Are you planning a group vacation and looking for the perfect rental in Pompano Beach? Look no further! Our group vacation rental is the ideal destination for family reunions, friend gatherings, corporate retreats, or any large group looking to enjoy a memorable beachside escape.

Why Choose Our Pompano BeachGroup Vacation Rental?

1. Spacious Accommodations: Our rental offers multiple bedrooms and bathrooms, providing ample space for everyone to relax and unwind. With a large living area, a fully equipped kitchen, and comfortable dining spaces, you'll have everything you need for a comfortable stay.
2. Prime Location: Situated just steps away from the pristine sands of Pompano Beach, our rental gives you easy access to sunbathing, swimming, and a variety of water sports. Enjoy the vibrant local scene with nearby restaurants, shops, and entertainment options.

So just an update from my previous posts about a month ago…
I ended up making the move to a different state to get away from her thinking it would help me be able to realise she wasn’t good for me and that I can start fresh now.
Boy was I wrong, ever since I got here I’ve had this unshakable feeling that I’ve deeply messed up and made the worst decision of my life by leaving.
I’m finding it incredibly hard to cut contact with her even though I’m a million miles away from her now. She’s expressed interest in coming to visit me despite still being with her AP.
I guess for me the reason I’m personally having such a hard time making the final step for myself by cutting her off. Is that I fundamentally still believe our relationship failing and getting to a point where an affair was an option, was my failure in the relationship.
The second main reason would be that I feel like I’m a really hard person to love because I have a lot of flaws. I’m not perfect and finding someone that is compatible with my life like she was will be incredibly challenging.
Very easy for me to be tempted by the notion oh well better the devil you know…. Yes she will likely continue to cheat on me but what’s the alternative?
So good people of this community, how did you find the strength to finally pull the trigger on NC? Of truley letting them go in your heart, mind and soul?

In this post, I will address the issues raised by readers in the previous post and discuss a cost-effective and ethical approach to growing your WhatsApp contact list for marketing purposes.
One commenter mentioned, “Nope. Never used WhatsApp and never will. I don't need another app or service to text and call people...that's what my phone does! My clientele doesn't use it, why should I?”
Here are some facts: Over 50 million companies globally use WhatsApp Business for marketing, and 54% of users prefer to receive marketing communications and order updates via WhatsApp.
Sources: Cooby , Statista. There is extensive information available on Google as well.
Another comment stated, “You're forgetting that I simply don't want you messaging me on WhatsApp unless I give you my number.”
Facts: Similar to SMS and email, nobody likes spam. WhatsApp is no different. You should block and report any number that sends unsolicited messages to you.
This brings us to today's topic: How can businesses obtain opt-ins for WhatsApp marketing?
Option 1: Create Click-to-WhatsApp Ads
If you use social media to promote products or run marketing campaigns, it’s an ideal opportunity to encourage customers to connect with your business on WhatsApp. Offering a click-to-chat option in your ads provides an easy entry point for customers to start a conversation, ensuring you have their consent to interact and know how they found your business.
Here’s how to create such an ad: [Create Ads That Click to WhatsApp]
Option 2: Obtain Customer Opt-Ins During Support Interactions
Add a WhatsApp Chat widget on your website using Clickiny.com. After resolving a customer’s issue, ask if they’d like to receive future notifications and updates. If they agree, send a message outlining the type of notifications they can expect and ask them to confirm their opt-in.
Option 3: Use Pop-Ups
You can collect opt-ins on your website using pop-ups, banners, or CTA snippets in locations that catch your customers’ attention. Clearly communicate the value and benefits of receiving notifications via WhatsApp, such as inspirations, new arrivals, and the latest discounts.
Tools like OptinMonster.com or Popupsmart can help you create these pop-ups.
Option 4: Ask for an Opt-In at Checkout
Since customers can use WhatsApp to receive crucial notifications like order confirmations, boarding passes, and delivery updates, they are more likely to opt-in during the purchase process. This is particularly effective for retailers, airlines, and logistics companies. Include a checkbox for opt-in at various touchpoints, such as when entering billing or delivery information.
Best Practices to Boost Your WhatsApp Opt-In Rate
To effectively increase your WhatsApp opt-in rate, consider the following strategies:
1. Highlight the Benefits: Clearly convey the advantages of receiving notifications and updates via WhatsApp. Make it evident how it adds value to the customer experience.
2. Respect Frequency: Avoid overloading customers with messages. Find a balance that keeps them informed without being intrusive.
3. Simplify the Opt-In Process: Ensure that the process to opt-in is straightforward and user-friendly. Minimize steps and make it easy for customers to sign up.
4. Integrate Seamlessly: Choose an opt-in method that fits naturally into your existing communication channels and business processes. This will make the transition smooth for both your business and your customers.
5. Provide Clear Opt-Out Instructions: Make sure customers know how to opt-out if they choose to, and promptly respect their requests. Transparency builds trust and reduces the likelihood of complaints.
By implementing these best practices, you can effectively grow your WhatsApp contact list while maintaining a positive relationship with your customers.

Personally, I think the hat goes off to roguelites. Just going off my personal example, it’s a genre that I totally disregarded up until I played Hades last year. It’s the noobish answer, I know, but something about the artstyle and character design fit my tastes perfectly. I’m sure I’m one of a small million who felt the same, even if it wasn’t their first roguelite.
Starting this year though, I got into so many top-notch roguelites that I can’t help but feel that the genre is absolutely exploding. To name but a few, Astral Ascent has to be my personal favorite. It has good character design and character options, an original spell shuffle system, the runs are *very* satisfying and the boss fights some of the best in any game of this type (their design especially + later interactions in the playthrough which I’m not going to get into). Of course, I can’t go without mentioning Balatro either — I saw a funny review calling it better than crack and better still if you’re ON crack, and the review hits the mark lol. Super addictive, super replayable, and easy to get into.
That’s just some 2 popular ones right now, but there are literally tons of more niche indies out there that are doing their own thing and more often than not, succeeding really well at that. The most release that caught my eye is Throne of Bone which is like a roguelite with auto-battles with card building. It’s EA now but thought I’d mention it. And speaking of card builders — another one that I gave me a good run for my money is Duelists of Eden. More or less a PvP-only interaction of One Step From Eden, but so smooth and lagless that it puts some other “bigger” games with a multiplayer component to shame (looking at you, Elden Ring). I mean, the very fact that it came out says that there’s a demand for these hybrid roguelites and that they’re becoming a staple of gaming really fast… or I think so?
With Hades 2 out in demo, and Slay the Spire 2 announced as well, I’m pretty happy with the way this genre at least is expanding its horizons. This is just my two cents on the topic I guess, but what do you think? Any other genres that you think have bright times in store for them?

The QuickBooks ABS PDF Driver plays a vital role in converting financial reports and forms into Adobe PDF format, ensuring easy sharing and preserving document integrity. However, encountering issues during the installation of the ABS PDF Driver can disrupt document management and financial reporting processes within QuickBooks. This comprehensive guide aims to address the QuickBooks ABS PDF Driver Installation Issue, providing troubleshooting steps and expert insights to resolve the problem effectively.
Understanding QuickBooks ABS PDF Driver:
The QuickBooks ABS PDF Driver is a specialized utility designed to facilitate the conversion of QuickBooks reports and forms into Adobe PDF format. It ensures that documents retain their formatting and integrity, making them easily shareable and suitable for printing or electronic distribution. The ABS PDF Driver is essential for creating permanent records of transactions, financial reports, and other documents critical for audits, financial analysis, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
Common Symptoms of ABS PDF Driver Installation Issue:

1. Installation Freezes: Users may encounter issues where the installation process freezes or gets stuck at a particular stage, preventing the completion of the installation.
2. Error Messages: Users may receive error messages during the installation of the ABS PDF Driver, indicating issues such as file corruption, compatibility problems, or insufficient system resources.
3. Compatibility Issues: The ABS PDF Driver installation may fail due to compatibility issues with the operating system, QuickBooks version, or other software installed on the system.
4. Incomplete Installation: In some cases, the ABS PDF Driver may not install correctly, resulting in missing or corrupted files, and rendering the functionality unusable.
5. System Performance Issues: Installation of the ABS PDF Driver may lead to system performance issues, such as slowdowns, freezes, or crashes, impacting overall productivity.

