Bart has sex with marge

YouTubers - A place for YouTube Creators

2011.06.01 19:45 MackieDrew YouTubers - A place for YouTube Creators

A community for established YouTube creators.
[link]


2016.09.20 18:25 PTbest WrestleFap

Subreddit dedicated to posting all women of wrestling.
[link]


2009.06.15 01:12 buu700 Relationship Advice

Need help with your relationship? Whether it's romance, friendship, family, co-workers, or basic human interaction: we're here to help!
[link]


2024.05.14 02:11 lleett So, what did Teresa’s Lawyers do regarding Marge?

Teresa said on the latest episode that before long and during filming, she could speak about what Marge has supposedly been doing and we would all be shocked, but she said she couldn’t say anything yet as it was all being handled by lawyers, which is only an issue if there are legal proceedings. But if that’s the case, filming is long since over and so we should know what it is now if anything has actually been filed or acted on legally, but I haven’t heard anything. Does anyone know what she’s on about?
Edit: Okay so after checking online what I found out:
  1. The ‘case’ Vanessa lost was re a restraining order against Luis, that happened in October last year.
  2. In February of this year, lawyers acting on behalf of Vanessa re harassment & abuse claims are taking Luis, Bo Deitl and their lawyers to court claiming wiretap and fraud in relation to this. Luis et al have since counter sued and this is all in progress, i.e. not settled.
  3. It is being reported that Luis claims Vanessa passed on info to the cast to use against him, including Marge, and he admitted to getting investigators to pose as clients to try to get info re this. (This would be no bombshell at all if true, don’t we already know this? Also it’s very understandable).
  4. Also, lastly, in an earlier case Vanessa and Luis settled out of court re her claims against him re abusive treatment when she would not engage in sex. At least one other ex partner has come out with the same allegations against Luis. (So, again, Vanessa warning the cast would make sense).
So yeah, I’m not sure Teresa has what she thinks she does…
submitted by lleett to rhonj [link] [comments]


2024.05.12 00:24 MrHockeyJournalist There Should Be a Hockey Episode of Bob's Burgers Featuring Louise Getting Into Hockey.

We know none of the Belcher kids like sports much and really neither do Bob or Linda for that matter. But Louise loves fighting, violence and kicking ass. I think hockey would be great for her. Especially since too, hockey comes up every known and then in the background of Bob's Burgers. Mostly through Teddy.
In this episode Teddy needs Bob to stand in as the replacement cook at the hockey rink during a weekend hockey tournament. It's a tournament that features both youth and adult divisions.
Louise witnesses the girls hockey and sees them checking, and hitting and taking bad penalties and wants to try it.
Tina meets an older hockey boy and of course keeps trying to sneak into the boys locker room. Zeke plays on said boy's hockey team and brings Jimmy Jr with him for support. Tina still like Jimmy Jr. but is conflicted with this hockey boy (who of course has no idea Tina exists).
Gene discovers the organ player and the organ and wants to play. The organist is a cranky old guy and the organ is over a hundred years old. The organist won't let Gene touch it but of course he is determined just to play one song.
Also we see Teddy and the Mighty Schmucks play. Teddy turns out to actually be good at hockey much to everyone's surprise. Also the rest of the Might Schmucks are aware Teddy isn't Jewish but keep him on the team because he is good. Teddy has no idea they know.
Of course Bob and Linda are overwhelmed by the food orders. Linda leaves Bob to fend for himself while she chats with the hockey moms (who to add further confusion about where Bob's Burgers takes place all have Minnesotan accents "Don't cha Know").
Finally before anyone says "Hockey is an expensive sport and the Belchers are poor, no way Louise can afford to play." This is a cartoon and if Homer and Marge can have both Bart and Lisa playing hockey, than Bob and Linda can pay for Louise to play.
submitted by MrHockeyJournalist to BobsBurgers [link] [comments]


2024.05.10 16:24 cosmogoblin [F] How being an influencer turned into a deadly game of cat-and-mouse

This story was originally written July 2023.
You might have heard of me. I was a social media influencer for two years.
I know kids have “influencer” as one of their top professions these days, but for me it was all an accident, really. I uploaded a few YouTube videos back in 2019, in the summer I finished school. All I did was rant about movies. I had a few notes, not a full script, and just spouted off to my laptop camera about inaccurate science, bad casting choices, real nitpicky stuff. In about six months I’d got 200 subscribers.
I was at university then, and I mentioned my videos to some of my uni friends. They subbed and told their friends, and I got up to 1,000 sub by January 2020. My videos were only about ten minutes long, and I had nowhere near the views to monetise. I was making one a week, but not on any sort of schedule. It was just something I did when I was bored.
Then the pandemic hit. A lot of students here in England basically got locked into their halls of residence (that’s dorms for any Americans reading), but I was lucky enough to get back to my parents’ before then. So I was doing what my uni laughably called “remote learning”, which basically meant a couple of video lectures a week, some worksheets, and lots and lots of my own research. I won’t bore you with the topic of my course; it’s not relevant.
I’m not exactly stereotypically pretty. I’ve come to accept that. My hair is stringy, my nose is too big, my face is profoundly asymmetrical, my complexion is strange and acned, my teeth are crooked … You get the idea. You can only do so much with makeup and hair that covers your face. I probably have fewer friends than I would if I looked like other people, and it actually took a lot of courage to make that first video - and even more courage to upload it.
I can only assume that’s the reason I went viral. It certainly wasn’t the high production values, or the tightly-written scripts, or the quality of my research. On the 9th of April I had 1,322 subscribers. On the 10th it was over 8,000. By the end of April it was up to 300,000, and I had actually monetised my channel.
The comments were … well, they were varied. Lots of hate because of my looks, but lots of love from people who just appreciated what I put out there, calling out others for their negative comments. I know many social media stars struggle with unkind comments, but I’d got used to it. Let’s be honest, they weren’t nice, but neither were they untrue. And comments under your video are easier to ignore than comments in the street. I was making decent money after all. If you were one of those commenters, you know which side you were on, and I love you either way. Thanks for the engagement - it’s not easy to gain financially from your unusual appearance!
The trouble with going viral is that it doesn’t last. Competing in the fast-paced world of internet stardom takes a lot of effort. I started experimenting with other things - YouTube shorts, TikTok, Instagram, pretty much anything going. The format that turned out to work best was actually TikTok. I’d bought some skimpy outfits and did ridiculous little dances. I quickly reached over a thousand views per video, and while I wasn’t up to their creator tier, it still worked. A well-known cosmetics company asked to sponsor my videos.
Cosmetics! Me! I guess they were going for woke points or something. I didn’t care, they offered me more money than I knew what to do with, as long as my views stayed high. So I started making 2-minute videos. A dance without make-up, then I applied the make-up - being sure to show the brand name clear and up-close - and then the same dance with make-up. If this is ringing any bells with you, then yes - that was me. And no, stupid - that’s not my real name.
I’d got used to undesired attention of course. Along with the unpleasant comments, I got my fair share of unwelcome male approaches. For a few hours after any upload, about half of my DMs were from men, and some women (or men with female account names), asking to see more of me. I wasn’t a camgirl, though I suppose I wasn’t a million miles away from one; but I could have been. I did seriously consider it a few times, but never actually followed through.
And half of the rest of my DMs, and a good portion of the public comments, were from angry women. What made me think I had the right to show off like that? How could I bring their favourite cosmetics brand into disrepute? But I’ve got pretty thick skin (hey, I can make that joke, you can’t), and mostly laughed the comments off and ignored them.
That was, in hindsight, a mistake.
By September my uni was reopening for in-person teaching. I was working six or seven hours a day just to keep up with everything, and had a couple more brands sponsoring me. Being an influencer isn’t just about filming for ten minutes a day and watching the money come in!
So I was going to tutorials an hour a day, watching video lectures at 2x speed, and ignoring my assignments in favour of making videos and replying to messages. It’s not like my pointless degree was helping with my real job.
Okay fine. It was geology. Rocks and stuff. You happy now? I bet you can’t tell the difference between sylvite and carnallite just by licking it, can you?
Anyway, the point is I came close to being chucked out. Actually I had to repeat the second year. At least I could afford it.
So anyway, I somehow got through to the end of my second year, the end of my second year again, and part way through my third year. I was passing my exams - just - and through several reinventions I had managed to maintain my social influencer role. Last Autumn I was getting some good views, and cash, back on YouTube. I was getting pretty good at make-up (I had an exclusive deal with one company on TikTok, and another deal with a different cosmetics company on YouTube). The videos that did well then were me with experimental hairstyles and not much in the way of clothes, putting on makeup for a few minutes, then reading out-of-copyright fiction in my patented “YouTube voice”. If you can imagine a cross between Shania Twain and Marge Simpson then… well, then you’re weird, but you’ve pretty much got it.
Then, last December, a week or so before the Christmas holidays, I went out with my friends. I had made a decent number, both girls and guys, by then. I could never quite tell whether it was my personality (which I assure you is fantastic), my influencer status, or the cash I was liberal with (it always seemed to be my round, and I didn’t mind). There were even a couple of boys who were keen on me, though I hadn’t done anything about it yet. Eight of us went out together to celebrate a birthday. It wasn’t actually anybody’s birthday that day, but Shireen had a Christmas Day birthday, and she wanted a proper party.
Now I look quite different in real life than I do online. I think the technical term is “frumpy” - jeans, trainers, fluffy jumper and a hat, or maybe a hoodie. The birthday girl had somehow convinced me to put a bit more effort in, and had helped me pick out some heels and a knee-length silver dress. Make-up was easy for me of course, and so I got dressed up and off we went to the Black Swan.
The Black Swan has several great qualities about it. One: it’s cheap. Two: it does good food. Three: it’s a couple of hundred metres from The Bar. We had a decent meal, a few drinks, and around 9 we walked to The Bar.
To be more precise, they walked. I wobbled. If you’ve watched my videos you might have seen me in heels, but did you ever see me walk in them? Didn’t think so.
The Bar is open til 3 in the morning. It looks respectable enough from the outside, especially in the afternoon; but after about 11, when most pubs close, it fills up with students drinking expensive-looking drinks. And almost every night, somebody jumps up onto a table, and then everybody’s up there dancing. In The Bar, either you hold your drink tightly, or you lose it.
I’d done this before, and I can handle my alcohol. I’ve stayed at The Bar till chuckout more than a few times, and I’ve been wobbly on the way home, but I’ve never thrown up or passed out. And so I was surprised when I woke up. The last thing I remembered was Stu saying he was tired, and Shireen replying that it wasn’t even midnight yet. Now I was lying on the hard wooden floor of my living room.
My head pounded. Daylight streamed through the window, and I blinked a few times and rubbed my eyes. My hands were wet and sticky.
I looked at them. They were covered in blood.
I looked down. My heels were across the room, but I was still wearing my dress. It, also, was covered in blood, a huge stain across the chest.
Panic set in. What happened to me last night? I checked myself out and could find no injuries. Where did the blood come from?
Standing up, I realised it was worse than that. Red pools stained the wooden floor. I don’t know much medicine, but if somebody had lost this much blood, I couldn’t see how they could have survived.
I stood up, unsure whether my shaking was from the shock or the alcohol. This was when I saw a shirt on the floor behind me. White, with a subtle pattern. I’m sure I don’t need to tell you that it wasn’t my shirt. I lived alone, and rarely invited people back to my flat. I looked around some more. A pair of men’s black leather shoes by the door. And then I saw it.
I suppose, rather, I should say him. He was naked except for a pair of dark blue jeans, slumped in the open doorway to the kitchen, covered in blood, and very, very, dead.
I panicked then. I’m calmer now, so let’s take a moment to describe my conclusions that morning. I had got very drunk. I had met a guy. We’d come back to my flat. We’d been getting naked (the shoes and shirt weren’t bloodied). Then, for some reason, we’d had an argument or a fight. The body had stab wounds in the chest, and a pool of blood had congealed onto the wooden floor of the living room and the linoleum of the kitchen where the man collapsed. How did those stab wounds get there? I didn’t know for sure, but a quick glance at my kitchen counter showed that my sharp carving knife was missing. It was all coming together. I didn’t know if he had picked up the knife, or if I had; I didn’t know why either of us would do that. I didn’t even know his name, and later when I checked his pockets, I couldn’t find any ID.
There was a lot I didn’t know. But I’m smart. So once I was done crying on the floor (I think it was about two hours), I came up with a plan. This man was dead, and I couldn’t do anything about that. But what would the consequences be? There’s no need for my life to be ruined as well. I decided not to call the police. People go missing mysteriously all the time, he can just be another statistic and I’ll get on with my life.
The blood on Dave was mostly dry by now. (Sure, I didn’t know his name, but every bloke’s called Dave, right?) So I put a badly-fitting vest on him to soak up the remaining blood, and his shirt over the top, along with his shoes. His jeans were bloody, but they were dark, so hopefully it wouldn’t show up in low light. I couldn’t find his coat, which was odd given how cold it was, but this would have to do. I put my dress and heels in a plastic bag, and grabbed a spade that I never used. Had I missed anything?
The knife. The fucking knife. I searched all over for it, but by the time it got dark I still hadn’t found it. I knew I couldn’t delay for long, so I figured it was best to deal with Dave now, and find the knife later.
Eight o’clock in the evening came. I’m lucky I have parking right outside my house, no street cameras, and a ground-floor flat. I put the bag in the boot of my car and came back for the body.
Have you ever tried to move a dead person? It’s not easy, and I’m not exactly strong. I put my arm around his waist and eventually managed to heave him almost upright. “Come on Dave, that’s it. We’re gonna get you home. Maybe calm down on the tequila next time right? Try to keep it in, and don’t you dare vomit in my car, you sexy bastard.”
Oh come on, what do you want from me? I’m an influencer, not a stand-up comedian. And anyway, I don’t think anybody saw me during the several minutes it took to drag Dave to the passenger seat. I really wish I’d got round to buying a bigger car than the Fiat Punto I’d had since I was 18, but it was too late for that now.
There’s a place about an hour’s drive from me called Epping Forest. The Heritage Trust reckon it’s most famous for its huge tracts of unspoiled wildlife, thousands of trees, and Iron Age settlements. But around here it’s best known as the place where murderers and gang members bury bodies. So off I trundled in my 1.2 litre pensioner-mobile. I arrived around 9:30, checked Google Maps, and drove offroad into the woods.
Do you know how long it takes to dig a grave? The answer is: a long time! By dawn I’d only managed a hole about two feet. Oh, and it was my third try, because the first two times I found too much rock. Well, it would have to do. In went Dave, and I shovelled the ground back over him. I thought I could put my clothes in with him, but it was a shallow grave, and when the inevitable dog-walker finds it I didn’t want them linked back to me. I mean, there’s my DNA in there for sure, but let’s not make it too easy for them, right? So I chucked the spade in a river, and the clothes went back home with me, including the vest I’d lent him.
Now in England we have a thing called ANPR everywhere. The police can just type in a car registration and see exactly where it’s been from traffic cameras. I needed an alibi. Why had I gone to Epping Forest? For a hike of course! So I walked around for a few hours, got breakfast at a pub, and told the staff about all the wacky adventures I’d had that night. And while I was there, for the first time in a good long time, I checked my phone.
Hundreds of messages, of course. But only one sent a shiver down my spine.
Jolly_Gal_56234
I KNOW WHAT YOU DID
My heart thumped. My ears started ringing. I felt dizzy, nearly passed out. How could anybody know?
Of course nobody knew. I actually got messages like this fairly often. Just some idiot trying to wind people up. They’d probably sent a dozen messages just like it, to random people, and I just blocked her. Still it rattled me. I finished my breakfast, paid up, walked back to my car, and drove home.
My flat was just as I left it. Dave was gone, but his blood was still there. I scrubbed the floor for hours, and it helped a bit, but you could still see the stains. Exhausted, I showered and went to bed.
The next morning I woke up. I hadn’t posted anything for a day and a half, so I needed to do something about that. Scrolling through my messages, one stood out like a police light.
Jolly_Gal_28473
YOU’VE BEEN A BAD GIRL 🔪
Shit. SHIT! What the fuck is going on? I stared at my phone, paralysed with indecision. When I finally snapped out of it I made sure the door was locked, and tried to come up with a plan.
I had no idea who was sending these. Maybe they didn’t really know anything. You send stupid messages like that to hundreds of people, you’re gonna come across one who’s actually done something bad, right? I poured myself a big glass of gin, decided that nobody could know anything, and made a video.
Remember that one where I didn’t speak at all, just danced for three minutes dressed like 90s Britney to 70s disco music, titled “HANGOVER DANCE”? Yeah, that’s the one. I didn’t trust myself to speak without breaking, but I could dance about as well as I ever could.
The rest of the day I answered messages, emailed my sponsors, and considered getting an agent. It’s still just me doing everything, and that Sunday afternoon, I really didn’t want to. I also spent a few hours scrubbing the wooden floor with baking soda and vinegar, and looking for the knife.
I kept getting messages from Jolly_Gal. It didn’t matter how much I blocked her, she just popped up again the next day with different numbers at the end of her username. Always all-caps, just a single sentence.
YOU DON’T DESERVE IT
YOU’LL GET WHAT’S COMING TO YOU
OWN UP
DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT
Exactly one message a day, but always at different times. I decided it was a bot, and it was just coincidence that it started when it did. Until Christmas Day.
I’d been back at my parents’ for a few days, and endured the usual conversations about what I was going to do for a “proper job” after uni. They’re great, and really supportive. They’ve just never understood what an “influencer” really is, and that “playing on my phone” for six hours a day counts as work. My brother Rich gets it, but the rest of my family is honestly baffled.
Anyway, Christmas morning comes. All four of us were in the house together (my brother’s 17 so he still lives there), and we gathered together in the living room opening presents. It was a couple of weeks since the incident, and I still had nightmares every night, and those sudden panic attacks - you know, when you’re sure you’re going to be found out - but I was getting used to it. It had happened, I couldn’t change it, and I’d have to keep it secret for the rest of my life; but it was becoming a sort of background hum. I don’t know if that’s too quick, but I suppose I’ve learned to handle difficulty in my life.
Until we finished opening presents and I checked my phone.
Jolly_Gal_814385
HAPPY CHRISTMAS
And underneath, a photo of my kitchen knife, stained with blood.
I ran out of the house in tears.
Rich found me, sitting on the wooden bridge down the road from the house, my legs dangling over the river. I came here a lot when I was a teenager, so it was the first place he looked. I’d left my phone on the living room floor, and the three of them had seen the message, so he knew what triggered me. He just didn’t know the full story.
Well, I told him. I mean, not everything, obviously. But I told him how this person had been harassing me for weeks. He listened sympathetically, like he’s always done, and asked if there was anything he could do to help. I didn’t say anything; I just turned around, hugged him, and cried into his Christmas sweater.
After about half an hour we went back to the house. Rich explained things to my parents, thank goodness. I don’t think I could have handled it.
The rest of the holiday was … okay, I guess. More messages from Jolly_Gal, but only text. I made videos most days, and met all two of my old schoolfriends for drinks, movies and shopping. They’re big fans of my channels. I even took Rich out for drinks one evening, though it took us four pubs to find somewhere that wouldn’t ID him. He’s a bit of a babyface.
I did all I could not to think about Dave. I put him to the back of my mind, letting him live in the shed at the bottom of the garden of my psyche where he couldn’t disturb me. I guess that’s why it came as a shock to me, when I packed my stuff into the boot of my car to head back to uni.
There was one suitcase I’d packed but hadn’t got round to taking into the house. And peeking around the edge was that plastic bag. I’d forgotten to get rid of it!
Dad was helping me load the car, so I couldn’t do anything about it. I tucked it out of sight, finished loading up, said goodbye, and drove back to uni. It was dark when I got back, so I unpacked everything else, triple-bagged my bloody clothes, left my phone at home (no tracking me!), and walked two miles to drop them into somebody else’s wheelie bin.
The next morning I checked my messages.
Jolly_Gal_12592
WELCOME HOME
And a photo of me dumping the bag the night before.
You know what? This didn’t bother me. I mean, it did bother me, but not as much as I guess Jolly_Gal hoped. I’ve been bullied and harassed most of my life, and I’ve got pretty good at ignoring it. Sure, it was an escalation - she was actually following me - but it was just one of almost thirty messages. Jolly_Gal was hoping to destroy me. Instead, she hardened my resolve.
Clearly she had enough evidence to go to the police, but she hadn’t. And obviously she lived nearby. Now I’m no hacker, but you don’t do a job like mine without learning your way around technology. So I started sleuthing. I hadn’t bothered blocking her after the third or fourth message, so I made a list of all the messages, including timecodes. I’ve got a geology degree (almost), and we have techniques to analyse rock strata. Finally I had a genuine use for all that studying I sort of did!
Jolly_Gal was not as clever as she thought. She’d got sloppy. About half of her messages were sent at strange hours, on the hour. These were presumably posted by her bot. But the other messages were all sent between 7 and 8 am, or between 6 and 10 pm. So I guessed that she has a normal 9-5 day job, or maybe she’s a student.
Next I searched all the social media sites I could think of for Jolly_Gal or JollyGal usernames. There are a few, so please don’t go harassing people with that username! I don’t want innocent people to get hurt. After a few hours I had profiles of all Jolly_Gals. Pictures, locations, partial travel history, even birthdays for some of them. I discounted those who clearly weren’t in England, but I still had too many to narrow it down. The photos had no EXIF data so I couldn’t tell the type of phone or camera they used.
So my days became something like this: Five hours doing uni stuff, five hours working on my socials, and an hour or two learning digital sleuthing. I still went out with my friends sometimes, but made sure not to drink too much. I know how to have a good time without being drunk!
The breakthrough came by total chance. I rarely read the local papers, and just got lucky one afternoon in March. I was waiting for a friend in the pub after lectures, and there was a copy of the Post somebody had left on a table. So I flicked through it. The local council was rubbish at doing traffic. Some group of OAPS was organising a May Day celebration. And a woman had been convicted of body-snatching.
I recognised her! There was a photo of a woman in her early twenties. She’d been arrested when a corpse went missing back in December, and they’d seen her take it on the morgue’s CCTV. She’d been released on bail. “Prevention of the lawful and decent burial of a dead body” is a rare crime these days, so she hadn’t been sentenced yet; instead she was released until her sentencing, expected to be in August. Her name was Jenny Smith, which is so common as to be almost useless - that is, if you don’t have a profile of her on your laptop at home!
The report also gave her address. So I started hatching a plan. I texted my friend that I wouldn’t make it, and went home.
Jolly_Gal, or rather, Jenny, lived near me, and actually went to the same university. She had accounts on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, and a few others. Of course you can’t get Jolly_Gal by itself these days, but my profile gave all her precise usernames. I spent my evening watching her videos and reading her tweets. And then I found the smoking gun.
Jenny had posted a video on TikTok last June bitching about me. She’s way prettier than me, and yet I’d got all the subs and follows. She deserved all those sponsorship deals. It wasn’t fair that I had hundreds of thousands of subs and she only had a few thousand. She even said I was ugly and deserved to die.
Well, she got one out of two right, I guess. You can decide which one.
It all started to slot into place. Jenny was absurdly jealous of me, so she’d hatched a plan to destroy me. She must have roofied me in The Bar, got me and Dave back to my place, stabbed him, poured blood everywhere, and taken the knife home. I mean, I don’t know anything about forensic science, and I was drugged and panicked when I woke up that morning. I’d have no way of knowing that Dave had died days before he ended up in my flat!
I’d never managed to get all the blood out of the wooden flooring, and ended up putting a really misplaced rug over it. I chiselled off a sample and gave it to one of my friends who was doing a PhD in biology. It took a bit of persuading, but he ran an analysis on it.
It was pig’s blood.
Fuck Jenny. She’s not Jenny, or Jolly_Gal, she’s fucking Carrie!
She planned to destroy me. She ruined my mental health, she framed me for murder. All because I was more popular on TikTok than she was. Well, two can play at that game. I didn’t deserve what Jenny did to me. She did.
I thought about this all night, coming up with plan after plan, weighing them in my head. I wanted two things: to destroy Jenny, and to feel good about it for myself. Finally I had a course of action I’m actually rather proud of.
I decided to start slow. I did something anybody could have done - I mocked up a poster. At the top was “Jenny Smith - body snatcher!”. Underneath were two pictures, her Insta profile pic and the courthouse photo from the paper, and between them: “From This … To This!” And all her various social media handles to top it off. I printed hundreds of these, and pinned them all around the university and her street.
I’ve never thought of myself as an unkind person - God knows I’ve suffered enough myself to be sympathetic to others. But I’m willing to admit I felt a lot of satisfaction seeing her comments fill up with accusations and links to the online article. Jenny carried on making videos, but I could tell she was suffering. Good!
That was stage one. I had to up the ante for stage two. Jenny had covered me and my flat with pig’s blood, so I think we all know what’s coming next.
I pondered for a long time whether I should do it in the day or the night. But you know what they say - go big or go home. I scoped out her house for a while, and found out that she leaves her kitchen window, at the back of the house, open. Now I’m not the most athletic girl in the world, but I can be pretty determined when I want to be. So one night around 2 am I walked to her house - it’s only about half a mile - and climbed through the window.
I almost gave myself a heart attack when I knocked a glass over on the kitchen sink! Luckily it didn’t smash. I hid in a corner and waited for a full half hour before I decided Jenny hadn’t heard me. Then I snuck upstairs, slow as anything, and crept into her room.
Actually, the first room wasn’t hers. She shared with a couple of other students. Thank fuck I checked first! The second room was the right one. She was asleep, alone, in a double bed. I was so quiet that the only thing I could hear was my heart pounding in my chest as I opened my canvas bag, gently deposited its contents onto the pillow next to her, and took a photo. It didn’t come out that well - I couldn’t use the flash - but hey, I have a souvenir!
I really wish I’d seen her face when she woke up the next morning, staring at a pig’s head. She didn’t post on her socials for a week after that, and for two days she even forgot to send me a threatening message.
I’m sorry? You think I’m done? Oh, my sweet summer child. I’ve barely begun.
Jenny had a boyfriend, Abdul. I made sure he wasn’t around when I broke in, but stage three involved him in a big way.
Abdul was also at our university, a year younger than me, a year older than Jenny. He wasn’t very active on social media, but he did tend to broadcast his activity on Twitter. And what do you know? He’s also a fan of The Bar. So I spent the next month planning my move. I bought a new clubbing dress and heels - hey, I kinda missed that outfit! - and asked around for the other thing I needed. Some things you can’t just buy in Next, or a local butcher’s, but eventually I managed it.
I got my chance one Friday in May. Abdul had loudly announced on Twitter that he was excited for his boys’ night out in The Bar, and Jenny had been gushing about a girls’ night on the whole other side of town. Perfect. I spent hours on my makeup, and got to The Bar around ten. Abdul and his mates were having a drinking contest, and leching up at the girls dancing on the tables.
I figured I had a good long while before he would be ready, so I had a couple of drinks - not too much, but like I said I can handle myself, and I knew Jenny wasn’t around - and got up on the tables myself for a bit. Then about midnight Abdul’s friend got another round in, while Abdul was in the loo. This was my chance. I walked up to their table - which had no dancing feet on it, but a heck of a lot of spilled beer - and started talking to them, saying I thought their friend was hot.
“Uh, what the fuck?” “Not a chance in hell.” “Get lost, freak!”
Lovely chaps. But they were too far gone to notice me dropping something into Abdul’s double-whiskey-and-coke. For all I know, it’s the exact same thing Jenny used on me all those months ago.
Abdul came back and downed his whiskey in one gulp. I was worried he was going to vomit it up, but he held it in and blamed his difficulty on the coke fizz. Yeah mate, sure, sure.
Not too long after, he started to fade. His friends were really taking the piss out of him for being such a lightweight. Well, when I came over, the pisstaking just got worse. I introduced myself (with a fake name, duh) and told him he was hot. Believe it or not, it was only about twenty seconds before he put his tongue down my throat. Wow, I’m not sure I even needed to bother with the roofie!
His friends, who had been so intent on being mean to me, now turned their attention to him. I suggested we ditch them and go back to his place (I’d checked, it was only five minutes’ walk sober) - and off we went.
That was the first time I had sex. I’m sure I don’t need to go into details, but we did a lot of stuff, and I enjoyed it. I’m not sure if that’s because it was good, or because he was good, or because I knew what it was all for. I was impressed that he managed to keep going as long as he did in his state, but I do feel a bit sorry for him; from his Twitter he seems like a decent guy.
When he finally fell asleep I left. I’d got what I came for - pictures. And the next day I made a new account and sent a DM to Jenny.
At first I blurred my face, or chose shots that didn’t include it. A bit of editing and I could have been anybody. I watched their messy breakup on Twitter, Jenny hurling accusations, Abdul protesting his innocence. I know this is the age of social media, but I never understood why people play these things out in public.
And then, after posting a picture a day for a few weeks (I’d taken a lot of pictures), I sent one that showed my face clearly.
Jenny had managed to restrain herself from replying before, but now she knew who I was. She was furious! The very idea that her boyfriend had cheated on her with ME, of all people, was unbelievable. And this was exactly the outcome I’d been going for.
Jolly_Gal was broken. She’d ruined her reputation. She’d lost her boyfriend. She had nightmares about pigs (okay, so I don’t know that for certain, but in my imagination she woke up screaming every night). She was possibly going to prison. And now she knew that not only was I more successful than her as an influencer, but I was the one to steal her lover. She still sent messages, at first angry, but they soon degenerated into pleading. “Please stop.” “I’m sorry.” “We can work this out.” Jolly_Gal without CAPS LOCK, it was glorious to see.
In fact it was almost perfect. Three stages of my plan were complete, and only one remained. Jenny’s sentencing was in three weeks, so I had to move quickly.
She had two flatmates, so I needed to work around them. They weren’t particularly active on Twitter, but Jenny was. I knew from her tweets that while her flatmates had gone home, she was staying on a couple of weeks after the end of term. She didn’t say why publicly, but it was for her trial. No flatmates, no boyfriend. Now was the time.
And that brings us up to date. I’ve typed this up over the last few days, and saved as a draft. The final chapter, hopefully, comes tonight.
*******
I’m at Jenny’s house, and I’ve just called the police.
I turned up at Jenny’s door just after seven. Luck was with me - she’d tweeted that she was expecting a Deliveroo takeout. And I got there first.
The idiot actually kept the knife. I’d seen it when I was in her room. When she answered the doorbell, expecting food, and saw me - ah, the look on her face was priceless.
“I’m so sorry! Please, let’s just talk. I didn’t mean it to get this -”
I stalked towards her, anger in my face. Jenny fled upstairs. Perfect! She went into her room and shut the door, but I was like the furies of Greek legend. I smashed the door in, and looked on as Jenny cowered on her bed.
In full daylight, I saw the knife took pride of place in what looked like a shrine. She had photos of me printed out, and she’d written on them “BITCH”, “WHORE”, “FREAK” and all sorts of other hateful words.
Jenny had tried to make me into a murderer, so I gave her what she wanted. I grabbed the knife and stood over her. The coward shrank into the bed, begging for forgiveness, pleading for her life. Unfortunately for her I was not inclined to oblige. I plunged the knife into her chest, just as she had done to Dave all those many months ago. Jenny whimpered like a whipped dog, and after the ninth stab (yes, I counted), she stopped.
The police are on their way. I’m definitely going to jail after this. But Jenny got what was coming to her. We could both have lived happily, but Jenny chose otherwise.
And me? I passed my degree. I have friends. And jail or not, I have a life.
Burn in hell, Jolly_Gal.
submitted by cosmogoblin to story [link] [comments]


