William andrew quarles

Reddit Poker

2008.03.17 15:13 Reddit Poker

Shuffle up and deal! Official subreddit for all things poker.
[link]


2013.06.17 16:19 noxflamma WetCement Minecraft

For posts about/related to our WetCement server.
[link]


2011.08.19 20:26 Allakhellboy Invincible and the Invincible Universe

Invincible is an Image Comics and Amazon TV series named for its superhero, "Invincible" ("Mark Grayson"). Created by writer Robert Kirkman with artists Cory Walker & Ryan Ottley. S1 & S2 are out now and S3 is on the way! Mark Grayson is a normal teenager, except for the fact that his father Nolan is the most powerful superhero on the planet. Shortly after his seventeenth birthday, Mark begins to develop powers of his own and enters into his father's tutelage.
[link]


2024.05.19 04:53 Cyber_Ghost_1997 What if Russia sold Alaska to the British Empire?

In our timeline, Russia sold Alaska to the US on March 30, 1867. Russia offered to sell back in 1859, believing the United States would off-set the designs of Russia’s greatest rival in the Pacific, Great Britain. The looming U.S. Civil War delayed the sale, but after the war, Secretary of State William Seward quickly took up a renewed Russian offer and on March 30, 1867, agreed to a proposal from Russian Minister in Washington, Edouard de Stoeckl, to purchase Alaska for $7.2 million. The Senate approved the treaty of purchase on April 9; President Andrew Johnson signed the treaty on May 28, and Alaska was formally transferred to the United States on October 18, 1867. This purchase ended Russia’s presence in North America and ensured U.S. access to the Pacific northern rim (Source: https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/alaska-purchase).
But what if in an alternate timeline they sold Alaska to the British Empire years earlier, maybe even before the American War for Independence broke out? As a result, the British decided to incorporate Alaska into the Colonies it had on North America. Maybe England expressed interest in owning Alaska after gold was found there. Therefore, the Russians formally sell Alaska to England.
How does this affect things later on? Does this alter the course of the American War of Independence?
submitted by Cyber_Ghost_1997 to HistoryWhatIf [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 04:37 lawarren12 Fanduel where that cash out option at 👀 lol

submitted by lawarren12 to fanduel [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 02:14 MLS_Reddit_Bot Match Thread: Columbus Crew @ Chicago Fire FC

Overview
Home Chicago Fire FC 1
Away Columbus Crew 3
Status Full Time
Venue Soldier Field
City Chicago, Illinois
Date Saturday May 18, 2024
Time 07:30 PM CDT
♻️ Auto-refreshing reddit comments link
Lineups
Chicago Fire FC Pos Columbus Crew Pos
Chris Brady, #34 G Patrick Schulte, #28 G
Rafael Czichos, #5 CD-L Rudy Camacho, #4 CD
Carlos Terán, #4 CD-R Yevhen Cheberko, #21 CD-L
Andrew Gutman, #15 LB Steven Moreira, #31 CD-R
Allan Arigoni, #27 RB Aidan Morris, #8 CM-L
Brian Gutierrez, #17 AM Darlington Nagbe, #6 CM-R
Gastón Giménez, #30 LM William Sands, #3 LM
Federico Navarro, #31 RM Mohamed Farsi, #23 RM
Hugo Cuypers, #9 F Christian Ramírez, #17 F
Christopher Mueller, #8 AM-L Marino Hinestroza, #11 CF-L
Fabian Herbers, #21 AM-R Diego Rossi, #10 CF-R
Maren Haile-Selassie, #7 SUB Malte Amundsen, #18 SUB
Spencer Richey, #18 SUB Sean Zawadzki, #25 SUB
Xherdan Shaqiri, #10 SUB Derrick Jones, #5 SUB
Jonathan Dean, #24 SUB Yaw Yeboah, #14 SUB
Mauricio Pineda, #22 SUB Taha Habroune, #16 SUB
Kellyn Acosta, #23 SUB Nicholas Hagen, #1 SUB
Arnaud Souquet, #2 SUB Maximilian Arfsten, #27 SUB
Tom Barlow, #12 SUB Alexandru Matan, #20 SUB
Georgios Koutsias, #19 SUB Jacen Russell-Rowe, #19 SUB
Match events via ESPN
  • Kickoff
  • 24' 🟨 Rafael Czichos (Chicago Fire FC) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
  • 30' ⚽ Goal! Chicago Fire FC 0, Columbus Crew 1. Diego Rossi (Columbus Crew) right footed shot from the right side of the six yard box to the bottom left corner.
  • 41' 🔄 Substitution, Columbus Crew. Jacen Russell-Rowe replaces Marino Hinestroza because of an injury.
  • 45' 🟨 Brian Gutiérrez (Chicago Fire FC) is shown the yellow card.
  • 45'+4' First Half ends, Chicago Fire FC 0, Columbus Crew 1.
  • 45' 🔄 Substitution, Chicago Fire FC. Kellyn Acosta replaces Gastón Giménez.
  • 45' 🔄 Substitution, Columbus Crew. Sean Zawadzki replaces Aidan Morris.
  • 45' Second Half begins Chicago Fire FC 0, Columbus Crew 1.
  • 55' ⚽ Goal! Chicago Fire FC 0, Columbus Crew 2. Christian Ramírez (Columbus Crew) header from the centre of the box to the top left corner. Assisted by Mohamed Farsi with a cross.
  • 57' 🔄 Substitution, Chicago Fire FC. Georgios Koutsias replaces Fabian Herbers.
  • 67' 🔄 Substitution, Chicago Fire FC. Maren Haile-Selassie replaces Chris Mueller.
  • 67' 🔄 Substitution, Chicago Fire FC. Xherdan Shaqiri replaces Brian Gutiérrez.
  • 70' 🔄 Substitution, Chicago Fire FC. Tom Barlow replaces Hugo Cuypers.
  • 73' 🔄 Substitution, Columbus Crew. Malte Amundsen replaces Will Sands.
  • 73' 🔄 Substitution, Columbus Crew. Alexandru Matan replaces Christian Ramírez.
  • 85' ⚽ Goal! Chicago Fire FC 1, Columbus Crew 2. Carlos Terán (Chicago Fire FC) header from very close range to the bottom left corner. Assisted by Georgios Koutsias following a corner.
  • 88' ⚽ Goal! Chicago Fire FC 1, Columbus Crew 3. Jacen Russell-Rowe (Columbus Crew) left footed shot from the left side of the six yard box to the top left corner. Assisted by Malte Amundsen with a cross.
  • 90' 🔄 Substitution, Columbus Crew. Derrick Jones replaces Diego Rossi.
  • 90'+3' 🟨 Federico Navarro (Chicago Fire FC) Yellow Card at 93'
This thread is managed by a bot running on AWS Lambda. All data is sourced from ESPN APIs. The project can be found on GitHub at mrundle/mls-reddit-bot. This post was last updated at 2024-05-18 21:38:10 CDT.
submitted by MLS_Reddit_Bot to MLS [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 01:20 danmalek466 Cover Appreciation…

Cover Appreciation…
Not taking away from any of the amazing writers, pencilers, colorists, or any other talents involved in these books, but this time we’ll praise the cover artists… Here we have:
Incredible Hulk (vol 4) 2F. Stephen Segovia Exclusive.
She-Hulk (vol 4) 1P. Miguel Mercado Trade Dress.
The Incredible Hulk (vol 1) 181O. Kaare Andrews Exclusive Facsimile Virgin.
Wolverine (vol 7) 33G. Scott Williams Exclusive Virgin.
…and three (3) David Nakayama Exclusives:
X-Men (vol 5) 25J. Rasputin
X-Men (vol 5) 27I. Mystique
X-Men (vol 4) 21H. Rogue
submitted by danmalek466 to comicbookcollecting [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 23:23 Normal-Practice-4057 William Aftons victims

This will be all the confirmed victims of William Afton across all timelines.
Games:
  1. Susie no last name
  2. Frtiz no last name
  3. Jeremy no last name
  4. Gabriel no last name
  5. Cassidy no last name
  6. Charlotte Emily
6.5 Elizabeth Afton (whoops)
7-11 (or 12 If you believe there was a 6th victim) Save them kids/DCI (no last or first name)
And he probably killed more but that's all we know
Novels:
  1. Charlie Emily
2.5 Elizabeth Afton (whoops)
  1. Micheal brooks
3.Cassidy
4.Susie
5.Fritz
6.Gabriel
  1. officer dunn (first adult kill)
Frights/Tales: 1. Andrew
  1. Susie
3-6. 4 more kids (seeing as into the pit represents williams kills for obvious reasons)
7.( Probably) Charlotte Emily
  1. Rory (left his ass down with no food)
  2. Hudson Foster (2nd adult kill)
  3. Kimberly (1st teen kill)
11.Dr. Phineas Taggart (3rd adult kill)
  1. Five Unnamed People (even less relevant then the dci)
And 25 kills if you believe in stitchline and tales games.
Movie:
  1. Garrett Schmidt
2-6 5 more kids
(The rest are kills William didn't do himself but got others to for him)
  1. Bob
  2. Carl
  3. Hank
10.Jeff
  1. Maxine "Max"
  2. Jane Schmidt
Also it was implied William was getting people killed before the film started so that too.
And if we count all of William's kills from all the universes we get 29+ and probably more...he must really like killing huh.
Let me know if I missed anyone.
submitted by Normal-Practice-4057 to fnaftheories [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 23:00 AutoModerator Daily Discussion Thread

Welcome to the Daily Discussion Thread

This thread is for casual conversation, anything that doesn't warrant it's own thread (repeated topics, surveys, polls etc) and off-topic content. It will only be lightly moderated - basically just don't abuse each other and you're good to go. It's a place for the community to connect and interact a little more freely, so play nice and respect your fellow community members.
If you have a newsworthy article or sub-relevant content please post it directly to the sub as a New Post.

Announcements

Upcoming AMAs

A big thanks to Bennelong, who is reaching out far and wide to bring some new AMAs to the sub. Please note that our AMAs will be heavily moderated to ensure rules are adhered to. We have MPs graciously putting their hands up for questions and don't need people unduly emboldened by anonymity to start breaking rules.
For a view of how MPs have voted on various issues please use They Vote For You. Please note that your research should not end there as many MPs vote along party lines whilst personally advocating internally for another position, but it can be a useful starting point.

Completed AMAs




Podcast

submitted by AutoModerator to AustralianPolitics [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 21:15 SanderSo47 Directors at the Box Office: Clint Eastwood (Part 1)

Directors at the Box Office: Clint Eastwood (Part 1)
https://preview.redd.it/m07tmkxgi81d1.jpg?width=2048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a069dd209bca819edad29814e0bbd2b76eaa50db

As Reddit doesn't allow posts to exceed 40,000 characters, Eastwood's edition had to be split into two parts because his whole career cannot be ignored. The second part will be posted tomorrow.

Here's a new edition of "Directors at the Box Office", which seeks to explore the directors' trajectory at the box office and analyze their hits and bombs. I already talked about a few, and as I promised, it's Clint Eastwood's turn.
Eastwood was a troublemaker at school, and he had a bunch of odd jobs such as lifeguard, paper carrier, grocery clerk, forest firefighter, and golf caddy. In 1951, he was drafted into the United States Army during the Korean War and was discharged two years later. Through this, he got into contact with a Hollywood representative, who got him into acting classes and started his acting career. He got his start by starring in the hit show Rawhide, but he said he was exhausted by the experience. This caught the attention of some film producers and he decided to act in films directed by the then-unknown Sergio Leone. His career was on the rise, and then he got the chance to make his directorial debut.
From a box office perspective, how reliable was he to deliver a box office hit?
That's the point of this post. To analyze his career.

