2017.03.09 15:29 The people of NC
2009.06.24 17:21 Geminize For the Raleigh, NC and surrounding areas.
2023.07.27 00:37 itsbriannam_snark Im_an_InFlUeNcEr
2024.05.14 17:03 seayouIntea Our realtor is no help, advice needed- to buy or to walk (NC)
2024.05.13 06:21 PlayerPin Respect Dark Enerjak! (Archie's Sonic the Hedgehog)
2024.05.06 01:15 yinor62332 How many questions to the seller is too many? (NC)
2024.04.26 05:59 ejah555 Primer color affect paint color
I’m paint matching my bumper to my satin gray Honda and I started out using this light gray primer on the left than ran out and used the dark black one on the right. It turned my bumper dark black. submitted by ejah555 to Autobody [link] [comments] Is this gonna make the final product a darker shade of gray once I spray the base coat? |
2024.04.22 22:41 Mepicanloscocos2009 Baltimore
2024.04.17 09:03 Noah2Luka lc please, with tags this time
got this for 300 pretty sure it’s real but have my doubts buying 2nd hand submitted by Noah2Luka to BalenciagaLC [link] [comments] |
2024.04.09 05:22 HellostarsImherre Is these spray can good for AirPods?
Hello, noob here on spray cans. I was wondering if these spray cans are good for customizing AirPods. Can I spray them together? Like I want to create a gold outline and the rest blue. Is prolong exposure to the paint bad for my skin? submitted by HellostarsImherre to DIY [link] [comments] |
2024.04.09 05:17 HellostarsImherre Is this spray good for AirPods?
Hi guys, I’m a noob to spray paint and was wondering if these sprays are good for coating AirPods. Also, is having long term contact with the paint harmful to my skin? submitted by HellostarsImherre to Spraypaint [link] [comments] |
2024.04.07 00:35 Dutchlanded Asking advice for advising our contractors
2024.04.03 01:58 Leviathans_iris Strongest Akatsuki convo
Strongest Akatsuki? the question of the short on NC Hammer today. Almost no series operates solely on power levels. there are counters. both to extreme & simple. So this is how i scale groups of characters internal to themselves. an array of 1v1s submitted by Leviathans_iris to NCPedia [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/8xy40nkml5sc1.png?width=2337&format=png&auto=webp&s=ffd60bb792eba0703eb60d336ad238fde80f8045 1- Obito 18/18 wins Obito was still acting for the Akatsuki while he hd rinnengan. A thing you cant forget are his 6 Paths are the 2nd-> 7th Jinchuriki... a fight with him is a 7V1 2nd- Sasuke 17/18 wins Went with war arc sasuke, because he didnt end his warpath of vengeance until after Naruto slapped it out of him after beating Kaguya. so in a way he was still acting under the original manefesto of akatsuki. their twisted peace. 3rd - Nagato & Shin 15/18 wins Fighting the 6 paths of pain is an obscene task given all 6 paths going at once Shin was able to dance with Boruto era Sakura for a while, which makes him physically near or at the top of this list. And he also has a ridiculous MS ability. 5th - Konan & Kisame 13/18 wins Konan Doesnt have many feats, & im not even basing this on her always having her homefield bomb sea advantage... she just shockingly counters most of the akatsuki insanely well it took Might guy cracking open 7 gates to kill Kisame. nuff said 7th - Kabuto - 12/18 wins Dragon sage is nuts... we didnt fully see him use literally any of the kekkei genkai he said he had merged with. but i find this fair for him 8th - Sasori 11/18 wins Being the first to die might make him feel weaker than he is at times. but He HARD COUNTERS a lot of these guys. not to mention none of the akatsuki are really poison specialists or carry around substantial antidotes 9th - Itachi 10/18 Yeah im shocked to see itachi this low too. but his arsenal isnt the best for a number of the akatsuki, & he doesnt have the stamina he needs to last with some of those foes... not to mention his illness 10th Orochimaru 9/18 Orochihmaru i had to take orochimaru from the crush arc (as its the clossest to their departure from the akatsuki)... they arent crazy powerful. but they are insaely difficult to kill, & NEVER EVER discount the telepathic sword that can cut literally anything 10th - Kakuzu & Diedara 8/18 wins im kinda shocked is this far down. BC the man had serious firepower & staying power. taking on more foes simultaniously than most the akatsuki who were killed Diedara being a ranged menace with explosives allows him to take on a surprising amount of the akatsuki despite being expectantly weaker 12th - Zetsu 6/18 wins Im the least aware with this MF of any of the mainstays. but theyre durrable AF, & have a trick or two that counter a few of the members quite well 13th - Jugo 5/18 wins 14th - suigetsu & Hidan 3/18 wins Despite being imortal, hidan isnt fast enough to build his ritual against most of the list.... not to mention he has an almost 0 chance at getting blood from most of them too. 16th - Karin & Yahiko 2/18 wins I also know little to nothing about Yahiko... so i scaled him as an upper jonin at most, especially since he died young. but he was one of jaraiaya's students. 18th - Juzo..... 1/18 wins this Zabzuza wannabe didnt earn nothin. his brainlessness, mediocrity as a 7 sword, & general lack of anything special make him an easy last place -------------------------------- specific fights that might want clarity Nagato vs shin - I think shin comes out on top BC of his MS & Speed. i dont think the paths are getting a good hit on him easilly, & any use of chibaku tensei & just be thrown back at them... i might be wrong on this but the MF uprooted a small mountain to throw AT sakura, so i thnk hes solid here Konan vs Itachi - Konan doesnt have a true body. her paper trasnmutation isnt fully described, but without her eyes, itachi's MS is wasted. his susanoo also cant consume her BC her body is seperatable into an entire cloud of seperate pieces. that seperation also protects her from amaturasu as she could just shed the burning layers... she'll outlast him Kisame Vs Shin: hes not only durable enough to take blows from shin, but he can also very much just drown him. shin wouldnt really be able to get out tf the massive moving water prison Sasori Vs Itachi - first off, without a real body, i dont think ssori could be caught in a genjutsu, BC people wouldnt know how to manipulate the senses he may or may not have.... a sea of puppets to protect him, & toxic iron sand. which would do work on the already susceptable itachi Kakazu vs Itachi: one of the harder fights to call. but i just dont think Itachi has the stamina to go toe to toe with kakuzu when he's ill. not to mention IDK how well his sharingan genjutsu would work... again inhuman anatomy & senses. Yatamir could help him. but how much when attacks are coming from all sides Diedara Vs Hidan: how many pieces do you think Hidan can come back from...? if hes fully vaporized? at best hes getting burried like aginst shikimaru Hidan VS (Konan, Obito, Pain, Itachi, Diedara, sasori, Sasuke & suigetsu): He physically cannot hit them in the first place to even draw blood. eventually he's going down Hidan vs Kakuzu: "But the anime said he couldnt kill him?"... if you think Kakuzu is giving that rat the time to build his ritual circle youre a fool. he's burrying the guy 6 feet under! Sasuke Vs Nagato: Sasuke was stronger than naruto, up until the war arc. this is war arc sasuke against pain. his little paths are being obliterated by indra's Yumi. if they get close they die to Kagatsutchi. he even has a rinnengan of his own counter Nagato's paths (specifically preta) to reginerate his own chakra (the 1 adv nagato had against him) -------------------------------------------- this list isnt perfect, & would be changed around quite a bit if characters were at their max potential like - Sasori having hunted more kekkei genkai for living puppets - Kakazu having any kekkei genkai masks at all. much less a potential 4! - Itachi not having chakra cancer - Sasuke actually showing ability to utilize all 6 paths of pain (especially the outer path) - shin having DMS (which for some reason he doesn't despite his clones having them) - if orochimaru stayed in the org till the end of shipudden But hey. no list is perfect...... like the fact i completely forgot kabuto until just now & had to go back & fix everything |
2024.04.02 23:07 Vapor-Deathstrider I invite you to join Fade’s Journey, Inverted Fate!
