Shailene woodley dating who
Jenna-Louise Coleman
2012.04.11 10:50 vodkacokebloke Jenna-Louise Coleman
The subreddit for all admirers of the actress Jenna-Louise Coleman.
2024.05.21 06:28 Musictravels23 SUMMER IN THE CITY! 1-2 FuIIy Furn amazing BRS ASAP within a Iarger shared 3BR/2BA apt in a high end property, in awesome Woodley Park right at the red Iine metro.
Both BRs are spacious, bright, sunny and include everything from a double bed with sheets, towels and a desk and chair, decent sized closet with hangers, laundry basket and iron/ironing board etc.Both fantastic BRs are available for entire summer ideaIIy starting ASAP (or by June 1) untiI end of August and rent is $1649/month/BR (but pIease note the rental agreements will be individual, per room). *For summer, June-Aug needs to be covered in full, May can be negotiated if needed, and exact move in/out dates can also be negotiated but rent terms remain.*Also available for mid-May until May 31, either $89/night/BR (4 night min), - ie if you have a place for 6/1 but need a fully furnished BR prior to that, or take for the entire summer.Included (but not limited to!):-Fully equipped kitchen (dishes, pots, pans, silverware, microwave etc)-Central air throughout the apartment and building-Fantastic Gym-Roofdeck with wifi-Business Center with wet bar and wifi-24/7 front desk, ATM, and many other amenities!-So close to the (red line) Woodley Park metro so you won't need a car here, but can get guest street parking for a month if need be and potentiaIIy parking avaiIabIe at an extra fee-DC Circulator (to downtown) and other bus lines also steps away (Metrobus 96 and L2 at least)Please note unfortunately this is not an ideal option for those who work mostly or fully from home, but certainly open and flexible to other arrangements so just share your details which will be much appreciated! Can't Be Missed! Viewings this week! caII 240-48nine-133eight ASAP!
submitted by Musictravels23 to DCforRent [link] [comments]
2024.05.05 13:33 creative-license FERRARI on Hulu May 24th
 | submitted by creative-license to adamdriverfans [link] [comments] |
2024.05.02 20:59 DemolitionMatter Gender inequality has more evolutionary roots than sociogenic roots, research shows.
DISCLAIMER: This post does NOT condone violence or crime, nor does it say that sexism is a good thing, but explains that it is not caused by patriarchy. It is not sociogenic, but part of nature. This does not mean it is good, but that it is not sociogenic, even if feminists say it is.
Feminists argue it was the "patriarchy" or men who created gender inequality or gender roles, and gender roles are often portrayed as evil and oppressive, but feminists reinforce them all the time in a subtle manner. It's actually evolution that caused gender inequality.
Gender equality doesn't necessarily create more happiness.
First, although there is evidence of gender equality bringing happiness, there's no consistent evidence that gender equality causes wellbeing in men or women. One study wrote: "greater gender equality has few significant effects on overall subjective well-being (males and females combined), except for a slight association of more female (relative to male) education with higher well-being." They elaborated:
This study, which is far more well-researched than others, shows a nuanced pattern across many countries. When it came to happiness, people in "gender equal" countries were more likely to simply happy but people in "gender unequal" countries are more likely to be very happy. People in "gender equal" countries were more likely to be simply satisfied with life but in "gender unequal" countries, people were more likely to be very satisfied with life. Being simply unhappy or unsatisfied did not differ between countries but being very unhappy/unsatisfied was slightly more common in "gender unequal" countries, but the percentage who were very unhappy/satisfied was minuscule. The vast majority of people in both kinds of countries were at least happy/satisfied with life. Increasing gender equality was mixed in its results:
Sexism and gender inequality has evolutionary roots.
This is a highly controversial point, but it is true. There's a lot of talk lately about how the hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, but this is false (a myth promoted by both the far left and feminists), and women did not hunt as much as men, but that idea was "proven" by research with high amounts of methodological bias.
A study called "An evolutionary life history explanation of sexism and gender inequality" by Nan Zhu and Lei Chang shows that sexism/gender inequality is indeed evolutionary. Contrary to popular belief, sexism was more based on discriminating against men or women or singling them out due to gender roles, and gender roles were important for the success of our species and survival. It wasn't about punishing a gender for their gender. Here's the abstract:
Rape and intimate partner violence are not caused by patriarchy, but are evolutionary tactics (despite being immoral and evolution/nature being amoral).
This is just like how men committing crimes against men (which is far more common) is also an evolutionary tactic. Nature is amoral and humans are, to an extent, a barbaric species (like any other species). This thread of mine talks about how not only is most sexism towards women benevolent sexism, but actual misogyny is rare among men, and those men were simply full of dark triad traits, and dark triad men and misogynistic men or rapists were two sides of the same coin. Dark triad traits are an evolutionary adaptation to have lots of casual sex, and they caused men to be interested in as many sex partners as possible. When these men have unusually high aspirations about how sexually active they must be, they tend to become misogynistic because they believe they are unattractive to women when they aren't, yet engage in a lot of promiscuity. As a result, these men have committed rape to get sex, but they also have a high amount of consensual sex partners. As a result, rape was found to be an evolutionary mating strategy from dark triad traits, which I elaborated on in that thread (no, it doesn't condone or defend sexual violence).
It is also possible countries with less gender equality, which have more intergroup violence or lack of resource security (which is what causes old-school gender roles and less gender equality), have more dark triad men, and the gender difference in dark triad traits between men and women is bigger. It's not patriarchy that causes dark triad traits in these countries, but intergroup violence and lack of resource security that causes these traits there. It could be intimate partner violence might be more common in these countries and it could be for evolutionary reasons and for the same reasons these countries have gender inequality or old-school gender roles more: the environment.
Although intimate partner violence is a gender symmetrical crime, I don't know if there's evolutionary reasons for why women commit intimate partner violence. There could be, but it has probably less research because society ignores male domestic violence victims. Among men who commit the crime, there are evolutionary reasons or hardwired instincts that cause it. For example, women with boyfriends/husbands who had children from previous partners are far more likely to be victims of intimate partner violence or homicide, whereas stepfather are more likely to be abusive. This is potentially due to sexual jealousy or resentment of the actual father due to knowing their children are not biologically their children. Even other species had intimate partner violence among both males and females:
Obviously, most men won't do these things, but obviously personality traits can still increase the risk along with evolutionary instincts, and so can attachment anxiety. There's also other factors for intimate partner violence and homicide, such as the fact that these offenders often tend to be generally violent criminals and have violent criminal records. There's obviously antisocial men who do tend to be violent in relationships because they're generally violent, but this is talking more about at least situation partner violence/homicide. Not all women killed by their partners were abused by them, even if it's true for most, but it's even more common for them to notice their partners' sexual jealousy or worries about infidelity, which the vast majority noticed for concerns their partner had. Additonally, this thread is NOT condoning violence against women, just like how acknowledging how violence against men is evolutionary does not condone it. Most male criminals harm men, and men usually restrict violence against women to when they commit sexual violence or intimate partner violence, and evolution explains all of this. Men have less evolutionary benefits to committing non-sexual crimes against women outside their relationship, unlike when they commit the same crimes against men.
There's also evidence showing that when the sex ratio has more women (more women than men in a population), men mated with more women than sexual aggression against women declined (rapists do tend to be promiscuous, but they have dark triad traits that make them more promiscuous as an adaptation, especially if women are less available to mate with, like polygamous societies). When there were more men than women, sexual aggression by men against women increased. Another study found that a sex ratio of more men than women increases men's intimate partner violence against women, and even more so when more women are working. They explain the evolutionary reason behind it:
There is a lot of evidence that gender inequality or sexism comes from evolution, and as society becomes more economically successful, has less intergroup violence, and becomes more convenient as a whole, this issue in society lessens. There's also evidence that men are evolutionarily hardwired to be more likely than women to endorse old-school gender roles, or sexism, about men and women.
This is in line with my post, which cites a lot of evidence to back its statements up, about how the changes in gender roles, ages of marriage, fertility, etc. were due to changes in environment, and that feminism played no role in it.
submitted by DemolitionMatter to LeftWingMaleAdvocates [link] [comments]
Feminists argue it was the "patriarchy" or men who created gender inequality or gender roles, and gender roles are often portrayed as evil and oppressive, but feminists reinforce them all the time in a subtle manner. It's actually evolution that caused gender inequality.
Gender equality doesn't necessarily create more happiness.
First, although there is evidence of gender equality bringing happiness, there's no consistent evidence that gender equality causes wellbeing in men or women. One study wrote: "greater gender equality has few significant effects on overall subjective well-being (males and females combined), except for a slight association of more female (relative to male) education with higher well-being." They elaborated:
Most of the gender equality measures do not predict differences between male and female subjective well-being, neither when considering zero-order correlations (Table 1) nor in regression models that control for plausible covariates (Tables 5, 6). Therefore we can confirm the conclusion of Vieira Lima (2011) that greater gender equality or higher female status does not usually benefit women more than men. For example, a higher proportion of women in high-status occupations does not raise the average subjective well- being of all women, although it is likely to do so for the minority of highly ambitious women competing for these positions. High female labor force participation and non- agricultural employment emerge as conditions that appear to reduce female relative to male (or raise male relative to female) well-being (Tables 5, 6). This result confirms and extends the observation of Tesch-Ro ̈mer et al. (2008) of a predominantly negative rela- tionship between relative female life satisfaction and relative female economic activity rate. One possible explanation is that in many (though not necessarily all) countries, the disutility of work is greater for women than men. In other words, women dislike gainful work in a modern economy more than men do.In fact, the research found that women are happier or more satisfied with life than men in Muslim countries, countries with less Catholic people, and countries without "communist" history. Furthermore, they found that female life satisfaction is higher in countries with more old-school gender roles:
One possibility is that higher female life satisfaction in countries with traditional gender roles is caused by lower female expectations. However, in this case we would expect that traditional gender roles favor higher self-reported female life satisfaction but not neces- sarily happiness. Inspection of Fig. 1 shows this not to be the case.Additionally, gender equality was not associated with more happiness/life satisfaction, and more female employment, or socializing it, actually reduces wellbeing for women.
The present study is strictly cross-sectional. However, it shows that greater gender equality is not associated with higher subjective well-being of women relative to men. It even suggests that high rates of female employment, or possibly a value system that insists on female employment, have the potential to reduce female well-being. Therefore we need to be aware of the possibility that continued efforts at educating women out of traditional female roles and into traditional male roles can reduce female subjective well-being, as has happened in the communist and ex-communist countries. But is this really surprising? Men would not be happy and satisfied either if they were forced out of traditional male roles and into traditional female roles. Perhaps the implicit belief among many social scientists that male-typical preferences, values and social roles are in some way superior to traditional female ones needs to be re-evaluated.They concluded this explains why wellbeing for women in the United States has declined in the past few decades as women entered the workforce more. This study found that although gender equality promoted happiness in both developed and developing countries, the effect was stronger in democratic or high income countries compared to nondemocratic or low income countries.
This study, which is far more well-researched than others, shows a nuanced pattern across many countries. When it came to happiness, people in "gender equal" countries were more likely to simply happy but people in "gender unequal" countries are more likely to be very happy. People in "gender equal" countries were more likely to be simply satisfied with life but in "gender unequal" countries, people were more likely to be very satisfied with life. Being simply unhappy or unsatisfied did not differ between countries but being very unhappy/unsatisfied was slightly more common in "gender unequal" countries, but the percentage who were very unhappy/satisfied was minuscule. The vast majority of people in both kinds of countries were at least happy/satisfied with life. Increasing gender equality was mixed in its results:
In gender equal countries, it was seen that increasing levels of gender egalitarianism tend to improve a person’s likelihood to be either very unhappy or at higher levels of happiness than unhappy.Increasing gender equality in the "egalitarian" countries decreased unhappiness, very slightly increased being very unhappy (very minuscule change), very slightly increased (minuscule change) being very happy and increased being simply happy. In the "unequal" countries, increasing gender equality decreased being very happy, increased being simply happy, somewhat increased being unhappy and made a minuscule decrease in being very unhappy. With life satisfaction, it decreased being unsatisfied or very unsatisfied in both kinds of countries but only made a noteworthy increase in being satisfied or being very satisfied in "unequal" countries and "equal" countries, respectively. Either way, the authors concluded that their research "demonstrates that levels of happiness and life satisfaction have a similar distribution in gender equal and unequal countries overall", and "while the impact of demographic components on happiness and life satisfaction does not vary in gender equal and unequal countries, gender egalitarianism demonstrates diversified patterns of happiness".
Sexism and gender inequality has evolutionary roots.
This is a highly controversial point, but it is true. There's a lot of talk lately about how the hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, but this is false (a myth promoted by both the far left and feminists), and women did not hunt as much as men, but that idea was "proven" by research with high amounts of methodological bias.
A study called "An evolutionary life history explanation of sexism and gender inequality" by Nan Zhu and Lei Chang shows that sexism/gender inequality is indeed evolutionary. Contrary to popular belief, sexism was more based on discriminating against men or women or singling them out due to gender roles, and gender roles were important for the success of our species and survival. It wasn't about punishing a gender for their gender. Here's the abstract:
Predisposed to differences in parental investment, men and women are expected to enact different reproduction-oriented, accelerated life-history strategies when facing high extrinsic risks or resource insecurity. Sexual selection processes would strengthen the sex differences in support of such accelerated life-history strategy, causing women to divert more time and energy to reproductive activities and depend more on men's economic provisioning and therefore enforcing sexist attitudes and gender inequality. This paper provides empirical support for this life-history explanation of sexism based on data from the World Values Survey and four United Nations sources. The results generally support our explanation in the following manners: (1) Societal-level extrinsic risks (worries over intergroup violence) were associated with higher sexism. (2) Men were more sexist, and the association between individual-level resource insecurity and sexism was more moderate in countries and regions with greater society-level extrinsic risks. (3) Societal-level extrinsic risks (adult mortality) and resource availability were associated with higher and lower gender inequality, respectively, through the mediating effects of accelerated life-history strategies, indicated by adolescent birth rates and total fertility.They also cite evidence for how environment affects reproductive outcomes and general behavior:
Resource insecurity, which is related to higher exposure to morbi- dity–mortality risks for offspring in almost all human forager societies (Marlowe, 2000), has been demonstrated to be associated with parental harshness and insecure attachment, which, in turn, are linked to traits of accelerated life-history strategies. These traits include earlier sexual debut and higher sexual activities during adolescence, which are pre- dicted by earlier pubertal development (Belsky, Houts & Fearon, 2010; (Belsky et al., 2010b)). In a longitudinal study, Belsky, Schlomer and Ellis (2012) found that lower income-to-needs ratio experienced during the early years was indirectly associated with higher adolescent sexuality through lower maternal parenting quality in childhood. By con- trast, Ellis and Essex (2007) observed that fewer marital conflicts, higher quality parental care, and higher socioeconomic status predicted later sexual development in girls. Overall, accelerated life-history strategies are in accordance with increased reproductive efforts at an earlier age, which are adaptive to stressful environments that reduce the chance of offspring surviving to maturity, but less so in stable and competitive environments (Del Giudice et al., 2015).Across countries, men scored higher on beliefs about old-school gender roles (or as the authors described, more sexist) than women. It wasn't because they're the "patriarchy" or "oppressors", but this difference in beliefs was higher in countries with higher extrinsic risks like intergroup violence (e.g.: war).
We found that males exhibited higher sexism than did females and that this trend was stronger in societies facing greater intergroup violence. This is consistent with our extrapolation that the traditional, sexist “protective males” stereotype is more advocated in societies facing an elevated danger of intergroup conflicts. Moreover, given that males have more incentives to escape parenting duties to focus on mating compared with females, males likely gain more reproductive success from sexist gender roles than females do when enacting accelerated life-history strategies. This might explain why the sex difference in sexism was greater in societies with higher extrinsic risks.Extrinsic risks were associated with accelerated life history strategies (e.g.: having children), which, in turn, is associated with gender inequality. Societal level extrinsic risks (like intergroup violence) were associated with more sexism, and "societal-level extrinsic risks (adult mortality) and resource availability were associated with higher and lower gender inequality, respectively, through the mediating effects of accelerated life-history strategies, indicated by adolescent birth rates and total fertility." Individual-level resource insecurity and societal intergroup violence both predicted more sexism or beliefs endorsing old-school gender roles, but: "society-level intergroup violence may have overshadowed individual-level resource insecurity such that the detrimental effect of resource insecurity was less severe in societies with high intergroup violence".
Rape and intimate partner violence are not caused by patriarchy, but are evolutionary tactics (despite being immoral and evolution/nature being amoral).
This is just like how men committing crimes against men (which is far more common) is also an evolutionary tactic. Nature is amoral and humans are, to an extent, a barbaric species (like any other species). This thread of mine talks about how not only is most sexism towards women benevolent sexism, but actual misogyny is rare among men, and those men were simply full of dark triad traits, and dark triad men and misogynistic men or rapists were two sides of the same coin. Dark triad traits are an evolutionary adaptation to have lots of casual sex, and they caused men to be interested in as many sex partners as possible. When these men have unusually high aspirations about how sexually active they must be, they tend to become misogynistic because they believe they are unattractive to women when they aren't, yet engage in a lot of promiscuity. As a result, these men have committed rape to get sex, but they also have a high amount of consensual sex partners. As a result, rape was found to be an evolutionary mating strategy from dark triad traits, which I elaborated on in that thread (no, it doesn't condone or defend sexual violence).
It is also possible countries with less gender equality, which have more intergroup violence or lack of resource security (which is what causes old-school gender roles and less gender equality), have more dark triad men, and the gender difference in dark triad traits between men and women is bigger. It's not patriarchy that causes dark triad traits in these countries, but intergroup violence and lack of resource security that causes these traits there. It could be intimate partner violence might be more common in these countries and it could be for evolutionary reasons and for the same reasons these countries have gender inequality or old-school gender roles more: the environment.
Although intimate partner violence is a gender symmetrical crime, I don't know if there's evolutionary reasons for why women commit intimate partner violence. There could be, but it has probably less research because society ignores male domestic violence victims. Among men who commit the crime, there are evolutionary reasons or hardwired instincts that cause it. For example, women with boyfriends/husbands who had children from previous partners are far more likely to be victims of intimate partner violence or homicide, whereas stepfather are more likely to be abusive. This is potentially due to sexual jealousy or resentment of the actual father due to knowing their children are not biologically their children. Even other species had intimate partner violence among both males and females:
These cases demonstrate that intimate partner violence is neither exclusive to humans nor exclusive to males. Intimate partner violence is the result of a natural process—Darwinian selection. These cases also call into question the default hypothesis that physical violence between pair-bonded individuals is caused by socialization. Proponents of the socialization hypothesis would not argue that burying beetles and razorbills are socialized to inflict partner-directed violence, and it may be erroneous to assume this default position for human intimate partner violence. In every species studied to date (including humans), intimate partner violence occurs when the actions of one partner (either male or female) threaten the survival or reproduction of the other.Men also mate guard (guard their partner from other men) when she has high reproductive value or attractiveness, is ovulating, is around other men, or has other traits making her more prone to infidelity. Men's mate retention behaviors and mate guarding about making sure where she was or knowing who she talks to was associated with intimate partner violence perpetration against her. The relationship between accusations of female infidelity and female-directed violence was mediated by non-violent direct guarding behaviors. When it comes to marital sexual aggression, women's risk of sexual coercion by their partner was not related to power in the relationship, like who controls the decision making, and thus, women with a man with the dominant position in the relationship don't experience more sexual coercion from their husbands. A lot of evidence shows that sexual coercion in marriage might be due to paternity uncertainty or worrying the wife is cheating:
Sexual coercion in response to cues of his partner's sexual infidelity might function to introduce a male's sperm into his partner's reproductive tract at a time when there is a high risk of cuckoldry (i.e., when his partner has recently been inseminated by a rival male). This sperm competition hypothesis was proposed following recognition that forced in-pair copulation (i.e., partner rape) in nonhuman species followed female extra-pair copulations and that sexual coercion and rape in human intimate relationships often followed accusations of female infidelity.Forced in-pair copulation, unlike general forced copulation, is rare in the animal kingdom because many species don't have long-term pair bonding, which is why it cannot occur. Many avian species have long-term pair bonds, as it exists in many of these species. It does not exist randomly, and happens immediately after extra-pair copulations, intrusions by rival males, and female species in some of these species, which leads to male-favoring sex ratio. Forced in-pair copulation right after suspected or confirmed extra-pair copulation in these species is a sign of a sperm competition tactic. Some ancestral women have mated with multiple men within short periods of time so sperm from more than 1 man can enter her reproductive tract. This explains why women are hardwired to cheat or get sexually bored quicker in relationships compared to men. Men who physically abuse or rape their wives had higher scores on sexual jealousy. Women who are victims of marital rape also are more likely to have been unfaithful. If they weren't, they were perceived that way. Because women can't be cuckolded given that they know which child is theirs and men would not bring an illegitimate child into the marriage, but outside the marriage, sexual jealousy and risk of being cheated on was not linked to women committing sexual coercion, but men who worried about sexual infidelity, had a partner who was at risk of cheating or who had a partner who did cheat, engaged in more sexual coercion, and many convicted partner rapists disproportionately had wives who cheated on them. Men's sexual coercion was consistently predicted by female infidelity and this held true even when controlling for men's personalities and controlling behavior (which can amplify the risk under these circumstances). Additionally, this explains why abusive relationships have more sex, and this is true for mates in various species close to humans, including gorillas, baboons, macaques, and chimpanzees.
Obviously, most men won't do these things, but obviously personality traits can still increase the risk along with evolutionary instincts, and so can attachment anxiety. There's also other factors for intimate partner violence and homicide, such as the fact that these offenders often tend to be generally violent criminals and have violent criminal records. There's obviously antisocial men who do tend to be violent in relationships because they're generally violent, but this is talking more about at least situation partner violence/homicide. Not all women killed by their partners were abused by them, even if it's true for most, but it's even more common for them to notice their partners' sexual jealousy or worries about infidelity, which the vast majority noticed for concerns their partner had. Additonally, this thread is NOT condoning violence against women, just like how acknowledging how violence against men is evolutionary does not condone it. Most male criminals harm men, and men usually restrict violence against women to when they commit sexual violence or intimate partner violence, and evolution explains all of this. Men have less evolutionary benefits to committing non-sexual crimes against women outside their relationship, unlike when they commit the same crimes against men.
There's also evidence showing that when the sex ratio has more women (more women than men in a population), men mated with more women than sexual aggression against women declined (rapists do tend to be promiscuous, but they have dark triad traits that make them more promiscuous as an adaptation, especially if women are less available to mate with, like polygamous societies). When there were more men than women, sexual aggression by men against women increased. Another study found that a sex ratio of more men than women increases men's intimate partner violence against women, and even more so when more women are working. They explain the evolutionary reason behind it:
Multivariate regression results furnish evidence supporting evolutionary psychology by demonstrating that a high sex ratio increases male-on-female intimate partner violence. Results also show that male-on-female intimate partner violence is higher in cities where more women work. Such a finding further buttresses the logic associated with evolutionary psychology because participation in the workforce is theorized to afford a woman a greater opportunity to meet and interact with men other than her husband or boyfriend.Conclusion
There is a lot of evidence that gender inequality or sexism comes from evolution, and as society becomes more economically successful, has less intergroup violence, and becomes more convenient as a whole, this issue in society lessens. There's also evidence that men are evolutionarily hardwired to be more likely than women to endorse old-school gender roles, or sexism, about men and women.
This is in line with my post, which cites a lot of evidence to back its statements up, about how the changes in gender roles, ages of marriage, fertility, etc. were due to changes in environment, and that feminism played no role in it.
2024.05.02 20:55 DemolitionMatter Gender inequality has more evolutionary roots than sociogenic roots, research shows.
DISCLAIMER: This post does NOT condone violence or crime, nor does it say that sexism is a good thing, but explains that it is not caused by patriarchy. It is not sociogenic, but part of nature. This does not mean it is good, but that it is not sociogenic, even if feminists say it is.
Feminists argue it was the "patriarchy" or men who created gender inequality or gender roles, and gender roles are often portrayed as evil and oppressive, but feminists reinforce them all the time in a subtle manner. It's actually evolution that caused gender inequality.
Gender equality doesn't necessarily create more happiness.
First, although there is evidence of gender equality bringing happiness, there's no consistent evidence that gender equality causes wellbeing in men or women. One study wrote: "greater gender equality has few significant effects on overall subjective well-being (males and females combined), except for a slight association of more female (relative to male) education with higher well-being." They elaborated:
This study, which is far more well-researched than others, shows a nuanced pattern across many countries. When it came to happiness, people in "gender equal" countries were more likely to simply happy but people in "gender unequal" countries are more likely to be very happy. People in "gender equal" countries were more likely to be simply satisfied with life but in "gender unequal" countries, people were more likely to be very satisfied with life. Being simply unhappy or unsatisfied did not differ between countries but being very unhappy/unsatisfied was slightly more common in "gender unequal" countries, but the percentage who were very unhappy/satisfied was minuscule. The vast majority of people in both kinds of countries were at least happy/satisfied with life. Increasing gender equality was mixed in its results:
Sexism and gender inequality has evolutionary roots.
This is a highly controversial point, but it is true. There's a lot of talk lately about how the hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, but this is false (a myth promoted by both the far left and feminists), and women did not hunt as much as men, but that idea was "proven" by research with high amounts of methodological bias.
A study called "An evolutionary life history explanation of sexism and gender inequality" by Nan Zhu and Lei Chang shows that sexism/gender inequality is indeed evolutionary. Contrary to popular belief, sexism was more based on discriminating against men or women or singling them out due to gender roles, and gender roles were important for the success of our species and survival. It wasn't about punishing a gender for their gender. Here's the abstract:
Rape and intimate partner violence are not caused by patriarchy, but are evolutionary tactics (despite being immoral and evolution/nature being amoral).
This is just like how men committing crimes against men (which is far more common) is also an evolutionary tactic. Nature is amoral and humans are, to an extent, a barbaric species (like any other species). This thread of mine talks about how not only is most sexism towards women benevolent sexism, but actual misogyny is rare among men, and those men were simply full of dark triad traits, and dark triad men and misogynistic men or rapists were two sides of the same coin. Dark triad traits are an evolutionary adaptation to have lots of casual sex, and they caused men to be interested in as many sex partners as possible. When these men have unusually high aspirations about how sexually active they must be, they tend to become misogynistic because they believe they are unattractive to women when they aren't, yet engage in a lot of promiscuity. As a result, these men have committed rape to get sex, but they also have a high amount of consensual sex partners. As a result, rape was found to be an evolutionary mating strategy from dark triad traits, which I elaborated on in that thread (no, it doesn't condone or defend sexual violence).
It is also possible countries with less gender equality, which have more intergroup violence or lack of resource security (which is what causes old-school gender roles and less gender equality), have more dark triad men, and the gender difference in dark triad traits between men and women is bigger. It's not patriarchy that causes dark triad traits in these countries, but intergroup violence and lack of resource security that causes these traits there. It could be intimate partner violence might be more common in these countries and it could be for evolutionary reasons and for the same reasons these countries have gender inequality or old-school gender roles more: the environment.
Although intimate partner violence is a gender symmetrical crime, I don't know if there's evolutionary reasons for why women commit intimate partner violence. There could be, but it has probably less research because society ignores male domestic violence victims. Among men who commit the crime, there are evolutionary reasons or hardwired instincts that cause it. For example, women with boyfriends/husbands who had children from previous partners are far more likely to be victims of intimate partner violence or homicide, whereas stepfather are more likely to be abusive. This is potentially due to sexual jealousy or resentment of the actual father due to knowing their children are not biologically their children. Even other species had intimate partner violence among both males and females:
Obviously, most men won't do these things, but obviously personality traits can still increase the risk along with evolutionary instincts, and so can attachment anxiety. There's also other factors for intimate partner violence and homicide, such as the fact that these offenders often tend to be generally violent criminals and have violent criminal records. There's obviously antisocial men who do tend to be violent in relationships because they're generally violent, but this is talking more about at least situation partner violence/homicide. Not all women killed by their partners were abused by them, even if it's true for most, but it's even more common for them to notice their partners' sexual jealousy or worries about infidelity, which the vast majority noticed for concerns their partner had. Additonally, this thread is NOT condoning violence against women, just like how acknowledging how violence against men is evolutionary does not condone it. Most male criminals harm men, and men usually restrict violence against women to when they commit sexual violence or intimate partner violence, and evolution explains all of this. Men have less evolutionary benefits to committing non-sexual crimes against women outside their relationship, unlike when they commit the same crimes against men.
There's also evidence showing that when the sex ratio has more women (more women than men in a population), men mated with more women than sexual aggression against women declined (rapists do tend to be promiscuous, but they have dark triad traits that make them more promiscuous as an adaptation, especially if women are less available to mate with, like polygamous societies). When there were more men than women, sexual aggression by men against women increased. Another study found that a sex ratio of more men than women increases men's intimate partner violence against women, and even more so when more women are working. They explain the evolutionary reason behind it:
There is a lot of evidence that gender inequality or sexism comes from evolution, and as society becomes more economically successful, has less intergroup violence, and becomes more convenient as a whole, this issue in society lessens. There's also evidence that men are evolutionarily hardwired to be more likely than women to endorse old-school gender roles, or sexism, about men and women.
This is in line with my post, which cites a lot of evidence to back its statements up, about how the changes in gender roles, ages of marriage, fertility, etc. were due to changes in environment, and that feminism played no role in it.
submitted by DemolitionMatter to MensRights [link] [comments]
Feminists argue it was the "patriarchy" or men who created gender inequality or gender roles, and gender roles are often portrayed as evil and oppressive, but feminists reinforce them all the time in a subtle manner. It's actually evolution that caused gender inequality.
Gender equality doesn't necessarily create more happiness.
First, although there is evidence of gender equality bringing happiness, there's no consistent evidence that gender equality causes wellbeing in men or women. One study wrote: "greater gender equality has few significant effects on overall subjective well-being (males and females combined), except for a slight association of more female (relative to male) education with higher well-being." They elaborated:
Most of the gender equality measures do not predict differences between male and female subjective well-being, neither when considering zero-order correlations (Table 1) nor in regression models that control for plausible covariates (Tables 5, 6). Therefore we can confirm the conclusion of Vieira Lima (2011) that greater gender equality or higher female status does not usually benefit women more than men. For example, a higher proportion of women in high-status occupations does not raise the average subjective well- being of all women, although it is likely to do so for the minority of highly ambitious women competing for these positions. High female labor force participation and non- agricultural employment emerge as conditions that appear to reduce female relative to male (or raise male relative to female) well-being (Tables 5, 6). This result confirms and extends the observation of Tesch-Ro ̈mer et al. (2008) of a predominantly negative rela- tionship between relative female life satisfaction and relative female economic activity rate. One possible explanation is that in many (though not necessarily all) countries, the disutility of work is greater for women than men. In other words, women dislike gainful work in a modern economy more than men do.In fact, the research found that women are happier or more satisfied with life than men in Muslim countries, countries with less Catholic people, and countries without "communist" history. Furthermore, they found that female life satisfaction is higher in countries with more old-school gender roles:
One possibility is that higher female life satisfaction in countries with traditional gender roles is caused by lower female expectations. However, in this case we would expect that traditional gender roles favor higher self-reported female life satisfaction but not neces- sarily happiness. Inspection of Fig. 1 shows this not to be the case.Additionally, gender equality was not associated with more happiness/life satisfaction, and more female employment, or socializing it, actually reduces wellbeing for women.
