2024.05.04 18:37 northern_orchid Are pelvic ligaments readily visible on ultrasound?
2024.04.26 23:54 DOSO-DRAWS Have you noticed how the Sphenoid bone is kind of like the Skull's Pelvis? They're strikingly visually similar, and they actually have similar functions - that of hub-like mediating all the other bones/plates within the skeleton/skull.
submitted by DOSO-DRAWS to Anatomy [link] [comments] |
2024.04.16 19:18 TerrysClavicle Old Model 3 v. New Model 3 (structural)
I dug into this cause I've always been fascinated by unibody construction & car safety and i've always wondered what new Model 3 had in store. Legacy 3 leaves much to be desired with its lacklustre intrusion measurements compared to Model Y. So of course for 2024, Tesla beefed up Model 3. submitted by TerrysClavicle to teslamotors [link] [comments] 1) Even though the diagrams show extruded aluminum crush cans for 24+ 3, after looking into it some more, it seems legacy 3 has this as well. So scratch that. Tesla just chose not to illustrate that in the older diagram. 2) complete utilization of inner uhss ring (red is the highest strength the auto industry uses). legacy 3 used weaker steel in these sections. Model Y also uses a complete uhss ring like 24+ model 3 hence Model Y's (2170) extremely strong crash performance. 3) small strips/brackets of uhss on the lower sill for added and more even engagement in side loading scenarios so more of the structure can initiate loading sooner and more evenly. I imagine IIHS will test new 24+ Model 3, it'll be exciting to see if it does glance-off in small overlap like Model Y and also how it performs in side impact 2.0--so far no non-suv vehicle has aced this test as the test is extremely demanding on pelvis and torso for smaller cars, and on most SUVs. Model Y of course fully aces all body regions, with its added mass and height helping it. There's still more to dig into, a lot more, but just a brief glance this is what i saw. i wonder what the inner door structure looks like in 24+ Model 3. i'll bet its W beams or overall door structure somehow tie into the uhss strips you see above the side extruded aluminum bar. https://preview.redd.it/5r4ecfhyivuc1.png?width=819&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2b9c74ff52464aa3205b519f3a39f71c9da7211 |
2024.04.09 22:55 Doubtfulaboutit Elden Ring Design Inspiration
NOTE: the numbering got out of order when I posted so donât read too much into paragraphs numbers. submitted by Doubtfulaboutit to eldenringdiscussion [link] [comments] The Great Runes of Elden Ring all correspond in some way to the whole of the Elden Ring that we see depicted on the title screen and in Marika's body. (I won't be discussing the Lattice in the background that is associated with Radagon simply because that is not a rune that the game grants us or seems to do much with, although it is possible its an interpretation of the pillars I mention below). https://preview.redd.it/syohlz7ooitc1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f7d24a5f0405ed082a9b8a26fae096853941f670 All of these runes exist as one within Marika up until the shattering, during which they are claimed by various demigods (with exception to Rennala as Radagon gifts the Rune of the Unborn to her). While all of these fit pretty easily into the design of the Elden Ring the game is famous for, there is another design that the rings fit (fairly) neatly into that I believe served as the inspiration for the Elden Ring and, to some degree, even characteristics of the demi gods themselves. In Kabbalah there is a tree known as the Sephiroth (no, not that one) Tree. The tree is at the core of Kabballah, it's most influential and multi-layered symbol. Kabbalah is not an exact practice across time and you will find a great variety of explanations, art and diagrams that attempt to explain humanity's existence. However, some aspects are fairly consistent. https://preview.redd.it/o14tndppoitc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=95932ae6c1b3fb4b0ada5b10f29a69d365dff24c The Sephiroth tree is called such because there are the ten Sephiroths (or sefirots), primal numbers which, in combination with the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet, represent the plan of creation (or Order of Creation) of all upper and lower things. They are the ten names, attributes or powers of God, and form a pulsating organism called the "mystical face of God" or the "Body of the Universe". It stands on the Three Pillars: Mercy (Right), Severity/Punishment (Left) and Balance (Central). The central pillar is the spine or lineage through which the Divine Dew flows down. The 10 Sephiroth are also separated into Four Worlds: the light world, the throne world, the world of angels and the spiritual world corresponding with the material world (these aren't super important but factor into the design). You can google longer and more in-depth explanations of each of the ten attributes but I'll provide a brief explanation of each here: World 1:
https://preview.redd.it/gvlxto7roitc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5a17b211b440df099a29eacae171bf028308b42c That is a lot to just throw onto the tree so lets break it down:
https://preview.redd.it/ko5c5uvsoitc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2840b00b42099cb1d0703bb85abd5505f8a14a87 In contrast to this symbol of life, the Rune of Death is the inverse, the rune being upturned in the opposite direction https://preview.redd.it/gmjf3rwtoitc1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=665ae556bc78e203ac4e2f2963cb8462e824c056 "BUT WAIT!! What about Messmer?" Good question, there is an 11th Sephiroth, a hidden one. (No Im not making this up) https://preview.redd.it/pzd8098voitc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=54e2762f0701dc533c673614bc0ef5aeeed575d6
|
2024.04.09 22:17 Doubtfulaboutit The Elden Ring's Rune Design Inspiration
NOTE: the numbering got out of order when I posted so donât read too much into paragraphs numbers. submitted by Doubtfulaboutit to Eldenring [link] [comments] The Great Runes of Elden Ring all correspond in some way to the whole of the Elden Ring that we see depicted on the title screen and in Marika's body. (I won't be discussing the Lattice in the background that is associated with Radagon simply because that is not a rune that the game grants us or seems to do much with, although it is possible its an interpretation of the pillars I mention below). https://preview.redd.it/rd6cqhmreitc1.jpg?width=666&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7ebe41286a25b4ac7a640d52c02ad6ed45de2fa1 All of these runes exist as one within Marika up until the shattering, during which they are claimed by various demigods (with exception to Rennala as Radagon gifts the Rune of the Unborn to her). While all of these fit pretty easily into the design of the Elden Ring the game is famous for, there is another design that the rings fit (fairly) neatly into that I believe served as the inspiration for the Elden Ring and, to some degree, even characteristics of the demi gods themselves. In Kabbalah there is a tree known as the Sephiroth (no, not that one) Tree. The tree is at the core of Kabballah, it's most influential and multi-layered symbol. Kabbalah is not an exact practice across time and you will find a great variety of explanations, art and diagrams that attempt to explain humanity's existence. However, some aspects are fairly consistent. Numbers are linked to English translation below The Sephiroth tree is called such because there are the ten Sephiroths (or sefirots), primal numbers which, in combination with the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet, represent the plan of creation (or Order of Creation) of all upper and lower things. They are the ten names, attributes or powers of God, and form a pulsating organism called the "mystical face of God" or the "Body of the Universe". It stands on the Three Pillars: Mercy (Right), Severity/Punishment (Left) and Balance (Central). The central pillar is the spine or lineage through which the Divine Dew flows down. The 10 Sephiroth are also separated into Four Worlds: the light world, the throne world, the world of angels and the spiritual world corresponding with the material world (these aren't super important but factor into the design). You can google longer and more in-depth explanations of each of the ten attributes but I'll provide a brief explanation of each here: World 1:
https://preview.redd.it/8zbuz74dyhtc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4509df1612b72a752736321949ebda20ae0c2bdf That is a lot to just throw onto the tree so lets break it down:
https://preview.redd.it/3rtl3a6vditc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e333d80a02d7447467e0e4d61ffd7736f16d7ffc In contrast to this symbol of life, the Rune of Death is the inverse, the rune being upturned in the opposite direction. https://preview.redd.it/rljh5jxeeitc1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0699626631a08243d09c8bcdf65e59091180d6b8 "BUT WAIT!! What about Messmer?" Good question, there is an 11th Sephiroth, a hidden one. (No Im not making this up). https://preview.redd.it/7irpp5yfgitc1.jpg?width=1668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=97be0135ee414f5c667db6d5e310c1b2fe33bec8
|
2024.04.03 07:02 DickSnapper_inHalfer I can feel a tight âbowstringâ from my anus to my scrotum. It is tender to the touch, and I get a very sharp pain if I press into hard.
2024.03.29 11:15 Flat_Introduction740 Babyâs heartbeat is near my pelvic bone
2024.02.16 17:33 nightingales101 Teaching anatomy
2024.01.31 04:01 ohmanyikes Adenomyosis - Imaging Criteria for Diagnosis
The uterine length is measured in the midsagittal plane from the outer serosal surface of the fundus to the external cervical os.The volume (in units of ml) is calculated using the following formula.
The uterine height (AP) is measured in the midsagittal plane anteroposteriorly from outer to outer serosal surfaces.
The uterine width is measured in the transverse plane.
volume = length * height * width * 0.523The "normal" volumes for the uterus are based on the patient's age.
According to this method, the normal mean uterine volume in the age of 0-1 month is 3.4 ml, in 3 months is 0.9 ml, in 1-5 years is 1 ml, in 7 years is 0.9 ml, in 9 years is 1.3 ml, in 11 years is 1.9 ml, in 13 years is 11 ml, and in 15 years is 21.2 mlAdditional measurements can be used to find the "body to cervix" ratio. (Here's a ratio calculator to make things easy!)
The uterine body length is measured in the midsagittal plane from the fundal outer serosal surface to the internal os.
The uterine cervix length is measured in the midsagittal plane from the internal os to the external os.