It should be noted that as he started his career in the 1970s, some of the domestic grosses here will be adjusted by inflation. The table with his highest grossing films, however, will be left in its unadjusted form, as the worldwide grosses are more difficult to adjust.

Play Misty for Me (1971)

"The scream you hear may be your own!"
His directorial debut. It stars Eastwood, Jessica Walter and Donna Mills, and follows a radio disc jockey being stalked by an obsessed female fan.
Before his colleague Irving Leonard died, he and Eastwood had discussed the idea of producing a film that was to give Eastwood the artistic control he desired, and his debut as a director. Eastwood said he was ready, "I stored away all the mistakes I made and saved up all the good things I learned, and now I know enough to control my own projects and get what I want out of actors."
The film was a huge success for Eastwood, and it also received positive reviews. So far, his directorial career was off to a great start.
  • Budget: $950,000.
  • Domestic gross: $10,600,000. ($81.7 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $10,600,000.

High Plains Drifter (1973)

"They'd never forget the day he drifted into town."
His second film. The film stars Eastwood, Verna Bloom and Mariana Hill, and follows a mysterious stranger who metes out justice in a corrupt frontier mining town.
Eastwood reportedly liked the offbeat quality of the film's original nine-page proposal and approached Universal with the idea of directing it, which would make it his first directed Western. The screenplay was inspired by the real-life murder of Kitty Genovese in Queens in 1964, which eyewitnesses reportedly stood by and watched. Holes in the plot were filled in with black humor and allegory, influenced by Sergio Leone.
It was well received, and the film even surpassed Play Misty for Me at the box office. Eastwood was just going up.
  • Budget: $5,500,000.
  • Domestic gross: $15,700,000. ($110.4 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $15,700,000.

Breezy (1973)

"Her name is Breezy."
His third film. It stars William Holden and Kay Lenz, and follows the relationship between a middle-aged real estate agent and a young hitchhiker.
This was his first directed film without starring on it. And his lack of presence certainly hurt the film; it received mixed reviews and flopped at the box office.
  • Budget: $750,000.
  • Domestic gross: $200,000. ($1.4 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $217,753.

The Eiger Sanction (1975)

"His lifeline, held by the assassin he hunted."
His fourth film. Based on the novel by Trevanian, the film stars Eastwood, George Kennedy, Vonetta McGee, and Jack Cassidy. It follows Jonathan Hemlock, an art history professor, mountain climber, and former assassin once employed by a secret government agency, who is blackmailed into returning to his deadly profession for one last mission.
The film received mixed reactions for its writing, and it wasn't a box office success either.
  • Budget: $9,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $14,200,000. ($82.4 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $14,200,000.

The Outlaw Josey Wales (1976)

"An army of one."
His fifth film. Based on the novel Gone to Texas by Forrest Carter, it stars Eastwood, Chief Dan George, Sondra Locke, Bill McKinney and John Vernon. The film tells the story of Josey Wales, a Missouri farmer whose family is murdered by Union militia during the Civil War. Driven to revenge, Wales joins a Confederate guerrilla band and makes a name for himself as a feared gunfighter. After the war, all the fighters in Wales' group except for him surrender to Union soldiers, but the Confederates end up being massacred. Wales becomes an outlaw and is pursued by bounty hunters and Union soldiers as he tries to make a new life for himself.
Eastwood was fascinated by the novel and he bought the film rights, hoping to star on the film. He got Philip Kaufman involved as screenwriter and possible director, but left after disagreeing with Eastwood in the material adapted to the screen. Kaufman insisted on filming with a meticulous attention to detail, which caused disagreements with Eastwood, not to mention the attraction the two shared towards Locke and apparent jealousy on Kaufman's part in regard to their emerging relationship. This caused Eastwood to take over as the director. Kaufman's firing angered the DGA, as he did most of the pre-production, and sanctioning a $60,000 fine. This resulted in the Director's Guild passing a new rule, known as "the Eastwood Rule", which prohibits an actor or producer from firing the director and then personally taking on the director's role.
The film received critical acclaim, and in subsequent years, is ranked among Eastwood's greatest films. It was also a huge success at the box office, doubling his previous highest grossing film. It was also one of the few Western films to receive critical and commercial success in the 1970s at a time when the Western was thought to be dying as a major genre in Hollywood.
  • Budget: $3,700,000.
  • Domestic gross: $31,800,000. ($174.5 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $31,800,000.

The Gauntlet (1977)

"The man in the middle of..."
His sixth film. It stars Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Pat Hingle, William Prince, Bill McKinney, and Mara Corday. It follows a down-and-out cop who falls in love with a prostitute, to whom he is assigned to escort from Las Vegas to Phoenix for her to testify against the mob.
While it received mixed reviews, it became another box office success for Eastwood, becoming his now highest grossing film.
  • Budget: $5,500,000.
  • Domestic gross: $35,400,000. ($182.4 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $35,400,000.

Bronco Billy (1980)

"The most outrageous of 'em all."
His seventh film. The film stars Eastwood and Sondra Locke, and focuses on the financially-struggling owner of a traditional Wild West show and his new assistant.
It became another critical and commercial success for Eastwood, who referred to the film as one of his most affable shoots of his career.
  • Budget: $6,500,000.
  • Domestic gross: $24,265,659. ($91.9 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $24,265,659.

Firefox (1982)

"The most devastating killing machine ever built... his job... steal it!"
His eighth film. Based on the novel by Craig Thomas, it stars Eastwood, Freddie Jones and David Huffman. The Soviets have developed a revolutionary new jet fighter, called "Firefox". Naturally, the British are worried that the jet will be used as a first-strike weapon, as rumors say that the jet is undetectable on radar. They send ex-Vietnam War pilot Mitchell Gant on a covert mission into the Soviet Union to steal the Firefox.
The film received mixed reviews, but it earned almost $47 million, becoming Eastwood's highest grossing title as director.
  • Budget: $21,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $46,708,276. ($151.1 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $46,708,276.

Honkytonk Man (1982)

"The boy is on his way to becoming a man. The man is on his way to becoming a legend."
His ninth film. It's based on the novel by Clancy Carlile, and it stars Eastwood and his son Kyle. It follows Red Stovall, a country music singer and composer. With his nephew Whit by his side, he travels to Nashville to perform at the Grand Ole Opry in the backdrop of the Great Depression.
While the film received acclaim, it earned just $4.4 million, becoming his second worst performer.
  • Budget: $2,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $4,484,991. ($14.5 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $4,484,991.

Sudden Impact (1983)

"Dirty Harry is at it again."
His tenth film. The fourth installment in the Dirty Harry series, directed, it stars Eastwood and Sondra Locke. The film tells the story of a gang rape victim who decides to seek revenge on her rapists 10 years after the attack by killing them one by one. Inspector Harry Callahan, famous for his unconventional and often brutal crime-fighting tactics, is tasked with tracking down the serial killer.
The film received mixed reviews from critics, but it earned over $150 million worldwide, Eastwood's first film to pass that milestone. It's also very popular for including the iconic catchphrase, "Go ahead, make my day."
  • Budget: $22,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $67,642,693. ($212.1 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $150,642,693.

Pale Rider (1985)

"...And Hell followed with him."
His 11th film. It stars Eastwood, Michael Moriarty and Carrie Snodgress. A couple and their daughter, along with a few others, are driven out of Lahood, California, by goons working for a mining baron. However, a stranger enters their life to assist them in their fight.
There was no stopping Eastwood: another critical and commercial success.
  • Budget: $6,900,000.
  • Domestic gross: $41,410,568. ($120.2 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $41,410,568.

Heartbreak Ridge (1986)

"The scars run deep."
His 12th film. It stars Eastwood, Marsha Mason, Everett McGill, and Mario Van Peebles. The story centers on a U.S. Marine nearing retirement who gets a platoon of undisciplined Marines into shape and leads them during the American invasion of Grenada in 1983.
The film was inspired by an account of American paratroopers of the 82nd Airborne Division using a pay telephone and a credit card to call in fire support during the invasion of Grenada, and fashioned a script of a Korean War veteran career Army non-commissioned officer passing on his values to a new generation of soldiers. Eastwood was interested in the script and asked his producer, Fritz Manes, to contact the US Army with a view of filming the movie at Fort Bragg. However, the Army read the script and refused to participate, due to Highway being portrayed as a hard drinker, divorced from his wife, and using unapproved motivational methods to his troops, an image the Army did not want.
It received mixed reviews, with some deeming the film as "imperialist propaganda". But it was still another box office success.
  • Budget: $15,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $42,724,017. ($121.7 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $121,700,000.

Bird (1988)

"There are no second acts in American lives."
His 13th film. The film stars Forest Whitaker and Diane Venora. It is constructed as a montage of scenes from saxophonist Charlie Parker's life, from his childhood in Kansas City, through his early death at the age of 34.
Eastwood, a lifelong fan of jazz, had been fascinated by Parker ever since seeing him perform live in Oakland in 1946. He approached Chan Parker, Bird's common-law wife on whose memoirs the script was based, for input, and she lent Eastwood and arranger Lennie Niehaus a collection of recordings from her private collection Before Eastwood was involved, Richard Pryor was originally cast as Parker.
Despitive positive reviews, it performed poorly, earning just $2.2 million in North America.
  • Budget: $14,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $2,181,286. ($5.7 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $2,181,286.

White Hunter Black Heart (1990)

"An adventure in obsession."
His 14th film. Based on the novel by Peter Viertel, it stars Eastwood, Jeff Fahey, George Dzundza, Alun Armstrong and Marisa Berenson. It follows a famous movie director, John Wilson, who goes to Africa to make his next movie. He is an obstinate, contrary director who'd rather hunt elephants than take care of his crew or movie. He has become obsessed with one particular elephant and cares for nothing else.
Despite positive reviews, it made just $2.3 million domestically, not even 10% of the budget.
  • Budget: $24,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $2,319,124. ($5.5 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $2,319,124.

The Rookie (1990)

His 15th film. The film stars Eastwood, Charlie Sheen, Raul Julia, Sônia Braga, Lara Flynn Boyle, and Tom Skerritt. It follows a veteran police officer teamed up with a younger detective, whose intent is to take down a German crime lord in downtown Los Angeles, following months of investigation into an exotic car theft ring.
It received negative reviews for its acting and story, and it became another flop for Eastwood. That's three bombs in a row. Ouch.
  • Budget: $30,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $21,633,874. ($51.6 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $21,633,874.

Unforgiven (1992)

"Some legends will never be forgotten. Some wrongs can never be forgiven."
His 16th film. It stars Eastwood, Gene Hackman, Richard Harris and Morgan Freeman. It follows William Munny, a widower with two young kids, who was once a very vicious gunfighter who gave up everything after marriage. Now, a man named Schofield Kid brings him an offer that he cannot refuse, forcing him to come out of retirement for one last job.
David Webb Peoples wrote the script all the way back to 1976, and it was optioned by Francis Ford Coppola, but he lacked the funds needed to helm it. By Eastwood's own recollection, he was given the script in the "early 80s" although he did not immediately pursue it, because, according to him, "I thought I should do some other things first". Eastwood has long asserted that the film would be his last traditional Western, concerned that any future projects would simply rehash previous plotlines or imitate someone else's work. He dedicated the film to his close friends and mentors Sergio Leone and Don Siegel. Hackman initially refused to participate as his daughters were upset that he was starring in too many violent films, but he became fascinated by the script that he agreed.
It opened with $15 million and it legged all the way to $100 million after playing for almost one year, closing with $159 million worldwide, his now highest grossing film. The film received Eastwood's best reviews of his career, with many considering the film as his magnum opus as director. It received 9 Oscar nominations, and won four: Best Picture and Best Director for Eastwood, Best Supporting Actor for Hackman, and Best Film Editing. So Eastwood, on top of being a reliable box office draw, was now a 2-time Oscar winner.
  • Budget: $14,400,000.
  • Domestic gross: $101,167,799. ($225.2 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $159,167,799.