2024.05.07 00:09 MirkWorks The American Religion by Harold Bloom (New Age)

11
The New Age: California Orphism
California, for most of this century, has been our new Burned-over District, replacing the western reserve of New York State, which was the religious hothouse of the nineteenth century. Though the New Age cults have no more than about thirty thousand members, their fellow travelers are an untold multitude. Virtually all our bookstores feature a New Age section, ranging from Shirley MacLaine recalling her previous incarnations to the memoirs of prehistoric warriors, Schwarzkopfs of 35,000 years ago. Networking in our America, these days, takes place either among the politically correct academics of the high camp of Resentment, or among the dank cranks of the belated Aquarian Conspiracy, trying to float our planet off into cosmic consciousness.
Religious criticism cannot be applied to Scientology, or to the Moonie Unification Church, any more than literary criticism can find its texts-for-discussion in Alice Walker or in Danielle Steel. The New Age is a borderline case, like Allen Ginsberg or John Updike. The warlocks and the mediums of California Orphism aren’t exactly Emanuel Swedenborg or even Madame Helena.
Petrovna Blavatsky, of whom W.B. Yeats sublimely remarked: “Of course she gets up spurious miracles, but what is a woman of genius to do in the nineteenth century!” The spurious miracles of the New Age are the comic outreaches of the American Religion, and might yield a few amiable insights to a properly disinterested religious criticism. The way not to criticize the New Age is simply to denounce it, which is the practice of Christian apologists such as Kerry D. McRoberts in his New Age or Old Lie (1989), an Evangelical ferocity of a treatise:
Easily sensationalized? Hardly, since New Age fantasies are beyond further sensationalizing. Their ultimate American ancestor is Emerson, who would have had grand entertainment from them, and yet Emerson hardly would have rejoiced in this varied progeny. To have given us Walt Whitman and Wallace Stevens is one kind of achievement; to have helped foster Norman Vincent Peale and the wild apostles of Harmonial religion is quite another. Sydney Ahlstrom’s definition of Harmonial religion is now classic:
The last phrase is the title of Ralph Waldo Trine’s book of 1897, which preached a universal religion in which God and man were seen as differing only in degree, not in essence. Hailing his namesake Emerson as prophet of the New Harmonial era, Trine set the pattern for a long procession of similar diffusers of the sage of Concord. The late President Bart Giamatti of Yale (later baseball commissioner) accurately remarked to me once that the actual Emerson was “as sweet as barbed wire,” a truth lost upon the Harmonials.
Health and Harmony worthies, after Trine, memorably included Emmet Fox, Norman Vincent Peale, Ann Morrow Lindbergh, Thomas Merton, and all of our current New Age prophets, seers, and shamans. These are legion, yet are varied ancestors of Swedenborg, Madame Blavatsky, and the Jesuit scientist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. The American 1960s doubtless originated the ferment out of which the New Age emanated, but the movement essentially was revived in the California of the later 1970s and may have achieved its greatest prominence throughout the 1980s. Its most enthusiastic (and uncritical) chronicler remains Marilyn Ferguson, who celebrated its promise in The Aquarian Conspiracy (1980). Her catalog of gurus began with Teilhard de Chardin, Jung, Aldous Huxley, and J. Krishnamurti, and then went on to include a remarkable mingling (among others) of Tillich, Buber, Gregory Bateson, assorted Swamis, Marshall McLuhan, Buckminster Fuller, and even Werner Erhard. California, she declared, was the “Laboratory for Transformation,” and the inevitable location for sparking a return to “the God within.” We are well within the belated repetition of what I have called American Orphism when we contemplate California Orphism.
Having read his way through Mrs. Eddy, Mrs. White, and the Book of Mormon, the religious critic encounters his inevitable defeat in the pages of Matthew Fox, David Spangler, David Toolan, Chogyam Trungpa, and the other major New Age authors. One reads the same passages over again, worried that one has missed the point, only to discover that points belong to the wrong mindset. Here, absolutely at random, is Trungpa:
We are told (p. 79) that drala is “the living magic of reality,” but the definition does not aid me in the difficult act of interpreting whether or not looser garments will bring me nearer to such living magic. New Age prose is its own genre, and the wonder of the New Age, at its advent, will be how the newagers will manage to read their own edifying discourse. Rather than pursue the pith of their doctrine in particular authorities, I will summarize the burden of what my doughty efforts have contrived to dredge up, so far. Somewhat in the background of the New Age is the lucid and beautiful anthology edited by Aldous Huxley, The Perennial Philosophy (1945). Huxley’s spiritual authorities were the great seers and mystics of the ages, among them William Law, Thomas Traherne, the Bhagavad Gita, Meister Eckhart, and Saint Augustine. In the contemplative brilliance of Huxley’s own prose as frame, the profundities of Law and Eckhart acquired fresh reverberation. By recourse to Huxley, you can sometimes construe a New Age passage and hazard some guess as to more or less what some California sage hoped she or he might mean. Otherwise, the student of the New Age must be resigned to that proverbial picnic, to which the authors bring the words (or some of them, anyway) and the readers bring the meanings.
Elevated consciousness would appear to be the common goal of all New Age Enthusiasts, including Ms. Shirley MacLaine, certainly the handsomest of the movement’s public figures. Monistic ecologists of the spirit, they proclaim that now is the acceptable time for a great leap forward in paradigms, despite one’s gloomy sense that the era belongs to Reagan, Bush, and similar anchors of the Old Age. If one must have apocalyptics, far better that they should be of the California Orphic variety than our multitude of Fundamentalist literalizers of the Revelation of St. John the Divine and the book of Daniel. California apocalypses are by no means all benign: any reader of Nathanael West’s The Day of the Locust can recall the fury that descends there on Los Angeles, and can wonder how ominous a prophecy it may prove to be. But New Age apocalypse is humane, indeed even sentimental. Our planet is not about to float off into a cosmic greenpeace, but at least it is heartening that the New Age Orphics dream of so amiable a conclusion.

God, for the New Age, is rather too purged of the anthropomorphic for my taste, and I assume that the Theosophical legacy is responsible for no otherwise uncharacteristic a Californian dehumanization of God. A God immanent both in outward nature and in consciousness evades the intervening space of incarnation. Christianity therefore is mostly irrelevant to the New Age, except insofar as Christianity already has been modified into the American Religion, of which the New Age is sometimes a charming parody.
One might say that the New Age is to the American Religion what Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest is to Shakespearean drama: a great shadow’s last embellishment. The Mormon aspiration of mounting to godhood or the Southern Baptist experience of an uncreated self within one, is replaced by the entertainment of the notion that one’s own consciousness is God. And the Mormon ambition of populating a planet only with one’s own family, or the Southern Baptist passion for being alone with Jesus, is taken to the lunatic apotheosis that one’s very own spirit guide is built into the ecology of one’s own mind. American Gnosticism and American Enthusiasm are splendidly parodied by California Orphism, by a metamorphic glamour that dissolves the last empiric constraints which the universe of death exercises against our drive for spirituality.
Aldous Huxley, in his introduction to The Perennial Philosophy, gave a warning that New Age Enthusiasts, like everyone else, will receive nothing for nothing:
  • The Perennial Philosophy is primarily concerned with the one, divine Reality substantial to the manifold world of things and lives and minds. But the nature of this one Reality is such that it cannot be directly and immediately apprehended except by those who have chosen to fulfill certain conditions, making themselves loving, pure in heart, and poor in spirit.
California Orphism, skipping over Huxley’s monitory remark, apprehends Reality directly and immediately, at no inner expense whatsoever. Marilyn Ferguson, in the accents of a benign consumerism, excitedly assured her Aquarian conspirators that even death had surrendered to their aspirations:
  • A number of those filling out the Aquarian Conspiracy questionnaire commented that their experiences had forced them to give up their previous assumption that bodily death ends consciousness. Despite their disaffiliation with formal religion, 53 percent expressed strong belief in such survival and another 23 percent said they were “moderately sure,” a total of 75 percent. Only 5 percent were skeptical and 3 percent disbelieving. (pp. 383-84)
What the God of California shares with the God of the American Religion, and indeed of Christianity, is that he is the Reality you set against the Freudian reality principle, the necessity of dying, of really dying, once and for all. The Californian God differs in that he is a kind of public orange grove, where you can pick as and when you want, particularly since he is an orange grove within. His perpetual and universal immanence makes it difficult for a newager to distinguish between God and any experience whatsoever, but then why should such a distinction occur to a Californian Orphic? Matthew Fox, ostensibly a Catholic priest, has formulated a curious doctrine of “panentheism” to avoid this collapse into pantheism, but Fox is one of my defeats. Several attempts on my part to read through The Coming of the Cosmic Christ (1988) have failed, as no prose I have ever encountered can match Fox’s in blissful vacuity, where all things flow to all, as rivers to the sea.
The absolute immanence of the New Age God is, I suppose, the inescapable poem of California’s climate, the cosmos as one grand orange, consciousness as its juice. “The sacramental consciousness of panentheism develops into a transparent and diaphanous consciousness wherein we can see events and beings as divine.” If one substituted “oranges” for “divine” as the final word in that Foxian sentence, after substituting “juice” for the two appearances of “consciousness,” then mere understanding might be advanced:
  • The sacramental juice of panentheism develops into a transparent and diaphanous juice wherein we can see events and beings as oranges.
To render justice unto Fox and most followers of the New Age, he and they hedged the obsessive immanence of God with a touch of transcendence. There is thus a heavenly or archetypal orange somewhere, as well as the enveloping cosmic orange. But this difference makes so little difference, on a daily basis, as not to survive the pragmatic test. Fox has a nostalgia for the Church’s sacraments but he, like all newagers, doesn’t really need them.
The perfect concentrate of consciousness is the Grail for which the New Age quests, a Grail it rather surprisingly identifies with near-death experiences, which now constitute a considerable American growth industry. Here again I must mutter my defeat, since I cannot understand how any near-death experience whatsoever can give evidence of the survival of consciousness after death. Carol Zaleski’s very useful Otherworld Journeys: Accounts of Near-Death Experience in Medieval and Modern Times (1987) notes the rise of IANDS (International Association of Near-Death Studies). IANDS has become a marvelous amalgam of near-death research with New Age ideology, complete with “maroon T-shirts, and a logo that combines the tunnel image with the Taoist yin-yang symbol,” as well as a quarterly newsletter hopefully entitled Vital Signs. As Zaleski shows, this is nothing new, but was inaugurated as early as 1903 by the British psychic research F.W.H Myers, himself a crucial influence upon my favorite modern literary critic, the late G. Wilson Knight. Still, the modern phase of near-death jamboree begins only with Raymond Moody’s relatively careful Life after Life (1975), a threshold work that does not cross over into New Age exuberance. That achievement belongs to Kenneth Ring, a Moody disciple who made the great leap and oranged himself:
  • Near-death experiences collectively represent an evolutionary thrust toward higher consciousness for humanity as a whole.... People who have had near-death experiences, as well as many other people whose lives have been transformed by one or more deep spiritual experiences, all these people as a totality represent in effect a more highly advanced human being…. To my thinking, the emergence of this new strain of human being…on the planet now, signals a possibility that the dawning of the New Age is indeed upon us. (quoted in Zaleski, pp. 107-8)
Zaleski’s own restrained conclusions are altogether different:
  • At this stage I see no justification for treating contemporary near-death testimony as the foundation for a new eschatology or religious movement. Near-death literature is at its best when it is modest and anecdotal; pressed into service as philosophy or prophecy, it sounds insipid. (p. 204)
But the apostles of the New Age ignore such a warning, and rely not only upon Moody and Ring but also upon Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, author of On Death and Dying (1969, 1975) and its companion works. Kubler-Ross, by whatever means, has comforted both the dying and their survivors, while assuring all of us that there is no such thing as death, and also that dying is in itself rather a good thing. It is hardly a limitation of the New Age that so much of its appeal is founded upon thanatology. Christianity, after all, stakes everything upon the Resurrection; if Jesus Christ did not rise from the dead, in defiance of nature, then all of Christianity is simply an imposture. The American Religion, as I have argued throughout, is ultrasupernaturalistic, and its varieties demand even more violent miracles than are afforded by institutional and historical Christianity. Extravagant as the New Age is, it is only the most garish of all the American originals that have expressed our national spiritual exuberance.
submitted by MirkWorks to u/MirkWorks [link] [comments]


2024.05.06 05:50 veranda3 Am I overreacting or does my MIL have a thing for her son?

Hi! I haven’t brought this up to my husband yet but I’m starting to get pretty uncomfortable and don’t know if it’s just my postpartum hormones.
My MIL is a very nice lady but has a habit of over sharing and saying a lot of sexual (borderline inappropriate?) jokes. She blames it on her “trauma” and always laughs it off and says “i know, i’m terrible”. She divorced my husband’s dad when he was young and has since had a new husband or boyfriend every couple years. He’s her oldest kid, which may be why she acts like this with him but not his brother who’s 3 years younger? My husband’s 25 and his brother just turned 23 for reference.
We live about 6 hours away from her now but her and my husband call/FaceTime daily. She makes a lot of sexual jokes and really just has no filter at all. My husband is aware of this and always tells her “mom stop” or “you’re terrible” in a joking way. I can’t think of specifics but when he was a teenager he got his mom a book of sex positions for old people or something for her birthday, if that puts into perspective their relationship. She was basically a single mom so I can understand to some extent that they are close but it’s always made me uneasy. He tells her everything and there really are no secrets with them. This has already been a problem for me before because he’s had a habit of telling her important things and forgetting to tell me, never sitting down and having distraction-free conversations with me but can stop what he’s doing to talk to her for 30 mins while we were in the middle of something, etc.
We now have a 6 week old baby boy and she has been getting on my nerves like crazy, calling him “her baby” and making me feel like now I’m not only in competition with her for my husband but now my son. I thought this was just my postpartum hormones making me crazy but tonight we were in town visiting and from the jump she sat right next to him on the couch and had her hand on his knee. She even looked at me and said “did you know he had insert knee problem idk how to pronounce” while making eye contact with me and rubbing on his knee/leg. I brushed this off until he got drunk (cinco de mayo!) and i look over from the kitchen to see her sitting next to him, body turned and legs crossed towards him, stroking his hair with her arm around him and laughing so hard at his drunk stories. She was also calling him her baby and saying she loves him. He’s a grown man who drank one too many margs, i felt like she didn’t need to treat him like a baby and be all over him. He was just having a good time. I texted my sister who was right there and even her boyfriend texted her saying he felt uncomfortable with how she was stroking my husband’s hair.
My husband asleep so i haven’t brought this up yet and am unsure if I’m going to, but her inappropriate sexual jokes she’s constantly making with her son- about her body and our sex life and other people’s sex life and everything in between- mixed with her extreme ‘boy mom’ energy is starting to worry me. Especially now that we have a baby boy.
I feel like my husband brushes this off because she’s always been like this and she’s somewhat aware she’s weird. I’m just glad we don’t live close. My question is – Am i overreacting? Do i bring this up or let it go until something happens when he’s sober and will remember it?
submitted by veranda3 to JUSTNOMIL [link] [comments]


2024.04.28 16:28 mikebirty The draft class and the episode of The Simpsons that aired next after they were born

This is the 9th straight year I've done this - first I've posted here though. Nick Gargiulo definitely has the best episode hands down.
Bo Nix - Pygmoelian (Moe's face is obscured on the Duff Calendar, leading to him getting plastic surgery) Jonah Elliss - Three Gays of the Condo (Homer moves in with a gay couple Grady and Julio) Troy Franklin - Pray Anything (Homer sues the Springfield Church) Kris Abrams-Draine - Treehous of Horror XII (Homer gets his friends cursed, Marge buys an automated house voiced by Pierce Brosnan and Lisa and Bart parody Harry Potter) Audric Estime - Treehouse of Horror XIV (Homer becomes the Grim Reaper, Frink wins the Nobel Prize, Bart stops time with a magic stop watch) Devaughn Vele - Miracle of Evergreen Terrace (Bart starts a fire that destroys all the family's presents and blames a robber) Nick Gargiulo - Treehouse of Horror XI (Homer's a ghost trying to do a good deed, Bart and Lisa retell Hansel and Gretel and dolphins take over Springfield)
submitted by mikebirty to DenverBroncos [link] [comments]


2024.04.28 11:10 Itchy-Recognition840 The Ponzi Papers and the Burning Man

 It's Friday, April 19th in New York City. Donald Trump is on trial for one of the many crimes he is accused of. Around 1:39 that afternoon, a man walks up to police barricades and the crowd of onlookers and media. He throws pamphlets on the ground before taking out a bottle of liquid and pouring it over his head and body. At 1:39 PM, the man lit himself on fire collapsing onto a police barricade. Police and bystanders attempted to extinguish the flames but their efforts failed to save the life of Max Azzarello. 
What would posses a man to do something like this? Well if you read all the news reports, it's because he was a crazy conspiracy theorist that lost his mind. That's where most of us left it. As with any story, there is usually more to it that we don't know. I don't like not knowing and this was a drastic and insane act that I had to better understand. Who is Max Azzarello and what was on the pamphlets he threw down before his horrible act? I started by looking into who Max was. He was some what of an activist, a researcher and investigator (in his own right) and a genuinely good person according to friends and family. Those close to him were devastated by the news and the actions that Max took on this April afternoon. The media has highlighted any flaw or error Max had during his life as they usually do when they want you to feel a certain way about someone. Outside of the act of setting himself on fire very publicly, why do they want you to dismiss him as a nut job? I had to find out what this was all about, what drove a seemingly normal man to do something this drastic. This final. With the help of a friend, I was able to find Max's final words online. I'll include a copy of Max's unabridged words below as I feel it is important that we all read it. After reading it, I understood what Max was trying to do. He wasn't a crazy man, he was a martyr. Max chose this fate not at random, but after much thought and analysis. He chose to travel from Florida to New York to enact his plan outside the trump trial because he knew that every media outlet in the “free” world would be outside covering the trial. They would not be able to ignore him now. He planned his actions with the mindset of getting the most coverage of it possible. The media mentioned it, then it went away like everything does in our society. Max was dead and nothing else has happened. I refuse to let Max be forgotten. Max had struggled deeply trying to get people to pay attention to his message. I can relate to that struggle as I've tried to spread his words since his death with virtually no response from anyone. The short of Max's claim is that our government here in America and others around the world working with them are planning something big. They plan a complete flip from democracy to fascism. That's crazy talk right? Well ask yourself this, is their any evidence of something like this happening? Would it even be possible? Let's look into that. In order for a government to overthrow the will and rights of its people requires many things and most of them have already been done. I'm not an expert on government and politics but I am a student of history and I have enough common sense to draw lines between things. I also have pretty good self-awareness that allows me to be critical of my conclusions and not grasp at straws. Let's go over some simple facts that we should all be aware of. Please remember, these are not conspiracies, these are hard proven facts. 1. Our government is corrupt. We all see the corruption and deceit no matter our political leanings or beliefs. We know they are robbing us blind and cheating and lying. They openly commit crimes and violate our civil rights. Let's look into the crimes we know of first before digging into our crumbling rights. 2. Crimes have included but are not limited to: Bribery, fraud, insider trading, sexual assault, theft, war crimes, extortion, and election fraud. I won't go into all the specifics on these, but I think the majority of people can agree that we have witnessed these crimes happen over and over and they go unpunished or get off with a slap on the wrist. We can argue who is guilty and who isn't of what crimes, but that is an argument distraction. They love that we argue and disagree so much. 3. Rights Violations. We are all generally aware of rights violations by police officers and law enforcement in general. We are less aware of the stripping of our rights by the government. This has been happening for a long time in America, but we only need to go back to the attacks on 9/11. After those attacks, a bill was passed illegally called the Patriot Act. We were sold a fake story with a fake premise of safety. They like to scare you so you want their protection. After we were lied to about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction resulting in another war, we were told the Patriot Act was a simple bill to protect us from terrorist. The truth was, that it was the first step in revoking our 4th amendment. With the revelations of Edward Snowden, we were informed of just how far our government went. Illegal spying, data collection, and rights violations under the name of national security. They don't need a warrant anymore and you have no defense from prosecution. They collect all of your data, all the time on all devices. Your entire life and everything you say or do is recorded by our handy cell phones and home assistants as well as a massive surveillance network. It's stored on NSA servers for anyone who gets out of line or stands up for their rights. Your fourth amendment died when those towers came down and a lot of you celebrated it. Censorship is putting the last nail in the coffin of our first amendment. We lost part of it long ago when the CIA enacted operation Mockingbird and infiltrated all of our media. We no longer have a free media. No matter what your favorite news channel, it and all of it's employees are government assets regardless of their personal knowledge of it. You only see what they want you to see. This is the main reason they have to kill tiktok. They always kill what they can't control.
I could go on with this for days, but hopefully you get the point that they are infringing or out right ended our rights. Maybe you are one of those people who is stars and bars American and believe in our system and country. You are probably insulting me as a conspiracy theorist or whatever the opposite of your political agenda is. Racist, communist, liberal, leftist, right wing, republican, democrat, whatever. I ask you only do one thing. Ask yourself if this is the country that we wanted for our selves and our children. Is this the nation and society our parents or grandparents wanted for us? Look around you. Don't add blame or feelings to things, just look at what they are. We are being destroyed by drugs and addiction. We have homeless encampments flooding our major cities. Crime is insane. Racial tension is higher than it's been since the civil rights movement despite the majority of American's being more accepting and less racist than our ancestors. We are being dumb-ed down with poor education and lies. Our economy is not good and we suffer from the pains of inflation. We have people starving to death in the worlds richest country. The cost of living is soaring past our income levels. 1% of our population owns more than the other 99%. You have virtually no workers rights in most states and are controlled by the corporations that own us all. Our food is poisoned and killing us. Just look at the report from an independent group on the amount of lead in Lunchables. Why didn't the FDA find that? It's what we pay them for after all. We are constantly inundated with propaganda designed to cause discourse, distraction and ignorance. The single most important document in American history has been labeled as bad and racist. Why would anyone want to make people turn against our constitution? They know most of you have never read the constitution let alone understand your rights. It's easy to manipulate those who are unaware of the facts. The constitution is not racist or evil. The men who wrote it might have been, that's an argument for another time. The document itself is amazing and critical. Stop reading it with negative thoughts about its writers and read it for what it says. We have the freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of religion. It's the first right in the Bill of Rights for a reason. Our freedom of speech is required for us to speak out about injustices and have our concerns and complaints heard. It's singly the most important thing we have and yet many of your actively work to curtail that right for others. Be assured, it won't stop with the ones you don't want to hear. We need that freedom of speech to avoid having to enact other rights, but we will get back to that later. Freedom of religion doesn't feel that important to me because I'm not very religious. For those of us who are religious this is a major one. For those of us who are non religious, this right is for us as well. While it protects their right to practice their religion, it protects us from having to practice it with them. We all know that has been violated in both ways. Freedom of the press is very under appreciated. Having an open and honest news media allows the average American to know what is happening in our society and world. It use to be a very important tool for us to suss out corruption and crimes. It's now a weapon used against us and against political rivals. It shuts down open debate and promotes division and hate. It has been the single worst change for America. Many of you call for the removal of the second amendment and most with good reasoning and cause. Gun violence is ridiculous in the United States, but we have to understand the problem and not try to put a bandage on it. The criminals will still have guns even if you outlaw them. They might have less and be harder to get, but they will still commit crimes and own guns. We have to look at the reasons that so much gun crime happens. Is it culture, greed, hate, mental illness, or poverty? It's probably all of those and more but those pale in comparison to what could happen to an America without guns. We all want to live in a safe world where guns are effectively useless outside of hunting or sport, but that is a fantasy land currently. What the pro second amendment people fail to explain properly and often fail to understand themselves is that gun rights are required. You don't get to remove someone else's right. Sure we feel we need guns for protection in some cases, but the idea behind the second amendment is protection from the government. This is the point where someone comments about how stupid we are to think our little guns can defeat the American government or its forces. You are correct, that would be stupid to think that we can grab an AR-15 and defeat a group of FBI agents or military. After all, what can my little AR do to a tank or drone right? That's not the meaning behind the second amendment. The authors of the constitution were very aware of a governments ability to separate itself from its people and control them. We aren't supposed to start a fight or try some kind of war, they are a deterrent. It's our responsibility to hold our government accountable and when our branches are no longer separate and they are all corrupt, then we must act to arrest and prosecute the criminals on our own. Our government is so corrupt, so aligned, and so controlled by corporations and money that we will have to stand up, united and armed, and demand that they be handed to us for arrest and trial. We have to find honest judges and lawyers and we have to make sure that our laws are obeyed and we don't violate their rights while trying to retake ours. We must practice what we preach. Why the guns, because if you think they are going to stand there while thousands of unarmed citizens make demands you are crazy. We need to have massive numbers of people, all armed, to deter any action against us. We do not want a fight, we do not want war, but we will not be denied our rights and we will not allow the criminals to run this prison that use to be America. It's the second amendment because its the most important after our first amendment freedoms. They knew once you lost the first amendment, then the second is your only remaining option. We are nearly there and that's scary for most of us. We need to do this together because we can't fix any of our other problems while a bunch of elites who live in a different world from the rest of us are in control of everything.
You might be asking what can we do? Well, to start, go read the constitution or at least the Bill of Rights. Understand them and their value to you. Once you know your rights, its easier to see how often and horribly they are violated daily. Also, go read the words of Max Azzerrelo. Regardless of your feelings about him, have the respect to read the words that he died to share with the world. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE LAST WORDS OF MAX AZZARELLO
My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan. This extreme act of protest is to draw attention to an urgent and important discovery: We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup. These claims sound like fantastical conspiracy theory, but they are not. They are proof of conspiracy. If you investigate this mountain of research, you will prove them too. If you learn a great deal about Ponzi schemes, you will discover that our life is a lie. If you follow this story and the links below, you will discover the rotten truth of ‘post-truth America’. You will learn the scariest and stupidest story in world history. And you will realize that we are all in a desperate state of emergency that requires your action. To my friends and family, witnesses and first responders, I deeply apologize for inflicting this pain upon you. But I assure you it is a drop in the bucket compared to what our government intends to inflict.

Because these words are true, this is an act of revolution.

Last March, a billionaire named Peter Thiel started a bank run on Silicon Valley Bank. I knew enough about Thiel that I found this incredibly suspicious: My hunch was that this was intentional, though I couldn’t fathom why. I began investigating online, and quickly found cryptocurrency’s fingerprints all over it. The bank run occurred just days after Silvergate Bank – which catered almost exclusively to crypto companies – collapsed. Meanwhile, several crypto cheerleaders were all over financial media warning of a regional banking crisis, and nobody in media was addressing the clear crypto connections. I dug deep into the financials of Thiel’s venture capital firm Founders Fund and eventually uncovered the following, all proven many times over. Cryptocurrency is our first planetary multi-trillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. It was expressly created for this purpose by a laundry list of rich and powerful people out of Stanford/Silicon Valley and Harvard/Facebook. The March 2023 bank failures were all intentional: the banks were used to move out stolen Ponzi money. This signals that they’re no longer dumping cash in to keep the cryptocurrency Ponzi afloat, and that it will soon go insolvent, as all Ponzis must. When the Ponzi scheme goes insolvent, it will take down half the stock market with it: The perpetrators used their major companies to pipe into the blockchain so they could funnel money out from the crypto exchanges. This includes Google, Tesla, Apple, PayPal, Facebook, Disney, Walmart, Target, InBev, Zoom, and countless others. It is a Ponzi scheme so large that it created global inflation, which is why the price of Bitcoin has been a remarkable leading indicator for inflation rates. Victims who bought crypto don’t realize their money has already been stolen, so the money gets double-counted by the victims and the criminals who stole it. As it turns out, our elites are awash in Ponzi schemes. Stanford’s StartX.com investment fund and Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Program for Evolutionary Dynamics’ he ran at Harvard are both fake-science Ponzi factories that these schools have invested billions in: They are filled with fraudulent companies that use smoke and mirrors to promise miraculous new technology, but always collapse while the perpetrators only get richer.

