LONG post ahead, almost entirely old news, if you don't care to hear about this topic anymore, just don't read. It's interesting to me, I like documentation and still care to talk about it with people who are also interested, simple as.
After Joost's latest story (I don't know if something new and specific happened that prompted him to post this), I've been thinking about Luchtballon's video and the disqualification controversy again, so I wanted to share some thoughts with you guys.
As the Dutch broadcaster Avrotros confirmed on their own part, and it is the wisest thing to do, Joost has likely been keeping quiet on purpose to avoid further complicating his legal case.

Avrotros (on June 6th): ...In this article, we want to share what we can, but we also ask for understanding of the fact that not everything can be made public (yet).
The investigation into the incident after Joost Klein's performance in the 2nd semi-final is still pending at the Swedish Public Prosecution service.
...During this investigation, we unfortunately cannot go into the details, the circumstances, and the handling of this incident because this could influence the investigation.

From the moment he was removed from the rehearsals to Freshtival, he went radio silent for obvious reasons, but his associates such as his broadcaster and friends have made some statements.
Avrotros said on May 11th, the day of the grand final:

...Against clearly made agreements, Joost was filmed when he had just gotten off stage and had to rush to the greenroom. At that moment, Joost repeatedly indicated that he did not want to be filmed. This wasn’t respected. This led to a threatening movement from Joost towards the camera. Joost did not touch the camera woman. This incident was reported, followed by an investigation by the EBU and police.
Yesterday and today we consulted extensively with the EBU and proposed several solutions. Nevertheless, the EBU has still decided to disqualify Joost Klein. AVROTROS finds the penalty very heavy and disproportionate. We stand for good manners — let there be no misunderstanding about that — but in our view, an exclusion order is not proportional to this incident.
We are very disappointed and upset for the millions of fans who were so excited for tonight. What Joost brought to the Netherlands and Europe shouldn’t have ended this way.

Combined with their statement on June 6th, Avrotros maintained that his disqualification was a "disproportionate" punishment to what actually happened.

We can say that based on the information we had then and have now, we still believe that the disqualification was unnecessary and disproportionate.

On May 12th, Appie, Joost's friend and the performer in the blue bird costume for Europapa, posted this TikTok where he criticizes the EBU for disqualifying Joost over "basically nothing", but letting the Israeli delegation's actions slide.
https://reddit.com/link/1dc4cnm/video/k23x77d5rl5d1/player
Appie posted another TikTok on May 14th where he said "fuck you" to Eurovision, and a video on May 17th where he acted like Joost's lawyer and said "Free that nigga Joost man, that nigga ain't did nothing wrong. Fuck Sweden." (king 😭)
As you guys probably know and have seen the footage, Appie himself was also personally harassed by the Israeli delegation, and he obviously was one of the main witnesses of this entire situation, being Joost's friend and someone who performs with him on stage. Reported by Wiwibloggs:

Following the news (of Joost being removed from the flag parade and rehearsal), Dov Gil-Har — a news anchor at Israel’s state broadcaster — approached the Dutch bluebird dancer with a camera, saying, “Where were you? We missed you on stage.” A security guard for the Dutch team is heard saying, “What are you doing? Why are you doing that?” and “Can you stop that please.”

These people wouldn't stop bugging Joost and his team, took videos and shared them on their own like it's a badge of honor to harass people. I have always found the timing of this extremely suspicious. Either they were somehow involved with the reporting of the incident, thus Dov Gilhar knew just when to taunt Appie, or they had no involvement but the delegation was so obnoxious that they were just not leaving Joost's team alone at any point, so it coincided with this moment. What is more likely? Which option is less disgraceful? They're assholes either way.
Joost's Swedish lawyer made a statement on May 17th:

As I understand it, there was an agreement between him and the management. It was a sensitive occasion where he would not be photographed when he left the stage. He was to be met by his team but there was a photographer. He asked the person to stop filming. Then [Joost] pushed the camera away to remove it. He denies threatening this person. We have had access to the investigation and now have the opportunity to comment on it. We will request that some Dutch people be heard. Then we’ll see if we get it through. I see the chances of release as good.

Throughout the aftermath of this controversy, multiple contestants have shown support for Joost (5miinust x Puulup from Estonia, Dons from Latvia, Besa from Albania, Luna from Poland, etc.) and multiple broadcasters (Slovenia, Serbia, etc.) have questioned the EBU's decision to disqualify him, as well as their other failures at managing the contest in general (Norway). The impression I get, however, is that besides the Dutch team, they were not present during the incident and do not seem to have personal insight to the situation as witnesses. It's probably only the Dutch team who do.
On the 18th, Joost's friend and collaborator bbno$ appeared on a livestream with Jack Manifold where he said:

Joost Klein, I've known him for like 5 years... He was trying to get on to Eurovision... He's down the road and it's the most inspirational thing he's ever done, it's so beautiful that he can get to the point he got... Then there's a press conference.... He kinda stands up for himself and both his parents passed away.... He was standing up, politically, in my opinion, in the right political stance. And he ended up getting shit talked and someone said to him backstage something about his dead parents and shit talking his dead parents. So he obviously, pushed them, did something, and at that point, he got disqualified from it... and then he just exploded. His popularity went times five in a day.