A Perfect World (1993)

His 17th film. Kevin Costner, Eastwood and Laura Dern, and follows an escaped convict who takes a young boy hostage and attempts to escape on the road with the child, while being pursued by a Texas Ranger.
The film received critical acclaim, and has appeared as one of Eastwood's best films. The film disappointed in North America, but it earned up to $100 million overseas (Eastwood's first film to gross that much) and ended with $135 million worldwide.
  • Budget: $30,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $31,130,999. ($67.2 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $135,130,999.

The Bridges of Madison County (1995)

"The human heart has a way of making itself large again even after it's been broken into a million pieces."
His 18th film. Based on the novel by Robert James Waller, it stars Eastwood and Meryl Streep. The film is set in 1965, following a war bride, Francesca Johnson, who lives with her husband and two children on their Iowa farm. That year she meets National Geographic photojournalist, Robert Kincaid, who comes to Madison County, Iowa to photograph its historic covered bridges. With Francesca's family away for a short trip, the couple have an intense, four-day love affair.
It received more critical acclaim, and made over $180 million worldwide, becoming his highest grossing film. For her performance, Streep was nominated for an Oscar for Best Actress.
  • Budget: $22,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $71,516,617. ($146.5 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $182,016,617.

Absolute Power (1997)

His 19th film. Based on the novel by David Baldacci, it stars Eastwood, Gene Hackman, Ed Harris, Laura Linney, Judy Davis, Scott Glenn, Dennis Haysbert, and Richard Jenkins. It follows a master jewel thief who witnesses the killing of a woman by Secret Service agents.
It received mixed reviews, and disappointed at the box office.
  • Budget: $50,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $50,068,310. ($97.4 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $92,768,310.

Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil (1997)

"Welcome to Savannah, Georgia. A Ccty of hot nights and cold blooded murder."
His 20th film. Based on the book by John Berendt, it stars John Cusack and Kevin Spacey. It follows the story of antiques dealer Jim Williams, on trial for the killing of a male prostitute who was his lover. The multiple trials depicted in Berendt's book are combined into one trial for the film.
It received mediocre reviews, and flopped at the box office.
  • Budget: $30,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $25,105,255. ($48.8 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $25,105,255.

True Crime (1999)

His 21st film. Based on the novel by Andrew Klavan, it stars Eastwood, Isaiah Washington, Denis Leary, LisaGay Hamilton and James Woods. It follows a journalist covering the execution of a death row inmate, only to discover that the convict may actually be innocent.
This was another project that received mediocre reviews and flopped at the box office.
  • Budget: $55,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $16,649,768. ($31.2 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $16,649,768.

Space Cowboys (2000)

"Boys will be boys."
His 22nd film. It stars Eastwood, Tommy Lee Jones, Donald Sutherland, and James Garner as four aging former test pilots who are sent into space to repair an old Soviet satellite.
It received very positive reviews, and earned over $128 million worldwide.
  • Budget: $60,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $90,464,773. ($164 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $128,884,132.

Blood Work (2002)

"He's a heartbeat away from catching the killer."
His 23rd film. Based on the novel by Michael Connelly, it stars Eastwood, Jeff Daniels, Wanda De Jesús, and Anjelica Huston. It follows a retired FBI agent who recently had a heart transplant but still takes up the job to nab a killer.
It was another film with mediocre reviews and flop status.
  • Budget: $50,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $26,235,081. ($45.5 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $31,794,718.

Mystic River (2003)

"We bury our sins, we wash them clean."
His 24th film. Based on the novel by Dennis Lehane, it stars Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Kevin Bacon, Laurence Fishburne, Marcia Gay Harden, and Laura Linney. It follows three childhood friends who are reunited 25 years later when one of them suffers a family tragedy.
Michael Keaton was originally cast in the role of Det. Sean Devine, and did several script readings with the cast, as well as his own research into the practices of the Massachusetts Police Department. However, creative differences between Keaton and Eastwood led to Keaton leaving the production. He was replaced by Kevin Bacon. This was the first film in which Eastwood would be credited as composer.
The film had a slow roll-out, but it was aided by strong word of mouth, closing with a wonderful $156 million worldwide. It also received acclaim, and was named as one of Eastwood's greatest films. Sean Penn received universal acclaim for his performance, with some naming it among the best acting of the century, particularly for one scene (if you watched it, you definitely know which scene). It received 6 Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director for Eastwood. It won two: Best Actor for Penn and Best Supporting Actor for Robbins.
  • Budget: $25,000,000.
  • Domestic gross: $90,135,191. ($153 million adjusted)
  • Worldwide gross: $156,595,191.

Come back tomorrow for Part 2

Don't suggest directors for the next edition here. Save it for tomorrow.

submitted by SanderSo47 to boxoffice [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:55 Superlitusaball150 Happy 23rd anniversary to Shrek & Happy 17th anniversary to Shrek the third

Happy 23rd anniversary to Shrek & Happy 17th anniversary to Shrek the third
Both movies released the same date
submitted by Superlitusaball150 to DreamWorks [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:38 Luck_Top Finally have an all Galaxy Opal Team as a F2P player but there’s always room for improvement.

Finally have an all Galaxy Opal Team as a F2P player but there’s always room for improvement. submitted by Luck_Top to NBA2K24MyTeamMobile [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 18:08 Marambal17 On this day in 2001, this timeless classic premiered in the US.

On this day in 2001, this timeless classic premiered in the US. submitted by Marambal17 to 2000sNostalgia [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 17:56 CallMeDockett What are your thoughts on this movie?

What are your thoughts on this movie? submitted by CallMeDockett to moviecritic [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 17:11 energyspectrum Setting things up for the future

I’ve just discovered that KC3 had a second mistress besides Camilla, named Kanga, and she died a couple of weeks after Diana. Paving the way for Camilla to go unchallenged. Isn’t that suspicious?
I think what’s happening here with the Kate mystery is that the RF are working to a very long term plan. I can imagine that they’ve mapped out a timeline, say going over 5 years…
Year 1: Kate is missing
Year 2: Kate dies. William portrayed as broken & lonely, supported by longtime friend Rose Hanbury
Year 3: Quiet period. William goes underground for a while (Andrew-style)
Year 4: Rose & William relationship announced
Year 5: New King & Queen throned
That’s just my clumsy example, but my point is that the RF will resort to a long-term plan like this to achieve their goals. William probably feels hot under the collar right now, but he’s expecting that and knows it will pass. It’s one of many phases we’ll all be taken through over years that the RF are relying on to manipulate us. Years down the line he’s expecting we all will have forgotten the Kate mystery, forums like this will have been scrubbed from the internet and the public will have swallowed the cancer narrative. The ones who didn’t are just conspiracy theorists.
I suspect the RF have operated like this from the word go, they’ve always been psychopathic, look at Henry 8th, Bloody Mary etc. They are lunatics.
As well as that the RF are divorced from reality and cushioned from any personal impact or public reaction. It’s all a game. Like the chess pieces in Harry’s book.
They’re living in a giant world of make believe, they’re not responsible for their actions, they have staff and methods to hide their crimes and therefore can and do get away with anything. There are sticky moments yes, but it’s worth it for the main prize.
They meticulously scheme their way through the world by planning over time. Long-term gaslighting.
I believed that approach was used for Diana and Kanga too.
submitted by energyspectrum to KateMiddletonMissing [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 16:26 Available_Reason7795 Happy 23rd anniversary to Dreamworks’ take that to Disney, Shrek!

Happy 23rd anniversary to Dreamworks’ take that to Disney, Shrek! submitted by Available_Reason7795 to 2000sNostalgia [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 15:57 zain_ahmed002 A guide to how Remnant, Agony and emotions work

Disclaimer: This will be a "long" post for some, as it's supposed to be informative. If you don't like reading then idk what else I can do lmao, but there's no need in saying "I ain't reading allat, so I'll believe.." as that just promotes toxic behaviour.
So I did make a post explaining this a while ago, but it's a bit outdated and doesn't explain it in the detail that this post will. This post is actually based on a Twitter thread I made (I won't link it as Reddit weirdly formats it lol, if you wanna find it just search "Zain_Ahmed002 Twitter" and my profile will pop up"

Remnant

A lot of people misunderstand what Remnant actually is. I've seen it used as an umbrella term, far too many times. It's often used as something to explain the unexplainable, but in actuality Remnant has always been consistent and has been shown to us in a scientific way.
Simply put, Remnant is explained as the "tangible" mixing with the "intangible":
https://preview.redd.it/6e90art3k61d1.png?width=591&format=png&auto=webp&s=1cdf2e9e38c072b8f839ebfdbef9fe64e9786bb4
Afton, in TFC, expands on this explanation by saying how his body (current soul host) when paired with his emotion (pain) allows his soul to "follow" it to then lead it to its "eternal home":
https://preview.redd.it/hml0lgodk61d1.png?width=765&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a571be5af9dd4a8cd9213b4bcba9eee47291e00
Some people have an issue with the grammar of the first sentence, as people claim that ", and also the.." suggests that either or are required. But that's not true at all, both are required as the next line shows that both his body and his pain are required for the soul to follow.
Afton's hypothesis pairs with Talbert's description from above, and we can combine the two to form a simple formula for how Remnant forms:
https://preview.redd.it/m03alwp3n61d1.png?width=1101&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4890324d0ffd15c7d4d3719ccdcd98c709df539
Memories + Emotion
We learn through different parts of the canon that memories hold pieces of the soul, given Talbert’s description they latch onto the objects (Tangible). We also learn that the memories are influenced by the emotion, where a possession via the emotion of love will result in more positive memories. A great example of this is Jake, where he doesn't really recall the pain he felt when he had cancer as his "remnant" is formed from the pure emotion of love.
Not many cases involve a pure emotion, Andrew's and Jake's are the only one's specified to have a pure emotion and it explains why the way they possess objects id different (more on this later).
Current soul host
This is essentially a "fancy" term I made due to the lack of name given to this variable. It's essentially where the soul resides before it goes to "follow" the memories and emotions into the new object, which acts as the new soul host.
So, for a first-time possession, the current soul host will be the human body. And the object will be an animatronic or something, making the animatronic the new soul host. So that when that object dies/ breaks, the soul follows the same formula shown above to another object for it to act as the new new soul host. See what I mean?
We see this with Andrew, where he moves from William (his current soul host) into objects like Fetch, which then become his new soul host.