Identifying Possible Causes:

1. System Compatibility: The ABS PDF Driver may not be compatible with the operating system or QuickBooks version installed on the system, leading to installation issues.
2. Software Conflicts: Conflicts with other software installed on the system, such as antivirus programs, firewalls, or third-party applications, can interfere with the ABS PDF Driver installation process.
3. Insufficient System Resources: Inadequate system resources, such as RAM, disk space, or processing power, can prevent the ABS PDF Driver from installing correctly.
4. Corrupted Installation Files: Corrupted installation files or incomplete downloads can result in installation failures or errors during the ABS PDF Driver installation process.
5. Network Issues: Connectivity issues or network interruptions during the installation process can cause the ABS PDF Driver installation to fail or freeze.

Troubleshooting Steps:

1. Verify System Requirements:
   • Ensure that your system meets the minimum requirements for installing the ABS PDF Driver, including operating system compatibility, disk space, and system resources.
   • Check the QuickBooks documentation or the official Intuit website for detailed system requirements.
2. Disable Antivirus/Firewall:
   • Temporarily disable antivirus software and firewall settings to prevent them from interfering with the ABS PDF Driver installation process.
   • Remember to re-enable antivirus and firewall protection after completing the installation.
3. Run QuickBooks Diagnostic Tool:
   • Utilize the QuickBooks Diagnostic Tool to diagnose and fix common installation issues, including ABS PDF Driver installation problems.
   • Download and install the QuickBooks Diagnostic Tool from the official Intuit website and follow the on-screen instructions to scan and repair installation issues.
4. Perform Clean Install:
   • Perform a clean install of QuickBooks to ensure that all components, including the ABS PDF Driver, are installed correctly.
   • Uninstall QuickBooks using the Control Panel, then reinstall the software using the latest installation files downloaded from the Intuit website.
5. Update QuickBooks:
   • Ensure that QuickBooks is up to date by installing the latest updates and patches released by Intuit.
   • Updates may include bug fixes, compatibility improvements, and enhancements that can resolve ABS PDF Driver installation issues.
6. Check Disk Space and System Resources:
   • Verify that your system has sufficient disk space and system resources to accommodate the ABS PDF Driver installation.
   • Clear disk space by removing unnecessary files and programs, and close any resource-intensive applications running in the background.
7. Check for Corrupted Files:
   • Verify the integrity of the ABS PDF Driver installation files by downloading them again from the official Intuit website.
   • Ensure that the downloaded files are not corrupted or incomplete before initiating the installation process.
8. Install in Safe Mode:
   • Install the ABS PDF Driver in Safe Mode to minimize potential conflicts with other software or processes running on the system.
   • Boot your computer into Safe Mode and then initiate the ABS PDF Driver installation process.
9. Contact QuickBooks Support:
   • If troubleshooting steps fail to resolve the ABS PDF Driver installation issue, contact QuickBooks support for further assistance.
   • Provide detailed information about the issue, including error messages, system specifications, and troubleshooting steps taken, to expedite the resolution process.

Expert Tips for Preventing ABS PDF Driver Installation Issues:

1. Keep Software Updated: Regularly update QuickBooks and other software installed on your system to ensure compatibility and resolve known issues.
2. Backup Data Regularly: Create regular backups of your QuickBooks data to prevent data loss in case of installation or compatibility issues.
3. Verify Compatibility: Before installing the ABS PDF Driver, verify compatibility with your operating system and QuickBooks version to avoid compatibility issues.
4. Install from Official Sources: Download installation files from the official Intuit website or trusted sources to ensure the integrity and authenticity of the software.

Conclusion:
The QuickBooks ABS PDF Driver Installation Issue can disrupt document management and financial reporting processes within QuickBooks, affecting productivity and efficiency. By following the troubleshooting steps outlined in this guide and implementing expert tips, users can effectively resolve the issue and ensure seamless functionality of the ABS PDF Driver. Regular maintenance, software updates, and proactive troubleshooting are essential practices to prevent and address ABS PDF Driver installation issues, ensuring smooth document conversion and enhancing the functionality of QuickBooks for streamlined financial management.
Visit–https://www.errorsfixs.com/blog/quickbooks-abs-pdf-driver-installation/

The atmosphere in the arena was electric, with anticipation crackling in the air like electricity. Spectators filled every seat, their eyes trained eagerly on the ring, awaiting the clash of titans about to unfold. The announcer's voice boomed over the speakers, commanding attention.
"Ladies and gentlemen, prepare yourselves for a battle of epic proportions! In the blue corner, hailing from the land of the rising sun, standing at an impressive 6 feet 2 inches tall, we have Jin 'The Funeral Dove' Kazuya!"
Jin stepped into the ring, his presence commanding respect despite his slender frame. His black hair fell messily around his pale face, his eyes gleaming with determination as he prepared to face his opponent.
"And in the red corner, representing the pride of England, towering at an astonishing 210 centimeters and weighing in at a mighty 153 kilograms, we have Aaron!"
The crowd erupted into cheers as Aaron made his entrance, his imposing stature casting a shadow over the ring. His cold demeanor belied the raw power that emanated from every muscle in his body, his reputation as a heavyweight boxer preceding him like a thunderclap.
As the bell rang, signaling the start of the match, the two fighters wasted no time in sizing each other up. Jin moved with the grace of a dancer, his agile footwork keeping him just out of Aaron's reach. He launched a flurry of kicks, each one aimed with deadly accuracy, but Aaron remained unfazed, his focus unwavering.
With a grunt of exertion, Aaron closed the distance between them, unleashing a barrage of thunderous punches aimed at Jin's midsection. But Jin was no easy target, his evasive maneuvers and quick reflexes allowing him to dodge and weave through Aaron's onslaught with ease.
The crowd watched in awe as the two fighters exchanged blows, each one a testament to their skill and determination. Jin danced around Aaron, his kicks coming at lightning speed from all angles, while Aaron pressed forward relentlessly, his punches like battering rams.
As the match wore on, the tension in the arena reached a fever pitch. Jin's agility and precision kept him one step ahead of Aaron's brute strength, but the Englishman refused to relent, his punches growing more ferocious with each passing moment.
In a sudden burst of speed, Jin launched himself into the air, his leg extending in a powerful kick aimed directly at Aaron's head. The crowd held its breath as the kick connected with a resounding crack, sending shockwaves rippling through the arena.
But Aaron was made of sterner stuff, his iron will and determination keeping him on his feet despite the force of Jin's blow. With a roar of defiance, he retaliated with a devastating punch aimed at Jin's chest, but the Japanese fighter was already one step ahead.
With lightning-fast reflexes, Jin twisted his body to the side, narrowly avoiding the full force of Aaron's blow. In one fluid motion, he lashed out with another kick, this time aimed at Aaron's legs, seeking to weaken his opponent's stance.
The crowd watched in rapt silence as the two fighters continued to trade blows, each one a testament to their skill and determination. But in the end, it was Jin who emerged victorious, his agility and precision proving to be the deciding factors in the match.
As Aaron staggered backwards, his strength finally failing him, the crowd erupted into cheers and applause, their admiration for both fighters evident in the thunderous applause that filled the arena. Despite the outcome, both men had given their all in the pursuit of victory, and their bravery and skill would be remembered long after the final bell had rung.

Hello, i’ve been working in apperal for like 3 weeks now 20-29 hours a week. The works not bad at all, my walmart is small, my coworkers are nice. It’s more relaxing than my home life, but when i work 8 hour shifts i spend the second half of them basically completly useless. I am told i look unwell and i think my coworkers are worried about me. At first i thought this was a normal part of getting used to the job, but im starting to wonder if i should be more concerned. To clarify how i feel like four hours in, im shaking (more than usual ig 😂), i am dizzy and getting vertigo even if i sit down. My hips hurt like hell (that part i can get over and my body may get used to 🤷‍♀️) and i honestly just can’t concentrate AT ALL like my job shouldn’t be that hard of me. If im a little out of focus i can usually just do some easy zoning but no, at this point im so unable to concentrate that i can no longer notice on my own that say a shirt is unfolded and will just walk right past it while activly looking for something to do. Or i will struggle to get shorts on a hanger, or i won’t be able to focus enough to put the clothes in order of size. I also start to get frusterated really easily. Like i had to step out for a minute because i got so frusterated at some shorts i wanted to snap the hanger in half. Idk whats wrong with me. I was thinking my blood sugar may be low? Maybe im dehydrated? So i drink water and eat a snack but it barely makes a difference.
How awful is it normal to feel getting used to this job? How long should this take to stop? Should i be concerned?
I just worry because my co workworkers seem so concerned i would think if this was a normal part of adjusting they would have seen it many times before or experienced it themselves.

8/10.
Very good step in the right direction but definitely room for improvement. If I was king of Blizzard here is what I would change:
DIFFICULTY:

- Lower exp gain by ~10-15%. Leveling feels just a bit too fast for my taste.