During his Freshtival performance on May 19th, which was his first public appearance since Eurovision, Joost said:

I know everyone expects me to say something, but everything is love. I love you. What a mentality here. I feel the love in the air. We need a little more love.

And he posted "Love always wins 💙" on his story while on stage. The fandom was happy to see him doing fine. After this, he started being more active, posting TikToks and Instagram stories promoting music with his friends again.
On May 26th, Joost was performing in Canada with bbno$. He said "Fuck Eurovision" and "They tried to ban me from fucking Eurovision but I'm in Canada." on stage. I find the second one particularly interesting, I mean, you know that I am already Team Joost but his wording does make it sound like he was specifically targeted for disqualification, like something minor was overblown to turn into an excuse to get rid of him. Not the type of wording someone who believes they faced consequences for being truly guilty would use.
There goes the dumbass claim of people who say "B-but he apologized to the photographer after the incident, so he must be guilty!" He had a dispute and snapped in the spur of the moment after his boundaries were crossed repeatedly, then allegedly apologized because he might have felt bad about coming off as aggressive regardless as he is a normal human being. It doesn't mean he cannot find how the EBU managed this situation unfair.
On May 27th, it was confirmed by the Malmö Presecutor's office that "Joost is insisting police speak with witnesses who live in the Netherlands". Speaking of the delay. The Swedish prosecutor said “It is about Joost and his defence team wanting a number of people in the Netherlands to be heard. In that scenario, I need to send a request for legal assistance and that takes a certain amount of time.”
On June 5th, the Hot Air Balloon Day, his first single since the contest, Luchtballon was released. I consider this to be the best statement he could make about the controversy without complicating things for himself legally. I think this was a very clever artistic decision. He is technically not making a statement about his case, he is just getting revenge on faceless NPCs working for Onion Corp in San Andreas graphics. I love this video so much, the nostalgia factor, all the details, it's perfect.
The production of this song was in the works before the incident although Tantu and Joost likely changed up some parts of it after it. I think they have always been planning this to be his post-Eurovision comeback, planned to be released on the Hot Air Balloon Day but they adapted it in ways that relate to the ongoing controversy. The video is obviously about Eurovision.
We first see Joost, Stuntje and Appie in their Europapa outfits, flying in a balloon and performing on the ground somewhere that like the windmill in Europapa. When the blue bird gets shot and blood splashes on his face, Joost turns his head backwards like an owl.
Joost has said in an interview "Deep down there is still an inner child in all of us. For me the bird represents my childhood, sitting in front of a tv in a small Dutch village. The act we created for Eurovision is everything I wanted to see at Eurovision as a child” while describing the blue bird.
The hot air balloon also gets shot. Joost and Stuntje fall down from the basket, the former crashes into a burning city at night and the latter vanishes into the air.
The beat drops, Joost gets dragged from the floor by two men in suits while people around him dance. Stuntje makes a call and rides a motorcycle.
Joost is thrown in jail in his underwear and climbs up the small window to see men in suits dance as they burn his Europapa suit. He turns his head around like an owl for the second time.
I think the timing in both occurences show this motion represents moments in which Joost felt like his dreams were destroyed, or bitter realization when things took an ugly turn for him.
He is then saved by Stuntje and they drive off to the small house he escaped to. His semifinal performance is on the TV. Joost looks at a picture of them three together from Europapa and then looks at the Onion Corp building standing in the dark of night and lightning.
They take the subway to the Onion Corp, showing up in a villainous, dark version of their Eurovision outfits. They barge in to shoot up men in suits. Joost cheats away to the rooftop when he gets cornered. He faces a man who tells him he can't be free, then gets kicked by the black bird (the blue bird resurrected) when he is about to explain his "whole plan".
The three guys reunite to fly away in an onion shaped hot air balloon. We hear the cameo about Joost moving on from his traumas from Overthinking It, followed by shining sillhouettes of his parents.
Conclusion & TLDR:

• Joost seems to be doing fine, is surrounded with a very supportive friend group, and he acknowledges the love he has been receiving from fans.
• Obviously I don't know what's happening behind the scenes, but as a fan, I think things are looking good for Joost. The public opinion is already mostly in his favor and especially after the investigation, he will be vindicated, the EBU will look dumber for doubling down on their mismanagement of this situation. I have no doubt that he will get out of this as someone who is proven innocent.
• He is currently sticking to the legal advice of not making open statements about the controversy to avoid complicating his ongoing investigation. The "OMG JOOST DIDN'T TALK TO THE PRESS!" stuff probably happened because he has not been talking to them for this exact reason, he knows they will ask about the controversy.
• His associates such as his friends and broadcaster have made statements that indicate that his disqualification was disproportionate, the incident was something mino"basically nothing". They confirm that Joost was provoked by having his boundaries crossed behind the scenes. There probably is no secret ammo information the EBU withholds that will come out later about the altercation between Joost and the photographer that makes him look bad, they already used the worst of what they got, basically, and it was a nothingburger.
• Their and Joost's attitude, as well as his lawyer's opinion, imply that they, as people who have the most detailed insight to the situation, are all confident his name will be cleared. Imagine how badly everything I have talked about would age if these people knew that Joost truly did something incriminating. They know that he didn't, so they can comfortably make these claims.
• For completely understandable reasons, Joost feels resentment for the EBU now. Sorry, people who wanted him to come back for ESC 2025.
• I expect more detailed statements from him and other insiders once the legal case is closed, whenever that is.
• Luchtballon is a multilayered masterpiece and the best fuck you to the EBU ever.

We often dislike the amount of $ we pay for each transaction due gas fees so I decided to share my DYOR regarding it and hopefully you will learn something like I did. Enjoy it bronuts.
Ethereum's got its own special way of handling transaction fees called "gwei." Think of gwei as tiny pieces of ETH used to pay for gas fees on the Ethereum network. They are important for making sure transactions and smart contracts get processed smoothly without clogging up the system.

Key Points

Unit of Measurement:
1 ETH = 1,000,000,000 gwei (1 billion gwei)
Purpose: Used to calculate gas fees for transactions and smart contracts
Gas Fees:
Paid in gwei to incentivize validators to include transactions in blocks
Adjustable Fees:
Fees can fluctuate based on network demand; higher gwei means faster processing
User Control:
Users can set the amount of gwei they're willing to pay to speed up their transactions
Network Efficiency:
Helps manage network congestion and prioritize transactions

But why are fees so high/low sometimes?

High Demand:
When there's a surge in transactions (like during popular NFT drops or DeFi activities), more people are competing to get their transactions processed. This pushes gas fees up.
Low Demand:
During quieter times, fewer transactions mean less competition, and gas fees drop.

What are layer 2s and why are they necessary

Layer 2s are solutions built on top of the Ethereum blockchain to improve its scalability and efficiency. They process transactions off the main chain (Layer 1) and then consolidate the results back onto it.
Scalability: Layer 2s help Ethereum handle more transactions per second, reducing congestion.
Lower Fees: By offloading transactions from the main chain, they significantly lower gas fees.
Faster Transactions: Transactions on Layer 2s are processed quicker than on the main chain, improving the user experience.
There are various L2 scaling solutions, but rollups are currently the most widely used. Rollups bundle several transactions into one that gets recorded on the main Ethereum blockchain. There are two types of rollups: Optimistic Rollups, which rely on economic incentives and game theory for transaction validation, and Zero-Knowledge (zk) Rollups, which use cryptographic proofs to ensure security and privacy.
One can look at L2s based on a few factors: the total value locked (TVL), their revenue, their unique value proposition and developer activity. Here are a few names:

• Optimism;
• Arbitrum;
• Base;
• Linea;
• Polygon.

Final thoughts

Imagine a future where Ethereum's gas fees are consistently low but not compromising the activity 😆 That's what developers have been trying to do for years. With the widespread adoption of Layer 2 solutions and the successful implementation of Ethereum 2.0 and Dencun update, transactions become faster and cheaper for everyone. Let's hope developers keep innovating and finding more solutions 🤞

