2009.11.19 20:07 Gatecrasherc6 headphones: cans for nerds, stuff that matters
2024.05.22 04:08 camusurfing Bill Clinton and Kosovo
Thirty one people in Kosovo are named ‘Klinton’ and another two are named ‘Clinton’. Someone might think that that’s not surprising. Things become a little more interesting when one looks into the data of ‘Statistical agency of Kosovo’ and figures that the first ever occurrence of somebody being named ‘Klinton’ in Kosovo was in 1993, the very same year when the 42nd president of US, Bill Clinton, assumed office. The other ‘Klintons’ were named as follows: 7 in 1999, 4 in 2000, another 4 in 2001 and various numbers throughout the years until the last baby was named in 2020. This name did not exist as a name in Albanian (for those unfamiliar with the region: Kosovo has 94% Albanian population) and was purely created in honor of Bill Clinton. Apart from the creation of a new name(as far as Albanian is concerned), Kosovo created a large statue of Bill which was unveiled by the man himself on 1st of November 2009. Just a few meters away from his statue there’s a women’s clothing store named Hillary(last picture). This is easily one of the most frequented roads, by pedestrians and cars alike, in whole of Kosovo. Elsewhere in Prishtina, another street has also been named after U.S. President George W. Bush. In addition, several cities in Kosovo, including Prizren, have streets named after President Woodrow Wilson. In 2016 Kosovo government renamed a 21-mile roadway in the southeastern part of the country as the Joseph R. "Beau" B***n III National Road. The love of Albanians for US goes way back and a tiny glimpse of that is demonstrated by two famous lines that close each of seven verses of a poem named ‘Give to the mother’ that was written by Fan Stilian Noli (6 January 1882 – 13 March 1965, an Albanian writer, scholar, diplomat, politician, historian, orator, Archbishop, Metropolitan and founder of the Albanian Orthodox Church and the Albanian Orthodox Archdiocese in America) in the begging of 20th century: submitted by camusurfing to Presidents [link] [comments] ‘Hold on, mother, don’t be scared Since your sons are in America’ Now I understand that all of this may seem excessive to many people, but being a person who went through the 90s as a little kid in Kosovo, I must admit that I understand every single aspect of our admiration for US and Bill Clinton. From being a kid who at 5, literally repeatedly was trying to convince himself that ‘I had lived enough and death is not long’ to being liberated, causes one to have a fair bit of lifelong undiluted adoration for USA 🇺🇸 I remember for many years having a big and quality US flag in the room which I shared with my sibling. I remember the only time ever my parents bought a dozen beer cans(liberation day) and I also remember the shock when I, a kid naive in matters of love, heard my aunt laughingly declare ‘I love [husband name] but I would cheat on him with Bill Clinton [giggles], and I don’t think he would even mind’. Mind you, Kosovo has no oil or diamonds. ‘We must follow the example of the World War II generation, by standing up to aggression and hate.’ Bill Clinton regarding NATO intervention in Kosovo P.S. I am aware of how borderline chaotic my writing is but it’s way too late in here and I was supposed to be asleep 4 hours ago. Also pics 1-6 are mine while 7,8,9 are taken from internet. |
2024.05.22 04:08 Yankeebot IT'S NOT WHAT YOU WANT: The Yankees fell to the Mariners by a score of 6-3 - May 21, 2024 @ 07:05 PM EDT
Mariners Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Crawford, J - SS | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .194 | .286 | .290 |
2 | Rodríguez, J - CF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | .268 | .317 | .325 |
3 | Raley, L - LF | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .306 | .336 | .472 |
4 | Raleigh - C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | .219 | .300 | .444 |
5 | Canzone - RF | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .217 | .288 | .522 |
a-Haniger - RF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .216 | .281 | .364 | |
6 | France, T - 1B | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .242 | .289 | .379 |
7 | Garver - DH | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .179 | .282 | .343 |
8 | Rojas, J - 3B | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .290 | .359 | .427 |
9 | Moore, D - 2B | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .243 | .350 | .504 |
Totals | 36 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 14 |
Mariners |
---|
a-Struck out for Canzone in the 8th. |
BATTING: 2B: Rojas, J (5, Schmidt); Garver (7, Santana, D). HR: Moore, D 2 (6, 3rd inning off Schmidt, 1 on, 1 out, 9th inning off Burdi, 0 on, 0 out); France, T (5, 7th inning off Santana, D, 0 on, 0 out); Raley, L (4, 8th inning off Andrews, 0 on, 0 out). TB: Crawford, J; France, T 5; Garver 3; Moore, D 9; Raley, L 4; Rojas, J 2. RBI: France, T (17); Moore, D 4 (19); Raley, L (12). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Rodríguez, J 2; Rojas, J. GIDP: France, T. Team RISP: 2-for-8. Team LOB: 6. |
FIELDING: E: Rodríguez, J (3, fielding). PB: Raleigh (1). |
Yankees Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Volpe - SS | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .269 | .341 | .421 |
2 | Soto, J - RF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .309 | .408 | .539 |
3 | Judge - DH | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .267 | .404 | .572 |
4 | Verdugo - LF | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .254 | .326 | .408 |
5 | Rizzo - 1B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .257 | .322 | .396 |
6 | Wells, A - C | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .205 | .312 | .308 |
a-Stanton - PH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .250 | .298 | .506 | |
Trevino - C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .283 | .330 | .446 | |
7 | Torres - 2B | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .223 | .301 | .310 |
8 | Cabrera, O - 3B | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .248 | .286 | .372 |
9 | Grisham - CF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .056 | .227 | .139 |
Totals | 32 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
Yankees |
---|
a-Popped out for Wells, A in the 7th. |