Stage | Uterus Body Length (cm) | Body to Cervix Ratio |
---|---|---|
Neonatal | 3.5 | 1:2 |
Pediatric | 1-3 | 1:1 |
Prepubertal | 3-4.5 | 1-1.5:1 |
Pubertal | 5-8 | 1.5-2:1 |
Reproductive | 8-9 | 2:1 |
Postmenopausal | 3.5-7.5 | 1-1.5:1 |
2024.01.27 14:58 MarkOnYourSoul 29, varicocele embolisation story, UK - cautiously optimistic
2024.01.25 21:52 KirtanForGod13 Introducing Myself
This is a really long intro to myself and my pain, but I made it this long to include as many details as possible, because the more details the better (in my opinion, at least). submitted by KirtanForGod13 to PiriformisChronicPain [link] [comments] I'm a 19 year old suffering from right side abdominal pain, pain in the right thigh, tingling above and in my right foot (both front and back of foot). The pain started seven months ago (in mid-June 2023). I did too many crunches (100) in one go for my body to be able to handle, and I strained my abdominal muscle(s). I don't know exactly which ones, because I didn't have an MRI back then, but my current guess is it involved the psoas and rectus abdominis. I was in severe pain and couldn't walk straight (I walked slightly bent forward on the right side to guard my injured side). I'm a singer, and so I couldn't sing without excruciating pain, because anytime I put pressure on the strained muscle, it hurt like crazy, and singing as I like to sing involves pressure on the abdomen when breathing out (creating the noise). The funny thing is, a muscle strain was not my first thought. I thought the pain was internal (in the organs or something), so I talked to my PCP (who also thought there was a gallbladder issue or something), who referred me for an ultrasound. I got the ultrasound done within 8 days of when the pain started, which all came back negative. That's when I deduced that the likely cause of the pain was a muscle strain. I was in a lot of pain, so I always stayed in a crouched-forward position to guard the injured right abdomen. I didn't do anything except for desk work in a crouched-forward position for close to 8-9 hours a day. Then when I got up, I also stayed in a crouched-forward position to protect the pain area, because it hurt quite a lot. I refused to do even gentle stretching because of the pain. I thought just resting plus heat plus ice would solve the issue. A month or so went by (we're in mid-July), and I still wasn't experiencing pain relief, so I went to PT. They also diagnosed me with an abdominal muscle strain and gave me a bunch of stretches and strengthening stuff. Didn't help much. (To be clear, I was in less pain than I was when I initially injured myself, but the pain wasn't getting much better. I was still walking crouched over and couldn't sing or run or do anything basically). This is when I started looking to get an MRI. So I got an MRI of my entire abdomen (with and without contrast) in mid-August (by now, it had been two months since I got injured). The MRI came back negative without any problems that could be seen in the abdominal wall or the organs. At this point, I got really worried. I talked to my PT, who said that a negative MRI confirmed that the pain was likely stemming from a muscle strain in the abdomen that had healed itself by the time I got the MRI, and that the pain was coming from the muscle(s) being super tight and stiff because I had basically not used it and constantly guarded and protected it. At this point the problem was so bad that I couldn't put my weight on my right side while walking. So, my father made me walk straight and normally with a proper gait without constantly crouching forward to protect my right side. The first day or two, it really really hurt my abdomen and groin-ish and pelvic area the first day, because it was so stiff and I felt that I was ripping a bunch of muscle and knots in the problem area due to walking normally. Within a few days, though, it started feeling just a tiny bit better and I was walking with a normal gait with (relatively) less stiffness, albeit still with a lot of stiffness and pain. Finally, after walking like an old man for a little more than two months, it seemed that there was some progress. However, a good amount of pain was still there. Any time I stretched my abdominal muscles through things such as the cobra pose, I felt a huge tugging sensation inside on the right side (the problem area), as though something were holding me back. No such feeling on the left abdomen, however. In late August and early September, I went to a chiropractor, who took X-rays and found that my pelvis is slightly tilted in such a way that my left leg is functionally slightly shorter than the right leg, maybe like half an inch (I think they said the left pelvis is slightly rotated to the back or something, I don't remember very well). I do see a slight difference in the heights of the pelvic bones on my left and right sides, but again, it's very minor. He did a few treatments which consisted of adjustments which said would help straighten out the spine, but I stopped going because I wasn't feeling much relief and didn't think he was addressing the right issue. To be fair, the right leg being slightly longer than the left leg does make the right side more susceptible to being tighter than the left side, but it was never an issue for me (I've never felt off-balance or anything), and I don't think it's a major impediment in my healing. I could be wrong though. I then went out of country for a month. I was still in considerable pain there so I went to a renowned hospital while on vacation. They diagnosed me with a nerve entrapment, specifically Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES). Their explanation for my pain while doing stuff like singing and running was that those activities put pressure on my abdomen, and whenever there's pressure on the abdomen, I'm also putting pressure on a compressed and irritated nerve, which was increasing my pain in those activities. They also found a positive Carnett's sign (basically, in this test, if your abdomen hurts more when you tense the muscles, that's a positive Carnett's sign and likely indicates some sort of musculoskeletal issue in that region). It seemed that someone finally had something resembling a diagnosis of what I was suffering from. They offered a cortisone injection, their reasoning being that if I can stop the pain for some time and really focus on stretching, I may be able to release the fascia that's entrapping the nerve. I thought that was a good plan and went ahead with two injections in the span of 12 days. The second injection was in very late September, and I left for the US one day after the second injection. The injections reduced the pain but didn't fully relieve it. I was still not able to sing, run, etc. (e.g. the stuff I want to be able to do). I, however, started an aggressive stretching routine in October three times a day, close to 30 minutes for my routine, with hopes that I would feel better. I initially felt some reduction in stiffness for two-three weeks, but it kind of plateaued after that. Since then, I haven't really felt any improvements in the tugging sensation I feel in my right abdomen every time I stretch the hip or the abdomen. Another problem that started to arise was that I started to get pain in my right thigh, as well as a tingling/numbness feeling near my foot. I also started developing a pinching and tingling sensation in the back of my foot, and twitching in my toes. All of this on the right side only (the side that initially got injured). Growing hopeless after a month and half of stretching with not much improvement, I sought out another chiropractor in mid-November. This chiropractor was the first who mentioned that he strongly suspected a tight psoas to be a contributing factor for me. He also mentioned "scar tissue", which was the first time I was hearing that phrase. However, he mostly did chiropractic adjustments, which didn't make it much better. Meanwhile, the leg issues weren't showing any signs of getting better. I soon started getting more worried and reading online a lot about scar tissue and adhesions and stuff. As I read more and more, I grew convinced that my pain was being caused by the fact that I didn't let my injured muscle heal properly by constantly guarding and compressing it, and that has caused some sort of scar tissue/adhesion build up. This was also probably affecting a nerve or several nerves which was causing me pain in the legs as well. This is when I first ran into ART. I thought it could help break up scar tissue. I went to my first ART provider in late November. However, pretty soon, I realized that he wasn't helping. His fifteen-minute appointments consisted of maybe two or three repetitions of the ART motion in the psoas. The rest of the time he spent talking about stuff and overall wasting time. So I went to a second ART practitioner in mid-December (this is the one I'm still going to). He is a lot more genuine and seems to care about getting me better. He also thought the psoas is the issue and is focusing his treatment there. However, I'm not sure whether he's effectively addressing the adhesions, because he says he's going after the knots/trigger points, and he thinks that breaking up the knots will slowly rip the adhesions out. It's been close to 20 ART treatments now, and I'm not feeling much better as compared to before I started ART. I still can't sing or run or jump without pain. I also did Graston for a month from mid-December to mid-January. Still pretty much the same. I've also started having pain in my back and lower leg (only on the right side) and I'm going to get an MRI in mid-February to rule any disc bulge out (though I don't think this is the issue, especially because I'm 19). This month (e.g. mid-January), I started shockwave for the psoas at this chiropractic clinic. Four treatments in, I still don't feel any difference. I don't know if they're targeting the adhesions properly or not. They say that if I have adhesions, I'll feel an ache when the shockwave gun goes over the adhesion area, otherwise not. I feel the ache in some places, but so far have not felt much relief. The tug inside my abdomen is still there and pretty strong. They have directed treatment both through the front and the back to get to the psoas. My doctor is offering a third injection, which I really don't want to take but there isn't really any other option. I've been to a neurosurgeon and they're considering nerve ablation or surgery to remove the anterior cutaneous nerve in my abdomen. I don't know if that'll help with the pain going down the leg as well. I may also try PRP injection soon. And I really don't want any of this stuff I think the problem is that my psoas is glued to (at least) the femoral nerve somewhere and that's causing a good chunk of this. I don't know though, because no one has been able to give me a good specific diagnosis yet. The MRI of my lumbar spine should clarify things further (but I don't think the main issue is the back). As a 19-year-old, I'm really concerned about this. I really want to be able to sing, run, and just live without pain. I don't want to waste my youth being in pain and not being to help anybody because I'm in constant pain. I'm putting in a pain diagram below. Based on the pain scale in this forum, my pain fluctuates between 3 and 6. 3 is when I'm resting (e.g. sleeping or sitting), 6 is its highest when I try something like singing. https://preview.redd.it/8ru24b2gfnec1.png?width=2166&format=png&auto=webp&s=46f9f988f8f6eb8498ce4e380787272d08e327c4 I really hope and think that my problem is adhesions and not something else. What do you guys think? |
2024.01.24 00:29 stencyl_moderator trying to understand how a trace from a pelvis can tell you whether a character is facing up or down on the floor.