- Slightly increase overall monster damage & health in World Tiers 2-4. Game feels a bit too easy In all non-pit activities. World Tier 1 should be the "easy" mode for that audience, not the whole game levels 1-100.

- Greatly increase World Boss damage and health in World Tiers 2-4. They get melted in ~5 seconds, very anti-climactic.

- Make the Capstone dungeons a little more challanging to complete. I easily cleared them while being ~15 levels underleveled, without focusing too much on my geaaspects.

• Make Profane Mindcages a permanent thing, and have them apply to ALL overworld activities. 3 different potions available to craft: 1) increase enemy levels by 10. 2) increase enemy levels by 25. 3) increase enemy levels by 50.

GAMEPLAY:

- More random mini bosses from previous Diablo games spawning in dungeons, like the Butcher. I'd like to see Blood Raven yell "join my army of the dead", summon some zombies and destroy me with an her bow & arrow.

• Add scattered prisms into the Legion loot chests. Nobody does legions anymore, but maybe this would make legions worthwhile when you're low on prisms.

SKILLS: - Slightly more robust skill tree. I understand that this game is marketed to a more casual audience, but we can do better than having ~2 modifications per active skill. I'd like each skill to branch out to 4 or 5 different variants... Like the "runes" on Diablo 3 that changed how your skill worked, we had 5 options per skill.
ITEMS:

- Improve the aspects on less used Uniques. The update was great, but lots of uniques are very bad compared to legendary now due to lack of tempering. Frostburn for example: "Lucky hit: up to 25% chance to freeze enemies" can be improved to "Lucky hit: up to 25% chance to freeze enemies. Deal 10% (x) more damage to frozen enemies." ...small changes to make these items somewhat usable.

- Set items (don't increase damage by 1000% like D3), but id like to chase sets that are usable but not super OP. I'd like cool auras/transmogs for completing the set. Tal Rasha/IK set Aura's were so cool in D2. Transforming into a vampire when you completed the Trang-Ouls set in D2 was so freaking cool as well. I'd like to see more stuff like that.

- Id like to see a new rare legendary item type called "Jeweler's helm" or "Jeweler's axe" etc.... they would have no aspects or affixs (except innate affixs) but they would drop with 2-6 sockets on them. This would lead to...

• RUNEWORDS! I'd like to be able to find ultra rare runes and put them into ideal "Jeweler's" bases with the right innate affixs and slot numbers and make cool Runewords. That is all :)

Firefox 115.11.0esr (64-bit)
For some reason can't log in anymore into my email account. Was able to log in without any issues about a week ago.
Steps to reproduce:

1. Go to https://mail.tutanota.com/login
2. The site returns a completely blank white page with nothing on it. Tried it for several days now but consistently get the blank page.

The underlying source code for the empty page is as follows:

          TutanotaTags                            

Any ideas? Thanks

I used to think being a good talker was the key to making connections. But man, was I wrong! Turns out, being a good listener is where it's at. Seriously, people appreciate it so much when you actually hear them out instead of just waiting for your turn to speak. Plus, you learn way more when you listen. It's like being a detective, picking up on clues and getting to know someone on a deeper level.
Sure, it's not always easy. Sometimes you gotta bite your tongue when you're itching to jump in with your own story. But trust me, it's worth it. People open up when they feel heard, and you end up building some killer relationships. So, next time you're chatting with someone, resist the urge to dominate the convo. Take a step back, listen up, and watch the magic happen. It's a game-changer, I promise.

Step into a world of refreshing flavor and unparalleled convenience with the Blueberry Lemon – Rama 16000 Puffs disposable vape. Perfect for both novice vapers and seasoned enthusiasts, this high-capacity device offers an exceptional vaping experience that lasts and lasts.

Exquisite Flavor Profile

The Blueberry Lemon – Rama 16000 Puffs delivers a delightful blend of juicy blueberries and zesty lemon. This fusion creates a perfectly balanced flavor profile that tantalizes your taste buds with every puff. Enjoy the sweet and tangy notes that make this vape a refreshing treat, perfect for any time of the day.

Unmatched Longevity

Say goodbye to frequent refills and recharges. The Rama 16000 Puffs disposable vape is designed for extended use, offering an impressive 16000 puffs per device. Whether you're on a long trip or simply prefer a low-maintenance vaping option, this device ensures you won't run out of your favorite flavor anytime soon.

Convenient and Hassle-Free

One of the standout features of the Blueberry Lemon – Rama 16000 Puffs is its convenience. There’s no need to worry about charging, refilling, or maintaining the device. Simply unbox it, enjoy the rich flavors, and dispose of it responsibly once it's depleted. It's the ultimate hassle-free vaping solution for those with busy lifestyles or for anyone seeking an easy and enjoyable vaping experience.

Sleek and Portable Design

Designed with portability in mind, the Rama 16000 Puffs is sleek and compact, making it easy to carry in your pocket or bag. Whether you're on the go, traveling, or simply out and about, this disposable vape is the perfect companion, providing you with a reliable and enjoyable vaping experience wherever you are.

Quality You Can Trust

Rama is a trusted name in the vaping industry, known for its commitment to quality and innovation. The Blueberry Lemon – Rama 16000 Puffs is no exception, offering a premium vaping experience that combines excellent flavor, longevity, and convenience. Each device is crafted with care, ensuring you get the best with every puff.

Conclusion

The Blueberry Lemon – Rama 16000 Puffs disposable vape is the perfect choice for those seeking a long-lasting, flavorful, and convenient vaping experience. With its exquisite flavor profile, impressive puff count, and hassle-free design, it stands out as a top choice for vapers everywhere.
Shop Now and experience the refreshing burst of Blueberry Lemon with the enduring performance of Rama 16000 Puffs. Enjoy the perfect blend of flavor and convenience today!

How can we stop going around in circles with these corrupted nihilists? (basically an extreme religious-nut but in reverse; no meaning, no value, no good/bad, nothing matters) I've compiled some of my thoughts/comments.

But first If you are not caught up yet:
1 Re: Vegan Gains ...The Militant Vegan Raffaela Interview - (May 12, 2024)
2 Vegan Gains is a sub-Jerkivest [5/11/24]
3 Moral Realism Debate w/ Inmendham - (May 16, 2024)
4 WTF #899: The vegan gains debate ... Value realism - (May 19, 2024)
5 Vegan Gains ...Denialism is the only nihilism [5/19/24]
also saw this Controversial Topics with Vegan Gains (Horse Riding, Bivalves, Depression, and much more!) - (May 11, 2024) ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ (he thinks in terms of some dogmatic religious brain-rot morality source of right/wrong, but a kind of reversed/opposite conclusion of it's absence, nihilism)
the very reason religion was invented in the first place was because humans by nature had a value-engine driving them & NEED for meaning, that's the irony. value gave rise to religion, religion never needed to grant value. The fact people can't grasp this. 🤦 ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

Now onto the various arguments, sorry how long and out of order it is But the idea is to provoke you coming up with better ideas/arguments, and if you can critic and strenghen my and ultimately inmendham's arguments. The GOAL should be to Create a formal argument AKA a syllogism, modus ponens. Something clear and concise that can't be taken out of context or misinterpreted, as happened with the debate...

