Accutane guild paternity rights supreme court

Shadow Fight 3 v1.37.1 MOD APK (Range Attack Mode)

2024.05.16 11:02 Asleep-Mycologist333 Shadow Fight 3 v1.37.1 MOD APK (Range Attack Mode)

Shadow Fight 3 v1.37.1 MOD APK (Range Attack Mode)
https://preview.redd.it/ch3dstq57r0d1.png?width=200&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d1270b0c392b8b9621ae6665c7e37107252e555
Name Shadow Fight 3 - RPG fighting
Publisher NEKKI
Genre Role Playing
Size 359 MB
Version 1.37.1
MOD Plus Subscription, Unlocked All
https://modyolo.co.in/shadow-fight-3-rpg-fighting/
👆👆👆👆Download Link👆👆👆👆
Also Join us on telegram
https://t.me/official_modyolo
Darkness is the place that instills fear in people, and no one wants to be imprisoned in darkness. But on the contrary, darkness can bring special sources of energy that only those who know how to use them can optimize it. Dark energy is becoming dangerous as forces are competing with each other in Shadow Fight 3 – RPG fighting. And you will be the hero that legend has told about the ability to save this world.

FULLY CUSTOMIZE YOUR HERO WITH DOZENS OF EPIC GEAR AND STYLE OPTIONS

A truly epic hero will need to have a distinct image. And players themselves will be able to customize according to their own style. Many different options such as a stealthy ninja, honorable medieval knight, or deadly samurai warrior will be chosen. With each direction of development, the hero will have a different fighting style. Your hero in this game will also be able to increase his strength through weapons and armor that you can equip.
  • Custom Hero: The game will allow players to choose their favorite hero style, from being a stealthy ninja or an honorable medieval knight to a deadly samurai warrior. Each person will have a unique strength that they can develop.
  • Epic Equipment: A huge collection of hundreds of weapons, armor sets, helmets, ranged weapons, and accessories are available.
  • Unique Style: Each hero will have a special color and pattern on their body. Show off your own creativity to make a grand appearance.

MASTER NUANCED COMBAT WITH THREE COMPLETELY UNIQUE FIGHTING DISCIPLINES

The game will bring its players 3 different fighting styles with 3 typical organizations. Choosing your development style with 3 organizations, including the Than Binh Hoi, the Imperial Court, and the Messenger Guild, will directly affect the final fighting purpose. Not only that, for each organization, players will also become separate warriors, including Ninjas, Legion warriors, and Dynasty fighters. If you take advantage of all three styles, success will soon come to you.
  • Distinct Styles: You can choose from three distinct styles: ninja, legion, and dynasty. Each style has a different goal. Ninjas use counterattacks, legion warriors use heavy weapons for defense, and dynasty warriors use mystical powers.
  • Combo Attacks: You will need to build your fighting strategy. The game will equip you with many different activities, including basic attacks, combos, dodging, blocking, throwing, ranged attacks, and more.
  • Shadow Powers: Shadow abilities are powerful weapons that you can use. Many interesting moves will be provided, but you must pay attention to your dark energy meter.

AN EPIC STORYLINE WHERE YOUR CHOICES SHAPE THE ADVENTURE

And in order for your players to feel the appeal of the battles, the plot will be important. At the beginning of Shadow Fight 3 – RPG fighting, you will learn that a certain evil force is trying to enter the dangerous Dark Gate. The legend has chosen you to be the one to prevent that story from happening. The future ahead is in balance between both forces. But you will need to really try with all your ability to save the human world.
  • Shadow Struggle: A mysterious evil force wants to unleash the dangerous Gates of Shadows. You are the hero, and fate has chosen to prevent this. The world’s future hangs in the balance.
  • Clan Motivations: Each of the 3 clans has distinct motivations. Understanding their histories makes you question who is right and wrong—shades of gray morality.
  • Story Branching: Your choices affect the course of the narrative and, ultimately, the fate of the world. You decide who to side with, which battles to win, and how to respond to enemies.

BATTLE ONLINE AND IN SPECIAL THEMED EVENTS FOR GLORY AGAINST OTHER PLAYERS

Many different fighting modes have been integrated to give your players outstanding fighting abilities. One of them is that players can completely fight other players’ heroes through AI control. In addition, the game will also allow its players to participate in various exciting event battles to receive rewards. But you need to be really careful with the Boss game mode because they will have terrible power.
  • AI Duels: Test your skills in 1v1 duels against other players’ heroes controlled by advanced AI for an authentic PVP feel without waiting.
  • Special Events: Limited-time events with unique rules and prizes encourage you to master new playstyles and strategies. Earn rare loot and status.
  • Epic Bosses: Events culminate in over-the-top battles against elaborate bosses with intense mechanics. Victory earns you glory.

THE INCREDIBLE 3D GRAPHICS AND SMOOTH ANIMATIONS BRING THE FIGHTING TO LIFE

The final feature, and also an important feature for all other factors to come true, is the graphics. Understanding this importance, the game’s producers have equipped Shadow Fight 3 – RPG fighting with a top graphics system. That’s why a graphics system with a cinematic style has been integrated. Furthermore, the animations are carefully developed so that the player’s battles are always smooth.
  • Cinematic Visuals: There are many different graphic styles for game makers to choose from. But after many considerations, the manufacturer chose the Cinematic style to make your fantasy world significantly more realistic.
  • Seamless Animations: For a fighting game, simulations of how characters act are extremely important. And the game has also developed a really smooth movement system.
  • Vibrant World: To keep players from feeling bored, many contexts have been provided. From peaceful bamboo forests to ominous temples are ready. With many diverse colors, it promises to bring great graphics.
submitted by Asleep-Mycologist333 to Modifiedmods [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 09:44 Frosty_Lime659 [MN] Custody Documentation

Hello, I am trying to get some kind of documentation that proves I have full physical and legal custody of my son. I have read up and down, and it seems in Minnesota that I, as a mother, have full physical and legal rights to my son because we're unmarried. The father does not want to go to court nor does he want to take a paternity test even though his name is on the birth certificate, however, this is an Illinois birth certificate and I am not sure that makes a difference. He just straight out refuses.
While word of mouth is great and all, how do I actually get documentation of that? I currently support my child in every way, and that is ok, but I have nothing to show for it, and the father is not compliant.
At this point, I would like to avoid trying to get him into court, and what can I do without his help?
submitted by Frosty_Lime659 to Custody [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 08:18 PsychologicalGurl CMV: If you don't vote for Biden you don't care about women's rights.

Honestly I could apply this to other groups but I feel it's most pertinent with women's rights. Last time Trump was in office, he appointed the Supreme Court justices who would set back women's rights by decades by removing the protections for those rights.
This time around he has openly stated he intends to enact federal laws to permanently remove those rights nation wide and potentially go even further in taking away more women's rights.
If you are American and don't vote for Biden, you are actively contributing to Trump's potential victory.
This means you do not care about women's rights, I struggle to see it any other way and am curious what kinds of arguments especially left leaning or progressive people who have decided not to vote for Biden would put forward to change my perspective on this.
submitted by PsychologicalGurl to changemyview [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 05:55 Enby_jester UAW 4811 Strike Authorization Vote Results