BATTING: 2B: Verdugo (11, Woo). HR: Torres (3, 7th inning off Thornton, 2 on, 2 out). TB: Torres 4; Trevino; Verdugo 2; Volpe; Wells, A. RBI: Torres 3 (14). 2-out RBI: Torres 3. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Rizzo; Judge; Cabrera, O. Team RISP: 1-for-6. Team LOB: 5. |
FIELDING: DP: (Volpe-Torres-Rizzo). |
Mariners Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woo (W, 2-0) | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 77-58 | 0.57 |
Speier | 0.1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17-9 | 4.50 |
Thornton (H, 5) | 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13-10 | 2.75 |
Stanek (H, 8) | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16-10 | 3.94 |
Muñoz, A (S, 10) | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18-12 | 1.69 |
Totals | 9.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1 |
Yankees Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schmidt (L, 5-2) | 5.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 100-62 | 2.59 |
González, V | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16-9 | 2.45 |
Santana, D | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17-11 | 5.03 |
Andrews | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15-10 | 27.00 |
Burdi | 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 21-13 | 1.93 |
Ferguson | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9-7 | 5.29 |
Totals | 9.0 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 4 |
Game Info |
---|
Balk: Santana, D. |
Disengagement violations: Santana, D. |
HBP: Raleigh (by Andrews); Rizzo (by Speier). |
Pitches-strikes: Woo 77-58; Speier 17-9; Thornton 13-10; Stanek 16-10; Muñoz, A 18-12; Schmidt 100-62; González, V 16-9; Santana, D 17-11; Andrews 15-10; Burdi 21-13; Ferguson 9-7. |
Groundouts-flyouts: Woo 5-3; Speier 0-0; Thornton 0-0; Stanek 1-1; Muñoz, A 2-0; Schmidt 4-3; González, V 1-1; Santana, D 1-2; Andrews 0-0; Burdi 0-0; Ferguson 1-0. |
Batters faced: Woo 20; Speier 3; Thornton 3; Stanek 4; Muñoz, A 5; Schmidt 20; González, V 3; Santana, D 6; Andrews 3; Burdi 4; Ferguson 3. |
Inherited runners-scored: Thornton 2-2; Burdi 1-0. |
Umpires: HP: D.J. Reyburn. 1B: Nic Lentz. 2B: Alex MacKay. 3B: Lance Barksdale. |
Weather: 76 degrees, Partly Cloudy. |
Wind: 8 mph, Out To LF. |
First pitch: 7:09 PM. |
T: 2:58. |
Att: 37,257. |
Venue: Yankee Stadium. |
May 21, 2024 |
Inning | Scoring Play | Score |
---|---|---|
Top 3 | Dylan Moore homers (5) on a fly ball to left field. Josh Rojas scores. | 2-0 SEA |
Top 7 | Ty France homers (5) on a fly ball to left center field. | 3-0 SEA |
Top 7 | Dylan Moore singles on a line drive to center fielder Trent Grisham. Mitch Garver scores. | 4-0 SEA |
Bottom 7 | Gleyber Torres homers (3) on a fly ball to left center field. Aaron Judge scores. Anthony Rizzo scores. | 4-3 SEA |
Top 8 | Luke Raley homers (4) on a fly ball to right field. | 5-3 SEA |
Top 9 | Dylan Moore homers (6) on a fly ball to right center field. | 6-3 SEA |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mariners | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 6 | |
Yankees | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2024.05.22 04:07 Zenth93 My family is a ball and chain.
2024.05.22 04:06 Shlowzimakes Resources for finishing techniques
I think I’m a medium-intermediate sewist, in that I can follow a relatively complex pattern. However, I mostly use indie patterns with very handholding instruction booklets. Recently I’ve been trying to use some vintage big 4 patterns, which are kind of the opposite of that. These garments are coming out much sloppier than my other pieces, and I’m sure it’s because the instructions in older patterns were written with the assumption that sewists just knew what finishing methods to use when. Most recently I made a princess seamed blouse with facings for the buttons instead of a placket and the facings are just flopping around inside. The instructions said to “finish the facing edges” so I zig zagged them, but there must be a nicer way of finishing and anchoring them down.this was my first experience with princess seams, I probably should have tried a more handholding pattern first. So my question is, how do you learn this stuff? Any resources for finishing techniques? Picture of the pattern I used, in case anyone is interested. submitted by Shlowzimakes to sewing [link] [comments] |
2024.05.22 04:06 Hell-Adjacent What Servant have you been waiting for forever?
2024.05.22 04:04 Evening_Road3633 I'm a playnite newbie
2024.05.22 04:04 Due-Clue-2425 Looking for my old Gen2
2024.05.22 04:04 Designer_Advice2573 A Long Awaited EliaUK Review
TLDR - It took a month for my watch to get from China to my house, after EliaUK asked me to pay extra for FedEx when he used UPS Ground Triangular shipping. It was very frustrating, but I think EliaUK is working on being a better TD. I don’t think, atm, that everyone should run for the hills and have his name removed from the TD list. But we are blessed with a lot of great options, and personally i would reccomend Nobile, PopUp and LiLi above him by a decent margin. submitted by Designer_Advice2573 to 1688Time [link] [comments] So I wanted to give the full synopsis of my expierence with EliaUK, for those interested in an in-depth and very wordy reivew of the process over the last couple of months, just for people to make an informed decision. Yes, I was one of those people caught up in the drama of EliaUK having terrible communication and shipping bambozzlement, and personally, I think he was just overloaded and frustrated by the western buyers’ wanting a particular level of service. But I do want to paint the good and the bad, for buyers purchasing in the future. So I first reached out to Elia on 4/1 (april 1st, for the non-americans) to inquire about a silver DJ. This would be my second purchase, as I had purchased a Cartier from David as my first rep for my sister’s birthday present. I had reached out to Elia, Lili, PopUp, DeLoveG, Lin Feng, NewTime, and David. Pricing was as follows: EliaUK - $378 (FedEx shipping was the supposed shipping method, we’ll get to that…) LiLi - $385 PopUp - $371 Lin Feng - $392 New Time - $431 David - $417 I was originally planning to use LiLi (had been wanting to because the reviews were great) but she was pretty slow to respond, which I took as her just being overloaded, so I passed