The anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the global personal health record software market is approximately 10% throughout the forecast period, with a valuation exceeding USD 7 billion in 2020. Key drivers behind this growth include the escalating need for managing and securely storing personal healthcare data, alongside the increasing adoption of advanced technologies and supportive government initiatives. Moreover, the rising uptake of cloud-based software solutions for the seamless communication of personal healthcare information is expected to further propel market expansion in the forecast period.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=147367
Market Trends:
Increased Focus on Patient-Centric Care: There's a growing emphasis on patient-centric care, driving the adoption of personal health record software solutions that empower individuals to actively manage and engage with their own healthcare data. These platforms enable patients to access, update, and share their health information with healthcare providers, fostering collaboration and personalized treatment plans.
Rise of Telehealth and Remote Patient Monitoring: The proliferation of telehealth services and remote patient monitoring solutions is fueling demand for personal health record software that seamlessly integrates with virtual care platforms. These solutions enable patients to capture and transmit vital health data from home, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of remote consultations and care delivery.
Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning: Personal health record software is increasingly leveraging AI and machine learning algorithms to analyze health data, identify patterns, and provide personalized insights and recommendations. These intelligent features enable proactive health management, early detection of health issues, and personalized interventions tailored to individual patient needs.
Interoperability and Data Exchange Standards: There's a growing focus on interoperability and data exchange standards to facilitate seamless communication and integration of personal health record software with electronic health record (EHR) systems, healthcare providers, and other healthcare stakeholders. Standardized data formats and interoperable platforms enable secure sharing of health information across disparate systems, improving care coordination and continuity.
Security and Privacy Enhancements: With the increasing digitization of healthcare data, ensuring the security and privacy of personal health records is paramount. Personal health record software vendors are implementing robust encryption, authentication, and access control measures to safeguard sensitive health information from unauthorized access, breaches, and cyber threats, thereby enhancing patient trust and confidence in these platforms.
Market Opportunities:
The personal health record software market presents significant opportunities for growth and innovation driven by several key factors. With the increasing focus on patient-centric care and the rising demand for digital health solutions, there is a growing need for personal health record software that empowers individuals to actively manage their health information and engage in their own care. Opportunities abound for software developers to create intuitive, user-friendly platforms that streamline the collection, storage, and sharing of health data across various devices and healthcare providers. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms presents opportunities to enhance personalization, predictive analytics, and clinical decision support within personal health record software.
According to the recent report published by RC Market Analytics, the Global Personal Health Record Software Market is expected to provide sustainable growth opportunities during the forecast period from 2024 to 2030. This latest industry research study analyzes the personal health record software market by various product segments, applications, regions and countries while assessing regional performances of numerous leading market participants. The report offers a holistic view of the personal health record software industry encompassing numerous stakeholders including raw material suppliers, providers, distributors, consumers and government agencies, among others. Furthermore, the report includes detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the global market considering market history, product development, regional dynamics, competitive landscape, and key success factors (KSFs) in the industry.
Browse the Full Report Discretion @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/personal-health-record-software-market/
Geographically, the personal health record software market report comprises dedicated sections centering on the regional market revenue and trends. The personal health record software market has been segmented on the basis of geographic regions into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. Personal health record software market estimates have also been provided for the historical years 2020 to 2023 along with forecast for the period from 2024 - 2030.The report includes a deep-dive analysis of key countries including the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, China, Japan, India, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, among others. Thereby, the report identifies unique growth opportunities across the world based on trends occurring in various developed and developing economies.
The Personal Health Record Software Market Segmentation:
By Component:

• Software & Mobile Apps
• Services

By Deployment:

• Web-based
• Cloud-based

By Architecture Type:

• Payer Tethered
• Provider Tethered
• Standalone

By Region:

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East & Africa

Leading participants in the worldwide personal health record software market include Healthspek, NoMoreClipboard, Health Companion, Records For Living, Inc., and Patient Ally. These entities are strategically navigating the market landscape via expansion initiatives, fresh investments, service innovation, and collaborative endeavors. Moreover, players are actively venturing into new geographic territories through expansion efforts and acquisition activities to leverage synergies and attain a competitive edge through collaborative synergy.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=147367
Key Questions Answered by Personal Health Record Software Market Report:

• Product popularity and adoption based on various country-level dynamics
• Regional presence and product development for leading market participants
• Market forecasts and trend analysis based on ongoing investments and economic growth in key countries
• Competitive landscape based on revenue, product offerings, years of presence, number of employees and market concentration, among others
• Various industry models such as SWOT analysis, Pestle Analysis, Porter’s Five Force model, Value Chain Analysis pertaining to Personal Health Record Software market
• Analysis of the key factors driving and restraining the growth of the global, regional and country-level markets from 2020-2030

About Us:RC Market Analytics is a global market research firm. Our insightful analysis is focused on developed and emerging markets. We identify trends and forecast markets with a view to aid businesses identify market opportunities to optimize strategies. Our expert’s team of analysts’ provides enterprises with strategic insights. RC Market Analytics works to help enterprises grow through strategic insights and actionable solutions. Feel free to contact us for any report customization at sales@researchcorridor.com.
Media Contact:
Company Name: RC Market Analytics Pvt. Ltd. Contact Person: Vijendra Singh Email: sales@researchcorridor.com Visit us: https://www.researchcorridor.com/

The global endometrial ablation devices market is projected to experience a noteworthy compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 5% from 2024 to 2030. This growth trajectory is primarily attributed to the increasing incidence of gynecological conditions among women, including cervical cancer, menorrhagia, and abnormal vaginal bleeding. According to recent data from the World Health Organization (WHO), cervical cancer ranks among the most prevalent cancers affecting women globally, with approximately 570,000 cases diagnosed in 2018 alone.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=104032
Market Trends:
Technological Advancements: The market is witnessing continuous advancements in endometrial ablation technologies, leading to the development of more efficient, minimally invasive, and safer devices. Innovations such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, and hydrothermal ablation techniques are gaining traction for their precision and effectiveness in treating endometrial conditions.
Growing Preference for Minimally Invasive Procedures: There is a notable shift towards minimally invasive endometrial ablation procedures, driven by patient preferences for shorter recovery times, reduced pain, and fewer complications compared to traditional surgical interventions. Devices offering outpatient or office-based treatments are increasingly favored by both patients and healthcare providers.
Expanding Indications and Applications: Endometrial ablation devices are being utilized for a broader range of indications beyond menorrhagia, including the treatment of other gynecological conditions such as uterine fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia, and adenomyosis. This expansion of indications broadens the market potential for these devices and contributes to increased adoption rates.
Personalized Treatment Approaches: There is a growing focus on personalized treatment approaches in endometrial ablation, with healthcare providers tailoring procedures to individual patient needs and characteristics. This trend is supported by advancements in diagnostic technologies, patient profiling, and treatment planning algorithms, allowing for more targeted and effective therapies.
Shift towards Office-Based Procedures: Office-based endometrial ablation procedures are becoming increasingly common due to their convenience, cost-effectiveness, and reduced need for hospitalization. The availability of compact, portable, and user-friendly devices enables healthcare providers to perform procedures in office settings, offering greater accessibility to patients and minimizing healthcare resource utilization.
Market Opportunities:
The endometrial ablation devices market presents significant opportunities for growth and innovation. With an increasing prevalence of gynecological conditions such as menorrhagia and uterine fibroids, there is a growing demand for minimally invasive treatment options that offer improved patient outcomes and quality of life. Technological advancements in endometrial ablation techniques, including radiofrequency, cryoablation, and microwave ablation, present opportunities for device manufacturers to develop more efficient, precise, and user-friendly devices. Furthermore, the expansion of indications for endometrial ablation beyond menorrhagia to include conditions such as adenomyosis and endometrial hyperplasia expands the market potential for these devices. Moreover, the shift towards office-based procedures and outpatient settings offers opportunities to enhance accessibility and convenience for patients while reducing healthcare costs.
According to the recent report published by RC Market Analytics, the Global Endometrial Ablation Devices Market is expected to provide sustainable growth opportunities during the forecast period from 2024 to 2030. This latest industry research study analyzes the endometrial ablation devices market by various product segments, applications, regions and countries while assessing regional performances of numerous leading market participants. The report offers a holistic view of the endometrial ablation devices industry encompassing numerous stakeholders including raw material suppliers, providers, distributors, consumers and government agencies, among others. Furthermore, the report includes detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the global market considering market history, product development, regional dynamics, competitive landscape, and key success factors (KSFs) in the industry.
Browse the Full Report Discretion @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/endometrial-ablation-devices-market/
Geographically, the endometrial ablation devices market report comprises dedicated sections centering on the regional market revenue and trends. The endometrial ablation devices market has been segmented on the basis of geographic regions into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. Endometrial ablation devices market estimates have also been provided for the historical years 2020 to 2023 along with forecast for the period from 2024 - 2030.The report includes a deep-dive analysis of key countries including the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, China, Japan, India, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, among others. Thereby, the report identifies unique growth opportunities across the world based on trends occurring in various developed and developing economies.
The Endometrial Ablation Devices Market Segmentation:
By Device Type:

• Hysteroscopy Devices
• Thermal Balloon Ablators
• Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation Devices
• Hydrothermal Ablators
• Electrical Ablators
• Others

By End-User:

• Ambulatory Surgical Centers
• Hospitals
• Clinics

By Region:

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East & Africa

Key players in the global endometrial ablation devices market include Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic, AngioDynamics, Cooper Surgical Inc., and Olympus Corporation. These companies are strategically expanding their market presence through various avenues such as expansion initiatives, investment in new technologies, introduction of innovative services, and collaborative efforts. Additionally, players are venturing into new geographical territories through expansions and acquisitions, aiming to leverage synergies for a competitive edge.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=104032
Key Questions Answered by Endometrial Ablation Devices Market Report:

• Product popularity and adoption based on various country-level dynamics
• Regional presence and product development for leading market participants
• Market forecasts and trend analysis based on ongoing investments and economic growth in key countries
• Competitive landscape based on revenue, product offerings, years of presence, number of employees and market concentration, among others
• Various industry models such as SWOT analysis, Pestle Analysis, Porter’s Five Force model, Value Chain Analysis pertaining to Endometrial Ablation Devices market
• Analysis of the key factors driving and restraining the growth of the global, regional and country-level markets from 2020-2030

About Us:RC Market Analytics is a global market research firm. Our insightful analysis is focused on developed and emerging markets. We identify trends and forecast markets with a view to aid businesses identify market opportunities to optimize strategies. Our expert’s team of analysts’ provides enterprises with strategic insights. RC Market Analytics works to help enterprises grow through strategic insights and actionable solutions. Feel free to contact us for any report customization at sales@researchcorridor.com.
Media Contact:
Company Name: RC Market Analytics Pvt. Ltd. Contact Person: Vijendra Singh Email: sales@researchcorridor.com Visit us: https://www.researchcorridor.com/

Introduction

In this post, we'll be discussing something called "Virtue Ethics." This is a normative theory of ethics that's most associated with Aristotle, though has in recent times experienced a resurgence of sorts from modern philosophers, some of whom have tweaked and modified it, and in doing so have created different branches on this tree of moral theory. We will be comparing these different flavors of Virtue Ethics to that of the New Testament's, pointing out where they're similar, as well as highlighting where the NT differs (and is actually superior) from the heathens' views.
I want to preface all this with a verse and a warning:

"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ."-Colossians 2:8

The entire Bible, over and over again, warns against syncretism. It's a running theme throughout to condemn the practice, with this verse being one of the more explicit ones to do so.
Mapping the ideas of Pagans (and especially Greek philosophers) onto the Scriptures has always resulted in people severely misinterpreting the Bible, as looking at the Word of God through a Hellenistic lens is and always has been extremely innapropiate to the author's original intent.
Whenever Greek philosophy or ideas are referenced, they're always portrayed in a bad light or otherwise used to make a point. Examples of the latter could be found in the apostle Paul's writings, as he was a fully educated Roman citizen of his day, and so he made use of known Hellenestic philosophy and literature (that he would have been familiar with) by redefining their terms and ideas in a way that would be consistent with the theology of his own religion. The apostle Peter did the same within his own epistles whenever he mentioned "Tartarus," the abyss/prison for certain disobedient angels that rebelled against God, despite the fact that the word has its roots in Greek mythology and not Hebrew religion (though, the belief that there were a group of spiritual beings that rebelled against the highest authority in the heavens was one technically shared between the two ancient cultures; even if the parties involved were vastly different, as well as the contexts of the rebellion itself).
The affect Hellenstic philosophy has had on the way people think (even subconsciously) can still be felt to this day, and can be seen in the confusion modern "Christianity" has brought on through its adoption of Gnostic teachings such as Dualism or the inherently fatalistic views that many unknowingly hold due to the error of Classical Theism.
While yes, I will be commending the heathen (unbeliever) whenever they are right with their ideas as pertaining to this subject, I will also show where they are wrong.
Let's begin.