2024.01.19 14:54 throwawaylooking123 My conclusive research on Hairline and most other facets of appearance
Contents submitted by throwawaylooking123 to tressless [link] [comments]
Alright, let's break down looksmaxxing entirely, all the information you're about to witness is based on my own multi-year process of self-experimentation in seeing what works objectively, and what does not. Please bear with me in fully explaining EVERYTHING. Hydration Stay extremely hydrated during the day, but stop drinking before bed or you will risk wet dreams increasing frequency Androgen Receptors Ejaculation, in it's absolute form detaches androgen receptors from your biology temporarily. After 7 days- and this is consistent across ALL men-, the androgen receptors RE-attach, you NEED androgen receptors attached to your biology for ideal muscular-skeletal growth- so wait 7 days after ejaculation and on the 7th day you're good to begin 'truly' looksmaxxing. there is scientific documentation on this 7 day period it takes for androgen receptors to reattach, in fact, on the 7th day, your testosterone triples. I'm saying, when you ejaculate your body's entire reserve of ANDROGEN RECEPTORS, the receptors that ABSORB testosterone, are DETACHED from the BODY FOR 7 DAYS. YOUR TESTOSTERONE SPIKES ON THE 7TH DAY OF ABSTAINANCE. BUT YOU NEED YOUR ANDROGEN RECEPTORS ATTACHED TO YOUR BODY TO MAKE MEANINGFULL BONE/MUSCLE MASS. Facial Hair Once your androgen receptors reattach after the 7 day no-ejaculation period, your hair follicles continue their development, no matter how hairless and twinky you may be initially, you go 3 months no cum/wet dreams and you'll start to see significant follicle increase. Sexual Health I've already told you about 7 day abstinence, but ideally you also need to understand that ANY AND ALL AROUSAL immediately generates semen in the prostate, Sperm always remains in the balls though, till ejaculation. The semen in the prostate MUST be expelled EVERY DAY, or it will cause prostate cancer if left dormant inside the prostate. NOTE:EXPELLED DOES NOT MEAN CUM, you can expel residual semen from your prostate by squatting slightly in the bathroom and mentally pushing in on your frontal pelvis, like you would on your anus when you're taking a shit. Non-sperm'ized' semen will be forced out like a long rope. Morning wood is arousal caused by potty training because the musculature holding in the urine also interacts with the genitals and stimulates them. Wet dreams are an extreme of this phenomenon. Biological Health Potty training may be damn near evil (joking), holding in waste unnaturally long (while sleeping specifically) atrophies the digestive system over time and over the course of generations, it is also the direct cause of digestive cancers, the same way dormant semen in the prostate too long is the cause of Prostate cancer. This is why modern NOFAP is slightly misguided, without knowledge on how to expel the semen in their prostate without ejaculating. Testicular cancer is also caused by extended and unnatural lower torso/pelvic muscle activity in the body. Facial Structure and Hairline https://preview.redd.it/vum2o6guiedc1.jpg?width=446&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cd3683960d3b93df4e6789bf64f9256b5df9fe7e Why do all lions and tigers look very similar? with their minor differentiators that allow herd members to different being minor facial differences, minor hair differences, voice, scars etc? because this is called NATURAL FORM; deer, goats, animals of the wild, in general, maybe only biologically different when it comes to environmental and diet changes across their separate genus', but i'll get to this also. You all obviously know what 'mewing' is yes? mewing, for all intents and purposes, is not real in a 'new discovery' sense. Human breast proportions are caused by animal fat consumption, tongue posture is the differentiator between the cranial 'growth direction' of children sucking on these different breast types: carnivore vs herbivore breast growth in women. That's correct, the tongue posture of black Africans and Eurasians differentiated entirely in this specific aspect. but i'll delve deeper into this later. If you want a visual difference, look up the pornstar Addison Lorie . and compare her NIPPLE POSITION and BREAST PLUMPNESS with any flat saggy titted woman pornstar you can find, from this you can infer that she grew up on heavy animal meat and animal fat. Her face is very ugly and undeveloped, agreed, but this is absolutely more anecdotal to her breast proportions being different from her own while she was still a baby breastfeeding. estrogen in women simply mediates fat distribution, this coupled with lack of androgen receptor density allows animal fat (saturated fat) to proliferate in ideal areas all over the body, specifically breasts, lack of androgen receptor density is the crucual factor in differentiating men and women. When exposed to female biology; saturated fat gives women the 'good' type of tits, but when exposed to androgen receptors in men, increases testosterone, it's the 'all-fat' in homo sapiens. Animal meat/fat is ideal for human consumption and mediated by our gender differentiated hormonal receptors. WE ARE CARNIVORES/OMNIVORES BY VIRTUE OF THIS DIFFERENCE, this is why our facial structure looks different from the gorillas/chimps that are PRIMARILY vegetarians; flat/saggy tits ==== chimp breasts. Saturated/animal fat is the primary mediator in the difference between humans and other apes. Next topic, you ever heard about chewing? How hypetrophy in the jaw muscle makes the mandible bone bigger? This is consistent for ALL muscles in the skull but the growth IS NOT acromegaly. It grows in the NATURAL homo sapien form. That's why ALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE HAVE SPECIFIC GOOD LOOKING FEATURES even if they have essentially 'non-ideal' features to add some uniqueness. like eye color, skin and hair (generally). So here's the general run down on 'BONE HYPERTROPHY' EAT WHOLE STEAKS OF RED MEAT, as raw you can get without risking parasitic infection. The action of baring down on a large steak with ALL OF YOUR TEETH and then FORCE TEARING AWAY WITH YOUR HEAD while holding it still with your hands, maintains, generates & fixes teeth STRAIGHTNESS by hypertrophying TOTAL MAXILLARY MUSCULATURE through the complete-teeth activity, and in turn, accelerating an increase in mandible and maxillary bone proliferation. If you're male then maintaining POST 7 DAY abstinence through out makes it easier for you as testosterone goes straight to the muscles in your face through your now-attached androgen receptors. Now let me tell you about hair; your hair follicles are attached to a 'hair muscle' system, you can see this on any skull diagram for muscles in the skull; the pericranial aponeurosis. You can literally continuously hypertrophy the very front muscular attachment 'forward' to lower your hairline over time. I suggest you SHAVE YOUR HEAD COMPLETELY before doing this, your head hair itself may act like some kind of 'hair-line' anchor and make you just start stretching the skin on your face. PROPER Muscular hypertrophy in all face muscles, 8 minute-holds once every two weeks and you should see bone mass increase within 1 month: The specific exercise you should do are extreme forms of 'pretending you are outside in the sun on an extremely windy day, very autistic, I know, but so is looksmaxxing in general. https://preview.redd.it/ayvrtvpwiedc1.jpg?width=1000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=23de6d411578f43dc2553d2602a54cb330c4b1d2 Hold this position AGGRESSIVELY for 8-minutes straight, once every 2 weeks is enough, remember what I said about the importance of abstinence in muscle-bone mass growth, you want to look like this you need a little discipline... Also, 'imagine' forcing your hair 'muscles' DOWN during a 'frown', there are muscles there, just touch it and try your hardest to 'FORCE IT DOWN' like any other muscle, you should see results in WEEKS, if not DAYS. https://preview.redd.it/k8rlts8yiedc1.jpg?width=390&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9a8ffba8352466f297c8baf25efe1ab823e2be97 Notice that these big boned dimorphic faces have a THIN NOSE, a THIN NOSE is a high-bone mass nose. when people have pudgy thick noses, this means that the skin that is supposed to be being stretched into an attractive thin forward shape, is being compressed against the absence of a developed nasal bone structure. BALDING Balding is plain and simply what happens when you ejaculate too much, you remain inside the period of androgen receptor detachment from the body so your muscles begin to completely atrophy, regardless of how much gym you do. Remember, after ejaculation there is an ABSOLUTE PERIOD OF 7 DAYS before your androgen receptors re-attach. Your hair line is definitely not exempt from this, but if you accompany abstinence with 'hair muscle' downward hypertrophy, you should be able to completely recover 'AND MORE' your hairline. Body Height is also not entirely genetic, but obviously predisposed to existing genetics of course, this is all about ideal food amount intake as well as physical activity during development; basketballers all have basketballer shoulders swimmers always have wide shoulders. but swimming isn't a natural 'continuous stimuli' activity, so all their bodies are retarded looking ngl. It's just excessive muscular-skeletal usage in the area of the shoulder- swimmers obviously do this when they swim, ballers obviously do this when they train dribbling and shooting and dunking. But ideally, you do this while you're young and growing so you develop in these facets early and don't have to do autistic dead arm hangs at the age of 17 and get insane clavicle skin stretch marks like I did, just to get wider shoulders and longer clavicles. BREASTFEEDING. Remember what I said about NIPPLE POSITION and BREAST PLUMPNESS? ALL GIRLS need to grow up eating primarily animal meats and fat and their breasts will grow in their IDEAL form REGARDLESS OF RACE. this will mean IDEAL facial proportions for the kids that they breastfeed because IDEAL tongue habits will subconsciously develop. Natural 'mewing' per-se We've already discussed how female breast 'proportions' are differentiated in homo sapiens by the TYPE of fat consumption during growth-> animal fat vs plant fat. Black people initially were the original ones with caucasian skull structure (see:florisbad skull from south africa 200,000 years ago) but humans came from here of course, so it makes sense. https://preview.redd.it/amni7mt1jedc1.jpg?width=1327&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=40c91830174b623a87691dbc2dcb4ebc9f29a074 That was before Africa was in essentiality a desert. But right now, African girl breasts are flat and saggy, no matter how young or old on a large scale, but not a COMPLETE scale, just generally due to herbivorous diet at large in Africa right now. Long saggy breasts, instead of plump. This is more consistent with chimpanzee breast proportions because in The desert that Africa is right now, their diet will predominantly be plant foods, because there are few places for prey to live, fewer they aren't already being hunted by predators. But THIS DIET DIFFERENTIATION creates the breast proportion difference across races. Not 'genes'. But why