without the harsh side effects often associated with pharmaceutical options.

Click Here To Buy Gluco 6 Supplements From The Official Website

How to Use Gluco 6
For optimal results, take Gluco 6 as directed on the packaging. Typically, it is recommended to take one to two capsules daily with meals. Consistency is key, so make Gluco 6 a part of your daily routine to experience the full benefits.
Who Should Use Gluco 6?
Gluco 6 is suitable for adults looking to maintain healthy blood sugar levels. It is especially beneficial for:
· Individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes seeking to manage their condition naturally.
· Those experiencing frequent blood sugar fluctuations and related symptoms like fatigue, irritability, and cravings.
· Anyone looking to support their overall health and well-being by maintaining balanced blood sugar levels.
Customer Testimonials
· John D., 45: "I've struggled with high blood sugar for years. Since I started taking Gluco 6, my levels have stabilized, and I feel more energetic and focused throughout the day. It's been a game-changer for me."
· Sarah L., 32: "As someone with a family history of diabetes, I'm always looking for ways to stay healthy. Gluco 6 has helped me keep my blood sugar in check, and I love that it's made from natural ingredients."
· Michael P., 50: "I was skeptical at first, but Gluco 6 has really made a difference. My cravings are under control, and I haven't felt this good in years. Highly recommend!"
Safety and Quality Assurance
Gluco 6 is manufactured in a state-of-the-art facility that adheres to the highest standards of quality and safety. Each batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure purity, potency, and consistency. Additionally, Gluco 6 is free from artificial additives, preservatives, and common allergens, making it a safe choice for most individuals.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Gluco 6 safe to take with other medications? A: While Gluco 6 is made from natural ingredients and is generally safe, it's always best to consult with your healthcare provider before starting any new supplement, especially if you are taking other medications or have underlying health conditions.
Q: How long will it take to see results? A: Results can vary from person to person, but many users report noticing improvements in their blood sugar levels and overall energy within a few weeks of consistent use. For best results, continue taking Gluco 6 as part of your daily routine.
Q: Can Gluco 6 help with weight loss? A: While Gluco 6 is primarily designed to support healthy blood sugar levels, many users find that it helps reduce cravings and supports better appetite control, which can contribute to weight loss efforts.
Q: Are there any side effects? A: Gluco 6 is made from natural ingredients and is generally well-tolerated. However, if you experience any adverse reactions, discontinue use and consult your healthcare provider.
Q: Is Gluco 6 suitable for vegetarians or vegans? A: Yes, Gluco 6 is made from plant-based ingredients and is suitable for vegetarians and vegans.
Conclusion
Maintaining healthy blood sugar levels is essential for overall health and well-being. Gluco 6 offers a natural, effective solution to support blood sugar balance, enhance energy levels, and promote better health. With its blend of scientifically-backed ingredients, Gluco 6 is your trusted ally in the journey toward optimal blood sugar health. Whether you're looking to manage existing blood sugar issues or simply want to support your overall wellness, Gluco 6 is here to help. Take control of your health today with Gluco 6, and experience the benefits of balanced blood sugar levels.

Click Here to Order Gluco 6 Supplement From Its Official Website.

https://www.latinoleadmn.org/group/leadership-action-team/discussion/f1409eab-800e-4b4e-9b31-be3eb3f2b0e8
https://www.50statecoalition.com/group/rheaakio/discussion/5d748f3f-2dc6-4215-8aed-d0f35f126024
https://www.irvac.org/group/mysite-200-group/discussion/e6935855-08b1-437d-8ef5-3e1ef810dff9
https://www.myrtlebeastocr.com/group/news-events/discussion/794f7370-dc9d-4a78-a72d-8d95c6b8b8d3
https://www.grbudc.com/group/fathers-day-luncheon-pictures/discussion/2dbdb369-de43-4a59-9f6f-e187a01ffc33
https://www.oksoberfest.com/group/oksoberfest-group/discussion/dc10f0f6-4ca2-4331-acfa-f788b481f05c
https://www.espacobaiao.com/group/grupo-template-2-espaco/discussion/b06d7c18-16cf-4a56-9776-a90550f40d25
https://www.beyondyogabysaillo.com/group/my-site-2-gruppe/discussion/8438a6c9-c2b7-4b5e-8a21-71b19095640c
https://forum.freeflarum.com/d/64494-where-can-i-buy-gluco6-at-the-best-price
https://diendannhansu.com/threads/what-are-the-benefits-of-using-gluco6-for-blood-sugar-management.438165/
https://blog.rackons.in/are-there-any-side-effects-of-taking-gluco6

Imagine your customers raving about how their makeup stays flawless from morning till night because of your setting spray. That's the dream, right? But creating that perfect formula can be quite the challenge for any beauty brand.
From my experience, ingredients like glycerin and hyaluronic acid are essential for maintaining hydration, while alcohol-free formulas help prevent drying out the skin. Adding green tea extract can also provide valuable antioxidant properties. If you're looking to start manufacturing your own setting sprays, consider partnering with private label cosmetics manufacturers like Nako Cosmetics and Lady Burd, who offer great bases to build on.
What about you all? What ingredients or formulations have you found most effective for setting sprays? Any tips or recommendations for creating a product that keeps makeup intact without looking cakey or shiny? I'd love to hear your insights and success stories!