"What Is Virtue Ethics?"

First, we need to define some terms and point out the differences between this view and others within the larger debate of normative ethics.
There are three major approaches in normative ethics, those being: Consequentalism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics. The following are definitions of the terms:
Consequentialism – a class of normative, teleological ethical theories that holds that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for judgement about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.
Deontology – theories where an action is considered morally good because of some characteristic of the action itself, not because the product of the action is good. Deontological ethics holds that at least some acts are morally obligatory regardless of their consequences for human welfare.
Virtue Ethics – theories that emphasize the role of character and virtue in moral philosophy rather than either doing one’s duty or acting in order to bring about good consequences. The virtue ethicist would argue that actions themselves, while important, aren't as important as the character behind them. To the virtue ethicist, consequences are also important, but they would say that good consequences ultimately flow from a virtuous character who has made virtuous decisions. Theories of virtue ethics do not aim primarily to identify universal principles that can be applied in any moral situation, instead teaching that the best decisions can vary based on context, and that there are only some actions that would be universally evil, only because those actions could never flow from a virtuous character in the first place (e.g., rape).
Aristotle's idea of ethics is in an important respect different from most people's, especially today. Heirs as we are to Kant’s idea of duty – there is a right thing that one ought to do, as rational beings who respect other persons – and to Mill’s idea of utility – the right thing to do is that which produces the greatest good for the greatest number – most of us see ethics as concerned with actions. "The function of ethics is to help me see what I ought to do in a given situation," the modern says. Aristotle’s approach was different. His ethic is not so much concerned about helping us to see what we ought to do, as about what sort of person we ought to be.
Aristotle was concerned with character, and with the things that go to make up good and bad character; virtues and vices. His sort of ethic does not look at our action to see if it fulfils our duty, or produces a certain outcome, such as the greatest good of the greatest number, and therefore merits approval. Instead, it looks at us; at the character behind the actions, to see whether we merit approval.
Comparing Virtue Ethics with philosophies such as Deontology and Consequentialism, we are able to divide ethical theories into two kinds; act-centered theories and agent-centered theories. Kant’s (Deontological) and Mill’s (Utilitarian) approaches are act-centered, because they concern themselves with our actions, whilst Aristotle’s is agent-centered because it concerns itself with the character of a person, which in his view was ourselves and our own dispositions that prompt our actions.
Both approaches have ardent present-day advocates, and so both are alive and well. Virtue Ethicists are dissatisfied with the answers ‘modern’ act-centered philosophy offers, and look for a more flexible, person-centered approach that takes more account of the subtle varieties of human motivation. Those in this camp see ethics as being about people – moral agents – rather than merely about actions. Of course, your actions matter. But, for Aristotle and his present day advocates alike, they matter as expressions of the kind of person you are. They indicate such qualities as kindness, fairness, compassion, and so on, and it is these qualities and their corresponding vices that it is the business of ethics to approve or disapprove.
All this seems simple and uncontroversial; there are two ways of looking at an action to evaluate it morally. You can take the action in isolation and judge it, or take the agent and judge him or her.
Virtue ethicists argue that act-centered ethics are narrow and bloodless. What is needed is a richer moral vocabulary than just ‘right and wrong’. There are subtle but important differences between actions that are good because they are kind and those that are good because they are generous, and those that are good because they are just. Likewise, there are subtle but important differences between actions that are bad because they are selfish and those that are bad because they are cruel and those that are bad because they are unfair. These, and many other, distinctions are lost when we talk simply about doing one’s duty, or promoting utility. Questions of motive and of character are lost, in these asceptic terms. Modern moral philosophy won’t do: it is cold, technical and insensitive to the many kinds and degrees of value expressed in human actions. Ethics is more than just thought experiments and hypotheticals about what would be the right course of action to take in any given situation we might conjure up from the comfort of our armchair. Ethics is about doing, and about context and character.

The Different Kinds of "Virtue Ethics"

Virtue Ethics has has been developed in two main directions: Eudaimonism, and agent-based theories.
Eudaimonism (Aristotle's view) bases virtues in human flourishing, where flourishing is equated with performing one’s distinctive function well. In the case of humans, Aristotle argued that our distinctive function is reasoning, and so the life “worth living” is one which we reason well. He also believed that only free men in the upper classes of society (i.e., the aristocrats) could excel in virtue and eschew vice, being that such men had greater access to the means in accomplishing this task as they had the wealth and resources to better perform their distinctive function of 'reasoning,' and thus "live well." For the Eudaimonian, inner dispositions are what one ought to focus on in order to cultivate virtuous traits, and thus a virtuous character.
In contrast, an agent-based theory emphasizes that virtues are determined by common-sense intuitions that we as observers judge to be admirable traits in other people. There are a variety of human traits that we find admirable, such as benevolence, kindness, compassion, etc., and we can identify these by looking at the people we admire, our moral exemplars. Agent-based theories also state that the motivations and intentions behind an action are ultimately what determine whether or not said action is actually virtuous. Whereas Eudaimonism understands the moral life in terms of inner dispositions or proclivities to act in certain ways (whether righteous or wicked, just or unjust, kind or cruel, etc.), agent-based theories are more radical in that their evaluation of actions is dependent on ethical judgments about the inner life of the agents who perform those actions, that is, what the motivations and intents are of a person.
[Note: While both Eudaimonism and agent-based theories are both agent-centered, Eudaimonism is not to be confused with an agent-based theory. Both branches concern themselves more with agents rather than acts themselves, but Eudamonism focuses on the self to improve whereas the agent-based theory focuses on others to improve.]

Common Critcisims Toward Secular Forms of Virtue Ethics

Firstly, Eudaimonism provides a self-centered conception of ethics because "human flourishing" (here defined as simply fulfilling our base function as humans, which is "reason" according to this view) is seen as an end in itself and does not sufficiently consider the extent to which our actions affect other people. Morality requires us to consider others for their own sake and not because they may benefit us. There seems to be something wrong with aiming to behave compassionately, kindly, and honestly merely because this will make oneself happier or "reason well."
Secondly, both Eudaimonism and agent-based theories also don't provide guidance on how we should act, as there are no clear principles for guiding action other than “act as a virtuous person would act given the situation.” Who is a virtuous person? Who is the first or universal exemplar?
Lastly, the ability to cultivate the right virtues will be affected by a number of different factors beyond a person’s control due to education, society, friends and family. If moral character is so reliant on luck, what role does this leave for appropriate praise and blame of the person? For the Eudaimonian, one ought to be born into a status of privilege if they wish to excel in being virtuous. For the proponent of an agent-based theory, one ought to be born into a society or family with good role models and preferably be raised by such, else they have no moral exemplars to emulate.

The New Testament's Virtue Ethic

The New Testament authors didn’t sit down and do a self-consciously philosophical exercise, for this was not what they were concerned with. They were concerned with giving practical instruction to disciples of the faith, and merely trying to express the ethical implications of their spiritual experience. That being said, we know the apostle Paul was familiar with the writings of Aristotle. We can actually identify places where Paul displays knowledge of Aristotle and incorporates some of the philosopher's ideas into his own epistles. Before we do this, however, it's important we refute common misnomers about what the Bible teaches concerning ethics in general.
You probably have heard many attack the ethics of the New Testament as being primitive and simplistic. "God dictates universal commands to follow: 'do not lie,' do 'not divorce,' 'do not insult.' And the only motivating factor is escaping hellfire and obtaining the reward of eternal pleasure." But in reality, this is a gross misrepresentation of the ethics laid out in the NT. I will argue the NT advocates for a form of virtue ethics, instead of claiming the NT contains a form of deontic ethics, as it is so often assumed.
Elizabeth Anscombe was one of the most influential virtue ethicists of the 20th century. Her work helped to revive virtue ethics in the modern era, however she also criticized the ethics of the Bible for promoting a form of ethics different than what Aristotle promoted:
"...between aristotle and us came Christianity, with its law conception of ethics. For Christianity derived its ethical notions from the Torah. (One might be inclined to think that a law conception of ethics could arise only among people who accepted an allegedly divine positive law..." (Modern Moral Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 124, 1-19)
We've already dealt with the issue of the Torah in another post. The Torah is not laying down moral laws, but describing justice in the form of ancient Near Eastern wisdom literature. But does the New Testament teach a deontic form of ethics? Anscombe might appear justified in her claim, as some "Christian" theologians have explicitly taught the ethics of the NT is deontic.
However, other theologians have argued the ethics of the NT is best characterized as a form of virtue ethics. In a study of the NT, we'll support this notion. As noted earlier, one of the central features of this approach to ethics is that the aim of ethics should be on living a virtuous life. Other forms of ethics focus on directing actions when confronted with a moral dilemma, but for virtue ethics every action is a moral or immoral action because all of our actions contribute or do not contribute to living a virtuous life. In other words, for a virtue ethicist, everything we do will contribute to living a fulfilled life. Now, the NT promotes a similar idea with a slight modification. The NT changes the distinctictive function and purpose for man in Eudaimonism from "reasoning" to loving God and others instead, and thus "living well" is changed from self-centered 'flourshing' (as defined by Aristotle) to glorifying God instead. The apostles taught everything we do contributes to living a life that glorifies God:

"Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God."-1 Corinthians 10:31
"And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him."-Colossians 3:17

So we see the same idea in Paul, that everything we do can be seen as a moral or immoral action. Everything we do should be seen as contributing to living a life that glorifies god or not. As a believer, the aim is not just doing good actions to avoid punishments, but to see everything we do as glorifying God. On secular virtue ethics, all our actions are either advancing a good life or not: nourishing your body contributes to living a good life. In a Biblical context: taking the time to properly dress contributes to living a good life, and not giving into the sin of sloth. So all our actions can be moral actions in this context, and so likewise for Paul and Jesus, all we do can contribute to living a life that glorifies God.
Since God made our bodies to thrive and enjoy life, we should nourish our bodies so we can thrive as God intended for our bodies to do, thus ultimately glorifying Him. Since we were created to experience and feel enjoyment, laughing and enjoying things throughout life glorifies God as well since we're experiencing emotions that God created to be experienced. Everything we do should be to glorify God, and often all that is is living our lives in the way that they were intended to be lived. Biblical ethics is very much more than merely performing right actions, but living a virtuous life that brings glory to God.
As Jesus said:

"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind."-Matthew 22:37b

It is also important to focus on what it means to love, which is an important aspect of what it means to be a believer. Paul makes the radical claim that to love is the entirety of the law of God:

"For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."-Galatians 5:14

Jesus also taught that to love God and love others were the two greatest commandments (Mark 12:28-31, Matt. 22:34-40). He also extends the commandment to love beyond one's brethren, and to love our enemies (Matt. 5:44). Loving those around us is central to what it means to be a believer (John 13:34; 15:12-17, Rom. 12:10; 13:8, 1 Cor. 13:1-8; 16:14, 2 Cor. 8:8, Eph. 4:2; 5:2, Phili. 1:9, Heb. 10:24, Jam. 2:8, 1 Pet. 1:22, 1 John 2:10; 3:23).
One might suggest this is no different than the Golden Rule: "Do unto others as you would have them do to you," or a Kantian rule: "I ought never to act except in such a way that I could also will that my maxim should become a universal law." In other words, "to live well is to perform good deeds or actions and nothing more." But an important point about loving someone is it cannot be done through actions alone. For example, one could buy a gift for their spouse to cheer them up. However, one could perform this action merely because they value performing right actions without any love for the person. One could donate to charity because it is the right thing to do, and not because she cares for the people who would benefit. In such scenarios, they can be seen as idolizing moral laws, not necessarily caring about helping others.
But to love someone requires more than merely performing right actions. You cannot love someone and not care about who they are as a person and where they are heading in life. To love is to will the good of the other. Jesus chastised the Pharisees of his day for only performing right actions, but not loving their brethren in their hearts. His criticism follows Matthew chapter 22, where Jesus says the greatest commandments are to love. The implication is the Pharisees perform proper actions, but have the wrong motivations for doing so. James Keenan puts it like this:
"Essential to understanding this command is that we love our neighbors not as objects of our devotion, but rather as subjects; that is, as persons. Thus, we cannot love others only because God wants us to do so, since then we would love them as means or as objects and not as persons. We can only love one another as subjects, just as God loves us." (Jesus and Virtue Ethics: Building Bridges Between New Testament Studies and Moral Theology, pg. 86)
A critic may bring up that verses of the NT are still phrased as commands, and therefore the structure implies duties were the central aspect of Christian ethics. But the importance of duties is not foreign to Virtue Ethics. Instead of being central to the ethical framework, duties flow from a virtuous character. Virtues are active and have certain demands for which a person must fulfill in their active behavior.
According to Aristotle, knowledge of the virtues gives us practical wisdom in how to properly act. Duties flow from the understanding of the demands of virtues. To put it another way, for virtues to manifest in persons, they have certain demands that must be fulfilled. For the believer, the command of love flows from being virtuous and aligning oneself with the character of God. Commitment to the character of Christ, who perfectly carried out the will of the Father, allows us to perform right and proper actions.
The NT also contains lists of virtues the believer ought to emulate, the most famous of these is in Galatians chapter 5:
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law." (vss. 22-23)
Now, the connection with Aristotle cannot be more pronounced. The Greek phrase "against such there is no law" is almost identical to what we find in Aristotle's politics (3.13.1284a). It seems clear Paul is teaching a similar ethical framework to what Aristotle advocated for. Paul is teaching that the believing community ought to be persons who display key virtues, and that their conduct would not need to be regulated by a law. Instead, their character should be the standard others can measure themselves by. Romans chapter 2 is also a place we see references to Aristotle, where Paul notes that when Gentiles do what the law requires, they are "a law unto themselves" (vss. 14-15). In other words, they do not need to be told to act a certain way. They have the proper virtuous character that directs their actions, to do the good the law requires. Paul is advocating in Galatians that believers should think in a similar way.
So in Galatians 5, we have affinity with the teachings of Aristotle, and in other lists of virtues throughout the NT we see a similar idea, which is that Christians were meant to display virtues primarily (Rom. 5:3-5, 1 Cor. 13:1-8, Col. 3:12-17, 1 Tim. 3:2-3; 4:7-8, Jam. 3:17-18, 2 Pet. 1:5-8). From that, good deeds will properly manifest in our actions.
Anscombe made a great point on what the focus of ethics should be:
"It would be a great improvement if, instead of 'morally wrong', one always named a genus such as 'untruthful', 'unchaste', 'unjust'. We should no longer ask whether doing something was 'wrong', passing directly from some description of an action to this notion; we should ask whether, e.g., it was unjust; and the answer would sometimes be clear at once." (Modern Moral Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 124, 1-19)
Interestingly enough, Paul lays out a similar idea in explaining Christian ethics:

"Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things. Those things, which ye have both learned, and received, and heard, and seen in me, do: and the God of peace shall be with you."-Philippians 4:8-9

In other words, the central aspect on living a Christian life was on what is virtuous, not on what is lawfully right or wrong. Right actions flow from whatever is honorable, true, and pure. Correlating with this is how Paul responds to the Corinthians who claimed that "all was lawful." Paul reminded them the emphasis is not on what is lawful, but on what is good for building a virtuous character:

"All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not."-1 Corinthians 10:23

One's main focus ought to be on what is good, not on laws that dictate behavior.
One of the key aspects of Virtue Ethics is the idea we ought to learn from virtuous teachers and imitate them. A virtuous character is obtained by imitating what a virtuous person does. This parallels a key aspect of Christian ethics. Imitating Christ was (and still is) crucial to living a virtuous life:

"For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:"-1 Peter 2:21

Paul says in Romans 8:29 that Christians were predestined "to be conformed to the image of his Son." Jesus often taught his followers to do as he does (Matt. 16:24, Mark 8:34, Luke 6:40; 9:23, John 13:15, 34). Paul says in 1st Corinthians 11: Be ye followers [i.e., imitators] of me, even as I also am of Christ" (vs. 1). Hebrews 13:7 says to imitate the faith of the patriarchs. 1st Thessalonians 2:14 says to imitate each other. And jesus taught to imitate the good Samaritan from his parable (Luke 10:37). Imitating virtuous teachers was key for Christian ethics.
Aristotle tended to compare acquiring virtues with that of learning a practical skill, like playing an instrument or learning how to become a builder. Such practical skills are best picked up when trained by a master of that particular skill, because a teacher can always provide more insight through lessons they learn from experience. For example, an expert salesman can provide examples from his experience of what works with specific customers that a sales textbook could never provide. Many professions today require on-the-job training or experience before even hiring an applicant. The reason is: experience is key to learning a profession. Merely acquiring knowledge from a textbook or an instruction manual is often insufficient to master a skill, so why would mastering the skill of virtue be any different?
In the NT, a believer is to see the world through the eyes of Christ and to love as he loved. One cannot learn how to be a virtuous person without knowing what that life would look like. A key component of Christian theology is that the Messiah perfectly represented the Father and His will on earth, to show us how to properly live as God intended for man. This central tenet of the NT aligns well with agent-based theories of Virtue Ethics, and modifies it so that the person of Jesus Christ is the universal exemplar that one is meant to emulate. We are called to imitate him through our actions, thoughts, and desires, and to conform ourselves to the way he lived. As Paul said:

"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me."-Galatians 2:20

If learning from Christ is key, we should briefly take a look at the Sermon on the Mount, which is said to be one of Jesus' most important series of teachings. Daniel Harrington notes:
"The sermon begins with nine 'beatitudes' (see 5:3–12) in which Jesus declares as 'happy' or 'blessed' those who practice certain virtues, and promises them an eternal reward and the fullness of God's kingdom." (Jesus and Virtue Ethics: Building Bridges Between New Testament Studies and Moral Theology, pg. 62)
Jesus laid out what a life for those that follow him look like in detail. One ought to be merciful, pure in heart, a peacemaker, thirst for righteousness, etcetera (Matt. 5:2-10). The Sermon does not merely include what right actions are, but includes sections on proper desires. Not only is it wrong to murder, but it is wrong to desire to murder or wish ill on someone (Matt. 5:22). Avoiding adultery is good, but one also should not covet after another man's woman in their heart (Matt. 5:28). In other words, merely avoiding immoral actions is not enough. One must also not desire vices. A believer is called to desire what is good.
The Sermon is not necessarily laying down universal moral commands. For example, Matthew 5:9 says, "Blessed are the peacemakers," but this doesn't imply absolute Pacifism, as it would contradict passages in the Old Testament where it explicitly says there is a time for war (Ecc. 3:8). The point of the Sermon is to teach what a virtuous life ought to look like. A follower of Christ ought to use reason to know what is proper to do in various circumstances. For example, in Matthew chapter 6, Jesus offers guidance on how one ought to pray by presenting the Lord's prayer (vss. 9-15). This is a model of how to pray. It's not a command for followers to always pray in this exact way.
In reality, the Sermon on the Mount mixes in exhortations, parables, hyperbole, declarations, commands, etc. It is best understood as displaying what a virtuous life ought to look like. It's not a law code. Building on this, it's important to understand a proper action is context sensitive. Under Virtue Ethics, one should not necessarily apply a universal maxim to every situation. Sometimes the proper action will depend on what is at stake, who is involved, what is the background, etc. Aristotle advocated against the idea there were fixed universal laws that dictate actions, and instead he argued the right action would depend on the circumstances one finds themselves in. Although the ethics of the NT may be a bit more strict, it still places an emphasis on being sensitive to the context of situations.
In 1st Corinthians chapter 8, Paul lays out instructions on how to deal with meat that has been sacrificed to Pagan idols. Instead of stating an absolute prohibition against meat sacrificed to idols, Paul instructed Christians to use reason to come to the proper ethical decision based on context. In other words, the right action is not determined only by a law. Instead, the Christian had to make the proper decision based on the context: if eating caused another to stumble, then you ought to abstain; if not, then there's no harm done. The value of the action depends on the context.
A Deontologist might reply that there's still a universal law given here: that one should always abstain if it's going to cause another to stumble. This objection can be addressed by asking: how are we to know if eating the meat will cause another believer to stumble? To answer such a question, one must be sensitive to the context, which in this case would be knowledge of the fellow believer and your relation to him. It is the context that determines the right action, not a universal law. Moreover, Paul states that the primary goal for the believer should be to love (1 Cor. 13). The first consideration is once again not the rightness of action, but having love for one another. From this, knowledge of the proper action will follow.
Paul often explains that living a proper life as a believer will take work and practice. He reminded Timothy to attend readings, practice what these things mean, and keep a close watch on himself (1 Tim. 4:13-14). Elsewhere, he directs that all believers must work on their faith (Phili. 2:12). Beyond this, he also noted that not all Christians would have the same gifts, and to accept that this was normal (1 Cor. 12). For some, certain things may be a hindrance, whereas for others it is acceptable (Rom. 14:2-4). What matters is that we love and build one another up (1 Thess. 5:11). Right actions flow from love and knowledge of virtue. Rules are not the primary motives that dictate our actions; rules are secondary in this regard.
An interesting case can be studied with regards to divorce in the Gospels. Jesus preaches against divorce (Mark 10:7-9) and it is often interpreted to mean "divorce is always wrong, regardless of circumstances." However, it should be noted the prohibition on divorce is not a universal law. The context can affect whether or not a divorce is permissible. Jesus says that one can divorce over sexual immorality. Paul also has a situation where divorce is permissible, namely if one spouse is an unbeliever and wishes to leave (1 Cor. 7:15). The implication one can derive is divorce is not ideal, but there are circumstances where it may be the proper action to take. Given the other features of Christian Virtue Ethics we already covered, the proper action to take will depend on the circumstances and what the virtuous agent thinks is the most loving thing to do. A universal prohibition on divorce is not a Christian ethic. Instead, one ought to discern the proper action from circumstances. However, it's clear in most cases divorce would not be the virtuous thing to do.
Building on this, it's important to note that within NT ethics, certain acts are always wrong. For example, idolatry and sexual immorality are always wrong (1 Cor. 10:14, Col. 3:15, 1 Pet. 4:13). There are no possible scenarios where it would be okay to rape, because such an act would never flow from a virtuous character. But this concept is not foreign to theories of Virtue Ethics. Aristotle noted that for some actions, no qualifications could make them virtuous. Actions such as rape or murder are always wrong, because they would never flow from a virtuous character. So it's not as if a Virtue Ethicist cannot claim that some actions are always wrong. They simply are qualified as being unable to flow from virtue, whereas actions like lying or waging war could be considered virtuous for the right reason.
Now, despite Christian Virtue Ethics having many similarities with Eudaimonism (Aristotelian ethics), there are also numerous differences beyond what we've already noted. One of the deficiencies of how Aristotle lays out his ethical theory is that it is essentially an all-boys club. Aristotle writes mainly to aristocratic men, excluding women and slaves. In his view, women were inferior to men and slaves lacked the necessary rational faculty. But the Christians rejected this mentality, as the teachings of Christ and the apostles were available to all (Matt. 28:19). Paul said, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal. 3:28). Peter wrote that all Christians were part of the priesthood of Christ (1 Pet. 2:5). Jesus had women followers (Luke 8:2-3), and they were entrusted with delivering revelation (Mark 15:40–16:8). What we find throughout the NT is a radical change to how women were viewed in the ancient world. Paul is also likely building on Aristotle's household structure and refining it. David deSilva says the household codes of the NT are "...following the pairs laid out as early as Aristotle to such a degree as to suggest that these were standard topics in ethical instruction" (Honor, Patronage, Kinship & Purity, pg. 231). But Paul adds an important preface: submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ (Eph. 5:20-21). DeSilva says:
"...husbands, we cannot then ignore the distinctively Christian addition they bring to this arrangement; husbands are to be subject to their wives as well." (Honor, Patronage, Kinship & Purity, pg. 233)
Thus Paul doesn't break down the traditional perspective on the structure of the family, but he does add the idea that we all must submit to each other in reverence, love, unity, and cooperation because all are equal before God. There is no explicit mention in the NT calling for the abolishment of slavery, but it should be noted that Paul taught that slaves should be seen as equals. In the letter to Philemon, Paul is clear that his slave is no longer "as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved" (vs. 16). Thus, within Christian ethics class distinctions were supposed to evaporate. All were brothers and sisters of one family.
An important aspect of Christian ethics is that it wasn't a standalone ethical theory. It's embedded in the larger Christian worldview. The ethical framework is dependent on Christian doctrines. For Aristotle, his ethical theory is for men who were raised well. This is why these specific men desire to be virtuous and perform right actions. As for why the believer does good and desires to be virtuous, it's not because one was raised well, but because they have been activated by the power of God's Spirit (John 3:6, 1 Cor. 12:13). For believers, the reason as to why we desire to be good and virtuous is because the Spirit of God has regenerated us. He loves us so we can love others (1 John 4:19). One is meant to look to the life of Christ and what he has done by dying on the cross, to know that we are loved and forgiven. This in turn is meant to activate a good life, having seen what we have gained and been forgiven of. He calls and activates us to do similar to those around us. This is a more open system for people of all groups and classes. One only has to call upon the name of the Lord to be included. It does not require a specific gender or to be raised a certain way.
The goal of Aristotelian ethics is to achieve 'eudaimonia.' However, within the Bible the goal is as the Westminster Shorter Catechism puts it: "Man's chief end is to glorify God, and enjoy Him forever." Since the central aspect of Biblical Eschatology is that humans will continue on forever in resurrected bodies, the aim of ethics is more than living a good life presently. Living a good life now is important, but it was only one aspect in the Christian worldview. Humans are meant to live beyond this life, so the aim is also about building virtuous souls that will continue on. The importance of this is more crucial than it may seem at first. Paul said that we must all appear before judgment, so that "every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad" (2 Cor. 15:10).
Being a virtuous person requires integrity, because one will still have to answer to God after death. If one can commit an evil act and no one finds out, then from the outside perspective he or she may still appear virtuous. Culturally speaking, the ancient world was very different from our own. All wrongdoings centered around public honor and shame. One did good to receive public honor, and one did not do what was bad to receive public shame. Right and wrong were connected to one's public honor and shame in the ancient Greco-Roman world. Thus good and evil were public ideas, not personal ideas. Ethical demands were grounded in the community in one's public appearance
The Biblical idea of an omniscient God who cared about our ethical status laid a foundation for integrity and personal guilt to emerge. Now one ought to do good because he is beholden to God, not just the community. Believers are to remain focused on God's approval and on the actions that lead them, regardless of the world's response. This lays down fertile ground for integrity to emerge. So the Biblical worldview has another important element built in that encourages ethical behavior, regardless of the honor it brings. One ought to do good because of a commitment to God not, because it might bring honor to one's name publicly.