Limitations of Remnant

Emotions
As discussed above, certain emotions can influence the way a soul possesses an object. It all comes down to the "energetic radius", which Taggart explains as the distance an emotion can travel.
https://preview.redd.it/yzulsm3hp61d1.png?width=802&format=png&auto=webp&s=9bba4f42109b567f8f1188e90dee207c3ebe9bc3
https://preview.redd.it/onlh66uhp61d1.png?width=795&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb7e2dc890b542326817ce32c3acfc604b09512d
As Taggart explains, agony can radiate the furthest but love can still radiate/ "has its influence" to an extent.
We see this with Andrew, where he leaves current soul host of William, and then "infects" nearby objects at the distribution centre.
A "normal" possession would require very close - physical contact, like we see here with Charlie and it's why the MCIs were stuffed.
https://preview.redd.it/ugox48xyp61d1.png?width=355&format=png&auto=webp&s=013038f2b0dbd63a2d7e3468cb572b0415eeed04
This isn't to say that possessions with agony mean that the soul can be catapulted to an object far away, they still have to be nearby.. Just not physically touching.
Souls can't just willingly leave the object they're in
I have seen a lot of people theorise that souls can "leave" an object they're in, mainly with the new CassidyVictim video that's gaining a lot of attention. The claim is something like BV has a "half possession" and that he was able to leave Golden Freddy.. That's just not possible.
As explained above, until the soul host dies or breaks, the soul remains trapped in that object.
It's literally why Henry says that the MCIs are "trapped in prisons", as they can't just get up and leave. Some people use Susie from Coming Home or the MCIs seen in Follow Me as evidence of them leaving, but that's not the case as they're cases of soul splitting. I have made a post explaining that here.
So that's Remnant in a nutshell.
Now, emotions. Certain emotions have certain qualities.

Emotions

Emotions, mainly agony and love, can be a stand-alone thing, where it leaves a person and "pours" into objects.
Also to clarify, "Agony" is an umbrella term used to collate all negative emotions like rage and grief. Both of which have their unique qualities.
Rage and love seem to be emotions that can leave the human body, without taking the soul with it. An example of this is the "ice crystals" experiment Taggart researches and also carries out.
https://preview.redd.it/t5g6kc3ew61d1.png?width=783&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee8b2e17748a3b4ae9bdfcb52ea76ac818586979
The ice crystals made from the emotion of love were simply the emotion of love leaving the human body and pouring into the crystals, forming "beautiful ice crystals".
Taggart recreated this experiment, but with rage.
https://preview.redd.it/8h1o2w4nw61d1.png?width=821&format=png&auto=webp&s=e1473160c8a710cf4e2838bbb357134b94055756
And just like love, Taggarts soul didn't leave his body.
I'm mentioning this as grief also take "a piece" of the person's soul with it. This does not mean that the person "possesses" the object, it's just a tiny fragment of their soul as like I've explained right at the beginning of this post, memories can be intertwined with pieces of the soul.
It's mainly the memory that sticks, and the piece of the soul there pretty much does nothing. We see this with Henry's grief pouring into the Charliebots in TFC:
https://preview.redd.it/d7b2n046x61d1.png?width=741&format=png&auto=webp&s=e99c7ac3c3567c4267f6a9a698ece35fea36e7c6
https://preview.redd.it/vwq0dgt6x61d1.png?width=748&format=png&auto=webp&s=9843a0846b95a52f412696f8738d74d56cf58be4
https://preview.redd.it/yjzs24k7x61d1.png?width=790&format=png&auto=webp&s=105990f4f9fad814613e3db80035c7d1177f3cd4
Like I said, this does not happen with rage, as we see this with the Mimic and the Springtrap anomaly formed in the story In The Flesh, where they refer to the person as their "father" as they don't hold any of their memories, nor do they hold any piece of their souls
https://preview.redd.it/p382b6hix61d1.png?width=786&format=png&auto=webp&s=0623b4d1189effecb2ca91edb2c2d78bf37e1128
https://preview.redd.it/tile403jx61d1.png?width=567&format=png&auto=webp&s=1b9fdc013d84bb5335a26ca36a1c6d4d5ef820c2
Showing how emotions can latch onto objects and influencing them.

Conclusion

So to summarise: 1. Remnant is (Emotion + memories) + host + object 2. A soul can't leave the prison it's in 3. Emotions can give the remnant different properties and doesn't always require physical contact 4. Agony can be an emotion on its own, poured into objects
The end.
submitted by zain_ahmed002 to fnaftheories [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 15:57 zain_ahmed002 A guide to how Remnant, Agony and emotions work

A guide to how Remnant, Agony and emotions work
Disclaimer: This will be a "long" post for some, as it's supposed to be informative. If you don't like reading then idk what else I can do lmao, but there's no need in saying "I ain't reading allat, so I'll believe.." as that just promotes toxic behaviour.
So I did make a post explaining this a while ago, but it's a bit outdated and doesn't explain it in the detail that this post will. This post is actually based on a Twitter thread I made (I won't link it as Reddit weirdly formats it lol, if you wanna find it just search "Zain_Ahmed002 Twitter" and my profile will pop up"

Remnant

A lot of people misunderstand what Remnant actually is. I've seen it used as an umbrella term, far too many times. It's often used as something to explain the unexplainable, but in actuality Remnant has always been consistent and has been shown to us in a scientific way.
Simply put, Remnant is explained as the "tangible" mixing with the "intangible":
https://preview.redd.it/6e90art3k61d1.png?width=591&format=png&auto=webp&s=1cdf2e9e38c072b8f839ebfdbef9fe64e9786bb4
Afton, in TFC, expands on this explanation by saying how his body (current soul host) when paired with his emotion (pain) allows his soul to "follow" it to then lead it to its "eternal home":
https://preview.redd.it/hml0lgodk61d1.png?width=765&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a571be5af9dd4a8cd9213b4bcba9eee47291e00
Some people have an issue with the grammar of the first sentence, as people claim that ", and also the.." suggests that either or are required. But that's not true at all, both are required as the next line shows that both his body and his pain are required for the soul to follow.
Afton's hypothesis pairs with Talbert's description from above, and we can combine the two to form a simple formula for how Remnant forms:
https://preview.redd.it/m03alwp3n61d1.png?width=1101&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4890324d0ffd15c7d4d3719ccdcd98c709df539
Memories + Emotion
We learn through different parts of the canon that memories hold pieces of the soul, given Talbert’s description they latch onto the objects (Tangible). We also learn that the memories are influenced by the emotion, where a possession via the emotion of love will result in more positive memories. A great example of this is Jake, where he doesn't really recall the pain he felt when he had cancer as his "remnant" is formed from the pure emotion of love.
Not many cases involve a pure emotion, Andrew's and Jake's are the only one's specified to have a pure emotion and it explains why the way they possess objects id different (more on this later).
Current soul host
This is essentially a "fancy" term I made due to the lack of name given to this variable. It's essentially where the soul resides before it goes to "follow" the memories and emotions into the new object, which acts as the new soul host.
So, for a first-time possession, the current soul host will be the human body. And the object will be an animatronic or something, making the animatronic the new soul host. So that when that object dies/ breaks, the soul follows the same formula shown above to another object for it to act as the new new soul host. See what I mean?
We see this with Andrew, where he moves from William (his current soul host) into objects like Fetch, which then become his new soul host.

Limitations of Remnant

Emotions
As discussed above, certain emotions can influence the way a soul possesses an object. It all comes down to the "energetic radius", which Taggart explains as the distance an emotion can travel.
https://preview.redd.it/yzulsm3hp61d1.png?width=802&format=png&auto=webp&s=9bba4f42109b567f8f1188e90dee207c3ebe9bc3
https://preview.redd.it/onlh66uhp61d1.png?width=795&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb7e2dc890b542326817ce32c3acfc604b09512d
As Taggart explains, agony can radiate the furthest but love can still radiate/ "has its influence" to an extent.
We see this with Andrew, where he leaves current soul host of William, and then "infects" nearby objects at the distribution centre.
A "normal" possession would require very close - physical contact, like we see here with Charlie and it's why the MCIs were stuffed.
https://preview.redd.it/ugox48xyp61d1.png?width=355&format=png&auto=webp&s=013038f2b0dbd63a2d7e3468cb572b0415eeed04
This isn't to say that possessions with agony mean that the soul can be catapulted to an object far away, they still have to be nearby.. Just not physically touching.
Souls can't just willingly leave the object they're in
I have seen a lot of people theorise that souls can "leave" an object they're in, mainly with the new CassidyVictim video that's gaining a lot of attention. The claim is something like BV has a "half possession" and that he was able to leave Golden Freddy.. That's just not possible.
As explained above, until the soul host dies or breaks, the soul remains trapped in that object.
It's literally why Henry says that the MCIs are "trapped in prisons", as they can't just get up and leave. Some people use Susie from Coming Home or the MCIs seen in Follow Me as evidence of them leaving, but that's not the case as they're cases of soul splitting. I have made a post explaining that here.
So that's Remnant in a nutshell.
Now, emotions. Certain emotions have certain qualities.

Emotions

Emotions, mainly agony and love, can be a stand-alone thing, where it leaves a person and "pours" into objects.
Also to clarify, "Agony" is an umbrella term used to collate all negative emotions like rage and grief. Both of which have their unique qualities.
Rage and love seem to be emotions that can leave the human body, without taking the soul with it. An example of this is the "ice crystals" experiment Taggart researches and also carries out.
https://preview.redd.it/t5g6kc3ew61d1.png?width=783&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee8b2e17748a3b4ae9bdfcb52ea76ac818586979
The ice crystals made from the emotion of love were simply the emotion of love leaving the human body and pouring into the crystals, forming "beautiful ice crystals".
Taggart recreated this experiment, but with rage.
https://preview.redd.it/8h1o2w4nw61d1.png?width=821&format=png&auto=webp&s=e1473160c8a710cf4e2838bbb357134b94055756
And just like love, Taggarts soul didn't leave his body.
I'm mentioning this as grief also take "a piece" of the person's soul with it. This does not mean that the person "possesses" the object, it's just a tiny fragment of their soul as like I've explained right at the beginning of this post, memories can be intertwined with pieces of the soul.
It's mainly the memory that sticks, and the piece of the soul there pretty much does nothing. We see this with Henry's grief pouring into the Charliebots in TFC:
https://preview.redd.it/d7b2n046x61d1.png?width=741&format=png&auto=webp&s=e99c7ac3c3567c4267f6a9a698ece35fea36e7c6
https://preview.redd.it/vwq0dgt6x61d1.png?width=748&format=png&auto=webp&s=9843a0846b95a52f412696f8738d74d56cf58be4
https://preview.redd.it/yjzs24k7x61d1.png?width=790&format=png&auto=webp&s=105990f4f9fad814613e3db80035c7d1177f3cd4
Like I said, this does not happen with rage, as we see this with the Mimic and the Springtrap anomaly formed in the story In The Flesh, where they refer to the person as their "father" as they don't hold any of their memories, nor do they hold any piece of their souls
https://preview.redd.it/p382b6hix61d1.png?width=786&format=png&auto=webp&s=0623b4d1189effecb2ca91edb2c2d78bf37e1128
https://preview.redd.it/tile403jx61d1.png?width=567&format=png&auto=webp&s=1b9fdc013d84bb5335a26ca36a1c6d4d5ef820c2
Showing how emotions can latch onto objects and influencing them.