The present study is strictly cross-sectional. However, it shows that greater gender equality is not associated with higher subjective well-being of women relative to men. It even suggests that high rates of female employment, or possibly a value system that insists on female employment, have the potential to reduce female well-being. Therefore we need to be aware of the possibility that continued efforts at educating women out of traditional female roles and into traditional male roles can reduce female subjective well-being, as has happened in the communist and ex-communist countries. But is this really surprising? Men would not be happy and satisfied either if they were forced out of traditional male roles and into traditional female roles. Perhaps the implicit belief among many social scientists that male-typical preferences, values and social roles are in some way superior to traditional female ones needs to be re-evaluated.They concluded this explains why wellbeing for women in the United States has declined in the past few decades as women entered the workforce more. This study found that although gender equality promoted happiness in both developed and developing countries, the effect was stronger in democratic or high income countries compared to nondemocratic or low income countries.
This study, which is far more well-researched than others, shows a nuanced pattern across many countries. When it came to happiness, people in "gender equal" countries were more likely to simply happy but people in "gender unequal" countries are more likely to be very happy. People in "gender equal" countries were more likely to be simply satisfied with life but in "gender unequal" countries, people were more likely to be very satisfied with life. Being simply unhappy or unsatisfied did not differ between countries but being very unhappy/unsatisfied was slightly more common in "gender unequal" countries, but the percentage who were very unhappy/satisfied was minuscule. The vast majority of people in both kinds of countries were at least happy/satisfied with life. Increasing gender equality was mixed in its results:
In gender equal countries, it was seen that increasing levels of gender egalitarianism tend to improve a person’s likelihood to be either very unhappy or at higher levels of happiness than unhappy.Increasing gender equality in the "egalitarian" countries decreased unhappiness, very slightly increased being very unhappy (very minuscule change), very slightly increased (minuscule change) being very happy and increased being simply happy. In the "unequal" countries, increasing gender equality decreased being very happy, increased being simply happy, somewhat increased being unhappy and made a minuscule decrease in being very unhappy. With life satisfaction, it decreased being unsatisfied or very unsatisfied in both kinds of countries but only made a noteworthy increase in being satisfied or being very satisfied in "unequal" countries and "equal" countries, respectively. Either way, the authors concluded that their research "demonstrates that levels of happiness and life satisfaction have a similar distribution in gender equal and unequal countries overall", and "while the impact of demographic components on happiness and life satisfaction does not vary in gender equal and unequal countries, gender egalitarianism demonstrates diversified patterns of happiness".
Sexism and gender inequality has evolutionary roots.
This is a highly controversial point, but it is true. There's a lot of talk lately about how the hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, but this is false (a myth promoted by both the far left and feminists), and women did not hunt as much as men, but that idea was "proven" by research with high amounts of methodological bias.
A study called "An evolutionary life history explanation of sexism and gender inequality" by Nan Zhu and Lei Chang shows that sexism/gender inequality is indeed evolutionary. Contrary to popular belief, sexism was more based on discriminating against men or women or singling them out due to gender roles, and gender roles were important for the success of our species and survival. It wasn't about punishing a gender for their gender. Here's the abstract:
Predisposed to differences in parental investment, men and women are expected to enact different reproduction-oriented, accelerated life-history strategies when facing high extrinsic risks or resource insecurity. Sexual selection processes would strengthen the sex differences in support of such accelerated life-history strategy, causing women to divert more time and energy to reproductive activities and depend more on men's economic provisioning and therefore enforcing sexist attitudes and gender inequality. This paper provides empirical support for this life-history explanation of sexism based on data from the World Values Survey and four United Nations sources. The results generally support our explanation in the following manners: (1) Societal-level extrinsic risks (worries over intergroup violence) were associated with higher sexism. (2) Men were more sexist, and the association between individual-level resource insecurity and sexism was more moderate in countries and regions with greater society-level extrinsic risks. (3) Societal-level extrinsic risks (adult mortality) and resource availability were associated with higher and lower gender inequality, respectively, through the mediating effects of accelerated life-history strategies, indicated by adolescent birth rates and total fertility.They also cite evidence for how environment affects reproductive outcomes and general behavior:
Resource insecurity, which is related to higher exposure to morbi- dity–mortality risks for offspring in almost all human forager societies (Marlowe, 2000), has been demonstrated to be associated with parental harshness and insecure attachment, which, in turn, are linked to traits of accelerated life-history strategies. These traits include earlier sexual debut and higher sexual activities during adolescence, which are pre- dicted by earlier pubertal development (Belsky, Houts & Fearon, 2010; (Belsky et al., 2010b)). In a longitudinal study, Belsky, Schlomer and Ellis (2012) found that lower income-to-needs ratio experienced during the early years was indirectly associated with higher adolescent sexuality through lower maternal parenting quality in childhood. By con- trast, Ellis and Essex (2007) observed that fewer marital conflicts, higher quality parental care, and higher socioeconomic status predicted later sexual development in girls. Overall, accelerated life-history strategies are in accordance with increased reproductive efforts at an earlier age, which are adaptive to stressful environments that reduce the chance of offspring surviving to maturity, but less so in stable and competitive environments (Del Giudice et al., 2015).Across countries, men scored higher on beliefs about old-school gender roles (or as the authors described, more sexist) than women. It wasn't because they're the "patriarchy" or "oppressors", but this difference in beliefs was higher in countries with higher extrinsic risks like intergroup violence (e.g.: war).
We found that males exhibited higher sexism than did females and that this trend was stronger in societies facing greater intergroup violence. This is consistent with our extrapolation that the traditional, sexist “protective males” stereotype is more advocated in societies facing an elevated danger of intergroup conflicts. Moreover, given that males have more incentives to escape parenting duties to focus on mating compared with females, males likely gain more reproductive success from sexist gender roles than females do when enacting accelerated life-history strategies. This might explain why the sex difference in sexism was greater in societies with higher extrinsic risks.Extrinsic risks were associated with accelerated life history strategies (e.g.: having children), which, in turn, is associated with gender inequality. Societal level extrinsic risks (like intergroup violence) were associated with more sexism, and "societal-level extrinsic risks (adult mortality) and resource availability were associated with higher and lower gender inequality, respectively, through the mediating effects of accelerated life-history strategies, indicated by adolescent birth rates and total fertility." Individual-level resource insecurity and societal intergroup violence both predicted more sexism or beliefs endorsing old-school gender roles, but: "society-level intergroup violence may have overshadowed individual-level resource insecurity such that the detrimental effect of resource insecurity was less severe in societies with high intergroup violence".
Rape and intimate partner violence are not caused by patriarchy, but are evolutionary tactics (despite being immoral and evolution/nature being amoral).
This is just like how men committing crimes against men (which is far more common) is also an evolutionary tactic. Nature is amoral and humans are, to an extent, a barbaric species (like any other species). This thread of mine talks about how not only is most sexism towards women benevolent sexism, but actual misogyny is rare among men, and those men were simply full of dark triad traits, and dark triad men and misogynistic men or rapists were two sides of the same coin. Dark triad traits are an evolutionary adaptation to have lots of casual sex, and they caused men to be interested in as many sex partners as possible. When these men have unusually high aspirations about how sexually active they must be, they tend to become misogynistic because they believe they are unattractive to women when they aren't, yet engage in a lot of promiscuity. As a result, these men have committed rape to get sex, but they also have a high amount of consensual sex partners. As a result, rape was found to be an evolutionary mating strategy from dark triad traits, which I elaborated on in that thread (no, it doesn't condone or defend sexual violence).
It is also possible countries with less gender equality, which have more intergroup violence or lack of resource security (which is what causes old-school gender roles and less gender equality), have more dark triad men, and the gender difference in dark triad traits between men and women is bigger. It's not patriarchy that causes dark triad traits in these countries, but intergroup violence and lack of resource security that causes these traits there. It could be intimate partner violence might be more common in these countries and it could be for evolutionary reasons and for the same reasons these countries have gender inequality or old-school gender roles more: the environment.
Although intimate partner violence is a gender symmetrical crime, I don't know if there's evolutionary reasons for why women commit intimate partner violence. There could be, but it has probably less research because society ignores male domestic violence victims. Among men who commit the crime, there are evolutionary reasons or hardwired instincts that cause it. For example, women with boyfriends/husbands who had children from previous partners are far more likely to be victims of intimate partner violence or homicide, whereas stepfather are more likely to be abusive. This is potentially due to sexual jealousy or resentment of the actual father due to knowing their children are not biologically their children. Even other species had intimate partner violence among both males and females:
These cases demonstrate that intimate partner violence is neither exclusive to humans nor exclusive to males. Intimate partner violence is the result of a natural process—Darwinian selection. These cases also call into question the default hypothesis that physical violence between pair-bonded individuals is caused by socialization. Proponents of the socialization hypothesis would not argue that burying beetles and razorbills are socialized to inflict partner-directed violence, and it may be erroneous to assume this default position for human intimate partner violence. In every species studied to date (including humans), intimate partner violence occurs when the actions of one partner (either male or female) threaten the survival or reproduction of the other.Men also mate guard (guard their partner from other men) when she has high reproductive value or attractiveness, is ovulating, is around other men, or has other traits making her more prone to infidelity. Men's mate retention behaviors and mate guarding about making sure where she was or knowing who she talks to was associated with intimate partner violence perpetration against her. The relationship between accusations of female infidelity and female-directed violence was mediated by non-violent direct guarding behaviors. When it comes to marital sexual aggression, women's risk of sexual coercion by their partner was not related to power in the relationship, like who controls the decision making, and thus, women with a man with the dominant position in the relationship don't experience more sexual coercion from their husbands. A lot of evidence shows that sexual coercion in marriage might be due to paternity uncertainty or worrying the wife is cheating:
Sexual coercion in response to cues of his partner's sexual infidelity might function to introduce a male's sperm into his partner's reproductive tract at a time when there is a high risk of cuckoldry (i.e., when his partner has recently been inseminated by a rival male). This sperm competition hypothesis was proposed following recognition that forced in-pair copulation (i.e., partner rape) in nonhuman species followed female extra-pair copulations and that sexual coercion and rape in human intimate relationships often followed accusations of female infidelity.Forced in-pair copulation, unlike general forced copulation, is rare in the animal kingdom because many species don't have long-term pair bonding, which is why it cannot occur. Many avian species have long-term pair bonds, as it exists in many of these species. It does not exist randomly, and happens immediately after extra-pair copulations, intrusions by rival males, and female species in some of these species, which leads to male-favoring sex ratio. Forced in-pair copulation right after suspected or confirmed extra-pair copulation in these species is a sign of a sperm competition tactic. Some ancestral women have mated with multiple men within short periods of time so sperm from more than 1 man can enter her reproductive tract. This explains why women are hardwired to cheat or get sexually bored quicker in relationships compared to men. Men who physically abuse or rape their wives had higher scores on sexual jealousy. Women who are victims of marital rape also are more likely to have been unfaithful. If they weren't, they were perceived that way. Because women can't be cuckolded given that they know which child is theirs and men would not bring an illegitimate child into the marriage, but outside the marriage, sexual jealousy and risk of being cheated on was not linked to women committing sexual coercion, but men who worried about sexual infidelity, had a partner who was at risk of cheating or who had a partner who did cheat, engaged in more sexual coercion, and many convicted partner rapists disproportionately had wives who cheated on them. Men's sexual coercion was consistently predicted by female infidelity and this held true even when controlling for men's personalities and controlling behavior (which can amplify the risk under these circumstances). Additionally, this explains why abusive relationships have more sex, and this is true for mates in various species close to humans, including gorillas, baboons, macaques, and chimpanzees.
Obviously, most men won't do these things, but obviously personality traits can still increase the risk along with evolutionary instincts, and so can attachment anxiety. There's also other factors for intimate partner violence and homicide, such as the fact that these offenders often tend to be generally violent criminals and have violent criminal records. There's obviously antisocial men who do tend to be violent in relationships because they're generally violent, but this is talking more about at least situation partner violence/homicide. Not all women killed by their partners were abused by them, even if it's true for most, but it's even more common for them to notice their partners' sexual jealousy or worries about infidelity, which the vast majority noticed for concerns their partner had. Additonally, this thread is NOT condoning violence against women, just like how acknowledging how violence against men is evolutionary does not condone it. Most male criminals harm men, and men usually restrict violence against women to when they commit sexual violence or intimate partner violence, and evolution explains all of this. Men have less evolutionary benefits to committing non-sexual crimes against women outside their relationship, unlike when they commit the same crimes against men.
There's also evidence showing that when the sex ratio has more women (more women than men in a population), men mated with more women than sexual aggression against women declined (rapists do tend to be promiscuous, but they have dark triad traits that make them more promiscuous as an adaptation, especially if women are less available to mate with, like polygamous societies). When there were more men than women, sexual aggression by men against women increased. Another study found that a sex ratio of more men than women increases men's intimate partner violence against women, and even more so when more women are working. They explain the evolutionary reason behind it:
Multivariate regression results furnish evidence supporting evolutionary psychology by demonstrating that a high sex ratio increases male-on-female intimate partner violence. Results also show that male-on-female intimate partner violence is higher in cities where more women work. Such a finding further buttresses the logic associated with evolutionary psychology because participation in the workforce is theorized to afford a woman a greater opportunity to meet and interact with men other than her husband or boyfriend.Conclusion
There is a lot of evidence that gender inequality or sexism comes from evolution, and as society becomes more economically successful, has less intergroup violence, and becomes more convenient as a whole, this issue in society lessens. There's also evidence that men are evolutionarily hardwired to be more likely than women to endorse old-school gender roles, or sexism, about men and women.
This is in line with my post, which cites a lot of evidence to back its statements up, about how the changes in gender roles, ages of marriage, fertility, etc. were due to changes in environment, and that feminism played no role in it.
2024.04.28 22:16 Superb-Programmer311 Small world
 | I was watching The Secret Life of the American Teenager. And Cierra Ramirez plays a pregnant teen. And I think the woman playing her grandmother is the same actress as her birth grandma in the fosters! submitted by Superb-Programmer311 to TheFosters [link] [comments] |
2024.04.26 07:47 Affectionate-Art8631 Sex and the City in 2024?
As a fun little thought experiment, I started to wonder what it would be like if either SATC had come out this year, or if it had been rebooted instead of 'And Just Like That'. Like, who would be a good cast to embody these characters in today's pool of actors? What elements would have opportunities to be updated? This is what I came up with:
Carrie: I think Carrie would have the most career changes (you can't live her lifestyle and be a newspaper columnist in 2024), but the fewest character changes. A prominent social media influencer under the handle @ sexandthecity. The interview interludes from the first few seasons would be the #streetinterviews all over TikTok (ex: whatspoppin), and her "I couldn't help but wonder" moments could #storytime style vlogs. Vapes instead of smoking cigarettes. Played by Vanessa Hudgens.
Miranda: Career-wise, very similar, but specifically a lawyer for a big tech company. Is updated to a more overt, millennial feminist, fluent in Twitter discourse lingo. In a classic Miranda fashion, contains multitudes, and probably loudly criticizes the media's reductionist portrayal of women while also being a Housewives superfan. Starts the show out identifying as straight, and slowly coming to terms with her bisexuality (in a way more natural and character driven than in 'And Just Like That'). Played by Alia Shawkat (if Cynthia Nixon can go bottle red, so can Alia 🤭 ).
Samantha: In order to Samantha to remain the scandalizing, sex positive heart of the show in a 2024 setting, the goal post needs to move a little. Updating Samantha from a "trysexual" to openly pansexual, albeit with a healthy love for dick 😂 (I don't even feel like this is a major change as she had a serious relationship with Maria) , and getting into messy situations with polyamory, kink, and other modern ideas of sex/relationships. A PR job in the 2020s also has a lot of fun updated story opportunities. Played by Kate Hudson.
Charlotte: WASPy Charlotte is still here, but she's gone "stealth wealth." She is a GOOP loving woman who is lowkey addicted to #tradwife content on Instagram and enjoys cottagecore minimalism. Besides those time period updates, she's still the same naive, idealistic romantic that we know and love. Played by Shailene Woodley.
Big: I don't really feel like there's a ton to update about Big because he's made so enigmatic in the original series, and you can kind of fit that in any time period without it seeming dated. The hard part is finding an actor who gives cool energy, but also a kind of weary energy, and isn't a polished pretty boy. My money is on Ben Affleck for Big.
Stev(i)e: Still giving working class, native New Yorker energy, but make it soft stud. I know this would change up the pregnancy plotline a bit, but swap testicular canceorchidectomy with breast cancemastectomy, and have Miranda get pregnant from a one-night-stand , and I think it could work. Played by Lena Waithe.
Stanford: Stanford is honestly unchanged personality-wise. Maybe gets a bit more inclusion into the group instead of being relegated to the GBF, but otherwise it's classic Stanford. Played by Bowen Yang.
Anywho, this was fun for me to think about! How about y'all? What would you think would need a 2024 update if the show had aired today? Who would you cast?
submitted by Affectionate-Art8631 to sexandthecity [link] [comments]
Carrie: I think Carrie would have the most career changes (you can't live her lifestyle and be a newspaper columnist in 2024), but the fewest character changes. A prominent social media influencer under the handle @ sexandthecity. The interview interludes from the first few seasons would be the #streetinterviews all over TikTok (ex: whatspoppin), and her "I couldn't help but wonder" moments could #storytime style vlogs. Vapes instead of smoking cigarettes. Played by Vanessa Hudgens.
Miranda: Career-wise, very similar, but specifically a lawyer for a big tech company. Is updated to a more overt, millennial feminist, fluent in Twitter discourse lingo. In a classic Miranda fashion, contains multitudes, and probably loudly criticizes the media's reductionist portrayal of women while also being a Housewives superfan. Starts the show out identifying as straight, and slowly coming to terms with her bisexuality (in a way more natural and character driven than in 'And Just Like That'). Played by Alia Shawkat (if Cynthia Nixon can go bottle red, so can Alia 🤭 ).
Samantha: In order to Samantha to remain the scandalizing, sex positive heart of the show in a 2024 setting, the goal post needs to move a little. Updating Samantha from a "trysexual" to openly pansexual, albeit with a healthy love for dick 😂 (I don't even feel like this is a major change as she had a serious relationship with Maria) , and getting into messy situations with polyamory, kink, and other modern ideas of sex/relationships. A PR job in the 2020s also has a lot of fun updated story opportunities. Played by Kate Hudson.
Charlotte: WASPy Charlotte is still here, but she's gone "stealth wealth." She is a GOOP loving woman who is lowkey addicted to #tradwife content on Instagram and enjoys cottagecore minimalism. Besides those time period updates, she's still the same naive, idealistic romantic that we know and love. Played by Shailene Woodley.
Big: I don't really feel like there's a ton to update about Big because he's made so enigmatic in the original series, and you can kind of fit that in any time period without it seeming dated. The hard part is finding an actor who gives cool energy, but also a kind of weary energy, and isn't a polished pretty boy. My money is on Ben Affleck for Big.
Stev(i)e: Still giving working class, native New Yorker energy, but make it soft stud. I know this would change up the pregnancy plotline a bit, but swap testicular canceorchidectomy with breast cancemastectomy, and have Miranda get pregnant from a one-night-stand , and I think it could work. Played by Lena Waithe.
Stanford: Stanford is honestly unchanged personality-wise. Maybe gets a bit more inclusion into the group instead of being relegated to the GBF, but otherwise it's classic Stanford. Played by Bowen Yang.
Anywho, this was fun for me to think about! How about y'all? What would you think would need a 2024 update if the show had aired today? Who would you cast?
2024.04.23 19:35 Automatic_Usual9568 The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare Review
The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare
By Mike Likes Stuff
I have a complicated relationship with the works of Guy Ritchie. His films helped shape the way I interact with cinema, but as of late, I’ve been mostly out on his work. Newer works feel like a self-referential self-love act that we are all forced to reckon with. Luckily, Ritchie’s second pair up with Henry Cavil (god damn statue of a man) isn’t horrible, but honestly isn’t great either. Two interwoven plots, held up by some good acting, keep this from being unwatchable.
There are two things we can count on from Guy Ritchie: style, and guns (or swords for you Aladdin stands). Oozing with angsty English attitude, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare doesn’t stray far from its filmographic brethren. Slick in wardrobe, hair and makeup, we are easily transported to the mid-forties which, shockingly, doesn’t impede Ritchie’s flair. Every character but two, more on that later, do feel like pieces plucked directly from World War Two. Bombastic and clear, the sound mixing only aids in getting us to the port of Fernado Po. Dialogue is exactly what you’d expect it to be, quick with the sarcasm we’ve heard in the last eighteen things Ritchie has written.
The acting is serviceable. While being the center of attention for every shot he’s in, Cavil somehow saunters through the entire film. His entire character has absolutely zero sense of urgency for anything, often times being the person that makes other characters wait. With the film ostensibly written to be about his character, based on the real-life exploits of Gus March-Philips, I wondered if the real March-Philips was so nonchalant about the madness around him as well. One of the great tragedies is that Cavil is so out acted and its by three other actors, two of which I didn’t see coming. Most would assume Alan Ritchson hot off success of season two of Reacher would pull away from Cavil, and they would be one hundred percent correct. In sheer size Ritchson towers above everyone, even though he’s only a few inches taller than our lead. His chest is wild, like how does someone get that broad? He’s impressive and honestly, his character seems more fleshed out too. Most aside from March-Philips most characters do seem like actual people. Where March-Philips only exists as an idea; and one that, if we ask too many questions, we may not believe him as a character; other characters have more backstory, more interesting characteristics, more fun things to say. The other two characters of interest were Babs Olsanmokun’s Richard Heron and Til Schweiger’s Heinrich Luhr. Olsanmokun’s character has the benefit of not being based off an existing person, so Heron can have depth and intrigue. In a film that has the basis for James Bond lurking among the cast, Olsanmokun feels more like an international man of mystery; always able to use wit and a few well-placed bullets to de-escalate a situation. Schweiger’s Luhr is the kind of bad guy we all love to hate, self-obsessed Nazi. He has a real, I wanna hit this guy face, and evil half smile that makes even the calm moments feel stressful.
Though with all this good there are some rougher aspects of the film. First and foremost: Roy Kinnear, great job getting the voice of Churchill down, but you missed everything else. The mannerisms are wrong, the cadence is wrong, and whoever did Kinnear’s makeup got as far away from Churchill as they could get. The Churchill was unbelievable and pulled away from the rest of the film in such a huge way that it was hard to get back on track. Eiza Gonzalez is clearly trying as our token female Marjorie Stewart, but she has a look in her face that can only be described as someone who has seen a smart phone. Much like Shailene Woodley in 2023’s Farrari, there are some actors we just won’t be able to get the 21st century out of; and that’s fine for the right role, this was not the right role. All of the action sequences are wonderful when lit properly. This makes for a rather rough third act where everything happens under the guise of night with most of the cast wearing a dark color to blend in with their enemies. The last action sequence is easy to lose yourself in. From time to time I was confused about where we were. Anything that isn’t an interior is just ok at best with flashes of massive fire that erupt seemingly out of nowhere.
The long and short of it is this isn’t going to take Richie’s career back to the heights of his work in the UK on a smaller budget, I’m not even sure he knows how to make those films anymore. This isn’t gonna make or break any of the rest of the cast nor does it deserve to. This film is a gentleman’s six, it’s not great, but in no way bad. When it’s finally streaming, this will be a worthy watch for anyone who needs an action fix.
Much like a tea break, this film deserves a beer break. Go get an English porter. Really sit in the lovely nuttiness and perceived over carbed notes of the beer. Let it dance on your taste buds like you with Henry Cavil would dance on you. Enjoy the beer, not a bad movie, not a bad beer style.
Cheers to Y’all and to the movies
submitted by Automatic_Usual9568 to u/Automatic_Usual9568 [link] [comments]
By Mike Likes Stuff
I have a complicated relationship with the works of Guy Ritchie. His films helped shape the way I interact with cinema, but as of late, I’ve been mostly out on his work. Newer works feel like a self-referential self-love act that we are all forced to reckon with. Luckily, Ritchie’s second pair up with Henry Cavil (god damn statue of a man) isn’t horrible, but honestly isn’t great either. Two interwoven plots, held up by some good acting, keep this from being unwatchable.
There are two things we can count on from Guy Ritchie: style, and guns (or swords for you Aladdin stands). Oozing with angsty English attitude, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare doesn’t stray far from its filmographic brethren. Slick in wardrobe, hair and makeup, we are easily transported to the mid-forties which, shockingly, doesn’t impede Ritchie’s flair. Every character but two, more on that later, do feel like pieces plucked directly from World War Two. Bombastic and clear, the sound mixing only aids in getting us to the port of Fernado Po. Dialogue is exactly what you’d expect it to be, quick with the sarcasm we’ve heard in the last eighteen things Ritchie has written.
The acting is serviceable. While being the center of attention for every shot he’s in, Cavil somehow saunters through the entire film. His entire character has absolutely zero sense of urgency for anything, often times being the person that makes other characters wait. With the film ostensibly written to be about his character, based on the real-life exploits of Gus March-Philips, I wondered if the real March-Philips was so nonchalant about the madness around him as well. One of the great tragedies is that Cavil is so out acted and its by three other actors, two of which I didn’t see coming. Most would assume Alan Ritchson hot off success of season two of Reacher would pull away from Cavil, and they would be one hundred percent correct. In sheer size Ritchson towers above everyone, even though he’s only a few inches taller than our lead. His chest is wild, like how does someone get that broad? He’s impressive and honestly, his character seems more fleshed out too. Most aside from March-Philips most characters do seem like actual people. Where March-Philips only exists as an idea; and one that, if we ask too many questions, we may not believe him as a character; other characters have more backstory, more interesting characteristics, more fun things to say. The other two characters of interest were Babs Olsanmokun’s Richard Heron and Til Schweiger’s Heinrich Luhr. Olsanmokun’s character has the benefit of not being based off an existing person, so Heron can have depth and intrigue. In a film that has the basis for James Bond lurking among the cast, Olsanmokun feels more like an international man of mystery; always able to use wit and a few well-placed bullets to de-escalate a situation. Schweiger’s Luhr is the kind of bad guy we all love to hate, self-obsessed Nazi. He has a real, I wanna hit this guy face, and evil half smile that makes even the calm moments feel stressful.
Though with all this good there are some rougher aspects of the film. First and foremost: Roy Kinnear, great job getting the voice of Churchill down, but you missed everything else. The mannerisms are wrong, the cadence is wrong, and whoever did Kinnear’s makeup got as far away from Churchill as they could get. The Churchill was unbelievable and pulled away from the rest of the film in such a huge way that it was hard to get back on track. Eiza Gonzalez is clearly trying as our token female Marjorie Stewart, but she has a look in her face that can only be described as someone who has seen a smart phone. Much like Shailene Woodley in 2023’s Farrari, there are some actors we just won’t be able to get the 21st century out of; and that’s fine for the right role, this was not the right role. All of the action sequences are wonderful when lit properly. This makes for a rather rough third act where everything happens under the guise of night with most of the cast wearing a dark color to blend in with their enemies. The last action sequence is easy to lose yourself in. From time to time I was confused about where we were. Anything that isn’t an interior is just ok at best with flashes of massive fire that erupt seemingly out of nowhere.
The long and short of it is this isn’t going to take Richie’s career back to the heights of his work in the UK on a smaller budget, I’m not even sure he knows how to make those films anymore. This isn’t gonna make or break any of the rest of the cast nor does it deserve to. This film is a gentleman’s six, it’s not great, but in no way bad. When it’s finally streaming, this will be a worthy watch for anyone who needs an action fix.
Much like a tea break, this film deserves a beer break. Go get an English porter. Really sit in the lovely nuttiness and perceived over carbed notes of the beer. Let it dance on your taste buds like you with Henry Cavil would dance on you. Enjoy the beer, not a bad movie, not a bad beer style.
Cheers to Y’all and to the movies
2024.03.31 09:01 createdjustforthis23 31/03/2024
I still felt like he was kind of upset with me last night, well not upset with me per se but idk, disinterested? He didn’t sound like he wanted to spend time with me. I’ve been asking how he is and if he’s okay and he says he’s fine, so he’s either a) not telling me something or b) it’s nothing outside of us. I’m trying to think of rational reasoning, ie he’s tired as I know he hasn’t been sleeping so well or he’s a bit down because he’s lost some motivation with his writing or he misses his friends and not seeing them regularly is maybe taking a toll on him more than he thinks or I don’t know. I’m trying to not fall into a black hole of doom and gloom about us and not be stuck in that fearful feeling that he’s about to end things. The thing is sometimes I want him to end things with us, not because I don’t want him and us - I want that so badly, more than anything - I guess purely because of my guilt. Guilt for being so difficult with us. He deserves someone easy and local and just someone who doesn’t take energy and patience but instead gives those things. I don’t know. I just want the best for him, I want him to be his happiest self, and I feel like maybe I’m not the one to bring that out in him? I don’t want him to so much as think about another girl, the idea of him with someone else makes me want to erupt into flames and scream (healthy, no?) but I hate hate hate the idea of dragging him down and being the source of his unhappiness. That sounds so lame. I hope he doesn’t end things, I hope it so much.
I don’t know what my season is. M was trying to work it out the other day but we came up with nothing. I seem to be several of them and none of them at the same time?! HOW. I don’t have unique colouring in the slightest! Half of me wants to go be professionally analysed but it’s a lot of money for something I don’t hugely care about. But so naturally I have:
Famous brunette Autumns: * Shailene Woodley * Evangeline Lilly * Ana de Armas * Annes Elwy * Lilly Collins * Kate Beckinsale * Ashley Judd * Minnie Driver * Liv Tyler
Except a lot of them have darker skin than I do and they’re a lot warmer in tone, granted they’re all famous and get spray tans and stuff but still. So I’ve been trying to google what seasons these celebrities are as they have vaguely similar coloured features to me - obviously they’re all infinitely more beautiful than I could ever even hope to be - but I STILL DONT MNOW MY SEASON. It doesn’t even matter but it’s now the fact I can’t work it out it’s making me want to know more. Maybe I’m too bleh to have a season, maybe that’s a part of why I’m ugly - because my colours just don’t mesh?
I love puppy so much, he’s so cute it’s unbearable.
I think I have a skewed take on sexual assault, I never seem to think it’s that bad. I know in theory it is and I always feel sympathy and all of that, but for example the book I’m reading today, she’s just endured something sexual she did NOT want and here I am reading and thinking it’s not that big of a deal just accept it. And I don’t like that I think like that, because that’s always my thought process. Apart from say some sort of aggressive rape or something, but even then I think “it could be worse” and I just… I don’t want to react that way. It’s not that I don’t believe someone or that I think it’s a nothing thing, but I also do feel like sometimes it’s a nothing thing even though I know it’s not - I wonder why? I’m presuming because of my own history with men. I know I’ve technically been sexually assaulted a fair bit, but idk. I say technically as I didn’t give any form of consent but I also blamed myself - like the time when I was 16 or 17 and my friends found me asleep/super tipsy in a room at a party with some guy all over me and fingers inside me and feeling me up and anyway. I know that doesn’t excuse his actions, but I also shouldn’t have put myself in that position so I put that blame on myself. Or with R, I don’t want to write about that but in retrospect that wasn’t him just wanting me it was him not accepting no for an answer and doing things anyway and me just letting it happen for idk, four years I guess. Not all the time, I wanted it a lottt of the time and initiated it a lotttt, but I would probably say a couple times a month he would disregard what I wanted and go ahead anyway. Or the time I was actively not wanting it and pushing him away and anyway I don’t want to write or think about this. I know I need to talk about this in therapy, I just find it scary to bring up, but I guess it will help me move on so it’s a necessity. Anyway I don’t want to write about myself or think about that, tbh it’s not even a big deal I feel entirely numb about everything that’s happened - more or less- I just wanted to say that I don’t like my reaction to some things.