do humans eat meat? Why did we start eating animal fats in the first place and make our women develop these shapely tits that other chimps don't have? this is what differentiated the chimps that lost the fur and just kept eating plant from the chimps that lost the fur and STARTED STALKING BIG CATS. HUMANS DIFFERENTIATED THEMSELVES BY SCAVENGING BIG CAT KILLS. Our ancestors were the most attractive people possible, but relative to them, 'Attractiveness' does not exist. Like lions and tigers, deers and rabbits, there is a 'Natural form'. Humans have one to, that I assume would look like some artistic combination wherein a dark-African man has the cranial proportions of some hyper-European like Fabien Pelous, and much more body hair, as we are talking about pre-desert African homo-sapiens. Humans have been around for over 500,000 years, and attractive 'caucasoid skulls' are the only ones you're going to find going back before humans left Africa ~70,000 years ago (see:florisbad skull). Neanderthals were all ugly as fuck (but were a post-african settlement a little farther back than the 70,000 year old out of africa exodus). Let's recap: IDEAL HUMAN DIET, CREATING IDEAL HUMAN BREASTS, CREATING IDEAL HUMAN BREASTFEEDING, CREATING IDEAL TONGUE POSTURE, CREATING IDEAL PROPORTIONS. how often do you think ALL of these factors are met perfectly? And you want to talk genetics? look at Zendaya's parents- her mom probably has great tits, but both of her parents are ugly as fuck. Human Nature Our growth is non-exponential relative to ideal environmental conditions, when we scavenged big cat kills and needed to burst run to escape them, climb trees etc; too much size and you become unnaturally large and slow, a 6'3-6-8 man can probably effectively outmaneuver a Dark-maned lion or panther with burst speed, a 7' man will have his right leg shredded trying to get up the tree, literally too much growth leads to a weird bell curve degeneration effect in our hypothetical 'Natural' 'Pre-desert Africa'. Though of course, with enough scientific engineering, the growth is effectively exponential, like any other animal that encounters a different environmental pace, elephant->wooly mammoth. Minor additives Did you know that sleeping on pillows malforms by enlarges your occiput unnaturally, while also destroying your neck posture? back sleeping is in general deforming and unnatural but if you want to flatten your occiput before training yourself to side-sleep, you should probably back sleep on a HARD FLOOR till you notice your occiput is flattened completely then STOP, this should take only a week or two. You don't want to be this guy, even if this DOES seem like the norm (of course it is, pillows and soft beds are the norm) https://preview.redd.it/ltkuu6g3jedc1.jpg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5080522021f3dc4591f35d4ef47b4ed04b812278 You may notice an anecdotal trend of Japanese people with flat occiputs, are you also aware they sleep on flatter, lower beds? https://preview.redd.it/3oud2pd5jedc1.jpg?width=1808&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fc1f41e1bb6c71d37ed23e6ce7f626c129a0423d Sleeping on soft beds instead of harder surfaces like our ancestors (grass & dirt) etc, malforms your spinal growth as the pelvic region is very heavy and sinks into the bed during sleep because of it's sheer weight. https://preview.redd.it/bprh8b47jedc1.jpg?width=488&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d49ff374a2908ab59081dcc5f905ef193b390839 Sitting down in general is unnatural, and deforms sternum growth and development, concaving the chest over the course of life and on a greater scale, generations, sleeping on your back accelerates this, if you want your kids chests to look like this, keep doing both, the scientific name for this pectus excavatum. https://preview.redd.it/3rebxbu8jedc1.jpg?width=1910&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4048d4277ab9ff84307ce1039da1aaeed25b21c5 https://preview.redd.it/ceoh6tr9jedc1.jpg?width=1036&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc2856940cf72c21f410962d6b8f18a352a9a633 https://preview.redd.it/129n74qajedc1.jpg?width=2048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ddcd0c524e177725a8e9991331aa13ad6c364a93 Sunlight exposure over the course of about anything longer than ~15 minutes to the naked body significantly increases circulating testosterone in men, your risk of cancer is decreased only after the 7 day non-ejaculatory period. Fasting for 24 hours immediately spikes HGH for a continuous period till you begin eating again, and sprinting increases stable HGH. A long-term sprinting regimen increases bone thickness and total muscle mass in the entire legs, while heavy strict-curl HOLDS increase bone thickness in the entire arms; repetition exercises are a meme. Strict curling to a ~90 degree (humerus-radius) hold acts on the ENTIRE BODY down to your pelvis and legs, so you need TOTAL MUSCLE EQUILIBRIUM during this exercise. When it starts getting heavy YOU WILL SHIT YOURSELF, BUT THIS IS NATURAL, YOUR BODY IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE TRAINED TO HOLD IN WASTE MATTER https://preview.redd.it/5fxwpcndjedc1.jpg?width=480&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b44354acd01483d0f25fb12039377777b27531ce https://preview.redd.it/ruyr76zdjedc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=57323f46397e112cd58b73e4373eb4cf23b47674 For the trans women/cis women As I mentioned, carnivore diet(specifically the saturated fat) creates voluptuous and proportional breasts, so, theoretically, if you wanted massive voluptuous tits, as a post-pubertal woman you'd just need to inject estrogen and consume high amounts of very fatty beef for like a couple months. For a trans woman, your testicles are actually very important here, ejaculation in men spikes prolactin, a doctor can explain to you why this is important in estrogen increase, but the point is, you have your own natural estrogen injection; ejaculation. On top of artificial stuff you can get from a doctor, all you would need to do is literally the same thing; consume high amounts of very fatty beef, for a long period of time. This is literally like how ejaculation is the cause of gyno, but instead of gyno, you are straight up giving yourself breasts and on a larger scale, a feminine fat distribution. Penis size Now this one is a little more unbelievable, but if you want to grow your dick it's actually super simple, your flaccid penis is at a downward angle while flaccid, to grow it make sure you can some how artificially 'keep it in that downwards flaccid position' while getting fully erect, by fully erect, your body only assesses your penis as 'fully erect when the angle get's high and your mind starts 'consciously' throbbing, this is why it is also important, while holding your now 'continuously erecting' penis in that 'flaccid position' to also MAKE SURE YOU ARE MENTALLY NO WHERE NEAR YOUR PENIS, there can be no mental activity near your dick, you must not be holding in pee, poop, anything, you must not consciously 'throb', the erection-ing must be strictly due to something you are viewing online and not you physically touching your dick outside of whatever apparatus is holding it in the 'flaccid angle'. imagine a chastity cage but one that does not constrict the size of the penis, just the angle. Pretty much, you are tricking your penis into thinking it still needs more blood, by making it think it's still in the 'flaccid state', it's like jelqing, but instead, it's the actual biological process that grows the penis in the first place during childhood. Obviously, the penis is a muscle so my discussion on testosterone and androgen receptor attachment is CRUCIAL here. Cancers Cancers are entirely biological degeneration from our artificial environment, I already explained how holding in waste from subconsciously trained potty training is the direct cause of cancers, the same is probably true for skin products, hair products, air purity etc. All cancers can be traced to our artificial foundation of living. Mental gains Within a month on post-7 day ejaculatory recovery, your mental clarity should begin to increase drastically. But only to a point of clear minded thinking and assessment, it isn't going to make you fucking superman. The issue with society nowadays is literally that humans have lived hundreds of thousands if not millions of years, (my general estimate based on existing fossil samples is ~800,000 years) in normal conditions, it's only in the past ~10,000 or so we started literally mentally training our children to have late night ejaculations from wet dreams because of potty training's consequent function on genital muscle stimulation. 7 day ejaculation recovery period There is a 7 day ejaculation recovery period present in ALL HUMAN MEN, where, for exactly 7 days after you ejaculate, androgen receptors attached to your body will weaken and detach, this of course means that the receptor that literally transfers circulating testosterone in your body into active testosterone in your muscles/bones etc, is no longer attached to your muscles/bones etc. On the 7th day after the last ejaculation, your androgen receptors completely reattach, and this, for whatever reason, spikes your testosterone for the entire day to >1.5x their normal levels, returning to their baseline at the end of the day This of course means that you should not be masturbating ever you fucking idiot Hair Thickness This is a direct result of hypertrophy of the underlying muscle, eyebrows specifically, scroll up for information on how to get great eyes. The Skull https://preview.redd.it/l7ic9s4hjedc1.jpg?width=950&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1f75d2585045e83413205798259eae6edcb68c9e Something I always have to add about these images is that these super robust skulls are always missing a small subnasal process below their nasal 'hole' but slightly above their upper teeth, this is also muscular hypertrophy related, along with cheekbones and the rest of the facial skeletal process. You can see what i'm talking about here. https://preview.redd.it/sje3uvvhjedc1.jpg?width=413&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d593facc7f17be07f911b42745f5475075d528da It's actually supposed to be a little more pronounced than that even, however it seems this bone is very soft and gets destroyed, relatively more easily than the rest of the skull post death. It creates a more straight, 'uniform looking' lower facial profile, the lower facial cranial bone mass surrounding the teeth, (including the one I just mentioned) would obviously stretch the skin forward against the bones, this means thinner lips of course. https://preview.redd.it/go9losvijedc1.jpg?width=865&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=19b792041fadc2c90fa5cd394deca1343743fbc3 My body-remodeling regimen My current regimen is on the basis of 2 weeks. I train in strength conditioning but you can replace that specific week with whatever sport YOU train in. DO NOT REPLACE the sprint week. This is your natural human activity. Week 1
If you want to accelerate any facet of this regimen, you can try to eat everything on your eating days and fast completely on your sport/sprint days. Be cautious, the HGH output from doing this is immense, as HGH spikes from fasting alone after 24 hours Posture Total spinal posture (including neck, shoulder girdle, torso, pelvis) is crucial for facial proportion development |