Conclusion

So to summarise: 1. Remnant is (Emotion + memories) + host + object 2. A soul can't leave the prison it's in 3. Emotions can give the remnant different properties and doesn't always require physical contact 4. Agony can be an emotion on its own, poured into objects
The end.
submitted by zain_ahmed002 to fivenightsatfreddys [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 12:00 milb_bot 05/17/2024 Daily Minor League Hitter Standouts

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

stats for games since 04/08/2024
 

AAA Standouts

Jackson Holliday 0/4 BB -- [2B, 20, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .236 BA .396 OBP .167 ISO 72 AB 2 HR 2 SB 20 BB% 19 K%
Junior Caminero 1/5 2B K -- [3B, 20, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .306 BA .364 OBP .245 ISO 98 AB 6 HR 8 BB% 20 K%
Javier Sanoja 2/5 -- [SS, 21, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .277 BA .344 OBP .108 ISO 83 AB 1 SB 9 BB% 3 K%
Owen Caissie 1/3 2B 2BB K -- [CF, 21, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .283 BA .421 OBP .159 ISO 113 AB 3 HR 4 SB 18 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Jonatan Clase​ 3/3 2B BB SB -- [CF, 21, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .385 OBP .274 ISO 84 AB 4 HR 10 SB 18 BB% 25 K%
Jordan Walker 2/4 3B BB -- [RF, 21, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .328 BA .394 OBP .103 ISO 58 AB 2 SB 10 BB% 12 K%
Thomas Saggese 2/5 2B 2K SB -- [2B, 22, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .263 BA .336 OBP .161 ISO 118 AB 4 HR 5 SB 5 BB% 20 K%
Juan Brito 1/3 2B BB -- [2B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .213 BA .349 OBP .205 ISO 122 AB 6 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 15 K%
Drew Romo 2/3 BB -- [C, 22, PCL - COL] - [F] [T] .425 BA .438 OBP .226 ISO 106 AB 4 HR 2 SB 1 BB% 18 K%
Victor Scott II 1/5 HR BB K -- [CF, 23, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .205 BA .287 OBP .128 ISO 78 AB 2 HR 8 SB 9 BB% 18 K%
Lawrence Butler 2/5 2B K SB -- [CF, 23, PCL - OAK] - [F] [T] .429 BA .556 OBP .143 ISO 7 AB 1 SB 22 BB% 11 K%
Connor Norby 3/4 2 2B -- [RF, 23, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .250 BA .346 OBP .170 ISO 112 AB 4 HR 4 SB 12 BB% 33 K%
Tristan Peters 3/4 2 2B BB K -- [RF, 24, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .234 BA .339 OBP .117 ISO 94 AB 2 HR 4 SB 11 BB% 25 K%
Parker Meadows 2/2 2B 2BB SB -- [CF, 24, INT - DET] - [F] [T] .267 BA .361 OBP .267 ISO 30 AB 2 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 27 K%
Ji Hwan Bae 2/4 2B BB K SB -- [2B, 24, INT - PIT] - [F] [T] .345 BA .467 OBP .161 ISO 87 AB 3 HR 7 SB 17 BB% 28 K%
Dustin Harris 1/3 HR 2BB -- [LF, 24, PCL - TEX] - [F] [T] .252 BA .353 OBP .108 ISO 111 AB 2 HR 10 SB 12 BB% 22 K%
Shay Whitcomb 4/6 3B HR K -- [DH, 25, PCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .312 BA .402 OBP .284 ISO 109 AB 7 HR 4 SB 13 BB% 19 K%
🔥​ Jesús Bastidas​ 4/5 2B 2 HR -- [SS, 25, PCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .298 BA .371 OBP .282 ISO 131 AB 8 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Jacob Amaya 3/5 2 2B 3B -- [SS, 25, PCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .222 BA .329 OBP .167 ISO 72 AB 1 HR 12 BB% 16 K%
Sandro Fabian 3/4 3B HR BB -- [RF, 26, PCL - TEX] - [F] [T] .284 BA .336 OBP .165 ISO 109 AB 2 HR 1 SB 5 BB% 15 K%
Logan Davidson 3/5 2B 3B HR 2K -- [3B, 26, PCL - OAK] - [F] [T] .337 BA .390 OBP .228 ISO 92 AB 4 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 34 K%
Coco Montes 3/5 2B 3B HR -- [2B, 27, PCL - COL] - [F] [T] .383 BA .465 OBP .275 ISO 120 AB 6 HR 2 SB 14 BB% 19 K%
Forrest Wall 3/4 2B 2BB 2 SB -- [DH, 28, INT - ATL] - [F] [T] .329 BA .450 OBP .207 ISO 82 AB 4 HR 6 SB 17 BB% 28 K%
Trayce Thompson 3/3 3 HR 2BB SB -- [RF, 33, INT - NYM] - [F] [T] .282 BA .362 OBP .364 ISO 110 AB 11 HR 3 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
 

AA Standouts

Nelson Rada 1/4 -- [DH, 18, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .261 BA .328 OBP .027 ISO 111 AB 12 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Samuel Basallo 2/4 2K -- [1B, 19, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .250 BA .295 OBP .158 ISO 120 AB 5 HR 1 SB 5 BB% 22 K%
Cole Young 1/4 2B -- [2B, 20, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .233 BA .321 OBP .092 ISO 120 AB 1 HR 6 SB 10 BB% 16 K%
🔥​ Carson Williams​ 2/4 2 2B 2BB K SB -- [SS, 20, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .347 BA .430 OBP .246 ISO 118 AB 5 HR 10 SB 11 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Deyvison De Los Santos​ 3/3 HR BB -- [1B, 20, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .386 BA .443 OBP .315 ISO 127 AB 12 HR 7 BB% 19 K%
Brady House 1/3 HR BB K -- [3B, 20, EAS - WSH] - [F] [T] .226 BA .323 OBP .252 ISO 115 AB 8 HR 1 SB 11 BB% 24 K%
Adael Amador 0/1 3BB K 2 SB -- [2B, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .143 BA .317 OBP .010 ISO 98 AB 13 SB 17 BB% 17 K%
James Triantos 3/5 2B K -- [2B, 21, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .283 BA .313 OBP .167 ISO 120 AB 3 HR 7 SB 4 BB% 10 K%
Alex Ramírez 2/4 K SB -- [CF, 21, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .255 BA .344 OBP .066 ISO 106 AB 12 SB 12 BB% 22 K%
Frederick Bencosme 1/2 HR -- [SS, 21, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .241 BA .305 OBP .167 ISO 108 AB 4 HR 4 SB 7 BB% 15 K%
Marcelo Mayer 2/5 2B -- [SS, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .306 BA .354 OBP .179 ISO 134 AB 3 HR 7 SB 7 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Dayan Frias​ 3/3 2B HR -- [3B, 21, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .218 BA .317 OBP .149 ISO 87 AB 3 HR 1 SB 11 BB% 28 K%
Warming Bernabel 2/5 2B -- [3B, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .231 BA .256 OBP .111 ISO 117 AB 3 HR 3 SB 3 BB% 19 K%
Pascanel Ferreras 2/4 2B 3B K -- [SS, 22, TEX - HOU] - [F] [T] .355 BA .474 OBP .258 ISO 31 AB 1 HR 15 BB% 21 K%
Yohandy Morales 1/3 HR BB -- [1B, 22, EAS - WSH] - [F] [T] .231 BA .305 OBP .111 ISO 117 AB 2 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Diego Cartaya 1/3 HR BB K -- [C, 22, TEX - LAD] - [F] [T] .155 BA .307 OBP .183 ISO 71 AB 4 HR 15 BB% 28 K%
Alex Freeland 2/4 BB SB -- [SS, 22, TEX - LAD] - [F] [T] .258 BA .452 OBP .129 ISO 31 AB 1 HR 4 SB 14 BB% 11 K%
Dylan Beavers 2/4 HR K -- [CF, 22, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .305 BA .404 OBP .200 ISO 95 AB 4 HR 7 SB 14 BB% 22 K%
Tsung-Che Cheng 2/4 HR -- [SS, 22, EAS - PIT] - [F] [T] .219 BA .348 OBP .135 ISO 96 AB 4 HR 6 SB 15 BB% 25 K%
Daniel Mateo 1/4 HR -- [CF, 22, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .138 BA .242 OBP .103 ISO 29 AB 1 HR 4 SB 12 BB% 24 K%
Tanner Schobel 2/4 2B BB K SB -- [2B, 22, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .236 BA .344 OBP .100 ISO 110 AB 1 HR 6 SB 14 BB% 23 K%
Mason Auer 4/5 3B SB -- [CF, 23, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .222 BA .282 OBP .056 ISO 36 AB 4 SB 5 BB% 25 K%
Brenden Dixon 2/3 HR BB K -- [3B, 23, EAS - PIT] - [F] [T] .200 BA .294 OBP .156 ISO 45 AB 2 HR 2 SB 11 BB% 25 K%
Ezequiel Pagan 2/4 HR -- [RF, 23, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .208 BA .250 OBP .208 ISO 77 AB 5 HR 2 SB 2 BB% 17 K%
Dru Baker 4/6 K 2 SB -- [RF, 24, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .271 BA .326 OBP .025 ISO 118 AB 13 SB 7 BB% 16 K%
Andrew Cossetti 3/5 2B HR 2K -- [DH, 24, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .235 BA .325 OBP .225 ISO 102 AB 5 HR 10 BB% 33 K%
Cooper Bowman 3/5 2B HR K -- [3B, 24, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .256 BA .369 OBP .184 ISO 125 AB 5 HR 16 SB 15 BB% 21 K%
Tim Tawa 3/4 2B HR -- [2B, 25, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .276 BA .343 OBP .236 ISO 123 AB 8 HR 6 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Ethan Salas 1/2 2BB -- [DH, 17, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .163 BA .288 OBP .077 ISO 104 AB 2 SB 14 BB% 26 K%
Cam Collier 1/4 HR K -- [DH, 19, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .240 BA .289 OBP .216 ISO 125 AB 7 HR 1 SB 5 BB% 22 K%
Victor Acosta 1/4 2B K SB -- [2B, 19, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .163 BA .265 OBP .071 ISO 98 AB 6 SB 7 BB% 26 K%
🔥​ Dylan O'Rae​ 2/2 2BB 2 SB -- [2B, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .256 BA .393 OBP .091 ISO 121 AB 18 SB 15 BB% 20 K%
Christopher Suero 2/4 HR 2K -- [C, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .143 BA .242 OBP .143 ISO 28 AB 1 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 27 K%
Xavier Isaac 2/4 BB K 2 SB -- [1B, 20, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .291 BA .378 OBP .264 ISO 110 AB 7 HR 7 SB 12 BB% 26 K%
Jadher Areinamo 1/4 2B SB -- [SS, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .254 BA .291 OBP .110 ISO 118 AB 1 HR 13 SB 5 BB% 12 K%
Diego Velasquez 1/3 HR BB -- [SS, 20, NWL - SF] - [F] [T] .283 BA .380 OBP .141 ISO 92 AB 2 HR 6 SB 10 BB% 17 K%
Won-Bin Cho 2/4 HR K -- [CF, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .179 BA .281 OBP .071 ISO 84 AB 1 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 38 K%
Henry Bolte 0/3 2BB SB -- [RF, 20, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .256 BA .400 OBP .207 ISO 121 AB 5 HR 15 SB 16 BB% 32 K%
Creed Willems 1/3 HR BB K -- [1B, 20, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .250 BA .313 OBP .317 ISO 104 AB 8 HR 7 BB% 20 K%
Nick Morabito 1/4 BB 2K 2 SB -- [LF, 21, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .353 BA .436 OBP .088 ISO 34 AB 9 SB 12 BB% 17 K%
Ryan Spikes 1/2 HR 2BB K -- [3B, 21, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .147 BA .289 OBP .103 ISO 68 AB 1 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 28 K%
Jaden Rudd 2/3 BB SB -- [LF, 21, NWL - TOR] - [F] [T] .220 BA .303 OBP .068 ISO 59 AB 3 SB 10 BB% 30 K%
Brayan Buelvas 3/4 2B 3B -- [CF, 21, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .265 BA .369 OBP .212 ISO 132 AB 5 HR 11 SB 14 BB% 17 K%
Misael Urbina 0/2 2BB 2 SB -- [LF, 22, MID - MIN] - [F] [T] .193 BA .297 OBP .136 ISO 88 AB 2 HR 7 SB 12 BB% 30 K%
Albert Fabian 2/3 2 2B BB -- [LF, 22, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .233 BA .341 OBP .096 ISO 73 AB 2 SB 14 BB% 18 K%
Enrique Bradfield Jr. 3/4 2B 3B K SB -- [CF, 22, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .243 BA .317 OBP .149 ISO 74 AB 16 SB 8 BB% 19 K%
Jace Bohrofen 2/3 2B HR -- [RF, 22, NWL - TOR] - [F] [T] .329 BA .481 OBP .177 ISO 79 AB 2 HR 2 SB 20 BB% 23 K%
Kiko Romero 1/2 HR 2BB K SB -- [3B, 23, SAL - NYY] - [F] [T] .224 BA .408 OBP .241 ISO 58 AB 4 HR 3 SB 21 BB% 35 K%
🔥​ Victor Labrada​ 3/3 2B HR BB 3 SB -- [LF, 24, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] .391 BA .509 OBP .261 ISO 46 AB 1 HR 9 SB 19 BB% 14 K%
Jack Pineda 3/4 HR BB -- [SS, 24, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .270 BA .360 OBP .140 ISO 100 AB 3 HR 5 SB 11 BB% 24 K%
Braiden Ward 2/3 2 HR -- [2B, 25, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .325 BA .411 OBP .241 ISO 83 AB 2 HR 14 SB 4 BB% 22 K%
 