Sometimes I wonder if it’s even possible to have the kind of life I want. I mean.. is it too late? I’m 31, 32 this year. I know in the grand scheme of things that still leaves a lot of time - should I live to the average age - but I feel like so much of life has passed me and I’ve missed it. This is not a pity party, I just wonder if it’s too late.
Are things with him crumbling? I can’t shake the feeling he has no interest in me or time with me. And it makes sense if that is the case, it makes more sense than him still wanting me. Then again what difference does it truly make to me, it’s not like he would end things and I would go out and go on dates and sleep around - I do not want that, I mean I do - I want romance and love with my whole entire heart, it’s all I want - but I’m not in a place for a relationship and if he ends things with me I’m not going to go out and replace him, I’ll commit to being fully single and focusing on myself. Not forever, but for a while. I don’t want to write about this either. I don’t want to think about myself today. I’m getting on my last f’ing nerves, I want to claw myself to shreds I’m irritating myself so much. I’m not a violent person with others but I do have very violent thoughts about myself like fantasies about slicing myself and flinging myself off buildings and clawing into myself - it always tends go come from a place of self hatred and disgust in myself. I’m wary of mentioning that though, because I’ve mentioned it in passing before and self harm became this big conversation in a session and like I’m sorry but this is a waste of time like I’m not going to do that so just calm the hell down? Anyway it would only make me uglier to have scars all over me now wouldn’t it.
I don’t like how todays journal sounds so I’m just going to write what I’ve done and be done with it:
Right I’m feeling flat and this journaling is making it worse. I’m sorry for being so negative, I’m finding it harder to fight it the last little bit but I shall keep trying. Night
submitted by createdjustforthis23 to u/createdjustforthis23 [link] [comments]
I don’t know what my season is. M was trying to work it out the other day but we came up with nothing. I seem to be several of them and none of them at the same time?! HOW. I don’t have unique colouring in the slightest! Half of me wants to go be professionally analysed but it’s a lot of money for something I don’t hugely care about. But so naturally I have:
- medium, warm/reddish brown hair
- hazel eyes leaning more green
- fair skin with a neutral-cool undertone
- high contrasting features, ie fair skin, darker hair, darker eyes.
Famous brunette Autumns: * Shailene Woodley * Evangeline Lilly * Ana de Armas * Annes Elwy * Lilly Collins * Kate Beckinsale * Ashley Judd * Minnie Driver * Liv Tyler
Except a lot of them have darker skin than I do and they’re a lot warmer in tone, granted they’re all famous and get spray tans and stuff but still. So I’ve been trying to google what seasons these celebrities are as they have vaguely similar coloured features to me - obviously they’re all infinitely more beautiful than I could ever even hope to be - but I STILL DONT MNOW MY SEASON. It doesn’t even matter but it’s now the fact I can’t work it out it’s making me want to know more. Maybe I’m too bleh to have a season, maybe that’s a part of why I’m ugly - because my colours just don’t mesh?
I love puppy so much, he’s so cute it’s unbearable.
I think I have a skewed take on sexual assault, I never seem to think it’s that bad. I know in theory it is and I always feel sympathy and all of that, but for example the book I’m reading today, she’s just endured something sexual she did NOT want and here I am reading and thinking it’s not that big of a deal just accept it. And I don’t like that I think like that, because that’s always my thought process. Apart from say some sort of aggressive rape or something, but even then I think “it could be worse” and I just… I don’t want to react that way. It’s not that I don’t believe someone or that I think it’s a nothing thing, but I also do feel like sometimes it’s a nothing thing even though I know it’s not - I wonder why? I’m presuming because of my own history with men. I know I’ve technically been sexually assaulted a fair bit, but idk. I say technically as I didn’t give any form of consent but I also blamed myself - like the time when I was 16 or 17 and my friends found me asleep/super tipsy in a room at a party with some guy all over me and fingers inside me and feeling me up and anyway. I know that doesn’t excuse his actions, but I also shouldn’t have put myself in that position so I put that blame on myself. Or with R, I don’t want to write about that but in retrospect that wasn’t him just wanting me it was him not accepting no for an answer and doing things anyway and me just letting it happen for idk, four years I guess. Not all the time, I wanted it a lottt of the time and initiated it a lotttt, but I would probably say a couple times a month he would disregard what I wanted and go ahead anyway. Or the time I was actively not wanting it and pushing him away and anyway I don’t want to write or think about this. I know I need to talk about this in therapy, I just find it scary to bring up, but I guess it will help me move on so it’s a necessity. Anyway I don’t want to write about myself or think about that, tbh it’s not even a big deal I feel entirely numb about everything that’s happened - more or less- I just wanted to say that I don’t like my reaction to some things.
Sometimes I wonder if it’s even possible to have the kind of life I want. I mean.. is it too late? I’m 31, 32 this year. I know in the grand scheme of things that still leaves a lot of time - should I live to the average age - but I feel like so much of life has passed me and I’ve missed it. This is not a pity party, I just wonder if it’s too late.
Are things with him crumbling? I can’t shake the feeling he has no interest in me or time with me. And it makes sense if that is the case, it makes more sense than him still wanting me. Then again what difference does it truly make to me, it’s not like he would end things and I would go out and go on dates and sleep around - I do not want that, I mean I do - I want romance and love with my whole entire heart, it’s all I want - but I’m not in a place for a relationship and if he ends things with me I’m not going to go out and replace him, I’ll commit to being fully single and focusing on myself. Not forever, but for a while. I don’t want to write about this either. I don’t want to think about myself today. I’m getting on my last f’ing nerves, I want to claw myself to shreds I’m irritating myself so much. I’m not a violent person with others but I do have very violent thoughts about myself like fantasies about slicing myself and flinging myself off buildings and clawing into myself - it always tends go come from a place of self hatred and disgust in myself. I’m wary of mentioning that though, because I’ve mentioned it in passing before and self harm became this big conversation in a session and like I’m sorry but this is a waste of time like I’m not going to do that so just calm the hell down? Anyway it would only make me uglier to have scars all over me now wouldn’t it.
I don’t like how todays journal sounds so I’m just going to write what I’ve done and be done with it:
- I had a morning shower which was nice.
- Cuddles with pup
- Took him for a walk, not a big one.
- Felt light headed - marked it in my tracker but otherwise no issues on new medication.
- Read.
- Texted happy birthday to my brother was asked to join them for a family sushi dinner in town but I said no as I’m out here - obviously more politely.
- Helped mum organise and declutter and move things.
- Made a plum pie.
- Read.
- Played with puppy and we ran around the house and garden together as he was experiencing his zoomies and it’s so fun to make him even more hyper
- Had a roast for dinner, I had all of half a small potato, 1/3 of a small kumara, a small piece of pumpkin and peas. I’m not a big roast girl, I also just didn’t feel that hungry.
- Did the crossword.
Right I’m feeling flat and this journaling is making it worse. I’m sorry for being so negative, I’m finding it harder to fight it the last little bit but I shall keep trying. Night
2024.03.24 22:26 sideswipe781 UFC Atlantic City: Blanchfield vs Fiorot Full Card Betting Preview Sideswipe MMA
Lifetime - Staked: 800.9u, Profit/Loss: +31.44u, ROI: 3.93%, Parlay Suggestions: 156-54 Dog of the Week: 12-11
2024 - Staked: 153.8u, Profit/Loss: -1.92u, ROI: -1.25%
As always, scroll down for UFC Atlantic City Breakdowns. The following is just a recap of last event’s results.
UFC Vegas 89 (PREVIOUS CARD)
Staked: 12u
Profit/Loss: -5.18u
Parlay Suggestions: 1-1
Dog of the week: Cameron Saaiman ❌
✅ 2u Namajunas to Win at -160 (won +1.22u)
✅ 1u Namajunas to Win and Over 1.5 Rounds at -115 (won +0.85u)
❌ 0.25u hahbazyan to Win by Submission at +1100
❌ 2u Saaiman to Win at +137
❌ 3.5u Quarantillo to Win at -137
❌ 1.5u Quarantillo to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds at +120
✅ 0.25u Padilla to Win by Submission at +600 (won +1.5u)
❌ 1u Usman to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds at +210
❌ 0.25u Namajunas, Saaiman & Quarantillo all to Win at +517
❌ 0.15u Namajunas, Saaiman, Quarantillo & Usman all to Win at +1369
❌ 0.1u Namajunas, Saaiman, Quarantillo & Usman to Win & O1.5 Rnds in Each at +3,565
UFC Atlantic City: Blanchfield v Fiorot
Deleted the opening rambling as character count hit the limit. Just know I am tired and need a break from these endless cards.
Let’s get into it!
Erin Blanchfield v Manon Fiorot
High level fight! Excited to see this one. Quite a binary matchup though, as we have the division’s best striker vs the division’s best grappler. As exciting as it is from a fan perspective, given the stylistic clash and what it means for the future of the women’s game…it’s not an easy fight to break down.
The reason for that is Fiorot’s takedown defence: a 91% success rate – which also included defending six from Namajunas (who has a 48% takedown success rate with those added…very good takedown ability from Rose). The only woman who has taken her down is Jennifer Maia, who never settled Fiorot and got reversed in the same exchange. In fact, the way Fiorot handled the wrestling exchanges in that one was phenomenal, so no woman has gotten the better of her in the grappling yet.
That’s what makes this one so exciting, as Blanchfield’s got good takedowns from a variety of ways. Against Maverick she was hitting bodylock trips, singles/doubles and hip throws. It was a pleasure to watch that performance, against an opponent I rate highly.
If Blanchfield manages to ground Manon though, then I think we could see the most dominant angle to the fight. Of course, we haven’t really seen it, but I would imagine that Fiorot’s bottom grappling on the mat isn’t going to be super elite. Especially not against Erin, who is really, really good there.
If it does get stuck on the feet, we’re clearly going to expect Fiorot to get the better of her opponent…but I think there’s something to be said for Erin’s pressure and tenacity on the feet. I wouldn’t have expected her to get the better of Taila Santos on the feet either, but she made the difference with how intense she was. I’ve said it before quite a few times, but pressure, volume, and just generally being a nuisance can work wonders when you’re technically outclassed. Merab Dvalishvili does this better than anyone.
So I don’t really have strong opinions here when it comes to picking a winner, because remarkably we still have gaps in our knowledge of how Fiorot grapples. It’s a close fight where one woman is probably going to look dominant and look like value…but because we don’t know who is going to win the takedown battle, or how Fiorot handles potentially being on her back it could be either of them. A classic “I told you so fight” as I like to call it.
However, I do think it’s fair to give a slight advantage to Erin, as I expect the gap in the grappling to be the biggest gap of all. Erin can win this fight easier than Fiorot can, because even if we get 15 minutes of striking, Erin could still make it competitive. -150 Blanchfield seems about right to me, but I don’t think there’s enough value or confidence to be placing a bet here.
How I line this fight: Erin Blanchfield -150 (60%), Manon Fiorot +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Vicente Luque v Joaquin Buckley
I’m convinced that Vicente Luque is a bit of a busted prospect by this point. The guy was in some WARS in his very long-winded journey to the top 15 (Bryan Barberena and Niko Price x2), that by the time he actually got to the big stages he found himself being a step behind the elite level. Things have gotten worse, as the recent KO loss to Geoff Neal was significantly brutal and caused a bleed on the brain, which supposedly Luque needed to seek important medical clearance for, or else his MMA career would have ended prematurely.
He’s a mainstay in the rankings now, but his best win is only Michael Chiesa, and he only won that fight because Chiesa got too aggressive going for the kill when he was in a very dominant position. You could argue that RDA and Tyron Woodley are bigger names to have on the record, but both of those guys are considered old and way past their prime by this point.
In terms of his in-cage abilities, Luque will always be dangerous and well rounded. He doesn’t actively wrestle much, but he’s clearly got some opportunistic submissions up his sleeve – mainly in the form of front chokes when defending takedown attempts. On the feet, he is certainly hittable and has obviously relied on durability to carry him all this way, but he certainly packs power on the return.
Joaquin Buckley is taking a big step up in competition here. I’ve always had a bit of a soft spot for Buckley – I think he’s funny on the mic and his KO of Impa Kasangany is still the best UFC KO of all time in my opinion. Buckley’s best UFC win to date came in his most recent performance against Alex Morono, an unranked journeyman that’s well-rounded by unathletic and flawed.
Buckley’s a physical specimen, and his athleticism and strength obviously play a huge part in his style. He’s not the most technical striker in the world, but technique isn’t a metric the judges score fights on…damage is though, and Joaquin can dish out damage!
So in terms of a head-to-head, I think this fight is pretty self-explanatory. It’s very likely going to turn into chaos, as both men’s careers have often promised. Luque loves getting into gritty wars that go down to the wire, and Buckley will certainly oblige in that. Both men have clear fight ending power, but Luque has the more diverse skillset with the ability to mix in submission threats and potentially even takedowns. Also, the Brazilian is clearly the more experienced and battle tested opponent, with the far superior resume so far.
With that said, I think Luque has shown himself to be frail enough that an explosive big hitter will always have a chance against him. Not to make a serious comparison between the two, but the way Geoff Neal ran through Luque has kind of made it impossible for me to ever count out a KO from a big swinger like Buckley. And after that result, his durability is only going to be brought into question more.
So all in all that leads me to lean Luque’s way, but not by as significant a margin as it would be if he was fighting someone like Alex Morono. Buckley excels in one area that Luque has started to show weakness towards (durability), but not enough for there to be multiple process driven paths to victory for him (like if he was a committed takedown threat). I expect the Brazilian to win but I really wouldn’t be shocked if Buckley scored an upset. Therefore, Luque -175 is roughly where I would line this one, which is similar to the odds currently available and subsequently providing no value on either man.
How I line this fight: Vicente Luque -175 (64%), Joaquin Buckley +175 (36%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Virna Jandiroba v Lupita Godinez
This is a very fun fight. I really love when Jandiroba gets scheduled, because she’s got that Demian Maia-esque one-dimensional style that she unapologetically brings to every fight…and it’s fun trying to figure out how her opponents attempt to solve the puzzle.
She goes up against a pure wrestler here in Lupita Godinez. I’ve spoken at length about how good I think Lupita can be, citing her performances over Ariane Carnelossi and Elise Reed as some of the most dominant we have ever seen in recent years in WMMA. I have also had issues with the way Godinez sometimes forgets about what got her to the dance, such as when she attempted just two/three takedowns and barely won/lost a split decisions in striking contests against Cynthia Calvillo/Angela Hill. The latter was most concerning as Hill has long been known as a fighter you DEFINITELY want to grapple if you want the easiest path to victory…and Godinez didn’t. Performances like that will always stay with me, and I therefore become very untrusting of those fighters going forward. There’s a few fighters later on the card who have been guilty of similar (Jamall Emmers).
Ironically, that kind of striking-based gameplan is absolutely the path Godinez needs to take here. She’s not blowing anyone’s hair back with her stand up, but it’s going to be better than Virna’s! Despite making slight improvements, the Brazilian is still very rigid and awkward, and tries to avoid engaging too much on the feet as she figures out how to work in her next takedown. But as I said in the previous paragraph when questioning Lupita’s IQ, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Mexican play the fool and over-engage in the grappling and not look to strike…and therefore put herself into trouble. Virna on bottom is still a more dangerous position for Lupita than Virna on the feet, and Virna herself would rather have the fight there also.
Another key aspect to this fight is therefore figuring out how much success Virna can have in landing takedowns herself. Unfortunately, Lupita has done a very good job of staying upright whenever she’s been challenged with a takedown, having only suffered four in her UFC career so far. The defence rate sits at a very impressive 86%, and the takedowns she has suffered haven’t really resulted in anything significant for her opponents as her get-ups are also good. That’s the key piece of information here, and it’s why Loopy is the favourite.
Loopy has the fundamental advantages in being the better striker, a decent grappler herself, and also seemingly having the ability to keep the fight standing, but questions about her fight IQ and her instinctive Plan A skillset (IE looking to shoot takedowns and grapple when she knows she shouldn’t) concern me too much to have significant faith in her. The most likely and dominant outcome is a win for Godinez via striking, but can we really trust her to stay away from her wrestling? I just have clear visions of her clearly winning three minutes of striking, then shooting a sloppy takedown and getting submitted straight away.
I think it’s up to the individual bettor as to whether or not they want to roll the dice here. Personally I couldn’t trust her enough to grade her any steeper than -200, so there isn’t enough value on the betting line for me, but it’s currently quite fair.
How I line this fight: Virna Jandiroba +200 (33%), Lupita Godinez -200 (67%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Bruno Silva v Chris Weidman
Oh god, please don’t do this Chris. He’s absolutely cooked, there’s really no need for him to be bone-headed and test himself like this in front of a home crowd.
He looked pretty shit in that fight against the equally shit and massively regressed Brad Tavares. He lost that fight as the more wilted fighter, but also because Tavares’ one elite skillset is his takedown defence…basically preventing Chris from winning the only way he confidently knows how.
He faces another striker in Bruno Silva here, but there are a few differences this time around. Bruno CAN be taken down, which gives the immobile and old Chris Weidman a genuine path to victory here. However, unlike against Tavares, the chances of Weidman getting sent to the shadow realm are much, MUCH higher, because Silva absolutely can and will crack if given the chance (whereas Tavares is very pillow-fisted).
I simply cannot trust Chris Weidman to stay safe for long enough in this fight, and another key issue here is that even in his prime he was never super dangerous from top position. Due to that, even if he does have a good first round and spends time on top of Bruno, the Brazilian has shown he has 15 minutes worth of KO potential, so he’ll get multiple bites of the cherry when each fight starts standing. Think back to Silva’s win over Andrew Sanchez, where he got soundly outgrappled for 10 minutes and still bonked the wrestler in the third (guess who bet Sanchez as a +200 underdog there!).
The Bruno KO method of victory is obviously going to the most expected outcome here, so I think it’s highly unlikely that we see any sort of value on it…but that’s firmly what I predict to happen here. I couldn’t trust Chris to win this fight, especially when I’m only being offered around +200 for it. Conversely, Bruno Silva is a flawed fighter that can be taken down, so I’m not sure I really trust him to be the one to play executioner here either, at least from a moneyline perspective. I’ll keep an eye out for the Silva KO line, but I fully expect the current -275 moneyline to get steamed before the props show up…so that KO line will be something ugly like -150.
I have a personal rule of not betting MoV props at anything shorter than -150 because you’re paying juice for something very specific…so it’s likely I’ll pass. -125 or better on the KO would be worth a bet though.
How I line this fight: Bruno Silva -300 (75%), Chris Weidman +300 (25%)
Bet or pass: Depends on Silva’s KO price.
Prop leans: See above.
Nursulton Ruziboev v Sedriques Dumas
Strange that the UFC have gone from being gentle with Dumas to suddenly attempting to send him up shit’s creek. Fremd/Brundage/Azaitar is some generous competition, but Ruziboev really might not be. Not only that, but Dumas has kind of been fairly tested in all three of those fights. Obviously he lost to Fremd, but 29-28 scorecards against the others indicate that his UFC career isn’t going to go very far unless he makes serious improvements.
Dumas is a rangey and lengthy kind of guy, but will be at a three-inch height disadvantage to his Uzbekistani opponent. Neither guy is a particularly impressive striker, but Ruziboev has at least demonstrated some clear KO power. Dumas does his best work on the mat, but Nursulton’s got a very active guard and has shown he’s a fighter you don’t really want to taked own with his sweeps and reversal…so does Dumas hold an advantage anywhere?
However, having said all that, running the tape on Ruziboev is kind of a pointless task. The way he manages to lock up submissions so quickly is certainly impressive, but they happen so quick that there’s not much evidence of him showing he is a complete martial artist, , or that the level of competition he’s facing is any good either. It was entertaining viewing, but it really didn’t give me any real confidence that Ruziboev can do anything except look dangerous in the opening three minutes. He could have elite cardio, or he could have 3 minutes and one second…we just don’t know.
To make matters worse, I watched about five fights that were all one-way traffic for the Uzbekistani fighter, but not once did I see him attempt a takedown. When his primary skillset appears to be his opportunistic submission ability, it surprises me that he doesn’t actively seem to initiate a whole lot of grappling, instead preferring to remain at kickboxing range where he’s not particularly impressive at all.
Anyone who has a strong opinion on this fight is talking out their ass, I think. With more questions than answers about Ruziboev, putting money on this fight would solely be in the interest of fading Dumas – which although I understand, is still not a particularly good idea in the long run.
Ruziboev may hit yet another R1 finish, but if this one goes into the second round then there’s going to be a lot of new information. I hope we get to see it, because I cannot engage with his fights in the future until I know more. I advise you take the same stance.
I might have some fun and ask all of this week’s parlay posters what they like about Ruziboev’s game to see if they can formulate a justification for the -275 (or likely worse) pricetag. I expect many/all will be exposed as not having a fucking clue other than “submission go brr”... because there’s literally no tape out there.
How I line this fight: It is completely impossible to do so.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Andre Petroski v Jacob Malkoun
Yo why is a guy who lost to Cody Brundage a favourite here!? Just kidding.
This is yet another really fun fight. Both men are really good offensive grapplers, with Andre showing class with his top control, transitions and submission ability, and Malkoun showing himself to be a tenacious wrestler that won’t quit on himself.
Petroski’s stock plummeted really badly in 2023. He almost fumbled a really easy layup match against Gerald Meerschaert (had the potential to keep the fight standing but failed to beat a very average striker because he had no set up and tried to hit home runs with every punch), and then he parlay’d that flat performance with a 66 second KO bludgeoning from Michel Pereira. No shame in that really but it was a year to forget for the former TUF competitor.
It's kind of unfortunate that Petroski’s on a two-fight skid, because I think a much nicer price on Malkoun would have been available were it not for Petroski being in bad form. Reason being, Malkoun’s cardio is going to be the biggest weapon in this fight, as long as he can stay safe to extend it into the latter half. Petroski does not have good cardio, and even in performances where he’s been dominant with the grappling, he’s faded late. Against Malkoun, who averages 7.2 takedowns landed per 15 minutes (that might lowkey be an all-time great record for someone with over an hour’s in-cage time), he will be fucked if this fight hits round three because we are about to watch a terrifying grappling pace.
The question is whether or not Petroski can end the fight before it gets there. I don’t rate Petroski’s striking – but he will hit hard and can finish Jacob if he lands clean (though I think this unlikely with how badly he looked against GM3). He also has very good BJJ, and has displayed the ability to win via sprawl-based submissions before (Anaconda vs Maximov, who was viewed as a BJJ specialist). So can Malkoun mind his Ps and Qs in the grappling realm to drag Petroski into deep waters, in quintessential Jacob Malkoun fashion?
I’d certainly lean towards yes, given that he looked more than comfortable and actually the better grappler than Brendan Allen…and that’s why I have no problem with the -200 pricetag on Malkoun. There’s some danger in finishing ability for Andre, sure, but I think the Aussie has demonstrated enough tenacity and grit to be able to fight hard for your money and come out the other side. Kind of a similar skillset to a Fluffy Hernandez, but without the submission threat.
I don’t think there’s enough meat on the bone for a bet here, but I’d say Malkoun’s price is spot on so I don’t mind him as a parlay leg. I will be keeping an eye out to potentially play Malkoun and Over 1.5 Rounds via an SGP builder though, as I think Malkoun’s path to victory is pretty much synonymous with the fight going late. He’s not very dangerous so I don’t see him finding a finish over Petroski early.
How I line this fight: Andre Petroski +250 (29%), Jacob Malkoun -250 (71%)
Bet or pass: 1.5u Jacob Malkoun to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds (+100 or better)
Prop leans: See above. Any sort of late-based props for Malkoun would be interesting
Live Betting Leans: If Malkoun loses the first round, keep an eye on your app. The tide will turn here.
Connor Matthews v Dennis Buzukja
Dunno who Connor Matthews is, but I know Dennis Buzukja shouldn’t really be good enough to be a favourite against anyone at a UFC level. Tape’s about to be painful…
He has a 7-1 record that’s absolutely pathetic. The combined record of his non-DWCS opponents was 27-119, which is nothing short of embarrassing. He trains at New England Cartel with Rob Font and Calvin Kattar. Predominantly wins by submission…including against Jay Ellis…
He lost to Francis Marshall in his first DWCS appearance, but I was impressed with his hands, head movement and general pressure in the early goings of that one. Took about a minute of tape before the NEC affiliation made a whole tonne of sense with those hands! He faced multiple takedown threats and did a great job defensively with each of them, even threatening a guillotine with one of them. He got wobbled in the first round and the fight change drastically after that, but I was still impressed with his performance whilst seemingly on auto-pilot.
Watching the Farias fight (his return to DWCS), I was again impressed with his R1 pressure and top control grappling…but again he got tagged a fair bit and had to hustle through it. He did slow down a bit in round three but he had his foot on the gas much better this time around, and I’d attribute it moreso to Francis Marshall being a better pressure fighter in his first fight. Overall, I was quite impressed and I think he’s ready for the UFC step up, despite the awful regional record.
He faces Dennis Buzukja, who has been on the cusp of UFC level for what’s felt like years. He made his DWCS appearance in 2020, after having a similarly embarrassing regional record against bums and also training at a reputable gym at Serra Longo. He got pieced up in that fight by Melsik Bahgdasaryan, who seems to be cutting it just fine in the UFC himself. Dennis then took to social media and begged for a short notice spot seemingly every time someone in his weight class fell out, and his opportunity came against Sean Woodson in August 2023.
Woodson’s no joke and the kind of fighter you kind need a full camp to really prepare for, so I give him a pass for that loss. However, he attempted just one takedown and landed less than 50 significant strikes, which isn’t an impressive output by any stretch. He just doesn’t have a striking style that impresses – it’s very single shot and square stance.
Next came his sophomore UFC appearance against Jamall Emmers, a guy that’s failed to show any finishing ability at UFC level – until he sparked Buzukja in under a minute. Again Dennis fought passively, and had nothing to offer in return as Emmers came hot out the gates.
It’s not often I do this, but I think I’m going to be betting a DWCS making their debut. I think Matthews has proven that he will fight hard for your money, and is well rounded enough to be able to handle what isn’t really a step up in competition at all. Buzukja on the other hand is clearly not capable of surviving at this level and doesn’t have long before he’ll get cut. Matthews isn’t a world beater, but I could easily see him beating a few of the more flawed fighters on the roster’s lower end…and Dennis Buzukja fits the bill for that. Personally I think Matthews should be a -150 favourite at least here, as my only strong dislike of his style is the amount he gets wobbled…and Dennis Buzukja hasn’t really shown much in terms of volume or damage with his striking. I’ll be betting Matthews for 1u at +110 or better.
How I line this fight: Connor Matthews -150 (60%), Dennis Buzukja +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: 1u Connor Matthews to Win (+110 or better)
Prop leans: None
Angel Pacheco v Caolan Loughran
Loughran is a talented guy that didn’t really show what he’s capable of in his debut. Taylor Lapilus is just more talented and had the skillset necessary to keep the fight where he wanted it.
Angel Pacheco got a UFC contract despite losing his DWCS fight…because of course he did! He threw a lot of shots and landed quite a few of them, but that’s all he did. Wasn’t enough to win a single round though. We’ve also since seen Danny Silva barely handle the lower level of UFC calibre in Josh Culibao.
Prior to that his record is pretty shite. No wins over notable opposition, but a loss to now 15-14 Nate Williams, who couldn’t get a win in LFA or PFL.
That’s all we can really say here, because there are gaps in my knowledge of Pacheco and Loughran isn’t well-rounded enough to be trusted with the fade. If Pacheco had elite takedown defence and the fight was forced into a standup affair, I can’t have confidence that Loughran is even superior.
Therefore, there’s not much point in looking into this fight any further. I’ll root for Loughran because Pacheco doesn’t deserve to be here and Caolan had a tough debut, but that’s as far as my investment goes. These debut fights should be treated more as an opportunity to learn more about fighters.
How I line this fight: Too many unknowns to line this one
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Chidi Njokuani v Rhys McKee
Chidi Njokuani is 35 years old, which immediately waves red flags for some people. Can’t really blame them.
Rhys McKee is shit at fighting, which immediately waves red flags for me.
He’s got a hell of a chin, but his toughness and heart are pretty much the only thing that’s remarkable about him. I’ve spoken before about being wary of fighters who get credit for toughness, as it’s a nice way of highlighting their inferiority. Getting pieced up by Ange Loosa on the feet is the perfect example, as Ange isn’t that good a striker. The toughness could actually be useful here against Chidi though, as he’s pretty damn low volume and could be outhustled if the fight spans across 15 minutes.
Chidi’s on a three-fight losing streak himself, including two brutal knockout losses amongst them. This is a steep price to be paying on a guy who is old and declining, with durability that’s only going to get worse…but I still think he deserves to be favoured due to actually being a decent striker. I won’t trust him with my money because he’s waving too many red flags, but I reckon he probably wins.
EDIT: Shoutout to u/Shabozz for the added insight in the comment section. I had no idea this fight was as 170lbs, which is a terrible idea for Chidi. Moving down in weight and starving your brain of Oxygen at 35 years old when you've been KO'd twice sounds like an idea I'd be keen to fade. I still don't really think McKee is any good but he's a potent finisher and will absolutely give it his all. The money is piling in on him as well at the moment which I think is also telling...so I'll be playing McKee ITD for 1u at +200 or better.
How I line this fight: Given the weight class, it's probably a pick'em
Bet or pass: 1u McKee ITD at +200 or better
Prop leans: None
Julio Arce v Herbert Burns
Herbert Burns is one dimensional but not good enough to get the fight where he wants it to be, also having about seven minutes of cardio to attempt to wrestle. Julio Arce is far more well-rounded but has been a bit of a middleman. I don’t like the idea of trusting middlemen at -500. He does however have a 95% takedown defence rate, which implies he’s got the good to keep this fight right where he wants it. Sounds like a nightmare matchup for Herbert Burns.
Can’t bet the juice, can’t bet the dog. Easy as that.
How I line this fight: Julio Arce -400 (80%), Herbert Burns +400 (20%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Ibo Aslan v Anton Turkalj
Anton Turkalj is everyone’s favourite shit underdog. This guy is 0-3 in the UFC but he’s somehow conned his way into being a reliable + money play that everyone seems to want to back. I bet Tyson Pedro against this guy, and the betting public graciously let me get +100 to do it (I liked Pedro when he was -150 and the public all steamed Anton).
