Welcome back queens from our first ball! You had a tall order this challenge, and several of you did very well. Let’s not delay the results any longer!
Tracy Martel, you are safe
Absynthe, Mistress Anna Conda, Liz Onya, Raven Starfire, B*tch, and Miz Erie, you all represent the tops and bottoms of this challenge. Now, on to the critiques.
Absynthe: Absynthe, I love simple looks when they’re done right, and each and every one of your looks did simplicity right. I especially appreciate that you weaved a theme through all three looks. For your first look, I love that you went with a more recent trend. I can totally see Kim K wearing this in an “unexpected” paparazzi pic. At first, I was skeptical of the skirt, because tighter skirts or pants were more the style, but I actually appreciate that you didn’t directly copy a Kim K look. My only real critique is the shoes. I think the black laces, especially on clear shoes, takes away from the simplicity in the rest of the look and brings down the athleisurewear vibe. I would have preferred a sneaker or basic heel. I also kind of wish you had used a different lip, not only to break up a set, but also because big ass lips were more on trend for this style. Still, I really like this look as a whole. Now, your second look, I really really love. I instantly got this was a 60s look, yet it feels fresh to me. The dress is the perfect silhouette, and the squares you created are so crisp. The largest black square has a little blotch of gray that I immediately noticed, and I wish you had fixed it. But, that’s really the only thing here I can critique. I think my favorite part of this look is the mug, these eyes are just so right for a 60s look. Every choice your made with this second look is great. The third look is really the best in terms of simplicity done right. There’s not much going on, but all the details are so good and beautiful. I love the little belt below the waist, it helps convey the Greek/Roman feel you were going for. With the rest of the editing, there’s some small (small) issues. On the right side of the dress, there’s a gliterry piece sticking out that I think came from merging pieces together. I also feel like the shawl is oversaturated for this look. In a different look, it would be fine, but with the softness of the dress and overall feel of the look, that bright bright red doesn’t quite fit. Don’t think I didn’t notice that all the metals match this time though - I did and I appreciate it. Putting the small editing issues aside, this look is very beautiful and regal. In fact, all three looks are really great and beautiful. Great work Absynthe!
Mistress Anna Conda: Mistress, all three of your looks have a great concept, but fall short in terms of execution. For the first one, before you added a description, I really had no idea what decade or century you were going for. With the description, I kind of see the 2010s, but that should have been conveyed clearer. The wig is the main aspect thats makes this look feel older than the 2010s. And, I don’t love that you lightened it. The original color would have matched the pants, and if you didn’t want them to match, the wig should be a color thats more different than the pants. I appreciate that you recolored the necklaces to match the earrings, but I wish you had done the opposite, because the gold necklaces blend into the top, making it look even messier. The pants totally give 2010s, and the color is really nice. However, they don’t look like jeans, they look like leggings. Adding stitching or denim patterning would’ve made them look more like jeans. Its a nice look, I like the attitude and idea, but the small details are off and it missed the main goal of the challenge. Of your three looks, I think this second look is my least favorite. For one thing, this jumpsuit for a disco look is about the most expected choice ever. The recoloring is really nice, the teal and orange combo is really pretty. But, the balance is off. There is a lottt of teal and not a lot of orange. What’s really brining this look down, though, is the wig. To be frank, it looks like a dead bush with some green spores. If there was a reference, I wish you had provided it because I couldn’t find it online. I see the idea you had, and it could’ve been cute, but the colors really need to be changed. As a whole, I think this look is suffering from a lack of creativity and needs to be amped up. The third look is the best out of the three. Its very cute, and clearly reads as 1890s. She looks like a mix of little bo peep and mary poppins. The combination of pieces is really smooth, and the top and bottom come together to make a nice, cohesive dress. The only editing issue you have is on the top. Where the pink and blue meet, theres a rough, shaky black line. I think you were trying to make them look layers, but it just looks odd, and because of the fold that stretches across the shirt, that prevents the two different colors from looking like layers. Not to beat a dead horse, but another issue with the top is the stark difference in fabrics. The skirt is a very soft, almost matte material while the top is shiny and plasticy. They don’t look like they’d be a part of the same dress, ruining the illusion. The wig, hat, and gloves were a nice touch though and help elevate the look a bit. This look is mostly accurate for the 1980s, but what’s not right for the time period is the waist. The dress you’ve created is very unflattering, in that it completely eliminates your waist. Corsets were still popular in the 1890s, so at the very least, there should be a semblance of an hourglass figure. All three looks are nice, but not particularly stunning, mainly because of the details.
