In the realm of academia, mastering the art of essay writing is crucial. Whether you're a seasoned scholar or a freshman navigating your first college assignments, the ability to express your ideas clearly and cohesively is paramount. Academic writing demands precision, clarity, and structure to effectively communicate your arguments. So, let's delve into some essential tips to enhance your essay writing prowess while also exploring how assignment help services can aid your academic journey.
Architecture assignment Help
Understanding the Assignment
Before diving into writing, it's vital to grasp the assignment's requirements thoroughly. Take note of the topic, word count, formatting guidelines, and any specific instructions provided by your instructor. Understanding what is expected of you will help you tailor your essay accordingly.
Developing a Strong Thesis Statement
A clear thesis statement serves as the foundation of your essay. It encapsulates the main argument or point of view you'll be presenting and guides the reader on what to expect. Ensure your thesis is specific, debatable, and relevant to the topic at hand.
Structuring Your Essay
Organize your essay into a coherent structure that flows logically from introduction to conclusion. Typically, essays comprise an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Start with an attention-grabbing introduction that provides context for your topic and ends with a strong thesis statement. Each body paragraph should focus on a single idea or argument supported by evidence and analysis. Finally, the conclusion should summarize your main points and reiterate the significance of your thesis.
Using Clear and Concise Language
Avoid ambiguity and verbosity in your writing. Opt for clear, concise language to convey your ideas effectively. Be wary of jargon or overly complex terminology that might confuse your readers. Remember, clarity is key to ensuring your message is understood.
Citing Sources Properly
In academic writing, it's essential to give credit to the sources you've used to support your arguments. Whether you're paraphrasing or directly quoting, cite your sources according to the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). Failure to acknowledge sources can lead to accusations of plagiarism, so always cite responsibly.
Seeking Assistance When Needed
Despite your best efforts, there may be times when you find yourself struggling with an assignment. This is where assignment help services can be invaluable. Whether you're grappling with complex concepts in architecture or wrestling with AutoCAD assignments, seeking assistance from professionals can provide the clarity and guidance you need to succeed.
Navigating Architecture Assignments
Architecture assignments often require a blend of creativity and technical expertise. From designing structures to analyzing architectural theories, students face a myriad of challenges. If you find yourself stuck with your architecture assignments, don't hesitate to seek help. Whether it's understanding architectural principles or tackling design projects, expert assistance can alleviate your concerns and enhance your understanding.
Conquering AutoCAD Assignments
AutoCAD, a ubiquitous software in the field of design and engineering, presents its own set of challenges for students. From drafting intricate diagrams to mastering 3D modeling, proficiency in AutoCAD is highly sought after. If you're struggling to do your AutoCAD assignment, consider reaching out to assignment help services. These professionals possess the expertise to guide you through the intricacies of the software and ensure your assignments meet the required standards.
In conclusion, mastering academic writing is an essential skill for students across disciplines. By adhering to the tips outlined above and leveraging the assistance of assignment help services when needed, you can craft clear, cohesive essays that showcase your intellect and understanding. Remember, academic success is within your reach with the right guidance and support.

https://preview.redd.it/xsqk6rui13sc1.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a24a82c7489e0821002087c65a5098063148986a
I didn't write this so don't get mad at me. I translated some of the images, omitted the filler images and added some links to illustrate some of the ideas. Read the full article bellow
Original https://www.tart-aria.info/apokalipsis-xix-veka-podlinnaja-istorija-genocida/
Apocalypse of the 19th century. The true story of genocide
Neo Ficial
02/21/2022
Introduction
Why does humanity need to know about the past? To learn from it and not repeat mistakes. However, what lessons can you and I learn if we don’t have a past, and the whole story was invented for us? You've probably heard the phrase “rewriting history,” or something similar.
In the comments to films on the YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/unofficialhistory, the thesis was often voiced that it is impossible to rewrite the whole history, since these are different countries, sometimes very unfriendly to each other, different political systems, different languages, etc. These are millions of copies of archival documents and physical artifacts.
We will return to the issue of languages, documents in archives and ancient objects today, later, but now, in order to understand how history is written, it is enough to remember the old joke:
​
A man returns on a train from a business trip. It takes a place on the bottom shelf of a compartment carriage and suddenly, a slender female leg hangs from the top shelf.