Welcome to Skin Secrets by Dr. Greta McLaren, your premier destination for rejuvenating cosmetic treatments in the Port Charlotte, FL area. At our medical spa, we specialize in providing expertly administered Botox and dermal filler treatments designed to enhance your natural beauty and restore youthful vitality to your appearance.
Led by the renowned Dr. Greta McLaren, our team is committed to delivering personalized care in a welcoming and professional environment. Whether you’re looking to smooth out fine lines and wrinkles or add volume and contour to your face, our state-of-the-art services are tailored to meet your individual needs and ensure optimal results. Experience the art of aesthetic enhancement at Skin Secrets and discover how we can help you feel confident and radiant.
Message Skin Secrets today or call us at [239-800-SKIN(7546)](tel:2398007546) to schedule your complimentary consultation.

Dysport®

Like Botox, Dysport (pronounced “dis-port”) is a type A botulinum toxin, a highly refined protein commonly used to relax muscles and inhibit sweating. Studies have shown Dysport to work just as well as Botox and may last longer.

BOTOX®

Skin Secrets by Dr. Greta McLaren applies advanced injection techniques that also lift and raise the brows, widen the eyes, soften lip lines, turn up the corners of the mouth and treat neck wrinkles. By starting BOTOX® early, you can prevent lines from becoming permanently ironed into your skin. BOTOX® can also be used to treat excessive sweating.

Juvéderm®

JUVÉDERM® is the #1 selling collection of hyaluronic acid fillers in the U.S. Each product in the JUVÉDERM® Collection of Fillers adds volume to a different area of the face—without surgery. All JUVÉDERM® fillers are smooth, crystal-clear gels that are administered by injection in Skin Secrets by Dr. Greta McLaren.

Radiesse

Radiesse and Radiesse (+) are dermal fillers that are FDA-approved to smooth moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds (the creases that extend from the corner of your nose to the corner of your mouth). Radiesse is also used for correcting volume loss in the back of the hands.

Restylane

The Restylane family of products is a brand of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers, which includes Restylane Silk, Restylane Lyft, Restylane, Restylane Refyne and Restylane Defyne. Each is a clear gel formulation of hyaluronic acid specifically formulated to act like your body’s own naturally produced hyaluronic acid. Each Restylane product is designed for a specific purpose.

RHA®

The RHA® Collection of resilient hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers includes RHA® Redensity™, RHA® 2, RHA® 3 and RHA® 4. RHA® Redensity™ is indicated for injection into the dermis and superficial dermis of the face, for the correction of moderate to severe dynamic perioral rhytids in adults 22 or older.

Xeomin®

Xeomin® is made through a unique precision manufacturing process that isolates the therapeutic component of the molecule and removes the complexing/unnecessary proteins that don’t play an active role in treatment.

Premier Medical Spa, and Anti-Aging Clinic near Port Charlotte, FL

When you’re searching for a premier, upscale MedSpa experience, look no further than Skin Secrets near Port Charlotte, Florida. Our experienced team – led by Dr. Greta McLaren – specializes in minimally invasive, non-surgical procedures and treatments customized to your personal needs and goals.
For over 30 years, Dr. McLaren has undergone extensive training in both cosmetic dermatology and laser surgery. She is a laser Surgeon and aesthetic medicine specialist who is considered an expert and has been invited to teach her aesthetic skills nationally to other physicians throughout the United States. She is a member of the American Society of Laser Medicine and Surgery, and American Society for Photodynamic Therapy.
Message Skin Secrets today or call us at [239-800-SKIN(7546)](tel:2398007546) to schedule your complimentary consultation.

Adding fluoride to drinking water, a practice known as water fluoridation, is primarily intended to reduce the incidence of dental caries (tooth decay). This public health measure has been widely implemented in many countries and has been subject to extensive research. Here are the effects of fluoride on human physical and mental health based on current scientific understanding:

Physical Health Effects

1. Dental Health:

• Positive Effects: The primary benefit of water fluoridation is the reduction in dental caries, particularly in children. Fluoride helps to remineralize tooth enamel and make it more resistant to acid attacks from bacteria in the mouth.
• Dental Fluorosis: Excessive fluoride exposure during tooth development can lead to dental fluorosis, which is usually mild and appears as white spots on the teeth. In severe cases, it can cause brown stains and surface pitting.

