How to estimate partial autocorrelation

Ask Physics

2011.09.08 19:28 Fauster Ask Physics

[link]


2012.02.17 18:34 Advice from experienced mechanics from several fields.

This is more than a car repair forum!
[link]


2015.07.06 01:20 squidboots we diagnose your sick plants!

If you're wondering "What's wrong with my plant?", we will help you diagnose and treat it!
[link]


2024.05.14 08:10 SolarSolutionCompany What Is The Power Output Of A Solar Panel

Solar panels are marvels of modern engineering, silently transforming sunlight into usable electricity. But what exactly is the power output of a solar panel? How much energy can you realistically expect from these sleek, sun-soaking rectangles?
This comprehensive guide will demystify solar panel power output, explaining the key concepts, influencing factors, and how it translates to meeting your energy demands.

Watts and Kilowatts: The Language of Solar Power

Like light bulbs, solar panels are rated in watts (W). This measurement indicates their maximum power production under ideal conditions, known as peak sun.

Standard Solar Panel Wattage

Modern residential solar panelstypically range from 250 to 450 watts per panel. This means a single panel could power several small appliances or a significant portion of a larger one. However, most homes need multiple panels to cover their entire energy needs.

Factors Affecting Solar Panel Output

The power output of a solar panel isn't static; it's influenced by several factors:

From Watts to Kilowatt-Hours: Your Solar Energy Production

The amount of electricity your solar panels generate over time is measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh). This is the unit you see on your electricity bill.
To estimate your annual production, consider:

  1. Your System Size: The total wattage of all your panels combined (e.g., a 6 kW system has 6,000 watts).
  2. Peak Sun Hours: The average daily hours of direct sunlight in your location.
  3. Panel Efficiency: This will vary based on the specific model.
A solar professional can provide a more accurate estimate tailored to your location and system.

Matching Output to Your Needs

The goal is to match your solar panel system's output to your home's energy consumption. Factors to consider include:

FAQs

Read more: The Best Time to Install Solar Panels: A Strategic Guide for Savings and Sunshine

Conclusion

Understanding solar panel power output is key to making informed decisions about your renewable energy journey. With the right knowledge and guidance, you can harness the sun's power to significantly reduce or eliminate your reliance on the grid, save money, and contribute to a cleaner environment.
submitted by SolarSolutionCompany to u/SolarSolutionCompany [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 22:01 jennyacosta09 Take my Statistics exam for me Reddit

If you are unable to Handle your online Exam, Assignments and full courses, get paid help from Online Helpers at Hiraedu!
Contact Details for Hiraedu Helper:
WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657
Call: +1 727 456 9641
Website: hiraedu. com
Email: info@hiraedu. com
ASSESSMENTS I CAN COMPLETE:
MY MATH SUBJECTS OF EXPERTISE:
I am very knowledgeable and proficient in assisting students in a wide range of mathematics classes. I can help students complete their homework assignments and other projects get an A on quizzes, tests, and exams (including proctored assessments) answer online discussion posts write essays & papers in MLA APA Chicago format and provide general overall academic help in each math course listed below:
STATISTICS HELP (MY BEST SUBJECT):
ALGEBRA HELP:
CALCULUS HELP:
I CAN AID STUDENTS TAKING PROCTORED ASSESSMENTS:
I CAN VERIFY MY ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS:
I HAVE PAID ACCESS TO OVER 15 STUDY-HELP WEBSITES AND MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE:
MY AVAILABILITY & RELIABILITY:
MY EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE OF EXPERTISE:
SCHOOLS FROM WHICH I'VE HELPED STUDENTS IN :
As of 2021, I have tutored and helped students enrolled at the following U.S. universities community colleges county & city colleges schools for-profit institutions listed below in alphabetical order:
I OFFER FLEXIBLE PAYMENT PLANS:
TUTORING AVAILABLE FOR OTHER SUBJECTS:
THE OBLIGATORY "IS THIS A SCAM?" QUESTION:
Considering the fact that you found my contact information online, it’s understandable to be skeptical regarding the legitimacy of my services. Therefore, I’m willing to do all of the following to help you feel more secure in trusting me with your academic needs:
MY TEAM'S CLASSES OF EXPERTISE:
MY EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE OF EXPERTISE:
MY REBUTTAL TO THE OBLIGATORY “IS THIS A SCAM?” QUESTION:
At the risk of sounding arrogant, I consider myself to be at least marginally more intelligent (both academically & socially) than the average person. Therefore, if I ever decided to suddenly risk prison time, risk my reputation, and risk enduring the wrath of modern-day “cancel culture” by scamming people out of their money:
HOW TO CONTACT ME:
Contact Details for Hiraedu Helper:
WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657
Call: +1 727 456 9641
Website: hiraedu. com
Email: info@hiraedu. com
TAGS:
Accounting Exam Help Reddit, Best Online Test Takers Reddit, Best Ways to Cheat on a Test Reddit, Best Website to Pay for Homework Reddit, Bypass Respondus Lockdown Browser Reddit, Calculus Test Taker Reddit, Canvas Cheating Reddit, Cheating in Online Exam Reddit, Cheating on Pearson Mymathlab Reddit, Cheating on Proctortrack Reddit, Cheating on Zoom Proctored Exams Reddit, Cheating on a Test Reddit, College Algebra Mymathlab Reddit, Do Homework for Money Reddit, Do My Assignment Reddit, Do My Exam for Me Reddit, Do My Homework for Me Reddit, Do My Math Homework Reddit, Do My Math Homework for Me Reddit, Do My Test for Me Reddit, Doing Homework Reddit, Domyhomework Reddit, Exam Cheating Reddit, Exam Help Online Reddit, Examity Reddit, Finance Homework Help Reddit, Fiverr Exam Cheating Reddit, Gradeseekers Reddit, Hire Someone to Take My Online Exam Reddit, Hire Test Taker Reddit, Homework Help Reddit, Homework Sites Reddit, Homeworkdoer.org Reddit, Homeworkhelp Reddit, Honorlock Reddit, How Much Should I Pay Someone to Take My Exam Reddit, How to Beat Honorlock Reddit, How to Beat Lockdown Browser Reddit, How to Cheat Examity Reddit 2022, How to Cheat Honorlock Reddit, How to Cheat and Not Get Caught Reddit, How to Cheat in School Reddit, How to Cheat on Canvas Tests Reddit, How to Cheat on Examity Reddit, How to Cheat on Honorlock Reddit, How to Cheat on Math Test Reddit, How to Cheat on Mymathlab Reddit, How to Cheat on Online Exams Reddit, How to Cheat on Online Proctored Exams Reddit, How to Cheat on Zoom Exam Reddit, How to Cheat on Zoom Exams Reddit, How to Cheat on a Proctored Exam Reddit, How to Cheat with Proctorio 2020 Reddit, How to Cheat with Proctorio Reddit, How to Cheat with Respondus Monitor Reddit, How to Get Past Lockdown Browser Reddit, Hwforcash Discord, I Paid Someone to Write My Essay Reddit, Is Hwforcash Legit, Lockdown Browser Hack Reddit, Lockdown Browser How to Cheat Reddit, Math Homework Reddit, Monitoredu Reddit, Mymathlab Answer Key Reddit, Mymathlab Answers Reddit, Mymathlab Cheat Reddit, Mymathlab Proctored Test Reddit, Online Exam Help Reddit, Online Exam Proctor Reddit, Online Proctored Exam Reddit, Organic Chemistry Exam Help Reddit, Organic Chemistry Test Taker Reddit, Paper Writers Reddit, Pay Me to Do Your Homework Reddit, Pay Me to Do Your Homework Reviews Reddit, Pay Someone to Do Homework Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My Assignment Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My College Homework Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My Homework Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My Math Homework Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My Online Class Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My Online Math Class Reddit, Pay Someone to Do My Programming Homework Reddit, Pay Someone to Do Statistics Homework Reddit, Pay Someone to Take Exam Reddit, Pay Someone to Take Exam for Me Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Calculus Exam Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Chemistry Exam Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Exam Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Online Class Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Online Exam Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Proctored Exam Reddit, Pay Someone to Take My Test in Person Reddit, Pay Someone to Take Online Class for Me Reddit, Pay Someone to Take Online Test Reddit, Pay Someone to Take Your Online Class Reddit, Pay Someone to Write My Paper Reddit, Pay for Homework Reddit, Pay to Do Homework Reddit, Paying Someone to Do Your Homework Reddit, Paying Someone to Take My Online Class Reddit, Paying Someone to Take Online Class Reddit, Paysomeonetodo Reddit, Physics Test Taker Reddit, Proctored Exam Reddit, Reddit Do My Homework for Me, Reddit Domyhomework, Reddit Homework Cheat, Reddit Homework Help, Reddit Homework for Money, Reddit Honorlock Cheating, Reddit Mymathlab Hack, Reddit Mymathlab Homework Answers, Reddit Paid Homework, Reddit Pay Someone to Do Your Homework, Reddit Pay Someone to Take Online Test, Reddit Pay for Homework, Reddit Pay to Do Homework, Reddit Test Takers for Hire, Reddit Tutors, Should I Pay Someone to Take My Exam Reddit, Statistics Test Taker Reddit, Take My Calculus Exam Reddit, Take My Class Pro Reddit, Take My Class Pro Reviews Reddit, Take My Exam for Me Reddit, Take My Math Test for Me Reddit, Take My Online Class Reddit, Take My Online Class for Me Reddit, Take My Online Exam for Me Reddit, Take My Online Exams Reddit, Take My Online Exams Review Reddit, Take My Online Exams Reviews Reddit, Take My Online Test Reddit, Take My Online Test for Me Reddit, Take My Physics Exam for Me Reddit, Take My Proctored Exam for Me Reddit, Take My Statistics Exam for Me Reddit, Take My Test for Me Reddit, Takemyonlineexams Reddit, Test Taker Reddit, We Take Classes Reddit, Write My Exam for Me Reddit
submitted by jennyacosta09 to Statisticshelpers_ [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 20:22 Kitchen-Breakfast859 Tip for Eating Out

I just wanted to share a tip for eating out that I found very useful. To calculate the calories and macros for food while eating out, I enter a description of the food (I generally copy and paste the description from the restaurant’s online menu, but you can make it up yourself) into ChatGPT-4 to give me an estimated range, then I take the higher end of the range it generates to be safe, and enter all the values into a ‘Quick Add’ entry in MF.
My current goal is weight loss, so that’s why I err on the side of using the higher end of the estimated range.
All this being said, I don’t eat out very often, so I’m not sure how accurate this method would be on a daily basis. But I think it is a great way to be able to eat out or eat food made by other people without having to have a partially logged day.
P.S. Some might wonder if the same can be achieved with the “AI Describe” feature in MF, but I found that it frequently makes mistakes even when putting in an exact list of measured ingredients, so I think it needs to be improved a lot more before it can be reliably used.
submitted by Kitchen-Breakfast859 to MacroFactor [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 19:44 A_movable_life Uncle with 2 months or so to live attempted to guilt trip me into resuming contact

When I found this forum about a month ago I was reading the back posts and weeping the whole time.
Background:
I have processed this in therapy, made my peace, and have empathy for the situations that made her who she is.
I don't want to cause her harm, and fortunately I am really bad at relationships, and do not have children. Because it would be very painful if she had grandchildren that she has no access to. My sister and BIL can't have kids. (Details omitted for TW)
I work in the MH field, I'm an Nurse Practitioner. I worked as part of a DBT team. I am not DBT trained or certified but I got really good at boundaries, and sensing manipulation, without having an emotional response.
Before I went NC I would directly and clearly set limits. I stopped her when she would try to split my Sister and I, or gossip about her. There were several times every visit where I would stop her, and explain how I would not engage, did not want to hear, or set a reasonable expectation. Her reply a few times was "Don't analyze me."
Which is amusing because after the last estrangement, I asked her to go to therapy.... never happened.

Current Situation:
My Mother visited my Uncle who is dying of cancer and has by his estimation about 2 months to live.
My Mother sent me a text that I should visit him that she was down there and he does not have much time to live. I forgot I hadn't blocked her number on the new phone.
I have been NC for 9 years other then sending her a 9th Step (AA) letter. I intend to be NC for the rest of her life or mine whichever ends first.
I asked if she was present in the room. She left the morning of him calling me. I said I appreciated him not doing "One of those Ophra type interventions" as it's usually destructive.
I asked about visiting. Everyone has been invited down but me. He says he would like a visit.
He wants me "As a personal favor" to reconcile with her. I should mention he's a retired corporate attorney. Yes it's not amateur hour on either side of the phone. He said she was "Distraught that I would not talk with her."
I said let's address the second item, as you may not want me to visit depending on how I answer.
I would prefer having this conversation in person and to not have this conversation on a 2 sided Cell phone call either.
I said "no."
He pushed back and said this was not normal. I explained how it's more common then you would think both from people I know and also from being in clinical practice for almost 20 years.
He said "I can hear it in your voice that you want to reconcile." (Defining my feelings) I said I am speaking to you in the same tone I use with my patients.
I said that I will not be interacting with her for the rest of our lives. That this was a carefully made and considered decision.
I said we can discuss my reasons if you would like.
He said that was not his concern that it was between my Mother and I.
My mind formulates, "So no matter what happened, there is no reason that would cause you to find estrangement acceptable." Secondly you are implicating that I am being unreasonable, or worse yet cruel.
This goes in circles.
He bounces off a few boundaries, answer stays the same.

I figure I am going to let him know some of the situation. Because he's dying and I don't want him to think I am just being unreasonable and stubborn.
I then explain a little of how our childhood was. The abuse that my mother and I got. I also said I suspect my sister getting other abuse. Left that one hanging out there... Remember this is what I do for a living so that should have significant weight.
The things I did that I regret, and have made amends, as well as going to therapy, stopped drinking, worked the steps, and so forth.
I mentioned my sister goes to Trauma therapy, partially because of me.
Which also puts out there "Has your Sister ever had any therapy for all the stuff she has been through?"

He says "I can hear you are angry at your mother.." (defining feelings again) "
"Help me understand why do you feel that way."
"Based on what you said (above)" I said back, I am not angry at her. I have accepted and made my peace with this situation. I only listed my part in it, and what I have done to become a better person."
Which floats the unsaid question "What is her part in this?"

I said the offer is on the table to talk about this, or not talk about it. That is up to him. If you do want to have this conversation then it needs to be scheduled so I can have my notes.
The offer of a visit is "We shall see, and depends on how I am doing, check back in a week." I know the answer already. I also explained if I visit I will be getting a hotel room and a rental car, and that it's probably better if we do 2-3 hour visits so I don't tire him out.
The unsaid part is I want to be able to leave if I need to immediately, I want to be able to go to daily AA meetings, I want my own space process this coming loss. I
wrote a poem about this situation and read it in at my AA homegroup (The meeting you go to most and help keep it going.) I haven't written a poem since HS writing class. I've been weepy about the whole situation on and off.

I have a letter penned to my cousins, who I am in contact with explaining that he is a father figure in my life, that this is a very painful situation for me anticipating his passing, and that I apologize for not attending major life events in their lives and their children's lives because of this estrangement. That I won't be attending his service because it's the place for my Mother to mourn her last living sibling.


Conclusion:
  1. That firstly he feels that there is nothing that would justify estrangement.
  2. That my Mother probably said she has no insight into why I estranged her.
  3. Based on #2 I am guessing that she has had no therapy. A good therapist would turn that around and use certain questions to help her develop insight.
  4. That he feels I am angry and I want to reconcile.
  5. Defining my feelings is a huge red flag for me.
  6. I bet he didn't expect me to be calm, collected and give a rational and consistent dialogue.
  7. Having to hear about his Sister's home life probably hurts. The fact that he probably had no clue until my father passed, he has a lot of guilt.
  8. He's formally trained and skilled in negotiation tactics.
  9. He's dying so he has a huge ability to guilt me.
  10. I gave him the option to understand, that I would visit if asked, that I would limit exposure, and that we did not have to address this, or we can look at photos and tell stories, etc. What is not on the table is reconciliation with my Mother.










submitted by A_movable_life to raisedbynarcissists [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 16:51 Just_Askin_Questionz Installer said they had the wrong system day of install, so questioning their info

got auto-modded here from hvac so posting here as well just in case it's better forum:
A little bit of background, we're new to New England so never dealt with oil until now. The current oil furnace and whole house AC are super old (we've been told like 80s/90s) and each have their own problem. Super weak cooling and it trips the breaker each time, heater needs a new control module of sorts every season since it burns out or something. So we DO want to replace.
  1. I was pushing for a heat pump after all the reading I've done how they're better. So check me if I'm wrong, is a heat pump in this climate (CT) okay nowadays? I would love to ditch oil completely if the heat pumps are efficient (especially compared to this old stuff)
  2. I was told that the BTUs we need for heat don't work with the size of heat pump system (I thin it was 7 ton needed) and our existing duct work. Is this BS or an actual thing?
  3. I do think we need new a furnance and heat pump and was told could get the heat pump to cover the cooling 100% at a good efficiency, then it would also work for heating up until a certain point then we'd kick over to oil when it got too cold. So saving in oil use in that case (maybe like a few months). Reading around this seems like the truth.
    1. Problem being here they priced us at this system which sounded great (Heat pump worked to -5, but since the heat it was rated at (I think it was 3 ton) it would really only heat to about like ~20s is what the guy estimated for us) before oil would kick on fully. Which sounded okay to me.
    2. Apparently though the guy just called day of installed and the furnace and heat pump he configured don't actually work with each other. This of course drops my confidence in them (they did have good reviews on our local facebook group, he said it was a new system and sorry that the tech didn't catch that, but still I just feel like he was trying to upsell now. Definitely want to call another company now as well, we already have the deposit in, but I assume since the system I had signed for isn't possible I could get that back if I wanted.
I'll post the system we got quoted at (no prices unless asked in case that breaks rules) for context:
Remove existing oil, furnace
Rem remove existing condenser and AC coil
Install Amana Horizontal Discharge Heat Pump 16.2 SEER2, Single-Phase, Variable-Speed, 3 Ton
Evaporator Coil CAPE Series - Cased, Upflow/Downflow, with EEV
Furnace Spirit Oil 106K BTU 85% Low Profile Highboy Front Flue ECM 1600 CFM 4 Ton
Thanks for the long read, let me know if any other questions, but my main concern is should we be getting the heat pump in this climate (from what I was reading they are now pretty reliable in the cold, but I don't want to be had). Thanks. We also don't have solar to offshoot some of what I've read about the electric cost during winter, but if we kept just partial oil that's okay since we also have an oil water heater. Any thoughts? Thank you
submitted by Just_Askin_Questionz to hvacadvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 16:26 Processter How would I start a 3d printing business, if I had to restart after 10 years. 15 “things” I would need.

