I have created a ton of tools that help writers that are struggling, one of which is a spreadsheet full of world-building questions for those who write fantasysci fi. I will be picking some parts to publish, but if you think that there would be interest in the spreadsheet, I can post that, too.
First part is this section of questions about the species on your unique world/planet
General Species Information:

1. How many distinct species exist on your planet?
2. What are the criteria for classifying a group as a separate species?
3. Are there recognized taxonomic categories for different species?
4. How do species interact within ecosystems?
5. Are there dominant or keystone species that heavily influence ecosystems?
6. What is the typical lifespan of various species?
7. Are there seasonal variations in the behavior of different species?
8. Do species exhibit migratory patterns or movements?
9. Are there endangered or protected species on your planet?
10. How do different species contribute to the planet's biodiversity?

Physical Characteristics:

1. What are the physical sizes of various species?
2. Do species exhibit sexual dimorphism in physical characteristics?
3. Are there species with unique adaptations to specific environments?
4. How do different species reproduce and care for their offspring?
5. Are there species with extraordinary strength or speed?
6. What sensory abilities do various species possess?
7. Do species have unique markings or colors for identification?
8. Are there species with specialized limbs or appendages?
9. How do species adapt to changes in their environments?
10. Are there species with unique anatomical features?

Behavioral Traits:

1. How do different species communicate with each other?
2. Are there recognized mating rituals or courtship behaviors?
3. What role does social behavior play in different species?
4. Do species exhibit hierarchical structures within their groups?
5. How do species handle conflicts or disputes?
6. Are there migratory patterns or seasonal behaviors?
7. Do different species form alliances or cooperate for survival?
8. Are there nocturnal or diurnal behaviors among species?
9. What role does play or recreation play in various species' lives?
10. Are there species with unique learning abilities or intelligence?

Habitats and Environments:

1. Where do different species predominantly inhabit on the planet?
2. Are there species adapted to extreme climates or conditions?
3. How do various species interact with their specific environments?
4. Are there migratory patterns or movements between habitats?
5. What is the impact of human activities on different species' habitats?
6. Do certain species exhibit territorial behaviors?
7. Are there recognized nesting or denning behaviors among species?
8. How do species contribute to the overall health of their ecosystems?
9. Are there symbiotic or mutually beneficial relationships between species?
10. How do species adapt to changes in their natural habitats?

Diet and Feeding Patterns:

1. What types of diets do various species have?
2. Are there herbivorous, carnivorous, and omnivorous species?
3. How do different species hunt or gather food?
4. Are there species with unique feeding adaptations?
5. Do certain species play specific roles in balancing ecosystems through their diets?
6. Are there seasonal variations in feeding patterns?
7. How do species handle competition for food resources?
8. Are there recognized migration patterns related to food availability?
9. What impact do human activities have on different species' diets?
10. Are there species with specialized digestive systems?

Reproductive Strategies:

1. How do various species reproduce, and are there different reproductive strategies?
2. Are there recognized mating seasons or reproductive cycles?
3. How many offspring do different species typically have?
4. Do species invest heavily in parental care or exhibit more independent offspring?
5. What role do environmental factors play in reproductive success?
6. Are there recognized courtship rituals or displays?
7. How do different species attract mates?
8. Are there recognized gestation or incubation periods for offspring?
9. Do certain species exhibit monogamous or polygamous mating systems?
10. How do species ensure the survival of their offspring?

Cultural and Societal Aspects:

1. Do different species have cultural practices or traditions?
2. How are knowledge and traditions passed down among species?
3. Are there recognized leaders or influencers within species groups?
4. What role does cooperation play in species societies?
5. How do different species handle conflicts or disputes within their communities?
6. Are there recognized ceremonies or rituals among species?
7. How do species handle changes or introductions of new elements into their societies?
8. Do different species have ways of expressing emotions or social bonds?
9. Are there recognized forms of art or creative expression among species?
10. How do different species address issues of justice or societal norms?

Interspecies Interactions:

1. How do different species interact with each other?
2. Are there alliances or conflicts between certain species?
3. Do species engage in trade or exchange of resources?
4. Are there recognized communication methods between species?
5. What role do interspecies collaborations play in survival?
6. How do different species contribute to each other's well-being?
7. Are there recognized instances of cooperation during times of crisis?
8. How do different species navigate shared territories or resources?
9. Are there cultural exchanges between species?
10. How do different species handle misunderstandings or conflicts?

Evolutionary Histories:

1. What are the evolutionary origins of different species?
2. Are there recognized evolutionary milestones or adaptations?
3. How have different species evolved to coexist on the planet?
4. Are there species with shared ancestors or common evolutionary paths?
5. What impact do environmental changes have on species evolution?
6. Are there recognized extinction events in your planet's history?
7. How do different species contribute to the planet's overall evolutionary trajectory?
8. Are there recognized periods of speciation or diversification?
9. How do different species adapt to changes in ecosystems over time?
10. What role does genetic diversity play in species survival?

Human-Species Interactions:

1. How do humans interact with different species on the planet?
2. Are there recognized conservation efforts to protect specific species?
3. How do human activities impact the habitats and survival of different species?
4. Are there conflicts or collaborations between humans and certain species?
5. Do different species play roles in human cultures or traditions?
6. What role do different species play in human economies?
7. Are there ethical considerations in human interactions with different species?
8. How do humans contribute to the well-being of other species?
9. Are there recognized efforts to study and understand different species?
10. How do humans contribute to the preservation of biodiversity on the planet?

These questions explore the diversity and intricacies of various species on your planet, covering aspects ranging from physical characteristics to cultural and societal dynamics, and their interactions with humans and each other.

Let f: [0, 1] → [0, 1] be the function defined by x 3 3 − x 2 + 5 9 x + 17 36 𝑥 3 3 − 𝑥 2 + 5 9 𝑥 + 17 36 . Consider the square region S = [0, 1] × [0, 1]. Let G = {(x, y) ∈ S : y > f(x)} be called the green region and R = {(x, y) ∈ S : y < f(x)} be called the red region. Let Lh = {(x, h) ∈ S : x ∈ [0, 1]} be the horizontal line drawn at a height h ∈ [0, 1] . Then which of the following statements is(are) true?
(A) There exists an h = [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] such that the area of the green region above the line Lh equals the area of the green region below the line Lh
(B) There exists an h = [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] such that the area of the red region above the line Lh equals the area of the red region below the line Lh
(C) There exists an h = [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] such that the area of the green region above the line Lh equals the area of the red region below the line Lh
(D) There exists an h = [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] [ 1 4 , 2 3 ] such that the area of the red region above the line Lh equals the area of the green region below the line Lh
This is pyq sum and all the soln i look are bit confusing pls explain and sen Thank YOU

Yesterday's Standout Pitchers

^{stats for games since 04/05/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Sem Robberse 6 IP ER 4H BB 5K -- [RHP, 22, INT - STL] - [F] [T] 42.2 IP 2.77 ERA 1.02 WHIP 9.2 K/9 2.1 BB/9 4.3 K/BB 19.8 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Blake Walston 5 IP ER 6H 2BB 7K -- [LHP, 22, PCL - ARI] - [F] [T] 29.1 IP 2.78 ERA 1.44 WHIP 8.4 K/9 4.9 BB/9 1.7 K/BB 8.6 K-BB% 1.1 GO/AO
Adam Mazur 6 IP 2ER 6H 2BB 6K -- [RHP, 23, PCL - SD] - [F] [T] 6.0 IP 3.0 ERA 1.33 WHIP 9.0 K/9 3.0 BB/9 3.0 K/BB 16.0 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
🔥​ Tyler Woessner​ 6 IP ER 2H 2BB 9K -- [RHP, 24, INT - MIL] - [F] [T] 11.0 IP 11.45 ERA 2.09 WHIP 10.6 K/9 9.8 BB/9 1.1 K/BB 1.8 K-BB% 0.4 GO/AO
Carson Seymour 5 IP ER 3H 2BB 7K -- [RHP, 25, PCL - SF] - [F] [T] 26.2 IP 5.84 ERA 1.72 WHIP 10.6 K/9 4.8 BB/9 2.2 K/BB 13.7 K-BB% 2.3 GO/AO
Zach Logue 7 IP H 8K -- [LHP, 28, INT - ATL] - [F] [T] 27.0 IP 2.67 ERA 0.93 WHIP 10.7 K/9 3.0 BB/9 3.6 K/BB 21.1 K-BB% 1.1 GO/AO
 

AA Standouts

🔥​ Chase Petty​ 5 IP ER 3H 2BB 9K -- [RHP, 21, SOU - CIN] - [F] [T] 31.0 IP 5.81 ERA 1.58 WHIP 10.2 K/9 4.1 BB/9 2.5 K/BB 15.2 K-BB% 1.9 GO/AO
🔥​ Jairo Iriarte​ 6.2 IP 4ER 6H BB 11K -- [RHP, 22, SOU - CWS] - [F] [T] 36.2 IP 2.73 ERA 1.3 WHIP 10.7 K/9 5.2 BB/9 2.0 K/BB 14.4 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Victor Mederos 8 IP ER 5H BB 3K -- [RHP, 22, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] 35.2 IP 5.62 ERA 1.34 WHIP 5.6 K/9 3.6 BB/9 1.6 K/BB 5.3 K-BB% 1.6 GO/AO
Mason Barnett 4.2 IP 4ER 8H BB 8K -- [RHP, 23, TEX - KC] - [F] [T] 33.0 IP 5.18 ERA 1.33 WHIP 12.5 K/9 3.5 BB/9 3.5 K/BB 23.2 K-BB% 1.3 GO/AO
Aaron Davenport 7 IP ER 3H 6K -- [RHP, 23, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] 38.1 IP 1.89 ERA 1.05 WHIP 7.8 K/9 3.1 BB/9 2.5 K/BB 13.5 K-BB% 0.5 GO/AO
Joander Suarez 3.2 IP H 5K -- [RHP, 24, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] 37.1 IP 2.18 ERA 0.86 WHIP 7.8 K/9 2.4 BB/9 3.2 K/BB 15.8 K-BB% 1.0 GO/AO
🔥​ Braxton Ashcraft​ 7 IP 4H BB 10K -- [RHP, 24, EAS - PIT] - [F] [T] 32.1 IP 4.21 ERA 1.18 WHIP 9.0 K/9 1.4 BB/9 6.4 K/BB 20.3 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
🔥​ Pierson Ohl​ 6 IP 4H BB 10K -- [RHP, 24, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] 37.0 IP 3.65 ERA 1.16 WHIP 7.5 K/9 1.7 BB/9 4.4 K/BB 15.7 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Cole Wilcox 7 IP 2ER 6H BB 6K -- [RHP, 24, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] 32.0 IP 3.38 ERA 1.38 WHIP 7.0 K/9 3.1 BB/9 2.3 K/BB 10.1 K-BB% 1.0 GO/AO
Reid VanScoter 5.1 IP 3ER 5H BB 8K -- [LHP, 25, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] 36.1 IP 3.74 ERA 1.16 WHIP 6.5 K/9 2.7 BB/9 2.4 K/BB 10.3 K-BB% 1.1 GO/AO
David Peterson 5.1 IP 5H 8K -- [LHP, 28, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] 5.1 IP 0.0 ERA 0.98 WHIP 14.1 K/9 0.0 BB/9 -- K/BB 40.0 K-BB% 2.5 GO/AO
 

A+ Standouts

🔥🔥​ Owen Murphy​​ 6.1 IP 3H 11K -- [RHP, 20, SAL - ATL] - [F] [T] 41.0 IP 1.54 ERA 0.73 WHIP 13.2 K/9 2.6 BB/9 5.0 K/BB 31.0 K-BB% 0.3 GO/AO
Victor Juarez 5 IP 4H 3BB 6K -- [RHP, 20, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] 29.1 IP 2.47 ERA 1.1 WHIP 7.7 K/9 3.1 BB/9 2.5 K/BB 13.3 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Patricio Aquino 6 IP ER 5H BB 5K -- [RHP, 21, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] 26.2 IP 5.5 ERA 1.45 WHIP 5.5 K/9 3.8 BB/9 1.5 K/BB 4.2 K-BB% 1.3 GO/AO
Miguelangel Boadas 5 IP 4ER 5H 2BB 9K -- [RHP, 21, MID - MIN] - [F] [T] 19.2 IP 7.03 ERA 1.46 WHIP 12.2 K/9 3.8 BB/9 3.2 K/BB 18.9 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Joe Elbis 5.2 IP 3H BB 5K -- [RHP, 21, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] 28.1 IP 2.56 ERA 1.07 WHIP 7.4 K/9 3.5 BB/9 2.1 K/BB 10.3 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
Manuel Mercedes 4.2 IP 2ER 2H 2BB 5K -- [RHP, 21, NWL - SF] - [F] [T] 27.1 IP 6.64 ERA 1.73 WHIP 7.3 K/9 5.6 BB/9 1.3 K/BB 3.9 K-BB% 2.6 GO/AO
D.J. McCarty 4 IP 2ER 4H 4BB 7K -- [RHP, 21, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] 17.1 IP 4.21 ERA 1.4 WHIP 7.9 K/9 5.3 BB/9 1.5 K/BB 6.5 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
Peter Heubeck 5 IP 2ER 4H 2BB 6K -- [RHP, 21, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] 27.0 IP 3.33 ERA 1.41 WHIP 13.3 K/9 6.7 BB/9 2.0 K/BB 17.4 K-BB% 0.4 GO/AO
Edgardo Henriquez 2 IP 2H 4K -- [RHP, 21, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] 4.0 IP 0.0 ERA 0.75 WHIP 18.0 K/9 0.0 BB/9 -- K/BB 50.0 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
Gavin Collyer 2 IP ER H BB 6K -- [RHP, 23, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] 14.1 IP 2.55 ERA 1.28 WHIP 10.2 K/9 5.1 BB/9 2.0 K/BB 13.3 K-BB% 1.0 GO/AO
Cooper Hjerpe 4 IP H 2BB 7K -- [LHP, 23, MID - STL] - [F] [T] 22.2 IP 3.65 ERA 1.35 WHIP 14.2 K/9 6.1 BB/9 2.3 K/BB 20.6 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Dominic Perachi 4 IP H BB 9K -- [LHP, 23, SAL - PIT] - [F] [T] 14.1 IP 0.0 ERA 0.71 WHIP 10.2 K/9 3.2 BB/9 3.2 K/BB 21.2 K-BB% 2.4 GO/AO
Juan Nuñez 4.2 IP ER 3H 9K -- [RHP, 23, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] 29.1 IP 2.47 ERA 1.1 WHIP 11.8 K/9 3.1 BB/9 3.8 K/BB 23.7 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
Hayden Mullins 4 IP 4ER 3H 2BB 7K -- [LHP, 23, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] 25.0 IP 3.96 ERA 1.36 WHIP 11.5 K/9 5.0 BB/9 2.3 K/BB 16.1 K-BB% 1.1 GO/AO
Juan Burgos 4 IP H 5K -- [RHP, 24, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] 24.1 IP 1.87 ERA 0.95 WHIP 9.3 K/9 4.1 BB/9 2.3 K/BB 14.6 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
 