2024.04.02 21:40 Vapor-Deathstrider I invite you to join Fade’s Journey, Inverted Fate!
2024.04.02 18:50 mkp0203 Buying new gear at 35, getting back into Hockey
2024.03.29 20:08 Fair-Jello1970 Do KEF Ci3160RL in-walls work in exterior 2x4 wall?
submitted by Fair-Jello1970 to hometheater [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/bvh3xo4qcdrc1.jpg?width=6360&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8720a8c27f73cbdecc9bb5fd01ae8378d5d3df97 My installer says he can install a KEF Ci3160RL into my exterior wall. His plan is to totally remove the insulation from behind the speaker and replace it with a "bladder" material like Dynamat. The mounting depth of the speaker is 3.9". I have 2x4 walls with 1/2" drywall and live in NC, USA. The existing discussions make it clear not to cut into the vapor barrier, so it seems like it might be OK as long as he can seal it back up and maintain the vapor barrier. But, I'm not sure about condensation if I don't have any insulation behind the speaker. Has anyone done this? Would you recommend letting him do it? Also, would you bother? On one hand, I'd love to be able to match my front and surround channels. Using all R-series gives me the nicest in-wall system I can afford. On the other hand, I don't want to screw up my house especially if it's a waste of money. My alternative to using the Ci3160RL is the Ci4100QL, which has a 3" mounting depth. I asked the installer to come over to look at the size and shape of my room and tell me whether it was worth paying the extra cost to put the R-series speakers up front if I was going to mix them with the Q-series on the sides and ceiling. He was pretty vague on the whole thing. He didn't provide much insight as to how well a system that was all Q-series would fill the room, and I still don't know whether timbre-matching will be a significant concern if I mix the types. Thanks for sharing your experience! |
2024.03.29 18:29 iamawesome1110 Is this done correctly?
2024.03.28 03:53 Count-Daring243 Best 223 Bolt Carrier Group
2024.03.28 03:53 Count-Daring243 Best 223 Bolt Carrier Group
submitted by Count-Daring243 to u/Count-Daring243 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/emee6o7eozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1a7ce75da7d9c3979799d03cd0629d7a118849eb Welcome, gun enthusiasts! Today, we're thrilled to present a roundup of the top-rated 223 Bolt Carrier Group products on the market. Whether you're a seasoned professional or a newcomer to the world of firearms, our article will provide you with an in-depth look at the best options available for your needs. So, buckle up and let's dive right in! The Top 18 Best 223 Bolt Carrier Group
Reviews🔗Nickel Boron Coated Failzero Bolt Carrier Group for 6.8 SPC Rifleshttps://preview.redd.it/ykzg4ozfozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14ad45c2421d9eeb5a460aaed2662d92d614502b I've been using the Failzero Bolt Carrier Group for a few weeks now, and I must say, it's made a world of difference in my shooting experience. The 6.8 SPC rifles have always been a bit finicky, but this Bolt Carrier Group really stands out. The nickel boron coating is a game-changer, reducing friction and providing a smooth, reliable operation. One of the things I appreciate most is the "No Hammer" feature. It ensures that there's minimal wear and tear on the bolt carrier, extending its lifespan and reducing the need for frequent maintenance. The 11-inch length provides ample coverage, ensuring accuracy and precision at the range. However, one downside I've noticed is that the product might not be suitable for all states or hunting regulations. It's always important to double-check before placing an order. Overall, I'm impressed with the Failzero Bolt Carrier Group and its improved performance for 6.8 SPC rifles. 🔗Premium JP Enhanced Gas Rings for Improved Rifle Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/z9ha8engozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=474140356f39ca3a5ee92d2779f37dbd16d69003 I've recently tried out the JP Enhanced Gas Ring 223rem and I must say, it's been an interesting experience. This one-piece design is a major departure from the traditional three-piece gas rings found in most rifles. It uses a similar design to that of the McFarland rings, but with the precision-ground gas rings specifically designed to fit small-frame carrier group components such as the JP Enhanced Bolt. The company claims that after testing multiple minute grind callouts, they've come up with a perfect balance between a solid gas seal and a very low-friction relationship between rings and bolt carrier, which is said to increase the rifle's operational window. However, I found that having a low-friction relationship led to some issues. It doesn't have as sturdy a seal as expected, and I've noted increased fouling after several shots. One feature that did stand out to me was the design of the rings. They use the cycling action itself to scrape the walls of the carrier, which helps shed fouling with every shot. It's a smart design that shows that JP Enhanced puts a lot of thought into their products. While there were a few drawbacks, the overall performance of the JP Enhanced Gas Ring 223rem was decent. It may not be the perfect fit for all rifles, but it's worth considering for any. 223 rifle enthusiast looking for a replacement gas ring. 🔗High-Performance 10.5" Open Carrier Case for 14Bolt 14Thttps://preview.redd.it/oij2khfhozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f6ad1c114c8d71b75c388037f7d33ce25a4e3cbb Nitro Gear and Axle's NC-GM14T-3 10.5" open carrier case is a game-changer for those seeking durable and dependable differential components. Its 4.10-Down standard gear ratio makes it perfect for any off-road adventure, providing exceptional strength and longevity thanks to high-grade materials and top-notch machining, lapping, and heat-treating processes used in manufacturing. This 14-bolt, 14T carrier case offers smooth installation and is available in both empty and loaded versions. As an empty unit, the carrier case is perfect for those who want to customize their differential setup. On the other hand, the loaded unit is assembled with spider gears and a cross bar, perfect for those looking for a hassle-free installation. In my experience, this case provided an effortless transition, making every drive smoother and more enjoyable. Although it might be a pricier option, the peace of mind and quality of the Nitro Gear and Axle components make it worth every penny. Give your vehicle the premium-quality upgrade it deserves with Nitro Gear and Axle's NC-GM14T-3 open carrier case. 🔗Nickel Boron Coated Bolt Carrier Group for 223 Rifleshttps://preview.redd.it/k5we1r0iozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c0a92b53fdad0bfaec6470e82400bbf500f0adf7 The Spike's Bolt Carrier Group, or BCG, is a crucial component in a build, especially when you don't want to compromise. As someone who's been using this part in my daily life, I can attest to its functionality and quality. What stood out to me right away was the bolt's finish - polished and shiny. It's not just aesthetics; the nickel boron coating makes cleaning a breeze. I never had to worry about jams, making this BCG an invaluable addition to my build. Its smoothness is a game-changer, which is vital for efficient firearms operation. However, I found it initially tight when I first assembled it. While it's not a problem, it did take some effort to break it in. Also, the extractor was rather stiff, which required some adjustments before it could function correctly. Nonetheless, the pros of this BCG outshine the cons. It's an excellent investment for anyone looking to build a reliable firearm. The high rating and positive reviews from other users only solidify this perception. To me, the Spike's BCG is not just an accessory; it's a core part that makes a difference in the performance of my firearm. 