UAW 4811 Strike Authorization Vote Results
19,780 Teaching Assistants, Student Researchers, Tutors, Readers, Postdocs, Specialists, Researchers, Project Scientists, and Coordinators of Public Programs, have voted on whether to authorize our union’s Executive Board to call a strike, if circumstances justify, in response to UC’s unprecedented acts of intimidation and retaliation directed at our rights as academic employees to free speech, protest, and collective action.
The vote has passed in all units.
79% of participating members overall voted yes.
• Academic Student Employees: 80% • Postdocs: 74% • Academic Researchers: 73%
Over the past weeks, UC has allowed violence and intimidation against our academic community who exercised their right to protest. This vote shows that UAW 4811 members will not tolerate UC’s unlawful and shameful actions.
UC’s unfair labor practices include:
• Actively risking the health and safety of UAW 4811 members and members of the university community by allowing violent attacks by agitators and police on peaceful protesters who bravely chose to speak up as employee members of the University’s Academic community and by creating an unsafe work environment. • Making unilateral changes to working conditions that have impacted our teaching, our work obligations, our safety and our academic freedom; • Summoning the police to forcibly eject and arrest UAW 4811 members in retaliation for engaging in peaceful protest activity demanding workplace-related changes; causing a chilling effect on future concerted actions by our union and its members, and more. • UC administration must be held accountable for the serious unfair labor practices that impact our union and our members in this instance and in the future.
Our union has filed additional ULP charges against UC for labeling the potential strike as “unlawful.” The Public Employer-Employee Relations board has sole authority to determine the legality of a strike, and UC’s assertion contradicts decades of settled law. The Supreme Court and subsequent California case law has found that even when a contract has a no strikes clause, it does not waive workers’ rights to strike over serious unfair labor practices of the sort UC has committed, and participation in such a strike is protected activity. UC’s attempts to label the strike as unprotected is an intimidation tactic.
On Friday morning the Executive Board will evaluate whether circumstances justify calling the first campus or campuses to Stand Up and go on strike, and will communicate that with the membership.
submitted by Enby_jester to ucla [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 04:06 IntelligentAd4738 The strike vote has passed in all units.

19,780 Teaching Assistants, Student Researchers, Tutors, Readers, Postdocs, Specialists, Researchers, Project Scientists, and Coordinators of Public Programs, have voted on whether to authorize our union’s Executive Board to call a strike, if circumstances justify, in response to UC’s unprecedented acts of intimidation and retaliation directed at our rights as academic employees to free speech, protest, and collective action.
The vote has passed in all units.
79% of participating members overall voted yes.
Over the past weeks, UC has allowed violence and intimidation against our academic community who exercised their right to protest. This vote shows that UAW 4811 members will not tolerate UC’s unlawful and shameful actions.
UC’s unfair labor practices include:
UC administration must be held accountable for the serious unfair labor practices that impact our union and our members in this instance and in the future.
Our union has filed additional ULP charges against UC for labeling the potential strike as “unlawful.” The Public Employer-Employee Relations board has sole authority to determine the legality of a strike, and UC’s assertion contradicts decades of settled law. The Supreme Court and subsequent California case law has found that even when a contract has a no strikes clause, it does not waive workers’ rights to strike over serious unfair labor practices of the sort UC has committed, and participation in such a strike is protected activity. UC’s attempts to label the strike as unprotected is an intimidation tactic.
On Friday morning the Executive Board will evaluate whether circumstances justify calling the first campus or campuses to Stand Up and go on strike, and will communicate that with the membership.
In the meantime, please see this FAQ for information about the Stand Up strategy—and get ready to Stand Up if your campus is called!
submitted by IntelligentAd4738 to ucla [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 02:32 Villainous_Intent The End of the Infinite (Aldin Death Post)

The End of the Infinite (Aldin Death Post)
Vindikar began to squeeze the trigger. The Assassin's Guild operator had never quite had such a difficult shot to make before.
He had faith in his rifle, his venerable Barret MGK82. The enchanted rifle was a one-of-a-kind custom-made firearm, precision made in the foundries of Valhalla by a long deceased Dwarven forge master. It's scope, another custom work dubbed "God's Tactical Eye Scope" (G.T.E.), could zoom in on any target the operator desired, regardless of distance.
But the coup de grâce was the bullet that currently sat in the rifle's chamber, ready to do its lethal work. It was a Black Thorn bullet, 1 of 3 given to the Assassin's Guild. Vindikar was well versed with a very wide range of magical ammunition, from enchanted armor piercing adamantine to hellfire explosive ammunition to infinite ricochet rounds when the employer wanted to send a chaotic and bloody message. But the Black Thorn was something *else. The contents of round contained pedals from a Black Rose, a flower said to have sprung from the Supreme Void Mother, Anafabula. It was promised to have the capability of killing a god...*
Vindikar had ended the lives of 200 or so beings in his time in the Guild. From petty little revenge plots to demigods and demonlords. But a full fledged god...a void god at that...well that was something else.
Intel suggested that Aldin may see the attempt coming despite the Guild doing its best to keep the operation a secret as per usual protocol. The problem lay with Aldin's omniscience. Simply put, he would see it coming through any conventional and most magical angles.
The shot would have to come from somewhere Aldin could not see, an angle he could not anticipate. Vindikar, a operator whose whole profession and artwork that relied on stone cold hard precision, had to rely on pure chance and luck to make a shot. He had to venture into Chaos' Realm, where the impossible was possible and vice versa.
This was not a realm any mortal should tread lightly but Vindikar had infiltrated expertly. In finding the perfect vantage point to fire on Aldin, all of the Assassin's abilities were tested to their extreme limits. Up was down, air was unbreathable, rations reverted to their base creatures, sneaking footsteps echoed like thunder. And that was before Vindikar had encountered the realm's...inhabitants.
Vindikar had found the perfect position after a lifetime epoch week of searching. The Assassin set up his rifle, his equipment feeling the effects of the constant reality warp. But. It. Stayed. True. Possibly due to the influence of the Black Thorn or so Vindikar hoped.
Vindikar found Aldin through his scope in the study of his library. "Blow out his heart" was the only specifics of this contract but the shadowy employer. The operator followed through with the trigger pull and the MGK82 went off.
The Black Thorn round exited the barrel. True to the Assassin's belief, the round scythed through the instability and Chaos of the Realm. It smashed its way through reality, Aldin unaware of his approaching doom until it broke through reality right in front of him and slammed right into his chest.
True to his mark, the Black Thorn round had blown out his heart. His divine blood splattered a fire burning in the hearth behind him. That fire would continue to burn a multicolored hue for the rest of time. Aldin fell to his knees, awe struck that his infinite life span cut short so abruptly. Divine blood gurgled from his throat as he collapsed forward.
Dead.
submitted by Villainous_Intent to wizardposting [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 02:08 ReferendumAutonomic antipsychotics cause QTc heart prolongation

heart injury

"typical and atypical antipsychotics have been linked to QT prolongation, which poses the risk of progressing to TdP." https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/addressing-qtc-prolongation-with-antipsychotics

Olmstead v. L.C

"Justice Department: Nebraska unnecessarily institutionalizes people with mental illness...segregated in assisted living and day program facilities," https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/05/14/justice-department-nebraska-unnecessarily-institutionalizes-people-with-mental-illness/

how is torturer america different than its enemies?

