So after 5 years of fighting to figure out what was going on with me and being told a mixture of: anxiety, depression, migraines and/or allergies. I finally got a doctor to listen to me (an optamologist of all things) and her finding my optic nerves being swollen and that I possibly have this disease caused me to fight for an MRI/MRV. That showed I had:

1. A partially empty sella
2. A 13 cm cyst on my pituary gland
3. Mild narrowing along the lateral aspect of bilateral transverse venous sinuses

All of that combined with my symptoms had me finding a new doctor to go to because my neurologist saw all of that and still said "it's just depression" so I did research and asked my pcp to refer me to a neuro-optamologist. He said everything sounds like IIH and scheduled me a LP. That came out at 35, got my official dx and diamox ordered.
I've been scared to start diamox from all the horror stories but, I've kept doing research and feel a bit better about starting it knowing that upping my wateelectrolytes and potassium can help tremendously with side effects. However, I was hoping for a few things to be answered by you lovely people.

1. I'd absolutely LOVE to hear positive stories. I desperately need it for both people getting their lives back having IIH and people on diamox. I've felt like I haven't lived in years due to so many different illnesses (pcos, anxiety, depression, adhd, chronic pain, migraines and now IIH.) I felt like I could still live my life until about 5 years ago when I started getting insane head pressure but, anytime I went to the ER or a doctor - they were like "oh that must be a headache or migraine". No one would listen when I said "no, it doesn't hurt..I can have a migraine with it but this is different, I feel like my head is full and needs drained". Anyways, since that started 5 years ago my head pressure episodes have gotten worse and I'm usually bed ridden that entire time cause I just cannot function. I miss living my life and I just want hope.
2. I know I need to bring this back up with my doctor but, when they went over my MRI/V notes no one mentioned the "Mild narrowing along the lateral aspect of bilateral transverse venous sinuses". Is this what people get stents for? Is that stenosis? Should I be asking them to look more into that?
3. I had my LP done on Fri (the 10th) and I've been naesous almost constantly since. Is that a normal thing? I've had a headache and migraine as well, migraine was on day 3 and then day 4/yesterday was a mild headache. From my understanding a spinal headache from an LP is undeniable and you'll know it's from that, correct? This has felt like a typical migraine/headache. Nothing I'm not used to and it doesn't seem to make a difference if I'm standing/sitting/laying. I will also note after 10+ years of migraines and very little helping them, Emgality has been the thing that has made my almost daily migraines go down to 1 or 2 a month and I'm 3 days out from my next injection which typically is when my head gets irritated so I think that's why my head is irritated and that it's not LP related but, I just wanted to make sure.
4. Last question (for now lol), I've seen people recommend getting blood work frequently once on diamox. How do you go about this? My neuro-opt never called me once we got results - he just saw my OP was at 35 and sent in the medicine and I'm hoping to talk to him tomorrow to go over it a bit more but, do I need to advocate for regular blood work? If so, how often? What should I ask them to keep an eye on? I've seen too many people say their doctors didn't tell them about needing to drink more, get more potassium or electrolytes etc. so I want to make sure I'm prepared to fight for myself to try negating any possible side effects from taking diamox before I start.

Also whoever wrote the IIH packet on here - you're a Godsend. Thank you! Having all those notes is super helpful. 🫶

Hi,
Im trying to bring up a simple IPSEC Tunnel with IKEv2 between test Palo Alto (ver 9.0.0) and test Cisco Router (/vios_l2-adventerprisek9-m") in EVE-NG, but tunnel not coming and and here all I see in debugs on Cisco side:
\May 15 06:28:34.568: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:29:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:29:35.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:29:35.927: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:30:05.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:30:05.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:30:05.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:30:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:30:35.920: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:30:35.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:31:05.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:31:05.920: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:31:05.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:31:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:31:35.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:31:35.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:32:37.251: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:32:37.251: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:32:37.257: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:33:07.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:33:07.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:33:07.260: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:33:37.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:33:37.255: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:33:37.261: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:34:07.253: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:34:07.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:34:07.262: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:34:37.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:34:37.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:34:37.261: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
-------------
If I type "test vpn ike-sa" on Palo I also getting this:
\May 15 06:35:38.092: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:35:38.093: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:35:38.099: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:35:57.010: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:35:57.011: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:35:57.013: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:02.227: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:02.227: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:02.229: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:08.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:36:08.091: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:36:08.096: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:36:12.109: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:12.110: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:12.111: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:31.901: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:31.902: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:31.903: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:38.097: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:36:38.098: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:36:38.107: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:37:08.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:37:08.092: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:37:08.097: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:37:11.489: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:37:11.490: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:37:11.491: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:37:38.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:37:38.092: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:37:38.100: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:38:10.876: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:38:10.877: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:38:10.880: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
Configuration on Cisco side:
crypto ikev2 proposal TEST
encryption 3des
integrity sha1
group 2
crypto ikev2 policy TEST
proposal TEST
crypto ikev2 profile TEST
match identity remote address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.255
authentication local pre-share key metaxa1234
authentication remote pre-share key metaxa1234
lifetime 28800
crypto ipsec transform-set TEST esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile TEST
set transform-set TEST
set pfs group5
set ikev2-profile TEST
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no switchport
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
negotiation auto
end
interface Loopback0 - simulation of user IP
ip address 172.20.16.1 255.255.255.252
end
interface Tunnel1
ip address 10.227.1.1 255.255.255.252
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel destination 172.16.1.2
tunnel protection ipsec profile TEST
end
ip route 10.30.30.0 255.255.255.252 10.227.1.2
On Palo Alto side:
IKE Crypto: Encryption - 3des, Auth - Sha1, DH - group2, key lifetime 2
IPsec Crypto - ESP, Encryption 3des, Auth - Sha1, DH group (PFS) - group5, lifetime 1 hour
IKE Gateway - Peer IP 172.16.1.1, local 172.16.1.2/30, interface: Ethernet 1/4, Version: IKEV2 only mode, Auth Pre-shared: same key as on cisco, Advanced options: Ike crypto profiles set to IKE crypto config profile
IPsec Tunnel: tunnel interface: Tunnel.1, type: auto-key, address-type: ipv4, ike gateway: set ike gateway configured, ipsec profile: set IPsec setting configured, no proxy ID (route-based VPN)
Routing:
Static route 172.20.16.0/30 (loopback ip on cisco side) interface: tunnel1, next-hop IP address - 10.227.1.1 (peer tunnel IP)
there is no policy issues, physical interfaces are directly connected and can ping each other
What can be the issue here?