I’ve shared my story on how I started, ran for 10 years, and remotely sold my 3dp business HERE.
Now I would like to speculate on How I would start it if I had to do it again. Why? 2 reasons:
  1. When it was time to sell, I discovered, that the most valuable assets of my business were NOT the printers or production base and that I could've significantly grown and therefore increased business value if I did certain things a certain way.
Knowing that and other things - I would've tried to do "the right things" from the beginning, and I hope it would help those who are thinking about or starting it right now.
I concentrate on the business side since the 3dp business is first of all a business, and I go through with it as I would’ve done it (not just some average avatar model).
This article doesn’t cover everything and simplifies some parts, but I tried to make it as real and in-depth as possible since the devil is in the details.
  1. I am starting new business projects right now, and the path I am taking is almost the same (minus printers basically) path;

Vision

First I need to ask myself: what kind of 3dp business would I like to start? It may be hard to answer right at the start, but I do know 4 things:
  1. I want it to be service-based (at least in the beginning, then I may consider a hybrid: service+product model);
  2. I want it to be B2B (higher check, less transactional costs);
  3. I want to gravitate towards big/complicated models;
  4. I will offer some post-processing (get hand dirty, mot many others willing to do that);
Here I may also need to identify, who my target audience is. But It is hard, and may sometimes be harmful in the beginning, so I will stick with 4 general assumptions listed above, and see where keywords lead me.
But I will revisit this very important question (let's call it a “vision”) as soon as I have a meaningful chunk of data and experience.

Research

Then I will conduct research.
For that, I need to pick a place (3dp business is place-bound to a certain degree). Let's say a city - Austin - TX.
Note here - the bigger city, the better.
Now I need 3 lists:
  1. First is a List of keywords with average monthly searches and cost of clicks for different areas:
    1. Austin;
    2. Other big cities nearby;
    3. State of Texas;
    4. Nearby states;
    5. The whole of the US.
One tab for each. You can pick as many areas as you see fit, and the logic behind it is that you want to know the demand in places you may be able to serve.
I need general high-frequency keywords as well as Google suggestions and low-frequency keywords. The broader the scope, the better. There is a free tool called Keyword Planner (it also provides a click cost estimation for Google ads) inside a Google Ads account. If you don’t use Google ads, you can pick any keyword search tool out there.
Now I need to sort it, vet out unneeded ones, and separate them into groups based on intent (informational or commercial). I will also create a list of “minus” words (will use them later).
When it is all done, I need to assemble a “core”: a few groups of keywords united by intention.
If I don’t use keys/groups for commercial purposes, I may use them for info articles (SEO). The most visited (by a long shot) page on the site, which I sold as a part of the business was “The History of 3d printing”.
📜 Research should also include many other “places”, basically one should identify where potential customers hang out, what they need (their problems), and how one can reach them, and as a result will have some potential acquisition channels, and a list of “problems” to form an offer with.
I will only cover the fastest and the one I know best - Google ads (+ a bit of SEO for the long game). This channel corresponds rather well, with my understanding, of where my “target audience” may be (more on that below).
  1. Second is a List of competitors. I will only need ones’ that will compete with me for my target demographic. Specifically, I would like to know:
    1. Domain name;
    2. Their offer (range of services, materials, unique propositions);
    3. Their main (and all significant pages) Title, H1, description, “subtitle”, unique selling propositions, and maybe a screenshot of HERO;
    4. Their CTAs (calls to action - do they use online calculators, contact form…).
The list can go on, but those are the most important (probably), the logic behind it - I want to know what has been offered so far, compare it to the demand from list 1, and identify where I can “squeeze in”.
  1. Third list - competitor’s prices. Based on my initial ”vision” (what/for whom I will try to do) I prepare a couple of inquiries, which I send to competitors to quote.
I would like to know:
  • Price;
  • Fulfillment time;
  • Conditions;
  • How competitors interact with prospects.
Inquiries may be:
  1. A somewhat complicated “technical” model of a middle size;
  2. Small-to-mid batch of parts (up to 100-300);
  3. A somewhat big (that will probably require printing in parts and assembly) model + separately I would inquire about painting;
As a result, I understand how I may price my services. I prefer to start somewhere in the lower middle of a price range and slowly go up.
I know what I won't do - I won't try to go for the cheapest price - it is a road to nowhere. I may go for it once or twice to snatch an order, which will be beneficial to my portfolio, but that is it!
Now I also understand how my competitors interact with their customers and what I can offer in this regard.

Plan

With that data gathered I am now ready to compose a “business plan” /set up business goals for 1-3 years, and lay out a tactical (more detailed) plan for a quarter or so.
Usually, the latter shall be detailed like: I need to reach X revenue/per day, to get Y rev per month, and for that, I will need Z inquiries and so on... But as I am just starting, it may not make a lot of sense, since there are no "base" numbers. But I will use that type of planning as soon as I have those numbers (after 6-12 months).
I also will align the plan with my vision, and maybe add some details to it, based on the data I’ve gathered.
I will have a somewhat united note/doc with actionable tasks, equipped with due dates (those are very important), and an overall plan.
I like to unify all of the above (lists, vision, tasks…) as a project in a project management software (later about that). Much easier to manage and keep track of.

Offer and Site creation

Now I can form my offer.
This offer will be presented on my site, in my ads, and everywhere else.
I need to describe CLEARLY what do I do exactly, for whom, and why those people should take their business to me (competitive advantages).
I pick a name, and domain name and make a logo. I keep in mind that they are a part of the offer (everything is), and I keep them as short, direct, and close to the point as possible. I squeeze a relevant keyword in if I can.
Before I decide I type the name into the search and see what pops up (don’t skip that part).
Now I can make a site. I pick one of the No-code options to create it myself or delegate it. Keep in mind that you will need to correct and change the site: an offer (text. headings), portfolio, blog (for SEO purposes), services, etc. The no-code solution will allow you to do that yourself.
It will be a landing page (in the beginning), and it will include:
  • Title (shown as a first string in search);
  • Description (shown as a second string in the search);
HERO SECTION (first screen basically - 80% of people won’t go below it)
  • H1 (main “title” shown on the top of the page)
  • Subtitle (text below the H1, usually supports the H1 and includes unique selling points);
  • Clear CTA (Call to action);
  • Foto or video of what I’ve done (the visual representation of services works really well);
  • Unique selling points (not included in the subtitle, or supporting/elaborating on them);
END OF THE HERO SECTION
  • Unique selling points;
  • All other headers;
  • All other text;
  • Examples (what I’ve done) and/or testimonials - if I truly just starting I may need to make some examples of objects I would like to make (as close to desired nich as possible) and take GOOD photos of them (It can be powerful, that is what I did and people told me many times, that they “came” because of “beautiful” thing that we’ve done (“beautiful” is mostly attribute off a picture, then a thing);
  • FAQ (those shall be questions that your customers ask you the most, I mean REAL questions - they work rather well as objection handlers);
  • Clear CTA (Call to action);
As there is just one page, it should target the most relevant oand big commercial keyword group.
The “art” of creating a Title, H1, and the rest of the text, headings, and attributes is a delicate dance between the need to be different from competitors, the need to incorporate the right keywords, basic SEO guidelines, and most importantly - to present a compelling offer.
📜 An important thing to keep in mind - your first screen should tell, straight and clearly - what services you provide, for whom, and why a visitor should click your CTA, or continue reading.
Last thing - make sure that it looks fine and loads quickly on mobile. More than half of the traffic will be from there.
Research says, that If it loads more than 3 seconds - more than 70% of people bounce.
Check your speed here - https://pagespeed.web.dev/
There is A LOT more to that, but it is beyond the scope of this article.

Traffic: Ads and SEO

Now I need traffic:
Google ads. As I just starting, I need to be as targeted as possible. So I will:
  • Vet keywords carefully, avoid high-frequency ones, and compose them into groups.
  • Start with one or two groups, with a limited number of keywords with clear commercial intent.
  • Limit the location to the city I am in.
  • Add a minus keywords list. If a search query includes one of the words from the list (like FREE, or CHEAP) - ads won't be shown.
Google pushes everyone really hard to use responsive search ads + broad match + AI-suggested keywords (performance MAX they call it), but I won't.
Why?
  1. It will greatly disperse the focus, and therefore results of my campaign.
  2. It is still not working properly, especially for small and/or “complicated” niches. In other words, it will waste my money, (relocate it to Google), without bringing back results (or at least as many).
And I don't want that.
I will use exact match, fix (pin) headings and descriptions, and practically make "an old school" text ad from a responsive search ad. I will have to do different ads for different keywords (if the keyword or phrase is matched in the title, conversion is higher); Yes, it will be more work, but results will be better, and controllable.
Just how I like them.
Now I will compose my "SEO plan", I will:
  • Plan to add new "commercial" pages to the site (one page per meaningful keyword group) as I go.
  • Create a schedule: after the main page is up, I will try to “deploy” them in 2-4 week intervals, starting with the most meaningful/impactful.
  • Make Google index it through its search console after the first publishable version of the site is done. I will repeat the operation with every meaningful page I add, including info SEO pages (below).
  • Form a few groups from keywords with informational intent, vet groups that align with my direction, and plan an article for each vetted group - a separate page on the site with a personal set of SEO attributes.
  • Publish them with the same or longer intervals as for the "commercial" pages.
  • Try to make those articles as valuable for the reader as possible. Everything I do shall be client-oriented (bring value), and user behavior is more and more important for SEO.
This “article” is an example of such a page.
I won't cover social media here, since its plenty of info on that topic.
From my experience, if I plan (and I do) to offer 3d printing services to businesses (B2B), social media (with the exception of LinkedIn maybe, not sure nowadays what is what) is not exactly a place for “fishing” (I might be wrong).

Legal+

Moving along to the legal land.
I will not go deep into the business structure (LLCs or sole proprietorships), just say that you need one. Figure out what works best in your case, but note: if you are planning (envisioning) to sell your business one day (or a part of it) - you will need it to be at least an LLC.
This structure (as stated in the name), also limits your liability, which is not a bad thing. One more thing that does that, and at times viewed as a formality - is a contract.
I’ve learned to appreciate contracts and pay attention to their "design". The contract sets expectations, protects both you and your client, and serves as an extension to your offer - a clear, correct, and honest contract, that picks up on promises you’ve made will reassure your client that you are a trustworthy professional.
Create a clear, correct contract template (or templates), seek professional help/advice if needed, and try not to overcomplicate it (easier-smaller the better).
📜 Before the contract, expectations are set during all interactions with a client: nuances, limitations, examples, samples, etc. As the number of interactions with clients starts to grow you will notice repetitive patterns in questions and answers. Create a base with answer templates - those saved me a ton of time and improved the quality of my communication.

3d printers and a space (finally here they are)

Well, and yeah, I need 3d printers to start a 3d printing business.
If you plan to start such a business, you may already have some, and/or possess the needed knowledge in the matter, but I still going to say a few things. No specific models, or vendors though, since there is a lot of printer-related content out there, and the scene is rapidly (wink) changing.
I would try to pick one type of printer (or at least a vendor) and stick to it. Benefits:
  • Somewhat stable overall quality;
  • Same spare parts;
  • Same repair and maintenance routine;
  • Same working protocols;
  • Same slicing…
I also will (at least in the beginning) look for stable machines, that would not require a ton of maintenance.
Note here: your choice shall also be based on your perceived goal (niche you want to end up with/customers you want to serve), and you may need different types of printers for that.
Depending on my situation, I may not need an office/working space right from the start (at least not until the idea has been validated). If I do, I would get something with a space to grow (aligned with my plan/goals), but I would try not to jump over my head with it.

One software to control it all

There is one more thing that I will need right from the start (because I don’t want to replicate my own mistakes) - a software suite to manage the business. Getting it from the start will provide the most leverage and set me up on the right path.
I will need:
  • CRM - all work with a client: pricing, offers, deals, followups, deadlines, docs… +
  • ERP - control and management of all resources: materials, printers, team… +
  • Production scheduling +
  • Maintenance, Repairs, Spare parts, and materials control +
  • Team + Docs + Files storage + Contractors + Spending + everything else.
I couldn't find one that incorporates all of it, so I’ve made my own (there is a Free version, try it out, let me know what you think).
Management software and CRM might not be obvious must-haves, but they are if I want to make it into a controllable and growing business (and I do).
There is no other way, look at any business that made it - they all without exception use such systems.
One more thing - all business decisions shall be based on data: how would I know, for example, if my ads campaign is making (and how much) or losing money, without knowing what my average check, margin, or LTV is for any type of service for a needed time period?

Summary and Q&A

There is a lot more to that, but it is already too long.
So I’ve got:
  1. List of keywords;
  2. List of competitors;
  3. Price research (and base price level as a result);
  4. A plan;
  5. An offer;
  6. Name and logo;
  7. Website (with offer and good photos of done jobs on it);
  8. Google ads campaign (or other acquisition channel, start from one you know best/where your customers are);
  9. SEO plan;
  10. Legal entity;
  11. Contract templates;
  12. “Sales templates” base (those collected on the go, but you may already have something since you talked to people before);
  13. Printers;
  14. Some physical space;
  15. Management system/software (like this one)
3 BONUS reminders for myself:
  • To get paid in advance. ALWAYS, at least partially;
  • To do extra for customers. If I can, when I can;
  • To be patient- business is a marathon, not a sprint;
Some Q&A:
  • Is the 3d printing business a good business to start?
It is not a get-rich-quick scheme, and it is not particularly easy, but all things that are worth doing are hard (that is what they say).
If you like it/are passionate about it/good at it (the most important factor in my opinion.) - it certainly might be.
I’ve planned to go with the B2B service model (on-demand manufacturing), and that trend will only grow over time.
Since we talked about the US, let's take a look at this article and specifically the chart of Construction spending on US manufacturing https://www.businessinsider.com/us-building-factories-census-data-chips-act-inflation-reduction-act-2023-6?op=1 + big new “infrastructure rebuild projects” might be somewhere around the corner.
What does it all have to do with a small 3dp service? The economy is an interconnected system. All of those “big projects” will require a lot of smaller contractors/suppliers, and they will need smaller ones…and that is where I come in.
  • Why the service model?
2 reasons:
  1. I know how to do it (done it for 10 years), the data above backs the idea up, and I still see a lot of upsides and opportunities there (aside from the data).
  2. It is a lot easier to “search” for product ideas - they come to you (for that you will have to have a B2C “department” though). I’ve recently talked to a few 3dp business owners (and read a few stories over the years), and almost all of them had their product ideas brought to them by clients.
  • Is it profitable?
If you create a system (management software can help with that) with processes in place, create and maintain customer acquisition channels, and price correctly - it will be.
I hope you got some value out of it.
Thanks for reading.
submitted by Processter to Entrepreneur [link] [comments]


2024.05.13 01:02 Constant-Show2229 [FOR HIRE] Pay Someone to Take My Statistics Exam For Me Reddit -- Take My Statistics Test Reddit Do My Statistics Exam Reddit Statistics Exam Taker Reddit Pay Someone to Take My Online Statistics Class Reddit Pay Someone to Take My Statistics Class Reddit Math Probability Algebra MyStatLab

If You're struggling to handle your Online Exams, Assignments or any other coursework, get help from Hiraedu and pay after the exam. Contact details for Hiraedu is: WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657 OR Call: +1 727 456 9641
ASSESSMENTS I CAN COMPLETE:
MY MATH SUBJECTS OF EXPERTISE:
I am very knowledgeable and proficient in assisting students in a wide range of mathematics classes. I can help students complete their homework assignments and other projects get an A on quizzes, tests, and exams (including proctored assessments) answer online discussion posts write essays & papers in MLA APA Chicago format and provide general overall academic help in each math course listed below:
STATISTICS HELP (MY BEST SUBJECT):
ALGEBRA HELP:
CALCULUS HELP:
Paid Help from Hiraedu: If You're struggling to handle your Online Exams, Assignments or any other coursework, get help from Hiraedu and pay after the exam. Contact details for Hiraedu is: WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657 OR Call: +1 727 456 9641
ATTRIBUTES THAT SET ME APART FROM OTHER TUTORS:
I CAN AID STUDENTS TAKING PROCTORED ASSESSMENTS:
I CAN VERIFY MY ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS:
I HAVE PAID ACCESS TO OVER 15 STUDY-HELP WEBSITES AND MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE:
MY AVAILABILITY & RELIABILITY:
MY EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE OF EXPERTISE:
SCHOOLS FROM WHICH I'VE HELPED STUDENTS IN :
As of 2021, I have tutored and helped students enrolled at the following U.S. universities community colleges county & city colleges schools for-profit institutions listed below in alphabetical order:
Paid Help from Hiraedu: If You're struggling to handle your Online Exams, Assignments or any other coursework, get help from Hiraedu and pay after the exam. Contact details for Hiraedu is: WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657 OR Call: +1 727 456 9641
I OFFER FLEXIBLE PAYMENT PLANS:
TUTORING AVAILABLE FOR OTHER SUBJECTS:
THE OBLIGATORY "IS THIS A SCAM?" QUESTION:
Considering the fact that you found my contact information online, it’s understandable to be skeptical regarding the legitimacy of my services. Therefore, I’m willing to do all of the following to help you feel more secure in trusting me with your academic needs:
MY REBUTTAL TO THE OBLIGATORY “IS THIS A SCAM?” QUESTION:
At the risk of sounding arrogant, I consider myself to be at least marginally more intelligent (both academically & socially) than the average person. Therefore, if I ever decided to suddenly risk prison time, risk my reputation, and risk enduring the wrath of modern-day “cancel culture” by scamming people out of their money:
HOW TO CONTACT ME:
Paid Help from Hiraedu: If You're struggling to handle your Online Exams, Assignments or any other coursework, get help from Hiraedu and pay after the exam. Contact details for Hiraedu is: WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657 OR Call: +1 727 456 9641
My contact details:
WhatsApp: +1 (213) 594-5657
Call: +1 727 456 9641
Website: hiraedu. com
Email: info@hiraedu. com
What are your Thoughts! Write in comments and ask for help if needed
Suggest more topic Ideas
Join this subreddit to help us grow!
submitted by Constant-Show2229 to Statisticshelpers_ [link] [comments]


2024.05.12 19:42 PossessionMinimum360 What is the answer to this mcq (Calc BC)

What is the answer to this mcq (Calc BC)
submitted by PossessionMinimum360 to APStudents [link] [comments]


2024.05.12 17:47 Routine-Tip6759 [React] Deep Honesty v/s Shallow Honesty [BLOG]

Most people avoid saying literally false things, especially if those could be audited, like making up facts or credentials. The reasons for this are both moral and pragmatic — being caught out looks really bad, and sustaining lies is quite hard, especially over time. Let’s call the habit of not saying things you know to be false ‘shallow honesty’.
Often when people are shallowly honest, they still choose what true things they say in a kind of locally act-consequentialist way, to try to bring about some outcome. Maybe something they want for themselves (e.g. convincing their friends to see a particular movie), or something they truly believe is good (e.g. causing their friend to vote for the candidate they think will be better for the country).
Either way, if you think someone is being merely shallowly honest, you can only shallowly trust them: you might be confident that they aren't literally lying, but you still have to do a bit of reverse engineering to figure out what they actually believe or intend.
This post is about an alternative: deep honesty, and the deep trust that can follow. Deep honesty is the opposite of managing the other party’s reactions for them. Deep honesty means explaining what you actually believe, rather than trying to persuade others of some course of action. Instead, you adopt a sincerely cooperative stance in choosing which information to share, and trust them to come to their own responses.
In this post, we've leaned into the things that seem good to us about deep honesty. Writing while being in touch with that makes it seem easier to convey the core idea. We've tried to outline what we see as disadvantages of deep honesty, but we're still probably a bit partial. We would love to see discussion of the idea, including critical takes (either that our concepts are not useful ones, or that this is less something to be emulated than we imply).
The rest of this post will be:

Examples of shallow (versus deep) honesty

Why deep honesty?