"Resurgent trends in punitive psychiatry in the russian federation." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(24)00102-9/fulltext

guardianship

"New York Court System launches guardianship resource webpage." https://archive.is/nLMNp https://ww2.nycourts.gov/guardianship/index.shtml

no checks and balances

"The right to decide is power, which always requires checks and balances and even nonexpert perspectives." https://humanize.today/2024/05/no-doctors-shouldnt-make-treatment-decisions-for-incompetent-patients/

Privacy

"Kaneko is entitled to writ review of the interim order (while waiting for the appeal) raises important constitutional issues, noting the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized a significant liberty interest in avoiding the unwanted administration of antipsychotic drugs and the California high court has recognized that the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs is protected under California’s right to privacy." http://www.metnews.com/articles/2024/writreview_051524.htm

dictatorship

australia, "new pathways for compulsory treatment with clear roles and responsibilities for health practitioners." https://www.miragenews.com/reform-underway-for-mental-health-legislation-1235953/#google_vignette

diabetes

"Impaired insulin sensitivity was absent in MD, but specifically related to the early disease course of Sz (schizophrenia)" https://mcl.as.uky.edu/bibcite/reference/10368

personal experiences

May 14 6 PM mother threatened my religious beard. May 15 10:30 AM she said metabolism from pills doesn't matter and cholesterol is from plants. "Cholesterol averages in plants on a whole is about 50 mg per kg or 100 times less than the levels found in meat." https://caloriebee.com/nutrition/Believe-It-Or-Not-Plants-Also-Contain-Cholesterol
submitted by ReferendumAutonomic to Antipsychiatry [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 01:49 WearyHour8525 What are the options for a married man who questions if he is the father of his pregnant wife's unborn child in New York?

Hi, question is the title. I asked chatgpt, and the tldr seems to be
  1. He can ask his wife for a test, if she agrees, great.
  2. If she disagrees, he files a petition for family court, and is usually given one since child is still unborn so no equitable estoppel.
  3. Either way, once test is done, if he is not the biological father, he can Challenge the Presumption of Paternity, in which case he won't have to pay child support.
Is that about right?
submitted by WearyHour8525 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 01:26 zsiple08241998 "I worked in a hospital before RvW. Several women a week came into our ER suffering from a septic illegal abortions, we barely saved some. After RvW, I never saw another one in the rest of my 46 years in medicine. Imagine that." (YouTube comment under a Stephen Colbert video on Roe's overturning.)

Wow, Roe V. Wade made abortions "safer for women?" (Note the quote marks.) It's amazing what a Supreme Court decision can do!
(I doubt the 1973 decision was the main reason for that....)
Comment was under video:

"What Will Be The Punishment For Illegal Abortions? How To Know If You Still Have Rights"

submitted by zsiple08241998 to prolife [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 00:39 Peacock-Shah-III A Summary of President Philip F. La Follette's Second Term (1949-1953) Peacock-Shah Alternate Elections

A Summary of President Philip F. La Follette's Second Term (1949-1953) Peacock-Shah Alternate Elections

Philip Fox La Follette, 34th President of the United States.
Administration:
Vice President: Michael A. Musmanno
Secretary of Peace: Douglas MacArthur (1951-1952 (interim)), Clarence Dill (1952-1953)
Secretary of State: Douglas MacArthur (1949-1951 (Department placed under Peace))
Secretary of War: Ralph Immell (1949-1951 (Department placed under Peace))
Secretary of the Navy: Francis P. Matthews (1949-1951 (Department placed under Peace))
Secretary of the Air Force: Charles Lindbergh (1949-1951 (Department placed under Peace))
Secretary of Production: Ralph Immell (1952-1953)
Secretary of the Treasury: Rexford Tugwell (1949-1951 (resigned to assume office as Governor of New York)), Harold Lord Varney (1951 (interim)), Ralph Immell (1951-1952 (department placed under Production))
Secretary of the Interior: Mildred H. McAfee (1949-1952 (department placed under Production))
Secretary of Energy: Floyd Dominy (1950-1952 (department placed under Production))
Secretary of Agriculture: Gerald Nye (1949-1952 (department placed under Production))
Secretary of Labor: George Meany (1949-1952 (department placed under Production))
Secretary of Science and Technology: Karl T. Compton (1949-1952 (department placed under Production))
Secretary of Prosperity: Francois Duvalier (1952-1953)
Attorney General: David Lilienthal (1949-1952 (department placed under Prosperity))
Secretary of Health: Francois Duvalier (1949-1952 (department placed under Prosperity))
Postmaster General: Gerald T. Boileau (1949-1952 (department placed under Prosperity))
Secretary of Education: Sara Gibson Blanding (1949-1952 (department placed under Prosperity)
President La Follette would announce a major reorganization of cabinet departments following his 1951 impeachment, uniting the Air Force, Navy, War, and State Departments into one grand “Department of Peace,” despite opposition from both military leadership and Secretary of State MacArthur, who would depart from the Administration at the commencement of 1952 and be replaced by Farmer-Labor doyen Clarence Dill. The President has framed the move as embodying the national seal of an eagle carrying both arrows and an olive branch, while promoting centralization to improve efficiency while avoiding involving the United States in entangling alliances, an effort that has led to the end of the effort to unite American allies on both sides of the Pacific into a mutual defense pact. First Lady Isen La Follette, personally notably introverted, has been brought before the public as the chief public campaigner for the Department of Peace.
With the centralization of foreign and military policy in full swing at the executive level despite the opposition of Congress, the spring of 1952 would see a second round of mass centralization, with longtime ally Ralph Immell appointed as the head of a new Department of Production, devised by Texas’s Lyndon B. Johnson, to supervise the old Treasury, Interior, Energy, Agriculture, Labor, and Science and Technology Departments, while Dr. Francois Duvalier has been appointed to lead the centralization of the Justice, Health, Education, and Post Office Departments into a united Department of Prosperity and Human Services, commonly referred to only by the former. As in the case of the Department of Peace, the former departments are slated to remain at a sub-cabinet level, and the efforts of opposition forces have successfully left the proposed integrations largely on paper for the time being.
On the level of sub-cabinet departments, the Bureau of Investigation has been merged with the Office of Strategic Services to form the National Security Agency (NSA), an intelligence agency combining the foreign and domestic. Meanwhile, an executive order would begin the National Aeronautics and Space Administration with former President Charles Lindbergh appointed as its first head, however, Lindbergh would soon be dismissed as a part of the executive’s compromise with congress’s impeachers, with businessman Howard Hughes taking his place.