A Standouts

Franklin Gomez 4.2 IP 2ER 3H 3BB 5K -- [LHP, 18, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] 17.0 IP 3.18 ERA 1.0 WHIP 12.2 K/9 4.2 BB/9 2.9 K/BB 22.1 K-BB% 1.5 GO/AO
Barrett Kent 4.1 IP 4ER 5H 2BB 6K -- [RHP, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] 32.2 IP 4.47 ERA 1.27 WHIP 10.6 K/9 4.5 BB/9 2.4 K/BB 16.2 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
🔥​ Gary Gill Hill​ 6 IP ER 4H 8K -- [RHP, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] 30.0 IP 2.7 ERA 1.07 WHIP 10.2 K/9 3.0 BB/9 3.4 K/BB 20.5 K-BB% 2.5 GO/AO
Juan Salas 6.2 IP 2H 2BB 8K -- [RHP, 21, FSL - STL] - [F] [T] 31.2 IP 1.44 ERA 0.96 WHIP 11.5 K/9 2.9 BB/9 4.0 K/BB 24.0 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Gabriel Barbosa 4 IP 4ER 6H 8K -- [RHP, 22, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] 31.1 IP 5.5 ERA 1.32 WHIP 10.4 K/9 2.0 BB/9 5.1 K/BB 21.0 K-BB% 1.6 GO/AO
Drew McDaniel 7 IP 5H 9K -- [RHP, 23, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] 32.2 IP 2.24 ERA 1.09 WHIP 10.6 K/9 3.4 BB/9 3.2 K/BB 20.2 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
Hunter Patteson 7 IP H 7K -- [LHP, 24, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] 31.2 IP 2.88 ERA 0.87 WHIP 10.1 K/9 1.2 BB/9 8.8 K/BB 26.3 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Michael Sansone 4 IP H BB 7K -- [LHP, 24, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] 13.0 IP 0.69 ERA 0.69 WHIP 11.1 K/9 1.4 BB/9 8.0 K/BB 30.4 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
 

Rookie Standouts

Jeremy Pilon 4 IP ER 2H 2BB 5K -- [LHP, 18, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] 7.2 IP 3.75 ERA 0.97 WHIP 13.8 K/9 3.8 BB/9 3.7 K/BB 25.8 K-BB% 1.6 GO/AO
Joneiker Arellano 3 IP ER 4H 6K -- [RHP, 19, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] 5.0 IP 5.4 ERA 1.6 WHIP 10.8 K/9 0.0 BB/9 -- K/BB 26.1 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Anthony Flores 2.2 IP 3ER 3BB 7K -- [LHP, 19, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] 4.2 IP 12.86 ERA 1.67 WHIP 19.3 K/9 10.7 BB/9 1.8 K/BB 18.2 K-BB% 1.5 GO/AO
Yeferson Vargas 3 IP ER 3H 2BB 6K -- [RHP, 19, GCL - BOS] - [F] [T] 6.0 IP 4.5 ERA 1.83 WHIP 15.0 K/9 4.5 BB/9 3.3 K/BB 25.0 K-BB% 6.0 GO/AO
Luis Morellis 3 IP BB 5K -- [RHP, 20, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] 7.0 IP 1.29 ERA 0.57 WHIP 16.7 K/9 1.3 BB/9 13.0 K/BB 48.0 K-BB% 0.2 GO/AO
 

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 04/05/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

🔥​ Junior Caminero​ 3/6 HR K -- [2B, 20, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .314 BA .379 OBP .267 ISO 86 AB 6 HR 9 BB% 20 K%
James Wood 3/4 BB -- [LF, 21, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .354 BA .441 OBP .238 ISO 130 AB 7 HR 9 SB 13 BB% 19 K%
Javier Sanoja 1/3 BB SB -- [SS, 21, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .246 BA .321 OBP .087 ISO 69 AB 1 SB 10 BB% 3 K%
Jordan Walker 2/3 2B SB -- [RF, 21, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .327 BA .382 OBP .082 ISO 49 AB 2 SB 9 BB% 10 K%
Jonatan Clase 2/5 2B K -- [CF, 21, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .235 BA .364 OBP .259 ISO 81 AB 4 HR 9 SB 17 BB% 25 K%
Drew Cavanaugh 2/3 BB -- [C, 22, PCL - SF] - [F] [T] .462 BA .562 OBP .000 ISO 13 AB 12 BB% 12 K%
Juan Brito 2/4 2B BB -- [2B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .210 BA .344 OBP .177 ISO 124 AB 5 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 18 K%
Leo Jimenez 3/3 2B -- [SS, 23, INT - TOR] - [F] [T] .264 BA .432 OBP .176 ISO 91 AB 4 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 17 K%
Everson Pereira 3/5 HR K -- [RF, 23, INT - NYY] - [F] [T] .260 BA .338 OBP .260 ISO 127 AB 8 HR 4 SB 7 BB% 34 K%
Victor Scott II 1/3 BB K 2 SB -- [CF, 23, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .203 BA .267 OBP .101 ISO 69 AB 1 HR 8 SB 7 BB% 19 K%
Livan Soto 1/3 HR 2BB K -- [2B, 23, INT - CIN] - [F] [T] .310 BA .398 OBP .167 ISO 84 AB 2 HR 1 SB 13 BB% 17 K%
Alexander Canario 2/4 HR BB K -- [CF, 24, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .245 BA .333 OBP .170 ISO 53 AB 2 HR 8 BB% 30 K%
Will Banfield 2/4 HR -- [C, 24, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .244 BA .295 OBP .146 ISO 82 AB 2 HR 5 BB% 35 K%
Eguy Rosario 2/4 HR -- [3B, 24, PCL - SD] - [F] [T] .321 BA .424 OBP .357 ISO 28 AB 2 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 18 K%
Darren Baker 3/5 2B K 2 SB -- [2B, 25, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .324 BA .391 OBP .049 ISO 102 AB 10 SB 10 BB% 18 K%
🔥​ Shay Whitcomb​ 3/5 2B 2 HR -- [3B, 25, PCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .267 BA .355 OBP .257 ISO 105 AB 6 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 20 K%
Jesús Bastidas 2/2 HR BB -- [2B, 25, PCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .282 BA .361 OBP .266 ISO 124 AB 7 HR 4 SB 9 BB% 25 K%
Zach DeLoach 2/3 HR 2BB -- [LF, 25, INT - CWS] - [F] [T] .277 BA .376 OBP .069 ISO 101 AB 1 HR 7 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
Pedro León 3/6 2 HR K -- [CF, 25, PCL - HOU] - [F] [T] .293 BA .387 OBP .268 ISO 123 AB 8 HR 11 SB 12 BB% 24 K%
Diego A. Castillo 4/4 2B BB SB -- [3B, 26, INT - MIN] - [F] [T] .278 BA .368 OBP .124 ISO 97 AB 2 HR 5 SB 11 BB% 14 K%
Ruben Cardenas 3/6 HR K SB -- [1B, 26, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .291 BA .355 OBP .218 ISO 110 AB 6 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 21 K%
Brewer Hicklen 3/4 2 HR -- [RF, 28, INT - MIL] - [F] [T] .268 BA .375 OBP .259 ISO 112 AB 8 HR 14 SB 11 BB% 28 K%
Yu Chang 3/4 2B HR 2BB K SB -- [SS, 28, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .323 BA .488 OBP .258 ISO 31 AB 2 HR 2 SB 21 BB% 24 K%
🔥​ Mike Brosseau​ 3/3 3 HR BB SB -- [1B, 30, INT - NYM] - [F] [T] .268 BA .397 OBP .214 ISO 56 AB 3 HR 1 SB 13 BB% 20 K%
 

AA Standouts

Roman Anthony 2/5 HR 2K -- [CF, 20, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .237 BA .341 OBP .169 ISO 118 AB 3 HR 4 SB 13 BB% 30 K%
🔥​ Cole Young​ 3/5 2B BB K SB -- [SS, 20, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .331 OBP .083 ISO 120 AB 1 HR 7 SB 9 BB% 16 K%
Carson Williams 1/3 3B BB -- [SS, 20, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .330 BA .403 OBP .217 ISO 115 AB 4 HR 9 SB 9 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Deyvison De Los Santos​ 1/3 HR 2BB -- [1B, 20, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .359 BA .413 OBP .321 ISO 131 AB 12 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 20 K%
Emmanuel Rodriguez 2/3 2BB -- [CF, 21, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .258 BA .455 OBP .258 ISO 89 AB 4 HR 9 SB 25 BB% 30 K%
Yanquiel Fernandez 2/5 HR K SB -- [RF, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .255 BA .308 OBP .128 ISO 94 AB 3 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 25 K%
Marcelo Mayer 3/5 2 2B K SB -- [SS, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .302 BA .348 OBP .190 ISO 126 AB 3 HR 8 SB 7 BB% 21 K%
Warming Bernabel 2/4 BB -- [3B, 21, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .222 BA .250 OBP .111 ISO 108 AB 3 HR 3 SB 3 BB% 19 K%
Kyle Teel 3/4 2B BB -- [C, 22, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .273 BA .379 OBP .152 ISO 99 AB 3 HR 1 SB 13 BB% 27 K%
🔥​ Agustin Ramirez​ 4/5 HR K SB -- [C, 22, EAS - NYY] - [F] [T] .283 BA .404 OBP .354 ISO 113 AB 12 HR 7 SB 16 BB% 18 K%
Diego Cartaya 2/4 HR K -- [DH, 22, TEX - LAD] - [F] [T] .191 BA .349 OBP .162 ISO 68 AB 3 HR 16 BB% 27 K%
Dylan Beavers 3/4 2 2B -- [RF, 22, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .303 BA .413 OBP .162 ISO 99 AB 3 HR 7 SB 16 BB% 19 K%
Bladimir Restituyo 2/3 2BB -- [CF, 22, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .271 BA .330 OBP .073 ISO 96 AB 2 HR 7 SB 8 BB% 18 K%
Ben Ross 2/4 2B SB -- [SS, 22, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .170 BA .256 OBP .066 ISO 106 AB 1 HR 6 SB 9 BB% 29 K%
Tanner Schobel 3/5 2 SB -- [3B, 22, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .248 BA .359 OBP .092 ISO 109 AB 1 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 21 K%
Pablo Aliendo 2/4 HR K -- [C, 22, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .265 BA .381 OBP .279 ISO 68 AB 5 HR 11 BB% 36 K%
Brennan Milone 4/4 BB SB -- [2B, 23, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .288 BA .380 OBP .171 ISO 111 AB 4 HR 3 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
Cody Freeman 2/4 2 2B BB SB -- [3B, 23, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .282 BA .336 OBP .182 ISO 110 AB 4 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 13 K%
Keyber Rodriguez 3/5 HR -- [SS, 23, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .212 BA .250 OBP .212 ISO 33 AB 2 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 16 K%
Alberto Rodriguez 4/5 K SB -- [RF, 23, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .255 BA .311 OBP .064 ISO 94 AB 1 SB 6 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Ivan Melendez​ 4/5 2B 2 HR -- [3B, 24, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .243 BA .317 OBP .189 ISO 111 AB 6 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 30 K%
Alerick Soularie 1/3 BB 3 SB -- [LF, 24, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .154 BA .324 OBP .096 ISO 52 AB 1 HR 12 SB 15 BB% 22 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Sebastian Walcott 1/3 BB 2K -- [DH, 18, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .181 BA .295 OBP .105 ISO 105 AB 2 HR 2 SB 13 BB% 29 K%
Jefferson Rojas 3/6 2B -- [SS, 19, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .286 BA .326 OBP .087 ISO 126 AB 2 HR 5 SB 5 BB% 15 K%
Luis Lara 1/3 SB -- [LF, 19, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .266 BA .358 OBP .055 ISO 128 AB 16 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
William Bergolla 1/4 SB -- [SS, 19, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .190 BA .247 OBP .060 ISO 84 AB 7 SB 7 BB% 13 K%
Samuel Zavala 1/5 HR K -- [CF, 19, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .189 BA .264 OBP .142 ISO 127 AB 3 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 21 K%
Termarr Johnson 1/3 2B 2BB 2K -- [DH, 19, SAL - PIT] - [F] [T] .172 BA .390 OBP .071 ISO 99 AB 1 HR 4 SB 22 BB% 24 K%
Luke Adams 2/4 2B K SB -- [3B, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .214 BA .420 OBP .167 ISO 84 AB 3 HR 9 SB 16 BB% 22 K%
Gregory Barrios 1/4 BB SB -- [SS, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .321 BA .370 OBP .134 ISO 112 AB 1 HR 8 SB 5 BB% 11 K%
Sal Stewart 4/4 2B -- [2B, 20, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .284 BA .402 OBP .147 ISO 109 AB 2 HR 2 SB 16 BB% 16 K%
Manuel Pena 1/4 2B BB -- [2B, 20, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .240 BA .304 OBP .115 ISO 104 AB 1 HR 2 SB 7 BB% 24 K%
🔥​ Jadher Areinamo​ 2/3 2B BB K 2 SB -- [2B, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .263 BA .299 OBP .093 ISO 118 AB 1 HR 12 SB 5 BB% 14 K%
Luis Ravelo 2/4 2B BB 2K -- [SS, 20, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .196 BA .248 OBP .165 ISO 97 AB 3 HR 4 BB% 32 K%
Bryant Betancourt 2/3 SB -- [C, 20, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .262 BA .357 OBP .083 ISO 84 AB 1 HR 5 SB 12 BB% 22 K%
Henry Bolte 1/3 2B 2BB K SB -- [RF, 20, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .248 BA .373 OBP .192 ISO 125 AB 5 HR 14 SB 14 BB% 36 K%
Allan Castro 3/4 BB K -- [RF, 20, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .240 BA .381 OBP .130 ISO 100 AB 1 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 23 K%
Dyan Jorge 3/4 SB -- [SS, 21, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .291 BA .402 OBP .039 ISO 103 AB 10 SB 13 BB% 17 K%
Sabin Ceballos 2/5 2B BB -- [3B, 21, SAL - ATL] - [F] [T] .240 BA .355 OBP .067 ISO 104 AB 1 SB 10 BB% 18 K%
Kristian Campbell 2/5 HR BB K -- [CF, 21, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .279 BA .404 OBP .302 ISO 86 AB 6 HR 1 SB 16 BB% 28 K%
Matthew Etzel 2/4 2B BB 2 SB -- [RF, 22, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .309 BA .400 OBP .145 ISO 110 AB 2 HR 19 SB 13 BB% 20 K%
Enrique Bradfield Jr. 2/5 3B K SB -- [CF, 22, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .247 BA .345 OBP .123 ISO 73 AB 16 SB 11 BB% 18 K%
🔥​ Rafael Morel​ 3/4 HR BB SB -- [2B, 22, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .267 BA .357 OBP .058 ISO 86 AB 1 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 28 K%
Ethan Workinger 2/5 HR -- [DH, 22, SAL - ATL] - [F] [T] .291 BA .390 OBP .154 ISO 117 AB 3 HR 2 SB 11 BB% 18 K%
Rodolfo Nolasco 2/4 2B HR K -- [RF, 22, NWL - SF] - [F] [T] .181 BA .263 OBP .157 ISO 83 AB 3 HR 10 BB% 43 K%
Colby Halter 3/5 2B K SB -- [2B, 22, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .248 BA .381 OBP .096 ISO 125 AB 1 HR 6 SB 16 BB% 29 K%
Kevin Kilpatrick Jr. 5/6 2B -- [CF, 23, SAL - ATL] - [F] [T] .306 BA .356 OBP .134 ISO 134 AB 1 HR 10 SB 6 BB% 18 K%
 