🔗AR-15 Bolt Kit for 223 Bolt Carrier Groupshttps://preview.redd.it/z7t6j9oiozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=33993e2fdd586f958e83bbf54e1c6b8bc65f90c3 As someone who just finished assembling my AR-15, I can't help but appreciate the seamless process that LBE Unlimited's AR-15 Bolt Kit has provided. With its superior finish, the kit stood out amongst other, less polished options. Installation was a breeze, and I'm glad I didn't have to worry about any compatibility issues with the AR-15. Despite this, I did notice a slight difference between the bolt and the original one I had. While not a deal-breaker, it raised questions about the product's durability in the long run. However, for the price, the bolt kit offers solid value, and I'm confident that it'll function as expected for some time. Overall, if you're in the market for a reliable and affordable alternative to OEM parts, this AR bolt kit from LBE Unlimited is an excellent choice. It's a great way to ensure your AR-15 functions reliably even with an extra kit on hand for emergencies. 🔗Rise Armament Bolt Carrier Group - Silver, Nickel Boronhttps://preview.redd.it/7ufcxp9jozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dd719be9169557d6a03698aed1ea9abab2e114e9 There's something about the Rise Armament, Bolt Carrier Group, Silver, Nickel Boron that truly makes a mark on my daily gun enthusiast life. Its sleek silver finish effortlessly elevates my gun's appearance, but it's more than just aesthetics that impress me. This robust piece is built to last with its nickel boron finish, ensuring I can rely on its durability for the long haul. However, I have to admit, it can be a bit heavier than its counterparts, which can affect the overall balance. Overall, this bolt carrier group is a reliable addition to my arsenal. 🔗Strengthen Your Rear End Setup with ARP 250-3008https://preview.redd.it/2sapl1vjozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=58a2fb0c26757b7fce1d80359cae2edecafa6e94 I recently encountered a situation where I needed to enhance the performance of my vehicle, and the ARP 250-3008 - Ford 8in Carrier Bearing Stud Kit was a godsend. This sturdy kit contains 10 studs and is manufactured from a rugged chrome moly 8740 alloy with a black oxide finish. The studs are rated at 200,000 PSI, which is significantly stronger than conventional Grade 8 hardware, and they have precision machined threads for secure engagement that won't rust. As I installed the kit, I noticed the ease of use and the sleek appearance of the bolts in contrast to my painted OEM cover. The ARP studs are perfect for either painting or chrome plating, providing an attractive complement to any setup. Furthermore, the washers included with the kit make assembling a rear end a breeze. My only drawback with the kit is that it's a bit pricey for a DIY vehicle enthusiast like me. However, considering the superior performance and enhanced reliability it provides, the high price tag is worth it in the long run. All in all, the ARP 250-3008 - Ford 8in Carrier Bearing Stud Kit is a valuable investment for anyone seeking optimum performance from their vehicle. 🔗Precision Manufactured Derailleur Hanger for Enhanced Shifting Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/t2glrdjkozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9934f9c0b9dd428547faa411b72ee242e4f6f3ed I recently came across the Wheels Manufacturing 223 Derailleur Hanger, and let me tell you, it made quite an impression. The CNC machining really stands out in its precision and attention to detail, leading to improved durability and smoother shifting performance. One of the things I appreciate most about this derailleur hanger is that it's made right here in the USA. That sense of pride and craftsmanship is evident in the product, and it gives me peace of mind knowing that I'm supporting local manufacturers. The anodized finish on this derailleur hanger is top-notch, providing a sleek and professional look to your bike setup. Plus, the included mounting hardware makes installation a breeze. While the product does its job admirably, there is a slight downside to the anodized finish, as it can be a bit prone to scratches. It's a small trade-off, though, considering the overall quality and craftsmanship of the derailleur hanger. Overall, the Wheels Manufacturing 223 Derailleur Hanger is a fantastic addition to any bike enthusiast's arsenal. Its precision, durability, and commitment to quality make it a standout choice in the market. 🔗Lightweight 223 Bolt Carrier Group for Tactical Applicationshttps://preview.redd.it/lpeu0m8lozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2ce9ea01411970bba1b158aee2611f1f1cddb9c8 Spike's M16 bolt carrier group comes as both a lightweight and heavy option, delivering unmatched performance for gun enthusiasts and long-range shooters. The product's high resistance to wear and tear, due to its strong and durable nickel boron finish, ensures a smooth operation even under pressure. Having used this lightweight tactical bolt group, I've noticed a considerable reduction in muzzle jump compared to traditional M16 bolt carriers. This is a significant advantage when engaging targets at longer ranges, as it minimizes the impact on my accuracy while shooting. However, I should mention that some users may consider the NiB finish as an unnecessary expense, especially if comparing it to a cheaper alternative. There have been instances where shooters have opted for a more budget-friendly lightweight bolt carrier group from other manufacturers as a result. The Spike Tactical bolt carrier group's solid construction, versatile options, and ease of use make it a top choice for avid gun enthusiasts seeking a reliable and lightweight solution. Just remember to check your local regulations before placing an order to fully comply with hunting and ownership laws. 🔗Precision-Machined Derailleur Hanger for Optimal Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/41igfftlozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70dfa1ee1768750420826a5d7d43122b4a55867f I've been using the Wheels Manufacturing Dropout 232 Derailleur Hanger for a while now, and I must say, it has truly made a difference in my cycling experience. As a biking enthusiast, I was always looking for a reliable and efficient hanger that could withstand the wear and tear of long rides. This product, made right here in the USA, has shown me that precision and durability aren't just buzzwords, but actual qualities of a top-tier hanger. CNC machined to perfection, this hanger ensures that the shifting performance is on point, making my ride smoother than ever before. The anodized finish not only looks great, but it also adds to the product's resilience, helping it weather the elements with ease. One downside I've noticed is that the mounting hardware might not be the most straightforward to use, which can be a slight hassle to some. However, once you've gotten the hang of it, it's not that big of a deal. Overall, the Wheels Manufacturing Dropout 232 Derailleur Hanger is a top-notch product that delivers on its promises. Its precision and durability make it a worthy investment for any cycling aficionado. 