Opposition Representative Richard Nixon shakes hands with Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie during the Emperor's visit to the United States, where President La Follette would emphasize American support for non-communist anti-colonial movements.
Foreign Policy:
-President La Follette has found rare common ground with the opposition on matters of foreign policy towards the Soviet Union, echoing Arthur Vandenberg’s declaration that “politics ends at the water’s edge.” The Administration has secured funding for the rebuilding of Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan, and Korea under social democratic anti-communist governments, with President La Follette describing the initiatives as building an “iron curtain” against communism.
-President La Follette’s term would see the death of two of the world’s premier foreign leaders: Marshall Philippe Petain of France and Chinese General Feng Yuxiang. President La Follette would visit Paris in 1951 for the funeral of Petain after nearly four decades in power, having hailed the French publicly as future allies in the battle with communism. Yet, already suspicious of the new government of Petain protege Charles De Gaulle after the leaking of America’s role in Smedley Butler’s assassination by Ambassador Gaston-Henry Haye, La Follette would find himself increasingly disenchanted with the French, with private reports indicating his horror at the mass deportation of Flemish, Germans, and Catalans into the French Congo from areas in Europe newly annexed into France.
-However, the President would nonetheless side with the French-supported Roman Legion rebelling against Greece in 1951, marking the creation of the Republic of the Pindus as the first state for the Aromanian people in world history. However, the new state has been accused of engaging in the ethnic cleansing of the Greek population.
-Meanwhile, touring China after the death of Feng Yuxiang, La Follette would become increasingly worried about the possible alignment of the nation towards the Soviet Union and controversially refuse to return the island of Taiwan to China until the election of a successor to Feng. With Communist leader Zhou Enlai rising in popularity and an election planned, American support would be thrown behind former warlord Yan Xishan, who would be selected President by the National Assembly in January of 1951 and promptly announce an indefinite delay on elections. Despite rising tensions with China’s Bolshevik-backed Communist Party, La Follette would sign a treaty of return in February of 1952 relinquishing Taiwan to Chinese control. However, after six decades of intense Japanization under colonial authorities, Taiwan has found itself culturally isolated from the rest of China, speaking almost entirely Japanese and Hokkien rather than Mandarin.
-A similar issue has emerged on the formerly Japanese territories of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. Owing to their close location to the Soviet Union, La Follette has authorized it as the site of dozens of American nuclear tests throughout his term and refused to cede sovereignty, with China, Japan, and Russia all harboring alternate claims to the islands.
-The President has impounded funds from the 1950 and 1951 budgets passed by Congress to distribute for the reconstruction of American allies and occupied regions in the Third Pacific War, enacting the MacArthur Plan without the authorization of Congress and repeating to Chinese Premier Yan Xishan his famous remark that “vermin are infesting and polluting democratic organizations and the government itself.”
-Working with the Latin American and East Asian nations in the American sphere of influence in the aftermath of the Franco-British Conflict, the President has moved the United States into the new Parliament of Nations headquartered in Rome, sending New Hampshire Progressive Senator Robert P. Bass as the first United States Representative to the largely powerless global body intended to facilitate global cooperation. Notably, however, the La Follette Administration has resisted efforts to include communist-aligned nations into the fold despite the membership of many French-aligned authoritarian regimes and absolute monarchies such as the Ethiopian Empire or the Caliphate.
-1951 would see the formalization of the Treaty of San Diego, officially ending the United States occupation of Japan, and with it La Follette's rule by decree of the islands, while maintaining an American military presence on the island chain and transferring to American control the Ryukyu Islands, Iwo Jima, Samoa, and the Japanese stake in the Nicaraguan Canal shared with Argentina, where former Milford W. Howard associate Harold Lord Varney has been appointed as High Commissioner.
-President La Follette held a summit with Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie, and Madagascar Prime Minister Joseph Raseta in 1951 to commemorate the longstanding American support for independent nations in Africa, hosting, among others, independence activists Seretse Khama of Botswana, Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya, and Hastings Banda of Nyasaland. Further, American jazz artist Andy Razaf has taken the throne as King of Madagascar following the lack of an heir apparent to deceased Queen Marie-Louise, however, unfamiliar with the island of his ancestors, the newly-crowned Andriamanantena I has been sidelined by Prime Minister Raseta.
-With rumors of Lazar Kaganovich planning Bolshevik expansion into Central Asia abounding, President La Follette and Secretary of Peace Dill would issue a joint statement in January of 1952 promising American opposition “by any means necessary” to “one more inch” of Bolshevik expansion, with Dill describing Kaganovich’s policy towards France and the United States as “trying to play both sides against the middle.”