2024.01.17 09:49 throwawaylooking123 ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED, MAXIMUM ATTRACTIVENESS
Contents submitted by throwawaylooking123 to LooksmaxingAdvice [link] [comments]
Alright, let's break down looksmaxxing entirely, all the information you're about to witness is based on my own multi-year process of self-experimentation in seeing what works objectively, and what does not. Please bear with me in fully explaining EVERYTHING. Hydration Stay extremely hydrated during the day, but stop drinking before bed or you will risk wet dreams increasing frequency Androgen Receptors Ejaculation, in it's absolute form detaches androgen receptors from your biology temporarily. After 7 days- and this is consistent across ALL men-, the androgen receptors RE-attach, you NEED androgen receptors attached to your biology for ideal muscular-skeletal growth- so wait 7 days after ejaculation and on the 7th day you're good to begin 'truly' looksmaxxing. there is scientific documentation on this 7 day period it takes for androgen receptors to reattach, in fact, on the 7th day, your testosterone triples. I'm saying, when you ejaculate your body's entire reserve of ANDROGEN RECEPTORS, the receptors that ABSORB testosterone, are DETACHED from the BODY FOR 7 DAYS. YOUR TESTOSTERONE SPIKES ON THE 7TH DAY OF ABSTAINANCE. BUT YOU NEED YOUR ANDROGEN RECEPTORS ATTACHED TO YOUR BODY TO MAKE MEANINGFULL BONE/MUSCLE MASS. Facial Hair Once your androgen receptors reattach after the 7 day no-ejaculation period, your hair follicles continue their development, no matter how hairless and twinky you may be initially, you go 3 months no cum/wet dreams and you'll start to see significant follicle increase. Sexual Health I've already told you about 7 day abstinence, but ideally you also need to understand that ANY AND ALL AROUSAL immediately generates semen in the prostate, Sperm always remains in the balls though, till ejaculation. The semen in the prostate MUST be expelled EVERY DAY, or it will cause prostate cancer if left dormant inside the prostate. NOTE:EXPELLED DOES NOT MEAN CUM, you can expel residual semen from your prostate by squatting slightly in the bathroom and mentally pushing in on your frontal pelvis, like you would on your anus when you're taking a shit. Non-sperm'ized' semen will be forced out like a long rope. Morning wood is arousal caused by potty training because the musculature holding in the urine also interacts with the genitals and stimulates them. Wet dreams are an extreme of this phenomenon. Biological Health Potty training may be damn near evil (joking), holding in waste unnaturally long (while sleeping specifically) atrophies the digestive system over time and over the course of generations, it is also the direct cause of digestive cancers, the same way dormant semen in the prostate too long is the cause of Prostate cancer. This is why modern NOFAP is slightly misguided, without knowledge on how to expel the semen in their prostate without ejaculating. Testicular cancer is also caused by extended and unnatural lower torso/pelvic muscle activity in the body. Facial Structure and Hairline https://preview.redd.it/0pk9okkirycc1.png?width=446&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fd3262d4999d20e38ab7452a487dac0535503d1 Why do all lions and tigers look very similar? with their minor differentiators that allow herd members to different being minor facial differences, minor hair differences, voice, scars etc? because this is called NATURAL FORM; deer, goats, animals of the wild, in general, maybe only biologically different when it comes to environmental and diet changes across their separate genus', but i'll get to this also. You all obviously know what 'mewing' is yes? mewing, for all intents and purposes, is not real in a 'new discovery' sense. Human breast proportions are caused by animal fat consumption, tongue posture is the differentiator between the cranial 'growth direction' of children sucking on these different breast types: carnivore vs herbivore breast growth in women. That's correct, the tongue posture of black Africans and Eurasians differentiated entirely in this specific aspect. but i'll delve deeper into this later. If you want a visual difference, look up the pornstar Addison Lorie . and compare her NIPPLE POSITION and BREAST PLUMPNESS with any flat saggy titted woman pornstar you can find, from this you can infer that she grew up on heavy animal meat and animal fat. Her face is very ugly and undeveloped, agreed, but this is absolutely more anecdotal to her mother's breast proportions being different from her own while she was still a baby breastfeeding. estrogen in women simply mediates fat distribution, this coupled with lack of androgen receptor density allows animal fat (saturated fat) to proliferate in ideal areas all over the body, specifically breasts, lack of androgen receptor density is the crucual factor in differentiating men and women. When exposed to female biology; saturated fat gives women the 'good' type of tits, but when exposed to androgen receptors in men, increases testosterone, it's the 'all-fat' in homo sapiens. Animal meat/fat is ideal for human consumption and mediated by our gender differentiated hormonal receptors. WE ARE CARNIVORES/OMNIVORES BY VIRTUE OF THIS DIFFERENCE, this is why our facial structure looks different from the gorillas/chimps that are PRIMARILY vegetarians; flat/saggy tits ==== chimp breasts. Saturated/animal fat is the primary mediator in the difference between humans and other apes. Next topic, you ever heard about chewing? How hypetrophy in the jaw muscle makes the mandible bone bigger? This is consistent for ALL muscles in the skull but the growth IS NOT acromegaly. It grows in the NATURAL homo sapien form. That's why ALL GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE HAVE SPECIFIC GOOD LOOKING FEATURES even if they have essentially 'non-ideal' features to add some uniqueness. like eye color, skin and hair (generally). So here's the general run down on 'BONE HYPERTROPHY' EAT WHOLE STEAKS OF RED MEAT, as raw you can get without risking parasitic infection. The action of baring down on a large steak with ALL OF YOUR TEETH and then FORCE TEARING AWAY WITH YOUR HEAD while holding it still with your hands, maintains, generates & fixes teeth STRAIGHTNESS by hypertrophying TOTAL MAXILLARY MUSCULATURE through the complete-teeth activity, and in turn, accelerating an increase in mandible and maxillary bone proliferation. If you're male then maintaining POST 7 DAY abstinence through out makes it easier for you as testosterone goes straight to the muscles in your face through your now-attached androgen receptors. Now let me tell you about hair; your hair follicles are attached to a 'hair muscle' system, you can see this on any skull diagram for muscles in the skull; the pericranial aponeurosis. You can literally continuously hypertrophy the very front muscular attachment 'forward' to lower your hairline over time. I suggest you SHAVE YOUR HEAD COMPLETELY before doing this, your head hair itself may act like some kind of 'hair-line' anchor and make you just start stretching the skin on your face. PROPER Muscular hypertrophy in all face muscles, 8 minute-holds once every two weeks and you should see bone mass increase within 1 month: The specific exercise you should do are extreme forms of 'pretending you are outside in the sun on an extremely windy day, very autistic, I know, but so is looksmaxxing in general. https://preview.redd.it/tr17wbhjrycc1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=1111c4f95790ddc4379fcced0049df37b79804f2 Hold this position AGGRESSIVELY for 8-minutes straight, once every 2 weeks is enough, remember what I said about the importance of abstinence in muscle-bone mass growth, you want to look like this you need a little discipline... Also, 'imagine' forcing your hair 'muscles' DOWN during a 'frown', there are muscles there, just touch it and try your hardest to 'FORCE IT DOWN' like any other muscle, you should see results in WEEKS, if not DAYS. https://preview.redd.it/hew2k37krycc1.png?width=390&format=png&auto=webp&s=e68b4456c7d5f55f079806ab68adc0c3c80636d0 Notice that these big boned dimorphic faces have a THIN NOSE, a THIN NOSE is a high-bone mass nose. when people have pudgy thick noses, this means that the skin that is supposed to be being stretched into an attractive thin forward shape, is being compressed against the absence of a developed nasal bone structure. BALDING Balding is plain and simply what happens when you ejaculate too much, you remain inside the period of androgen receptor detachment from the body so your muscles begin to completely atrophy, regardless of how much gym you do. Remember, after ejaculation there is an ABSOLUTE PERIOD OF 7 DAYS before your androgen receptors re-attach. Your hair line is definitely not exempt from this, but if you accompany abstinence with 'hair muscle' downward hypertrophy, you should be able to completely recover 'AND MORE' your hairline. Body Height is also not entirely genetic, but obviously predisposed to existing genetics of course, this is all about ideal food amount intake as well as physical activity during development; basketballers all have basketballer shoulders swimmers always have wide shoulders. but swimming isn't a natural 'continuous stimuli' activity, so all their bodies are retarded looking ngl. It's just excessive muscular-skeletal usage in the area of the shoulder- swimmers obviously do this when they swim, ballers obviously do this when they train dribbling and shooting and dunking. But ideally, you do this while you're young and growing so you develop in these facets early and don't have to do autistic dead arm hangs and get insane clavicle skin stretch marks. BREASTFEEDING. Remember what I said about NIPPLE POSITION and BREAST PLUMPNESS? ALL GIRLS need to grow up eating primarily animal meats and fat and their breasts will grow in their IDEAL form REGARDLESS OF RACE. this will mean IDEAL facial proportions for the kids that they breastfeed because IDEAL tongue habits will subconsciously develop. Natural 'mewing' per-se We've already discussed how female breast 'proportions' are differentiated in homo sapiens by the TYPE of fat consumption during growth-> animal fat vs plant fat. Black people initially were the original ones with caucasian skull structure (see:florisbad skull from south africa 200,000 years ago) but humans came from here of course, so it makes sense. https://preview.redd.it/5gwghv0lrycc1.png?width=1327&format=png&auto=webp&s=2093523da0606151dbd7c4116a078ecc3a9aeb59 That was before Africa was in essentiality a desert. But right now, African girl breasts are flat and saggy, no matter how young or old on a large scale, but not a COMPLETE scale, just generally due to herbivorous diet at large in Africa right now. Long saggy breasts, instead of plump. This is more consistent with chimpanzee breast proportions because in The desert that Africa is right now, their diet will predominantly be plant foods, because there are few places for prey to live, fewer they aren't already being hunted by predators. But THIS DIET DIFFERENTIATION creates the breast proportion difference across races. Not 'genes'. But why do humans