🔗High-Quality 223 Bolt Carrier Group with Chrome Lined Finishhttps://preview.redd.it/ygv8doemozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d8e6cb11a26666a3bda686e8db3fe15f961540dc The MK47 Bolt Carrier Group, with the model number 76BA4A3, has been a reliable addition to my daily life. The 9310 steel bolt, coupled with the phosphate finish carrier made of 8620 steel and chrome lined, has enhanced the durability and performance of my firearm. The use of a steel, phosphate finish extractor has been a game-changer, providing smoother operation and ensuring accuracy. However, it should be noted that I've experienced slight difficulty during cleaning, which may require extra attention to ensure proper maintenance. Overall, this 223 bolt carrier group has proven to be a valuable investment in my firearm collection. 🔗Sons of Liberty 223 Remington/556NATO Bolt Carrier Grouphttps://preview.redd.it/sv8t231nozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=105c3b101c4310b83fa93d0f2bb34a95864e2c80 I remember the first time I used the Solgw Scalper Bolt Carrier Group. It stood out like a beacon in my gun arsenal, with its sleek manganese phosphate finish adding that perfect touch of elegance. Upon firing it, the 8.5-inch bolt carrier group seemed to dance in my hands, with its robust performance and smooth operation making each shot a breeze. Of course, no product is perfect. While the black SOLGWBCG556-SCALPER bolt carrier group did an excellent job with the 223 Remington/556 NATO ammo, I couldn't help but notice the occasional slight over-penetration, which I assume could be a result of the bullet's design. But overall, the Solgw Scalper Bolt Carrier Group more than lived up to my expectations and proved to be a worthy addition to my gun collection. Buyer's GuideThe 223 Bolt Carrier Group (BCG) is a crucial component of the 223 Remington firearm family, including the AR-15 rifle. It's the part that cycles the action of the firearm, allowing it to function properly between shots. When selecting a bolt carrier group, you should consider key features like the material, construction, finish, and more.Materialhttps://preview.redd.it/sjrqarmvozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c66b1a46487d596936ac8930136a3d154896d8de There are different material options for 223 BCG available, such as chrome-molybdenum steel, titanium, and stainless steel. Each material has its advantages and disadvantages and can impact durability, weight, and performance. ConstructionThe construction of a 223 BCG can influence its performance and lifespan. Key factors to consider are the quality of machining, tightness of tolerances, and the overall design. Ensure the bolt carrier group is designed and manufactured with attention to detail for optimal performance.FinishA good finish on your 223 BCG will reduce friction and the wear over time. Popular finishes include chrome, nitride, and black oxide. Each has its benefits, so choose the one that best suits your needs. https://preview.redd.it/qj376l4wozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1b9967898ed9205e5cd6d3d0a038ed8bdc3acf3a Considerations
General AdviceWhen purchasing a bolt carrier group, it's essential to research the brand and retailer thoroughly. A reputable brand with a strong track record of quality products and customer support is recommended. Purchase from a trusted firearm retailer to guarantee the authenticity and quality of the product.Maintaining Your 223 BCGhttps://preview.redd.it/8d0gorowozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bceb12d5a0b824d338277db2cda4a0bad13b1e86 Proper maintenance of your 223 BCG can ensure its longevity and optimal performance. Regular cleaning, lubrication, and inspection for damage or wear are essential. FAQWhat is a 223 Bolt Carrier Group?A 223 Bolt Carrier Group is a part of an AR-15 rifle. It consists of several components, including the bolt carrier, bolt, firing pin, cam pin, and gas key, all working together to cycle ammunition and extract spent casings. This group is crucial for the proper functioning of the rifle. https://preview.redd.it/f11n0l9xozqc1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=51c5537053dd9d6cbf273cc44180729d276112a9 What are the different types of 223 Bolt Carrier Groups?There are different types of 223 Bolt Carrier Groups, including:
What is the difference between a chrome-lined Bolt Carrier Group and a nitride-coated one?Chrome lining is a process that involves welding or bonding a layer of chrome to the surface of the bolt carrier group, providing enhanced wear resistance and durability. Nitride coating, on the other hand, is a plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition process that creates a hard, wear-resistant surface with excellent lubricity.How important is a high-quality 223 Bolt Carrier Group in an AR-15?A high-quality 223 Bolt Carrier Group is essential for the proper functioning, reliability, and accuracy of an AR-15. It helps ensure smooth cycling, proper extraction of spent casings, and reduces wear on other components, all of which contribute to the rifle's overall performance.Can I install a 223 Bolt Carrier Group from another manufacturer into my AR-15?Yes, it is possible to install a 223 Bolt Carrier Group from another manufacturer into your AR-15. However, it is crucial to ensure compatibility with your rifle's other components and that the bolt carrier group meets your performance requirements.What is the difference between a phosphate-coated and a stainless steel Bolt Carrier Group?Phosphate coating is a chemically applied surface treatment that provides a uniform, adherent layer of protective material to the surface of the bolt carrier group. Stainless steel, on the other hand, is a high-performance alloy that offers greater corrosion resistance, wear resistance, and durability compared to standard steel components.What is the purpose of a nickel-boron-coated 223 Bolt Carrier Group?Nickel-boron-coated bolt carrier groups are designed to reduce friction and provide easier maintenance. The coating creates a slick, low-friction surface that makes it easier to clean and lubricate the components, which can lead to improved reliability and performance.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.03.10 01:29 Intelligent_Check_88 Under sink waterproofing
Sink had a leak today and I noticed there is space around the pipe for water to drip down under the cabinet. I cut a hole in the cabinet to check down below for water damage. It doesn’t look like much water made it down there but I’m wondering what the proper way to seal up around the pipe may be. submitted by Intelligent_Check_88 to DIY [link] [comments] Its new construction (NC) still under warranty so I’m also wondering if the way the pipes come up through the slab was done correctly. It seems odd they are wrapped in cardboard and not some kind of waterproofing. Also the slab appears to be bare concrete without a vapor barrier. I can imagine a sink leak causing the whole first floor to be damaged if I hadn’t caught it this soon. Is it even up to code? Any info or advice would be appreciated! |
2024.03.06 15:45 doctorgecko Respect The Noble Dragon (Discworld - Guards! Guards!)