Implications for Preterists

Paul believed that the Second Coming would happen in his generation, and prescribed certain things in the NT on the basis of that belief. An example of an exhortation that would no longer apppy to us today would be 1st Corinthians 7:24-29, where Paul argues that the times him and his fellow Christians were in called for celibacy, being that the Lord was fast approaching. It wasn't a sin if you did get married, of course; it was just harder to serve the Lord in this context if you had a family to worry about. Thus, Paul encouraged being single.
So, we need to be careful when reading the NT and determining what prohibitions or exhortations are still applicable to us today. Context is key.

The anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the global indoor location market is projected to exceed 22% throughout the forecast period, with a market size reaching approximately USD 7 billion in 2020. A key driver behind this growth is the escalating demand for indoor positioning solutions across diverse settings, including hospitals, airports, hotels, warehouses, and commercial establishments. Additionally, the increasing integration of beacons into various infrastructure elements such as cameras, LED lighting, Point of Sale (POS) devices, and digital signage is poised to further propel market expansion.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=34300
Market Trends:
Advanced Indoor Positioning Technologies: The market is witnessing advancements in indoor positioning technologies such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), Ultra-Wideband (UWB), and inertial navigation systems (INS). These technologies enable more accurate and reliable indoor location tracking, catering to diverse applications including asset tracking, navigation, and proximity marketing.
Integration with Internet of Things (IoT): The integration of indoor location systems with IoT infrastructure is gaining momentum. By combining location data with sensor data from IoT devices, businesses can gain deeper insights into operational efficiency, resource utilization, and customer behavior within indoor spaces.
Indoor Mapping and Navigation Solutions: There's a growing demand for indoor mapping and navigation solutions to enhance wayfinding experiences in complex indoor environments such as malls, airports, and hospitals. Augmented reality (AR) and indoor mapping platforms are being leveraged to provide intuitive navigation and location-based services to users.
Real-Time Location Services (RTLS): Real-time location services are becoming increasingly important across industries for asset tracking, personnel monitoring, and safety applications. RTLS solutions utilize indoor positioning technologies to provide real-time visibility into the location and movement of assets and personnel within facilities.
Location-Based Marketing and Personalization: Location-based marketing is gaining traction as businesses seek to engage customers with targeted offers, promotions, and content based on their indoor location. Proximity marketing solutions leverage indoor location data to deliver personalized experiences and drive customer engagement in retail stores, airports, and other indoor venues.
Market Opportunities:
The indoor location market presents a plethora of opportunities for innovation and growth across diverse industries. With the increasing demand for precise indoor positioning solutions, there's a significant opportunity for companies to develop advanced technologies that cater to various applications such as asset tracking, navigation, and proximity marketing. Integration with emerging technologies like IoT and augmented reality opens up new possibilities for creating immersive indoor experiences and unlocking operational efficiencies in sectors such as retail, healthcare, hospitality, and logistics. Additionally, the growing emphasis on real-time location services (RTLS) and indoor analytics offers opportunities for businesses to optimize resource utilization, enhance safety protocols, and improve the overall customer experience.
According to the recent report published by RC Market Analytics, the Global Indoor Location Market is expected to provide sustainable growth opportunities during the forecast period from 2024 to 2030. This latest industry research study analyzes the indoor location market by various product segments, applications, regions and countries while assessing regional performances of numerous leading market participants. The report offers a holistic view of the indoor location industry encompassing numerous stakeholders including raw material suppliers, providers, distributors, consumers and government agencies, among others. Furthermore, the report includes detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the global market considering market history, product development, regional dynamics, competitive landscape, and key success factors (KSFs) in the industry.
Browse the Full Report Discretion @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/indoor-location-market/
Geographically, the indoor location market report comprises dedicated sections centering on the regional market revenue and trends. The indoor location market has been segmented on the basis of geographic regions into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. Indoor location market estimates have also been provided for the historical years 2020 to 2023 along with forecast for the period from 2024 - 2030.The report includes a deep-dive analysis of key countries including the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, China, Japan, India, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, among others. Thereby, the report identifies unique growth opportunities across the world based on trends occurring in various developed and developing economies.
The Indoor Location Market Segmentation:
By Component:

• Hardware
• Solutions
• Services

By Technology:

• BLE
• UWB
• Wi-Fi
• RFID

By Application:

• Emergency Response Management
• Sales & Marketing Optimization
• Remote Monitoring
• Predictive Asset Maintenance
• Supply Chain Management
• Inventory Management

By End-User:

• Retail
• Travel & Hospitality
• Media & Entertainment
• Transportation & Logistics
• Government and Public Sector
• Manufacturing
• Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
• Others

By Region:

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East & Africa

Several prominent companies operating in the global indoor location market include Acuity Brands, Apple, AiRISTA, CenTrak, and Azitek. These companies are strategically navigating markets via expansion, fresh investments, service innovations, and collaborative ventures. Additionally, players are venturing into new geographic territories through expansion and acquisitions, leveraging synergies to gain a competitive edge.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=34300
Key Questions Answered by Indoor Location Market Report:

• Product popularity and adoption based on various country-level dynamics
• Regional presence and product development for leading market participants
• Market forecasts and trend analysis based on ongoing investments and economic growth in key countries
• Competitive landscape based on revenue, product offerings, years of presence, number of employees and market concentration, among others
• Various industry models such as SWOT analysis, Pestle Analysis, Porter’s Five Force model, Value Chain Analysis pertaining to Indoor Location market
• Analysis of the key factors driving and restraining the growth of the global, regional and country-level markets from 2020-2030

About Us:RC Market Analytics is a global market research firm. Our insightful analysis is focused on developed and emerging markets. We identify trends and forecast markets with a view to aid businesses identify market opportunities to optimize strategies. Our expert’s team of analysts’ provides enterprises with strategic insights. RC Market Analytics works to help enterprises grow through strategic insights and actionable solutions. Feel free to contact us for any report customization at sales@researchcorridor.com.
Media Contact:
Company Name: RC Market Analytics Pvt. Ltd. Contact Person: Vijendra Singh Email: sales@researchcorridor.com Visit us: https://www.researchcorridor.com/

The anticipated CAGR for the global blockchain devices market is over 38% throughout the forecast period, with projections indicating it will surpass USD 4 billion by 2027. Key drivers include the rising embrace of blockchain in finance, spurred by the emergence of Bitcoin. Additionally, rapid advancements in retail and supply chain applications, coupled with growing global investment in cryptocurrency, are poised to fuel market expansion in the coming years.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=147403
Market Trends:
Decentralization: The ongoing trend towards decentralization is fundamentally reshaping how transactions and data are managed in various industries. By decentralizing control away from centralized authorities, blockchain technology empowers participants to engage in peer-to-peer transactions with enhanced security, transparency, and autonomy. This shift towards decentralization is driving the adoption of blockchain devices across sectors such as finance, supply chain management, healthcare, and more.
Interoperability: Interoperability has emerged as a critical focus area in the blockchain devices market, reflecting the need for seamless communication and collaboration among disparate blockchain networks and devices. As blockchain ecosystems continue to proliferate, ensuring interoperability enables efficient data and asset exchange across different platforms, protocols, and devices. This trend fosters greater connectivity, scalability, and innovation within the broader blockchain ecosystem.
Integration with IoT: The convergence of blockchain technology with the Internet of Things (IoT) is unlocking new opportunities for enhanced data security, integrity, and trust in interconnected devices and systems. By integrating blockchain with IoT devices, organizations can establish tamper-resistant ledgers that record and verify device interactions and data transactions in real-time. This integration enhances the reliability and transparency of IoT data, paving the way for innovative applications in smart cities, industrial automation, healthcare monitoring, and beyond.
Focus on Security: Security remains paramount in the blockchain devices market, given the persistent threat landscape characterized by cyberattacks, data breaches, and vulnerabilities. To mitigate these risks, stakeholders are investing in robust security measures spanning cryptographic protocols, secure hardware, multi-factor authentication, and consensus mechanisms. By fortifying the security posture of blockchain networks and devices, organizations can safeguard sensitive data, digital assets, and transactions against malicious actors and unauthorized access.
Scalability Solutions: Scalability poses a significant challenge for blockchain technology as it strives to accommodate increasing transaction volumes and network activity without compromising performance or decentralization. In response, developers and researchers are exploring innovative scalability solutions such as sharding, layer-two protocols, sidechains, and consensus optimizations. These scalability solutions aim to enhance the throughput, efficiency, and usability of blockchain networks and devices, thereby supporting broader adoption and use cases across industries.
Market Opportunities:
The blockchain devices market presents a myriad of opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and market expansion. With the continued growth of blockchain technology across industries, there's a rising demand for specialized devices capable of securely storing, processing, and interacting with blockchain-based assets and transactions. Opportunities abound for companies to develop next-generation hardware and software solutions that address the evolving needs of users, including enhanced security, interoperability, scalability, and user experience. Moreover, the convergence of blockchain with emerging technologies such as IoT, artificial intelligence, and edge computing opens up new avenues for creating interconnected ecosystems and innovative applications.
According to the recent report published by RC Market Analytics, the Global Blockchain Devices Market is expected to provide sustainable growth opportunities during the forecast period from 2024 to 2030. This latest industry research study analyzes the blockchain devices market by various product segments, applications, regions and countries while assessing regional performances of numerous leading market participants. The report offers a holistic view of the blockchain devices industry encompassing numerous stakeholders including raw material suppliers, providers, distributors, consumers and government agencies, among others. Furthermore, the report includes detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the global market considering market history, product development, regional dynamics, competitive landscape, and key success factors (KSFs) in the industry.
Browse the Full Report Discretion @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/blockchain-devices-market/
Geographically, the blockchain devices market report comprises dedicated sections centering on the regional market revenue and trends. The blockchain devices market has been segmented on the basis of geographic regions into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. Blockchain devices market estimates have also been provided for the historical years 2020 to 2023 along with forecast for the period from 2024 - 2030.The report includes a deep-dive analysis of key countries including the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, China, Japan, India, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, among others. Thereby, the report identifies unique growth opportunities across the world based on trends occurring in various developed and developing economies.
The Blockchain Devices Market Segmentation:
By Component:

• Hardware Wallets
• Smartphones
• Crypto ATMs
• IoT Gateways
• Other Devices

By Conectivity:

• Wired Devices
• Wireless Devices

By Application:

• Personal
• Corporate

By End-Use:

• BFSI
• Government
• Consumer
• Retail & E-commerce
• Automotive
• Travel & Hospitality
• Transportation & Logistics
• IT & Telecommunication
• Others

By Region:

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East & Africa

Several key players in the worldwide blockchain devices market include Avado, Coinsource, Bitaccess, Helium Systems, and General Bytes. These companies are actively navigating markets via expansion, fresh investments, service innovations, and collaborative ventures. They're also venturing into new territories through expansions and acquisitions, leveraging synergies for a competitive edge.
To know more about this study, request a free sample report @ https://www.researchcorridor.com/request-sample/?id=147403
Key Questions Answered by Blockchain Devices Market Report:

• Product popularity and adoption based on various country-level dynamics
• Regional presence and product development for leading market participants
• Market forecasts and trend analysis based on ongoing investments and economic growth in key countries
• Competitive landscape based on revenue, product offerings, years of presence, number of employees and market concentration, among others
• Various industry models such as SWOT analysis, Pestle Analysis, Porter’s Five Force model, Value Chain Analysis pertaining to Blockchain Devices market
• Analysis of the key factors driving and restraining the growth of the global, regional and country-level markets from 2020-2030

About Us:RC Market Analytics is a global market research firm. Our insightful analysis is focused on developed and emerging markets. We identify trends and forecast markets with a view to aid businesses identify market opportunities to optimize strategies. Our expert’s team of analysts’ provides enterprises with strategic insights. RC Market Analytics works to help enterprises grow through strategic insights and actionable solutions. Feel free to contact us for any report customization at sales@researchcorridor.com.
Media Contact:
Company Name: RC Market Analytics Pvt. Ltd. Contact Person: Vijendra Singh Email: sales@researchcorridor.com Visit us: https://www.researchcorridor.com/

When commenting please state what item you have to offer and what you would like in return from my list. thanks
Want:
Q50c25 Railway
Uny AP WWR USA Scout Pieces
OE AP WWR USA Scout Pieces
B2525 Enclave plasma w aligned auto barrel, stock and reflex sight.
Open to other offers
Trades
(Rifles)
B2525 Combat Rifle
BE15V Combat Rifle
J2525 Combat Rifle
AAE25 Handmade
B2525 Handmade
B2515R Handmade
B2515V Handmade
BE15v Handmade
B5015v Handmade
FE25 Handmade
J2515v Handmade
J3325 Handmade
QE15R Handmade
V2515R Handmade
B25FMS Plasma Gun
VE25 Railway
VE25 10MM SMG
Q2515r Tesla
AAE50 Fixer
AAE25 Fixer
AA5015c Fixer
AA3325 Fixer
Ari2525 Fixer
AriE15R Fixer
B2525 Fixer
B3325 Fixer
B3350 Fixer
B50c15v Fixer
B50c25 Fixer
BE25 Fixer
B50c50 Fixer
F2525 Fixer
I3325 Fixer
I5015c Fixer
J2525 Fixer
J2515v Fixer
Q251A Fixer
Q2515R Fixer
Q2525 Fixer
Q5025 Fixer
Q3325 Fixer
TSE25 Fixer
V3325 Fixer
V2525 Fixer
V5025 Fixer
BE25 Lever Action
B5025 Lever Action
I2515R Lever Action
IE15R Lever Action
(Heavy)
AA25/250 50 Cal
EE15v 50 cal
J2590 50 Cal
BE15v Gatling Gun
B2590 Gatling Laser
J2590 Gatling Plasma
BE1A LMG
JE90 LMG
(Melee)
B40 1s Bear Arm
AA40SS 15% less DMG Meat Hook
(Shotguns)
IE15r Combat Shotgun
I2515r Combat Shotgun
TSE15r Pump Action
(Armour)
Mixture of FSA/USA pieces in EA set
Uny AP Sneak
Bol AP Sentinel
Van AP Sentinel
Van AP Cavalier
Van AP Sneak
(Power Armour)
Ass Sentinel Unltracite
OE Cavaliers Ultracite w 2 AP
OE Sentinel Ultracite
OE WWR X-01 w 2 AP
OE Cavalier Excavator w 1 AP / Jet Pack torso
OE Sentinel Excavator / Jet Pack torso
OE WWR Excavator / Jet Pack torso
Van Sentinel Ultracite w 2 AP
Van Cavalier X-01 w 1 AP
Van WWR Raider w 1 AP
Cham WWR Excavator w 1 AP / Jet Pack torso
(Outfits)
Asylum worker Hat Brown
Asylum worker Hat Forrest
Asylum worker Hat Red
Asylum worker uniform Brown
Asylum worker uniform Weathered
BOS Jumpsuit
Bomber Jacket
Emmett Mountain Hazmat Suit
Crazy Guy Mask
Huntes Long Coat
Imposter sheepsquatch outfit
Longshoreman Outfit
Reclaimed deep mining gas mask
Straightjacket Clean
Travelling leather coat
Winter Jacket & Jeans
Bloody Chef Hat
Bloody Chef Outfit
Grillmasters Hat
Cultis Incarnated Helmet
Responders Paramedics Jumpsuit
Urban Scout Mask
Western Outfit
Western Outfits & Chaps
White Powder Jumpsuit
(Plans)
High Capacity
Armor Plated
Insulated
Refrigerated
Lead Lined
Rad Barrel
Fixer
Bear Arm
All serum plans available individually or as a full set

Apologies in advance for the big wall of text!
I've owned a freehold property in England for the last 2 years (bought as a new build) that has a shared private parking area that is managed by a Management Company set up by the developer, and currently still managed by that developer. Part of the sale included being required to pay a service fee to that management company. I was ok with this because part of the TP1 the agreement was that the ownership of the parking area would be transferred to the management company, and the residents made managing directors of the company. This happened happened yet, however, since the remaining plots haven't yet been sold.
After 2 years of sending no invoices for the service charges, they've suddenly sent 3, for the 2 previous years and a year in advance.
For at least the first year, the management company was officially dormant on companies house.
After I sent a letter in response to the invoices asking for accounts of what work had been carried out, which as part of the TP1 they were supposed to have compiled each year and sent to us (which they didn't), I received a response saying they wouldn't send the accounts, followed the next day by a final reminder and a threat of court action.
The day after that day, the company was dissolved by Companies house for not filing required documents.
The charges are £500 per year, which is excessive for a small parking area. However, I'm aware that as a freeholder I don't have the same rights as leaseholders to contest the charge itself. I also know there's legislation on the way to remedy this. I've also seen information about them being able to forcibly convert my freehold property into a leasehold, but I'm unsure about the conditions under which they can do this!
I'm pretty sure that right now I do have to pay the charges, but I don't know:-

• Should I be paying for the period the company was dormant? Would I be able to contest that at court?
  
• Should I pay a now-dissolved company? What happens to the money I send?
  
• Can the now-dissolved company actually take me to court?
  
• Is there anything lawful I can do to delay this until the new legislation (the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill) comes into effect at which point I could contest the charges?
  

I'm mostly worried that in the interim between now and when I (and the other residents) become managing directors that the developer will have paid his own development company all the money we put in to do nonexistent work/repairs and pocket the money, or that later on he won't actually transfer the management to us as is stated in the TP1.
I'm grateful for any advice given, even if the advice is "you need to just pay it and live with it"! Right now I just don't know what the right thing to do is!
The development company is privately owned by a single individual who has proven in the past to be untrustworthy, breaking promises, outright lying, and intimidating residents to get his way in previous interactions. So I'm not confident there's any recourse via any kind of customer service or complaints resolution process with the developer.

I have already gotten my medication compounded into a liquid formula so I can better control my tapering process, but the compound pharmacist cannot release the compounded medication to me without a memo from my psychiatrist. Bear in mind that the compound pharmacy is a private enterprise separate from the public healthcare system (or any for that matter).
Turned out that my psych refused to issue the memo for the meds to be released to me. I am trying to get the compound pharmacy to explain my situation to the psych on my behalf, but I am not sure of the outcome. Even the pharmacists acknowledged that I need to go slow on the tapering, and even told me that the psychiatrists don't know any better on the pharmacology of the drugs. But their hands are tied as their "status" is lower than that of medical doctors. I begged the pharmacist over the phone to please assist me on that matter or else I may die from the reckless deprescribing (I think I almost cried). She assured me she would do what she can. I am essentially stuck now.
I really don't understand what is the role of a psych. If they are going to just prescribe meds that are already indicated on a list, then why go through all the medical training only to be a sales rep for drugs. They don't even know the psychopharma action of drugs, and they don't know how to administer basic forms of therapy. All thye do is prescribe drugs, and then forcefully detain people if they are "at risk." That's all they do. Oh, and travel overseas frequently to talk to pharma reps. I am disgusted at the entire mainstream healthcare system, but even I have to acknowledge that psychologists, counsellors and pharmacists have a harder job and a more complex duty in dealing with mentally and emotionally struggling people. They are having it worse than these psych(o)s who just prescribe drugs like candy while earning a significantly higher income.
Tell me, am I wrong? Am I crazy? Do I make sense? These evil psychiatrists put me on drugs that I find difficult to come off from, and then when I want to come off of them they are not giving me any support, but instead trying to taper me off so rapidly (do we even consider that a taper???) that I have to experience withdrawals, only to be put on more drugs into my system. My psych even refused to prescribe me the meds for me to slowly taper off from! I am not going to even start on their entitled, snobbish attitude who tried all sorts of way to "expose" my contradictions (eg. saying things like "if you don't like the meds, then why should I prescribe them to you?" when I need the supply to taper at my own pace)
I swear, these people are absolute monsters and psychopaths. I am so helpless in the face of the taper process before me.

In a bid to illuminate the intricate nuances of Trimethoprime production costs, a comprehensive report has been unveiled, providing an insightful analysis into the production process, procurement resources, and market dynamics. This exhaustive report aims to empower businesses with valuable insights for strategic decision-making and operational optimization.
Request For Sample: https://www.procurementresource.com/production-cost-report-store/trimethoprim/request-sample

Procurement Resource Assessment of Trimethoprime Production Process

The report meticulously evaluates the procurement resources essential for the Trimethoprime production process. Through a detailed assessment, it identifies key inputs, suppliers, and their respective contributions, enabling stakeholders to streamline procurement strategies and enhance supply chain efficiency.

Product Definition

Trimethoprime, a vital antibiotic, plays a pivotal role in combating bacterial infections. The report elucidates the product's characteristics, applications, and market significance, providing a comprehensive understanding of its role in the pharmaceutical landscape.

Market Drivers

In an ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding market drivers is paramount. The report delves into the factors propelling the demand for Trimethoprime, including rising prevalence of bacterial infections, increasing healthcare expenditure, and advancements in medical research. By elucidating these drivers, businesses can capitalize on emerging opportunities and navigate market challenges adeptly.

Raw Materials Requirements

A critical aspect of production cost analysis is the evaluation of raw materials requirements. The report meticulously delineates the raw materials essential for Trimethoprime production, their sourcing channels, and pricing dynamics. This comprehensive insight empowers businesses to optimize raw material procurement strategies and mitigate cost escalations.

Costs and Key Process Information

Through an in-depth analysis of production costs and key process information, the report unveils critical insights into cost structures, manufacturing processes, and efficiency benchmarks. By identifying cost-saving opportunities and operational bottlenecks, stakeholders can drive efficiency improvements and enhance profitability.