Interestingly enough they’re giving Ibo Aslan the chance to play executioner to Turkalj’s UFC career, and also the chance to avenge the only loss of his professional career. I watched that fight back and Ibo Aslan won 95% of it in a pretty dull and cage pushy affair, before completely gassing out and quitting. Turkalj has always been credited as a guy who can weather a R1 storm and turn the tide, that’s why people backed him against Pedro, Petrino and even Jailton Almeida. He certainly did it in that 2020 fight, and I’m sure he’ll probably use the exact same gameplan here.
These two really don’t like each other, as there was plenty of animosity and shit talking before and after their first encounter. Massive thank you to the UFC for putting this one together, it just makes so much sense.
So does lightning strike twice for Anton Turkalj here? Very possibly. Aslan has only won one fight that’s gone passed the first round, and that came before we knew he had cardio issues anyway. The initial loss to Turkalj could have provided the wakeup call that he needed to fix that cardio, as is often the way when R1 demolition men get dragged into deep waters and exposed. It could however have taught him absolutely nothing, and he might still have the exact same amount of gas in the tank as he did the first time they fought. We haven’t seen him go any longer since then, so we simply cannot know unless we train with him.
On the subject of training - I have learnt since initially posting that Aslan now trains at Xtreme Couture, which i think could have some significance. Considering I expect him to probably have learnt from the cardio problems, training there probably enhances his ceiling and raises the expectation of how good he could be.
Initially I believed it should be a pick'em, but I don't mind Aslan being the slight favourite here. I'm still not super convinced in either side, but I am now interested in combining Aslan to Win with an Under in an SGP. It will only be a 1u bet but should enhance the odds for Aslan to hit the PTV his moneyline is based on anyway.
In short, I'm backing Aslan's potential improvements because of the camp he is at and the mistakes he has already made. Small 1u bet though.
How I line this fight: Aslan around -150 max
Bet or pass: 1u Aslan to Win and Under 1.5 or 2.5 Rounds....we will see.
Prop leans: Alsan R1 or Turkalj 2/3, or Under 2.5 Rounds, or FDGTD
Live Betting Leans: I’m sure the books will be all over it, but if this one makes it to the stool you absolutely need to bet Anton. He’ll likely be a significant underdog by that point, but he’s dealt with the worst and actually has a much cleaner path to victory now.
Melissa Gatto v Victoria Dudakova
I still think about that takedown that Dudakova landed on Istela Nunes – she like rolled off a low single, I’ve never seen that before (granted I have no wrestling background so maybe that’s pretty common). Then she fought Jinh Yu Frey who is old and had already lost to Demopoulos, Viana and Reed, which is a disgustingly bad run of losses and deserves cutting instantly. Despite that, Dudakova’s still clearly lost a round, where she was taken down and controlled, with very little ability to get back to her feet. She locked down position, regained guard and threatened submissions, as well as some pretty threatening upkicks…but I could very easily see her getting controlled on the mat for 15 by a good wrestler with decent submission defence from top. It’s not a good idea long term to play defence for a round and happily surrender it, especially not in WMMA where you cannot rely on finishes to bail you out.
That’s the angle that explains the betting line here, I think…because it’s certainly surprising to see an undefeated prospect be an underdog to journeywoman currently on a two-fight losing streak. So…is it valid?
Melissa Gatto looks to wrestle a fair bit, but she’s not very good at it I don’t think. She struggled to get Ariane Lipski to the floor, which doesn’t really bode well here given her gameplan going into this fight would probably be very similar to that one. She also showed the exact weakness that I’ve just criticised Dudakova for too – fishing for submissions and not really looking to find a way back into a neutral position. I know Gatto’s got a BJJ background…but we’ve not really seen it at this level, have we? Attempting armbars from back control isn’t a high IQ move. She had absolutely nothing in terms of get ups against Tracy Cortez either.
So in a fight where both women will want to be on top, I’ve got to favour Dudakova’s wrestling and believe she’s going to be the one winning the majority of those exchanges. And on the mat I think she’s got what it takes to be careful against the submission attempts and to win rounds with control time, and maybe a little ground and pound.
I’m not really too sure which woman deserves to be favoured when it comes to pure standup though, but I don’t really think that’s where this fight is going to be won and lost anyway. I liked Dudakova’s jab in that Frey fight, but Gatto’s got decent enough footwork and fundamentals to turn this one into a very close one to score if they strike for 15 minutes.
So to summarise, I see Dudakova being the much more likely to win the fight via dominant position in scrambles, I don’t rate Gatto’s submission game from bottom, and I think the striking is going to be too close to give an edge. Therefore, that has me thinking Dudakova deserves to be the slight favourite. Add in the intangibles about the Russian being an untested fighter that could have a much higher ceiling than we realise (what if she had an off night against Frey and in every other parallel universe she smokes her?), and that leaves me thinking Dudakova should be about -125 to -150 here.
However, I can currently see her as the betting underdog at +137. To me that’s just wrong, and I don’t expect the public to bet Gatto at this price. People don’t care about WMMA, and if they do it will be to blind bet the dog (not saying that’s a bad strategy). Therefore, I’m going to capitalise on the overcorrection to a lacklustre performance from Dudakova, and back her to win at +137 or better for 1u sometime soon.
How I line this fight: Viktoria Dudakova -135 (57%), Melissa Gatto +135 (43%)
Bet or pass: 1u Viktoria Dudakova to Win at +137
Prop leans: Probably a decision win, but the underdog moneyline is more than enough for me
Bill Algeo v Kyle Nelson
This matchup is basically the Sideswipe Derby – my greatest money train vs the guy I have lost the most money on.
Bill Algeo is one of my money trains. I’ve bet confidently on that fella in each of his last three wins, and they weren’t small bets either. He’s well-rounded, durable, and cocky, and his cardio can be weaponised as he grows into fights.
Kyle Nelson is a guy I’ve been fading since like 2017. I’ve just never understood what exactly he does well. He’s got that weird mesmerising ability to lull opponents into his tempo and style, completely ignoring their own strengths and just chasing him as he does his annoying circle, circle, body kick routine.
Bill Algeo at -200 is a weird price though, in my opinion. Nelson’s probably one of the worst guys Algeo has fought in his UFC career but he’s being respected like it’s a reasonable matchup. I’d personally be fine with Algeo getting close to the top 15 opponent with a win here, whereas Nelson’s still not far off getting cut if he loses a fight or two.
Algeo’s basically the same kind of guy as Billy Q. Well rounded, but with an intense gas tank that will push you if you aren’t ready for it. Nelson’s cardio is okay but we saw him struggle when a pace was put on him by Billy Q…so I think Algeo grows into this fight similarly to how Billy Q did.
I’ve actually got a bit of a bad record trying to bet against Kyle Nelson, but I think this is a real gift of a spot for Bill Algeo, who fights in front of a home crowd. Personally I think the -200 price tag is a bit on the generous side, so I will be keen to play Algeo for 3u. However, like last week I am keen to utilise the Over 1.5 Round prop in a SGP for this fight, as I think Nelson is durable and Algeo needs a bit of time to get going. It’ll likely be 2u Algeo to Win at -200, and 1u on the prop when the lines drop.
How I line this fight: Bill Algeo -300 (75%), Kyle Nelson +200 (25%)
Bet or pass: 3u Bill Algeo to Win, in some capacity
Prop leans: Algeo and Over 1.5 Rounds or Algeo Decision.
Nate Landwehr v Jamall Emmers
Jamall Emmers is one of those guys. Plenty of talent and promise, but combined the fight IQ of a plank of wood, it just never worked out like it was supposed to. I’ll never forget him waiting until round 3 to grapple Giga Chikadze, when everyone and their mother knew it was the obvious path to take. Ironically he did the same thing against Jack Jenkins recently and he lost a split AGAIN. It’s therefore a re-occuring theme, and it makes him incredibly untrustworthy.
On the complete opposite end of the spectrum we have Nate Landwehr. Nate the Train isn’t particularly good at any one area of MMA, but boy is he scrappy and dedicated. He’ll go hard for 15, and you won’t deter him from getting right back on the horse when things don’t go his way.
Personally I think that kind of archetype usually causes a lot of problems for guys with bad fight IQ, because someone like Landwehr is going to ask Emmers a lot of questions…and the fight becomes a case of whether or not Emmers has the answers. He’s looked sensational in his last two wins, but the level of competition has been amongst the lowest the UFC could produce. Before that, he was dropping Pat Sabatini and getting leg locked 30 seconds later. Poor IQ.
So this one is a case of pick your poison. The inferior fighter but a dog you can trust, or the man with the better skillset who is prone to capitulating at any moment? No idea, it’s an easy pass for me. Excited to watch the car crash unfold though!
Moneyline wise, I wouldn’t blame you for taking a stab on Nate Landwehr really. Emmers just objectively cannot be trusted at anything north of -200.
How I line this fight: No idea but not Emmers passed -200.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Bets (Bold = been placed)
1u Cage Warriors - Sean Marcos da Silva to Win (+200)
1.5u Bruno Silva to Win by TKO/KO (-125)
2u Bill Algeo to Win (-188)
1u Bill Algeo to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds (-125)
0.5u Bill Algeo to Win in Rounds 2 or 3 (+448)
1u Rhys McKee to Win ITD (+190)
1u Julio Arce to Win in Rounds 2 or 3 (+207)
1u Connor Matthews to Win (+114)
1u Ibo Aslan to Win & Under 1.5 Rounds (+175)
1u Viktoria Dudakova to Win (+137)
1.5u Jacob Malkoun to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds (-125)
0.25u Parlay Pieces (+405)
Parlay Pieces: Bruno Silva, Jacob Malkoun, Bill Algeo, Jamal Emmers
Dog of the Week: Connor Matthews
FUTURE BETS
1.5u PFL Liz Carmouche & Kana Watanabe to Win (-125)
UFC Vegas 91: Allen v Curtis 2
1u Chris Curtis to Win (+200)
0.5u Alexander Hernandez to Win in Round 1 (+225 or better)
3u Melissa Mullins/Dixon & Deiveson Figueiredo to Win (-115)
3u Morgan Charriere to Win (-125)
1u Charlie Campbell to Win (-188)
1u Ignacio Bahamondes to Win in Rounds 2 or 3 (+300 or better)
1u Dan Argueta to Win (+170 or better)
UFC 300: Pereira v Hill
2u Alex Pereira to Win (-137) (This was bet ages ago in the hopes the price would shoot off, but it hasn't so I'm reducing my stake)
submitted by sideswipe781 to MMAbetting [link] [comments]
2024 - Staked: 153.8u, Profit/Loss: -1.92u, ROI: -1.25%
As always, scroll down for UFC Atlantic City Breakdowns. The following is just a recap of last event’s results.
UFC Vegas 89 (PREVIOUS CARD)
Staked: 12u
Profit/Loss: -5.18u
Parlay Suggestions: 1-1
Dog of the week: Cameron Saaiman ❌
✅ 2u Namajunas to Win at -160 (won +1.22u)
✅ 1u Namajunas to Win and Over 1.5 Rounds at -115 (won +0.85u)
❌ 0.25u hahbazyan to Win by Submission at +1100
❌ 2u Saaiman to Win at +137
❌ 3.5u Quarantillo to Win at -137
❌ 1.5u Quarantillo to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds at +120
✅ 0.25u Padilla to Win by Submission at +600 (won +1.5u)
❌ 1u Usman to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds at +210
❌ 0.25u Namajunas, Saaiman & Quarantillo all to Win at +517
❌ 0.15u Namajunas, Saaiman, Quarantillo & Usman all to Win at +1369
❌ 0.1u Namajunas, Saaiman, Quarantillo & Usman to Win & O1.5 Rnds in Each at +3,565
UFC Atlantic City: Blanchfield v Fiorot
Deleted the opening rambling as character count hit the limit. Just know I am tired and need a break from these endless cards.
Let’s get into it!
Erin Blanchfield v Manon Fiorot
High level fight! Excited to see this one. Quite a binary matchup though, as we have the division’s best striker vs the division’s best grappler. As exciting as it is from a fan perspective, given the stylistic clash and what it means for the future of the women’s game…it’s not an easy fight to break down.
The reason for that is Fiorot’s takedown defence: a 91% success rate – which also included defending six from Namajunas (who has a 48% takedown success rate with those added…very good takedown ability from Rose). The only woman who has taken her down is Jennifer Maia, who never settled Fiorot and got reversed in the same exchange. In fact, the way Fiorot handled the wrestling exchanges in that one was phenomenal, so no woman has gotten the better of her in the grappling yet.
That’s what makes this one so exciting, as Blanchfield’s got good takedowns from a variety of ways. Against Maverick she was hitting bodylock trips, singles/doubles and hip throws. It was a pleasure to watch that performance, against an opponent I rate highly.
If Blanchfield manages to ground Manon though, then I think we could see the most dominant angle to the fight. Of course, we haven’t really seen it, but I would imagine that Fiorot’s bottom grappling on the mat isn’t going to be super elite. Especially not against Erin, who is really, really good there.
If it does get stuck on the feet, we’re clearly going to expect Fiorot to get the better of her opponent…but I think there’s something to be said for Erin’s pressure and tenacity on the feet. I wouldn’t have expected her to get the better of Taila Santos on the feet either, but she made the difference with how intense she was. I’ve said it before quite a few times, but pressure, volume, and just generally being a nuisance can work wonders when you’re technically outclassed. Merab Dvalishvili does this better than anyone.
So I don’t really have strong opinions here when it comes to picking a winner, because remarkably we still have gaps in our knowledge of how Fiorot grapples. It’s a close fight where one woman is probably going to look dominant and look like value…but because we don’t know who is going to win the takedown battle, or how Fiorot handles potentially being on her back it could be either of them. A classic “I told you so fight” as I like to call it.
However, I do think it’s fair to give a slight advantage to Erin, as I expect the gap in the grappling to be the biggest gap of all. Erin can win this fight easier than Fiorot can, because even if we get 15 minutes of striking, Erin could still make it competitive. -150 Blanchfield seems about right to me, but I don’t think there’s enough value or confidence to be placing a bet here.
How I line this fight: Erin Blanchfield -150 (60%), Manon Fiorot +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Vicente Luque v Joaquin Buckley
I’m convinced that Vicente Luque is a bit of a busted prospect by this point. The guy was in some WARS in his very long-winded journey to the top 15 (Bryan Barberena and Niko Price x2), that by the time he actually got to the big stages he found himself being a step behind the elite level. Things have gotten worse, as the recent KO loss to Geoff Neal was significantly brutal and caused a bleed on the brain, which supposedly Luque needed to seek important medical clearance for, or else his MMA career would have ended prematurely.
He’s a mainstay in the rankings now, but his best win is only Michael Chiesa, and he only won that fight because Chiesa got too aggressive going for the kill when he was in a very dominant position. You could argue that RDA and Tyron Woodley are bigger names to have on the record, but both of those guys are considered old and way past their prime by this point.
In terms of his in-cage abilities, Luque will always be dangerous and well rounded. He doesn’t actively wrestle much, but he’s clearly got some opportunistic submissions up his sleeve – mainly in the form of front chokes when defending takedown attempts. On the feet, he is certainly hittable and has obviously relied on durability to carry him all this way, but he certainly packs power on the return.
Joaquin Buckley is taking a big step up in competition here. I’ve always had a bit of a soft spot for Buckley – I think he’s funny on the mic and his KO of Impa Kasangany is still the best UFC KO of all time in my opinion. Buckley’s best UFC win to date came in his most recent performance against Alex Morono, an unranked journeyman that’s well-rounded by unathletic and flawed.
Buckley’s a physical specimen, and his athleticism and strength obviously play a huge part in his style. He’s not the most technical striker in the world, but technique isn’t a metric the judges score fights on…damage is though, and Joaquin can dish out damage!
So in terms of a head-to-head, I think this fight is pretty self-explanatory. It’s very likely going to turn into chaos, as both men’s careers have often promised. Luque loves getting into gritty wars that go down to the wire, and Buckley will certainly oblige in that. Both men have clear fight ending power, but Luque has the more diverse skillset with the ability to mix in submission threats and potentially even takedowns. Also, the Brazilian is clearly the more experienced and battle tested opponent, with the far superior resume so far.
With that said, I think Luque has shown himself to be frail enough that an explosive big hitter will always have a chance against him. Not to make a serious comparison between the two, but the way Geoff Neal ran through Luque has kind of made it impossible for me to ever count out a KO from a big swinger like Buckley. And after that result, his durability is only going to be brought into question more.
So all in all that leads me to lean Luque’s way, but not by as significant a margin as it would be if he was fighting someone like Alex Morono. Buckley excels in one area that Luque has started to show weakness towards (durability), but not enough for there to be multiple process driven paths to victory for him (like if he was a committed takedown threat). I expect the Brazilian to win but I really wouldn’t be shocked if Buckley scored an upset. Therefore, Luque -175 is roughly where I would line this one, which is similar to the odds currently available and subsequently providing no value on either man.
How I line this fight: Vicente Luque -175 (64%), Joaquin Buckley +175 (36%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Virna Jandiroba v Lupita Godinez
This is a very fun fight. I really love when Jandiroba gets scheduled, because she’s got that Demian Maia-esque one-dimensional style that she unapologetically brings to every fight…and it’s fun trying to figure out how her opponents attempt to solve the puzzle.
She goes up against a pure wrestler here in Lupita Godinez. I’ve spoken at length about how good I think Lupita can be, citing her performances over Ariane Carnelossi and Elise Reed as some of the most dominant we have ever seen in recent years in WMMA. I have also had issues with the way Godinez sometimes forgets about what got her to the dance, such as when she attempted just two/three takedowns and barely won/lost a split decisions in striking contests against Cynthia Calvillo/Angela Hill. The latter was most concerning as Hill has long been known as a fighter you DEFINITELY want to grapple if you want the easiest path to victory…and Godinez didn’t. Performances like that will always stay with me, and I therefore become very untrusting of those fighters going forward. There’s a few fighters later on the card who have been guilty of similar (Jamall Emmers).
Ironically, that kind of striking-based gameplan is absolutely the path Godinez needs to take here. She’s not blowing anyone’s hair back with her stand up, but it’s going to be better than Virna’s! Despite making slight improvements, the Brazilian is still very rigid and awkward, and tries to avoid engaging too much on the feet as she figures out how to work in her next takedown. But as I said in the previous paragraph when questioning Lupita’s IQ, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Mexican play the fool and over-engage in the grappling and not look to strike…and therefore put herself into trouble. Virna on bottom is still a more dangerous position for Lupita than Virna on the feet, and Virna herself would rather have the fight there also.
Another key aspect to this fight is therefore figuring out how much success Virna can have in landing takedowns herself. Unfortunately, Lupita has done a very good job of staying upright whenever she’s been challenged with a takedown, having only suffered four in her UFC career so far. The defence rate sits at a very impressive 86%, and the takedowns she has suffered haven’t really resulted in anything significant for her opponents as her get-ups are also good. That’s the key piece of information here, and it’s why Loopy is the favourite.
Loopy has the fundamental advantages in being the better striker, a decent grappler herself, and also seemingly having the ability to keep the fight standing, but questions about her fight IQ and her instinctive Plan A skillset (IE looking to shoot takedowns and grapple when she knows she shouldn’t) concern me too much to have significant faith in her. The most likely and dominant outcome is a win for Godinez via striking, but can we really trust her to stay away from her wrestling? I just have clear visions of her clearly winning three minutes of striking, then shooting a sloppy takedown and getting submitted straight away.
I think it’s up to the individual bettor as to whether or not they want to roll the dice here. Personally I couldn’t trust her enough to grade her any steeper than -200, so there isn’t enough value on the betting line for me, but it’s currently quite fair.
How I line this fight: Virna Jandiroba +200 (33%), Lupita Godinez -200 (67%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Bruno Silva v Chris Weidman
Oh god, please don’t do this Chris. He’s absolutely cooked, there’s really no need for him to be bone-headed and test himself like this in front of a home crowd.
He looked pretty shit in that fight against the equally shit and massively regressed Brad Tavares. He lost that fight as the more wilted fighter, but also because Tavares’ one elite skillset is his takedown defence…basically preventing Chris from winning the only way he confidently knows how.
He faces another striker in Bruno Silva here, but there are a few differences this time around. Bruno CAN be taken down, which gives the immobile and old Chris Weidman a genuine path to victory here. However, unlike against Tavares, the chances of Weidman getting sent to the shadow realm are much, MUCH higher, because Silva absolutely can and will crack if given the chance (whereas Tavares is very pillow-fisted).
I simply cannot trust Chris Weidman to stay safe for long enough in this fight, and another key issue here is that even in his prime he was never super dangerous from top position. Due to that, even if he does have a good first round and spends time on top of Bruno, the Brazilian has shown he has 15 minutes worth of KO potential, so he’ll get multiple bites of the cherry when each fight starts standing. Think back to Silva’s win over Andrew Sanchez, where he got soundly outgrappled for 10 minutes and still bonked the wrestler in the third (guess who bet Sanchez as a +200 underdog there!).
The Bruno KO method of victory is obviously going to the most expected outcome here, so I think it’s highly unlikely that we see any sort of value on it…but that’s firmly what I predict to happen here. I couldn’t trust Chris to win this fight, especially when I’m only being offered around +200 for it. Conversely, Bruno Silva is a flawed fighter that can be taken down, so I’m not sure I really trust him to be the one to play executioner here either, at least from a moneyline perspective. I’ll keep an eye out for the Silva KO line, but I fully expect the current -275 moneyline to get steamed before the props show up…so that KO line will be something ugly like -150.
I have a personal rule of not betting MoV props at anything shorter than -150 because you’re paying juice for something very specific…so it’s likely I’ll pass. -125 or better on the KO would be worth a bet though.
How I line this fight: Bruno Silva -300 (75%), Chris Weidman +300 (25%)
Bet or pass: Depends on Silva’s KO price.
Prop leans: See above.
Nursulton Ruziboev v Sedriques Dumas
Strange that the UFC have gone from being gentle with Dumas to suddenly attempting to send him up shit’s creek. Fremd/Brundage/Azaitar is some generous competition, but Ruziboev really might not be. Not only that, but Dumas has kind of been fairly tested in all three of those fights. Obviously he lost to Fremd, but 29-28 scorecards against the others indicate that his UFC career isn’t going to go very far unless he makes serious improvements.
Dumas is a rangey and lengthy kind of guy, but will be at a three-inch height disadvantage to his Uzbekistani opponent. Neither guy is a particularly impressive striker, but Ruziboev has at least demonstrated some clear KO power. Dumas does his best work on the mat, but Nursulton’s got a very active guard and has shown he’s a fighter you don’t really want to taked own with his sweeps and reversal…so does Dumas hold an advantage anywhere?
However, having said all that, running the tape on Ruziboev is kind of a pointless task. The way he manages to lock up submissions so quickly is certainly impressive, but they happen so quick that there’s not much evidence of him showing he is a complete martial artist, , or that the level of competition he’s facing is any good either. It was entertaining viewing, but it really didn’t give me any real confidence that Ruziboev can do anything except look dangerous in the opening three minutes. He could have elite cardio, or he could have 3 minutes and one second…we just don’t know.
To make matters worse, I watched about five fights that were all one-way traffic for the Uzbekistani fighter, but not once did I see him attempt a takedown. When his primary skillset appears to be his opportunistic submission ability, it surprises me that he doesn’t actively seem to initiate a whole lot of grappling, instead preferring to remain at kickboxing range where he’s not particularly impressive at all.
Anyone who has a strong opinion on this fight is talking out their ass, I think. With more questions than answers about Ruziboev, putting money on this fight would solely be in the interest of fading Dumas – which although I understand, is still not a particularly good idea in the long run.
Ruziboev may hit yet another R1 finish, but if this one goes into the second round then there’s going to be a lot of new information. I hope we get to see it, because I cannot engage with his fights in the future until I know more. I advise you take the same stance.
I might have some fun and ask all of this week’s parlay posters what they like about Ruziboev’s game to see if they can formulate a justification for the -275 (or likely worse) pricetag. I expect many/all will be exposed as not having a fucking clue other than “submission go brr”... because there’s literally no tape out there.
How I line this fight: It is completely impossible to do so.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Andre Petroski v Jacob Malkoun
Yo why is a guy who lost to Cody Brundage a favourite here!? Just kidding.
This is yet another really fun fight. Both men are really good offensive grapplers, with Andre showing class with his top control, transitions and submission ability, and Malkoun showing himself to be a tenacious wrestler that won’t quit on himself.
Petroski’s stock plummeted really badly in 2023. He almost fumbled a really easy layup match against Gerald Meerschaert (had the potential to keep the fight standing but failed to beat a very average striker because he had no set up and tried to hit home runs with every punch), and then he parlay’d that flat performance with a 66 second KO bludgeoning from Michel Pereira. No shame in that really but it was a year to forget for the former TUF competitor.
It's kind of unfortunate that Petroski’s on a two-fight skid, because I think a much nicer price on Malkoun would have been available were it not for Petroski being in bad form. Reason being, Malkoun’s cardio is going to be the biggest weapon in this fight, as long as he can stay safe to extend it into the latter half. Petroski does not have good cardio, and even in performances where he’s been dominant with the grappling, he’s faded late. Against Malkoun, who averages 7.2 takedowns landed per 15 minutes (that might lowkey be an all-time great record for someone with over an hour’s in-cage time), he will be fucked if this fight hits round three because we are about to watch a terrifying grappling pace.
The question is whether or not Petroski can end the fight before it gets there. I don’t rate Petroski’s striking – but he will hit hard and can finish Jacob if he lands clean (though I think this unlikely with how badly he looked against GM3). He also has very good BJJ, and has displayed the ability to win via sprawl-based submissions before (Anaconda vs Maximov, who was viewed as a BJJ specialist). So can Malkoun mind his Ps and Qs in the grappling realm to drag Petroski into deep waters, in quintessential Jacob Malkoun fashion?
I’d certainly lean towards yes, given that he looked more than comfortable and actually the better grappler than Brendan Allen…and that’s why I have no problem with the -200 pricetag on Malkoun. There’s some danger in finishing ability for Andre, sure, but I think the Aussie has demonstrated enough tenacity and grit to be able to fight hard for your money and come out the other side. Kind of a similar skillset to a Fluffy Hernandez, but without the submission threat.
I don’t think there’s enough meat on the bone for a bet here, but I’d say Malkoun’s price is spot on so I don’t mind him as a parlay leg. I will be keeping an eye out to potentially play Malkoun and Over 1.5 Rounds via an SGP builder though, as I think Malkoun’s path to victory is pretty much synonymous with the fight going late. He’s not very dangerous so I don’t see him finding a finish over Petroski early.
How I line this fight: Andre Petroski +250 (29%), Jacob Malkoun -250 (71%)
Bet or pass: 1.5u Jacob Malkoun to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds (+100 or better)
Prop leans: See above. Any sort of late-based props for Malkoun would be interesting
Live Betting Leans: If Malkoun loses the first round, keep an eye on your app. The tide will turn here.
Connor Matthews v Dennis Buzukja
Dunno who Connor Matthews is, but I know Dennis Buzukja shouldn’t really be good enough to be a favourite against anyone at a UFC level. Tape’s about to be painful…
He has a 7-1 record that’s absolutely pathetic. The combined record of his non-DWCS opponents was 27-119, which is nothing short of embarrassing. He trains at New England Cartel with Rob Font and Calvin Kattar. Predominantly wins by submission…including against Jay Ellis…
He lost to Francis Marshall in his first DWCS appearance, but I was impressed with his hands, head movement and general pressure in the early goings of that one. Took about a minute of tape before the NEC affiliation made a whole tonne of sense with those hands! He faced multiple takedown threats and did a great job defensively with each of them, even threatening a guillotine with one of them. He got wobbled in the first round and the fight change drastically after that, but I was still impressed with his performance whilst seemingly on auto-pilot.
Watching the Farias fight (his return to DWCS), I was again impressed with his R1 pressure and top control grappling…but again he got tagged a fair bit and had to hustle through it. He did slow down a bit in round three but he had his foot on the gas much better this time around, and I’d attribute it moreso to Francis Marshall being a better pressure fighter in his first fight. Overall, I was quite impressed and I think he’s ready for the UFC step up, despite the awful regional record.
He faces Dennis Buzukja, who has been on the cusp of UFC level for what’s felt like years. He made his DWCS appearance in 2020, after having a similarly embarrassing regional record against bums and also training at a reputable gym at Serra Longo. He got pieced up in that fight by Melsik Bahgdasaryan, who seems to be cutting it just fine in the UFC himself. Dennis then took to social media and begged for a short notice spot seemingly every time someone in his weight class fell out, and his opportunity came against Sean Woodson in August 2023.
Woodson’s no joke and the kind of fighter you kind need a full camp to really prepare for, so I give him a pass for that loss. However, he attempted just one takedown and landed less than 50 significant strikes, which isn’t an impressive output by any stretch. He just doesn’t have a striking style that impresses – it’s very single shot and square stance.
Next came his sophomore UFC appearance against Jamall Emmers, a guy that’s failed to show any finishing ability at UFC level – until he sparked Buzukja in under a minute. Again Dennis fought passively, and had nothing to offer in return as Emmers came hot out the gates.
It’s not often I do this, but I think I’m going to be betting a DWCS making their debut. I think Matthews has proven that he will fight hard for your money, and is well rounded enough to be able to handle what isn’t really a step up in competition at all. Buzukja on the other hand is clearly not capable of surviving at this level and doesn’t have long before he’ll get cut. Matthews isn’t a world beater, but I could easily see him beating a few of the more flawed fighters on the roster’s lower end…and Dennis Buzukja fits the bill for that. Personally I think Matthews should be a -150 favourite at least here, as my only strong dislike of his style is the amount he gets wobbled…and Dennis Buzukja hasn’t really shown much in terms of volume or damage with his striking. I’ll be betting Matthews for 1u at +110 or better.
How I line this fight: Connor Matthews -150 (60%), Dennis Buzukja +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: 1u Connor Matthews to Win (+110 or better)
Prop leans: None
Angel Pacheco v Caolan Loughran
Loughran is a talented guy that didn’t really show what he’s capable of in his debut. Taylor Lapilus is just more talented and had the skillset necessary to keep the fight where he wanted it.
Angel Pacheco got a UFC contract despite losing his DWCS fight…because of course he did! He threw a lot of shots and landed quite a few of them, but that’s all he did. Wasn’t enough to win a single round though. We’ve also since seen Danny Silva barely handle the lower level of UFC calibre in Josh Culibao.
Prior to that his record is pretty shite. No wins over notable opposition, but a loss to now 15-14 Nate Williams, who couldn’t get a win in LFA or PFL.
That’s all we can really say here, because there are gaps in my knowledge of Pacheco and Loughran isn’t well-rounded enough to be trusted with the fade. If Pacheco had elite takedown defence and the fight was forced into a standup affair, I can’t have confidence that Loughran is even superior.
Therefore, there’s not much point in looking into this fight any further. I’ll root for Loughran because Pacheco doesn’t deserve to be here and Caolan had a tough debut, but that’s as far as my investment goes. These debut fights should be treated more as an opportunity to learn more about fighters.
How I line this fight: Too many unknowns to line this one
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Chidi Njokuani v Rhys McKee
Chidi Njokuani is 35 years old, which immediately waves red flags for some people. Can’t really blame them.
Rhys McKee is shit at fighting, which immediately waves red flags for me.