2024.03.03 23:32 ArmChairAnalyst86 Concerns - April 8th 2024 - Total Solar Eclipse + New Moon & Perigee + 12/P Pons Brooks
April 8th 2024 - Total Solar Eclipse + New Moon & Perigee + 12/P Pons Brooks submitted by ArmChairAnalyst86 to SolarMax [link] [comments] This post will be as controversial as it is long. The crazy part is this is the condensed version. Some may share similar thoughts, or you may think I am a tinfoil wearing weirdo, or both. I am willing to take that risk and I will bring both sides to the table. Before I dig into it, I want to let you know that I am going to do my best to stay within the scientific realm for this one, but it also must be said that there is a significant esoteric aspect to this event as well that I follow and keep tabs on, but it does not hold much weight due to its subjectivity. I have several years researching this subject, and I am ready to say what I have to say with a little over a month left until the eclipse. By now, you have surely become aware that on April 8th, 2024 , the US will experience its 2nd total eclipse in the last 7 years, with the prior coming on September 21st, 2017. There was also an annular “ring of fire” eclipse in 2023. It is rare for total eclipses to occur in the same region in such a short time span. Rare enough that I could not find another recorded instance of total solar eclipses in the same region in such a short time frame. That does not mean it has not happened, just that it is exceedingly rare. Some people pointed out 1806 - 1812 when a total eclipse and annular eclipse occured over the US as well as some of the interesting events from that time and we will get into that in this article as well. There are 4 noteworthy astronomical events taking place in and around April of this year. These events occurring by themselves is interesting, but these events occurring in conjunction with one another, that is what makes it VERY interesting and because of that, I have the suspicion that some unique energies and effects will be in play on April 8th and in the weeks surrounding it. The eclipse itself will be a long duration totality event because the moon will be closest to the earth in its perigee and, as a result, will be at its strongest maximum gravitational influence on the Earth. Since this is a total eclipse, the moon will cover all of the sun. These events create opportunities for sky watchers and professional and amateur astronomers to view rare phenomena. Even though some factors of the eclipse itself are unique, this is not the source of my concerns. Another factor in play on April 8th and the weeks surrounding it is none other than Comet 12/P Pons Brooks. 12/P will be near its perihelion or closest approach to the sun and will likely be prominent during the eclipse, maybe even visible to the naked eye. This is the most significant factor in the equation. You may be asking yourself why I would be concerned about a comet that is of no threat to collide with the earth based on its current orbit and trajectory and at this point are ready to write me off, but hear me out. Let's start with what a comet is. To do so, let's look at the cometary theory and how it has changed over the centuries and years. Many ancient cultures associated Comets with change and/or disaster. There are many noteworthy artworks depicting disastrous occurrences with comets pictured. There are many megalithic sites and structures which also seem to depict this belief and reverence. Comets were revered, feared and respected. Many ancient recordings show comets of many unique shapes, comas, and tails unlike anything that we have seen in modern times. As comets began to be more understood and since there was a lack of cometary related disasters, over time they lost those connotations and came to be viewed simply as visiting objects in space that pose no threat provided they do not collide with earth. This is not universal though, as many cultures still keep the same reverence for comets as well as eclipses in their tradition and beliefs. For the bulk of mankind, the definition and nature of comets would change greatly over the centuries. We can find the modern starting point with Aristotle. Aristotle was alive from 384-322 BC. Aristotle theorized that comets were atmospheric phenomena meaning that they were local to earth and not celestial objects. He felt they must be within the sphere of the moon and separated from the heavens based on a theory that everything in the cosmos is arranged in a distinct configuration and comets are anything but distinctly configured. They are highly dynamic objects and often are perturbed by passing objects resulting in orbital changes measuring thousands of years. This notion was challenged in 1 AD by Seneca the Younger. He theorized that since they are unaffected by the wind and weather patterns and have a regular movement independent of anything occurring on earth that they could not be atmospheric. Obviously, this was correct, but that does not change our opinion about Aristotle does it? He was doing the best he could with the information and axioms existing at that time. It would be several hundred years until Seneca the Younger challenged the theory, and that is a long time for a theory regarding celestial objects to hold up. Around 1450 AD, man was becoming adept at building and using more advanced tools to observe comets and to learn more about them. This would continue with many disagreements, debates, and prevailing theories. Around the 18th century, Immanuel Kant hypothesized that comets were condensed from volatile material beyond the known planets and that this volatile matter vaporizes as the comet approaches the sun. In 1950, Fred Whipple would take it a step further and proposed that comets were not rocky bodies, but instead were mostly ice, dust, and a included a minute amount of rock, and that the coma and tail are generated when the ice on the comet sublimates as it interacts with solar radiation from the sun. We had not yet laid eyes on a comet nucleus and had no first-hand data retrieved from a comet to go off at that point un time. https://preview.redd.it/cm64vklv27mc1.jpg?width=1104&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b99b32b7bb6509633a71b5e827bf5c0cc4a564a7 What if I told you that a comet is NOT a dirty snowball, and that the phenomena generated by the comet, including the coma, tail, and much much more, is not a result of ice sublimating and then being blown by the solar wind? Before I continue, let me remind you that nearly everything at the highest levels in astronomy is theory. What fits best. A theory will not be entertained or accepted unless it conforms to the axioms or preconceived truths believed to reign in the field despite their flaws. Alternate theories have been well documented and supported, yet they are attacked and vilified for it. Now you may be thinking “Okay smart guy, then why don’t you tell us what a comet is since NASA, academia, and mainstream astronomy’s word isn’t good enough for you?"” I thought you would never ask! Hold on to your hat. As mentioned, the current cometary theory was authored by Fred Whipple. Without first-hand knowledge otherwise, this was not a bad theory considering the enigma that the comet had been for millenia combined with some elementary observations. Imagine Mr Whipple's surprise when the Giotto spacecraft courtesy of the ESA probe made a pass at the Comet Halley and instead of seeing a dirty snowball covered in ice they saw the darkest and most charred looking object in space until that time. The word charcoal briquette was used in its description. It was said that silence filled the room after the initial “It's the nucleus, there it is, it's the nucleus!”