Write your name in graffitic

TipOfMyFork

2020.01.08 21:59 Ravdk TipOfMyFork

Want to know what your food is called? Are you searching for the name of that delicious snack from the nineties? What ingredient did your grandma use in her special recipe? Find your food and drinks by asking the community! Please keep in mind this is only for identifying food you like. Mold, Rot, Defects, Mistakes, Safety questions, and food you dislike are for the rest of Reddit.
[link]


2012.02.05 07:54 doginabathtub For photos that are, you know, mildly interesting

Aww, cripes. I didn't know I'd have to write a description. How many words is that so far, like a hundred? Soooo, yeah. Mildly interesting stuff. Stuff that interests you. Mildly. It's in the name, ffs.
[link]


2008.01.25 04:36 Podcasts - discover, discuss, review

podcasts: a subreddit to discover, discuss, and review podcasts with other podcast enthusiasts. As part of this mission, podcasts is curated to promote respectful and on-topic discussions. This is not a place to promote your podcast.
[link]


2024.05.15 16:09 Acrobatic-Rise-766 My life.

Hello, my name is Daunte 17 M nice to meet whoever is reading this. I am warning you if you take time out of your day to actually read what I am saying it will likely be sloppy and not easy to truly understand, but it’s very hard to grasp a whole life of experiences through writing.
My mother abused me my whole childhood, she’d let other men (her boyfriends) mentally fuck with me, because I was feminine. I’m not going into full details, but it was both physical and mental. My father was aware of the abuse, but ignored it and glamorized himself to be a bare minimum father, because he bought me things I wanted, but when I started emotionally acting out he verbally and physically disciplined me instead of getting me help. My mom would look past my abuse, but I remember her talking about my mental and emotional issues to her friends rather than getting me help. I feel like I was failed by everyone, because everyone could notice it even my teacher. I’d always show up to school late with bruises and I was in the 4th grade, I even tried to tell one of my teachers about it but he looked past it weirdly. Everybody in my fucking life recognized I had issues but never did anything. I am turning 18 this year, and my family fight to have this good relationship with me now for some reason, but this grudge feels eternal. When I was 12 I went to a counselor to tell him I wanted to die, instead of sending me to a psych ward or anything like that he sent me home with my mother and took her side as I was to scared to admit about my past nor did I have any visible self harm scars so I just said I was stressed with life. My mother made more of a joke about me, telling me I was faking it. I then vented to one of my friends on my phone and saw and kicked me out. When i told my father I wanted to die he did nothing, fuck I had to schedule my own therapy appointment at 12 that I only went to once, because nobody cared to schedule another visit for me. Everybody knew about my abuse, they knew I wanted to die, and did nothing. My whole family, my grandma, auntie, uncle, took my mother’s side and said I was just looking for attention. I was only 12. My sister has been sent by my mother to psych wards multiple times, and used that as her excuse to not sending me to one. I really don’t know why they cared about my sister more than me, yes she had her own fair share of issues but she got help with them. I never received any psychological help, which caused me to start using drugs to escape my issues. When I turned 14 I would often skip school to use, and my mother instead of helping me just told me I was amounting to nothing. I gave up on school very quick, even though I use to be a straight A student, apart of student council, extemporaneous speaker, and did track, until my issues started to catch up to me. The abuse was still ongoing when I was 14 and I told one of my REACH teachers about it, but we didn’t have enough evidence for him to contact CPS. This large neglect for my health really took a toll on me. My only escape for awhile was my friends, but funny thing is they just made jokes out of me as well, I was small and skinny so I was usually the bud of the joke or the one they slapped around. I never understood why I was treated the way I was until I stopped pitying myself. My last time going to therapy I told her I heard voices that weren’t there and she gave me a book to cope. That was the last straw. I realized how truly sick everyone in my life was and let my anger get the best of me, I cut off my friends, verbally abused my parents till the little relationship we had was diminished and completely socially isolated myself and figured out my issues by myself. Truly this was the best thing I’ve ever done as I bought my own car by myself at 16 with NOBODYS help but a slight loan from some dude whos a family friend (which I payed off quickly) and am graduating early and attending college for polici science and philosophy. My family has made attempts to create a relationship with me and I have put on a fake facade to make them think they have, but truly they could all fucking die and I could not care less. That might sound awful to say. I know. But I mean it in a sense of dis-acknowledgment rather psychotically. One reason I am making this post is, because yes I am stable and independent but I still can’t escape this anger. I am filled with memories and trauma and I feel like I will never fully heal. I can’t help but feel like I could make it big but still be rooted in this pain and just lose it. I am not looking for engagement or pity, again I just needed to chaotically write something as I felt it would be healthy. If you read all of this thank you and I’m sorry if I hurt your brain. I can’t even fit all my issues into one post or I’d be here all day. I always still feel like a child no matter how much growth I have had. I am always alone now and my only hope is that I can get a decent profession and make end meets. I am proud of myself for still being here, but I can’t help but feel like I’ll be alone forever. Surviving SA (I am not getting into because it doesn’t matter), abuse, neglect etc makes me feel as I will never make friends or relationships, because I can never be fully stable without these things haunting me. I do have hope though not gonna lie, I know others have it worse and survive to tell the tail which only gives me aspiration rather than some complex of foreshadowing my issues, because they don’t compare to some others. If you’re reading this, your issues are valid no matter how big or small and your feelings truly matter. I wish somebody told this to me before so I’m telling this to you. No matter how evil this world is, it is truly a gift at the end of the day and I know we can all soon live life to our fullest potentials. Thank you for reading and I apologize for the sloppiness I just wanted to do this for a while as I felt it would be therapeutic.
submitted by Acrobatic-Rise-766 to offmychest [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 16:07 routbof75 If you left GEO, check your paystubs

I’m writing this as a sort of public-service announcement to any ex-GEO members who went through the process of leaving GEO, namely:
1) Notifying GEO leadership and/or your department stewards, AND
2) Filling out HR’s form to cease union due deductions.
I did both in early October. However, I noticed today that union dues have been deducted from my pay stub since February.
I contacted HR and it turns out that GEO sent over erroneous member lists in January/February that included my name.
Beyond the fact that HR shouldn’t be discarding my own written consent form because a third party asked them to, it seems that GEO - for whatever reasons I may like to speculate - are transmitting false information to HR on members, and having dues deducted from non-members
Check your paystubs.
submitted by routbof75 to uofm [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 16:00 Ok-Pianist1211 S2E8: "The Viscount Who Loved Me"

I am gobsmacked that season 3 comes out tomorrow. I have had such a blast writing up these rewatch recaps. For anyone that's curious, I'm watching all four episodes when I wake up tomorrow morning (probably around 7AM EST), then heading to lunch to debrief with my cousin before we rewatch a second time.
This is my absolute favorite episode of the series. I've watched it so many times, it's just such a great finale. So, I say this begrudgingly, thank you to Jess Brownell for writing such an excellent episode. If you keep up this energy in seasons three and four, I will gladly eat my words.
"The Viscount Who Loved Me" finds the Bridgerton family recovering from the fallout of Eloise's scandal, Kate recovering from her injury, and the final ball of the season, hosted by the Featheringtons.
Benedict appears for the first time in this episode when he arrives at the Danbury House, his valet having noticed Anthony carrying Kate inside. He asks Anthony if he's alright, and you can really see his concern for his brother. When Anthony says everything is his fault, you can clearly see the look on Ben's face change, and I just love Luke T in this scene.
We see Benedict again in the Bridgerton drawing room, a week having gone by, strewn over his favorite chair, next to Eloise as he sketches away. When Anthony enters, making demands, Ben looks a bit irritated with his brother, especially as he begins to berate Colin, declaring "he is one and twenty, Brother." Anthony dismisses him, saying, "Keep to your doodling," clearly offending Ben, before he leaves along with the rest of the siblings.
Also, non-Benedict related comment, but I never noticed that in the scene where Footman John drops off the parcel with the hidden message inside from Theo, Eloise's dress has a distinct floral pattern on. So I apologize to Theloise truthers, but even in a scene involving Theo, there are obvious signs pointing to Sir Phillip.
We don't see Ben again until about twenty-two minutes, where Ben is happily painting Tessa when Rupert walks in, calling Ben's work "remarkable" and his best yet, before saying that the people at the Academy assumed he'd be "all drink and no paint." Suddenly Ben's confidence washes away, as he asks Rupert to clarify what he means. Rupert admits to Benedict that Anthony has made a large donation to the school, which ultimately secured him a place. He says he thought Benedict knew, but we all know he did not, and you can just see the pain in his face as he realizes he did not in fact get into the Academy based on his skill, but rather based on his last name and the financial support Anthony gave. This would have taken place right after Benedict rattled off his "what is it truly to admire a woman," poem, Anthony having responded, "you should apply yourself more often, Benedict." I often wonder if Anthony had wanted Ben to do exactly that, and apply himself, recognizing his brother's potential, and made the donation so Ben would have the opportunity. But, regardless, this absolutely shatters Benedict's confidence in himself as an artist, and is likely the catalyst for his journey in season three.
Also, more floral patterns on Eloise's dress during the "break up" with Theo.
And we have the swing scene, Benedict approaching his sister looking rather worried for her, obviously knowing of her scandal. He says, "you seem to have the melancholy of heartbreak about you," and Eloise fires back "what would you know of heartbreak?" Benedict kind of scoffs, replying, "I would not, really." We all know what this is: Benedict is probably just eight-ish episodes away from having his heart shattered in a million pieces if I had to guess. This conversation is just so great, both siblings feeling like imposters, both wanting something more out of life and feeling like it's been taken away from them. Benedict tells Eloise that when looking at a Bridgerton painting, one feels "disappointment" and "lack of inspiration." He is, of course, describing how he currently feels about himself. He's disappointed in the fact that his art skills did not get him admitted to the Academy, and is no longer feeling inspired because of that. Perhaps he just needs a muse? I think it's likely he will find that muse very soon, and his underlying story next season will probably revolve around that "lack of inspiration." But, aside from all this, we do have a really lovely moment between these two siblings. I wonder if they will be more at odds next season because of Eloise's friendship with Cressida, or if we will be blessed with more swing set scenes.
Benedict is next seen arriving at the Featherington Ball with Anthony, Violet, and Eloise, looking like he really does not want to be there as he bites his lip and walks off. He then returns, nudging Eloise in the arm, saying, "Steady." Eloise looks to Violet, replying, "And ready," the two walk off, Benedict smiling as they go.
Benedict appears again after Penelope runs off, having heard Colin's words for her, encountering Anthony. Benedict tells him he's leaving the Academy because of his donation. Benedict admits to Anthony that he knows he was trying to help in his own "misguided way," before telling him that he believes Anthony did it because he recognized that Benedict just wasn't good enough. Anthony tells him, "If you want to paint, paint. It is one of your many talents, chief among them your natural girl for seeing what others need, even when they cannot see it themselves." He admits it has taken him too long to realize it, and Benedict brushes off the compliment, his confidence lost entirely, and tells Anthony to enjoy the rest of his evening. This is how the season is wrapping up the kind of back and forth between the brothers, where Benedict is constantly reaching out to Anthony, and Anthony is dismissing him. Finally it's Anthony who is reaching out, telling Benedict he is essentially sorry for not realizing sooner that Benedict was always seeing in him what Anthony himself didn't even realize. But now Benedict is shutting his brother out, in a switch that may give Anthony room to help his brother through this dark period next season.
Finally we see Benedict in his studio, closing his box of art supplies (with four fingers, leading to the season four theory), effectively closing this chapter of his life.
Benedict appears in the epilogue, playing pall mall with the family and Kate after they return from their honeymoon. Six months have gone by. He looks distinctly less happy than he did for most of the second half of this season, part of him missing, but he does smile at Newton running off with Anthony's ball. He grins at Daphne as they watch Anthony so in love, laughing a bit when she declares it means they are cutting out. Benedict makes his last appearance this season, walking off as Anthony and Kate hold up the pall mall game, pleased that his brother has finally found true happiness.
And thus concludes our Benedict-centric rewatch of seasons one and two. His ending is rather sad here, having given up the Academy, which made him so happy throughout this season, but we have a rather good idea where we'll find him in season three. Hopefully he will find his muse when he is least expecting it, but we know he's feeling unconfident and beaten down by the fact that his admission to the art academy was not based on his talent. Colin's travels and Anthony's marriage will likely leave Benedict feeling like he has nothing at all. As Bridgerton likes to beat down their leads before their season begins (Penelope got a one-two punch in the finale, as her friendship with Eloise ends and then she overhears Colin saying he would never court her), so I expect Benedict to be kicked down rather effectively in the season three finale. It will be sad to watch, but worth it knowing what's coming.
I'll probably be muting both this sub and the main one tonight so I don't see any spoilers before I finish season 3 tomorrow morning, but I hope you have all enjoyed going on this ride with me. I'll see everyone tomorrow, when we have more Benedict to analyze!
Best Benedict quote from this episode: "Imposter party of two?"
submitted by Ok-Pianist1211 to Benophie [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:59 SweitzerCJ Holding your kid back a grade?