Hi,
Im trying to bring up a simple IPSEC Tunnel with IKEv2 between test Palo Alto (ver 9.0.0) and test Cisco Router (/vios_l2-adventerprisek9-m") in EVE-NG, but tunnel not coming and and here all I see in debugs on Cisco side:
\May 15 06:28:34.568: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:29:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:29:35.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:29:35.927: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:30:05.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:30:05.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:30:05.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:30:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:30:35.920: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:30:35.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:31:05.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:31:05.920: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:31:05.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:31:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:31:35.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:31:35.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:32:37.251: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:32:37.251: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:32:37.257: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:33:07.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:33:07.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:33:07.260: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:33:37.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:33:37.255: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:33:37.261: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:34:07.253: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:34:07.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:34:07.262: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:34:37.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:34:37.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:34:37.261: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
-------------
If I type "test vpn ike-sa" on Palo I also getting this:
\May 15 06:35:38.092: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:35:38.093: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:35:38.099: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:35:57.010: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:35:57.011: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:35:57.013: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:02.227: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:02.227: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:02.229: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:08.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:36:08.091: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:36:08.096: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:36:12.109: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:12.110: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:12.111: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:31.901: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:31.902: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:31.903: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:38.097: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:36:38.098: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:36:38.107: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:37:08.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:37:08.092: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:37:08.097: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:37:11.489: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:37:11.490: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:37:11.491: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:37:38.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:37:38.092: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:37:38.100: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:38:10.876: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:38:10.877: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:38:10.880: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
Configuration on Cisco side:
crypto ikev2 proposal TEST
encryption 3des
integrity sha1
group 2
crypto ikev2 policy TEST
proposal TEST
crypto ikev2 profile TEST
match identity remote address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.255
authentication local pre-share key metaxa1234
authentication remote pre-share key metaxa1234
lifetime 28800
crypto ipsec transform-set TEST esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile TEST
set transform-set TEST
set pfs group5
set ikev2-profile TEST
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no switchport
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
negotiation auto
end
interface Loopback0 - simulation of user IP
ip address 172.20.16.1 255.255.255.252
end
interface Tunnel1
ip address 10.227.1.1 255.255.255.252
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel destination 172.16.1.2
tunnel protection ipsec profile TEST
end
ip route 10.30.30.0 255.255.255.252 10.227.1.2
On Palo Alto side:
IKE Crypto: Encryption - 3des, Auth - Sha1, DH - group2, key lifetime 2
IPsec Crypto - ESP, Encryption 3des, Auth - Sha1, DH group (PFS) - group5, lifetime 1 hour
IKE Gateway - Peer IP 172.16.1.1, local 172.16.1.2/30, interface: Ethernet 1/4, Version: IKEV2 only mode, Auth Pre-shared: same key as on cisco, Advanced options: Ike crypto profiles set to IKE crypto config profile
IPsec Tunnel: tunnel interface: Tunnel.1, type: auto-key, address-type: ipv4, ike gateway: set ike gateway configured, ipsec profile: set IPsec setting configured, no proxy ID (route-based VPN)
Routing:
Static route 172.20.16.0/30 (loopback ip on cisco side) interface: tunnel1, next-hop IP address - 10.227.1.1 (peer tunnel IP)
there is no policy issues, physical interfaces are directly connected and can ping each other
What can be the issue here?

Hi,
Im trying to bring up a simple IPSEC Tunnel with IKEv2 between test Palo Alto (ver 9.0.0) and test Cisco Router (/vios_l2-adventerprisek9-m") in EVE-NG, but tunnel not coming and and here all I see in debugs on Cisco side:
\May 15 06:28:34.568: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:29:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:29:35.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:29:35.927: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:30:05.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:30:05.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:30:05.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:30:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:30:35.920: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:30:35.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:31:05.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:31:05.920: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:31:05.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:31:35.920: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:31:35.921: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:31:35.926: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:32:37.251: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:32:37.251: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:32:37.257: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:33:07.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:33:07.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:33:07.260: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:33:37.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:33:37.255: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:33:37.261: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:34:07.253: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:34:07.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:34:07.262: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:34:37.252: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:34:37.253: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:34:37.261: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
-------------
If I type "test vpn ike-sa" on Palo I also getting this:
\May 15 06:35:38.092: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:35:38.093: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:35:38.099: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:35:57.010: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:35:57.011: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:35:57.013: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:02.227: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:02.227: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:02.229: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:08.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:36:08.091: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:36:08.096: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:36:12.109: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:12.110: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:12.111: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:31.901: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:36:31.902: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:36:31.903: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:36:38.097: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:36:38.098: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:36:38.107: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:37:08.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:37:08.092: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:37:08.097: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:37:11.489: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:37:11.490: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:37:11.491: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
\May 15 06:37:38.091: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address* 172.16.1.1
\May 15 06:37:38.092: IKEv2:Found Policy 'TEST'*
\May 15 06:37:38.100: IKEv2:SA is already in negotiation, hence not negotiating again*
\May 15 06:38:10.876: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Negotiating limit reached, deny SA request*
\May 15 06:38:10.877: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 172.16.1.2:500/To 172.16.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0]*
Initiator SPI : A20CF3ECC17A2213 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0
IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT Exchange REQUEST
\May 15 06:38:10.880: IKEv2-ERROR:: A supplied parameter is incorrect*
Configuration on Cisco side:
crypto ikev2 proposal TEST
encryption 3des
integrity sha1
group 2
crypto ikev2 policy TEST
proposal TEST
crypto ikev2 profile TEST
match identity remote address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.255
authentication local pre-share key metaxa1234
authentication remote pre-share key metaxa1234
lifetime 28800
crypto ipsec transform-set TEST esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile TEST
set transform-set TEST
set pfs group5
set ikev2-profile TEST
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no switchport
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
negotiation auto
end
interface Loopback0 - simulation of user IP
ip address 172.20.16.1 255.255.255.252
end
interface Tunnel1
ip address 10.227.1.1 255.255.255.252
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel destination 172.16.1.2
tunnel protection ipsec profile TEST
end
ip route 10.30.30.0 255.255.255.252 10.227.1.2
On Palo Alto side:
IKE Crypto: Encryption - 3des, Auth - Sha1, DH - group2, key lifetime 2
IPsec Crypto - ESP, Encryption 3des, Auth - Sha1, DH group (PFS) - group5, lifetime 1 hour
IKE Gateway - Peer IP 172.16.1.1, local 172.16.1.2/30, interface: Ethernet 1/4, Version: IKEV2 only mode, Auth Pre-shared: same key as on cisco, Advanced options: Ike crypto profiles set to IKE crypto config profile
IPsec Tunnel: tunnel interface: Tunnel.1, type: auto-key, address-type: ipv4, ike gateway: set ike gateway configured, ipsec profile: set IPsec setting configured, no proxy ID (route-based VPN)
Routing:
Static route 172.20.16.0/30 (loopback ip on cisco side) interface: tunnel1, next-hop IP address - 10.227.1.1 (peer tunnel IP)
there is no policy issues, physical interfaces are directly connected and can ping each other
What can be the issue here?

