Ce este Phoenix?

• Posibilitatea de a integra cod Java direct in template-ul HTML, fara sa fie nevoie sa inveti o sintaxa noua sau utilitare speciale
• O sintaxa mai usor de inteles care necesita doar un caracter special @ pentru a integra codul Java in codul HTML
• Fragmente sau componente care pot fi combinate si reutilizate, facand codul mai usor de mentinut
• Viteza, viteza, viteza - Inca nu am benchmark-uri oficiale, insa in testele mele (rudimentare), Phoenix este mult mai rapid decat Thymeleaf, si chiar mai rapid decat Rocker. Posibil ca Phoenix sa fie cel mai rapid template engine pentru Spring care exista.
• Posibilitatea de a returna atat pagini HTML cat si JSON dintr-un singur controller intr-un mod foarte usor: doar returnezi un Phoenix Result
• Reverse routing - o functionalitate complet noua pentru Spring. In tempalte-uri URL-urile se scriu la runtime si nu trebuie scrise manual. Doar mentionezi controller-ul si metoda, iar Phoenix calculeaza URL-ul corect. Atfel poti schimba URL-ul in controller fara sa fi nevoit sa modifici si template-ul
• Aproape 100% compatibil cu Rocker, astfel ca aplicatiile existente facute cu Rocker sa fie usor de migrat. Si desigur lucrez ca sa il duc la 100%
• Pagini modificate dinamic prin call din JS catre BE pentru a obtine un fragment/modul gata de adaugat la DOM
• Usor de configurat* (WIP pentru a reduce dependintele necesare)

De ce Phoenix si nu React/AngulaVue?

Open Source

Pareri, Opinii, Critici, etc.

UNIT-I
Introduction to Java, Inheritance, Exception Handling, Multithreading, Applet Programming. Connecting to a Server, Implementing Servers, Making URL Connections, Socket Programming.
UNIT-II
Preparing a Class to be a Java Bean, Creating a Java Bean, Java Bean Properties, Types of beans, Stateful Session bean, Stateless Session bean, Entity bean Servlet Overview and Architecture, Interface Servlet and the Servlet Life Cycle, Handling, HTTP GET Requests, Handling HTTP POST Requests, Session Tracking, Cookies. Handbook of B.Tech. Programmes offered by USICT at Affiliated Institutions of the University.
UNIT-III
JSP- Introduction, Java Server Pages Overview, Implicit Objects, Scripting, Standard Actions, Directives, Custom Tag Libraries.
UNIT- IV
The Roles of Client and Server, Remote Method Invocations, Setup for Remote Method Invocation, Parameter Passing in Remote Methods, Introduction of HB, HB Architecture.

• Eastbound Route 33 drivers will turn right on South Carlton Street, left on Reservoir Street, left on Evelyn Byrd Avenue, and then left on Burgess Road to return to Route 33.

O exercício das atribuições da Procuradoria-Geral do Estado é privativo dos procuradores integrantes da carreira, que será organizada e regida por estatuto próprio, definido em lei, com observância dos artigos 39 e 132 da Constituição Federal de 1988. Diante do exposto, de acordo com a Constituição do Estado do Paraná e da República e a jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal, é correto afirmar que (A) ofende a Constituição da República a previsão da Constituição do Estado do Paraná que não obriga que o Procurador-Geral do Estado, chefe da instituição, seja escolhido dentre os integrantes da carreira. (B) ofende a Constituição da República a previsão da Constituição do Estado do Paraná que garante aos Procuradores do Estado a prerrogativa da inamovibilidade, na forma da lei. (C) o ingresso na carreira de procurador far-se-á na classe inicial, mediante concurso público específico de provas e títulos, organizado e realizado pela Procuradoria-Geral do Estado e a estabilidade ocorrerá após dois anos de efetivo exercício, mediante avaliação de desempenho. (D) ofende a Constituição a previsão da Constituição do estado que veda aos procuradores do Estado a percepção de honorários decorrentes da sucumbência. (E) ofende a Constituição da República o dispositivo que veda aos procuradores do Estado o exercício da advocacia fora das funções institucionais.