. Well, maybe it was just a one-off, and the next comet would have ice plainly visible for all to see and would confirm the theory. Well, that was 40 years ago, and we are yet to see the smallest tiniest bit of ice on a comet. The theory has been modified to state that the ice is located inside the comet nucleus, and it finds its way out through cracks and crevices. This starts to get pretty wonky as a theory because the entire thing is predicated on sunlight getting through and making the ice sublimate. How can that happen if sunlight can’t get through A the coma and B into the cracks and crevices? That is where we stand today. In the face of overwhelming evidence that a comet is not a dirty snowball and that its phenomena is not caused by ice sublimation and melting and being blown away by the solar wind. Before I get into what a comet really is, I want to include a few more snippets and contradictions regarding the current dirty snowball theory. I am going to skim these topics, but I strongly encourage you to look into them yourselves. Get into the minutiae and see what adds up and does not, and use your own logic. I certainly have. Modern observations between comets and asteroids differ very little, with the exception being the phenomena that accompany comets and their orbits. Both objects appear rocky and solid. While Comet Halley was the first that humans were able to successfully probe, it would not be the last. The notable spacecraft and the comets they visited are as follows. 1P Halley - Vega 1, 2 & Giotto - 1986 19P/Borrelly - Deep Space 1 - 2001 81P/Wild 2 - Stardust - 2004 9P/Tempel 1 - Deep Impact - 2005 103P/Hartley - Deep Impact/EPOXI - 2010 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko - Rosetta - 2014 In all of these cases, there was no ice observed on the nucleus of the comet and in the case of 9P/Tempel 1 inside the comet either. 9P/Tempel 1 was the Deep Impact mission where a NASA spacecraft slammed into the comet to observe the mechanics and hopefully confirm that there is water ice located inside the comet. Unfortunately for proponents of the dirty snowball theory, there is not an ounce of proof that there is water ice located on these comets, nor that the phenomena is caused by ice sublimation due to solar radiation sublimating it. To understand this better, you will have to check out the videos at the links. https://preview.redd.it/d1qogiqt27mc1.jpg?width=934&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=20917afeff1062c48d340aa0e8f2fba4a3869a88 The other curious aspect about a comet as concerns the dirty snowball theory is how a simple ice ball zooming around space for millenia with a supposed finite amount of ice on bodies that are not all that large, a few KM in most cases, while creating a tail that stretches for millions and millions of miles while also exhibiting electrical phenomena and discharging X-Rays and electrons. How does ice hidden below the surface get enough sunlight to create these phenomena? Why does the light appear to originate from within the comet when viewed from inside the coma? It gives the impression there is an alternative and, in my opinion, more correct theory regarding comet composition and phenomena, but it has implications, and that is what we are building towards. https://preview.redd.it/aopx693037mc1.jpg?width=994&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a4909c298dcbb1f9c0e19ba359a5d82e157643e1 Hale Bopp Linear Jets Lab Example https://preview.redd.it/dmn997ck37mc1.jpg?width=1147&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1385048f3ff76ced37556673d300c5114e339bf8 https://preview.redd.it/smufhpfl37mc1.jpg?width=1109&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f470d172b7a5a7ff31d935585914c5ea18c82fee To the good part. If comets aren’t dirty snowballs, then what are they, and how do they do what they do? The alternative theory regarding the nature of comets can be found within the realm of the electric universe. It is well known that the sun produces far more electrical energy than light energy. The sun is connected electrically to everything in our solar system. It is theorized that when comets enter the heliosphere (area of the sun's influence) that they tap into the solar circuit, creating the phenomena. Just as electricity is dynamic, so are comets. They can change their magnitude, have unique outbursts, and make other alterations that defy the dirty snowball theory in addition to the observational history being totally in conflict with the theory. It is true that in most cases, a comet's behavior is relative to its proximity to the sun. Inner solar system comets can become very dynamic inside the orbits of Earth and Venus. When sungrazing comets appear, often CME’s can follow. This is chalked as a coincidence, but I do not think it is. It is true that comets are producing a lot of water and with that heat and energy. The mechanism is described as follows: silicates and oxygen originating from the comet's atmosphere meet the hydrogen rich solar wind, water is created, and with it a massive release of energy and heat. The coma is a plasma of charged particles that is electrical in nature. I could go on and on about this, and frankly, it gets deep. Deeper than I am able to effectively grasp in a manner that I can relay to you, but I am convinced and I am going to include several resources that you can take in and make your own determination. Now we get to the issue, what does this mean for us, and why am I concerned? The solar eclipse in itself has some unique attributes. The moon will be in a new moon phase and at perigee or known as the closest proximity to earth within its orbit, which means it a gravitational influence will be at maximum level. This is why the total eclipse totality is expected to last for around 4 minutes in many locations. There will be some planetary conjunctions and alignments in play that will also be lending their influence to earth and the solar system in general. The sun is nearing solar maximum, and since it is occurring in the spring equinox, the chances for solar activity will be elevated, as fall and spring are the most common times for large solar storms to occur. These things in themselves make for an interesting eclipse, but now we must add the interloper, the intruder, Comet 12/P Pons Brooks AKA the Devil Comet. Why is it called the “Devil Comet”? Is it because it carries with it the forces of evil and is the devil's limo? No, nothing like that. It gained its moniker due to the “horns” it appears to sprout when it undergoes fairly regular outbursts of activity. During these outbursts, the comet jumps up several orders in magnitude and for reasons not well understood it forms the appearance of growing horns, looking like the Millennium Falcon, or Pac Man, to name a few. These outbursts are attributed to “cryovolcanic activity”. In other words, an ice volcano. This is perfectly in line with the widely held notion of the dirty snowball model. Even though the comet is scorching hot and charred, has no visible ice on the surface, and no ice is observed on any other comet, the explanation remains mundane and