The Confirmed Hoax Fallacy An Old Argument Raises Its Ignorant Head Yet Again TEMPORAL RECON JUN 8
I was recently invited to write an essay by someone who I respect greatly in their own personal search for truth. He asked that, while an update to Conviction of a Time Traveler is not necessarily in the offing, he did wonder if I might be amenable to a friendly reminder of the evidence provided in COATT nearly a decade ago now.
What spurred his request was that he had noticed recently that several people online had been echoing the ‘confirmed hoax’ trope when discussions would might around to the John Titor series of posts which occurred online back in 2000/2001.
His noticing of this false argument was nothing new; I had also noticed it crop up from time to time over the last 20 years. I hold the ‘confirmed hoax’ argument in special and particular disdain. Why?
Primarily because evidence exists and was provided in Conviction of a Time Traveler in 2009 that Titor was legitimate and, ironically enough, was read by many of the so-called experts espousing the ‘confirmed hoax’ lie. So when these fake experts tell you that the Titor story was a ‘confirmed hoax,’ they are lying to you.
Conviction of a Time Traveler provided new and original evidence that has never, to date, been debunked since its publication; a full 14 years. The evidence provided (which many of these lazy forum participants are aware of) pointed to one, inexorable and inescapable conclusion: Titor was legit. But this evidence, while never disproven, is always ignored. Why is that? We’ll put a pin in that…
Pledge your support
Ironically, not only has the evidence documented in Conviction of a Time Traveler never been debunked, but it has also even been plagiarized by lazy authors who can’t be bothered to do original research or, lacking the intellectual horsepower necessary to do even that, fail to provide appropriate attribution to their source material.
So what of this, ‘Confirmed Hoax’ claim? Is it true? HAS the John Titor episode actually been ‘confirmed’ as a hoax?
When someone in a position of pretend authority declares from their cardboard pedestal that the John Titor story is a ‘Confirmed Hoax,’ have you ever noticed they never provide the person who did the confirming?
“Confirmed hoax?” ‘Confirmed’ by whom, pray tell?
When the term ‘Confirmed Hoax’ is used, what imagery comes to mind? I dare say it implies that some sort of shadowy group of learned scholars sat around a big wooden table, carefully assessed and addressed the claims. All the evidence and counter-arguments were carefully measured while hidden away in some stone castle somewhere until a white puff of smoke curls over its stone-tiled rooftops, declaring to the world once and for all,
“Our confirmation is complete. John Titor was a hoax!”
Bullshit.
Here’s the dirty little secret of the ‘Confirmed Hoax’ statements: they are actually shorthand for,
“I don’t have the intellectual capacity to argue in favor or against, so in order to come off like some sort of authority and maintain my fake position of authority, I’ll just take the safest position and simply declare that the Titor story is a hoax, that it was ‘confirmed’ and let’s please just move on to some other topic.”
‘Confirmed Hoax,’ is a coward’s gambit, a bet, that there won’t be anyone to come along to rock the boat and topple these posers off their flimsy stage of pretend authority.
This was the environment I walked into when I first published Conviction of a Time Traveler in 2010, and apparently, it hasn’t changed in 15 years.
When I first posted on Paranormalis (IIRC) announcing that I had written a book that documented the evidence in favor of Titor’s veracity, the then-reigning Titor authority (‘Darby’) haughtily pronounced, “Present your evidence and we’ll discuss it.”
Share
It was in that moment that I chose a path that nobody before me had ever embarked upon. I said, “No.”
Nobody had ever said ‘no’ before. There are pages and pages of forum posts by people before me who discovered some of the same bits and pieces that I discovered that pointed to Titor’s truth. And they were excited to show what they had discovered! And, owing to their excitement, and unfortunately, their naivete, they excitedly shared their evidence, wrongfully believing that the forums’ leadership was interested in getting to the bottom of the Titor episode.
Little did they suspect that ‘Darby’ and others were acting as gatekeepers of truth, whose sole purpose was to establish and maintain a lid on the narrative that was the John Titor episode. He, and his ilk gaslighted and bullied these poor naifs into silence by using their fake authority to debunk and explain away the very real evidence they had discovered.
That is, until COATT was published.
Unfortunately for these enemies of Truth, the internet is forever. In my research leading up to the publication of Conviction of a Time Traveler, I had the benefit of not only studying Titor’s posts, but also all the follow-on discussions after their departure.
I reviewed literally years of online forum content and, as I did so, I made a very curious observation: in all the years of discussion after Titor departed, not one piece of evidence ever (ever) caused ‘Darby’ or any of the other fake authorities to question their ‘it’s a hoax!’ position. They NEVER saw a piece of evidence that they didn’t dismiss, mock, ignore or explain away with contortions of logic that would make Wetzel’s Pretzels blush. This is in stark contrast to how someone who was truly in search of truth would act.
If ‘Darby’ and the others truly were curious, isn’t this a little odd? Really? Not ONE piece of evidence ever caused ‘Darby’ to pause and say, “hmm, that’s interesting…”
Not once, ever.
And there are years of forum posts to confirm this.
So, when Darby commanded from his perch of fake authority that I ‘present my evidence so that we might discuss it’ I laughed in his face [paraphrasing],
“No. A real discussion of the evidence hasn’t occurred here for years, and I do not recognize your so-called position as some sort of ‘expert’ on the Titor story. LITERALLY EVERYTHING there is to learn, or study, is published in the Titor posts for all to read. You hold no special knowledge, no special position, no special nothing. I do not submit to your fake authority. You want to learn about Titor, read the book.”
Or words to that effect, anyway…
In the end, the evidence provided in COATT was so unassailable and the argument so solid that ‘Darby’ and his ilk suddenly became more and more quiet as they slowly realized I wasn’t going to wilt under their “authoritay.” Eventually, they slinked away with their rhetorical tails tucked.
But this was not the end of the story! Because ‘time travel’ had become quite the pet interest of mine (owing to the further evidence I discovered after publication), that I continued to post online in various discussion forums. I even wrote numerous essays on a variety of topics, all spurred on by the ‘time travel’ question and all its implications.
Fast Forward Fast forwarding to today, we’re back at the ‘confirmed hoax’ argument again. What was once offered up (“HOAX!”) by Darby and others, is now cold soup served by the latest crop of fake authorities. And what happens when fake authority utters the ‘Confirmed Hoax’ discussion-brake? The same thing that happened a decade ago: the earnest neophyte shrugs their shoulders secure in the false belief that others smarter than they have studied the topic and arrived at some irrefutable conclusion; no further discussion necessary (or allowed). They have no idea just how close they came to uncovering something truly fantastic, had they only relied on their own judgment instead of the know-nothing proclamations of others.
Pledge your support
Which brings me to why I wrote COATT in the first place. Instead of simply doing my research and arriving at my own (private) conclusion, I realized that too many people were believing fake authority and ignoring Titor’s warnings about our future. Once I realized that Titor was legitimate (caveated, of course), how could I NOT share my findings? The stakes were simply too high.