there. PopUp was newer at the time, and I felt like there weren’t enough reviews to pull the trigger (that has since changed, and I had ordered and recieved a watch from him all while waiting for this watch from EliaUK to arrive). Lin Feng was starting to recieve some bad reviews, so I skipped that. And then New Time and David were just a lot higher. So I pulled the trigger on Elia I had specifically asked for FedEx tracked shipping, with insurance. His only reply was “200 No insurance”. Which is fine, I’m dabbling in the purchasing of replica watches from China, I should assume some level of risk. From this point forward I asked if he preferred Chinese or English, and he asked for Chinese, so I began to use google translate for all future conversations. I then asked to move forward with VSF 41mm DJ, and asked how long QC photos would take. He said 4-7 days, then he said FedEx shipping would be 350cny. I confirmed paypal, sent over the payment on 4/12 with the increased price for FedEx. 4/17 (5 days later, well within the quoted QC time) he sends over the pictures. Everything looks good, but someone on reddit had mentioned that one of the SELs might have a bit of a gap. I asked about it, and his resonse was “there must be something wrong with your vision”. Gonna chalk it up to poor translation, but that did start the feeling of not really having a lot of faith in this person as a TD. I know that sounds extremely petty, but compared to my conversations with LiLi, David, and PopUp, it just seemed a bit sharp, and I just want to be completely honest. Anyways, he sent a video 2 days later, I said screw it, I just want the watch, so I gave him the GL. Sent over the address and everything. 2 days later I get a shipping label, with a UPS code at the top. Now when it comes to purchasing illegal stuff from overseas, I assume the posture of “I’ll take what I can get”, so I didn’t really want to rock the boat and just be out a full $400 when I piss off some guy on the other side of the world. So I didn’t question him initially about the shipping, and maybe I should have, but again, I tried to just get my watch at the end of the day. So fast forward a week (4/29), I ask him if there is any chance that this watch was seized by customs, seeing as it hasn’t updated on the app (UPS just said, for about 3 and a half weeks, that “label has been created”). He said this was the safest way to ship, and told me to “be patient”. Which, in hindsight, I totally get. It is now it hand, all is well in the world. But whenever you pay extra for quicker, expedited shipping, and you’re told to just chill out? It just doesn’t really fix the issue. Around this time is when a lot of people were getting very fed up with Elia’s communication. For those not in the know, feel free to read up on it, they’re all still on this page I believe. But the issue that I was having was that I had no real clue if he was telling the truth or not. And it seemed like he had done this to a lot of people. Tommy (moderator) had mentioned that he sent over a logistics person to help Elia with his shipping situation, and honestly I think whoever he was using (whether it was the person Tommy suggested or not) was using THE CHEAPEST method possible to get watches to people. Also at that time, Tommy reached out to him to try and come to an understanding. Personally? I think that is crazy and extremely unnecessary. Tommy is a MODERATOR on a REDDIT PAGE. To assume a person on Reddit should go out of their way to fix your issues for you is crazy, especially when it’s about ILLEGAL WATCHES FROM CHINA. Tommy, good on you for doing it. But imo, that is insane lol. And I guess this brings me to my point: If this were THE STANDARD: you get rough communication with a person on the other side of the world, you throw money at them at the hopes that a watch comes in, and you’re grateful when it does, that would be completelty fine, and there were be no issues. But that’s just not the case right now. LiLi has been a much better communicator, and her prices have really set the bar high when it comes to getting a lot of watches to a lot of people at a very reasonable price. PopUp has done a phenomenal job of offering a very similar product. Nobile is not only doing things similar, but has raised the bar by trying to bring more watches to the states while also being very invested in the community. If Elia was the standard, I wouldn’t be writing this post, and I would be right there with the older heads in the room telling people to shut up and be grateful. But I don’t think that’s true. There are so many great options to choose from regarding TD’s in this subreddit, I just don’t see why you would feel the need to pay for one thing, get another thing, have poor communication, be told to chill out when questioning, then wait a month for your watch. Now, fwiw: It seems as if EliaUk has changed a handful of his processes over the last month. I have seen watches ordered after me arrive in the states before me. Clearly he is working on progressing, and being better. Whenever my shipping label did finally update, he actually sent me a picture first, unprovoked. At the end of the day, that is EFFORT. And I can be frustrated at a past issue, but I can also be adult enough to notice someone is trying to be better, and I tend to give them a second chance. So for those looking for a good TD, I think Nobile, PopUp, and LiLi all are great options and I personally think those are the ones that have definitely earned your business. I do think EliaUK is working on being better, and I do notice and really appreciate that |
2024.05.22 04:03 agnelchettiar Exploring Symptoms of Alopecia Areata Understanding the Puzzle of Patchy Hair Loss Best Hair Loss Treatment Coimbatore
2024.05.22 04:02 xtoxicxk23 New Bermuda turning red in some areas
Just seeded Bermuda about 1.5months ago and everything is filling in nicely. I noticed tonight that some very small areas had Bermuda grass with tips that were turning reddish. A quick search says that it could be low phosphorus. Does the picture I took match this suggestion? This is the first time I've ever grown a lawn so open to all the wisdom that can be shared! submitted by xtoxicxk23 to lawncare [link] [comments] |
2024.05.22 04:01 itsmelita My first relationship and I don’t know what to do.
2024.05.22 04:01 Zenth93 My family is a ball and chain.