Funneling trillions of dollars in stolen cash through the stock market created the largest stock-market anomaly in history. The stock chart signature of a Ponzi scheme is a massive increase (while they stack up cash) and then a massive fall (as they funnel out the stolen cash). This chart shape appeared in all the companies listed above. In order to explain the massive anomaly, our criminal government unleashed COVID on the world and told us these were the “stay at home stocks.”

Ponzi schemes are vicious beasts, and cryptocurrency is history’s largest Ponzi by orders of magnitude. It could best be described as an economic doomsday device, intentionally made to shatter the world economy. The U.S. government is fully involved in this totalitarian con: To illustrate its bipartisan support, I’ll note that nearly every participant of the Clinton Global Initiative has ties to cryptocurrency, while two of the biggest tech VCs who participated are Trump associates Josh Kushner and Anthony Scaramucci. To better understand our form of government, I will point you to one of the most astonishing pieces of stand-alone evidence I’ve found: Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton’s 1988 DNC speech where he nominated Mike Dukakis for president against George H.W. Bush. The speech is a vile, mean-spirited roast of Dukakis that makes no sense whatsoever: For Clinton to ruthlessly attack a member of his own party should have been political suicide, and he repeatedly mocks Dukakis’ noble and earnest qualities. Notably, actor Rob Lowe, who was supporting Dukakis, was victim of a teen sex blackmail operation at the DNC that year. Since we know Clinton is a close associate with teen sex blackmail artist Jeffrey Epstein, we can suddenly make perfect sense of the nonsensical speech by applying this lens: Bill Clinton is a cocky mob boss who blackmailed Mike Dukakis because Dukakis thought his job was to help the public. He teases out the future public revelation that Kitty Dukakis drank rubbing alcohol, and offers a strange anecdote about the crack epidemic that reveals he is an exceedingly proud drug runner. What does this revelation tell us? That our government is conning us completely. That Bill Clinton was secretly on (former CIA Director) George H.W. Bush’s side, and that the Democrat vs. Republican division has been entirely manufactured ever since: Clinton is with Bush; Gore is with Bush; Trump is with Hillary, and so on. When they present themselves in public, they are acting as characters that are against one another, practicing kayfabe as wrestlers do. As it turns out, we have a secret kleptocracy: Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry. They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money.

Since it is fully parasitic, a secret kleptocracy is an incredibly unstable form of government – left to its own devices, it can only lead to fascism or failed state.

One of the key findings of this research is that Harvard University is one of the largest organized crime fronts in history, which is how they churn out billionaires – it’s a major hub of this sprawling criminal network. As it turns out, dozens of the writers of The Simpsons went to Harvard. So I asked myself the question: If The Simpsons served the interests of organized crime, how would it do so? Well, it offers a dysfunctional family suffering from moral decay, a community incapable of solving its problems, a worker drone who slaves away for an evil billionaire, and cathartic laughs for our poor collective circumstances. There are some notable specifics as it relates to this research, too: In Marge vs. The Monorail, the townsfolk are too oafish and divided to invest in the town’s needs (fix Main Street) and fall for the charms of a dazzling showman with a bogus monorail Ponzi scheme. When we know that the show is closely linked to an organization that invests billions of dollars in Ponzi factories, this becomes quite damning. In Lisa the Iconoclast, Lisa discovers that town founder Jebediah Springfield was a secret criminal con artist, and that the townsfolk’s lives are a lie. Realizing this is an important discovery, she desperately tries to get the townsfolk to listen to her. But they meet her with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship and she fails to get through to them. Ultimately, she realizes the town is so far gone that perhaps it’s better for them to be lied to by con artists, and she keeps the secret to herself. And here I’ve been, like Lisa Simpson, desperately trying to get friends, family, and the public to believe the proof of a totalitarian con I’m trying to show them, and they’ve turned away with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship. And so, we realize the criminal truth of The Simpsons: Our elites are telling us that our eroding collective circumstances are our own fault, and we can’t do anything about it, while they steal the American Dream from us. It is, for lack of a more elegant word, brainwashing. — Lastly, we string these major discoveries together: Cryptocurrency is an economic doomsday device; our government is a secret kleptocracy; The Simpsons exists to brainwash us. From there, the only research we need is critical thinking and we’re able to piece together the true story of our circumstances. Consider America since 1988: Institutions like healthcare and universities have become parasitic in their skyrocketing prices. News media tells us to be angry and tribalized. Daytime television warns us of moral decay. Local news tell us to fear our neighbors. The Simpsons tells us we’re too oafish and divided to save the American Dream. Seinfeld tells us to celebrate the assholes and be irritated by all the normal people around us. “Reality” TV tells us that real life is filled with hedonism and strife. Social media, owned by crypto criminals like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, is flooded with nonsense conspiracy theories and memes reminding us that we are hopeless, helpless, anxious, depressed, ironic, scared, apathetic, escapist, lonely, misguided, and jaded, telling us we can’t do anything but have a laugh at our circumstances. Liberals mock the hypocrisy of conservatives; conservatives mock the hypocrisy of liberals, and our collective circumstances erode. The left shouts “All Cops Are Bastards,” which ensures they’ll be hated by the police and the public (and flies in the face of leftist theory). The public’s distrust of the government is at an all-time high, but so is the belief that we are helpless to do anything about it. And with all this, a sharp rise in apocalyptic messaging: Climate change will kill us all; COVID will kill us all; vaccines will kill us all; AI will kill us all – no matter the bubbles we ascribe to, we’re bombarded with existential crises with no solutions. We’ve seen a surge in apocalyptic film, literature, and video games that tell us there is no way out of our poor circumstances but total societal breakdown. Zombies tell us that the public is our enemy. If you go to your nearest convenience store, you can buy a can of water called “Liquid Death.” This is our rotten farce: For our entire lives, we have been flooded with media designed to slowly steer us into a world where the American Dream was dead, where the public was fully divided against itself, where everybody believed we were powerless to do anything about our worsening circumstances. It is all so they can organize an unprecedented, apocalyptic rug pull on the entire populace as they pivot to fascism, which is perhaps best understood as kleptocracy at the barrel of a gun. When we piece it all together, we understand the truth: We are in a totalitarian doomsday cult. Why on earth would our elites do this? There are many reasons, but the simplest is because capitalism is unsustainable, and they knew it: Climate change and resource extraction would catch up eventually. So, they never intended to sustain it. They knew all along that they would gobble up all the wealth they could, and then yank the rug out from under us so they could pivot to a hellish fascist dystopia. — Things escalated wildly in 1988 when former CIA Director George H.W. Bush got the White House, but this plan had been in action long prior: Why is Stanley Kubrick’s comedy about mutually assured destruction called Dr. Strangelove: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? Because he was a cocky secret fascist who was getting us to stop worrying and love the bomb. Why did he make A Clockwork Orange? So we’d rejoice at ultra-violence designed to desensitize us to the horrors of the world. Why were the Manson Family murders crawling with cover-ups and intelligence agents? Because our government wanted to make us fear for our lives and believe that hippies are deranged psychopaths. Why did Walt Disney produce a fraudulent documentary that told us Lemmings follow each other off cliffs? So we would believe it. Why did The Beatles tell us to fear the taxman, to scoff at revolution, chase nonsense conspiracy theories, and that happiness is a warm gun? So we would believe it. Why did Easy Rider tell us that the hippie movement was dead? So we would believe it. Why did Chinatown end with defeatism in the face of massive corruption? So we would believe it. Why did George Orwell tell us of a hellish future of totalitarian control that we are powerless to stop? So we would believe it. Why did Wall Street tell us “greed is good”? So we would believe it. Why did Do The Right Thing tell us we’re all racially tribalized? So we would believe it. Why did Simpsons creator Matt Groening make a comic strip called Life in Hell? So we would believe it. And on, and on, and on, and on. When it comes to any popular media, if you ask yourself the question, “Why would secret doomsday cult kleptocrats want the public to consume this?”, you will find your answers. — This is obviously very bad news, but the biggest lie we’ve been told is that we are powerless. We’ve got one way out of hellworld, and that’s for the public to realize that we’ve been conned completely so we can build a united movement that shatters every lie they’ve told us, mocks this rotten farce as loudly as it deserves, and aims at nothing short of abolishing our criminal government so we can build one that serves the public. To understand this story is to see right through the con, to become immune to the endless sea of criminal propaganda, and to feel the great joy and power that comes with freedom. If a small number of people quickly put on these truth-colored glasses, we are in for an unimaginably bright future. If not, we get an apocalypse. For more information, I’ve put together this booklet that includes other major findings and a map to a sea of proof, along with all the other essays on this site. For the true history of America since the end of World War II, see here. To see this discovery unfold in real-time, along with further explanations, hundreds of pieces of evidence not covered here, advice, inspiration, political theory, and the heart and soul of a man escaping history’s largest doomsday cult, see my Instagram story highlights. I apologize for leaving things so scattered, but this has been an exhausting affair. So long as you understand this (true) ideology, you will be able to learn the whole story. Here is a federal lawsuit I filed against dozens of perpetrators of the cryptocurrency Ponzi – not for litigation, but just to preserve the information and attach my name to it. I was terrified and hadn’t slept in days and it shows, but it served its purpose of keeping myself alive long enough to keep learning and telling this story. I no longer have my original research files from the crypto rabbit hole. If you want to see them, you’ll have to get my laptop back from the government. Ask them how they got it - it’s a very fun story. I hope you know how powerful you are. I wish you a hell of a lot more than luck. Max Azzarello
submitted by Itchy-Recognition840 to ThisIsReality [link] [comments]


2024.04.24 04:40 Decent_Panic_5669 How the Simpsons could come to HS

Currently the other big park in Orlando with a big globe has the theme park rights to the Simpsons however that contract ends in 2028 and they could close Springfield sooner than that and if they close it Disney then immediately gains the Theme park rights to the Simpsons and with how recognizable the property is they're bound to make their way to WDW, so i'm proposing my idea for the Simpsons
My personal guess is Hollywood Studios since that's Disney's park for IP's that need immersive lands instead of being represented in larger lands, and with this I say its between 2 sections of the park that could turn into Springfield the back corner with Rock N Rollercoaster and Lightning McQueen Racing Academy, or Animation Courtyard where Star Wars Launch Bay and The Little Mermaid Show stand
And I say they'll take Animation Courtyard for a few reasons, for 1 the area they would work with is much bigger and the only way to expand the back corner is the street that leads into it, for 2 It would still be located in Animation Courtyard which makes perfect sense, since the Simpsons is obviously an animated property, and for 3 Mickey and Minnies Runaway Railway is located right across from this plot which would then contain the Mickey Mouse and friends property, the Simpsons, and Toy Story Land right above making this circular area a destination with the most iconic cartoon characters of all time residing in the area
Now what will the land look like, the land will feature 1 major dark ride called "Simpsons: Skip Day" where Bart skips a day of school and you (acting as Homer and Marge) must chase after him and find him, with the exterior being Springfield Elementary and as you exit you'll enter the lands main gift shop "Barts Con Shop" themed to the schools bathroom where students trade things with one another however its just Bart ripping people off all of this is at the bottom next to Walt Disney Presents, at the top the Simpsons house will sit with this being a meet and greet location where you can meet all the Simpsons characters as you work your way throughout the house, off to the side will be "Moe's Tavern" a dine in restaurant and bar, and at the center of the land and as the land icon Jebediah Springfield will have a statue as he is the founder of Springfield after all

However this is just my idea and I would love to here your's down below and lets all try to be respectful, also adding this would most likely open 2029
submitted by Decent_Panic_5669 to DisneyHS [link] [comments]


2024.04.21 05:29 Agreeable-Ad4806 The deeper significations of the signs as ascendants (Part 3: Libra)

Preface: this applies to sidereal Libra rather than tropical Libra.
In Vedic astrology, Libra is an extremely complex Rashi. What may seem simple on the surface is really the most profound. Libra is the sign of balance; I’m sure you’ve heard that before, but what is being balanced, and why? Due to the implications that this sign can have, the significance of it has stayed hidden. The names attributed to Libra in ancient astrological texts, such as "Tauli" (weigher), "Vanika" (merchant), "Yuka" (that which joins), and "Tula" (scale) are merely suggestive and do not fully elucidate the true significance of this Rashi. These names lack specificity and fail to provide a comprehensive understanding of Libra's deeper significance. As a result, students of astrology must rely heavily on intuition to grasp the true meaning concealed within this Rashi and its corresponding stage of cosmic evolution. The reliance on intuition demonstrates the complexity and enigmatic nature of Libra's symbolism, making it a challenging subject to comprehend fully. The inner drives and true nature of Libra ascendants poses a formidable challenge to decipher. It's like running a relay race, where the baton is passed onto the next person, each exchange bringing us closer to the finish line, but the process is fraught with uncertainty and potential danger of losing momentum or falling due to lack of balance. There’s an inherent difficulty in attempting to dissect and interpret the essence of Libra, but it can nevertheless be done with persistent study and effort.
Libra as a whole can be very incomprehensible in Vedic astrology. It is very difficult to decide whether it is a materialistic sign or a spiritualistic one. It has been said that it represents the intersection of the centrifugal and the centripetal forces in nature. These two forces are always operating on everything that exists in nature. The proportion of these forces, however, differs in relation to various things. Centrifugal energy is that which tries to move out, gush forth, and spill out uncontrollably. It resembles the path of involution, the Pravritti Marg which is the process of involvement in matter. Under the influence of this energy one is involved in procreation, multiplication, propagation, generation, etc. Such individuals heavily influenced by this force always hanker after material prosperity in face of spiritual bankruptcy. On the other hand, as a result of the centripetal force, the consiousness of the individual endeavours to penetrate the veil of the physical and the seen in order to discover the underlying nature of things, the inner causes of the outer phenomena. Where these two tendencies meet, there is an equilibrium whose direction is decidedly difficult to determine, and where they meet is the sign of Libra.
The intricate dynamics of Libra ascendants reveal a constant interplay of powerful and conflicting forces within them. Internally, they resemble dormant volcanoes, with their minds in a perpetual state of hyperactivity. Their heightened sensitivity to external stimuli renders them acutely aware of the slightest shifts in their environment. Libra-born individuals possess a deep understanding of how external influences impact their psychological well-being, particularly in the areas of interpersonal relationships. Ideally, there exists a balance between the inward and outward forces acting upon them that creates a harmonious equilibrium between introspection and engagement with the external world. However, achieving this balance can prove elusive in practical life. Instead, many Libra ascendants find themselves grappling with repression, their emotions tightly controlled to the point of appearing indifferent. Yet, beneath this facade lies a reservoir of inner strength and resilience.
The Libra born are not simple and relaxed individuals. Outwardly, they may be composed and of a constant congenial attitude, but inwardly they are stewing. The essential characteristic of Libra ascendant is the undercurrent of conflicts. The depth of Libra conflict can be felt in another way as well. The beginning of cosmic evolution starts with differentiation. The first differentiation is between Mool Prakriti (Primordial Root Matter) and Daivi Prakriti (Cosmic Ideation). As an interaction of these two principles, all subsequent levels of manifestation took place. This process continued up to the lowest depth of material aspiration, and at this point, involution in matter is complete, and the evolution to spirit has not yet started. Astrologically speaking, this situation is suggested by Saturn, the planet of materialism, being exalted in Libra Rashi and the Sun, planet of divine illumination, being debilitated. This also explains spiritual loss despite favourable opportunities. Libra ascendants are often misunderstood people that struggle to really immerse themselves into anything. Moreover, whenever the Sun and Saturn are located together in Libra, particularly if it happens to be the ascendant, the native is likely to suffer from conflicting ideologies that manifest as symptoms of schizophrenia.
The intense desire of Libra ascendants to maintain inner equilibrium often leads to the suppression of their latent talents, denying them the opportunity for full expression. Despite possessing tremendous soul-power, their potential remains largely hidden, contributing to a deep sense of dissatisfaction with their circumstances and themselves. Internally, they grapple with inner turmoil while outwardly presenting an image of remarkable composure and balance. Their demeanor exudes tranquility, and they navigate social interactions with poise, appearing as loyal and conscientious citizens despite the turmoil they are wresting within. In fact, they may even fail to recognize it themselves, dawning a persona of constant stoicism, even when they ought to be outwardly distressed. In addition to seeking balance between inner and outer forces, Libra ascendant individuals also strive to reconcile their personal preferences and societal obligations. They exhibit a strong sense of duty towards their families, communities, and nations, often willing to make sacrifices for their well-being. However, these internal and external forces are immensely potent and intricately nuanced, posing significant challenges in their management and control.
The potential for psychological imbalance among Libra ascendants poses a significant risk to the society in which they reside. However, this imbalance can be mitigated through the cultivation of an absorptive capacity for the spiritual forces inherent in the sign. Libra individuals are encouraged to focus on acquiring techniques for assimilating spiritual power, primarily through the practice of Yoga, which they are uniquely suited for. Without such controls in place, it is preferable for them not to tap into their latent powers. If Libra ascendants were consciously aware of their latent powers, they could potentially become super-dictators and powerful autocrats, wielding immense influence over individuals and organizations alike. Thus, the responsible cultivation and management of their spiritual potential are crucial to prevent misuse and ensure positive contributions to society.
It was to save this eventuality that the ancient seers had initially given out only ten signs of the zodiac to the profane. During that period the seventh sign was highly esoteric and they had veiled it by uniting Virgo and Scorpio as one. It is said that the ancient Greeks got an inkling of it and they established Libra as the seventh sign. Virgo and Libra so far considered as two in one were made to represent 'directly and symbolically the primeval dual man and his separation into two sexes'. During this reformation of the zodiacs, Madame H.P. Blavatsky has stated, Libra was added as the twelfth sign, though it is simply an equilibrating sign. This reformation took place at the beginning of the Lemurian age when the hermaphrodite humanity was separated between two sexes which aroused in them the feeling of affection, love, care, and sympathy for the opposite sex. These noble sentiments and emotions provided the protective shield to mankind. That is why a little of the esoteric astrological knowledge concerning the Libra sign was made exoteric at that time. But humanity has not so far achieved remarkable progress in altruism and spiritualism. Unless that is done, the real meaning of Libra and how to access its power can never be revealed without risking the complete destruction of society.
The Cosmic Dance by Nataraja has some inner connection with the seventh sign of the zodiac and its standstill posture. This Mudra (posture) of the celestial dancer represents the stage of divine creation when the immensely vital and dynamic spiritual powers flowing outward without seeking anything for itself has been activated at such a speed that it gives an outward appearance of stillness though inwardly it is functioning at a tremendous speed. The Divine Dancer at this stage is functioning at such a high speed that he seems poised, still, and balanced. The balance, harmony, rhythm, and poise achieved by Nataraja in his Cosmic Dance, especially at the moment of his standstill posture, seems to resemble the characteristics of the seventh sign of the zodiac. The stillness or the balance of Nataraja achieved at this moment is the result of the tremendous speed at which he is functioning.
This dance being spoken about has great significance in Hindu scripture. The dancer in question is Shiva, and this dance is said to be of destruction, wherein the Tandava is performed. Tandava as the cosmic dance signifies the destruction of the material universe to pave the way for its renewal and the beginning of a new state within the endless cosmic cycle. This dance is not just a performance but a metaphor for the continuous cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction that governs the universe. Shiva's dance embodies the paradoxical nature of existence, where destruction is intertwined with creation, and chaos coexists with order. In Hindu mythology, Shiva is often depicted as the destroyer of ignorance and the embodiment of transformation. Therefore, his dance symbolizes the constant flow of energy, the eternal rhythm of life and death, and the cyclical nature of existence. Every aspect of the dance, from the gestures of his hands to the expressions on his face, holds deep symbolic significance, reflecting the interconnectedness of the cosmos and the divine. In this cosmic dance, Shiva is both the creator and the destroyer, a source of all life and the ultimate reality beyond form and time. Thus, the significance of everything related to the dance lies in its portrayal of the fundamental principles of the universe and the eternal dance of existence itself.
The theory of relativity posits that an object moving at the speed of light would seem stationary, but what would happen if it surpassed this speed? The dynamic stillness of Shiva in his dance, arises from his incredible speed, symbolized by the flaming halo around him. This dynamic stillness signifies a balance between movement and stability, reflecting the Libra ascendants' sensitivity to all aspects of life. Fire, representing existence at every level of manifestation, parallels the essence of Libra individuals who exhibit sensitivity and involvement in both spiritual and material realms. In the Cosmic Dance, Shiva's right foot crushes the dwarf, symbolizing ignorance, while Goddess Ganga, representing divine knowledge, stands beside him. This imagery signifies the crushing of materialism and the elevation of spirituality. Regardless of their life's path, Libra ascendants undergo significant events aimed at eradicating materialistic tendencies and embracing spiritual enlightenment. This process parallels the annihilation of ignorance and the resurrection of divine knowledge, ultimately leading Libra individuals towards spiritual growth and wisdom.
In his two upper hands, Shiva holds the Damaru, a drum shaped like an hourglass, and fire, symbolizing life. These purifying elements cleanse existence of impurities and facilitate transformation. However, change is often fraught with challenges, a reality reflected in the lives of Libra individuals, who frequently endure hardship, leading to spiritual refinement. I’ve personally said before that I believe Libra ascendant is a curse, but that is merely a reflection of my apprehension towards spirituality. The two lower hands of Shiva are in a blessing mudra, signifying divine benediction bestowed upon all Libra ascendants, so it is auspicious. But for those inclined to materialistic ambition, the suffering incurred by Libra ascendants can seem terrifying. It’s kind of like the Christian god in the Old Testament. When he sent the plagues to Egypt, it was not out of malice, but rather love. Once you acknowledge that the true nature of reality is spiritual, you will understand that all material suffering you experience in life is inconsequential. Though life's journey may seem disillusioning at times, especially as one nears its end, this disillusionment is, in fact, a form of divine blessing. Thus, the true symbol of Libra may be found in the Cosmic Dance of Lord Shiva in his Nataraja form, embodying the cyclical nature of existence and the divine blessings inherent in life's challenges. I have not yet reached the point of spiritual maturity myself to fully appreciate this. To me, the influence of Libra Ascendant is one of trials I am not capable of withstanding myself, as it bodes an omen for spiritual balance through destruction of materiality.
Venus governs Libra Lagna 1st house, while Mercury rules its 9th house. When these planets combine, conjunct, or aspect one another, individuals often excel in the arts, particularly as art critics or literary reviewers. They display proficiency in craftsmanship, mechanical engineering, and logical reasoning. However, their logical nature, devoid of intuition, can lead to stubbornness, prejudice, and a strong desire to assert their viewpoints, even if not well-founded. In marriage, Libra ascendants seek partners who are assertive, passionate, and appreciative of their sexual prowess. They may boast about their virility and expect easy success with the opposite sex. However, they can often find themselves with aggressive partners. Fidelity isn't a strong suit for Libra ascendant, and they may engage in clandestine affairs, though they lack the courage to justify their actions and prefer to keep them hidden. Some may even opt for low-profile marriages, suggesting a platonic relationship to maintain appearances. Professions requiring intellect and logical thinking suit Libra ascendants well. They excel in executing instructions or developing ideas proposed by superiors. When given clear directives, whether from their inner voice or external authorities, they execute tasks meticulously and with unwavering dedication. Libra ascendants typically enjoy financial stability, though their wealth accumulation depends on various factors. Generally, they fare better economically compared to individuals from similar social backgrounds. However, they should be cautious of exhaustion, depression, anemia, and accidents. Fasting is often beneficial for their well-being.
submitted by Agreeable-Ad4806 to Advancedastrology [link] [comments]


2024.04.21 01:35 LtColumbo403 On the trail of a spirit (2/3)

← On the trail of a spirit (1/3)
IN THE QUR'AN

THE CAVE

We are now firmly anchored in synchromysticism, and it is in this context that I notice other correspondences with the Qur'an.
I was still pondering the word "club" when a scene from an episode of The Simpsons piqued my curiosity. From there I discovered what I call a synchromystic correspondence between part of the Simpsons episode and the story of the companions of the cave described in Surah 18 of the Qur'an, The Cave.
From an entry point, if we use similarities as markers, the unfolding of the Simpsons scenes is almost in sync with the sequence of ayat in Surah 18 from the moment the young men entered the cave. I'll try to clarify this for you:

In the cave

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[17-18]; The young men entered the cave:
18:17 And [had you been present], you would see the sun when it rose, inclining away from their cave on the right, and when it set, passing away from them on the left, while they were [lying] within an open space thereof. That was from the signs of Allah. He whom Allah guides is the [rightly] guided, but he whom He leaves astray - never will you find for him a protecting guide.
18:18 And you would think them awake, while they were asleep. And We turned them to the right and to the left, while their dog stretched his forelegs at the entrance. If you had looked at them, you would have turned from them in flight and been filled by them with terror.
▶ The Simpsons - sun; Mr. Burns' turn to strike the ball.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:[17-18] The Simpsons - sun
18:17 "And [had you been present], you would see the sun when it rose, inclining away from their cave on the right, and when it set, passing away from them on the left," Note that in the first scene of the video the thrown ball is shown merging with the sun. Then the next ball has a deviated trajectory from left to right: "Oh, a cunning stratagem, sir. It's curving right toward the green, and it's... there."
18:17 "while they were [lying] within an open space thereof." A 👁️‍🗨️ wide open space (clearing) between group of trees.
18:18 "And you would think them awake, while they were asleep." A character suddenly loses consciousness, causing another character to be confused.
18:18 "And We turned them to the right and to the left," A character turning on himself (starting from his left) with a club in his hand. (⇢ read [q-l-b] below the table ⬇️)
18:18 "while their dog stretched his forelegs at the entrance." 👁️‍🗨️ Two parallel golf clubs on the ground, in the foreground in front of the clearing. (⇢ read [k-l-b] below the table ⬇️)
18:18 "If you had looked at them, you would have turned from them in flight and been filled by them with terror." A character flees in haste at the sight of another lying on the ground.
[q-l-b]: Note that Homer turns through 360° with a club in his hands and the club itself turns on its axis in the air. In Ayah 18:18 the word used to express the action of turning something is "wanuqallibuhum" from the root q-l-b; wa[and]-nu[we]-qallibu[turned]-hum[them].
There is a 🔊 resemblance in sound between the consonants of the word club in English, c-l-b, and the root q-l-b in Arabic (the sound produced by the letter Qaf in Arabic is a kind of [k] pronounced further back in the throat).
---
[k-l-b]: Same idea as [q-l-b] here. In Ayah 18:18 the word used for "while their dog" is wakalbuhum; wa[and]-kalbu[dog]-hum[their]. Kalb from the root k-l-b.
The consonants of the word club in English, c-l-b, and the root k-l-b in Arabic are 🔊 very much alike in sound.
And the dog stretches forth its two forelegs, "dhira'ayhi", which is a declension of the word dhira' (cubit, from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger). Their shape could well be represented by golf clubs.

Delivery

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[19-20]; The companions of the cave are released and discuss their affair:
18:19 And similarly, We awakened them that they might question one another. Said a speaker from among them, "How long have you remained [here]?" They said, "We have remained a day or part of a day." They said, "Your Lord is most knowing of how long you remained. So send one of you with this silver coin of yours to the city and let him look to which is the best of food and bring you provision from it and let him be cautious. And let no one be aware of you.
18:20 Indeed, if they come to know of you, they will stone you or return you to their religion. And never would you succeed, then - ever."
▶ The Simpsons - city; Marge travels to a faraway city in search of a high-quality dress.
▶ The Simpsons - dollar; This time, Marge goes to Main Street and buys a high fashion dress.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:[19-20] The Simpsons - city
18:19 "[...] So send one of you with this silver coin of yours to the city" A character going alone in a city...
18:19 "and let him look to which is the best of food*️⃣ and bring you provision from it" "Miss? Do you have a Chanel suit or any other high-quality clothes?"
18:20 "[...] they will stone you" A character stoned by a golf ball
18:20 "or return you to their religion." "I'm sure he'd support your application for membership tonight." | "Bull honkey! I don't care about joining this stupid club." | "But does your wife?"
*️⃣"azka ta'aman", literally "the purest food".

Time is money

Qur'an 18:19 The Simpsons - dollar
18:19 "And similarly, We awakened them that they might question one another. Said a speaker from among them*️⃣," Just as they are about to exit the house, the chatty character asks another one questions.
18:19 "How long have you remained [here]?" "How much did it cost?"
18:19 "They said, "We have remained a day" "A dollar. Let's go."
18:19 "or part of a day." "With tax or without?" | "Without. Let me go."
*️⃣"qâilun minhum", which is understood to mean "the talkative one among them".

Who's the Boss?

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:21; Dispute:
18:21 And similarly, We caused them to be found that they [who found them] would know that the promise of Allah is truth and that of the Hour there is no doubt. [That was] when they disputed among themselves about their affair and [then] said, "Construct over them a structure. Their Lord is most knowing about them." Said those who prevailed in the matter, "We will surely take [for ourselves] over them a masjid."
▶ The Simpsons - party; The Simpsons go to the reception.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:21 The Simpsons - party
18:21 "[...][That was] when they disputed among themselves about their affair" Arguing characters
18:21 "and [then] said, "Construct over them a structure1️⃣. Their Lord is most knowing about them2️⃣."" "I'm driving up to the main building. They've got valet3️⃣ parking tonight."
18:21 "Said those who prevailed in the matter, "We will surely take [for ourselves] over them a masjid4️⃣."" The dominant character chooses that they should walk instead: "Stop the car. We're walking." Following that decision they find themselves in a situation 👁️‍🗨️ reminiscent of the faithful behind their imam in a masjid (a mosque).
1️⃣In other translations "bun'yanan" is translated as "building".
2️⃣"them" refers to the people of the cave. These people are described earlier in the surah as "young men of sound judgment" (fit'yatun). Fit'yatun is a declension of the word fatan. Fatan has another meaning, used later in the same surah, that of "servant/valet/slave" (lifatahu), remember that.
3️⃣See 2️⃣ above, young man/valet/servant are definitions of the same word in surah 18.
4️⃣I don't have a clear idea of what the sentence means. The term masjid means a station of prostration, it is used to refer to mosques for example because the faithful stop there to practice prayers composed of prostrations (sujud).