He’s got a hell of a chin, but his toughness and heart are pretty much the only thing that’s remarkable about him. I’ve spoken before about being wary of fighters who get credit for toughness, as it’s a nice way of highlighting their inferiority. Getting pieced up by Ange Loosa on the feet is the perfect example, as Ange isn’t that good a striker. The toughness could actually be useful here against Chidi though, as he’s pretty damn low volume and could be outhustled if the fight spans across 15 minutes.
Chidi’s on a three-fight losing streak himself, including two brutal knockout losses amongst them. This is a steep price to be paying on a guy who is old and declining, with durability that’s only going to get worse…but I still think he deserves to be favoured due to actually being a decent striker. I won’t trust him with my money because he’s waving too many red flags, but I reckon he probably wins.
EDIT: Shoutout to u/Shabozz for the added insight in the comment section. I had no idea this fight was as 170lbs, which is a terrible idea for Chidi. Moving down in weight and starving your brain of Oxygen at 35 years old when you've been KO'd twice sounds like an idea I'd be keen to fade. I still don't really think McKee is any good but he's a potent finisher and will absolutely give it his all. The money is piling in on him as well at the moment which I think is also telling...so I'll be playing McKee ITD for 1u at +200 or better.
How I line this fight: Given the weight class, it's probably a pick'em
Bet or pass: 1u McKee ITD at +200 or better
Prop leans: None
Julio Arce v Herbert Burns
Herbert Burns is one dimensional but not good enough to get the fight where he wants it to be, also having about seven minutes of cardio to attempt to wrestle. Julio Arce is far more well-rounded but has been a bit of a middleman. I don’t like the idea of trusting middlemen at -500. He does however have a 95% takedown defence rate, which implies he’s got the good to keep this fight right where he wants it. Sounds like a nightmare matchup for Herbert Burns.
Can’t bet the juice, can’t bet the dog. Easy as that.
How I line this fight: Julio Arce -400 (80%), Herbert Burns +400 (20%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Ibo Aslan v Anton Turkalj
Anton Turkalj is everyone’s favourite shit underdog. This guy is 0-3 in the UFC but he’s somehow conned his way into being a reliable + money play that everyone seems to want to back. I bet Tyson Pedro against this guy, and the betting public graciously let me get +100 to do it (I liked Pedro when he was -150 and the public all steamed Anton).
Interestingly enough they’re giving Ibo Aslan the chance to play executioner to Turkalj’s UFC career, and also the chance to avenge the only loss of his professional career. I watched that fight back and Ibo Aslan won 95% of it in a pretty dull and cage pushy affair, before completely gassing out and quitting. Turkalj has always been credited as a guy who can weather a R1 storm and turn the tide, that’s why people backed him against Pedro, Petrino and even Jailton Almeida. He certainly did it in that 2020 fight, and I’m sure he’ll probably use the exact same gameplan here.
These two really don’t like each other, as there was plenty of animosity and shit talking before and after their first encounter. Massive thank you to the UFC for putting this one together, it just makes so much sense.
So does lightning strike twice for Anton Turkalj here? Very possibly. Aslan has only won one fight that’s gone passed the first round, and that came before we knew he had cardio issues anyway. The initial loss to Turkalj could have provided the wakeup call that he needed to fix that cardio, as is often the way when R1 demolition men get dragged into deep waters and exposed. It could however have taught him absolutely nothing, and he might still have the exact same amount of gas in the tank as he did the first time they fought. We haven’t seen him go any longer since then, so we simply cannot know unless we train with him.
On the subject of training - I have learnt since initially posting that Aslan now trains at Xtreme Couture, which i think could have some significance. Considering I expect him to probably have learnt from the cardio problems, training there probably enhances his ceiling and raises the expectation of how good he could be.
Initially I believed it should be a pick'em, but I don't mind Aslan being the slight favourite here. I'm still not super convinced in either side, but I am now interested in combining Aslan to Win with an Under in an SGP. It will only be a 1u bet but should enhance the odds for Aslan to hit the PTV his moneyline is based on anyway.
In short, I'm backing Aslan's potential improvements because of the camp he is at and the mistakes he has already made. Small 1u bet though.
How I line this fight: Aslan around -150 max
Bet or pass: 1u Aslan to Win and Under 1.5 or 2.5 Rounds....we will see.
Prop leans: Alsan R1 or Turkalj 2/3, or Under 2.5 Rounds, or FDGTD
Live Betting Leans: I’m sure the books will be all over it, but if this one makes it to the stool you absolutely need to bet Anton. He’ll likely be a significant underdog by that point, but he’s dealt with the worst and actually has a much cleaner path to victory now.
Melissa Gatto v Victoria Dudakova
I still think about that takedown that Dudakova landed on Istela Nunes – she like rolled off a low single, I’ve never seen that before (granted I have no wrestling background so maybe that’s pretty common). Then she fought Jinh Yu Frey who is old and had already lost to Demopoulos, Viana and Reed, which is a disgustingly bad run of losses and deserves cutting instantly. Despite that, Dudakova’s still clearly lost a round, where she was taken down and controlled, with very little ability to get back to her feet. She locked down position, regained guard and threatened submissions, as well as some pretty threatening upkicks…but I could very easily see her getting controlled on the mat for 15 by a good wrestler with decent submission defence from top. It’s not a good idea long term to play defence for a round and happily surrender it, especially not in WMMA where you cannot rely on finishes to bail you out.
That’s the angle that explains the betting line here, I think…because it’s certainly surprising to see an undefeated prospect be an underdog to journeywoman currently on a two-fight losing streak. So…is it valid?
Melissa Gatto looks to wrestle a fair bit, but she’s not very good at it I don’t think. She struggled to get Ariane Lipski to the floor, which doesn’t really bode well here given her gameplan going into this fight would probably be very similar to that one. She also showed the exact weakness that I’ve just criticised Dudakova for too – fishing for submissions and not really looking to find a way back into a neutral position. I know Gatto’s got a BJJ background…but we’ve not really seen it at this level, have we? Attempting armbars from back control isn’t a high IQ move. She had absolutely nothing in terms of get ups against Tracy Cortez either.
So in a fight where both women will want to be on top, I’ve got to favour Dudakova’s wrestling and believe she’s going to be the one winning the majority of those exchanges. And on the mat I think she’s got what it takes to be careful against the submission attempts and to win rounds with control time, and maybe a little ground and pound.
I’m not really too sure which woman deserves to be favoured when it comes to pure standup though, but I don’t really think that’s where this fight is going to be won and lost anyway. I liked Dudakova’s jab in that Frey fight, but Gatto’s got decent enough footwork and fundamentals to turn this one into a very close one to score if they strike for 15 minutes.
So to summarise, I see Dudakova being the much more likely to win the fight via dominant position in scrambles, I don’t rate Gatto’s submission game from bottom, and I think the striking is going to be too close to give an edge. Therefore, that has me thinking Dudakova deserves to be the slight favourite. Add in the intangibles about the Russian being an untested fighter that could have a much higher ceiling than we realise (what if she had an off night against Frey and in every other parallel universe she smokes her?), and that leaves me thinking Dudakova should be about -125 to -150 here.
However, I can currently see her as the betting underdog at +137. To me that’s just wrong, and I don’t expect the public to bet Gatto at this price. People don’t care about WMMA, and if they do it will be to blind bet the dog (not saying that’s a bad strategy). Therefore, I’m going to capitalise on the overcorrection to a lacklustre performance from Dudakova, and back her to win at +137 or better for 1u sometime soon.
How I line this fight: Viktoria Dudakova -135 (57%), Melissa Gatto +135 (43%)
Bet or pass: 1u Viktoria Dudakova to Win at +137
Prop leans: Probably a decision win, but the underdog moneyline is more than enough for me
Bill Algeo v Kyle Nelson
This matchup is basically the Sideswipe Derby – my greatest money train vs the guy I have lost the most money on.
Bill Algeo is one of my money trains. I’ve bet confidently on that fella in each of his last three wins, and they weren’t small bets either. He’s well-rounded, durable, and cocky, and his cardio can be weaponised as he grows into fights.
Kyle Nelson is a guy I’ve been fading since like 2017. I’ve just never understood what exactly he does well. He’s got that weird mesmerising ability to lull opponents into his tempo and style, completely ignoring their own strengths and just chasing him as he does his annoying circle, circle, body kick routine.
Bill Algeo at -200 is a weird price though, in my opinion. Nelson’s probably one of the worst guys Algeo has fought in his UFC career but he’s being respected like it’s a reasonable matchup. I’d personally be fine with Algeo getting close to the top 15 opponent with a win here, whereas Nelson’s still not far off getting cut if he loses a fight or two.
Algeo’s basically the same kind of guy as Billy Q. Well rounded, but with an intense gas tank that will push you if you aren’t ready for it. Nelson’s cardio is okay but we saw him struggle when a pace was put on him by Billy Q…so I think Algeo grows into this fight similarly to how Billy Q did.
I’ve actually got a bit of a bad record trying to bet against Kyle Nelson, but I think this is a real gift of a spot for Bill Algeo, who fights in front of a home crowd. Personally I think the -200 price tag is a bit on the generous side, so I will be keen to play Algeo for 3u. However, like last week I am keen to utilise the Over 1.5 Round prop in a SGP for this fight, as I think Nelson is durable and Algeo needs a bit of time to get going. It’ll likely be 2u Algeo to Win at -200, and 1u on the prop when the lines drop.
How I line this fight: Bill Algeo -300 (75%), Kyle Nelson +200 (25%)
Bet or pass: 3u Bill Algeo to Win, in some capacity
Prop leans: Algeo and Over 1.5 Rounds or Algeo Decision.
Nate Landwehr v Jamall Emmers
Jamall Emmers is one of those guys. Plenty of talent and promise, but combined the fight IQ of a plank of wood, it just never worked out like it was supposed to. I’ll never forget him waiting until round 3 to grapple Giga Chikadze, when everyone and their mother knew it was the obvious path to take. Ironically he did the same thing against Jack Jenkins recently and he lost a split AGAIN. It’s therefore a re-occuring theme, and it makes him incredibly untrustworthy.
On the complete opposite end of the spectrum we have Nate Landwehr. Nate the Train isn’t particularly good at any one area of MMA, but boy is he scrappy and dedicated. He’ll go hard for 15, and you won’t deter him from getting right back on the horse when things don’t go his way.
Personally I think that kind of archetype usually causes a lot of problems for guys with bad fight IQ, because someone like Landwehr is going to ask Emmers a lot of questions…and the fight becomes a case of whether or not Emmers has the answers. He’s looked sensational in his last two wins, but the level of competition has been amongst the lowest the UFC could produce. Before that, he was dropping Pat Sabatini and getting leg locked 30 seconds later. Poor IQ.
So this one is a case of pick your poison. The inferior fighter but a dog you can trust, or the man with the better skillset who is prone to capitulating at any moment? No idea, it’s an easy pass for me. Excited to watch the car crash unfold though!
Moneyline wise, I wouldn’t blame you for taking a stab on Nate Landwehr really. Emmers just objectively cannot be trusted at anything north of -200.
How I line this fight: No idea but not Emmers passed -200.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None
Bets (Bold = been placed)
1u Cage Warriors - Sean Marcos da Silva to Win (+200)
1.5u Bruno Silva to Win by TKO/KO (-125)
2u Bill Algeo to Win (-188)
1u Bill Algeo to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds (-125)
0.5u Bill Algeo to Win in Rounds 2 or 3 (+448)
1u Rhys McKee to Win ITD (+190)
1u Julio Arce to Win in Rounds 2 or 3 (+207)
1u Connor Matthews to Win (+114)
1u Ibo Aslan to Win & Under 1.5 Rounds (+175)
1u Viktoria Dudakova to Win (+137)
1.5u Jacob Malkoun to Win & Over 1.5 Rounds (-125)
0.25u Parlay Pieces (+405)
Parlay Pieces: Bruno Silva, Jacob Malkoun, Bill Algeo, Jamal Emmers
Dog of the Week: Connor Matthews
FUTURE BETS
1.5u PFL Liz Carmouche & Kana Watanabe to Win (-125)
UFC Vegas 91: Allen v Curtis 2
1u Chris Curtis to Win (+200)
0.5u Alexander Hernandez to Win in Round 1 (+225 or better)
3u Melissa Mullins/Dixon & Deiveson Figueiredo to Win (-115)
3u Morgan Charriere to Win (-125)
1u Charlie Campbell to Win (-188)
1u Ignacio Bahamondes to Win in Rounds 2 or 3 (+300 or better)
1u Dan Argueta to Win (+170 or better)
UFC 300: Pereira v Hill
2u Alex Pereira to Win (-137) (This was bet ages ago in the hopes the price would shoot off, but it hasn't so I'm reducing my stake)
2024.03.23 18:58 autobuzzfeedbot 29 Times Celebs Revealed Things And We Were Uh....No One Asked, But Thanks
- Jada Pinkett Smith once revealed that her grandma taught her about masturbation at age nine. "My grandmother taught me about self-pleasuring because she wanted me to know that that pleasure was from me,” Pinkett Smith revealed. “She didn’t want me to fall into the hands of a man — and if he gave me pleasure, to think that that was him. And she taught me at nine!”
- Meghan Trainor and her husband Daryl Sabara made headlines when they revealed they installed double toilets in their home so they could pee together simultaneously. They've only pooped at the same time once, but Trainor says Sabana will hang out with her while she poops there. However, Trainor won't return the favor — "He'll hang out with me while I poop. It was just, I can't take his poops. Sorry, Daryl," she revealed. "Like, man poops are a different fucking level. But my poops don't smell."
- Machine Gun Kelly and Megan Fox have made numerous headlines for sharing details of their relationship, but probably the most controversial was when Megan said they drank each other's blood. Clarifying her comments, Fox said, "It’s just a few drops, but yes, we do consume each other’s blood on occasion for ritual purposes only .... And it is controlled where it’s, like, ‘Let’s shed a few drops of blood and each drink it.' He’s much more haphazard and hectic and chaotic, where he’s willing to just cut his chest open with broken glass and be like, ‘Take my soul.’”
- Lea Michelle once showed BFF Jonathan Groff her "whole vagina" after he asked her to, saying he'd never seen one before. "I was like, 'Sure.' And I took a desk lamp … and showed him. That's how close we are," Michelle recounted.
- Kim Kardashian said she once had sex with Pete Davidson in front of a fireplace to honor her (still-living, BTW) grandmother MJ. Speaking to MJ, she said, "You know what's so crazy? Pete and I were staying at the Beverly Hills Hotel last weekend, and we were sitting in front of the fireplace, just talking for hours, and I was like, 'My grandma told me that you really live life when you have sex in front of the fireplace,' and so we had sex in front of the fireplace in honor of you."
- Olivia Wilde once said of her sex life drying up with ex-husband Tao Ruspoli, "I felt like my vagina died. Turned off. Lights out ... you can lie to your relatives at Christmas dinner and tell them everything on the home front is just peachy. But you cannot lie to your vagina.” She added later, “Sometimes your vagina dies. Then you know it’s time to go. ... [Men] are not allowed to be the only ones thinking with their genitals.”
- She also told us a littleeeee too much about her sex life with then-partner Jason Sudeikis, saying they “have sex like Kenyan marathon runners.”
- Cate Blanchett once described the first sex scene she ever saw, which she said she witnessed at a movie with her mother. "I remember the first time I saw a sex scene. My parents took me, I think I was in third grade. It had Gene Wilder in it, it was Silver Streak. ... He was with this woman on a runaway train, running from the law, and he'd hurt himself. She started to kiss him. And he said, 'Well actually it hurts here and here' and I thought, 'Where is this going?' And she started to unbutton his shirt. I could feel my mother's buttocks clenching beside me. And I thought, 'Ooo I want some of that.'"
- Sarah Jessica Parker once revealed she loves how diapers smell. "I even like when they´re wet and you smell them all warm like a baked good. I love the smell of Balmex. Love it," she said.
- Alicia Silverstone revealed that she basically mama-birds her son when she posted a video of her feeding her son by chewing food and then spitting it into his mouth. She described, “I fed Bear the mochi and a tiny bit of veggies from the soup from my mouth to his," saying “It’s his favorite … and mine. He literally crawls across the room to attack my mouth if I’m eating."
- She also said that she didn't have to use diapers much with him because she knew when he'd need to go to the bathroom, saying, “The cues part for me was really fun because I thought he was flirting with me because he'd do this little smile. That’s when he had to pee.”
- In an interview with Playboy, John Mayer claimed “there have probably been days when I saw 300 vaginas before I got out of bed" (referring to porn).
- In the same interview with Playboy, John Mayer described Jessica Simpson as "crack cocaine to me,” saying, “Sexually it was crazy. That’s all I’ll say. It was like napalm, sexual napalm. Did you ever say, ‘I want to quit my life and just f—ing snort you? If you charged me $10,000 to f–k you, I would start selling all my s–t just to keep f—ing you.'”
- Speaking of Jessica Simpson, she once revealed on Ellen that she only brushes her teeth "maybe three times a week." because she doesn't "like them to feel too slippery" and she needs "a little coating." Instead of brushing every day, she uses "a shirt of something" to wipe her teeth.
- Ricky Martin once revealed he loves giving golden showers. "I've done it before in the shower. It's like so sexy, you know, the temperature of your body and the shower water is very different."
- On their podcast, We Bought A House, Claudia Sulewski and Finneas O'Connell revealed that Claudia sometimes has Finneas check her vagina for tampons because she's forgotten a tampon in before and is afraid of getting Toxic Shock Syndrome, and if she tries to check herself her body goes numb and she's been known to faint. They also revealed that the first time Finneas performed oral sex on her, she was wearing a tampon and forgot.
- Charlie Puth once revealed that the first song he ever "jerked off to" was "This Love" by Maroon 5. He later told Adam Levine this, who apparently said "That’s really weird," which...I agree with.
- On the Office Ladies podcast, Jenna Fischer once revealed she doesn't wash her hands after peeing when she's at home— though, don't worry, she added, "I always wash my hands after poop. Always. I never wipe a poop and then not wash my hands, everybody. I feel like I want that to be clear."
- Speaking of pee, Madonna once posted a video of herself taking an ice bath and drinking her own pee, saying, "It's really good to drink urine after you’ve got out of the frozen bath."
- Kristen Bell and Dax Shephard often tell us a little too much information. In one of their worst stories, they revealed their kids sleep on their floor every night while they sleep on a water-based mattress pad. One night, Bell smelled a terrible odor and they all admitted to farting, with Shephard admitting to being the "leader." But when the smell persisted for a few days, Bell checked the sleeping pad and realized Sherhard had accidentally filled it with a protein shake instead of water. They were unsuccessful in eliminating the smell and continued to sleep on it anyway — even though Shepherd was worried about maggots.
- Terrance Howard revealed in an interview with Elle that he wouldn't date a woman who doesn't keep baby wipes in her bathroom, saying, "If they're using dry paper, they aren't washing all of themselves. It's just unclean. So if I go inside a woman's house and see the toilet paper there, I'll explain this. And if she doesn't make the adjustment to baby wipes, I'll know she's not completely clean."
- In an interview with Marie Claire, Chrissy Teigen revealed that she used to think John Legend had never seen her butthole...until he corrected her, saying "Are you kidding? Every time anyone does anything doggy style, you see a butthole. I see it every time."
- DJ Khaled once garnered backlash for revealing that he doesn't perform oral sex, saying, "I can't do that" and "It's certain things I just don't do. I believe a woman should praise the man, the King." He then said it wasn't okay for his girlfriend to refuse to perform oral sex, saying, "Nah, it's not okay. You gotta understand I'm the Don, I'm the King."
- Kelly Clarkson revealed that she pees "almost every time" she takes a shower, saying. “You can't help it. It goes back to that childhood sleepover, they put your hand in the hot water, and sometimes you pee. The hot water hits your body and — not every time, but, like, if I've gotta go."
- Shailene Woodley once revealed she likes to expose her vagina to the sun. "[One] thing I like to do is give my vagina a little vitamin D," she said. "I was reading an article written by an herbalist about yeast infections and other genital issues. She said there's nothing better than vitamin D. If you're feeling depleted, go in the sun for an hour and see how much energy you get. Or, if you live in a place that has heavy winters, when the sun finally comes out, spread your legs and get some sunshine."
- Woodley also eats clay, makes her own toothpaste out of clay and essential oils, and apparently even makes her own medicine. Oh, and she only washes her hair once a month.
- Speaking of washing, let's end with the infamous celebrity bathing habits examples. After Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher once revealed that they only bathe their kids when they see dirt on them, a whole bunch of other celebrities joined in.
- Kristen Bell agreed, saying "I'm a big fan of waiting for the stink. Once you catch a whiff, that's biology's way of letting you know you need to clean it up."
- And Jake Gyllenhaal told Vanity Fair, "More and more I find bathing to be less necessary, at times."
2024.03.22 14:20 chrisoncontent Javier Bardem should have played Ferrari (imho)
Hear me out! I've loved Adam Driver since Girls. He's one of our most interesting movie stars and he's a perfect Leading Mann. And don't get me wrong: he's good in Ferrari! As discussed on the pod, it could have easily been an embarrassing miscalculation but it totally works.
However, as I've been reflecting on the movie over the past few months, a movie which is so much about mortality and human costs, I think it would benefit from a more age-accurate actor. Someone who probably does have more miles behind them than in front of them.
I think Bardem is an obvious choice: he can bring both paternal warmth and a dangerous brusqueness; you know he'd have chemistry with Cruz (imagine those scenes!); and I think Ferrari's infidelity plays differently with an older actor - you're no longer afforded a subconscious "of course Shailene Woodley and Adam Driver would be into each other."
Idk, just a thought that I had falling asleep last night as I continue to wrestle with this film that, like many Michael Mann films, will undoubtedly grow in my estimation as time goes on.
submitted by chrisoncontent to blankies [link] [comments]
However, as I've been reflecting on the movie over the past few months, a movie which is so much about mortality and human costs, I think it would benefit from a more age-accurate actor. Someone who probably does have more miles behind them than in front of them.
I think Bardem is an obvious choice: he can bring both paternal warmth and a dangerous brusqueness; you know he'd have chemistry with Cruz (imagine those scenes!); and I think Ferrari's infidelity plays differently with an older actor - you're no longer afforded a subconscious "of course Shailene Woodley and Adam Driver would be into each other."
Idk, just a thought that I had falling asleep last night as I continue to wrestle with this film that, like many Michael Mann films, will undoubtedly grow in my estimation as time goes on.
2024.03.22 09:05 Several-Lie4513 Which young actors/actresses aged well?
I (35m) have always followed the actors/actresses growing up around my same age and was always curious who would translate in to a great actor. I have a top and it's : Paul Dano, shailene woodley, Dane Dehaan, Zach Efron, Emile Hirsch, shia lebouf, ... Are there any that I've missed?
submitted by Several-Lie4513 to moviecritic [link] [comments]
2024.03.16 02:09 BlackWidow1990 Inspired by Rider: Which celebrities did you predict would make it that actually did make it? Which aren’t as big as you thought? Who made it big that surprised you?
Here are mine!
Who I predicted would make it big: Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus, Tom Hardy, Darren Criss, Emma Roberts, Elizabeth Olsen, Chris Evans
Who I thought would be bigger: Logan Lerman, Victoria Justice, Leighton Meester, Emily Osment, Nick Robinson
Who I was surprised by: Zac Efron, Megan Fox, Shailene Woodley
submitted by BlackWidow1990 to boymeetsworld [link] [comments]
Who I predicted would make it big: Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus, Tom Hardy, Darren Criss, Emma Roberts, Elizabeth Olsen, Chris Evans
Who I thought would be bigger: Logan Lerman, Victoria Justice, Leighton Meester, Emily Osment, Nick Robinson
Who I was surprised by: Zac Efron, Megan Fox, Shailene Woodley
2024.03.04 21:11 jonfinazzo Close Decision Wins That Changed Fighters’ Careers
- Alex Pereira v Jan Blachowicz
- Pereira was coming off a KO loss to Israel Adesanya just 3 months earlier to this fight
- This was Pereira’s first attempt at moving up a weight class
- With a loss here, he is either moving back down to Middleweight, getting a lesser opponent at Light Heavyweight, or retiring
- For Jan, he was coming off a split draw against Magomed Ankalaev for the LHW title - a loss here would stray him even further from a title shot again
- Pereira lost round 1 due to Jan having his back for most of it
- Round 2 was clear for Pereira as Jan was regaining his cardio from all the round 1 grappling while Poatan peppered Jan from a distance
- Round 3 was razor close with Pereria landing 35 strikes to Jan’s 26, but Jan ended the round with a nice takedown and finished the fight on top
- Another thing to note is Jan was looking insanely tired after RD 1 while Poatan’s body language seemed like he was super fresh
- Regardless, Pereira would win this fight and go on to defeat Jiri for the title
- Alex Volkanovski v Max Holloway II
- Volk was 20-1 heading into this bout after having just beaten Max in their first match for the title in another close but not as close decision
- Max had already lost to Volk so a 2nd loss would send him to the back of the line for featherweight title contention
- According to the totals, Volk landed 35 more strikes over the five rounds and outlander Holloway in 2,3,4 and 5
- However, Holloway was getting the better of the exchanges and was landing with more power
- Ultimately, Volk came away with the nod, Holloway ended up fighting two more fights before rematching Volk for a third time, and lost again
- Volk, meanwhile, would further cement his legacy with wins over Korean Zombie and Brian Ortega - if Max beat Volk in the 2nd fight, we would’ve potentially never seen Volk’s dawg come out in that Ortega fight
- Khamzat Chimaev v Gilbert Burns/Kamaru Usman
- Khamzat is currently 13-0 and set for a title shot or at least a number one contender’s shot with his next fight
- However, his most recent wins besides Kevin Holland have been razor close decision victories and without them, we might not even be talking about the guy seriously anymore
- Against Burns, Khamzat clearly won round 1 but was viciously knocked down in RD2
- He was outstruck in both rounds 2 and 3 by burns but his takedowns and control proved to be the deciding factor in his decision victory
- More recently, Khamzat defeated Kamara Usman in a 3 round war and the fight played out very similarly
- Khamzat clearly won RD1 but was outstruck by Usman in Rounds 2 and 3, which led to a majority decision win for Khamzat
- I personally had this fight scored as a draw with Khamzat 10-8ing RD1 and losing the next 2
- A loss here wouldn’t have necessarily derailed either fighter’s careers, but only time can really tell since it just happened
- Henry Cejudo v Demetrious Johnson II
- Might Mouse was so dominant in his FW reign that this fight could have potentially been the last FW title fight ever since Dana wanted to scrap the division entirely
- Because Cejudo won, he was given a double champ opportunity against TJ Dillishaw and won that as well
- He also ended up defeating Marlon Moraes and Dominick Cruz subsequently, cementing himself as the TRIPLE C and an all time great
- Mighty Mouse would leave the UFC after this fight and continue his legacy at ONE Championship
- Looking at the fight itself, Mighty Mouse outlander Cejudo in every round but surrendered takedowns in Rds 2, 4, and 5 which ultimately led the judges to lean Cejudo
- I honestly thought Mighty Mouse won here but people often forget just how much the course of UFC history changed due to these scorecards
- GSP v Johnny Hendricks
- Hendricks entered this fight with a 14-1 record, having finished 9 of his opponents to date
- GSP was on the tail end of his career, and ultimately this was his last title defense and fight at Welterweight
- With a win here, Hendricks could take GSP’s aura and become the new Welterweight king, but that was not the case
- Looking at the stats, GSP outlander Hendricks in rounds 1, 3, and 5, but Hendricks was certainly throwing and landing with more power which was seen all over GSP’s face
- Both fighters landed some takedowns but Hendrick’s takedown in RD3 should have been enough to outweigh the strike differential giving GSP the round
- After this fight, GSP would retire until his Bipsing fight
- Hendricks would fight and defeat Robbie Laweler for the vacant gold before losing another controversial split decision in the rematch, leading to a 2-5 finish to his career
- Jorge Masvidal’s entire career
- The problem with Gamebred’s fighting style is he fights very passively and doesn’t take too many risks too often
- This often leads him to seeing the judges scorecards and leaving his fighting fate in their hands
- Masvidal has had 4 split decisions in the UFC and has lost all 4 of them, tying Angela Hill’s record for most lost split decisions in UFC history
- He also has a few unanimous decision losses that could have went either way like against Wonderboy or Paul Daley
- If those decisions were to flip the other way, he would have surely seen a title shot much earlier than he did in his career
- A split decision win over Benson Henderson would have propelled him to a title shot
- A split decision win over Damian Meia or a decision win against Wonderboy would have done the same as well, but if he had defeated Wonderboy he would have never started his new era of being a KO artist, since his next fight was against Darren Till and the rest is history
- Israel Adesanya v Robert Whittaker II
- At the time, Izzy was 21-1 and had his first loss recently to Jan Blachowicz at LHW
- Izzy had been clearing out the Middleweight division and it was prime time for a rematch with the guy he took the belt off of - Robert Whittaker
- Whittaker had amassed a 3 fight win streak since his first bout with Adesanya at this point and was looking like the only real threat left
- With a win here, Whittaker Izzy would have more than likely had a trilogy and who knows how that one plays out
- Also, if Whittaker won, the UFC may have been more hesitant to push Alex Pereira to a title shot - Poatan only had 1 UFC victory at the time of this fight but after Izzy won here, they jettisoned him up the rankings with fights against Bruno Silva and Sean Strickland
- Some people may debate me on this but I think the UFC definitely would’ve slowed Pereira’s trajectory down if Izzy was not going to be his endgame
- Looking at the fight itself, Whittaker nearly matched Adesanya in strikes round by round and even got some takedowns in 4 of the 5 rounds
- Izzy got a quick knockdown in RD1 but Whittaker was able to amass a lot of control time over the course of the fight and was threatening chokes on Izzy’s back for a small portion
- Ultimately, I agree that Izzy won here but the middleweight division could have been turned on its head with a Reaper victory here
- Robbie Lawler v Carlos Condit
- After competing in one of the best fights of all time against Rory Mcdonald, reigning Welterweight champion Robbie Lawler defending his belt against Carlos Condit
- Condit had become a fan favorite for his unique striking techniques and had almost taken the belt off of GSP with an insane head kick, but GSP was able to weather the storm and win
- Condit entered his bout with Lawler having gone 2-3 in his last 5, but he was given the shot more so because the fans knew it would be a war and there weren’t any real contenders for Lawler yet
- Looking at the scorecards, it is clear that Condit won rounds 1 and 4 and Lawler won 2 and 5, but the judges saw round 3 differently, thus leading to a split decision win for the champ
- Looking at the fight stats, you can clearly see Condit outstruck Lawler 22 to 11 in round 3 and should have won that round unanimously - there weren’t any takedowns and the control time was very minimal for both fighters
- Ultimately, Condit did not win here and would go 2-5 in his following 7 UFC fights, whereas Lawler would lose the belt in his next fight against Tyron Woodley
- If Condit won here, I can see a world where they run the fight back, which would leave Tyron Woodley to potentially fight Wonderboy in a number 1 contenders match instead of fighting him twice for his belt
- If that fight had occurred, who knows how the welterweight division would’ve shaken out moving forward
- Driccus Du Plessis v Sean Strickland
- It’s hard to have this fight on the list since it just happened and we don’t know the full ramifications of it, but the decision here was insanely close and led to a new title holder
- With a win, DDP sets himself up with a match against Adesanya in one of the last superfights UFC can put on
- With a win, Strickland would have elevated himself to another tier of middleweight and would have potentially set up a title bout between himself and robert whittaker
- All 3 judges gave Stricklland rounds 1 and 5 and gave DDP 2 and 4, but round 3 was scored differently for each
- Technically speaking, Strickalnd threw and landed more strikes than Driccus but the eye test would say that DDP was landing the bigger shots
- Ultimately, time will tell with how this fight will change each’s careers
- Sean O’Malley v Petr Yan
- Coming into this fight, O’Malley was sporting a 15-1 record and his only ranked competition was Pedro Munoz, a fight that ended in a No Contest due to eye poke
- Yan, on the other hand, was ranked in the top 3 of bantamweight and had just had two title fights against Aljamain Sterling as well as a decisive decision win against Cory Sandhagen
- By all means, this was a huge jump for Sugar and a loss here would’ve alerted people that he was a fraud and he should no longer be associated with the higher brass of the bantamweight division
- Regardless of decision, Sugar definitely put on one of his best performances and both fighters gave each other everything they had
- Even if the judges scored this in Yan’s favor, I could still have seen a world where Sugar’s stock gets boosted, but he definitely would not have gotten a title shot next like he did
- Looking at the fight itself, Petr landed more strikes in RD1 and had a takedown to go with it
- Petr against outlander Sugar in RD2 and mixed in 3 more takedowns leading to over 2 minutes of control time in the round
- Rd3 was a definitive Sugar round as he almost doubled Yan’s output
- On MMA Decisions, only one analyst of the 26 scored it for O’malley
- RD3 was a unanimous Sugar round and RD1 was a significant Yan round - it mainly comes down to how you score RD 2 - do you lean more for Yan’s control or do you lean more for Sugar’s power shots?