2024.05.22 04:01 TigersBot The Tigers fell to the Royals by a score of 10-3 - Tue, May 21 @ 07:40 PM EDT
Tigers Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Greene, R - LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .240 | .350 | .451 |
2 | Canha - DH | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .231 | .355 | .397 |
3 | Pérez, W - CF | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .297 | .368 | .505 |
4 | Carpenter, K - RF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .276 | .322 | .545 |
5 | Vierling - 3B | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .268 | .292 | .428 |
6 | Keith, C - 2B | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .230 | .286 | .267 |
7 | Torkelson - 1B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | .218 | .284 | .346 |
8 | McKinstry - SS | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .200 | .293 | .246 |
a-Ibáñez - SS | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .279 | .303 | .410 | |
9 | Kelly, C - C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | .216 | .318 | .284 |
Totals | 33 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Tigers |
---|
a-Flied out for McKinstry in the 7th. |
BATTING: 2B: Keith, C (5, Anderson, N). 3B: Vierling (4, Marsh). TB: Keith, C 4; Pérez, W; Vierling 4. RBI: Keith, C (14); Vierling 2 (18). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Torkelson; Kelly, C. Team RISP: 2-for-6. Team LOB: 6. |
FIELDING: E: Keith, C (4, throw). |
Royals Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Garcia, M - 3B | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .263 | .308 | .429 |
2 | Witt Jr. - SS | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .304 | .362 | .546 |
Hampson - SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .255 | .296 | .294 | |
3 | Pasquantino - 1B | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .230 | .307 | .412 |
4 | Perez, S - C | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .343 | .404 | .560 |
5 | Massey - 2B | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .283 | .295 | .495 |
6 | Frazier - DH | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .189 | .294 | .253 |
7 | Melendez - LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .179 | .232 | .345 |
8 | Renfroe - RF | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .160 | .236 | .282 |
9 | Isbel - CF | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .220 | .267 | .354 |
Totals | 38 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
Royals |
---|
BATTING: 2B: Pasquantino (13, Mize). 3B: Garcia, M 2 (3, Mize, Holton, T). HR: Witt Jr. 2 (7, 2nd inning off Mize, 2 on, 1 out, 6th inning off Foley, 0 on, 0 out); Renfroe (4, 7th inning off Wentz, 0 on, 1 out). TB: Frazier; Garcia, M 8; Isbel 2; Massey; Pasquantino 2; Perez, S 2; Renfroe 4; Witt Jr. 9. RBI: Garcia, M (32); Massey (20); Perez, S (39); Renfroe (18); Witt Jr. 6 (31). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Melendez 2. SF: Massey; Witt Jr. Team RISP: 4-for-7. Team LOB: 7. |
Tigers Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mize (L, 1-3) | 1.2 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 52-37 | 4.57 |
Holton, T | 3.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 36-26 | 3.91 |
Foley | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20-13 | 2.45 |
Wentz | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 31-25 | 3.86 |
Totals | 8.0 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
Royals Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marsh (W, 4-1) | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 94-59 | 2.72 |
Zerpa | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-5 | 1.40 |
Long | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-7 | 0.00 |
Anderson, N | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 30-20 | 4.15 |
Totals | 9.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
Game Info |
---|
Pitches-strikes: Mize 52-37; Holton, T 36-26; Foley 20-13; Wentz 31-25; Marsh 94-59; Zerpa 7-5; Long 10-7; Anderson, N 30-20. |
Groundouts-flyouts: Mize 2-2; Holton, T 3-1; Foley 0-2; Wentz 2-1; Marsh 3-2; Zerpa 1-2; Long 1-1; Anderson, N 0-1. |
Batters faced: Mize 15; Holton, T 13; Foley 5; Wentz 8; Marsh 25; Zerpa 3; Long 3; Anderson, N 5. |
Inherited runners-scored: Holton, T 2-0. |
Umpires: HP: Clint Vondrak. 1B: Mark Wegner. 2B: Bruce Dreckman. 3B: Jeremie Rehak. |
Weather: 75 degrees, Partly Cloudy. |
Wind: 18 mph, L To R. |
First pitch: 6:40 PM. |
T: 2:19. |
Att: 14,031. |
Venue: Kauffman Stadium. |
May 21, 2024 |
Inning | Scoring Play | Score |
---|---|---|
Bottom 1 | Bobby Witt Jr. singles on a ground ball to pitcher Casey Mize. Maikel Garcia scores. | 1-0 KC |
Bottom 1 | Salvador Perez singles on a line drive to right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Bobby Witt Jr. scores. | 2-0 KC |
Bottom 2 | Bobby Witt Jr. homers (6) on a fly ball to center field. Kyle Isbel scores. Maikel Garcia scores. | 5-0 KC |
Bottom 2 | Michael Massey out on a sacrifice fly to right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Vinnie Pasquantino scores. | 6-0 KC |
Bottom 3 | Maikel Garcia triples (3) on a line drive to center fielder Wenceel Pérez. Hunter Renfroe scores. | 7-0 KC |
Bottom 3 | Bobby Witt Jr. out on a sacrifice fly to right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Maikel Garcia scores. | 8-0 KC |
Top 4 | Matt Vierling triples (4) on a sharp line drive to center fielder Kyle Isbel. Mark Canha scores. Wenceel Pérez scores. | 8-2 KC |
Top 4 | Colt Keith singles on a ground ball to center fielder Kyle Isbel. Matt Vierling scores. | 8-3 KC |
Bottom 6 | Bobby Witt Jr. homers (7) on a fly ball to center field. | 9-3 KC |
Bottom 7 | Hunter Renfroe homers (4) on a fly ball to left center field. | 10-3 KC |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tigers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 6 | |
Royals | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 7 |
2024.05.22 04:01 KCRoyalsBot The Royals defeated the Tigers by a score of 10-3 - Tue, May 21 @ 06:40 PM CDT
Tigers Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Greene, R - LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .240 | .350 | .451 |
2 | Canha - DH | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .231 | .355 | .397 |
3 | Pérez, W - CF | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .297 | .368 | .505 |
4 | Carpenter, K - RF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .276 | .322 | .545 |
5 | Vierling - 3B | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .268 | .292 | .428 |
6 | Keith, C - 2B | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .230 | .286 | .267 |