Fellow travelers meet, they begin an affair, and they get off together at a station that is far from the traveler’s destination. The next morning, the man, having freed himself from the embrace of his mistress, sends an SMS to his legal wife: “I was on the train, dot, my leg turned up, dot, I’m lying in bed, dot, kiss, dot.Please note, friends, every word said by the man in the message is the pure truth. However, did he tell the truth to his wife? Definitely not. This paradox is actively used for historical falsifications.
Thus, we understand how we could hide the past, very simply, by mixing lies with truth. When presenting information, some facts are kept silent, and several true facts, preferably known to everyone, are added to the obviously false ones, then all the information as a whole looks truthful. Then repeat it several times, from different sources, preferably popular and known to be trusted. Then this information itself becomes an axiom, and can already be used as evidence. This is called manipulation of facts. This happens all the time in official history.
​
Manipulation of history is a huge complex machine, a whole system that tries to take into account even the little things, but still this machine is not able to grasp the immensity, and like any machine, sometimes it fails, missing some grains, and in these grains we and you can recreate the whole picture of what happened in the past.
​
Regardless of which version of history is considered official, one way or another, according to any version of history, at a certain point in time some kind of turning point occurred and people had to start all over again. Thus, our entire civilization is a post-apocalypse, we are still trying to get out of the hole that we abandoned as a result of the catastrophic events of the past. If you remember, the so-called official history, which is described in school textbooks, conventionally divides the history of mankind into several periods:
​
Primitive society, tribal system, hunting and gathering;
Slave system, Ancient Rome, Ancient Greece, Ancient East;
Feudalism, the so-called “Middle Ages”;
Capitalist structure.
It should be noted here that many of the events described in official history actually took place, only as in that anecdote, under other circumstances, in another place and at another time. We ourselves remember the events of the 21st century, since we were direct witnesses to this, according to the chronology of the events of the 20th century, there is quite a lot of documentary evidence and living witnesses, but then it’s more complicated.
​
The line of historical events now used by official science is valid from the present day only until the middle of the 19th century, and earlier events are already located on the chronological line as the officials arranged them. Moreover, the events of the so-called “Middle Ages” actually took place precisely in the 19th century, and the events of the 19th century went back to the Middle Ages or even further into the depths of centuries.Apocalypse of the 19th century.
(diagram)
​
You can easily see this for yourself if you take any event from “deep antiquity” and look for connections with other events of that era and the 19th century. In most cases, it turns out that the “ancient” event is associated with the 19th century much more than with the era to which it is attributed.
​
The material is very difficult to understand; in order to understand all the logic presented in the article, it is very important not to make hasty conclusions, but to read it completely, in order and to the end. Treat everything you read as a fairy tale, some kind of fantastic story, and after reading to the end, you will decide for yourself whether this could have happened or not. As they say, knowledge begins with surprise.
​
To make it easier for you to understand, later in the article I will use the modern calendar system and chronological scale, as well as call the states as they are called today, although in the past, the countries located in these territories were called differently and the chronology was different. I will also use modern terminology in the names of processes and technical means. If we have previously considered any issue in more detail, I will refer to an article on this issue.
​
And one more important detail: the dates used. Here I want to especially emphasize that this is just an official backdating that deliberately placed different episodes of one event in different years in the chronology, or even in different periods in history, in order to hide the event itself. The article is based on well-known dates taken from open sources. The dates have been refined as much as modern science allows. However, it was modern official science that repeatedly manipulated dates, spreading events one after another in time, and placing events from different periods side by side. That is why I never tire of saying - do not believe me, since I do not claim to be the ultimate truth. If you are really interested, doubt it and check for yourself
​
Chapter 1. Life “BEFORE”. Background
Before the cataclysm, the world was global, there was a single architectural and engineering school, a single cultural civilization, with advanced technologies, significantly superior to ours in terms of scientific and technological development.
​
Here I would like to recall the most common statement of skeptics that in the age of horse-drawn carriages there could not have been nuclear weapons.
Firstly , bows, flintlock guns and horse-drawn carts, this is all post-apocalyptic, we will return to this later.
Secondly , even if in our time you come to New Guinea, or the Amazonian Selva, and look at the level of technical development of those tribes, then it will be difficult to believe in our nuclear age
​
There were only 6 large states in the world. What these countries were called is now unknown for certain. We will conventionally call these countries “Huge Powers”. Although this is a very real and not a conditional definition. They really were huge, literally and figuratively, since some countries occupied an entire continent, and the level of scientific and technological development was significantly higher than the development of our civilization.