On the subject of Efilism, tread lightly, the philosophy and argument extends beyond merely focusing on suffering; it also includes the critical issue of consent violation. Its proponent and creator, Inmendham, argues for value realism, which contrasts starkly with the notion of subjective morality which I find illogical. While objective morality is full of baggage... often linked to outdated religious doctrine so on face value it's not fun or easy subject to broach... many contemporary non-religious ethicists ground it in realism. Personally me, inmendham and others see no use for the term "morality" as it's tainted. value-realism is the subject. Is it a value-laden universe or not?
it is not necessary to call TRUE/REAL right or wrong Objective, because if objective is defined as mind-independent than without minds there's nothing right/wrong to happen to, therefore THE discussion should be just regarding what is TRUE or NOT, subjective doesn't necessarily mean mere contrived opinion or preference but can be logical conclusion, e.g. you can conclude 2 + 2 = 4 as we understand these concepts of numbers to model reality but can you call it objective or mind-independent 2 + 2 = 4, or that math exists? Not really. As you require a modeler to model reality, an observer to make the observation, a mind to come to such accurate conclusions. To me, claiming there is no real right or wrong is akin to asserting that moral standards and ultimately the subject of Ethics is as fictitious as religion or Santa Claus, you just believe it cause you want to or have preference to. Why maintain this pretense if it's all a mere fabrication / contrivance?
Regarding subjective judgments such as determining "What's the tastiest potato chip or the most beautiful painting?", these are not factual assessments about the things themselves, The question itself is misleading, because the thing itself has none of those qualities objectively, Instead, such qualities are OUTPUTs generated by the interaction of our bodies and minds with these INPUT items, the input is quite arbitrary/irrelevant, unlike the highly meaningful & distinct output generated of positive or negative experiences. You might get off more on certain female body part than another, it doesn't matter, the output positives & negatives is more or less same among individuals and that's what's relevant... not what specific fun or hobby gets you or them off or pushes their buttons.
It can be TRUE that a certain food item is the tastiest to that personal individual, or gross to another, and we can talk about intersubjective truths with averages overall. But one's experience of what is tastiest for them doesn't contradict another's, they can both be true for them individually, as you are likely not even sharing the same exact experiences to judge differently. And one's very perception or framing of the experience changes the experience itself, no way around this truth. Some people find bricks tasty or edible, just how their brain is wired.
It's important to recognize that differing opinions of personal taste do not inherently conflict in the way ethical contradictions do. With ethical matters, asserting that two diametrically opposed views are equally valid is problematic, either one is right and the other wrong, or both might be based on flawed reasoning. Pretending 2 opposing ethical views can be both equally right/true/correct is utter contradictory mush, either one of them must be right / wrong, or both are contrived meaningless nothing opinions, just made up. you wouldn't say whether one believes in god or not IS mere personal opinion/preference and such 2 opposing views can be equally right at same time, that's utter contradictory nonsense, by saying 2 opinions that gRAPE is both good & bad at same time are equally right opinons, right loses all meaning and you might as well say neither is right and both are wrong, they each have their own contrived fairytale delusion.
Now with Ethics of right / wrong, it does not depend on one single individual's preference or opinion, but taken as the whole, if you violate one without consent you still have to account for that since you are seemingly putting the weight on the preference otherwise preferences are utterly meaningless and irrelevant.
ALSO, Do you call whatever you prefer what's right, or do you prefer to try to do what is right?
Do you prefer to seek out what is the right most accurate conclusion given all the facts of reality, or contrive right to be what's in your preference/interest or personal gain?
I don't think VG or most these talking heads understand value-realism (problematic events within subjectivity/a non-physical but REAL reality of the mind). Obviously there's no objective divine or otherwise prime-directive moral-rules we must follow. Unfortunately Religion has poisened the conversation so much with archaic ideas and mushy terms like 'Morality'. Understand there is no 'moral truth', let alone an objective one, ofc if you pigeon-hole me or all realists into defending such nonsense it's easy to refute them. What I'm interested in is subject of Ethics, and to start whether or not value/problematic events exist or do not exist.
Here's a silly question by nihilists: "why is suffering bad?"
Response: How do you identify suffering? Based on the fact that it feels bad. (Yes subjectively) Just as we can subjectively understand 2+2 = 4
Or this: "prove suffering bad, objectively"
Also question-begging, obviously it is subjective. If such badness cannot exist mind-independently by definition.
"Prove suffering is bad, objectively"
is begging the question, because...
It strawmans / assumes the badness must be bad mind-independently, it isn't therefore, it isn't bad.
Answer this, evolutionarily do animals PERCEIVE being tortured skinned alive nail in the eye as BAD, or does it impose torture which we RECOGNIZE and define as Bad by definition?
If true PAIN/torture isn't bad then why does it exist evolutionarily? Answer: (problem -> solution) mechanism which functions as ability to learn & improved survival, this mechanism was reinforced over time as it worked.
inmendham & realists like myself argue: it is the case Descriptively, Objectively evolution IMPOSED Prescriptive-value-judgements onto animals which function as a learning/problem solving mechanism. Fact is, the invention of 'PROBLEM' is something I/we/animals had nothing to do with... (no-free-will-choice) but are simply byproduct in observation of this fact.
If real PROBLEM(s) didn't truly exist then Arguably the word and conceptual understanding it points 👉 to wouldn't exist either. As if beings could be truly blind never seeing colors/vision yet pulling the idea out of thin air and conceiving of such a thing, how preposterous, that'd be giving human creativity/imagination way too much credit. The only nihilist argument then is that by evolution we & all feeling organisms are somehow ultimately deluded or have illusion of problem where there is none, which I find deeply implausible. Run the torture study/experiment a million times putting people's arm in the fire "yep still bad". Filtering out people who lack ability to feel pain of course.
As evolutionary biologists even states pain is a message to the animal "don't do that again". Can't get descriptively prescriptive more than that.
Are You Getting It?
The Ought is literally baked in as an IS. The is-ought gap to be bridged is a complete Red-Herring, yes you can't derive an Ought from an IS, because if you oughtn't do something, then it can never be BAD... problematic/BAD/torture can't mean anything if it doesn't scream OUGHT-not.
All you have to agree to is due to evolution it created torture which is decidedly negative/ inherently BAD, by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't feel bad or be torturous at all... THEN ask yourself, how can something be BAD yet it's not BAD to create that BAD?
This is Checkmate. These are irrefutable Facts & Logical deductions.
So much for it all being false-perception, the very fact placebo patients perceive an otherwise harmless laser as BAD/painful makes it so. It's the TRUE reality in their mind and you can't deny that fact. It's also a fact believing a pain isn't really all that bad can make it so, but this doesn't make these value-laden experiences NOT real/true.
As per evolution, your body/brain's mechanisms must generate & impose a prescriptive-value-judgement / problematic event within your mind,
It's nagging, complaining, telling you keeping your hand on the hot stove is a mistake/problematic/bad. (not in itself but as a consequence)
I believe this brain making me write all this... is making an accurate assessment when it observe certain events to be problematic/bad where it's happening which is within subjectivity, where's your evidence my perceptions are fooling me or I'm somehow deluded? I witnessed the crime take place and you were nowhere near the crime scene yet you have the authority to claim otherwise as fact? (You are not simply agnostic to my problem suffering but a De-nihilist)
Once one accepts this evolutionary fact we can move on to more complicated questions regarding ethics, like how do weigh the good & the bad, conflicting preferences, etc. Otherwise, it's all pointless & futile, like arguing bivalves or wild-suffering with a non-vegan. They're just not on that level yet and it's a waste of time.
revised version of my other comment: I believe that many discussions around morality miss a crucial point about value-realism, which acknowledges problematic events within subjectivity, a non-physical but real reality of the mind. It is evident that there are no objective, divine, or prime-directive moral rules we must follow. Unfortunately, religion has muddied the conversation with archaic ideas and terms like 'morality'.
There is no 'moral truth,' especially not an objective one. If critics pigeonhole realists into defending such notions, it becomes easy to refute them. My interest lies in ethics and whether value/problematic events exist.
Consider this question by nihilists: "Why is suffering bad?"
Response: Suffering is identified because it feels bad, subjectively. Just as we subjectively understand 2+2=4, we can recognize suffering through its unpleasant experience.
When asked to "prove suffering is bad, objectively," this is question-begging, as the question assumes that the badness must exist independently of minds, which it does not by definition. This question straw-mans the issue by requiring mind-independent badness, ignoring the subjective nature of suffering. As if the quality of it being BAD must be granted by something outside the experience itself.
Evolutionary Perspective: Animals perceive and react to torture (e.g., being skinned alive) as bad because evolution has imposed mechanisms that signal harm. Pain serves as a problem-solving mechanism, reinforcing behaviors that enhance survival. If pain and suffering weren't inherently problematic, they wouldn’t exist in the form they do.
Realists like myself argue that evolution has objectively imposed prescriptive-value judgments on animals. The concept of 'problem' or 'bad' arises from these evolutionary mechanisms, not from free will. The existence of these concepts indicates the reality of these problematic experiences.
If real problems didn’t exist, neither would the concepts describing them. This is akin to how beings blind from birth wouldn’t conceive of color. Suggesting that evolutionary processes have universally deluded all feeling organisms into perceiving problems where there are none is implausible.
As evolutionary biologists state, pain signals to the animal, "don't do that again," which is descriptively prescriptive. The 'ought' is embedded within the 'is.' Thus, the is-ought gap is a red herring because prescriptive judgments are evolutionarily ingrained.
Again, How do you identify suffering? Based on the fact that it feels bad. (Yes subjectively) Just as we can subjectively understand 2+2 = 4