In all the above examples, it’s easy to see how deep honesty could go wrong — your boss thinks you’re a moron, your friends don’t care about your feelings, you have a weird existential crisis about whether you’re even a good person, and instead of going straight to a conference you get dragged off for half an hour of interrogation by government officials.
But what if it went right? It seems like when deep honesty is well-received, it leads to better outcomes, often in ways you can’t foresee. This isn’t a trite or mystical claim: rather, there will always be information you’re lacking that other people have. When you’re deeply honest, you equip them to make best use of their private information as well as yours. Perhaps your manager knows of a clever workaround to the problems you have. Even when they can’t make special use of the information, deep honesty makes it easy for them to rely on your reports, and so strengthens the relationship.
There are good reasons to refrain from deep honesty: it is a risk, and sometimes a large one. In the case of admissions, usually when you reject someone from a programme, you have a pretty clear sense of why, and actually explaining that to the applicant could be very helpful. But as well as being time-consuming, telling someone why they didn’t meet the bar can provoke quite a negative reaction and sometimes even reprisal. Deep honesty is an act of trust in the recipient.
However, it’s also sometimes quite hard to realize how much you’re missing when you stick to shallow honesty, and is easy to overestimate how successfully you’re crafting your message. Shallow honesty involves some amount of optimization, and so it falls prey to all of optimization's classic failures.
To take the example of public messaging, particularly smart and capable people are especially likely to spot disingenuous sales pitches, and when they do, they have basically no reason to tell you that you seem manipulative to them, and so there’s no feedback loop. From their perspective, there’s a chance you might be provoked to switch to deeper honesty, but you also might just optimize more carefully. So you learn nothing, and you end up missing out on some of the best people without even noticing.
Shallow honesty works well enough in cases where, in some sense, the other person wants it. The border patrol official would be happy to accept that you're here to see friends and wave you through, without working their head around the subject of the conference. But in domains where people are actively trying to resist adversarial optimization, they can catch on pretty fast.
Indeed, people with experience running admissions rounds generally learn how to spot applications that are shallow, because so many people do it. Likewise with funding applications. It is very natural to want to put your best foot forward and pitch people on why you’re so shiny and polished and great, but often it is a mistake. Sometimes the person reading your application wants to understand what you’re actually like, and if you clearly only give them half the picture then they still have to figure out the other half, only now they’re much less certain.

What deep honesty is not

Having made the case for deep honesty, it’s worth laying out some pitfalls, both in the application, and in how you might interpret the concept.

It is not a universal stance

Deep honesty is not a property of a person that you need to adopt wholesale. It’s something you can do more or less of, at different times, in different domains.

It is not independent of the listener

The words which will help a young child to understand what’s going on will be different from the words which will help an expert. Deep honesty is attuned to the situation, and the audience.

It is not telling people everything

Deep honesty doesn’t mean you have to share every detail that might be relevant. Deep honesty is in touch with what the listener cares about, and is in touch with your and their rights to choose where to spend time communicating. If the cashier at the grocery store asks how you’re doing, it’s not deeply honest to give the same answer you’d give to a therapist — it’s just inappropriate.

It does not relieve you of a responsibility to be kind

Deep honesty means you don’t take responsibility for how others respond to your words. Your responsibility is to make your words good — speaking with truth, relevance, and kindness. Their responsibility is to act well given that. But blunt truths can be hurtful. It is often compatible with deep honesty to refrain from sharing things where it seems kinder to do so (although be honest with yourself about whether it would be a deeper kindness to share). And it’s of course important, if sharing something that might be difficult to hear, to think about how it can be delivered in a gentle way.

It is not incompatible with consequentialism

A pure act-consequentialist, choosing the words that they predict will have the best outcomes, might sometimes lie. Many consequentialists would reject that as naïve and demand at least shallow honesty as a side constraint.
However, this may still be too naïve. The winner’s curse is that whoever wins an auction is liable to have overestimated the value of the object. The same dynamic applies when you’re optimizing for what to say. You have noisy estimates of how good each option will be, and it’s likely that the one that looks best to you will be an overestimate — perhaps because it interacts with some kind of blindspot you have. If you’re optimizing under shallow honesty, you’re stuck with this problem. With deep honesty, you can hope that you may reveal useful information to people who don’t share your blindspots (even if you don’t know what that information is). And especially when you’re interacting with very competent people, you may not be so good at telling how they will receive any particular message.
So deep honesty as a heuristic for action for boundedly rational actors looks pretty good on consequentialist grounds. It’s very compatible with taking the low-hanging fruit of consequentialism — thinking through possible bad effects of communication, and taking steps to mitigate those. (Deep honesty also looks generally very good from non-consequentialist perspectives on ethics.)

Challenging cases for deep honesty

It’s not always the wise or moral choice to be deeply honest. Deep honesty is a risk, and it’s a bigger risk in some cases than others.
Even when you’re not being deeply honest about everything, it’s often worth remaining deeply honest at the meta level. Warn people that you’re biased and may argue for one side. Tell them that you’re simplifying things, or steering around a topic you don’t want to get into.

Large inferential gaps

Sometimes you have a very different worldview from your audience.
If you have a good understanding of their perspective (e.g. imagine explaining something to your own small child), you may be able to predict that they might draw inferences you’d consider inaccurate from things you share. It isn’t deeply honest to knowingly let them draw important false inferences, at least without warning them about this issue. But when bandwidth is limited, you may well not be able to bottom out all of the differences in perspective. In this case, deep honesty means improving their understanding of relevant topics in ways they’d endorse with moderately more context (you don’t get to assume they come to endorse your whole worldview). Sometimes this means (transparently) steering around a topic that’s more likely to cause inaccurate inferences; sometimes it means going out of your way to cancel possible implications.
Sometimes you don’t even know what inferences they might draw. Then it’s especially easy for attempts at communication to go wrong, and you might want to be correspondingly cautious about it. Deep honesty may take you into a zone of sharing things you might not otherwise share and are vulnerable. On the other hand, it’s hard to optimize in a shallowly honest way when you don’t understand the audience, so the unforeseen benefits of deep honesty can be especially helpful in these cases.

Audiences you don’t want to cooperate with

Sometimes people will want information so that they can cause harm, and it is reasonable to not help them. Sometimes you will meet people who actively want to twist your words, and it is reasonable to not give them ammunition.

Multiple audiences

It can be harder to be deeply honest when delivering a single message to multiple audiences that have different contexts and background assumptions. What’s most useful to one audience may not be most useful to another.
We can distinguish between active deep honesty, where you are trying to share whatever information the listener would most want (to reach an informed independent view), and passive deep honesty, where you’re at least not aiming to persuade the listener of something. With multiple audiences, you may only get to choose one to be actively deeply honest with in any moment, but you can always be passively deeply honest with all of them.
Sometimes you have some audiences you’d like to be deeply honest with, and others you wouldn’t. Now you have to make a judgment call about how much you value deep trust with the first group, versus how worried you are about the risks of deep honesty with the second.
Here’s a very rough sketch of the concepts we’re using

What being deeply honest might look like

Deep honesty is about empowering your listeners. In principle this could involve conscious optimization for what seems like it might be most useful for them. But as a practical matter, the best guide is often asking yourself, as you say something, “did it feel honest to say that?”. Anecdotally, it seems like this can lead to a qualitatively different mode of expression — where you don’t allow your communication to be steered by ulterior motives — and that some people are pretty good at intuiting when people are or aren’t in this mode. This is a very helpful skill to develop.
Deep honesty is often a bit scary, because you don’t know how others will react to it. This is why engaging in it can require something like faith, that striving after virtue will lead to good things, even if you’re not in a position to be able to say what those are.
Fortunately, although deep honesty has been described here as some kind of intuitive act of faith, it is still just an action you can take with consequences you can observe. So rather than diving in wholesale, you can just try to pay a bit more attention to where you’re already doing it or not doing it, whether it seems like others are doing it, and experiment with doing it a bit more in cases where that seems like it might work out.
Seriously, skipping to 100% deep honesty all the time would be a mistake, and also probably impossible. But it seems like maybe deep honesty is underrated right now.
So ask yourself more often, when thinking about how to communicate, “what is kind, true, and useful?” and “what is the heart of the matter?” rather than “what will have good effects?”. Take a moment to appreciate the people who seem to actually consistently say what they really believe, even if it means revealing that they're wrong or ignorant or have silly reasoning about something, and especially if it's not politically expedient..
Often when people are shallowly honest, they still choose what true things they say in a kind of locally act-consequentialist way, to try to bring about some outcome. Maybe something they want for themselves (e.g. convincing their friends to see a particular movie), or something they truly believe is good (e.g. causing their friend to vote for the candidate they think will be better for the country).
Either way, if you think someone is being merely shallowly honest, you can only shallowly trust them: you might be confident that they aren't literally lying, but you still have to do a bit of reverse engineering to figure out what they actually believe or intend.
This post is about an alternative: deep honesty, and the deep trust that can follow. Deep honesty is the opposite of managing the other party’s reactions for them. Deep honesty means explaining what you actually believe, rather than trying to persuade others of some course of action. Instead, you adopt a sincerely cooperative stance in choosing which information to share, and trust them to come to their own responses.
In this post, we've leaned into the things that seem good to us about deep honesty. Writing while being in touch with that makes it seem easier to convey the core idea. We've tried to outline what we see as disadvantages of deep honesty, but we're still probably a bit partial. We would love to see discussion of the idea, including critical takes (either that our concepts are not useful ones, or that this is less something to be emulated than we imply).
The rest of this post will be:

Examples of shallow (versus deep) honesty

Why deep honesty?

In all the above examples, it’s easy to see how deep honesty could go wrong — your boss thinks you’re a moron, your friends don’t care about your feelings, you have a weird existential crisis about whether you’re even a good person, and instead of going straight to a conference you get dragged off for half an hour of interrogation by government officials.
But what if it went right? It seems like when deep honesty is well-received, it leads to better outcomes, often in ways you can’t foresee. This isn’t a trite or mystical claim: rather, there will always be information you’re lacking that other people have. When you’re deeply honest, you equip them to make best use of their private information as well as yours. Perhaps your manager knows of a clever workaround to the problems you have. Even when they can’t make special use of the information, deep honesty makes it easy for them to rely on your reports, and so strengthens the relationship.
There are good reasons to refrain from deep honesty: it is a risk, and sometimes a large one. In the case of admissions, usually when you reject someone from a programme, you have a pretty clear sense of why, and actually explaining that to the applicant could be very helpful. But as well as being time-consuming, telling someone why they didn’t meet the bar can provoke quite a negative reaction and sometimes even reprisal. Deep honesty is an act of trust in the recipient.
However, it’s also sometimes quite hard to realize how much you’re missing when you stick to shallow honesty, and is easy to overestimate how successfully you’re crafting your message. Shallow honesty involves some amount of optimization, and so it falls prey to all of optimization's classic failures.
To take the example of public messaging, particularly smart and capable people are especially likely to spot disingenuous sales pitches, and when they do, they have basically no reason to tell you that you seem manipulative to them, and so there’s no feedback loop. From their perspective, there’s a chance you might be provoked to switch to deeper honesty, but you also might just optimize more carefully. So you learn nothing, and you end up missing out on some of the best people without even noticing.
Shallow honesty works well enough in cases where, in some sense, the other person wants it. The border patrol official would be happy to accept that you're here to see friends and wave you through, without working their head around the subject of the conference. But in domains where people are actively trying to resist adversarial optimization, they can catch on pretty fast.
Indeed, people with experience running admissions rounds generally learn how to spot applications that are shallow, because so many people do it. Likewise with funding applications. It is very natural to want to put your best foot forward and pitch people on why you’re so shiny and polished and great, but often it is a mistake. Sometimes the person reading your application wants to understand what you’re actually like, and if you clearly only give them half the picture then they still have to figure out the other half, only now they’re much less certain.

What deep honesty is not

Having made the case for deep honesty, it’s worth laying out some pitfalls, both in the application, and in how you might interpret the concept.

It is not a universal stance

Deep honesty is not a property of a person that you need to adopt wholesale. It’s something you can do more or less of, at different times, in different domains.

It is not independent of the listener

The words which will help a young child to understand what’s going on will be different from the words which will help an expert. Deep honesty is attuned to the situation, and the audience.

It is not telling people everything

Deep honesty doesn’t mean you have to share every detail that might be relevant. Deep honesty is in touch with what the listener cares about, and is in touch with your and their rights to choose where to spend time communicating. If the cashier at the grocery store asks how you’re doing, it’s not deeply honest to give the same answer you’d give to a therapist — it’s just inappropriate.

It does not relieve you of a responsibility to be kind

Deep honesty means you don’t take responsibility for how others respond to your words. Your responsibility is to make your words good — speaking with truth, relevance, and kindness. Their responsibility is to act well given that. But blunt truths can be hurtful. It is often compatible with deep honesty to refrain from sharing things where it seems kinder to do so (although be honest with yourself about whether it would be a deeper kindness to share). And it’s of course important, if sharing something that might be difficult to hear, to think about how it can be delivered in a gentle way.

It is not incompatible with consequentialism

A pure act-consequentialist, choosing the words that they predict will have the best outcomes, might sometimes lie. Many consequentialists would reject that as naïve and demand at least shallow honesty as a side constraint.
However, this may still be too naïve. The winner’s curse is that whoever wins an auction is liable to have overestimated the value of the object. The same dynamic applies when you’re optimizing for what to say. You have noisy estimates of how good each option will be, and it’s likely that the one that looks best to you will be an overestimate — perhaps because it interacts with some kind of blindspot you have. If you’re optimizing under shallow honesty, you’re stuck with this problem. With deep honesty, you can hope that you may reveal useful information to people who don’t share your blindspots (even if you don’t know what that information is). And especially when you’re interacting with very competent people, you may not be so good at telling how they will receive any particular message.
So deep honesty as a heuristic for action for boundedly rational actors looks pretty good on consequentialist grounds. It’s very compatible with taking the low-hanging fruit of consequentialism — thinking through possible bad effects of communication, and taking steps to mitigate those. (Deep honesty also looks generally very good from non-consequentialist perspectives on ethics.)

Challenging cases for deep honesty

It’s not always the wise or moral choice to be deeply honest. Deep honesty is a risk, and it’s a bigger risk in some cases than others.
Even when you’re not being deeply honest about everything, it’s often worth remaining deeply honest at the meta level. Warn people that you’re biased and may argue for one side. Tell them that you’re simplifying things, or steering around a topic you don’t want to get into.

Large inferential gaps

Sometimes you have a very different worldview from your audience.
If you have a good understanding of their perspective (e.g. imagine explaining something to your own small child), you may be able to predict that they might draw inferences you’d consider inaccurate from things you share. It isn’t deeply honest to knowingly let them draw important false inferences, at least without warning them about this issue. But when bandwidth is limited, you may well not be able to bottom out all of the differences in perspective. In this case, deep honesty means improving their understanding of relevant topics in ways they’d endorse with moderately more context (you don’t get to assume they come to endorse your whole worldview). Sometimes this means (transparently) steering around a topic that’s more likely to cause inaccurate inferences; sometimes it means going out of your way to cancel possible implications.
Sometimes you don’t even know what inferences they might draw. Then it’s especially easy for attempts at communication to go wrong, and you might want to be correspondingly cautious about it. Deep honesty may take you into a zone of sharing things you might not otherwise share and are vulnerable. On the other hand, it’s hard to optimize in a shallowly honest way when you don’t understand the audience, so the unforeseen benefits of deep honesty can be especially helpful in these cases.

Audiences you don’t want to cooperate with

Sometimes people will want information so that they can cause harm, and it is reasonable to not help them. Sometimes you will meet people who actively want to twist your words, and it is reasonable to not give them ammunition.

Multiple audiences

It can be harder to be deeply honest when delivering a single message to multiple audiences that have different contexts and background assumptions. What’s most useful to one audience may not be most useful to another.
We can distinguish between active deep honesty, where you are trying to share whatever information the listener would most want (to reach an informed independent view), and passive deep honesty, where you’re at least not aiming to persuade the listener of something. With multiple audiences, you may only get to choose one to be actively deeply honest with in any moment but you can always be passively deeply honest with all of them.
Sometimes you have some audiences you’d like to be deeply honest with, and others you wouldn’t. Now you have to make a judgment call about how much you value deep trust with the first group, versus how worried you are about the risks of deep honesty with the second.
submitted by Routine-Tip6759 to prakharkpravachan [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 22:27 Lipe18090 (Spoilers Extended) A List of Every Confirmed and Completed TWOW Chapter We Know About, Updated

Intro

Almost four years ago, BryndenBFish released a post and tried to figure out how many Winds chapters are already written. However, many years have passed and we have more information, so in this post I'll try to extend his post with the new chapters that George has talked about! I'll give both the pessimist and the optimist possible estimates.

Arya Stark: 3 - 7 Chapters.