Liz Onya: Liz, each and every one of your looks is so great, and I can clearly tell you put a lot of thought and effort into every one. This first look of yours is so beautiful. I actually had to look up Akaska because I’ve never seen the movie, and all the references are so right. I especially like the headpiece, its very accurate to hers. My favorite part of this look is the smoke at the bottom, it really helps sell the mysterious vampire mystery. However… this is not a 2000s look. It kind of feels like a cope out. While the movie was made in the 2000s, the vampire your imitating is ancient Egyptian, and therefore dressed in a way thats meant to imitate ancient fashion. While others did imitate movie characters, their movie characters were from the 2000s canonically and therefore dressed in 2000s fashion. Vampires definitely were a big part of the 2000s, but if you had done Twilight instead, that would’ve fit the 2000s better because the fashion in that movie was from the 2000s. There’s no issues with your look, its gorgeous, but it does not fit the challenge prompt. Your second look is my favorite of the three, and dare I say, my favorite out of all the 1900s look. I could immediately tell this was from the 1980s, and I think you did the 80s in such a fun, new way. I love art, and I love when its incorporated into to fasion. The recoloring on the dress is just amazing. I love how it looks like its literally made of painted paper, and the shakiness of the lines works really well here because its accurate to the reference you provided. Even though it is very accurate to the reference, you still managed to make it your own by combining two references and through the wig and makeup choices. The body paint is fantastic, and even the white line on the wig looks like paint, a detail I love. The wig helps reinforce that this is an 80s look, and its blocky shape works perfectly with all the shapes throughout the dress. I don’t have a single negative thing to say about this look, incredible work. With your third look, I love love love that you went with a more obscure reference, and gave us a little history lesson. The editing really turns this into a stunning look. It easily could have been too basic if you left the dress as it is in the game, but that pool of blood at the bottom really amps up the horror here. The way you intertwined your fingers into the victims hair is so great and such an important detail. With the head, I do wish that the victims skin tone was different because at first glance it looks like your holding your own head. Using a different body type helped create a difference, but a different skin tone would have really hit it home. As for the victims body, I was really confused on what it was until I zoomed in on my laptop. All the dark blood all over the body makes it blend into the pool of blood, so its not clear that its a body. Less blood or a lighter outfit would have made it clearer. You do get extra credit for creating two 1800s looks, though. As for your head, the blood splatter on the face was such a great detail to add in there, I really love it. I would have liked a different mug, though. She looks almost surprised or sad - like shes not the one who just murdered a woman. A fiercer, meaner mug would’ve been better. The hair is great, it looks like the 1890s, but unkept and messy, adding the story. Overall, this look is so hauntingly beautiful, and tells such a great visual story. You just keep wowing me every challenge, Liz!