eat meat? Why did we start eating animal fats in the first place and make our women develop these shapely tits that other chimps don't have? this is what differentiated the chimps that lost the fur and just kept eating plant from the chimps that lost the fur and STARTED STALKING BIG CATS. HUMANS DIFFERENTIATED THEMSELVES BY SCAVENGING BIG CAT KILLS. Our ancestors were the most attractive people possible, but relative to them, 'Attractiveness' does not exist. Like lions and tigers, deers and rabbits, there is a 'Natural form'. Humans have one to, that I assume would look like some artistic combination wherein a dark-African man has the cranial proportions of some hyper-European like Fabien Pelous, and much more body hair, as we are talking about pre-desert African homo-sapiens. Humans have been around for over 500,000 years, and attractive 'caucasoid skulls' are the only ones you're going to find going back before humans left Africa ~70,000 years ago (see:florisbad skull). Neanderthals were all ugly as fuck (but were a post-african settlement a little farther back than the 70,000 year old out of africa exodus). Let's recap: IDEAL HUMAN DIET, CREATING IDEAL HUMAN BREASTS, CREATING IDEAL HUMAN BREASTFEEDING, CREATING IDEAL TONGUE POSTURE, CREATING IDEAL PROPORTIONS. how often do you think ALL of these factors are met perfectly? And you want to talk genetics? look at Zendaya's parents- her mom probably has great tits, but both of her parents are ugly as fuck. Human Nature Our growth is non-exponential relative to ideal environmental conditions, when we scavenged big cat kills and needed to burst run to escape them, climb trees etc; too much size and you become unnaturally large and slow, a 6'3-6-8 man can probably effectively outmaneuver a Dark-maned lion or panther with burst speed, a 7' man will have his right leg shredded trying to get up the tree, literally too much growth leads to a weird bell curve degeneration effect in our hypothetical 'Natural' 'Pre-desert Africa'. Though of course, with enough scientific engineering, the growth is effectively exponential, like any other animal that encounters a different environmental pace, elephant->wooly mammoth. Minor additives Did you know that sleeping on pillows malforms by enlarges your occiput unnaturally, while also destroying your neck posture? back sleeping is in general deforming and unnatural but if you want to flatten your occiput before training yourself to side-sleep, you should probably back sleep on a HARD FLOOR till you notice your occiput is flattened completely then STOP, this should take only a week or two. You don't want to be this guy, even if this DOES seem like the norm (of course it is, pillows and soft beds are the norm) https://preview.redd.it/4ttrgrxlrycc1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=fb8beda75b236cf4dfd897f0c605f7a01a4da899 You may notice an anecdotal trend of Japanese people with flat occiputs, are you also aware they sleep on flatter, lower beds? https://preview.redd.it/39t7p3omrycc1.png?width=1808&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc319dc04f2f7bef076d46b6b6026fd38d8c323a Sleeping on soft beds instead of harder surfaces like our ancestors (grass & dirt) etc, malforms your spinal growth as the pelvic region is very heavy and sinks into the bed during sleep because of it's sheer weight. https://preview.redd.it/5u0ors9nrycc1.png?width=488&format=png&auto=webp&s=bbf0c44797d0bd7e302f2eb0446d127df7da734d Sitting down in general is unnatural, and deforms sternum growth and development, concaving the chest over the course of life and on a greater scale, generations, sleeping on your back accelerates this, if you want your kids chests to look like this, keep doing both. https://preview.redd.it/2jktqnynrycc1.png?width=1910&format=png&auto=webp&s=83de7d481e0bc1e955b62ab3a309e4ecf53aa65a https://preview.redd.it/35axmlgorycc1.png?width=1036&format=png&auto=webp&s=0db36e8d14ee034461b2cba284c264b4664a9579 https://preview.redd.it/2vdk6pxorycc1.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=d53f91ca17c901395b1181aed2bf3c8a32f2d62e Sunlight exposure over the course of about anything longer than ~15 minutes to the naked body significantly increases circulating testosterone in men, your risk of cancer is decreased only after the 7 day non-ejaculatory period. Fasting for 24 hours immediately spikes HGH for a continuous period till you begin eating again, and sprinting increases stable HGH. A long-term sprinting regimen increases bone thickness and total muscle mass in the entire legs, while heavy strict-curl HOLDS increase bone thickness in the entire arms; repetition exercises are a meme. Strict curling to a ~90 degree (humerus-radius) hold acts on the ENTIRE BODY down to your pelvis and legs, so you need TOTAL MUSCLE EQUILIBRIUM during this exercise. When it starts getting heavy YOU WILL SHIT YOURSELF, BUT THIS IS NATURAL, YOUR BODY IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE TRAINED TO HOLD IN WASTE MATTER https://preview.redd.it/p8tygvpprycc1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=99357b7d36073dba3411b41c94f1b5ad5ce76a13 https://preview.redd.it/ncyei65qrycc1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=1d4a3a4245c2188c4cc434d91769b216040046d7 For the trans women/cis women As I mentioned, carnivore diet(specifically the saturated fat) creates voluptuous and proportional breasts, so, theoretically, if you wanted massive voluptuous tits, as a post-pubertal woman you'd just need to inject estrogen and consume high amounts of very fatty beef for like a couple months. For a trans woman, your testicles are actually very important here, ejaculation in men spikes prolactin, a doctor can explain to you why this is important in estrogen increase, but the point is, you have your own natural estrogen injection; ejaculation. On top of artificial stuff you can get from a doctor, all you would need to do is literally the same thing; consume high amounts of very fatty beef, for a long period of time. This is literally like how ejaculation is the cause of gyno, but instead of gyno, you are straight up giving yourself breasts and on a larger scale, a feminine fat distribution. Penis size Now this one is a little more unbelievable, but if you want to grow your dick it's actually super simple, your flaccid penis is at a downward angle while flaccid, to grow it make sure you can some how artificially 'keep it in that downwards flaccid position' while getting fully erect, by fully erect, your body only assesses your penis as 'fully erect when the angle get's high and your mind starts 'consciously' throbbing, this is why it is also important, while holding your now 'continuously erecting' penis in that 'flaccid position' to also MAKE SURE YOU ARE MENTALLY NO WHERE NEAR YOUR PENIS, there can be no mental activity near your dick, you must not be holding in pee, poop, anything, you must not consciously 'throb', the erection-ing must be strictly due to something you are viewing online and not you physically touching your dick outside of whatever apparatus is holding it in the 'flaccid angle'. imagine a chastity cage but one that does not constrict the size of the penis, just the angle. Pretty much, you are tricking your penis into thinking it still needs more blood, by making it think it's still in the 'flaccid state', it's like jelqing, but instead, it's the actual biological process that grows the penis in the first place during childhood. Obviously, the penis is a muscle so my discussion on testosterone and androgen receptor attachment is CRUCIAL here. Cancers Cancers are entirely biological degeneration from our artificial environment, I already explained how holding in waste from subconsciously trained potty training is the direct cause of cancers, the same is probably true for skin products, hair products, air purity etc. All cancers can be traced to our artificial foundation of living. Mental gains Within a month on post-7 day ejaculatory recovery, your mental clarity should begin to increase drastically. But only to a point of clear minded thinking and assessment, it isn't going to make you fucking superman. The issue with society nowadays is literally that humans have lived hundreds of thousands if not millions of years, (my general estimate based on existing fossil samples is ~800,000 years) in normal conditions, it's only in the past ~10,000 or so we started literally mentally training our children to have late night ejaculations from wet dreams because of potty training's consequent function on genital muscle stimulation. 7 day ejaculation recovery period There is a 7 day ejaculation recovery period present in ALL HUMAN MEN, where, for exactly 7 days after you ejaculate, androgen receptors attached to your body will weaken and detach, this of course means that the receptor that literally transfers circulating testosterone in your body into active testosterone in your muscles/bones etc, is no longer attached to your muscles/bones etc. On the 7th day after the last ejaculation, your androgen receptors completely reattach, and this, for whatever reason, spikes your testosterone for the entire day to >1.5x their normal levels, returning to their baseline at the end of the day This of course means that you should not be masturbating ever you fucking idiot Hair Thickness This is a direct result of hypertrophy of the underlying muscle, eyebrows specifically, scroll up for information on how to get great eyes. The Skull https://preview.redd.it/xv89aovqrycc1.png?width=950&format=png&auto=webp&s=442a0020d7ad52ee3a867a327d328317ac23c319 Something I always have to add about these images is that these super robust skulls are always missing a small subnasal process below their nasal 'hole' but slightly above their upper teeth, this is also muscular hypertrophy related, along with cheekbones and the rest of the facial skeletal process. You can see what i'm talking about here. https://preview.redd.it/1slzz3lrrycc1.png?width=413&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b90f57050de88d21fb7ffe6b4b75e2555ed0171 It's actually supposed to be a little more pronounced than that even, however it seems this bone is very soft and gets destroyed, relatively more easily than the rest of the skull post death. It creates a more straight, 'uniform looking' lower facial profile, the lower facial cranial bone mass surrounding the teeth, (including the one I just mentioned) would obviously stretch the skin forward against the bones, this means thinner lips of course. https://preview.redd.it/xdfj7sbsrycc1.png?width=865&format=png&auto=webp&s=492f09c1c4614cec92f46588afb95ab7800729fb My body-remodeling regimen My current regimen is on the basis of 2 weeks. I train in strength conditioning but you can replace that specific week with whatever sport YOU train in. DO NOT REPLACE the sprint week. This is your natural human activity. Week 1
If you want to accelerate any facet of this regimen, you can try to eat everything on your eating days and fast completely on your sport/sprint days. Be cautious, the HGH output from doing this is immense, as HGH spikes from fasting alone after 24 hours Posture Total spinal posture (including neck, shoulder girdle, torso, pelvis) is crucial for facial proportion development |
2024.01.15 15:30 saucebossman1 Aligning crooked spine and nose breathing
2023.12.14 07:06 Crazycrazy9708 Adhesion Tear?