A Standouts

Leodalis De Vries 2/4 -- [DH, 17, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .194 BA .324 OBP .097 ISO 31 AB 1 SB 13 BB% 27 K%
Colt Emerson 1/4 2B -- [SS, 18, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .292 BA .447 OBP .154 ISO 65 AB 2 HR 1 SB 18 BB% 14 K%
Maykel Minoso 2/5 2B -- [C, 18, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .121 BA .171 OBP .030 ISO 33 AB 5 BB% 22 K%
Antonio Anderson 0/2 3BB -- [3B, 18, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .105 BA .287 OBP .010 ISO 105 AB 2 SB 19 BB% 25 K%
🔥​ Byron Chourio​ 2/4 HR BB K -- [RF, 18, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .226 BA .296 OBP .167 ISO 84 AB 1 HR 5 SB 10 BB% 29 K%
Jansel Luis 3/5 2B K SB -- [2B, 19, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .256 BA .304 OBP .078 ISO 129 AB 1 HR 5 SB 4 BB% 27 K%
Jesus Baez 1/3 2B BB -- [DH, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .293 BA .343 OBP .173 ISO 133 AB 4 HR 5 SB 6 BB% 9 K%
Jean Joseph 2/4 HR -- [LF, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .235 BA .365 OBP .176 ISO 51 AB 2 HR 2 SB 12 BB% 19 K%
Max Clark 1/4 BB 2 SB -- [CF, 19, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] .250 BA .363 OBP .080 ISO 112 AB 1 HR 10 SB 15 BB% 17 K%
Brandon Winokur 2/4 2B 2 SB -- [SS, 19, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .263 BA .328 OBP .149 ISO 114 AB 2 HR 9 SB 7 BB% 30 K%
Ronny Hernandez 2/4 2B -- [C, 19, CAR - CWS] - [F] [T] .232 BA .336 OBP .053 ISO 95 AB 12 BB% 13 K%
Jeral Perez 2/3 HR BB -- [2B, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .309 BA .450 OBP .218 ISO 110 AB 5 HR 3 SB 18 BB% 22 K%
🔥​ Samuel Gil​ 2/3 2B 2BB SB -- [2B, 19, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] .231 BA .352 OBP .066 ISO 91 AB 1 SB 14 BB% 25 K%
Kendall George 3/5 SB -- [CF, 19, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .269 BA .406 OBP .013 ISO 78 AB 11 SB 18 BB% 17 K%
🔥​ Dillon Head​ 3/4 3B 2 SB -- [CF, 19, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .258 BA .333 OBP .144 ISO 97 AB 1 HR 5 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Cristhian Vaquero​ 1/1 2B 3BB SB -- [RF, 19, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .118 BA .259 OBP .129 ISO 93 AB 2 HR 7 SB 12 BB% 39 K%
Jonny Farmelo 2/3 2B BB SB -- [CF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .267 BA .419 OBP .119 ISO 101 AB 3 HR 11 SB 17 BB% 24 K%
Andy Perez 2/3 2B 2BB -- [SS, 19, CAL - COL] - [F] [T] .305 BA .350 OBP .183 ISO 131 AB 4 HR 2 SB 6 BB% 16 K%
🔥​ Miguel Bleis​ 2/4 2B HR BB K 2 SB -- [CF, 20, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .231 BA .336 OBP .148 ISO 108 AB 2 HR 12 SB 12 BB% 17 K%
Jesus Hernandez 2/4 BB K 2 SB -- [SS, 20, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .194 BA .354 OBP .010 ISO 103 AB 10 SB 19 BB% 22 K%
Cristian Hernandez 2/3 BB K SB -- [SS, 20, CAR - CHC] - [F] [T] .303 BA .397 OBP .073 ISO 109 AB 1 HR 15 SB 11 BB% 23 K%
Juan Alonso 2/3 3B BB -- [DH, 20, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .223 BA .361 OBP .128 ISO 94 AB 1 HR 3 SB 15 BB% 29 K%
Johnfrank Salazar 1/2 2B 3BB -- [1B, 20, FSL - STL] - [F] [T] .273 BA .349 OBP .078 ISO 77 AB 8 BB% 15 K%
Everett Cooper III 1/3 BB 2 SB -- [2B, 20, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .234 BA .388 OBP .000 ISO 64 AB 5 SB 20 BB% 13 K%
Avery Owusu-Asiedu 2/4 2B HR -- [CF, 20, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .208 BA .298 OBP .158 ISO 101 AB 2 HR 9 SB 11 BB% 39 K%
Jackson Castillo 2/4 HR BB -- [LF, 21, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .250 BA .392 OBP .203 ISO 64 AB 2 HR 7 SB 18 BB% 24 K%
Romeo Sanabria 2/4 2B HR -- [1B, 22, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .325 BA .438 OBP .192 ISO 120 AB 5 HR 2 SB 16 BB% 19 K%
Colby Shade 2/4 HR BB K SB -- [CF, 22, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .234 BA .339 OBP .117 ISO 94 AB 2 HR 11 SB 10 BB% 30 K%
Carson Jones 3/4 2B HR K 2 SB -- [LF, 23, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .292 BA .370 OBP .231 ISO 65 AB 3 HR 12 SB 9 BB% 38 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Luis Lameda 1/2 HR 2BB -- [2B, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .176 BA .333 OBP .176 ISO 17 AB 1 HR 14 BB% 28 K%
🔥​ George Wolkow​ 1/2 2B 3BB K 2 SB -- [CF, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .385 BA .500 OBP .269 ISO 26 AB 1 HR 2 SB 15 BB% 43 K%
Eric Bitonti 2/5 3B HR 3K -- [3B, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .294 BA .368 OBP .265 ISO 34 AB 2 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 34 K%
D'Angelo Tejada 1/2 3BB K SB -- [3B, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .250 BA .417 OBP .000 ISO 8 AB 1 SB 25 BB% 41 K%
Enrique Jimenez 2/3 2BB SB -- [1B, 18, GCL - DET] - [F] [T] .192 BA .333 OBP .115 ISO 26 AB 1 HR 3 SB 18 BB% 15 K%
Javier Mogollon 1/4 2BB K 2 SB -- [SS, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .167 BA .412 OBP .167 ISO 24 AB 1 HR 6 SB 29 BB% 44 K%
Eduardo Quintero 2/3 2B 2BB -- [CF, 18, AZL - LAD] - [F] [T] .200 BA .355 OBP .040 ISO 25 AB 16 BB% 25 K%
Franyerber Montilla 1/3 2B 2BB SB -- [2B, 19, GCL - DET] - [F] [T] .385 BA .556 OBP .192 ISO 26 AB 7 SB 22 BB% 13 K%
Yasser Mercedes 2/5 2B HR 2K -- [CF, 19, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .387 BA .441 OBP .258 ISO 31 AB 2 HR 5 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
Jhonny Severino 2/2 2 2B 2BB -- [3B, 19, GCL - PIT] - [F] [T] .350 BA .435 OBP .150 ISO 20 AB 3 SB 13 BB% 30 K%
Yordalin Pena 2/3 2BB K SB -- [LF, 19, GCL - STL] - [F] [T] .308 BA .400 OBP .115 ISO 26 AB 1 SB 13 BB% 13 K%
Juan Cruz 2/3 3BB SB -- [RF, 20, AZL - SEA] - [F] [T] .429 BA .529 OBP .429 ISO 14 AB 2 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 35 K%
Eddy Isturiz 2/2 3B BB 2 SB -- [LF, 20, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .300 BA .500 OBP .200 ISO 10 AB 2 SB 28 BB% 35 K%
🔥​ Geuri Lubo​ 2/2 2B HR BB 2 SB -- [RF, 20, AZL - CHC] - [F] [T] .462 BA .533 OBP .308 ISO 13 AB 1 HR 3 SB 13 BB% 20 K%
Omar Nuel 3/5 2 2B 2K 2 SB -- [RF, 21, AZL - KC] - [F] [T] .429 BA .467 OBP .357 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 2 SB 0 BB% 33 K%
Carlos Jimenez 2/4 HR BB K SB -- [LF, 21, AZL - SEA] - [F] [T] .440 BA .576 OBP .400 ISO 25 AB 3 HR 3 SB 24 BB% 24 K%
 

Questo è l'articolo che ha destato la mia attenzione

L'agenzia delle Entrate in una delle risposte ai quesiti presentate nel corso di Telefisco 2024 del 1 febbraio replica a dubbi sulla deduzione dei costi secondo il principio di cassa dando rilievo all'ordine di pagamento del bonifico. Relativamente alla non coincidenza tra il pagamento effettuato con bonifico e il relativo addebito (successivo) dello stesso sul conto corrente viene sinteticamente evidenziato che nessuna rilevanza ai fini fiscali è da attribuirsi al momento in cui materialmente avviene poi l’addebito sul conto corrente dell’erogante. L'agenzia ha replicato ritenendo di poter applicare quanto già chiarito, nella risoluzione 23 aprile 2007, n. 77/E, riguardante il caso di un pagamento on line dei contributi mediante l’utilizzo della carta di credito.
Nel documento di prassi è stato chiarito che «il momento maggiormente rilevante, nel caso in cui i contributi vengano versati con carta di credito on-line, è quello in cui viene utilizzata la carta di credito» e, di conseguenza, i contributi si considerano versati dal professionista nel momento stesso in cui manifesta la volontà di sostenere l’onere dando ordine di pagamento alla banca.
La risposta è interessante poiché applicabile in modo trasversale in ogni ipotesi di applicazione del principio di cassa, ad esempio: alla deduzione di un onere in dichiarazione dei redditi per un privato.

E' dunque cambiato il criterio di cassa per i pagamenti con bonifico da parte dei contribuenti privati?
Se sì, immagino che verrà formalizzato sulla prossima circolare AdE sugli oneri in detrazione/deduzione che dovrebbe uscire a giugno ma, se così non sarà, come bisogna regolarsi? Sarà comunque valido a livello interpretativo da parte dei funzionari AdE del 36-TER con decorrenza 1.2.24?

1. SOMMA, YUMA - All 4 U
2. Key Notez - Your Love Ain't The Same ( Maz Remix )
3. Amy Winehouse Back To Black ( DSF Edit )
4. Donna Summer - I Feel Love ( VXSION Edit )
5. Collé - Kupata feat Nes Mburu
6. Mwaki - Zerb ft. Sofia Nzau ( &Friends Remix )
7. Time - PACHANGA BOYS ( Roy Rosenfeld Private Mix )
8. Moojo, Demayä feat. Arkadyan - Desperado (Besh Remix)
9. who is he - bill withers (victhor remix)
10. BLACK COFFEE, ZAKES BANTWINI - JUJU (CHALEEE & SAMMI FERRER EDIT)
11. Francis Mercier, Frigid Armadillo, Luedji Luna - Uiara
12. Nico De Andrea - My Everything (Bohemian Extended Remix)
13. Yamil - Amonunde
14. Yamil - Cotonú
15. Yamil - Nimbe
16. Marten Lou - Better Days
17. Camelphat - What a Day (Marten Lou Remix)
18. Luchii - Vertebrea (SOMMA Remix)
19. Folamour, Amadou & Mariam - Voyage (Antdot remix)
20. Guapo & Peaty - 6pm In Casablanca
21. Juan Yarin - Sun WLimiter
22. KURA - Sentir Saudade (GUAPO & Antdot Remix)
23. Peaty, Soldera - Niafunke
24. Ajna & Jamiie ft Nomvula - ID DEMO NEW
25. Alok - Yawanawa Sina Vaishu (Maz Remix)
26. QUENTRO & Tuna - Soro Soke
27. Raffa Guido - Preguntas
28. PEATY - Ouda
29. Peaty - KILOSA
30. Chouja - Nyu Bi Woni
31. Ah Ya Alby (Ajna & Samm Edit)
32. Rockin Moroccan - All that she wants
33. Raffa Guido - Famax (Jerak Remix)
34. Cloonee Wade - Mi Amor (VXSION Remix)
35. DOT (BR), Rachel Reis - Eu Vou Pra Bahia (DSF Remix)
36. The Weeknd - Save Your Tears (DSF Edit)
37. Marasi - Sweet Dreams
38. MILKY CHANCE - STOLEN DANCE (VXSION EDIT)
39. Joris_Voorn,_Matthew_Dear_Homeland_&ME_Remix_Jinadu_Vocal_Edit
40. Maz,_Bakka_BR,_Berimbouse_A_Hora_é_Agora_Ft_Rafa_Unreleased
41. Raffa Guido - Yo ma Love (Original mix)
42. Depeche Mode - Enjoy The Silence (DSF Edit)
43. Liva K - True Story
44. TRAVIS SCOTT - BUTTERFLY EFFECT (&ME EDIT)
45. Candi Stanton - Hallelujah Anyway (Larse 2024 Edit)
46. MOOJO, DA CAPO FEAT. TABIA - WHAT U DESIRE (VOCAL MIX)
47. Cesaralina [Darmon Edit] ( Montrouge Remix )
48. Naomi Sharon - Definition Of Love ( Alex Kósh Remix )
49. Cheb Khaled - Abdel Kader (Mont Rouge Remix).wav
50. Maz, APACHE, Maxi Meraki (feat. Tabia) - Nothing On Me (&ME Edit).mp3
51. Harry Styles - Sign Of The Time (DSF Remix).wav
52. Janet Jackson – Together Again (Rampa Edit)
53. Lemon Glow - Beach House (Marten Lou Remix).wav
54. Frank Ocean – Lost (Beswerda Remix).mp3
55. Moojo, AWEN – Giant [Master].wav
56. Adassiya - Sa Ansa (Alex Twin Remix)
57. Anastacia - Left Outside Alone (DSF Edit)
58. Dennis Ferrer - Hey Hey (Da Capo Dub)
59. Caiiro, Moojo – Here We Are V1 Master.wav
60. Bob Marley - Is This Love (DSF's Believe In U Edit).flac
61. Reamonn - Supergirl (DSF Edit).mp3
62. Chris IDH - Sunray
63. Da Capo Ft. Toshi - New Sun (Original Mix)
64. Uncle Waffles - Tanzania (Rampa Remix)
65. Drake - A Keeper (Moojo Remix)
66. Marten Lou - Radiohead 40
67. Rihanna - Stay (Moojo Remix)
68. Omah Lay & Naomi Sharon - Push ( BLK Remix )
69. Sanba Yo Pran Pale (&ME Remix)
70. Samm (BE) & Ajna (BE) - Move V2
71. Brandy - Almost Doesn’t Count (&ME Edit)
72. Da Africa Deep - Humans (&ME Edit)
73. Mano, Ajna - Bottom
74. Samm & Ajna - A Frenchie Thing
75. Ajna (BE) - Astro
76. Alex Wann, Soubeiran, Nes Mburu - N’Gele
77. Bun Xapa - La Mezcla
78. Keinemusik - Muye (Enoo Napa Remix)
79. MoBlack, Santiago Garcia ft. Yung Wylin - Good Energy
80. Moojo - Swing My Way
81. Samm & Reyou - Mama Hoekanda
82. Ilanga - Masšh (&Me Edit)
83. Masšh___Adam_Port_feat_Ninae_All_I_Got_Original_Mix
84. Rui Da Silva - Touch Me (Peace Control Remix)
85. Franc Fala - MoBlack, Benja, Franc Fala - Yamore (FF Master)
86. Downstream - MakeÌ_z, Life on Planets (Lazare Remix)
87. Billie Eilish - Everything I Wanted (Marten Lou Remix)
88. Cher - Believe (Super Flu Remix)
89. Drake - Get it Together (VXSION Remix)
90. Feid - Classy 101 (Maz, VXSION Edit)
91. Antdot & Maz - Corpo e Canção
92. Maz - Ndaciii
93. Maz (BR) & Antdot - Run (Original Mix)
94. Samm (BE) - Troy
95. Innerbloom - RÜFÜS DU SOL (Dennis Louvra Remix)
96. Samm & Maxi Meraki - Everybody Get Up
97. VXSION, Peace Control - Back To Life
98. ZASA ID- KEINEMUSIK
99. Toto - Africa (Rampa Remix)mp3
100. Unkle - Only You (&ME Remix).mp3
101. Chris IDH – 7Nation.wav
102. Naomi Sharon - Another Life (DSF Remix).wav
103. Abra - Feel (&ME Remix).wav
104. Pablo Fierro – Kababo (Unreleased Edit).wav
105. Future & Tems - Wait 4 U (Mont Rouge Remix).wav
106. France Gall – Ella, Elle L’a (Rampa Edit).wav

Hi! I just wanted to tell about my experience with Yunexpress. It was good honestly. I ordered on Sunday, got the tracking code on Monday and the product itself was dispatched to Yunexpress on Wednesday. And now a week later I'm writing this message with the keyboard. I ordered directly from the Keychron.com website (Q3 Knob ISO, pre-assembled, nordic).
It only took a week to arrive here in Finland and for me to be able to go collect it. I did not have to pay any import taxes or VAT.