So, I'm in unique situation and figured I'd ask random people on the internet for advice, since we don't fit into many of the boxes you usually see with this question.
Backstory- We adopted two kids from a foreign country 2 years ago. English is not their native language. At adoption my son E (age 6) and his sister C (age 8) could not count to ten, say the alphabet, or write their names (In their native language). Covid basically cancelled two years of school for them, so E never had any formal education (he was in "kindergarten") and in C's 3rd grade class they were learning to color. When we returned to the US, We enrolled C in 3rd grade (She also has a learning disability and an IEP) so she's a year old for her grade but she's doing great. E we enrolled in 1st grade. We started the school year in the US late, and his first year was mainly spent learning to speak English. They've also been receiving outside bilingual tutoring.
So basically E (now 8 yo in 2nd grade) is having to learn K-2 all in this year, and its been rough. My wife and I are considering holding him back a year, because he cannot do 2nd grade level work without lots of support. His testing scores show he's learning at the same rate as the other kids, but since he started so far behind he is still in the bottom 5% overall with his standard scores. He reads at a kindergarten level in English. He's embarrassed in class (tries to hide his papers and scores) and while we've tried very hard to encourage him for working hard and rewarding effort and not results its been rough for him. He behaves very well in class, is not a distraction to others, and socially gets along well.
Our concern is that E will continue to get passed through the system and never catch up and the school will just say its because of his background. If he can spend another year reinforcing 1st and 2nd grade concepts he might be able to succeed in school instead of us all having to do so much work to get him to below average. Studies show if you're going to hold a kid back do it as early as possible. Studies show holding kids back can cause some pretty big emotional and social problems. Studies show for ELL learners repeating a grade can be pretty helpful. The school strongly recommends advancing him the 3rd grade, but in our district its a parent decision. They say that since he is learning they will continue to teach him at the level he's at with in class small group support, etc etc, and that other kids without his background are at similar levels so he'll be fine.
Anyone have any experience holding your kids back? Or being held back yourself? Should I crosspost this to r teachers or something?
submitted by SweitzerCJ to Parenting [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:54 LongjumpingGap1636 akashic codes ..

akashic codes ..
akashic codes..
 morning, beautiful 🥰 
so you're aware of my love of words .. a lifetime logophile and enthusiast of etymology, I know in my heart that 'words mean things'
having spent years building and retaining a vast vocabulary, it is my humble opinion this exercise simply makes one a happier, smarter and wiser individual, if gor no other reason it allows one to properly share ones thoughts and desires without confusion or misunderstanding
as well, this gift allows one to render far more adept at making critical decisions and choices, due to ones ability to tap into deeper understandings of the varying nuances an obstacle may proffer whilst one is deciphering best overall outcomes
there are many multiples of languages .. dialects, colloquialisms and cultural ways of speaking and writing .. and even those multiples are multiplied tenfold when you add in the time in history they were shared
were they spoken only by the shaman of the tribe? were they art forms carved into stones or were they heiroglyphs inked into fabrics and onto parchments?
however today, let us focus on one of the most important of all languages: the wordless languages where the lights and colors are the methods to communicate events, wisdoms and even dangers
where sounds of song, knocks, grunts, barks and howls are the methods of communication .. where rhythmic intelligence is chirped throughout the jungle or beautiful, vibrational love songs of a oceangoing mammal are sung into the deepest waters of the oceans to her mates and children
even the biologics on earth know and use this vibrational language
and each sound, color and frequency has a name .. ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🤍 the Light itself has a name .. and the way the Light speaks
 the language of Light what is Akashic Code ✨ Light Codes 
it is the harmonic vibrations which emanate from the many universes, the deepest corners of space and throughout the history since before time was recorded or heard by man; indeed before the ancients arrived here and began to watch over our earthly home with us for millennia, long before we arrived
also known as the akashic sounds, this frequency is sung from the heart of the universe into your heart, from the stars into your soul, seeping into your very dna with all its knowledge, wisdom and mysteries .. the mysteries of the mystic the mysteries of our past, our present and our future
seemingly sung with words unknown by human ears, your chakras listen and react to these codes 🔥 your cells absorb the healing sounds, colors and energies embedded with everything they need to know
like musical manna to your lightness .. your true self, your light body ✨ these codes feed and nourish your body and soul with truth, honest emotions ❤️ bathe you in love and with a kindness unknown in this human world
when you listen to the light codes .. the akashic records .. feel the warmth of the colors and the depth of the sounds, be still 🙏 clear your mind and remain in a safe place .. absorb the energy and drink in the colors, sate your appetite for intelligence with this literal food from the gods ❤️‍🔥 as you listen to the clicks, repetitive chants and fast tones softened by choruses of what, I M H O, reminds me of native indigenous, tribal songs .. sung by the spiritual souls at the fireside celebrations and told the stories of old
multidimensional shapes will appear and geometric symbols will be recognized by your ancient light being 💥🌈🕊️🌹
peace to you today as we continue our journey into this mystic together and gain in our ascent up to the stars and back to our ancestral home 🌸
keep your Eyes Wide Open and your Heart Filled with Love ❤️ 🪷🥳
 all my love, always 💋 
submitted by LongjumpingGap1636 to SpiritualAwakening [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:54 LongjumpingGap1636 akashic codes ..

akashic codes ..
akashic codes..
 morning, beautiful 🥰 
so you're aware of my love of words .. a lifetime logophile and enthusiast of etymology, I know in my heart that 'words mean things'
having spent years building and retaining a vast vocabulary, it is my humble opinion this exercise simply makes one a happier, smarter and wiser individual, if gor no other reason it allows one to properly share ones thoughts and desires without confusion or misunderstanding
as well, this gift allows one to render far more adept at making critical decisions and choices, due to ones ability to tap into deeper understandings of the varying nuances an obstacle may proffer whilst one is deciphering best overall outcomes
there are many multiples of languages .. dialects, colloquialisms and cultural ways of speaking and writing .. and even those multiples are multiplied tenfold when you add in the time in history they were shared
were they spoken only by the shaman of the tribe? were they art forms carved into stones or were they heiroglyphs inked into fabrics and onto parchments?
however today, let us focus on one of the most important of all languages: the wordless languages where the lights and colors are the methods to communicate events, wisdoms and even dangers
where sounds of song, knocks, grunts, barks and howls are the methods of communication .. where rhythmic intelligence is chirped throughout the jungle or beautiful, vibrational love songs of a oceangoing mammal are sung into the deepest waters of the oceans to her mates and children
even the biologics on earth know and use this vibrational language
and each sound, color and frequency has a name .. ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🤍 the Light itself has a name .. and the way the Light speaks
 the language of Light what is Akashic Code ✨ Light Codes 
it is the harmonic vibrations which emanate from the many universes, the deepest corners of space and throughout the history since before time was recorded or heard by man; indeed before the ancients arrived here and began to watch over our earthly home with us for millennia, long before we arrived
also known as the akashic sounds, this frequency is sung from the heart of the universe into your heart, from the stars into your soul, seeping into your very dna with all its knowledge, wisdom and mysteries .. the mysteries of the mystic the mysteries of our past, our present and our future
seemingly sung with words unknown by human ears, your chakras listen and react to these codes 🔥 your cells absorb the healing sounds, colors and energies embedded with everything they need to know
like musical manna to your lightness .. your true self, your light body ✨ these codes feed and nourish your body and soul with truth, honest emotions ❤️ bathe you in love and with a kindness unknown in this human world
when you listen to the light codes .. the akashic records .. feel the warmth of the colors and the depth of the sounds, be still 🙏 clear your mind and remain in a safe place .. absorb the energy and drink in the colors, sate your appetite for intelligence with this literal food from the gods ❤️‍🔥 as you listen to the clicks, repetitive chants and fast tones softened by choruses of what, I M H O, reminds me of native indigenous, tribal songs .. sung by the spiritual souls at the fireside celebrations and told the stories of old
multidimensional shapes will appear and geometric symbols will be recognized by your ancient light being 💥🌈🕊️🌹
peace to you today as we continue our journey into this mystic together and gain in our ascent up to the stars and back to our ancestral home 🌸
keep your Eyes Wide Open and your Heart Filled with Love ❤️ 🪷🥳
 all my love, always 💋 
submitted by LongjumpingGap1636 to FollowMeIntoTheMystic [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:45 Oderus667 Escort inquiry leads to death threats

OK, so...I was in the mood for some company last Friday night, decided to call an escort, got in touch with one, then pulled the plug because she started putting off a heavy scam vibe. No money or deposit sent, and I thought that would be that. Am I a reckless, horned-up idiot? Yes. But I'm not a total idiot. The next day, I got a super angry text (from a Nigerian number) saying I wasted his girl's time and I owe him $1200. Of course, I blocked and deleted. The next day I got an even crazier text demanding that I pay, along with an extremely explicit death threat against me andmy family, along with a photo of two beheaded human heads. Super disturbing and now - pissed at behavior, deleted and blocked the scammer again.
And today (three days later) I get this: "Greetings I’m writing to you to tell you that yesterday you were talking to my girl and I lost a lot of money for your game I’m Tony Gonzales boss and proletarian of the dating house which you wanted to be with one of my girls and you only played I have your information and everything about your family we’re going to solve this in a good way that’s why I communicate with you you owe me 2500 you can pay everything or something until I finish the payment you decide how we do it on the phone or in person"
(The use of the word "proletarian" was pretty amusing, actually.)
They called my cel at the same time they texted this, and then listed my name and address. So naturally, I will keep deleting and blocking until they hopefully go away, but shit I'm not gonna lie this has been a little rattling. Again, I know I was impulsive and reckless, so I consider it a lesson I definitely needed to be taught.
submitted by Oderus667 to Scams [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:44 Saspurillah Non-religious talking to a Catholic Professor about his faith.