2023.09.02 14:36 Angel466 [Bob the hobo] A Celestial Wars Spin-Off Part 0884
2023.08.25 19:19 Super-Masterpiece-34 Is the holotype of Giganotosaurus really larger than most Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens, as many people claim?
We often hear a saying online that the holotype of giga is larger than the majority of specimens of Tyrannosaurus Rex . Because we only found two specimens of giga. This statement has become an important basis for those who firmly believe that giga is bigger. So is that really the case? This post will systematically analyze the accuracy of this statement. This post will be long, but source reliable data and content is a lot. I hope you enjoy it and see the end submitted by Super-Masterpiece-34 to Dinosaurs [link] [comments] Firstly, it cannot be denied that the absence of specimens will greatly affect our judgment of the average size of the species and whether the specimens currently discovered are large or small for this species. This is also an important reason why many people believe that giga may be larger than Tyrannosaurus Rex, as they believe that holotype may be a smaller or average sized specimen, especially when it is already larger than some adult Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens. However, when we make such comparisons, we often overlook a very important issue, their ages. For dinosaurs, there may be a clear difference in body mass between young adult specimens and skeletally mature specimensďźasymptotic individualsďź. Because they can still grow to some extent in adulthood. This table is a description of the maturation stage of dinosaur bones https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0947 The table is from this article Simple explain EFS (external fundamental system), its appearance means that the specimen has been fully grown. On the contrary, The absence of an EFS suggest that the specimens are still growing, although growth was greatly slowing. Its presence also means this specimen reach the asymptotic mass for its species. We can call these individuals asymptotic individuals, the A2 and X individuals in this table, and in general, asymptotic specimens tend to be larger and heavier than young adults or A1 adults Tyrannosaurus rib (FMNH PR 2081 Sue) showing the 15th to 19th growth lines. external fundamental system(EFS) with nine tightly spaced growth lines, indicating late-adulthood senescence and growth-rate attenuation. Giga Holotype MUCPv-CH1 :The sutures of the anterior part of the frontal bone are barely visible, and the fusion has blurred almost all the sutures. This is a class X feature, so the Holotype is an old individual, fully skeletally mature (especially the dinosaur is fused from tail to head, if the skull is so highly fused, the trunk is is basically fused) BTW, Carcharodontosaurus neotype SGM DINO-1 and Meraxes.giga are also specimens with complete bone maturation, class X. https://preview.redd.it/usa0pj7tq7kb1.jpg?width=1576&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=304867c05d8dd6a5e21d3be8f4579bcffcbad443 https://preview.redd.it/8nc2xvfuq7kb1.jpg?width=1577&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=928c0f387e964fef116edfc6d82f0cb34ad8a0fd https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2002)022[0802:TBOGCD]2.0.CO;2022[0802:TBOGCD]2.0.CO;2)The osteological description of Giganotosaurus above comes from this paper So in simple terms, the holotype of giga is an old adult specimen with no room to grow. Although that doesn't mean it's necessarily a large one in giga. However, It's more fair to compare the size and weight of Tyrannosaurs rex specimens with same complete bone maturation rather than compare with of all adults. So, how many Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens are there that we can be sure that they have reached the A2 or X level? Or to put it another way, how many Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens have been found that have EFS on long bone sections? Let's count. In the following comparison, the circumference of the femur will be used as an important reference index to evaluate the size of the specimen, because the Campione formula based on the circumference of the femur is the most commonly used method to calculate the body weight of theropod dinosaurs in academic papers. The accuracy and reliability of this formula, and why the femur circumference is used as the basis for judging the size of theropod dinosaurs are explained in detail in this article, which will not be repeated in this post. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12226 "Body mass estimation in non-avian bipeds using a theoretical conversion to quadruped stylopodial proportions" Overall, when we do this comparison, the circumference of the femur is the most reliable and accurate indicator compared to the rest of the bone in the body. Especially when it comes to a less complete specimen, if the specimen retains the femur, then our estimate of its size will be relatively reliable.It is important to note that there are three main methods for estimating theropod weight today. Campion formula, GDI, scanning skeleton to obtain digital modeling. The latter two require that the estimated specimens have a high degree of skeletal integrity to ensure accuracy. These two methods obviously do not apply in the comparison of this post. 1.Sue,It was once thought to be the oldest Tyrannosaurus rex, and even now. Observations of long bone sections show that it was an asymptotic individualďźA2 or X levelďź. And, in all current weight estimates, sue significantly exceeds CH1. SUE 2.Scotty,In a 2019 paper describing Scotty, the paper states that scotty is larger than sue and is the largest Tyrannosaurus rex we have ever found. However, the gap between the two is not obvious, and it is not too big a problem to say that the two are the same. So, we can be sure that scotty is also bigger than CH1. At the same time, the paper also states that scotty should be an asymptotic individual like sue. https://preview.redd.it/zlu1z2vw8fkb1.png?width=1260&format=png&auto=webp&s=37497b48d7e45852c58d2b16663146a5b1b6c447
https://preview.redd.it/884p1vhxr9kb1.png?width=1090&format=png&auto=webp&s=a465c643a7863d9974d5d183bf541fdcb88ce683 https://preview.redd.it/37hgbs3cw9kb1.jpg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b2a5d3193cc5a359f353499444edc89aa9a31bb mor555 4.MOR1152 ďź bone sections show that it is also an asymptotic individual, but due to the lack of accurate data measurement, its specific size is difficult to accurately estimate. Except Horner once rated the MOR1152's size and gave it the largest XL. It is very interesting that in the femur circumference measurement of G-REX MOR1128 in 2022, the femur circumference of MOR1128 is 580mm, which is consistent with sue, and the rating of MOR1128 in this table is L. We know that sue is significantly heavier than CH1. So, conservatively, MOR1152 should also be larger than CH1 https://preview.redd.it/eviqoq8zw9kb1.png?width=2275&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba0c77fe516f89fab99786d8cd14c4887dd2b0e0 https://preview.redd.it/vzfgm3kmy9kb1.png?width=3008&format=png&auto=webp&s=d88fb4250d82705de47978f7754f37d441ab2b50 5.RTMP 81.12.1 Huxley rex The age of this specimen is 22 years old. Although the bone section shows that it does not yet have EFS, considering that its age of 22 years is not young for Tyrannosaurus Rex, there is no problem in treating it as an asymptotic or quasi-asymptotic individual. As for its size, although it retains the femur, it has a broken femur, and the revised estimate of its circumference is about 560mm. This means that the specimen was also likely larger than CH1. However, it should be noted that due to the age problem, the weight estimates in the following two tables are outdated formulas, and all the weight estimates in the table are far smaller than the data in recent years, so the weight estimates in these two tables can be ignored https://preview.redd.it/2xgdqgm90akb1.png?width=1059&format=png&auto=webp&s=cd017d54491a446172271234f8073ee79e7a310a weight estimates in these two tables can be ignored weight estimates in these two tables can be ignored
https://preview.redd.it/dy1j5ys14akb1.png?width=1045&format=png&auto=webp&s=5988b805e4fb932733eef8ad75826ec89a91e947 EDIT: Add an individuals with no specific age, but a description of the stage of bone maturity 7.MOR008 Most of the Jugal-Post-oribtal of Tyrannosaurus Rex has a slit and is not fused, but MOR 008 does, which Rayfield thinks is a sign of an elderly individual; MOR 008 is therefore between "A1" grade adults and "X "grade elderly individuals by this standard. In most body size estimates, MOR008 is roughly the same size as sue, although it is uncertain how large MOR008 is and who is larger compared to SUE. But it's reasonable to assume that it's not that different in size from sue. So, that also makes it significantly larger than CH1 https://preview.redd.it/iwuwujen9fkb1.jpg?width=964&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=731b1fa4c326dd757b48f5dcb4252bdc66d2e01e The above are all Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens that can be determined to be asymptotic individuals. In fact, there are other Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens whose age may have reached the asymptotic line, and EFS appear in long bone sections. Trix, for example, has been reported to be possibly older than Sue and, by various estimates, larger than CH1. But since there is no definitive evidence, this is not included in the list for the time being. So far, 5 of these 7 specimens are larger than CH1, and 4 of these 5 are significantly larger than CH1. One is about the same size as CH1, not too far apart, and one is definitely smaller than CH1. From this result, the size of CH1 does not stand out in the A2 and X class Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens after limiting the objects of comparison. So, when compared to all adult tyrannosaurs, does CH1 stand out? Before making the comparison, it should be noted that although Campione's formula has been shown to be highly accurate in estimating body weight, it is based on only one variable, the circumference of the femur, and there are bound to be errors. When the object of weight estimation has a relatively high degree of integrity, it is more accurate to estimate the weight after scanning the skeleton to get the volume. Stan is a good example, if you look at the volume of the skeleton, it is obviously larger than CH1, but if you use the formula to calculate the weight, it will be smaller than CH1. In most cases, the formula of Campione generally has a relatively high accuracy. stan and ch1 ďźWhen the formula was used to estimate