Delivery Status:Delivered Destination:FI Origin:CN 21 2024-05-15 11:42:21 Handed over to the recipient----(My home town) 20 2024-05-15 11:15:52 First arrival notification sent----(My home town) 19 2024-05-15 11:15:52 Ready to be collected----(My home town) 18 2024-05-15 11:15:52 Received at parcel point----(My home town) 17 2024-05-15 10:31:34 Delivered to parcel point 16 2024-05-15 03:16:43 Loaded for delivery to parcel point----JYVÄSKYLÄ 15 2024-05-15 02:18:41 Waiting to be loaded for parcel point----JYVÄSKYLÄ 14 2024-05-15 02:18:41 Received at destination terminal----JYVÄSKYLÄ 13 2024-05-15 02:18:41 Consolidated----JYVÄSKYLÄ 12 2024-05-14 21:57:36 Loaded for main transport----Vantaa 11 2024-05-14 20:35:49 Received for carriage----Vantaa 10 2024-05-14 13:53:17 Consolidated----Vantaa 9 2024-05-14 08:52:31 Delivered to local carrier 8 2024-05-13 20:30:33 Clearance processing completed - Import----Helsinki, Helsinki, FI 7 2024-05-13 14:00:00 International flight has arrived----FI 6 2024-05-11 00:20:00 International flight has departed----CN 5 2024-05-10 12:57:59 Arrived at the origin international airport----CN 4 2024-05-09 10:58:01 Shipment is in transit to next facility----Mainland China, CN 3 2024-05-08 04:58:46 Departed from sort facility----Mainland China, CN 2 2024-05-08 03:24:45 Arrived at origin facility----Mainland China, CN 1 2024-05-06 09:33:32 Shipment information received 

Yuntrack is pretty bad, but if you go to DevTools and see the request to their API, you can actually get pretty nice information, like the AWB number to get the exact flight info your parcel will be on. Mine flew first to Doha from China (Saturday) and from Doha to Helsinki (Monday).
Now that I have had the keyboard for about an hour I have to say it's really good and worth the roughly ~200 € I paid for it. Very quick delivery.