INTRODUCTION
welke commando's kunnen worden ingetikt?
Switch>?
Exec Commands:
Connect-Open a terminal Connection
Disable-Turn off privileged commands
Disconnect-Disconnect an existing network Connection.
Enable-Turn on privileged Commands
Exit-Exit From the EXEC
logout-Exit From the EXEC
Ping-Send echo messages
Resume-Resume an active network Connection
Show-Show running System information
SSH-Open a Secure Shell Client Connection
Telnet-Open a telnet Connection
Terminal-Set terminal line parameters
Traceroute-Trace route to destination __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Naar Priviledged mode (soort administrator)
Switch> enable
Switch# __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Vraag alle instellingen op:
Switch> enable
Switch# show running-config _____________________________________________________________________
Bewaar alle instellingen:
Switch# copy running-config startup-config __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
BASIC CONFIGURATION COMMANDS
Plaats een Wachtwoord Voor de console:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# line console 0
Switch(config-line)# password hoek
Switch(config-line)# login _____________________________________________________________________
plaats een wachtwoord Voor priviledge mode:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# enable Password Geheim _____________________________________________________________________
Plaats een banner:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# banner motd@ [naam]@ _____________________________________________________________________
Verander de hostname:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# hostname kamer-215
Kamer-215(config)# _____________________________________________________________________
ip address toekennen aan een interface:
router> enable
router# configure terminal
router(config)# interface gigabitEthernet 0/0/0
router(config-if)# ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 _____________________________________________________________________
Poort activeren:
router> enable
router# configure terminal
router(config)# interface gigabitEthernet 0/0/0
router(config-if)# no shutdown _____________________________________________________________________
Domain name:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# username admin password CCNA
Switch(config)# ip domain name cisco.com
Switch(config)# crypto key generate RSA
How many bits in the module [512]:1024 _____________________________________________________________________
SSH Configureren:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# line vty 0 15
Switch(config-line)# login local
Switch(config-line)# transport input ssh __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
VLAN CONFIGURATION COMMAND:
VLAN Configuratie:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# vlan 10
Switch(config-vlan)# name vlan10
Switch(config-vlan)# exit _____________________________________________________________________
Ip-adressen toewijzen aan VLAN'S en gateway Configuratie instellen:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config) # interface vlan 10
Switch(config-if)# ip addres 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
Switch(config-if)# interface range fa0/1-5
Switch(config-if-range)# switchport mode access
Switch(config-if-range)# switchport access vlan 10
Switch(config-if-range)# exit _____________________________________________________________________
Trunk-poorten definieren:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# interface range fa0/1-5
Switch(config-if-range)# switchport mode trunk
Switch(config-if-range)# exit _____________________________________________________________________
Routering tussen VLAN'S configureren met IEEE802.1Q Encapsulation:
Router> enable
Router# configure terminal
Router(config)# interface gigabitEthernet 0/1.20
Router(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1Q20
Router(config-subif)# ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
IP ROUTING AND ROUTE CONFIGURATION COMMAND:
Ip routing Configureren:
Router> enable
Router# configure terminal
Router(config)# interface gigabitEthernet 0/1
Router(config-if)# no Shutdown
Router(config-if)# exit
Router(config)# interface vlan 40
Router (config-if)#ip default-gateway 192.168.0.1 _____________________________________________________________________
Ip route Configureren:
MIS> enable
MIS# configure terminal
MIS(Config)# interface gigabitEthernet 0/1
MLS(config-if)# no switchport
MLS(config-if)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 gigabitEthernet 0/1
MLS(config-if)# exit __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DHCP AND IP HELPER CONFIGURATION COMMAND:
DHCP Configuratie:
MIS> enable
MIS# configure terminal
MLS(config)# interface gigabitEthernet 1/0/24
MLS(config-if)# no switchport
MLS(config-if)# ip add dhcp _____________________________________________________________________
DHCP Pool:
Router>enable
Router# configure terminal
Router(config)# Ip dhcp excluced-address 10.1.0.1 10.2.0.3
Router(config)# Ip dhcp pool net03
Router(dhcp-config)# network 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0
Router(dhcp-config)# default-router 10.2.0.1
Router(dhcp-config)# dns-server 8.8.8.8 _____________________________________________________________________
Ip helper addressen:
Switch> enable
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# interface gigabitEthernet 0/0/1
Switch(config-if)# ip helper-address 10.1.0.1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
OSPF CONFIGURATION COMMAND:
OSPF:
Router> enable
Router# Configure terminal
Router(config)# router ospf 10
Router(config-router)# router-id 4.4.4.4
Router (config-router)# network 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
Router(config-router)# default-information origanate
Router(config-router)# passive-interface S0/3/1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ACL AND NAT CONFIGURATION COMMAND:
COMING SOON __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CDP AND LLDP CONFIGURATION COMMAND:
COMING SOON __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
welke wildcard hoort bij welk Subnetmask:
32 Subnetmask (255255.255.255):0.0.0.0,.131 Subnetmask (255.255.255254):0.0.0.1,.130 Subnetmask (255.255255.252):0.0.0.3,.129 Subnetmask (255.255.255248):0.007,.128 Subnetmask (255.255.255.240):0.0.0.15,127 Subnetmask (255255.255.224):0.0.0.31,.126 Subnetmask (255.255.255.192):0.0.0.63,125 Subnetmask (255.255.255.128):0.0.0.127,124 Subnet mask (255.255.255.0):0.0.0.255,123 Subnetmask.(255255. 254.0):0.0.1.255,.122 Subnetmask (255255.252.0):0.0.3.255,.121 Subnetmask (255.255.248.01:0.0.7.255,120 Subnetmask (255.255,2400):0.0.15.255,/iq Subnetmask (255.255.224.0);0.0.31.255,118 Subnetmask (255.255.19201:0.0.63.255,../17 Subnetmask (255.255.128.0):0.0.127.255,116 Subnetmask (255.255.0.0):0.0.255255,.115 Subnetmask (255.254,0.0);0.1255255,,.114 Subnetmask (255.252.0.0):03255255,...113 Subnetmask (255.248.0.0):0.7.255255,.112 Subnetmask (255.240.0.0):015.255255,

Bitterness towards City has been longstanding, though it is understandable; we got lucky with competent owners. However, it's now so toxic you have mainstream media blatantly using it to win public favour.
Last night's spurs game was peak bitterness, and it's actually unfair on others. A few examples:

• they gave our keeper MOTM to help shape a narrative, but the Spurs keeper was incredible and got very little recognition. He pulled off more worldies for sure.
  