Hi all,
First, this is a long post, and for that I apologize. I have a lot on my mind I’m trying to process right now. I’m also a creative writing minor, so I realize this will come across as a story.
I attend a fairly conservative college where most of the students being Christian. I myself am not religious, and due to the environment I try to keep that fact to myself so as not to be rude or disruptive. Some people do know about my lack of belief, and I’ve had mixed responses from them when they learn. Some want to convert me, others are rather nonchalant about it.
The reason I am writing is because I recently had a conversation with one of my literature professors that has left me wondering how I should respond. The conversation started after I asked him a follow up question to something he mentioned about the Bible: “That it’s the greatest story about the human condition humanity ever told.” For context, he’s been a Catholic his entire life.
My follow up question to him after class was this: “But if it’s just a story, why should we believe it, especially when there seem to be so many contradictions within it?” This tends to be my first question when someone makes a claim about the Bible, and it is born partly out of curiosity (I genuinely want to know why, as no Christian I’ve talked with has given me a good answer to it) and partly as a challenge, as I don’t want to see him wasting his life worshipping something that isn’t true. Perhaps this is not the best motivation, but it is what sparked my question.
He didn’t answer right away, but when he did this is (roughly) what he said: “My favorite story is William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury. I think it, while being fictitious, presents a deep understanding of human nature. I read it to understand the characters, and, by understanding them, hopefully learn a little bit more about myself and others in the process. Does it matter if it is true? Depends on what you mean by true. If you mean it in the sense of “this actually happened,” then you will be disappointed by a lot of literature. But if you mean it as “this reveals an important quality of human condition,” then I think it is very true.” He then chuckled and added, “Your question reminds me of a quote one of my professors told me when I was a student: ‘Everything in the Bible is true; some of it actually happened.”
This surprised me, as this is the first time I had really talked with someone who didn’t take the Bible (specifically the creation story) literally. I clarified with him to make sure I understood him correctly, and he affirmed what I said.
I probed him a bit more about that, asking if the fact that it was written by humans makes it less trustworthy. Why should we place so much faith in something that was written by mere men? I figured he would say something like “God wrote the Bible,” as that is what people I know have said.
He paused again and thought. His eventual response was this (if I recall correctly): “I have two reasons for why I believe in the Bible, one reason for believing in God, and one additional reason for why I am Catholic. The first reason for why I believe in the word of the Bible is because I think it is written by God. Unfortunately, that isn’t the most convincing reason even for myself, as why should I believe it is written by God? This leads to my second reason, which is that I simply find the story of the Bible presents to be the most beautiful and brilliant work to ever exist. I have spent years studying the intricacies of the Bible simply because I find its underlying themes and its story of human failure and promise for redemption to be gripping and compelling. Shakespeare doesn’t even come close, in my opinion. If it’s not written by God with human hands, then I don’t know what is. But this still is built upon believing that God exists, so let’s go to why I think that.
"The way I see it, faith is a natural part of human life. It is impossible to find a functional person who doesn’t trust something, and trust is one of the pillars of faith, so similar in fact that I view it as faith. If everything in the world is man-made and artificial, without divine influence, I think at the very least I would still choose to believe in the word of the Bible because I find it the most beautiful thing in the world. A large part of the reason I believe in God is because I think it is natural to have faith in something. If I am going to have faith in something no matter what, I want my faith to be in something beautiful, intellectually rigorous, and good for humanity.
“This leads into my reason for being Catholic, which is in large part it is because I think it presents the most holistic, beautiful, and practical theory for human success. Everything it teaches is geared toward human success, both individually and socially. People might disagree with what the Catholic Church defines as “human success,” but I think the Catholic Church is onto something.”
I asked him to elaborate, and he explained how the Catholic Church (if I understand correctly) places great emphasis on God’s first two commands to Adam and Eve: “Be fruitful and multiply.” “Multiply,” he explains, “sounds like what it says: make more humans.” This is not to say every male and female should hook up, but rather that we as a society should be concerned about the “continuation of our species.”
This command is to be taken hand in hand with the next one: “Be fruitful.” Making lots of babies isn’t the point--the point is to make lots of “good” humans. What does he mean by ‘good?’ “That,” he shrugs, “is where a lot of people disagree. I myself am not entirely sure how to describe ‘good’ humans, but I’ll try. I could say ‘love’ is the measure of a 'good' human, but even there people disagree with what ‘love’ is. I think love, however, is fundamentally about willing the best for the other, to the point of being willing to lay down your life for that person. An enduring society that produces those types of people is one that I would say is a good society, and I think people who take the ideals of Catholicism seriously and live them out as intended are the most likely to do that.”
I asked him about the abuse that the LGBTQ community has had to endure at the hands of Christians, and how the Catholic Church does not recognize same-sex marriage and calls those people sinners. I also asked about how denying abortion access to women is loving to them. He winces at this, and says this in reply: “A lot of people say and do terrible things in the name of Jesus and 'love.' The Catholic Church’s official teachings do not say we should be cruel to LGBTQ members or to women who have had or want an abortion. Unfortunately, people are people and people are often hypocrites, many without realizing it. When it comes to the LGBTQ community, the Catholic Church does not say ‘being homosexual is a sin,’ it says that homosexuality is a disordered desire. The ‘sin’ comes from acting on that desire, as the Catholic Church holds that all sexual acts should be reserved for the opposite sex as a unitive and potentially procreative act within the security of monogamous marriage between a man and a woman. This goes back to “be fruitful and multiply:” Sex is so very pleasurable because it is extremely important for reproduction, which is what all life, in general, tries to do. Since the sexual act has been shown scientifically to significantly rewire the human brain, shouldn’t we try to be as careful as we possibly can be with it and make sure it is used for its intended purpose: to make babies? That is part of the Church’s practical reasoning for why homosexual acts (and extramarital and non-unitive sex) are not to be encouraged or endorsed by the Catholic Church.
"Many Christians, unfortunately, forget the lessons of the Gospel stories of the woman about to stoned and the woman at the well: those two woman were isolated and outcast from their homes for their sexual acts; one of them was about to be killed it. What happens to these women is intended to be viewed as unloving. Jesus, however, befriends them despite them ‘objectively’ sinning. He never endorsed their behavior, but he still treated them with respect and love. Even if people today might argue those women did nothing wrong, the point of those stories is that Jesus considered them ‘sinners’ and yet he loved and befriended them anyway. That is literally what Jesus was doing in every city he went to: Spending time with the people who were considered terrible sinners, not because he agreed with their actions but because they are human and thus deserve to be loved. I think Christians today too often forget that is the core message of the Jesus' teachings: to love one another.
“As for abortion, the Catholic Church’s position on that rests upon our emphasis on the inherent dignity of human life. The Catholic Church believes human life begins at conception. Operating under that view, abortion is murder and should thus be strongly discouraged and/or condemned. Personally, I think it should still remain a decision between a woman and her doctor, as the doctor is the only one with the medical expertise necessary to accurately say when an abortion is actually necessary to save the woman’s life. That, however, is a tragedy, and it is one the Catholic Church acknowledges is an unfortunate situation of ‘abortion is necessary to save a life that would be otherwise lost.’ Doctors need the confidence and ability to make difficult decisions without fear of being punished for it. That means there is a risk of abuse and malpractice, but that is the nature of trust.”
We were running out of time before he had to get to his next class, so I asked him one last question that was on my mind: “Can the existence of God be proved?”
He chuckled at this. “Some of my colleagues will likely disagree with me on this, but I personally don’t put a lot of stock in ‘proofs for God.’ I haven’t found one that convinces me, and I believe in God. I think they do a good job of suggesting God exists, but proving He exists? I don’t think so. I don’t think it’s possible to prove God’s existence to someone who doesn’t already believe in God. I think the most we can do is show is why belief in God is not illogical—that’s the role of apologetics. But I can’t say, with absolute certainty, that I am right. That’s part of why it is faith: We might be wrong. If we are wrong, then ‘we are of all people the most pitiable.’” (I had to look this up afterward, as he made it sound like a quote. He was quoting Paul’s letter (1 Cor:15-19) talking about what it means if Christians are wrong about their faith. It seems he was applying this quote to all people of faith who are wrong.)
He gave me an example of what he means by ‘impossible to prove:’ “Think of your paper for this class. You, hopefully, are writing about something that you think is true. You are speculating at what the author meant, at how the author thought, why the author wrote the book or scene the way he or she did, or any works or events that likely influenced the work you are studying. Can you know for certain that you are correct?”
My answer: “No. But I can find evidence for it that shows I probably am.”
His reply: “Exactly. It is the same way with God. I don’t think we can prove God definitely exists the same way you can’t prove, with 100% confidence, that your paper’s thesis is correct. I think there is a lot of evidence that suggests God does exist, but I can’t prove it. Belief in God is inductive, and therefore inherently uncertain. This is how the Catholic Church also understands “Natural Law” and “Moral Law.” We can’t really prove either of them exist, we just have a lot of evidence gathered from observing the world and humanity that we think strongly suggests a natural and moral law. Apologists are the ones in charge of showing how our teachings and beliefs on these subjects are not inconsistent and intellectually bankrupt to hold.
“One last thing, to explain what I mean by ‘lots of evidence for God’s existence.’ Imagine we were to find Van Gogh’s The Starry Night out in the woods. I can’t prove that someone painted it, but I think a strong case can be made that someone did paint it. I might go so far as to argue it is obvious. That’s how I tend to view the world and the universe: one giant painting made by God by means of scientific laws and evolution.”
At this point he had to leave for his next class. He thanked me for the conversation and asked if I was still able to make it to cigars this Friday to celebrate the end of the term. I told him yes, and that I will probably have more questions and that I hope he didn’t mind if I asked him. He said he did not mind.
So that leads me to here: I have never had a conversation with a person of faith like this before. Almost every response he had appealed to an intuition that he seemed fine with not everyone sharing. He's also the first Christian I've met who says he doesn't think God can be proved and doesn't seem bothered by that. I suppose my question for you is: What should I ask him? What should he clarify?
submitted by Saspurillah to atheism [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:40 MrHellride Don't Get Bit by the Hostgator.

A friend and I are looking for a new host. He linked me to a PC/Mag list where they have a recommendation for Hostgator. They claim that you get unlimited disk space (untrue). They have removed a lot of access through Cpanel. Such as you can't increase your file size upload. They add on charges arbitrarily without notifying you, and if you don't keep up with your card charges they get away with it. They won't refund the money that you shouldn't have been charged. They flood your email with special offers. They make you have a 6 digit pin, (I've had my same pin since 2012 and there was no reason to change it). They only allow 2 back ups, so if you have 4 domains, you're out! After you get your first back up, the second back up will never complete. Trying to send an email from Hostgator is horrible since many clients won't let an email from Hostgator through due to all the spam that comes from them. They updated their website and have removed many names of domains and replaced them with numbers that you have to write down. All the services are listed with these numbers so you don't really know what you have or what they are trying to charge you with. The prices have been removed and replaced, "Renew now" buttons. All in all Hostgator is crap.
The reason that we are looking for a new host is that I just cut the apron strings with Hostgator, and he didn't know I had been using them for the past 12 years.
submitted by MrHellride to webhosting [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:35 kronmatron Entropy: Decay of Dreams

🎵Vortex- Carbon Based Lifeforms
I don't want to be a tasteless person, but I wasn't surprised enough to have my mom make a trembling-handed cake for me on my birthday. Okay, her body hasn't collapsed yet, she can still manage her affairs, but it will collapse.
I never had any problem with "this moment". Either the future is coming to me, or I'm going to it. Even in the darkest times of the past, I was young and full of hope, so the present is bright, but the future is completely dark... Whenever I think about the future, my brain short-circuits.
I wish my mom, especially my mom, could stay strong enough for us to argue, because I hadn't accounted for her aging. I woke up after the Parkinson's diagnosis. Now it bothers me again, but I can't say anything. I'm aware that there is an old and sick person in front of me. My attitude has changed now. The problem is, my attitude has changed towards everything; it has changed, or I haven't noticed over time. I've become a middle-aged person who constantly emphasizes respect and love in conversations.
I'm overly affectionate and overly respectful; yes, that's very nice, but it's also the most obvious sign of my aging. When delivery drivers are late, I don't get angry. I say, "It's okay, darling, what matters is that you come and go safely." I'm tolerant in traffic. I had an accident the other day. The shopkeepers helped together, and I was deeply moved. Then I revised my affairs in a way that could help more small businesses.
I have few but valuable friends. We don't argue, but if we do, I say, "You're my ... year friend, my brothesister. I'm really sorry if I hurt you." They do the same. In the past, we would hang up on each other and not call each other for a while. Now everyone is aware. Time is short and valuable.
The worst part is my attitude on online forums where I occasionally write. Sometimes I enter the forums of groups I like to feel young and write nonsense. Young people swear at me, I can't swear back. Then I say, "What am I doing here?" and leave, and go back to my own forums about theosophy, literature, work, etc. I guess they don't want us anymore...
As for love. That's over. I can't take anyone seriously enough to fall in love. Yes, a human being is a ladder rising to God, but if they've climbed as much as I have, we probably don't meet. They're probably all introverted like me, not communicating with anyone. The others are after physical pleasures; they have weaknesses, fears, devilish qualities... I also have a brain that can analyze quickly. Even if I admire someone at first, my admiration fades very quickly.
My longest admiration was for a rock star named Jack White. I tried a little hard to maintain my admiration, just to find inspiration. I realized he was extremely unpleasant after my analysis. Just an ordinary talented person. There are no virtuous qualities. That's over too.
These days I've gone back to the past. I listen to Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, and so on.
When Cornell died in 2017, I wasn't very aware of what was going on because I was depressed. Besides, grunge was very out of fashion. A few months ago, I could realize that Eddie Vedder was alive but aging, but it had a very bad effect. All the songs left in my ears found meaning. The bad part is, he's 60 and botoxed, but he's still in my head like in '92. I was 8 in '92, these guys were big brothers, and their music was very boring. Now I realize that the boring music was the anthem of my youth.
Oh, my sister Merich is experiencing the same awareness. When we get bored, we watch all the live concerts of Pearl Jam in '92, '93, '94... that we found on YouTube and have fun together. And then there's always the same question in our heads, "Did Jill convince Eddie Vedder to botox?" and the same joke, "If Chris saw these botoxes, he would commit suicide again..." We laugh. Then a cold wind, a brain tingling about time...
You've been stuck in the '90s for 3 hours, now it's 2024... You're 41. This girl you laughed with, your sister, is 46... The guy who crowd-surfed at the concert is 60... Your mom will call soon, she's 76... Your dad's blood pressure is high, he's 79...
We're dying badly... But not just like that. We're dying pretty fast and entropy leaves no room for love.
I looked at new terms, except for "sapiosexual", they've made up interesting terms like "noetisexual" for people like me. I don't know what I am, if I solve it, I'll be enlightened anyway.
The hell with terms. I'm a human being, just like everyone else, a victim of entropy. I'm obsessed with entropy. Let them come up with a term for that. Let them make a flag too. Asexuals have a flag. Let's have our flag too.
submitted by kronmatron to u/kronmatron [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:23 Icy-Lunch-1204 [Task] AI for historical fiction creation

Hiii!💞 Searching for someone to help me(for pay ofc) create a custom chatbot for novel writing and Character creation. Recently while messing around with YesChat AI, I found this one that created a character and storyline based on your features. I was hooked and ive been trying to teach a few bots to create storylines resembling a mix of my favourite novels and ideas but sadly their memory systems arent capable of remembering the theme for a prolonged period of time and due to the restrictions in language usage arent able to create very vivid overviews of the characters. I have a wide range of materials(all PDF, sorted by name) that I've already put together that include my favorite books, authors, themes, eras, historical context, narratives, writing tips and other archivebased texts. (Some examples: D. H. Lawrence, Gustave Flaubert, Charles Bukowski, Virginia Woolf) Thank you!
submitted by Icy-Lunch-1204 to slavelabour [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:08 WhatCanIMakeToday Operational Efficiency Shares: Rehypothecating 🐇🐇🐇🐇 And Breaking Free Of Chains [WalkThrough] (4/n)