I use Arch Linux on WSL2 on a Windows 11 as my main setup. I am developing an app that uses two containers, one is the backend(golang echo + SQLite) the other is frontend (golang echo + templ + HTMX + tailwindcss)
So far everything was going fine, I am able to properly start both the containers using podman-compose and a compose.yaml file and both the container start up without much problems.
The problem comes when I try to send an HTTP request from one container to the other. The backend is running on port 8080 and frontend runs on port 9090 while being in the frontend container I run the following commad:- curl http://project_backend:8080 It says it cannot resolve project_backend
And the same goes for trying to access project_frontend from the backend container
A few hours before when I made the compose.yaml file, everything was working properly for some reason, after that I never changed anything, I was testing with how the notifications work with various backend events on the frontend like updating a record in the database etc. All I did a few hours before was start the containers and update the user profile a few times to check the notifications feature and during that time everything was working fine and both the containers were properly interacting with each other. The only thing was that the websocket connection was not starting for some reason but atleast HTTP requests were happening. Then I just ran podman compose down and just shut my computer down.
Now, after a few hours, when I turned my computer back on and ran podman compose up -d --build again, neither the HTTP requests nor the WebSocket connection is working.
Here is my compose.yaml file ``` version: "3.8"
name: project
services: backend: container_name: project_backend build: context: ./backend dockerfile: dev.dockerfile volumes: - ./server:/ussrc/app ports: - "8080:8080" frontend: container_name: project_frontend build: context: ./frontend dockerfile: dev.dockerfile volumes: - ./client:/ussrc/app - /ussrc/app/node_modules ports: - "3000:3000"
```
Here is the output of podman info host: arch: amd64 buildahVersion: 1.35.4 cgroupControllers: [] cgroupManager: cgroupfs cgroupVersion: v1 conmon: package: /usbin/conmon is owned by conmon 1:2.1.11-1 path: /usbin/conmon version: 'conmon version 2.1.10, commit: e21e7c85b7637e622f21c57675bf1154fc8b1866' cpuUtilization: idlePercent: 98.36 systemPercent: 0.34 userPercent: 1.29 cpus: 12 databaseBackend: sqlite distribution: distribution: arch version: unknown eventLogger: journald freeLocks: 2044 hostname: Trash-Can idMappings: gidmap: - container_id: 0 host_id: 1000 size: 1 - container_id: 1 host_id: 100000 size: 65536 uidmap: - container_id: 0 host_id: 1000 size: 1 - container_id: 1 host_id: 100000 size: 65536 kernel: 5.15.146.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 linkmode: dynamic logDriver: journald memFree: 992231424 memTotal: 4109623296 networkBackend: netavark networkBackendInfo: backend: netavark dns: package: /uslib/podman/aardvark-dns is owned by aardvark-dns 1.10.0-2 path: /uslib/podman/aardvark-dns version: aardvark-dns 1.10.0 package: /uslib/podman/netavark is owned by netavark 1.10.3-1 path: /uslib/podman/netavark version: netavark 1.10.3 ociRuntime: name: crun package: /usbin/crun is owned by crun 1.15-1 path: /usbin/crun version: - crun version 1.15 commit: e6eacaf4034e84185fd8780ac9262bbf57082278 rundir: /run/use1000/crun spec: 1.0.0 +SYSTEMD +SELINUX +APPARMOR +CAP +SECCOMP +EBPF +CRIU +YAJL os: linux pasta: executable: /ussbin/pasta package: /usbin/pasta is owned by passt 2024_05_10.7288448-1 version: pasta 2024_05_10.7288448 Copyright Red Hat GNU General Public License, version 2 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. remoteSocket: exists: false path: /run/use1000/podman/podman.sock security: apparmorEnabled: false capabilities: CAP_CHOWN,CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE,CAP_FOWNER,CAP_FSETID,CAP_KILL,CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE,CAP_SETFCAP,CAP_SETGID,CAP_SETPCAP,CAP_SETUID,CAP_SYS_CHROOT rootless: true seccompEnabled: true seccompProfilePath: /etc/containers/seccomp.json selinuxEnabled: false serviceIsRemote: false slirp4netns: executable: "" package: "" version: "" swapFree: 916111360 swapTotal: 1073741824 uptime: 1h 8m 20.00s (Approximately 0.04 days) variant: "" plugins: authorization: null log: - k8s-file - none - passthrough - journald network: - bridge - macvlan - ipvlan volume: - local registries: {} store: configFile: /home/axew/.config/containers/storage.conf containerStore: number: 2 paused: 0 running: 2 stopped: 0 graphDriverName: overlay graphOptions: {} graphRoot: /home/axew/.local/share/containers/storage graphRootAllocated: 1081101176832 graphRootUsed: 14620078080 graphStatus: Backing Filesystem: extfs Native Overlay Diff: "true" Supports d_type: "true" Supports shifting: "false" Supports volatile: "true" Using metacopy: "false" imageCopyTmpDir: /vatmp imageStore: number: 20 runRoot: /run/use1000/containers transientStore: false volumePath: /home/axew/.local/share/containers/storage/volumes version: APIVersion: 5.0.3 Built: 1715595915 BuiltTime: Mon May 13 15:55:15 2024 GitCommit: d08315df35cb6e95f65bf3935f529295c6e54742-dirty GoVersion: go1.22.3 Os: linux OsArch: linux/amd64 Version: 5.0.3
Here is the ouput to podman network inspect project_default [ { "name": "quark_default", "id": "85a2498bd3f1d9590cc18225004f5ea036e148c0ba3c33f2ef0e3b70f7b57dea", "driver": "bridge", "network_interface": "podman1", "created": "2024-05-15T14:52:28.020114452+05:30", "subnets": [ { "subnet": "10.89.0.0/24", "gateway": "10.89.0.1" } ], "ipv6_enabled": false, "internal": false, "dns_enabled": true, "labels": { "com.docker.compose.project": "quark", "io.podman.compose.project": "quark" }, "ipam_options": { "driver": "host-local" }, "containers": { "68b9a2c3eacb7cdb31b25d58140dc52206e31d826851ce026515956cb1771f65": { "name": "quark_client", "interfaces": { "eth0": { "subnets": [ { "ipnet": "10.89.0.5/24", "gateway": "10.89.0.1" } ], "mac_address": "ee:a7:b3:42:09:a8" } } }, "fd6ac91b87a1bed5825b74c2ba424a5fc9e7d480050716dbd4e9b3b1d4554233": { "name": "quark_server", "interfaces": { "eth0": { "subnets": [ { "ipnet": "10.89.0.4/24", "gateway": "10.89.0.1" } ], "mac_address": "5e:38:ac:5a:46:3b" } } } } } ]

Selling cache sets at below mentioned price:
My profile- https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198272324546
steam rep- https://steamrep.com/profiles/76561198272324546
Add me if you are interested(only serious buyers (who have read the whole post and sure about buying))
buyer goes first. Reservation is mandatory and nonrefundable.
accepting dota 2 tradable items and tf2 keys
TI8 cache 1

Hero	Price ( USD)	Quantity
Trail of the Sanguine Spectrum(blood seeker)	15$	2
Pitfall Crusader(Pangolier)	23$	1
Insights of the Sapphire Shroud(Dark seer)	10$	5
Pillar of the Fractured Citadel(Spirit breaker)	12$	3
Forlorn Descent(Undying)	15$	0
The Murid Divine(necrophos)	22$	2
Primer of the Sapper's Guile(techies)	20$	3
Molokau Stalker(venomancer)	15$	4
Morbific Provision(witch doctor)	15$	3
Raptures of the Abyssal Kin(queen of pain)	12$	4
Fate Meridian(invoker)	25$	3
Grasp of the Riven Exile(weaver)	10$	6
Visions of the Lifted Veil(phantom assassin)	35$	1
Endowments of the Lucent Canopy(shadow shaman)	100$	sold out

TI8 cache 2

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Pitmouse Fraternity(meepo)	15$	8
Fires of the Volcanic Guard(Ember spirit)	20$	7
Third Awakening(Dragon knight)	35$	0
Shackles of the Enduring Conscript(AXE)	8$	10
Shimmer of the Anointed(Nyx)	6$	10
Cruelties of the Spiral Bore(Magnus)	45$	sold out
Loaded Prospects(Brew master)	15$	8
Ire of Molten Rebirth(Phoenix)	8$	6
Pattern of the Silken Queen(Brood mother)	8$	11
Dread Ascendance(Doom)	50$	1
The Rat King(Chen)	10$	9
Raiments of the Obsidian Forge(Underlord)	20$	4

TI9 cache 1

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Echoes of the Everblack(Abbadon)	30$	1
Allure of the Faeshade Flower(Dark willow)	25$	1
Paean of the Ink Dragon(Grimstroke)	20$	3
Scorched Amber(Dragon Knight)	30$	2
Priest of the Proudsilver Clan(Chen)	15$	5
The Arts of Mortal Deception(Enigma)	10$	4
Poacher's Bane(Tide hunter)	20$	6
Soul of the Brightshroud(Death prophet)	20$	2
Curse of the Creeping Vine(Undying)	20$	3
Pursuit of the Ember Demons (Husker)	22$	2
Appetites of the Lizard King(Slark)	25$	3
Forbidden Medicine(Dazzle)	20$	3
Riddle of the Hierophant(Oracle)	12$	7
Glimmer of the Sacred Hunt(Drow ranger)	30$	sold out
Adornments of the Jade Emissary(Earth Spirit)	25$	1
Defender of Ruin(Disrupter)	25$	8

TI9 cache 2

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Sight of the Kha-Ren Faithful(Drow ranger)	15$	21
Tribal Pathways(Warlock)	10$	26
Directive of the Sunbound(Clockwork)	10$	23
Souls Tyrant(Shadow fiend)	40$	4
Endless Night(Abbadon)	25$	8
Dapper Disguise(Pudge)	18$	16
Prized Acquisitions(Bat rider)	6$	29
Verdant Predator(Venomancer)	8$	23
Fury of the Bloodforge(Bloodseeker)	10$	27
Automaton Antiquity(Broodmother)	10$	25
Tales of the Windward Rogue(Pangolier)	30$	5
Grim Destiny(Wraith king)	20$	21
Distinguished Expeditionary(Tusker)	12$	26
Fowl Omen(Necrophos)	18$	21
Cinder Sensei(Ember Spirit))	80$	4

TI10 cache 1

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Origin of the Dark Oath(Night stalker)	28$	22
Ravenous Abyss (Underlord)	15$	34
Apocalypse Unbound(Ancient appartion)	10$	36
Beholden of the Banished Ones(Warlock)	15$	5
Fury of the Righteous Storm(Disrupter)	10$	36
Lineage of the Stormlords(Juggernaut)	35$	16
Silent Slayer(Silencer)	20$	32
Mindless Slaughter(Pudge)	15$	37
Heartless Hunt(Bounty hunter)	15$	31
Herald of the Ember Eye(Grim stroke)	15$	27
Fissured Flight(Jakiro)	12$	34
Flashpoint Proselyte(Husker)	20$	34
Glory of the Elderflame(Lina)	25$	26
Signs of the Allfather(Nature's Prophet)	20$	34
Songs of Starfall Glen(Enchantress)	10$	23
Ancient Inheritance(Tiny)	25$	51
Forsworn Legacy(Mars)	40$	26

TI10 cache 2

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Evolution of the Infinite(Enigma)	10$	24
Beast of the Crimson Ring(Bristle Back)	15$	23
Clearcut Cavalier(Timbersaw)	8.5$	27
The King Of Thieves(Keeper of the light)	10$	27
Horror from the Deep(Tidehunter)	20$	22
Ire of the Ancient Gaoler(Arc warden)	40$	1
Talons of the Endless Storm(Chaos Knight)	14$	22
Carousal of the Mystic Masquerade(Rubick)	12$	26
Crown of Calaphas(Shadow demon)	15$	26
Wrath of the Fallen(Doom)	15$	26
Blacksail Cannoneer(Sniper)	13$	26
Secrets of the Celestial(Skywrath mage)	10$	27
Blaze of Oblivion(Phoenix)	8$	26
Master of the Searing Path(Ember spirit)	30$	10
Steward of the Forbidden Chamber(Templer assassin)	30$	30
Claszureme Incursion(Faceless Void)	80$	1

Aghanim's cache sets

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Silverwurm Sacrifice(Dragon Knight)	40$	5
Scales of the Shadow Walker(Phantom lancer)	12$	19
Perception of the First Light(Dawn breaker)	12$	16
Apex Automated(Clockwork)	10$	17
Test of the Basilisk Lord(Razor)	12$	17
Secrets of the Frost Singularity(Ancient appartion)	8.5$	20
Perils of the Red Banks(Chen)	8$	20
The Chained Scribe(Grim stroke)	12$	18
Widow of the Undermount Gloom(Brood mother)	10$	20
Forgotten Fate(Mars)	10$	18
March of the Crackerjack Mage(Rubick)	10$	19
Stranger in the Wandering Isles(Drow ranger)	55$	1
Cosmic Concoctioneers(Alchemist)	7$	19
Days of the Demon(Axe)	25$	7
Blightfall(Abbadon)	8$	21
Pyrexae Polymorph Perfected(Ogre magi)	20$	25
Wrath of the Celestial Sentinel(Chaos Knight)	50$	8

Diretide cache set

Blue Horizons(Marci)	25$	6
Dark Behemoth(Primal beast)	50$	3

2023 cache sets

Hero	Price(USD)	Quantity
Snailfire (SnapFire)	25$	10
Brightfist (Marci)	22$	10
Primeval Abomination(primal beast)	8$	10
Astral Herald(dawn breaker)	7$	10
Spectral Shadow(Abbadon)	5$	10
Taur Rider(alchemist)	5$	10
Crescent Huntress(spectre)	10$	10
Tyrant of the Veil(wraith king)	8.5$	10
Tomo'kan Footsoldier(hood wink)	7$	10
Darkwood Eulogy(death prophet)	5$	10
Sea Spirit(kunkka)	12$	10
Triumph of the Imperatrix(legion commander)	7$	10
Beast of Thunder(storm spirit)	10$	10
Ancestral Heritage(jakiro)	6$	10
Dezun Viper(dazzle)	7.5$	10

Weather Effects

Weather	Price
Ash	10$
Aurora	3$
Harvest	3$
Moonbeam	5$
Rain	10$
Spring	5$
Snow	5$
Siroco	3$
Pestilence	2$

Buyers go first, add me now if interested for 30 days cooldown, make sure to leave a comment on my profile . 30% reserve amount required at the time of reserving cache sets. fees(depends on your payment method) on you.
If you are buying more than 4 cache sets then u will get addition discount.
WHY YOU SHOULD TRUST ME:
I have more than 1000$ worth of cache sets in my inventory and i have been selling cache sets from past 2 years so why would i scam you for some small amount and you can also check the profile of the people who have given their feedback on my profile . I can also provide you with screenshots of my previous successful trades

Easy listening..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-E9m-JlbdU
🎧"Greatest Hits #2" (30-Second Clips) of Hip-Hop/Rap BEATS POWER MIX (2024) 21 (30-second) Instrumentals in a Hip-Hop Beats Power Mix. {Endless Cloud Sky Visuals}. Also, Free to Download for Listening. Great Driving Music! Thanks for watching, while listening to the mix! HEAR THIS! 🎶 🎧 Instrumentals by Josh Grennan Beats
Time Stamps for Music in Video: 0:00 - Instrumental # 1 0:34 - Instrumental # 2 1:04 - Instrumental # 3 1:39 - Instrumental # 4 2:10 - Instrumental # 5 2:36 - Instrumental # 6 3:10 - Instrumental # 7 3:44 - Instrumental # 8 4:16 - Instrumental # 9 4:47 - Instrumental # 10 5:20 - Instrumental # 11 5:54 - Instrumental # 12 6:26 - Instrumental # 13 6:53 - Instrumental # 14 7:24 - Instrumental # 15 7:56 - Instrumental # 16 8:30 - Instrumental # 17 9:06 - Instrumental # 18 9:37 - Instrumental # 19 10:08 - Instrumental # 20 10:43 - Instrumental # 21 Thanks for viewing! Which Instrumental did you make it to? Write the Instrumental number in the comments. Thanks for participating.

instrumentals

beats

riddims

instrumentalmusic

The Download Link from Soundcloud.com -- https://soundcloud.com/chelseajoshjosiahmusic/30-second-clips-of-hip-hoprap-beats-power-mix-2024 (FREE DOWNLOAD FOR LISTENING AT EASE)

My tradelink: https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffenew/?partner=102474654&token=BH1q6eSo
My steam profile: https://steamcommunity.com/id/darknezz_/
Everything up for a trade, some skins might not be tradable or visible yet
Buyouts are in cash (EURO), send trade offers, only trading, i'm taking cases
★ Butterfly Knife Case Hardened FN - B/O 1316.91
★ Falchion Knife Doppler (Ruby) FN - B/O 942.16
★ Talon Knife Tiger Tooth FN - B/O 607.15
★ Karambit Ultraviolet FT - B/O 581.21
AWP Lightning Strike FN - B/O 500.60
★ Driver Gloves Imperial Plaid FT - B/O 285.21
★ Sport Gloves Slingshot BS- B/O 261.85
★ StatTrak Flip Knife Case Hardened FT- B/O 239.18
★ Bayonet Ultraviolet FT - B/O 212.18
★ Skeleton Knife Scorched BS- B/O 210.51
★ Shadow Daggers Doppler (Phase 1) FN - B/O 196.39
★ Paracord Knife Crimson Web FT- B/O 171.36
★ StatTrak Bowie Knife Rust Coat WW - B/O 138.56
★ Falchion Knife Autotronic BS- B/O 136.26
★ Paracord Knife Blue Steel BS- B/O 134.78
★ Shadow Daggers Slaughter FT- B/O 127.72
★ Navaja Knife Tiger Tooth MW- B/O 123.22
★ Driver Gloves Lunar Weave FT- B/O 121.75
★ Bowie Knife Damascus Steel WW - B/O 121.62
★ Bowie Knife Freehand FT- B/O 116.17
★ StatTrak Paracord Knife Boreal Forest MW- B/O 115.01
★ StatTrak Gut Knife Crimson Web FT- B/O 114.24
★ Falchion Knife Bright Water FT- B/O 106.29
★ Hydra Gloves Case Hardened FT- B/O 101.15
★ Gut Knife Damascus Steel MW- B/O 100.76
★ StatTrak Bowie Knife Urban Masked FT- B/O 96.21
★ Shadow Daggers Lore BS- B/O 89.85
P90 Emerald Dragon MW- B/O 89.28
★ Driver Gloves Rezan the Red FT- B/O 87.16
★ Bowie Knife Urban Masked FT- B/O 85.87
StatTrak AWP Electric Hive FN - B/O 84.07
★ Paracord Knife Safari Mesh MW- B/O 80.80
StatTrak M4A4 Temukau MW- B/O 76.75
StatTrak AWP Wildfire FT- B/O 76.62
★ Survival Knife Forest DDPAT BS- B/O 76.25
★ Gut Knife Safari Mesh FT- B/O 72.39
StatTrak Desert Eagle Kumicho Dragon FN - B/O 70.59
★ Driver Gloves Queen Jaguar FT- B/O 70.08
★ Broken Fang Gloves Yellow-banded FT- B/O 69.95
★ Navaja Knife Night Stripe FT- B/O 68.98
★ Driver Gloves Diamondback BS - B/O 67.70
★ Hand Wraps Duct Tape FT- B/O 67.32
★ Specialist Gloves Buckshot FT- B/O 67.14
StatTrak Galil AR Eco MW - B/O 63.85
★ Hydra Gloves Emerald FT- B/O 60.33
★ Driver Gloves Racing Green FT- B/O 57.31
AK-47 Asiimov MW - B/O 57.06
★ Driver Gloves Queen Jaguar BS - B/O 56.37
★ Broken Fang Gloves Yellow-banded BS - B/O 55.97
AWP Wildfire FT - B/O 55.51
Stickers, pins, capsule, agents, souvenirs
And more…
Some prices might be outdated
My tradelink: https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffenew/?partner=102474654&token=BH1q6eSo

My tradelink: https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffenew/?partner=102474654&token=BH1q6eSo
My steam profile: https://steamcommunity.com/id/darknezz_/
Everything up for a trade, some skins might not be tradable or visible yet
Buyouts are in cash (EURO), send trade offers, only trading, i'm taking cases
★ Butterfly Knife Case Hardened FN - B/O 1316.91
★ Falchion Knife Doppler (Ruby) FN - B/O 942.16
★ Talon Knife Tiger Tooth FN - B/O 607.15
★ Karambit Ultraviolet FT - B/O 581.21
AWP Lightning Strike FN - B/O 500.60
★ Driver Gloves Imperial Plaid FT - B/O 285.21
★ Sport Gloves Slingshot BS- B/O 261.85
★ StatTrak Flip Knife Case Hardened FT- B/O 239.18
★ Bayonet Ultraviolet FT - B/O 212.18
★ Skeleton Knife Scorched BS- B/O 210.51
★ Shadow Daggers Doppler (Phase 1) FN - B/O 196.39
★ Paracord Knife Crimson Web FT- B/O 171.36
★ StatTrak Bowie Knife Rust Coat WW - B/O 138.56
★ Falchion Knife Autotronic BS- B/O 136.26
★ Paracord Knife Blue Steel BS- B/O 134.78
★ Shadow Daggers Slaughter FT- B/O 127.72
★ Navaja Knife Tiger Tooth MW- B/O 123.22
★ Driver Gloves Lunar Weave FT- B/O 121.75
★ Bowie Knife Damascus Steel WW - B/O 121.62
★ Bowie Knife Freehand FT- B/O 116.17
★ StatTrak Paracord Knife Boreal Forest MW- B/O 115.01
★ StatTrak Gut Knife Crimson Web FT- B/O 114.24
★ Falchion Knife Bright Water FT- B/O 106.29
★ Hydra Gloves Case Hardened FT- B/O 101.15
★ Gut Knife Damascus Steel MW- B/O 100.76
★ StatTrak Bowie Knife Urban Masked FT- B/O 96.21
★ Shadow Daggers Lore BS- B/O 89.85
P90 Emerald Dragon MW- B/O 89.28
★ Driver Gloves Rezan the Red FT- B/O 87.16
★ Bowie Knife Urban Masked FT- B/O 85.87
StatTrak AWP Electric Hive FN - B/O 84.07
★ Paracord Knife Safari Mesh MW- B/O 80.80
StatTrak M4A4 Temukau MW- B/O 76.75
StatTrak AWP Wildfire FT- B/O 76.62
★ Survival Knife Forest DDPAT BS- B/O 76.25
★ Gut Knife Safari Mesh FT- B/O 72.39
StatTrak Desert Eagle Kumicho Dragon FN - B/O 70.59
★ Driver Gloves Queen Jaguar FT- B/O 70.08
★ Broken Fang Gloves Yellow-banded FT- B/O 69.95
★ Navaja Knife Night Stripe FT- B/O 68.98
★ Driver Gloves Diamondback BS - B/O 67.70
★ Hand Wraps Duct Tape FT- B/O 67.32
★ Specialist Gloves Buckshot FT- B/O 67.14
StatTrak Galil AR Eco MW - B/O 63.85
★ Hydra Gloves Emerald FT- B/O 60.33
★ Driver Gloves Racing Green FT- B/O 57.31
AK-47 Asiimov MW - B/O 57.06
★ Driver Gloves Queen Jaguar BS - B/O 56.37
★ Broken Fang Gloves Yellow-banded BS - B/O 55.97
AWP Wildfire FT - B/O 55.51
Stickers, pins, capsule, agents, souvenirs
And more…
Some prices might be outdated
My tradelink: https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffenew/?partner=102474654&token=BH1q6eSo

Before taking anyone's advice, ask them what they've achieved. If their results aren't impressive, everything they tell you is bullcrap.