antiquated. Where is all of the ice if ice creates the cometary features? How can a comet last for thousands of years if it is constantly using up its ice creating tails and comas, which in some cases become larger than the sun itself? Well, what about the alternate theory? Does it explain the phenomenon better, and what are the implications if so? If comets are dirty snowballs, we have nothing to worry about. It may put on a good show, but that is about it. However, if they are dynamic electrical objects interacting with the sun's electrical energy and are actively discharging, we could possibly have a problem on our hands. I am not stating with 100% certainty or trying to spread alarm, but I am going to voice my concern here. Here are the stats on Comet 12/P Pons Brooks Type: Periodic - Halley Type Orbital Period - 71 years Nucleus Size - 34 +/- 12 KM Next Perihelion (closest approach to sun) - April 21 2024 Perihelion Distance - 0.78 AU - For Reference Venus is 0.72 AU, so this comet will be as near to the sun as venus Next Perigee (closest approach to earth) - June 4 2024 Perigee Distance - 1.55 AU What these numbers tell us is that 12/P is a fairly large object and it will make a close approach to the sun before approaching Earth. It will be nearing perihelion during the eclipse and could be prominent and visible to the naked eye. The wild card here are the outbursts. Let's consider those outbursts for a minute by examining the outburst on 7/20/2023 and 10/05/2023. 7/20 - Magnitude increased from 16 to 11 with a 100X brightening at 3.9 AU. For reference, Jupiter is at 5.2 AU. 10/5 - Magnitude increased from 15 to 11 with 40X brightening at 3.1 AU. What these numbers tell us is that despite being a fairly vast distance from the sun still, this comet has the ability to jump considerably in magnitude and brightness and there have been many more outbursts than the two I mentioned above. This does not fit within the dirty snowball model. How can a dirty snowball that far from the sun and its solar radiation exhibit such massive outbursts over and over and over again? Cryovolcanic activity just does not mesh with the observations of other comets. I think it is more likely that this comet has some unique properties that we do not understand or have not observed closely in detail, and the outbursts and unique jet forms are due to the electrical discharge phenomenon. The power of which is dictated by the sun and on that both models can agree, just due to wholly different mechanics. You can tell which theory I subscribe to, but again, I do not rule out the old theory, but I have seen enough to definitely consider alternatives. So here it is. I am concerned that 12/P will continue its outburst pattern and that one could occur before, during, or after the eclipse at a time when unique energies and forces will be in play. The main risk is solar in nature, in the form of an excited sun interacting with this nearby comet of substantial size, possibly creating a significant space weather event. The other risk is seismic in nature. With the planetary conjunctions, a total solar eclipse with a new moon at perigee, and a potentially very dynamic comet all in play at the same time, there is a lot going on. The path of totality will cross over the New Madrid Seismic Zone, held responsible for the most destructive earthquakes in American history. You may feel that I am grasping at straws here, but I am not. Again, I am not saying I am right, only that I have concerns and have my eye on things. There is an old saying that history doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes. The last time that the New Madrid Seismic Zone unleashed a massive earthquake, actually it unleashed 3, was from 1811 to 1812. Were there any other factors at play then as well? Actually, there were. In 1806, there was a total solar eclipse that crossed a very similar path to the 2024 total solar eclipse occurring on April 8th. There would be another eclipse in 1811, but only an annular, but it was a long duration event estimated at 6 minutes 5 seconds. This eclipse took a similar path to the 1806 event and did not cross, like the 2017 and 2024 events that form an X directly over the NMSZ. Also prominent during this time frame was a large comet in the sky. This comet was known as Techumsehs comet and played a pivotal role in the affairs of war and state. I recommend searching that topic all on its own. That comet also has another name. That name is 12/P Pons Brooks AKA, the devil comet. Yes, it is the same comet that will be visiting us next month alongside the eclipse. It would appear we have a series of eclipses and the same dynamic and unusual comet in play in an eerily similar manner to 1811 to 1812. One factor that is NOT the same as 1811-12 is our sun and the earth's magnetic field. The sun was 2 years out of solar minimum in 1812 and arrived at solar maximum in 1816. In this case, the sun will be at or near solar maximum during the eclipse and the comets approach. The earth's magnetic field was MUCH stronger in 1811. Starting in the mid-1800s, the magnetic field strength began to decline, and over the coming century and decades would accelerate in that decline. Conservatively, field strength has declined approximately 20% since then. In other words, ⅕ of our protection is gone, which leaves us more vulnerable to the electromagnetic energies we encounter from the sun as well as other bodies and events. Coinciding with this declination in field strength is that both magnetic poles going from their typical polar wander in roughly the same geographical area to a straight line dash north and south and has since gone over the geographic north pole and continues to accelerate its movement. It is believed we are in the process of our magnetic poles undergoing excursion or flip. The magnetic north pole moved more from 1984 to 2007 than it had in the 125 years from 1859 to 1984. 1859 was the year when these symptoms really began in earnest, and that year coincided with the Carrington Event, which was the most severe and also the first recorded geomagnetic storm on earth. At the time, only telegraphs existed, but they were effectively fried literally, and one could imagine what a similar event would be like in modern times where we are life and death dependent on technology and electricity to live. Am I saying a Carrington level event is in our future? Heck, no. That can not be predicted and could theoretically occur at any time. What I am saying is that there are factors in play that could increase the chances of an event. It should be noted that the NMSZ earthquakes did not occur immediately with the comet and eclipse. If anything, those events helped set the seismic activity in motion and are not well understood. There is a correlation between seismic activity and our sun, but it's not well understood or documented. The planet is already seismically and volcanically active at this time. I see a risk period spanning approximately 12 months. The reason for the extended risk period is based on the time frame for the 1811-1812 quakes. It also takes into consideration an even more momentous comet event occurring late this year. That comet is C/2033 A3 Tsuchinshan-Atlas. A3 deserves its own write-up and will get it once more details become clear, but here is what we know so far. C/2023 A3 Tsuchinshan-Atlas Discovered on January 9th by China’s Purple Mountain Observatory at +7.3 