A Standouts

Leodalis De Vries 1/4 2B BB 3K -- [SS, 17, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .200 BA .319 OBP .100 ISO 40 AB 1 SB 12 BB% 34 K%
🔥​ Juan Flores​ 2/5 2B HR -- [C, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .272 BA .350 OBP .196 ISO 92 AB 3 HR 6 BB% 19 K%
Yophery Rodriguez 0/3 BB K SB -- [DH, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .224 BA .323 OBP .138 ISO 116 AB 3 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 31 K%
John Cruz 2/3 2B BB -- [RF, 18, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .155 BA .236 OBP .027 ISO 110 AB 2 SB 7 BB% 26 K%
Axiel Plaz 2/4 HR K -- [C, 18, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .500 BA .500 OBP .750 ISO 4 AB 1 HR 0 BB% 25 K%
Juan Baez 1/4 2B -- [3B, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .278 BA .333 OBP .078 ISO 115 AB 4 SB 6 BB% 5 K%
Kevyn Castillo 1/5 HR 2K -- [CF, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .272 BA .364 OBP .088 ISO 114 AB 2 HR 7 SB 11 BB% 31 K%
George Lombard Jr. 1/4 2B -- [3B, 18, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .231 BA .398 OBP .062 ISO 65 AB 8 SB 20 BB% 24 K%
Ralphy Velazquez 1/2 BB -- [1B, 18, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .272 BA .373 OBP .211 ISO 114 AB 6 HR 3 SB 13 BB% 21 K%
🔥🔥​ Josue De Paula​​ 3/4 2 HR BB K -- [DH, 18, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .269 BA .364 OBP .258 ISO 93 AB 4 HR 3 SB 11 BB% 28 K%
Marco Vargas 1/3 2BB -- [SS, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .323 BA .500 OBP .065 ISO 31 AB 3 SB 25 BB% 6 K%
🔥​ Jansel Luis​ 3/4 2 3B -- [SS, 19, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .289 BA .336 OBP .125 ISO 128 AB 1 HR 5 SB 3 BB% 26 K%
🔥​ Devin Saltiban​ 2/4 2 2B BB SB -- [2B, 19, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .226 BA .333 OBP .119 ISO 84 AB 2 HR 7 SB 11 BB% 26 K%
Randy De Jesus 2/5 3B 2K -- [RF, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .348 OBP .225 ISO 80 AB 3 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 31 K%
Aron Estrada 1/2 BB SB -- [SS, 19, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .268 BA .328 OBP .045 ISO 112 AB 10 SB 5 BB% 19 K%
Waner Luciano 1/4 HR K -- [2B, 19, CAR - HOU] - [F] [T] .227 BA .323 OBP .100 ISO 110 AB 2 HR 1 SB 11 BB% 25 K%
Diego Benitez 1/3 HR BB 2K -- [SS, 19, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .143 BA .244 OBP .095 ISO 105 AB 2 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 39 K%
Jeral Perez 3/5 2B K -- [2B, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .333 BA .455 OBP .231 ISO 108 AB 5 HR 4 SB 17 BB% 23 K%
Michael Arroyo 1/4 HR BB -- [SS, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .256 BA .357 OBP .149 ISO 121 AB 2 HR 2 SB 9 BB% 23 K%
Ricardo Cabrera 2/3 2BB K -- [2B, 19, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .283 BA .367 OBP .170 ISO 106 AB 3 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 21 K%
Narciso Polanco 2/3 SB -- [2B, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .204 BA .324 OBP .097 ISO 93 AB 1 HR 7 SB 15 BB% 21 K%
Kendall George 3/4 BB K -- [CF, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .309 BA .429 OBP .012 ISO 81 AB 10 SB 17 BB% 17 K%
Lazaro Montes 2/3 BB -- [RF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .311 BA .418 OBP .197 ISO 122 AB 5 HR 15 BB% 17 K%
Bryce Eldridge 2/4 HR 2K -- [1B, 19, CAL - SF] - [F] [T] .259 BA .319 OBP .173 ISO 81 AB 3 HR 8 BB% 26 K%
Natanael Yuten 2/4 3B 2K -- [LF, 19, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .283 BA .347 OBP .217 ISO 106 AB 4 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 29 K%
Jeffry Rosa 0/3 3BB K SB -- [RF, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .179 BA .378 OBP .214 ISO 28 AB 2 HR 1 SB 16 BB% 32 K%
Aidan Miller 2/4 2 2B 2BB K -- [SS, 19, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .341 BA .424 OBP .259 ISO 85 AB 4 HR 8 SB 9 BB% 17 K%
Edward Duran 1/3 2BB SB -- [C, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .289 BA .432 OBP .066 ISO 76 AB 6 SB 17 BB% 14 K%
Angel Genao 2/3 3B HR -- [SS, 20, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .339 BA .381 OBP .252 ISO 115 AB 5 HR 4 SB 7 BB% 15 K%
Logan Wagner 2/4 3B BB -- [3B, 20, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .200 BA .407 OBP .175 ISO 40 AB 1 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 25 K%
Adrian De Leon 2/4 HR BB -- [C, 20, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .288 BA .382 OBP .119 ISO 59 AB 2 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 25 K%
Angel Tejada 1/2 2B BB K 2 SB -- [3B, 20, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .293 BA .317 OBP .152 ISO 99 AB 2 HR 18 SB 2 BB% 19 K%
Anthony Scull 2/5 2B K SB -- [LF, 20, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .261 BA .305 OBP .092 ISO 119 AB 1 HR 2 SB 2 BB% 19 K%
Jesus Galiz 1/4 HR BB -- [C, 20, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .222 BA .391 OBP .148 ISO 54 AB 2 HR 11 BB% 27 K%
Elijah Green 2/4 2 SB -- [CF, 20, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .188 BA .300 OBP .152 ISO 112 AB 4 HR 15 SB 11 BB% 42 K%
Ariel Almonte 2/4 HR BB -- [DH, 20, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .202 BA .323 OBP .346 ISO 104 AB 11 HR 14 BB% 33 K%
Druw Jones 4/5 HR -- [CF, 20, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .286 BA .383 OBP .143 ISO 91 AB 2 HR 2 SB 13 BB% 34 K%
🔥​ Austin Charles​ 2/4 2 HR K -- [SS, 20, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .255 BA .363 OBP .167 ISO 102 AB 5 HR 13 SB 12 BB% 27 K%
Eddy Rodriguez 1/4 HR -- [LF, 20, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .283 BA .371 OBP .117 ISO 60 AB 1 HR 4 SB 12 BB% 22 K%
Ronald Hernandez 3/5 HR K -- [C, 20, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .223 BA .352 OBP .068 ISO 103 AB 1 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 26 K%
🔥​ Adrian Placencia​ 3/4 HR BB K SB -- [SS, 20, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .208 BA .396 OBP .208 ISO 77 AB 4 HR 2 SB 20 BB% 30 K%
Jackson Castillo 3/3 2 2B BB -- [CF, 21, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .306 BA .449 OBP .258 ISO 62 AB 3 HR 6 SB 20 BB% 19 K%
Alexis Hernandez 1/3 BB 2 SB -- [LF, 21, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .175 BA .325 OBP .032 ISO 63 AB 11 SB 14 BB% 35 K%
Trent Farquhar 2/2 2B 4BB -- [3B, 23, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .315 BA .523 OBP .151 ISO 73 AB 1 HR 6 SB 28 BB% 14 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Jeremy Rodriguez 4/4 SB -- [SS, 17, GCL - NYM] - [F] [T] .414 BA .514 OBP .103 ISO 29 AB 2 SB 17 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Ariel Castro​ 3/3 2B HR SB -- [LF, 18, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .222 BA .312 OBP .185 ISO 27 AB 1 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 31 K%
Yassel Soler 3/4 2B BB K SB -- [DH, 18, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .417 BA .475 OBP .194 ISO 36 AB 1 SB 10 BB% 20 K%
Braylin Morel 1/3 HR -- [LF, 18, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .167 BA .316 OBP .200 ISO 30 AB 1 HR 2 SB 15 BB% 23 K%
Yaikel Mijares 2/5 2B K SB -- [3B, 18, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .258 BA .314 OBP .226 ISO 31 AB 2 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 37 K%
Adrian Gil 1/1 3BB -- [3B, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .346 BA .553 OBP .154 ISO 26 AB 1 HR 4 SB 21 BB% 21 K%
Eduardo Quintero 2/4 HR K -- [CF, 18, AZL - LAD] - [F] [T] .250 BA .400 OBP .219 ISO 32 AB 2 HR 15 BB% 25 K%
Derek Bernard 2/5 2B K SB -- [RF, 18, AZL - COL] - [F] [T] .206 BA .308 OBP .147 ISO 34 AB 3 SB 12 BB% 35 K%
Junior Garcia 2/4 HR K -- [LF, 18, GCL - ATL] - [F] [T] .321 BA .424 OBP .143 ISO 28 AB 1 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 39 K%
Maykel Minoso 3/4 2B 3B K -- [DH, 18, GCL - TOR] - [F] [T] .429 BA .500 OBP .429 ISO 7 AB 12 BB% 25 K%
Aroon Escobar 2/3 2 HR -- [2B, 19, GCL - PHI] - [F] [T] .333 BA .429 OBP .233 ISO 30 AB 2 HR 14 BB% 8 K%
Yasser Mercedes 3/3 2B BB SB -- [CF, 19, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .441 BA .500 OBP .265 ISO 34 AB 2 HR 6 SB 10 BB% 15 K%
Abdias De La Cruz 4/5 2B K SB -- [LF, 19, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .233 BA .324 OBP .167 ISO 30 AB 2 SB 10 BB% 29 K%
Franyer Noria 0/1 BB 3 SB -- [3B, 19, GCL - BOS] - [F] [T] .316 BA .458 OBP .053 ISO 19 AB 5 SB 12 BB% 16 K%
Yordalin Pena 2/4 2B 3B 2 SB -- [CF, 19, GCL - STL] - [F] [T] .294 BA .368 OBP .176 ISO 34 AB 3 SB 10 BB% 15 K%
Arfeni Batista 2/4 2B HR K -- [3B, 19, GCL - STL] - [F] [T] .192 BA .276 OBP .154 ISO 26 AB 1 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 37 K%
Brian Sanchez 2/2 2B BB SB -- [CF, 19, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .381 BA .458 OBP .190 ISO 21 AB 3 SB 12 BB% 25 K%
 
submitted by milb_bot to DynastyBaseball [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 09:49 PleaseAcceptMe2024 Gianmarco is everywhere.