• the match commentary, pre during and post, was feeling sorry for arsenal for much of it. It was embarrassing and minimizes the credit towards city, esp pep who has worked wonders to instill an incredible ethic. When son went one on one the commentators focused on how arsenal fans were feeling...nothing about city fans who were shitting their pants
  
• constant minimisation or ignorance towards citys achievements. Narrative was focused on spurs wanting to lose (their efforts say otherwise) rather than city grinding a result for the first time in that stadium. Before that it was city winning because Fulham didn't turn up and before that because refs are on our side. And through the season it's 115 charges (which carra will cling to until his grave, even if they don't relate to spend).
  
• carra and neville barely spoke after it went 2-0. Almost as if they were disappointed.
  
• both carra and nevilles best 11 drooling over arsenal players (who have been excelletnt btw)...but we're on for a double!
  
• why the fk do we have utd and lfc fans commentating our games...it's madness
  

There's probably a million other examples you can add. Trying to spill bitter over our experience, and getting paid while doing it. Only thing more annoying is the number of gambling ads on tv which is crippling society yet funding their wage packet.

I've been a torb one trick for half of ow2 now. As the game has been going on he slowly has felt less and less impact full to me. As the game continues to speed up and require more consistent damage torb kind of stayed the same and at this moment in season 10 he feels almost useless even if they have a dive comp. Like when is he actually viable? Cassidy is just way stronger against dive characters due to his way more consistent damage and hinder. Junk or literally any other spam character I would consider way better at choke holding due to the mobility most of those heroes offer. Bastion or reaper are way better at tank melting which is another torb thing. Hell even sym seems to have stronger turrets as I just tickle people half the time. But don't get me wrong his turret is decent when u use it properly but tbh it literally dies in 2 shots and doesn't move so it's usually a miracle if it gets any uptime. It just feels like in every scenario other characters are better. I guess he can do it all in a way but not good enough to where it matters it feels like. Don't get me wrong in lower ranks I feel fine with him as the games are a lot more random but when my team mates are top 500's almost every game is Cassidy, souljurn, and tracer and the other team is a lot more coordinated. I can't go and flank torb since if they see my slow big hitbox ass I'm just feeding and even when I sit in the backline I'm not doing anything as I can't apply any aggression for my Frontline but put my self in deaths range against Cassidy or souljurn by just saying hi. Even dive comps destroy him as they're coordinated and they just destroy my turret and focus me first so I can't bully the tank. It feels like I'm just feeding every game by playing him at this point. When am I supposed to play torb then? I've played multiple games with other characters mainly cas and genji or pharah are the ones I think of rn but they just feel light years easier to get value with and I literally don't have to think as much. Characters like genji and pharaoh require a little bit of positioning but when I play people like souljurn Cassidy or soldier I might as well have been drooling out of my mouth. felt like a point and click adventure game with a bunch of pretty colors. I didn't think of positioning as anyone who challenged me was sorry because I can just kill them so quick. No thought about bullets needing to be somewhere as they go where u aim. Ults took a little bit of brain power but that's it.I climbed to almost top 500 recently and was steadily playing masters 4 games for a little but just recently got into a losing streak and am diamond 1. I just can't win anymore and idk if it's me or the character at this point. I'm determined to stay with my little torb but anytime I play literally any hitscan or almost any other character. I feel like I'm just doing "more". My main question here is am I wrong for wanting torb to be stronger along with the other characters? Am I weird for thinking he's one of the weakest characters and when is he actually a better pick compared to everyone else. Please answer my questions and maybe tell me again what to do to bring the most out of torb. I swear I've read all the reddits and watched all the guides on what to do with this character for every map and every character and every scenario but it doesn't feel to even matter. But BINGO!

Welcome, students, to a world where understanding computer networks isn't just about theory, but about hands-on experience. At computernetworkassignmenthelp.com, we pride ourselves on providing comprehensive assistance to students struggling with their computer assignments. Today, we're thrilled to introduce an exclusive offer that will revolutionize the way you approach your assignments. Dive into the world of Wireshark, the ultimate tool for network analysis, and witness the difference it makes in your learning journey.
Wireshark Assignment Help:
Understanding computer networks often requires more than just reading textbooks or attending lectures. It demands practical knowledge and expertise in tools like Wireshark, which allow you to analyze network traffic with precision. Whether you're grappling with packet sniffing, network troubleshooting, or protocol analysis, our team of experts is here to guide you every step of the way. With our Wireshark assignment help services, you can gain a deeper understanding of networking concepts and excel in your coursework.
Why Wireshark?
Wireshark isn't just another tool in the arsenal of network engineers; it's a game-changer. With its intuitive interface and powerful features, Wireshark empowers users to dissect network protocols, troubleshoot network issues, and analyze security vulnerabilities. From beginners to seasoned professionals, Wireshark caters to all levels of expertise, making it an indispensable tool in the world of computer networking.
Exclusive Offer: 20% OFF on Wireshark Tools
As a token of our appreciation for your trust in our services, we're excited to announce an exclusive offer on Wireshark tools. For a limited time, use the referral code WAHFF20 to avail yourself of a 20% discount on all Wireshark-related assignments. Whether you're struggling with capturing packets, decoding protocols, or interpreting network traces, our experts are here to provide personalized assistance tailored to your needs. Don't miss out on this opportunity to transform your assignments and elevate your understanding of computer networks.
Benefits of Choosing Us:

1. Expert Guidance: Our team comprises seasoned professionals with years of experience in computer networking and Wireshark analysis. Rest assured, you're in capable hands.
   