All you have to agree to is due to evolution it created torture which is decidedly negative/ inherently BAD, by definition. Otherwise it wouldn't feel bad or be torturous at all... THEN ask yourself, how can something be BAD yet it's not BAD to create that BAD?
Conclusion: By acknowledging that evolution created inherently negative experiences like torture, we accept that these experiences are bad by definition. Denying the badness of creating bad experiences is contradictory. Therefore, once recognizing the true reality of subjective experiences, only then we can move on to complex ethical questions about weighing good and bad and addressing conflicting preferences.
playing devil's advocate let's try Steelman their position and then arrive at the logical conclusions of it and then perhaps refute it. If they say: "veganism = right" realize there is no contradiction IF by 'right' they just mean it's literally nothing but their preference...
There's no goal to prefer to know/do what's right, RATHER what's right is whatever matches our personal preferences, so unlike flat earther vs round earth beliefs/CLAIMs which can contradict/conflict with each other since either 1 is right or both are wrong. Individual tastes don't.
Whereas if VG says 9 people gRAPE the 1 kid for fun is WRONG because he's a threshold-deontologist but Also RIGHT to a hedonistic utilitarian, Those views only contradict/conflict if they are making VALUE-claims or recognizing a problematic event take place. However, with VG apparently he would have to say he's not claiming or labelling anything as TRULY problematic at all but merely describing his preferences like flavor of ice cream...
Now, of course, as the realist, I find such a view more deplorable/worse than if they were merely agnostic on right/wrong. Cause it's one thing to say there's a right answer to questions of Ethics but we have no objective scientific basis to determine it yet or lack knowledge VS saying they have knowledge there is absolutely no right or wrong.
Under Anti-realism nihilism, what they mean by wrong/right, is just their preference, if I understand correctly (which I'm quite sure) Anti-realism nihilism reduces the Subject of Ethics down to nothing but you or someone else pontificating/opining (i.e "me no like torture") . It defends some sort of expressivism, emotivism, normative, prescriptive reduction of Ethics. Which I find lubricious and has to be a mistake,
I don't see anyone playing any different game even the nihilists invest their money and plan ahead for self-interest, no one truly signs up for torture for fun like it's no problem, and runs away from pleasure happiness as bad. Further, it stands to reason... since we can recognize objectively evolution created a punishment mechanism to enforce learning and survival, BAD/PROBLEM as a concept is something I/WE/Animals had nothing to do with. We didn't invent it, we recognize it and respond accordingly. Even evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins stated that pain is a message to the organism 'don't do that again!'
We must address further the flawed logic of VG and other nihilists reducing Ethics down to mere arbitrary preferences like potato chip flavor, or how much salt you prefer in the soup. As it is completely disanalogous & dishonest upon reflection. QUOTE: "There's no arguing against Efilism, it's just personal opinion. Like arguing what tastes better... ice-cream or potato chips?"
Say if you believe that the mona-lisa is beautiful, and I personally find it ugly, this conflicts/contradicts nothing because it claims nothing in terms about that object or reality outside of our own minds.
such qualities are OUTPUTs generated by body/mind from these INPUTs, the input is quite arbitrary/irrelevant, unlike the highly meaningful & distinct output generated of positive or negative experiences.
it doesn't matter what specific fun or hobby gets them off or pushes their buttons in order for it MATTER, those differences don't make it any less real OR all mere subjective opinion. the output positives & negatives is more or less same among individuals and that's what's relevant...
It can be TRUE that a certain food item is the tastiest to some personal individual, or gross to another, one's experience of what is tastiest for them doesn't contradict another's, they can both be true for them individually because it is the reality in their mind, Some people find bricks tasty or edible, just how their brain is wired.
while one person may find a certain food delicious, another may find it repulsive, without invalidating each other's experiences because they are true for them individually. both experiences are valid/correct.
However, actions that disregard another's negative experience invalidate their reality. if you find being boiled alive problematic and I do it anyway believing it's ok, I am invalidating your experience as either not real, relevant, doesn't matter, or my preferences are more important (carry more weight) than yours. Or simply believe it's ALL equal or arbitrary and I just prefer to exploit you so I do that.
Positive or negative experiences are largely consistent among people, making them relevant, regardless of the specific stimuli. Individual truths about taste or preference coexist without contradiction, reflecting each person's value-generated reality.
This cannot honestly be applied to one's mere opinion it's fine to boil kids alive, as you are invalidating the fact that it matters to those victims. You saying it doesn't matter or your gain of pleasure outweighs their loss of pain, is a claim about the reality of events going on in their mind, so there is room for conflict/contradiction. They can't both be right/wrong at the exact same time.
A strong non-intuition argument/claim & facts presented render value-nihilism implausible:
It is Descriptively the case, that Evolution IMPOSED Prescriptive-ought statements... of 'PROBLEMATIC sensation/event' on organisms which functioned as a learning mechanism and improved survival.
Therefore, BAD/PROBLEM isn't mere subjective opinion but something I/we/animals had nothing to do with and are mere by-product reacting to an observation.
This is pretty much the only base-axiom needed to ground my own torture as mattering as the original actual value-currency at stake. That paired with the fact I sampled consciousness and know it matters to me whether or not I am tortured, the fact that I personally observe it as problematic makes it the true reality for my own mind...
...AND it's not mere opinion/proclamation / or idea humans creatively invented out of thin air... as if like everyone could be truly blind yet conceptualizing colovision, makes no sense. plus that's giving humanity way too much credit of imagination.
Can't really have thoughts about information that you don't have. The concept of bad/problem arguably wouldn't even exist if it never was so.
Yes, I agree very semantics. I am attempting to shed clarity on this topic. Looking at the word "BAD" purely in a descriptive sense (e.g., that which can be categorically applied to extreme suffering) it loses all meaning if it's not truly consequential (i.e., it matters whether one experiences bad or not). If it doesn't actually matter ("no problemo") then it can't be bad, only an illusion/delusion of it, yet it's an effective one evolution imposed on organisms as a learning/problem-solving mechanism. The value-realists like myself have every reason to believe evolution created the real thing, not some contrived pseudo-problem organisms feel compelled/obligated to solve.
One only requires the axiom of a Descriptive Bad to ground Ethics. Why? Because it can be argued that a descriptive statement of BAD/problem is prescriptive by it's very nature in the meaning the of word/language.(otherwise its psuedo-bad/fake langauge, redefines bad as aversion/mere preference against) Otherwise, it can't mean anything to be bad, torturously obnoxious, unwanted experiential events couldn't mean anything. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins even state pain is a punishment signal/message to the animal: "Don't do that again!" If those aren't prescriptions imposed, then I don't know what is. The animal doesn't simply decide/prefer to avoid the event and finds it bad, it's told/finds it bad and so prefers to avoid the event/problem. If god or there were some logically or physically possible way it were to be invented how else would it exist?, or what you think evolution's reward & punishment mechanism accomplished? If it didn't synthesize problematic sensations to force organisms to solve?
Evolution prescribes Needs/wants, at the same time imposes a PAIN/PROBLEM of starvation/hunger which by it's very nature is a prescription for solution (i.e. sustenance/relief/comfort.)
By the very nature of "PROBLEM" it prescribes -> "SOLUTION" not merely a contrived or trivial-like on paper math problem, but the origin of why the word even exists: the problem of pain, a true whip/punishment mechanism, real currency to play with, real loss. Idk how you can describe something categorically as a PROBLEM in the true sense of the word if it doesn't come with it a necessary prescription for its solution. Because if there is no NEED for a solution, then it turns into no longer a problem again...
I don't see how it could be any other way because if there's no real game to be playing with value baked into it, then money would be worthless/not even exist, animals wouldn't bother evade standing in the fire, etc.
Saying It is Descriptively the case, that Evolution IMPOSED Prescriptive-ought statements... of 'PROBLEMATIC sensation/event' on organisms which functioned as a learning mechanism and improved survival.
Is the same as saying Evolution IMPOSED torture/BAD, as that's what torture/bad is... a prescribed need for solution to a problem which is some form of relief/comfort.
The prescription arises as a result of accepting step 1. (which nihilists reject/deny) problem solution. The latter does not follow/exist without the former. basic 2+2 = 4 logic. There's no point figuring out the answer to the math equation, if we don't agree first and foremost a problem exists. Nor how to solve a disease, if we don't first and foremost recognize a disease exists. And so, Any debate with nihilists on step 2: of determining what is the most likely solution / right answer becomes irrelevent and a waste of time. Arguing about whether x or y IS the right answer to fixing/preventing diabetes is pointless when they don't even agree the really disease exists. They don't believe an actual real BAD / Problem exists.
VG reduces it down to mere preferences, his reasonings that even if universally sentience prefers not suffebe tortured... Well, just because it is the case descriptively we prefer to avoid suffering doesn't mean we ought/should prevent suffering. He hasn't bridged the IS-OUGHT gap. But he got it backwards,
the claim/argument... ISN'T that because descriptively, sentience universally has a preference to avoid suffering, it is therefore bad,
the claim/argument... IS that it's descriptively bad/problematic, therefore universally there's a deductively logically assigned preference to avoid it,
Again you can't classify/label something as a problem if it's inconsequential whether it is solved or not. The word loses all meaning. If something NEEDs solving/fixing it means there's a problem, if there's a problem it means there's something NEED solving/fixing. Evolution manufactures these needy problems in organisms to manipulate and control them.
Merely what our preferences are IS NOT relevant, preference "frustration" arguably IS. (if preferences couldn't be frustrated "i.e., no value" than it wouldn't matter which way things turned out)
You can have a preference for some art style over another, if we were just programmed non-feeling robots that preferred to avoid standing in the fire, but there was no real kernel of value/bad, then it wouldn't matter.