7 | Torkelson - 1B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | .218 | .284 | .346 |
8 | McKinstry - SS | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .200 | .293 | .246 |
a-Ibáñez - SS | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .279 | .303 | .410 | |
9 | Kelly, C - C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | .216 | .318 | .284 |
Totals | 33 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Tigers |
---|
a-Flied out for McKinstry in the 7th. |
BATTING: 2B: Keith, C (5, Anderson, N). 3B: Vierling (4, Marsh). TB: Keith, C 4; Pérez, W; Vierling 4. RBI: Keith, C (14); Vierling 2 (18). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Torkelson; Kelly, C. Team RISP: 2-for-6. Team LOB: 6. |
FIELDING: E: Keith, C (4, throw). |
Royals Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Garcia, M - 3B | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .263 | .308 | .429 |
2 | Witt Jr. - SS | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .304 | .362 | .546 |
Hampson - SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .255 | .296 | .294 | |
3 | Pasquantino - 1B | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .230 | .307 | .412 |
4 | Perez, S - C | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .343 | .404 | .560 |
5 | Massey - 2B | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .283 | .295 | .495 |
6 | Frazier - DH | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .189 | .294 | .253 |
7 | Melendez - LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .179 | .232 | .345 |
8 | Renfroe - RF | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .160 | .236 | .282 |
9 | Isbel - CF | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .220 | .267 | .354 |
Totals | 38 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
Royals |
---|
BATTING: 2B: Pasquantino (13, Mize). 3B: Garcia, M 2 (3, Mize, Holton, T). HR: Witt Jr. 2 (7, 2nd inning off Mize, 2 on, 1 out, 6th inning off Foley, 0 on, 0 out); Renfroe (4, 7th inning off Wentz, 0 on, 1 out). TB: Frazier; Garcia, M 8; Isbel 2; Massey; Pasquantino 2; Perez, S 2; Renfroe 4; Witt Jr. 9. RBI: Garcia, M (32); Massey (20); Perez, S (39); Renfroe (18); Witt Jr. 6 (31). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Melendez 2. SF: Massey; Witt Jr. Team RISP: 4-for-7. Team LOB: 7. |
Tigers Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mize (L, 1-3) | 1.2 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 52-37 | 4.57 |
Holton, T | 3.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 36-26 | 3.91 |
Foley | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20-13 | 2.45 |
Wentz | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 31-25 | 3.86 |
Totals | 8.0 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
Royals Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marsh (W, 4-1) | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 94-59 | 2.72 |
Zerpa | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-5 | 1.40 |
Long | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-7 | 0.00 |
Anderson, N | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 30-20 | 4.15 |
Totals | 9.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
Game Info |
---|
Pitches-strikes: Mize 52-37; Holton, T 36-26; Foley 20-13; Wentz 31-25; Marsh 94-59; Zerpa 7-5; Long 10-7; Anderson, N 30-20. |
Groundouts-flyouts: Mize 2-2; Holton, T 3-1; Foley 0-2; Wentz 2-1; Marsh 3-2; Zerpa 1-2; Long 1-1; Anderson, N 0-1. |
Batters faced: Mize 15; Holton, T 13; Foley 5; Wentz 8; Marsh 25; Zerpa 3; Long 3; Anderson, N 5. |
Inherited runners-scored: Holton, T 2-0. |
Umpires: HP: Clint Vondrak. 1B: Mark Wegner. 2B: Bruce Dreckman. 3B: Jeremie Rehak. |
Weather: 75 degrees, Partly Cloudy. |
Wind: 18 mph, L To R. |
First pitch: 6:40 PM. |
T: 2:19. |
Att: 14,031. |
Venue: Kauffman Stadium. |
May 21, 2024 |
Inning | Scoring Play | Score |
---|---|---|
Bottom 1 | Bobby Witt Jr. singles on a ground ball to pitcher Casey Mize. Maikel Garcia scores. | 1-0 KC |
Bottom 1 | Salvador Perez singles on a line drive to right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Bobby Witt Jr. scores. | 2-0 KC |
Bottom 2 | Bobby Witt Jr. homers (6) on a fly ball to center field. Kyle Isbel scores. Maikel Garcia scores. | 5-0 KC |
Bottom 2 | Michael Massey out on a sacrifice fly to right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Vinnie Pasquantino scores. | 6-0 KC |
Bottom 3 | Maikel Garcia triples (3) on a line drive to center fielder Wenceel Pérez. Hunter Renfroe scores. | 7-0 KC |
Bottom 3 | Bobby Witt Jr. out on a sacrifice fly to right fielder Kerry Carpenter. Maikel Garcia scores. | 8-0 KC |
Top 4 | Matt Vierling triples (4) on a sharp line drive to center fielder Kyle Isbel. Mark Canha scores. Wenceel Pérez scores. | 8-2 KC |
Top 4 | Colt Keith singles on a ground ball to center fielder Kyle Isbel. Matt Vierling scores. | 8-3 KC |
Bottom 6 | Bobby Witt Jr. homers (7) on a fly ball to center field. | 9-3 KC |
Bottom 7 | Hunter Renfroe homers (4) on a fly ball to left center field. | 10-3 KC |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tigers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 6 | |
Royals | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 7 |
2024.05.22 04:01 Plastic_Mission_7085 Debating
2024.05.22 04:01 FTCW Can I remove this wire?(probably telephone)
2024.05.22 04:01 steinney555 Sanity check and thank you to the community [2-4 days out]
2024.05.22 04:01 Atoraxic Directed Energy development budget growth from 2014- 2023.
News June 30, 2014
Conducted And Directed Energy Weapons To Drive Non-Lethal Weapons Market Growth
The concept of a weapon that is designed merely to temporarily incapacitate, with little or no lasting injury, is relatively new. The development of non-lethal weapons can be viewed as a consequence of the rise of democratic values. The use of lethal force on a nation’s own citizens is often met with dissent and criticism in democracies. The rise of non-lethal weapons has taken place in the last two decades. Non-lethal weapons for anti-personnel purposes have become increasingly high in demand from law enforcement agencies across the world. The new report has calculated that in 2014 the market will be worth $1,630.6M.
The new report, now available on ASDReports, Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Market 2014-2024: Conducted & Directed Energy Weapons (CEW & DEW), Less Lethal Weapons (LLW) & Equipment for Military & Law Enforcement. This report finds overall market growth over the forecast period as more nations enter the market and technological advances realise new capabilities.