Looking for an exhaustive and personalized report that could significantly substantiate your business

In today's fiercely competitive pharmaceutical landscape, having access to comprehensive and personalized insights is imperative for sustaining competitive advantage. Our report goes beyond conventional analyses, offering tailored recommendations and actionable insights customized to meet your business needs. Whether you're a pharmaceutical manufacturer, distributor, or investor, this report equips you with the strategic intelligence needed to thrive in a dynamic market environment.
In conclusion, the Trimethoprime Production Cost Analysis Report stands as a beacon of intelligence in the pharmaceutical domain, providing stakeholders with a roadmap for operational excellence, cost optimization, and strategic growth. With its comprehensive analysis and personalized insights, it serves as an indispensable tool for businesses seeking to navigate the complexities of Trimethoprime production and capitalize on emerging opportunities in the global pharmaceutical market.

Contact Us:

Company Name: Procurement Resource Contact Person: Christeen Johnson Email: [sales@procurementresource.com](mailto:sales@procurementresource.com) Toll-Free Number: USA & Canada – Phone no: +1 307 363 1045 UK – Phone no: +44 7537 132103 Asia-Pacific (APAC) – Phone no: +91 1203185500 Address: 30 North Gould Street, Sheridan, WY 82801, USA

Other things on sale include:
FreshCo: Bnls/sknls chicken breasts $10 for 4 , blackberries $2.99, 400g block cheese $4.44
Walmart: bacon $2.94, green onion $0.47, mango $0.47, loaf of bread $0.94 (sale ends Thursday)
Metro: strawberries for $1.99 and frozen pizza $3.49 (name-brand and store-brand) (sale ends today, Ontario and Quebec have the strawberry sale)
Let's keep each other informed, comment if there are any other sales on in your town! Also, while Walmart and other corporations are just as bad, the focus for right now NEEDS to be on just Loblaws- this is so we can make the others come to heel. The other corporations are watching, they know what is coming if they don't lower prices, and they know we see through any PR team's attempt to thwart us. Our dollars are talking!
Food for thought- if Loblaws doesn't cave soon, the people who are now going elsewhere for their weekly groceries will most likely not return ever, due to their shopping habits changing- if it continues for a few more weeks, they will never get back into the habit of going to Loblaws stores. We can see from the hundreds of thousands of views the posts on this sub of "only" 79000 members has, that the power of our words and actions here have greater impact than they can ever control.

Most of these ill let go of for cheap since the rolls arent the best. The higher end weapons i want apparel, bloodied swing speed melee, bloodied or quad weapons (non heavy) and or plans. The lower end stuff ill consider almost any offer besides junk or caps.
Hag
Deathclaw
Usa Mask
AAE50WBS Rail
AAE15FR Fixer
AAE50WBS Fixer
B25FFR25AP Rail
B50C15FR EPR (Severe Beta Wave Tuner, Stabilized Sniper Barrel, Stabilized Stock, Long Night Vision Scope)
B25FFR90 Fixer
Q50VHC15VCC Fixer
QE50WBS Fixer
Q25FFR25AP Bolt-Action Pipe Pistol
Q25FFR100FMS Rail
Q50C1A Rail
Q50C90 Rail
Q50C15FR NU Laser Rifle
TSE25AP Rail
TSE15FR Rail
AA15AP15VCC Fixer
AA50C1A Elders Mark
AAE1A Elders Mark
AA50CGhost EPR (True Automatic Barrel)
AA50C1A Black Powder Blunderbuss
AA40SS25AP Super Sledge
Ari50C25AP Rail
Beserkers25DWA25AP Rail
B40SS15LDTWB Grognak Axe
B25FFR1P Handmade
B50C1S Deathclaw Gauntlet
B50C1S Lead Pipe
B40SS Meat Hook (Two Star)
BE50DRWA Handmade
B25MDWNM1S Drill
B25DWA25AP Rail
BE50DRWA Rail
BE Assault Rifle (Two Star)
B40SS Sledge Hammer (Two Star Level Ten)
B40SS Super Sledge (Two Star)
FE25AP Rail
GourE15FR LMG
Jug40SS40LDTWPA Chainsaw
Jug40SS25AP Chainsaw
Jug40SS50WBS Meat Hook
Jug50C1P Rail
Jug25FFR15FR Rail
Jug50C15FR Western Revolver
Junk25FFR90 Rail
Jug25FFR15FR Fixer
Mutants50C90 Chainsaw
Mutants50C15FR Handmade
StalkersE1P Handmade
Sup40PA1S Chainsaw
SupE90 LMG
Sup25FFR15FR Rail
TS50LD15FR Fixer
TS25DWA90 Handmade
Troubleshooters25FFR25AP Rail
V50C40LDTWPA Chainsaw
VE1A LMG
Uny1SWWR Sturdy Robot Left Leg

“Well…..frak.”
Those were the only words Corporal James Diogenes could think of to describe his current situation. Behind him, he watched as his comrades turning tail and running away.
“Cowards. Cowards one and all.”
He spit into the dirt towards his former allies then turned towards the other part of his problem.
Xenos. A large army of Xenos, one that was far more disciplined and had far more bodies than command had assumed. He couldn’t remember what they were called or even remember the name of the planet he was on. He couldn’t care for either topic. He wasn’t surprised that the Intel he and his colleagues had been fed was wrong, it often was, but never to this degree. The enemy outnumbered the imperial army forces at least 7 to 1 if not far more. Their tactics were similar to those employed by the imperial army but their population meant they could do more tactical maneuvers, on more fronts, at the same time.
Why the imperial navy didn’t annihilate those armies from orbit, James would never understand. Given his current situation he most likely wouldn’t get a chance to ask. He checked the magazine on his auto-gun, the rifle being rather old by the standards of the current imperial army but its age held up as it punched through most body armor he came across.
“…..Frak.”
He cursed again as he inspected the magazine. Three, maybe four rounds left before he was out? He looked over his shoulder and sighed. The cowards took the ammo with them along with any other supplies they could carry, leaving an empty trench and a few rows of rusty flay-wire.
And James but he chose to stay behind.
A low chuckle escaped him as that thought came to mind. He shook his head as he took his spot in the trench. He wouldn’t win this fight, he was sure of it, but by Terra and in the Emperor’s name he would make them bleed. He would make them hurt.
The few rounds he had in his magazine were gone in no times at all. Four enemies laying in the dust and being trampled by their friends was proof of that. He smiled grimly as he watched his enemies march towards him. They had all bowed their heads slightly, seemingly expecting more shots. That got him laughing. A few bullets and a whole army was shaking before him. He wondered if this is what the primarchs, the emperors daughters, felt like whenever they were on crusade.
He tossed his empty rifle to the side. His smile grew as he held his knife, gripping it tightly as he watched the advancing line of xeno scum. The leather of his glove strained as his hidden knuckles grew white from how tightly he gripped his knife. He considered for a moment what he’d do when the enemy came into the trench. He knew he would fight and die, but he wondered how many of them he’d kill before they took him down.
He reached back behind him, grabbing the Krak grenade he had attached to his belt. He held it tightly and used the middle finger of his knife hand to pull the pin. He held close, holding the striker lever down to ensure it wouldn’t go off until he let go of it. Then he waited.
The world closed in. Darkness tinted the edge of his vision as he watched his enemy march ever closer. Nothing existed save for him and the enemy. He knew what this was. Adrenaline, anticipation, and fear all coming together to activate his fight-or-flight response. He whole body felt charged and he had to stop himself from jumping out of the trench and running…..where? He wasn’t sure. He couldn’t guarantee his body wouldn’t turn tail and follow the rest of the imperial army back to the transports.
He adjusted his cap, scratched his bearded cheek and continued to watch. Watch and wait. That was all he could do now. His breathing grew heavy and erratic, his teeth barred, and a low growl escaped him.
The marching stopped.
He stared and waited.
A ploy? A chance to surrender maybe? Were they simply calling in artillery on his position?
That last thought stopped him. Artillery. Would they call artillery or an orbital strike or some other long distance attack on his position?
No. No, no, no, no they wouldn’t escape him that easy.
He scowled and climbed out of the trench, charging the Xenos line with a roar. The knife was raised over his head, holding it in an upside down fashion, as he sprinted towards his enemy. He refused to die to some cowardly artillery strike, he absolutely refused to be turned into a red smear on some backwater planet that no one would ever remember or care about.
The enemy….ran. They ran! He laughed as he chased after them. It didn’t make sense and he didn’t care. He couldn’t care, he was beyond caring.
“Get back here you throne damned bastards! GET THE FRAK BACK HERE!”
He slowed down long enough to toss the Krak grenade, laughing loudly when he saw it go off and take a handful of Xenos down.
The blood….was blood always so beautiful?
He continued running after the enemy before he stopped again. He stopped running cause something had stopped him. He didn’t understand, his legs were still under him, he was still alive, he could still fight!
“Kraking, bastard, filthy xenos, kill you all-“
“Shut up.”
He stopped talking, the voice snapping him out of…..whatever that was. He regained control and realized why he stopped running. Something had picked him up. He stared down at the ground only to realize how high he was above it.
“Hnngh, let go of me.”
He turned towards whatever was holding him only for his eyes to grow wide.
There stood….a woman. A very big woman with metallic dreadlocks poking out of her skull, her armor exposing skin and flesh in the fashion of a gladiator of old. He stared at him with a raised eyebrow and a silent growl as a twitch of pain or anger made her right eye close for a half second.
“Excuse me….heh….corporal.”
She said his rank as if it was an insult, even going as far as spitting on the ground after she said it. She held up by the back of his flak vest like he was little more than a lost puppy. She treated him like he wasn’t worth even talking to and that he was some stupid grunt who was simply in the way.
Space marines raced past both of them, ignoring them in favor of chasing after the retreating Xenos. They….were gonna steal his glory.
“Let me go damn you, the fights over there!”
The woman laughed loudly. Her head held back as her laughter echoed over the battlefield. A part of him thought her laughter was the most horrific and beautiful sound he ever heard, but it was overshadowed by his growing rage.
“You wouldn’t do-hnngghh-do anything to those alien freaks by yourself. Go home boy. Run with the rest of your fri-“
He swiped at her and smiled widely when he saw a small, paper thin cut open up on her cheek. A small trickle of blood dribbled down her skin as her smile disappeared. Her free hand came up and wiped at the cut. She studied the small swipe of blood on her finger. The cut was nothing, it wouldn’t even scar and she had lost far more blood then this in the blood pits. But something about this man taking a swipe at her, daring to cut her, daring to even consider killing or harming her…..
She smiled widely and put the man on her shoulder.
“You. I like you. You’re mine now little man.”
He tried to jump off but she held firm and turned away from the battle. Her sons would handle the fight. He roared on her shoulder and struggled against her grip, his rage growing as he did everything he could to get into the fight and kill. He wanted to, no needed to spill blood. He needed to kill, he needed to make them bleed.
But this goddess in bronze wouldn’t let him. She walked away and set him down in a space marine Rhino. He didn’t know her, he didn’t know why she took him, and he didn’t care. Instead he sighed and hung his head as he lit a iho stick.
“Don’t worry Corporal, there will be more glory to be had.”
He stared at her. His eyes were bloodshot, his body covered in dust and he felt exhausted.
“Hnngh…frakking….throne damn you….”
She smiled widely at that and pulled the trigger on her chainaxe. She then turned towards the driver.
“On second thought, hmm let’s go. I wanna see what you got little corporal.”
He smiled at that and stood up, popping his neck. He exhaustion was forgotten for the time being as the thought of killing those damned Xenos got his blood pumping and made him want to move.
“By the way.”
The giantess spoke as the rear hatch opened, revealing the same battlefield he had just left.
“My name is Atalanta.”
Please note: I’m not a writer and this whole story came to me while I was in a shower and from my lack of artistic skill. Sorry if it’s trash.