Tyrion Lannister: 5 - 7 Chapters.

Barristan Selmy: 3 - 4 Chapters

Arianne Martell: 3 Chapters

Melisandre of Asshai: 1 Chapter

Theon Greyjoy: 2 Chapters

Aeron Greyjoy and Samwell Tarly: 3 - 4 Chapters

Areo Hotah: 2 - 3 Chapters

Cersei Lannister: 4 - 6 Chapters

Asha Greyjoy: 2 Chapters

Jon Connington: 2 Chapters

Sansa Stark: 1 Chapter

Victarion Greyjoy: 2 - 3 Chapters

Bran Stark: 1 Chapter

Daenerys Targaryen: 1 - 2 Chapters

Davos Seaworth: 1 - 2 Chapters

Jaime Lannister and Brienne of Tarth: 1 - 2 Chapters

Prologue:

Unknown TWOW Chapters GRRM Has Written or Was Writing

Conclusion

Here's our grand tally for confirmed chapters that George was writing or wrote from TWOW:
Minimum Number of Confirmed TWOW Chapters: <46 (38 Known POV chapters + 5 Unknown POV Chapters (Spring 2015 TWOW Chapter, "Smudge" in 2018 and the 3+ chapters he was making good progress on in July 2020).
Maximum Number of Confirmed TWOW Chapters: 64>
GRRM expects The Winds of Winter to be about 300 pages longer than A Storm of Swords and A Dance with Dragons. The books had respectively 82 and 73 chapters in it, meaning that at the pessimistic floor of 46+ chapters he's working on/has completed for TWOW, GRRM would be about 3/4 complete, which does in fact factor that he has already said that Winds is around 3/4 or 75% done in the Stephen Colbert interview.
Again, that's the statistical floor, the most pessimistic possible take for where George is at. The statistical ceiling is higher, but even then, the reality is that GRRM has more finished, drafted or fragmentary chapters than the ones I've been able to find in my research. It only seems that each time he writes, the book becomes bigger.
The storylines that seem closer to conclusion are Cersei, Areo, Arya and Meereen, while the Northern storyline seems to be very far from being finished.
Now, we should bear in mind that GRRM has recently stated he still has a "long ways to go" and "not to get too excited." At the very least, we can celebrate GRRM making progress and see some hard data behind his stated progress, but get depressed because he seems to not have written anything in 2023, since he estimates 1.100 pages done both in the end of 2022 and in the end of 2023.
Ultimately, I hope this post both provides hard data and also links to the sample chapters/recounts of chapters read at conventions and links to places where George has talked about other TWOW chapters. If I've missed anything, feel free to let me know!
Thanks for reading!
submitted by Lipe18090 to asoiaf [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 22:08 ArmChairAnalyst86 Your Comprehensive Guide To the Mothers Day Solar Storms of 2024 (Round 2)

Your Comprehensive Guide To the Mothers Day Solar Storms of 2024 (Round 2)
UPDATE 8:30 PM EST
Good evening everyone, I put the caps away for the update since there is no big X flare in the update, but as we got into in the initial post, the big X5.89 CME is headed this way. It was brought to my attention by neutralbystander11 that SWPC has released an update with some more infomation. My initial estimation of impacts was based on the DONKI scorecard, which is a more comprehensive and aggregate system of all models. However, its has limitations, namely how will existing waves combine and interact. The SWPC update is suggesting that the CMEs have in fact combined on the heels of the X5.89 which did appear to have a higher velocity than the preceeding CMEs upon ejection. That has influenced them to issue another G4-G5 watch. Looking at the solar wind right now, I do believe tomorrow night is going to be a better shot than tonight for another sighting. Could be wrong, and you need to leave me alot of room on that front, because arrival times is the hardest part with a dynamic setup like this. We all should be watching the solar wind for signs of imminent arrivals just in case they arrive sooner than expected. SWPC did not say anything about exact arrival time and their comments conflict with the latest ENLIL runs, which have not been the most reliable here lately. DONKI model aggregates suggest an arrival time of tomorrow 5/12 at 00:02 UTC which is 7 PM EST. That would be just about perfect, but the problem is that very little has panned out on the timelines implied. Again, we take the info for what its worth, but results may vary. I have eyes on it, but right now I am getting the sense that tomorrow night may be a better opportunity. I am watching the solar wind right now and the speed is insane at nearly 1000 km/s but the density is extremely light. A small fraction of what it was last night and the Bz is wavering back and forth from north to south orientation and we need a solid southerly orientation to hit paydirt. Its enough for a solid and steady G3, but one look at the auroral oval and you will see that last night was MUCH different.
We do not know when exactly it will arrive, but most indications are sometime tomorrow. I will show you what I am looking at. Check the left side for arrival time sfrom various offices, but the bottom is an average of all. It does say an upper bound of Kp8, but a common theme this week has been overperformance and SWPC apparently has gotten the memo with stronger wording showing up the past 24 hours or so.
https://preview.redd.it/1jy4xn5s6wzc1.png?width=1707&format=png&auto=webp&s=b0915f298b2695375b19a4fc01cf5aa98169bcb4
The ingredients are there for another spectacular night, but we are going to need a few things to work out right, but I think the chances are pretty good. More so than tonight, but again, I could very well be wrong. The CME will do as it please. All we can do is stay tuned, keep eyes on the skies and our data points, and hope that conditions line up, including the time of day for optimal viewing.
And nope, I am still not worried, just excited. Someone made an important comment earlier, and while we do need to keep it in context of changes in our mag field since then, but back in 03, we took an X10 and X17 direct almost back to back. Yet most I have talked to who saw that storm and this one say that the auroral display last night was noticeably more intense. If you have any input on that, do share. Do with that what you will, it is only anecdotal of course, but I can tell you after this epoch of skywatching ends, we are going to be breaking it down for months to come and the thing I am most interested in is Maggie. Our magnetic field is far more than our forcefield from such events and its a crucial component in virtually all levels of life on earth.
One final thing before I go. I want to talk about flying during geomagnetic storms. I have gotten far more of this question than I expected, but then again, I did not expect to have over 2000 people here a few days ago. People have asked if it is safe for them to fly, or even if it is safe for their pregnant spouses to fly. I fully understand the gravity of the question and I want to allay some concerns. If you get the chance to fly during a geomagnetic storm, do it. It will not harm you in and of itself. You will not be exposed to significant amounts of radiation. There is one metric you need to watch when it comes to flying, and its the same one as our astronauts and people on the ISS. Protons. Aside from navigation and communications considerations, the main thing airlines pay attention to is the solar radiation levels in the form of proton storms. When you see the chances for particular type of flares, you will sometime see probabilities for proton events. Proton events often accompany big flares and CMEs, but they can stem from other things too. Just like the Kp Index and the G1-G5 scale, proton radiation storms have their own scale from S1 to S5. Currently we are at S1 levels and have not exceeded it except for a brief moment yesterday. Levels could rise again, but so far have been muted, which is a tiny bit surprising but the numbers dont lie. The effects of proton storms are typically constrained to the polar regions unless the storm is sufficiently powerful enough to reach lower. There have been occaisions where airlines and space based entities have had to make adjustments on account of this, but when it comes to flying, they are looking at it closely. It never hurts to ask if you feel leery about it, but dont expect the ticket counter attendant to be able to explain it.
AA
Hey everyone, last night I had stated that it appeared the bulk of the CME was headed northward. Well in the light of day, that does not appear to be the case. LASCO coronagraphs updated this morning as well as the DONKI scoreboard and it does appear we have impacts that will continue through today, and until tomorrow, and possibly even Monday. Now this last flare and CME did stem from the 2nd strongest flare of this cycle I do believe, an impressive X5.9 with "massive dimming" according to CCMC indicating an impressive CME. It is a partial halo, and what that is telling us is that the bulk of it is in fact heading our way. It was of reasonably long duration and it will be on the tail end of a very active period thus far. Additionally there have been a few upper M-Class flares with decent duration themselves with probable CMEs. They have not been accurately modeled just yet. I am still consulting the ENLIL spiral, but its updates are lagging behind significantly. I am mainly working off imagery now and the DONKI scoreboard which honestly has been one of the coolest tools I have found, fortunate to have found it last week before this event. Thank you Mr. Harlan Thomas. Lets talk about what a "halo cme" means and clear up a few misconceptions.
When this term is used, its because in the coronographs, it appears that ejecta is literally flying out of all sides of the sun. We know this is not the case. CMEs are directional in nature, and while they can grow to massive sizes, they still do not go in all directions at once. The reason it appears that way is the viewing angle. The imagery is taken alot closer to earth than it is the sun. As a result, when a CME is fired directly at us, it appears to come from all sides of the sun from our angle, but really its just a wave that appears to grow larger in terms of visually as it gets closer. This same mechanic is often used to determine what is going on with other objects in space. If we detect something and it starts growing suddenly, its because its either coming towards us and appearing larger as a result, or because its actually growing of course. You would be surprised how much information about the cosmos is deduced by using process of elimination and if X = Y than it must be Z. We do the best we can with what we have. This particular CME was a partial halo, so that indicates the bulk of it is headed here, but some will miss.
As a result, DONKI is giving the latest CME an upper bound of Kp7 from an average of all models, with some individual models forecasting Kp8. This event has taught us in real time that the models are good for advice, but have a long way to go both in forecasting strength and timing. I lean more towards it overperforming than under performing even though its not as geoeffective as the previous waves because it will encounter a very perturbed magnetosphere. This storm did not quite get to Halloween 2003 levels in terms of strength, yet by many reports the aurora were reported to be more intense last night. For those who have been watching our magnetic field closely, this does not come as a surprise. After this event passes, we will dive into that a little bit more and break down what this means in the grand scheme, but for now lets focus on the here and now.
FORECAST FOR TONIGHT
The models are suggesting impacts continue into tonight with potential arrivals from the X1.0 and M9.8 which was the most impressive signature in AIA 131 with a rotating starlike effect and it went on for a long time with dual peaks near X1. It has an upper bound of Kp9 HOWEVER there is a chance that this wave has already affected us. We just dont know and all we can do is measure the impacts as they occur. I have had alot of questions about this and after the forecast I will explain. We also have impacts scheduled into tomorrow with upper bounds of Kp8. We also have the possibility of the X1.1 and X3.9 arriving in the next 24 hours. So the long and short of it is this. Tonight remains an excellent opportunity to aurora chase. The solar wind speed is very high currently at 918 km/s but the density is super low. However, if those arrivals start to come in, the density could jump, and that will start some fireworks with speeds that high. It would also be good if the Bz stays mostly south, the further the better. The bottom line is this. You are going to have to keep checking the SWL auroral dashboard and watch those numbers or you can cheat and look at the auroral oval to get a realtime idea of where it SHOULD be visible. Its a very good chance, and I would be optimistic we will get another show and its in the realm of possibility for it to be better than the first, but the opposite is true too. We just dont know because what happens in the solar wind, stays in the solar wind, until it reaches our probes around 5% of the way from here to the sun. That is our lead time ladies and gentlemen. 5%.
THis is the timeline for a flare/CME event and how we detect it.
X-Ray flux indicates a solar flare is in progress which will be quickly be confirmed by SDO imagery and similar probes in varius spectrums and wavelengths.
The solar flare has characteristics of a CME which are dimming around it, shockwave dispersal, and ejecta visible in various wavelengths. LASCO coronagraphs will pick it up and be able to get a general idea of the direction using visual analysis as well as instrumental. If the blast is full halo, it can be assumed its coming here.
Next its velocity and density will be measured and estimated using all data points available. Again, hard to measure these details so far away, but the system works as far as that goes, because we have many eyes on the sun. We dont have so many on the long trip between here and there since these bodies are so far apart and in motion. So using that data as well as all other data points, it is fed into the solar wind models like the WSA-ENLIL or EUHFORIA which will do their level best to give us a timeline and gauge the impacts.
Results vary widely between models and reality in this case and as the variables increase, the results are harder to predict. In this case we have a train of CMEs headed here, and I have said this from the very start, I fully expected them to struggle, and they have. The same rationale is why I was so confident saying this storm would overperform its forecast. I dont have to worry about being as right as much as they do, so I can take those risks. They have to play it safe.
So in summary, we detect and measure them as they leave the sun but we will not see them again in real detail until they reach our probes located about 5% to 6% of the entire distance from the earth to the sun. Using these probes, we then can detect their signatures and get a better idea of what is coming. When you look at your dasbhoard on SWL, and specifically the solar wind charts, there is a line that says "earth" but the chart goes further. What you are seeing is the characteristics of the CME be detected and then fed into the models. So as a result, there is no choice but to use the models for guidance and then take it as it comes. We get more advanced at this every decade and its likely that tools will be implemented in the future that give more data and therefore more accurate forecasts, especially for the tough ones like this weekend. You will just need to stay plugged in.
Is It Safe To Put The Tomato Plants Back Outside and Come Out of the Bunker?
In my humble opinion, this weekend should go a long way in allaying some fears about how vulnerable we are AT THIS POINT IN TIME to significant space weather events. By all metrics we experienced an extreme storm on the practical scale. Yes, Maggie sure is taking a beating this weakend, but so far she has not flinched, and life goes on despite hitting an estimated Kp11 according to some models with auroras visible in southern Mexico and Cuba. This should allay some fears about these garden variety solar storms being hazardous or dangerous to our technologically dependant way of life. Its significant, but not unprecedented in modern times. There may very well come a time when this is not the case, when a solar storm of this magnitude could be hazardous, but that is a hypothetical. So many things COULD happen and we have to respect that but at the same time, we have to live in the moment, the moment is all we have, and for now we are fine against stuff like this. There have been some outages and disruptions which were predicted and expected. Satcoms stuggled and various services have had outages. GPS and Radio definitely suffered and continue to. Starlink took a hit but seems to have recovered for the most part. There are still sporadic outages and performance issues across the board. Being impacted and being devastated are not the same though and this is all part of the game, but as far as I know, there have been no significant powergrid issues. Could there have been? People ask about 1989 when Quebecs grid went down and point to that, but what most dont know is that there were other factors in that stemming from the geology that caused the currents to do something unexpected. It was down for around 9 hours in some places. At the same time, we learned from it, and contrary to belief, measures have been taken to safeguard us during these events. Would those safeguards work in a CE or greater size storm? I hope we never have to find out together. We would not be defenseless, but it would likely be disastrous and theres no way around that in my view, but that aint this weekend folks. I wonder if the twitter people feel silly today?
Many have asked, how would we know if a storm was going to be that bad? What would the lead time be? Some even wonder if such information would be withheld. I will just tell you that there is no way that could happen. It is not just NASA/NOAA etc watching this stuff. Many are. The data and imagery is free to use for everyone and many keep tabs, far more closely than myself. If a CE happened, we would see the flare and CME signature and would immediately know that something extraordinary and anomalous happened by the flash, the radio burst, and all of the measurements taken during every CME. The numbers would tell us that the potential is there. However, in order to get the finer details, it takes a little time, and very precious time at that. These CMEs over the weekend arrived in around 48 hours. The Carrington Event was said to arrive somewhere between 14-17 hours IIRC. The long and short of that problem is that if you are not already prepared by the time the CME is detected, you are in a bad way. At the same time, its very difficult to prepare for the possibility of such a long term scenario but folks, we can't worry about it and get anxious.
Any number of things COULD happen. ATLAS could detect a 25KM comet headed directly for us from deep space. A supervolcano could erupt and wreck our climate and block the sunlight. WWIII could break out and go nuclear. I could go on and on and on with examples. These things are in fact threats, but all you can do is try to prepare for them. Stressing yourself about it needlessly serves no purpose. Existential threats are not in short supply these days and anyone truly paying attention recognizes that. I say this as a father and a husband. I do not miss much, at all because I cannot look away. I have been following the story that is human civilization in the modern age since I was very young. When I was a little boy and while other kids were watching cartoons and nickolodeon, I watched Hurricane Andrew slam into Florida, the OKC bombing, Desert Storm. I have been this way as long as I can remember and in some ways I feel cut out for it but that is probably me just being the main character of my own story, and we all do that at times. It can and does create anxiety sometimes and I recognize that but I try to keep it in its proper place and perspective but I man my station on the watchtower and I dont know why.
So lets enjoy this friends. We may have another very exciting night. After these CMEs pass, guess what? Solar max is not over and shows no signs of letting up just yet. It looks like we have some new active regions coming into view and complexity is a little muted but the size is there. AR3664 looked about the same at the E limb. Until those poles reverse and the rearrangement completes, we are in the thick of it. This does mean the CE watch continues of course, but more likely it just means we are going to have some more weekend like this one. Maybe more intense or maybe less. I can tell you that the fine folks here on this sub will be watching for all things. The fun stuff and the scary stuff and we will try to give it to you as straight as we can without the BS. I am analyst by trade in real life. I understand what it takes to analyze something effectively. It means looking at something without bias, without emotion, and without personal feelings or desires. Sometimes those things creep in anyway, but its the job of the analyst to keep his objectivity and not be swayed by anything but the result. I have been analyzing the sun and other topics for a long time and I have done so with no audience. I started this sub and in the past week it blew up and I cannot tell you how grateful and touched I am from it truly and every writer who has ever written anything, just wants somebody to read it. However, I am not willing to hype things up, scare people, be misleading, be overtly controversial, or get too high on my own supply. I am pleased that we did this organically but whether it was 1 person or 1000, I am going to do it the exact same way.
Well that is enough for now, so lets wrap it up. Again, I cannot demonstrate my gratitude enough. I am a sensitive person and I have no shame in that, and some of the comments had me saying nah, just something in my eye, I kid you not. Its been a great experience and I hope its been great for you, and I look forward to many more. As always I will try to answer questions and allay concerns as a priority but I see the thank yous and I appreciate them all.
For you nerds out there who want to see the DONKI scoreboard here it is.
https://kauai.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/CMEscoreboard/
SWL dashboard
https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/auroral-activity.html
WSA-ENLIL Solar Wind Model
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/wsa-enlil-solar-wind-prediction
Down Detector To Check For Outages
https://downdetector.com/
New Active Regions Coming Into View
https://preview.redd.it/61sqiqgotuzc1.png?width=414&format=png&auto=webp&s=94fe1ecad5e8c1ea6c92b0a88b382d38fd0ba763
And last but not least, my favorite AIA 131, the last 48 hours. BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM. SDO is having some bandwidth issues, so I cant attach video right now, but here is the link to the SWL viewer of it.
https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-images/sdo.html#SDO_1024-16
AA
submitted by ArmChairAnalyst86 to SolarMax [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 20:08 mullighanisdog Interviews from the Zone - The Ecologist - Part 2