A detailed analysis of the latest political, economic and technological trends lies at the heart of the reports unparalleled quantitative and qualitative analysis of the non-lethal weapons market. The new report assesses that global spending on non- lethal weapons will amount to $1630.6m in 2014, or the start of the forecast period covered by this report. This 239 page report is packed with 205 tables, figures and charts that illustrate key trends in the market at the global level, 2 submarkets, and in 15 leading national markets. The report profiles 17 leading non- lethal weapons companies. The report also contains interviews with expert members within the industry and details of more than 150 relevant non-lethal weapons contracts and programmes.
“Non-lethal anti-personnel systems such as conducted energy weapons, less-lethal ammunition, tear gas and pepper spray have proven capabilities in crowd control situation. Our research indicates that non-lethal anti-personnel weapons are becoming increasingly high in demand particularly from law enforcement agencies.
In recent years, advances in energy weapon technology both Conducted Energy Weapons (CEW) for anti-personnel utility and Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) technology predominantly for anti-vehicle have highlighted the demand for such systems, particularly in nations with more advanced armed forces.
Furthermore, efforts of nations such as India, Brazil and South Africa to modernise their armed forces and security services will provide significant new market opportunities. It is believed that a lowering of barriers to entry with technological advancements made over the past decade will create new demand for a range of non-lethal systems. This new demand will drive growth within the market.”
The Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Market 2014-2024: Conducted & Directed Energy Weapons (CEW & DEW), Less Lethal Weapons (LLW) & Equipment for Military & Law Enforcement report will be of impressive value to current and future investors into the industry, as well as to companies and research centres who wish to broaden their knowledge of the non-lethal weapons market.
Conducted And Directed Energy Weapons To Drive Non-Lethal Weapons Market Growthhttps://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/conducted-energy-weapons-drive-non-lethal-weapons-0001
The concept of a weapon that is designed merely to temporarily incapacitate, with little or no lasting injury, is relatively new. The development of non-lethal weapons can be viewed as a consequence of the rise of democratic values. The use of lethal force on a nation’s own citizens is often met with dissent and criticism in democracies. The rise of non-lethal weapons has taken place in the last two decades. Non-lethal weapons for anti-personnel purposes have become increasingly high in demand from law enforcement agencies across the world. The new report has calculated that in 2014 the market will be worth $1,630.6M.
The new report, now available on ASDReports, Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Market 2014-2024: Conducted & Directed Energy Weapons (CEW & DEW), Less Lethal Weapons (LLW) & Equipment for Military & Law Enforcement. This report finds overall market growth over the forecast period as more nations enter the market and technological advances realise new capabilities.
A detailed analysis of the latest political, economic and technological trends lies at the heart of the reports unparalleled quantitative and qualitative analysis of the non-lethal weapons market. The new report assesses that global spending on non- lethal weapons will amount to $1630.6m in 2014, or the start of the forecast period covered by this report. This 239 page report is packed with 205 tables, figures and charts that illustrate key trends in the market at the global level, 2 submarkets, and in 15 leading national markets. The report profiles 17 leading non- lethal weapons companies. The report also contains interviews with expert members within the industry and details of more than 150 relevant non-lethal weapons contracts and programmes.
“Non-lethal anti-personnel systems such as conducted energy weapons, less-lethal ammunition, tear gas and pepper spray have proven capabilities in crowd control situation. Our research indicates that non-lethal anti-personnel weapons are becoming increasingly high in demand particularly from law enforcement agencies.
In recent years, advances in energy weapon technology both Conducted Energy Weapons (CEW) for anti-personnel utility and Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) technology predominantly for anti-vehicle have highlighted the demand for such systems, particularly in nations with more advanced armed forces.
Furthermore, efforts of nations such as India, Brazil and South Africa to modernise their armed forces and security services will provide significant new market opportunities. It is believed that a lowering of barriers to entry with technological advancements made over the past decade will create new demand for a range of non-lethal systems. This new demand will drive growth within the market.”
The Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Market 2014-2024: Conducted & Directed Energy Weapons (CEW & DEW), Less Lethal Weapons (LLW) & Equipment for Military & Law Enforcement report will be of impressive value to current and future investors into the industry, as well as to companies and research centres who wish to broaden their knowledge of the non-lethal weapons market.
Visiongain Publishes Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Market Report 2024-2034https://www.visiongain.com/dew-market-report/
26 February 2024
Defence
Visiongain has published a new report entitled Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Market Report 2024-2034: Forecasts by Type (Lethal Weapons, Non-lethal Weapons), by System (Anti-Satellite (ASAT) DEW, Electromagnetic Railgun Systems, Counter-Drone DEW Systems, Other), by Technology (High-Energy Lasers (HEL), High-Power Microwaves (HPM), Sonic Weapons, Electromagnetic Weapons, Other), by Application (Ground-Based DEW for Military Bases, Airborne DEW for Aircraft Defence, Naval DEW for Ship Defence, Homeland Security, Critical Infrastructure Defence, Other) AND Regional and Leading National Market Analysis PLUS Analysis of Leading Companies AND COVID-19 Impact and Recovery Pattern Analysis.
The global directed energy weapons (DEW) market was valued at US$6.4 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 19.6% during the forecast period 2024-2034.
Requirement for Cost-Effective Defense Solutions
The requirement for cost-effective defense solutions amidst constrained defense budgets is driving the adoption of directed energy weapons by military organizations worldwide. Traditional kinetic weapons and missile defense systems involve high procurement, operation, and maintenance costs, making them economically unsustainable for many defense budgets. Directed energy weapons offer a more cost-effective alternative with reduced ammunition costs, minimal logistical footprint, and lower lifecycle expenses. For example, the deployment of laser-based counter-UAV systems by military forces provides a cost-effective means of defending against small unmanned aerial threats compared to conventional missile-based interceptors.
Increasing Investments in Directed Energy Programs
The increasing investments in directed energy programs by government agencies, defense contractors, and research institutions are driving innovation and growth in the global directed energy weapons market. Countries such as the United States, China, Russia, and European nations are allocating substantial funding to accelerate the development and deployment of directed energy technologies for military applications. These investments support research and development initiatives aimed at enhancing the performance, reliability, and operational capabilities of directed energy weapons across various platforms. For instance, the U.S. Department of Defense's Directed Energy Weapons Directorate (DEWD) oversees a range of directed energy programs focused on advancing laser, microwave, and radiofrequency technologies for military use.