- Ultimately, Sean won and beat Sterling for the belt while Yan lost and would lose against to Merab in his following bout
- JDM v Bassil Hafez - Hafez was on short notice and debatably won 2 rounds against JDM, but a loss here would’ve certainly derailed JDM’s hype train
- Benson Henderson v Frankie Edgar II - Edgar lost but he still got another title shot at a higher weight class after
- Rose v Carla II - title changed hands on one of the most boring fights of all time
- This one is for u/NutsHang: Ian McCall v Mighty Mouse for the inaugural flyweight belt - fight went to a draw and was supposed to go to a third round but it did not. This led to Benavidez not getting a title shot in his prime and having to wait for the McCall Johnson rematch
RE-EDIT: Masvidal Wonderboy wasn't as close I remembered - apologies on that specific take
2024.02.07 19:49 KeptCurrent Best of Park City: Feb 7 - 14
 | Hey Everyone, submitted by KeptCurrent to parkcityvisitors [link] [comments] This week is packed with excitement, as we gear up for both the Super Bowl and Valentine's Day next week. We tried to make it easy for you to make your plans. In addition to these festivities, Kept Current has something special in store for next week. We're thrilled to announce that will be running a campaign for Random Acts of Kindness Week. We've teamed up with the Chamber of Commerce and a host of local businesses ready to surprise you with some wonderful gestures! Make sure to follow us on Instagram because that is where all the fun will take place Feb 14 - 20. But that's not all – we're extending an invitation to other local businesses interested in joining our campaign to give back to the community. If you are a business with a product or a solo entrepreneur with a service and you want to join forces, reach out to me and I'll give you the details. The deadline for participation is Friday. BIG GAME https://preview.redd.it/9hzc1aw5l7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92c761dff180bddcf721a77b6390e9758f8ec276 Big Game Viewing Party @ The Pendry Sunday, February 11, from 4:00 PM - 9:00 PM / Rick Gerber 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Get ready for the ultimate game day experience in Park City on Sunday, February 11th! Aprés Pendry is hosting a lively pre-game event with live music by Rick Gerber, followed by the big game on large HD TVs. Enjoy great seats, tasty game-time snacks, draft beers, and fantastic entertainment. Join the fun and cheer on your favorite team!Other Places to Watch the Game
https://preview.redd.it/pf425ko6l7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=db4273ae6f3ebdef13ab341a6de35f8521a792f6 Valentine's Day Specials Wednesday, February 14th
https://preview.redd.it/xaaaa2h8l7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=606eeb929715fb8da4d4fa5a9d476eb9166b4525 Kept Current Collective Valentine's Day Gift GivingLooking for the perfect Valentine's Day gift? Kept Current has got you covered! Our new Fashion Contributor, Diana Heather, has curated a special holiday assortment suitable for the whole family. From super affordable finds to high-end luxury items, we've made sure there's something accessible for everyone. CHECK IT OUT NONPROFIT https://preview.redd.it/p62n3t19l7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=01590fbc2e15c28c268cbe0317b10c0dbf7d7f9e Green Business Lunch & Learn: Recycle Utah Wednesday, February 14 from 12:00 - 1:00 PM Join Park City's vibrant energy community this February at the Energy Lunch & Learn. Designed for professionals, entrepreneurs, and sustainability enthusiasts, the event features enlightening talks on clean energy and efficiency. Hear from experts like Scott Dwire, Peter Nelson, and Emily Quinton, and discuss the latest in sustainable energy practices. Enjoy a Chamber-provided lunch and valuable networking opportunities. For dietary accommodations, contact Morgan Mingle at [morganmingle@visitparkcity.com](mailto:morganmingle@visitparkcity.com) SIGN UP FOOD & DRINK https://preview.redd.it/gxie4ryal7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=648f7ffb5bcf6cc9999666cb7616bba83a3ef1fa The Art of Cake Decorating @ Deer Valley Creative Academy February 10 & 11, from 3:30 PM - 5:00 PMEnhance your cake decorating skills with a Deer Valley pastry chef's expert guidance. Learn the art of layering and coating to create stunning cakes that captivate. This hands-on experience is perfect for those looking to elevate their cake decoration prowess. RSVP https://preview.redd.it/qc2tuxccl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b95fb9cecb8ec377383b06c3a947d551e7d36320 Sweetheart Sips: Passion Inspiring Wines Friday, February 9, from 6:30 PM - 7:45 PMJoin Professor Maggie Heile for a lively session to delight the senses just in time for an early V-Day. She will curate a selection of distinctive wines, each under $40 and often missed in stores. Enjoy tastings, engaging stories about the wineries, and a Blind Tasting Challenge. This event is ideal for wine lovers and beginners alike. Enhance your wine tasting experience with delicious Charcuterie Platters, available for purchase from our friends at Park City Dessert. Must be ordered at least 1 day in advance. New Location: They are now located at the Treasure Mountain Inn - Crescent Room. GET TICKETS CHARCUTERIE https://preview.redd.it/xkpfpq1dl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2d1487d951037b81b95164ab1b1869de929b9021 Winter Pasta by Hand @ Mindful Cuisine February 9, from 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Join a fun-filled pasta making class where attendees dive into the art of creating three types of pasta, each paired with its own seasonal sauce. Ideal for those who enjoy a hands-on culinary experience. Vegetarian option available, but sorry to say, it's not suitable for those with gluten sensitivities. The evening menu includes: Savory Crostini with jam and cheese Tricolor Salad with apples and hazelnuts Ravioli, Herb Laminated Pappardelle, and Gnocchetti Pear and Cranberry Galette RSVP https://preview.redd.it/kq9ddurdl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=84ae31af1664fd497f58e54f2f3f1bcbf95ee0e9 Mardi Gras Costume Party: Club Free Tuesday, February 13, from 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Discover a lively, alcohol-free social scene with ClubFree in Summit County, perfect for adults 21 and over. Join them for a Mardi Gras celebration where you can showcase your creativity with the best costume. They are offering prizes for the top three! Space is limited, so be sure to register. Enjoy complimentary non-alcoholic drinks and snacks. RESERVE https://preview.redd.it/yhykkn5gl7hc1.jpg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2b9343507ce1fe7d9ac3f4611619ea788c08352a The Nordic Yurt: Wilderness Access OutfittersExperience a unique winter adventure with the Nordic Yurt snowshoe dinner at Soldier Hollow Nordic Center in the Olympic Park. Embark on a half-mile snowshoe trek through the scenic Olympic venue to a cozy yurt. There, you'll savor a 4-course meal, relax by the fire, and enjoy stunning views of the snow-covered Heber Valley. This is the quintessential winter experience you've been seeking RESERVE SPORTS https://preview.redd.it/qjex7gghl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=18394eebd0c09f23d8fbb3ee061119fe59edcfa7 Enlighten Yoga: Valentine's Day Yoga Sculpt w/ Bethany Saturday, February 10 from 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM Gather your best friends for a Galentine's celebration focused on self-love and friendship! Join us for a reflective and uplifting sculpt class led by Bethany, complete with galentine cards and a fun atmosphere. After the workout, enjoy a protein recovery shake and explore the option of getting some permanent jewelry. It's a perfect way to celebrate yourself and the special women in your life! COST: $30 SIGN UP Park City Mountain's 60th Anniversary Weekend February 9 - 11 Join the 60th season celebration at Park City Mountain, a journey from Treasure Mountains to the largest ski resort in the U.S. Weekend Highlights:
Utah Jazz Vs Golden State Warriors Monday, February 12, @ 7:00 PM Get ready for a showdown as the Utah Jazz take on the Golden State Warriors at the Delta Center! This thrilling match-up promises to be a high-energy battle between two of these iconic NBA teams. Don't miss the chance to witness this epic clash on the court. GET TICKETS https://preview.redd.it/xbqnvd4jl7hc1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=c2b53b7e6e733d797a160cea5db5bb9bdf561225 Soldier Hollow Grand Tour & Grand Enduro February 10 & 11 The Soldier Hollow Grand Tour is a celebrated highlight of the ski season, offering participants a comprehensive challenge across Soldier Hollow's (SOHO) renowned terrain. Known for its world-class grooming, the Grand Tour showcases the best of Soldier Hollow, testing skiers' abilities in a variety of conditions. Following this, the new 2024 Soldier Hollow Grand Enduro adds an exciting twist with its Enduro-style downhill race. This unique event is perfect for adrenaline seekers, featuring multiple timed downhill segments to determine the swiftest skiers. SIGN UP https://preview.redd.it/lnx1j4ojl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=392b9cf6fdda1b15012ec4391ee3a3b2d5a4240b Park City Ski & Snowboard Town Series u/Utah Olympic Park Thursday, February 15, Check-in u/5**:00 PM / Race @ 6:00 PM** The Town Series offers two distinct racing formats for ski enthusiasts. First, there's a traditional downhill format, granting alpine racers rare access to the UOP lifts. Additionally, an uphill SkiMo race is available for those seeking a different challenge. Each race format is independent and timed separately. This series welcomes all community members and ages, though it's recommended for intermediate level skiers and above. It's a great opportunity for ski lovers to showcase their skills in a friendly, competitive environment. REGISTER https://preview.redd.it/zz3wygfkl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7ff3571f1c5a07efaa6ac6a0502623475f2714cc The Shop The Shop has a few cool things going on this week. First don't miss "Friends for Free" in February. Simply sign up as usual, either online or in-person, and bring or meet your friend at the studio. Introduce them to your instructor, and they'll handle the rest. Offer valid from February 1st to March 1st. Enjoy yoga with a buddy! If that wasn't enough:
REGISTER https://preview.redd.it/7i76ugdll7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3b86ebcb11fde287999deb639d3214ed3cba7bf5 Mid-Week Fat Bike Series Tuesday, February 13, Check-in 5:00 PM / Race @ 6:30 PM This is an inclusive community event catering to cyclists of all skill levels and ages. Set on picturesque snow-laden tracks under the night lights, it fosters a warm, community-centric vibe. Ditching conventional podium presentations, each race night is spiced up with thrilling giveaways, featuring an array of sponsor-provided gear. More than just a race, it's a meaningful contribution to the biking community, with all proceeds from season passes and race entries benefiting various BIKE UTAH programs.REGISTER Fins & Fur 10th Annual Ice Fishing Derby Saturday, February 10, from 8:00 AM - 1:00 PM The 10th annual Fins & Fur Ice Fishing Derby at East Canyon Reservoir is set to thrill fishing fans. Along with the top four prizes, participants can also compete for hourly awards for the biggest catch. Remember, pre-registration is a must to join in the excitement and the chance to win! Tickets are selling out, so I listed this early. REGISTER https://preview.redd.it/g0fjqw6ql7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36e4c53ebd268f9b4a5923f4484666bc5174851a Rossignol X Ski Utah Women's Touring Day @ Solitude February 10, from 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM & February 11, from 8:30 AM - 3:30 PM Women of all skill levels and ages are invited to a fun, educational day on snow at Solitude Mountain Resort. The event kicks off on February 10th with a welcome party and essential snow safety overview by the Utah Avalanche Center. On February 11th, the day is packed with activities, including a guided tour, skiing, and an après-ski session. Registration covers the welcome reception, breakfast, guided tour, lunch, demo gear, and more. Participants should bring their own equipment. This special event is a collaboration between Ski Utah, Utah Avalanche Center, and Solitude Mountain Resort, with no lift ticket required. COST: $150 Sales end Feb 9.REGISTER FAMILY FUN https://preview.redd.it/l0iz7qxql7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2bb198df7abb01e043a9db1d6900b22d40d0752 Valentine's Family Mindful Yoga @ The Shop Saturday, February 10 from 10:00 AM - 11:00 AMThis family-friendly event welcomes everyone, from babies to grandparents, for a delightful time filled with yoga, mindfulness, storytelling, dancing, art, and more. A suggested donation of $30 per family is appreciated. Just bring your yoga mat and join in – no registration needed! It's a perfect opportunity for families to bond and have fun together in a relaxed and positive environment. \Woodward Park City If you are looking for some wholesome family fun, or just trying to get the kids out of the house for a bit, here is what is going on at Woodward this week!
We Dream of Robots @ Park City Film Saturday, February 10 @ 4:00 PM “We Dream of Robots” showcases the hopes and dreams of a determined group of teenagers from the Uruguayan countryside whose rural daily lives inspire them to embrace the challenge of building a better future for all. Imagine having no cell phone but learning to assemble and program a robot. Imagine walking or biking three hours to school, then staying an additional three hours to brainstorm robotic solutions to local flooding. The film documents the journeys of two teams from such humble origins that vie for glory against 70 other squads in the first robotics competition ever held in Latin America. The collaboration, commitment, national pride, and creative spark these kids share will lift your heart and inspire you. Ages 10 + COST: FREE GET TICKETS MUSIC THIS WEEKGo to KEPT CURRENT MUSIC for show times, tickets, and future concerts. 2/7 +++ (Crosses) @ The Depot 2/7 DJ Juggy @ Downstairs 2/7 Brooke Mackintosh @ Riverhorse 2/7 Terrell Thomas & Morgen Call Duo @ The Spur 2/8 Robbie Law @ Alpine Social Aid & Pleasure Club 2/8 Dan Weldon @ Riverhorse 2/8 Matthew Bashaw @ Silver Star Cafe 2/8 The Lone Bellow @ The Egyptian Theatre 2/8 Cosmic Hootenanny @ The Commonwealth Room 2/8 Shannon Runyon Duo & Dueling Pianos @ The Spur 2/8 Nate Smith @ The Complex 2/8 DJ Dolph @ Downstairs 2/9 David Quackenbush @ Snowbasin 2/9 Simply B @ Apres Pendry 2/9 Angie Petty @ RIverhorse 2/9 Wildflowers @ The Stateroom 2/9 Mister Sister Trio @ Silver Star Cafe 2/9 The Lone Bellow @ Egyptian Theatre 2/9 Soja @ The Complex 2/9 Scott Foster & Los Hellcaminos @ The Spur 2/9 Lavelle Dupree @ Downstairs 2/10 DJ My Guy @ Canyons Village 2/10 Cherry Thomas @ Snowbasin 2/10 Ryan Innes @ Apres Pendry 2/10 Wilderado @ PCMR 2/10 Mister Sister @ Riverhorse 2/10 Magic City Hippies @ The Depot 2/10 Red Rock Hot Club @ Silver Star Cafe 2/10 Lil Skies @ The Complex 2/10 THe Lone Bellow @ Egyptian Theatre 2/10 Night Lovell @ The Complex 2/10 Miss DJ Lux & Hardy Brothers @ The Spur 2/10 Nathan Spenser & His Band @ The Notch 2/10 Big Richard @ The Commonwealth Room 2/10 Dreamers Delight @ The Cabin 2/10 DJ Crooked @ Downstairs 2/11 Rick Gerber @ Apres Pendry 2/11 Nate Robinson @ Riverhorse 2/11 Ian McIver & Dueling Pianos @ The Spur 2/11 DJ Dirty Dave @ Downstairs 2/12 Tucker Eschmeyer @ Riverhorse 2/12 Cory Wong featuring Monica Martin @ The Depot 2/12 Sarah Hakes & Daniel Torriente @ The Spur 2/13 Kate Chanson @ State Road Tavern 2/13 Ryan Innes @ Riverhorse 2/13 Haken @ The Depot 2/13 Sydnie Keddington & Brennan Hansen Duo 2/14 Randy Moser @ State Road Tavern 2/14 Tucker Eschmeyer @ Riverhorse 2/14 Bailey Zimmerman @ The Complex 2/14 Aspen Anonda & Moren Call Duo @ The Spur 2/14 Kitchen Dwellers @ The Commonwealth Room 2/14 Industry Night w/ DJ Juggy @ Downstairs ARTS & CULTURE https://preview.redd.it/yucw9imsl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60e3582feca70e45700f181ca8e51973ab81365a Leadership 101: Charting Our Community's Future Friday, February 9 from 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM Leadership 101 is an insightful and comprehensive program tailored for busy citizens, local employees, and community leaders eager to understand the inner workings of their community. This deep-dive initiative offers valuable knowledge about local operations and roles, empowering participants to be more informed and actively engaged in the ever-evolving dynamics of their community. It's an ideal resource for those looking to make a meaningful impact locally. I'll be here with my Leadership Class 30. Come say hiGET TICKETS https://preview.redd.it/z2glfw7tl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0b1b770be2c68ef049d5974fe657c719efb796b3 VDay Candy-Crush Floral Arrangement Thursday, February 8, @ 4:00 PM Flower enthusiasts are invited to an arranging session where you can create your own petal-filled masterpiece. You will be supplied with an array of beautiful blooms, a stylish vase, and all necessary materials, complemented by sips and chocolates. Each attendee gets to create and take home their own beautiful arrangement. Hurry, as spots for this blooming experience are limited.GET TICKETS Dr. Wendy Troxel, Ph.D. Sleep Well to Live Well Thursday, February 8, @ 7:00 PM Don't miss Dr. Wendy Troxel, an internationally acclaimed sleep expert and author, as she sheds light on the essential role of sleep in our lives. In her talk, Dr. Troxel will reveal practical and research-backed strategies to enhance both the quantity and quality of your sleep. She'll tackle common sleep questions and highlight how good sleep is crucial for health, well-being, and productivity. This is a chance to learn small but impactful steps to improve your overall sleep health.GET TICKETS📷 https://preview.redd.it/r4m5d1ztl7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9268757bccc5c3140476e00253d18c4558338094 Matt Flint: Pentimento @ Gallery MAR Friday, February 9, from 6:00 PM -9:00 PM "Pentimento," a captivating solo exhibition by the exceptionally gifted Matt Flint, showcases his exploration of the art term "pentimento." This concept reveals the visible traces of a painting's earlier layers or alterations. Flint's work masterfully embodies this, with each canvas unveiling the intricate journey of its creation. The layers beneath subtly emerge, creating rich textures and complex compositions. Attendees can immerse themselves in the narrative of each piece, complemented by live music and light refreshments. COST: FREE SIGN UP Happily Ever After with Rom-Com Author Tessa Bailey VIA ZOOM w/ Summit County Library Thursday, February 8 @ 6:00 PM Meet Tessa Bailey, #1 New York Times bestselling author, as she launches her steamy sports romance, "Fangirl Down." Dive into the tale of a fallen golfer and his number one fan, blending love, challenge, and redemption. Discover Bailey's captivating storytelling at this not-to-be-missed event. REGISTER Ferrari @ Park City Film February 9 - 11 Fri & Sat @ 7:00 PM / Sun @ 6:00 PM “Ferrari” is set during the summer of 1957. Behind the spectacle and danger of 1950’s Formula 1, ex-racer, Enzo Ferrari, is in crisis. Bankruptcy stalks the company he and his wife, Laura, built from nothing ten years earlier. Their tempestuous marriage struggles with the mourning for their one son. Ferrari struggles with the acknowledgement of another. His drivers’ lust to win pushes them out to the edge. He wagers all in a roll of the dice on one race, the treacherous 1,000-mile race across Italy, the iconic Mille Miglia. Starring Adam Driver, Penélope Cruz, Patrick Dempsey and Shailene Woodley. GET TICKETS |
2024.02.07 19:35 KeptCurrent Best of Park City: Feb 7 - 14
This week is packed with excitement, as we gear up for both the Super Bowl and Valentine's Day next week. We tried to make it easy for you to make your plans.
In addition to these festivities, Kept Current has something special in store for next week. We're thrilled to announce that will be running a campaign for Random Acts of Kindness Week. We've teamed up with the Chamber of Commerce and a host of local businesses ready to surprise you with some wonderful gestures! Make sure to follow us on Instagram because that is where all the fun will take place Feb 14 - 20.
But that's not all – we're extending an invitation to other local businesses interested in joining our campaign to give back to the community. If you are a business with a product or a solo entrepreneur with a service and you want to join forces, reach out to me and I'll give you the details. The deadline for participation is Friday.
BIG GAME
https://preview.redd.it/45mlqg6gi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ee2a0032adf7ee684f7f9f38b704da3fa8b9a7b1
Big Game Viewing Party @ The Pendry Sunday, February 11, from 4:00 PM - 9:00 PM / Rick Gerber 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Get ready for the ultimate game day experience in Park City on Sunday, February 11th! Aprés Pendry is hosting a lively pre-game event with live music by Rick Gerber, followed by the big game on large HD TVs. Enjoy great seats, tasty game-time snacks, draft beers, and fantastic entertainment. Join the fun and cheer on your favorite team!Other Places to Watch the Game
VALENTINES DAY
Valentine's Day Specials Wednesday, February 14th
https://preview.redd.it/4ql8pv4ji7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7231a03bdea7da7486b062ed3cc484faaa750c0f
Kept Current Collective Valentine's Day Gift GivingLooking for the perfect Valentine's Day gift? Kept Current has got you covered! Our new Fashion Contributor, Diana Heather, has curated a special holiday assortment suitable for the whole family. From super affordable finds to high-end luxury items, we've made sure there's something accessible for everyone. CHECK IT OUT
NONPROFIT
https://preview.redd.it/ma23ex8ki7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=029c5a4363791beebe9f8074388759da58f24d8c
Green Business Lunch & Learn: Recycle Utah Wednesday, February 14 from 12:00 - 1:00 PM
Join Park City's vibrant energy community this February at the Energy Lunch & Learn. Designed for professionals, entrepreneurs, and sustainability enthusiasts, the event features enlightening talks on clean energy and efficiency. Hear from experts like Scott Dwire, Peter Nelson, and Emily Quinton, and discuss the latest in sustainable energy practices. Enjoy a Chamber-provided lunch and valuable networking opportunities. For dietary accommodations, contact Morgan Mingle at [morganmingle@visitparkcity.com](mailto:morganmingle@visitparkcity.com)
SIGN UP
FOOD & DRINK
https://preview.redd.it/84qw5ocmi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bff7bf118cbbcc570cd099200152755de816b718
The Art of Cake Decorating @ Deer Valley Creative Academy February 10 & 11, from 3:30 PM - 5:00 PMEnhance your cake decorating skills with a Deer Valley pastry chef's expert guidance. Learn the art of layering and coating to create stunning cakes that captivate. This hands-on experience is perfect for those looking to elevate their cake decoration prowess. RSVP
https://preview.redd.it/2sjk96aoi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9f1d49ef1561df15651adba7ab1118f085daa213
Sweetheart Sips: Passion Inspiring Wines Friday, February 9, from 6:30 PM - 7:45 PMJoin Professor Maggie Heile for a lively session to delight the senses just in time for an early V-Day. She will curate a selection of distinctive wines, each under $40 and often missed in stores. Enjoy tastings, engaging stories about the wineries, and a Blind Tasting Challenge. This event is ideal for wine lovers and beginners alike.
Enhance your wine tasting experience with delicious Charcuterie Platters, available for purchase from our friends at Park City Dessert. Must be ordered at least 1 day in advance.
New Location: They are now located at the Treasure Mountain Inn - Crescent Room.
GET TICKETS
CHARCUTERIE
https://preview.redd.it/6nbgl9voi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=df5be557037c7c033c71b6442f54ca22f5364a2b
Winter Pasta by Hand @ Mindful Cuisine February 9, from 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Join a fun-filled pasta making class where attendees dive into the art of creating three types of pasta, each paired with its own seasonal sauce. Ideal for those who enjoy a hands-on culinary experience. Vegetarian option available, but sorry to say, it's not suitable for those with gluten sensitivities. The evening menu includes:
Savory Crostini with jam and cheese Tricolor Salad with apples and hazelnuts Ravioli, Herb Laminated Pappardelle, and Gnocchetti Pear and Cranberry Galette
RSVP
https://preview.redd.it/suz0ojnpi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5e991b7c3b5010b6d173ecbd54743a49c875cd6e
Mardi Gras Costume Party: Club Free Tuesday, February 13, from 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Discover a lively, alcohol-free social scene with ClubFree in Summit County, perfect for adults 21 and over. Join them for a Mardi Gras celebration where you can showcase your creativity with the best costume. They are offering prizes for the top three! Space is limited, so be sure to register. Enjoy complimentary non-alcoholic drinks and snacks.
RESERVE
https://preview.redd.it/8sdnynuri7hc1.jpg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70c5f0e5caad89cbb95b725d9c29aea169d19641
The Nordic Yurt: Wilderness Access OutfittersExperience a unique winter adventure with the Nordic Yurt snowshoe dinner at Soldier Hollow Nordic Center in the Olympic Park. Embark on a half-mile snowshoe trek through the scenic Olympic venue to a cozy yurt. There, you'll savor a 4-course meal, relax by the fire, and enjoy stunning views of the snow-covered Heber Valley. This is the quintessential winter experience you've been seeking
SPORTS
Enlighten Yoga: Valentine's Day Yoga Sculpt w/ Bethany Saturday, February 10 from 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM
https://preview.redd.it/zjyfy6jsi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=786233229a6abec41469f387375f4fd44ddd9c1d
Gather your best friends for a Galentine's celebration focused on self-love and friendship! Join us for a reflective and uplifting sculpt class led by Bethany, complete with galentine cards and a fun atmosphere. After the workout, enjoy a protein recovery shake and explore the option of getting some permanent jewelry. It's a perfect way to celebrate yourself and the special women in your life! COST: $30
SIGN UP
Park City Mountain's 60th Anniversary Weekend February 9 - 11
Join the 60th season celebration at Park City Mountain, a journey from Treasure Mountains to the largest ski resort in the U.S.
Weekend Highlights:
https://preview.redd.it/5m89f6avi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aab4b34e179c55d6197d2cfe564045069a83fb21
Utah Jazz Vs Golden State Warriors Monday, February 12, @ 7:00 PM
Get ready for a showdown as the Utah Jazz take on the Golden State Warriors at the Delta Center! This thrilling match-up promises to be a high-energy battle between two of these iconic NBA teams. Don't miss the chance to witness this epic clash on the court.
GET TICKETS
https://preview.redd.it/85cv0jcwi7hc1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=467739e66e2a0925aa0cb7058d461ee5e4bb63e2
Soldier Hollow Grand Tour & Grand Enduro February 10 & 11
The Soldier Hollow Grand Tour is a celebrated highlight of the ski season, offering participants a comprehensive challenge across Soldier Hollow's (SOHO) renowned terrain. Known for its world-class grooming, the Grand Tour showcases the best of Soldier Hollow, testing skiers' abilities in a variety of conditions. Following this, the new 2024 Soldier Hollow Grand Enduro adds an exciting twist with its Enduro-style downhill race. This unique event is perfect for adrenaline seekers, featuring multiple timed downhill segments to determine the swiftest skiers.
SIGN UP
https://preview.redd.it/b53lbtbxi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2039e1596f7a4ae954654fd3a6fb8a2c0855ecc
Park City Ski & Snowboard Town Series u/Utah Olympic Park Thursday, February 15, Check-in u/5:00 PM / Race @ 6:00 PM
The Town Series offers two distinct racing formats for ski enthusiasts. First, there's a traditional downhill format, granting alpine racers rare access to the UOP lifts. Additionally, an uphill SkiMo race is available for those seeking a different challenge. Each race format is independent and timed separately.
This series welcomes all community members and ages, though it's recommended for intermediate level skiers and above. It's a great opportunity for ski lovers to showcase their skills in a friendly, competitive environment.
REGISTER
https://preview.redd.it/2bfi5t7yi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aadf6827597be356369816367cf37b42f2f48076
The Shop
The Shop has a few cool things going on this week. First don't miss "Friends for Free" in February. Simply sign up as usual, either online or in-person, and bring or meet your friend at the studio. Introduce them to your instructor, and they'll handle the rest. Offer valid from February 1st to March 1st. Enjoy yoga with a buddy!
If that wasn't enough:
REGISTER
Mid-Week Fat Bike Series Tuesday, February 13, Check-in 5:00 PM / Race @ 6:30 PM
This is an inclusive community event catering to cyclists of all skill levels and ages. Set on picturesque snow-laden tracks under the night lights, it fosters a warm, community-centric vibe. Ditching conventional podium presentations, each race night is spiced up with thrilling giveaways, featuring an array of sponsor-provided gear. More than just a race, it's a meaningful contribution to the biking community, with all proceeds from season passes and race entries benefiting various BIKE UTAH programs.REGISTER
Fins & Fur 10th Annual Ice Fishing Derby Saturday, February 10, from 8:00 AM - 1:00 PM
The 10th annual Fins & Fur Ice Fishing Derby at East Canyon Reservoir is set to thrill fishing fans. Along with the top four prizes, participants can also compete for hourly awards for the biggest catch. Remember, pre-registration is a must to join in the excitement and the chance to win! Tickets are selling out, so I listed this early. REGISTER
https://preview.redd.it/fbarsnrcj7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4a19c5bc27e69fe745603ceb66384e270afd9989
Rossignol X Ski Utah Women's Touring Day @ Solitude February 10, from 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM & February 11, from 8:30 AM - 3:30 PM Women of all skill levels and ages are invited to a fun, educational day on snow at Solitude Mountain Resort. The event kicks off on February 10th with a welcome party and essential snow safety overview by the Utah Avalanche Center. On February 11th, the day is packed with activities, including a guided tour, skiing, and an après-ski session. Registration covers the welcome reception, breakfast, guided tour, lunch, demo gear, and more. Participants should bring their own equipment. This special event is a collaboration between Ski Utah, Utah Avalanche Center, and Solitude Mountain Resort, with no lift ticket required. COST: $150 Sales end Feb 9.REGISTER
FAMILY FUN
https://preview.redd.it/uxy1sw93j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7a1d0520512056462ddeaec14bafad465277b332
Valentine's Family Mindful Yoga @ The Shop Saturday, February 10 from 10:00 AM - 11:00 AMThis family-friendly event welcomes everyone, from babies to grandparents, for a delightful time filled with yoga, mindfulness, storytelling, dancing, art, and more. A suggested donation of $30 per family is appreciated. Just bring your yoga mat and join in – no registration needed! It's a perfect opportunity for families to bond and have fun together in a relaxed and positive environment.📷 Woodward Park City If you are looking for some wholesome family fun, or just trying to get the kids out of the house for a bit, here is what is going on at Woodward this week!