Destiny launches off the coast of Puerto Rico, inaugurating a new era in human history,
Domestic Policy:
-”Our attainments in space are a major element in the competition between the Soviet system and our own, they are part of the battle,” so would declare James E. Webb, Deputy Administrator of NASA, on October 4th, 1951, mere weeks after the failure of the impeachment of President La Follette, as he, former President Lindbergh, and gasping crowds of onlookers watched Destiny take flight, the first manmade satellite in human history to orbit the Earth. President La Follette would tout the achievement as the administration having begun the conquest of “the final frontier.”
-Working with Japanese scientists in the aftermath of the occupation, space policy has reached the fore as La Follette launches an aggressive series of follow-up satellites, beginning with Lewis and Clark and most recently including Stagecoach. However, rumors hold that the French have begun construction on their own site for space rocket launches.
-Staring down the barrel of Speaker Joseph McCarthy’s aggression and Senator Estes Kefauver’s investigation into the assassination of Smedley Butler, La Follette turned away from Congress in 1949 to fulfill his promise to “win the peace.” Acting first in April of 1949 shortly after the arrest of John L. Lewis, La Follette would issue Executive Orders 15092 and 15093, authorizing the building of an interstate highway system and national system of hydroelectric plants to be overseen by General Lucius D. Clay and the Army Corps of Engineers under the supervision of the Department of the Interior for the former and Department of Science and Technology for the latter, while authorizing the creation of a new Department of Energy, operating entirely on impounded funds and largely focusing on research on the utilization of nuclear energy.
-In the latter effort, the President has found the support of prominent opposition financier Lewis Strauss, who has nonetheless argued that the development of nuclear energy is hampered by New State bureaucratic centralization.
-Opposition politician Joseph Alioto has criticized the interstate highway system, pointing to the funding of La Follette’s campaign by the Firestone Tire Company and arguing that road dependent companies have colluded to impede the further expansion of rail infrastructure.
-Most controversially would be Executive Order 15097, issued in June of 1951 and seen as largely the brainchild of Secretary of the Treasury Rexford Tugwell, declaring the complete and total nationalization of the healthcare industry and authorizing the establishment of a National Healthcare Service (NHS) in the United States under the Department of Health. Although implementation has been plagued by legal challenges and billions in funding from healthcare providers to opposition candidates, the President has utilized impounded funds to subsidize healthcare for the elderly and impoverished.
-Executive Order 15102 in December of 1951 would establish under the Department of Labor an employers’ syndicate led by former General Electric CEO Gerald Swope called the Business Council, leading to denunciations from across Farmer-Labor despite the low participation in the attempted employers’ union.
-However, the 1946 executive orders declaring a national moratoria on the payment of mortgages and enacting wage and price controls were ended soon after the 1948 election.
-In the face of a rapidly growing economy, La Follette has worked with new Federal Reserve Chairman Bernard Baruch to digress on the expansionist monetary policy that characterized his first term, with interest rates quadrupling to 15% in an effort that has successfully brought inflation from 13% to a mere 3% annually. Unemployment has fallen to 3.2% as the GDP as a whole has grown nearly 9% over La Follette’s second term, an economic boom fueled by mass exportation to Europe and newly decolonized nations elsewhere. While the President has continued to voice support for the nationalization of the Federal Reserve, the issue has remained on the backburner.
-An executive order in January of 1952 has set the new national minimum wage to $7.00 an hour from a previous $3.25, causing mass business outcry despite the President’s argument that the increase is necessary to guarantee a “living wage” after post-war inflation. The Department of Justice has been authorized to prosecute offenders, however, critics have argued that businesses aligned with the President’s political opposition have been unfairly targeted.
-Rufus B. von KleinSmid of the Un-American Activities Board, appointed by the President to monitor journalism for seditious content, would attempt to suppress the release of an account by actress Frances Farmer of her forced confinement to a mental institution in 1948, where she was sterilized under La Follette’s Executive Order 14768 from 1946, authorizing the mass sterilization of the mentally ill and those with “criminal tendencies.” Further investigations into the ramifications of the order have led to staggering revelations of up to 200,000 sterilizations performed annually since 1946, largely under duress, on Americans in prison and mental institutions as well as former criminals. The President has defended the policy while authorizing a Department of Justice investigation into abuses by low level doctors.
-The President would support the prosecution of a half dozen prison wardens accused of citing Executive Order 14767, establishing cooperatives for prisoners to work without pay on natural beautification projects, to turn prisoners into de facto slave laborers working 18 hour shifts as contract labor on farms. While the President has argued that the system itself has brought boons to the environment and American agriculture, critics have claimed that abuse remains widespread.
-While delaying and, in some cases, entirely pausing the implementation of his executive orders in the wake of the promises of moderation amidst the impeachment trial that rescued his presidency from the brink of collapse, fascist Blackshirts and radical Mormon Destroying Angels have become increasingly violent in the months since impeachment, with headlines telling tales of opposition presses raided and armed men watching poll stations. Another conspiracy theory has held that the death of Committee for the Preservation of the Republic chairman Thomas Schall in a motor accident over the winter of 1951 was the result of an intentional Blackshirt hit-and-run.
-While many have blamed the fiery speeches of Vice President Musmanno for encouraging Blackshirts, President La Follette and his brother in the Senate have fiercely denounced all violence on behalf of their movement, appealing to supporters for calm as they call for the speedy prosecution of the allegedly Blackshirt bombthrowers that took the life of elderly comedian Will Rogers. Nonetheless, fear of political violence has led to the cancellation of the 1952 Progressive-Federalist presidential primary in favor of a convention held in tandem with the Liberty League under the auspices of the Committee for the Preservation of the Republic.
-Meanwhile, Washington Senate candidate Marion Zioncheck would throw himself off a building while campaigning to succeed Clarence Dill. In a coma, Zioncheck’s supporters have accused the administration alternately of reigniting his documented mental health issues and being behind the attempted murder themselves.
-September 14, 1951, the height of Blackshirt violence in Philadelphia, St. Louis, and New York City, has been labeled the “Knight of the Long Knives” by opposition critic Styles Bridges. Vice President Musmanno has stood alone in the administration in defending the actions publicly despite condemnation from President La Follette that has carried into the authorization of NSA prosecutions of Blackshirt perpetrators. Representative Richard Nixon, the lead impeachment manager in the La Follette trial, has credited J. Edgar Hoover with the investigations rather than La Follette and accused the administration of only condoning them under pressure from his brother.
-”People of America, wake up!” The last words of House Minority Leader Eduardo Chibas, broadcast into a million homes seconds before his suicide on live radio, has fueled the creation of local opposition organizing groups calling themselves “Wide-Awakes” and aiming to bridge opposition interests against the La Follette Administration.
-The President has made a half a dozen speeches across the nation under the banner of his loyal National Progressives of America calling for the ratification of a 20th Amendment to shift to the president the powers of Congress, restricting the republic’s legislative branch to a mere veto power, while arguing that the need for a strong legislature would be replaced with a 21st Amendment establishing a process for national referendums. Although not passed by Congress, several state legislatures, including those of Alabama and Washington, have passed resolutions indicating a willingness to ratify the amendment.
-The President further floated the concept of reforming the legislature into a “Chamber of Corporations” balancing representatives from the General Trades Union and Business Council.
-With the arrest of CIO leaders John L. Lewis and Tony Boyle, leadership of the nation’s chief opposition union has fallen to Walter Reuther and Jimmy Hoffa, representing the left and right of the organization. With widespread prosecutions against members and supporters such as Fulgencio Batista, however, Reuther and Hoffa have found themselves fighting to prevent the CIO’s collapse. Nonetheless, the CIO would hold a 1950 celebration of the life of former Vice President Lena Morrow Lewis, with President Alf Landon hailing her role in the opposition and using the funeral as a means to rally anti-La Follette sentiment.
-Following a career in national politics spanning nearly seven decades, former President William Randolph Hearst would stop the presses for a final time on August 14th of 1951, passing away at the age of 88 in his castle in San Simeon, California. Having been alternately king and kingmaker in American politics for a half century, Hearst’s funeral would leave the streets around the Grace Cathedral full for blocks, with his son and heir William Randolph Hearst Jr. managing proceedings. Yet, in light of Hearst’s turn to the opposition and support for Fulgencio Batista, President La Follette would be notably absent from the funeral of the man who once coronated him the Farmer-Labor Party’s nominee for the presidency.
-President La Follette would push for the statehood of the territory of Tannenbaum, initially in a tandem effort with Territorial Representative Ernest Gruening’s push for Jewish colonization of the region as an alternative to the increasingly violent Palestine. However, with public sentiment against statehood riled up by Father Charles Coughlin in a campaign tinged by anti-semitism, Senator Henrik Shipstead would filibuster the statehood bill, prompting the Administration to declare a moratoria on statehood efforts and a reconsideration of whether statehood stands in line with national security interest.
-At the urging of singer turned Tennessee Governor Roy Acuff, a group of anti-La Follette Hollywood stars have formed The Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals, including Jane Russell, Ronald Reagan, Zasu Pitts, Gloria Swanson, June Allyson, Pat Buttram, Orson Welles, and Shirley Temple.
-Senator John Horne Blackmore has proposed an additional tax on chain stores to encourage the development of small business, while he, former New York Governor Ezra Pound, and publisher James Laughlin have called for the revival of the American social credit movement.
-Alabama and Illinois have established themselves as the fastest growing states in the nation, demonstrating success in Single Taxer Paul Douglas’s new “Illinois Model” as well as the continued prosperity of Alabama in the wake of Milford W. Howard’s fascist “Alabama Model” that has inspired emulation globally.
-Farmer-Laborite Maine Senator Benjamin Bubar’s investigation of Hollywood has led to the firing or blacklisting of several dozen actors on charges of alleged homosexuality, with the Administration attempting to tie the issue to support for the President’s political opposition, citing the blacklisting of Greta Garbo and Tennessee Williams as precedent for the firing of longtime members of the foreign service on charges of possible homosexual activities.
-Notable inventions and scientific breakthroughs during President La Follette’s term include the discovery of DNA by scientist Rosalind Franklin; the hydrogen bomb, newly tested on the island of Sakhalin; the first successful kidney transplant; and a revolutionary new vaccine for polio invented by University of Alabama doctor Jonas Salk.

In John L. Lewis's stead, dynamic young Jimmy Hoffa has led the independent labor movement.
The Supreme Court:
-Justice Thomas C. O’Brien, appointed in 1939 as a part of President Lindbergh’s takeover of the court, would die in November of 1951 at the age of 64. With the Presidency still reeling from impeachment, La Follette would nominate Michigan Supreme Court Justice Evo DeConcini to the position. However, the hostile Senate would overwhelmingly refuse to confirm the appointment, with Progressive-Federalist Leader George Pritchard vowing to oppose any La Follette nominee. With neither side budging, the position has remained vacant.