Let's imagine something was Objectively PROBLEMATIC, an IS statement. What would a real problem look like? something in NEED of a solution. Again, why? because If it doesn't matter whether or not it exists or is Solved or not, it could never be a problem in the first place. So either this problem exists or it doesn't. (NOTE: it doesn't need to be an objective problem to be REAL, "i.e mind-independent")
Next, if ASI or sentient beings were to sample this "problem", would it not be the case they would logically deduce it's in need of a solution? And assign their preferences accordingly to solving it? Cause again otherwise then you just see it as "no-problemo" again.
"If Inmendham's argument is that sentient beings create value, and that the universe has no value without the presence of a sentient being generating it, would it not follow that the ought is inherently built into sensation?" yes but the way VG unfairly reframes it is that we subjectively place value on it, THAT it's entirely subjective, like you prefer salty or sweet, or certain ice cream flavor. emphasizing that it's entirely subjective opinion. Take a look at his unfair silly example: "we can't say pineapple on pizza is objectively tasty or not..." this shows a complete ineptitude in grasping the subject and misrepresenting the argument like crazy, no one is arguing whether Mona Lisa is objectively beautiful or some such thing.
What is being argued: the positive or negative mind-dependent event produced in response to the sensual or perceptual stimuli, the input (object) is irrelevant, only the output (experience) matters and what the value-engine (BRAIN) produced. What pushes your buttons so to speak, blue jelly beans or green jelly beans, could differ between 2 individuals but the shared experience is the same more or less. Whether you wired to find pineapple on pizza tasty or gross is irrelevant, some people find bricks edible.
Main issue is they talking past each other: what inmendham is arguing for was either not expressed as best it could be, and/or VG does not quite comprehend what is being argued... inmendham claims/argues evolution created the real bad/PROBLEM and we respond in recognition of this fact/truth with preferences that follow accordingly, Logic cannot be escaped, once you know 2+2 = 4, you can't will or believe it to be 79. If you know the right answer "torture be Bad M'kay?" obviously you won't act or behave otherwise and say you love it. What could it mean to have a preference against experiencing torture... does such a statement even make any sense? All that is required is a real BAD to exist... and then the preference to avoid it logically follows, an inescapable truth. Unless he thinks I also choose or prefer to believe 2+2 = 4 ?
Essentially VG keeps counter-arguing that: "yes we want to avoid torture, but that's just your preference... just cause universally sentience has a preference against torture (a Descriptive / IS statement) doesn't logically follow some Normative/Prescriptive claim/statement. That just because something IS the case it doesn't follow that we OUGHT / should do X, like help others, prevent suffering, etc. That's a non-sequitur he says. Ultimately it's just a preference." sure but...
His argument only applies/counters a strawman position in his head: Because of this I and other realists can account for / side-step it completely, we aren't attempting to derive an OUGHT from an IS. e.g strawman: "we ALL have preference against torture, Therefore it's BAD." Or "we ALL have preference against torture, Therefore we OUGHT prevent it"
The actual argument is that it's Truly Bad/Problematic by the very nature of the word, Therefore first-hand observation follows universally a deductively logically assigned preference to avoid it. Not the other way around.
"If the only thing that can have meaning in the universe is the experience of a sentient being, ought we not maximize its value just by nature of its experience being the only thing that can matter?" yes the ought is a further logical extension of recognizing it to be a problem, which denotes/demands a solution, otherwise if it doesn't matter to solve it or not then you've turned it into a non-problem again. So it can only be categorically one or the other.
Issue of semantics, different terminology and definitions: as long as VG defines objective as "mind-independent" and sets the goal-post to the realist to find a mind-independent "wrong/bad" as if somehow we need some divine-command or absolute rule in the universe that declares it so... then there is no fruit to the discussion. suffering/bad takes place in the mind/experience, so of course it's unfair to ask one to present a mind-independent suffering/bad in the universe, it is begging the question. To be fair inmendham uses the term objective and could have done better job with defining/pushing his terms "e.g. objective as truth/real/fact" and not let VG impose in his own. However, I don't ascribe a requirement to demonstrate an Objective BAD to ground a BAD as real, valid, and true; it can be entirely based on Subjectivist grounds/axiomatic foundations.
Just because the BAD takes place within subjectivity doesn't make it any less real (non-physical/immaterial sure... but not unreal). VG and nihilists can't understand this. 2+2 = 4 is subjective as is all science ultimately as a root axiomatic-fact... as an observation requires an observer. This doesn't mean realism can't be proven/grounded, it can just like we can know 2+2=4 and the moon exists. If anti-realism is gonna deny subjective truths because it's subjective, then one can't know much of anything and reduces to solipsism. I am more certain I exist and the reality of "perceived" BAD I experience is actually a real BAD... THAN that the moon even exists or any other scientific empirical claim.
PROBLEM is something I/we/animals had Nothing to do with, we didn't invent it.
If Anti-realism nihilism was True and Real "PROBLEMS" didn't exist the word wouldn't exist. It is like being born never knowing or seeing or experiencing vision & color, it's impossible to contrive or imagine it. Some knowledge & information is only accessible through experience.
Even Richard Dawkins stated, "pain is a message to the animal Don't do that again!"
If the ought exists within subjectivity, as preferences, why would them being Subjective vs Objective determine whether or not their violation matters? If one experiences disgust looking at something AND another finds beauty... both are true realities for them, they don't conflict or contradict like empirical or fact claims, but instead both are correct and relevant, not one or the other, BECAUSE when someone says the mona Lisa is beautiful they are just saying it arises in them a sense of beauty, the thing/input is irrelevant whereas the output in mind is what is relevant and true for their reality.
Subjective =/= not true, I don't understand the dichotomy between objective vs subjective ethics, as if there isn't facts to glean about subjectivity.
There's also definition or semantic problems:
objective (mind-independent) vs subjective (mind-dependent)
Under such definition does it make sense to say Objectively evolution created feeling experiencing organisms having sense of taste, smell, sound, hunger, pain, to survive. So can we apply word objective to mind-dependent experiences or not?
And of course under such definition there is no objective mind-independent ethics as without minds there is no feeling subject of concern to even talk about in first place. So how silly...
Yet they take objective to mean True & Subjective made up or mere contrived opinion.
For me these are semantic word games that distract, I just care about what's fact/true. What many don't get is Even science, math is subjective invention, byproduct of subjective tool of language, doesn't mean we can't create an accurate model and picture of reality.
I believe the Is-Ought gap is a red-herring, sure it's true you can't contrive an Ought from just what IS, but with evolution the OUGHT statement is built-in, it's descriptively a prescriptive value statement imposed on me, I/we/animals literally have nothing to do with it, I'm just by-product an observer. This is key understanding.
There exists no objective or divine commandment "you OUGHT do X" written into the fabric of reality, and therefore if you don't that's Bad, No. That's nonsense/impossible logically.
Rather an Descriptive IS statement of X is a real bad/PROBLEM, denotes/demands a solution by it's very nature of the word, otherwise if it doesn't need solving then it becomes into a non-problem again, so either x categorically IS a PROBLEM or it's not.
The claim/argument... Is that it's Descriptively BAD/Problematic, therefore universally there's a deductively logically assigned preference to avoid it. Not the other way around. Our personal preference against torture forever doesn't make it therefore bad. The prescription is built in, forced onto us.
It's like "STOP!" & "GO" What do you say to a dog? "BAD dog!" This is saying it should or shouldn't do something. basically = "No!" "Stop!" That's a prescriptive statement/signal/conveyed message.
Or simply, alls required is Descriptively diagnose Torture as Problematic. Which implies Problem Solution Without necessity of solution there is no problem at all, likewise without problem solution means nothing.
​So you essentially boiled my position down to: "Evolution programmed preference to avoid torture." or "we evolved preference to avoid torture" Does that sound incoherent or what... as if I would make such a silly claim. Keep straw-manning.
Do you think animals have PREFERENCE by default to avoid being tortured burned alive and have sex, or logically preferences are born out of observing problematic negative / positive assigned accordingly through punishment & reward mechanisms aka prescriptions, think long and hard about this one...
This is why value or ethical nihilism is incoherent to me. IF torture be bad, how can it be NOT-bad/neutral to create BAD?
It either is truly BAD or it isn't. It's either real or it's an illusion/delusion and false perception.
Their position must reduce to there is no MEANINGFUL difference between Torture & Bliss. And evolution didn't create any problematic sensation or true punishment whatsoever. Instead, were somehow deluded to view being boiling alive as problematic sensation/BAD, and relief as good, we can't tell the difference or label which is which...
Vegan Gains or any anti-realist needs to substantiate these anti-realist nihilist claims & concede if he agrees with the statements below:
"The value-laden problematic BAD experience of being tortured boiled alive in a vat of acid indefinitely... isn't really bad, evolution didn't successfully impose a real negative punishment mechanism on animals, torture isn't something I/we/animals had nothing to do with and are just byproduct observing the imposition, NO! Instead our opinion has everything to do with it... what's problematic torture, one is merely subjectively interpreting/inventing/proclaiming it to be so! Evolution failed!"
"Animals run from fire cause they irrationally unreasonably subjectively interpret it to be bad/problematic sensation or experience, not cause DNA molecule made it so objectively for evolutionary reasons"
"It is all subjective preference like flavor of potato chips, problematic torturous experience isn't bad you just think it's bad or have preference against it."
"You don't logically recognize intrinsic problematic torturous experience then logically assign solution to problem which is preference to avoid that experience, No, you merely have subjective delusional preference against a nail in your eye and there is no logic to it"
"Good is Bad, and Bad is Good depending on opinion, no right or wrong, all subjective tho"
value anti-realism nihilism. INSANE! WORSE than a flat-earth theory!