O gabarito preliminar apontou a assertiva "b" como correta.
Entretanto, a assertiva "d" deve ser considerada correta também. Veja-se seu texto:
"ofende a Constituição a previsão da Constituição do estado que veda aos procuradores do Estado a percepção de honorários decorrentes da sucumbência.".
Ora, o STF já julgou em diversas ações a CONSTITUCIONALIDADE da percepção de honorários por procuradores do Estado. Observe-se trecho da ADI 6159/PI:
"2. Em recente decisão, proferida em caso análogo à presente ação, o Plenário do Supremo Tribunal firmou os seguintes entendimentos: (i) o pagamento de honorários sucumbenciais aos advogados públicos é constitucional; (ii) o recebimento da verba é compatível com o regime de subsídios, nos termos do art. 39, § 4º, da Constituição; e (iii) os honorários sucumbenciais, somados às demais verbas remuneratórias, devem estar limitados ao teto constitucional disposto no art. 37, XI, da Constituição (ADIs 6165, 6178, 6181, 6197, Rel. Min. Alexandre de Moraes, e ADI 6053, Rel. para acórdão Min. Alexandre de Moraes, julgadas na Sessão Virtual de 12.06.2020 a 19.06.2020)"
(Disponível em https://redir.stf.jus.bpaginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=754470245)
Diante disso, norma que veda a percepção de honorários ofenderia, sim a Constituição. Isso torna a assertiva "d" correta.
Além disso, a assertiva "e" também está correta ("ofende a Constituição da República o dispositivo que veda aos procuradores do Estado o exercício da advocacia fora das funções institucionais."). O STF já garantiu reiteradamente a possibilidade de procuradores advogarem, se a legislação de seu órgão assim permitir e eles não litigarem contra a fonte pagadora. Não há qualquer erro na assertiva se nenhuma dessas ressalvas for feita.

SITUAÇÃO DA QUESTÃO: GABARITO MANTIDO ARGUMENTAÇÃO DA BANCA: Ofende a Constituição da República a previsão da Constituição do Estado do Paraná que garante aos Procuradores do Estado a prerrogativa da inamovibilidade, na forma da lei. Art. 125 e 126 da CERJ e ADI 1246