How has COVID-19 had a significant negative impact on the Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Market?
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a discernible impact on the directed energy weapon (DEW) market, influencing various aspects of its development, production, and deployment. One notable effect has been the disruption of supply chains and manufacturing processes. Lockdowns, restrictions on movement, and workforce limitations imposed to curb the spread of the virus have led to delays in production schedules and the availability of essential components for DEW systems. This has, in turn, affected the overall pace of development and delivery of directed energy weapons.
Financial constraints have emerged as another significant impact of the pandemic on the directed energy weapon market. Many defence budgets faced reallocations and adjustments to address the immediate healthcare and economic challenges posed by the pandemic. Consequently, some defence programs, including those related to advanced technologies like DEWs, experienced budgetary constraints, slowing down investment and procurement processes.
Operational disruptions have affected the testing and validation phases of DEW systems. Social distancing measures and limitations on gatherings have impeded the ability to conduct field trials and exercises. These constraints have slowed down the evaluation and validation of directed energy weapons in real-world scenarios, hindering progress in achieving operational readiness.
How will this Report Benefit you?
Visiongain’s 372-page report provides 113 tables and 198 charts/graphs. Our new study is suitable for anyone requiring commercial, in-depth analyses for the global directed energy weapons (DEW) market, along with detailed segment analysis in the market. Our new study will help you evaluate the overall global and regional market for Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Get financial analysis of the overall market and different segments including type, system, technology, and application and capture higher market share. We believe that there are strong opportunities in this fast-growing directed energy weapons (DEW) market. See how to use the existing and upcoming opportunities in this market to gain revenue benefits in the near future. Moreover, the report will help you to improve your strategic decision-making, allowing you to frame growth strategies, reinforce the analysis of other market players, and maximise the productivity of the company.
What are the Current Market Drivers?
Need for Precision and Lethality in Modern Warfare The need for precision and lethality in modern warfare scenarios drives the adoption of directed energy weapons by defense forces worldwide. Traditional kinetic weapons, such as missiles and artillery shells, often result in collateral damage and unintended casualties, limiting their effectiveness in densely populated urban environments and sensitive infrastructure areas. Directed energy weapons offer a more precise and controlled means of engaging targets, minimizing collateral damage and civilian casualties while maximizing lethality against enemy assets. For example, the U.S. Air Force's Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) system demonstrates the capability of DEWs to engage and destroy incoming artillery shells and rockets with pinpoint accuracy, reducing the risk to friendly forces and civilian populations.
Growing Threat of Ballistic Missile and Hypersonic Weapons The growing threat posed by ballistic missile proliferation and the development of hypersonic weapons systems is driving the demand for directed energy weapons as a viable defense solution. Ballistic missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles pose significant challenges to existing missile defense systems due to their high speeds, maneuverability, and unpredictable trajectories. Directed energy weapons offer a potential solution for intercepting and neutralizing ballistic missiles and hypersonic threats in the boost, mid-course, and terminal phases of flight. For instance, the concept of using high-energy lasers or particle beams to intercept and destroy incoming missiles in near-real-time is being explored as a cost-effective and reliable defense against advanced missile threats.
Where are the Market Opportunities?
Advancements in Compact and Mobile Directed Energy Platforms Advancements in compact and mobile directed energy platforms are expanding the operational flexibility and deployment options for directed energy weapons in military environments. Traditional directed energy systems were often large, stationary installations limited to fixed bases or naval vessels, which restricted their mobility and deployment agility. However, recent technological advancements have led to the development of compact, lightweight, and mobile directed energy platforms that can be integrated into various military platforms, including ground vehicles, aircraft, and dismounted soldier systems. For example, the development of man-portable laser weapons, such as the U.S. Army's Mobile Experimental High Energy Laser (MEHEL) system, enables ground troops to engage and neutralize threats with precision and speed in diverse operational environments.
Need for Counter-UAS and Counter-Swarm Capabilities The proliferation of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and the emergence of drone swarms as asymmetric threats are driving the demand for directed energy weapons with counter-UAS and counter-swarm capabilities. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drone swarms pose challenges to conventional air defense systems due to their small size, agility, and swarm tactics, making them difficult to detect and intercept using traditional kinetic weapons. Directed energy weapons offer a rapid and effective means of countering UAS threats by providing continuous, 360-degree coverage, rapid engagement, and scalable lethality. For instance, ground-based laser and microwave systems deployed in urban areas or critical infrastructure sites can detect and neutralize hostile drones and swarms with precision, protecting assets and personnel from aerial threats.
Competitive Landscape
The major players operating in the directed energy weapons (DEW) market are BAE Systems PLC, Blue Halo, Elbit Systems Ltd, Honeywell International Inc, L3Harris Technologies, Inc, Leonardo S.p.A, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Moog Inc, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Rafael Advanced Defence Systems Ltd., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Rheinmetall AG, Textron Inc, Thales Group, The Boeing Company. These major players operating in this market have adopted various strategies comprising M&A, investment in R&D, collaborations, partnerships, regional business expansion, and new product launch.
Recent Developments
24 Sept 2023, Raytheon Technologies Corporation has entered into collaboration with Northrop Grumman to develop a prototype High-Power Microwave (HPM) weapon system for maritime applications.
04 June 2023, Lockheed Martin and Rafael Advanced Defence Systems partnered to manufacture 100 kW fiber-class laser weapons for the IRON BEAM project, aiming to defend Israel against rockets, mortars, and drones.
Notes for Editors If you are interested in a more detailed overview of this report, please send an e-mail to [contactus@visiongain.com](mailto:contactus@visiongain.com) or call +44 (0) 207 336 6100.