Raven Starfire: Raven, out of the three looks, I feel like you put the most thought and attention into the 1800s look, and let the others fall to the wayside. For your 2000s look… I’m really not loving it. You resubmitted it (which is fine) and I wish you hadn’t because I think the first submission was better. The blonde hair does not look good, the color is all wrong, and because it is so long, it completely ruins the rest of the look. The dark brown hair was a lot more complimentary and I felt it was a nice way for you to put your own spin on a Mean Girls look. The mismatched pinks really bother me, the jacket and the skirt aren’t the same shade and you could’ve easily fixed that. I’m not loving the top skirt combo otherwise either, the jacket is athleisurewear while the skirt is preppy. I think there was a lot more you could’ve done to make this look more cohesive and more unique; as-is, it reads as a knock-off mean girl. For the second look, I actually asked my mom if this look was accurate for the 80s (because she grew up then) and she confirmed that this is accurate for a boss bitch from the 80s. The makeup is great, she confirmed there were a lot of pastels in the 80s, and I like the expression the eye and lip combo makes. While all the pieces in the outfit are time-period accurate, I don’t love the look as a whole. Starting with the wig, I, for one, am not a fan of this wig already, but I think there were ways you could have improved it. But since you mentioned the big hair of the 80s, I really wish you had gone with a different wig entirely that was even bigger. I’ve seen my mom’s high school photos, and her hair takes up about 70% of the frame, so I would've loved to have seen you go really big. The same thing goes for the shoulder pads, I barely even noticed this top had them, which I wouldn’t care about if you hadn't mentioned big shoulder pads. The pattern on the top totally gives 80s, but I wish you had used a lower level of it, one that didn’t have the weird harness on it. If you wanted to keep the harness, I think it would've been nicer if it matched the skirt so the skirt color was tied into the shirt somehow. That also would’ve made the harness feel more like an intentional choice. I appreciate that you matched the shoes so exactly to the skirt, buttt I think white would’ve stood out more and tied into the gloves. This look is very accurate for the 80s, but I’m just not in love with it. Now, your 1800s look, I totally am in love with. It totally feels like its from the 1800s while still being unique and creative. The layering on the skirt is absolutely beautiful, I especially really appreciate the lace edges, it helps bring all the layers together into a cohesive look. The ruffles, the gloves, the pleats, its all so beautiful. Something was bothering me about the skirt, and it took me a little while to figure out what, but I realized the waist is not angled correctly. The figures of the queens in the game are angled to the right, so waistlines should be angled that same way. The waistline you created is angled head-on, and since the rest of the queen’s body and dress is not, it looks off. If that detail was fixed, this dress would be perfect. As for the mug, I love these eyes for this look. I’m not in love with the lips, though - the bright coral color doesn’t match the rest of the burnt tones in this look. I think a softer pink or orange lip would’ve worked better. But, these small issues don’t distract from the overall look too much, making for a stunning and beautiful look overall. If the other two looks were as great as the third look, you would be in the top, but the third look isnt enough to save you from the bottom on its own.
Btch: Btch, throughout all your looks, I can tell you really focused on refinement and cohesiveness. The first look is fine. It is not particularly inventive or creative, but it is cohesive. Even the small details go together. I especially appreciate how the zippers on the skirt match the jacket zippers, as do the silver hair accessories. The skirt color perfectly matches the fur on the jacket, which is great. Originally, my biggest issue was that you used the “Legally Drag” top to do an Elle Woods look, but then you deleted that reference pic. In doing so, you also deleted the decade you were referencing, which was in the challenge prompt. I still know you were going for the early 2000s, because I can’t erase my memory and you originally said so, but without the reference, it doesn’t totally give early 2000s. Elle Woods was over the top with how much pink she wore, that’s why she stood out - its not like that was an early 2000s trend. I don’t feel like this outfit is particularly inventive, even without the reference pic. I am grateful, though, that you took my note about using sets and didn’t use the matching hair or skirt for this top. The hair was a nice way to put your own spin on this style, and it gives early 2000s, I just wish you had incorporated your own twist into this look more. I also think the skirt you resubmitted with works a lot better for this look than the original skirt you