Political map of the world before the apocalypse
Political map of the world before the apocalypse
South America.
Africa, excluding the Mediterranean coast.
Australia.
India, China, Indochina, Indonesia.
Atlantis, which we know as Antarctica, is not shown for simplicity.
Hyperborea, let's conventionally call this country that.
I repeat, what it was called is now unknown for certain. It was a huge country over which the sun never set, it stretched from the European coast of the Atlantic Ocean to the east coast of the modern USA, encircling the entire northern part of the world, shown in red on the map.
​
This country included the territories of the former USSR, the USA, Canada, Northern Mexico, all countries of Europe, the African coast of the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabian Peninsula, and Iran. The land borders in Egypt and China are shown conditionally, because there is no data on where exactly they were. Here I would like to note that the Bering Strait did not exist and Asia and North America were connected by a wide isthmus.
At the same time, the Arctic Ocean was just an internal Hyperborean Sea, and a warm one, since throughout the entire earth there was a uniformly warm subtropical climate, which was maintained by the water-steam layer in the atmosphere. There were no deserts, cold zones or permafrost at all. Dense ancient forests grew all over the land. On the topic of climate change, there are already two articles on our website ( here and here ), but today we will return to this topic more than once.
People lived in harmony with nature and enjoyed excellent health and long life. The priority was goodness, mutual assistance and respect; all those universal human values ​​that we now strive for all the time, but cannot achieve, were commonplace at that time. It was this world that became the prototype of the Biblical paradise, into which people supposedly will go after death.
​
Chapter 2. Apocalypse
I would like to make two clarifications right away:
​
When we say “nuclear weapons,” we mean weapons comparable in power to nuclear weapons. Naturally, the principle of operation of this weapon could be anything, even vacuum, even electromagnetic, even plasma, even something we don’t yet know. But nuclear weapons, precisely as weapons of mass destruction as such, were also used during this war. At the same time, I emphasize that simultaneously with nuclear weapons, other types of weapons were used, comparable in power to them.
I deliberately call the events of the early 19th century the word “cataclysm” or “apocalypse”, and not just nuclear war, because the war itself is just one of several episodes of that disaster. The whole catastrophe consisted of several stages, the first stage of which was a war with the use of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. Natural collapse is the next stages. The chronology of the apocalypse itself was as follows:
Carpet nuclear strikes. The soil from the explosions is raised into the sky.
Massive fires from explosions burned organic matter over vast areas.
Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions caused by stress in the earth's crust. Again the soil is raised into the sky, this time it is ash and ash.
Since vast areas were stripped of vegetation, powerful dust storms began. Which also lifted another portion of soil into the sky.
The amount of dust in the atmosphere has reached a “critical mass”; the water-steam layer is collapsing at the poles and mud rains all over the Earth.
At the same time, you need to understand that all these events occurred in a relatively short period of time and were directly interconnected, so they need to be considered all together, as one single event.
​
1. Progress of the war
We are well aware of the course of events during the nuclear war itself, but we do not know what its true cause was and, most likely, we will never know. Here I can only assume that the conflict began over the Mediterranean coast of Africa and in particular the territory of Morocco. The African state probably laid claim to the entire continent, but its northern part was inhabited by, in modern parlance, “Slavic peoples.” I would like to emphasize right away that initially the people were united, there was not even a concept of “nationality”, all nationalities will be invented later, but we will return to this issue later, but for now we are looking at the chronology of events.
​
According to our assumption, the African state wanted to gain control of the Mediterranean coast of the continent and on this basis a conflict arose. There were probably attempts to resolve the issue diplomatically, since the alliance of Hyperborea and India was opposed by the alliance of Africa and Australia.
​
We don’t know how long the negotiations took and how they culminated, but on one autumn day, according to the modern calendar it was the end of October, surface-to-surface intercontinental ballistic missiles were launched from Africa. Africa launched targeted nuclear strikes on economically important and densely populated areas of Siberia and North America. Australia carried out similar surgical strikes in Siberia and India
​
https://preview.redd.it/nl54o7xpo2sc1.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee9b8799ac42e6fb861efa95e11eb1b81cf1e655
Hyperborea launched retaliatory targeted strikes on the territories of Africa and Australia. India gave an answer only in the direction of Australia, since trade agreements with Africa were still in force at that time.Apocalypse of the 19th century.