IF what Titor said were true 24 years ago, that the world was heading for an upending change in the status quo, and that many people would die as a result of it, how could I remain silent and not inform others that his warnings were something to be listened to? Perhaps people with ears to hear might take heed and make the appropriate preparations. I know I did.
But, as my friend has informed me, it appears that the fake experts have reared their ugly and useless heads once again telling us that there is ‘nothing to the Titor story’ and that it is a “confirmed hoax.”
THIS was the reason that I was recently asked to provide my evidence once again. And THIS is the reason this essay is dragging on. These pretenders to authority are like roaches; as soon as the exterminator leaves, they come out of the woodwork intent on dismantling the Truth once again. God’s work never ends, it seems, even with a 99% success rate…
So, now that we’ve got all THAT out of the way, and as a sort of transition, I’d like to bring you up to speed on what I’ve been up to since I published Conviction of a Time Traveler in 2010.
To be perfectly frank, after COATT’s publication, I thought I was done with the Titor story; I had said my piece and was perfectly willing to move on with my life and prepare for the event that causes the change in the status quo. But the annoying fact was that the Titor story itself didn’t end with the cessation of Titor’s posts in 2001.
As new evidence appeared in the months and years following publication, like dog shit on my shoe that I can’t scrape off, I could never cleanly cleave myself from the Titor story. Not that I wanted to, mind you, it is a fascinating topic, regardless of your opinion.
But what surprised me the most was that new evidence continued to appear, year after year. And, as more evidence appeared, my curiosity was consistently kept piqued and on alert. Trust me, it is exhausting.
To give you a sense of what I discovered, I can tell you that your experts are wrong and that ‘time travel’ is neither novel nor unusual; we are very literally awash in ‘time travelers.’ My research suggests that ‘time machines’ have been present in our past going as far back as 850AD. But I digress.
Share
Suffice it to say that the Titor rabbit hole is but one example of a massively large group of programs from an unknown number of organizations from across time. The ‘time travel’ question runs much deeper (and much farther back in time) and crosses over into more (so-called) esoteric topics than anyone gives it credit for. As I said, it’s exhausting.
My whole point here is that, even after I published in 2009, my curiosity in the topic (and its implications of yet larger vistas) did not wane. And, because of this continued and unabating curiosity, I discovered yet more evidence, crafted more theories and came to more conclusions.
A philosopher once described the acquisition of new information as an ever-expanding circle surrounding the man; a horizon where known and unknown meet where new answers only beget new questions which push the circle farther and farther out. This has been my experience over the last 15 years re the Titor narrative and the larger ‘time travel’ question. How could it be otherwise?
Unfortunately for you, you are being convinced by fools that the Titor episode is a ‘Confirmed Hoax.’ You haven’t even made the leap to the possibility that ‘time travel’ is even possible. How can you explore the implications of ‘time travel’ when you can’t even consider its reality, a fundamental starting point? I have a very strong (ehem) conviction that our collective naïveté on the subject will be violently revoked in the very near ‘future.’
The Two Camps, The Two Mistakes During my research, I observed that within the Titor commentariat there are two basic camps: the Debunkers and the True Believers.
The Debunking camp will provide any contortion of logic to maintain the ‘Titor was a hoax’ narrative.
The True Believers, on the other hand, will believe any contortion of logic that maintains their belief in The Gospel of John.
What if I told you both camps were wrong?
Now, the debunking camp will tell you that Titor must be a hoax because his predictions didn’t come true. Oh, well…his predictions didn’t come true? I guess we’re done then? Obviously, his whole purpose for posting was to make predictions like some Magic Eight Ball, right? And if those don’t pan out, well, ‘CONFIRMED HOAX!’
Get the Book
On the other side of that coin, the True Believers out there, who never saw a confirmation bias they didn’t love, will tell you that Titor’s predictions didn’t come true because he changed the future. This of course is a recipe for explaining away literally any detracting evidence thus making Titor true no matter any evidence to the contrary.
Let’s take the True Believers first:
The concept of Divergence, while a handy explanation, does not/cannot explain all differences in histories away. In fact, were what Titor said was true (remember, we are True Believers for the moment and are taking Titor’s words as gospel) he absolutely must take measures to minimize divergence as much as possible and NOT allow it to span wildly. Otherwise, the entire power of the ‘time machine’ is rendered moot. I accept that Divergence is likely a real measurement necessary for the efficient execution of ‘time travel’ missions, but it should, by no means, be the magic skeleton key to explain away every question.
In fact, while divergence is very likely a real ‘thing’ or artifact or measurement of difference between world lines, the Truth is that divergence must absolutely be kept to a minimum to make any practical use of the gravity engine sitting in the back seat of your old blue Geo Metro.
So, no. Divergence cannot be the handy tool we need to contort ourselves into believing, as much as we might like to.
Now for the debunkers:
The debunkers have a variety of options available to them to argue that Titor was a ‘confirmed hoax.’ Regardless, these arguments typically boil down to two primary classes:
He has special training or knowledge, and/or
He’s just a lucky guesser.
Unfortunately for the debunkers (and those who listen to them), these explanations make a very serious error: that predictions are a relevant metric to judge Titor’s truth at all. They are not.
Serious question: Why should a ‘time traveler’ be subject to the same metrics that a psychic is to determine if his claims of ‘time travel’ are true?
The point here is that you can’t compare a horse to a whale and complain that the horse can’t swim. They are two completely different animals, and the same goes for ‘time travelers’ and psychics or tarot readers or any other domain whose reputation is dependent on the true-ness of the information they provide. Comparing Titor’s predictions to actual, experienced history is also an imperfect and inappropriate metric if one is to objectively assess Titor from a blank slate starting point. This points to a much deeper insight into the true purpose of the Titor posts, but that’s for a different day.
So, because of both these problems, any real researcher worth their salt would have to find some other way to determine the truth/falsity of the Titor narrative.
Remember, when first approaching the Titor question as an objective investigator, Titor is both equally a hoax and legitimate. Imagine Schrodinger’s cat meets Columbo…
I’ll give you this observation for free, just to get your juices flowing:
Did you notice that absolutely none of John’s predictions (event + date) came true, but all his statements concerning conditions about our future did?
Don’t you find this interesting? Or hadn’t you noticed, too blinded by the bright and shiny, attention-grabbing predictions of nuclear war?
But I am getting ahead of myself; we still haven’t provided the evidence that it’s simply more likely that Titor was an actual time traveler than some ‘hoaxer genius.’ And so we finally get to the whole point of this essay in the first place, a reminder and summary of the evidence first provided in Conviction of a Time Traveler all the way back in those halcyon days of 2010:

1. Wireless Internet: Titor correctly predicted the advent of wireless internet when we were still using dial-up modems and America Online. Cable internet connections had only just been introduced.

“My closest friend raises horses and another works for a company that maintains “wireless” Internet nodes.”
– J. Titor, Nov 7, 2000

1. YouTube becoming like ‘live theatre’: Titor correctly predicted the social evolution of YouTube and the decentralization of entertainment away from Hollywood evolving from short videos of grannies and cute kittens on Youtube to a sort of “live theatre” where actual shows would be presented by literally anyone, online, in a world that hadn’t even seen streaming services or video sharing services such as Rumble, etc.

“Yes, there is an entertainment industry. Again, it is very decentralized. The technology to express yourself with video is so readily available that many people do it all by themselves or in small groups. Much of the distribution is over the web. I would compare it theater here.”
-J. Titor

1. IBM 5100 special capabilities: The statement that kicked everything off. Titor correctly identified the secret capabilities of the very first desktop computer manufactured by IBM in the 1970’s. These capabilities were utterly unknown and unacknowledged until Titor’s appearance in 2000. Interestingly, using this information, I was able to determine the most likely candidate of Titor’s grandfather which, upon this identification, also explained why Titor had to go all the way back to 1975 to pick up a copy of the 5100 and not 1985, 1995, or ‘elsewhen.’

“I was “sent” to get an IBM computer system called the 5100. It was one the first portable computers made and it has the ability to read the older IBM programming languages in addition to APL and Basic.”
– J. Titor, Nov 15, 2000

1. VOIP: Titor correctly predicted the development of phone calls being run across the internet, again, in a time where downloading a picture over dial-up took minutes.

“Many people use the Internet for communication and entertainment. I would say that affects our speech. We type very fast.”
– J. Titor, Feb 15, 2001

1. Soldier’s Winter Poem: Titor correctly predicted the poem, by name, “A Soldier’s Winter” and its topic. There is more to this particular prediction and statement about “A Soldier’s Winter“ than meets the eye, however.

“A Soldier’s Winter.”
-J. Titor, Feb 21, 2001

1. Second gulf war: Titor correctly predicted a second incursion into Iraq by allied forces. There is also more to this statement by Titor as well. But that’s a little advanced for right now.

“Are you really surprised to find out that Iraq has nukes now or is that just BS to whip everyone up into accepting the next war?”
-J. Titor, Feb 25, 2001

1. WMD and ‘hype’: Titor correctly predicted that the WMD story was hype and not to be believed (also, there is more to this statement than is visible on the surface). This statement’s purpose is closely related to statements #6 and #9.