*Serhii breaks out into a deep coughing fit. He apologizes and we continue\*
Ostap was now starting to get on my nerves. The Captain had sent him to retrieve me, he was raving mad, threatening me with all sorts of disciplinary action. Apparently I didn’t hear him yelling for me from the sidewalk outside. It was already getting dark at this point, and the Captain was extra paranoid about spending a night this far deep in The Zone.
Ostap already had the container in his hands. He opened it, and I carefully placed The Cue inside its four lead-lined walls. The container was heavy, but a necessary piece of equipment. Without it, the radiation from the artifact would kill us all.
The Captain wanted an immediate report. I delayed for as long as possible, trying to think of how I should articulate what the hell I just saw in a way that would also gain the Captain’s cooperation. You see, the Captain had full command over our mission's transportation. I knew that I needed our vehicle if I had any hope of getting the artifact back to the laboratory. This also means that the Captain could at any point deny me this transportation if he felt that the risk of transporting the artifact was too dangerous. This was standard protocol, standard life-saving protocol. I knew it was important, but I also knew that The Cue needed to get back, at any cost.
So what did you do?
I carefully downplayed the situation.
I instructed Ostap not to say a word to anyone about what he saw. I told the Captain directly, in private. I told him that The Cue had been disarmed, and that Stanislavs injuries were a result of his sloppy handling of the artifact. I told the Captain that I had conducted thorough tests and determined that The Cue was now safe. I threw some random numbers and measurements at the Captain that I knew would just cause him confusion, but would help to make my findings seem legitimate and trustworthy.
Without giving the Captain time to think, I told him as confidently as I could that we needed to secure the container inside of the BTR, as far from the driver as possible. We would secure the container with straps and I would personally sit next to it, to ensure it’s safe transport. With the container in hand, I then started marching towards the BTR.
The Captain bought every word, and began giving orders to his men to hurry up and help me. I felt glorious, and for that brief moment everything seemed like it was going to be okay.
The container was secured with straps to the floor, under my seat. When no one was looking, I carefully slipped off my soft kevlar vest and placed it over the container. I had to be careful not to get caught, because I knew this would raise suspicion. I didn’t want it known that I still had legitimate concerns of The Cue exploding during transport. I was nervous, I kept running the tests through my head over and over. Telling myself that if it was going to explode here, it would have exploded during the tests. As long as the artifact remains in the container, we are safe, we will be fine.
Stanislav was then loaded up. He was sedated heavily and coming in and out of consciousness. I could see now that his injuries extended up past his left hand, and that most of his left forearm was also wrapped in a deeply-soaked bloodied bandage. I pitied him, if he survives the radiation, surely his arm will need to be amputated. The medical officer had applied a tourniquet above the elbow, dating the time of application in the little white rectangle at the top of the apparatus. I remember looking at the time on the tourniquet, then checking my watch. It had been four hours. Four hours.
*Serhii breaks into a sudden and uncomfortable laugh, broken quickly by another coughing fit\*
My heart sank into my chest, and I could feel my anxiety spiking. I thought that was impossible, surely I misread his writing. I thought to myself, I had only been in the department store for forty minutes, perhaps fifty at most. I then checked my test records to confirm. The first three tests were conducted at 4:05pm, 4:11pm, and 4:18pm. Then I knew that I had to wait thirty minutes before conducting my second set of tests. I checked the log, expecting the times to be around the 5pm mark. The three times read: 6:46pm, 6:51pm, 6:56pm. How is that even possible? I was stumped, baffled. I looked down at my feet, at the container beneath me, and I swear on my life, I felt the thing inside breathing. By the time the true horror set in, the vehicle was already set in motion and we were on our way home.
We traveled for a brief while, uninterrupted. I didn’t know where exactly we were, I couldn’t keep my eye or mind off the container. I just remember being suddenly alerted by Stanislav. He had suddenly regained full consciousness. The medical officer was holding him down, I didn’t know why at first but then I saw that Stanislav kept trying to sit up. He appeared to be confused - like he awoke from a deep sleep, I didn’t know how long he had been unconscious for. My concept of time was gone to say the least.
Ostap went to assist the medical officer, they were holding Stanislav down to the stretcher. He was panicking and started calling out for us to let him go. He tried to forcefully push Ostap off of him, first with his good arm, and then afterwards with his injured arm. Stanislav pushed until his bandages started to unravel, revealing his open wound for the rest of us. I could see his injured arm bending, twisting, muscles tearing. It didn’t phase him. It didn’t seem like he had any concept of his injuries. The pushing turned into punching, which turned into biting. Ostap had to yank his hand away quickly to stop Stanislav from taking a chunk out of his wrist. This in turn freed Stanislav’s right arm, and he reached across the stretcher for the medical officer. The young officer started to squeal, and yelled for help, “he’s choking me, he’s choking me!” Stanislav had his hand around the poor boy's throat, and was squeezing with ferocious strength. I grabbed Stanislav’s arm with both of my hands and jerked it back into place on the stretcher. I felt his wrist break in my hands. Stanislav hadn’t noticed, he was still trying to pull away. The medical officer then got on top of the stretcher, placing his knee over Stanislavs chest, pinning him down. Stanislav was gasping for air, not really screaming, just gasping and strange animalistic grunting. Ostap started yelling this time, screaming at Stanislav to stop, to please stop. There was blood everywhere. I saw that Stanislav was bleeding again, and I noticed that the tourniquet had come undone. I switched off with Ostap and went around to the other side of the stretcher to reapply it. I think the medical officer noticed at the same time because he promptly ordered the BTR to halt. The Captain wasn’t in the back with us, he was at the front and could only hear what was going on.
He opened the rear door with a mighty fury, unleashing all his built up anger on poor Stanislav. The Captain stood with one foot on his chest, long enough to leave his boot impressions on the front of Stanislav’s blood soaked hazardous material suit. We each then took an arm, and Ostap held Stanislav’s head to the back of the stretcher. His mouth continued to open and close, and he was still trying to bite. The medical officer gave an injection and we re-tightened the tourniquet. We held on for another short while, until the medication kicked in and we felt Stanislav’s grip loosen up.
The Captain then roared in anger, the loudest I have ever heard him, “everybody out! I am calling a helicopter and we are being evacuated!”.
At that point was your mission completely abandoned?
Oh yes, and there was nothing I could do this time. After our fight with Stanislav, morale on the team was very low. Everyone was scared and just wanted to go home, and I didn’t blame them. Our driver, a young boy whom I learned was named Stepan, drove us to a nearby soviet-era gas station. There was a parking lot, big enough for the helicopter and we could take shelter inside of the derelict structure. The Captain didn’t want anyone inside the BTR, he was starting to become superstitious about the artifact. Now that he made it clear that we would be leaving it behind, he strictly ordered nobody to go near it.
There were issues we had with getting an air-evacuation. The Air Force was getting readings of an isolated emission way south of our location and refused to fly over it to come and get us. We were advised to take shelter at our current location and that a team would get to us as soon as they could.
Stanislav was on the floor of the gas station, tied to the stretcher with a rope. The medical officer was ordered to keep a rifle pointed at him until our rescue could arrive. Ostap was instructed to remove all the scientific equipment from the BTR and prepare it for flight. Stepan and I were instructed to take guard positions outside, watching over the BTR and securing our landing zone. I was especially given strict instructions not to go anywhere near The Cue. I think the Captain had come to his senses and I felt that I had lost his trust. I agreed with him, I knew that pushing him further would only result in irrational decision making and I just wanted to get back safely. I thought that maybe once the helicopter arrived, I could see exactly where we were and return another day with a field kit and conduct further testing here. I held hope, but barely.
We held that position for close to four hours, and I made sure to check my watch every thirty minutes to make sure. It was 3am and the Captain was growing obsessive. He would try the radio every fifteen minutes, seeing if the flight team had left the hangar. He was met with the same automated message each time, “Negative, continue to hold your position”. It was clear that we would be holding at that gas station until morning.
I had relieved Stepan of his duties and replaced him with Ostap. Stepan was obviously tired and I felt like Ostap kept better company anyways. The Captain didn’t care, I think his mind was preoccupied with other thoughts. I asked Ostap innocently how long he thought the collection took. He shrugged his shoulders, and provided an estimation of about an hour, maybe less. I then explained what I saw in my log book. Ostap hadn’t noticed until now. We both agreed to not say a word. No one but us appeared to notice, and we had no explanation for the rest of the team. We didn’t want to cause any further concern. Stanislav continued to rest, motionless on his stretcher. Ostap and I debriefed the situation further and decided on what we would write in our reports when we got back to The Institute. We were agreeable on what to put in our notes, as to avoid discrepancies and any unwanted attention. Our conversations then turned elsewhere, and then to nothing at all.
At 4:30am, I awoke to Stepan kicking me in the shoulder. I was sitting on my ass, leaning up against the wall. I didn’t remember falling asleep, or even sitting down. I don’t remember if I even felt tired. My adrenaline had been going non-stop since we first arrived at the department store. Stepan asked me how long I was asleep for, and I couldn’t give him an answer. I was waiting for some reprimand, some sort of punishment. I fell asleep on guard duty, even the most loose-headed recruit knew not to do that. But the punishment never came, Stepan didn’t have time to alert the Captain. He was transfixed on Ostap’s position. This alerted my attention and I looked as well. We both saw at the same time that Ostap wasn’t at his post.
Stepan gave me a brief look, I couldn’t tell if his face resembled anger towards me or fear towards the situation, then he went into the building to alert the Captain. I grabbed my rifle, and shouldered it. I then looked towards the BTR, and my heart stopped beating.
The rear hatch was open, and I saw a faint white light emanating from within. Every survival instinct I had left was screaming for me to just turn around and run away, let the military deal with this, my job is over. But I found myself actually walking towards the opened hatch. One step after the other, rifle down range. I felt so heavy, so tired. I was terrified. The faint moonlight illuminated the path in front of me and the asphalt I walked on glowed with a slight bluish hue. I could barely make out a shape on the asphalt. Rectangular and misshapen, but as I got closer, I saw that it was actually my kevlar vest. It had been tossed out of the hatch and onto the ground outside. I rounded the back of the BTR, staring now into the open hatch, and the source of that faint white light.
I found Ostap. He was on his knees on the floor of the cabin, with his back facing me. His elbows were bent at a 90 degree angle and held inwards. I couldn’t see his hands. I saw that he had partially undone his hazardous material suit, which was now tied sloppily around his waist like a sweatshirt. The lead-lined container was at his feet, closed, but resting on its side. I stared blankly at Ostap for what felt like two minutes, but in reality was only a couple seconds. He wasn’t moving. At first I thought he might have been dead but then I saw his sides expanding and I knew he was breathing. Ostap had not been alerted to my presence and I felt that I had the jump on him. I slowly reached for the container, I had to know. I opened it slightly, revealing a hollow, empty interior. Ostap must have heard me, because when I looked up again we were staring at each other. I still couldn’t see his hands, but I knew, and he knew that I knew. I greeted him as gently as I could, trying to mask my excitement. I asked him what he was doing. He looked at me with a puzzling expression, “I'm doing what you told me to do”. He then turned his shoulders to face me and raised his hands up slightly and I saw what I already knew. Gripped in both of his bare hands was The Cue. I gently put the container on the floor of the cabin and pushed it towards him. I opened my mouth to speak but I could not get a clear word out. I stuttered relentlessly, and questioned Ostap about what I had told him to do. Ostap was catching on and replied to me, “you ordered me to take out the artifact”. I didn’t say anything and we just stared at each other. He repeated again, “you ordered me”. “I did not do such a thing Ostap”, I replied as calmly as I could, “it is not possible, I had fallen asleep”. I thought about lying at first, to tell him that Stepan had relieved me so I could sleep. I was still embarrassed about my neglection, but I thought, what was the point?
Ostap looked down at his hands in puzzling confusion. He tried to reason with me, to justify what he had done. I believed that he had heard something, but it certainly wasn’t from me. I could see that Ostap was starting to panic. He was finally starting to realize the danger that he was in. I tried to calm him, I told him that it was okay, that he just needed to put the artifact back in the container. I only met his blank stare, I could tell that he was thinking, his mind was spinning. I slid the container closer to him, “Ostap, the container”, I told him. He instinctively and quickly pulled back, pulling his hands away from the container and up over his head. I cringed and stepped back instinctually. I could see his hands vibrating, The Cue was changing its density. He needed to stop shaking it, but I didn’t know how to tell him. “Ostap, listen, it’s going to be okay, I believe you, okay? I just need you to put the artifact in the container right now, okay?” I managed to catch him, he looked to me and then to the container. I stepped forwards towards the open hatch, sliding the container closer and rotating the opening towards him. I then retreated back to my position, and gave the same instructions I did before. Ostap slowly leaned forward, now over the open container. He reached for it with his left hand, his right still holding the artifact. I continued to coach him, “Slow Ostap, slow. You can’t rush”.
Ostap was in full panic now and he started hyperventilating. He had his left hand now on the opening. His right hand was moving towards the container. I saw that Stepan was approaching me from my left, followed by Cpt. Lytvyn. The Captain was angry, he stomped towards us, shouting all sorts of profanities. Ostap now had his right hand at the mouth of the opening, he was set to put it in the container. The Captain was closer now and he pushed Stepan to the side and overtook him, he started to yell towards me. Ordering me to get away from the vehicle and back to my post. I tried telling him to stop, to stand back. We almost have it, I yelled. Ostap had heard him also, he was now staring towards the sound of his voice, his mouth was agape and I could see that he was crying. Ostap had now stopped, holding the artifact just above the container. I was inpatient now with Ostap, “Ostap, put the artifact in the container, do it, please”. He wasn’t listening to me anymore. The Captain was coming. The Captain was coming and he was going to doom us all.
In an instant he was standing behind me, and raised his Makarov at Ostap. He commanded, “Son, put that down right now, or I will shoot you!”. Ostap screamed, pulled his hands away from the container, and threw The Cue against the floor.
There was a blinding flash, and that is all I remember.
submitted by mullighanisdog to TheZoneStories [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 15:51 labor-attorney Dismissal of an Expatriate due to Disputes with a Korean Branch Manager

Dismissal of an Expatriate due to Disputes with a Korean Branch Manager
Dismissal of an Expatriate due to Disputes with a Korean Branch Manager
Bongsoo Jung, Korean labor attorney at KangNam Labor Law Firm

I. Summary

The applicant, a female Singaporean, entered the communication facility installation company inSingaporewhere she received required training, and then she was assigned to its Korean Branch, Company A. It is at this time of employment where the applicant was dismissed due to disputes with the Korean branch manager (president). Shortly before the dismissal, the head office in Singapore had already given the applicant a three months advance notice of termination in accordance with her labor contract (termination of contract), because the head office was not satisfied with her work performance. The applicant filed a remedy application of unfair dismissal via her labor attorney arguing that she had been working diligently and without fault or negligence. There were two main controversial issues: The first was whether the three months advance notice of dismissal is justifiable under the Korean Labor Standards Act. The second was whether the dismissal notice from the transferor company could be effective at the transferee company.


II. Background Information

  1. The applicant, a Singaporean, was hired in April 2014 by theSingaporehead office where she had received the necessary training. In August 2014, she was assigned to its Korean Branch, Company A, where she signed a new labor contract as manager of general affairs and accounting.
  2. The sales manager of the head office demanded that the applicant should sign a falsified document stating that 48 million won was used to pay for the moving expenses of the applicant and another expatriate. As the applicant knew that the amount was the labor cost used for illegally employed short-term foreign workers, she refused to sign the falsified document. After this incident, her relationship with the head office deteriorated.
  3. Meanwhile, the Company A decided to close its business in March 2016. Because the company was reported to the authorities by a competing company and fined due to its doing business without government permission, it could not continue its sales any longer. At the same time, theSingaporehead office established a new business entity called Company B in March 2016 and performed the operations of the existing Company A, taking over the majority of employees belonging to Company A.

  1. On March 16, 2016, theSingaporehead office notified the applicant of her dismissal with three months advance notice. Nevertheless, she continued to perform her same duties as a manager of general affairs and accounting for the new establishment, Company B though her original contract was signed with Company A,

  1. The branch manager of Company B instructed the applicant in March 2016 to send a an email to existing customers of Company A stating that they could remit service charges to Company A’s bank account. The applicant suggested the implementation should be done after obtaining the permission from the head office explaining that this could lead to a fine equivalent to 5 million won because of the illegality of the transaction. However, the branch manager of Company B insisted that she should inform the customers without consideration of the law. The applicant thereby notified the head office inSingaporeof the contents of the letter and the risk. The Korean branch manager became very angry and said to her, “You are not authorized to communicate directly with the head office. Are you exceeding your authority to become a Korean branch manager?” One week after this incident, the branch manager confirmed that the applicant would be terminated on June 14, 2016, in accordance with the previous letter of her dismissal provided to her on March 16, 2016. She was then dismissed.

III. Company’s Claim

  1. The applicant had caused complications by carrying out duties beyond her authorities. Since she joined Company A in 2014, she created problems by reporting to the head office more than she had to given that her duties were limited to being a manager of general affairs and accounting.

  1. The termination of the contract is implemented legitimately in accordance with her labor contract. Article 9 (Termination of the Contract) of the labor contract stipulates, “Either party can terminate the contract by informing termination in writing three months in advance”. The company informed the applicant of the termination in writing on March 15, 2016, three months in advance according to the required procedure. The advance notice period of dismissal under the labor contract was longer than the one month advance period stipulated by the Labor Standards Act. The company found it necessary to terminate the labor contract based upon the relevant article of the labor contract as the company decided to close its business.
  2. The termination of the applicant’s labor contract was processed by Company A which was going through a liquidation process. As a result, the establishment and termination of the applicant’s labor contract was executed by Company A, which is a different business entity from Company B. Company A conducted procedures for dismissal of the applicant because she was regarded as unqualified for the position at the time of company’s liquidation. Therefore, the justification for dismissal should be analyzed solely under Article 23 (Restriction of Dismissal, etc.) of the Labor Standards Act, but rather Article 24 (dismissal for managerial reason) of the LSA should also be reviewed.