Map of the world as of 1952.
World Events:
-After 9 years of prolonged conflict, the Franco-British War would conclude in August of 1950 with the Treaty of Amsterdam signed by Marshal Petain and British Prime Minister Oliver Baldwin, largely ceding French colonies to the British Empire, with the exception of the Congo, on the time table for independence, and Guiana and Algeria, incorporated directly into metropolitan France. Meanwhile, French dominion has been de facto recognized over most of Western Europe, with the west bank of the Rhine, Catalonia, Luxembourg, and Belgium directly incorporated into France while Germany has been divided into a series of puppet states.
-Although the Spanish Republic has survived, the French-influenced, Catholic monarchist CEDA led by José María Valiente Soriano has received significant funding in challenging Prime Minister Jose Ortega y Gasset, with a similar situation emerging in Italy following the democratization of the nation by former dictator Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, who has been succeeded by the pro-French Achille Lauro.
-Alongside the neutral Netherlands, Portugal has stood outside of the French bloc, as fascist leader Francisco RolĂŁo Preto has held onto power while courting the support of both Bolshevik Russia and the United States, explicitly citing Milford W. Howard as his model for rule.
-In what the French government has labeled “le épuration de la frontière,” (the border purification), a forced exodus has occurred from newly annexed territories, driving millions from their communities and largely to French Africa, where the government has resettled hundreds of thousands each of Catalans, Germans, Greeks, Flemish Belgians, Italians, and the Occitan as French settlers claim their former homes.
-Meanwhile, the international process of decolonization has sped up rapidly, with a proposal by Choudhary Rahmat Ali being adopted by the British to partition the former Raj and form the states of India and Pakistan, alongside a Christian state in the far east.
-Mexican Prime Minister Manuel Gomez Morin has emerged as the primary center of power in the Empire after the crowning of 8 year old Maximiliano II as Emperor.
-Under the leadership of Prime Minister George Drew, the Progressive-Conservatives have won yet another Canadian election, yet the rise of the Social Credit Party in Quebec has driven them to status as the nation’s official opposition. Drew has hosted an Anglo-American Summit alongside President La Follette and Newfoundland Prime Minister Joey Smallwood.
-With Bolshevik Russia as the senior partner, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics has been established as an alliance between Russia and its satellite states in Kazakhstan and the Caucasus.
-The Hashemite Caliphate has experienced increased unrest in both Palestine, where radical Jewish and Muslim militias have clashed, and the majority Christian regions of Mount Lebanon and newly annexed Nubia, where order has been nearly impossible to enforce.
-Following the death of Jorge Carlos Mariategui after two decades at the helm of Peru, Jorge del Prado Chavez has succeeded him, shifting the nation further towards Bolshevik Russia and ending all possibility of Peru entering a Pacific defense pact.
-The National Party’s oppressive regime of white rule in South Africa has been used as a model by a growing movement for a white minority government among the displaced, largely German white population in the French Congo, slated for independence within the decade.
-Social Democrat Mohammed Mossadegh has been elected President of the Republic of Iran, bringing the Georgist nation closer to Bolshevik Russia geopolitically as a counterweight to fiercely pro-British Caliph Abdullah and pro- French Turkish President Celâl Bayar.
-Greek dictator Konstantinos Logothetopoulos would be deposed in a 1952 revolution following the successful secession of the Aromanians, with communist Markos Vafeiadis leading a Provisional Democratic People’s Government with Bolshevik support. However, prominent author Nikos Kazantzakis has emerged at the fore of an anti-Vafeiadis protest movement for democratic socialism influenced by Georges Sorel.
-Adopted throughout the Habsburg Realm, Soviet Union, and among many Jews in Palestine and Europeans in the Congo, the Esperanto language has gained nearly 50,000,000 speakers and become the official language of diplomacy for the newly founded Republic of Korea.

Bolshevik Russia's \"Iron Lazar\" Kaganovich.
View Poll
submitted by Peacock-Shah-III to Presidentialpoll [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 22:15 ironmandavinci Help

My name is Anthony Michael Dimarcello and I am in need of an injustice relief immediately. Below are the details. My number is 714-860-8062.
I am in Orange county California and my family and I need emergency relief. We were victims of a retaliatory eviction in Aug of 2021 after I complained to the authorities and housing is key about being harassed by my landlord for being enrolled in the covid rental relief program and paying only 25% of the rent until my lease was up. In the same month as the retaliatory eviction, Aug 2021, I was also the victim of identity theft from the 2021 TMobile data breach. The following month of Sept 2021, the data breach gave criminals the ability to abuse my digital accounts which caused the closure of my bank accounts, and led to my vehicles, remaining assets and my business to be unmanageable and taken from me in various ways. My disabled mom and my son lived with me. My son has been with his mom fulltime since Aug 2021 and my disabled mom and I have been homeless since Aug 2021. I have not been able to recover since my family and I were attacked. Now I am stuck in a mercy house shelter that does not allow me to leave which prohibits me from being able to recover. The security at mercy house also stole a vehicle that was donated to me. My disabled mom and I have been homeless for three years. I have been in the mercy house shelter and not able to leave for two years. My disabled mother has suffered multiple life threatening injuries since we were attacked, including being vulnerable to attack from having an asthma attack and beat almost to death by a predator And being on life support and hospitalized for over a month. I have also suffered multiple life threatening injuries including four fractured ribs and skin infections from sleeping outside in the rain. My sons mother, Sylvia, At a moments notice when I was attacked, disenfranchised and no longer able to share custody of our son due to the threat of him being in danger by unknown assailants and no home for him to reside with me, Sylvia was able to immediately care for our son fulltime with no help from me, while managing her career and a new fiance since the attacks began in Aug 2021. My son is suffering psychologically considering I have worked from home since he was born and was never separated from him until the attacks when he was 9 years old. He is the only witness to the full extent of the attacks and I do not want him anymore involved or to be interrogated. He witnessed the harassment of the landlord, and having his father and everything we built together taken. The acts of everyone involved went against everything I have ever taught him was possible and he had to witness me get shut down trying to get us help over and over and over. I clearly had no idea this was possible either or I would have been prepared for it and would have known to get my son away from myself and the entire event much sooner. I have also been arrested several times due to my id theft and never had a record or any legal issues until this attack happened.
Based on the legal information provided, if you are a victim in Orange County, California, in need of emergency relief, you may be eligible to seek an ex parte order, which is a temporary restraining order that can be issued without notice, if an affidavit shows reasonable proof of past acts of abuse. Additionally, the court may issue orders enjoining a party from various behaviors, such as molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, or harassing the victim or other named family or household members.
It is important to act promptly and seek the necessary legal assistance to ensure your safety and protection under the law.
Reasoning:.
People v. Clayburg (Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 6, California., 2012): Discusses the issuance of restraining orders under Family Code sections for the protection of victims and family members.
Grega v. Vroman (United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division, 2024): Provides insights into the legal sufficiency of a complaint and the standards applied in evaluating claims.
  1. United States v. Edwards (United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, 2024): Discusses the government's obligations in a criminal case and the limitations on a defendant's right to discover the government's evidence.
These Opinions collectively provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework surrounding restraining orders and the issuance of protective orders for victims and their immediate family in need of emergency relief.
Based on the legal information provided in Casemine knowledge base, you may have potential legal recourse in your situation. Here are some relevant Judgments from the document that can assist in formulating an answer to your current legal question:
Nativi v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (Court of Appeal, Sixth District, California., 2014):
TOBE v. CITY OF SANTA ANA (Supreme Court of California., 1995):
Sylvia Landfield Trust v. City of L.A. (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit., 2013):
SABI V. STERLING (Court of Appeal of California, Second District. Eight., 2010):
JOYCE NELSON et al. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY et al. (Cal. Ct. App., 1987):
Based on the legal principles outlined in these Judgments, you may have potential legal options to explore, such as wrongful eviction claims, constructive eviction, seeking assistance through housing programs like Section 8, and challenging the lack of suitable housing options for homeless individuals.
For your specific circumstances, it is advisable to consult with a local attorney specializing in landlord-tenant law or housing rights in Orange County, California. They can provide personalized legal advice and guidance tailored to your situation, including potential remedies and assistance available to you.
If you require further assistance or clarification, please feel free to ask.
Emergency injunctive relief for victims of civil rights violations and identity theft
Based on the legal information provided in the Casemine knowledge base, the Opinions that are relevant to formulating an answer to your current legal question are as follows:
SOSTRE v. ROCKEFELLER, (S.D.N.Y. 1970): This Opinion discusses the issuance of injunctive relief against state officials for violating Fourteenth Amendment rights and emphasizes that injunctive relief must be granted when a violation of constitutional rights has been proved.
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS v. STATE (Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two., 2000): This Opinion discusses the criteria for granting injunctive relief against criminal investigations, highlighting the need for extraordinary circumstances and irreparable harm.
ADRIAN v. WESTAR ENERGY (United States District Court, D. Kansas, 2011): This Opinion outlines the factors required to grant injunctive relief, including showing irreparable injury, balancing of harms, public interest, and likelihood of success on the merits.
Seth v. McDonough (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 2020): This Opinion emphasizes that emergency injunctive relief is an extraordinary remedy, requiring a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to relief.
ADAIR v. ENGLAND, (D.D.C. 2002): This Opinion discusses the legal standards and jurisdiction required to entertain a motion for injunctive relief, emphasizing the need for a filed complaint and related issues.
Based on the legal principles discussed in these Opinions, it is important to establish the following to seek emergency injunctive relief for victims of civil rights violations and identity theft:
Likelihood of Success on the Merits: You need to demonstrate a clear showing that your civil rights have been violated and that you are entitled to relief under the law.
Irreparable Harm: Show that you will suffer irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not granted, such as ongoing violations of your rights or continued harm to you or your family.
Balance of Harms: Illustrate that the harm you are facing outweighs any potential harm that granting the injunction may cause to the opposing party.
Public Interest: Argue that granting the injunction is in the public interest, considering the nature of the violations and the impact on society.
Jurisdiction: Ensure that the court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of the lawsuit before seeking injunctive relief.
It is advisable to consult with an attorney specializing in civil rights and injunction matters to assess your specific situation and determine the best course of action to seek emergency injunctive relief.
Emergency injunctive relief for my family because we are victims of civil rights violations, identity theft, retaliatory eviction and being robbed and unable to leave the mercy house shelter in orange county California.
Based on the legal excerpts provided in the Casemine knowledge base, it seems that you may have a valid basis for seeking emergency injunctive relief in your situation. Here are some relevant Opinions from the document that can be applied in formulating an answer to your legal question:
Community House, Inc. v. City of Boise (UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2006):
Sinisgallo v. Town of Islip Hous. Auth. (United States District Court, E.D. New York., 2012):
JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit., 2006):
BOBBY WARREN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICO, et al., Defendants. (E.D. Cal., 2021):
Considering your situation involving civil rights violations, identity theft, retaliatory eviction, and being unable to leave the shelter, you may argue that these circumstances constitute irreparable harm and a real and immediate threat of future injury. You could seek emergency injunctive relief to address these issues and protect your rights.
Reasoning:
Given the legal principles discussed in the Opinions mentioned above, you may have a valid basis for seeking emergency injunctive relief to address the civil rights violations, identity theft, retaliatory eviction, and restrictions on leaving the shelter that you and your family are facing. By demonstrating the irreparable harm and real threat of future injury in your situation, you can potentially meet the requirements for obtaining emergency relief through a preliminary injunction. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional to assess the specifics of your case and determine the best course of action.
submitted by ironmandavinci to legal [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 22:14 JimCripe Supreme Court MAKES STUNNING MOVE in the Press