The Hour is close, in sound.

➔ Qur'an 18:21; The Hour is to be expected:
18:21 And similarly, We caused them to be found that they [who found them] would know that the promise of Allāh is truth and that of the Hour there is no doubt. [...]
▶ The Simpsons - party; Homer hurries to the building, expecting to be called sir:
For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene".
The word translated as "the-Hour" is as-sa'ah. In the ayah, the word is pronounced as-sa'a-ta, but when the word is isolated, the final '-ta' disappears to be replaced by a small breath that comes from the bottom of the throat.
The ' in as-sa'ah corresponds to the Arabic letter 'ayn. It is pronounced by the expulsion of the breath through the constriction of the middle part of the throat. It can sound like a guttural /.
The words sa'ah in Arabic and sir in English are 🔊 close in sound.

Back to fitness

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:22; Count:
18:22 They [i.e., people] will say there were three, the fourth of them being their dog; and they will say there were five, the sixth of them being their dog - guessing at the unseen; and they will say there were seven, and the eighth of them was their dog. Say, [O Muḥammad], "My Lord is most knowing of their number. None knows them except a few. So do not argue about them except with an obvious argument and do not inquire about them among [the speculators] from anyone."
[+] In addition to the normal continuation of the thread of ayat we're going to look back at ayat counting the beginning of the youths' story. These are ayat that we haven't covered yet:
➔ Qur'an 18:[13-16]; Beginning of the story:
18:13 It is We who relate to you, [O Muhammad], their story in truth. Indeed, they were youths who believed in their Lord, and We increased them in guidance.
18:14 And We made firm their hearts when they stood up and said, "Our Lord is the Lord of the heavens and the earth. Never will we invoke besides Him any deity. We would have certainly spoken, then, an excessive transgression.
18:15 These, our people, have taken besides Him deities. Why do they not bring for [worship of] them a clear authority? And who is more unjust than one who invents about Allah a lie?"
18:16 [The youths said to one another], "And when you have withdrawn from them and that which they worship other than Allah, retreat to the cave. Your Lord will spread out for you of His mercy and will prepare for you from your affair facility."
▶ The Simpsons - triangle; The Simpsons discuss what they are going to do at the reception.
▶ The Simpsons - highlight; High point of the argument.

Semantic comparisons

I based my comparisons on the vocabulary used in Ayah 18:22. Specifically, the three roots m-r-y, ẓ-h-r and f-t-y.
m-r-y
18:22 [...] So do not argue about them except with an obvious argument
The words used in Arabic translated as "to argue"/"argument" are tumari/mira'an from the root m-r-y. This root generates three main groups of ideas: [dispute/opposition/contestation], [hesitation/doubt], and [squeezing the maximum amount of milk out of a camel's udder]:
Qur'an 18:22 "So do not argue [tumari] about them" The Simpsons - triangle
[dispute/opposition/contestation] [opposition/contestation] "I'm going to regale everyone with my anecdote. You know, the one I tried to say on the radio? Who's going to bleep me this time?"
[squeezing the maximum amount of milk out of a camel's udder] ["milking" an old lady for her money] "I'm going to pose as an Italian count and get some old lady to leave me all her money."
[hesitation/doubt] [hesitation/doubt] "I'm going to ask people if they know their servants' last names or, in the case of butlers, their first."
[+] A little clue led me to take a closer look at the ayat 18:[13-16] narrating the beginning of the story. I made an observation based on Marge's words, "No vulgarity. No mischief. No politics.":
Qur'an 18:[14-15] The Simpsons - triangle "No vulgarity. No mischief. No politics."
18:14 "[...] And We made firm their hearts when they stood up and said, "Our Lord is the Lord of the heavens and the earth. Never will we invoke besides Him any deity. We would have certainly spoken, then, an excessive transgression." (⇢ read [shatatan] below the table ⬇️) [vulgarity] "I'm going to regale everyone with my anecdote. You know, the one I tried to say on the radio? Who's going to bleep me this time?"
18:15 "These, our people, have taken besides Him deities. Why do they not bring for [worship of] them a clear authority?" (⇢ read [qawmuna] below the table ⬇️) [politics] "I'm going to ask people if they know their servants' last names or, in the case of butlers, their first."
18:15 "Why do they not bring for [worship of] them a clear authority? And who is more unjust than one who invents about Allah a lie?"" (⇢ read [mis-chief] below the table ⬇️) [mischief] "I'm going to pose as an Italian count and get some old lady to leave me all her money."
[shatatan] The young people's story and their conversations are said to be narrated "bil-haqqi" (in truth), i.e. as it happened. "shatatan", translated here as "an excessive transgression", is an informal word that is part of youth jargon, according to one explanation I heard. It's a very familiar way of saying "utter nonsense", "an ENORMOUS absurdity".
Perhaps a notch less vulgar than "(talk) sh!t" (or "bullsh#t") but 🔊 phonetically resembling it.
---
[qawmuna] "hâulâi" (These) is used to target a specific group of people. In this case "qawmuna" (our people). This is a statement about community affairs. Incidentally, "qawmuna" is 🔊 phonetically close to "common".
"bi-sultanin bayyinin" (with a clear authority) suggests a thinly veiled criticism of the political power. Indeed, the word sultanin can be translated as "compelling evidence" but also as "authority", "rule, dominion" or "sultan".
---
[mis-chief] I've repeated the sentence about authority here, because in this story, political authority conditions the religious situation of the people.
In my opinion, it's not just a statement about the people's misguidance, but a barely concealed accusation against their chief and their attachment to him. A pseudo "sultan" who is accused of inventing a baseless lie and thus being a source of wrongdoing and obscurantism.
[+] Another observation:
Qur'an 18:14 The Simpsons - triangle
18:14 "And We made firm their hearts*️⃣ when they stood up and said," Homer's group begins to walk, and as soon as Homer speaks, the "camera" shots show the growing cohesion of the group until they end up in a tight row. They speak collegially and the camera following their faces forms a triangle (the triangle is reputed to be the most stable form for a structure).
*️⃣"rabatna 'ala qulubihim", literally "we tied over their hearts" meaning we've fortified their hearts to keep their composure. It also suggests that their hearts are tied to each other, forming a steady union.
ẓ-h-r
18:22 [...] except with an obvious argument
The word used in Arabic translated as "obvious" is ẓahiran, which means "manifest (whereas previously latent)". This word comes from the root ẓ-h-r which generates seemingly distant meanings from each other. It gives the nouns back (of the body) and midday (when the sun is high) and also the verb to manifest.
A study in French tries to dissect the origin of the polysemy of this root: Une étude de la racine ظهر √ẓhr (A study of the root ظهر √ẓhr) by Jean-Claude Rolland with the collaboration of Jean-Marc Guyetand. The official link is dead at the time I publish this post, fortunately I had made a backup.
I skip the technical explanations and (do my best to) translate the conclusion into English:
Conclusion
There is only one root ظهر √ẓhr, which results from the crossing of the etymons {ẓ,r} and {h,r}.
– By the etymon {ẓ,r}, this root comes under the matrix of the throat and neck. Its semanticism is mainly oriented towards the back perceived as the extension of the back part of the neck, the nape of the neck. The etymon {h,r} only comes in reinforcement in the items relating to the notions of brilliance, midday, appearing, etc.
– But as there is only one word ظَهْر ẓahr to designate both the back of bipeds and that of quadrupeds, the root ظهر √ẓhr comes, by enantiosemy, to express both what is in the back of some, therefore behind them, hidden, invisible, and what is on the backs of others, therefore above, salient, shining, uncovered, visible.
(July 2020)
Qur'an 18:22 The Simpsons - highlight
18:22 "[...] except with an obvious [ẓahiran] argument" "You kids should thank your mother. Now that she's a better person we can see how awful we really are." (⇢ read [ẓahiran] below the table ⬇️)
[ẓahiran] It seems to me that all of these notions carried by the root ẓ-h-r have been assimilated in the form of a cartoon scene:
  • Verticality: Homer's statement carries in itself the notions of the root ẓ-h-r. Something that has reached a (supposedly) high point ("Now that she's a better person") leads to the manifestation ("we can see") of something not observed ("how awful we really are.").
  • Horizontality: Marge turns her back to Homer and the children, and the moment Homer's words hit her is emphasized by a play of light and shadow. Something emerged, the light grows on the front side until it stops at the boundary between front and back. And vice versa, when she finally turns back to Homer and the children. Plus, the dress clearly highlights the throat and neck.
f-t-y
18:22 [...] and do not inquire about them among [the speculators] from anyone.
The word used in Arabic translated as "to inquire" is tastafti. It is a verb formed from the root f-t-y which is declined in different meanings. From this root comes the word fatan which is used in this same surah (n°18) under its two definitions, "young men of sound judgment" (fit'yatun) and "servant/valet/slave" (lifatahu).
Qur'an 18:22 The Simpsons - triangle
18:22 "[...] and do not inquire1️⃣ about them2️⃣ among [the speculators] from anyone." "I'm going to ask people if they know their servants3️⃣' last names or, in the case of butlers, their first." | "No! No! No! Not tonight!"
1️⃣The word in arabic is "tastafti" from the root f-t-y.
2️⃣"them" refers to "fityatun" (from f-t-y; young men).
3️⃣see explanation above the table.

Tomorrow

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[23-24]; Tomorrow:
18:23 And never say of anything, "Indeed, I will do that tomorrow,"
18:24 Except [when adding], "If Allah wills." And remember your Lord when you forget [it] and say, "Perhaps my Lord will guide me to what is nearer than this to right conduct."
▶ The Simpsons - sir; Back to the "sir" scene.

Re-verse engineering

Homer Simpson:
For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene".
I think I can reconstruct some semblance of Homer's line by drawing on the two ayat above:
The Simpsons - sir Qur'an 18:[23-24]
maybe someone will 18:24 Perhaps my Lord will
call me 18:23 "wala taqulanna" (And never say). "qul" means "say". An emphatic suffix is added to give the form "-qulanna"; that is phonetically close to qul-'ana' (ana = me, I) ~~> qul 'me' ~~> call me.
sir                                        ? (⇢ read [?] below the table ⬇️)
without adding 18:24 Except [when adding]
"you're making 18:23 "Indeed, I will do
a scene" 18:23 that. "that" refers to "of anything" or more precisely to lishay'in; li[of]-shay'in[a thing]. I find that the /sh/ and /s/ sounds are often interchangeable in this kind of comparison. Which leads me to say that the English word scene and the Arabic word shay'in are 🔊 consonant.
[?] In the first part of the topic I mentioned a trivial correlation that, surprisingly, makes sense here. I wrote in ALL IN ONE > COLUMBO > "sir" scenes:
▶ The Simpsons - sir; Homer says: "For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene"."
▶ Columbo - sir; The character hears himself called "sir" and arguably, he's making a scene...
In the Columbo video, the character reacts to being called "sir" by reciting a line of dialogue from a scene in Macbeth: Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow, Macbeth - Act5, scene 5.
It was long before I could see any point in it, that serendipity led me to link "sir" and "tomorrow". That may be the missing link (the "?") of the table above.

Synchronicity

"sir" scene
I was in the process of typing up the content of this section when I watched, for the first time in my life, the film A Few Good Men (1992) with Tom Cruise. And there, synchronicity seems to reinforce the idea of correlation between "sir" and "tomorrow":
▶ A Few Good Men - sir; Particular reaction to being called "sir":
- Is this your signature?
- Yes, sir.
- You don't have to call me "sir". Is this your signature?
- Sir, yes, sir.
- You certainly don't need to do it twice in one sentence.
[...]
- What's a garden variety Code Red?
- Sir?
- Harold, you say "sir", I turn around and look for my father.
tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow...
Immediately following the "sir" scene of the interview with the two Marines, I noticed a sequence of short scenes all formed on the same principle: the character played by Tom Cruise talks with another character, and the scene ends with a "see you tomorrow" type of mention. A cinematographic method to create teasing or a certain tension probably, but less trivially it's the synchronicity with the writing of my topic that I'm highlighting here:
▶ A Few Good Men - tomorrows; Tomorrows in a row.

The right conduct

Something I noted:
Qur'an 18:24 The Simpsons - sir A Few Good Men - sir
18:24 Except [when adding], "If Allah wills." And remember your Lord when you forget [it] and say, "Perhaps my Lord will guide me to what is nearer than this to right conduct." Homer says: "For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene"." In other words, that his conduct would be in accordance with etiquette. "What's a Code Red?" | "Sir, a Code Red is a disciplinary engagement." | "What's that mean exactly?" | "Sir, a Marine falls out of line, it's up to the men in his unit to get him back on track."

Time and money

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:25; Three hundred + nine:
And they remained in their cave for three hundred years and exceeded by nine.
▶ The Simpsons - thirty-three hundred; Marge's confession:
We'll have a thirty-three hundred dollars credit at Chanel.

Getting the count right

Qur'an 18:25 The Simpsons - thirty-three hundred
18:25 And they remained in their cave for three hundred years [...] "We'll have a thirty-three hundred dollars credit at Chanel."
18:25 [...] and exceeded by nine "We'll have a thirty*️⃣-three hundred dollars credit at Chanel."
*️⃣"nine" in Ayah 18:25 is "tis'a" (with a 'ayn). Sounds like tisra with an 'r' from the middle part of the throat.
Placing the last syllable of the word "thirty" at the beginning gives "ty-thir". The pronunciation of the 'th' in thirty is close to the /s/ sound. So it sounds like tee-thir, quite close to 🔊 tis'a.

Face to face

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:28; Patience:
And keep yourself patient [by being] with those who call upon their Lord in the morning and the evening, seeking His countenance. And let not your eyes pass beyond them, desiring adornments of the worldly life, and do not obey one whose heart We have made heedless of Our remembrance and who follows his desire and whose affair is ever [in] neglect.
▶ The Simpsons - face to face; Marge faces a dilemma.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:28 The Simpsons - face to face
18:28 "And keep yourself patient [by being] with those who call upon their Lord in the morning and the evening, seeking His countenance1️⃣." "Come here, Maggie. Oh, Homie I like your in-your-face humanity. I like the way Lisa speaks her mind. I like Bart's... I like Bart."
18:28 "And let not your eyes pass beyond them, desiring adornments of the worldly life" The main character in the scene first turns her gaze away from the other characters to look in the direction of the reception room, then changes her mind and looks back to them. Facing each of them, one after the other.
18:28 "and do not obey one whose heart We have made heedless of Our remembrance" "Come on, let's go. I wouldn't want to join any club that would have this me as a member."
18:28 "and who follows his desire and whose affair is ever [in] neglect2️⃣." "I didn't have to spend our savings on this stupid gown."
1️⃣"wajhahu", literally "His face".
2️⃣"furutan", can also be translated as "excess", "exaggeration".

Surrounded

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[29-31]; Fire and gardens:
18:29 And say, "The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve." Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them. And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil, which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place.
18:30 Indeed, those who have believed and done righteous deeds - indeed, We will not allow to be lost the reward of any who did well in deeds.
18:31 Those will have gardens of perpetual residence; beneath them rivers will flow. They will be adorned therein with bracelets of gold and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade, reclining therein on adorned couches. Excellent is the reward, and good is the resting place.
▶ The Simpsons - surrounded; The Simpsons ignore the reception and go to Krusty Burger.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:[29-31] The Simpsons - surrounded
18:29 "[...] Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them." Shot of the exterior of the clubhouse, from which a dense yellowish light emanates: 👁️‍🗨️ The Simpsons - fire walls
18:29 "And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil*️⃣" A character drinks a yellow liquid: 👁️‍🗨️ The Simpsons - molten brass
18:29 "which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place." The liquid-drinking character is visually superimposed on another character behind her, whose face will soon express disgust. Followed by a transition shot of a face emitting a bright pulsating light. See ▶ The Simpsons - burning face
18:31 "[...] beneath them rivers will flow." The floor is washed with water just below where the main characters are seated.
18:31 "[...] and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade," (⇢ read [Green and Silk] below the table ⬇️)
18:31 "reclining therein on adorned couches" The main characters are seated on comfortable banquettes.
18:31 "Excellent is the reward, and good is the resting place." "But, you know, we realized we're more comfortable in a place like this."
*️⃣"kal-muh'li" in the Qur'anic text. The translation I use here says "murky oil", but another popular interpretation is "molten brass". You can also find "molten copper", "molten rocks", etc. It always refers to a scorching-hot liquid substance.
---
[Green and Silk]
[...] and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade
The whole surah revolves around the idea of comparison between two parties, I see here the entanglement of the notions of life in the "gardens of perpetual residence" and life in this world. I explain, green garments enters the lexical field of gardens while silk is part of the aspirations of this world.
Another thing about silk. I heard an explanation about the locution "sundusin wa-is'tabraqin" (fine silk and brocade). This would refer to fine silk garments with added thickness of fabric (is'tabraqin). The addition of "is'tabraqin" to the locution is understood to express the most expensive silk garments.
Back to The Simpsons:
  1. ▶ The Simpsons - city; The main character of the episode is looking for high quality clothing: "Miss? Do you have a Chanel suit or any other high-quality clothes?"
  2. ▶ The Simpsons - dollar; She finally buys a Chanel dress. Very likely a silk dress: "Ooh. Ooh. Ahh." "Mom, you are looking fabulous." "Yeah. You look great."
  3. ▶ The Simpsons - face to face; The same character who misses her green dress: "And I like my old green dress. I didn't have to spend our savings on this stupid gown."
  4. ▶ The Simpsons - surrounded; The character expressed her contentment with her green dress, but outwardly she's still wearing Chanel: "Hey, did you guys just come from the prom?" | "Sort of."

The good place

A little thought on the question of the good place and the bad place.
Spoiled for choice
➔ Qur'an 18:[29-31]:
18:29 And say, "The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve." [...]
Qur'an 18:29 Qur'an 18:[30-31]
18:29 "[...] Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them." 18:30 "Indeed, those who have believed and done righteous deeds - indeed, We will not allow to be lost the reward of any who did well in deeds."
18:29 "[...] And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil, which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place." 18:31 "Those will have gardens of perpetual residence; beneath them rivers will flow. They will be adorned therein with bracelets of gold and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade, reclining therein on adorned couches. Excellent is the reward, and good is the resting place."
Dump and go
▶ The Simpsons - surrounded; Good place? Bad place?:
Marge Busboy
"But, you know, we realized we're more comfortable in a place like this." "Man, you're crazy. This place is a dump. Oh man, I'd be anywhere except this place, that's for sure."
The Good Place
It's likely that some of you have already made the connection with The Good Place show. As for me, I only know it by name, but I understand that the main plot coincides with this subject. I refer to it here because, in addition to that, the 👁️‍🗨️ official imagery features characters sitting on a sofa.
.
.
.
This observation leads me to another. At the beginning of every Simpsons episode there's the couch gag, so I checked what the couch gag is for this episode:
▶ The Simpsons - couch gag: It's about the Simpson family sitting on the couch and their skin seems to have turned green...
◼️ This completes the transcription of the synchromystic correspondence.
End of part 2/3.
Some observations + the conclusion in On the trail of a spirit (3/3) →
submitted by LtColumbo403 to Retconned [link] [comments]


2024.04.20 19:50 LtColumbo403 On the trail of a spirit (2/3)

← On the trail of a spirit (1/3)
IN THE QUR'AN

THE CAVE

We are now firmly anchored in synchromysticism, and it is in this context that I notice other correspondences with the Qur'an.
I was still pondering the word "club" when a scene from an episode of The Simpsons piqued my curiosity. From there I discovered what I call a synchromystic correspondence between part of the Simpsons episode and the story of the companions of the cave described in Surah 18 of the Qur'an, The Cave.
From an entry point, if we use similarities as markers, the unfolding of the Simpsons scenes is almost in sync with the sequence of ayat in Surah 18 from the moment the young men entered the cave. I'll try to clarify this for you:

In the cave

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[17-18]; The young men entered the cave:
18:17 And [had you been present], you would see the sun when it rose, inclining away from their cave on the right, and when it set, passing away from them on the left, while they were [lying] within an open space thereof. That was from the signs of Allah. He whom Allah guides is the [rightly] guided, but he whom He leaves astray - never will you find for him a protecting guide.
18:18 And you would think them awake, while they were asleep. And We turned them to the right and to the left, while their dog stretched his forelegs at the entrance. If you had looked at them, you would have turned from them in flight and been filled by them with terror.
▶ The Simpsons - sun; Mr. Burns' turn to strike the ball.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:[17-18] The Simpsons - sun
18:17 "And [had you been present], you would see the sun when it rose, inclining away from their cave on the right, and when it set, passing away from them on the left," Note that in the first scene of the video the thrown ball is shown merging with the sun. Then the next ball has a deviated trajectory from left to right: "Oh, a cunning stratagem, sir. It's curving right toward the green, and it's... there."
18:17 "while they were [lying] within an open space thereof." A 👁️‍🗨️ wide open space (clearing) between group of trees.
18:18 "And you would think them awake, while they were asleep." A character suddenly loses consciousness, causing another character to be confused.
18:18 "And We turned them to the right and to the left," A character turning on himself (starting from his left) with a club in his hand. (⇢ read [q-l-b] below the table ⬇️)
18:18 "while their dog stretched his forelegs at the entrance." 👁️‍🗨️ Two parallel golf clubs on the ground, in the foreground in front of the clearing. (⇢ read [k-l-b] below the table ⬇️)
18:18 "If you had looked at them, you would have turned from them in flight and been filled by them with terror." A character flees in haste at the sight of another lying on the ground.
[q-l-b]: Note that Homer turns through 360° with a club in his hands and the club itself turns on its axis in the air. In Ayah 18:18 the word used to express the action of turning something is "wanuqallibuhum" from the root q-l-b; wa[and]-nu[we]-qallibu[turned]-hum[them].
There is a 🔊 resemblance in sound between the consonants of the word club in English, c-l-b, and the root q-l-b in Arabic (the sound produced by the letter Qaf in Arabic is a kind of [k] pronounced further back in the throat).
---
[k-l-b]: Same idea as [q-l-b] here. In Ayah 18:18 the word used for "while their dog" is wakalbuhum; wa[and]-kalbu[dog]-hum[their]. Kalb from the root k-l-b.
The consonants of the word club in English, c-l-b, and the root k-l-b in Arabic are 🔊 very much alike in sound.
And the dog stretches forth its two forelegs, "dhira'ayhi", which is a declension of the word dhira' (cubit, from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger). Their shape could well be represented by golf clubs.

Delivery

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[19-20]; The companions of the cave are released and discuss their affair:
18:19 And similarly, We awakened them that they might question one another. Said a speaker from among them, "How long have you remained [here]?" They said, "We have remained a day or part of a day." They said, "Your Lord is most knowing of how long you remained. So send one of you with this silver coin of yours to the city and let him look to which is the best of food and bring you provision from it and let him be cautious. And let no one be aware of you.
18:20 Indeed, if they come to know of you, they will stone you or return you to their religion. And never would you succeed, then - ever."
▶ The Simpsons - city; Marge travels to a faraway city in search of a high-quality dress.
▶ The Simpsons - dollar; This time, Marge goes to Main Street and buys a high fashion dress.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:[19-20] The Simpsons - city
18:19 "[...] So send one of you with this silver coin of yours to the city" A character going alone in a city...
18:19 "and let him look to which is the best of food*️⃣ and bring you provision from it" "Miss? Do you have a Chanel suit or any other high-quality clothes?"
18:20 "[...] they will stone you" A character stoned by a golf ball
18:20 "or return you to their religion." "I'm sure he'd support your application for membership tonight." | "Bull honkey! I don't care about joining this stupid club." | "But does your wife?"
*️⃣"azka ta'aman", literally "the purest food".

Time is money

Qur'an 18:19 The Simpsons - dollar
18:19 "And similarly, We awakened them that they might question one another. Said a speaker from among them*️⃣," Just as they are about to exit the house, the chatty character asks another one questions.
18:19 "How long have you remained [here]?" "How much did it cost?"
18:19 "They said, "We have remained a day" "A dollar. Let's go."
18:19 "or part of a day." "With tax or without?" | "Without. Let me go."
*️⃣"qâilun minhum", which is understood to mean "the talkative one among them".

Who's the Boss?

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:21; Dispute:
18:21 And similarly, We caused them to be found that they [who found them] would know that the promise of Allah is truth and that of the Hour there is no doubt. [That was] when they disputed among themselves about their affair and [then] said, "Construct over them a structure. Their Lord is most knowing about them." Said those who prevailed in the matter, "We will surely take [for ourselves] over them a masjid."
▶ The Simpsons - party; The Simpsons go to the reception.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:21 The Simpsons - party
18:21 "[...][That was] when they disputed among themselves about their affair" Arguing characters
18:21 "and [then] said, "Construct over them a structure1️⃣. Their Lord is most knowing about them2️⃣."" "I'm driving up to the main building. They've got valet3️⃣ parking tonight."
18:21 "Said those who prevailed in the matter, "We will surely take [for ourselves] over them a masjid4️⃣."" The dominant character chooses that they should walk instead: "Stop the car. We're walking." Following that decision they find themselves in a situation 👁️‍🗨️ reminiscent of the faithful behind their imam in a masjid (a mosque).
1️⃣In other translations "bun'yanan" is translated as "building".
2️⃣"them" refers to the people of the cave. These people are described earlier in the surah as "young men of sound judgment" (fit'yatun). Fit'yatun is a declension of the word fatan. Fatan has another meaning, used later in the same surah, that of "servant/valet/slave" (lifatahu), remember that.
3️⃣See 2️⃣ above, young man/valet/servant are definitions of the same word in surah 18.
4️⃣I don't have a clear idea of what the sentence means. The term masjid means a station of prostration, it is used to refer to mosques for example because the faithful stop there to practice prayers composed of prostrations (sujud).

The Hour is close, in sound.

➔ Qur'an 18:21; The Hour is to be expected:
18:21 And similarly, We caused them to be found that they [who found them] would know that the promise of Allāh is truth and that of the Hour there is no doubt. [...]
▶ The Simpsons - party; Homer hurries to the building, expecting to be called sir:
For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene".
The word translated as "the-Hour" is as-sa'ah. In the ayah, the word is pronounced as-sa'a-ta, but when the word is isolated, the final '-ta' disappears to be replaced by a small breath that comes from the bottom of the throat.
The ' in as-sa'ah corresponds to the Arabic letter 'ayn. It is pronounced by the expulsion of the breath through the constriction of the middle part of the throat. It can sound like a guttural /.
The words sa'ah in Arabic and sir in English are 🔊 close in sound.

Back to fitness

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:22; Count:
18:22 They [i.e., people] will say there were three, the fourth of them being their dog; and they will say there were five, the sixth of them being their dog - guessing at the unseen; and they will say there were seven, and the eighth of them was their dog. Say, [O Muḥammad], "My Lord is most knowing of their number. None knows them except a few. So do not argue about them except with an obvious argument and do not inquire about them among [the speculators] from anyone."
[+] In addition to the normal continuation of the thread of ayat we're going to look back at ayat counting the beginning of the youths' story. These are ayat that we haven't covered yet:
➔ Qur'an 18:[13-16]; Beginning of the story:
18:13 It is We who relate to you, [O Muhammad], their story in truth. Indeed, they were youths who believed in their Lord, and We increased them in guidance.
18:14 And We made firm their hearts when they stood up and said, "Our Lord is the Lord of the heavens and the earth. Never will we invoke besides Him any deity. We would have certainly spoken, then, an excessive transgression.
18:15 These, our people, have taken besides Him deities. Why do they not bring for [worship of] them a clear authority? And who is more unjust than one who invents about Allah a lie?"
18:16 [The youths said to one another], "And when you have withdrawn from them and that which they worship other than Allah, retreat to the cave. Your Lord will spread out for you of His mercy and will prepare for you from your affair facility."
▶ The Simpsons - triangle; The Simpsons discuss what they are going to do at the reception.
▶ The Simpsons - highlight; High point of the argument.