IV. Employee’s Claim

  1. Refuting reason for termination according to the labor contract
The company claimed that it had terminated the contract by giving three months advance notice as stipulated in the labor contract. The relevant article stipulates, “Either party can terminate the contract by informing termination in writing three months in advance”. However, Article 23 (1) of the Labor Standards Act regulates, “An employer shall not dismiss a work without justifiable cause.” Article 15 of the LSA also stipulates, “a labor contract which has established working conditions which do not meet the standards as prescribed by this Labor Standard Act shall be null and void to that extent. Those parts which are null and void shall be governed by the standards as prescribed by the Labor Standards Act.” Therefore, the dismissal provision of the labor contract that violated the Labor Standards Act is null and void, which means the company’s dismissal cannot be effective because there was no justifiable cause for dismissal.

  1. Refuting the dismissal due to termination of business
The company insisted that the notification to terminate the contract was justifiable because the dismissal was for managerial reasons at the time of Company A’s liquidation. However, Company B took over and implemented various business projects conducted by Company A. The majority of employees from Company A terminated their employment and continued working for Company B through re-employment, and the applicant was also promised re-employment. Accordingly, the dismissal of the applicant cannot be a dismissal notification from Company A, but a dismissal by the president (branch manager) of Company B after her employment was handed over Company B.

Concept of Business Transfer: the business transfer shall take over the employment of employees. (Mar 29, 2002, Supreme Court 2000 do 8448) A. Business transfer means the transfer of the group organized by certain purposes: namely, the transfer of a group composed of people and property retaining their identity. Partial business transfer is still possible. When the business transfer is implemented, employment of the employees concerned shall be handed over inclusively to the transferee in principle. Although retaining the identity of the business is a matter of fact to be estimated by the generally accepted idea, whether a transfer contract is accepted as a business transfer shall be decided not by how much property was transferred, but by whether the transferred business organization was totally or partially retained. For example, if all properties are transferred after an organization is liquidated, it is not a business transfer. On the other hand, if a business facility retaining its partial organization is handed over and if the transferred portion retains its previous role, this is a business transfer. B. If the business is transferred, the labor relation between the transferor (employer) and the employee is transferred inclusively to the transferee (new employer) in principle, unless there is special condition imposed in the transfer agreement. If there is a special condition between both parties in the transfer to exclude some employees, those employees excluded will not be transferred. In this case, the special condition shall be justifiable under Article 23 (1) of the Labor Standards Act, because it is equivalent to actual dismissal. Hence, it is not justifiable to dismiss an employee on account of a business transfer.

  1. Reason for unfair dismissal
To be determined as a justifiable dismissal, the disciplinary dismissal shall have justifiable reason. In reviewing actual facts of the case, the dismissal by the President (Korean branch manager) for the reasons of the employee’s contradictory behavior cannot be regarded as disciplinary dismissal. As dismissal is the severest discipline to sever the employee’s means of living, the reason for dismissal and application of disciplinary type shall be justifiable. Therefore, a dismissal that lacks legitimacy shall be null and void and be regarded as abuse of the employer’s managerial right.

V. Conclusion

As the company realized that the dismissal case seemed disadvantageous to the company, it accepted the Labor Relations Commission’s suggestions for settlement: The company would provide compensation, equivalent to six months’ wages excluding severance pay, and let the applicant to stay in the company’s rental apartment for three (3) additional months from the date of her resignation. The applicant accepted the settlement and cancelled her application of unfair dismissal against the company.
https://preview.redd.it/ajyz3ejdyszc1.jpg?width=1135&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=784f601bc4b4d7a3615a37309e09eecda828509f
submitted by labor-attorney to Korean_Law [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 12:29 BlatantConservative Since this subreddit has somehow become a John Brown memorial sub, I'd like to direct attention to someone from the same time and place, Harriet Tubman. Someone who is already a household name for being a badass, who is actually about ten times more of a fucking badass than history remembers.

The US public school system and the public consciousness in general would have us remember that Harriet Tubman only snuck around in the darkness and freed an undetermined amount of slaves. And didn't do much else.
First of all, "Harriet Tubman" is only her second name, her pre Civil War name. She was born as a slave in Maryland, as Araminta Ross, she escaped and changed her name to Harriet Tubman, but immediately before the Civil War she was known colloquially as "Moses" and during the war itself she became known as "General Moses."
She was both the first African American and the first woman to lead US military forces into combat, and she personally freed about ten times more slaves violently than she did in person through the Underground Railroad. She also never lost a military engagement, showing a skill for leading and directing fighting men that was way above the norm.
I'll go into it a little more chronologically.
She was born and enslaved in Dorchester County, Maryland. As a young woman, she was hit in the head by a heavy object thrown by an overseer, giving her narcolepsy and vivid dreams for the rest of her life. These dreams led her to believe that God put her on Earth to free slaves and end the institution of slavery. And although the dreams themselves were likely triggered by the brain injury she received when she was young, she met that mission with a determination, efficiency, and ruthlessness that completely overcame her limitations of being a black, former slave, and woman in the 1850s.
In 1849, when she escaped herself, she almost immediately worked odd jobs and gathered funds and support in Philadelphia to go back to Maryland and free her immediate family and friends.
On personal trips she took to free slaves, she only rescued about 70 people total. Which seems low, and people often feel underwhelmed at that number. Even though that's actually a massive number for smuggling easily identified fugitives through hostile territory.
But what Tubman actually did was build a bigger network. She became a fundraiser, and the semi-public face of the Underground Railroad. She interfaced with Frederick Douglas, and other Northern abolitionists. She helped build a network for escaped slaves to escape all the way to Ontario, due to fears of the Fugitive Slave Act forcing Northern states to capture and return freed slaves.
Harriet Tubman did not invent nor control the Underground Railroad. Indeed, it had been a decentralized organization for decades before her birth. But she did flush it with cash and recognition in the 1850s and she energized it to the point that Maryland and Virginia slaveholders were holding meetings about the spike in escaped slaves during that period.
The Underground Railroad is estimated to have freed roughly 100,000 slaves during this period. The margin for error for that is massive, as for obvious reasons records were not kept, but out of a population of roughly 4 million slaves, it was a statistically significant number of people freed.
People started referring to Tubman as "Moses" since she was instrumental in guiding people to a "promised land."
During this period, she met and became allies with John Brown. Brown immediately recognized her as an equal and started calling her "General Tubman," and Tubman immediately started working with him to provide funding and manpower support for his goals on the East Coast. Brown was already known for being a violent slaver-slaughtering insurgent during Bleeding Kansas (another fascinating and important part of history ignored by people in the modern day), and he was not really all that subtle about his reason for being on the East Coast being armed insurrection.
Over several years, Tubman and Brown worked together on the Harper's Ferry armory raid, Tubman soliciting funding from Northern abolitionists and looking for manpower. To put it into context, the Harper's Ferry US Army armory was one of the only two Federal armories in the United States, and one of the only two places the Federal government had the precise machining tools needed to produce firearms directly. Trying to take it and capture it and control it was ambitious, to put it mildly, and massively significant. A modern equivalent would be like trying to take Lockheed Martin's F-35 production line.
However, when the actual raid happened, Tubman was not present. It is unknown if she was never meant to be present, if she was ill and unable to make it, or if she elected not to show up due to her knowing exactly how many people were not coming. Regardless, to the end of her life, Tubman had nothing but praise and admiration for Brown, and she tried to name a building on her 1880s property after him, and undoubtedly would have named a child after Brown if she had been able to have children. Her nephew was also named John, and I highly suspect John Brown was the reason.
Directly before the war broke out, after Lincoln was elected and it became clear that the US federal military would not side with the south in the coming war, she traveled with General Benjamin Butler where he used federal troops to physically occupy Annapolis, Maryland and threatened to arrest any Maryland legislators who voted for secession. Butler is another fascinating historical figure, and pretty damn chaoticgood.
In 1861, the war broke out. Tubman continued to be informally attached to Butler's unit, until Massachusetts Governor John Andrew asked for her assistance in administrating Union occupied areas of South Carolina, and she moved to Port Royal (which is now, incidentally, the famous Parris Island Marine Corps boot camp).
In South Carolina, she worked with a good dozen Northern abolitionists who she had known before the war started, who were now all military leaders. When General David Hunter tried to raise an all black military unit comprised of freed slaves, Lincoln actually pushed back, at which case Tubman penned a scathing criticism of Lincoln that was published in Northern newspapers demanding that slaves be freed.
They soon were, and although Tubman probably can't be directly credited, Lincoln freed slaves for much the same reasons she penned out in her letter.
Before black people were allowed to make their own military unit, Tubman was put in charge of an off the record scouting/spy unit. Tubman was in charge of the budget, giving orders, reporting to superiors, and was treated as a military officer by the men around her. In addition, once freed slaves were allowed to form military units, Col Thomas Higginson with the 1st South Carolina Volunteers and Col James Montgomery of the 2nd South Carolina Volunteers started interfacing with Tubman and Tubman would be in operational control during some missions. These units were almost entirely composed of freed slaves, and the men of both white units and black units started calling Tubman "General Moses."
After Tubman devised and led several clandestine raids that freed more slaves, she was put in charge of the 2nd South Carolina Volunteers. Legally, James Montgomery was in charge, but in his private letters he confirms that General Moses was the true leader of the men. According to the men themselves, it was both, as Montgomery was also an ally of John Brown during Bleeding Kansas and was no stranger to leading freed slaves to slaughter slavers even prewar. The men of the 2nd Carolina loved both General Moses and Col Montgomery, but it should be noted that a general outranks a colonel.
In the raid of Combahee Ferry, Tubman personally directed Union gunboats past Confederate mines that her spy network had mapped the locations of, and then she landed on shore with a force of 150 men and raided three Southern plantations. These plantations were known as the "cradle of secession" and were owned and ran by dynastic old money Southern families who were well known and politically significant in the South.
More than 750 slaves were freed in this raid, with only one death of a slave due to a Confederate shooting her when she was fleeing.
The small Confederate contingent present was annihilated.
At one point in the battle, Confederate troops were firing on one of the ships, and they were destroyed by a full broadside of canons.
One source actually has Tubman's troops literally scalping and then killing any overseers they found, and it is true that zero prisoners were taken in this raid, partially because there was simply no space left after all of the freed slaves they were transporting to safety.
Tubman fought and led in battles as far south as Florida, including the Massachusetts's 54th assault on Fort Wagner (popularized by the movie Glory) and eventually was sent back to the North and hospitalized for sickness until the end of the war.
Unfortunately, after the war, because she was never actually legally in command or even paid by the US Army, her allies fought with Southern politicians for decades to get her paid or even a pension. She was eventually given a widow's pension as a compromise. During the war itself, she was only paid 200 dollars, equivalent to roughly 4 thousand dollars for four years of work in modern terms.
For the rest of her life, Tubman was plagued by money issues. Part of the reason for that is she immediately pivoted to women's suffrage, and even newspapers and allies friendly to black people didn't necessarily agree with her, and she lost some support and funding.
A white woman once interviewed her and asked if women deserved suffrage, as in the right to vote. Tubman replied with "I've suffered enough to believe it."
In 1897, she was invited to a speaking tour and a bunch of celebratory receptions to honor her life, but she was so poor and destitute she had to sell the cow on her upstate New York farm to afford the train tickets to make it.
Tubman's later life is difficult to watch because she basically was absolutely right on everything, and served the United States and humanity well, and basically was never rewarded. She never compromised on her beliefs even once her entire life. She died proud, surrounded by family, but also poor and in relative obscurity.
submitted by BlatantConservative to chaoticgood [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 05:16 Sea-Menu4471 Take A Look: Would Lower Jaw Surgery Benefit Me?

Background:
I am 33 yo Male. I've been told I have a 7-8mm overjet and a near 100% overbite, it's deep. I have narrow arches. I apparently have a recessed lower jaw, how severe I am unsure but that's primarily the reason of overbite I'm told. I do mouth breath/snore at times loudly I've been told. I used to smoke/vape weed habitually, but have stopped over the past year. I want to say my breathing has gotten better and snoring has improved. However, I'm not sure if it was that or due to my anatomy, or even both. Now, I've had braces before and the treatment obviously wasn't completed in my youth. Things have shifted all around after several years.
Dental Imaging:
https://imgchest.com/p/ne7bpbd8g45
https://imgchest.com/p/ne7bpbd8g45
Speech:
I have do have some trouble enunciating some words and always had. Words like "STRengthening" and "THRough". I would have to compensate by moving my lower jaw forward in attempt to get the words out right. Always made me self-conscious to do this. Sometimes, I'm just quiet because I fear I'm going to screw up my speech.
Bite:
My bite is off due to the position of the upper and lower teeth/jaw. I would have to move my lower jaw forward for example to bite an apple correctly. Due to that, I don't think I have a full strength front-bite I would've normally had if things were in their correct position. I've lived with it so long but I know it's compensation and always wondered how I would feel if I didn't have to do that.
Smile:
Finally, of course, my smile....I absolutely hate my smile. My goal would be correct the bite issues mentioned above, including widening my narrow arches a bit. If someone is sitting down and looking up at me I don't smile for fear they will see the huge overbite I have. I only smile if everyone is at eye level and I could adjust my jaw to mask my deep overbite. I strain to do this because it's an unnatural positioning of the jaw.
Consulting Orthodontist:
I am consulting with a orthodontist and after seeing several I finally found the right guy. He seems quite intelligent and confident in his knowledge/abilities. My orthodontist is not forcing me to do jaw surgery, but he did mention it as an option. He said my case would be quite the project. I told him I wanted Invisalign. He said with a combination of aligners, partial lower braces, and rubber bands and maybe TADs (if needed) he can reduce my overbite from near 100% to a 50%-40% overlap. He estimates my overjet could be reduced from 8mm down to 3mm-4mm.
My Questions for the Community:
Am I candidate for LJS? Would LJS benefit me? Could I only get away with LJS to remedy my issues? Would Invisalign/rubber bands/TADs be able to not only improve my bite but my speech issues as well?
Thank you all for reading, I really do appreciate honest, sincere insights.
submitted by Sea-Menu4471 to askdentists [link] [comments]


2024.05.11 05:08 Sea-Menu4471 Take A Look: Would Lower Jaw Surgery Benefit Me?

Background:
I am 33 yo Male. I've been told I have a 7-8mm overjet and a near 100% overbite, it's deep. I have narrow arches. I apparently have a recessed lower jaw, how severe I am unsure but that's primarily the reason of overbite I'm told. I do mouth breath/snore at times loudly I've been told. I used to smoke/vape weed habitually, but have stopped over the past year. I want to say my breathing has gotten better and snoring has improved. However, I'm not sure if it was that or due to my anatomy, or even both. Now, I've had braces before and the treatment obviously wasn't completed in my youth. Things have shifted all around after several years.
Dental Imaging:
https://imgchest.com/p/ne7bpbd8g45
https://imgchest.com/p/ne7bpbd8g45
Speech:
I have do have some trouble enunciating some words and always had. Words like "STRengthening" and "THRough". I would have to compensate by moving my lower jaw forward in attempt to get the words out right. Always made me self-conscious to do this. Sometimes, I'm just quiet because I fear I'm going to screw up my speech.
Bite:
My bite is off due to the position of the upper and lower teeth/jaw. I would have to move my lower jaw forward for example to bite an apple correctly. Due to that, I don't think I have a full strength front-bite I would've normally had if things were in their correct position. I've lived with it so long but I know it's compensation and always wondered how I would feel if I didn't have to do that.
Smile:
Finally, of course, my smile....I absolutely hate my smile. My goal would be correct the bite issues mentioned above, including widening my narrow arches a bit. If someone is sitting down and looking up at me I don't smile for fear they will see the huge overbite I have. I only smile if everyone is at eye level and I could adjust my jaw to mask my deep overbite. I strain to do this because it's an unnatural positioning of the jaw.
Consulting Orthodontist:
I am consulting with a orthodontist and after seeing several I finally found the right guy. He seems quite intelligent and confident in his knowledge/abilities. My orthodontist is not forcing me to do jaw surgery, but he did mention it as an option. He said my case would be quite the project. I told him I wanted Invisalign. He said with a combination of aligners, partial lower braces, and rubber bands and maybe TADs (if needed) he can reduce my overbite from near 100% to a 50%-40% overlap. He estimates my overjet could be reduced from 8mm down to 3mm-4mm.
My Questions for the Community:
Am I candidate for LJS? Would LJS benefit me? Could I only get away with LJS to remedy my issues? Would Invisalign/rubber bands/TADs be able to not only improve my bite but my speech issues as well?
Thank you all for reading, I really do appreciate honest, sincere insights.
submitted by Sea-Menu4471 to jawsurgery [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 22:00 LIS1050010 Guide: 12 Things To Look For In A Homesteading Property

If recent events have you seriously considering finally moving to the country and starting a homestead/hobby farm, you probably have a lot of questions. And though learning self-sufficiency skills is key (and fun!), the most important place to start with is learning what type of land to look for. Our experts have you covered in 12 things to look for in a homesteading property.
Homesteading, also known as “hobby farming”, was gaining in popularity before the pandemic. However, once COVID hit and things started shutting down the homesteading movement went from a steady growth to an explosive one!
Suddenly, the ideal of achieving greater self-sufficiency, having more space and securing one’s freedom became a top priority for millions of families across the globe.
In the United States, this was evident by several published migration reports which showed people leaving cities in droves and heading (largely) for the Southeastern United States.
If you’re one of those people who has already relocated and is looking for rural land to start a hobby farm, or you’re considering relocating and becoming a homesteader, this article is for you!
Throughout the years, we’ve featured dozens of families who abandoned conventional urban or suburban life to take up homesteading in the country. We’ve also interviewed a variety of rural land experts on what it takes to find, purchase and develop raw land into the home of your dreams.
This article is a compilation of their real-life tips and advice on the best attributes of a homesteading/hobby farming property.
As you’re reading this, keep in mind that everyone’s vision and goals for their homestead are unique. As are your location, budget, timeline, family needs, lifestyle, etc. Thus, there is not one find-a-perfect-property-formula we can share. There are however, several common considerations that can benefit anyone in finding an ideal property to call their family homestead. We hope this article helps you find yours!

#1: The Right Amount of Acreage

If you think you need 50 or 100+ acres to set up a functional homestead, think again. Many hobby farmers set up homesteads on smaller acreage, between 1-10 acres vs. 10-100 acres. The right amount of acreage for you depends entirely on your goals, budget, and objectives.
In How Many Acres Do You Need for a Hobby Farm or Homestead, Ben Faulk of Sand Hill Farms, offered this advice to aspiring homesteaders: “If you were going to have a homestead with 1-2 horses, a family cow, and your gardens, I’d want 10 acres of pasture, 2 acres for produce, maybe a one-acre orchard and the rest of it would be buildings. So 15 acres could hold most of what you want to do.”
However, many homesteading families, including those who make a living off the land, prefer a smaller farm.
Bottom line: do some serious research before committing to a certain amount of acreage---you may need less (or more) than you think.