1. America has a housing crisis and zoning is to blame - I. It is incorrect to say that America a whole has a housing crisis. In fact American housing is some of the most affordable in the world. We have had year on year price increases, but that is not the same as a crisis, and not something that local government have control over as they are driven by factors such as materials cost, interest rates and labor costs. We have a lower price to income ratio for homes than most developed countries do. Home ownership is more affordable in the US than it is many other countries as a result. US housing units are also generally much more spacious than counterparts in other countries. Us does have rent to income ratios similar or some cases higher than European countries, but rental units in the Us are generally larger than European and Asian ones, so rents per square would be lower once this is taken into account. See here: https://www.numbeo.com/property-investment/rankings\_by\_country.jsp and https://www.reddit.com/MapPorn/comments/1cajkf7/using\_square\_feet\_the\_average\_home\_size\_by\_state/ plus here https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/brief_international_housing_carliner_marya.pdf II. To the extent the US has an affordability problem it is concentrated in certain places like New Jersey, Connecticut, Downstate NY, Massachusetts, Maryland, North Virginia, Colorado, Oregon, California, Hawaii and Washington III. While all regulation adds cost, it would be wrong to blame zoning for affordability problems. If zoning in general and single family zoning in particular caused housing unaffordability, than places like Oklahoma City, Louisville, KY, Dallas, TX, Indianapolis and Columbus, Ohio should as unaffordable as California cities are, but they aren't. Zoning in America is ubiquitous, but housing affordability problems are concentrated in a few regions of the US. The real driver of affordability issues in certain regions is a combination of inclusionary zoning/rent regulation/rent control, anti-sprawl policies such as urban growth boundaries, multi acre minimum lot sizes, and agriculture/open space zoning, high impact fees, long approval times and something specific to California, CEQA. See here: https://reason.com/2022/03/13/how-the-war-on-sprawl-caused-high-housing-prices/ https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-regulatory-labyrinth https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/11/two-cheers-for-zoning/ https://californiapolicycenter.org/the-density-delusion/ https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Development_Fees_Slide_Deck_Final_1.pdf IV. Entitlement in most places is roughly 5% of the cost of development - https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/real-estate-developer-fees
2. Zoning is racist and exclusionary - Another common assertion is that single family zoning is racist or exclusionary. It is true that zoning has been used for racist purposes in the past like in Berkeley. That said nothing about zoning is inherently racist or exclusionary. The desire for single family zoning specifically comes from the desire to live in neighborhood of single family homes and live next to other single family homes, nothing about that is racist. Zoning exists from a planning perspective to ensure that infrastructure and government services aren't overloaded by development and that development is orderly (whether it accomplishes this is your own opinion), not to exclude minorities or the poor. Single family housing on per square foot basis is generally pretty affordable and there are many places with single family zoning that are affordable. While exclusive suburbs exist, affordable ones exist too. Not every American suburb is the Hamptons, Wilmette, Darien or Winnetka. Go to any majority black suburb or city and people there can be just as nimby as whites are and just as opposed to density. Most non-whites, except for Asians, have housing and neighborhood preferences similar to white people: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/02/majority-of-americans-prefer-a-community-with-big-houses-even-if-local-amenities-are-farther-away/
3. Zoning the main driver of urban sprawl - The problem with this is that while most municipalities have zoning, not all land in America is zoned. In my own state of Illinois, counties are permitted to, but not required to zone, and roughly half of Illinois Counties don't zone. Nearby Indiana, Wisconsin, and Missouri are similar in this regard. In Texas counties aren't allowed to zone without consent of the state legislature, and only a few do. Outside of the ETJ (Extra Territorial Jurisdiction) of Texas cities most land is unzoned. In cities that do have zoning, flexibility exists in the form of Planned Area or Planned Unit Developments, that allow to build development that doesn't fit into the zoning code. Finally Houston Texas has no zoning code and still resembles most sunbelt cities. The most you could say is that zoning helps to preserve sprawl that already got built.
4. Houston has zoning by another name - The reality is that Houston really does lack zoning and most of Houston's regulations are minimal. The regulations that do exist in Houston are either being repealed or being rolled back, such as the minimum lot size requirements. The city is more often than not very generous with granting variances, such as with setback regulations. So while Houston may not be an Anarcho-capitalist free for all, as no society is, it's a pretty good approximation of what market driven land use would look like. Some people will argue that deed restrictions and HOAs are the same thing as zoning, but in reality they are private agreements are an example of the market at work. Developers themselves, not the city of Houston, put deed restrictions on houses, because it makes the house more likely to sell. The zoning by another name cliche is just a way to get around the market not producing outcomes that you want.
5. Dense housing is 'illegal' - Saying that apartments are 'illegal' because an area is zoned single family is silly. This ignores rezonings, variances and conditional use permits. Other options include buying parcels already zoned for dense housing or building a planned area or planned unit development. Saying that dense housing is 'illegal' because building it requires a permit is like saying alcohol is illegal because selling alcohol requires a permit. If there really was some overwhelming demand for dense housing, developers would build it more than they do as developers are driven by the market place and by the almighty dollar.

• SPL (Student Pilot's License)
• PPL (Private Pilot's License)
• CPL (Commercial Pilot's License)
• ATPL (Airline Transport Pilot's License)
• For flying helicopters there are the PPL(H),CPL(H) and so on.

• Air Navigation
• Aviation Meteorology
• Air Regulations
• Technical General
• Technical Specific

• Level 4 - 3 years
• Level 5 - 6 years
• Level 6 - Lifetime Validity

• Monday, April 22 through Friday, April 26
• Monday, April 29 through Friday, May 3
• Monday, May 5 through Friday, May 10