2. Customized Solutions: We understand that every assignment is unique. That's why we offer personalized solutions tailored to your specific requirements, ensuring maximum satisfaction.
   
3. Timely Delivery: We value your time as much as you do. With our prompt service and efficient workflow, you can expect timely delivery of your assignments without any compromise on quality.
   
4. 24/7 Support: Have a question or need clarification at any hour? Our dedicated support team is available round the clock to address your concerns and provide assistance whenever you need it.
   

How to Avail the Offer:

1. Visit our website, computernetworkassignmenthelp.com.
   
2. Choose the Wireshark assignment help service that suits your needs.
   
3. Use the referral code WAHFF20 during checkout to apply the 20% discount.
   
4. Sit back and relax while our experts work their magic on your assignments.
   

Conclusion:
In the ever-evolving landscape of computer networking, staying ahead of the curve is essential. With our Wireshark assignment help services and exclusive discount offer, you have the opportunity to sharpen your skills, overcome challenges, and emerge as a confident, competent professional. Don't let assignments bog you down; embrace the power of Wireshark and unlock new possibilities in your academic journey. Transform your assignments today and embark on a path to success with computernetworkassignmenthelp.com.

Hey everyone! So I have always lived in high rise buildings with fantastic management, amenities, and maintenance. But I had a baby last year and decided it was time to move to a quieter and safer location. The apartment itself is very nice and has everything we need as a family, but it keeps having somewhat minor issues. I’m genuinely not sure if these issues are to be expected and I’m just spoiled, or are these real problems I need to address?
I’m not sure if this matters, but this is a middle class, mildly upscale, complex with about 1500 townhouses and apartments split in smaller buildings, all gated and homey feeling. I will just go ahead and list the issues I’ve had since May 1st.

1. Power went out for about 20 mins. I called emergency maintenance and left a voicemail per my welcome packet instructions, no response or follow up on their end but power did come back on.
   
2. May 4th I submitted a maintenance request because the dryer isn’t working, they came a day later and determined the knob was broken. They ordered parts, haven’t heard from them since. I have been using a power drill to turn the knob and use my dryer as that’s the only way.
   
3. The gas fireplace smokes and sets off the smoke alarms. They checked it out and used a C02 detector and said it’s not leaking. When I asked why it smokes and sets off alarms the maintenance man didn’t have an answer or offer to look at it more.
   
4. The hot water is “private”(?), as in the tank is in my unit and only for my use idk I’m not well versed in that stuff, but it can’t even fill a bath tub with hot water after no hot water being used for hours. This home has two extra large bathtubs and I have a baby so this one does really matter to me. I’ve been going olden days with pots of boiling water to heat it up for my son.
   
5. Breakers short out almost everyday. Not a huge inconvenience but it can be frustrating when I have the oven going and I don’t even realize the kitchen just turned off.
   
6. Phone service in my home is unreasonably bad, but perfectly fine anywhere else in the community. I can’t have phone calls or use data at all in my home.
   
7. Secondary bathtub (my bathtub since the master bath is in the room my son sleeps in) always spews out dark black specks when I initially run it. After it drains the remaining specks leave black smears on the tub, they come off with magic eraser.
   

Am I overreacting and this is all just part of living in more of a townhouse situation? Is this complete bs and I should make a big deal out of it?

I’ve just finished Jeremy IT lab. It took me 2 months because I’ve always do the practise lab and anki flashcards on a daily basis. Now, what will be the next step to prepare for CCNA? Can I try with boson ex sim?
Actually, I don’t know if Jeremy is enough to go for a simulation Exam on Boson.
Any suggestion?
Thanks :)

i was playing a comp game around 11:40 and was talking abt how its gonna be my birthday at 12 and everyone in the game vc were saying hbd and that they hope it goes well and the one person who didnt have a mic typed “happy birthday 2 our mercy!!” in all chat and everyone on the enemy team stopped fighting and crouched around me saying hi, then i was solo ulted by the tracer

Hi Everyone. I have made a path for myself on becoming a L1 SOC. Any advice or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. I'll try to keep it short. I started my masters in cybersecurity in Fall 2023 and will graduate in May 2025.
Completed November 2023- Google cybersecurity by Coursera Jan 15th- cleared Security + March 2nd - Cleared BTL1 and SOC Level path from TryHackMe May 3rd- cleared CDSA by HacktheBox.
Below are my goals and objectives for the coming year 1- clear CCNA by July 1st week(I should have gotten a networking cert before but I made a mistake) Don't wanna do Network + over CCNA. 2- Clear CYSA + by September 1st week 3- complete a full Blown SOC home lab that includes splunk, lima Charlie, and much more. (Taking some help from Eric Capuano's blog) 4- Do another practical Blue team Cert probably CCD by December 2nd week.
Apart from this I actively participate in online platform like BTLO to hone my skills. Probably going to do BTLO till June end and then shift to TCM Security Labs. I tried getting a summer internship but couldn't. :(
I made my university CTF team as well so we participate every week in different ctf competitions.
As for my experience, this is somewhere I lack unfortunately. I only have 4 months of technical support internship and 3 months of Data Analyst. Did my bachelors in Mechanical engineering.
If you have read this far I greatly appreciate it. :)

https://imgur.com/a/0QOYg1b Tokyo marui ksg shotgun, come with 3 tank none leak, 8 shell, ksg acetech tracer with flash light. 995$
https://imgur.com/a/h518lwe
https://imgur.com/a/L3qNMNV mws with 1 mags. 2 upper and 1 extra receiver and hop up unit. Brand new radian charging handle tan match gun pic in video, Bjtac 556, Bjtac outer barrel 10.5, Bjtac hopup, Unicorn barrel, Pdi w70 bucking, Dynamic spring set , Revanchist npas, Brand new federal concept feda npas, Ctr stock repro, Hao mk16 10.5 hand guard , Original box 📦. The second receiver is t8 upper, T8 hopup, T8 bucking , Stock inner barrel, Stock outter barrel, Stock handguard, T8 receiver , Extra stock outter barrel 552 red dot it turn on work just not great. Gun does have minor scratches on hao handguard shows in pictures. Other than that, it's in excellent condition. $1480 for the full package firm. All sell are final, shipping on buyer. I have 43 vouch on hopup if needed.