#2: A Mixture of Open Land and Forest

A mixture of pasture and wooded land gives you the ability to grow your own food, erect buildings, and raise animals in the open, while having access to shade and the benefits of timber for personal or financial gain.
However, if your budget is tight, inventory is low and/or location is a factor a fully wooded lot can be an excellent investment.
Forested land can often be purchased for less money than cleared land and then cleared to suit. This gives you the opportunity to custom-design your ideal mix of woods and open land while enhancing the value of your property and giving you a potential stream of future income in your timber.


#3: A Source of Water

Most rural properties require well installation, but it’s also wise to have a creek, river, pond, spring or lake on-site for homesteading purposes. Plus, if you’re interested in going off-grid or partially off-grid, a natural source of water for drinking, bathing, fishing, a spring house, electricity, etc. is a must.
Just be sure to check on any potential flooding/floodplain issues before purchase. This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t purchase a property with some flood plain or wetlands on it. It can actually be a benefit depending on what you want to do with your land. For example, elderberries can be grown on a flood plain and wetlands attract a variety of wildlife. Just make sure you have ample dry space to build your home, outbuildings, etc.

#4: Appropriate Site(s) for Your Home(s) and Outbuildings

The best location for your home and building sites should be discussed with a builder before you purchase the land. The reason being: the homesite you have in mind may or may not be feasible based on access, the amount of excavation required, well or septic requirements, flooding potential, proximity to trees or other factors relating to home design (barn, shed, cabin, etc.) off-grid capability, insurance, etc.
Bottom line: walk the property with a licensed contractor before you get dead-set on a piece of property and/or a homesite.


#5: The Right Location

As the old saying goes, you can change a lot of things about a home...just not it’s location. Thus, where you decide to buy should be heavily considered.
Some people love to be out in the middle of nowhere where they can do whatever they want with the land, homeschool their kids and be surrounded by untouched nature. Others will prefer to be within 20 minutes of a decent-sized town with a nice grocery store, movie theater, top-rated schools, homeschool coops, etc. And if you’re commuting to a job with the potential for traffic, you’ll definitely want to keep the length of that commute in mind.
The purpose of your land will also weigh into the equation, as some rural business ventures, such as retreats, hunting camps, etc. are better suited to very remote areas.


#6: Access to your property

Access isn’t typically a concern when purchasing a prebuilt home. However, when buying rural land you want to make sure you have rights to access that land easily. Ideally, you’d want a property with road frontage which may be private (meaning it’s up to you and/or your neighbors to maintain) or public/state maintained. If your land does not have road frontage, that could be a hindrance in getting a construction loan. Lack of access can also affect your building efforts since most homes and outbuildings require heavy equipment which must be trucked in on viable roads.


#7: Flexible Zoning

Rural properties typically have less zoning restrictions than urban or suburban land. But, the only way to know for sure is to check with the county. This is especially important for homesteaders who plan on keeping animals, erecting outbuildings, farming, or using the property for any type of unique purposes, including hunting and fishing. Your land agent can advise you on the best areas for zoning based on your land requirements.


#8: Clean soil

Soil is super important if you’re planning on growing or raising your own food and/or food for market. At the very least, you’ll want to ensure there is no soil contamination (or potential of) and you may wish to get a soil test to see what you’re working with. More often than not, poor soil can be amended to create a beautiful and fertile garden or farm. However, it’s best to test and not guess---especially if you’re planning on applying for organic certification, installing a pond or lake or suspect any type of contamination from previous owners or tenants.

#9: Covenants and Restrictions

One of the biggest perks of buying rural land is the freedom to do what you want with your property, without worrying about HOA rules.
However, many rural properties, especially those within rural neighborhoods, do have what are called Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (also known as CCRs). These are established to help maintain the value of your land while keeping undesirable developments, like a junkyard or waste facility, away from your property.
CCRs are typically much more flexible than HOA rules as they’re designed to preserve landowner freedom while protecting land values.


#10: Internet and Cell Service

Yes, becoming a homesteader usually means you have a desire to spend less time on screens. However, most people will still require high speed internet access for working, entertainment, starting or maintaining a business, homeschooling, keeping up with your favorite homesteading podcasts and other communications.
You can inquire about this with your land agent and check with neighbors in the area.
Keep in mind that although high speed internet in the country has come a long way it’s not uncommon for rural places to have poor cell service. Fortunately, this is usually fixable by getting a cell phone signal booster, connecting your phone to your Wi-Fi and/or getting a landline. Or, if you’re into being off-grid, all this may be a benefit!


#11: Access To The Right Utilities

Raw land typically requires that electricity, water, propone and septic be installed.
The cost to run electricity to your homesite will vary depending on the land’s location, topography, local rates and how far from your road your homesite is. In some areas, power companies will run the first few hundred feet of line above ground for free and underground power typically costs extra (but may be worth it for esthetics and/or if you're in a storm-prone location). The only way to know for sure is to get an estimate from the power company before you buy the land and choose your homesite.
If you’re considering solar, wind power or going off-grid, you’ll also want to factor in the best location for your home and buildings based on orientation and weather patterns.
The cost to install a well also varies depending on the well’s location and depth requirements.
You’ll also need to get a percolation test to ensure your land is suitable for septic system installation. From there, the price will vary based on the size of your home, the number of bathrooms and bedrooms, your soil, the land’s topography, and the tank’s location. For example, if you plan on building near a creek or lake that can increase the price of your septic system by thousands of dollars.
Finally, if you’re interested in having a gas stove or fireplace, you’ll probably need to have a propane tank installed.
Click the links above for detailed articles on wind power, going off-grid, well and septic installation.


#12: A Supportive Community

Going from a city or suburban lifestyle to homesteading can be made much easier if you’re surrounded by a supportive community. The best way to get a feel for this is to spend time in the area. Attend local festivals, visit the farmer’s markets, check out the schools and/or homeschooling community, if you’re religious, attend some local churches, visit the Chamber of Commerce and scope out the overall homesteading scene.
Once you start actively looking for properties and find one you love, don’t be afraid to introduce yourself to the neighbors and ask some questions. Most people are happy to meet their potential new neighbors and will have valuable information and insight on the neighborhood and your property of interest. Plus, if you end up buying it you’ve already made a connection.

Article Source
submitted by LIS1050010 to selfreliance [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 09:45 TheSpamPolice What Do We Actually Know About Ankylosaurus?

What Do We Actually Know About Ankylosaurus?
TLDR; Ankylosaurus doesn't have many fossil specimens. I wanted to learn what we actually know about it based on those few fossils. I'm assuming that the things we don't know about Ankylosaurus are filled in with information we do know about its close relatives.
https://preview.redd.it/4evimp2n0kzc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b80cd046f067cc8815ae0627a230fd734e7ef0d5
First off, I am not a paleontologist by any means. Like many people, I grew up with a love for dinosaurs with passive updates from articles since then. However, Ankylosaurus was always my favorite. The largest ankylosaur, built like a tank, covered in armor, and equipped with a club tail that could shatter the legs of a T.rex. That sounds unbelievably cool to any young dinosaur enthusiast.
I was reading up recently and found out that we only have a handful of Ankylosaurus fossils known to us. In fact, we have only three "good" specimens. I didn't see any thorough discussions of the Ankylosaurus in Paleontology, so I wanted to compile what I've read so that I (and others) can better understand my favorite dinosaur, and get input from people more knowledgeable than me to see if there's anything I missed or got wrong.
Here are the fossil specimens:
AMNH 5895
  • The holotype fossil, but the worst condition of the three
  • Found in 1906 in the Hell Creek Formation, USA
  • Consists of a partial skull, teeth, ribs, vertebrae, and osteoderms
This was the fossil first used to describe Ankylosaurus. From the partial skull, we know the head was triangular-shaped. From the leaf-shaped teeth, we know it was herbivorous. From the ribs and vertebrae, we know this was a somewhat wide animal. From the osteoderms, we know that it was armored to some extent. Other than that, the general shape of the dinosaur was filled in to look like depictions of the Stegosaurus at that time.
AMNH 5214
From this specimen, we have a very clear understanding of what the head looked like, we definitely know that it was armored, and now we know that it had a club-like tail. Reading about this specimen was what really got me invested in the first place. I was shocked to find out that the iconic Ankylosaurus tail club has only one known fossil.
CMN 8880
  • The largest of the three fossils, but somewhat damaged
  • Found in 1947 in the Scollard Formation, CAN only a kilometer north of where AMNH 5214 was found
  • Consists of a skull and mandible
From this specimen, we know that Ankylosaurus magniventris was the largest ankylosaurid based on size estimations made from the CMN 8880 skull.
Discussion:
These are the three best specimens of Ankylosaurus known to us at this time. Additionally, there's also AMNH 5866 (77 osteoderms) and CCM V03 (a section of vertebrae). But compared other North American late Cretaceous dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, and Edmontosaurus (who all have >85% complete fossils), it doesn't seem like much.
The general body shape and osteoderm layout is still disputed with no clear fossil records indicating what it look liked. We know the head, we know the tail, but we don't know what's in between the two.
So how do we get the fully-formed depictions we have today?
Unlike Ankylosaurus, there are 2 other North American late Cretaceous ankylosaurids for which we have an abundance of fossils: Euoplocephalus and Anodontosaurus. There are about a dozen known skulls and some nearly-complete fossils with osteoderms still attached (although I couldn't find images of them since most have been recently re-attributed to Scolosaurus instead). Although not as closely related, we also have the celebrity Borealopelta fossil in incredible condition.
So we don't know exactly what Ankylosaurus looks like, but we DO know what ankylosaurids look like. Making the fair assumption that Ankylosaurus looked similar to other ankylosaurids, I'm assuming that's how we got the image of the Ankylosaurus we know and love today.
I still have some questions unanswered though. How come we haven't been able to find that many Ankylosaurus fossils? How well-armored was it really? Did Ankylosaurus have unique features that other ankylosaurids didn't?
I would love to hear your thoughts below
submitted by TheSpamPolice to Paleontology [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 08:24 theconstellinguist Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities

Crossposting audience: This is the first subreddit with scientific research on economic abuse. Please follow to learn more about the dynamics and damage economic abuse does.
This piece isn’t directly on economic abuse, but it shows a very strong connection of how countries without pure analytical investment (weak bureaucracies) then experience corruption, and from the corruption, then experience little to no human rights due to the money going to the enforcement of human rights being pocketed and no enforcement actually happening. This piece paints a big picture of how places that do not invest but want conservation and human rights literally do not have the ability to see how investment is expensive and necessarily so; they fail to see the whole system.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258826217_Cheap_and_Nasty_The_Potential_Perils_of_Using_Management_Costs_to_Identify_Global_Conservation_Priorities
Countries that keep their projected costs low often do not calculate all the factors correctly and so as a result suffer political instability. To supplement this, local support often makes up the slack but that is not a sustainable solution to core miscalculations. Moving management around hoping someone pays up is like moving symbols around in an equation hoping they will teach the person who is supposed to do the teaching.
Here we investigate such relationships and first show that countries with low predicted costs are less politically stable. Local support and capacity can mitigate the impacts of such instability, but we also found that these countries have less civil society involvement in conservation.
Low costs usually mean low quality in terms of government. It’s one thing to get a low quality product, it’s another thing to get a low quality government; it hegemonizes itself until all people are trapped, such as the normalization of human commodification over consumer agency.
governments in countries with low predicted costs score poorly on indices of corruption, bureaucratic quality and human rights.
Projects in low cost countries tend to have negative impacts on people because they pay corrupt officials who don’t even use it for what they were hired to use it for. Even high cost countries can collapse into low cost when it becomes clear they can’t handle their money ethically. Then they have to drive down their price to get any business. High value is a delicate balance, much like the ecosystems they are trying to preserve. It is a full circle.
projects in apparently low-cost countries are less likely to succeed and more likely to have negative impacts on people.
Biodiversity is the collateral damage of human’s inability to control themselves around money and fix broken calculations advertising themselves at a price they can’t handle to catch funders, never actually able to grow out of it and accept more funds. No growth, in fact even worse results, happens under this overpaid management.
Biodiversity is declining at a rapid rate [1] but there is little spatial overlap at a global level between conservation need and local funding availability.
Issues with ego and costs drowned out the intended beneficiary which was the conserved environment showing the damage doing business around corruption can do
This work revealed that variation in protected area management costs overwhelmed the effects of biodiversity and threat in determining global conservation priorities, largely because country-level costs ranged by seven orders of magnitude [24,25]
Developing countries may claim lower costs, but they can be very unstable, as seen on the trafficking paper which has huge and massive pockets of irrational behavior due to commodification taking precedence over agency about opportunity cost from rational actors.
Ideally, global conservation cost metrics should reflect the probability of long-term project success because: a) obstacles to implementation decrease the likelihood of attaining conservation objectives, and b) overcoming these obstacles will increase project costs. Many countries with low predicted costs are developing countries [28] where less stable socio-political environments might make conservation investments
risky. Foreign investors often avoid these countries due to their unreliable business environments [29–31], and the same factors that deter economic investments likely present challenges to conservation as well.
Local communities cannot be asked to do the work of governments, and when the government is corrupt and doesn’t bring the money back down to where it was supposed to go but just pads salaries, no investment is possible and ultimately these corrupt officials destroy their environment and the investability.
For example, civil society involvement and support are critical to conservation success [7,33]. When international agencies work in foreign countries but fail to engage local communities, they must rely on national governments to manage funds and implement projects. This reliance on governments can be problematic in countries where political institutions are weak, unstable, or corrupt, as projects will be vulnerable to changes in or failures of national governments or economies [34,35].
Low management costs are underestimations of what is required to effectively conserve ecosystems, given the nebulous and numerous factors involved in so doing. So those that attempt to be liberal while economically conservative see less effective and stable governments and less protection of human rights. Continuing to underestimate the costs seems to lead to an inability to detect the increasing negative costs to people across the board in the poorly managed area. The negative costs again create a cycle of corruption where only low prices will even create any interest, leading to a catch-22.
We hypothesize that countries with low predicted management costs also tend to have lower levels of civil society involvement in conservation, less effective and stable governments, and less protection of human rights. Support of these hypotheses would suggest that the management cost estimates most often used in global conservation prioritization are simplistic and neglect important factors that impact project implementation and outcomes. Therefore, achieving long-term conservation success in countries with low predicted costs, and avoiding unintended negative impacts on people, may be more difficult or more expensive than current cost models predict.
Conservation, quality of governance, and human rights then go hand in hand.
We separately examined the relationships between national- level modeled protected area management costs and each socio-political variable: civil society involvement in conservation (NGO membership, IUCN Organizations, and Agenda 21 Initiatives), quality of governance (bureaucratic effectiveness, control of corruption, and political stability), and human rights (Empowerment Rights Index)
Low-cost conservation almost all had less effective governments, whereas more expensive conservation predictions and costs had the most effective governments, showing not underestimating the commitment required is the sign of a strong government.
(N=184, Spearman ρ=0.6401, p<0.0001; Figure 3a): protected area management
costs in the ten least corrupt countries are 41 times higher than in the 10 most corrupt countries. Governments are also less effective in low-cost countries (N=184, Spearman ρ=0.6729, p<0.0001; Figure 3b): protected area management costs in the ten countries with the most effective governments are 56 times higher than in the ten with the least effective governments.
Low protected area management costs generally have poorer human rights records
countries with low protected area management costs generally have poorer human rights records, so that the seven countries sharing the highest Empowerment Rights Index score are 6.3 times more expensive than the seven countries sharing the lowest score.
The breakdowns in governments that refuse or fail to pay the costs required create tensions between local and government demands that then fail the actual intended beneficiary. Then both crash.
This instability is a recognized problem in conservation, where it is linked with breakdowns in local or national institutional support for projects, threats to project
management and enforcement staff, and biodiversity loss through the impacts of militias and refugees [56]. It is also a prevalent problem, as 81% of violent conflicts between 1950 and 2000 took place completely or partially within biodiversity hotspots [57].
Creating a culture of volunteering and local fundraising is absolutely required; the prevention of this is a really, really bad sign. Engaged civil society has a stronger triad (conservation, excellence of government, and human rights)
This lower involvement of civil society in countries with low predicted management costs highlights another problem with using these cost estimates as a metric for realized conservation costs: volunteering and local fundraising are likely to be higher in countries with an engaged civil society [3].
Misappropriation of conservation benefits leads to project failure when international fundraisers start losing interest in helping a place that already had a federal government that was too corrupt to actually invest already.
However, accounting for the quality of governance in addition to biodiversity and direct costs can change cost-effective investment priorities at a global scale [62], and a number of case studies have shown the impacts of corruption often involve more than an increase in direct costs. For example, the misappropriation of conservation benefits or exposure to rent-seeking officials often results in loss of local support and project failure [63,64].
Bureaucracies are effective when they are analytically rigorous; when things are clearly spelled out, the understanding of the why of the bureaucracy is disseminated throughout the organization. It is ones that do not have disseminated comprehension that are the notorious Kafkaesque nightmares. However, this cannot be asked for in cultures that do not prioritize or even demonize analyticity. Ironically this causes underestimation of costs which leads to a “hemorrhaging” cycle of economic collapse.
We found that countries with low predicted costs score poorly on bureaucratic effectiveness measures (Figure 3b). This is a critical result, given that a wide range of conservation initiatives rely on effective bureaucratic systems for implementation.
Governments that have poor human rights records are more likely to negatively impact people trying to implement what they think they can implement but end up damaging people in so doing because they have not removed core issues in their implementation that stem from the fact they were even capable of human rights abuses. These can actually transition from moral failures to logistical failures as human rights crimes are littered with poor logic.
conservation policy [70]. This is why our final result (Figure 4) –that low-cost countries also have the worst human rights records – is particularly troubling. The implications of this finding are obvious: relying on governments with poor human rights records to achieve action on the ground is more likely to negatively impact people.
Low-cost countries have conservation projects that don’t conserve anything, feed corruption, cause international interests to act as foster parents, and then finally for the entire system, local and federal to collapse, doing nothing for the conserved area at all even though that was the whole point.
Projects in apparently low-cost countries could be less likely to succeed, more expensive to implement than originally expected, and more likely to have negative impacts on local people.
Over time after seeing this, people just completely give up on trying to help the offending country. Russia is a strong case of this.
Some donors already implicitly recognize the importance of accounting for implementation factors when directing funds, by avoiding difficult countries or working where they have historically built long-term collaborations and already have local support [71]
submitted by theconstellinguist to economicabuse [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 04:37 speedy2686 For Those Confused About the Relationship Between Calories and Macronutrients and How it Affects Your Diet