Semantic comparisons

I based my comparisons on the vocabulary used in Ayah 18:22. Specifically, the three roots m-r-y, ẓ-h-r and f-t-y.
m-r-y
18:22 [...] So do not argue about them except with an obvious argument
The words used in Arabic translated as "to argue"/"argument" are tumari/mira'an from the root m-r-y. This root generates three main groups of ideas: [dispute/opposition/contestation], [hesitation/doubt], and [squeezing the maximum amount of milk out of a camel's udder]:
Qur'an 18:22 "So do not argue [tumari] about them" The Simpsons - triangle
[dispute/opposition/contestation] [opposition/contestation] "I'm going to regale everyone with my anecdote. You know, the one I tried to say on the radio? Who's going to bleep me this time?"
[squeezing the maximum amount of milk out of a camel's udder] ["milking" an old lady for her money] "I'm going to pose as an Italian count and get some old lady to leave me all her money."
[hesitation/doubt] [hesitation/doubt] "I'm going to ask people if they know their servants' last names or, in the case of butlers, their first."
[+] A little clue led me to take a closer look at the ayat 18:[13-16] narrating the beginning of the story. I made an observation based on Marge's words, "No vulgarity. No mischief. No politics.":
Qur'an 18:[14-15] The Simpsons - triangle "No vulgarity. No mischief. No politics."
18:14 "[...] And We made firm their hearts when they stood up and said, "Our Lord is the Lord of the heavens and the earth. Never will we invoke besides Him any deity. We would have certainly spoken, then, an excessive transgression." (⇢ read [shatatan] below the table ⬇️) [vulgarity] "I'm going to regale everyone with my anecdote. You know, the one I tried to say on the radio? Who's going to bleep me this time?"
18:15 "These, our people, have taken besides Him deities. Why do they not bring for [worship of] them a clear authority?" (⇢ read [qawmuna] below the table ⬇️) [politics] "I'm going to ask people if they know their servants' last names or, in the case of butlers, their first."
18:15 "Why do they not bring for [worship of] them a clear authority? And who is more unjust than one who invents about Allah a lie?"" (⇢ read [mis-chief] below the table ⬇️) [mischief] "I'm going to pose as an Italian count and get some old lady to leave me all her money."
[shatatan] The young people's story and their conversations are said to be narrated "bil-haqqi" (in truth), i.e. as it happened. "shatatan", translated here as "an excessive transgression", is an informal word that is part of youth jargon, according to one explanation I heard. It's a very familiar way of saying "utter nonsense", "an ENORMOUS absurdity".
Perhaps a notch less vulgar than "(talk) sh!t" (or "bullsh#t") but 🔊 phonetically resembling it.
---
[qawmuna] "hâulâi" (These) is used to target a specific group of people. In this case "qawmuna" (our people). This is a statement about community affairs. Incidentally, "qawmuna" is 🔊 phonetically close to "common".
"bi-sultanin bayyinin" (with a clear authority) suggests a thinly veiled criticism of the political power. Indeed, the word sultanin can be translated as "compelling evidence" but also as "authority", "rule, dominion" or "sultan".
---
[mis-chief] I've repeated the sentence about authority here, because in this story, political authority conditions the religious situation of the people.
In my opinion, it's not just a statement about the people's misguidance, but a barely concealed accusation against their chief and their attachment to him. A pseudo "sultan" who is accused of inventing a baseless lie and thus being a source of wrongdoing and obscurantism.
[+] Another observation:
Qur'an 18:14 The Simpsons - triangle
18:14 "And We made firm their hearts*️⃣ when they stood up and said," Homer's group begins to walk, and as soon as Homer speaks, the "camera" shots show the growing cohesion of the group until they end up in a tight row. They speak collegially and the camera following their faces forms a triangle (the triangle is reputed to be the most stable form for a structure).
*️⃣"rabatna 'ala qulubihim", literally "we tied over their hearts" meaning we've fortified their hearts to keep their composure. It also suggests that their hearts are tied to each other, forming a steady union.
ẓ-h-r
18:22 [...] except with an obvious argument
The word used in Arabic translated as "obvious" is ẓahiran, which means "manifest (whereas previously latent)". This word comes from the root ẓ-h-r which generates seemingly distant meanings from each other. It gives the nouns back (of the body) and midday (when the sun is high) and also the verb to manifest.
A study in French tries to dissect the origin of the polysemy of this root: Une étude de la racine ظهر √ẓhr (A study of the root ظهر √ẓhr) by Jean-Claude Rolland with the collaboration of Jean-Marc Guyetand. The official link is dead at the time I publish this post, fortunately I had made a backup.
I skip the technical explanations and (do my best to) translate the conclusion into English:
Conclusion
There is only one root ظهر √ẓhr, which results from the crossing of the etymons {ẓ,r} and {h,r}.
– By the etymon {ẓ,r}, this root comes under the matrix of the throat and neck. Its semanticism is mainly oriented towards the back perceived as the extension of the back part of the neck, the nape of the neck. The etymon {h,r} only comes in reinforcement in the items relating to the notions of brilliance, midday, appearing, etc.
– But as there is only one word ظَهْر ẓahr to designate both the back of bipeds and that of quadrupeds, the root ظهر √ẓhr comes, by enantiosemy, to express both what is in the back of some, therefore behind them, hidden, invisible, and what is on the backs of others, therefore above, salient, shining, uncovered, visible.
(July 2020)
Qur'an 18:22 The Simpsons - highlight
18:22 "[...] except with an obvious [ẓahiran] argument" "You kids should thank your mother. Now that she's a better person we can see how awful we really are." (⇢ read [ẓahiran] below the table ⬇️)
[ẓahiran] It seems to me that all of these notions carried by the root ẓ-h-r have been assimilated in the form of a cartoon scene:
  • Verticality: Homer's statement carries in itself the notions of the root ẓ-h-r. Something that has reached a (supposedly) high point ("Now that she's a better person") leads to the manifestation ("we can see") of something not observed ("how awful we really are.").
  • Horizontality: Marge turns her back to Homer and the children, and the moment Homer's words hit her is emphasized by a play of light and shadow. Something emerged, the light grows on the front side until it stops at the boundary between front and back. And vice versa, when she finally turns back to Homer and the children. Plus, the dress clearly highlights the throat and neck.
f-t-y
18:22 [...] and do not inquire about them among [the speculators] from anyone.
The word used in Arabic translated as "to inquire" is tastafti. It is a verb formed from the root f-t-y which is declined in different meanings. From this root comes the word fatan which is used in this same surah (n°18) under its two definitions, "young men of sound judgment" (fit'yatun) and "servant/valet/slave" (lifatahu).
Qur'an 18:22 The Simpsons - triangle
18:22 "[...] and do not inquire1️⃣ about them2️⃣ among [the speculators] from anyone." "I'm going to ask people if they know their servants3️⃣' last names or, in the case of butlers, their first." | "No! No! No! Not tonight!"
1️⃣The word in arabic is "tastafti" from the root f-t-y.
2️⃣"them" refers to "fityatun" (from f-t-y; young men).
3️⃣see explanation above the table.

Tomorrow

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[23-24]; Tomorrow:
18:23 And never say of anything, "Indeed, I will do that tomorrow,"
18:24 Except [when adding], "If Allah wills." And remember your Lord when you forget [it] and say, "Perhaps my Lord will guide me to what is nearer than this to right conduct."
▶ The Simpsons - sir; Back to the "sir" scene.

Re-verse engineering

Homer Simpson:
For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene".
I think I can reconstruct some semblance of Homer's line by drawing on the two ayat above:
The Simpsons - sir Qur'an 18:[23-24]
maybe someone will 18:24 Perhaps my Lord will
call me 18:23 "wala taqulanna" (And never say). "qul" means "say". An emphatic suffix is added to give the form "-qulanna"; that is phonetically close to qul-'ana' (ana = me, I) ~~> qul 'me' ~~> call me.
sir                                        ? (⇢ read [?] below the table ⬇️)
without adding 18:24 Except [when adding]
"you're making 18:23 "Indeed, I will do
a scene" 18:23 that. "that" refers to "of anything" or more precisely to lishay'in; li[of]-shay'in[a thing]. I find that the /sh/ and /s/ sounds are often interchangeable in this kind of comparison. Which leads me to say that the English word scene and the Arabic word shay'in are 🔊 consonant.
[?] In the first part of the topic I mentioned a trivial correlation that, surprisingly, makes sense here. I wrote in ALL IN ONE > COLUMBO > "sir" scenes:
▶ The Simpsons - sir; Homer says: "For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene"."
▶ Columbo - sir; The character hears himself called "sir" and arguably, he's making a scene...
In the Columbo video, the character reacts to being called "sir" by reciting a line of dialogue from a scene in Macbeth: Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow, Macbeth - Act5, scene 5.
It was long before I could see any point in it, that serendipity led me to link "sir" and "tomorrow". That may be the missing link (the "?") of the table above.

Synchronicity

"sir" scene
I was in the process of typing up the content of this section when I watched, for the first time in my life, the film A Few Good Men (1992) with Tom Cruise. And there, synchronicity seems to reinforce the idea of correlation between "sir" and "tomorrow":
▶ A Few Good Men - sir; Particular reaction to being called "sir":
- Is this your signature?
- Yes, sir.
- You don't have to call me "sir". Is this your signature?
- Sir, yes, sir.
- You certainly don't need to do it twice in one sentence.
[...]
- What's a garden variety Code Red?
- Sir?
- Harold, you say "sir", I turn around and look for my father.
tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow...
Immediately following the "sir" scene of the interview with the two Marines, I noticed a sequence of short scenes all formed on the same principle: the character played by Tom Cruise talks with another character, and the scene ends with a "see you tomorrow" type of mention. A cinematographic method to create teasing or a certain tension probably, but less trivially it's the synchronicity with the writing of my topic that I'm highlighting here:
▶ A Few Good Men - tomorrows; Tomorrows in a row.

The right conduct

Something I noted:
Qur'an 18:24 The Simpsons - sir A Few Good Men - sir
18:24 Except [when adding], "If Allah wills." And remember your Lord when you forget [it] and say, "Perhaps my Lord will guide me to what is nearer than this to right conduct." Homer says: "For once, maybe someone will call me "sir" without adding, "you're making a scene"." In other words, that his conduct would be in accordance with etiquette. "What's a Code Red?" | "Sir, a Code Red is a disciplinary engagement." | "What's that mean exactly?" | "Sir, a Marine falls out of line, it's up to the men in his unit to get him back on track."

Time and money

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:25; Three hundred + nine:
And they remained in their cave for three hundred years and exceeded by nine.
▶ The Simpsons - thirty-three hundred; Marge's confession:
We'll have a thirty-three hundred dollars credit at Chanel.

Getting the count right

Qur'an 18:25 The Simpsons - thirty-three hundred
18:25 And they remained in their cave for three hundred years [...] "We'll have a thirty-three hundred dollars credit at Chanel."
18:25 [...] and exceeded by nine "We'll have a thirty*️⃣-three hundred dollars credit at Chanel."
*️⃣"nine" in Ayah 18:25 is "tis'a" (with a 'ayn). Sounds like tisra with an 'r' from the middle part of the throat.
Placing the last syllable of the word "thirty" at the beginning gives "ty-thir". The pronunciation of the 'th' in thirty is close to the /s/ sound. So it sounds like tee-thir, quite close to 🔊 tis'a.

Face to face

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:28; Patience:
And keep yourself patient [by being] with those who call upon their Lord in the morning and the evening, seeking His countenance. And let not your eyes pass beyond them, desiring adornments of the worldly life, and do not obey one whose heart We have made heedless of Our remembrance and who follows his desire and whose affair is ever [in] neglect.
▶ The Simpsons - face to face; Marge faces a dilemma.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:28 The Simpsons - face to face
18:28 "And keep yourself patient [by being] with those who call upon their Lord in the morning and the evening, seeking His countenance1️⃣." "Come here, Maggie. Oh, Homie I like your in-your-face humanity. I like the way Lisa speaks her mind. I like Bart's... I like Bart."
18:28 "And let not your eyes pass beyond them, desiring adornments of the worldly life" The main character in the scene first turns her gaze away from the other characters to look in the direction of the reception room, then changes her mind and looks back to them. Facing each of them, one after the other.
18:28 "and do not obey one whose heart We have made heedless of Our remembrance" "Come on, let's go. I wouldn't want to join any club that would have this me as a member."
18:28 "and who follows his desire and whose affair is ever [in] neglect2️⃣." "I didn't have to spend our savings on this stupid gown."
1️⃣"wajhahu", literally "His face".
2️⃣"furutan", can also be translated as "excess", "exaggeration".

Surrounded

Sources

➔ Qur'an 18:[29-31]; Fire and gardens:
18:29 And say, "The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve." Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them. And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil, which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place.
18:30 Indeed, those who have believed and done righteous deeds - indeed, We will not allow to be lost the reward of any who did well in deeds.
18:31 Those will have gardens of perpetual residence; beneath them rivers will flow. They will be adorned therein with bracelets of gold and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade, reclining therein on adorned couches. Excellent is the reward, and good is the resting place.
▶ The Simpsons - surrounded; The Simpsons ignore the reception and go to Krusty Burger.

Comparison table

Qur'an 18:[29-31] The Simpsons - surrounded
18:29 "[...] Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them." Shot of the exterior of the clubhouse, from which a dense yellowish light emanates: 👁️‍🗨️ The Simpsons - fire walls
18:29 "And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil*️⃣" A character drinks a yellow liquid: 👁️‍🗨️ The Simpsons - molten brass
18:29 "which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place." The liquid-drinking character is visually superimposed on another character behind her, whose face will soon express disgust. Followed by a transition shot of a face emitting a bright pulsating light. See ▶ The Simpsons - burning face
18:31 "[...] beneath them rivers will flow." The floor is washed with water just below where the main characters are seated.
18:31 "[...] and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade," (⇢ read [Green and Silk] below the table ⬇️)
18:31 "reclining therein on adorned couches" The main characters are seated on comfortable banquettes.
18:31 "Excellent is the reward, and good is the resting place." "But, you know, we realized we're more comfortable in a place like this."
*️⃣"kal-muh'li" in the Qur'anic text. The translation I use here says "murky oil", but another popular interpretation is "molten brass". You can also find "molten copper", "molten rocks", etc. It always refers to a scorching-hot liquid substance.
---
[Green and Silk]
[...] and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade
The whole surah revolves around the idea of comparison between two parties, I see here the entanglement of the notions of life in the "gardens of perpetual residence" and life in this world. I explain, green garments enters the lexical field of gardens while silk is part of the aspirations of this world.
Another thing about silk. I heard an explanation about the locution "sundusin wa-is'tabraqin" (fine silk and brocade). This would refer to fine silk garments with added thickness of fabric (is'tabraqin). The addition of "is'tabraqin" to the locution is understood to express the most expensive silk garments.
Back to The Simpsons:
  1. ▶ The Simpsons - city; The main character of the episode is looking for high quality clothing: "Miss? Do you have a Chanel suit or any other high-quality clothes?"
  2. ▶ The Simpsons - dollar; She finally buys a Chanel dress. Very likely a silk dress: "Ooh. Ooh. Ahh." "Mom, you are looking fabulous." "Yeah. You look great."
  3. ▶ The Simpsons - face to face; The same character who misses her green dress: "And I like my old green dress. I didn't have to spend our savings on this stupid gown."
  4. ▶ The Simpsons - surrounded; The character expressed her contentment with her green dress, but outwardly she's still wearing Chanel: "Hey, did you guys just come from the prom?" | "Sort of."

The good place

A little thought on the question of the good place and the bad place.
Spoiled for choice
➔ Qur'an 18:[29-31]:
18:29 And say, "The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve." [...]
Qur'an 18:29 Qur'an 18:[30-31]
18:29 "[...] Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them." 18:30 "Indeed, those who have believed and done righteous deeds - indeed, We will not allow to be lost the reward of any who did well in deeds."
18:29 "[...] And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil, which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place." 18:31 "Those will have gardens of perpetual residence; beneath them rivers will flow. They will be adorned therein with bracelets of gold and will wear green garments of fine silk and brocade, reclining therein on adorned couches. Excellent is the reward, and good is the resting place."
Dump and go
▶ The Simpsons - surrounded; Good place? Bad place?:
Marge Busboy
"But, you know, we realized we're more comfortable in a place like this." "Man, you're crazy. This place is a dump. Oh man, I'd be anywhere except this place, that's for sure."
The Good Place
It's likely that some of you have already made the connection with The Good Place show. As for me, I only know it by name, but I understand that the main plot coincides with this subject. I refer to it here because, in addition to that, the 👁️‍🗨️ official imagery features characters sitting on a sofa.
.
.
.
This observation leads me to another. At the beginning of every Simpsons episode there's the couch gag, so I checked what the couch gag is for this episode:
▶ The Simpsons - couch gag: It's about the Simpson family sitting on the couch and their skin seems to have turned green...
◼️ This completes the transcription of the synchromystic correspondence.
End of part 2/3.
Some observations + the conclusion in On the trail of a spirit (3/3) →
submitted by LtColumbo403 to JustSyncIntuit [link] [comments]


2024.04.20 03:13 No-Two2855 Max Azzarello

Dipshit Secrets of our Rotten World: How The Simpsons brainwashed us
If you’re just tuning in to this series, I posted this booklet alleging the wildest totalitarian conspiracy imaginable, with a map to a sea of proof.
The big picture: Cryptocurrency is history’s largest Ponzi scheme that will soon collapse the world economy, all so the U.S. government and their criminal allies can escalate the theft of our entire livelihoods with a fascist world coup.
The media is central to this totalitarian con: For decades, the public has been told that the American dream is dead, that we’ve suffered moral decay, that we are too divided to improve things as our problems mount. It’s cult leader behavior on a mass scale: They tell us we’re in hellworld, they make certain that it’s true, and they bleed us dry.
We’ve already covered how Reddit swarms with trolls to divide us into irony-poisoned tribes, and how our most elite universities manufacture outrage around the Israel-Hamas War in the news.
In this installment, we turn to one of the crown jewels of this criminal propaganda machine, telling us how far from grace the American family has fallen, every week for the last 34 years: The Simpsons.

Processing img 29axk1g8lw0c1...
--
Harvard Connections
The Simpsons is closely linked to Harvard University: More than 30 Harvard alumni have written for the show, including two of the show’s first writers in 1989, Al Jean and Mike Reiss.
Why is that relevant for us?
First, because Harvard is a nexus of many of the richest people on the planet: The odds of any random person becoming a billionaire are about one in 3 million. The odds of a Harvard alumnus becoming a billionaire are roughly one in 5,000, or six-hundred times more likely.
Second, because it’s ruthlessly criminal. Some of this has been covered in media:
  • In June of this year, their body part theft ring was exposed.
  • The Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, was subjected to psychological torture as a Harvard student in the 1960s, administered by former OSS (the precursor to the CIA) officer Henry Murray, which seems to have been part of the CIA’s MKUltra brainwashing program.
With this research, we learn much more:
  • Jeffrey Epstein’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard -- where Epstein held an office for over a decade -- was a Ponzi factory, as is Harvard Innovation Labs’ Launch Lab X, each full of fake-science startups the pretend they’re investing but steal the money instead.
  • The Social Network is a crime cover-up story: Facebook was created by this network for the express purpose of surveillance and control through monopolizing information.
  • Harvard is heavily involved with the cryptocurrency super-Ponzi, investing in crypto companies via the school’s endowment; Zuckerberg’s Libra cryptocurrency was established in Switzerland so they could funnel out stolen money through Credit Suisse; and they hold Bitcoin speeches in the Harvard Memorial Chapel.
With that, we owe it to ourselves to look closely at what The Simpsons has been telling us. Let’s take a tour of Springfield to understand what we’re learning from the cartoon the criminal billionaire factory built.
--
“Don’t forget. You’re here forever.”
In And Maggie Makes Three, Homer quits his miserable job at the nuclear power plant, and instead gets his dream job at a bowling alley. With Maggie on the way, they need more income, so Homer goes back to work for rich, evil supervillain Mr. Burns.
Mr. Burns makes Homer beg for his job back and gives him a plaque that reads, “Don’t forget: you’re here forever.”
In what is viewed by many fans as one of the show’s most touching moments, Homer tapes photos of Maggie to the plaque, so it reads, “Do it for her.”

Processing img wadg7exkow0c1...
Take a minute to soak that one in: The school with all the (evil) billionaires churns out writers for a show that says we have no choice but to work for evil billionaires for the rest of our lives. And what is our great resistance? We get to put pictures at our cubicles.
Do you know the phrase, “Work sets you free”? It was written on the gates of Auschwitz and other Nazi concentration camps. It was an evil, criminal lie that reinforced complacency by telling Jews and other victims their hellish circumstances were their path to salvation, all so the fascist government could steal their lives and labor.
Sound familiar? It’s the same message as this ‘touching’ Simpsons episode: That the best thing we can do for ourselves and our loved ones is to slave away for evil billionaires. That’s what the Harvard grads all tell us, anyway.
--
Marge vs. The Monorail
Ponzi schemes play a massive part of the story of our world. If you want to understand Ponzi schemes, just turn to 1993’s iconic episode Marge vs. The Monorail, written by celebrity Harvard alumnus Conan O’Brien.
Fast-talking conman Lyle Lanley pitches Springfield to invest in a monorail. Marge sees the obvious need (she wants the town to repair Main Street), but the townspeople are swayed by Lanley’s grift. The monorail crashes on its first ride and Lanley runs off with the town’s money.

Processing img ecq4lpklow0c1...
When you think of Ponzi schemes, simply think of Springfield’s monorail: A fake promise that the con artists don’t invest in so they can steal the money instead. There are usually complex financial specifics to make it work, but that is the heart of a Ponzi: the fake promise.
And wouldn’t you know it? The TV show with writers from the school with Ponzi factories told us that us oafish, divided Springfieldians had no choice but to be swayed by the dazzling conman.
--
“What you see is what you breathe.”

Processing img 1jkg5t4mow0c1...
These were the words that adorned the cover of the first issue of Simpsons creator Matt Groening’s comic book, Life in Hell, first published in 1977.
Let’s take that in once more: Groening said, “What you see is what you breathe.” In other words, what we see in our lives shapes who we are. He called it, “Life in Hell.”
Doesn’t life feel like hell in many ways? The daily grind, the rising prices, the worsening problems, the partisan anger, the endless war. Turns out, that was the plan all along: They’ve been telling us we’re in hell while they make things so hellish so they can line their pockets.
While it’s much easier to prove that a piece of media is criminal than specific individuals who made it (not everybody who helps make the Simpsons is in on the brainwashing, of course), this lets us know beyond a doubt that Matt Groening has been an evil death cult puppeteer for the last half century. It’s not proof on its own, but it becomes proof when we see all the other evidence of criminal hellworld propaganda, not just on The Simpsons, but across decades of film and television as we’ll see below.
--
Lisa the Iconoclast
Suffice to say, I have had one hell of a year. Here’s hoping my memoir gets decoded - it’s got all the tropes as these discoveries unfolded in real-time and I ascended into indescribable madness.
As I got deeper into the rabbit hole, there were months of pleading with friends and family members to take me seriously as my (proven) claims grew more outlandish, only making me look crazier in their eyes. I was the most alarmed person they had ever seen, and they took me to be alarming.
I tried to explain how we’re victims of a bigger con than any of them realize, but they would tell me it’s impossible. I tried to show them proof after proof as I found myself with the sudden power to explain and predict news headlines, but they couldn’t see it and wouldn’t engage.
They would tell me I’m misguided or that I need therapy. They might concede that there are crimes taking place, but they’d always follow up with, “That’s how it’s always been,” or, “But we can’t do anything about it,” or “Wouldn’t we be worse off trying to change it?”
Then, as I pieced together Matt Groening’s brainwashing supervillainy, I remembered 1996’s Lisa the Iconoclast and realized that I was living my own Simpsons episode.
In the episode, Lisa discovers that Jebediah Springfield, the town’s founder and hero, was secretly an evil pirate who tried to kill George Washington. Realizing that Springfield is built on a criminal lie, she tries to alert the townspeople but is met with ridicule, hostility, and disbelief.

Processing img sl7th8xmow0c1...
In the end, Lisa realizes that the townspeople are happier not knowing about the fraud at the heart of Springfield, so she keeps the secret to herself.
Where had my friends and family learned to doubt me completely? From The Simpsons, among other places.
Lucky for us, we know these are secrets worth sharing, and that truth profits all.
--
Lightning Round
If you’d like more examples of criminal propaganda in The Simpsons, there could be hundreds more. Here are some I’ll breeze through for brevity’s sake:
  • In The Computer Wore Menace Shoes (2000), Homer promotes wild conspiracy theories online before getting kidnapped and sent to an island by the mysterious deep state. When we know that this criminal network promotes nonsense conspiracies all over the internet themselves, we can recognize that they were telling us this is normal. Want to see a supervillain Easter egg? See if you can find the one hiding in Homer’s online handle, “Mr. X.”
  • What was the purpose of The Simpsons Movie? To prep us for COVID – which was all to mask the theft of trillions via cryptocurrency – by letting us know that black swan events happen, and that the government has powers beyond our comprehension.
  • You may have heard of The Simpsons Predict the Future: that the show mysteriously predicted major world events such as Trump’s presidency, the Titan sub, and September 11th. That’s because they know the scripted future, they want to make themselves seem ominous and powerful, and they want us chasing bullshit conspiracy theories around it. See if you can explain how that and Jeffrey Epstein’s 9/11 painting help prove that Bush did 9/11 in the context of these findings.
--
Beyond the Simpsons
Here are some damning quick hits of other film and television serving the same types of criminal interests. Once you get a feel for how this works and just how pervasive this criminal propaganda has been, I’d wager you could think of some others before long.
  • For the most brazen admission I know of, see Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove from 1964: A classic black comedy about nuclear destruction in the Cold War. Many are familiar with the film’s bizarre subtitle, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Once we realize we’ve got criminal brainwashing going on, we can make sense of it: He got us to stop worrying and love the bomb, and he told us he was doing it.
  • Kubrick’s other work clues into many other key themes: A Clockwork Orange tells us that watching ‘ultraviolence’ can make us turn away from it, knowing full well that it would desensitize us to it. 2001: A Space Odyssey tells us we’ve been violent for millions of years in the opening, tells us to fear future technology knowing the entire tech sector would be used in fearful ways. Eyes Wide Shut is just like QAnon: Make us think that the elites are nonsense evil ritualists so we don’t realize they’re evil financial criminals.
  • Mike Judge is a no-brainer: Beavis and Butthead and Daria tell us to embrace irony, stupidity, and apathy while we mock the earnest hippie loser teacher. Office Space lets us daydream that we escaped the grind, though they never let us leave. Silicon Valley masks the organized crime, reinforcing that tech titans are the main characters who shape the world that we’re helpless to consume. I hope Idiocracy speaks for itself.
  • Oliver Stone’s Wall Street) flipped morality on its head and told us point blank, “Greed is good.” Why? So we’d believe it, as millions of us have come to since.
  • When people think of John Carpenter’s They Live, the first word they think is likely, ‘obey.’ The film tells us that we’re all corporate slaves so they can continue to enslave us.
  • Author Michael Lewis wrote The Big Short to cover up the fact that investment banks like Bear Stearns were funneling Ponzi money and supposed to collapse. Don’t Look Up instills learned helplessness by telling us climate change will kill us and it’s too late to do anything about it.
Ad infinitum.
Pretty wild, right? We’ve got brainwashing secret evil super-Hitlers who’ve lured us into a psychological death camp. That means, per our employee handbook, we get to abolish our criminal government, work together, shut off the brain waves, build an infinitely better world that meets all of our needs, and laugh about this rotten farce forever.
And we’re going to make such good TV shows about it.
--
Processing img ji9djk4qow0c1...
For Phil and Brynn Hartman, whose deaths reek of a cover-up.
submitted by No-Two2855 to maxazzarello [link] [comments]


2024.04.20 03:12 No-Two2855 Max Azzarello Manifesto with links to his evidence.

Max Azzarello Manifesto with links to his evidence.
Dipshit Secrets of our Rotten World: How The Simpsons brainwashed us
If you’re just tuning in to this series, I posted this booklet alleging the wildest totalitarian conspiracy imaginable, with a map to a sea of proof.
The big picture: Cryptocurrency is history’s largest Ponzi scheme that will soon collapse the world economy, all so the U.S. government and their criminal allies can escalate the theft of our entire livelihoods with a fascist world coup.
The media is central to this totalitarian con: For decades, the public has been told that the American dream is dead, that we’ve suffered moral decay, that we are too divided to improve things as our problems mount. It’s cult leader behavior on a mass scale: They tell us we’re in hellworld, they make certain that it’s true, and they bleed us dry.
We’ve already covered how Reddit swarms with trolls to divide us into irony-poisoned tribes, and how our most elite universities manufacture outrage around the Israel-Hamas War in the news.
In this installment, we turn to one of the crown jewels of this criminal propaganda machine, telling us how far from grace the American family has fallen, every week for the last 34 years: The Simpsons.

Processing img 29axk1g8lw0c1...
--
Harvard Connections
The Simpsons is closely linked to Harvard University: More than 30 Harvard alumni have written for the show, including two of the show’s first writers in 1989, Al Jean and Mike Reiss.
Why is that relevant for us?
First, because Harvard is a nexus of many of the richest people on the planet: The odds of any random person becoming a billionaire are about one in 3 million. The odds of a Harvard alumnus becoming a billionaire are roughly one in 5,000, or six-hundred times more likely.
Second, because it’s ruthlessly criminal. Some of this has been covered in media:
  • In June of this year, their body part theft ring was exposed.
  • The Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, was subjected to psychological torture as a Harvard student in the 1960s, administered by former OSS (the precursor to the CIA) officer Henry Murray, which seems to have been part of the CIA’s MKUltra brainwashing program.
With this research, we learn much more:
  • Jeffrey Epstein’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard -- where Epstein held an office for over a decade -- was a Ponzi factory, as is Harvard Innovation Labs’ Launch Lab X, each full of fake-science startups the pretend they’re investing but steal the money instead.
  • The Social Network is a crime cover-up story: Facebook was created by this network for the express purpose of surveillance and control through monopolizing information.
  • Harvard is heavily involved with the cryptocurrency super-Ponzi, investing in crypto companies via the school’s endowment; Zuckerberg’s Libra cryptocurrency was established in Switzerland so they could funnel out stolen money through Credit Suisse; and they hold Bitcoin speeches in the Harvard Memorial Chapel.
With that, we owe it to ourselves to look closely at what The Simpsons has been telling us. Let’s take a tour of Springfield to understand what we’re learning from the cartoon the criminal billionaire factory built.
--
“Don’t forget. You’re here forever.”
In And Maggie Makes Three, Homer quits his miserable job at the nuclear power plant, and instead gets his dream job at a bowling alley. With Maggie on the way, they need more income, so Homer goes back to work for rich, evil supervillain Mr. Burns.
Mr. Burns makes Homer beg for his job back and gives him a plaque that reads, “Don’t forget: you’re here forever.”
In what is viewed by many fans as one of the show’s most touching moments, Homer tapes photos of Maggie to the plaque, so it reads, “Do it for her.”