I'll introduce you to digital selling stars who are worth following. They're amazing creators, entrepreneurs, and influencers.
First up in the spotlight is IAmPascio aka creatorpascal (I'm not pasting the links to his profiles here, but you can easily find him on X). He helps people be more productive with Notion templates. Check out his stats:

• 105.7k followers on X;
• $200k/year in sales;
• Over 11.5k reviews under his products on Gumroad.

What are his main features?

Nurturing the X community

Consistency and value are key, as always. There are daily experiments in his content:

• images
• threads
• photos
• catchy offers
• reposts of successful posts

And looooooads of value. Plus, constant engagement with followers, along with reflection on content results, gets him an X account that converts.

A storefront that sells

You won’t earn a dime if your product looks like crap. Here's what you have to do with every single product:

• perfect thumbnail and advanced illustrations, which are useful, not just shiny
• well-structured description with even more visual data
• testimonials are a must
• FAQ

When your products are ready, build upsells. Combine your products into bundles. Your customers get more value for less money, you get a higher average purchase—win-win.
And use lead magnets—free but decent products that attract more potential customers to your store.

Mastering marketing tools

Smart diversification does the job. Choose platforms with different types of content, like X and YouTube. Think about their potential and don’t try to grab them all at once, you probably won't make it.
A hidden gem idea from Pascio is to launch on Product Hunt. A decent launch can bring you a few thousand visitors and $10k in 24 hours.
Additional free/paid communities on Skool or Heartbeat might also give you a bigger audience.

UCL reported a slight revenue increase to $18.1 million in Q1 2024, with a net income of $0.4 million, as it continues to expand its product offerings and market presence.

Key Metrics

Revenue	$18.1M	0.7%
Gross Profit	$10.0M
	Operating Expenses	$9.0M
	Operating Expenses Growth	16.3%
	Net Income	$0.4M
Earnings Per Share	$0.01
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$24.7M

Business Highlights

• Total revenues were US$18.1 million, representing an increase of 0.7% from US$18.0 million in the first quarter of 2023.
• Growth was primarily driven by the continuous recovery of our 1.0 international data connectivity services business, and in particular our Roamingman brand services, which we believe will continue to rebound strongly.
• With 5G roaming network coverage expanding from 55 to 60 countries and regions, our full-speed 5G network roaming solution further solidified our leading position in this sector and helped expand our market share.
• We also made significant progress in rolling out an expanded array of comprehensive data connectivity solutions during the quarter to explore opportunities beyond portable Wi-Fi terminals.
• Recent progress includes the showcasing of our customer premises equipment through GlocalMe mobile/fixed broadband solutions, which provides a highly reliable dual broadband connection.
• In addition, we soft-launched a smart tracker through our GlocalMe Life solutions, which offers far more accurate and reliable tracking, something that other similar tag or tracker products on the market are unable to do.
• By offering more intelligent and convenient daily life products that satisfy a wide range of user needs, we are expanding our market reach and establishing a broader market presence to diversify our revenue streams and generate long-term sustainable growth.
• Furthermore, our newly launched GlocalMeSIM has made solid progress during the quarter, ranking high on a number of e-commerce platforms for travelers heading to destinations such as Japan and Hong Kong.

Guidance

• Revenue (next period): $22.0 - 24.0M

Future Business Drivers: - We have a number of exciting products in the pipeline, which will further strengthen our business. - We completed testing our soft cloud SIM technology for consumer IoT devices, which we expect to begin commercializing in the near future. - Specifically designed for consumer IoT devices that already have a massive end user base, such as walkie talkies, security cameras, and two-wheeled electric scooters, this turnkey solution is compatible with various chipset platforms and is expected to create significant growth opportunities for us. - GlocalMeSIM solutions, including our over-the-air (OTA) SIM and eSIM solutions, will continue to evolve into our innovative “All SIM” solution, allowing us to engage with a broader end user base beyond those in the portable Wi-Fi terminal market. - Additionally, GlocalMe Life has an exciting slate of “Easy Life” X series products under development, which will bring seamless connectivity into various high-frequency daily life application scenarios and are expected to begin generating revenues starting in the third quarter of this year. - We will unveil three GlocalMe Life products and upgraded GlocalMe App on May 23 at Viva Technology 2024 in Paris. - We believe these solutions will allow us to engage with a broader end user base by leveraging our cloud SIM and hyper-connectivity technologies, and ultimately build out our broader GlocalMe ecosystem and global leading mobile data traffic sharing marketplace.
Expectations: UCL's reported revenue of $18.1 million slightly exceeded the average analyst estimate of $17.9 million for Q1 2024. However, the EPS of $0.01 was above the average estimate of -$0.01, indicating better profitability than expected. Revenue growth was modest at 0.7%, compared to the previous year's $18.0 million, aligning closely with analyst expectations.

Bonjour femme recherche une femme( entre 24 et 36 ans ) avec de jolies formes , pour discuter et plus si affinité 🥰

I'm thinking about either getting the Lagkapten / Alex desk (47" x 24") or the MICKE desk (40" x 20") with the whiteboard add on piece that rests on the back.
MICKE has more storage options with drawers and shelves, but the Lagkapten / ALEX has overall bigger desk space and decent storage in the left side ALEX drawer (the right side will just be legs).
What do you think?

Hello!
I hope we're all doing well!
7/12 correct last time around which was a lot better than i expected, but most importantly, our secondary parlay landed! (Secondary Parlay: Aldrich/Hardy o1.5/2.5 or R3 Start + McKinney/Ribovics ITD + Woodson/Caceres o1.5/2.5 or R3 Starts + Lewis/Nascimento ITD)
Full detailed breakdown here: https://www.reddit.com/MMAbetting/comments/1csfr9o/ufc_fight_night_barboza_v_murphy_fight_predictions/?
Lets hope for another successful event! Tough one though.
(c) - Champ
D/DWCS - Debut/Dana Whites' Contender Series
FLS - Fight Lose Streak
FWS - Fight Win Streak
NS - No Streak
(#x) - Rank in Division
x/3 - Confidence Levels
Lets go!!!
Prelims
Women’s Strawweight
Emily Ducote (-275) (13-8-0, NS) v Vanessa Demopoulos (+220) (10-5-0, NS)
Striking: Ducote throws a lot of volume when she fights, she’s fairly tenacious and is great at stringing together combinations. Demopoulos isn’t too much of a striker, she’s more of a collision waiting to happen, usually throwing heavy then going for takedowns. Because of that, I do think Ducote will be able to easily read those initial attacks coming and retaliate accordingly. Ducote has the mild advantage here.
Wrestling/Grappling: Demopoulos’ main style is grappling, she’s quick to set up submissions off her back, she’s got great flexibility and I think it’ll be dangerous for Ducote to even try to grapple with her. Demopoulos is the more effective grappler here in my opinion, at least in terms of submission aggression.
Cardio: Both are decent but Ducote seems to have the better cardio, especially since she looks relatively okay as the rounds go by, even after throwing a lot of volume.
Prediction: Ducote via UD (1/3)
Bantamweight
Alatengheili (+150) (16-9-2, NS) v Kleydson Rodrigues (-185) (8-3-0, NS)
Striking: A tale of two styles, Alatengheili throws heavy, explosive attacks but usually only when he counters, and he tends to try to lure in his opponents to explode once they make their attack. Rodrigues seems to be more calculated and more diverse with his boxing, often countering and making the right reads and the right attacks to land cleanly against aggressive opponents. Rodrigues is also most likely going to add a lot of kicks in this fight, as that has been quite effective when Gutierrez fought Alatengheili. Both have their own little advantages here, but I like how clean Rodrigues has been, compared to the heavy inaccuracy of Alatengheili, which has been highlighted in the main write up.
Wrestling/Grappling: I mean, Alatengheili is a very good wrestler, but he doesn’t really use it as much as he should. He has the advantage here on paper, but I just don’t know if he is going to be using it in this fight. If he does, then he could absolutely get a win here.
Cardio: It’s a bit hard to say, I kind of want to say Alatengheili has the better cardio here given his style, but it’s just so hard to tell. Make your own judgement on this one perhaps, but it could be a 50/50.
Prediction: Rodrigues via UD (1/3)
Women’s Strawweight
Piera Rodriguez (-175) (9-1-0, NS) v Ariane Carnelossi (+145) (14-3-0, NS)
Striking: Rodriguez has clean strikes in her arsenal and she does string together combinations well, her long jab is awesome and she uses it over and over again, which could then help lead to a takedown. But overall, she seems a lot more educated with her striking than Carnelossi. Carnelossi just has power and a bully kind of style, nothing really clean about her striking at all. Perhaps a tale of two different styles here.
Wrestling/Grappling: It has been clear since the moment I saw this fight was announced, that Rodriguez is going to employ her wrestling against Carnelossi, I don’t think Carnelossi is any good on the ground, and Rodriguez has been shown to time her entries very well. Rodriguez is clearly better in the wrestling department in my opinion.
Cardio: Eh, I’d say Rodriguez has the better cardio here, she’s a lot more experienced in the UFC than Carnelossi so we have seen her in those long, drawn out fights.
Prediction: Rodriguez via UD (1/3)
Middleweight
Abus Magomedov (-250) (25-6-1, 2 FLS) v Warlley Alves (+205) (14-7-0, 3 FLS)
Striking: Whilst Alves is well known for his ridiculous punching power and explosive attacks, I do think the reach advantage of Magomedov stifles a lot of that, as well as gives Magomedov the additional advantage of being able to see things come his way, considering that he fights decently well at range, whereas Alves needs to enter the pocket to land his attacks.
Wrestling/Grappling: This is where Alves should take the fight to win, it’s perhaps the path of least resistance and Alves does have quite a few submission wins under his belt, plus the wrestling could exhaust Magomedov, who has a questionable gas tank (which has hopefully been improved upon).
Cardio: I don’t trust Magomedov’s cardio here, I think he’s still a 1.5 round fighter, so the advantage here in my honest opinion falls to Alves here. This is going to be an interesting aspect of the fight though, because if Magomedov has fixed all of his cardio and pacing problems, he could very well be a dangerous man.
Prediction: Magomedov via KO R2 (1/3)
Women’s Bantamweight
Tamires Vidal (+300) (7-2-0, NS) v Melissa Gatto (-410) (8-2-2, 2 FLS)
Striking: Vidal has a bit of a power and explosiveness advantage here, especially very early on, but Gatto is a bit more well versed and a bit more cleaner when it comes to striking.
Wrestling/Grappling: This is a clear advantage to Gatto, she is very, very good on the ground and if she can completely lock down the movement of Vidal, it could be a long, drawn out fight but ultimately a victory for Gatto.
Cardio: it’s been quite a while since we’ve seen Gatto fight, but we do know that she’s been in decision bouts before, so her cardio isn’t exactly a big issue, whereas Vidal has that style where she needs to get a quick finish or she is going to slow down substantially. Gatto should have the slightly better cardio here, but that time away could prove otherwise.
Prediction: Gatto via UD (1/3)
Light Heavyweight
Oumar Sy (D) (9-0-0, 9 FWS) v Tuco Tokkos (D) (10-3-0, 3 FWS)
Striking: I frankly have no clue who the better striker is here, Sy has a longer reach and that could assist in his striking, but it’s a double debut, I won’t actually know until the fight happens.
Wrestling/Grappling: What I am confident in when it comes to wrestling is the fact that Sy is going to look for takedowns, that’s his bread and butter, he loves getting those takedowns, locking in a body lock or a getting his hooks in, and raining down blows from above, he is vicious once he is able to maintain a ground and pound position.
Cardio: Tokkos is coming in on short notice, so he probably doesn’t have the gas tank for a full blown fight, so expect him to come out swinging in the first round, but after that, it should mostly be Sy being the fresher fighter, considering he’s done all the cardio and conditioning training.
Prediction: Sy via KO R1 (2/3)
Lightweight
Tom Nolan (-450) (6-1-0, NS) v Victor Martinez (+340) (13-5-0, NS)
Striking: The main attraction for Nolan is his striking, he is a dangerous boxer who has a sneaky strong left hand, and Martinez tends to leave that side exposed when he retreats or circles away, which makes Nolan and his reach advantage a bit of a dangerous combination. Martinez is great on the feet too, but he’s been hurt before and is a bit susceptible to follow up shots, something Nolan does well also.
Wrestling/Grappling: I think Nolan is well rounded enough to have the edge in wrestling here, but I only say that before I haven’t seen Martinez grapple yet… so Nolan probably has the advantage here.
Cardio: Tough one to tell… I’m gonna keep it safe and say its possible even, but since both fighters are finishers, I don’t know if it matters too much.
Prediction: Nolan via KO R1 (2/3)
Main Card
Women’s Strawweight
Angela Hill (#12) (-160) (16-13-0, NS) v Luana Pinheiro (#13) (+130) (11-2-0, NS)
Striking: Hill is overall the better and more competent striker, as well as the more pace effective one, whereas Pinheiro is only known for that R1 KO power kind of striking style, so I do think Hill has the advantage here, plus, her Muay Thai is fun to watch so keep an eye on those fun clinch strikes!
Wrestling/Grappling: This is Pinheiro’s only way to win, she’s a very good grappler with awesome throws in her arsenal, but we have been seeing Hill do well at avoiding a lot of the throws that her opponents attempt, her whizzer is fairly good and her instincts to get back to the feet are great. Advantage still falls to Pinheiro here, but Hill shouldn’t be underestimated with her grappling and wrestling.
Cardio: Given that Hill has been in 5 round fights before, and that she rarely fades even after a 3 round war, I think she has the better cardio here, and I mean, we just saw Pinheiro absolutely gas out when she fought Ribas, so there’s that.
Prediction: Hill via UD (1/3)
Bantamweight
Adrian Yanez (-350) (16-5-0, 2 FLS) v Vinicius Salvador (+275) (14-6-0, 2 FLS)
Striking: Yanez has the cleaner boxing, he is awesome at angling away and firing away outside of his opponents effective cone of attack. He could perhaps be in trouble if he gets too reckless and starts hanging around in the pocket too much, but if he’s sticking and moving, he has the advantage here… so, I suppose the advantage is circumstantial but Yanez should be the more effective striker.
Wrestling/Grappling: I mean, since Yanez doesn’t grapple, I’d be inclined to think that Salvador has the better wrestling here, but it kind of feels like a slightly irrelevant thing to talk about. Both fighters are mostly strikers so… this particular category doesn’t matter that much.
Cardio: Again, a tough one to figure out since both fighters are finishers somewhat. I do think Yanez has the ability to do well in all three rounds, but that’s about it.
Prediction: Yanez via KO R2 (1/3)
Welterweight
Ramiz Brahimaj (+170) (10-4-0, NS) v Themba Gorimbo (-205) (12-4-0, 2 FWS)
Striking: This is all Gorimbo here, since Brahimaj both has a massive reach disadvantage, and really is just a good grappler. Gorimbo is also coming off a KO win so that feeling of knocking someone out could be a feeling he might chase this weekend.
Wrestling/Grappling: I’m inclined to say it’s pretty even here, but there is concern on my end surrounding the injury of Brahimaj… is he able to wrestle and grapple as effectively as he could prior to the spinal injury? That will most likely be answered this weekend. Gorimbo is a great wrestler though, he’s solid on the ground and could effectively shut down any submission attacks Brahimaj tries to set up.
Cardio: Two years away, nursing an injury like what Brahimaj has been doing could hamper his cardio in some way. That’ll also be answered this weekend so at the moment, I suppose Gorimbo has better cardio, but still i’m not too confident in saying that.
Prediction: Gorimbo via KO R1 (2/3)
Co-Main Event
Welterweight
Khaos Williams (-125) (14-3-0, NS) v Carlston Harris (+105) (19-5-0, 2 FWS)
Striking: This is all Williams, he is an incredibly powerful striker who is so explosive… I do think he has the possibility of properly testing Harris’ chin this weekend, so keep an eye out on KO props for him.
Wrestling/Grappling: On the other end of this fight, you have Harris who has a grappling advantage and honestly needs to use his grappling in this fight or he’s probably going to eat devastating punches.
Cardio: It kind of depends on who executes their gameplan better… If Williams lands heavy punches and wears down Harris, Harris’s cardio could be seriously sapped. Same as if Harris grapples and removes the explosive output of Williams, it would only drain Williams’ cardio.
Prediction: Harris via Sub R2 (1/3)
Main Event
Featherweight
Edson Barboza (#14) (+125) (24-11-0, 2 FWS) v Lerone Murphy (-150) (13-0-1, 5 FWS FWS)
Striking: This is going to be a fantastic striking fight, first and foremost. You have the power and pure kickboxing technique of Barboza versus the brilliant boxing and fluidity of Murphy. I don’t think there’s a major advantage in this fight either way, we don’t quite know where the ceiling is for Murphy, but we do know that Barboza is one of the best strikers in the division.
Wrestling/Grappling: Whilst both fighters are mainly strikers, both fighters are also extremely good on the ground, with perhaps Barboza having a slight edge given his experience in MMA compared to Murphy who has only recently added some strong wrestling into his skill set.
Cardio: I know that age is a factor here, but I believe Barboza going 5 rounds against Yusuff is proof that he has good enough cardio to push a serious and consistent pace into the championship rounds. We don’t know if Murphy can do that just yet, i guess we’ll find out in this phenomenal main event!
Prediction: Barboza via UD (1/3)
Primary Parlay: Ducote/Demopoulos o2.5 or GTD + (optional Gatto/Vidal o2.5 or GTD) + Nolan/Martinez ITD + Hill/Pinheiro o2.5 or GTD + Barboza/Murphy R3 Starts
Locks of the week: Optional Sy + Nolan + Gorimbo
Alt Bets: Alves KO R1, Pinheiro Sub R2 or 3, Williams KO R1, Murphy KO R1 2 or 3 (combo rounds)
And that's it!
Prediction accuracy as of 2024: 64.6%
If you would like to donate and support me, as this is my only income, please do so via Paypal. All write ups are free, donations are insanely optional! https://paypal.me/Slayertip?country.x=AU&locale.x=en_AU