Hi everyone,
I thought I'd share my experiences with anxiety and some methods that have helped me manage it better. I hope these tips can be useful to others facing the same challenge.

1. 𝘼𝙘𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬𝙡𝙚𝙙𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝘼𝙣𝙭𝙞𝙚𝙩𝙮

The first step for me was to accept that I have anxiety. It’s not easy to admit, but it’s crucial. Anxiety doesn’t define who I am; it’s just a part of me that I need to manage.

1. 𝘽𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙚𝙘𝙝𝙣𝙞𝙦𝙪𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙈𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣

I found that breathing techniques and meditation significantly help in calming my mind. I started using apps like Headspace and Calm, which provide step-by-step guides. Just 10 minutes a day can make a big difference.

1. 𝙍𝙚𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙋𝙝𝙮𝙨𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙩𝙮

Exercise has a positive impact on my mood. Whether it’s a walk in the park, running, or yoga, physical activity helps me release built-up tension.

1. 𝙆𝙚𝙚𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙅𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙡

Writing in a journal helps me clarify my thoughts and express my emotions safely. It’s interesting to go back and read what I wrote because I can see my progress over time.

1. 𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙎𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙚

Whether it’s a trusted friend, a family member, or a therapist, talking about how I feel can be incredibly freeing. We’re not alone in this, and it’s good to remember that support is available.

1. 𝙄𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙨

I’ve tried to identify what triggers my anxiety and find ways to avoid or manage these factors. It could be work stress, certain social situations, or other elements.

1. 𝙎𝙚𝙡𝙛-𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣

It’s important to be kind to ourselves. Anxiety can be tough, but every small step towards managing it is a victory. It’s okay to not be perfect and to have difficult days.
I hope these tips are helpful, and I’m curious to hear what other methods you’ve found effective. Let’s support each other and share the resources that have helped us!
Thanks for reading and take care!

Welcome to the world of precision and creativity with the Gluwphy 20w Enclosure Laser Engraver. Designed for DIY enthusiasts and beginners alike, this innovative 8-in-1 laser engraver combines safety, speed, and high-tech features to elevate your engraving projects. With its Class 1 laser, integrated smoke filtering system, and user-friendly autofocus, you can effortlessly work on a variety of materials like wood, metal, leather, and glass. The spacious workspace and advanced air assist technology ensure your creations are both intricate and pollutant-free. Experience the future of engraving with unparalleled accuracy and ease—make your every project a masterpiece with Gluwphy.

Have You Ever Dreamed of a Safe and Easy-to-Use Laser Engraver?

If you’ve been searching for a laser engraver that isn’t intimidating and doesn’t require you to don a pair of unflattering filter glasses every time you use it, then let me introduce you to the Gluwphy 20w Enclosure Laser Engraver 8-in-1 Class 1 Laser Engraver and Cutter Machine. Trust me; this gadget will change the game for all DIY enthusiasts and beginners alike.

Gluwphy’s Mission: Safety First

Gluwphy aims to make laser engraving accessible and safe for everyone—even kids. Unlike other scorching Class IV lasers, the Gluwphy uses a Class 1 laser, which makes it inherently safer. Essentially, this means you can wave goodbye to the pesky filter glasses that other machines require. Safety is further amplified with built-in flame alarms and automatic focus, ensuring ease of use without compromising on security.

• Safety Features: Class 1 laser, built-in flame alarms, autofocus
• Ideal For: Beginners and family use

Speed Like No Other

On the topic of speed, let's just say Gluwphy laughs in the face of the competition. While many mini-laser engravers max out at 15,000mm/min, our Gluwphy 20w comes in hot with a staggering speed of 24,000mm/min. What does this mean for you? Less waiting around and more time for exploring your creative projects.

• Engraving Speed: 24,000mm/min
• Time Saved: Up to 60%

Larger Workspace for Bigger Dreams

If you've ever wrestled with a cramped engraving space, you know how limiting it can be. Gluwphy steps in with a generous placement area of 460x450mm and a working surface of 400x295mm. This amplified space eliminates those frustrating constraints, allowing room for creativity with larger materials and less wastage.

• Placement Area: 460x450mm
• Workspace: 400x295mm

Innovative Design That Saves You Space

With its unique lateral light output design, you can finally ditch the clunky, expensive heightening equipment. This design means the laser and claw disk center point are aligned, sparing you the hassle of constant adjustments. Place your material and get to work—simple as that.

• Design Feature: Lateral light output
• Space Saved: No need for riser base

Precision at Its Best

For anyone keen on precise placements and cuts, Gluwphy has your back. The red cross-positioning system allows you to place materials with pinpoint accuracy, removing the guesswork. Plus, it supports red cross walking borders, ensuring that your work area is precise and controllable.

• Positioning System: Red cross indicator
• Accuracy: More precise control

Clear Air, Clear Mind

A built-in smoke filtering system elegantly handles the usual smoke and dust that can cloud your workspace. This cleaner air not only protects you but also extends the lifespan of the exhaust fan. Coupled with an integrated air pump, it makes sure that your engraving stays sharp, and your vision clear.

• Filtration: Built-in smoke filtering system
• Cutting Effect: Enhanced with built-in blowing pipe

Superior Engraving Accuracy

Forget about those fuzzy edges with other machines. The Gluwphy offers an engraving accuracy of 0.08x0.08mm and dynamic accuracy of 0.01mm. This ensures your designs are crisp, clear, and repeatable, leaving you less room for errors.

• Engraving Accuracy: 0.08x0.08mm
• Dynamic Accuracy: 0.01mm

Versatility that Knows No Bounds

Imagine the possibility of engraving on a variety of materials—from wood panels to stainless steel, and even fabrics. The Gluwphy doesn’t limit your creative avenues. A single device that covers a broad spectrum of materials with ease makes it a perfect addition to any DIY enthusiast’s toolkit.

Material Types	Example Projects
Wood Panels	Custom signs, decorative items
Stainless Steel	Personalized jewelry, dog tags
Opaque Acrylic Panels	Business logos, awards
Fabrics	Custom bags, clothing patches
Paper	Detailed invitations, scrapbooking
Stones	Engraved keepsakes, home décor
Linden Wood (up to 12mm thick)	3D models, art pieces

Peace of Mind with Warranty

One of the best things about Gluwphy is that it comes with a one-year warranty. If you encounter any hiccups along the way, you’re covered, making it a risk-free investment.