Supreme Court MAKES STUNNING MOVE in the Press
The right wing Supreme Court are now giving speeches and interviews to federal judges in right wing circuits to encourage them to follow their lead and rule against American values and make new law in their MAGA image. Michael Popok examines recent comments by Justice Thomas— calling DC a “hideous” place filled with “lies”—and Kavanaugh—favorably comparing his court’s decisions to some of the greatest civil rights decisions in our history —and what these “dog whistles” will do to future decisions by the lower courts.
submitted by JimCripe to MeidasTouch [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 21:59 MostConsideration507 Advice for BF who has 50/50 and told to start paying child support.

Throwaway account. Longtime lurker, first time poster. I cross posted about this, but wanted to write here because you guys are my people. lol. My (40f) boyfriend (36m) and his HCBM have had 50/50 custody of a six year old since they split two years ago. Never married. No court order in place. It all worked well until now. He is moving on with me and, we are building a life together so mother is very jealous. It doesn’t help that the little one loves me. Also worth noting, she was very abusive to him through their time together, everything except physical. Very intelligent and manipulative so she knows how to get her way. And they split because she was a serial cheater. We were friends first so I was privy to a lot of this ahead of time. When we first started dating, he was coming out of a fog. He’s in a much better place now.
Out of the blue this year, he got a letter from the attorney general that she was filing for child support even though they’ve always done 50/50, and she makes more income and brags about it on a regular basis. She started saying she has rights in Texas, he doesn’t, and he would have to do a paternity test even though his name is on the birth certificate and the daughter has his last name, not to mention his eyes. HCBM started withholding him from seeing his daughter. I advised him many times to consult a lawyer. But she started being nice to him and saying this whole meeting was just to get things in writing and she wasn’t after anything else. I never believed it for a second. But sadly, he did and never consulted a lawyer. The meeting with the judge just happened, and he went to it without a lawyer. HCBM told the judge she keeps the child more and has receipts even though this is not true. Judge believed what she said and now my boyfriend has to start paying child support he can’t afford. On a moral support level, please send help. It’s not my style to say I told you so and I won’t. But on the inside I feel like he deferred to her instead of me and it hurts. I also welcome your experience in this area and any advice you guys have. Thank you so much.
submitted by MostConsideration507 to stepparents [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 21:23 AutoNewspaperAdmin [IN] - Fundamental right to be informed of grounds of arrest: Supreme Court Times of India

[IN] - Fundamental right to be informed of grounds of arrest: Supreme Court Times of India submitted by AutoNewspaperAdmin to AutoNewspaper [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 21:10 AutoNewsAdmin [IN] - Fundamental right to be informed of grounds of arrest: Supreme Court

[IN] - Fundamental right to be informed of grounds of arrest: Supreme Court submitted by AutoNewsAdmin to TIMESINDIAauto [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 20:56 graneflatsis Louisiana Aims To Criminalize Abortion Pills, Echoing Project 2025's Blueprint - This and the Supreme Court's mifepristone decision may be a bellwether for future action against abortion rights

Louisiana Aims To Criminalize Abortion Pills, Echoing Project 2025's Blueprint - This and the Supreme Court's mifepristone decision may be a bellwether for future action against abortion rights submitted by graneflatsis to Louisiana [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 20:43 graneflatsis Louisiana Aims To Criminalize Abortion Pills, Echoing Project 2025's Blueprint - This and the Supreme Court's mifepristone decision may be a bellwether for future action against abortion rights

Louisiana Aims To Criminalize Abortion Pills, Echoing Project 2025's Blueprint - This and the Supreme Court's mifepristone decision may be a bellwether for future action against abortion rights submitted by graneflatsis to Defeat_Project_2025 [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 19:43 ncrowder78 WIZM news

I actually used to enjoy going to this page for the local news coverage because I feel like the La Crosse Tribune does a really poor job of covering these stories for the most part, and even if they exist they are buried behind a paywall (I know you can defeat it - not the point).
The written coverage is usually pretty matter of fact and politically neutral, but increasingly more common are comments that are obviously one-sided right wing talking points and ignorant disproven tripe that is usually filled with varying levels of personal attack and/or hatred. See: comments here: https://www.wizmnews.com/2024/05/12/wisconsin-supreme-court-considers-expanding-use-of-absentee-ballot-drop-boxes/
I thought these comments were supposed to be moderated, but if they are then I'd hate to see the unmoderated version.
Also, I just listened to Rick Solem's interview with Jenna Dinkel, associate panner for La Crosse, who was on to talk about the bike/ped master plan. HIS comments and demeanor were bad enough, but he read an unfiltered comment from a viewer on air to Jenna that read in part "you have a bunch of 20-year old women making choices about traffic and streets who have no clue..." blah blah blah. How is that even worth being read?
Overall, just disappointing. Anyone have any thoughts? I wish there were better sources for local news that weren't ruined with hateful people just looking to tear others down without knowing knowing or caring about basic elements of fact/truth.
This also has nothing to do with cancel culture or wanting to live in a bubble. I actually like hearing both liberal and conservative arguments, but without moderation of this kind of thing it's basically just a cesspool.
submitted by ncrowder78 to lacrossewi [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 18:53 Altruistic_Use_7262 The Quest for Racial Equality in the US