Operational Efficiency Shares: Rehypothecating 🐇🐇🐇🐇 And Breaking Free Of Chains [WalkThrough] (4/n)
From the prior DD in this series [1], we know that ComputerShare can “give” the DTC registered DSPP shares to hold onto for operational efficiency which are then “given back” as shares beneficially owned “for the benefit of” (“FBO”) DSPP Plan Participants at ComputerShare, as illustrated in this diagram:
From The Prerequisite DD
It’s time to explore what “operational efficiency” benefits may be gained by DSPP shares going around this roundabout. At first glance, shares are basically just going in a big circle from DSPP Plan Participants with registered ownership DSPP shares at ComputerShare heading to the DTC, who hands shares to ComputerShare’s broker who maintains those shares for the benefit of ComputerShare who holds those shares for the benefit of Plan Participants. While I think it’s unlikely that shares just go around in a big fat circle for no reason, I do remember people getting onto flights to literally go nowhere a few years ago [CNN, NYT]; so maybe these operational efficiency shares simply miss hanging out at the DTC?
Let’s look more closely… While title is held by a registered DSPP Plan Participant, ComputerShare is giving the DTC possession [1] of registered DSPP shares to the DTC to hold for operational efficiency which then ultimately end back in the possession of ComputerShare’s broker (who isn’t lending out shares) for the benefit of ComputerShare for the benefit of Plan Participants. If we treat the DTC’s operations as a big black box, we see registered shares going into the DTC black box and beneficially owned shares coming out of the black box to ComputerShare for Plan Participants.
DTCC Black Box: Inputs vs Outputs
Investopedia says that shareholders have rights, with a list of 6 main rights including:
  1. Voting power on major issues.
  2. Ownership in a portion of the company.
  3. The right to transfer ownership.
  4. Entitlement to dividends.
  5. Opportunity to inspect corporate books and records.
  6. The right to sue for wrongful acts.
By contrast, beneficial owners only need to have or share 2 of those rights (bolded) according to the definition of beneficial owner in Rule 13d-3: the power to vote and the power to dispose of the security (e.g., sell).
§ 240.13d-3 Determination of beneficial owner.
(a) For the purposes of sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Act a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares:
(1) Voting power which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such security; and/or,
(2) Investment power which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security.
ComputerShare basically confirms this list (except for the right to sue as that’s probably not one their issuer customers would emphasize) and adds that beneficially held shares may be lent by brokers generally (but not by ComputerShare’s broker).
Registered Shareholder Rights vs Beneficial Owner Rights
Maybe you’ve had different experiences from me, but I’ve never known Wall St to deliver more than the bare minimum they’re contractually obligated to. Which means the DTC black box is very likely watering down shareholder rights from the 6 that go in down to the 2 which come out. (And yet, we’re supposed to believe that all shares are equal. 🙄)
Dividends (#4 on the list) [2] may be the clearest example of a watered down shareholder right. Registered shareholders have the right “to directly receive share dividends” [CS FAQ] which means if a company (e.g., GameStop or OverStock) issues a dividend, registered shareholders have the right to directly receive the dividend as issued. If the company issues a crypto dividend (as OverStock tried to do), registered shareholders have the right to directly receive the issued crypto dividend. Beneficial shareholders would get an issued dividend, if available, or a cash equivalent if not. Historically, stock and other dividends to beneficial shareholders could easily be delivered as a cash equivalent, a watered down form. Crypto dividends don’t scale well with shorts (both naked and legal via, for example, share lending and borrowing) because crypto tokens are unique which makes it abundantly clear why a crypto dividend was nixed for a heavily shorted idiosyncratic stock like GameStop; especially given GameStop’s particularly active shareholders.
Ownership (#2 on the list) may be the second clearest example of a watered down shareholder right as more security interests to shares exist in the DTC’s beneficial ownership system than there are shares; with the SEC saying beneficial shares get a pro rata interest in the securities of that issue held by DTC. [See End Game Part Deux: Problems at the DTCC plus The Bigger Picture, particularly the section “The Pie Is Shrinking: Get Out (And DRS) While You Can”]
Voting (#1 on the list) is also an example watered down shareholder right; this one having a long history on this sub with, for example, BroadRidge tossing 7B votes and bragging about it. (Beneficial owners only need to get shared voting rights per Rule 13d-3 above so those 7B “shared” votes just lost out to who they shared with.) Unlike other beneficially held shares, voting rights for DSPP shares are not watered down as ComputerShare sends registered holders their voting forms.

Operational Efficiency Shares, Whatcha Doing In There?

A big black box is a pretty good description of the DTC which does not want us to know the ins and outs of what’s going on. Black holes are a pretty good example of a big black box and, most importantly, we know a lot about black holes even though they can’t be directly observed. Just as we learned about black holes without direct observation, we can similarly learn a lot about the Operational Efficiency shares even though we can’t directly observe them in the DTC habitat.
Even though we can’t look inside the DTC’s big black box, it turns out we don’t really have to in order to identify some benefits from these operational efficiency shares taking their roundabout trip to nowhere.
Locates A few commenters have suggested that OE shares could be used for locates so I’ll address this first. Possible, yes. But I don’t view this as the most interesting use for OE shares. Brokers are supposed to “locate” securities available for borrowing before short selling. [Wikipedia)] Basically, before selling short a broker is supposed to find a source to borrow. The “locate” requirement does NOT require the security to be borrowed before short selling which can result in a legal naked short.
You may be wondering why I don’t view “locates” as particularly interesting for OE shares if short sellers need to locate shares to borrow before shorting. Well, market makers are also exempt from this requirement as long as they’re market making. 🙄 On top of the market maker exemption, remember House Of Cards? In House Of Cards 3 [SuperStonk], we learned about the now 🤦‍♂️ hilarious F**3 key **- yeah, the one on a keyboard. Brokers like Goldman found the locate requirement simply too much work so they would press the F3 key and their system would auto-approve the locate requirement based only on the number of shares available to borrow at the beginning of the day; regardless of whether those shares were still available to borrow or not.
House Of Cards 3
Meaning as long as there were some shares available to borrow at the beginning of the day for their share copying system, brokers could just smash the F3 key to make as many copies of shares as they need. Even if only 1 share was available to borrow at the beginning of the day, a broker could simply smash the F3 key 100 times to approve the locate requirement for 100 shares.
So while OE shares could be used for locates, they wouldn’t need many shares each day to make an unlimited number of copies - even just 1 is enough.
Lending shares on the other hand…
Rehypothecation Rehypothecation is the reuse of customer collateral for lending. Per a 2010 IMF Working Paper, The (sizable) Role of Rehypothecation in the Shadow Banking System,
Rehypothecation occurs when the collateral posted by a prime brokerage client (e.g., hedge fund) to its prime broker is used as collateral also by the prime broker for its own purposes.
This IMF paper defined a “churning factor” to measure how many times an asset may be reused; and then estimated a churning factor of 4 noting that it could be higher because international banks (e.g., HSBC and Nomura) were not sampled. This IMF paper found a single asset may be lent and borrowed 4 times, or more; an average which could be higher globally.
https://preview.redd.it/ymr3j03zri0d1.png?width=795&format=png&auto=webp&s=1555314cefd520658a4f78dc4745867063e3bf34
Churn Factor Could Be Higher Globally
How much higher? We may have seen a churn factor as high as 10 for a less idiosyncratic meme stock per my prior post, Estimating Excess GME Share Liquidity From Borrow Data & Churn Factor. Presumably, the idiosyncratic meme stock would have a higher churn factor (but not that important for this post).
More recently (2018), the Federal Reserve published this Fed Note on ​​The Ins and Outs of Collateral Re-use studying how often collateral is reused (i.e., rehypothecated) for Treasury & non-Treasury securities [3] with a beautiful figure illustrating how “for any given moment in time, one security can be attributed to multiple financial transactions” where a share could be posted multiple times through Security Financing Transactions (SFTs) and sold short. [4] Sounds familiar, right?
https://preview.redd.it/zsztmji4si0d1.png?width=1530&format=png&auto=webp&s=f222dfe50929f668af8f8f0b39514a7d862db9c9
Figure 6c of this Fed Note shows a Collateral Multiplier over time illustrating how “PDs [Primary Dealers] currently re-use about three times as many securities as they own for non-Treasury collateral and seven times as many securities as they own for U.S. Treasury securities”.
AKA \"Money Multiplier\"
The Fed Note describes their Collateral Multiplier as a “money multiplier” (Seriously, I couldn’t have made this up in a million years.),
In a sense, our Collateral Multiplier is akin to a "money multiplier," as it compares private liabilities created by a firm with the amount of specific assets held to create those liabilities. [​​The Ins and Outs of Collateral Re-use]
And, of course, the Collateral Multiplier aka “money multiplier” ratio goes up when there’s less collateral available and down when there’s more collateral available. (Can I get one of these multipliers?)
Intuitively, we expect the ratio to increase when collateral is scarce and to decrease when collateral is more abundant.
Which means Primary Dealers [Wikipedia has a list of familiar names including Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Nomura, BofA, Citigroup, TD, UBS, and Wells Fargo; amongst others] can simply kick securities around a few extra times (e.g., with SFTs and short sells) to effectively multiply the amount of money and/or collateral they have any time they need it. (Within limits, I hope…)
Thus, rehypothecation is a very interesting use of Operational Efficiency shares from ComputerShare as various primary dealers can simply “multiply” the number of shares they have – a concept that we’re already quite familiar with. As rehypothecation, short sells, and securities financing transactions are all perfectly legal, rehypothecating more GameStop shares provided to the DTC via operational efficiency satisfies Ground Rule #2 [defined in (1/n) in this series],
  1. All parties involved are all generally attempting to operate within the bounds of the laws and regulations wherever possible. (I know we often scream “crime”, but why break a law when money can simply [re]write laws to make activities legal. Regulatory failure is the reason why something that should be criminal, isn’t. And regulatory failure happens when armies of lawyers are paid to create and exploit loopholes so that actions which should be criminal, are instead legal.)
We can update our conceptual model to include rehypothecation to more clearly illustrate how Operational Efficiency shares held in the DTC can be rehypothecated (e.g., with SFTs and short sells) until a watered down share is delivered to ComputerShare’s broker to hold FBO ComputerShare, who holds the watered down share FBO DSPP Plan Participants.
https://preview.redd.it/bt3gnx99si0d1.png?width=4764&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b0b72b935f740e8a3036f88e1a4e1dfb57dd46c
You might notice from this illustration that ComputerShare has been telling the truth satisfying Ground Rule #1 [defined in (1/n) in this series]. Neither ComputerShare’s nor their broker lend or need to lend shares. All the rehypothecation happens “upstream” amongst other DTCC and NSCC Participants until shares are finally delivered to ComputerShare’s broker at the end of the “Churn Chain”. ComputerShare has made no representations about what the DTC can or can not do with the shares in their possession. And, realistically, ComputerShare is in no position to make any representations about what happens within the DTCC system – ComputerShare is only responsible for themselves and, to some extent, their broker.
The Fed Note and IMF paper found assets may be churned and reused 3-4 times (overall market average) which means the end of the chain is typically around D3 or D4. (If my prior DD estimates are correct, there were signs a less idiosyncratic meme stock may be churned up to 10 times ending the chain at D10 which suggests a potentially longer chain for GME, the idiosyncratic meme stock.) If there is no collateral reuse for an asset, the chain would have zero length meaning Operational Efficiency shares go straight from the DTC directly to ComputerShare’s broker. (Programmers almost certainly understand zero length chains very well – go find one if you need an explanation.)
GameStop is idiosyncratic, thus atypical. Per the IMF paper, collateral reuse increases when collateral is scarce and decreases when collateral is abundant (quoted above). If we consider GameStop investors have been direct registering shares (i.e., DRS) and registering shares (e.g., DSPP) thereby removing title and/or possession of shares from the DTC/DTCC/Cede & Co, then GameStop share availability has been becoming more scarce and the “Churn Chain” for GME should be longer than average representing a higher collateral multiplier and churn value.
While we may not know the exact length of the Churn Chain for GameStop shares, we can pretty well surmise that it’s not a zero length Churn Chain where there is no collateral reuse based simply on scarcity. After all, a shortage of available shares is, by definition, required for any short squeeze (including MOASS). Requests by brokers to enable Share Lending [5] is another example indicator that GameStop shares are scarce.
In addition, according to Investopedia [6], “Banks, brokers, or other financial institutions may navigate a liquidity crunch and access capital by rehypothecating client funds” and we’ve seen indicators showing us banks are in deep trouble:
The downside to rehypothecation is the higher leverage increases risks of default and a single collapse can start a chain reaction knocking down others like dominos.
There are also leverage considerations that increase that risk of default. Overleveraged investments often face covenants; when specific conditions are met, trading accounts may receive a margin call or face debt default. As a row of dominos fall after a single collapse, a single margin call may cause other debts to fail their account maintenance requirements, setting off a chain reaction that places the institution at higher risk of overall default. [6]
This risk for rehypothecation sounds exactly like what the Options Clearing Corporation was complaining about to the SEC when the ​​OCC Proposed Reducing Margin Requirements To Prevent A Cascade of Clearing Member Failures [SuperStonk] early 2024. If the OCC can eliminate margin calls, then no dominos get knocked down. (Thankfully, apes have done a phenomenal job in convincing the SEC that this OCC proposal is a very bad idea. Support the SEC’s rejection of this as Simians Smash SEC Rule Proposal To Reduce Margin Requirements To Prevent A Cascade of Clearing Member Failures!)
Most importantly, it may be tough to regain possession of an asset when someone in the rehypothecation chain defaults. Remember from the prior DD the expression about possession: Possession is nine-tenths of the law.
Clients must be aware of rehypothecation as it is technically their own assets that have been pledged for someone else's debt. This creates complicated creditor issues where an investors shares may longer be in their possession due to their custodian's default. [6]
We know assets are rehypothecated 3-4 times on average, GameStop shares are scarce, banks are in trouble, stock loan volume is skyhigh, and the risks of rehypothecation are real. So it’s pretty clear that rehypothecation is happening generally with pretty darn good reason to expect GameStop’s Churn Chain is at least of non-zero length (i.e., GameStop stock is being rehypothecated).