TL;DR: Remember when the City said that Ellis had violated the Charter by "attempting to discuss directly with the City Manager the matter of specific appointment to City employment."? They're now saying they didn't say that.
As many are aware, the City Manager, abetted by a weak City Council and an incompetent former City Attorney have been pursuing the removal of Charlyn Ellis from the City Council. Here's an earlier update from the case. There are more from the G-T.
Most recently, the City submitted a response in opposition to the Ellis' motion for summary judgement. You might wonder, "If the City can file a motion in opposition, can Ellis likewise submit an opposition to their motion for summary judgement, separate from her own motion for summary judgement? Could she submit a response in opposition to the City's response in opposition to her motion for summary judgement."
I would respond by saying, "How the hell should I know? I'm not some expert lawyer man. I'm just some guy--and also probably the number one customer of Block 15's in-store IPA sales, which is not a qualification for this exercise."
With that said, here are some totally non-expert and questionably sober thoughts on the response in opposition from the City, which you can find here.
The first argument focuses on standing. On its face, this is much less interesting for lay people like us, because it doesn't get to the core of the political power struggle that is affecting the governance of our town. I figured these details were trivial when I read through it a week ago. But when I read through this a second time, I realized that the City was walking back a pretty significant part of its beef. For example, our $1,000 per hour attorneys write that,

Here, Councilor Ellis has not demonstrated a credible threat of prosecution of any provision of Section 23(f)—other than the Influence or Coercion Clause—at the time her legal counsel filed this lawsuit on January 22, 2024, after 9 pm. The City’s Due Process Hearing Memorandum—filed before noon earlier that same day (see Shepherd Decl at ¶¶ 2-3)—made this abundantly clear. And, as described above, the City does not contend that Councilor Ellis violated either of the remaining provisions of Section 23(f) (or, in Councilor Ellis’s alternative grammatical framework, subsection ii). The City specifically elected not to proceed under the Specific Appointments Clause because, consistent with its other allegations, the City does not view Councilor Ellis’ conduct as “discussing”—or attempting to “discuss”—anything with the City Manager.

So, there's a lot to unpack here. They're saying that at the time her complaint was made, ^{specifically at 9 PM}, the City's due process hearing memo ^{which was edited at 12 PM that same day} didn't say that Ellis violated the Specific Appointments Clause.
"What the fuck is the specific appointments clause" you ask? The City has previously made the argument that there are actually multiple separate clauses to Section 23(f), and that to violate any one clause is to violate the charter. That is, they should not be read as being interdependent:

As relevant to these proceedings, Section 23(f) applies to City Councilors and reads as follows. For convenience, we have separated the independent clauses in the correct grammatical form: (f) Interference in administration and elections. Neither the Mayor nor any member of the Council shall [i] in any manner, directly or indirectly, by suggestion or otherwise, attempt to influence or coerce the Manager in the making of any appointment or removal of any officer or employee or in the purchase of supplies; or . . . . 1 [iii] discuss, directly or indirectly, with the Manager the matter of specific appointments to any City office or employment. A violation of the foregoing provisions of this section shall forfeit the office of the offender. Nothing in this section shall be construed, however, as prohibiting the Council, while in open session, from discussing with or suggesting to the Manager, fully and freely, anything pertaining to the City affairs or the interests of the City.

I realized it seemed weird to read that the City did not believe Ellis violated the Specific Appointments Clause because that's how the complaint about Ellis' actions was originally framed. From the GT

"By adding a level of specificity that you want the city manager to appoint a particular officer or employee, I think that’s exactly what the charter says you can’t do," Brewer said at the meeting.

Then there's the unsigned due process hearing letter dated December 6th, which states (my emphasis):

"WHEREAS the actions of Councilor Ellis at the City of Corvallis City Council meeting were a direct attempt to influence the City Manager in the appointment of an employee and an attempt to discuss directly with the City Manager the matter of specific appointment to City employment."

It sure makes it seem like the City did accuse Ellis of violating that clause because that's how they understood her actions to be a violation of the charter. Odd that now that apparently wasn't the case. It makes me wonder just what the hell the Mayor, City Council President (Yee), Vice President (Lytle), City Manager, and City Attorney thought they were putting their names to on December 5th when they signed a document stating that they "received concerns from Corvallis City staff, City Manager, City Councilor, and community members about the conduct of Councilor Ellis during a September 12, 2023 Corvallis Climate Action Board [sic] and during a September 18, 2023 City Council Meeting." Maybe an actual journalist could ask them that question.
Were those concerns related to the Specific Appointments Clause or the Influence or Coercion Clause? And when they say that "Each of the undersigned observed in person or through video recordings, the respective meetings and concluded that the video recordings were substantial evidence sufficient to place this matter on the agenda for the attention of the City Council for consideration" did they foresee that their new attorneys, replacing the demonstrably incompetent Jim Brewer, would decide that Ellis hadn't violated the Specific Appointments Clause at all?
Why is this relevant? Because the City is now arguing that, because they aren't actually alleging a violation of the Specific Appointments Clause--never mind that's exactly what they did, and what the Council would honestly still admit they thought they were doing since they're totally asleep at the wheel while the City Manager drives this process (^{remember that he's the only one whose even allowed to talk to the new City attorney})--Ellis doesn't have standing to have the whole of 23(f) thrown out. Just the part she is accused of violating. It makes this standing argument start to read like the City attempting to save a portion of 23(f) from judicial scrutiny by claiming it's not ripe for litigation, even though they were very clearly poised to wield that clause as a cudgel to have Ellis ousted from the Council. If putting it in a charging memo and having other Councilors pressure you to resign on the basis of that memo before you hold a kangaroo court hearing to kick out an elected official wouldn't make it ripe for litigation from a judicial standpoint, I think any layperson can see the implications here: Mark Shepard will use this clause as a political weapon again.
Beyond that, there seems to be a bunch of nonsense arguing about categories of speech suppression. The whole thing concludes with this statement:

"As described in the City’s Motion, if a Council member does not intend to “influence or coerce” the City Manager, then they have not violated the Influence or Coercion Clause. (Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (Dkt. 10) at 21.) And she fails to acknowledge another important purpose of the Influence or Coercion Clause: effectuating and maintaining the separation of powers between the City Manager and the City Council."

So, obviously, Ellis has contended that she didn't intend to violate the motion, which at the time didn't seem like a worthy defense, since the City was not alleging that the only "clause" of 23(f) that was violated required intent. And then the last sentence is just presented as an afterthought, when, in fact, that's the core issue of importance to this case: is the City Manager an all-powerful dictator whose behavior can be controlled only through the threat or actual enactment of his termination, imposing significant costs on the City, or can he be specifically directed to enact the Council's political agenda? Are Councilors able to speak freely about his operational decisions if they don't feel those comport with the policies they've adopted? Why do our new City attorneys spend so few words in support of this position that Mark and Jim have supported so emphatically?
Only time will tell. Kind of feels like the City is positioning to limit the damage here, but, again, I'm just some guy, so I might be full of shit. Either way, this latest motion definitely cost us all a lot of money.

I don't need to tell anyone here that housing affordability is bad right now so I'll cut to the chase...
What can be done about it?
I got seven proposals to address the problem.
But first.. lets talk about what I call 'Non-Solutions'.
A Non-Solution is something that feels like a solution but isn't. For example: Scratching at itchy skin isn't a solution to a rash.
There's a few Non-Solutions I'm going to be avoiding with my proposals:

• Price Fixing: Simply mandating that X costs $N, at a government level, doesn't fix anything. Ask USSR. Prices determined by markets are not 'fair', but they are realistic outcomes to the situations which created them, whether it's a lack of regulation, lack of supply, etc. High prices are a symptom of bigger problems that need to be addressed.
• Free Money: While it seems like an easy fix, just handing out money until everyone can afford everything, you don't need to be an economist to know that doesn't work. Prices are a function of purchase power. If you increase everyone's purchase power equally, prices will adjust to match. We've all seen this, the inflation we're experiencing right now in Australia is likely a direct outcome of the spending during the pandemic.

Instead solutions need to be formed through means such as:

• Using the tax system to incentivise behaviour that results in cheaper housing, and de-incentivise behaviour that results in more expensive housing.
• Adjusting laws that result in more expensive housing, removing laws that are an obstacle to cheaper housing.
• Creating alternatives to the existing housing stock in the market.
• Government initiatives that increase housing stock.

So - what could we do?

Proposal 1 - The AAHC

I call it the 'Australian Affordable Housing Construction Company', aka, AAHC Co.
Government initiated housing construction company, similar to the NBN Co.
It has one goal: Build houses and sell them. It has a target rate of 'houses/quarter' it aims to construct houses at. That rate is set by an independent body that aims to keep the cost of housing to a fixed level relative to incomes, and controlled in a fashion similar to the official interest rate. Another lever on the economy. The rate increases when housing supply is low, and decreases when housing supply is high.
The AAHC builds houses. Then sells them. Simple as that. No other purpose. The goal is to break even, build houses, sell them at market value (no profit). The great thing is, this means the AAHC has a net zero funding cost for the tax payer - literally costs nothing to run, because it pays for itself through sales of houses.
The actual construction would be done by external private construction companies under contract who compete under bids to build suburbs worth of houses in large projects. Which is another benefit. Lots of jobs creation, a big boon for our local manufacturing and construction industry, and any related employment opportunities (construction companies don't just hire builders after all, they hire graphic designers, accountants, managers, receptionists, etc).
As additional benefit, because the government is building the houses, it can ensure the houses meet conditions and standards we the people want to see applied to future housing construction. So it could be mandated for example, every new home constructed must have air conditioning, must have solar panels, etc.
The AAHC Co in summary:

• Allows for a market based approach to control the cost of housing.
• Costs nothing (to the taxpayer) to run, self funded.
• Reduces the single largest expense we have in life (housing).
• Would create tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands, of jobs.
• Can improve the quality of our supply of houses in the market by building better houses.

Proposal 2 - Nationalised Definitions of 'Tiny Homes', and Easing Of Laws Regarding Them

The reality is, there is such a shortfall of housing in Australia, that it may take a decade or longer to address the problem, even if we started implementing the right policies to do so today.
What people need is alternatives. Today.
Such as 'Tiny Homes'.
Tiny homes can be constructed in larger quantities, prefab, for cheaper than a house, and constructed on a trailer frame which allows them to be easily moved and transported.
They can be significantly cheaper than a house, and moved easily, opening up prospects for someone to own reasonable housing in Australia for a fraction of the cost of buying an established constructed house, by buying very cheap land, a cheap 'Tiny Home' and parking it permanently on their land. Then eventually moving it on, selling it even, once it comes time to upgrade to a permanent fixture house, or move into a larger fixed house.
Because they're legally defined as caravans, they subject to all the same rules.
The first problem is, those rules vary depending on where you live. Not just for each state, but even depending which council you live in. Some councils have no clear regulations at all, making matters worse. A nationalised definition of a 'Tiny Home', and national laws regarding them, would make life easier for everyone.
The second problem is, because currently Tiny Homes are defined legally as Caravans, they are subject to the same restrictions, which can be stifling, such as, subject to location (state or council laws vary). Here are some of the worst restrictions found around the country:

• Can not be placed on a vacant block of land without an existing dwelling
• No more than 1 is allowed on residential land
• Contains no more than 2 bedrooms
• Requires development approval every time they're moved
• May result in additional charges for council rates

A nationalised legal framework for tiny homes, and easing of laws around them, to make them easier and cheaper to obtain, install and live in, would open up possibilities for alternative means of housing to ease the burden on the existing housing market.

Proposal 3 - Housing Super Fund

Super is a well established method for ensuring individuals can afford their retirement without resorting to giving people free money or price fixing the cost of retirement. It forces employers to make contributions to employee's super funds, that then collect interest, grow, and eventually can be accessed at retirement age.
This is a mechanism we can borrow to achieve a similar result for renters, to allow them eventually afford housing.
I call it a 'Housing Super Fund'.
How it could work is like this:
Every tenant in Australia, could have a 'housing super fund' set up for them when they start renting. Every time a tenant pays rent, the land lord receiving the rental payment, could be required to deposit 5% of that payment into the tenant's housing super fund.
Land lords will insist, argue, that they will put up rents by 5% to compensate. But this is a lie. Prices are determined by customer purchase power. Renters will not have any additional purchase power as a result of this change. Rents won't go up in real terms over a long period of time, instead this change eats a cut away of rents from landlords and invests it on the behalf of tenants.
The housing super fund could be made accessible if and when a tenant is making their "first home purchase". If that never occurs, the funds could available automatically at retirement age instead.