What is one OW character you despised at first but ended up enjoying after learning said character?
I used to hate Lucios (not the healbot lucios but Lucios that can go on the offensive side of things). I mainly played as DPS and Tank when I first started OW2 a year and a half ago. With the only support character I’ve played being Zen for his DPS-like capabilities. I know , that’s silly but I’ve shredded teams playing as that metallic monk. Normally , I would shred through healbot lucios who couldn’t wallrun or boop to save their life. But..I would run into some Lucios whose wallrun was too cool and calculated. And those Lucios most certainly wasn’t afraid of a fight. I will not lie, some of my rage inducing moments comes from a Lucio who knows what they’re doing and is good with his aim. So months ago I’ve decided to pick him up since I had started practicing playing support so I can play all roles if any of mates wanted to switch out. I will not lie. It was a tough learning curve for me learning Lucio. It took me a good 2 weeks to adjust to the character’s play style, capabilities, weaknesses, strengths, and more importantly, his wall run mechanics. Now I’ve got over 40 hours of playtime on Lucio at the current time of this post. And I love playing as him now when I’m support because I’ve gotten his wallrun mechanics down to the point where I was able to successfully do the infamous Lijang tower rollout (only once lol) , having resulted in me booping an enemy rein and tracer off the bridge. I’ve gotten myself out of sticky situations thanks to his wall run and speed, kept my teammates healed and we’ve even been able to make some team plays with my ult/speed mechanic. I especially love displacing enemies with the boop or just overall booping them off an edge into oblivion. Most notable accomplishments I’ve achieved as Lucio was successfully doing the Lijang tower rollout once, having done 17k heals as the most amount of heals I’ve done as a Lucio , and having gotten 25 elims one match.

Hi, we have multiple servers across a few different countries and our users are worldwide. We are wanting to add a new server to be able to reduce the latency. I don't have access to the current servers to analyse the packets from there. They all respond to the same IP address via anycast.
This is what I'm planning to do:

1. Get a bunch of free HTTP/SOCKS VPNs around the world and connect to them (e.g. 123.123.123.123)
2. While connected, conduct a ping test to the VPN server, to measure the time it takes from my PC to VPN server and back
3. While connected, conduct a ping test to thw anycast address

Take 3 minus 2 and we get the supposedly latency from that ASN.
From there, we can identify which ASNs supposedly have the highest latency from ping responses, and deploy a server there.
Is there anything I'm missing here?

I literally had my medical/agility/investigation interview for NYS DOCCS a couple days ago. Before I went I was so curious as to what to expect so here’s how the day went for those applying currently.
Remember the entire day you’re there is part of the interview. Make sure you follow all the instructions including what’s written on your paperwork. The staff is always watching. I made sure to say hi and thank you to everyone I met regardless of what their job duty was and I did it with a smile.
First, you do the medical (pee test, hearing, EKG, eye exam and blood test). Then you meet with a physician to go over your medical evaluation. Then you’ll do the agility test. The only “difficult” part of the job is the 3 min step test. As long as you don’t quit or stumble, they’ll pass you. Just don’t quit!!
After all that you’ll meet with your assigned investigator. They’ll go over your packet line for line making sure everything was filled out and answered appropriately. And that was it. They didn’t even ask any personality questions like why you want to be a CO or ask about any experiences in careers related to the job.
Once that’s done they discuss the process and say no news is good news. My investigator said the process takes about 3-6 months but I’ve been reading people are getting called within 2 weeks. So now it’s just a waiting game. Good luck to everyone!

Finally got around to experimenting with the new Inaros kit and stumbled into my new favorite build - Kitty summoner wisp.
Using the dessication subsume and augment (over her 2) you can summon 5 swarm kavats to spread scarab swarm and infinitely resummon as long as you kill swarm afflicted units.
The kavats pick up the shock mote buff and the zaps spread the swarm very quickly. Combined with breach surge it is a bit of a graphical charlie foxtrot. Overall a very easy setup and you can run pretty much any weapon you want - having an absolute blast using the swarm tics as tracer rounds while my possy of pussies overruns everything.
Having no issues in steel path but I'm sure you have to rely on her stealth for survivability in endurance.
Credit to aznvasions for breaking down the mechanic, definitely recommend checking it out!