About Visiongain Visiongain is one of the fastest-growing and most innovative independent media companies in Europe. Based in London, UK, Visiongain produces a host of business-to-business reports focusing on the automotive, aviation, chemicals, cyber, defence, energy, food & drink, materials, packaging, pharmaceutical and utilities sectors.
Visiongain publishes reports produced by analysts who are qualified experts in their field. Visiongain has firmly established itself as the first port of call for the business professional who needs independent, high-quality, original material to rely and depend on.Visiongain Publishes Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Market Report 2024-2034
26 February 2024
2024.05.22 04:00 Silvermaine- P&V woes - advice
2024.05.22 04:00 Throwra76362 My(26F)boyfriend’s ex wife cheated on him (28M) and has major trust issues. How do I help him get over them?
2024.05.22 04:00 lethalmuff1n A potentially haunted hotel?
I went to a really interesting place for one of my recent work trips. It’s not uncommon to drive to different locations around the area to speak at conferences so when I was asked to travel to a new conference, I didn’t blink an eye. I was told it was 4 1/2 hours away in the small town of Warm Springs, Virginia. The hotel was the Omni Homestead, apparently having origins in the year 1766. “Wow,” I thought, “this sounds like a historic place”, and after looking up pictures and learning that presidents of the past such as Thomas Jefferson had bathed in its iconic Hot Springs, I knew that this would be a fun and interesting trip. I didn’t look up much about the hotel so I just up and went on my way. submitted by lethalmuff1n to Paranormal [link] [comments] Upon arriving I was I had my breath taken away by how expansive the grounds were. It was a sprawling set of buildings that seem to never end and the landscape that extended even further, deep in the woods near West Virginia, only accessible by a one lane, winding mountain road. It was beautiful. I was in the middle of nowhere, and the air was fresh and crisp. Upon entering, I was flanked by white columns, a pianist playing classical music on a grand piano and a presidential lounge with photos of presidents past. After being welcomed with a glass of champagne, I explored the vast hallways of the hotel, getting lost through the twists and turns. It definitely felt like I was in a different time period. It was beautiful - period specific carpets, furniture, bookshelves, and the walls were adorned with all of the history of the hotel and the town that it resided in. On the single night of my stay, I experienced a really strange phenomenon. I woke up in the middle of the night and noticed that the digital clock that was facing me from across the room was suddenly blank as if it had been unplugged. I felt a sudden rush of cold air come over me like an arctic blast. The blast was so strong it gave me chills. Then I saw a hand hovering in front of my face and dangle something in front of me. Through my blurred vision I could see some sort of bag with a name written on it, and in the outline of the bag I can make out what appeared to be a severed human foot. I tried to scream, but nothing came out. It was as if my voice was completely taken from me. I also heard whispering in my ear, but I couldn’t make out with the male voice was saying. It was all jumbled up and incoherent. It seemed as if he was reading a name that was scrawled at the top of the bag in old cursive script. I squinted. I tried to respond, but I could not make out the writing nor respond to my strange late night visitor. My body was also frozen and could not move or then away I was terrified, my heart was pounding, and I couldn’t breathe. I couldn’t scream. All I could hear was something in my ear trying to talk to me and show this grotesque discovery to me. Before I knew it, I “woke up”, and I thought “well that was a really scary dream.” But throughout the day, it really bothered me, so I started to look up the history of the hotel. Being that it was old I started to find articles about hauntings of the hotel and I wondered, “did a spirit visit me last night?” Throughout the day details continued to come back to me and I tried to rationalize what happened and brush it off as a dream but that didn’t seem to be the case. I set my room that night to 73°, which is very warm. I love to sleep warm, even under the blankets, almost to the point where I’m sweating. I just find it cozy. but the blast of air was so cold and so real I knew I couldn’t have imagined it, and that it wasn’t coming from the vents. The second thing I tried to rationalize was the clock and I looked at the clock to see if it was unplugged or if maybe power had gotten interrupted during the night, but the time displayed perfectly during the morning and it showed no signs of interruption. So, to verify that this wasn’t a dream and I was in fact awake and maybe figure out when this happened, I turned to my Oura app. Oura is a ring that I wear that tracks my sleep so that I know if I am getting enough rest. Upon checking my app, it distinctly showed that my sleep was interrupted and I was “awake” between 2:00 and 2:15am. So later that day, I called my good friend Rob, who is a medium, who took the time to do some research for me, and here is what he found. The Omni Homestead not only was a hotel, but it was also a Civil War hospital. So perhaps, there was a victim of the war who passed showing me his severed, limb, or a physician, who had to amputate a limb, and maybe was held accountable for the death of a patient. I found this all very curious and interesting because during the time, Rob told me that when they were doing amputations due to injuries from the war, there were many deaths, because obviously the medical field was not as advanced as it is today. I saw this entirely as a possibility, and I have been consumed with looking at things like the national archives to try to find records of physicians or soldiers, who may have gone through that hospital, that may jog some memory, or help me interpret what name was written on the bag, or that the mysterious man was trying to whisper in my ear. The more I tried to recollect, it sounded like it was five syllables and maybe had the letter “x” in it. Rob also explained to me that there were “perfect“ conditions for the manifestation of a spirit. Number one I am an emotionally vulnerable human being right now who is going through some trauma unfortunately, in my life. Two, the hotel is directly next to a running river, which apparently water can help spirits to manifest. Number three, the hotel is also attached to and close to, pretty much on top of, hot springs that are coming up from the earth, so the presence of more water seems to support this theory. And of course the suck of electricity from the clock and the cold spot in my room we know are also signs of spirits. I don’t think that these were coincidental or that they were a dream based on all of this information that I was able to gather. As terrifying as it was, it was a very curious and interesting, spiritual experience and not my first. I had one spiritual experience over 14 years ago And this has been my first one since. What do you think happened at the Omni Homestead hotel? Should I try to call and find the room I stayed in, would that number be helpful in seeing a location on a map and trying to see if that correlates to anything from the hotels previous history? |
2024.05.22 04:00 Throwra76362 My(26F)boyfriend’s ex wife cheated on him (28M) and has major trust issues. How do I help him get over them?