Gianmarco is everywhere.
I don't know if this post is allowed, but I was playing Horizon Forbidden West, more specifically its expansion Burning Shores. I came across a character that not only looked like gianmarco, but sounded exactly like him. I felt like I was going insane as IMDB does not credit him to that voice. I waited 10 minutes during the credits, just to find out this man is actually the one voicing the character.
https://preview.redd.it/rrc2nbj8451d1.png?width=1108&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f0c85eece5cdbdeb889d0c0d61ce292e9754763
Gianmarco, if you see this, I fucking hated your character with a passion. You played the role too fucking well.
Here is to hoping you come to my city.
Edit:
I found the day I searched it.
https://preview.redd.it/yspebhcl551d1.png?width=926&format=png&auto=webp&s=ad9639aec2fea9e10b5691f46acead1022754572
submitted by PleaseAcceptMe2024 to gianmarcosoresi [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 08:55 justyrust74 The article that inspired Mean Mr Mustard

The article that inspired Mean Mr Mustard submitted by justyrust74 to TheBeatles [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 06:00 Guinness Game Thread: Pirates @ Cubs - Fri, May 17 @ 01:20 PM CDT

Pirates @ Cubs - Fri, May 17

Game Status: Final - Score: 9-3 Pirates

Links & Info

Pirates Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 McCutchen - DH 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 .213 .320 .378
2 Reynolds, B - LF 5 1 2 0 0 1 1 .254 .341 .414
3 Cruz, O - SS 5 0 0 0 0 2 3 .251 .298 .425
Williams - SS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .245 .273 .340
4 Joe - RF 5 1 3 0 0 1 0 .296 .364 .504
5 Gonzales, N - 2B 4 1 2 1 0 0 2 .269 .286 .538
6 Suwinski - CF 5 1 1 0 0 2 4 .168 .252 .275
7 Grandal - C 5 1 2 3 0 0 3 .212 .229 .424
8 Tellez - 1B 4 2 2 0 0 0 1 .188 .258 .241
9 Triolo - 3B 4 1 2 3 0 2 0 .201 .291 .257
Totals 41 9 15 8 1 9 15
Pirates
BATTING: 2B: Gonzales, N (1, Hendricks). HR: Triolo (2, 3rd inning off Hendricks, 1 on, 0 out); McCutchen (6, 8th inning off Leiter Jr., 0 on, 2 out). TB: Gonzales, N 3; Grandal 2; Joe 3; McCutchen 4; Reynolds, B 2; Suwinski; Tellez 2; Triolo 5. RBI: Gonzales, N (6); Grandal 3 (9); McCutchen (11); Triolo 3 (15). 2-out RBI: Triolo; Grandal 3; McCutchen. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Grandal; McCutchen. SF: Gonzales, N. Team RISP: 4-for-8. Team LOB: 7.
Cubs Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Tauchman - DH 4 1 1 0 0 3 0 .263 .382 .416
2 Happ - LF 3 1 0 0 1 2 0 .216 .330 .314
3 Bellinger - RF 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 .256 .338 .480
4 Morel, C - 3B 4 0 2 2 0 1 0 .215 .296 .417
5 Busch - 1B 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 .250 .327 .465
6 Mastrobuoni - SS 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 .147 .256 .176
7 Madrigal - 2B 4 0 0 0 0 2 1 .222 .282 .264
8 Crow-Armstrong - CF 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 .236 .295 .364
9 Amaya - C 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 .187 .248 .297
Totals 31 3 4 3 4 15 6
Cubs
BATTING: 2B: Morel, C (4, Ryan). HR: Amaya (2, 8th inning off Mlodzinski, 0 on, 2 out). TB: Amaya 4; Morel, C 3; Tauchman. RBI: Amaya (12); Morel, C 2 (31). 2-out RBI: Amaya; Morel, C 2. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Busch 2; Mastrobuoni. Team RISP: 1-for-3. Team LOB: 5.
FIELDING: E: Crow-Armstrong (1, throw).
Pirates Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Skenes (W, 1-0) 6.0 0 0 0 1 11 0 100-67 2.70
Mlodzinski 1.2 3 2 2 1 1 1 48-28 10.80
Ryan 0.0 1 1 1 2 0 0 18-8 3.46
Stratton, H 1.1 0 0 0 0 3 0 15-10 3.74
Totals 9.0 4 3 3 4 15 1
Cubs Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Hendricks (L, 0-4) 4.2 11 8 7 0 4 1 89-64 10.57
Cuas 1.2 1 0 0 1 3 0 32-19 6.17
Little 0.2 0 0 0 0 1 0 8-6 5.91
Leiter Jr. 1.0 2 1 1 0 1 1 20-13 1.00
Neris 1.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22-16 2.81
Totals 9.0 15 9 8 1 9 2
Game Info
Pitches-strikes: Skenes 100-67; Mlodzinski 48-28; Ryan 18-8; Stratton, H 15-10; Hendricks 89-64; Cuas 32-19; Little 8-6; Leiter Jr. 20-13; Neris 22-16.
Groundouts-flyouts: Skenes 6-1; Mlodzinski 3-1; Ryan 0-0; Stratton, H 0-0; Hendricks 9-1; Cuas 0-1; Little 0-0; Leiter Jr. 0-0; Neris 1-1.
Batters faced: Skenes 19; Mlodzinski 9; Ryan 3; Stratton, H 4; Hendricks 25; Cuas 7; Little 2; Leiter Jr. 5; Neris 4.
Inherited runners-scored: Ryan 1-1; Stratton, H 2-0; Cuas 1-0; Little 1-0.
Umpires: HP: Brian O'Nora. 1B: Chris Conroy. 2B: Charlie Ramos. 3B: Brennan Miller.
Weather: 77 degrees, Sunny.
Wind: 6 mph, In From CF.
First pitch: 1:20 PM.
T: 2:57.
Att: 35,372.
Venue: Wrigley Field.
May 17, 2024
Inning Scoring Play Score
Top 3 Jared Triolo homers (2) on a fly ball to left field. Rowdy Tellez scores. 2-0 PIT
Top 4 Yasmani Grandal singles on a fly ball to left fielder Ian Happ. Nick Gonzales scores. 3-0 PIT
Top 4 Jared Triolo singles on a line drive to center fielder Pete Crow-Armstrong. Yasmani Grandal scores. Rowdy Tellez scores. Jared Triolo to 3rd. Throwing error by center fielder Pete Crow-Armstrong. 5-0 PIT
Top 5 Nick Gonzales out on a sacrifice fly to center fielder Pete Crow-Armstrong. Bryan Reynolds scores. 6-0 PIT
Top 5 Yasmani Grandal singles on a line drive to right fielder Cody Bellinger. Connor Joe scores. Jack Suwinski scores. 8-0 PIT
Top 8 Andrew McCutchen homers (6) on a fly ball to left field. 9-0 PIT
Bottom 8 Miguel Amaya homers (2) on a line drive to left center field. 9-1 PIT
Bottom 8 Christopher Morel doubles (4) on a sharp line drive to center fielder Jack Suwinski. Mike Tauchman scores. Ian Happ scores. Cody Bellinger to 3rd. 9-3 PIT
Team Highlight
PIT Jared Triolo's two-run homer (2) (00:00:26)
PIT Skenes K's seven straight to begin second MLB start (00:01:24)
PIT Yasmani Grandal's two-run single (00:00:33)
PIT Paul Skenes' 11th K completes six no-hit frames (00:00:13)
PIT Andrew McCutchen's solo home run (6) (00:00:26)
PIT Paul Skenes strikes out 11 in six no-hit innings (00:02:41)
CHC Miguel Amaya's solo homer (2) (00:00:20)
CHC Christopher Morel's two-run double (00:00:21)
PIT Condensed Game: PIT@CHC - 5/17/24 (00:12:02)
PIT Pirates vs. Cubs Highlights (00:03:12)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E LOB
Pirates 0 0 2 3 3 0 0 1 0 9 15 0 7
Cubs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 4 1 5

Decisions

Division Scoreboard

MIL 4 @ HOU 5 - Final
BOS 6 @ STL 10 - Final
CIN 3 @ LAD 7 - Final
Last Updated: 05/17/2024 11:49:19 PM CDT
submitted by Guinness to Cubs [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 05:59 MrSleepless1234 Something Is In the walls The Disturbing True Story of Daniel LaPlante