his weight, Stan weighed just 5779kg.In terms of the actual skeleton and volume,STAN is significantly larger than CH1. Although the ribs of the CH1 skeleton in this picture have obvious assembly errors, they can't be so narrow.stan's femur circumference seems to have been affected by compression. Compared with its length, the circumference of 505mm is unusualďźThis may also be the reason why the weight calculated by the formula is significantly less than the weight measured by the volume of the 3D scan skeleton. CH1 skeleton with a moderate torso width Estimates of stan's weight in the 2011 Hutchinson paperďźWhen the skeleton can be scanned to obtain the corresponding volume to calculate the weight, the reliability is certainly better than using a formula that relies on only one variable, no matter how reliable There are Tyrannosaurus rex individuals that measure the circumference of the femur As can be seen from the figure above, adult Tyrannosaurus rex specimens that are definitely smaller than CH1 are approximately these: RTMP 81.6.1ăLL 12823ăLACM 150167ă MOR 1125ăMOR 009ăBHI 6233 ăBHI 6230ăBHI 6435. Subadult or juvenileďźBHI4100 Duffyă USNM 6183ăLACM 23844 All of the remaining adults can achieve a body size similar to or larger than CH1, or even much larger. I know some people will say that the circumference of the femur is not equal to the size, there may be errors or something. Then we classified the specimens whose femur circumference was greater than 520mm but less than 540mm as similar in size to CH1, with no significant difference. Specimens with a femur circumference greater than 540mm are considered to be larger than CH1, and specimens with a femur circumference greater than 580mm are considered to be significantly larger than CH1. Specimens with a femur circumference less than 520mm are considered to be less than CH1 <520mm: BHI 3033 STANă MOR980ăRTMP 81.6.1ďźblack beautyďźăLL 12823ăBHI 6242 Henryă LACM 150167ă MOR 1125ăMOR 009ăBHI 6233 ăBHI 6230 Wy-rexăBHI 6435. >520mm but <540mm : MOR555(USNM 555000 Wankel)ă CM9380ăHMN MB.R.91216 TristanăBHI6232ăBHI6436ăRGM 792.000 Trixă >540mm but<580mm : Z-Rex samsonă TMT v222 Leeă RTMP 81.12.1 Huxley rex >580mm : ScottyăSueăBHI6248 E.D.CopeăMOR1128 G-Rexă RMDRC 2002.MT-001 BTW,A detailed analysis of BHI6248 E.D.Cope, a giant specimen, can be found in my previous post. It is probably the largest Tyrannosaurus Rex specimen we have found so far, and the largest theropod dinosaur. What makes me feel strange is that no one here has ever discussed this super giant specimen of Tyrannosaurus Rex BHI6248 nickname E.D.Cope : Dinosaurs (reddit.com) From the analysis of the full text, Among the 25 adult Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens with femur circumference data, the femur circumference of 11 specimens was smaller than CH1, and we believe that the body size of these 11 individuals was smaller than CH1, and the body size of 6 of the remaining 14 individuals was roughly equal to CH1, three of them could be basically determined to be larger than CH1, and 5 of them could be basically determined to be significantly larger than CH1. Notice that this classification is already in favor of CH1. Because there are actually many specimens with a femur circumference of less than 520mm that are very close to the femur circumference of 520mm, they may be similar in size to CH1, but here they are classified as being less than CH1 in size. Similarly, among individuals with femur circumference between 520mm and 540mm, the body size of some specimens may be larger than that of CH1. Especially in view of the comparison diagram of the actual skeleton of STAN and CH1 above, it is obvious that the volume of the torso and pelvis of T-Rex is significantly larger than that of giga. But they're all classified here as being about the size of CH1 Even on this somewhat unfair scaleďźit can be seen that the size of CH1 is about the median level among all adult Tyrannosaurus Rex individuals. If it is placed in an asymptotic individual like CH1, CH1 is relatively small. So the popular claim that CH1 was bigger than most Tyrannosaurs doesn't hold up in the face of the data. Finally, it should be noted that being an elderly individual does not necessarily mean that CH1 is a large individual in giga, it is still possible that it is a lower than average size giga, and the main point of this post is to show that it is inaccurate to say that CH1 is larger than most Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens given the available evidence. And, to be clear, all weight estimates of extinct creatures are just that - estimates, no matter how accurate, not facts. The only way to be 100% accurate is to weigh living animals, which is obviously impossible for extinct animals. There's no point in obsessing over whose estimate gave you a few hundred extra kilos. Because the weight of large animals is inherently fluctuating, it can be affected by various factors such as the health of the animal itself, whether it is full or not. But we can still get an idea of the approximate weight range of these animals, and who will be significantly larger. This is also why the post does not rank the specimens in terms of body size, but rather just a rough comparison of size. |
2023.08.18 22:49 SkittishR Another's Nightmare
2023.08.12 22:54 RuinedDruid Should I tuck if my hip freely dislocates?
2023.07.19 09:25 Detective_Joker Approximate size of the Armored Core statue in SDCC
The average 2nd - 3rd gen ACs have a 1:2 ratio when it comes to head + torso to hip + legs and since the ACs in 6th gen follows the third gen or second gen AC ratios, here goes. submitted by Detective_Joker to armoredcore [link] [comments] We get to see the top half, which is usually whats more than enough to use to measure the statue even without proper human for scaling. The top half you see in the image, on scale to the 1.1m barricade, is 3x of such measurements, hence it would be at least 3.3m. Now if you factor in the ratio of an AC, it's 1:2 or 1:3, and by that, including the legs, the statue is at least 9.9m tall, which makes it 10m tall for a 1(head-torso):2(pelvis-feet) ratio ; whereas it's at least 11 - 12m. This diagram may not be accurate since i cant get a perfect perspective diagram of the photo, but it is what it is. https://preview.redd.it/qmsyzswbgvcb1.png?width=1144&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fce5d366dd1ae601ac3e80d0c487e1726d525f0 |
2023.07.12 12:24 WLfan The Italian system revealed
The results of the Italian national team are causing a sensation within the weightlifting scene. In my opinion there are some peculiarities but... no big secrets, as someone may think. submitted by WLfan to weightlifting [link] [comments] Here are some interesting points. For someone they could be obvious, but I report them anyway:
This is a very stimulating ambient, where all athlete are friends (less or more), some are even engaged, and they push hard each other, every day.
The most important detail of the italian technique is the "cambio" which can be literally translated as "change" and corresponds roughly to the transition phase of the traditional nomenclature. The idea is: you have to reach a body and bar position that allows you to push against the floor to the best of your ability, like in the squat. So, after the first phase (the "stacco", the dead-lift) which ends just above the knee, there is the cambio, where the knee angle become smaller (and the knees move forward in some cases, depending on the structure of the athlete) and the hip angle become bigger. There is a cambio, a change in the angle motion. This cambio lasts until the shoulders, which were over the bar, are placed right over the barbell (half of the thigh for the snatch, few cm above the knee in the clean). So it's slightly different from the classical transition phase, which ends when the knee angle reaches its minimum. The \"cambio\" in a diagram from FIPE. I don't know why in the last image the barbell seems to be far from the thight. One principle is to let it slide on the thigh. From this position starts the next phase, the "scambio" (literally "exchange") which has a subphase, the "spinta" or push, where the knee and hip angles open maximally together, at the same time, to maximize vertical forces and minimize orizontal forces. So, in summary: - Stacco: from the ground to just above knee level. The center of pression on the feet is right at the centre or slightly moved forward, towards the ball of the feet. You have to push with quads and open the ankle e knee angles, but the hip angle remains the same. - Cambio: from the ground to the point where the shoulders come back above the barbell. The knee angle becomes smaller and the hip angle bigger. You still have to push against the ground. - Scambio, which have two subphases: spinta, where you have to open the knee and hip angles together untill the extension, and scambio, where you go down as fast as you can. These are the fixed points. There are more obscure points, which are sometimes explained and sometimes not. For example, the shoulder retraction during the cambio (as Celine Delia demonstrates here: https://www.instagram.com/p/CUlA8SiAZHB/?img_index=1): some coaches of the Italian team want it, for others is a too small detail to control. Nothing to report for the jerk, except one thing, in the receiving position: you should activate the glutes and search for a slight retroversion of the pelvis. This is something some coaches tell and some don't, it's not a staple element.
Younger athletes train 2-4 times a day, while older athletes train 1 or 2 times a day, also on sunday (not every week). There are no deload weeks, only deload days or sessions, if an athlete is really tired. According to a coach, there is no periodization. The concept of periodize is old and doesn't reflect the variation in the physical status of the athletes. So, every session they watch the athletes and decide how heavy they will go. Tipically maximal or submaximal weights are done 2-3 times a week for the snatch, less frequently for the clean and jerk. On the day with two sessions (Mon-Wed-Fri), in the morning they do squat and sometimes dead-lift, and a light snatch variation. In the afternoon the menĂš is heavy snatch or clean and jerk and squat or dead-lift.The day (Tue-Thu-Sat) with one session there are squat, dead-lift, some light variations and body-building.
Real natural? Of course I don't know for sure, but the Italian team has regular (almost) weekly controls. They are controlled even during national competitions. P.s I'll edit it as soon as I can, adding points and details that come back to my mind. P.p.s. Feel free to make questions, I'll try to answer them (as far as I know the answer, of course) |