In military affairs there is a concept of main targets and secondary ones, and these targeted strikes were carried out precisely on the main targets. After delivering targeted strikes, the Perimeter systems of both sides of the conflict activated the launch of all available nuclear weapons, or most of them. Subsequently, this system was called “Weapons of Retaliation.” Thanks to the actions of air defense systems, some of the launched missiles were destroyed and did not reach their targets. But there were a lot of missiles, too many.
“Discourse on the Seven Suns.” Collection of Komi-Permyak folk tales “One Hundred Silver Horses”:
​
“...When the fifth sun appeared, the ocean gradually dried up, when the sixth sun appeared, “the whole world was filled with smoke,” when the seventh sun appeared, the whole world split under the pressure of the flames.”
​
A strategic massive strike was carried out with weapons of mass destruction, through carpet bombing with ground-based contact detonation cluster munitions, in combination with individual strikes with especially high-power air detonation ammunition, including the concentration of several powerful strikes over a limited area, turning into deserts a flourishing region in which the life.
https://preview.redd.it/pcjlm5ih8xrc1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2bf331bfa887c010f77a198e972cb6f80746f0e1
For example, the Sahara, it became a desert precisely as a result of the events of the early 19th century. Thus, we immediately answer two popular questions - why was it necessary to bomb the deserts and why was it necessary to strike so densely.
​
Eye of the Sahara https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richat_Structure
To make it easier for you to understand the scale of the tragedy, I will give a simple example. Ground-based nuclear explosions carried out at the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site had a total power of approximately 100 megatons. Even if they were blown up in a short period of time, the zone of complete destruction would be only 8,500 sq. km. This is a square measuring 92 by 92 kilometers. The continuous fire zone is a square of 107 by 107 km. And all this is entirely within the testing area, and not halfway around the world. And naturally, this will not cover cities around the world with clay by 2 meters or more. Even looking at photographs of the craters, 200 years later, you understand what a hellish meat grinder there was. There is no need to even talk about the fact that these are karst sinkholes, since the formation of karst sinkholes requires liquid water, and here is Siberia, that is, permafrost. Meteorites? Perhaps, but why so selective and crowded? We look at what types of craters there are and how they differ in the article “Cesium-137 in Ryazan land7” . But even if half of these craters are craters from nuclear explosions, then calculate for yourself, based on the size of the crater, the power of the charge and the mass of soil raised into the atmosphere.
https://preview.redd.it/m7wit09s8xrc1.jpg?width=1277&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d6b0962bb554c21a265a5e5678112f1214783694
For reference: a crater with a diameter of 390 meters is left by a ground-based nuclear explosion with a capacity of 1 megaton in TNT equivalent, and the height of the rise of the cloud from such an explosion is 19 km.
​
The heaviest and largest particles, such as sand, settle around the epicenter of the explosion. But depending on the power of the explosion, even sand is thrown into the upper layers of the atmosphere, and not just clay.
​
But then why did the ancient cities survive, you ask? It all depends on the size of the city and its role in the strategic plan. Option one: more powerful charges flew to another address, and several smaller charges were thrown at one large city and they were not enough to completely wipe the city off the face of the earth, as for example there was one airborne nuclear explosion over Tula and one slightly south of Tula. Option two: all the charges that were in the launchers were fired automatically at specific, predetermined targets. Option three, there were no important targets in the surviving city.
​
Actually, the nuclear war itself did not last long. For example, the flight time of modern missiles is less than 20 minutes, so the total duration of hostilities in that war was one, maximum two days. There were also ground-based combined-arms operations, but there were literally only a few of them recorded: there were several instances of military clashes, as well as several cases of landings on enemy territory, but they did not affect the overall course of events, therefore, within the framework of this article, we will not consider combined-arms operations so as not to overload the reader with material.
​
In fact, the entire war consisted of an exchange of blows with weapons of mass destruction. Most of the inhabitants of the earth did not even have time to understand that the war had begun and ended. But the subsequent cataclysms lasted about two years. That is why, in popular memory and folklore, such a concept as a flood has been preserved, but there are practically no memories of the war itself.
​
And since we have touched on the topic of popular memory, I will immediately answer the question of why no one remembers this nuclear war. The first and most basic reason was stated above - the transience of the war itself.