We Dream of Robots @ Park City Film Saturday, February 10 @ 4:00 PM
“We Dream of Robots” showcases the hopes and dreams of a determined group of teenagers from the Uruguayan countryside whose rural daily lives inspire them to embrace the challenge of building a better future for all. Imagine having no cell phone but learning to assemble and program a robot. Imagine walking or biking three hours to school, then staying an additional three hours to brainstorm robotic solutions to local flooding. The film documents the journeys of two teams from such humble origins that vie for glory against 70 other squads in the first robotics competition ever held in Latin America. The collaboration, commitment, national pride, and creative spark these kids share will lift your heart and inspire you. Ages 10 + COST: FREE
GET TICKETS
MUSIC THIS WEEKGo to KEPT CURRENT MUSIC for show times, tickets, and future concerts.
2/7 +++ (Crosses) @ The Depot
2/7 DJ Juggy @ Downstairs
2/7 Brooke Mackintosh @ Riverhorse
2/7 Terrell Thomas & Morgen Call Duo @ The Spur
2/8 Robbie Law @ Alpine Social Aid & Pleasure Club
2/8 Dan Weldon @ Riverhorse
2/8 Matthew Bashaw @ Silver Star Cafe
2/8 The Lone Bellow @ The Egyptian Theatre
2/8 Cosmic Hootenanny @ The Commonwealth Room
2/8 Shannon Runyon Duo & Dueling Pianos @ The Spur
2/8 Nate Smith @ The Complex
2/8 DJ Dolph @ Downstairs
2/9 David Quackenbush @ Snowbasin
2/9 Simply B @ Apres Pendry
2/9 Angie Petty @ RIverhorse
2/9 Wildflowers @ The Stateroom
2/9 Mister Sister Trio @ Silver Star Cafe
2/9 The Lone Bellow @ Egyptian Theatre
2/9 Soja @ The Complex
2/9 Scott Foster & Los Hellcaminos @ The Spur
2/9 Lavelle Dupree @ Downstairs
2/10 DJ My Guy @ Canyons Village
2/10 Cherry Thomas @ Snowbasin
2/10 Ryan Innes @ Apres Pendry
2/10 Wilderado @ PCMR
2/10 Mister Sister @ Riverhorse
2/10 Magic City Hippies @ The Depot
2/10 Red Rock Hot Club @ Silver Star Cafe
2/10 Lil Skies @ The Complex
2/10 THe Lone Bellow @ Egyptian Theatre
2/10 Night Lovell @ The Complex
2/10 Miss DJ Lux & Hardy Brothers @ The Spur
2/10 Nathan Spenser & His Band @ The Notch
2/10 Big Richard @ The Commonwealth Room
2/10 Dreamers Delight @ The Cabin
2/10 DJ Crooked @ Downstairs
2/11 Rick Gerber @ Apres Pendry
2/11 Nate Robinson @ Riverhorse
2/11 Ian McIver & Dueling Pianos @ The Spur
2/11 DJ Dirty Dave @ Downstairs
2/12 Tucker Eschmeyer @ Riverhorse
2/12 Cory Wong featuring Monica Martin @ The Depot
2/12 Sarah Hakes & Daniel Torriente @ The Spur
2/13 Kate Chanson @ State Road Tavern
2/13 Ryan Innes @ Riverhorse
2/13 Haken @ The Depot
2/13 Sydnie Keddington & Brennan Hansen Duo
2/14 Randy Moser @ State Road Tavern
2/14 Tucker Eschmeyer @ Riverhorse
2/14 Bailey Zimmerman @ The Complex
2/14 Aspen Anonda & Moren Call Duo @ The Spur
2/14 Kitchen Dwellers @ The Commonwealth Room
2/14 Industry Night w/ DJ Juggy @ Downstairs
ARTS & CULTURE
https://preview.redd.it/ay0gqc45j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4a97c81482ade07054fa72bef404576378c5e2a5
Leadership 101: Charting Our Community's Future Friday, February 9 from 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM
Leadership 101 is an insightful and comprehensive program tailored for busy citizens, local employees, and community leaders eager to understand the inner workings of their community. This deep-dive initiative offers valuable knowledge about local operations and roles, empowering participants to be more informed and actively engaged in the ever-evolving dynamics of their community. It's an ideal resource for those looking to make a meaningful impact locally.
I'll be here with my Leadership Class 30. Come say hi
https://preview.redd.it/ihtvv507j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14324de26f6f9021ce05fa7f49fb3d3b2c280c5c
VDay Candy-Crush Floral Arrangement Thursday, February 8, @ 4:00 PM Flower enthusiasts are invited to an arranging session where you can create your own petal-filled masterpiece. You will be supplied with an array of beautiful blooms, a stylish vase, and all necessary materials, complemented by sips and chocolates. Each attendee gets to create and take home their own beautiful arrangement. Hurry, as spots for this blooming experience are limited.GET TICKETS
Dr. Wendy Troxel, Ph.D. Sleep Well to Live Well Thursday, February 8, @ 7:00 PM
Don't miss Dr. Wendy Troxel, an internationally acclaimed sleep expert and author, as she sheds light on the essential role of sleep in our lives. In her talk, Dr. Troxel will reveal practical and research-backed strategies to enhance both the quantity and quality of your sleep. She'll tackle common sleep questions and highlight how good sleep is crucial for health, well-being, and productivity. This is a chance to learn small but impactful steps to improve your overall sleep health.GET TICKETS📷
https://preview.redd.it/mxgk3ag8j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=441760d494abee406f30ff713a46f9bde898ca94
Matt Flint: Pentimento @ Gallery MAR Friday, February 9, from 6:00 PM -9:00 PM
"Pentimento," a captivating solo exhibition by the exceptionally gifted Matt Flint, showcases his exploration of the art term "pentimento." This concept reveals the visible traces of a painting's earlier layers or alterations. Flint's work masterfully embodies this, with each canvas unveiling the intricate journey of its creation. The layers beneath subtly emerge, creating rich textures and complex compositions. Attendees can immerse themselves in the narrative of each piece, complemented by live music and light refreshments. COST: FREE
SIGN UP
Happily Ever After with Rom-Com Author Tessa Bailey VIA ZOOM w/ Summit County Library Thursday, February 8 @ 6:00 PM
Meet Tessa Bailey, #1 New York Times bestselling author, as she launches her steamy sports romance, "Fangirl Down." Dive into the tale of a fallen golfer and his number one fan, blending love, challenge, and redemption. Discover Bailey's captivating storytelling at this not-to-be-missed event.
REGISTER
Ferrari @ Park City Film February 9 - 11 Fri & Sat @ 7:00 PM / Sun @ 6:00 PM
“Ferrari” is set during the summer of 1957. Behind the spectacle and danger of 1950’s Formula 1, ex-racer, Enzo Ferrari, is in crisis. Bankruptcy stalks the company he and his wife, Laura, built from nothing ten years earlier. Their tempestuous marriage struggles with the mourning for their one son. Ferrari struggles with the acknowledgement of another. His drivers’ lust to win pushes them out to the edge. He wagers all in a roll of the dice on one race, the treacherous 1,000-mile race across Italy, the iconic Mille Miglia.
Starring Adam Driver, Penélope Cruz, Patrick Dempsey and Shailene Woodley.
GET TICKETS
submitted by KeptCurrent to ParkCity [link] [comments]
In addition to these festivities, Kept Current has something special in store for next week. We're thrilled to announce that will be running a campaign for Random Acts of Kindness Week. We've teamed up with the Chamber of Commerce and a host of local businesses ready to surprise you with some wonderful gestures! Make sure to follow us on Instagram because that is where all the fun will take place Feb 14 - 20.
But that's not all – we're extending an invitation to other local businesses interested in joining our campaign to give back to the community. If you are a business with a product or a solo entrepreneur with a service and you want to join forces, reach out to me and I'll give you the details. The deadline for participation is Friday.
BIG GAME
https://preview.redd.it/45mlqg6gi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ee2a0032adf7ee684f7f9f38b704da3fa8b9a7b1
Big Game Viewing Party @ The Pendry Sunday, February 11, from 4:00 PM - 9:00 PM / Rick Gerber 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Get ready for the ultimate game day experience in Park City on Sunday, February 11th! Aprés Pendry is hosting a lively pre-game event with live music by Rick Gerber, followed by the big game on large HD TVs. Enjoy great seats, tasty game-time snacks, draft beers, and fantastic entertainment. Join the fun and cheer on your favorite team!Other Places to Watch the Game
- Montage 3:30 PM - 10:00 PM. Superbowl Buffet COST: $37.50 Kids /$62.00 Adults Call (435) 604-1700 for Reservations
- StarBar Big Game Buffet $60 pp ($35 for food & $25 drink minimum). Call 435-513-7200
- EPC @ Hyatt Centric: Game Day Buffett and Whiskey Blitz Cocktail Special. $29 pp
- Hearth & Hill Call 435-200-8840 for reservations.
- No Name
- The Spur
- Boneyard
- Collies
- Top of Main
- O'Shucks
- Butchers
VALENTINES DAY
Valentine's Day Specials Wednesday, February 14th
- KITA @ The Pendry Valentine's 3 Course Prix-Fixe $160 MENU & RESERVE
- Apex @ The Montage Call (435) 604-1402 for Reservations
- Yama Sushi Valentine’s Day Oshinagaki @ The Montage Call (435) 604-1700 for Reservations
- EPC @ Hyatt Centric: 3-course Prix-Fixe Menu w/ Pink Lady Cocktail Special $69 pp
- Tina's Bakery Valentine's Day Cooking Class: Wednesday, February 14, from 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM RSVP
- Goldener Hirsch Valentine's Day Mixology Class RSVP
- Goldener Hirsch Restaurant Valentine’s Day Dinner RESERVE
- Blue Sky Lodge: Bloom Bar: Build Your own Mini Bouquet with Petal Coop. Cost $50+ (depending on flowers you choose) No RSVPs necessary, just drop in anytime between 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM
- Yuta: Blue Sky Lodge: Valentine's Day Dinner $150 pp / +$120 pp for wine pairing RERSERVE
- Courchevel 4 Course Special $125 pp RSVP
- Grub Steak 2-Course Valentine's Day Special. COST $59.75 pp RESERVE
- Mariposa V-Day Dinner. $175 pp / + $90 wine Pairing MENU & RESERVE
- Simon's Restaurant 4-course prix fixe@ Homestead Resort Midway Call 435-654-1102 to reserve.
- Mindful Cuisine Valentine's Day Cooking Classes $224 per Couple
https://preview.redd.it/4ql8pv4ji7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7231a03bdea7da7486b062ed3cc484faaa750c0f
Kept Current Collective Valentine's Day Gift GivingLooking for the perfect Valentine's Day gift? Kept Current has got you covered! Our new Fashion Contributor, Diana Heather, has curated a special holiday assortment suitable for the whole family. From super affordable finds to high-end luxury items, we've made sure there's something accessible for everyone. CHECK IT OUT
NONPROFIT
https://preview.redd.it/ma23ex8ki7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=029c5a4363791beebe9f8074388759da58f24d8c
Green Business Lunch & Learn: Recycle Utah Wednesday, February 14 from 12:00 - 1:00 PM
Join Park City's vibrant energy community this February at the Energy Lunch & Learn. Designed for professionals, entrepreneurs, and sustainability enthusiasts, the event features enlightening talks on clean energy and efficiency. Hear from experts like Scott Dwire, Peter Nelson, and Emily Quinton, and discuss the latest in sustainable energy practices. Enjoy a Chamber-provided lunch and valuable networking opportunities. For dietary accommodations, contact Morgan Mingle at [morganmingle@visitparkcity.com](mailto:morganmingle@visitparkcity.com)
SIGN UP
FOOD & DRINK
https://preview.redd.it/84qw5ocmi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bff7bf118cbbcc570cd099200152755de816b718
The Art of Cake Decorating @ Deer Valley Creative Academy February 10 & 11, from 3:30 PM - 5:00 PMEnhance your cake decorating skills with a Deer Valley pastry chef's expert guidance. Learn the art of layering and coating to create stunning cakes that captivate. This hands-on experience is perfect for those looking to elevate their cake decoration prowess. RSVP
https://preview.redd.it/2sjk96aoi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9f1d49ef1561df15651adba7ab1118f085daa213
Sweetheart Sips: Passion Inspiring Wines Friday, February 9, from 6:30 PM - 7:45 PMJoin Professor Maggie Heile for a lively session to delight the senses just in time for an early V-Day. She will curate a selection of distinctive wines, each under $40 and often missed in stores. Enjoy tastings, engaging stories about the wineries, and a Blind Tasting Challenge. This event is ideal for wine lovers and beginners alike.
Enhance your wine tasting experience with delicious Charcuterie Platters, available for purchase from our friends at Park City Dessert. Must be ordered at least 1 day in advance.
New Location: They are now located at the Treasure Mountain Inn - Crescent Room.
GET TICKETS
CHARCUTERIE
https://preview.redd.it/6nbgl9voi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=df5be557037c7c033c71b6442f54ca22f5364a2b
Winter Pasta by Hand @ Mindful Cuisine February 9, from 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Join a fun-filled pasta making class where attendees dive into the art of creating three types of pasta, each paired with its own seasonal sauce. Ideal for those who enjoy a hands-on culinary experience. Vegetarian option available, but sorry to say, it's not suitable for those with gluten sensitivities. The evening menu includes:
Savory Crostini with jam and cheese Tricolor Salad with apples and hazelnuts Ravioli, Herb Laminated Pappardelle, and Gnocchetti Pear and Cranberry Galette
RSVP
https://preview.redd.it/suz0ojnpi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5e991b7c3b5010b6d173ecbd54743a49c875cd6e
Mardi Gras Costume Party: Club Free Tuesday, February 13, from 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Discover a lively, alcohol-free social scene with ClubFree in Summit County, perfect for adults 21 and over. Join them for a Mardi Gras celebration where you can showcase your creativity with the best costume. They are offering prizes for the top three! Space is limited, so be sure to register. Enjoy complimentary non-alcoholic drinks and snacks.
RESERVE
https://preview.redd.it/8sdnynuri7hc1.jpg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70c5f0e5caad89cbb95b725d9c29aea169d19641
The Nordic Yurt: Wilderness Access OutfittersExperience a unique winter adventure with the Nordic Yurt snowshoe dinner at Soldier Hollow Nordic Center in the Olympic Park. Embark on a half-mile snowshoe trek through the scenic Olympic venue to a cozy yurt. There, you'll savor a 4-course meal, relax by the fire, and enjoy stunning views of the snow-covered Heber Valley. This is the quintessential winter experience you've been seeking
SPORTS
Enlighten Yoga: Valentine's Day Yoga Sculpt w/ Bethany Saturday, February 10 from 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM
https://preview.redd.it/zjyfy6jsi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=786233229a6abec41469f387375f4fd44ddd9c1d
Gather your best friends for a Galentine's celebration focused on self-love and friendship! Join us for a reflective and uplifting sculpt class led by Bethany, complete with galentine cards and a fun atmosphere. After the workout, enjoy a protein recovery shake and explore the option of getting some permanent jewelry. It's a perfect way to celebrate yourself and the special women in your life! COST: $30
SIGN UP
Park City Mountain's 60th Anniversary Weekend February 9 - 11
Join the 60th season celebration at Park City Mountain, a journey from Treasure Mountains to the largest ski resort in the U.S.
Weekend Highlights:
- Friday, February 9: Enjoy The Pranksters' performance at Canyons Village's Forum Stage, followed by fireworks.
- Saturday, February 10: Wilderado takes the stage at Mountain Village's Eagle Super Stage.
- Throughout the Weekend: Experience live music and partner activations at Miners Camp and Mid Mountain Lodge.
- Kona Big Wave Ski Beach @ Legacy Lodge
- Mtn Dew Yeti Yurt @ Red Pine Lodge
- Toyota Music Den @ Miners Camp
https://preview.redd.it/5m89f6avi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aab4b34e179c55d6197d2cfe564045069a83fb21
Utah Jazz Vs Golden State Warriors Monday, February 12, @ 7:00 PM
Get ready for a showdown as the Utah Jazz take on the Golden State Warriors at the Delta Center! This thrilling match-up promises to be a high-energy battle between two of these iconic NBA teams. Don't miss the chance to witness this epic clash on the court.
GET TICKETS
https://preview.redd.it/85cv0jcwi7hc1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=467739e66e2a0925aa0cb7058d461ee5e4bb63e2
Soldier Hollow Grand Tour & Grand Enduro February 10 & 11
The Soldier Hollow Grand Tour is a celebrated highlight of the ski season, offering participants a comprehensive challenge across Soldier Hollow's (SOHO) renowned terrain. Known for its world-class grooming, the Grand Tour showcases the best of Soldier Hollow, testing skiers' abilities in a variety of conditions. Following this, the new 2024 Soldier Hollow Grand Enduro adds an exciting twist with its Enduro-style downhill race. This unique event is perfect for adrenaline seekers, featuring multiple timed downhill segments to determine the swiftest skiers.
SIGN UP
https://preview.redd.it/b53lbtbxi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2039e1596f7a4ae954654fd3a6fb8a2c0855ecc
Park City Ski & Snowboard Town Series u/Utah Olympic Park Thursday, February 15, Check-in u/5:00 PM / Race @ 6:00 PM
The Town Series offers two distinct racing formats for ski enthusiasts. First, there's a traditional downhill format, granting alpine racers rare access to the UOP lifts. Additionally, an uphill SkiMo race is available for those seeking a different challenge. Each race format is independent and timed separately.
This series welcomes all community members and ages, though it's recommended for intermediate level skiers and above. It's a great opportunity for ski lovers to showcase their skills in a friendly, competitive environment.
REGISTER
https://preview.redd.it/2bfi5t7yi7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aadf6827597be356369816367cf37b42f2f48076
The Shop
The Shop has a few cool things going on this week. First don't miss "Friends for Free" in February. Simply sign up as usual, either online or in-person, and bring or meet your friend at the studio. Introduce them to your instructor, and they'll handle the rest. Offer valid from February 1st to March 1st. Enjoy yoga with a buddy!
If that wasn't enough:
- 2/9 @ 7:00 PM Kirtan - No registration necessary, just show up! $20 per person. Whether you are a seasoned Kirtan enthusiast or someone exploring the magic of chanting for the first time, this event will uplift your spirit and create a space for shared joy and connection.
- 2/10 Sounds of the Heart Sound Healing from 3:50 PM - 5:30 PM: Join Elizabeth Jensen for a celebration of love, gratitude, and a healing journey through sound. Connect with your heart as you experience different instruments including metal bowls, crystal bowls, metal drums, a gong, a rain stick, and an African ocean drum. Registration is required for this event.
REGISTER
Mid-Week Fat Bike Series Tuesday, February 13, Check-in 5:00 PM / Race @ 6:30 PM
This is an inclusive community event catering to cyclists of all skill levels and ages. Set on picturesque snow-laden tracks under the night lights, it fosters a warm, community-centric vibe. Ditching conventional podium presentations, each race night is spiced up with thrilling giveaways, featuring an array of sponsor-provided gear. More than just a race, it's a meaningful contribution to the biking community, with all proceeds from season passes and race entries benefiting various BIKE UTAH programs.REGISTER
Fins & Fur 10th Annual Ice Fishing Derby Saturday, February 10, from 8:00 AM - 1:00 PM
The 10th annual Fins & Fur Ice Fishing Derby at East Canyon Reservoir is set to thrill fishing fans. Along with the top four prizes, participants can also compete for hourly awards for the biggest catch. Remember, pre-registration is a must to join in the excitement and the chance to win! Tickets are selling out, so I listed this early. REGISTER
https://preview.redd.it/fbarsnrcj7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4a19c5bc27e69fe745603ceb66384e270afd9989
Rossignol X Ski Utah Women's Touring Day @ Solitude February 10, from 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM & February 11, from 8:30 AM - 3:30 PM Women of all skill levels and ages are invited to a fun, educational day on snow at Solitude Mountain Resort. The event kicks off on February 10th with a welcome party and essential snow safety overview by the Utah Avalanche Center. On February 11th, the day is packed with activities, including a guided tour, skiing, and an après-ski session. Registration covers the welcome reception, breakfast, guided tour, lunch, demo gear, and more. Participants should bring their own equipment. This special event is a collaboration between Ski Utah, Utah Avalanche Center, and Solitude Mountain Resort, with no lift ticket required. COST: $150 Sales end Feb 9.REGISTER
FAMILY FUN
https://preview.redd.it/uxy1sw93j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7a1d0520512056462ddeaec14bafad465277b332
Valentine's Family Mindful Yoga @ The Shop Saturday, February 10 from 10:00 AM - 11:00 AMThis family-friendly event welcomes everyone, from babies to grandparents, for a delightful time filled with yoga, mindfulness, storytelling, dancing, art, and more. A suggested donation of $30 per family is appreciated. Just bring your yoga mat and join in – no registration needed! It's a perfect opportunity for families to bond and have fun together in a relaxed and positive environment.📷 Woodward Park City If you are looking for some wholesome family fun, or just trying to get the kids out of the house for a bit, here is what is going on at Woodward this week!
- 2/8 SkullCandy Rail Jam Series: Snowboarders and skiers jib for top honors at Woodward Park City's Monthly Rail Jam Series.
- 2/10 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM Bubly Tubing Bash
- 2/14 -16 Futures Tour: Multi-day Sloepstyle contest.
We Dream of Robots @ Park City Film Saturday, February 10 @ 4:00 PM
“We Dream of Robots” showcases the hopes and dreams of a determined group of teenagers from the Uruguayan countryside whose rural daily lives inspire them to embrace the challenge of building a better future for all. Imagine having no cell phone but learning to assemble and program a robot. Imagine walking or biking three hours to school, then staying an additional three hours to brainstorm robotic solutions to local flooding. The film documents the journeys of two teams from such humble origins that vie for glory against 70 other squads in the first robotics competition ever held in Latin America. The collaboration, commitment, national pride, and creative spark these kids share will lift your heart and inspire you. Ages 10 + COST: FREE
GET TICKETS
MUSIC THIS WEEKGo to KEPT CURRENT MUSIC for show times, tickets, and future concerts.
2/7 +++ (Crosses) @ The Depot
2/7 DJ Juggy @ Downstairs
2/7 Brooke Mackintosh @ Riverhorse
2/7 Terrell Thomas & Morgen Call Duo @ The Spur
2/8 Robbie Law @ Alpine Social Aid & Pleasure Club
2/8 Dan Weldon @ Riverhorse
2/8 Matthew Bashaw @ Silver Star Cafe
2/8 The Lone Bellow @ The Egyptian Theatre
2/8 Cosmic Hootenanny @ The Commonwealth Room
2/8 Shannon Runyon Duo & Dueling Pianos @ The Spur
2/8 Nate Smith @ The Complex
2/8 DJ Dolph @ Downstairs
2/9 David Quackenbush @ Snowbasin
2/9 Simply B @ Apres Pendry
2/9 Angie Petty @ RIverhorse
2/9 Wildflowers @ The Stateroom
2/9 Mister Sister Trio @ Silver Star Cafe
2/9 The Lone Bellow @ Egyptian Theatre
2/9 Soja @ The Complex
2/9 Scott Foster & Los Hellcaminos @ The Spur
2/9 Lavelle Dupree @ Downstairs
2/10 DJ My Guy @ Canyons Village
2/10 Cherry Thomas @ Snowbasin
2/10 Ryan Innes @ Apres Pendry
2/10 Wilderado @ PCMR
2/10 Mister Sister @ Riverhorse
2/10 Magic City Hippies @ The Depot
2/10 Red Rock Hot Club @ Silver Star Cafe
2/10 Lil Skies @ The Complex
2/10 THe Lone Bellow @ Egyptian Theatre
2/10 Night Lovell @ The Complex
2/10 Miss DJ Lux & Hardy Brothers @ The Spur
2/10 Nathan Spenser & His Band @ The Notch
2/10 Big Richard @ The Commonwealth Room
2/10 Dreamers Delight @ The Cabin
2/10 DJ Crooked @ Downstairs
2/11 Rick Gerber @ Apres Pendry
2/11 Nate Robinson @ Riverhorse
2/11 Ian McIver & Dueling Pianos @ The Spur
2/11 DJ Dirty Dave @ Downstairs
2/12 Tucker Eschmeyer @ Riverhorse
2/12 Cory Wong featuring Monica Martin @ The Depot
2/12 Sarah Hakes & Daniel Torriente @ The Spur
2/13 Kate Chanson @ State Road Tavern
2/13 Ryan Innes @ Riverhorse
2/13 Haken @ The Depot
2/13 Sydnie Keddington & Brennan Hansen Duo
2/14 Randy Moser @ State Road Tavern
2/14 Tucker Eschmeyer @ Riverhorse
2/14 Bailey Zimmerman @ The Complex
2/14 Aspen Anonda & Moren Call Duo @ The Spur
2/14 Kitchen Dwellers @ The Commonwealth Room
2/14 Industry Night w/ DJ Juggy @ Downstairs
ARTS & CULTURE
https://preview.redd.it/ay0gqc45j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4a97c81482ade07054fa72bef404576378c5e2a5
Leadership 101: Charting Our Community's Future Friday, February 9 from 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM
Leadership 101 is an insightful and comprehensive program tailored for busy citizens, local employees, and community leaders eager to understand the inner workings of their community. This deep-dive initiative offers valuable knowledge about local operations and roles, empowering participants to be more informed and actively engaged in the ever-evolving dynamics of their community. It's an ideal resource for those looking to make a meaningful impact locally.
I'll be here with my Leadership Class 30. Come say hi
https://preview.redd.it/ihtvv507j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14324de26f6f9021ce05fa7f49fb3d3b2c280c5c
VDay Candy-Crush Floral Arrangement Thursday, February 8, @ 4:00 PM Flower enthusiasts are invited to an arranging session where you can create your own petal-filled masterpiece. You will be supplied with an array of beautiful blooms, a stylish vase, and all necessary materials, complemented by sips and chocolates. Each attendee gets to create and take home their own beautiful arrangement. Hurry, as spots for this blooming experience are limited.GET TICKETS
Dr. Wendy Troxel, Ph.D. Sleep Well to Live Well Thursday, February 8, @ 7:00 PM
Don't miss Dr. Wendy Troxel, an internationally acclaimed sleep expert and author, as she sheds light on the essential role of sleep in our lives. In her talk, Dr. Troxel will reveal practical and research-backed strategies to enhance both the quantity and quality of your sleep. She'll tackle common sleep questions and highlight how good sleep is crucial for health, well-being, and productivity. This is a chance to learn small but impactful steps to improve your overall sleep health.GET TICKETS📷
https://preview.redd.it/mxgk3ag8j7hc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=441760d494abee406f30ff713a46f9bde898ca94
Matt Flint: Pentimento @ Gallery MAR Friday, February 9, from 6:00 PM -9:00 PM
"Pentimento," a captivating solo exhibition by the exceptionally gifted Matt Flint, showcases his exploration of the art term "pentimento." This concept reveals the visible traces of a painting's earlier layers or alterations. Flint's work masterfully embodies this, with each canvas unveiling the intricate journey of its creation. The layers beneath subtly emerge, creating rich textures and complex compositions. Attendees can immerse themselves in the narrative of each piece, complemented by live music and light refreshments. COST: FREE
SIGN UP
Happily Ever After with Rom-Com Author Tessa Bailey VIA ZOOM w/ Summit County Library Thursday, February 8 @ 6:00 PM
Meet Tessa Bailey, #1 New York Times bestselling author, as she launches her steamy sports romance, "Fangirl Down." Dive into the tale of a fallen golfer and his number one fan, blending love, challenge, and redemption. Discover Bailey's captivating storytelling at this not-to-be-missed event.
REGISTER
Ferrari @ Park City Film February 9 - 11 Fri & Sat @ 7:00 PM / Sun @ 6:00 PM
“Ferrari” is set during the summer of 1957. Behind the spectacle and danger of 1950’s Formula 1, ex-racer, Enzo Ferrari, is in crisis. Bankruptcy stalks the company he and his wife, Laura, built from nothing ten years earlier. Their tempestuous marriage struggles with the mourning for their one son. Ferrari struggles with the acknowledgement of another. His drivers’ lust to win pushes them out to the edge. He wagers all in a roll of the dice on one race, the treacherous 1,000-mile race across Italy, the iconic Mille Miglia.
Starring Adam Driver, Penélope Cruz, Patrick Dempsey and Shailene Woodley.
GET TICKETS
2024.02.02 11:02 TREV-THOM Max Kay's TASM 3 script & concept art...
 | So unlike some users on here (thinking of one in particular who shall live in infamy), I'm not operating under the delusion that the current SSU line-up is secretly a continuation of the TASM duo, even if that's what I would personally want. I don't think Andrew is coming back in anything Sony related till we officially hear otherwise. His happiest experience with playing Spidey was with Disney on NWH. submitted by TREV-THOM to SUMC [link] [comments] That said, I've decided to accept a very solid fan effort by an individual known as Max Kay, (which takes the form of the shared concept art & linked script), as my head-canon TASM 3. It's a surprisingly professionally written script that, had I had any say in Sony's decision making post-TASM 2, I would've absolutely greenlit as the sequel. Kay's TASM 3 delivers on TASM 2's Sinister Six tease, but instead of spending time introducing new characters like Kraven & Mysterio, Kay wisely assembles the majority of the Six from elements we were already introduced to, upgrading Rhino's suit, resurrecting Electro (now a puppet essentially), putting Felicia Hardy into the Black Cat persona, breaking Harry out of Ravencroft, & creating a surprise reveal for The Gentleman character that's actually brilliant, & again, saves time by not introducing a whole new character. Really our only brand new additions are Adrian Toomes/Vulture & Mary Jane Watson. The former is written with Christopher Lloyd in mind, & humorously the character tries to introduce himself as "The Eagle", but keeps on being mistaken as a Vulture by various characters throughout the script. And instead of Shailene Woodley, the script envisions Lily James in the part of MJ. Instead of a full blown romance, Peter & Mary Jane's interactions start off as an awkward matchmaking scheme by their Aunts, but they gradually develop a friendship, with a tease of their destined future suggested by script's end. Kay's main goal was to tie-up as many loose ends from the previous films as possible, completing their personal experience with the TASM films. This includes a wonderful send-off for Curt Connors/The Lizard, Aunt May confirming her suspicions about Peter, & even Peter finding Uncle Ben's killer. Other great highlights from the script: Peter diving fully into the Spider-Man persona, blaming himself for Gwen's death, culminating in a wonderful nightmare mirroring the Spidey on the side of a building moment from TASM 1, looking at his reflection in the glass, only to tear away the mask & find nothing underneath, a consequence of his neglecting his life as Peter. Peter helping the remaining members of the Stacy family move out of their apartment, a touching moment showing that despite the tragedy, there's no estrangement between the Stacys & Peter. Taking place at Christmas time, & J. Jonah Jameson wearing a Santa hat. (likely still played by J.K. Simmons) A Stan Lee cameo & expanded role for The Gentleman that would've only worked if this had been made in 2016, given the deaths of Stan & Michael Massee. In all, well worth a read for TASM fans who want a conclusion to the throughline of the films without getting lost in the weeds of cinematic universe building, which could've came after. Check out the script below: https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/15o4qQxXaw5APGytFpnNDEpCpXKmsy25p |
2024.01.29 09:10 elonmuskatemyson Do you have an insatiable craving for more TD4 akin content?