1. Bone Health:

• Skeletal Fluorosis: Chronic exposure to high levels of fluoride can lead to skeletal fluorosis, a condition that causes pain and damage to bones and joints. This condition is rare in communities with water fluoridation at recommended levels.

1. Thyroid Function:

• Some studies have suggested that high levels of fluoride exposure might be linked to changes in thyroid function, but the evidence is not conclusive. Recommended levels of fluoride in drinking water are generally considered safe for thyroid health.

Mental Health Effects

Research on the mental health effects of fluoride is less extensive and more controversial compared to physical health. Here are some key points:

1. Cognitive Development in Children:

• There have been some studies suggesting a potential association between high fluoride exposure and lower IQ levels in children. However, these studies often involve fluoride levels much higher than those used in public water fluoridation.
• The evidence is mixed, and many studies have methodological limitations. Reviews by health authorities, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), generally conclude that water fluoridation at recommended levels is safe and effective.

1. Neurodevelopmental Effects:

• Concerns have been raised about fluoride's potential neurotoxicity at high levels. Animal studies and some human studies indicate possible adverse effects, but these typically involve fluoride concentrations far above the levels used in public water supplies.
• More high-quality, well-controlled studies are needed to fully understand the potential neurodevelopmental effects of fluoride.

Regulatory and Health Organization Stances

Most health organizations, including the WHO, CDC, American Dental Association (ADA), and others, support water fluoridation as a safe and effective public health measure. They emphasize that the levels of fluoride used in water fluoridation are well below those associated with adverse health effects.

Conclusion

The addition of fluoride to drinking water at recommended levels has significant benefits for dental health, particularly in reducing cavities. While there are some concerns about potential adverse effects, particularly at high levels of exposure, the evidence suggests that fluoridation at levels used in public water systems is safe for both physical and mental health. Continuous monitoring and research are essential to ensure the safety and efficacy of water fluoridation practices.

Almond Milk

1. Nutritional Content:
   • Lower in calories than dairy milk.
   • Typically contains less protein than dairy milk.
   • Often fortified with calcium, vitamin D, and vitamin E.
   • Naturally lactose-free and dairy-free.
2. Dietary Considerations:
   • Suitable for those with lactose intolerance or dairy allergies.
   • Fits vegan and plant-based diets.
   • Generally lower in fat, especially saturated fat.
3. Environmental Impact:
   • Smaller carbon footprint compared to dairy milk.
   • Requires significant water for almond cultivation, especially in drought-prone areas.
   • Concerns about the impact on bee populations due to commercial pollination practices.
4. Taste and Texture:
   • Mild, nutty flavor.
   • Lighter texture compared to the creaminess of whole dairy milk.

Dairy Milk

Nutritional Content:

• Rich in protein and essential vitamins like B12.
• Contains calcium and other vital nutrients naturally.
• Available in various fat contents (whole, 2%, skim).

Dietary Considerations:

• Not suitable for those with lactose intolerance or dairy allergies.
• Source of complete protein with all essential amino acids.
• Naturally contains more saturated fat, particularly in whole milk.

Environmental Impact:

• Higher greenhouse gas emissions compared to plant-based milks.
• Concerns about animal welfare and the environmental cost of cattle farming (land use, water consumption, and methane emissions).

Taste and Texture:

• Rich, creamy texture, especially in whole milk.
• Familiar taste preferred by many for drinking and cooking.