Breaking The Chains

While some may like chains and being tied up, I’m not one of those apes. Especially as a Churn Chain waters down my shareholder rights and may make regaining possession of DSPP stock difficult in the event of a cascade of defaults, as warned by the OCC. (If you like chains, feel free to skip this section.)
As it turns out, we don’t need to know exactly how long the Churn Chain is for GameStop stock. Simply knowing a Churn Chain exists with non-zero length means there is a chain. Where there is a chain, it’s possible to break the chain. (Even if you don’t know how much health) your enemy has in a game, you still try to take your enemy out. Right?)
A churn chain that starts from ComputerShare holding DSPP shares in DTC for operational efficiency can easily be broken as “[a]n investor can, at any time, withdraw all or part of their shares in DSPP book-entry form and have them added to their DRS holding”. [ComputerShare] See also [7]. Quite possibly one of the easiest chains in the world to break as the Churn Chain is weak to DRS. Simply DRS the DSPP shares to take away the head of the chain and the rest of the chain falls apart. (And, DRS-ing "street name" shares cuts chains into pieces too!)
One side effect of breaking a Churn Chain is that all shares attributed to transactions in a broken chain (e.g., SFTs and short sells) need to be reallocated to other chains, effectively making other chains longer and increasing the risks from a default.
Analogy: Think of the shares as a deck of cards. If you deal 52 cards to 4 players (A, B, C and D), each player gets 13 cards. Each stack of 13 cards is basically a Churn Chain. But if you take out a stack by removing the bottom card from A and distribute the remaining 12 cards from A to B, C and D then B, C and D each now have 17 cards. If at any given time a card can cause a player to lose the game, it's better to have fewer cards than more. And, the players who get out early won't lose.
Any party in the Churn Chain who defaults will make it hard for the original owner to regain possession. Longer chains include more transactions and more parties so there’s more risk of default on longer chains than shorter chains. Thus we see another vicious cycle setup where incentives are aligned such that DSPP and beneficial shareholders may want to avoid the impending default and rehypothecation risk from their shares being held in DTC. In order to avoid the impending default and rehypothecation risks, shareholders are incentivized to Directly Register shares to ensure having both title and possession. (Shares held in “street name” have little or no protection from rehypothecation risk and simply registering shares in DSPP doesn’t guarantee possession [1].) As with the other vicious cycle, any remaining shareholders in DTC share a shrinking pie of diluted ownership so it is in their best interest to get out and DRS; thereby shrinking the diluted ownership pie even more which is more reason for remaining shareholders to get out. These vicious cycles will eventually leave few, if any, remaining shares at the DTC for beneficial shareholders. Nobody knows what will happen if this ♾️🏊 happens.

Footnotes

[1] If you haven’t already, please read the prerequisite DD in this WalkThrough Series to understand how ownership of property is separated into two concepts: title and possession. [See, e.g., StackExchange] Understanding the differences between title and possession are particularly important here where it’s worth being extra careful identifying how an entity is in control of an asset.
  1. DSPP is technically different from DRS [WalkThrough] (1/n)
  2. Definitely DIFFERENT "DRS Counts" [WalkThrough] (2/n)
[2] Dividends have been heavily discussed on SuperStonk with many DD posts, including for OverStock and the precedent OverStock set which would have allowed GameStop to issue their own crypto dividend, possibly as an NFT.
[3] Footnote 16 of the Fed Note itemizes various classes of non-Treasury collateral which includes equity which, per Investopedia, is a synonym for stocks.
[4] While short selling is pretty well known, Security Financing Transactions (SFTs) may be more obscure despite discussion of them in the past so here’s some historical SuperStonk links for you (where you may notice some well known OG DD apes):
[5] Simply search SuperStonk for share lending. Don’t make me Google That For You.
[6] https://www.investopedia.com/ REMOVE_FOR_AUTOMOD terms/r REMOVE_FOR_AUTOMOD /rehypothecation.asp
[7] Withdrawing whole DSPP shares into DRS seems to make a lot of sense as doing so guarantees possession. Selling fractionals, less so. If you intend to keep buying, I would think adding to the fractionals to later withdraw whole shares makes more sense. As for the concern about fractionals tainting the whole account, I’ll cover that in another post. For now, you do you.
submitted by WhatCanIMakeToday to Superstonk [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:05 nobodysgeese Three's a Crowd

Originally for TT: Sunlight, where we were challenged to write a story in the universe of another writingprompts author
Set in the universe of 'Perry the Parasite of a Perilous Planet', a SEUS serial by Zetakh
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4
When I woke up, there were three voices in my head, one more than usual.
"Ow," said one thought. That was probably my mental voice, since it matched the throbbing lump on the back of my head. It turned out that alien rocks hurt just as much as those on Earth, which I honestly shouldn't have been surprised by.
"Your nanobots are stemming the bleeding. A foreign object remains embedded in your head. Medical treatment recommended." I recognized the voice of Alfred, my implanted AI.
"Oh dear, is that red stuff supposed to stay inside? I assumed the... leakage was natural." And there was the unknown voice, speaking with a level of confusion which immediately frightened me.
"Al," I thought at him. "My head is crowded."
"Skull fractures will do that," he reminded me. "Your brain is compressed at the moment."
"Oh, are those supposed to be one piece?" The strange voice asked, and apparently Al heard it this time, since my headache instantly became worse as he turned on our anti-intrusion countermeasures. The voice continued, "I'll just move that thing there, push a bit on that, and-"
A flash of blinding pain, then blackness.
When I woke up, two voices were arguing in my head, neither of them mine.
"...don't just play around with brains! Humans need those! If Mike dies, I'll hit you with such a nanobot swarm that your constituent atoms will never find their way back together again."
"Mike will be fine! Probably. Besides, what kind of guest would I be if I couldn't heal a piece of carapace?"
"It's a bone, you anatomical nitwit."
"Ow." Yep, that was still my mental voice. The throbbing was gone, although the constant ache was hardly an improvement, especially when it was joined by a burning pain on my face. Feeling rather like a third wheel in my own head, I still interrupted them. "Al, how long was I out?"
"You were unconscious for forty-two minutes, Mike, but then someone immediately put you back to sleep for another three hours and twenty minutes."
"I fixed your skull. You're welcome!"
I winced as both their voices seemed to have an echo to them, each armed with a pickax and trying to mine directly out of my temples. "I get the head pain, but why is my face on fire?"
"This planet lacks both an ionosphere and an ozone layer, and orbits an unstable solar body-"
"The sun's very, very hot here, and you've been laying in it! Apparently, your body's covering doesn't like that."
The most pressing question finally came to my addled mind. "Who are you?"
"I'm... I don't have 'names', but I'm here to help."
"It is an unidentified parasite-"
"Symbiote!" the voice interrupted.
"-parasite," Al repeated. "It entered through your head wound, grew tendrils through your brain, and is using direct neural stimulation to speak with you. I am preparing nanobot countermeasures. It is currently burrowing towards your face as well."
As Al spoke, I stopped feeling my face. It was a nice break from the sunburn, but raised sudden, new worries at the same time. "I think it got there."
"I did!" Came the perky voice. "Some horrible person put these long, stringy things up to your skin which were hurting you, so I got rid of them!"
I was still trying interpret that when Al asked, "Did you disconnect Mike's nerves?"
"Um... what's a nerve?"
"He needs those, reconnect them immediately."
The pause was deeply worrying. At last, it said, "They didn't seem that important, and I was really hungry."
"...Activating nanobot swarm."
"Wait! Give me one moment and I'll..."
As I fell back into unconsciousness, I only hoped I'd wake with the same number of body parts, and approximately the right number of mental voices.
submitted by nobodysgeese to NobodysGaggle [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 15:01 ibid-11962 More Murtagh Questions [Post Murtagh Christopher Paolini Q&A Wrap Up #5]

As discussed in the first post, this is my ongoing compilation of the remaining questions Christopher has answered online between August 1st 2023 and April 30th 2024 which I've not already covered in other compilations.
As always, questions are sorted by topic, and each Q&A is annotated with a bracketed source number. Links to every source used and to the other parts of this compilation will be provided in a comment below.
The previous post focused on the essence of the Murtagh book and character. This installment will cover additional Murtagh-related questions, such as about specific elements of the writing process. The next post will cover the writing and publication of Eragon.