Processing img wadg7exkow0c1...
Take a minute to soak that one in: The school with all the (evil) billionaires churns out writers for a show that says we have no choice but to work for evil billionaires for the rest of our lives. And what is our great resistance? We get to put pictures at our cubicles.
Do you know the phrase, “Work sets you free”? It was written on the gates of Auschwitz and other Nazi concentration camps. It was an evil, criminal lie that reinforced complacency by telling Jews and other victims their hellish circumstances were their path to salvation, all so the fascist government could steal their lives and labor.
Sound familiar? It’s the same message as this ‘touching’ Simpsons episode: That the best thing we can do for ourselves and our loved ones is to slave away for evil billionaires. That’s what the Harvard grads all tell us, anyway.
--
Marge vs. The Monorail
Ponzi schemes play a massive part of the story of our world. If you want to understand Ponzi schemes, just turn to 1993’s iconic episode Marge vs. The Monorail, written by celebrity Harvard alumnus Conan O’Brien.
Fast-talking conman Lyle Lanley pitches Springfield to invest in a monorail. Marge sees the obvious need (she wants the town to repair Main Street), but the townspeople are swayed by Lanley’s grift. The monorail crashes on its first ride and Lanley runs off with the town’s money.

Processing img ecq4lpklow0c1...
When you think of Ponzi schemes, simply think of Springfield’s monorail: A fake promise that the con artists don’t invest in so they can steal the money instead. There are usually complex financial specifics to make it work, but that is the heart of a Ponzi: the fake promise.
And wouldn’t you know it? The TV show with writers from the school with Ponzi factories told us that us oafish, divided Springfieldians had no choice but to be swayed by the dazzling conman.
--
“What you see is what you breathe.”

Processing img 1jkg5t4mow0c1...
These were the words that adorned the cover of the first issue of Simpsons creator Matt Groening’s comic book, Life in Hell, first published in 1977.
Let’s take that in once more: Groening said, “What you see is what you breathe.” In other words, what we see in our lives shapes who we are. He called it, “Life in Hell.”
Doesn’t life feel like hell in many ways? The daily grind, the rising prices, the worsening problems, the partisan anger, the endless war. Turns out, that was the plan all along: They’ve been telling us we’re in hell while they make things so hellish so they can line their pockets.
While it’s much easier to prove that a piece of media is criminal than specific individuals who made it (not everybody who helps make the Simpsons is in on the brainwashing, of course), this lets us know beyond a doubt that Matt Groening has been an evil death cult puppeteer for the last half century. It’s not proof on its own, but it becomes proof when we see all the other evidence of criminal hellworld propaganda, not just on The Simpsons, but across decades of film and television as we’ll see below.
--
Lisa the Iconoclast
Suffice to say, I have had one hell of a year. Here’s hoping my memoir gets decoded - it’s got all the tropes as these discoveries unfolded in real-time and I ascended into indescribable madness.
As I got deeper into the rabbit hole, there were months of pleading with friends and family members to take me seriously as my (proven) claims grew more outlandish, only making me look crazier in their eyes. I was the most alarmed person they had ever seen, and they took me to be alarming.
I tried to explain how we’re victims of a bigger con than any of them realize, but they would tell me it’s impossible. I tried to show them proof after proof as I found myself with the sudden power to explain and predict news headlines, but they couldn’t see it and wouldn’t engage.
They would tell me I’m misguided or that I need therapy. They might concede that there are crimes taking place, but they’d always follow up with, “That’s how it’s always been,” or, “But we can’t do anything about it,” or “Wouldn’t we be worse off trying to change it?”
Then, as I pieced together Matt Groening’s brainwashing supervillainy, I remembered 1996’s Lisa the Iconoclast and realized that I was living my own Simpsons episode.
In the episode, Lisa discovers that Jebediah Springfield, the town’s founder and hero, was secretly an evil pirate who tried to kill George Washington. Realizing that Springfield is built on a criminal lie, she tries to alert the townspeople but is met with ridicule, hostility, and disbelief.

Processing img sl7th8xmow0c1...
In the end, Lisa realizes that the townspeople are happier not knowing about the fraud at the heart of Springfield, so she keeps the secret to herself.
Where had my friends and family learned to doubt me completely? From The Simpsons, among other places.
Lucky for us, we know these are secrets worth sharing, and that truth profits all.
--
Lightning Round
If you’d like more examples of criminal propaganda in The Simpsons, there could be hundreds more. Here are some I’ll breeze through for brevity’s sake:
  • In The Computer Wore Menace Shoes (2000), Homer promotes wild conspiracy theories online before getting kidnapped and sent to an island by the mysterious deep state. When we know that this criminal network promotes nonsense conspiracies all over the internet themselves, we can recognize that they were telling us this is normal. Want to see a supervillain Easter egg? See if you can find the one hiding in Homer’s online handle, “Mr. X.”
  • What was the purpose of The Simpsons Movie? To prep us for COVID – which was all to mask the theft of trillions via cryptocurrency – by letting us know that black swan events happen, and that the government has powers beyond our comprehension.
  • You may have heard of The Simpsons Predict the Future: that the show mysteriously predicted major world events such as Trump’s presidency, the Titan sub, and September 11th. That’s because they know the scripted future, they want to make themselves seem ominous and powerful, and they want us chasing bullshit conspiracy theories around it. See if you can explain how that and Jeffrey Epstein’s 9/11 painting help prove that Bush did 9/11 in the context of these findings.
--
Beyond the Simpsons
Here are some damning quick hits of other film and television serving the same types of criminal interests. Once you get a feel for how this works and just how pervasive this criminal propaganda has been, I’d wager you could think of some others before long.
  • For the most brazen admission I know of, see Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove from 1964: A classic black comedy about nuclear destruction in the Cold War. Many are familiar with the film’s bizarre subtitle, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Once we realize we’ve got criminal brainwashing going on, we can make sense of it: He got us to stop worrying and love the bomb, and he told us he was doing it.
  • Kubrick’s other work clues into many other key themes: A Clockwork Orange tells us that watching ‘ultraviolence’ can make us turn away from it, knowing full well that it would desensitize us to it. 2001: A Space Odyssey tells us we’ve been violent for millions of years in the opening, tells us to fear future technology knowing the entire tech sector would be used in fearful ways. Eyes Wide Shut is just like QAnon: Make us think that the elites are nonsense evil ritualists so we don’t realize they’re evil financial criminals.
  • Mike Judge is a no-brainer: Beavis and Butthead and Daria tell us to embrace irony, stupidity, and apathy while we mock the earnest hippie loser teacher. Office Space lets us daydream that we escaped the grind, though they never let us leave. Silicon Valley masks the organized crime, reinforcing that tech titans are the main characters who shape the world that we’re helpless to consume. I hope Idiocracy speaks for itself.
  • Oliver Stone’s Wall Street) flipped morality on its head and told us point blank, “Greed is good.” Why? So we’d believe it, as millions of us have come to since.
  • When people think of John Carpenter’s They Live, the first word they think is likely, ‘obey.’ The film tells us that we’re all corporate slaves so they can continue to enslave us.
  • Author Michael Lewis wrote The Big Short to cover up the fact that investment banks like Bear Stearns were funneling Ponzi money and supposed to collapse. Don’t Look Up instills learned helplessness by telling us climate change will kill us and it’s too late to do anything about it.
Ad infinitum.
Pretty wild, right? We’ve got brainwashing secret evil super-Hitlers who’ve lured us into a psychological death camp. That means, per our employee handbook, we get to abolish our criminal government, work together, shut off the brain waves, build an infinitely better world that meets all of our needs, and laugh about this rotten farce forever.
And we’re going to make such good TV shows about it.
--
Processing img ji9djk4qow0c1...
For Phil and Brynn Hartman, whose deaths reek of a cover-up.
submitted by No-Two2855 to maxazzarello [link] [comments]


2024.04.20 00:42 denverblondy1972 My entire family which is very small consists of narcissists. They are criminal and cover up crimes against their own children.

For years I have gone through unknowingly narcissistic abuse by my parents and my sister and now her children. I had no idea what it was or what they were. I always thought it was me. I was made to believe that and I truly did until recently. I come from a family that is extremely sick and full of narcissism. Just when you think they can't stoop any lower they do. It's unsettling to admit to yourself that you were never loved or cared for but I never was and I never will be. Being the scapegoat and the black sheep has built a pillar of strength out of me while they were trying to destroy me. For years I tried to rescue people and build them up that don't want to get better that don't want to be happy they choose to be sick and they choose to be miserable. Not my fault.
Today I'm doing something different and that is they have started to make false police reports against me when they don't like where the conversation is going. This is terrifying and it's a way to try to control me and to keeping the horrible secret quiet. I'm not going to keep it quiet anymore. I'm waiting for the police officer that had to waste his time yesterday to call me and actually tell someone of authority what the real deal is and why they're doing this. I hope he believes me because there's six of them and one of me and they will even lie about abuse they've inflicted on each other. I'm shaking head to toe right now. I'm pure white and my heart is pounding because I'm going to make their biggest nightmare happen. Their mistake was making false police reports that is an all-time low. When you waste law enforcements time and are completely lying on somebody? A huge problem because there are real emergencies happening elsewhere that those police officers should be at. Not at my parents house because they don't like the way a conversation is going and they've lost control of me and so they try to gain it back by calling the police on their own blood that has done nothing to warrant this. I can't be quiet about it anymore I have to say something.
My sister married a man when I was 14 years old and she was 19 and he was 20. When I was 15 years old I was over at my sister's house with my two friends and I was helping with the babies well my sister was at work and my two nieces who were three and one at that time. My brother-in-law that night tried to rape me in the bathroom. It was horrifying. I was so terrified that I became stronger than him because I was praying in my mind God help me God help me. God turned me into a thousand pound statue because he couldn't push me down he couldn't do anything to me he couldn't pick me up and I remember thinking he's not trying very hard. He reared his ugly head back and looked straight into my eyes and said oh my God what are you? He proceeded to bang his own head through his bathroom wall and it came out in the hallway and my two friends came and rescued me. After that? I did the right things I told my parents and no one ever called the police. Not my mom dad or sister.
My parents not once asked me if I was okay said they were sorry that happened to me if there was anything that they could do. They completely ignored me and would guilt me when my sister's family moved clear out to Washington when they would hear songs come on the radio like wind beneath My wings are forever Young they would cry for those grandkids but not a tear for me not a word of comfort. They closed their door when I would have night terrors in the middle of the night.
The way they behave around other people including my sister including her kids now is not who they really are. They groom people and I have figured out that they groom people just like child molesters because their fear is equal the same and that is being discovered and exposed. What I didn't realize was in my situation the narcissist support the child molester. My family has covered up sex crimes against children since 1988. My nieces could have been saved because they were three and one at the time and my ex brother-in-law's preference was 10 to 17. He raped his own sister. He came on to every single one of his brother's girlfriends and wives and every single one of his sons girlfriends to the point where they would say I'm not comfortable coming to your house anymore your dad is too touchy-feely. His own daughters never brought any girlfriends any friends to their house and I know exactly why. He tried to rape me in 1989. Recently my sister slept with my ex-husband and my parents took them out as a couple fishing and to Rockies games behind my back. My sister says the reason I did that with Jimmy is because you seduced my . My sister says the reason I did that with Jimmy was because you seduced and antagonized bart. Recently said this! She slept with my ex-husband and blamed me for it. She rolled on me like a cheap dime store s*** and told me she wouldn't care if I dated one of her ex-husbands. I said yes you would and you should! I would never do that! That's how sick these people are.
There were numerous neighbor girls that were molested and I knew this because my sister would call my mom and b**** about it but yet none of them did anything. I knew I couldn't do anything even when I reached the age of 18 because I would have all of them that would lie and cover it up. When nieces and nephew found out what happened to me because my sister while going through a divorce happily tells her own children what happened to me and gives them that shame to wea. That's the kind of mom she is no conscience and these kids start to call me saying auntie Mimi why didn't you come and get us out of there when our dad did that to you? I was stunned and I stuttered. They had a great question and it was important I answer that carefully but it took me back I had to sit down or I would have fallen down.. And then I remembered,
I was 15. I said this and I said now I have two parents downstairs that can answer this question but I want to tell you it's going to be the dog ate my homework excuses and it's going to hurt you bad. Would you like to know before you talk to them what they're going to say or would you like to have them tell you themselves and not have a warning and be shattered? My oldest niece said no you tell me first. I did. I said they're going to tell you this that they didn't want you to go into a foster home all of you guys because then they wouldn't know who you were with. My response to that has always been well how worse going to get for them and they deserved a chance! You will also hear that if they have the boss to say it they didn't want to take custody of you because they had raised all of their kids me and my sister and didn't want to race three more. Nobody said that they had to raise anybody and your Aunt Trish and Uncle Kurt would have been happy to take you guys in. What I'm saying is there is no good explanation that they're going to offer you because either way you cut it it's wrong and I'm so sorry.
I went downstairs with the phone in my hand and I handed the phone to my parents with a smirk of his Cheshire cat on my face because then I was 41 years old. I thought chickens have come home to roost and I want to see the looks on their faces answering this when there is no answer good enough to cover up sex crimes on children.
I'm 52 now and I've kept this secret hidden out of fear of what they would do to me and fear of not being believed but today is the day. I'm waiting for a call back from a police officer whose time they wasted and I'm starting to lose my nerve. They need to know why they are calling them wasting their time I need to take that chance and actually finally tell someone of authority. Tell somebody at all..
If you've had narcissistic parents/family members, you've been abused. I'm old enough now to take that chance and and trust somebody. I'm ready. I'm shaking and I'm going back and forth should I answer the phone or shouldn't I because it's been a couple of hours now. I have to.
These people that go by sister mother and father knowingly and willingly kept a child molester in business it happened to their own 15-year-old daughter and that was me. They did nothing but what they did do? They brought me back around him after he did that to me as a minor. This was such a serious situation my teacher wanted to take custody of me because he knew what they were doing was horrendous. My mother was a school bus driver for the same district I went to school at. When you're a bus driver or you work around children you sign a paper that says you solely swear that if you suspect child abuse there I was for everyone to see and nobody saw. Is it my fault because
It's sickening what I come from. I jokingly say this. I want a blood transfusion because I don't want to share anything with these people. They have turnips in their chests that I've been desperately trying to get blood from. You can't get blood out of turnips. I don't know what's more crazy, them being horrendous or me for trying to get blood out of these things because they're not human. Normal human beings don't go around deliberately intentionally willingly and knowingly plotting and planning to take other people down no matter what the cost and they're happy the closer you are to them the happier they are. Preferably their next of kin.
Pat Benatar was right hell is for children. My mom and dad and my sister belong in a prison cell right next door to Maxwell that sick woman that took underage girls to her boyfriend. She knew what he was. She did it anyway. He committed suicide in prison. Good riddance. My mom my dad and my sister are exactly like her. I am nothing like any of them. They will never change, they never grow, they're still so sickly immature because being the victim is easy. You don't ever have to admit you're wrongs or change who you are and going to 12 step meetings and church and counseling does them zero good. Those are just places where they can again manipulate others taking no accountability and blame everything on everybody else. It's pathetic.
Wish me luck. If there's anybody no matter what your age is and you're reading this and you can relate you're not alone. I also understand what I'm doing is very risky. I've told one of my close friends that if anything happens to me it needs to be investigated. You never know. Be careful everybody I respect all of you. E
submitted by denverblondy1972 to narcissisticparents [link] [comments]


2024.04.19 23:47 DavidLurkingOnReddit The Ponzi Papers - An Online Manifesto written by M. Crosby, a man who ignited himself outside of the Trump trials

The Ponzi Papers - An Online Manifesto written by M. Crosby, a man who ignited himself outside of the Trump trials
The Ponzi Papers Subscribe Sign in
Read in the Substack app Open app I have set myself on fire outside the Trump Trial.
M. CROSBY APR 19, 2024
331 My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan.
This extreme act of protest is to draw attention to an urgent and important discovery:
We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup.
These claims sound like fantastical conspiracy theory, but they are not. They are proof of conspiracy. If you investigate this mountain of research, you will prove them too. If you learn a great deal about Ponzi schemes, you will discover that our life is a lie. If you follow this story and the links below, you will discover the rotten truth of ‘post-truth America’. You will learn the scariest and stupidest story in world history. And you will realize that we are all in a desperate state of emergency that requires your action.
To my friends and family, witnesses and first responders, I deeply apologize for inflicting this pain upon you. But I assure you it is a drop in the bucket compared to what our government intends to inflict.
Because these words are true, this is an act of revolution.

Last March, a billionaire named Peter Thiel started a bank run on Silicon Valley Bank. I knew enough about Thiel that I found this incredibly suspicious: My hunch was that this was intentional, though I couldn’t fathom why.
I began investigating online, and quickly found cryptocurrency’s fingerprints all over it. The bank run occurred just days after Silvergate Bank – which catered almost exclusively to crypto companies – collapsed. Meanwhile, several crypto cheerleaders were all over financial media warning of a regional banking crisis, and nobody in media was addressing the clear crypto connections.
I dug deep into the financials of Thiel’s venture capital firm Founders Fund and eventually uncovered the following, all proven many times over.
Cryptocurrency is our first planetary multi-trillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. It was expressly created for this purpose by a laundry list of rich and powerful people out of Stanford/Silicon Valley and Harvard/Facebook. The March 2023 bank failures were all intentional: the banks were used to move out stolen Ponzi money. This signals that they’re no longer dumping cash in to keep the cryptocurrency Ponzi afloat, and that it will soon go insolvent, as all Ponzis must. When the Ponzi scheme goes insolvent, it will take down half the stock market with it: The perpetrators used their major companies to pipe into the blockchain so they could funnel money out from the crypto exchanges. This includes Google, Tesla, Apple, PayPal, Facebook, Disney, Walmart, Target, InBev, Zoom, and countless others. It is a Ponzi scheme so large that it created global inflation, which is why the price of Bitcoin has been a remarkable leading indicator for inflation rates. Victims who bought crypto don’t realize their money has already been stolen, so the money gets double-counted by the victims and the criminals who stole it. As it turns out, our elites are awash in Ponzi schemes. Stanford’s StartX.com investment fund and Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Program for Evolutionary Dynamics’ he ran at Harvard are both fake-science Ponzi factories that these schools have invested billions in: They are filled with fraudulent companies that use smoke and mirrors to promise miraculous new technology, but always collapse while the perpetrators only get richer.

Funneling trillions of dollars in stolen cash through the stock market created the largest stock-market anomaly in history. The stock chart signature of a Ponzi scheme is a massive increase (while they stack up cash) and then a massive fall (as they funnel out the stolen cash). This chart shape appeared in all the companies listed above. In order to explain the massive anomaly, our criminal government unleashed COVID on the world and told us these were the “stay at home stocks.”

Ponzi schemes are vicious beasts, and cryptocurrency is history’s largest Ponzi by orders of magnitude. It could best be described as an economic doomsday device, intentionally made to shatter the world economy.
The U.S. government is fully involved in this totalitarian con: To illustrate its bipartisan support, I’ll note that nearly every participant of the Clinton Global Initiative has ties to cryptocurrency, while two of the biggest tech VCs who participated are Trump associates Josh Kushner and Anthony Scaramucci.
To better understand our form of government, I will point you to one of the most astonishing pieces of stand-alone evidence I’ve found: Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton’s 1988 DNC speech where he nominated Mike Dukakis for president against George H.W. Bush. The speech is a vile, mean-spirited roast of Dukakis that makes no sense whatsoever: For Clinton to ruthlessly attack a member of his own party should have been political suicide, and he repeatedly mocks Dukakis’ noble and earnest qualities.
Notably, actor Rob Lowe, who was supporting Dukakis, was victim of a teen sex blackmail operation at the DNC that year. Since we know Clinton is a close associate with teen sex blackmail artist Jeffrey Epstein, we can suddenly make perfect sense of the nonsensical speech by applying this lens: Bill Clinton is a cocky mob boss who blackmailed Mike Dukakis because Dukakis thought his job was to help the public. He teases out the future public revelation that Kitty Dukakis drank rubbing alcohol, and offers a strange anecdote about the crack epidemic that reveals he is an exceedingly proud drug runner.
What does this revelation tell us? That our government is conning us completely. That Bill Clinton was secretly on (former CIA Director) George H.W. Bush’s side, and that the Democrat vs. Republican division has been entirely manufactured ever since: Clinton is with Bush; Gore is with Bush; Trump is with Hillary, and so on. When they present themselves in public, they are acting as characters that are against one another, practicing kayfabe as wrestlers do.
As it turns out, we have a secret kleptocracy: Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry. They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money.
Since it is fully parasitic, a secret kleptocracy is an incredibly unstable form of government – left to its own devices, it can only lead to fascism or failed state.

One of the key findings of this research is that Harvard University is one of the largest organized crime fronts in history, which is how they churn out billionaires – it’s a major hub of this sprawling criminal network.
As it turns out, dozens of the writers of The Simpsons went to Harvard. So I asked myself the question: If The Simpsons served the interests of organized crime, how would it do so?
Well, it offers a dysfunctional family suffering from moral decay, a community incapable of solving its problems, a worker drone who slaves away for an evil billionaire, and cathartic laughs for our poor collective circumstances.
There are some notable specifics as it relates to this research, too: In Marge vs. The Monorail, the townsfolk are too oafish and divided to invest in the town’s needs (fix Main Street) and fall for the charms of a dazzling showman with a bogus monorail Ponzi scheme. When we know that the show is closely linked to an organization that invests billions of dollars in Ponzi factories, this becomes quite damning.
In Lisa the Iconoclast, Lisa discovers that town founder Jebediah Springfield was a secret criminal con artist, and that the townsfolk’s lives are a lie. Realizing this is an important discovery, she desperately tries to get the townsfolk to listen to her. But they meet her with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship and she fails to get through to them. Ultimately, she realizes the town is so far gone that perhaps it’s better for them to be lied to by con artists, and she keeps the secret to herself.
And here I’ve been, like Lisa Simpson, desperately trying to get friends, family, and the public to believe the proof of a totalitarian con I’m trying to show them, and they’ve turned away with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship.
And so, we realize the criminal truth of The Simpsons: Our elites are telling us that our eroding collective circumstances are our own fault, and we can’t do anything about it, while they steal the American Dream from us. It is, for lack of a more elegant word, brainwashing.

Lastly, we string these major discoveries together: Cryptocurrency is an economic doomsday device; our government is a secret kleptocracy; The Simpsons exists to brainwash us. From there, the only research we need is critical thinking and we’re able to piece together the true story of our circumstances.
Consider America since 1988: Institutions like healthcare and universities have become parasitic in their skyrocketing prices. News media tells us to be angry and tribalized. Daytime television warns us of moral decay. Local news tell us to fear our neighbors. The Simpsons tells us we’re too oafish and divided to save the American Dream. Seinfeld tells us to celebrate the assholes and be irritated by all the normal people around us. “Reality” TV tells us that real life is filled with hedonism and strife.
Social media, owned by crypto criminals like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, is flooded with nonsense conspiracy theories and memes reminding us that we are hopeless, helpless, anxious, depressed, ironic, scared, apathetic, escapist, lonely, misguided, and jaded, telling us we can’t do anything but have a laugh at our circumstances.
Liberals mock the hypocrisy of conservatives; conservatives mock the hypocrisy of liberals, and our collective circumstances erode. The left shouts “All Cops Are Bastards,” which ensures they’ll be hated by the police and the public (and flies in the face of leftist theory). The public’s distrust of the government is at an all-time high, but so is the belief that we are helpless to do anything about it.
And with all this, a sharp rise in apocalyptic messaging: Climate change will kill us all; COVID will kill us all; vaccines will kill us all; AI will kill us all – no matter the bubbles we ascribe to, we’re bombarded with existential crises with no solutions. We’ve seen a surge in apocalyptic film, literature, and video games that tell us there is no way out of our poor circumstances but total societal breakdown. Zombies tell us that the public is our enemy. If you go to your nearest convenience store, you can buy a can of water called “Liquid Death.”
This is our rotten farce: For our entire lives, we have been flooded with media designed to slowly steer us into a world where the American Dream was dead, where the public was fully divided against itself, where everybody believed we were powerless to do anything about our worsening circumstances. It is all so they can organize an unprecedented, apocalyptic rug pull on the entire populace as they pivot to fascism, which is perhaps best understood as kleptocracy at the barrel of a gun.
When we piece it all together, we understand the truth: We are in a totalitarian doomsday cult.
Why on earth would our elites do this? There are many reasons, but the simplest is because capitalism is unsustainable, and they knew it: Climate change and resource extraction would catch up eventually. So, they never intended to sustain it. They knew all along that they would gobble up all the wealth they could, and then yank the rug out from under us so they could pivot to a hellish fascist dystopia.

Things escalated wildly in 1988 when former CIA Director George H.W. Bush got the White House, but this plan had been in action long prior:
Why is Stanley Kubrick’s comedy about mutually assured destruction called Dr. Strangelove: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? Because he was a cocky secret fascist who was getting us to stop worrying and love the bomb. Why did he make A Clockwork Orange? So we’d rejoice at ultra-violence designed to desensitize us to the horrors of the world.
Why were the Manson Family murders crawling with cover-ups and intelligence agents? Because our government wanted to make us fear for our lives and believe that hippies are deranged psychopaths.
Why did Walt Disney produce a fraudulent documentary that told us Lemmings follow each other off cliffs? So we would believe it.
Why did The Beatles tell us to fear the taxman, to scoff at revolution, chase nonsense conspiracy theories, and that happiness is a warm gun? So we would believe it.
Why did Easy Rider tell us that the hippie movement was dead? So we would believe it.
Why did Chinatown end with defeatism in the face of massive corruption? So we would believe it.
Why did George Orwell tell us of a hellish future of totalitarian control that we are powerless to stop? So we would believe it.
Why did Wall Street tell us “greed is good”? So we would believe it.
Why did Do The Right Thing tell us we’re all racially tribalized? So we would believe it.
Why did Simpsons creator Matt Groening make a comic strip called Life in Hell? So we would believe it.
And on, and on, and on, and on. When it comes to any popular media, if you ask yourself the question, “Why would secret doomsday cult kleptocrats want the public to consume this?”, you will find your answers.