​
The second reason is the so-called subjective perception factor. Here, in fact, everything is simple, people told their descendants either fairy tales, or what they themselves witnessed, or what their ancestors told them. However, if there are no such stories, this does not mean at all that this did not happen, it’s just that their ancestors don’t remember this (they didn’t see it, they don’t know how to explain it, etc.). Perhaps they were lucky to live in an area where there were no nuclear attacks, and subsequent disasters were not so terrible. Perhaps their story was somehow allegorical, perhaps figurative.
​
For example, let’s say I have never seen a trolleybus in my life. I have no idea what it is and on what principles it functions. The most I know about technology is the structure of a cart. Now, please tell me how this cart with horns rides without a horse?
​
Another example, can you by eye distinguish the flight of a meteorite from the flight of a Sarmatian missile warhead? Even specialists cannot do this without the appropriate equipment. And a person who sees an object flying in the sky will draw exactly what he sees - a light stripe, since in a motionless drawing it is very difficult to convey movement, especially the movement of a luminous object, especially one moving at great speed.Apocalypse of the 19th century.
https://preview.redd.it/b0puynu09xrc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=54882c2dedccad585e00036f9f1fff319b5b6a74
After some time, another person looking at this picture will perceive what is depicted as lightning or an asteroid, since, in his mind, there are no other examples of what it could be, and the brain is designed in such a way that it perceives on the principle of analogy, and if the brain does not find analogues, then a person simply may not notice this or that thing.
​
The third reason is the objective factor of perception: after all, a nuclear mushroom is not a nuclear explosion itself, as many people think, these are just convective currents of air and dust that form after a light flash, which is actually a nuclear explosion. But the strength of the light emitted by the fireball in a flash of light is such that you can not only go blind, but even burn out, therefore, it is quite natural that people who saw the fireball could not tell what the mushroom looks like. They either went blind, burned, or hid. And if people took cover from the flash of light in a timely manner, they might well not have seen the nuclear mushroom. Who remembers the old instructions on civil defense in schools of the USSR, they read:
​
“Duck down, cover up and DON’T LOOK at the flash.”
​
To understand what a fireball of a nuclear explosion is, try at noon on a bright sunny day, at least for a minute, to look at the sun without glasses and without closing your eyes! Naturally, you don’t even need to try to do this, otherwise you risk severely damaging your vision. But I think you understand the example, and the light flash of a nuclear explosion is thousands of times brighter. Of course, you will say that it’s a weak explanation, I don’t argue, but perhaps that’s why there is still isolated evidence of these fireballs, since there were people who, observing a nuclear explosion from a safe distance, even found the strength to write it down, and the documents were preserved in the archives.
​
We looked at these, and many other documents from the Tula State Archive, in the article, “The explosion over Tula in 1830, or a forgotten war https://www.tart-aria.info/vzryv-nad-tuloj-1830-goda-ili-zabytaja-vojna/. ” Three archival documents describe a fireball exploding over the city. After the release of this film, there was a flurry of comments that it was a meteorite or an asteroid. I am sure that such comments and accusations of illiteracy will continue today.
​
https://preview.redd.it/l6few8mfyyrc1.png?width=2234&format=png&auto=webp&s=7ce612dc07662aee51c328e4490a322bccf3fea4
Firstly , in the register of meteorites, comets and asteroids, the object that exploded over Tula at the beginning of the 19th century is not even close, and besides, there is simply no point in hiding a natural disaster. Yes, the mayor does not write in his report that it was a nuclear missile, but his report also does not indicate that it was a meteorite. The mayor wrote only what he saw. And he saw a flying fireball.
​
Secondly , I have already said many times, Cesium-137 is a man-made product and is not found in meteorite craters, but in Tula, in the layer of a fire in 1834, at a depth of 2 meters, Cesium-137 was discovered, which is a product of the nuclear decay of uranium or plutonium. Moreover, in the layers above or below, this cesium isotope is not present. But cesium cannot be a trace of a meteorite, for one simple reason: the half-life of Cesium-137 is no more than 30 years. Over millions of years, while the meteorite wanders through the expanses of space, not a trace of cesium would remain.