TL:DR: Playing any dive/rush tank is absolutely miserable as a solo queue experience because their counters require less skill from the opposition and more team coordination from your own teammates
I am seeing a lot of frustration with these static tanks of Orisa, Hog and Mauga from tank players and the community as a whole completely missing why we are frustrated from the ladder experience. I will first discuss why tank players (a small minority given the queue times and statistics we've seen in the past) enjoy certain tanks and the give a flow chart dialogue of what the community expects from their tank player when confronted with static tanks.
1) Dive and rush tanks are fun because they demand thoughtful positioning.
Tanks in OW2 are balanced around highlighting fine tuning these 3 characteristics: mobility, damage and sustainability. We can see that in dive tanks (Winston, DVA, Ball, Doomfist), which trade the other 2 for mobility. Their gameplan is to focus on punishing the enemy positioning by either breaking up enemy clusters or quickly helping with their own team backline. It's a dynamic class of characters that is exciting because of the quick decisions required to be made based on the state of the fight. Rush tanks (Rein, Ram, JQ, Zarya) trade the others in for damage. Though their playstyle requires a bit of set-up to get into the right position to start the brawl, this class of tanks are rewarded by the exciting moment of the fight unleashing onto the enemy. The third class of tanks (Sigma, Hog, Orisa, Mauga) focus on sustaining themselves theoretically in exchange for the other two characteristics, but fail to do so in reality (except for Sigma, who actually has drawbacks in his kit (range, damage) for being able to have a flexible shield, stun and kinetic grasp). The lack of ranged damage should be what stops them, but this drawback doesn't matter because not only can all 3 of the remainder tanks effectively still poke at a distance, they excel the most at close quarters which is the range at which ALL tanks need to be at. The dive tanks and rush tanks are punished for their efforts of taking positioning due to this third class of tanks being able to poke better than them, and then also punish them for coming close. Hog is theoretically supposed to be held back by his lack of range, but his damage reduction lets him brush off the entire team EVEN with an Ana nade (which this argument doesn't even consider Kiriko). Sure Hog can miss his hook, but engagement is still risky because going closer to him only plays into his strong shotgun. Mauga still remains strong (albeit perhaps not as strong as Hog and Orisa) because of his free disengage tool that lets him escape with literally no consequence and his lifesteal makes him unkillable especially when your tank is engaging with him. Combined with the tank passives, this third class of tanks are not only unkillable, you can't even farm ult charge off of them! Whereas dive and rush tanks gain no value from not engaging, the sustain tanks still can poke and benefit even more when they are engaged upon by the other team. Whereas other tanks demand thought in positioning in order to not take unnecessary damage, this class of tanks can, for the most part, be static with their team and not need to take risks because their firepower will easily outlast the other tanks' abilities to engage/disengage.
2) What can be done?
So here I'm going to write a couple suggestions provided by this community in response to dealing with this static class of tanks and then write a flow chart of decisions that are made. (this is assuming anything team-dependant actually goes your way)
A. Suppose you ask the support to switch to Ana and Zen
This further encourages a poke-fest and further benefits the sustain tanks because now you may have potentially lowered your team's healing output. Whether its attack or defense, this situation benefits the enemy team because they can just "outstall" your options.
B. Suppose you ask one of the dps to switch to Echo
Now the enemy team acknowledges you and runs double hitscan to really make sure there's no fun allowed. Now if you did both the first option and this one, then the team struggles even more because of the dps passive. Furthermore, in the first 2 cases, you're forced to further rely on your team to not play out of position as well because despite having an "advantage" with the character choice, one small mistake can lead to a hook, spear, stun that will lead to that player's immediate death.
C. Switch to sustain tank yourself
Well then why would I not start with this in the first place? Let me forgo my will in all of this and become a damage sponge so that in the poke-fest my team can potentially win. The tank is for the most part removed from any decision making because I just stand there, relatively risk free, and poking away until something gives. It is unbelievable that everybody gets to play to go for a kill, but a single person is devoted to doing everything then can to just stay alive and earn the ability to play the game. Why even enjoy the other tanks if all roads lead to Orisa, Hog and Mauga?
D. Play in a stack
I guess I should just schedule rank sessions because that is the amount of dedication I should be putting into a video game. I apologize for my lack of respect to the game and for my inability to find and lead teammates I can call my own.
3) Conclusion
The tank passive completely negates any penalty for playing the sustain tanks, and remove any form of enjoyment from playing other tanks that demand more active decision making. They are the only class of tanks that can reap benefits from both active and passive gameplay, a luxury that the others do not have whatsoever. I personally find it ridiculous that all characters have checks and balances that don't entirely demand on the team (DVA for pharah/echo or Winston, Winston for tracegenji or Sigma, Rein for hitscan or Zarya) yet the only true ability to deal with sustain tank as a tank player is to mirror! I apologize to those I've played with for not playing a static tank when I am being hard countered because I don't want to just gun go brr. To the argument of how pro-play shows that these characters are not dominant, I say: I thought this game wasn't balanced around numbers and pros? It's absolutely frustrating not being allowed to play active tanks, and then further maddening when the community talks about how "simple" the solutions are.
PS. I completely agree with that guy that posted about how OW2 devs definitely are catering towards the sustain tanks because the majority of the playerbase can't seem to play without a tank holding their hand.

Hi folks, I don't want to bore you with a long story but I feel it's unavoidable in order to explain my situation thoroughly so I'll start with bullets to give an overview of what my console is telling me.

• Mesh WiFi
• 100+ mbps download, 25+mbps upload
• ≈23ms latency
• 0-1% packet loss
• NAT type moderate
• UPnP unsuccessful
• Xbox Series X
• enabling QoS tagging temporarily resolves the issue for a few minutes maximum

Story: before I moved out of my parents place in 2018 I had this same issue, NAT type switching from open to moderate over and over, with open still presenting the same issues (almost as if it's actually moderate all the time despite displaying as open) and I never managed to get it working, my Dad runs his business from home and he is the network administrator, he assures me everything is fine with the router and settings. UPnP on, zero config etc
But nothing I do will fix the problem.
I move out, get my own router and everything, and it just works straight out of the box. Finally I have smooth online gaming without any lag issues (network speeds are identical to my parents place) 5 years of smooth gaming pass and sadly I'm forced to move back in with my parents, who now live somewhere else, but have the same network config as they did before.
Now I'm back in their new house and I'm having the same issues again, on both wired and wireless connections. Since I last lived with them my console now has the QoS tagging settings which 'appears' to resolve the issue when I test my NAT type and connection, but it doesn't, the issue persists - I can't hear audio in party chat clearly, it's distorted. I get a constant latency warning when trying to play multiplayer, despite my network speed being fine. I feared I would have this problem again before moving back in and my worst fears have been confirmed. I had to deal with this from 2009 when I was 16 trying to play modern warfare 2 with my buddies, and it continued until I left home in 2018. Hardware has been upgraded, replaced, even ISP has changed in that time and yet, whenever I'm at my parents place I have this issue.
I'm at a loss of what to do, is this anything to do with mesh WiFi? Because on paper the only difference between our networks is that here they're using 'Tenda Nova' brand mesh WiFi system and I wasn't - we have the same ISP and even the same tarrif too.
I cannot find the source of the issue and it's driving me nuts because I'm the only one in the house who is negatively affected by it so nobody else really cares. Every other device including my phone works fine, it's only my Xbox. I help run a sim racing league on Assetto Corsa and I've been unable to partake in any races since I moved back in, this sucks because it's my main hobby and every week I have to watch them all racing live on twitch knowing I can't even connect.
If anyone can suggest anything to help me out here I'd be eternally grateful, it's gonna be a long year if I can't relax and play games in the evenings after work :(
Something is definitely wrong with the network settings somewhere, because my own 'vanilla' network worked just fine
Thank you for reading my post, happy to answer any questions that I'm able to

Keeping your RV’s black tank clean and odor-free is essential for a comfortable and enjoyable camping experience. RV black tank additives are the key to maintaining proper sanitation and preventing unpleasant odors while on the road. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore everything you need to know about RV black tank additives, including how they work, why they’re essential, and how to choose the best one for your RV adventures.
Some of the best Products on the market
Thetford Aquramax ✔
RARITAN C.P. CLEANS ✔
RARITAN K.O ✔
DOMETIC MAX CONTROL ✔
THETFORD AQUABIO✔

Understanding RV Black Tank Additives

RV black tank additives are specially formulated chemicals or natural compounds designed to break down waste, control odors, and lubricate tank valves and sensors. These additives are essential for maintaining proper sanitation and preventing clogs, buildup, and foul smells in your RV’s black tank.