AU. Type - Unknown, but likely long period (80,000 yrs+) Size - Unknown - Likely of substantial size based on the distance and magnitude observed. Orbital Period - Unknown Current Magnitude - 12.2 - Exceeding predicted Predicted Magnitude - 13.5 Perihelion Date - 9/24/2024 Perihelion Distance - 0.39 AU - CLOSE Closest Approach to Earth - 10/13/2024 Closest Approach Distance - 0.48 AU - CLOSE This event has my attention as well due to the orbital path and distances, geometry, and size/magnitude. If you have not heard, this comet is being hailed as potentially the next “Great Comet” and shares some discovery characteristics with C/1995 O1 - Hale Bopp in regards to its distance and magnitude at such distance. More details are needed here and comets are just harmless dirty snowballs that can only cause problems by colliding with an object, there is nothing to be concerned about. However, if they are dynamic electrical objects, this likely large comet will be making some very close passes with both earth and sun. It will position itself nearly directly in between the sun and earth and is projected to be naked eye visible and all of the buzz remains firmly supportive of a ‘great comet' apparition. Comets are notoriously unpredictable and whether that is because the mainstream theory does not accurately take into account what comets are OR because they are simply that dynamic. They also have a tendency to be perturbed by passing objects such as planets. For instance, Hale-Bopp had over 1000 years shaved off its orbit due to its close approach to the large planets in our solar system. This is a lengthy article, and I could not even fit all that I wanted into it. It is already far too long and probably more suitable for video or listening, but I am old school, a reader and writer. I have so many smaller details and explanations concerning this topic and I encourage you the reader to contact me if you would like specific details or have questions or debate. I do not state these things as facts. I do not know first hand who has the correct theory. I have considered both sides and I come out on the electrical discharge model. I base this on the work of Jim McCanney, the NASA branded villain Immanuel Velikovsky, The Thunderbolts Project, and the Electric Universe theory. I have attached some links to videos with more information and I have a PDF book I can email you that goes into great detail the difference between theories and bases its findings on data gleaned from Voyager 1, Voyager 2, Pioneer spacecraft, the various cometary probes, and all manner of data and observations. The mainstream academic and scientific communities crucified these people for their alternative theories. Great lengths were taken to discredit Velikovsky and Jim McCanney and to render them pseudoscientists despite many of their theories and predictions ringing true. It makes one wonder, what is so sensitive around this topic that no alternatives will even be considered despite the evident and irrefutable deficiencies with the Dirty Snowball Theory. Mainstream is entirely within their rights to disagree with these men and their theories and to refute them if possible. They are NOT within their rights to discredit and brand them as grifters or pseudo professionals. Every writer knows that writing for money does not work as a sole motivation. I write frequently and I have never made a dime from it. People write to get their words out there, to bring a story or information to the people. Velikovsky did not write his books to get famous and rich, he wrote them because he felt that by comparing the ancient record and modern science he could understand the nature of the solar system and beyond. His books were best sellers before the concerted campaign to discredit and destroy his reputation. I don’t know what will happen. I do not know what is 100% true. I do have concerns and I have outlined why. I will be observing this eclipse about 3 miles from center totality. I will observe all space based platforms and data points available leading up and during the event including active regions, solar wind models, and X-ray flux. I will be on the lookout for any strange behavior by 12/P Pons Brooks. I mentioned that this event has some esoteric connotations and while I do not put much stock in such things, At the same I do not totally discount the ancient wisdom and experience that they are based on. I think humans have collectively forgotten more than we have learned in our iron age of technology. I think there are major inconsistencies between the proposed version of history taught in schools with what our history actually is. I mention this side of the equation because it has relevancy, but has no proof, and is based on subjective and myth laden information. In conclusion, I recommend that you keep an open mind and that you dig into the resources and authorities on the topic. I recommend that you keep an eye on the skies. I recommend that everyone should have at least 3 days supplies on hand at all times as basic preparation. Not for this event, but for any event. It has never been a better time to be a “prepper” and I use the term loosely, but there is a lot of talk about events affecting our power grid. I am of the strong opinion that the 3 X-Class flares which did not produce CME’s are responsible for the network outages that occurred. Either that, or it's a massive and unlikely coincidence that communications networks would go down immediately after the flares at a time when the effects on the ionosphere would be most pronounced from the flash of the flare providing a barrage of fast moving charged particles, mostly photons. I find the fact that the GOES-18 satellite monitoring the sun was also briefly knocked off line during this chain of events as supporting evidence. The uneven nature of the event also suggests solar causation because if it was a software glitch or user error, it would likely have affected all users simultaneously. I have also been informed that Verizon has reinforced their networks to some degree against space weather but I cannot confirm this at this time. Like I said, I believe it was the sun that did that, but I am not sure, and neither is anyone else. I think there is a long pattern of withholding information that could cause alarm, and hidden within this article is a situation that may fit that bill. We shall all find out together. I think the chances are that the event comes and goes uneventfully is most likely, but I am definitely leaving some room for the alternative. There are many irons in this fire. Thanks for reading and encourage you to reach out with questions, concerns, debates. Edit: one more thing It's observed by many that active regions on the sun rarely fire off big flare/CMEs when earth facing. The limb is where the big flares usually happens. If there is some mitigating factor in play, then could the presence of the moon in between have an effect? Many eclipses have come and gone without solar events so again, it's likely this one does too, but it's something I feel I should monitor. Thunderbolts Project - 12/P Evidence For Electric Comets Abbreviated Evidence |
2024.02.21 18:17 blusau Screenshots from the Superb Owl Stream (February 11)
submitted by blusau to F1NN5TER [link] [comments] |
2024.02.18 23:54 SabineRitter [ROUNDUP] UFOs and Sol Foundation videos. Countries:🇺🇸🇬🇧🇦🇺🇿🇦🇦🇪🇮🇳🇮🇪🇩🇪🇭🇺🇳🇱🇮🇹🇬🇹🇨🇭🇩🇰🇫🇷 Colors seen this week: 🟣, 🔵, 🟠,🟡, 🔴🔵🟢