​
Thirdly , from a meteorite hitting the ground, Cesium-137 is not formed, as some tried to convince me. Cesium-137 is a man-made product and is a product of the nuclear decay of Uranium or Plutonium, and is formed only during a nuclear decay reaction and nothing else (from the word at all). Consequently, the very presence of Cesium-137 is a fact confirming nuclear decay in this place, and this could be either a nuclear explosion or a nuclear power plant reactor, as they say, there is no third option.
​
Fourthly , Cesium-137 was discovered not only in Tula, but also in neighboring regions, and in territories north of the Chernobyl zone, as well as in other regions of Russia and abroad.
​
Let me digress for just a couple of minutes and explain some fundamentally important things. The most favorite argument against the version of a nuclear war of the past is the topic of several thousand years of radioactive contamination, and skeptics cite Chernobyl as an example. What they say is, “if there had been a nuclear war in the past, then the whole Earth would have erupted like Chernobyl, where it is impossible to live for thousands of years, since everything is contaminated.” There is one very important point here: there was no nuclear explosion at Chernobyl! The explosion at the 4th block of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant is comparable to the explosion of a “dirty bomb”, when radioactive fuel from the reactor was scattered around the epicenter, and finely dispersed radioactive dust was carried by winds over hundreds and thousands of kilometers.
To save you time, I'll explain it simply. According to the physics of decay processes, nuclear reactions at the epicenter of a nuclear explosion and in a nuclear power plant reactor are the same. And the significant difference is that in the reactor these processes are controlled and proceed slowly, but in the epicenter of the explosion the reaction is uncontrollable, and the faster the greater the charge power, that is, the amount of the starting substance, is. And during a nuclear explosion, some substances transform into others very quickly, and the greater the power of the charge, the faster these transformations occur, and the greater the amount of substance that has time to react.Apocalypse of the 19th century.
That is why, at the site of a nuclear explosion, you can find large quantities of cesium, iodine and other isotopes, which maintain an increased background radiation. But the half-life of Iodine-131 is 8 days, Cesium-137 is 30 years. Please note, half-life, not complete decomposition. This means that after 30 years, there will be half as much cesium, after another 30 years, there will be half of half of it left, and so on. That is, from a “conventional kilogram of Cesium-137”, after 30 years, there will be half a kilogram left, after another 30 years - 250 grams, after another 30 years - 125 grams, etc. Every 30 years, the amount of substance will decrease by 2 times. Thus, after 180 years, from a conventional kilogram of Cesium-137, 15 grams will remain. The numbers are absolutely conditional, just for ease of understanding that after 200 years, it is very possible to find the remainder, but not with a dosimeter, but in the laboratory and by the remaining amount of Cesium-137 and the number of half-lives, you can approximately calculate the date of the event, if you count in reverse side.
Thus, the Chernobyl trace, the Semipalatinsk trace and any other modern one are excluded. But the example of Chernobyl (or Fukushima) is not suitable, as you already understood, for the reason that mainly the original radioactive fuel is scattered there. Decay products, of course, also exist, but they are thousands of times smaller, and it is the radioactive fuel that will maintain a high radioactive background for hundreds of thousands of years.
​
But let's return to the issue of fireballs, because interestingly, a similar phenomenon was observed in North America. This event was called the "Starfall of 1833." On November 12-13, 1833, 34,640 star falls per hour were recorded, calculated by Professor Olmsted after the weakening of the stellar flow.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Leonids-1833.jpg
Don’t ask how or what he thought, but today there are no analogues to this event. Agnes Clarke, in her book A History of Astronomy in the Nineteenth Century, wrote: “As a result of the meteor shower of 1833, the study of meteorites once and for all became an integral part of astronomy.” According to her comments, North America bore the brunt.
​
On November 12-13, 1824, a bright fireball was seen in Mainz. After it, an earthquake occurred, which was recorded not only in Mainz, but also in Tuscany (Italy). All this was accompanied by thick fog. An earthquake was also recorded on the island of Meleda. And then, on November 27, 1824, a fireball the size of the Moon was observed in Prague.
​
From 1800 to 1850 huge meteors or small fragments of certain bodies fell from the sky almost every day.
In 1887 in the USA, Daniel Kirkwood, in the quarterly journal published by the American Philosophical Society since 1838, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, provided a list of the most significant cosmic incidents of the 19th century:
​
“In 1822, from November 12 to 13, various phenomena were noticed not only throughout Europe. Countless shooting stars in Orenburg, Warsaw and Cologne. Lightning in Odessa. A ball of fire, like lightning and a flash of light, from which a kind of small curtain of light unfolded, and then once again shone in the bright colors of the rainbow.”