“Are you really surprised to find out that Iraq has nukes now or is that just BS to whip everyone up into accepting the next war?”
-J. Titor, Feb 25, 2001

1. Optical Measurement for atomic clock: A biggie. Titor correctly predicted the development of a new sort of atomic clock and the reasons why it was an improvement over the then-current ‘radio’ method of atomic measurement (more precise).

Specifically, atomic clocks determine the length of a second by measuring the frequency of a particular atom. Cesium, Rhodium, etc. Measuring this frequency is done using something called the “radio method” which makes use of a gas and hitting that gas and atom with a microwave (the ‘radio’ part of the measurement). However, Titor claimed that a new ‘time machine’ had been developed that makes use of an optical means of measuring the atom’s frequency, an improvement. The Optical Frequency Comb was developed after Titor’s departure which enabled the measurement of an atom’s frequency optically, and which also allowed for greater precision in that measurement. Titor’s statement is a 3-fer:
He predicts an optical measurement system for atomic clocks.
He predicts the new system measures oscillation and not some other aspect.
He predicts this new system increases measurement precision and not some other aspect.
“The C206 uses 6 cesium clocks but they use an optical system to check the oscillation frequency. This makes the worldline divergence confidence much higher.”
– J. Titor, Nov 7, 2000

1. Ginger: The most enigmatic piece of evidence and what originally spurred me to look closer at this ‘confirmed hoax’ in 2010. In the very opening of Titor’s posts in 2000, someone asked three questions to allow Titor to ‘prove’ he was legitimate. Those questions were:

“1. What was the final death count in the recent India earthquake?

1. What is the "Ginger" (IT) invention?
   
2. Who wins the Stanley Cup (Hockey) this year?”
   

• M. Kolesnik, Jan 29, 2001

As you see, questions 1 and 3 are of the magic eight ball variety and are wholly inappropriate to assess Titor’s truthfulness. But we’ll extend some grace to Mr. Kolesnik as it was so early on in their discourse. And Titor demurred on answering these two questions anyway. He refused to answer the first question because he claimed he simply didn’t know. And he refused to answer the third question because he felt it to be unfair for someone to earn money using his information (pointing to a larger context of rules by which they operate).
But, the middle question, ‘…what is Ginger…’ did not violate either of those two questions so he acquiesced and answered it. He answered by saying,
“It looks like a sort of motorized scooter. What do you think IT is?”
– J. Titor, Jan 29, 2001
This answer immediately got my attention because, in 2000 when the question was asked, the answer was truly unknown, thus Mr. Kolesnik’s question. However, in 2009 when I was first looking into the Titor narrative, I knew what Ginger was because I remembered it. Hindsight truly was 20/20.
As a bit of background, during 1999 (the exact timing escapes me), a ‘viral’ marketing campaign was underway by an inventor named Dean Kamen. While never revealing what this new product was, the billboards merely asked,
“What is IT?”
or
“What is Ginger?”
That was all they said. It is obvious now, and was obvious even then, that Kamen was attempting to create a buzz for his new invention. Fair enough. It also explains why it was asked of Titor in 2000. Kamen’s ad campaign was working! People were truly wondering.
Now understand, the hype (and I use that term specifically) surrounding the Ginger ad campaign was fairly strong. Kamen predicted that his invention would reinvent how people moved about cities; it would cause their utter redesign and how they were laid out and organized. Big claims, to be sure. So strong in fact that Kamen was able to land a spot on Good Morning America where he finally revealed what his invention was.
In December of 2001, and live on the air, Kamen, with Katie Couric, revealed Ginger to the world. Ginger was none other than the Segway.
And what did Titor say it was?
“A type of motorized scooter”
And Stella says there’s nothing more to learn…
Get the Book
Titor’s absolute spot-on declaration of what Kamen’s invention was nearly a year before it was unveiled hit me right between the eyes. Eight years later, I already knew that Ginger was the Segway because I remembered the event.
Here was a maniac on the internet claiming to be a ‘time traveler’ and he correctly ‘guessed’ what Ginger was a mere 2 ½ hours after it was asked and 11 months before it was officially unveiled?
It was Titor’s statement here that caused me to look deeper (much deeper, in fact) into the Titor narrative and, after exhaustive research and extensive supporting evidence, I concluded that Titor was in fact, legitimate.
Now here’s the truly interesting part of this piece of the Titor saga: you can’t find this statement about Ginger online anywhere anymore. It has been scrubbed from online sources everywhere.
Now, when I first discovered the Titor story, I saw that there appeared to be a couple different versions of the posts and I just, by chance, found a version of the posts with the Ginger reference in it. I saw that some versions had the Ginger reference, and some did not. At the time, I did not know how to understand this. But I do now.
Revisiting Old Theories As I mentioned before, hindsight is 20/20, and that is especially true when discussing ‘time travel’ and ‘time travelers.’ So, it seems oddly appropriate to provide a few examples of updated information that only revealed themselves with the fullness of time after publication.
‘leader’ In Conviction of a Time Traveler, I found the following quote especially interesting:
“The President or “leader” in 2005 I believe tried desperately to be the next Lincoln and hold the country together but many of their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power base.”