Further Details about Writing Murtagh

Creating the Maps
For Murtagh I did all the maps after writing the book, but that's because I already knew all the locations and was familiar with them from writing the series. So I didn't need to do the maps before writing the book. [12]
What is your system for drawing maps? I usually start by thinking of what I want a location to look like. And that has nothing to do with a map. That's usually just thinking about how it will serve the story. And then the map will be based off of that. The biggest decision is usually what the style of the map should be, whether I want to do like a top-down city map for a place, or if I want it to be a more of a realistic image. So more of, let's say, a landscape painting, one could say, or if I want to do something that's more allegorical and evocative or symbolic, which there's actually one of those in Murtagh that really isn't a map, but it's a symbolic map, let's put it that way. And all of that is governed by what is the effect I hope to achieve with the reader. Because if it doesn't achieve the effect I want, then what's the point of doing it. I do try to avoid maps where I have to draw every single building if it's a city map because that's just annoying. I'd rather draw mountains than cities. [12]
I love the sort of top-down look, which is why I drew the the original map for Eragon in this style. [12]
Maps are an awesome thing, and they add so much to a world. And that's why I love drawing them, and I love finding them in books I'm reading. And it's also why I make such an effort to draw and paint maps for my own books. [12]
Favorite Parts
What kind of scenes do you enjoy writing most? I really empathize with the characters, so I find it difficult to write scenes where they experience difficulties. I like to write scenes where people wonder about the world, or where the story reaches a climax. With Murtagh, for example, this is the confrontation at the end of the book. Or the fight with the big fish, Muckmaw. There are also quiet moments that I enjoy writing. Again in Murtagh, when Silna – the werecat child – kisses Murtagh's head, that was a very special moment. I like to write things that have meaning and that requires context, so you have to build up to moments that are meaningful, both for myself as a writer and for the reader. [23]
Do you have a favorite moment in the book between Thorn and Murtagh? I have a couple of them. There's a moment after the encounter with Muckmaw when they exchange true names that I quite liked. The end of the Gil'ead sequence. Thorn has an appearance at the end of that sequence, which was rather dramatic. And then right near the end of the book, Thorn gets a crowning moment of awesome, one might say, to use internet speak. But Thorn really, he comes through in a pinch, and I just loved writing that. [32]
What was your favorite scene or moment that you wrote for Murtagh? I'd say the last chapter, and I'm not gonna say why, but I think it's obvious. There's a scene with a creature named Muckmaw, which I quite enjoy. Not just the confrontation with Muckmaw, the aftermath in the water. I was reading Blood Meridian at the time, and I think that influenced my descriptions. And there is a point in the story where something is renamed. And that was a very meaningful scene for me. Also, there's a werecat in the book and I love werecats. They're so much fun to write. [34]
What is your favorite line you've written? The first line I wrote for Murtagh before I had anything really for the book, I thought it was going to be the first line of the book and it ended up being partway through the first chapter, and it was "A man with a dragon is never truly alone." Which since he's an outcast the whole theme of being alone or not alone is kind of relevant. [33]
My favorite good/bad line from Murtagh is: “The water was like liquid ice.”.. . . Yeah, yeah. I know. But you understand what I meant! And that’s the point of writing. Ahahaha!* I didn't notice! just imagined really cold water Can’t tell you how many times I stepped into the Yellowstone River and thought: “This feels like ice! But liquid.” [T]
Providing Context
In the acknowledgments section you said you owe your agent some sushi? Yes! I bet him a sushi dinner, an expensive new York sushi dinner, that I could keep Murtagh under the length of Eragon. And I got close. The first draft was one hundred and sixty eight thousand words long. Eragon is one hundred and fifty six thousand words long. And I figured well I usually drop about ten percent of length in editing, so I thought I'd do that. The problem is I hate over explaining things. I know that sounds incredibly hypocritical based off what I've actually written, but because of my experiences of over explaining things, I've really tried to not do that as much, and so I wrote the book assuming that someone had read the Inheritance Cycle and remembered it. So I didn't explain what a lot of things were because I assumed the reader knew. And my editor came back and said "Christopher, I know what you're doing, but you can't do that. Because someone might pick this up without having read the Inheritance Cycle. And even if someone read the Inheritance Cycle, it's been twelve years. So provide a little context." Well, that ended up being thirty-three thousand words, give or take. So now we're at one hundred and ninety eight thousand words, so I owe my agent a sushi dinner. [17]
It's always interesting to me to see how people do their first chapters in a series. Because I always feel like chapter one is like "previously on..." It's funny. I wrote my latest book with basically no callbacks or explanations of established information. After four books and a million published words, you kind of think people have it under their belt. And my editor came back and she was like, "It's been eleven years since the last book, even if people are fans of the series, you got to give them a little more." So usually when I write a first draft, it drops by about 10% in editing. And with that book, it went up by 33,000 words, which all of it was basically context, which was interesting. So that was a first for me. I'm a kitchen sink author, so I throw everything in and then I usually cut back during editing. [33]
I would love to write books that are more around the length of 100,000 to 150,000 words. Like that's a good, solid length. That's where I was shooting for with Murtagh, but for some reason my editor kept asking me to add more and more stuff so we ended up close to 200,000 words. [1]
Final word count of Murtagh is 198,983 words. So my editor had me ADD about 34,000 words to the book over the course of editing/revising. Ha! That's a first. [T]
Gil'ead Sequence
Interesting choice to break it up into the sections of each city. Just the section in Gil'ead is basically a novel on its own. There's a full arc in Gil'ead that would be a normal size novel for any other writer. I nearly split it into two volumes, actually, there. But my editor said, "no, don't do that". The funny thing about Gil'ead is that actually was not in my original outline. The whole sequence. And the reason is that, for me, I was envisioning a much shorter book. And the whole thing was going to be them going to the village and dealing with Bachel. So let's get to the village as quickly as possible. So we'll just have a chapter or two at the beginning of getting the information. Well, storytelling 101, you can't make it easy for the character. So having Murtagh just be able to go get that information somewhere, find it out, just felt too easy. Also, I kind of locked myself into a little path because the first chunk of the book is reworking the short story from The Fork, the Witch, and the Worm. And at the end of that, Murtagh does not have the information he needs. So he can't get it from the people he interacts with in that chapter, which if I were writing Murtagh as a complete standalone, I could have considered that. So then I thought, "well, he'll go to Gil'ead and we'll have a really quick thing there. And he'll get his information." I started writing it the way I originally envisioned. But again it was too easy. So it was like, "OK. There needs to be a challenge here. What else is going on? How does it tie into my larger world and story?" And it does. There's some unresolved storylines there, but it does tie into the larger stuff I'm going to later. And then it was half the book. Seriously. At the end of the following chapter, right after Gil'ead, is almost perfectly 50% through the book. I'm sure everyone's heard of the three act play, but there's a competing theory of storytelling, which I'm actually very fond of, which is the five act play. So you have two acts at the beginning, two acts at the end, and then your middle act, and then you have an act in the middle. And in that middle act, you have a tipping point where your character sort of sees what they need, or sees what they can become. They ultimately see their own solution to their problems, but then the rest of the back half of the story is them grappling with that solution, coming to terms with it. And that actually worked, it was not intentional, but it worked out perfectly with the structure of this book. The structure of this book is also directly inspired by some of the structuring that I did in my sci-fi novels and I carried some of it back into Alagaësia. [11]
In regard of Murtagh or any other part of your work, what's the most intense moment for you during the creative process when you are in the midst of writing a novel? A lot of it is intense. I'm gonna divide it into two sections. The creative process itself, in the sense that where I'm creating the story and the characters and the world. In this case, of course, the world was pretty much in place, but in the outlining phase, I should say, that's a lot of fun. There's some pressure in the sense that I know if I don't get it right in that stage, that no matter how well I write the book, it won't hang together particularly well for the reader. So there's strain in that sense that I really want to get it right. But I wouldn't say there's any real pressure, because there's no deadlines at that point. I'm not actually writing the book. During the writing itself, there's definitely strain and intensity in wanting to get it right and do a good job of writing each individual scene and chapter and storyline. And sometimes that can get difficult, especially if I feel like I'm not really getting where I need to get in terms of the effect on the reader. I had that in a couple places in the first draft with Murtagh. One was with the character Bachel herself, who was quite different in the first draft. And then another one actually was the whole Gil'ead sequence, where my original idea for that sequence is actually what happens now in terms of the werecat kittens and all of that. And then I second guessed myself and thought, "well, maybe that's a little cheesy. Maybe I won't have a ticking clock element to that sequence. So I'm just gonna not have that, but he'll still have these various adventures in order to earn this information from the werecat Carabel." And the problem is it removed any sense of tension from that sequence. So I ended up having to rework a lot of the Gil'ead sequence to reintroduce that element, bring in the tension and make it all work. But both of those things happened in the second chunk, which I was gonna say is revision. And revision and editing tends to be the most intense part of the process, because at that point we're usually under deadline. We've committed to a release date and things are happening on the business side of things, that are sort of like unstoppable forces. The ticking clock in the real world. And that tends to be the most intense part because it's not that I can't do the work, I always can and I always am able to get where I wanna go. I'm not stressed about that, it's just instead of having two months to do something, now you got to do it in two weeks, and oh hey, you got a new baby you got to take care of at the same time. And that's what makes it really intense. [19]
One of the things that I loved about the very first half of this novel is that it is a quintessential RPG action adventure. Because poor Murtagh gets pushed and pulled willingly and unwillingly in the strangest directions. Yeah, he's on the series of fetch quests. It's funny. I've had a bunch of people react differently to that. I've seen people who kind of hate it and really love it, and a lot of people who say, "Well, Christopher's just writing out his D&D session". I literally have never played D&D except for my recent trip down to the Authors in the Dungeon down in Utah. So I don't play D&D. I have no one here to play it with. The only RPGs I've ever played are Skyrim and the Mass Effect series. My logic with that sequence was there was a whole lot we needed to see about Murtagh's back history without rehashing the Inheritance Cycle, without actually going back and rewriting scenes from his point of view. And just doing it all in flashbacks and dreams gets a bit tedious. On top of that, originally that sequence wasn't in the book I was going to write. I was going to start with essentially the opening. And then we were going to go to Nal Gorgoth fairly quickly in the book. But it just made it too easy. No one's going to give them the information for free. There's always a price attached to information. There had to be difficulty in getting it. And then once I was digging into that, I was like, okay, how can I use this to show some aspects of Murtagh's character, and then how will that then get reflected in the second half of the book? And how will that let me inform what happens in the second half of the book? And I really enjoyed that stuff. Muckmaw was a particular favorite of mine. [32]
Thorn
One of the things that we get a lot of in this book that was really wonderful after reading Inheritance, was Thorn's-- we don't really get his POV, but we get some POV through Murtagh of him. I think he only has one line in the entire Inheritance Cycle. In the last book. And we get a lot of him here. And we get a very different Rider-Dragon relationship between him and Murtagh versus Saphira and Eragon. What was the process of crafting that relationship to be similar in its like magical quality, but also different in the fact that they had a very trying kind of hatching? Well that was the key right there. I wanted it to feel different while still maintaining the sense that they'll back each other up no matter what, which they have in the past. That's an important part of that. But Murtagh is kind of a difficult personality himself. Thorn, as we see in the book, of course, had a very, very difficult upbringing under Galbatorix and then later on. And that leaves scars. That leaves marks. So trying to find a way to reflect that in the relationship without having them also just be at each other's throats, because they're not. They are being supportive. But at the same time, it's perhaps an overused word these days, but they have trauma that they are having to battle. [11]
One of my favorite things is the relationship between Murtagh and Thorn--they’re such a lonely duo, but it allows the book to kind of delve into that dragon/rider bond in a new way. What sets their relationship apart do you think? Murtagh and Thorn were joined under the most difficult of circumstances, and that shapes their interactions in a thousand different ways. Their relationship is more, ah, thorny than Eragon and Saphira’s, but they also still love each other and would lay down their lives for one another, should the occasion demand it. I found their interactions really interesting to write. Also, it felt important that I didn’t directly replicate Eragon and Saphira’s relationship. Murtagh and Thorn are very different beings, and readers should see that. [15]
What is the relationship between Murtagh and his dragon Thorn? Thorn's egg hatched when they were imprisoned by King Galbatorix. The two friends have been tortured and manipulated. They retain many traumas. They care deeply for each other and are closely bonded. But their relationship is more difficult than that of Eragon and his dragon Saphira. [4]
Claustrophobia
I definitely got choked up with just Thorn and his claustrophobia and how it was written, how it was handled, everything surrounding it. Out of pure curiosity, do you or do someone you know have that kind of claustrophobia that you were able to speak to about? No. A large part of the act of writing is the act of imagination, just like with acting. But even though there's no one in my life who suffers from that, when I'm writing Thorn or anyone who might feel that, I do my best to feel what they're feeling, which is why when writing scenes or a large chunk of a book where perhaps things are difficult for the characters, I have a bad time. Yeah, I hope you take breaks. Yeah, that's where it's good to go play with the kids and take a load off one's mind. But some of the battle scenes in Inheritance really got to me at times, because I'm thinking actually especially in Inheritance, but also in Brisingr, there were some large set pieces, battles. And it just takes a couple of weeks to write sometimes. And that's a long time to have your head in blood and guts. [11]
Bachel
You write so many diverse women in your books that we really enjoy. Between Arya, Angela, Nasuada, Queen Islanzadi, you write fantasy with women in positions of power, with agency and with action. And then we get to this book and we meet this villain, Bachel, and she's basically like, "what if Angela was evil?" I hadn't thought of it that way. I was reading the book. I was like, "Did Christopher Paolini and his sister have a fight? What changed in that relationship?" Because she's awful. So I've watched a lot of movies in my life, and a lot of old movies too. I was thinking of some of the classic actresses from the Golden Age of Hollywood who would come on the screen with a very imperious feel, like Sunset Boulevard or All About Eve or some of those films. And Bachel is sort of in that category of presence. And I think it's exactly what was needed to put Murtagh off balance. I was also thinking of Kai Winn from Deep Space Nine. I've always said that Kai Winn and from Harry Potter the headmistress Umbridge, and Hyacinth Bouquet from the British show Keeping Up Appearances. The three of them in a room together will be like a nuclear explosion. When you were approaching bringing this book from the short story about The Fork into a full novel, at what point did you create this character and where did she come from? I had a general idea before writing Murtagh, of course. I did a lot of plotting and preparatory work, but you never know how a character is going to come across until you write the first draft. And in the first draft, Bachel was not as successful as she is now, I think. I was writing the first draft quickly, and I was thinking of the stories a little bit more of like a Edgar Rice Burroughs style adventures. You go off into the jungle, and you find a hidden temple and lost civilization sort of thing. And as a result, in the first draft, Bachel was much more vampy. I really went hard on that angle. And then looking back over, it's like it didn't work. And it was so cliche and obvious. It was like, yeah, I needed to find another approach. So I kept reworking Bachel with each cycle of revision and it was getting better. The character was getting better and better, but I wasn't fully committing to the change. And it was right at the end of revisions. I mean, we were down to the wire and my editor said, we're still not quite there. And even though I hated to have to have any more work at that point, I knew she was right. So I went in. We're talking with a week to spare before we went to the printers. And I rewrote the first four chapters or so when he gets to the village. I rewrote pretty much every line of dialogue of hers and every description of her to bring it to where we are. And then I was like, "OK, now it works", and my editor agreed. She is terrifying and one of those characters that's not mustache twirly evil, but has so much evil within her. She thinks she can do no wrong, that she is always doing the right thing and that she knows what's best for all the people around her. And as a result is capable of anything. So all of which is to answer your question, her character was an iterative process to get where she needed to go. [11]
I try to imagine what it is to create characters and if some of them have the purpose to be a particular message or stand as a parable for a message or an idea and if yes, what does Bachel mean to you in a deeper way? I think the Bachel to me represents unquestioning belief and also the tyranny of unchecked power and control over people's lives. I think what differentiates Bachel from a real world cult leader, for example, and this actually kind of made it interesting to me, is that the Dreamers and Bachel are rational in the sense that they are believing in something that actually exists. The power that they are in awe of and that they are afraid of and that they worship actually exists. And the same is true of the priests of Helgrind. So in a sense they are not irrational to have that reaction. You might argue it's the wrong reaction. I would argue that they're overdoing it and the reaction is wrong and perhaps even evil, but they have more reason for their belief than a lot of people sometimes do because they have physical evidence on an ongoing basis of their object of worship. But again, Bachel would to me represent unchecked fanatical belief as well as personal exploitation of one's power over others. [19]
The cult experience in the pages of Murtagh eerily echoed in some ways certain experiences I've had with religion. Could you talk about where that part of your writing came from or how you went about writing it? I understand why that comment's anonymous, and I'm going to kind of adhere to that philosophy of anonymity here. Without going into details, I've had some family members who were in a cult at one point. And that occasioned quite a bit of discussion in my life growing up. Although the cult might seem, and probably is, completely over the top and cartoony in some ways, you would be astounded by how much of that was essentially true to life. Let's put it this way, playing Far Cry 5, if anyone's familiar with that, was a distinctly uncomfortable experience for me. So I did whatever I do when I encounter something uncomfortable. I played the game like four times in a row. [34]
No matter how outlandish a belief seems, it can be completely realistic in your world. Especially if you have people committed to it. I've had family members who've been in a cult at one point. That was interesting. So I've had firsthand experience seeing a lot of this stuff in person, and I used some of that in my latest book. [25]
How come Bachel is pronounced like that when it’s only one little line away from Rachel? The English language hurts my head. Because it’s not from English, and I wanted it to sound different from every other name in the series. [T]
Puce
In Murtagh I have a dragon who's not supposed to be a very nice dragon. I gave him the worst color I could. I have a puce dragon. And mind you, I don't necessarily mind the color itself. It's just for those who don't know, the original definition of the word puce is the color of dried flea blood. So it's a puce dragon. [33]
Traumatic Sequences
What was it like cranking up the anxieties of it, the horrors of it? It feels more mature this time around. Well, good. Murtagh is a more mature character, and he's always had a harder road to walk than Eragon. So, going easy on him was never an option, but it was hard to write. It's hard to put my mind in difficult situations for days on end, weeks on end, months on end when writing and editing. It takes a toll on you emotionally. At least, that's my experience because I empathize with the characters and the world. But at the same time, it's so interesting dramatically that I can't avoid it. Actually [the reason] why I wrote the book was that last chunk of the book. That's what everything leading up to was building and hopefully supporting so that when that hits, you're there going, “Oh my god.” [6]
There is a extended period of this book uh that is very traumatic. That is the darkest I think the series ever gets. Where did you find the line? Were there any drafts where you felt like you went too far with that section or where you had to pull it back? Yes. Not a huge amount though. First of all, I throw everything in in my first drafts, kitchen sink, because you can always dial it back, whatever it is. Even if it's a funny scene, it's like I push it as far as I can and then see how it hits the audience. So in the sequence you're talking about, there was one thing in particular I did that I actually don't want to talk about, that I cut out during editing at my editor's very wise advice, and I'm really glad I did. But that was a thing. Because I was like how far can I take this, and that was too far. [11]
Hopefully this is not scaring anyone off from reading Murtagh. No, it's fantastic. And I think just because it is darker doesn't mean it's bad. I think that it's honestly a perfect natural progression from the Inheritance Cycle to this character. I think it's what the character needed. I also don't think it's depressing, ultimately. [11]
Tell me a little about how you see Murtagh’s journey in this book. He’s certainly on a much darker road than his half-brother, how was it getting to write a story that has more mature themes? I found it enormously rewarding to write about a character who is both more mature and more complicated than Eragon was for the majority of the Cycle. Especially now that I’m older myself. Dramatically, Murtagh (and Thorn!) presented all sorts of interesting opportunities, and I did my best to take advantage of them in this book. Also, since a lot of my readers have grown up with the series, even as I did, I wanted to give them a book that would satisfy them as much as it will also hopefully satisfy younger readers. [15]
As a fifteen-year-old boy I would never have been able to imagine such a flawed character as a central figure, but I now view life very differently. And you notice that my readers who have grown along with me also see these extra shades of gray. [18]
Murtagh is indeed a more mature book than Eragon. Did you write it that way on purpose? Yes, Murtagh is an older character in the story than he or Eragon were in the first books. He is also a complicated person. And my readers have grown up with me in the meantime. So I felt it was important to write a book where my oldest readers would see my progression as writing, and read about characters they could once again identify with. At the same time, new readers should not be forgotten. That's why I wrote Murtagh in such a way that you can also read it without knowing the previous four books. I wanted to write a book that revolved around the difficult history of Murtagh and Thorn, but was still a fun adventure to read. [23]
If you love this fandom, why are you making us suffer so much with this book? I mean the ending redeems you a little bit but oh my god. I'm sure it's been an emotional rollercoaster for you too. There are parts of the story that are definitely very difficult for Murtagh and Thorn and part of that may be my own predilection for writing that sort of stuff but mostly it was that Murtagh has done some very unpleasant things in the Inheritance Cycle, especially to Nasuada. And he needed to come to terms with that, he needed to grapple that, he needed to face it. And there was no easy path forward for him. If I had done easy on Murtagh I feel like readers would have decided that I was cheating, going easy, and that Murtagh didn't actually have to face the consequences of his actions. Even if he wasn't a hundred per cent responsible for them at the time. I can assure you that, and I'll say this to other fans as well, after this story Murtagh is going to have an easier time of it. This book resolves his personal journey and Thorn's on a really fundamental level, and so life's going to be a little bit easier for Murtagh moving forward. [17]
Uvek
So going to Uvek, you've introduced another Urgal. I think that for a lot of readers, the twist on the Urgals in Eldest. They are not just beastial orcs or Uruk-hai or whatever other franchise does with them, Trollocs for Wheel of Time. They are this sentient race that wants to join the fight on the side of good. I think that that shook me when I first read it. How was it bringing another lead character really from that race into the book? And one of the things I really loved about the book is the scene where they're flying to the village, and they see the village of Urgals. And they're just playing with bows. They're just having a normal day. And he has this moment internally where he's like, "oh, maybe I need to be more inquisitive?" Uvek is one of my favorite characters from the book. I like the Urgal culture. I find it interesting. I wouldn't want to live next to an Urgal village, necessarily, especially since I have kids. But dramatically, creatively, they're really interesting to write about. And trying to balance them in the sense that they're a warrior culture like, we could say, the Klingons. But the Klingons take it to such a degree that realistically, you start asking the question of, how have they survived? How do they build a space-frame civilization when it seems like they tear each other apart super quickly? So with the Urgals, I wanted to show more. And in fact, in The Fork of the Witch and the Worm, the largest of the stories in that is The Worm, which is an Urgal story. And since I was looking at ways of exploring the idea of Murtagh and Thorn's relationship with society, being an outcast, all of that. The Urgals are outcasts in the land also. The other races aren't particularly fond of them. That was a nice connection to bring in and reflect off of Murtagh, so to speak. [11]
Typos
I just got off a very fresh reread of Murtagh. I just sent in typo corrections and a couple little tweaks here and there for the reprints. [32]
You mention in Murtagh that Murtagh's Gedwëy ignasia is on his right hand, but I think the community assumed it was on his left from Eldest. We're we all wrong or is that a continuity error I found? Typo. Getting fixed in reprints. [T]
Divers
I've seen a couple of questions about this, so -- for the record, "divers" is not a typo of "diverse". (Probably got too clever for my own good, but there you go.) Archaic language in fantasy books?!?! Say it ain't so! The language is half the fun. :D [T]
Not a typo. :D Archaic word. [T]
If this hypothetical typo is “divers” … that’s actually the correct word and not a typo. If it’s something else, just send a pic and we’ll get it fixed in reprints. [T]
CHRIS WHAT IS THIS? An excellent and archaic word. [T]
*sigh* . . . “divers” is a real word. Not a typo (and it doesn’t mean those who dive in the water) [T]
I mean, "divers" isn't a typo, so . . . That said, if you do find typos in Murtagh, feel free to tweet them at me. We'll get 'em fixed in reprints. Happens with every book. [T]
Heh. Good thing “divers” is actually a word (and it doesn’t mean someone diving into water). [T]
The thing I want to talk to you about today is Twitter drama. You've been getting in tons of fights with readers lately on Twitter. You've been saying some really awful and hateful things to them just because they're pointing out typos in your book. What's the deal with this "divers" typo? Yes, on the first page of Murtagh there's a word "divers", which is an archaic word that means many or a multitude or different things. And too many people think that I'm referring to scuba divers. So it is a fight worth having. You make up fake words all the time. You're a fantasy author. I think the difference here is that you've made up a fake word which also has a real world definition, a person who dives as a sport, and you've put it on the front page of Murtagh without any context clues provided as to how we should interpret this. This is a book that's part of a world that no one has read in more than 10 years. So don't you think that maybe you should apologize to your readers who have waited all this time for a quality product only to be let down by an "archaic" word, aka a typo, on the first page? Absolutely. In fact, I had a conversation with my editor about this before heading out on book tour and we'll be reprinting the books but we're going to translate it all into Pig Latin which should make it more understandable for readers. [31]
Reading Order
I didn't read FWW,should I read it before read Murtagh? I Thought it was a spin-off book. You don't have to read it ... but I would. It acts as a direct lead-in to Murtagh Honestly I'm finding it shocking the number of people who haven't read FWW. There's a solution to that. . . . (Why does that sound mildly threatening?) [T]
Even if you haven't read the other books I think you can certainly enjoy Murtagh as much or even more. [12]
Is Murtagh Book 5 in the story about Eragon/Alagaësia? Yes [R]
Murtagh is a direct inline full-length sequel to the series, even though it has a different main character. [1]
I just finished Fractal Noise last night, and when you mentioned in the afterward about another book for a certain Eragon character, I was hoping it would be him. Yeah, I wanted to mention Murtagh on the "Also By" page in Fractal Noise, but we weren't sure if Murtagh was getting announced before Fractal Noise got released to early readers. [T]
submitted by ibid-11962 to Eragon [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:57 nobodysgeese Grand Theft Adventurer