Proposal 4 - Increased Property Taxes for Landlords & Elimination of Negative Gearing

While some people are facing the prospect that they may NEVER be able to afford a house in their lifetime - other individuals, might have as many as 7 properties, and are currently shopping for their 8th.
It's obvious, that the system strongly favours those who already own houses and have capital, ahead of those who don't.
So, simple solution, is to increase taxes for being a landlord.
Property taxes faced by individuals could be higher for those who own more than one house, and increase with each additional house owned.
And, Negative Gearing, eliminated, since it creates such a massive financial incentive to own more than one house.

Proposal 6 - Harsh taxes on empty resident housing

A simple proposal.
There are empty houses across Australia.
Tax the owners until they either rent them out or sell them or move into them.

Proposal 7 - Housing HELP Loan

Saved the best for last. Got a HELP Loan? Then you know how this loan structure works.
You borrow money from the government to pay for education, and then pay off that help loan in your taxes, if and when your income is above a minimum threshold. In the mean time, the loan amount is adjusted based on interest rates at the end of each financial year.
There's no reason why we can't have a similar loan structure made available for housing.
'Housing HELP Loan' could be made available to cover up to 75% of the purchase price of an individual's first home, with the remaining 25% required as an upfront deposit. The loan then can be paid off as part of the individual's taxes if and when their income is above a minimum threshold.
This would enable millions who currently can't get a home loan to finally get one, and ensure the debt of a home loan isn't financially crushing when individuals end up in a situation where they are temporarily unable to pay off their loan due to loss of employment.
That's 7 proposals to fixing housing affordability in Australia.
Which ones do you think would work?
Which ones do you think would stand a chance politically of being supported by a major party and made into reality?

Have:
Q2525 Railway
Q50c25 Handmade
AA50c25 Elders Mark
Q50c25 Fixer
Q2525 Fixer
B50c25 Epr
AA50c25 Epr
B2515fr Epf
B2525 Fixer
BE25 Fixer
B2525 Handmade
BE25 Handmade
Q2515fr UC Laser
B2525 UC Laser
AA50c25 UC Laser
B50c25 NU Laser
AA2525 NU Laser
Q2525 Cryolator
V2525 EPR
B40p+1s Chainsaw
AA40p+1s Chainsaw
V40p50bs Chainsaw
AA2515fr Flamer
Railways:
Q2550bs Q50c15fr
Q2590wr Q50c90wr
Tse15fr
Fixers:
VE25 AAE25
Q2515c BE15fr TS50c25
B15v25 berE25 ber2525 V50c15fr
B50c15fr BE90wr TSE25
Q50c100 AriE25 TS2525
AAE15c AA2590wr AssE15fr
AA2515c JunkE25
Junk2525 JunkVHC25 Q25dwa25
Handmades:
V50c25 V2590wr
Q50c15fr TSE15c
Q50cStealth
B2515fr Ass2525
Heavy:
BE15fr lmg AA2515fr lmg
AA2590wr 50 Cal Q50c15fr lmg
Q50vhc25 cryolator TS2590wr cryolator
QBash90wr minigun ass2515fr cryolator
BE50drwa lmg TS2515fr GP
QE25 LMG, Minigun, Gatling gun
Aa2515fr GP B2515fr pepper shaker
Commando:
QE15fr Auto pipe TSE15fr Auto Pipe
QE25 Combat Rifle AAE15c elders mark
Q50vhc25 AR Q25100 Tesla TS2525 Tesla
I50c25 bpr VE90wr AR junk2525 epr
VE15fr lever action TSE15fr lever action
Q50vhc25 Plasma rifle BE+1p Fixer
B50c50bs Laser QE+1P Radium
B50vhc25 Elders Mark Q50c25 10mm smg
JugE15fr elders mark B50vhc25 .45 smg
QE250 auto pipe Q2525 gauss
Pistols:
B50c15fr gamma gun
MUT2525 laser pistol AAE25 10mm pistol
B50c25 M79 B2590 gamma
Bows:
AA50c25 crossbow I50C25 Crossbow
AA50vhc15c crossbow B50c25 bow
I50c25 Compound B50c90 Compound
Melee:
B15v50bs chainsaw AA40p50bs ripper
VSSS assaultron blade AA40p40 Drill
AASSS Glove (not sanitized)
V25D+1s chainsaw, BSSS deathclaw
Armor:
Best:
UNY AP SENT H Combat CP
UNY AP WWR FSA LA
UNY INT SENT S Metal LL
UNY INT SENT Trapper CP
UNY INT SENT USA CP
UNY INT SENT S Metal LL
UNT INT SENT Marine CP
UNY INT FDC Trapper LL
UNY AP SENT Reverse paint FSA RL/LL
UNY AP FDC Combat RA
UNY INT FDC ROBOT RL
UNY AP CAV H Combat CP
OE AP CAV Trapper LA
OE AP WWR S RAIDER RA
The rest (lots of good rolls):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GQ0neVgdAtcOlY2WnUkDvAtLYvLw-LIr6G_BaZzOFsU/edit?usp=sharing
Apparel:
TFJ x6
Red Asylum x4
LC x4
TLC x5
Responders Set x6
FCJS x6
Loon x3
Bosjs x3
WPJS
USA x2
FSA x2
Buffoon, Crazy Guy x2, Hag
Fiend, Raven x2, Demon
forest, yellow, pink asylum
Rare bats
Enclave Forceful Stock, Reflex Sight, Aligned Auto
Enclave Calibrated compacitor, Severe Beta Wave
Leaders
5k sd1 maps
2k L&L 8
2k explosive, 2k energy bobbles
2.5k psychobuff, 2.5k psychotats
Bulk steel
Bulk acid
Specific Wants:
TFJ, Red asylum, LC
Responders Set, FCJS, TLC
WPJS, BOSJS, USA, FSA
UNY AP SENT USA CP/LL
UNY AP SENT H Combat RA
Q2525 Auto Pipe
B/I 50vhc 25 compound bow
B50c25 Handmade and Fixer
Q groll fixers/handmades/rails
Grolls (Weps or Armor)
Leaders
Open to all offers however, let me know what your thinking and we can make a deal :)

Hello all. I am looking around for cartridge chamberings for 600-1000yards and noticed someone on this forum post a 25x47L that they had recently built. I have decided to do a new build on a tikka action and, looking at the new high bc bullets being released for .257 cal cartridges, thought twice on chambering a rifle in a 7mm cal cartridge. My question is: with a modern action, would it be absolutely idiotic to chamber a rifle in 257AI with a 1:7.5 twist for the said higher bc bullets? Would be looking to run 134gr hornady eld-m’s from a 26” barrel. Would i be unable to seat to the correct depth unless i invested in a custom reamer? Not able to do the same velocities as the 25x47L or 25 creed? Would i have any advantages to barrel life? I know accuracy may be easier to achieve with modern options, but i wanted to toy with this option as well. Thanks for any advice.

My PAL saturn has died in a few places and it's infeasible to fix it. I was looking for the best way to be able to play PAL and NTSC games, and have seen that you can get a 50/60hz switch on your console.
I just wanted to know if it's possible to install this on a Japanese unit, as all the mods I've seen discussed online or for sale have been a PAL model with it installed.
It's much cheaper to get a Japanese model and I think they look way cooler than the Western models, so I was hoping to snag one and get the mod done so I can play my PAL and NTSC physical copies on the one console. Thanks!
edit: I'm aware I can play any region games with an action replay cartridge. I have one. But I want to be able to play my PAL optimised games on the same console, if possible.

i am looking for 30k caps of worth of fuel(1c), rad sugar bombs (130c), Nuka Cola Dark (35c) or Junk Adhesive, Oil or Acid (4c)
Looking for for 100k caps for armors or 80k caps for weapons with star. Will also trade them for enclave Forceful stock or reflex sight.
Weapons;
AA15AP25LVC AD
AASSS Asssaultron Blade
AASSS Bone Hammer
AASSS Sledge Hammer
AA25ffr15fr Minigun
AASSS Machete
Ari50c15fr AD
AriE90rw Minigun
Ari40pa90rw Chainsaw
Ari25ffr25 Lever Action
Ari25ffr25 Fixer
Assassin’s 50vhc90rw Pepper Shaker
BSSS Chinese Officer Sword
BE25 Combat Rifle ⭐️
B5025 .44 Pistol
BSSS Spear
B25lvc Tesla (No second star)
Medic5025 SMG
Q25ffr50bs SMG
Instigating5025 Fixer
B15AP25LVC Fixer
ExecutionerE25 Fixer
V25ffr15fr Gatling Laser ⭐️
V2525 Pipe Rifle
VE15fr Gatling gun
V40paS Combat Knife
VE25 HM
V5025 HM
Armors;
Cham STR / WWR CE LA ⭐️
Cloaking AP / WWR CE CP
Cloaking Fire / FDC CE LA
Life Saver INT / FDC Trapper LL
Life Saver STR / WWR
OE AP / AWR Metal CP
OE AP / CAV Trapper LL
OE AP / Rad Recovery CE LA
OE Fire / WWR Robot LL
OE LED / SENT Sturdy Robot LL
OE Poison / WWR Sturdy Combat RA
OE Poison / WWR Trappers CP ⭐️
OE Rad / AWR CE LA
OE STR / CAV Heavy Raider CP
OE LED / SENT Wood LA
UNY AGI / CAV CE LA
UNY AP / AWR Heavy Leather CP ⭐️
UNY AP / FDC Leather RL
UNY Cryo / FDC CE RA
UNY Fire / CAV USA RA
UNY Fire / CAV USA RL
UNY Fire / SENT Heavy Robot CP ⭐️
UNY LED / SENT Sturdy Combat RL
UNY Poison / SENT Heavy Raider RL ⭐️
UNY Poison / CAV Heavy Metal RA ⭐️
UNY Poison / SENT Heavy Metal RA ⭐️
UNY S / CAV Wood RL
UNY STR / FDC Sturdy Robot LL
UNY STR / SENT FSA LL
VAN Rad / CAV CE RL
VAN AP / SENT USA RA ⭐️
VAN INT / WWR Trapper CP ⭐️
VAN Rad / WWR CE CP ⭐️
VAN STR / FDC CE LA ⭐️

Hi all! I’ve been searching for a Celica GT-S 7th gen for awhile. About 7 years ago I owned an 2004 WRX. Test drove a 2011 WRX last year and it was okay, but not as fun as I hoped. Now, a clean Celica GT-S popped up a few hour drive away.
1) Hoping to get some feedback and price and the car. I’ve tried to research as best as I can. I’ll be looking at this next Tueaday and paid the owners a small fee to hold it for me till then. Seem like really nice people.
2) I just want a good reliable car to drive that is nice to look at and fun. How will it compare to a WRX? For the $10k asking price I wonder if I should consider a WRX or Miata. Though clean WRXs are also hard to find, and perhaps the Celica will be more unique and fun.
Asking price: 10k (talked on the phone and they seem firm)
Specs - Clean title - 2002 GT-S - Manual 6 speed - 95k miles - No accidents (Clean VIN report) - Factory action package - Factory Silver - Stock except short ram intake - 2 owners (current owners are older folks, original owner put 35k miles on, current owners 60k miles since 2017) - Garage kept - Paint looks good (will determine paint and rust in person) - Leather seats w/ side airbags (side airbags are important to me) - Interior is in good condition w/ original stereo - Two interesting features I haven’t seen elsewhere: 2 sets of fog lights and 1 rear bumper light right under the lift gate, looks clean) - Comes with original wheels (poor condition) and new set of wheels
The car also comes with different Lotus badges and random Lotus flare. I’ve done extensive research to figure out if it was ever a thing that Lotus tuned a Celica, apparently the dealership 7 years ago told the current owners that Lotus made 50 of them. Sounds kinda hokey. I’ve found all the badges online for sale. Interestingly ChatGPT did say something about Lotus doing a special edition Celica, but my research seems inconclusive other than that. I don’t care much about the Lotus badges, I think someone just paid tribute to the Elise, doesn’t add or detract for me. Would be cool if it was tuned.
I may plan to do the ECU swap if I get it. Overall I really want a clean GT-S. I’m willing to pay for one, but does it seem a little high? Most GT-S I find are either trashed, or they’re still asking $8k and they’ve got $120k miles and not as clean as this one.