The Importance of Using RV Black Tank Additives

Using RV black tank additives offers several benefits for RV owners:

• Odor Control: Additives neutralize odors by breaking down waste and inhibiting the growth of odor-causing bacteria, ensuring a fresh and pleasant indoor environment.
• Waste Digestion: Additives accelerate the breakdown of organic waste, including solids, paper, and grease, reducing the risk of clogs and blockages in the black tank and sewer system.
• Tank Lubrication: Some additives contain lubricating agents that coat tank surfaces and lubricate valves and seals, preventing friction, corrosion, and damage to essential components.

Choosing the Best RV Black Tank Additive

When selecting an RV black tank additive, consider the following factors to ensure optimal performance and compatibility:

1. Type of Additive:

RV black tank additives are available in three main types:

• Chemical Additives: These additives contain powerful chemicals that break down waste and control odors effectively. They are suitable for most RV black tanks but may pose environmental concerns and health risks.
• Enzyme-Based Additives: Enzyme-based additives utilize natural enzymes to digest waste and neutralize odors without harsh chemicals. They are environmentally friendly and safe for septic systems.
• Bio-Packs or Drop-Ins: These pre-measured packets or tablets contain concentrated formulas of enzymes, bacteria, and other ingredients for easy and convenient dosing. They are ideal for occasional or seasonal RV users.

2. Odor Control:

Choose an additive with strong odor control properties to ensure a fresh and pleasant indoor environment in your RV. Look for additives with long-lasting fragrance and odor-neutralizing capabilities.

3. Compatibility:

Ensure that the additive is compatible with your RV’s plumbing system, including rubber seals, valves, and sensors. Avoid additives that contain harsh chemicals or abrasive ingredients that may damage or degrade tank components.

Top Picks for RV Black Tank Additives

Several reputable brands offer high-quality RV black tank additives tailored to the needs of RV owners:

• Camco: Camco offers a range of RV black tank additives, including chemical-based and enzyme-based formulas, designed to break down waste, control odors, and lubricate tank components.
• Thetford: Thetford’s line of RV black tank additives features powerful formulations that digest waste, eliminate odors, and maintain tank cleanliness for hassle-free RVing.
• Happy Campers: Happy Campers’ organic RV tank treatment contains natural enzymes and bacteria cultures that break down waste and neutralize odors without harsh chemicals, ensuring a clean and odor-free black tank.

Conclusion

Investing in the best RV black tank additive is essential for maintaining proper sanitation, preventing odors, and prolonging the lifespan of your RV’s plumbing system. Whether you prefer chemical-based additives for rapid waste breakdown, enzyme-based additives for eco-friendly odor control, or convenient drop-ins for hassle-free dosing, there’s an RV black tank additive available to suit your needs and preferences. Choose the best RV black tank additive for your RV adventures and enjoy clean, odor-free travels on the open road. Happy camping!

The Ultimate Guide to RV Black Tank Additives
Keeping your RV’s black tank clean and odor-free is essential for a comfortable and enjoyable camping experience. RV black tank additives are the key to maintaining proper sanitation and preventing unpleasant odors while on the road. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore everything you need to know about RV black tank additives, including how they work, why they’re essential, and how to choose the best one for your RV adventures.
Some of the best Products on the market
Thetford Aquramax ✔
RARITAN C.P. CLEANS ✔
RARITAN K.O ✔
DOMETIC MAX CONTROL ✔
THETFORD AQUABIO✔

Understanding RV Black Tank Additives

RV black tank additives are specially formulated chemicals or natural compounds designed to break down waste, control odors, and lubricate tank valves and sensors. These additives are essential for maintaining proper sanitation and preventing clogs, buildup, and foul smells in your RV’s black tank.

The Importance of Using RV Black Tank Additives

Using RV black tank additives offers several benefits for RV owners:

• Odor Control: Additives neutralize odors by breaking down waste and inhibiting the growth of odor-causing bacteria, ensuring a fresh and pleasant indoor environment.
• Waste Digestion: Additives accelerate the breakdown of organic waste, including solids, paper, and grease, reducing the risk of clogs and blockages in the black tank and sewer system.
• Tank Lubrication: Some additives contain lubricating agents that coat tank surfaces and lubricate valves and seals, preventing friction, corrosion, and damage to essential components.

Choosing the Best RV Black Tank Additive

When selecting an RV black tank additive, consider the following factors to ensure optimal performance and compatibility:

1. Type of Additive:

RV black tank additives are available in three main types:

• Chemical Additives: These additives contain powerful chemicals that break down waste and control odors effectively. They are suitable for most RV black tanks but may pose environmental concerns and health risks.
• Enzyme-Based Additives: Enzyme-based additives utilize natural enzymes to digest waste and neutralize odors without harsh chemicals. They are environmentally friendly and safe for septic systems.
• Bio-Packs or Drop-Ins: These pre-measured packets or tablets contain concentrated formulas of enzymes, bacteria, and other ingredients for easy and convenient dosing. They are ideal for occasional or seasonal RV users.

2. Odor Control:

Choose an additive with strong odor control properties to ensure a fresh and pleasant indoor environment in your RV. Look for additives with long-lasting fragrance and odor-neutralizing capabilities.

3. Compatibility:

Ensure that the additive is compatible with your RV’s plumbing system, including rubber seals, valves, and sensors. Avoid additives that contain harsh chemicals or abrasive ingredients that may damage or degrade tank components.

Top Picks for RV Black Tank Additives

Several reputable brands offer high-quality RV black tank additives tailored to the needs of RV owners:

• Camco: Camco offers a range of RV black tank additives, including chemical-based and enzyme-based formulas, designed to break down waste, control odors, and lubricate tank components.
• Thetford: Thetford’s line of RV black tank additives features powerful formulations that digest waste, eliminate odors, and maintain tank cleanliness for hassle-free RVing.
• Happy Campers: Happy Campers’ organic RV tank treatment contains natural enzymes and bacteria cultures that break down waste and neutralize odors without harsh chemicals, ensuring a clean and odor-free black tank.

Conclusion

Investing in the best RV black tank additive is essential for maintaining proper sanitation, preventing odors, and prolonging the lifespan of your RV’s plumbing system. Whether you prefer chemical-based additives for rapid waste breakdown, enzyme-based additives for eco-friendly odor control, or convenient drop-ins for hassle-free dosing, there’s an RV black tank additive available to suit your needs and preferences. Choose the best RV black tank additive for your RV adventures and enjoy clean, odor-free travels on the open road. Happy camping!