Originally for the prompt "I don't wanna fight you, low-level bandit." Says the Lv.100 Hero, who killed the embodiment of space-time. "I wouldn't want to fight me, neither." Says the low-level bandit.
There's an art to robbing heroes. Pick-pocketing can work, but it's best to stick to the wizards with that. Too many warriors can feel nearby people, or smell bad intentions, or hear the beat of your heart, or have any other number of ridiculous senses that make very little sense when you think about them for more than a moment. That's how they got my first partner. Poor Rook.
Similarly, traps are an option, but chancy. Most heroes have been trapped many, many times, and obviously they got out of all of them, or they'd be called ex-heroes. And they always escape at the worst possible time, usually while you're weighed down with their piles and piles of gold and can't run away quick enough. That's how they got my second partner. Poor Rip.
Financial crimes are the safest, until they suddenly aren't. A violent bunch, heroes are. Your normal businessman will take you through the courts, giving you time to run away. A hero is just as likely to respond to light embezzlement with a lightning bolt, before you even know they're on to you. Poor Rob.
The most dependable method, of course, is the same as with anyone else. Beat them up and take their stuff. Heroes have an innate respect for forcibly taken property rights, seeing as they tend to be pro-looting themselves. If you defeat them fair and square and then rob them, they're far less likely to hunt you down and kill you later. Naturally, the only problem with this strategy is the aforementioned "beating them".
A violent bunch, heroes are, and they tend to be terrible at scaling back their power. More than one enterprising bandit has been turned into a smear, because the hero was too used to fighting dragons or giants and didn't remember how hard to hit a person when they want to take them alive.
But there is a work around.
Which is how I found myself waiting outside the Dungeon of Lepus Mortifer. The hero had gone in a week ago, and I drew my dagger with a grin as he staggered out. His sword was battered and missing the tip, his armor had more holes than coverage, and if all that blood was his, I'd be grave-robbing him by the time I finished my spiel.
"Hand over all your gold," I growled, tossing my dagger from hand to hand. It was a practiced move, and scared everyone. Well, almost everyone; a few laughed, but they weren't laughing now.
The hero was neither scared nor amused, and just kept trudging forward.
"Oi!" I darted in front of him, making sure to block his way. "I said, hand over all your gold. Or else."
He nearly walked into me before he noticed I was in the path. Slowly, he raised his gaze and let out a low groan. "Really? A robber? A low-level robber? Don't you know who I am?"
"Of course!" I was rather offended that that last question. Who did he think I was? "Wouldn't be much point in robbing you if I didn't know you were rich. Now, your gold, hand it over, all of it, or else."
"Look, buddy, it's been a long day, and I don't wanna fight you."
I chuckled. "I wouldn't want to fight me neither. Of course it's been a long day. That's why I picked it!"
He waved vaguely to the side, exhaustion clearly weighing down his limbs. "Look, just step out of the way and I'll pretend this didn't happen."
"I will, I will," I said agreeably. "But first, your gold." I poked my dagger at one of the holes in his armor for emphasis.
The hero sighed. "And I can't talk you out of this?"
"Nope."
"Please?"
"Never."
"Pretty please with a--"
"Gold. Now. Every coin."
A strange gleam entered his eye, and I tamped down my nerves. No one walked out of this dungeon with any tricks left; that was why I'd waited for him to enter the Dungeon of Lepus Mortifer, after all. Still, I braced for trouble as he said, "All my gold, you said?"
I didn't like the tone his voice. It sounded... off. There was too much happiness, and not enough 'oh no, I'm being robbed' in the words. But he was complying, so I nodded.
"Yep, all of it."
"Every coin?"
"Yes." This was taking too long, so I tossed my dagger back and forth again for emphasis. "Now, please."
The hero smiled, and I gulped. That was Heroic Smile Number 13, 'Pleasure at another's ironic misfortune'. I'd last seen that smile just before a hero threw my partner Jack a hundred feet straight up when he told them to put their hands up. Poor Jack.
Of course, everyone remembers him by a different name now. Poor Flapjack.
I was beginning to think that this was a bad idea, and was contemplating making a run for it, when the hero said, "As you wish."
"Don't throw me!" I screamed. "I don't want to be a pancake." I closed my eyes and cowered to the ground. When nothing happened, I peeked. The hero still had that cursed smile on his face, but I was alive, and not flying. Then a sound made me look up.
He had given me all his gold, it seemed. All of it. And it was falling quickly.
I did end up a pancake, after all.
submitted by nobodysgeese to NobodysGaggle [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:56 VW_Photography How would I be able to loop this if the answer are neither A) B) or C)

Console.Write("Man: Are you ready to to go on a adventure? : ");
Console.WriteLine("\nA) YES!! \nB) NO!! \nC) I DONT KNOW");
Answer = Console.ReadLine();
switch (Answer)
{
case "A":
Console.WriteLine("Man: I thought so");
break;
case "B":
Console.WriteLine("Man: Well, fuck you too then");
break;
case "C":
Console.WriteLine("Man: MAKE UP YOUR MIND " + player1.name);
break;
default:
Console.WriteLine("Man: It's A-B or C dummy!\n Try again");
Console.WriteLine("\nPress any key to continue");
Console.ReadKey();
Console.Clear();
break;
}
Thank you so much for the help in advance
submitted by VW_Photography to csharp [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:50 tkitg Data filtering in Elixir Phoenix application

Hello, I'm RoR developer and three months ago I've started learning Elixir Phoenix. Right now I'm digging into LiveView which I love. Unfortunately I ran into a problem with Ecto data filtering so I wanted to ask how you filter data in your Phoenix applications?
In RoR there is a gem called ransack which will allow you to dynamically create DB queries from passed params and filter data through your attributes and their associations. I wanted to ask if there is similar hex package that allows you to easily search through Ecto based on param names. Pagination would be helpful too.
I've found these 3 packages:
rummage_ecto - looks like it's no longer maintained + there seems to be problem with liveview
turbo_ecto - API like ransack however project seems abandoned
flop - looks ok to me, however don't currently have version 1.0 and don't support OR statements right now
Did I miss any package? Do you have any experience with these packages in production or do you write your own filtering and pagination logic? If so, how you keep your code DRY? Any experience from production and practice is welcome.
Thank you in advance.
submitted by tkitg to elixir [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:49 PTB_683 writing my first non-fanfic storyline, any advice.?

Well, I started writing this like today, any advice is appreciated :)
here's what I've written so far:-
"" The world swirled in a maelstrom of colors and sensations, As Vector plummeted through a cosmic expanse, his Mind was in fragments, filled in uncertainty and in total dispute.

He felt Sensations and Emotions he never knew he could feel, Oblivious of his fate and future as he transitioned through realms bundled together in a kaleidoscope of hazy memories and uncertainty.

Vector suddenly found himself sinking in his own thought and sensation, though he was unable to fathom the reason behind it, he found himself drowning in guilt.
Every moment that passed, his eyes grew heavier, as if his body wished for him to die.

Then he came conscious, under the shade of a tall tree, shimmering under the moon’s glow.