• Warranty: One-year quality protection

As you can see, the Gluwphy 20w Enclosure Laser Engraver offers a blend of safety, innovation, and functionality. This isn't just a tool; it's your gateway to endless creative possibilities without the daunting learning curve. Excited to get one? You should be!

So, you’ve got an event at the Tivoli Royal Court in Okhla, and you’re scratching your head, wondering how to get there without having to sell a kidney for cab fare. Fear not, fellow traveler! The Delhi Metro is here to save the day (and your wallet). In this article, we’ll walk you through everything you need to know about reaching the Tivoli Royal Court using the nearest metro station. We’ll throw in some laughs, some lists, and even a table or two for good measure. Let’s dive in!

Getting to Know the Tivoli Royal Court

First things first, let’s get acquainted with the place. The Tivoli Royal Court is a swanky venue located in Okhla, South Delhi. Known for its elegant decor and top-notch facilities, it’s a popular choice for weddings, corporate events, and other grand celebrations. If you’re headed there, you’re likely in for a treat – and probably a lot of delicious food.

Why Choose the Metro?

Now, you might be thinking, “Why not just take a cab?” Well, here are a few reasons the Delhi Metro might be your best bet:

1. Cost-effective: Save your money for the event – those samosas aren’t going to pay for themselves.
2. Time-efficient: Delhi traffic can be a nightmare. The metro zips past the snarls and jams.
3. Eco-friendly: Reduce your carbon footprint. Mother Earth will thank you.

Nearest Metro Station to Tivoli Royal Court

The Contenders

The nearest metro station to the Tivoli Royal Court is Govind Puri Metro Station on the Violet Line. But let’s not jump the gun – here’s a list of other nearby stations, just in case you have a change of heart (or route):

1. Govind Puri (Violet Line)
2. Okhla NSIC (Magenta Line)
3. Nehru Place (Violet Line)
4. Kalkaji Mandir (Violet Line & Magenta Line)

Govind Puri Metro Station: The Winner

Without a doubt, Govind Puri is your best bet. It’s the closest station to Tivoli Royal Court and offers a straightforward route.

How to Get There from Govind Puri

• Exit the Station: Take the exit towards Okhla Phase III.
• Catch an Auto-rickshaw: You can easily find autos outside the station. It’s a short ride to the Tivoli Royal Court, and autos are usually more than willing to take you there.
• Enjoy the Ride: Sit back, relax, and maybe enjoy a little breeze (if it’s not too hot).

Other Options: If You’re Feeling Adventurous

If you’re up for a bit of exploration or need an alternative route, here are some other stations and how to get from them to the Tivoli Royal Court:

Okhla NSIC (Magenta Line)

• Exit the Station: Head towards the exit for Okhla Phase I.
• Hop in an Auto: Much like at Govind Puri, autos are your friends here.
• Short Ride: It’s a slightly longer ride than from Govind Puri, but still pretty quick.

Nehru Place (Violet Line)

• Exit the Station: Follow signs for Nehru Place market exit.
• Take an Auto or Bus: Autos are available, or you could take a bus if you’re feeling particularly adventurous (and thrifty).

Kalkaji Mandir (Violet & Magenta Lines)

• Exit the Station: Choose the exit based on the line you’re coming from.
• Auto or E-rickshaw: Both are readily available, and the ride is not too long.

A Step-by-Step Guide: Reaching Tivoli Royal Court

1. Planning Your Route

Let’s break it down into bite-sized steps. Think of it as a recipe for travel success:

• Check the Metro Map: Identify your starting station and plot a course to Govind Puri.
• Purchase Your Token/Card: Grab a token for a single journey or use your metro card for convenience.
• Hop on the Metro: Board the metro towards Govind Puri. Enjoy the ride and maybe catch up on some reading or people-watching.

2. Navigating the Metro

• Stay Alert: Keep an eye on the stations. Govind Puri is on the Violet Line, so make sure you’re on the right train.
• Station Announcements: Listen to the announcements. They’re there to help, even if they sometimes sound like they’re underwater.
• Get Off at Govind Puri: Exit the train and head towards the station exit for Okhla Phase III.

3. The Final Stretch

• Find an Auto: Walk out and flag down an auto-rickshaw. Tell the driver you’re headed to Tivoli Royal Court. They’ll know where it is – it’s a popular destination.
• Enjoy the Ride: It’s a short trip, so sit back and maybe enjoy a bit of local scenery.

Table: Quick Reference for Metro to Tivoli Royal Court

Metro Station	Line	Exit Direction	Transport Option	Approx. Travel Time
Govind Puri	Violet Line	Okhla Phase III	Auto-rickshaw	10-15 minutes
Okhla NSIC	Magenta Line	Okhla Phase I	Auto-rickshaw	15-20 minutes
Nehru Place	Violet Line	Nehru Place market exit	Auto-rickshaw / Bus	20-25 minutes
Kalkaji Mandir	Violet & Magenta Lines	Depending on Line	Auto-rickshaw / E-rickshaw	20-25 minutes

Tips for a Smooth Journey

• Travel Light: The less you carry, the easier your journey. Plus, you’ll have more room for all the goodies at the event.
• Be Early: Delhi Metro is usually punctual, but it’s always good to give yourself a buffer.
• Stay Safe: Keep an eye on your belongings and be aware of your surroundings.

Wrapping It Up with Some Humor

Navigating Delhi can sometimes feel like participating in a reality show. You’ve got the drama of rush hour, the comedy of trying to communicate with auto drivers, and the suspense of wondering if you’ll get a seat on the metro. But with this guide, you’re well-equipped to make it to the Tivoli Royal Court with ease (and maybe even a smile).
So, next time someone asks you how to get to the Tivoli Royal Court in Okhla, you can confidently say, “Oh, that’s easy! Just take the metro to Govind Puri and grab an auto from there.” You might even add, “And don’t forget to invite me to the event – I love a good party!”
And there you have it – a simple, humorous, and hopefully helpful guide to navigating your way to the Tivoli Royal Court via the nearest metro station. Safe travels, and enjoy the event

I did some osint tutorial https://quiz.sector035.nl/beginners/ (challenge 5) where you have to find out when https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUVFeXSdkO8 was uploaded. In the source code it says:
2020-06-04T12:19:58-07:00
sadly even when formatted correctly this is not the solution, it is:
2020-06-04T19:19:58Z as the site https://mattw.io/youtube-metadata/ tells me.
does the 07:00 just indicate it is a derivation from standard time or what is the idea? it is really confusing to me.
I also tried looking at the code here: https://github.com/mattwright324/youtube-metadata/blob/mastejs/youtube-metadata.js but I have no idea of Javascript and am not programming a lot so I don't really understand all the steps he takes to get the correct time through combining the published time + the converted time. He uses the website https://www.timeanddate.com/ somehow but to me it is all magic since even with the javascript playground I found no easy way to debug the code to better understand the steps, maybe someone can guide me on how to do that so I have an easier time looking that stuff up in the future?
Sry for the long text and thank you in advance for any answers!

I'm excited to announce that Chainspot, a powerful aggregator of cross-chain Web3 solutions, has joined the Prom ecosystem of products. This new integration brings a wealth of benefits to the platform, enhancing the user experience and improving transaction efficiency across multiple chains.
About Chainspot
Chainspot is a cutting-edge platform that offers seamless DeFi interactions through its cross-chain liquidity aggregation and smart routing engine. It supports both B2C and B2B applications, providing users with fast and efficient cross-chain transactions across 31 supported networks. Developers can also take advantage of Chainspot’s versatile transfer services, which can be adapted to any decentralized application (dApp).
Integration Benefits
By incorporating Chainspot into the ecosystem, Prom is opening up new opportunities for projects within the network. This integration aims to improve user experiences by making internal protocol transactions as fast and efficient as possible. With Chainspot’s advanced routing engine, users can enjoy swift cross-chain transactions, enhancing the overall fluidity and usability of the platform.
Future Developments
Once the Prom mainnet is launched, the Chainspot Router will be integrated into the Prom network. This integration will allow users to transfer assets swiftly from any supported chain to Prom, ensuring a smooth and seamless experience. Additionally, Prom will be listed on the Chainspot Portal, an extensive data aggregator designed for easy navigation across Web3 products.
Conclusion
The addition of Chainspot to the Prom ecosystem is a significant step forward in my mission to provide top-notch DeFi solutions. This collaboration will not only enhance the efficiency and speed of transactions within the network but also offer users and developers a more robust and interconnected platform. I'm thrilled about the possibilities this integration brings and look forward to seeing the positive impact on the Prom ecosystem.