• J. Titor, Feb 19, 2001

And it wasn’t necessarily the full content of Titor’s statement here, it was those damn quotes around the word ‘leader.’ Why would he put quotes around a word so simple in its definition? In COATT, I surmised that Titor was referring to Obama at the time for a variety of reasons. Namely the very high coincidence factor between facts surrounding Obama and Lincoln. My own belief also was that Titor would not consider Obama as the rightful leader of the United States due to the known problems with his birth certificate, thus making him ineligible for the Presidency. Thus, Titor wrote ‘leader’ with those quotes around it indicating his misgivings.
Of course, here we are 24 years after Titor’s statement and 12 years after I wrote COATT, and I have now come to a different conclusion about the quotation marks around the word ‘leader’. I now surmise that Titor was referring to Biden and not Obama when he wrote that. Because I personally didn’t have a ‘time machine’ at the time, I never could have expected the dementia patient currently ‘in’ the White House and supposedly ‘leading’ the country. For anyone watching, it is patently obvious that Mr. Biden isn’t ‘leading’ anything. So, in the context of this and our current national situation, those quotation marks sure make a hell of a lot more sense now, don’t you think? This reassessment obviously puts a giant bullseye on the 2024-2025 time period for what Titor commented upon in 2000.
So, yes. I have reassessed this particular conclusion since publishing Conviction of a Time Traveler due to the slow passage of time and its equally slow revelation of Truth.
Gates Another interesting comment by Titor had to do with Bill Gates. Recall that in 2000/2001, Bill Gates was ‘merely’ the CEO of Microsoft. He was among the richest men in the world and many news stories of the time commented upon this fact. Almost kind of like Elon Musk’s notoriety in both scope and scale. So, as such, a forum participant named ‘Joe’ asked Titor for any information regarding Bill Gates’ future. Titor’s response?
“This I do know but I won’t discuss.”
-J. Titor, Feb 23, 2001
An interesting, if not completely unhelpful, answer. Wouldn’t you say?
Considering we now know how Gates has morphed from Tech Titan selling mediocre products to Farmland baron, GMO mosquito breeder and mRNA advocate and (alleged) mass murderer in India and elsewhere in the third world, Titor’s statement that he does know about Gates’ future rings true.
In fact, what was also a bit interesting was when someone later pressed him on any information regarding Gates’ future. To which he responded,
Just curious, why is he of such interest?
-J Titor, Mar 5, 2001
Considering what we know now about Gates and his predilections (his ‘wife’ deserted him upon revelation of his visits to Epstein Island), I’m willing to bet that John was naturally curious as to why Gates, of all people, was of such interest to the forum participants that they would ask twice about him. Coincidence? Or did Titor suspect a mole from a different program in the forum? Who knows. His curiosity about their curiosity in Gates is interesting, nothing more.
Conclusion And there you have (some of) it. A summary of some of the evidence documented in Conviction of a Time Traveler written nearly 15 years ago. The evidence contained in that small book has never been debunked or disproven. It has been plagiarized by some and ignored by others. If you were unaware of COATT and are a regular participant in the online discussions about ‘time travel,’ you should ask yourself why the ‘leadership’ on those forums never mention COATT. Curious, don’t you think?
The reason I wrote COATT in the first place was because, after I had done my own research to satiate my own personal curiosity, I realized that some people online were downplaying his posts’ importance in the hopes that they could dissuade people from believing in Titor and the possibility of ‘time travel.’
I saw this dishonesty and decided to fight back against it by merely providing the information I discovered. From my point of view, Titor was warning us about a very severe time in our future that would upend the status quo and was to be a highly dangerous one.
Taken at face value (always a good starting point), Titor’s warnings merited being taken seriously. Had the naysayer’s deceit been left unanswered, how many of you would have failed to prepare for what is just around the corner? You have prepared, haven’t you?
And yes, as is readily obvious to many, those hard times are right around the corner. Looking at Titor’s statements 24 years later and simply looking around at the state of America and the world, do his statements seem so outlandish now?
John’s ‘final’ words to the forum in March of 2001 ring eerily prescient now:
Bring a gas can with you when the car dies on the side of the road.
-J. Titor, Mar 23, 2001
It is my sincerest hope that my small book project (and the essays that followed) spurred you to think twice about the world we live in and take the necessary actions you feel you should to keep you and your family safe for the world’s awakening and rebirth.
As Ever,
Temporal Recon Share
As Ever

I was expecting a red dragon or a red select. However, upon arrival, the pot said Blood Good. The trunk is grafted as well.
I just want to take care of the tree properly. Help please!
Ordered from Plantsome, arrived two days ago (Vancouver, BC, Canada).