He felt A warm breeze blew upon him, enveloping his torn white robes.
Vector felt, nor saw even a speck of similarity in the realm before him and the realm that he once called home.
Ahead of him lay a dense forest, tightly in the grip of nature.
Distant howls of creatures that Vector could not name echoed through the forest.
The moon, that shine through the forest roof, formed an intricate pattern on the forest floor.

Vector wandered ahead, every step he took, drawing his vision hazier.
Yet again, lost in thought, and unable to comprehend anything ahead of him, he could not notice the once muddy forest path, transitioning into a smooth cobbled street, lit dimly by grand old lanterns.
Then, everything went black, as if he were in a vast void.

Vector woke up, finding himself in quite a cozy bed, with the occasional chirping of birds.
The sun’s rays lit up the room.
Vector looked out the window, admiring and observing everything he could. But soon, he felt the presence of a man behind him.
Was he the reason Vector was in this abode?
“Who could you be?” Vector asked, as he scowled at the man.
Vector hazily recalled from where Vector was from, he was taught of “mortals” as heartless creatures, who were cold hearted murderers, and were exiled into this world, why would this one be any different?
This led him to another thought, why was he here?
Vector was soon broken out of his mind, when the man replied,
“I thought you would be more grateful; I guess I was wrong” He continued; “I found you in the middle of the street, I think I should be the one asking you; so, say, who are you?”
Vector blurted, with a hint of hesitance, as he stormed off; “It is not of your concern!” ""
submitted by PTB_683 to writers [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:40 NerzyTheOne Guide: "How to replace firewalls with minimal changes"

Hi u/PaloCommunity,
I've just finished writing my Discussion Post in the PaloAlto Networks Live Community. I'm copying the content (unformated) below. If you want to view it formated, go to following link: https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/guide-quot-how-to-replace-firewalls-with-minimal-changes-quot/m-p/586777
~Foreword~
Last weekend we changed from old Firewall Hardware to new one.
On our Productionsite we switched from "PA-3250" to "PA-1410".
In our Datacenter, we switched from "PA-5250" to "PA-5410".

I am writing this article in case someone needs an easy way to replace old Hardware.
I wasnt able to find an article/discussion on this topic directly, so I'm writing one.

The Discussion/Article will consist of the following Points:
  1. Foreword
  2. General Information
  3. Our approach
  4. "How To" (TLDR)
  5. How to replace a Firewall with "Device States"-Export (In Detail)
  6. "Nice to know" Information


~General Information~
Some Information about our envrionment:
-We use Panorama to manage our Firewalls
-We use "Active/Passive" on all "HA"-Sites

Initial Situation:
-We wanted to do a "1:1" replacement/swap,
This means we wanted to:
-Use the same "Mgmt Ips"
-Use the Same Hostname
-Use similar Interfaces
-Use the same Ruleset
-Same Objects, NAT Rules, VPNs, etc…
-We wanted to have minimal Downtime during the swap


~Our approach~
We asked ourself: "What is the best approach for a replacement like this"
We thought "If we have the whole config in place on the new device, including Ips, Interfaces, Ruleset, etc., we should be able to "Unplug" the old Devices and just have the new one "Active" running".

After defining our way to go, we started searching on "How to export Config, including Ruleset etc"
Thats where we stumbled upon the "Device State*"
-What is "Device State"?
-Device State is essentially the config, including Ruleset, thats been pushed from panorama. (The device state contains ALL information pushed from the Panorama + the "running config". NAT-Rules, Interfaces etc. will also be included in this .xml)

Once we had this information we started on the replacement (TLDR follows, to save you time in case that verison is not feasible for you)


~"How To" (TLDR)~
(TLDR) Quick Rundown:


~How to replace a Firewall with "Device States"-Export~
  1. Export Original Device State
"How to export a Device State of old Hardware?"
● Go to "Device -> Setup -> Operations -> "Export device state""
Save the Device State with a proper name, youll need it later (PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz")

  1. Setup new Firewall
You'll need to perform the initial Setup for your new Firewall. (CLI)
● Setup Password AND COMMIT
● Setup Mgmt IP (So you can access the Web-UI)
Example: set deviceconfig system ip-address 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0

  1. Export "Device State" of new Device
After successfully setting up "Mgmt-IP" and "Password" for the new Firewall, export the Device State of the new Firewall (WebUI)
● Go to "Device -> Setup -> Operations -> "Export device state""
Save the Device State with a proper name (PA01001_NewHardware.tgz")

  1. Replace "Admin"-User in "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" with the "Admin"-User of the "PA01001_NewHardware.tgz"
You have to replace the Adminuser, in the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" with the Adminuser, of the "PA01001_NewHardware.tgz" because passwords are hashed by the device.
!The hashed password of the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" will not work on the new device!
To replace the Admin user you have to do the following:
● Open "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" and "PA01001_NewHardware.tgz" in "7zip"
● Search for "running-config.xml" in both device states and open it by hiting "Edit"
● In the "PA01001_NewHardware.tgz" Search for and copy it
Copy the whole block:

59193ioasdo%93osaPASSWORDHASH


yes



● In the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" running-config, search for and replace this user with the just copied user from above
● Save the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz"

  1. Import Edited, "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" to new Hardware
Now, after you edited the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" to have the new user, you can start importing the device state to the new Firewall.
● Log on to WebUI of the new Firewall
● Go to "Device -> Setup -> Operations -> "Import device state""
● Select the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" file and hit "Ok"
You might have to reload the page (and maybe give yourself another IP) because the Mgmt-IP has now been swapped to the Mgmt-IP of the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz"

  1. "Validate commit"
Now, once youve uploaded the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" you can hit "Vallidate Commit"
During this step you might see some errors that you have to clean up in your "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz"
Example of errors during the Vallidate:
deviceconfig -> setting -> management -> quota-settings -> chassis-quota unexpected here
deviceconfig -> setting -> management -> quota-settings is invalid
deviceconfig -> setting -> management is invalid
deviceconfig -> setting is invalid
deviceconfig is invalid
rulebase -> security -> rules -> Block_TorAddresses -> source 'panw-torexit-ip-list' is not an allowed keyword
rulebase -> security -> rules -> Block_TorAddresses -> source panw-torexit-ip-list is an invalid ipv4/v6 address
rulebase -> security -> rules -> Block_TorAddresses -> source panw-torexit-ip-list invalid range start IP
rulebase -> security -> rules -> Block_TorAddresses -> source 'panw-torexit-ip-list' is not a valid reference
rulebase -> security -> rules -> Block_TorAddresses -> source is invalid
rulebase -> security -> rules is invalid
rulebase -> security is invalid
rulebase is invalid
vsys is invalid
devices is invalid
log-settings -> correlation unexpected here
log-settings is invalid
shared is invalid

Example on "How to clean up "chassis-quota unexpected here""
● Open "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" and search for "running-config.xml"
● Search for
● Delete the whole block from the Device State:



16
32
5
2
2
2
20
20



● Save the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" again
● Upload the Updated "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz" and hit "Validate Commit" again.
● If there are still errors, you have to clean up those errors as well (might also be settings in "template-config.xml" for example)
● Repeat those steps until there are no errors left


7. Commit
After you cleaned up the commit errors, and "Vallidate Commit" does not display any more errors, you are ready to hit "Commit"
Once you've hit "Commit", you are done and ready to use the new Firewall

We had literally no downtime. The worst downtime with this method was 6 ping losses in our Datacenter.
It was my first replacement I've ever performed so I was kinda nervours at the beginning, but after the replacement of the first HA-Pair the way to go was pretty clear and I was calm for the following replacements.





~"Nice to know" Information~
  • I disabled "ZTP" (ZeroTouchProvisioning) immediately after first boot of the new Firewall
  • Remember to commit after changing the password via CLI!
  • To have the smoothes transition of old hardware to new one, I recommend activating "Trial" Licenses for the new Hardware.
    • With trial licenses you are able to download content updates, EDLs, etc…
  • Make sure the Interface speed of the new Hardware matches the interface speed of the old hardware
    • If Interface Speed differs, you have to swap interfaces (GUI or CLI) after successfully importing the "PA01001_OriginalHardware.tgz"
  • If your setting up a new "HA-Pair" you have to export/import the HA Key of both new devices

If I'd had to replace Firewalls next week, I would use the same method. Once you get used to interpreting the Error Messages during "Validate Commit", its smooth sailing.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask and imma try to get back to you asap.
submitted by NerzyTheOne to paloaltonetworks [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:25 Super_Map_ Why SpeedyPaper stands out in the crowd of essay writing services

As students, finding a reliable essay writing service is paramount, especially when deadlines are looming and the workload gets overwhelming. Today, I’m focusing on why SpeedyPaper.com is often regarded as a top choice among its peers like EssayMarket.net, WritePaperFor.Me. Let's dive into what makes SpeedyPaper stand out and how it compares briefly with other services.
Why Choose SpeedyPaper?
Pros:
Cons:
How Does SpeedyPaper Compare to Others?
In conclusion, while each service has its merits, SpeedyPaper’s blend of speed, quality, and customer support makes it particularly appealing, especially for those in urgent need of reliable and efficient academic writing assistance. If you’re looking to try a new service or are unsatisfied with your current provider, considering SpeedyPaper might just be the move you need to manage your academic commitments more smoothly.
submitted by Super_Map_ to LearnLore [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:21 These-Background4608 The Adventures of Superman Novel

The Adventures of Superman Novel
Just picked this up from the local library. Originally published in 1942, this novel was apparently the first novelization of a comic book character. It has some beautiful illustrations (some of them full-color) from Joe Shuster and it does flesh out much of Superman’s origin, especially that of the planet Krypton (officially renaming his birth parents Jor-El & Lara) as well as covering his early childhood on Earth, naming his adoptive parents Sarah & Eben. (Apparently, Jonathan & Martha didn’t come until much later).
The main plot is Superman squaring up against ghost ships & Nazi spies. Considering the time period, it definitely feels like your standard Golden Age Superman story. I’m very curious as to why, for a project like this, DC had somebody other than Jerry Siegel write this. I’m sure Siegel, being the huge book nerd that he was, would’ve loved to pen a Superman novelization. Perhaps the decision wasn’t his choice.
But anyway, this novel was an interesting piece of superhero fiction. Maybe one day I can track down a copy. For those of you who were fortunate enough to read this, what did you think?
submitted by These-Background4608 to superman [link] [comments]


2024.05.15 14:19 BridgertonRantsMods Eloise/Philoise Fans "Safe Space" - for book fans and non-book fans

Eloise/Philoise Fans
1) This is space for Eloise/Philoise fans to rant without ship-wars/ fan wars. If you want to engage in ship wars, please visit one of the Character Rant & Fan Wars posts. Polin Fans your safe space is here
2) Do not hate on Theo, Colin, Penelope, Lady Whistledown, Polin, Luke Newton, Nicola Coughlan, the Featheringtons, or other ships/actors in this safe space.
  • Balanced criticism of S3 characters, plots, acting, and writing is okay, but please do not rehash character attacks, ship attacks, etc from previous seasons as that will lead to a fan war in this safe space.
  • Book Fans & Non Book Fans: Please do not use this "Safe Space" to debate whether Eloise should end up with Theo, or someone else, as that will lead to a fan war in this safe space. Use the Eloise/Philoise Character Rant & Fan Wars post instead.
3) This is also safe space for Eloise fans to criticize Eloise. Please ensure that your Reddit comment / post history indicates that you are a long-time Eloise fan. If you are not a long-time Eloise fan, your comments might be removed by the mods to maintain this safe space.
Claudia Jess, Eloise Bridgerton
Philoise

Kanthony Fans Safe Space - Rant here

We've established Account Standards to reduce fan-baiting and trolls in these Safe Spaces. If there is a delay in publishing your comment, or your comment is removed for "disturbing the safe space", use the Character Rant & Fan Wars posts instead, or send a message to the Mods.

Non-Eloise Fans:

Please do not start or finish arguments with Eloise fans here. This is space for Eloise fans to rant without ship-wars. If you want to engage in ship wars, please visit one of the Character Rant & Fan Wars posts.

Book Fans & Non-Book Fans

Book Fans & Non Book Fans: Please do not use this "Safe Space" to debate whether Eloise should end up with Theo, or someone else, as that will lead to a fan war in this safe space. Use the Eloise/Philoise Character Rant & Fan Wars post instead.

"Safe Space" Rules & Account Standards

1) The usual rules of this subreddit apply. In addition, we will not tolerate any ship-wars/ fan wars, trolling or passive-aggressive ship attacks in these safe spaces.
2) We've established Account Standards to reduce fan-baiting and trolls in these Safe Spaces. If there is a delay in publishing your comment, or your comment is removed for "disturbing the safe space", use the Character Rant & Fan Wars posts instead, or send a message to the Mods.

Character Rants & Fan Wars

All Fans, No Stans - Episode Discussions

No Stan Wars. If you have low karma, or a new account there may be delays in publishing your comment. Use the "Character Rants & Fan Wars" posts instead.
TLDR: We created separate safe spaces to address recent concerns about the fandoms' mental health. Kanthony and Polin are the largest fandoms at the moment, so we will pilot this with them. We've established Account Standards to reduce fan-baiting and trolls in these Safe Spaces. If there is a delay in publishing your comment, or your comment is removed for "disturbing the safe space", use the "Character Rant & Fan Wars" posts instead. Polin Fans your safe space to Rant is here
submitted by BridgertonRantsMods to BridgertonRants [link] [comments]


http://rodzice.org/