I wrote this in response to a redditor who seemed confused about how the body uses energy and macronutrients. Responses to this comment have been positive, so I thought it might help others if it didn't sink with that other post.
I'm going to start with a basic explanation of the relationship between calories, protein, fat, and carbohydrate; then, I'll tell you how to estimate how many calories you need and how many grams of each macro. I'll wrap it up with a metaphor for how to think about macros and weight control.
Each macronutrient contributes to the total number of calories you eat throughout the day. Protein has four calories per gram, carbohydrate has four calories per gram, and fat has nine calories per gram. As an aside, alcohol has seven calories per gram, and fiber averages about two calories per gram after it's been partially digested by the bacteria in your gut. You'll sometimes see that some people subtract fiber from total carbohydrate to get "net carbs." This isn't exactly correct, because it's assuming that fiber has no caloric load; but it's not ultimately going to make that big of a difference, because very few people are going to eat more than forty or fifty grams of fiber in a day at most.
As for determining how much of any nutrient you need, we can base it off of your weight (or goal weight, if you're especially overweight) and your height. You can estimate your total caloric need by simply taking your height in centimeters and multiplying by ten. This will give you a good starting point for a diet. Track your weight everyday, under the same conditions (i.e. after waking, before eating or drinking, and after going to the bathroom, ideally with little or no clothing). Take the average of your weight for one week and again for the second week and compare: did you lose weight, gain weight, or stay the same? Depending on the answer, adjust calories to meet your goal.
The amount of protein you need can vary based on whether or not your doing strength training or other intense athletics, but even for sedentary dieters, it's not a bad idea to get about 0.8 grams of protein per pound of bodyweight per day (use your target bodyweight if your overweight). Similarly, try to get about 0.5 grams of fat per pound of bodyweight per day (again, use target bodyweight if needed). Subtract four calories from your daily total for every gram of protein and nine calories for every gram of fat; whatever is left over can be filled with carbs or any mix of macros that suit your tastes. That said, if you have an active lifestyle, you should try to consume those remaining calories as carbohydrate as much as possible. Lastly, try to get 25-40 grams of fiber per day.
A good way to imagine how your body uses these calories is to imagine a bucket. This bucket represents the total amount of calories you can eat in a day without gaining weight. You're going to fill it throughout the day with carbs, fats, and protein; and any that overflows from the bucket is going to be stored as fat. In theory, you could eat nothing but one macronutrient, whether carbs, fat, or protein, and if it overflows the bucket, the extra gets stored in your fat tissue.
Here's where it gets a little tricky. Your body prefers to use carbs for fuel first and store fat as fat, because it doesn't require any conversion. Protein, on the other hand, is costly to convert, so that only gets converted as a last resort.
Now imagine you eat a normally varied diet of some mixture of carbs, fats, and protein. When it goes into the bucket, the protein sinks to the bottom, the carbs sit on top of that, and the fats float on top. If you overeat, the fats overflow first (i.e. get stored as fat). If you continue to overeat, the carbs overflow next. If you continue to overeat, the protein is the last thing to overflow.
Likewise, if you ate nothing but one kind of macronutrient, you'd still have to overflow the bucket to gain weight, which you could do with protein, carbs, or fat. The difference is that it would be most difficult to do with protein because it's so filling.
I hope this makes sense.
P.S. Someone asked whether "per pound" was a typo. The following is my response:
That was not a typo.
The per pound recommendation is the lower recommendation in the context of strength training. The per kilogram recommendation is for sedentary people.
That said, even if a person is sedentary, I recommend the higher intake, especially for people trying to lose weight, because it will satisfy your hunger for longer periods of time. Additionally, when you’re dieting, you will lose some amount of muscle mass, and a higher protein intake limits that loss somewhat. The more muscle you have, the more calories you burn; therefore, for the purpose of weight control, maintaining muscle mass is beneficial.
submitted by speedy2686 to 1200isplenty [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 03:27 Legitimate_Vast_3271 Assyrian Eclipses and the Anchor Date

In August 1891, William T. Lynn, a fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society and member of the British Astronomical Association, wrote a letter to the editors of the Observatory (a journal devoted to astronomy) concerning Assyrian eclipses. In his letter, he related the following:
"But two, if not three, eclipses (of the Sun) do really appear to be recorded in the Assyrian inscriptions. The first of these occurred in B.C. 763 on the 15th of June, and was total in or near Nineveh. There appears no reason to doubt that it is mentioned in the Assyrian so-called 'Eponym Canon,' which was interpreted by Sir Henry Rawlinson in 1862, from the fragments of terra-cotta tablets brought over by Sir A. H. Layard and placed in the British Museum. The inscription in question states (as kindly translated for me by Mr. T. G. Pinches, of the British Museum) that in the "Eponymy of Bur-sagale, governor of Gozan, a revolt in Ashur (the city) took place in the month Sivan and the Sun was eclipsed." This, according to the Canon, was in the eighth year of the reign of Assur-day-an, and the record must be allowed to fix subsequent dates in the Canon with great precision. For although Oppert, by assuming a lacuna of 46 years in it, endeavored to identify the eclipse with the annular one of June 13th, B.C. 809, there seems little ground for this or doubt that the view of George Smith is correct, and the eclipse the total one of June 15th, B.C. 763."
Assigning the solar eclipse in the Eponymy of Bur-sagale to the year 763 B.C.E. established the anchor date for the chronology of the Neo-Assyrian period. Lynn stated the eclipse was then fixed to the eighth year; however, it appears in the canon published by Smith in the ninth year - perhaps a lapse in memory. Professor Julius Oppert maintained that there was a break in the canon because he recognized a conflict with the Biblical records and concluded that the eclipse of 809 B.C.E. was the correct one. That Oppert held this opinion, of 46 missing years, is also confirmed by George Smith on page 75 in his book, "The Assyrian Eponym Canon," which he published 16 years before Lynn wrote his letter to the editors of the Observatory.
Moreover, neither Smith nor Lynn were willing to accept Oppert's opinion that 46 years were missing from the canon. Trying to add back 46 years in a single place in the canon was more than they were willing to attempt. Nevertheless, when the Biblical chronology is aligned to the accepted chronology (using 539 B.C.E.), 46 years are missing from the Assyrian and Babylonian periods, but certainly not in one place. Within the cannon, only 15 years are missing between the reigns of Ashur-nerari V and Tiglath-Pileser III. An additional ten years are missing in the post-canonical period from the reign of Ashurbanipal after the reign of Samas-suma-ukin and before the reign of Kandalanu, during which time Ashurbanipal ruled over Babylon. Another 21 years are missing from the Neo-Babylonian period, after the death of Labashi-Marduk and before the reign of Nabonidus, during which time Belshazzer exercised military control without being officially acknowledged as king. These are the 46 missing years, but not the 46 missing years Oppert thought should have been added back into the canon in one place (for more specific information, see the articles "Interregnum" and "Eponymen").
Therefore, the eclipse of June 13th, 809 B.C.E., is the one that occurred in the Eponymy of Bur-sagale. Oppert was correct but unable to understand where the chronological errors actually were, and Lynn and Smith were right to reject Oppert's opinion, but only because he proposed to add back 46 years in a single place in the canon. Nevertheless, the anchor date of June 15th, 763 B.C.E., for the Neo-Assyrian empire is wrong. Additionally, a lunar eclipse occurred in the eponym of Mutakkil-Marduk (Waterman Vol. 2, 1930:483, Letter 1406) on October 21, 844 B.C.E., 35 years prior to the solar eclipse in the eponym of Bur-Sagale.
Lynn's second reference to an Assyrian eclipse is also recorded in his letter and reads as follows:
"An eclipse is also mentioned in an Assyrian tablet in the British museum, which would seem to have occurred in the reign of Esar-haddon. Mr. Pinches thus translates the portion referring to the eclipse: - 'Since the king my Lord went to Egypt, an eclipse has taken place in the month of Tammuz [corresponding nearly to our own June]. . . . . . When I brought the account of the eclipse of the month Tammuz, I sent it away to the presence of the king.' It is very difficult to identify this eclipse with any resulting from calculation; the only conjecture I can make is that it may have been one which occurred on the 27th of May, B.C. 699, and was annular in India."
The only eclipse that matches the biblical chronology occurred on 8/6/-699 (700 B.C.E.), which was in Esarhaddon's twelfth year. According to the Esarhaddon Chronicle, which states, "The twelfth year: The king of Assyria marched to Egypt but became ill on the way and died on the tenth day of the month of Arahsamna." According to the report, the eclipse occurred in the month of Tammuz (June/July), which would have been after Esarhaddon marched toward Egypt but before he became ill and died on the tenth day of Arahsamna (OctobeNovember). Thus, Esarhaddon died shortly after the eclipse took place.
The accepted chronology assigns Esarhaddon's reign to the years 681-669 B.C.E., which includes his ascension year. In considering Lynn's second eclipse and searching through all the years of Esarhaddon's reign (according to the accepted chronology), the annular eclipse (seen as partial at Nineveh) of 6/17/-678 (679 B.C.E.) would be a candidate, except the eclipse occurs in the second year of his reign, which was five years before his first campaign to Egypt.
Esarhaddon's campaign against Arzâ, located at what is termed the "brook of Egypt," does not imply he campaigned in Egypt in his second year, because Arzâ was a separate city-state kingdom located at the southernmost end of Canaan and not in Egypt (see "The Brook of Egypt and Assyrian Policy on the Border of Egypt," Nadav Na'aman).
Lynn's suggestion for the second eclipse (that of the "27th of May, B.C. 699") must be a mistake for the 27th of May, B.C. 669 because there was no eclipse on the date he provided, in addition to it being displaced 30 years from the last year of Esarhaddon's reign. Nevertheless, the final part of the eclipse of 5/27/-668 (669 B.C.E.) was only visible above the horizon for 15 minutes and was over before reaching three degrees above the horizon. With the mountains partially obstructing the view and the sun being eclipsed only for a small fraction of its diameter at the bottom, it is unlikely to have been visible. Perhaps this was part of the reason Lynn stated, "It is very difficult to identify this eclipse with any resulting from calculation."
At this point, the only other option available for the advocates of the accepted chronology would be to look at the reign of another king who went to Egypt during an eclipse in the month of Tammuz. Ashurbanipal is the only alternative. His reign, according to the biblical chronology, is significantly different from that of the accepted chronology.
Ashurbanipal ruled Assyria from 699-652 B.C.E., with his first regnal year in 669 B.C.E., which is 48 years. The reason for the ten-year difference between the biblical chronology and the accepted chronology is because of the additional ten years (twelve total) he ruled Babylon after the reign of Samas-suma-ukin and before the reign of Kandalanu. Edwin Thiele created a coregency between Hezekiah and Manasseh in an attempt to synchronize the biblical chronology with the accepted chronology because he didn't know Asshurbanipal ruled Babylon for the ten additional years after he defeated Samas-suma-ukin.
The accepted chronology assigns Ashurbanipal's reign to the years 669-631 B.C.E., for a total of 38 years. Concerning the later part of his reign, Wikipedia makes the following statement:
"The end of Ashurbanipal's reign and the beginning of the reign of his son and successor, Ashur-etil-ilani, is shrouded in mystery on account of a lack of available sources."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashurbanipal
Additionally, it must be pointed out that there is a dispute concerning the reign of Ashurbanipal over whether he reigned for longer than 38 years. Wikipedia has concluded that Ashurbanipal's reign could not have exceeded 38 years.
"Inscriptions by Ashur-etil-ilani suggest that his father died a natural death, but do not shed light on when or how this happened. Though his final year is often erroneously given as 627 or even 626, this follows an estimate from an inscription written nearly a century later at Harran by Adad-guppi, the mother of the Neo-Babylonian king Nabonidus (r. 556–539). The final contemporary evidence for Ashurbanipal being alive and reigning as king is a contract from Nippur made in 631. If Ashurbanipal's reign had ended in 627 the inscriptions of his successors Ashur-etil-ilani and Sinsharishkun in Babylon (covering several years) would have been impossible, given that the city was seized by Nabopolassar in 626 and never again fell into Assyrian hands."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashurbanipal
However, the Biblical chronology demonstrates that ten years are missing from the post-canonical period, which reveals that Ashurbanipal ruled Babylon for ten additional years and reigned for 48 years. Because the proponents of the accepted chronology have not considered the Biblical chronology, they are divided among themselves with insuperable difficulties.
According to the accepted chronology, Ashurbanipal secured Egypt by 663 B.C.E., which was in the early part of his reign. He put down the rebellion that began in the last years of Esarhaddon. However, during Ashurbanipal's campaigns in Egypt, there was only one partial eclipse, which was visible at Niniveh on 8/27/-663 (664 B.C.E.), but it occurred in month six (Elul), where the criteria requires month four (Tammuz). The scribe did not provide the day of the month. The best case would place the eclipse 42 days late (relative to the months), and the worst case would be 72 days late, which would be difficult to account for. The eclipse of 8/6/-699 (700 B.C.E.), which agrees with the Biblical chronology for the last year of the reign of Esarhaddon, is only 21 days late in the best case, 51 days late in the worst case, and off nominal (the middle of the month) by 36 days, whereas the eclipse considered for the reign of Ashurbanipal is 57 days off nominal.
It is prudent to keep in mind that looking for an eclipse too far from the actual month stated in the report and attempting to justify it by assuming excess or missed intercalations beyond what is within reason will only increase the probability that the eclipse is the wrong one.
There are no other eclipses that merit consideration while Ashurbanipal campaigned in Egypt. Therefore, only the eclipse of 8/6/-699 (700 B.C.E.), which occurs in the twelveth year of Esarhaddon's reign (according to the biblical chronology), meets the required criteria with the least amount of difficulty, but only so long as the solution is sought within the reign of Esarhaddon.
In consideration of Lynn's statement regarding the eclipse, "which would seem to have occurred in the reign of Esar-haddon," and assuming that the reported eclipse is not firmly fixed to his reign, Ashurbanipal, unlike Esarhaddon, would have occasion to go to Egypt without prosecuting a military campaign. After Ashurbanipal regained control of Egypt, he installed Psammetichus as king and entered into a treaty with him. The eclipse of 6/17/-678 (679 B.C.E.), which took place in Ashurbanipal's 21st year (according to the Biblical chronology), occurred in the first year of his reign in Babylon after he defeated Samas-suma-ukin. This eclipse meets the required criteria, and, under the circumstances, the purpose of his visit could have been to reaffirm the terms of the treaty. The date of the eclipse falls almost exactly in the middle of the month of Tammuz, which is much closer than the eclipse on 8/6/-699 (700 B.C.E.) for the twelveth year of Esarhaddon. For this reason, and assuming the circumstances of the report do not require it to be placed in the reign of Esarhaddon, assigning the eclipse in the report to 6/17/-678 (679 B.C.E.) in the 21st year of Ashurbanipal is preferable because it falls within the middle of the month Tammuz and aligns with the political circumstances associated with the king going to Egypt.
Nevertheless, the report cannot be simultaneously associated with the reigns of both kings. Until there is evidence that the report is limited to the reign of Esarhaddon, the eclipse in the reign of Ashurbanipal is to be preferred. However, it is possible for the proponents of the accepted chronology to choose from several eclipses in the reign of Ashurbanipal (according to the accepted chronology) that would meet the criteria in the report. The eclipses on 6/27/-660 (661 B.C.E.) and 6/7/-650 (651 B.C.E.) are both options.
Lynn's third reference to an Assyrian solar eclipse involved some degree of controversy but was accepted as a valid eclipse after he made an inquiry to Theophilus Pinches, a member of the staff at the British Museum, who confirmed that the text did in fact describe an eclipse. Lynn related this information, in addition to other details, to the editors of the Observatory in his letter, which contained the following statement:
"The immediate successor of Esarhaddon was Asshur-bani-pal. An inscription made in his reign was interpreted by. Fox Talbot (see the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archeology, vol. i. pp. 13 and 348) to record the occurrence of an eclipse of the Sun, which, at the suggestion of Oppert, was supposed to have been that of the 27th of June, B.C. 661. The inscription, as translated by Talbot, states that it took place whilst the king of Elam was preparing an attack upon Assyria, and that 'for three days the evening Sun was darkened as on that day.' No eclipse of course could produce such an effect as this; but he suggests that 'it is not impossible that, in a very ignorant age, the report of such a wonder having happened in Susiana should be believed in Assyria, at the distance of many hundred miles, and have been chronicled by a superstitious scribe.' Revising, however, a record by a conjectural process of this kind is always a hazardous proceeding, and on reading it I felt doubtful whether an eclipse was really referred to in the inscription. But Mr. Pinches has kindly examined it again, and considers that the eclipse and the three days' darkness at evening are distinct occurrences, forebodings of evil to the king of Elam. He, thus, in fact translates the passage: - 'Te-umman devised evil, and Sin [the moon god] devised against him forebodings of evil. In Tammuz an eclipse at evening - he troubled the lord of light and the setting sun thus also for three days was troubled - it went forth for the end of the reign of the [king] of Elam. This [omen] was the announcement of his [i. e. the god's] decision, which changeth not.' Upon the whole, therefore, we may fairly conclude that the eclipse of June 27, B.C. 661, is really alluded to in this inscription."
Oppert was correct in identifying the eclipse of 6/27/-660 (661 B.C.E.), although he couldn't place it in the 39th year of Ashurbanipal without knowledge of the ten missing years (after the reign of Samas-suma-ukin) and the 21 missing years during the neo-Babylonian period (after the death of Labashi-Marduk).
submitted by Legitimate_Vast_3271 to BiblicalChronology [link] [comments]


2024.05.09 21:01 The_BroScientist Cytoxan — Time to Effect

Hello,
I have had autoimmune encephalitis for three years, and after 8 neurologists have been recently diagnosed. Quite a while ago I received corticosteroids, which helped tremendously. Brought me out of psychosis, but I still had terrible symptoms.
Five months ago I started cellcept, and that has helped as well- albeit only partially.
I am starting cytoxan. My neurologist wants to do a three month trial of cytoxan before committing to a full six month course with infusions monthly totaling 9g of cytoxan for the full six months. 4.5g for the first three.
I am wondering if anyone who has been on cytoxan can give me any estimate on how long it took for them to see improvement.
Best,
Eric
submitted by The_BroScientist to Encephalitis [link] [comments]


http://activeproperty.pl/