Sulfur Market size was valued at US$ 6.07 Bn. in 2023 and the total Sulfur revenue is expected to grow at 4 % from 2024 to 2030, reaching nearly US$ 7.99 Bn.
Sulfur Market Overview The MMR report provides comprehensive market forecasts for each segment within the Sulfur market. It highlights the market dynamics, including growth drivers, restraining factors, opportunities for new entrants, and relevant government regulations. Additionally, the report offers insights into strategic decisions made by industry experts during the forecast period.
Click here free sample copy:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/26714
Sulfur Market Scope
The report covers the size of the Sulfur market across various divisions and regions from 2024 to 2030. It includes analysis of market dynamics, product pricing trends, recent market developments, and in-depth geographical insights. Strategies employed by key players and detailed company profiles based on business models are also featured. A PESTLE analysis is conducted to evaluate overall market conditions.
Sulfur Segmentation The market is segmented based on various criteria to provide a detailed analysis of each segment's performance and growth potential.
by Product
Pharmaceutical Grade Industrial Grade
by End Use Industry
Fertilizers Chemical Processing Metal Manufacturing Petroleum Refining Others
by Application
Sulfuric Acid Synthesis Sulphonate Surfactants Synthesis Agrochemicals Metal Extraction Oil Refining Others
by Sales Channel
Direct Sale Indirect Sale
Sulfur Key Players
The report profiles leading key players and other prominent players in the Sulfur market, providing insights into their strategies and market positioning.
North America 1. Nutrien 2. The Mosaic 3. Koch 4. Compass Minerals 5. Kemin Industries 6. Global Nutritech 7. Tiger-Sul Products 8. Sulphur Solutions
Europe 9. K+S 10. SK Eurochem 11. Tessenderlo Group 12. Gazprom 13. Exxon Mobil 14. Rosneft
Asia Pacific 15. Nufarm 16. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Ltd. 17. Coromandel International 18. Zuari Agro Chemicals 19. Sulphur Mills 20. Sinopec
Middle East and Africa 21. Israel Chemicals 22. Aramco 23. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company
South America 24. Petrobras 25. Vale 26. Pluspetrol
Know more about the report:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-sulfur-market/26714/
Sulfur Regional Analysis
The Sulfur market report covers the regional market sizes and forecast values for North America (United States, Canada, Mexico), Europe (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Rest of Europe), Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, ASEAN Countries, Rest of APAC), South America (Brazil), and the Middle East and Africa. It also examines the factors influencing the market positively and negatively in each region.
Sulfur Key Questions Answered in the Sulfur Market Report - What is the Sulfur Market? - What is the forecast period for the Sulfur Market? - What is the competitive scenario in the Sulfur Market? - Which region holds the largest market share in the Sulfur Market? - What opportunities exist in the Sulfur Market? - What are the restraining factors in the Sulfur Market? - Who are the key players in the Sulfur Market?
Sulfur Key Offerings - Market Share, Size, and Forecast by Revenue (2024-2030) - Market Dynamics: Growth Drivers, Restraints, Investment Opportunities, and Key Trends - Market Segmentation: Detailed Analysis by Sulfur Market - Competitive Landscape: Leading Key Players and Other Prominent Players
Sulfur About Maximize Market Research Maximize Market Research is a multifaceted market research and consulting company with expertise across various industries. These include science and engineering, electronic components, industrial equipment, technology and communication, automotive, chemical products, general merchandise, beverages, personal care, and automated systems. We provide market-verified industry estimates, technical trend analysis, crucial market research, strategic advice, competition analysis, production and demand analysis, and client impact studies.
**Contact Maximize Market Research:*\* 3rd Floor, Navale IT Park, Phase 2 Pune Banglore Highway, Narhe, Pune, Maharashtra 411041, India Email: [sales@maximizemarketresearch.com](mailto:sales@maximizemarketresearch.com) Phone: +91 96071 95908, +91 9607365656

I'm not asking for skin care or medical advice, mentally broke auto mod is trash tastic
Anyways this is my recipe:
Lemme know what u think:
Reactive Base:
Lye: 4.3% - saponifying agent
Jewel weed gel: 8.5% - removes poison/ toxins
Soap base:
Mct oil: 14.5% - Caprilic/Capric
Glycerin: 41.5% - humectant
Alchohol: 31.2% - your mom: add after reactive Base and soap base are mixed.
Medicinals in alcohol:
Calendula pedals - triterpenes
Red bee propolis - polyphenols
Aloe ferox bitter - polysachrides
Frankensense tears - boswillic acid
Comfrey leafs - allantoin
Saw palmetto berries - beta sitosterol
EO: % of base weight
Oregano: 1% - Carvacrol/thymol
Cod liver: 1% - vitamin a
Borage: 1% - Gamma Linoleic Acids
Chems:
Sodium citrate: 1% - vitamin c
Sodium lactate: 2% - lactic acid
Sorbitol: 3% - alpha hydroxy acids.

Try this:
Reactive Base:
Lye: 4.3% - saponifying agent
Jewel weed gel: 8.5% - removes poison/ toxins
Soap base:
Mct oil: 14.5% - Caprilic/Capric
Glycerin: 41.5% - humectant
Alchohol: 31.2% - your mom: add after reactive Base and soap base are mixed.
Medicinals in alcohol:
Calendula pedals - triterpenes
Red bee propolis - polyphenols
Aloe ferox bitter - polysachrides
Frankensense tears - boswillic acid
Comfrey leafs - allantoin
Saw palmetto berries - beta sitosterol
EO: % of base weight
Oregano: 1% - Carvacrol/thymol
Cod liver: 1% - vitamin a
Borage: 1% - Gamma Linoleic Acids
Chems:
Sodium citrate: 1% - vitamin c
Sodium lactate: 2% - lactic acid
Sorbitol: 3% - alpha hydroxy acids.
Tell me what u think,