[Visually detailed version of the story below for those that would prefer to watch] https://youtu.be/IMftmJWOITg
[References for the writeup for those that want to learn more] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZJ7TC8pysunEF6KneY49Ci6TCi2EzBoWFI3M09TRQwA/edit?usp=sharing
This story is one of the creepiest true stories I've ever heard, it's a story that makes you wonder about what people's true intentions really are. Most of us have at least one person in our lives that we feel we can trust with anything and everything, but no matter how much you trust somebody, you never really know what's actually going on inside their head, do the words they tell you really match the thoughts that they're having behind them. No matter how much you trust somebody, you never really know what they might be thinking, or what they might be doing in their spare time.
Our story today starts off in December of 1986, in a small town in Massachusetts.
Frank Bowen lived together with his two young daughters, Tina(15), and Karen(9).
Recently they had just lost their mother to cancer, and it was a very hard time for everybody.
To make matters worse the household was now only under one income, so Frank started to work more and more hours just to make sure they could still get by.
Because of this, he began leaving the girls home alone more often than usual.
One evening, while Frank was working, Tina and Karen would be at home continuing to find ways to cope with the loss of their mother.
That night they attempted to find further closure, their way of doing this was by bringing out a Ouija Board and conducting a seance, hoping that in doing so they would be able to speak with their mother one last time.
They tried for many hours, but sadly nothing was happening, the idea seemed like it was turning into a dead end.
Eventually, feeling tired, emotionally drained, and hopeless, they decided to give up and head to their bedrooms to get some rest.
Some hours would pass until the 2 girls would be woken up by a startling sound.
They sat upright, listening closely... It sounded like a quiet tapping sound, but where was it coming from?
Staying quiet and listening even closer, they waited, trying to figure out what was happening.
They couldn't pinpoint exactly where it was coming from, but it sounded like it was coming from inside the walls... and as they listened the knocking would only grow louder.
Both of them came to the realization that the seance must have actually worked, they thought to themselves their mother must have actually heard them.
When their father Frank would later come home they would tell him all about the experience.
He didn't believe them and brushed it off entirely, the intense stress from their loss must have been taking it's toll, playing mean tricks on their imaginations in an attempt to find peace.
Concerned he told his daughters that if this were to continue, he would be taking them all for counselling.
He wished for his daughter's peace of mind, it was all too much, and he wished for their family's troubles just to discontinue... Unfortunately, continue it did.
Night after night, again and again the girls would be awoken by the same unnerving knocking sounds that they heard before. Each time they would scream for their father, but every single time he would arrive the sounds would come to a halt. He opened the door, he listened... Silence was all that he could hear. His concern for them would only increase.
Over the next few weeks, things would only seem to escalate as the events they experienced became stranger and stranger. The knocking became more consistent, it was to the point that it was ruining the girls sleep, it was driving them insane... Though, that wasn't the only thing that was happening.
Their possessions began to... disappear... somehow... misplace themselves.
Items that they were certain were in different places the day prior, would be found thrown across the floor or moved to a different location. They would come home to find furniture moved to the other side of the room, seemingly all on it's own.
They were all experiencing the same thing together, but their father Frank wasn't buying it.
His daughters insisted that they had nothing to do with it and that it must be a ghost, but he couldn't get himself to believe such a ridiculous idea.
He truly believed his daughters were under such emotional distress, that they must be the culprits for all of this.
The knocking would continue into the new year, but on one January evening, something was different.
It didn't sound like the knocking was coming from the walls this time... it sounded like it was coming from the basement.
Terrified but curious, they grabbed a kitchen knife and shakily made their way down to the depths of their home. When they got to the bottom, the noise had ceased. They froze as they saw something that they knew wasn't supposed to be there.
On the basement wall, written in dark red, was a message they wished they never saw: "I'm in your room. Come and find me".
Horrified they ran out of the house as quickly as possible, making their way to their neighbors to tell them what happened.
When their father arrived they explained to him what happened, but again he just thought that they were doing this as a failed way of coping, the stress manipulating their minds into doing crazy things.
Following this he would send them for counselling, but things only continue to get worse.
Many weeks later the girls would hear even more knocking... this time the sound emanating from behind Tina's bedroom wall. Upon entering Tina's room they were met with another horribly red message sprawled across the walls: "I'm back. Find me if you can".
Fearful for their lives they went over to a neighbor's house once more, calling their father to come home.
When he got home this time he was furious, still blaming his daughters for all of this he stormed inside to prove that there was nobody there.
When he got inside, more had happened inside the house than the girls had originally explained.
He started to understand that something else was going on, somebody else must have been in here.
Frank entered Tina's room by himself, and when he did there was an extra message painted across the walls: "Marry me".
He stared at the wall in disbelief as his mind raced, trying to piece together what was happening.
That's when he noticed something... On the other side of the room, a figure stood dressed in the clothing of his now deceased wife. Blonde hair hung down across the figure's shoulders, draping down to the hatchet that was held in it's hand.
Although that part of the story doesn't end there, we're going to need to go back to a time before the knocking began, the family would receive a phone call from a boy named Danny.
Danny would say that he got their number from a friend that went to the same school as them.
The picture Danny would paint of himself was that of a blonde, attractive, fit, and smart boy that lived in the area. It was innocent enough and no alarm bells were raised, after a few phone calls Tina and Danny began to grow closer with each other. He seemed like a nice guy, so one night, they organized for a date.
The day for the date came by and Danny arrived at Tina's doorstep, she excitedly opened the door to greet him but quickly stopped in her tracks. Danny was nothing like he explained...
He wasn't attractive at all, his hair wasn't blonde, it was dark and greasy, and his appearance just looked disorganized. She decided to forget about it and they went out for a bit anyway. It only lasted a little over an hour before she got herself out of there.
During their date the passing of her mother was brought up, and Danny seemed to take an unnaturally high interest in the subject.
Tina would later say that it was like Danny was obsessed with the passing of her mother, questioning her often about how much she had suffered when it happened.
Having a bad feeling about this, naturally Tina didn't go on another date with Danny, she wouldn't pick up another call from him, and that was that... Or so she thought...
Danny was a very psychologically disturbed individual... He had a very bad upbringing. He suffered an extremely traumatic childhood which warped his mind to an unrepairable state at an early age. His father would often abuse him, physically, emotionally, and sexually. He struggled to make friends, he struggled with his grades, and he didn't have proper habits for hygiene. Most people at school thought he was creepy and weird. Concerned with his obviously abnormal behavior, school officials referred him to a psychiatrist... This same psychiatrist would sexually abuse Danny also, for an entire year.
Seemingly everybody he trusted betrayed him.
He turned to crime, and he began spending his evenings breaking into people's homes and stealing from them.
By 15 his behavior got worse, and he wouldn't just break in and steal things anymore, now he would move things around and leave things behind... Misplace things, make people wonder if somebody had been in their house.
He was conducting a psychological game that he enjoyed, he was doing it just to mess with people, but subtly, not so obvious that you were 100% sure of yourself, purposely in a way that he knew you would be questioning yourself, where the only thing you were left with was confusion and uncertainty.
By the age of 17 one of the homes he had broken into belonged to friends of Tina's family... It's speculated that this is how he obtained her phone number to begin with.
Coming back to where left Frank, he's in Tina's room, he just saw a bloody message painted across the walls saying "Marry Me", and on the other side of the room, a figure stood dressed in the clothing of his now deceased wife. Blonde hair hung down across the figure's shoulders, draping down to the hatchet that was held in it's hand.
The figure lunged at him, struggling with him for a few seconds until eventually pushing past him, somehow leaving him unharmed. As Frank turned to lay eyes on his attacker, they were nowhere to be seen... It was as if they had just disappeared into nothingness.
Frank ran to the neighbors as fast as he could and the police were called to the scene, but when they arrived they couldn't find anybody else in the house.
Frank was horrified, he didn't know what to do. For the time being they stayed with relatives while Frank figured out what to do next. 2 days later he would come back to the home to grab a few things, as he arrived, before he got out of the vehicle he noticed the same figure that attacked him was standing in view of the window. Frank began to panic as he called the police once again.
What happened next even scared the officers.
This is a quote from one of the officers that arrived on scene:
"When I opened the door, on the right-hand wall, I saw a knife sticking out of the wall. And I see it's through a picture - a family picture - written on it was 'I'M STILL HERE. COME FIND ME.' Now the hair goes up on the back of my head. On another wall, I saw another picture saying 'I'M GOING TO KILL YOU ALL' with a knife through it." - Officer Bezanson
They searched the house more thoroughly this time. Behind the washer and dryer, they found a piece of wood that was hiding a crawl space that led through the entire house.
Speaking about the state of Danny and Tina. Danny didn't like how his calls were being ignored.
When he was rejected, he broke into her house, happened to stumble across the crawlspace, and for about a month he would torment them while lingering in the walls of their home.
He would knock and tap on the walls, he would listen to them talk, he created peepholes in all of the rooms so he could watch them whenever he wanted. Those red messages? He was using ketchup to make it look like blood just so he'd get inside their heads. That figure that charged at Frank wearing his deceased wife's clothes? That was Danny, he dressed himself up, put makeup on and a blonde wig, attempting to look like their mother. Whether he was doing that to actually convince the children that he was their mother's spirit, or if he was just trying to scare them is unknown.
The very last time the police were called where they found the crawlspace, they would find Danny curled up inside.
He would be charged with armed assault, sent to a juvenile detention facility for the next 10 months, and be released through a $10 000 bail in October 1987. This decision would ultimately lead to the death of 3 people in the near future.
Andrew and Priscilla Gustafson were a young couple who had been living in the small city for the past 5 years. They lived there with their two children Abigail(7), and William(5)... and she was currently pregnant awaiting another child.
They lived roughly half a mile from where Danny lived.
Not even a month after Danny was released he would break in and steal items from their home just like he did to many others. He would continue to do this to several homes in the area in the following weeks.
On December 1st, Danny would return to the home while everybody was gone.
Andrew was at work, Abigail was at school, and Priscilla was out to pickup William.
The last time Priscilla was seen alive was around 1:00 Pm when she was picking up William from the babysitter.
Danny heard Priscilla enter the home, and instead of leaving like he usually would, he took her to the bedroom, locked William in a closet, then proceeded to sexually assault her, until he decided to shoot her twice in the head. He obtained the weapon from a neighbors home that he robbed earlier.
Then he took William out of the closet, drowning him in the upstairs bathtub, and went to leave like nothing happened. Before he left Abigail returned home from school, so naturally being the horrifying monster he is, he drowned her in the downstairs bathroom before leaving.
Around 5:30 is when Andrew Gustafson would return home, and he would find the gruesome bloody leftovers of what had transpired in the main bedroom. He called the police before searching anywhere else.
Andrew would later say:
"I was too afraid of going to look for my children because I was afraid I’d find them dead... It was so shocking and unbelievable. I screamed. I wailed.”
Officers had a feeling that Danny had something to do with it from the very start.
A police lieutenant was on the search for Danny, a resident of the area he was in felt like something was wrong so she went up to him and asked him if he would be with her as they walked into her home.
She would later say:
"I drove into the driveway and into the garage. I immediately drove back out and sit in the driveway feeling extremely uncomfortable,"
When they entered the home, Danny was there... He jumped out of one of the windows and got away as he ran into the forest.
Danny would later force a resident of a different nearby street into her car, but he would escape again after the resident had jumped from the vehicle.
Later that evening and 48 hours after the search began they would finally find him hiding in a dumpster nearby.
Hair from Abigail was found on his sock, sealing his fate in relation to the murders.
Upon hearing about what had happened, Frank Bowen would say:
"If Daniel LaPlante does not get convicted and gets out again, I will personally kill him."
"You can't imagine what kind of fear we have been living in. He is mentally insane. There is no question about it,"
"And now, I am financially broke and emotionally disturbed and trying to put my life together again."
In 1988 Daniel LaPlante was found guilty of all three murders and sentenced to 3 life sentences, with the possibility of parole after 45 years.
submitted by MrSleepless1234 to longform [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 04:32 Queen-of-Sharks What are the Debunked/Basically Debunked FNAF theories?

I want to write a FNAF fan series that ponders the question "If every disproven FNAF theory was correct, what would that actually look like?" This isn't just recontextualizing the timeline, btw. I'm rewriting the series from the ground up with all these theories applied. So, I looked into lists of debunked FNAF theories to apply them to the story, but I quickly ran into a problem. These lists suck and are super biased.
Like, I can understand that in a series with this little confirmed, you can stretch the definition to include theories that just don't work, even if they aren't technically debunked. But some of these guys (not naming names) genuinely listed stuff like RealGolden (Golden Freddy being a real animatronic), WorldCanon (FNAF World being in continuity with the games), OMCHelp (William screaming for help when you speed up the audio in the red lake in UCN), and FNAF2Summer (FNAF 2 being set in summer) as examples of debunked theories. Like, bro, what? The fact that a very large number of people not only believe these theories, but are able to use them to build other theories like RealGolden > normal MoltenMCI, or WorldCanon > BVReciever and ShatterVictim is evidence in and of itself that these theories are far from debunked.
BTW, that's my criteria. A theory is only "debunked" if it is effectively impossible to argue that it's true without ignoring or straight-up contradicting what is shown in the games (or other in-continuity material) or what is stated by Scott. I'd appreciate it if you all could let me know of any theories you have that fit this criteria. There are only two rules:
  1. No Dream Theory or any similar theories, because that removes all room for potential storytelling.
  2. No Adult Theory. You know why if you were planning to suggest Adult Theory.
Here are theories I currently have listed, which I'll update as more people chip in.
submitted by Queen-of-Sharks to fnaftheories [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 01:29 ElectivireMax Which team wins, assuming everyone is healthy?

Which team wins, assuming everyone is healthy? submitted by ElectivireMax to NFLv2 [link] [comments]


http://activeproperty.pl/