if you wish to keep in contact with me or follow me on twitter, my twitter handle is @Slayer_Tip, and my Discord is Slayertip#7013.
Lets have a fun and friendly discussion down below about this weekends card!
I hope you all have an amazing day, look after yourselves, and enjoy this awesome event!

Hello!
I hope we're all doing well!
We did relatively okay last time, with our secondary parlay landing clean! Everything else kinda fell apart, but I did a bit better than I feared i would have done.
Another rough fight night to predict here! Should be a fun event though.
Onwards to the predictions!
(c) - Champ
D/DWCS - Debut/Dana Whites' Contender Series
FLS - Fight Lose Streak
FWS - Fight Win Streak
NS - No Streak
(#x) - Rank in Division
x/3 - Confidence Levels
lets go!
Prelims
Women’s Strawweight
Emily Ducote (-275) (13-8-0, NS) v Vanessa Demopoulos (+220) (10-5-0, NS) - Oh look, a fight that’s probably going to go to the scorecards. Ducote is coming off a relatively strong win against Yoder, she was very capable of stuffing all of those takedown attempts coming her way and matching the tenacity of Yoder on the feet. Now, I am always a bit iffy when it comes to someone with a record like Ducotes’, but I do believe they (The UFC) didn’t quite build her up properly, giving her opponents like Godinez and Hill very early on in her UFC career. Ducote is a fairly well rounded fighter who does well on her feet, but most importantly, her grappling is relatively good, having been capable of defending the takedowns of Godinez, which isn’t a small feat since Godinez is well known for her wrestling capabilities. That ability to defend takedowns is massively important when dealing with someone like Demopoulos, whose main threat in most of her fights are her takedowns and grappling attacks. Ducote has fairly standard striking attacks for a well rounded MMA fighter, she is very quick on the feet and throws a lot of volume when she attacks, which could prove challenging to Demopoulos as she tries to enter range and initiate a takedown. Now, whilst Ducote has a lot of volume and speed to her strikes, she lacks in the “finishing” area, she doesn’t quite have the tenacity to finish her opponents, there’s no hurry. With that said though, she does have a bit of a familiar pattern of touching up her opponents until that right hand finds its mark, then she adds emphasis on that right-side punch. She has, however, one weird tendency to just stand there, staring, whilst in the pocket, with a rather square stance, and whilst that might help her with the offensive output, she is still standing there with minimal defences. That’s something that has contributed to her losses in the past and something that Demopoulos could possibly use as a way to find an entry for a takedown. Demopoulos is coming off a win against Murata, but it was a fairly unimpressive performance with Demopoulos getting taken down a lot, and although she looked fairly good on the feet with powerful single attacks, I don’t quite know how effective she is going to be against a volume-heavy fighter like Ducote. Demopoulos has a few tendencies as a fighter that are great, she is fairly active in the guard off her back, throwing up submissions very quickly, but the problem with that is nowadays if you can’t lock in a submission, then you are losing the fight, and I think if Demopoulos does pull guard, Ducote should have the ability to control her on the ground and avoid submissions. This is a very, very 50/50 fight in my opinion. Ducote has a slight advantage on the feet due to her speed and volume, but on the ground it’s looking like Demopoulos has the advantages there, as she does have great instinct on when to lock in a submission or shift the hips. The safest bet here is either o2.5 rounds or the fight going the distance, this isn’t a ML bet fight by any means in my opinion. As for my prediction, I am very split but i’m leaning towards Ducote to win this one, but it’s the slightest lean one can imagine.
Ducote via UD - (1/3)
Bantamweight
Alatengheili (+150) (16-9-2, NS) v Kleydson Rodrigues (-185) (8-3-0, NS) - This is a fascinating one. Alatengheili was scheduled to fight a month ago but it was cancelled due to an illness, so I fully expect him to fight again this week. The kinda good news about that is he doesn’t really need to have a big camp since he already had the conditioning and cardio from that other camp preparing for Victor Hugo. Alatengheili is a very aggressive and powerful fighter, everything he throws has so much speed and power behind it, and whilst there might not be a lot of volume behind those punches, he shouldn’t be underestimated on the feet because of his explosiveness. Alatengheili also uses that explosive power to wrestle, and he is fairly good on the ground, able to maintain a strong position at all times and just land heavy ground and pound. Alatengheili is powerful but he doesn’t display that power with reckless abandon, he tends to be a bit of a counter puncher, his hands are often low or loose, which lures his opponent in to strike, in which he then propels himself forward with a quick flurry of dangerous punches, then there’s a reset and he waits to lure his opponent in again. That’s his typical gameplan and it works a lot of the time, but I do think he might get exposed by one thing that Rodrigues could do, and that’s chop at the legs to remove or mitigate that explosiveness that Alatengheili relies on. Rodrigues on the other hand has not had as much experience nor octagon time that Alatengheili has had, but his style seems to be a bit of a challenge for Alatengheili, at least from what I can see. Rodrigues is very well rounded, he is very quick on the feet, but most of all, he doesn’t do anything too crazy to be lured into a potential counter-flurry by Alatengheili. Rodrigues loves to kick at range, he is so dynamic and can switch up the angles of the attacks so quickly that he could possibly just keep kicking Alatengheili until the fight is over, as long as he keeps a safe distance from a retaliatory attack. He is very quick at throwing out those kicks and I do think if he attacks the legs early enough he is going to be effective, as Gutierrez was when he fought Alatengheili. Alatengheili is going to have to mix it up in this fight to get ahead, he is going to have to rely heavily on his wrestling in order to get a win here, because we have seen that Rodrigues is mostly a kickboxestriker, and if Alatengheili can push a nasty pace and pressure (something he only does if he is successful with his counters or see’s his opponent is hurt), that completely removes Rodrigues’ ability to kick. However, the biggest danger with any sort of aggressive forward movement from Alatengheili is the ridiculous hand speed of Rodrigues, his boxing speed is ferocious and he doesn’t necessarily overthrow, everything is clean and tight, and given how open the defences are with Alatengheili, I do think a check left hook or an uppercut is going to be a highly effective tool that Rodrigues is going to utilise, especially if Alatengheili is going to look for takedowns. The focus and timing of Rodrigues is something that I really like also, he is so calm but intense in the cage, he sees a lot of his opponents attacks coming, and since Alatengheili’s actions are huge and relatively easy to read (as there is quite a wind up for it) Rodrigues should be able to avoid it or counter effectively. One major thing I want to point out here that makes me lean on Rodrigues even moreso is the striking inaccuracy of Alatengheili, he is a powerful fighter, i cannot state this enough, but it is thanks to that power and his willingness to throw down heavy punches that he often misses. I’m gonna list some stats, so bear with me… These are his striking accuracy stats from a handful of his recent fights, starting from the most recent to ones earlier in his career. Gutierrez with 28% Accuracy, Anheliger with 37%, Lopez with 30% and Kenney with 26%. This is why I emphasized before how important Alatengheili’s wrestling is going to be in this fight, because if you’re going to go up against a very tricky and accurate striker like Rodrigues, you cannot play that accuracy game and risk winging punches against him. With that said though, don’t count of Alatengheili here, his power and explosiveness are always going to be a problem and it should generally be a good idea to sprinkle a little bit of money on him, even moreso that he’s an underdog. My prediction for this fight is a long, drawn out Rodrigues win, but it’s a tough one because we haven’t quite seen that much greatness from Rodrigues.
Rodrigues via UD - (1/3)
Women’s Strawweight
Piera Rodriguez (-175) (9-1-0, NS) v Ariane Carnelossi (+145) (14-3-0, NS) - Normally, a lot of fights interest me, even the ones that don’t interest the vast majority of others… but this one? I have no feelings one way or the other about this one, it seems like a filler fight lol. Rodriguez is a relatively well rounded fighter coming off a tough loss against Gillian Robertson, and I mean, that kind of loss tends to come with the territory of wrestling a well known submission specialist, so I don’t exactly fault Rodriguez for losing in that way. There is very little doubt that Rodriguez is going to have a major advantage in the wrestling department, a lot of her fights involve her taking down her opponent, it's what she does exceptionally well and considering how dreadful Carnelossi’s takedown defence is, it is going to be Piera’s imperative to take down Carnelossi. The problem with Rodriguez is that she's a little bit one dimensional, she doesn’t do too well on the feet and Carnelossi does have very strong strikes, I mean, look at her, she’s absolutely a power puncher. Rodriguez is highly diverse with her striking, both in terms of range and variability of attack, she has excellent fundamentals with the boxing, landing combinations in the pocket and moving away, and one main thing she does extremely well is that jab, its a really long, lunging jab, and the reason why I point that out is because it somewhat masks the takedown, she uses that jab over and over, and because that motion to jab is almost similar to a level change, she doesn’t necessarily feint the jab to get to the level change/takedown position, but her opponents just think another jab is coming. This is going to be a great set up against Carnelossi, attack her with long, prodding jabs, and after a few of those, go for a level change, because its that long lunge that looks like a level change. To put it bluntly, anything to get a level change and a takedown will be highly effective against Carnelossi. Carnelossi is an interesting one to talk about because she had a fun start to her career with an extremely entertaining fight against Liang Na, but if you look closely, she is just a fun fighter, not a great one. Her punching power is probably her biggest asset, because everywhere else she absolutely is not worth talking about, and it’s that punching power that will be evident when she inevitably clips Rodriguez. Carnelossi is one dimensional, but boy is she scrappy and I don’t think Rodriguez can afford to get crazy with her on the feet, because Rodriguez will be hurt by something in the pocket, the smartest thing Rodriguez can ideally do is level change and absolutely remove the power from Carnelossi, and considering that Carnelossi’s power is generated from a very still-standing stance, it wouldn’t take much to take her off her feet. I got Rodriguez winning this one, it should hopefully be a fun fight.
Rodriguez via UD - (1/3)
Middleweight
Abus Magomedov (-250) (25-6-1, 2 FLS) v Warlley Alves (+205) (14-7-0, 3 FLS) - It kind of seems like they are setting Magomedov up for success here. Magomedov may have had a tough last two bouts, but considering the fact that he faced Strickland and Borralho, that’s ridiculous levels of competition for a newcomer. Magomedov had one major issue exposed when he fought Strickland and that was his cardio, everything else he looked absolutely incredible at, he has a lot of power in his hands, he’s long and dynamic with his attacks and he has great wrestling, but it was his cardio that made him fall apart. During his Borralho fight, despite losing that bout, those cardio issues didn’t seem as present, he has seemingly learnt to pace himself and he honestly looks to be a decent up and comer now that he’s facing slightly more adjusted competition instead of straight up killers. Magomedov has a massive, massive reach advantage over Alves, and that’s going to be prevalent when Magomedov lands those beautiful strikes at range. He does use his kicks alot, and alongside said kicks are a lot of knee feints, it's a bit odd to look at, it could just be him getting ready to check leg kicks or to feint a kick, but it's just one of those things that I can’t quite figure out. Anyway, Magomedov’s cardio is going to be in question again today, and whilst I did say that he seems to be mostly fine, or at least a bit better than when he fought Strickland, he still tends to overthrow a lot, there is no pitter patter of punches that you somewhat see, they’re all still big actions and those big actions cost him his cardio early on. The best way to kind of describe Magomedov, at least cardio wise, is a slightly more talented and skillful McKinney. My main concern is how exposed his face is to getting hit, all it would take is for Alves to rush in like a bull and throw some heavy overhand punches, make it very gritty in there and make Magomedov tired. That’s the only way I can kind of see Magomedov struggle a lot. Alves is an exceptionally quick starter, he is an absolute firecracker and if he can catch Magomedov early, that’s going to be absolutely massive given the size difference. Everything Alves throws comes with silly amounts of power, and he isn’t necessarily a headhunter, he chops at the legs and body occasionally, he’s quite diverse and I think those leg kicks are going to be problematic for Magomedov, considering Magomedov needs to push forward in order to get his combinations off. Alves is a tough, tough fighter, and whilst he is coming off a savage knockout by Aliskerov, I do think that Alves is still one dangerous fighter to take on, maybe not as technical as Borralho (to compare to Magomedov’s last opponent), but he is an absolute monster when it comes to aggression and that alone could exhaust Magomedov. However, the reach and movement of Magomedov is going to be a major challenge here. I am not completely counting out Alves here, I think he is being a bit underestimated here, but I just think Magomedov has a lot more tools in his arsenal that is going to be boosted by that reach advantage, and it does seem that Alves is fairly susceptible to down the pipe shots, something that Magomedov does well. Range and distance are going to be the main gameplan for Magomedov and his time I think. I got Magomedov winning this one, but i am not very confident in this one due to the volatility of Alves’ actions. He is a wild and fast starter so I expect that first round to be the most sketchiest.
Magomedov via KO R2 - (1/3)
Women’s Bantamweight
Tamires Vidal (+300) (7-2-0, NS) v Melissa Gatto (-410) (8-2-2, 2 FLS) - This is certainly an interesting one. Vidal is coming off a tough loss against Rendon, and it was a bit of a boring fight in all honesty, with Vidal being somewhat effective on the feet with big and powerful attacks, but ultimately succumbing to the wrestling of Rendon. I don’t see that much changing this time around since Gatto is a great wrestler and Vidal has clearly shown major defensive issues in the wrestling department, so to put it bluntly, it just seems like Vidal has a puncher's chance, and if she does land those punches, I do think the tides can change a little in her favour, but it would only take one takedown for Gatto to be in full control for the rest of that round. Outside of her loss to Rendon, Vidal looked fun against Pascual, then again, a lot of fighters of a reasonably low calibre can look good against Pascual, so I think that was one of those “set up for success” fights. Still, the aggression and threat of a knockdown/out from Vidal will be fairly prevalent during this fight. But that’s about it, shes a powerful striker and quite dynamic, but her takedown defence is going to be a problem. Gatto was scheduled to fight Dudakova a few weeks ago, however that fight fell off, which is probably good for Gatto coz she’s ready for a fight regardless, shes still somewhat fresh off camp and was going to probably employ the same strategy against Vidal that she would have against Dudakova, and that was to wrestle. Gatto’s wrestling has always been a bit of a highlight for her, she’s physically strong and is able to do well in advantageous positions, holding her opponents down and either landing ground and pound or just grinding them out, exhausting them for a large chunk of the round. Gatto is also very dangerous on the feet, she has deceptively quick and powerful punches which she uses to both damage her opponents but also as an opportunity to raise their guard so the level change is more easily accessible. No matter what way you cut this slice of cake, I think Gatto’s wrestling is going to be a major problem for Vidal, and Vidal’s only way to win this fight is to keep it standing and just brawl, make it look gritty in there and potentially freeze up Gatto’s ability to wrestle cleanly. I am leaning on Gatto to win this one, but that unpredictability of Vidal’s aggression is going to be a big factor here. No major bet advice here, it seems like there is a possibility of it going over 2.5 rounds, but that’s about it.
Gatto via UD - (1/3)
Light Heavyweight
Oumar Sy (D) (9-0-0, 9 FWS) v Tuco Tokkos (D) (10-3-0, 3 FWS) - ITS DOUBLE DEBUT TIME!!! These are getting rarer and rarer the more we see fighters from DWCS make their way to the UFC, so this is a fun little occasion. Sy is coming into this fight a little bit more prepared, at least physically and cardio wise, than his replacement opponent in Tokkos. Sy is coming off a string of beautiful fights on various promotions, but most importantly he’s been relatively tested on KSW, which is one of the better promotions to come out of the European world of MMA. Sy is a long and rangey fighter who has dangerous head kicks and dangerous wrestling skills that he uses really well, and whilst he has a massive reach advantage over his opponent, he doesn’t exactly strike in any traditional way, you don’t see him throw a lot of jabs, he mostly uses his reach to lock in takedowns (since it’s easier to lock in takedowns with longer arms), and the moment the fight goes to the ground, expect him to find a position to where he can reign down heavy ground and pound. I would love to see him strike a bit more, but most of his fights are him taking his opponents down and landing ground and pound, and if he does that against a replacement fighter in Tokkos, I expect him to dominate and completely shut down Tokkos since it would take preparation to get out of funky positions that Sy puts his opponents in, and I don’t know if Tokkos has that wrestling background to handle the larger and longer opponent in Sy properly on the ground. Tokkos seemingly came out of nowhere this last week, and that one thing that blasted me in the face was the record of his second most recent opponent, Brian Jackson. Dudes got a 1-7 record and Tokkos torched him (expectedly), that doesn’t bring a lot of confidence to me that a guy like Tokkos, coming from a relatively decent gym in Kill Cliff FC, takes on and fights someone like that. Tokkos is overall a decent fighter with some strong wins under his belt, but the main thing going against him here is preparation time, and whilst he does have a fair bit of experience under his belt, I just don’t think he’s ready for someone like Sy on short notice. Tokkos is a relatively well rounded fighter with great wrestling and decent striking, but i just think all of that is going to be possibly negated by the substantial reach advantage of Sy. This is a double debut though, and whilst I normally steer clear from calling someone new to the UFC a lock, I think the fact that Sy has had a full camp for… three fights (Bellato, Trocolli (both cancelled) and now Tokkos), I think he’s ready for this fight and ready for the UFC. He will be an optional lock, but still a 2/3 confidence pick, if that makes sense.