This is obviously very bad news, but the biggest lie we’ve been told is that we are powerless. We’ve got one way out of hellworld, and that’s for the public to realize that we’ve been conned completely so we can build a united movement that shatters every lie they’ve told us, mocks this rotten farce as loudly as it deserves, and aims at nothing short of abolishing our criminal government so we can build one that serves the public.
To understand this story is to see right through the con, to become immune to the endless sea of criminal propaganda, and to feel the great joy and power that comes with freedom.
If a small number of people quickly put on these truth-colored glasses, we are in for an unimaginably bright future. If not, we get an apocalypse.
For more information, I’ve put together this booklet that includes other major findings and a map to a sea of proof, along with all the other essays on this site.
For the true history of America since the end of World War II, see here.
To see this discovery unfold in real-time, along with further explanations, hundreds of pieces of evidence not covered here, advice, inspiration, political theory, and the heart and soul of a man escaping history’s largest doomsday cult, see my Instagram story highlights. I apologize for leaving things so scattered, but this has been an exhausting affair. So long as you understand this (true) ideology, you will be able to learn the whole story.
Here is a federal lawsuit I filed against dozens of perpetrators of the cryptocurrency Ponzi – not for litigation, but just to preserve the information and attach my name to it. I was terrified and hadn’t slept in days and it shows, but it served its purpose of keeping myself alive long enough to keep learning and telling this story.
I no longer have my original research files from the crypto rabbit hole. If you want to see them, you’ll have to get my laptop back from the government. Ask them how they got it - it’s a very fun story.
I hope you know how powerful you are. I wish you a hell of a lot more than luck.
Max Azzarello
Subscribe to The Ponzi Papers By M. Crosby
After Peter Thiel started a bank run in March 2023, we did 1,500 hours of research and uncovered proof of a totalitarian con-job that's been bleeding us dry since 1988 and will soon collapse the world economy.
Subscribe
331 Share 331 Comments Commenting has been turned off for this post
Top
Latest
Dipshit Secrets of our Rotten World A summary of the world's largest conspiracy that will soon propel us into World War III and collapse the world economy. OCT 11, 2023 • M. CROSBY
14 The True History of the World (Haunted Carnival Edition) For a printable PDF, click here. This story was essentially proven in reverse: In March 2023, a tech billionaire named Peter Thiel started a bank run… MAR 20 • M. CROSBY
6 NYU is a Mob Front For a brief summary of NYU’s crimes, see the booklet above (printable PDF available here). For a more detailed summary and footnotes, see below. A brief… APR 15 • M. CROSBY
5 See all Ready for more?
Subscribe © 2024 Maxwell Azzarello Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start Writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture
submitted by DavidLurkingOnReddit to ForMyRecords [link] [comments]


2024.04.19 21:25 Last-Satisfaction333 Max Azzarello letter

My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan.
This extreme act of protest is to draw attention to an urgent and important discovery:
We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup.
These claims sound like fantastical conspiracy theory, but they are not. They are proof of conspiracy. If you investigate this mountain of research, you will prove them too. If you learn a great deal about Ponzi schemes, you will discover that our life is a lie. If you follow this story and the links below, you will discover the rotten truth of ‘post-truth America’. You will learn the scariest and stupidest story in world history. And you will realize that we are all in a desperate state of emergency that requires your action.
To my friends and family, witnesses and first responders, I deeply apologize for inflicting this pain upon you. But I assure you it is a drop in the bucket compared to what our government intends to inflict.
Because these words are true, this is an act of revolution.
--
Last March, a billionaire named Peter Thiel started a bank run on Silicon Valley Bank. I knew enough about Thiel that I found this incredibly suspicious: My hunch was that this was intentional, though I couldn’t fathom why.
I began investigating online, and quickly found cryptocurrency’s fingerprints all over it. The bank run occurred just days after Silvergate Bank – which catered almost exclusively to crypto companies – collapsed. Meanwhile, several crypto cheerleaders were all over financial media warning of a regional banking crisis, and nobody in media was addressing the clear crypto connections.
I dug deep into the financials of Thiel’s venture capital firm Founders Fund and eventually uncovered the following, all proven many times over.
Cryptocurrency is our first planetary multi-trillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. It was expressly created for this purpose by a laundry list of rich and powerful people out of Stanford/Silicon Valley and Harvard/Facebook.
The March 2023 bank failures were all intentional: the banks were used to move out stolen Ponzi money. This signals that they’re no longer dumping cash in to keep the cryptocurrency Ponzi afloat, and that it will soon go insolvent, as all Ponzis must.
When the Ponzi scheme goes insolvent, it will take down half the stock market with it: The perpetrators used their major companies to pipe into the blockchain so they could funnel money out from the crypto exchanges. This includes Google, Tesla, Apple, PayPal, Facebook, Disney, Walmart, Target, InBev, Zoom, and countless others.
It is a Ponzi scheme so large that it created global inflation, which is why the price of Bitcoin has been a remarkable leading indicator for inflation rates. Victims who bought crypto don’t realize their money has already been stolen, so the money gets double-counted by the victims and the criminals who stole it.
As it turns out, our elites are awash in Ponzi schemes. Stanford’s StartX.com investment fund and Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Program for Evolutionary Dynamics’ he ran at Harvard are both fake-science Ponzi factories that these schools have invested billions in: They are filled with fraudulent companies that use smoke and mirrors to promise miraculous new technology, but always collapse while the perpetrators only get richer.
Funneling trillions of dollars in stolen cash through the stock market created the largest stock-market anomaly in history. The stock chart signature of a Ponzi scheme is a massive increase (while they stack up cash) and then a massive fall (as they funnel out the stolen cash). This chart shape appeared in all the companies listed above. In order to explain the massive anomaly, our criminal government unleashed COVID on the world and told us these were the “stay at home stocks.”
--
Ponzi schemes are vicious beasts, and cryptocurrency is history’s largest Ponzi by orders of magnitude. It could best be described as an economic doomsday device, intentionally made to shatter the world economy.
The U.S. government is fully involved in this totalitarian con: To illustrate its bipartisan support, I’ll note that nearly every participant of the Clinton Global Initiative has ties to cryptocurrency, while two of the biggest tech VCs who participated are Trump associates Josh Kushner and Anthony Scaramucci.
To better understand our form of government, I will point you to one of the most astonishing pieces of stand-alone evidence I’ve found: Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton’s 1988 DNC speech where he nominated Mike Dukakis for president against George H.W. Bush. The speech is a vile, mean-spirited roast of Dukakis that makes no sense whatsoever: For Clinton to ruthlessly attack a member of his own party should have been political suicide, and he repeatedly mocks Dukakis’ noble and earnest qualities.
Notably, actor Rob Lowe, who was supporting Dukakis, was victim of a teen sex blackmail operation at the DNC that year. Since we know Clinton is a close associate with teen sex blackmail artist Jeffrey Epstein, we can suddenly make perfect sense of the nonsensical speech by applying this lens: Bill Clinton is a cocky mob boss who blackmailed Mike Dukakis because Dukakis thought his job was to help the public. He teases out the future public revelation that Kitty Dukakis drank rubbing alcohol, and offers a strange anecdote about the crack epidemic that reveals he is an exceedingly proud drug runner.
What does this revelation tell us? That our government is conning us completely. That Bill Clinton was secretly on (former CIA Director) George H.W. Bush’s side, and that the Democrat vs. Republican division has been entirely manufactured ever since: Clinton is with Bush; Gore is with Bush; Trump is with Hillary, and so on. When they present themselves in public, they are acting as characters that are against one another, practicing kayfabe as wrestlers do.
As it turns out, we have a secret kleptocracy: Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry. They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money.
Since it is fully parasitic, a secret kleptocracy is an incredibly unstable form of government – left to its own devices, it can only lead to fascism or failed state.
--
One of the key findings of this research is that Harvard University is one of the largest organized crime fronts in history, which is how they churn out billionaires – it’s a major hub of this sprawling criminal network.
As it turns out, dozens of the writers of The Simpsons went to Harvard. So I asked myself the question: If The Simpsons served the interests of organized crime, how would it do so?
Well, it offers a dysfunctional family suffering from moral decay, a community incapable of solving its problems, a worker drone who slaves away for an evil billionaire, and cathartic laughs for our poor collective circumstances.
There are some notable specifics as it relates to this research, too: In Marge vs. The Monorail, the townsfolk are too oafish and divided to invest in the town’s needs (fix Main Street) and fall for the charms of a dazzling showman with a bogus monorail Ponzi scheme. When we know that the show is closely linked to an organization that invests billions of dollars in Ponzi factories, this becomes quite damning.
In Lisa the Iconoclast, Lisa discovers that town founder Jebediah Springfield was a secret criminal con artist, and that the townsfolk’s lives are a lie. Realizing this is an important discovery, she desperately tries to get the townsfolk to listen to her. But they meet her with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship and she fails to get through to them. Ultimately, she realizes the town is so far gone that perhaps it’s better for them to be lied to by con artists, and she keeps the secret to herself.
And here I’ve been, like Lisa Simpson, desperately trying to get friends, family, and the public to believe the proof of a totalitarian con I’m trying to show them, and they’ve turned away with hostility, apathy, disbelief, and partisanship.
And so, we realize the criminal truth of The Simpsons: Our elites are telling us that our eroding collective circumstances are our own fault, and we can’t do anything about it, while they steal the American Dream from us. It is, for lack of a more elegant word, brainwashing.

Lastly, we string these major discoveries together: Cryptocurrency is an economic doomsday device; our government is a secret kleptocracy; The Simpsons exists to brainwash us. From there, the only research we need is critical thinking and we’re able to piece together the true story of our circumstances.
Consider America since 1988: Institutions like healthcare and universities have become parasitic in their skyrocketing prices. News media tells us to be angry and tribalized. Daytime television warns us of moral decay. Local news tell us to fear our neighbors. The Simpsons tells us we’re too oafish and divided to save the American Dream. Seinfeld tells us to celebrate the assholes and be irritated by all the normal people around us. “Reality” TV tells us that real life is filled with hedonism and strife.
Social media, owned by crypto criminals like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, is flooded with nonsense conspiracy theories and memes reminding us that we are hopeless, helpless, anxious, depressed, ironic, scared, apathetic, escapist, lonely, misguided, and jaded, telling us we can’t do anything but have a laugh at our circumstances.
Liberals mock the hypocrisy of conservatives; conservatives mock the hypocrisy of liberals, and our collective circumstances erode. The left shouts “All Cops Are Bastards,” which ensures they’ll be hated by the police and the public (and flies in the face of leftist theory). The public’s distrust of the government is at an all-time high, but so is the belief that we are helpless to do anything about it.
And with all this, a sharp rise in apocalyptic messaging: Climate change will kill us all; COVID will kill us all; vaccines will kill us all; AI will kill us all – no matter the bubbles we ascribe to, we’re bombarded with existential crises with no solutions. We’ve seen a surge in apocalyptic film, literature, and video games that tell us there is no way out of our poor circumstances but total societal breakdown. Zombies tell us that the public is our enemy. If you go to your nearest convenience store, you can buy a can of water called “Liquid Death.”
This is our rotten farce: For our entire lives, we have been flooded with media designed to slowly steer us into a world where the American Dream was dead, where the public was fully divided against itself, where everybody believed we were powerless to do anything about our worsening circumstances. It is all so they can organize an unprecedented, apocalyptic rug pull on the entire populace as they pivot to fascism, which is perhaps best understood as kleptocracy at the barrel of a gun.
When we piece it all together, we understand the truth: We are in a totalitarian doomsday cult.
Why on earth would our elites do this? There are many reasons, but the simplest is because capitalism is unsustainable, and they knew it: Climate change and resource extraction would catch up eventually. So, they never intended to sustain it. They knew all along that they would gobble up all the wealth they could, and then yank the rug out from under us so they could pivot to a hellish fascist dystopia.

Things escalated wildly in 1988 when former CIA Director George H.W. Bush got the White House, but this plan had been in action long prior:
Why is Stanley Kubrick’s comedy about mutually assured destruction called Dr. Strangelove: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? Because he was a cocky secret fascist who was getting us to stop worrying and love the bomb. Why did he make A Clockwork Orange? So we’d rejoice at ultra-violence designed to desensitize us to the horrors of the world.
Why were the Manson Family murders crawling with cover-ups and intelligence agents? Because our government wanted to make us fear for our lives and believe that hippies are deranged psychopaths.
Why did Walt Disney produce a fraudulent documentary that told us Lemmings follow each other off cliffs? So we would believe it.
Why did The Beatles tell us to fear the taxman, to scoff at revolution, chase nonsense conspiracy theories, and that happiness is a warm gun? So we would believe it.
Why did Easy Rider tell us that the hippie movement was dead? So we would believe it.
Why did Chinatown end with defeatism in the face of massive corruption? So we would believe it.
Why did George Orwell tell us of a hellish future of totalitarian control that we are powerless to stop? So we would believe it.
Why did Wall Street tell us “greed is good”? So we would believe it.
Why did Do The Right Thing tell us we’re all racially tribalized? So we would believe it.
Why did Simpsons creator Matt Groening make a comic strip called Life in Hell? So we would believe it.
And on, and on, and on, and on. When it comes to any popular media, if you ask yourself the question, “Why would secret doomsday cult kleptocrats want the public to consume this?”, you will find your answers.

This is obviously very bad news, but the biggest lie we’ve been told is that we are powerless. We’ve got one way out of hellworld, and that’s for the public to realize that we’ve been conned completely so we can build a united movement that shatters every lie they’ve told us, mocks this rotten farce as loudly as it deserves, and aims at nothing short of abolishing our criminal government so we can build one that serves the public.
To understand this story is to see right through the con, to become immune to the endless sea of criminal propaganda, and to feel the great joy and power that comes with freedom.
If a small number of people quickly put on these truth-colored glasses, we are in for an unimaginably bright future. If not, we get an apocalypse.
For more information, I’ve put together this booklet that includes other major findings and a map to a sea of proof, along with all the other essays on this site.
For the true history of America since the end of World War II, see here.
To see this discovery unfold in real-time, along with further explanations, hundreds of pieces of evidence not covered here, advice, inspiration, political theory, and the heart and soul of a man escaping history’s largest doomsday cult, see my Instagram story highlights. I apologize for leaving things so scattered, but this has been an exhausting affair. So long as you understand this (true) ideology, you will be able to learn the whole story.
Here is a federal lawsuit I filed against dozens of perpetrators of the cryptocurrency Ponzi – not for litigation, but just to preserve the information and attach my name to it. I was terrified and hadn’t slept in days and it shows, but it served its purpose of keeping myself alive long enough to keep learning and telling this story.
I no longer have my original research files from the crypto rabbit hole. If you want to see them, you’ll have to get my laptop back from the government. Ask them how they got it - it’s a very fun story.
I hope you know how powerful you are. I wish you a hell of a lot more than luck.
Max Azzarello
submitted by Last-Satisfaction333 to u/Last-Satisfaction333 [link] [comments]


2024.04.17 01:10 NerdyReligionProf Response to Siker's Analysis of "Homosexuality in the NT" - As Requested

Yesterday u/Exotic-Storm1373 asked whether Jeff Siker's claims about "biblical/Christian views of homosexuality" in a post on Bart Ehrman's blog are accurate. The OP helpfully summarized Siker's claim that Rom 1:26-27 and 1 Cor 6:9 cannot be enlisted to reject "committed homosexual relationships" now since Paul supposedly would only have been aware of pederasty, prostitution, and slave prostitution as "same-sex practices" options "found in pagan culture." It's easier for me to post my response as a new post than a comment. Hopefully this helps!
In short, I disagree with Siker, though there are a variety of points to untangle.
First, it sounds like Siker is offering a scholarly version of the kind of argument Matthew Vines makes at a more popular level to the effect that 'Paul can't be condemning what we think of as committed loving homosexual relationships because he was thinking of bad things like prostitution or uncontrolled-lust homosexuality.' Thus the idea is to claim that Paul's letters can't be enlisted to authorize contemporary homophobia since he wouldn't have known about the kinds of relationships gay Christians want to have now. I appreciate the contemporary ethics of Siker's approach since homophobia is dehumanizing and harmful. But the idea that this approach inherently reflects "liberal leanings" (Siker's claim) ignores that plenty of liberal folks reject homophobia without trying to enlist and sanitize the Bible as support.
Second, and related, I disagree with the claim that Paul would only know of pederastic or enslaved prostition versions of homoeroticism. It is true that Greek, Roman, and Jewish sources do not often feature something resembling "a committed loving queer sexual relationship." But this is where confusion often sets in. We need to distinguish between [A] whether such queer relationships were actually non-existent in Mediterranean antiquity and thus whether writers were actually not-aware of them versus [B] whether what's going on is that the dominant Greco-Roman sexual ideologies that shape our texts do not have room for such relationships. According to dominant ideals, powerful men are supposed to actively penetrate those below themselves on the social and gender hierarchy. A man who delights in being penetrated by another man is by-definition (relatively speaking) effeminate, and thus not to be celebrated. Women loving and sexually engaging with other women means they aren't being used by (the right) men, and thus Greek and Roman writers tend to disparage, ridicule, and reframe female homoeroticism. But our texts are not direct sociological data. They reflect and think-with dominant sexual ideologies, which by-definition erased or reframed divergent sexual and gender expressions. This is why Amy Richlin ("Not Before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman Law against Love between Men," JHS 3 [1993]]: 523-73), Bernadette Brooten (Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996]), Deborah Kamen and Sarah Levin-Richardson ("Lusty Ladies in the Roman Literary Imaginary," in Ancient Sex: New Essays, ed R. Blondell and K. Ormand [Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2015], 231-51), and Jimmy Hoke (Feminism, Queerness, Affect, and Romans: Under God? [Atlanta: SBL Press, 2021], 27-37), among others, have argued that women (and men) who liked homoerotic or other non-normative sex and relationships existed in Mediterranean antiquity even though our sources erase, reframe, and distort them. In other words, writers like Paul could certainly have been aware of queer sexualities and relationships that were not enslaved prostitution or pederasty. Folks like Vines and Siker unintentionally reinscribe the association between homoeroticism and pedophilia / sexual violence. For what it's worth, everyone should read Richlin's article from 30 years ago. Doesn't matter whether you agree with all of her arguments, it's brilliant scholarhsip.
Third, there's a related debate about whether our texts even have a category for something like sexual orientation, or whether they simply imagine sex in terms of other grids like active versus passive or penetrator versus penetrated (e.g., see Craig Williams's excellent sketch of these paradigms in Roman literature, Roman Homosexuality, 2d Ed [New York: Oxford University Press, 2010]). The most common position among scholars who actually study gender and sex in Greco-Roman antiquity is that our sources do not reflect ideas like sexual orientation, and thus categories like homosexuality or homosexuals (or heterosexuality and heterosexuals) are not historically helpful for reading our texts. Other scholars like Richlin and Brooten have critiqued these positions, though they still forcefully argue that our sources think with overtly hierarchical patriarchal ideologies about sex like penetrator and penetrated. This final point is something on which Richlin is often misrepresented, which is bizarre since she wrote one of the classic books for understanding such dominant sexual ideologies, The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor, Rev. Ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
Fourth, when it comes to Romans 1:18-32, the basic point is that Paul discusses the total moral failure of gentiles by sketching their (feminizing) descent into being dominated by their passions. One of the culminating illustrations Paul uses of gentiles being dominated by their passions is their transgression of the gendered order, exemplified by gentile men losing sexual control of "their women" (i.e., these men are failed men from this angle) in 1:26 and then in 1:27 gentile men being consumed by passion for each other and penetrating other men (and being penetrated by them), which is an inversion of the normative sexual order. Paul treats male-male anal penetration as a goes-without-saying illustration of gentile corruption and domination by their passions. It's part of Paul's larger point that gentiles have become (effeminately) mastered by their passions (see Stanley Stowers's classic articulation of this decline-of-civilization reading of Rom 1:18-32 in A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles [New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994]). The key issue here is that there's no reason from a literary perspective to think Paul only has in mind enslaved prostitution or pederasty. It's just male-male anal penetration, especially between free men, that upends the normative gender order. If anything, Paul elsewhere may indicate being ok with free men penetrating (raping) their male or female slaves since that use of slaves was acceptable within many moral schemes, Paul never objects to it, and some passages potentially align with treating enslaved humans as legitimate non-marriage sexual outlets (e.g., Jennifer Glancy's argument in her excellent book, Slavery in Early Christianity [New York: Oxford University Press, 2002] about 1 Thess 4:4's εἰδέναι ἕκαστον ὑμῶν τὸ ἑαυτοῦ σκεῦος κτᾶσθαι).
Fifth, there's no reason to limit οὔτε μαλακοὶ οὔτε ἀρσενοκοῖται of 1 Cor 6:9 to prostitution. Malakos means soft or effeminate. In Greek texts it often does refer to men who are penetrated sexually since that's, by-definition, effeminizing. But a man who was unrestrained or execessive in his penetrating of women is likewise an examble of effeminate in Greek sources. ἀρσενοκοίτης's meaning remains debated, but the etymological game of making it man-bedders is problematic. Rather than get bogged down in this lexical discussion, the larger point regarding Siker is, again, that the issue of whether "committed same sex relationships" are in view is irrelevant. Paul lists effeminate gentiles as those who will not inherit the kingdom of God: a male prostitute is by-definition effeminate for these discourses, but so would a man in a "committed same sex relationship" who is anally penetrated.
Sixth, and this is key: I do not understand why scholars with "liberal leanings" think they can salvage a moral Bible by explaining-away Paul's (what we can redescribe as) homophobia. Even if all of Siker's claims were true, Paul's logic is entirely premised on reprehensibly misogynist gender ideologies. So if you rescue Paul from homophobia in two passages, you're still left with the steaming pile of sexist norms and logics that animate his other arguments. Hope this helps!
submitted by NerdyReligionProf to AcademicBiblical [link] [comments]


2024.04.15 17:18 BlondArrowUK Why Saltburn is a step by step rip off of The Talented Mr Ripley

Saltburn is a blatent rip off of The Talented Mr Ripley. If you examine it, every plot point has been stolen in sequence. The entire film follows nearly every plot point from the talented Mr Ripley, shamelessly. Though both good films, it's not fair to deny how the directo writer of Saltburn stole the entire storyline. Here's how:
You have Ripley being obsessed with Dickie and wanting his upper class life. Then you have Oliver feeling the same for Felix and his lifestyle.
Both manipulate to become friends with the other person. Ripley by manipulating his way into Dickies life by lying and saying he knew him in University, and Ollie by lying about his parents being dig addicts, but mostly Ollie lying about his father dying for pity to gain entry into Felix's friendship group.
They both nearly lose the friendship on the exact same subject, cleaning up after themselves, Ollie with the "only the rich can afford to be this filthy" and cleaning up Felix's dorm room, and Ripley cleaning up after Dickie. Both Dickie/Felix lose their tempers and scream at the other boy.
Poor, dear Pamela commits suicide after Ollie puts the suggestion in Elspeths mind that she's lying about her depression and Pamela then kills herself. Just as Silvera asks Dickie for help, but he snubs her and she kills herself.
Dickie's friend, Freddie, is the first to be suspicious and mock Ripley in front of everyone "you stay in Dickie's House, you eat Dickies food, you wear Dickies clothes, and his father picks up the bill. " Just as Farleigh is also the first one to be suspicious of Ollie and tricks him into humiliating himself at the party where he gets him to sing Rent by the Pet Shop Boys. This is why Farleigh is then got rid of, just as Freddie Miles is murdered when he becomes too suspicious and confronts Tom.
Then we have Dickie telling Tom that he has to leave but they'll have one last party in Rome. This leads to Dickies innocence that he is more powerful than Ripley because he has money. Which leads to Ripley confessing his love to Dickie on the boat, when he is rebuffed, he kills Dickie. Then he lays with his dead body, hugging him. Just like Felix ends his friendship with Ollie, but agrees to say nothing to his family and to have their last party - Ollie's birthday party. He is humiliated by no one knowing his name while singing Happy Birthday. Here, we have a mirror image, yet again, where Ollie confesses his love to Felix in the maze when Felix pushes Ollie away and tells him he makes his blood run cold. Just like Ripley can't stand to lose the money and luxury of Dickies life. Ollie can't. Ollie gives him an overdose, and then he takes it a step further than Ripley by having sex with Felix's grave.
Next. Marge, the main female character in the Talented Mr. Ripley is the second, after Freddie, to grow suspicious of Ripley, except her suspicion is dead on point and she has the entire thing figured out, she then confronts Ripley about wearing and having Dickies rings. Ripley has already got a razor and plans on killing her with it, even cutting himself in the process. In Saltburn, the main female character, Felix's sister, Venetia, is the most suspicious of Ollie and has figured the whole thing out (like Marge), with her "stranger danger" speech to Ollie. The scene is reversed with her being in the bath, whereas Tom is in the bath when Marge confronts him. She then confronts him about knowing everything, just like Marge does. Smelling Felix's cologne, and accusing Ollie of wearing Felix's underwear, just as Marge confronts Tom with Dickies rings. Ollie then leaves the razor blades there for Venetia to kill herself, which she does. Marge only escapes this fate because of Peter Smith Kingsly walking in and unknowingly saving her. It's even the same weapon of choice.
The main plot point is that Dickie's father sends Tom to go after Dickie, and in Saltburn, Elspeth is the one that won't let Ollie leave due to her relying on him. So in both films it's the parents who get their own children killed by putting their own needs first.
The writeDirector of Saltburn has blatantly ripped off the Talented Mr Ripley film. She's just thrown in some younge modern generation fashions and witty retorts. It's like comparing Dangerous Liasons to Cruel Intentions, but at least the writer of Cruel intentions gave the original film the credit of deserved and didn't just steal from it, throw in some over the top scenes for a modern audience and try to pass it off as original. There are other scenes which are lifted from Ripley, such as the Bath tub scene where Ripley asks to share a bath with Dickie. Dickie knows he fancies him, as Ripley is caught staring at his behind in the mirror. Then he gets in the bathwater of Dickie. It's taken a step further in Saltburn, with Ollie drinking Felix's bath water.
Both Dickie and Felix let the underprivileged friend Ripley/Ollie wear their clothes and stay in their homes. Ripley makes a move on Marge as Ollie does on Venetia. Ripley tries to make himself appear more like Dickie with clothes and hair. Just as Ollie (failing drastically) Does the same by dressing as Felix and changing his parting, and both get rid of their glasses, etc. Both Tom/Ollie watch the boy they're in love with, make love to a girl, and cry. Ollie, through the window while watching Felix have sex. Tom watching Dickie make love to Marge on the boat Etc. Etc.
It's so blatent, I'm suspicious why no one has sued.
Isn't that enough to prove where writeDirector, Emerald, got her material?
submitted by BlondArrowUK to saltburn [link] [comments]


2024.04.05 21:53 Ecstatic_Soil3014 LOVE IT OR HATE IT..

Thank You writer / director Steven Zaillian (writer of Schindlers List, Moneyball, seriously...too many fabulous films to list here IMDB him), for the new Netflix psycho-dark, cleverly shot cinematography twisted thriller series RIPLEY.
Without giving any major spoilers...it's a monochromatic Hitchcock spin of the original Anthony Minghella The Talented Mr. Ripley with Matt Damon, Jude Law, Cate Blanchett & Gwyneth Paltrow. I loved that film too. I could watch it over and over. I can't speak to the real original: the 1960 French version Purple Noon (only bc I had no idea it existed until I read reviews for RIPLEY... today).
Andrew Scott (Succession, Fleabag, All of Us Strangers) plays Tom Ripley. Don't expect to see the same homoerotic charming portrayal of Tom Ripley / Matt Damon. This Tom is colder, more psychopath, possibly even on the spectrum or just very antisocial, whose perfectly round reptilian dead black eyes will sear though you, chill to the bone and keep you spellbound, but for some reason, and I'm guessing this was intentional, you won't feel at all sympathetic as we did for Damon's Ripley. And thats perfectly fine. The only light those coal black eyes reflects is the light in others, those souls he yearns to emulate, but simply cannot. As we all know...no amount of silk jammies, Brooks Bros. suits and Feraggamos can ever fully mask the Borderline/Malignant Narcissist. This is its own character study on the lonely frustrated white male psychopaths who exhibit insecure jealous behavior. In fact Scott is nearly a perfect poster boy of the American Incel of Proud Boys. So perhaps the modern Tom Ripley character will even help shed light and speak to this whole new brood of young American white male misogyny, of seething, growing rage and empathy-less sociopaths we are breeding in American society today.
I've read that these are the reasons for less positive reviews. I don't think it's fair since I can't and I don't even TRY to compare the two versions. Don't expect a newer sexy Jude Law as Dickie Greenleaf either. But the Dickie Greenleaf in RIPLEY portrayed by Johnny Flynn (David Bowie in Stardust) is way less Versace ad, and way more ... depth to the distant lost soul searching for his life purpose as the typical spoiled American trust funder who escaped Americaland to live the artists life in Italy on daddy's money, claiming to study Caravaggio so he can pretend to be a painter. His terrible art is genuinely funny and so on pointe. Don't expect the cool reserved polished Cate Blanchett as Marge. Dakota Fanning as Marge holds her own. She's cunning and sharp and her apex predator silent stares, as she zeroes in on Tom from their first meeting, gives reason to her silence and is as unnerving as when she speaks in short blunt accusatory one liners.
In my little hayud of dark humor I reshot the scene over the real scene: (this doesn't spoil the real scene bc its my fantasy spin on the actual scene and impossible bc of time frame)...though you may hear it when you see the real scene....
CUE MUSIC: INT. MARGE'S ITALIAN ARTIST ONE ROOM STUDIO: In the corner of the room WE SEE a 1960's Italian record player as a 45 vinyl drops and as the needle grinds away WE HEAR the synth intro and scratchy hoarse voice of 1980s Kim Carnes sing: "....And she'll unease you. All the better just to please you. She's precocious and she knows just What it takes to make a pro blush. She got Greta Garbo stand off sighs.... She's got Bette Davis eyes.".....Only I swapped PRECOCIOUS with "she's ferocious..." when the camera cuts to Dakota and her bulging eyeballs stare burning and arcing through the air to cause Tom's anal sphincter to recoil a tiny bit. It's like he's been made within 3 seconds and they just met. Like two Rotties staring each other down over the bone (Dickie).
There is no role of the naive Gwyneth. At least not yet. I'm on Episode 8. Either I have to wait until next season which will suck. Doesn't matter that we know how the story ends. It's soooo fun. It's beautifully shot and very Fellini-esque. At first I wasn't sure about the monochromatic vs the warm Kodachrome of the 90s version. Now I see why. The angles and shadows are necessary. The peeling stucco of old Italian villages wouldn't be the same if it were in color. I compare RIPLEY to finally being brought a fresh baked sourdough boule or baguette, still moist and warm and buttered wrapped in a thick Belgian linen dishtowel baked in a wood-fired oven, just when you thought you were about ready to stop watching and waiting, subscribing for better content and actually start reading books again. ALSO : The Italian detective Inspector Pietro played by Maurizio Lombardi....woooowee. Eccellente !!! Dang it. I have to keep returning to edit...I totally forgot to mention the Freddie character (played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman in the Talented version)...Good Lord...where did this actor come from? He's almost more sinister than Tom. I can't even decide if he's male or female (non-binary).....like an Italian male version of Cara Delevigne in a Brioni suit. The actor is Eliot Sumner...and apparently IS Non Binary and goes by THEY/THEM...and is the son of Sting and Trudy Stiler. "They" definitely nailed their role. Total steals every scene They are in.
RIPLEY is like the boule of Sourdough you've been hoping for. After months of being force-fed the war rations of tasteless stale leavened generic no name white bread baked mass quantity in commercial ovens in a Sylmar warehouse shipped out to Costco. This is how I can best explain what its been like over the past several months, long before the writers strike, waiting for a good edge of the seat thriller series (in the genre of dark psycho-thriller dramas). Wasting your time and money watching the most awful boring twist-less meaningless storylines, feeling cheated when showrunners add more pointless themes to make up for the lack of good content, constant background music that never ceases to fill the gaps of dialogue, silly vapid dialogue, leaning on the 70s/80s library to build a soundtrack (bc most new music sucks so bad), adding tons of nudity and sex and gratuitous violence to carry the film or sell the series bc there is nothing else worth watching, all in all attempting to make up for the trinity of what makes any good film or series worthwhile: 1. great storytelling & good writing, 2. strong plots and subplots, and 3. character development. RIPLEY has it ALL..and I'm so so grateful.
submitted by Ecstatic_Soil3014 to RIPLEY_SERIES [link] [comments]


2024.04.02 12:59 Atr-D I completed Xenosaga Episode III, thus marking the end of a journey.