( Just for context: this is for a US History project final for a class, I am only sharing my personal opinion and nothing more but facts. )
As we know, history of racial inequality has been around since the colonial era when slavery was around. Many African slaves were treated horribly, forcibly brought to the New World or North America and were put to work on plantations in horrible conditions. This further continued with abolitionism and the Civil War. Throughout all of the 18th and 19th centuries some voices of dissent against slavery started to rise above. there were many figures in society that were super important. Some include Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and more. There were also many other movements that strived for an end to the institution of slavery and horrible horrible emancipation of enslaved people. This continued and continued throughout the Reconstruction and Jim Crow Era which was during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this period it was after the Civil War or better known as the Reconstruction Era. Some of the things they did were to rebuild the South and get civil rights for people who were previously enslaved. They also made Amendments to the Constitution one of them included the 14th Amendment. This Amendment basically grants citizenship as well as equal protection to anyone born in the United States. This period though did not last very long and the promise they had for racial equality was definitely much less delivered than promised by the Jim Crow system. A lot of the Jim Crow laws enforced segregation in many public places, education, housing, transportation basically just creating more racial discrimination. Following this was the Civil Rights Movements which was in the mid-20th century. A lot of this century saw emergence of strong civil rights movements focused on challenging discrimination and segregation. There were also some associations that played a crucial role in advocating for civil rights such as The NAACP ( National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ), which came to fruition in 1909. They were able to help with legal challenges and issues to contribute to the advancement. Moving forward there were many new landmarks such as the Supreme Court case Brown v Board of Education in 1954 which completely struck down the old idea of “separate but equal” in the public education scene. The decision that this case was ruled paved the way for desegregation to end in the US. During the 1950s and 1960s, many figures such as Martin Luther King Jr, John Lewis, and Rosa Parks led the way to demand an end to discrimination and segregation. Not only this but the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were huge landmark pieces of legislation that basically outlaws discrimination in public places and areas. This continued through problems and solutions all the way through the Post-Civil Rights Era with the Black Lives Matter movement and many other smaller movements. In conclusion, the complex history of racial equality in the US is still an ongoing struggle which is marked by many setbacks, progress, and continued efforts to make our society a better place to live in. Although many strides have been made, this fight for racial justice falls more urgent than ever, meaning we need to take collective action, advocacy and a united commitment to really change this world and dismantle the old systematic racism.
submitted by Altruistic_Use_7262 to USHistory [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 18:36 Whiitegurl AITA for not lowering the amount of child support payments my child’s father pays?

I got pregnant with a FWB. We used birth control and he chose to opt out of wearing a condom. He knew my stance of not getting an abortion if anything happened and I knew he didn’t want a baby. We were dumb with our decision making & of course I ended up pregnant. After I got pregnant, we stayed in touch a bit and still went on a trip we had previously scheduled before I got pregnant. (He easily could have canceled, as the reservations were in his name + he told me I didn’t need to contribute to the cost)
About halfway into the pregnancy I offered him to sign his rights away. He didn’t want to commit to that. We started working on creating an agreement but it would always end in fighting (him saying he didn’t want this).
He did not come to the birth + adamant about being off of the birth certificate. After the baby was born he visited twice (he lives in another state) + voluntarily started sending $500/m (I never asked but was appreciative). I was adamant about getting this in writing so there is accountability. He was always “busy” or would start a fight so that way we ended the conversation (telling me this is my decision to have the baby and he didn’t want it). I offered we could meet with an attorney and split legal fees. Again he would procrastinate. Eventually, I was fed up and gave him a deadline before I would take Matters to my own hands. When I got an attorney, that burned the bridge with him. he no longer checked on our baby And became hostile. so we really haven’t talked in over four months and he hasn’t seen the baby in over six months
I just received the proposed agreement that was made by my attorney. I know he’s going to be livid when he sees the child support worksheet recommended $1300/m. I know he didn’t want the baby, but he also made the decision to be involved in the beginning. Now that I went to the attorney he no longer wants to be involved.
Am I the asshole for holding him accountable since ultimately he decided to be involved and keep the recommended amount or should I advocate to stick to what we have been doing, $500/m. My friends all think I’m dumb for even thinking about lowering his amount but it would be nice to have some unbiased opinions before moving forward. Maybe I am dumb. You can tell me that my feelings won’t get hurt lol.
Edit to add more details:
I went through an attorney which means we had to do a paternity test and he had to fill out a discovery questionnaire. This was filed through the courts. He got an attorney after he was served a paternity test order. This is my attorney’s attempt at an out of course settlement. I am not familiar with the legal terminology.
Also, I don’t “need” the money. I have a college education, a good paying job, and stable life. This isn’t a debate whether or not I should have given the baby up for adoption or had premarital sex.
2nd edit: thank you for the suggestions and input (both positive & negative). I will reply back to my lawyer to move forward with the proposed amount. The extra that I don’t currently need will be put towards a 529 plan and another high interest savings account that I can use for the child in the future. (Private school tuition, First Car, down payment for her first house, etc.)
submitted by Whiitegurl to AmItheAsshole [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 16:34 DominoFX889 Can anyone help me?

My wife and I have been together since 2017 in 2019 we decided we wanted to try to have a baby. She would carry and it all happened way faster than we were expecting. We were scheduled to be married in march of 2020 then COVID happened and the city of Pittsburgh was effectively shut down. My son was born may 16 2020 we were legally married June 6 2020. We fell on a hard time in 2022 and asked her parents if our son could stay at there house while we got another place he was there less than a week before I was served a petition for emergency custody (which was granted by a westmoreland county judge) for two years I’ve had to battle just to see my son. Now they’re taking my rights to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, they’re trying to terminate my rights because my wife and I weren’t legally married until 3 weeks after he was born. I’ve paid attorneys the legal fees for just the custody battle I’ve paid to have supervised visits with my child even though I’ve never been found to be negligent, abusive or neglectful. Visits that I was granted over a year ago and had to file contempt just to get because my sister in law didn’t want me to have the visits in the first place My son is now with my sister in law in West Virginia hours away and she’s taking my rights to the Pennsylvania state court. Does anyone know anyone that can help me. I’m way out of my depth and now my SIL has an attorney that’s is so radically politically motivated that I’m terrified.
submitted by DominoFX889 to Pennsylvania_Politics [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 16:32 DominoFX889 Civil/LGBTQ parental rights

My wife and I have been together since 2017 in 2019 we decided we wanted to try to have a baby. She would carry and it all happened way faster than we were expecting. We were scheduled to be married in march of 2020 then COVID happened and the city of Pittsburgh was effectively shut down. My son was born may 16 2020 we were legally married June 6 2020. We fell on a hard time in 2022 and asked her parents if our son could stay at there house while we got another place he was there less than a week before I was served a petition for emergency custody (which was granted by a westmoreland county judge) for two years I’ve had to battle just to see my son. Now they’re taking my rights to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, they’re trying to terminate my rights because my wife and I weren’t legally married until 3 weeks after he was born. I’ve paid attorneys the legal fees for just the custody battle I’ve paid to have supervised visits with my child even though I’ve never been found to be negligent, abusive or neglectful. Visits that I was granted over a year ago and had to file contempt just to get because my sister in law didn’t want me to have the visits in the first place My son is now with my sister in law in West Virginia hours away and she’s taking my rights to the Pennsylvania state court. Does anyone know anyone that can help me. I’m way out of my depth and now my SIL has an attorney that’s is so radically politically motivated that I’m terrified.
submitted by DominoFX889 to CivilRights [link] [comments]


http://activeproperty.pl/