Sy via KO R1 (2/3)
Lightweight
Tom Nolan (-450) (6-1-0, NS) v Victor Martinez (+340) (13-5-0, NS) - Both fighters made their debut and lost in the same way, in the same round, so let’s call this a second attempt at a debut lol. Nolan made his debut against knockout artist Nikolas Motta, and honestly that is a dangerous fight for anyone to take, but it probably made sense to the matchmakers since both fighters are prolific knockout artists. Nolan does finish his opponents very quickly a lot of the time, and I do think he has a massive advantage on the feet against Martinez since Martinez isn’t exactly a big threat on the feet, and his inactivity over the past few years (or lack of solid activity at least) leaves some questions hanging in the air. Nolan has a reach and height advantage here, but the most prominent advantage will be with his reach where he can string together gorgeous straight combinations to decent effect, and that’s what he’s really known for, he’s got awesome boxing and he is very confident in his punching power. He is also relatively defensively sound for someone with his size because I have pointed out before that a lot of taller and longer fighters don’t shell up a lot or have a lot of defensive layers to their style, but Nolan is overall a fairly solid boxer both on the offence and defence, it’s just a shame he got fed to the wolf when he fought Motta. Nolan made the simple mistake when he fought Motta of being in the pocket without care, and i think those kinds of mistakes are easy enough to fix, and considering Martinez is not the same kind of threat on the feet compared to Motta, I do think that gives Nolan a bit more freedom to string together combinations and overall look great on the feet, as he was meant to be, since his whole career up until that loss to Motta has been him having gorgeous striking. Martinez is coming off a KO loss also, but it was by Jordan Leavitt, and that’s just a painful look on anyone's record to get knocked out by someone who is not known for his striking. Martinez is overall a good striker, he has very fast hands, but I have noticed one thing about him that I can see Nolan landing cleanly. Martinez has the tendency to leave his right hand far from a block position, its more of a parry position, in front of him instead of beside him, and he tends to lower that hand when taking a back step, and I cannot help but see the Southpaw striker in Nolan land that left hand to the chin of Martinez. Now, any sort of exchange between either fighter here is going to be a dangerous one for both parties, but that is where reach comes in, Nolan has a diverse boxing skillset and his long attacks allow him to carry power as much as anyone elses short hooks would. One major thing Martinez is going to have to be careful of is a knee up the middle by Nolan as Nolan’s height is going to allow that knee to come up to target without a major loss to momentum, and I mean, if Martinez got dropped by Rosales on DWCS, then by Leavitt, I just don’t know if he has the chin to withstand the battering that comes from Nolan. I got Nolan winning this one, but this is going to be a fantastic fight which isn’t likely to go the distance.
Nolan via KO R1 - (2/3)
Main Card
Women’s Strawweight
Angela Hill (#12) (-160) (16-13-0, NS) v Luana Pinheiro (#13) (+130) (11-2-0, NS) - This is a great fight. Hill is coming off a very strong win over Denise Gomes, and it was honestly such a brilliant performance by someone who a lot of people tend to ignore. Hill is an incredibly diverse fighter, she is tenacious on the feet, highly capable of stringing together strong combinations from all ranges, and as she closes the distance, she’s good at tying up her opponent in a clinch and landing awesome knees and elbows. This is all Hill and her cumulative experience in the Octagon against a wide range of different fighters and styles, and it’s clear to me that her preparation for a lot of her fights involve solid planning and back up plans, because whilst her record reflects a rough run through her career, her level of competition is insane. Hill isn’t a finisher though, but she is someone who can keep a ridiculous pace for three rounds, so I do think that she has the capabilities to overwhelm Pinheiro on the feet, especially since we just saw Ribas do the same thing a little over 5 months ago. Hill will have a striking advantage in this fight, she throws a lot of volume at high speed towards her opponent and they do land effectively, and with a slight edge in reach I do see her having a bit more success on the feet here especially since Pinheiro does not have a lot of head movement or striking defence. Pinheiro is a danger to Hill in the grappling department though, especially in those transitions from standing to ground, she utilises hip throws relatively well and could make this fight ugly on the ground, but I don’t think there is a major submission threat here, I think her style is predominantly control and ground and pound, both things that Hill has experience in dealing with, although she still will lose the round if Pinheiro executes her gameplan well. Pinheiro has power in her hands, she could potentially make Hill a little bit frozen and hesitant on the feet once Pinheiro lands that overhand right that Pinheiro loves to throw early, but she doesn’t throw it often enough to lead to a significant finish, she’s a very low volume, high impact striker and that could play in the favour of Hill if Hill’s volume walks Pinheiro back into the cage. Pinheiro could make this fight dangerous for Hill on the ground, but we have seen a few times now that Hill is very good at the basics of takedown defence, underhooks, whizzers (if i spelt that correctly) and quickly getting back to a standing position, she is not complacent on the ground or in that transition to the ground, and I think any sort of failed takedown attempt from Pinheiro is going to fuel Hill a lot more, since Pinheiro only has a few kinds of takedowns. This is a hard on to pick in all seriousness, I might get the prediction wrong, but I have a strong feeling that we are going to see this fight go over 2.5 rounds, or even hit the scorecards. As for the prediction, looking at this fight, I am kind of leaning on Hill here, because Pinheiro’s wins aren’t as significant as Hill’s wins, and i do think Pinheiro fades a little bit as the fight goes on.
Hill via UD - (1/3)
Bantamweight
Adrian Yanez (-350) (16-5-0, 2 FLS) v Vinicius Salvador (+275) (14-6-0, 2 FLS) - I love this fight. Yanez is coming off two painful back to back KO losses, whenever a young fighter comes into the UFC, tears through the division, then hits a losing skid, it’s always a concern to any fan or pundit. However, I do think that leg kick KO is anomalous to the UFC, it rarely happens and I don’t think Salvador is much of a leg kicker anyway so the threat isn’t there. However, I do want to add that the psychological factor of maybe getting leg kicked to oblivion is going to weigh heavy on Yanez’ mind, and I do wonder if Yanez has drilled checking leg kicks before. Now, Yanez is still a dangerous opponent for anyone to take, he still has incredibly technical MMA boxing, and that’s going to be on full display this weekend. Yanez is so fluid and yet tricky on the feet, he’s very good at gauging range and firing away from different angles, as well as timing his shots off his opponents striking attempts, everything involving striking exchanges will most likely be in the favour of Yanez, he thrives in that space and I do believe his experience and his wins prior to those two devastating losses are going to shine this weekend. My only concern about Yanez is his ability to not get carried away and show his chin too much, because whilst Salvador is yet to get a win in the UFC, he still has had some mild striking success against fighters like Altamirano and Vergara, and it wouldn’t take a lot for Salvador to find the chin of Yanez. Salvador is a very funky and unorthodox fighter, and whilst that always brings positive attention to him, I also think that has been a product of failure for him also since the more cleaner fighters outbox him, are generally a lot faster and just find their mark a bit quicker, if that makes sense? I mean, Salvador’s stance is fairly loose, his chin is in the air and his shell is rather loose, and that’s not good news, especially if he’s facing a vicious fighter like Yanez. Salvador thrives in chaotic fights though, he is awesome and making it dangerous and risky for his opponents to fight in the pocket, but his style emanates a lack of self preservation. He is a kill or be killed kind of fighter in my opinion, and I firmly believe that when he got dropped numerous times in that first round against Victor Altamirano, it only showed us, and any future opponent (via tape watch in prep) that he is very hittable, his head is right there and the only reason it wasn’t there for Vergara was due to the significant difference in height and reach. Salvador moving up to 135 could make him a lot more interesting in terms of being able to explode more often and having more power behind his punches, but I also think it means he is dealing with more harder hitting fighters, and with the accuracy and boxing skill set of Yanez, I just think Salvador is going to get outdone here. I got Yanez winning this one, but I am interested to see if Salvador has what it takes to win and upset a lot of parlays out there.
Yanez via KO R2 - (1/3)
Welterweight
Ramiz Brahimaj (+170) (10-4-0, NS) v Themba Gorimbo (-205) (12-4-0, 2 FWS) - Brahimaj is coming back after two tough years away, and the reason why it’s tough is because he has been dealing with a spinal injury, and boy do i empathise with that. Now, his injury is mostly C-Spine and shoulder area nerve damage, this is terrible for a fighter because it effectively eliminates your ability to comfortably strike, sprawl, wrestle, underhook/overhook stuff, everything that you see in a fighter typically comes from shoulder rotation and all that stuff, so for Brahimaj to be out for two years, dealing with all of that, does not give me a lot of confidence in him being 100% coming into this fight against Gorimbo. Brahimaj is a dangerous grappler who thrives on the ground, he is honestly only dangerous on the ground, but the problem is that Gorimbo is very good on the ground himself, at least good enough to know what is being set up, and it’s on the ground where Brahimaj has his only chance to win. Unfortunately for Brahimaj, it’s going to take some work to get the fight to the ground and Gorimbo is more than willing to keep the fight standing, so honestly, I just don’t think Brahimaj is going to be as well rounded or as effective as he needs to be in order to get a win here. Gorimbo is riding some momentum coming into this fight, as he is coming off a lightning quick KO over Pete Rodriguez, and I mean, Rodriguez sucks, he’s one of the worst fighters in the UFC and that KO means nothing in the grand scheme of things, it’s just an additional win on a record with barely any weight to it. Gorimbo is going to be a lot more confident in his boxing though since that win, that feeling of getting knockouts is an addictive one and I think he’s going to be using his incredible reach advantage to look to get another KO this weekend over the possibly rusty Brahimaj. Gorimbo is a very well rounded fighter who honestly has a lot of potential to be a star, he has excellent boxing, and honestly very good wrestling and grappling, and I do think if the fight does go to the ground, Gorimbo has the fight IQ to notice set ups coming, neutralize them and remain on top in control, landing ground and pound or just advancing to his own submission positions. The most likely scenario though is Gorimbo keeps this fight standing and overwhelms Brahimaj on the feet, because he probably wants to chase another KO since that feeling is notoriously addictive. I got Gorimbo winning this one, I can’t wait to see how far this man goes in his career.
Gorimbo via KO R1 - (2/3)
Co-Main Event
Welterweight
Khaos Williams (-125) (14-3-0, NS) v Carlston Harris (+105) (19-5-0, 2 FWS) - This feels like a classic Striker versus Grappler fight. Williams is a strong, powerful striker who is such a threat on the feet, especially early on when he wants to push a nasty pace and land those devastating punches. He is known for being a bully, crashing forward with crazy power and aggression. There is no clean technique coming from Williams, it is mostly wild, wild punches and he is confident in his ability to knock out his opponent, that’s what makes him a dangerous threat to his opponents, that confidence. The right hand is Williams best weapon, his right overhand or hook is going to be the one that knocks out Harris if it lands, but that’s all he is, a powerful right side puncher, and if Harris times a takedown well, all of that threat is gone. On the flip side, Harris is primarily a grappler with a solid grappling base, and whilst he has faced his fair share of dangerous strikers, I believe Williams’ power is something different. Now, Harris has the potential to take this fight to the ground, I know that according to UFC stats that Harris has an 80% takedown defence, but there has not been enough wrestling in his fights, by his opponents, to fully prove that his takedown defence is that great, it’s only been used sparingly against him since most of his fights are absolute wild exchanges and beautiful displays of violence on the feet. Williams' propensity to head hunt could lead to an opening for a level change by Harris, but it’s a risky thing to do because any punch that lands on Harris is going to hurt him, and considering the age factor here, its possible his chin isn’t going to hold up well against the power of Williams. Now, Harris was getting ragdolls and outwrestled by Wells when they fought, and whilst that isn’t a great look for Harris, I don’t think Williams has the wrestling capabilities that Wells has, so I think the main submission threat from Harris in this fight is going to come from the clinch, so guillotines and front head choke variants are going to be on the menu for Harris this weekend, it’s just a matter of if he gets into that position or if he gets his head blasted over and over by powerful punches from Williams. This is a dangerous fight to bet on if you’re thinking of Moneyline betting, it can easily go either way since both excel in their respective styles, the safest and smartest bet here in my opinion is that this fight doesn’t hit the judges scorecards. As for my prediction, I don’t think i’ll be getting this right due to the volatile nature of this match up, but…
Harris via Sub R2 - (1/3)
Main Event
Featherweight
Edson Barboza (#14) (+125) (24-11-0, 2 FWS) v Lerone Murphy (-150) (13-0-1, 5 FWS FWS) - Man this is a funky main event. Barboza is a legend of the sport, but most importantly, and perhaps most relevant to this write up, he is an old dog who can still hang with the toughest. His last two wins have been against Yusuff and Quarantillo, two very difficult fighters to take on at 145 and it’s his win over Yusuff that I want to highlight… Yusuff exploded in the first round, looked for that finish and Barboza survived and thrived throughout the rest of the fight, it was a beautiful display of heart, toughness, and adaptability, because that was not the first firefight that Barboza has been in, and considering his current opponent, it sure as shit won’t be his last. Barboza is well known for his outstanding kicks, but he’s also just overall a ridiculously dangerous striker. An understated aspect of his whole game though is his wrestling and grappling, he might not be looking for a lot of takedowns when he fights, but he is well versed on the ground, having taken down Yusuff 3 of 4 times in the final round of a high pace main event is testament to his cardio and conditioning, despite the concern surrounding his age. Barboza is going to be a true test on the feet for Murphy, and I think it’s going to be the toughest fight of his career. Murphy is coming off a string of strong victories in the UFC, with his most recent one being against Culibao, and I gotta say, Murphy is one of those dangerous prospects that we all should keep an eye on. Murphy is a rapidly improving fighter who adds weapons to his arsenal every single time he comes out. He was originally a boxer with outstanding punching power and speed, he was ridiculously slick on the feet, but after each fight he adds more kicks, more movement and wrestling, he has slowly become a very well rounded fighter, and this makes his upcoming bout against a very tested veteran who is still here to stay in Barboza incredibly fascinating. There is a slight catch to all of those additional things added into his arsenal though, and that’s each time something has been added, the next opponent has something else to prepare for. I firmly believe that Murphy’s rise to this position and to this fight is not from his outstanding skill level, but from his incredible repertoire of techniques he has acquired and learnt over his UFC career. Unpredictability is king when it comes to new fighters, we have seen new fighters add things to their game that have completely changed and accelerated their growth, and that’s exactly what we have seen for Murphy. Murphy has a wide variety of strong strikes he uses effortlessly, from standard boxing combinations to a very snappy high kick, to strong grappling and control on the ground, he hasn’t mastered any of these things, but since they are added along each and every time he fights, his opponents are rarely prepared. This is not going to be the case for Barboza, Barboza is very, very well rounded and well versed in almost every aspect of MMA. Ill keep this short. I got Barboza winning this one, but I am still going to be a fan of Murphy, regardless of result.
Barboza via UD - (1/3)
Primary Parlay: Ducote/Demopoulos o2.5 or GTD + (optional Gatto/Vidal o2.5 or GTD) + Nolan/Martinez ITD + Hill/Pinheiro o2.5 or GTD + Barboza/Murphy R3 Starts
Locks of the week: Optional Sy + Nolan + Gorimbo
Alt Bets: Alves KO R1, Pinheiro Sub R2 or 3, Williams KO R1, Murphy KO R1 2 or 3 (combo rounds)
And that's it!!!!
Prediction accuracy as of 2024: 64.6%
If you would like to donate and support me, as this is my only income, please do so via Paypal. All write ups are free, donations are insanely optional! https://paypal.me/Slayertip?country.x=AU&locale.x=en_AU
if you wish to keep in contact with me or follow me on twitter, my twitter handle is @Slayer_Tip, and my Discord is Slayertip#7013.
Lets have a fun and friendly discussion down below about this weekends card!
I hope you all have an amazing day, look after yourselves, and enjoy this awesome event!