(NOTE: This is a super long post of 56 paragraphs, so to make things easier to read, I will number each major section and indicate how many paragraphs they contain.)
  1. INTRO (8)
Background
In my journey to complete every Xeno game, I have finally completed them all as I finished Xenosaga Episode III a few days ago. Going into this game, I had heard it was fantastic, and it absolutely was. I made reviews of the first and second games in the past, so it was only right that I make a review of the third. Xenoblade is my favorite franchise, so I’m glad I got to experience its spiritual predecessor.
As a warning, this will be a lengthy 56-paragraph post because these games literally contain an encyclopedia’s worth of information (as proven by the database). The main sections of this review will be a story/character section and a gameplay section, but since I can’t address everything, I’ll start by talking about additional details worth mentioning.
Music
Yuki Kajiura’s soundtrack is fantastic. I love how the main battle theme, “fallout,” is a rather slow and melodic piece. It really displays the gravity of the story in this final game. “hepatica (KOS-MOS)” was so beautiful when I heard it during the final T-elos fight. Of course, “godsibb” is a classic that’s very reminiscent of the final boss theme in Xenoblade Chronicles 1 for me, so maybe Manami Kiyota took inspiration from Yuki Kajiura’s work in XS3 when making that final boss theme.
“rolling down the U.M.N.” is a fantastic opening area theme as it’s incredibly futuristic yet jazzy at the same time. Takahashi stated in the Xenoblade Chronicles Original Soundtrack Trinity Box that the inspiration for the jazz music in Torna ~ The Golden Country was the movie Whiplash, but it’s interesting hearing a jazzy song in XS3 as well. I could talk more about the music, but that’s all I’ll say for now.
Required Homework
Before starting XS3, an acquaintance of mine recommended that I watch fan translations of two Xenosaga-related projects that never released outside of Japan. The first was Xenosaga: Pied Piper, a mobile game for flip phones that details Ziggy’s human life as Jan Sauer; the second was Xenosaga II to III: A Missing Year, a Flash video series or PowerPoint presentation that gives a bunch of connecting lore between XS2 and XS3.
It’s wild to me that Namco decided to release these two important canon stories in relatively inaccessible formats, even for the time. With how much of a nightmare the development of the Xenosaga games reportedly was, this was probably a compromise since they likely didn’t have the time to make PS2 or even DS versions of Pied Piper or A Missing Year, but these stories aren’t just mere spinoffs. Pied Piper and A Missing Year contain vital lore as they are essentially Xenosaga 0 and Xenosaga 2.5, respectively.
Sure, the in-game database essentially gives you a CliffsNotes version of A Missing Year at the start, but reading an encyclopedia is not the same as seeing a story play out in front of you. Ziggy’s backstory is also given to you while you’re on Michtam, but that’s at the end of the game immediately before the Voyager fight. Stuff like Lactis’s backstory with Jan Sauer is rarely mentioned before the Voyager fight, and a lot of the Pied Piper details only come from a database you find in the final dungeon (which comes after the Voyager fight).
Even though I’ve now played every Xeno game, I guess that technically doesn’t include Pied Piper since that’s inaccessible. Ziggy became my favorite character in the series through both Pied Piper and XS3, so if this trilogy ever gets a remastered collection like the Metal Gear Solid games did, then I hope Pied Piper is included and localized just like how the original Metar Gear games were included in the MGS collection.
  1. STORY & CHARACTERS (20)
When talking about the story, it’s hard to summarize everything since so much happens in this game. In many ways, this game is like “What if The Rise of Skywalker were actually good?” This game had to wrap up an entire trilogy after the first two entries were basically just a two-part introductory story. Unlike TRoS, XS3 has the benefit of being a video game, so it's not as burdened by time constraints as a movie would be. It's crazy how XS3 (57 hours) took about the same time as XS1 (56 hours) for me to beat despite XS3 having way more plot, but the pacing of XS3 is much faster.
My favorite characters in the main party were Ziggy and Jr. since their stories had the most pathos. Ziggy’s story in Pied Piper and its resolution in defeating Voyager was fantastic, and Richard Epcar absolutely nailed Ziggy's trauma vs. Voyager, especially when Voyager bragged about killing Ziggy's son. Jr. has been consistently great throughout the trilogy with his backstory of Albedo and Dmitri Yuriev. There’s really only one major critique I have about the story (which I’ll talk about at length later), so for now, I’m going to list some things I loved.
Xenogears Nods
Since this was the end of the trilogy, I loved the references to Xenogears. I like that Jin Uzuki wears a green robe now since he’s fully leaned into being a Citan Uzuki archetype by wielding a katana and knowing more about the lore than we do. Of course, Abel’s design is an obvious nod to Fei Fong Wong, and Abel was also the name of the original Fei in XG. It’s funny how XS3 Abel essentially is the ZohaGod instead of being the one who made contact with the Zohar in XG.
Speaking of Abel, I don’t know how Nephilim managed to get an adult form at the end despite her being the spirit of a human child. I get Nephilim was always an Elly reference, but it’s weird that she gets an Elly form while Abel doesn’t get a Fei form despite him being a higher-dimensional entity. Abel was never human, so he can theoretically change his appearance whenever he wants, yet Nephilim changes while Abel doesn't.
Abel’s Ark was a great dungeon because the entire place is a nod to the endgame of XG. The area theme is a remix of “One Who Bares Fangs at God” (the true final boss theme in XG), which was a pleasant surprise since I didn’t expect Yuki Kajiura to remix a Yasunori Mitsuda song. The 4 floating spheres are like the mini-bosses before Deus in XG, and the Gnosis bosses for the XS3 spheres are references to the Gears of Citan, Bart, Rico, & Billy.
I’ll admit that I didn’t realize the bosses XG references until after the fact, which makes me ashamed because I also didn’t notice until later that Mai Magus & Leupold are obvious nods to Maria & Seibzehn from XG. Speaking of Mai, I’m probably the only person on the Internet who assumed Mai was a younger version of Doctus from Scientia. Seeing as Doctus has a similar hair color, I thought there was going to be a heartwarming moment where Shion learns that Doctus is an older Mai who survived Miltia, but I guess not (RIP Mai, maybe?).
Additional Character Notes
I loved that Albedo made a brief return since he was my favorite villain in the series. Crispin Freeman sounded like he had so much fun playing this character, so I’m glad he was one of the few English actors who was in every game. I thought it was neat that after finally getting his death wish in XS2, Albedo returns in this game but isn't a boss, instead helping Jr. to kill Dmitri Yuriev.
By the way, regardless of whether you’re talking about KOS-MOS or T-elos, I think both of their designs are great because Mary Magdalene of Xenosaga (not the Biblical version) is one of the most beautiful women in fiction in my opinion. I’m also glad I finally got to experience both of their original stories since I finally got KOS-MOS in Xenoblade Chronicles 2 for the first time just a few months ago (despite me playing the game for hundreds of hours over the course of 6 years and 2 playthroughs).
Speaking of XC2, T-elos’s Blade Quest in XC2 has a nice optional scene with KOS-MOS if you’ve awakened KOS-MOS by then, and KOS-MOS’s Blade Quest revolves around Zeke’s niece Astelle, who is essentially a stand-in for Shion. KOS-MOS’s moves in XC2 are references to her Xenosaga abilities (like the Hilbert Effect and X-BUSTER), and now I understand why T-elos in XC2 likes to step on her enemies (hot) and crush them since T-elos in XS3 crushes KOS-MOS at the end of Chapter 3.
Speaking of Mary Magdalene, I only realized this a few days after beating the game, but chaos is essentially the spiritual representation of Jesus. While we see Jesus the man in the flashback, chaos is essentially the symbolic other half of Mary Magdalene’s power (him being the Anima and her being the Animus), so both of them were essentially the spiritual side of Jesus while the Jesus we see in the cutscene was just a man/preacher.
At the end of XS2, I thought that chaos was Jesus since Wilhelm called him Yeshua. I was soon told by others that chaos wasn’t Jesus, but after a lot of thought, chaos actually was the “Jesus” of the story in a sense. Yeshua is Jesus’s Hebrew name in real life, and according to Gnosticism (which Takahashi loves), Jesus had both a flesh and spiritual form, so chaos could be seen as an allegory for the spiritual Christ.
The Kevin Problem
If I had to describe my least favorite aspect of the story, it would have to be everything involving Kevin. I’m someone who tries to be more forgiving of Shion since a lot of people I’ve seen hate her. I thought she was a fine character in XS1 and XS2 because I could buy her being a traumatized individual. Sadly, Kevin’s presence in XS3 drags down Shion for me, and it’s incredibly frustrating to see people like Allen, Jin, and even Miyuki get treated like dirt when they risk their lives for her.
Female characters often get unfairly criticized when they act “emotional,” so I usually try to be empathetic even if I ultimately disagree with their decisions. As a result, I don’t want to act like everything is Shion’s fault seeing as she’s ultimately the victim of a toxic and pedophilic relationship (seeing as Kevin loved her when she was 8), but the only time I feel like Shion is truly unbearable is any time Kevin comes up.
In Chapter 7, Shion decides she wants to be with Kevin despite her seeing his younger self be a total asshole who contributed to Miltia’s destruction. Besides the obvious fact that it was a dumb decision even in universe, I hated how she lashed out and acted bitter towards her friends afterwards even though they saved her from making a huge mistake. Even worse is that she doesn’t convey to her friends the rationale behind her decision other than “I love him.”
In games like Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones or Fire Emblem Echoes: Shadows of Valentia, the characters of Eirika and Celica, respectively, are often criticized by fans for making certain bad decisions due to their emotions, but I personally find those critiques to be too harsh because fans wouldn’t give them that much flack if they were men. Hell, Eirika’s brother, Ephraim, makes a similar mistake if you play his route in that game, yet he doesn’t get criticized nearly as much.
What makes those situations different from Shion to me, though, is that Eirika and Celica realize almost immediately after their decisions that they fucked up, so they immediately suffer the consequences and take ownership of their mistakes. With Shion, she acts like nobody cares about her when that’s objectively false, and it literally takes Allen nearly getting killed AND Mary/KOS-MOS saving him before she even considers for a second that maybe being with Kevin isn’t the best idea.
To use a Monolith Soft comparison, Kalas from Baten Kaitos is an asshole for half of the game and makes an even more morally reprehensible decision than Shion does, yet the reason why I was able to turn around and appreciate him was because he actually has to live with the consequences of said decision. Plus, him being an asshole is an intentional writing decision with a massive payoff that doesn’t take until the very end of the game.
With Shion, my guess is that the writers were trying to portray Shion as a suicidal abuse victim with Stockholm Syndrome, but if so, they didn’t do a good job of showcasing why Shion would even like Kevin since every scene he’s in just shows him as an openly detestable dipshit. In fact, when Shion finally leaves him, she reveals that she knew Kevin was just using her, but she thought being in his presence was good enough for her to sacrifice all of her friends.
I guess Shion knowing that she was used doesn’t make her as stupid as I thought she was, but it does make her seem very mean-spirited as a result. While Kalas from Baten Kaitos can be an insensitive jerk, he isn't actively malicious like Shion is. She would knowingly cast aside her brother and friends who’ve literally risked their lives for her (Allen especially) just for some love (and sex) with Kevin. Yes, I’m aware that Kevin ultimately manipulated Shion, but the game failed to make Kevin intimidating or even relatable in any way. Because of Kevin, Shion becomes an active danger to the safety of her allies.
It takes until the very end of the game when Jin is saying his pre-death goodbye for Shion to finally apologize for her actions, and I think that was a rather poor decision by the writers to wait that long since that’s an entire Disc 2 where she’s actively feuding with her allies. Even at the end, the game tries to give Kevin a redemption and graceful sendoff, but that was wholly undeserved as Kevin was not worthy of an emotional farewell from Shion. This sendoff tells me the writers believed Shion was partially right in caring for him, which is a terrible message to send.
  1. GAMEPLAY (22)
Maximizing EXP Gain
One thing I really liked about the combat in both XS1 and XS2 was killing enemies on the Point Bonus Event Slot because it was a great way to optimize EXP, SP, TP (for XS1), and CP (for XS2) gain so that you don’t have to grind. With XS3, Event Slots are no more, so extra EXP and SP are gained by killing enemies with Special Attacks to get a Finish Strike Bonus that multiplies EXP, SP, and gold by 1.5 for each enemy you perform the FS on.
In many ways, this is similar to Chain Attack Overkill in Xenoblade Chronicles 2 and Xenoblade Chronicles 3 since you perform special moves to kill enemies for extra EXP and rewards. Usually in normal battles for XS3, it takes a while to build up your boost count to 2, and then you only have time to Special Attack one enemy per encounter. Still, getting an FS Bonus even just once per encounter is always worth going for in the long run since those extra rewards add up significantly, but optimizing FS Bonuses becomes much easier with AoE Special Attacks.
When MOMO reaches Level 24 (around the time of Labyrinthos), she gets Guilty Rain, an AoE lightning Special Attack. This move is insanely good for EXP optimization because now you can get the FS Bonus on all enemies in an encounter rather than just one. It means you get a true 1.5x gain on all enemies, which speeds up the EXP, SP, and gold gain even more.
Soon after that, Shion at Level 26 gets Lock Shot, which is even better because it’s an AoE beam Special Attack that seals boosts if it doesn’t kill, and Ziggy at Level 26 gets Hind, an AoE fire Special Attack. Eventually, everyone except Jin gets an AoE Special Attack. Junior’s Storm Waltz at Level 30 is busted because it’s also a large break attack; KOS-MOS at Level 31 gets her famed X-BUSTER; and chaos gets Imperial Judgement at Level 34.
Support Strats
About a month before playing XS3, I played Shin Megami Tensei III: Nocturne, and I’m so glad I played that before XS3 because the combat system of XS3 reminds me so much of a MegaTen game. Buffs and debuffs in XS3 are guaranteed and not RNG-based (except for some late-game bosses), so similar to Nocturne, you can run into a regular loop of AoE buff, AoE debuff, AoE Special Attack, enemies dead.
Because of how valuable buffs and debuffs are, Shion, Jr., & chaos were very valuable in my playthrough. Shion is your earliest source of Offensive (AoE attack buff) and Defensive (AoE defense buff) as she gets both at the start of her A branch (A-2). She also gets Disengage at Level 23 to remove enemy buffs, and it only costs 10 EP to use, which is insanely cheap for how valuable that is.
Jr. is the only one who has any form of Fist Down (physical attack debuff) or Soul Down (ether attack debuff) for most of the game, and he gets them through his early Tech Attacks. Even though they’re single-target moves, these are your only source of enemy attack reduction for a large portion of the game if you didn’t get the Fist Down or Soul Down spells on chaos. All other sources of Fist Down or Soul Down are from the Disc 2 EX Skill Trees. As a result, Jr. is very helpful for survival against tough bosses throughout the game.
chaos is strange (and talented) in that he has a lot of great spells, but they’re split pretty evenly across his two skill branches. If you want Offensive, Skin Down (AoE physical defense debuff), Mind Down (AoE ether defense debuff), or Recover EP, you have to commit to the B branch (which is what I did). If you want Defensive, Fist Down, or Soul Down, you have to commit at least 190 SP to the A branch (140 SP for all of A-2, 50 SP for any one of the skills I listed).
I usually saved my Skill Upgrades for characters with availability issues such as KOS-MOS and then Shion, yet I still felt obligated to invest 200 SP worth of Skill Upgrades (1 C & 2 Bs) in chaos during Chapter 7 so that he could get Defensive, Fist Down, & Soul Down. Regardless, he’s still valuable for the whole game due to his early Tech Attacks that give an early source of Skin Down and Mind Down (similar to how Jr. is your early source of Fist Down and Soul Down).
Other Combat Notes
One thing I quickly realized in XS3 is that EP is arguably the best stat in the game. Since Tech Attacks are based on EP in this game just like how Ether Attacks are, that means both your ether-based and physical-based characters want extra EP. AoE attacks are also really good in this game since they’re the fastest way to increase your boost gauge, and with escaping battles being very easy, you can easily build boost through traps and back attacks.
Of course, since I was playing through the game blind, I didn’t get to utilize certain OP strats that I learned about after the fact like Devil Break Ziggy, Gale Strike Jin, or the Seven Moons sidequest. Even so, I was still able to recognize during my playthrough that Ziggy is busted in this game since he’s strong, tanky, decently quick (compared to the previous two games), and by far the most reliable breaker. Choke is an amazing break move on human bosses that came in clutch for me.
It’s ironic that Devil Break is in his Blocker skill branch, so I didn’t get it early on as I committed to the Breaker skill branch. Plus, even when I did get Devil Break towards the end of the game, I didn’t use it much since I already had Heavy Tackle III and Road Rage II, the latter of which is AoE. Plus, I let my SMT brain get the best of me and rarely used Devil Break due to the “lower accuracy” description.
Since I often try to use characters who are thematically relevant to each boss fight, I didn’t use Ziggy in my finishing party for most boss fights since his only significant one is Voyager. I still used him throughout the boss fights themselves for breaking and tanking, but when going for kills, I swapped him out for others; however, even with relatively less SP than others, he was still great in combat and vital to my strategies.
I talked earlier about how much I love Ziggy as a character, so even though I didn’t use him as much as I could have, it was nice to see him be amazing at combat in XS3 since he was sadly terrible in XS2 due to his lack of airborne attacks and his inherent fire element (when you want attacks to be neutral). The same applies to chaos since he also had no airborne attacks and had an inherent aura element in XS2, but chaos becomes amazing in XS3.
E.S. Combat
XS3 easily has the best mech combat of the entire trilogy, and it's also much better than both Gear combat in Xenogears and Skell combat in Xenoblade Chronicles X. What XS3 gets right is that mech combat doesn’t have to be slow or confusing as hell. Your EN (energy) refills with each turn, meaning you don’t have to micromanage Fuel or EP like in other games. Equipment upgrades have a linear progression, meaning building strong mechs isn’t an unintuitive mish-mash of accessories like the Yakuza 3 Cabaret Club minigame was (as I played Yakuza 3 just before XS3).
In Xenogears, you have to constantly stock up on Fuel, and your only healing options are Chu-Chu or a FrameHP accessory that burns tons of Fuel. The game also doesn't tell you that Deathblows in foot combat are necessary for unlocking new Gear combos. Gears are very expensive to maintain, and buying physical-based armor is sort of a trap since you actually want better evasion and Ether Defense by late game. You're never told that the Response stat boosts both accuracy and evasion, and Magnetic Coats that boost Response by 25 are no longer available by endgame.
In XS1, the game doesn’t tell you a lot of important details about A.G.W.S. combat such as how you need two identical weapons to use W-ACTs or how ether damage is calculated. As a result, I didn’t use A.G.W.S. much outside of being an extra health bar since the mechs themselves can’t use items, boosts, or traditional healing spells. I learned after the fact that A.G.W.S. combat can actually be really good, but the game doesn’t teach you how to properly utilize its mechanics, which makes mech combat easy to ignore as it's optional.
Before XS3, XS2 E.S. combat was the best mech combat I had played so far. Sure, I understand that it’s not mind-blowing by any stretch since it’s basically standard turn-based combat, but considering how tedious the ground combat in XS2 can be, the mech combat is much more comfy by comparison. It tells you how much mech combat in all these Xeno games has struggled to be intuitive when the barebones XS2 version is one of the best ones for a casual player.
As a diehard Xenoblade fan, I can tell you that Xenoblade Chronicles X Skell combat is a major downgrade from XS3. It’s already a downgrade from that game’s foot combat, but it looks even worse now that I’ve played XS3 since XCX didn’t learn any lessons from XS3. XCX mech combat makes Arts cooldowns super slow (even going up to 60 seconds); it brings back the tedious Fuel system from XG; broken Skells invoke a QTE-based insurance mechanic (not joking); and Skell Overdrive is pure RNG unlike the execution-based foot Overdrive. Plus, there are a million different ways to customize the mechs to where finding the optimal build is way too expensive and time-consuming for a casual player without a guide.
With all of that being said, XS3 mech combat still has some quirks that weren’t apparent to me. After watching a speedrun, I learned that Jin using the gigantic one-hit weapons with E.S. Reuben did insane damage. I didn’t use those weapons when I played since they seemed to utilize as much as 410 EN with only 1 hit, which didn’t seem worth it. What the game doesn’t tell you is how strong each individual weapon is since the weapon attack stats listed (POW & EATK) are actually just general stat buffs.
I didn’t realize until doing more research that the EN stat is essentially a measuring stick of how much damage each individual weapon deals. For example, Jin’s one-hit weapons use about twice as much EN as his two-hit weapons, but that means his one-hit weapons will essentially do about twice the total damage of the two-hit weapons. I was more focused on accuracy, hits, & Team Combos, so I didn’t know how busted Reuben’s damage could be.
Damn, I could have gone through those later boss fights a lot faster if I had realized the strength of Jin’s one-hit weapons. I finally realized how strong the two-handed guns were on E.S. Asher by late game since they had 10 hits and a Team value of 25, but for some reason, I didn’t use the one-hit swords on Reuben despite my generators having an EN value of 900 by late game. Well, when I eventually replay these games in the far future, I’ll definitely experiment with A.G.W.S. combat in XS1 and Reuben’s damage in XS3.
  1. EXTRA THINGS (3)
As someone who grew up on Ace Attorney and Professor Layton as a teenager, I am all about puzzles, so of course I played HaKox. It’s not my favorite puzzle in the world seeing as it involves real-time execution, but I at least beat World 5 (didn't do World 6, though). When I got Jr.’s Vaquero after beating World 5, my jaw DROPPED when I saw it had 82 STR & 82 EATK. The moment you unlock World 5, the most up-to-date weapon for Jr. is the Black Relic at 39 STR, 39 EATK, & 10 VIT. It literally doubles the best weapon you can buy at that point of the game.
I enjoyed getting the super weapons for Shion and KOS-MOS as well, but I missed out on Jin’s because I didn’t realize you had to go into the boys room to talk to a droid that can merge the Prayer Beads with VB-Crimson. I knew you had to merge those two items, but I didn’t know you had to talk to someone. Again, the speedrun showed that I missed out on OP Jin damage both on foot and in mech. I was too blinded by his lack of AoE Special Attacks to see his true value.
Oh yeah, I probably should’ve realized this in XS2, but I only just realized that E.S. Zebulun’s design was the basis for Eunie’s Ouroboros design in XC3. I knew that E.S. Dinah was an obvious reference to the Xenogears (mech), but I didn’t realize that Eunie’s Ouroboros was basically Zebulun. I guess I just assumed Zebulun was like Crescens from XG, but that’s false seeing as Sena’s Ouroboros is based off of Crescens. By the way, I like that Mio’s Ouroboros form is based off of KOS-MOS instead of a mecha.
  1. CONCLUSION (3)
With all that said, going through all of Xenosaga was a delight. XS1 is a great introduction and has improved for me over time, XS2 is a game I respect and enjoy even if it has some flaws, and XS3 is the best of the trilogy in every way. After beating the Future Redeemed DLC for Xenoblade Chronicles 3, I knew I had to find a way to play the Xenosaga trilogy after that DLC had some Xenosaga Easter eggs. It’s funny that I played Xenogears after beating base XC3 since the plot of XC3 was based on Gears, and I played the Xenosaga trilogy after beating Future Redeemed since it had Xenosaga nods.
I’m not sure how to end this lengthy post, so I guess I’ll just say … play Baten Kaitos. It’s the Monolith Soft series developed for the GameCube around the same time as Xenosaga, yet despite those games obviously being much more niche with less of a budget, they surprisingly had no development issues compared to Xenosaga. They have a steampunk/fantasy setting rather than sci-fi; each game has its own unique but exciting card-based battle system; and the music is composed by Motoi Sakuraba of Tales fame.
As a result, both BK games are much more complete and finished products that don’t feel nearly as compromised as the Xenosaga trilogy despite each BK game being much longer than any of the Saga games. Bandai Namco did nothing to market the Baten Kaitos I & II HD Remaster on Switch last year, so I want to spread the good news (like Jesus Christ from Xenosaga Episode III) about these games because they are wonderful. I played them for the first time with the remaster, and they blew me away. Regardless of the franchise, Monolith Soft rules.
submitted by Atr-D to Xenosaga [link] [comments]


2024.03.27 19:48 erickleincaw I have a story to share about The Simpsons [unreleased media]

Versions of The Simpsons existed on-tape in mid-production process. (I'm aware these are only kinda-almost-not-really "Lost Media" but I figured that The Simpsons was popular enough that my memories were still worth relating here.)
I was a 17 year old intern at Fox 11 in L.A. in the summer of 1994 in the on-air promotions department video tape library. When I wasn't running an errand for someone, or dubbing a tape, or bulk erasing tapes in a degaussing machine or playing endless games of Minesweeper, I would grab a VHS off the shelves and go into a conference room and watch an "unsweetened" episode of The Simpsons.
"Unsweetened" means that it was the edit of the episode prior to having music and sound effects added. Unsweetened versions were useful to the on-air promotions department because it was their job to cut together all of the promos that aired on Fox and the "sweetening" would get in the way.
"Unsweetened" on The Simpsons tapes also happened to mean that some of the writing process of the episode was still in progress. Lines of dialogue were sometimes rewritten and jokes were occasionally punched up after the initial voice acting was recorded. So the episode would unfold exactly as I knew it (like most kids my age I was a devoted fan of the show) and then Marge or Homer or Lisa or Bart's mouth would move but some non-actor's voice would woodenly speak the line. It was a place-holder for the animators to work off of before the actors recorded the new lines.
And very occasionally, entire jokes, or tags to scenes, would be changed or cut. These always delighted me. I felt like I was receiving privileged information.
I remember one and only one deleted joke in detail because it made a big impression on me at the time. Bart broke his leg jumping on the trampoline. Homer and Marge take him to Dr Hibbert. This is all in both versions of the episode. Then Dr Hibbert makes some sort of recommendation for a more expensive procedure that would speed up Bart's healing (remember that Bart's concern is having to wear the cast all Summer) and Homer asks if they can afford said option and the camera pans over to a here-to-fore unseen official, a large middle aged women who represents the health care industry who has been sitting in the exam room, and she has one line, a bit of a joke, brusquely denying the claim. In my memory she is dressed in a uniform, like a cross between a nurse and a Communist Party official. Her hat might say "H.M.O." or she might be wearing a badge on her uniform. (At that point in the 90's "H.M.O." was a well known short-hand for joke writers to use to poke fun at the entire American health care system).
I never left the building with one of these VHS tapes or a copy. I can only assume they were recycled and eventually destroyed, but who knows.
submitted by erickleincaw to lostmedia [link] [comments]


2024.03.27 19:29 TMc2491992 S&H, Pew ranges compared Generation X

Gen X ranges S&H: 1961-1981 Pew: 1965-1981
Strauss and Howe’s gen X, previously known as 13th generation the latter a purely US centric name coincidentally denoteing the generation’s bad luck, that bad luck is probably better attributed to the UK’s Xers. Pew research centre began Gen X, the marketer’s name which stuck and in my humble opinion, suits the generation who couldn’t care less about all this “generations” rubbish.
As was the case with the start of the boom generation, the radical shift in the social mood of the 60s ushered in a new generation, shaped by the mood of the adult world and through how their parents raised them, or in the case of boomer parents or lack thereof. The big government period that is typical of 1st turnings produced a well funded system of schools, scouting organisations and other institutions specifically for youth. Late wave silent and early boomer parents were able to spend more time careers or “finding themselves” whatever the hell that means, rather than raising a family. In reaction to the authoritarian and science textbook parenting of their GI parents, boomers did not want to subject their children or themselves to this “plastic” way of living. In the 60s institutions and self help guides handed to them by their parents took some of the child care of the shoulders of parents. Those institutions however, over the course of the awakening would weaken due to a combination of the lack of interest in children and later, through the libertarian anti-government tendency’s of late wave boomers. Going into the 70s the GI parenting as a science has gone completely out of style as children were view in a negative light in a very adult world. The 1968 family movie, Chitty chitty bang bang shows us a society in which is anti-child to the extent where children were illegal as Jews were in nazi germany, the children of the Germanic ‘Vulgaria’ were seized by a child catcher general. A man who would be assumed to be on a sex offender resister and I do believe that was the intent, a satire of where society was heading at the time. Before moving on, In the UK, the 1960s but mostly, the 70s and early 80s was a very dark time for kids, gen X kids specifically. The 70s was the period where prolific pedophiles imbedded themselves in institutions, only the past 20 years we have had 50 something Xers testifing on the physical and sexual abuse that took place in orphanages and young offender’s prisons. We even invented a term for this. Historic child abuse. Celebrity pedophiles such as jimmy Savile, Ralph Harris and Gary glitter having free reign using their money and connections to silence whistleblowers, only after 1982 their behaviour was checked, their protection began wain during the 1990s pedophile witch-hunts. Children’s cartoons shifted from shorts like Felix the cat, Mickey Mouse and other Lost and GI made cinema filler reels which were put on TV, gave over to the made for TV budget Hannah Barbara cartoons which were made with both adults and children in mind. These 60s cartoons were just the continuation of what existed previously. The real change came in the 70s this is the era which I call the “PSA-toons” made by silent and early wave boomers, he-man and fat Albert are both examples of kids 70s shows that taught Xer kids the thing that parents could not be arsed to. The UK’s ITV aired “Charlie the cat” PSA shorts in the advert cycle. For adults, covered by Neil Howe on a number of occasions.The devil child horror movie, if not that, movies with bratty and wilful kids, note the 1971 Willy wonker film. As a result of this way of “raising” kids they had to raise themselves making mistakes along the way which would cement their reputation as “bad kids”, the bart Simpson generation. Remembering Pendulum from part 1, gen X is being raised during a period of increasing individualism or ME. A few years before the peak of ME, dispite Xers being a generation of nomads and individuals, they driven the ME-WE pendulum back down over the course of the unraveling in the music scene. A few factors in society causes a shift towards protective parenting that the young generations as of posting this are familiar with. 1981, is the year that both S&H and Pew agree on. Those reasons will be covered in part 3. But it is clear that the homealone latchkey parenting ended as the 40something boomer parents aimed to emulate their own upbringing in a more balanced way.
S&H: Strauss and Howe starts their 13er Xers a just before the start of the awakening which is marked for the US by the the assassination of JFK, but was properly started in 1964 marked by the election of the socially progressive Labour Party and the Beatles going global.
Pew: Using the mood change as a start and end point for the boomer generation, pew went a year off while S&H remained constant with their few years before the change ranges. Pew’s 1965 starting point is one year off from the noticeable mood change and a few years off the JFK book mark. That makes the range 15 years short, a fixed range probably based of the 1982 millennial start leading to the nonsense ranges of later generations.
submitted by TMc2491992 to Generationalysis [link] [comments]


http://activeproperty.pl/