WINTER SCAPE MURDETHRILLER MOVIES AND SHOWS:
Fargo - A classic! 90s comedy murder mystery drama - MAX
Fargo - No relation to the movie, a murdecrime anthology tv series but also taking place in frozen Fargo, stacked casts and excellent storylines - FX/HULU
The Valhalla Murders - serial killer murder mystery 8 episode limited series taking place in Iceland, watch with subtitles and not the dub, dub is bad lol - NETFLIX
Insomnia - great Al Pacino/Robin Williams murder mystery, opposite of TD4, in this winter scape crime thriller the sun never sets - PARAMOUNT PLUS/RENT on Prime
Wind River - great movie (and sad/tragic and something that happens to indigenous women) with Elizabeth Olsen investigating a SA crime/murder on a frozen Native American reservation - FREEVEE/RENT on Prime
Whiteout - a poorly made 2000s murder mystery in Antarctica - MAX
The Snowman - a poorly executed murder mystery/thriller taking place in Sweden (I think?) - NETFLIX
Black Mountain Side - archeologist uncover a strange structure in frozen northern Canada. ThrilleMystery/Horror - FREEVEE/ROKU/PRIME
Underwater - not in a winter scape but has a similar plot: scientists accidentally discovering terrifying fill in the blank in a remote nearly inescapable lab. A horrosci-fi flick - HULU
To Catch a Killer - (2023) serial killer murder mystery taking place mid-winter in Baltimore with Shailene Woodley and Ben Mendelson - HULU
No Exit - stranded in a blizzard kidnap mystery thriller - HULU
The Thing - a classic! Listing for anyone who may not be familiar, sci-fi/mystery/horror 80s flick taking place in the Antarctica (there’s a remake from 2011 that is not very good watch the 80s version) - Rent on Prime
The Outsider - this is a pretty scary and baffling murder mystery limited series, it’s not a winter scape but akin in the level of spookiness and more Ben Mendelson content - MAX
IF YOU WANT WINTER ADVENTURE AND LESS MURDERY:
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty - this is a great funny feel good adventure that only partially takes place in a winter scape but is really fun! - RENT on prime
Full Circle - Documentary about tragic winter sports accident that leads to inspiring journey about being disabled and still pursuing your dreams - NETFLIX
The Day After Tomorrow - stranded in NYC when a sudden new ice age begins to take over the world. Sci-fi/action/adventure - RENT on prime
The Lake at the Bottom of the World - documentary about scientists trying to get to a lake 3500 feet below the ice to learn about the origins of life and climate change - PRIME
Into the Wild - another classic, doesn’t completely take place in a winter scape, based on a true story of a feel good adventure to go live in the Alaska wilderness - RENT on Prime
Society of the Snow - new award nominee drama based on a true story of a rugby team’s plane that crashes into a mountain glacier - NETFLIX
EVEREST - you can guess what this survival drama/adventure is about - PEACOCK
The Revenant - period piece winter survival/revenge drama with DiCaprio - RENT on prime
The Grey - stranded in the Alaskan wilderness from a plane crash Liam Neeson basically takes on a pack of wolves thrilledrama/action - MAX
Arctic - A drama like The Grey but with a different lead and in the arctic - NETFLIX
Frozen - A dumb 2010 thriller, not the Disney movie, where friends get stranded on a ski lift in dangerous freezing temps at a resort that’s closed for the weekend - FREEVEE/ROKU/PRIME
Buried - Documentary about a deadly avalanche in the 80s at a Utah ski resort - NETFLIX
Visual/aesthetic list available here on my Letterboxd (add me!)
submitted by elonmuskatemyson to TrueDetective [link] [comments]
Fargo - A classic! 90s comedy murder mystery drama - MAX
Fargo - No relation to the movie, a murdecrime anthology tv series but also taking place in frozen Fargo, stacked casts and excellent storylines - FX/HULU
The Valhalla Murders - serial killer murder mystery 8 episode limited series taking place in Iceland, watch with subtitles and not the dub, dub is bad lol - NETFLIX
Insomnia - great Al Pacino/Robin Williams murder mystery, opposite of TD4, in this winter scape crime thriller the sun never sets - PARAMOUNT PLUS/RENT on Prime
Wind River - great movie (and sad/tragic and something that happens to indigenous women) with Elizabeth Olsen investigating a SA crime/murder on a frozen Native American reservation - FREEVEE/RENT on Prime
Whiteout - a poorly made 2000s murder mystery in Antarctica - MAX
The Snowman - a poorly executed murder mystery/thriller taking place in Sweden (I think?) - NETFLIX
Black Mountain Side - archeologist uncover a strange structure in frozen northern Canada. ThrilleMystery/Horror - FREEVEE/ROKU/PRIME
Underwater - not in a winter scape but has a similar plot: scientists accidentally discovering terrifying fill in the blank in a remote nearly inescapable lab. A horrosci-fi flick - HULU
To Catch a Killer - (2023) serial killer murder mystery taking place mid-winter in Baltimore with Shailene Woodley and Ben Mendelson - HULU
No Exit - stranded in a blizzard kidnap mystery thriller - HULU
The Thing - a classic! Listing for anyone who may not be familiar, sci-fi/mystery/horror 80s flick taking place in the Antarctica (there’s a remake from 2011 that is not very good watch the 80s version) - Rent on Prime
The Outsider - this is a pretty scary and baffling murder mystery limited series, it’s not a winter scape but akin in the level of spookiness and more Ben Mendelson content - MAX
IF YOU WANT WINTER ADVENTURE AND LESS MURDERY:
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty - this is a great funny feel good adventure that only partially takes place in a winter scape but is really fun! - RENT on prime
Full Circle - Documentary about tragic winter sports accident that leads to inspiring journey about being disabled and still pursuing your dreams - NETFLIX
The Day After Tomorrow - stranded in NYC when a sudden new ice age begins to take over the world. Sci-fi/action/adventure - RENT on prime
The Lake at the Bottom of the World - documentary about scientists trying to get to a lake 3500 feet below the ice to learn about the origins of life and climate change - PRIME
Into the Wild - another classic, doesn’t completely take place in a winter scape, based on a true story of a feel good adventure to go live in the Alaska wilderness - RENT on Prime
Society of the Snow - new award nominee drama based on a true story of a rugby team’s plane that crashes into a mountain glacier - NETFLIX
EVEREST - you can guess what this survival drama/adventure is about - PEACOCK
The Revenant - period piece winter survival/revenge drama with DiCaprio - RENT on prime
The Grey - stranded in the Alaskan wilderness from a plane crash Liam Neeson basically takes on a pack of wolves thrilledrama/action - MAX
Arctic - A drama like The Grey but with a different lead and in the arctic - NETFLIX
Frozen - A dumb 2010 thriller, not the Disney movie, where friends get stranded on a ski lift in dangerous freezing temps at a resort that’s closed for the weekend - FREEVEE/ROKU/PRIME
Buried - Documentary about a deadly avalanche in the 80s at a Utah ski resort - NETFLIX
Visual/aesthetic list available here on my Letterboxd (add me!)
2024.01.14 22:57 jobsinanywhere Stan Reveals Premiere Date for Three Women Starring Shailene Woodley and Betty Gilpin
 | submitted by jobsinanywhere to newslive [link] [comments] |
2024.01.10 12:17 Jhonjournalist Angela Bassett and Many Others in the 14th Annual Governors Awards
 | submitted by Jhonjournalist to u/Jhonjournalist [link] [comments]
Angela Bassett, Mel Streams, and Ditty Littleton got privileged Oscars, while Michelle Satter was regarded with the Jean Hersholt Compassionate Honor. 14th Annual Governor AwardsThe celebration at the Beam Dolby Assembly Hall at Applause Hollywood was attended by numerous Hollywood stars, including Margot Robbie, Ayo Edebiri, Julianne Moore, Natalie Portman, Jurnee Smollett, Charles Melton, Barry Keoghan, Eugenio Derbez, Gael García Bernal, Claire Foy, Cailee Spaeny, Lily Gladstone, Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert Downey Jr., Cillian Murphy, Florence Pugh and Taraji P. Henson.Different VIPs who showed up at the occasion included Shailene Woodley, Olivia Munn, Rita Wilson, Tom Hanks, Emily Obtuse, Emma Stone, Olivia Rodrigo, Eva Longoria, David Oyelow, Imprint Ruffalo, Ariana DeBose, Penelope Cruz, among numerous others. Angela Bassett hit the honorary pathway on Tuesday to accept her privileged Oscar in an honor commendable look. The entertainer, 65, shone in a Dolce and Gabbana naked tulle dress. The Dark Jaguar: Wakanda Always star’s mermaid outline was encrusted with precious stones from her neck to the dress’ stitch. The sleeveless look was made with a deception tulle that incorporated an ombre impact made by the gems. Several kid twins, Bronwyn Brilliant, and Slater Josiah matched their dad in every single dark outfit — giving their mom her opportunity to excel! Slater presented in a smooth dark patent calfskin suit that incorporated a weak padded design. He finished his look with a dark tie. Bronwyn wore a decorated dark A-line dress that incorporated a dark beading and white gems. Her look was finished off with a gem-encrusted miniature dark sack and silver circle studs. Learn More: https://worldmagzine.com/entertainment/angela-bassett-and-many-others-in-the-14th-annual-governors-awards/ |
2024.01.06 14:03 RallySallyBear PSA: Don’t see the Ferrari movie. This is your trigger warning.
Came back just to share this despite saying I’d absent myself from the sub for the month (going well so far!)
1) it’s… not good. Just so much about it is a mess - let’s start with, why is Adam Driver playing a 60 year old man? Shailene Woodley a minor part of an Italian woman? Patrick Dempsey’s accent - why? I know Dempsey loves racing but it is such a poor choice when the part is so minor! Cast anyone else! Why is the score so bad, randomly cutting off but for no real effect? And the dialogue??? Anyone who said this is one of the best movies of 2023 is being delusionally swayed by the strength of the cast based on their prior work - but it’s just made me question if Adam Driver is talented, or just tall. But more importantly… 2) in terms of triggering the betrayed, it’s worse than Oppenheimer, IMO - it’s Penelope Cruz’s entire story line, finding out how deeply she’s been betrayed by not just her husband, but her entire town … like it’s literally 50/50 in terms of “affair and betrayal” versus “zoom zoom race cars!”
(Also at least Oppenheimer was good - I actually found it quite beautiful despite those affair-laden moments. For me those twinges of pain were worth it - Ferrari is not, not only because it’s bad but because the affair content is way too much)
ETA: Penelope Cruz is a great angry wife
submitted by RallySallyBear to AsOneAfterInfidelity [link] [comments]
1) it’s… not good. Just so much about it is a mess - let’s start with, why is Adam Driver playing a 60 year old man? Shailene Woodley a minor part of an Italian woman? Patrick Dempsey’s accent - why? I know Dempsey loves racing but it is such a poor choice when the part is so minor! Cast anyone else! Why is the score so bad, randomly cutting off but for no real effect? And the dialogue??? Anyone who said this is one of the best movies of 2023 is being delusionally swayed by the strength of the cast based on their prior work - but it’s just made me question if Adam Driver is talented, or just tall. But more importantly… 2) in terms of triggering the betrayed, it’s worse than Oppenheimer, IMO - it’s Penelope Cruz’s entire story line, finding out how deeply she’s been betrayed by not just her husband, but her entire town … like it’s literally 50/50 in terms of “affair and betrayal” versus “zoom zoom race cars!”
(Also at least Oppenheimer was good - I actually found it quite beautiful despite those affair-laden moments. For me those twinges of pain were worth it - Ferrari is not, not only because it’s bad but because the affair content is way too much)
ETA: Penelope Cruz is a great angry wife
2024.01.01 21:12 cunning_alias My house purchase experience in 2023 with data on prices (asking vs sold) in South Dublin
Commented on a few posts over the year about my experience and people found it useful so here is the final updated version and what we can learn from it. By the end of the year I could estimate the value of a house and even advised some friends that were selling and guessed the correct price within 2k. If people have any questions, I will try reply when available. Probably won't have much free time when back to work but will try my best.
I will start off with the pricing data. After the table will be our experiences/tips with viewings, estate agents, bidding, what to check when you are serious about a house and interesting things we noticed.
Target areas: Everything between Carrickmines, Milltown, Booterstown, Dalkey.
Houses: This list is all the houses that we considered. We went to see some of them but overall this list was to track price patterns for areas and over time.
What the data for 66 houses tells us:
Our house hunting experience:
Viewings:
BER Ratings
This relates a bit to viewings a bit as you got very different types of people at viewings based on the ratings. From what we found, aiming for a C rated house is the sweet spot.
Estate Agents:
This was a mixed bag, as expected. Some were fantastic (shoutout to DNG Stillorgan who were always great) and others were such obvious chancers it was embarrassing. My final conclusion was that if you are selling houses in areas that are in high demand, you really don't have to put much effort in. Many of the houses sell themselves. So the estate agents that were clearly putting the effort in stuck out.
Bidding:
We bid on 1 house and made offers on 2 others so this should give a good overview of the different approaches:
Checks to do on a house when you are serious
There are a number of things to check even before going to view somewhere if you think you might be very interested in it. If a house seems too good to be true, you might find out why.
Interesting things we noticed
There is probably more and I will add to it if I remember. If you got this far, thanks! Wanted to get all of this out of my head so someone else can use it. Best of luck with your house hunts. It's a lot of work but it is worth it.
submitted by cunning_alias to irishpersonalfinance [link] [comments]
I will start off with the pricing data. After the table will be our experiences/tips with viewings, estate agents, bidding, what to check when you are serious about a house and interesting things we noticed.
Target areas: Everything between Carrickmines, Milltown, Booterstown, Dalkey.
Houses: This list is all the houses that we considered. We went to see some of them but overall this list was to track price patterns for areas and over time.
What the data for 66 houses tells us:
- 7.5% - 5 houses sold for their asking price
- 25.3% - 17 houses sold for under the asking price
- 67.1% - 45 houses went for over the asking price
- The greatest drop in price was €50,000
- The average price drop was €21,823
- The greatest increase in price was €152,000
- The average price increase was €52,420.24
- Taking all the houses into account, the average was an increase in price of €29,670
- Taking all the houses into account, the average was an increase of 4.2% in price.
- In the 1st half of the year, 21 houses went for over asking and 12 went below.
- In the 2nd half of the year, there was an increase in the number of houses that went for over asking price (24) compared to below the asking price (6). I would need more data to see if this is a regular occurrence across a calendar year. Based on a single year of data this would point to the market in these areas increasing in demand. Considering the type of houses we were mainly looking at (3 bed, off street parking, decent garden) this would make sense as supply isn't increasing for these.
- Edit: Average asking price was €698,372.
| Asking Price | Sold for | Sold date | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Beech Park Drive, Foxrock, Dublin 18 | €799,000.00 | €799,000.00 | 2023-01-27 | €0.00 |
| 24 Seafield Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €575,000.00 | €680,000.00 | 2023-02 | €105,000.00 |
| 5 Ardagh Avenue, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €730,000.00 | €705,000.00 | 2023-02-10 | -€25,000.00 |
| 98 Foxrock Park, Foxrock, Dublin 18 | €745,000.00 | €735,000.00 | 2023-02-14 | -€10,000.00 |
| 142 Foxrock Park, Foxrock, Dublin 184 Bed1 BathSemi-D | €775,000.00 | €770,000.00 | 2023-02-23 | -€5,000.00 |
| 27 Springhill Avenue, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €600,000.00 | €550,000.00 | 2023-03-15 | -€50,000.00 |
| 21 Woodlawn Park, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin | €695,000.00 | €710,000.00 | 2023-03-22 | €15,000.00 |
| 113 Fosterbrook, Booterstown, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €750,000.00 | €767,000.00 | 2023-03-22 | €17,000.00 |
| 53 Cedarmount Road, Mount Merrion, Co. Dublin | €695,000.00 | €750,000.00 | 2023-03-27 | €55,000.00 |
| 2 Kill Lane, Foxrock, Foxrock, Dublin 18 | €675,000.00 | €724,000.00 | 2023-04-17 | €49,000.00 |
| 44 South Park, Foxrock, Dublin 18 | €735,000.00 | €725,000.00 | 2023-04-20 | -€10,000.00 |
| 29 Dargle Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €825,000.00 | €777,000.00 | 2023-04-21 | -€48,000.00 |
| 46 Abbey Road, Monkstown, Co. Dublin | €645,000.00 | €660,000.00 | 2023-04-25 | €15,000.00 |
| 117 Stillorgan Wood, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin | €749,000.00 | €735,000.00 | 2023-04-28 | -€14,000.00 |
| 15 Trimleston Drive, Booterstown, Co. Dublin | €650,000 | €630,000 | 2023-04-28 | -€20,000 |
| 25 Stradbrook Hall, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €635,000.00 | €660,000.00 | 2023-05-03 | €25,000.00 |
| 54 Clonkeen Drive Foxrock Dublin 18, Foxrock, Dublin 18 | €745,000.00 | €755,000.00 | 2023-05-04 | €10,000.00 |
| 94 Stillorgan Wood, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin | €745,000.00 | €780,000.00 | 2023-05-15 | €35,000.00 |
| 27 Drummartin Road Goatstown Dublin 14, Goatstown, Dublin 14 | €725,000.00 | €705,000.00 | 2023-05-16 | -€20,000.00 |
| 27 Drummartin Road Goatstown Dublin 14, Goatstown, Dublin 14 | €699,000.00 | €705,000.00 | 2023-05-16 | €6,000.00 |
| 10 Obelisk Grove, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €670,000.00 | €750,000.00 | 2023-05-18 | €80,000.00 |
| 28 Church Road, Glenageary, Co. Dublin | €699,000.00 | €725,000.00 | 2023-05-18 | €26,000.00 |
| 42 Rockford Park, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €545,000.00 | €582,500.00 | 2023-05-22 | €37,500.00 |
| 10 Hollywood Drive, Goatstown, Goatstown, Dublin 14 | €750,000 | €855,000 | 2023-05-25 | €105,000 |
| 2 Park View, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €875,000.00 | €885,000.00 | 2023-05-30 | €10,000.00 |
| 67 Rockville Drive, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €615,000.00 | €632,000.00 | 2023-05-31 | €17,000.00 |
| 13 Castlebyrne Park, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €645,000.00 | €690,000.00 | 2023-05-31 | €45,000.00 |
| 78 Granville Road, Cabinteely, Dublin 18 | €585,000.00 | €570,000.00 | 2023-06-01 | -€15,000.00 |
| 45 Stillorgan Wood, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin | €725,000.00 | €725,000.00 | 2023-06-07 | €0.00 |
| 12 Hawthorn Manor, Carysfort Avenue, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €660,000.00 | €685,000.00 | 2023-06-14 | €25,000.00 |
| 2 Ardagh Crescent, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €650,000.00 | €620,000.00 | 2023-06-15 | -€30,000.00 |
| 5 Balally Avenue, Balally, Dundrum, Dublin 16 | €675,000.00 | €675,000.00 | 2023-06-21 | €0.00 |
| 51 Dargle Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €795,000.00 | €860,000.00 | 2023-06-23 | €65,000.00 |
| 80 Dale Road, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin | €660,000 | €660,000 | 2023-06-23 | €0 |
| 2A Taney Park, Dundrum, Dundrum, Dublin 14 | €775,000 | €826,000 | 2023-06-23 | €51,000 |
| 54 Balally Hill, Dundrum, Dublin 16 | €625,000.00 | €663,000.00 | 2023-06-29 | €38,000.00 |
| 60 Lower Kilmacud Road, Kilmacud, Co. Dublin | €645,000.00 | €735,000.00 | 2023-07-04 | €90,000.00 |
| 12 Glandore Park, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin | €775,000 | €770,000 | 2023-07-04 | -€5,000 |
| 61 Hampton Park, Saint Helen's Wood, Booterstown, Co. Dublin | €790,000.00 | €850,000.00 | 2023-07-05 | €60,000.00 |
| 70 Trimleston Park, Booterstown, Co. Dublin | €735,000 | €762,251 | 2023-07-06 | €27,251 |
| 9 Allen Park Road, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin | €750,000.00 | €870,000.00 | 2023-07-11 | €120,000.00 |
| 41 Richmond Avenue, Monkstown, Co. Dublin | €695,000.00 | €750,000.00 | 2023-07-12 | €55,000.00 |
| 45 Churchview Park, Killiney, Co. Dublin | €675,000.00 | €655,000.00 | 2023-07-12 | -€20,000.00 |
| 41 Richmond Avenue, Monkstown, Co. Dublin | €695,000 | €750,000 | 2023-07-12 | €55,000 |
| 181 Balally Drive, Dundrum, Dublin 16 | €625,000 | €620,000 | 2023-07-13 | -€5,000 |
| 10 Richmond Grove Monkstown, Monkstown, Co. Dublin | €725,000.00 | €750,000.00 | 2023-07-14 | €25,000.00 |
| 113 Lakelands Close, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin | €675,000 | €725,000 | 2023-07-14 | €50,000 |
| 25 Foxrock Court, Foxrock, Dublin 18 | €775,000.00 | €840,000.00 | 2023-07-17 | €65,000.00 |
| 6 Meadow Vale, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €710,000.00 | €691,000.00 | 2023-07-20 | -€19,000.00 |
| 3 Ramleh Park, Milltown, Dublin 6 | €795,000 | €810,000 | 2023-07-20 | €15,000 |
| 39 Rockford Manor, Stradbrook Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €775,000.00 | €865,000.00 | 2023-07-26 | €90,000.00 |
| 56 Taney Road, Dundrum, Dundrum, Dublin 14 | €645,000 | €797,000 | 2023-07-26 | €152,000 |
| 8 Woodley Road, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin | €650,000.00 | €675,000.00 | 2023-07-28 | €25,000.00 |
| 39 Trimleston Gardens, Booterstown, Co. Dublin | €749,950 | €890,000 | 2023-07-28 | €140,050 |
| 1 Beaumont Drive, Churchtown, Churchtown, Dublin 14 | €695,000.00 | €750,000.00 | 2023-08-10 | €55,000.00 |
| 3 Patrician Park, Kill Avenue, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin | €530,000 | €490,000 | 2023-08-16 | -€40,000 |
| 1 Trimleston Drive, Booterstown, Co. Dublin | €760,000.00 | €780,000.00 | 2023-08-18 | €20,000.00 |
| 20 The Grange, Kill Lane, Deans Grange, Co. Dublin | €650,000 | €615,000 | 2023-08-18 | -€35,000 |
| 2 Clonard Park Dundrum Dublin 16, Dundrum, Dublin 16 | €795,000 | €903,110 | 2023-08-18 | €108,110 |
| 34 Seafield Road, Booterstown, Co. Dublin | €745,000 | €765,000 | 2023-08-21 | €20,000 |
| 3 Abbey Park, Monkstown, Co. Dublin | €650,000 | €710,000 | 2023-08-25 | €60,000 |
| 17 Churchview Park, Killiney, Co. Dublin | €695,000.00 | €770,000.00 | 2023-08-30 | €75,000.00 |
| 47 Ashton Park Monkstown, Monkstown, Co. Dublin | €745,000.00 | €825,000.00 | 2023-09-15 | €80,000.00 |
| 24 Grange Terrace, Deansgrange Road, Deans Grange, Co. Dublin | €560,000 | €605,000 | 2023-10-19 | €45,000 |
| Aisling, Aisling, 206 Clonkeen Road, Deansgrange, Blackrock, Co. Dublin | €695,000 | €725,000 | 2023-11-13 | €30,000 |
| 42 Watson Avenue, Killiney, Co. Dublin | €595,000 | €595,000 | 2023-12-08 | €0 |
| 20 Woodley Park, Kilmacud, Co. Dublin | €650,000 | €715,000 | 2023-12-22 | €65,000 |
Our house hunting experience:
Viewings:
- We went to view around 10 houses, which is above average apparently, but we were not in a rush to move out of our apartment and could take our time a bit more than others. I would recommend giving yourself as much time as possible so that you don't feel rushed.
- On the day of the viewing, ring the estate agent and ask what the current offer is. Some estate agents will ring you to confirm on the day anyway and will update you but others don't bother and there is nothing worse than using a lunch break to view a house only to find it is 50 over asking when you arrive.
- If you are serious about a place, bring some family or friends along to the 2nd viewing to get another point of view. You will miss things yourself.
- If you like the house, go for a walk around the area after and get chatting to some of the locals. Gives you a good idea of the place.
- Don't feel worried if there are a lot of people at a viewing at a weekend. There seem to be some people who just go and view houses to get ideas for their own place or to be nosey. Some busy viewings I was at still had no bids a few weeks later. That said, busy viewings can be very annoying and make it hard to get a feel for a house.
- Have a list of questions ready. These were ours:
- Type of sale. E.G. is it probate, people downsizing/upsizing etc
- If it is probate, how far along is it. If they are vague about this, be wary.
- If there are other bidders already, ask what type they are. Cash, mortgage, in a chain. If you are a cash or mortgage buyer and the only other bidder is in a chain, you would be preferred.
- What work has the house had done? The main thing to look for is the electrics. Is the fuse board an ancient one with screw in fuses? Are the power sockets in the skirting boards? If so it will probably need to be upgraded.
BER Ratings
This relates a bit to viewings a bit as you got very different types of people at viewings based on the ratings. From what we found, aiming for a C rated house is the sweet spot.
- B3 or higher houses will have a much higher demand than I expected. This is down to a few things:
- Green mortgages
- These are houses that don't need anything done to move in. Families with a few kids seemed to be a big target market.
- Non-Irish families moving here. If you are moving your family to Ireland and you don't know what to look for, the advice they are given seems to be to aim for B3 or better.
- Tend to have multiple bidders.
- Low rated houses:
- Not as much demand.
- Mostly saw young couples at viewings. Rarely with kids.
- Suits people starting out as they can improve over time.
- A good way to get something with a good garden, garage etc for a good price.
- C rated
- Seems to be the sweet spot of being in good condition and not having huge demand.
- Might need a bit of work in the near future.
- Not as many on the market although that could just have been our experience.
Estate Agents:
This was a mixed bag, as expected. Some were fantastic (shoutout to DNG Stillorgan who were always great) and others were such obvious chancers it was embarrassing. My final conclusion was that if you are selling houses in areas that are in high demand, you really don't have to put much effort in. Many of the houses sell themselves. So the estate agents that were clearly putting the effort in stuck out.
- If a house has a low BER rating, you will want an estate agent that is honest. Some were happy to list off everything wrong with a house in detail along with potential repaireplacement costs. Others would talk as if they were trying to sell you used car.
- If you hear buzz words like "vendor needs a quick sale", take it with a pinch of salt. The house I was told this in is still up for sale at a crazy price 6 months later.
- If a viewing is quiet and you like the estate agent, get chatting them. If you aren't interested in that house they might advise you on what you should be looking for and they will keep you in mind if something comes up that could suit you.
Bidding:
We bid on 1 house and made offers on 2 others so this should give a good overview of the different approaches:
- Regular bidding
- Bidding through a website. Very easy to use and got email updates whenever a bid went in.
- Didn't require checks to see if you had approval in principal which was a bit strange.
- Only us and one other bidder.
- We bid in small amounts and stretched it out as we weren't in a rush.
- Kept viewing other houses while this was going on.
- We hit our set limit for that house and pulled out.
- Interestingly, the estate agent contacted us 2 weeks later to see if we were still interested as the bidders who beat us hadn't actually got their AIP sorted yet. It was too late by then and we had found something better.
- Off market viewing and email offer (also known as the dodgy estate agent example)
- Based on a house that was sale agreed we were interested in with the same estate agent, we were contacted about a house in the same estate that had not gone on daft etc yet and the seller was looking for a quick sale. The house that had sold earlier was an incredible A rated place with all the extensions done and it went for almost 900k.
- The house for sale ticked our boxes but the asking price was far too high. 825k. A bigger house with a better BER and south garden right beside it had sold for 730 a few months earlier in the year.
- The estate agent implied that the vendor was asking too much and that we should put in a lower bid. I made an offer of 700 with the idea of trying to talk them close to 750 which is probably still a bit overpriced.
- I got a snotty email back from the estate agent back for wasting his time and said he expected over 800k. He compared it to the house that they sold for 900k and said it was similar. It wasn't even in the same league. D rating, smaller garden. No extension work done.
- When I replied pointing out that the houses were not comparable and pointed to the one that sold for 730 that was similar, I never heard from him again.
- This was in the summer.......that house is still up for sale today and has dropped below 800 now.
- The 'Buy it now' house (the one we bought)
- We went to see a house that ticked all the boxes and had just come on the market. It had some interest at this stage but no bids. We decided to do a different approach with bidding.
- We had dealt with the estate agent before so they knew we were serious and good to move quickly if needed. I asked them if they could ask the vendors what price they would accept to take it off the market now.
- They came back with an amount that was pretty much our happy price point for the house.
- I made it clear that we would offer that amount if they took it off the market. This was not an opening bid. If they wanted us to bid normally we would but it would be a much lower first bid.
- They accepted this and I am now typing this from my new office.
Checks to do on a house when you are serious
There are a number of things to check even before going to view somewhere if you think you might be very interested in it. If a house seems too good to be true, you might find out why.
- Planning permission check - https://dlrcocouncil.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappvieweindex.html?id=af21eeb123224c4c877f410139ed1e69
- This is the big one. There were some deals that I found but when you look into it, there is a block of apartments going up beside it.
- Property price register - https://propertypriceregisterireland.com/
- Another big one. Check the road and nearby roads for recent sales to compare prices. You can then possibly find the old adds on myhome (daft tend to remove them) and see what the house was like.
- Flood maps - https://www.floodinfo.ie/map/floodmaps/
- Freehold/Leasehold check - https://www.landregistryireland.com/map-search
- Radon check - https://gis.epa.ie/EPAMaps/Radon?&lid=EPA:RadonRiskMapofIreland
- Check out local community twitters and facebook pages. Should give you an idea of the area.
Interesting things we noticed
- For the most part, being within walking distance of the Luas or Dart massively increases the price and demand of a house.
- If you want a garage (something I wanted), you have to aim for something older that hasn't had it converted into a room. Hard to find in houses that are not poor BER ratings.
- Some areas might not seem that appealing based on logical data but they carry a premium because of the name. Goatstown, Foxrock, Dalkey and Mount Merrion would be some that come to mind.
- For the Luas, being between Sandyford and town is preferable due to higher frequency. Same goes for the Dart and Dun Laoghaire.
- Booterstown has some deals but you better have a poor sense of smell.
There is probably more and I will add to it if I remember. If you got this far, thanks! Wanted to get all of this out of my head so someone else can use it. Best of luck with your house hunts. It's a lot of work but it is worth it.