​
Not understanding such a scale, people of that time naturally attributed what was happening to natural phenomena. There are very many books in which meteors, atmospheric phenomena, etc. are recorded. during the period November 12-25, 1824. It is quite obvious that storms, fires, and other natural disasters were caused by one event.
​
Researchers who are skeptical even about the idea of ​​nuclear war in the early 19th century are trying to find any other explanation for the buried buildings, deserts and other non-connections of the office. stories. And one of these explanations is an asteroid/comet, from the impact of which the Drake Passage and the Sahara Desert were allegedly formed, and the asteroid itself allegedly bounced off the planet like a ball. If you look at this strait from a general perspective, it seems that there is an arc here, which was supposedly left by that same fallen asteroid, plowing the bottom. However, take a closer look, there is clearly not a circle here, but almost a right angle.
https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/the-drake-passage-impact-event/
And if anyone didn’t know, these islands are a range of volcanoes. And this happened due to a fracture of the tectonic plate caused by the immersion of Antarctica by 400 meters. But we will talk about this further when we touch on the topic of the so-called “World Flood”.
https://preview.redd.it/phy9ska4bxrc1.png?width=1918&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4649f3152b766187f137cb92d787b4578568661
One subscriber, compiling her genealogy, carefully studied the Revision Tales of the Ural Cossack Army. In the 1834 census, every fifth or sixth Cossack has the entry: “Died in 1830.” Moreover, this applies to adult Cossacks, and not to their children and wives. Children and wives survived 1830. It turns out that in 1834 they tried to count the Cossacks who died during the massacre in 1830.Apocalypse of the 19th century. Studying the events of those years, we cannot ignore the translation of Proto-Slavic writing, the supposedly “unreadable” Etruscan letter, made by Gennady Stanislavovich Grinevich.
I highly recommend reading the original. It just describes the events of the invasion of “Navo Ra”, flying balls with energy very similar to nuclear energy. Next quote:
“...the drama of the situation is aggravated by the fact that there is a certain “Navo Ra” - a deadening sun, emitting superheat, with which it kills people as it flies over them....” What are we talking about here? Perhaps about some kind of deadly weapon of incredible destructive power. Literal translation of the text on the stone from the Perugia Museum. But, apparently, there is no need to give its modern translation, since everything in it is quite clear and so, despite the fact that some of its lines cannot yet be translated and some words have been encountered whose interpretation and translation are not always unambiguous. The above text is one of the dramatic pages in the history of the Slavs. History, unknown to us, hidden from us behind the thickness of millennia.”
This is how the Mayan Code of Rio describes the effects of radiation, quote:
“...the dog that arrived was without hair, and its claws fell off...”
This description is nothing more than a description of the characteristic symptoms of radiation sickness.
Descriptions have been preserved, as official historians believe, of the beginning of the plague epidemic in 1333 in China:
“...before the outbreak of the epidemic, there was a roar underground, the mountains shook and some collapsed, fiery rain fell, those people who saw it went blind and then quickly died...”
https://preview.redd.it/p7nsg18kbxrc1.jpg?width=874&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cf635231e273b121cca337d02f2b92e4e46f810c
finish reading at :
https://www-tart--aria-info.translate.goog/apokalipsis-xix-veka-podlinnaja-istorija-genocida/?\_x\_tr\_sl=auto&\_x\_tr\_tl=en&\_x\_tr\_hl=en&\_x\_tr\_pto=wapp
https://www.tart-aria.info/apokalipsis-xix-veka-podlinnaja-istorija-genocida/
fun links https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_ashmounds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisk_metallic_burial_case https://www.quora.com/Why-are-coffins-in-the-UK-lead-lined
https://www.reddit.com/CulturalLayecomments/c3ky07/interesting_analogy/ https://imgur.com/a/4ejtDrF https://www.reddit.com/CulturalLayecomments/bkfoq1/anomalous_polygonal_masonry_in_the_small_town_of/
https://www.reddit.com/CulturalLayecomments/b96g9x/maps_of_africa_from_1800s_show_less_charted/
https://www.reddit.com/CulturalLayecomments/8wn9pa/buried_russian_churches_a_look_inside/
Original https://www.tart-aria.info/apokalipsis-xix-veka-podlinnaja-istorija-genocida/
​