had. Overall, the look is cohesive and solid, but not particularly creative or unique. This second look of yours is super cute, and I’m glad you took the time to recolor and resubmit it. Changing the green for the red helped simplify and refine the look- its a small change with a big effect. I am a little tired of seeing this top used for 90s looks, but the recoloring and pants help make it feel fresher. The hair is super cute for this look, but its reminds me more of Black Panthers from the 60s/70s than the 90s. It just makes me really want a Black Panter look, and sad that you didn’t give that to me. A beanie or bucket hat would’ve fit the 90s more. The shoes are cute, but they don’t really mesh with the rest of the outfit because there’s not cheetah print anywhere else. I like the little ankle bracelets, and the red cheetah print is cute, but a solid color shoe would’ve worked better. They also could’ve worked if cheetah print was incorporated somewhere else in the outfit. Its a very cute, fun look, but a tad basic. On the flip side, this third look of yours is super fun and unexpected! I adore that you went for a masculine look. I’m not always crazy about masc looks in this game, but when it’s done right, they’re so good. And this is done soooo right. Those rich brown tones look so good, and that mug is so sexy. With your editing, the hat got a little fuzzy. The ribbon around the hat could be clearer; it kind of blends into the hat. Similarly, while I appreciate that you went back to change the colors of the bows on the shoes, since they are so dark now, they just look like a blur from afar. Additionally, I really wish you had edited the hat onto a more masculine wig. The beautiful hair and sparkling earrings ruin the hot man fantasy I desperately want. I know I’ve been harsh on your editing before, and I hope that’s not why you chose not to fully edit this look. I really wouldn’t care that you didn’t fully edit if the hair didn’t pull me out of the fantasy so much. The rest of the outfit is really great and beautiful, the shining light against the dark outfit is just stunning. This look very much feels like the 1800s, but I can’t judge its accuracy to a decade because you didn’t specify a decade, which was in the challenge prompt. The inspo pic you provided shows looks from a lot of different years, and they vary, so I would’ve liked to know which decade you were trying to emulate. Otherwise, I really enjoy this look, it’s a nice twist that I didn’t expect from you!
Miz Erie: Miz, you had some great ideas for this challenge, but the execution of each look fell a little short. Your first look is cute. A bit basic, but cute. The hair i really like, I could very much see someone in an early 2000s movie with this hair. Lots of denim was definitely a trend in the early 2000s, and I’m glad you brought that. What was not a trend in the early 2000s was big top little bottoms. That’s a more recent trend. Even putting that aside, I still don’t love the tiny skirt with the giant jacket. I really want some baggy pants to balance the look more. The recoloring on the skirt is really nice, it matches the jacket without blending in. I also like the recoloring of the shoes, they feel very early 2000s and pull in the pink from the top and thong. The mug is really nice too, these lips are perfect for this look are totally give early 2000s frosted lips. I am assuming you went for an early 2000s look though because you did not specify that, which was in the challenge prompt. For your second look, I’m very happy that you specified that this was showgirl look and not a flapper look, and provided some reference pics. The top, bottom and shoes look good together and definitely give 1920s showgirl. I get what you were trying to do with the headpiece when looking at your reference photos, but I don’t feel like it works. It doesn’t look fun or sparkly like the one in the photo do, and the harsh spikes bring down the playfulness in the rest the outfit. The Eyevie or So Raven wig would have matched the reference pics more and fit the rest of the outfit better. Part of my dislike for the headpiece may be because of the mug. She’s supposed to be a showgirl, but she looks so depressed, its making me sad. I just don’t understand why you went for such a sad face. For the rest of the outfit, while the top and bottom match colors and look good together in that regard, the nakedness of the top against the bottom doesn’t fully work for me. The skirt is a little slutty with the leg sticking out, but its waist is solid. She either needs to be wearing less clothes or more clothes. The shoes work really well, they’re subtle but the gold details are a nice touch. The idea is nice, but these issues bring the whole look down. Your third look is the best, but theres still some issues with it. I love the idea behind your 1850s look, and parts of it are really beautiful, but the execution fell short in a few ways. The combination of the top and dress is really nice, they come together to make a cohesive dress perfectly. There’s a slight editing issue with the wig though. On the left shoulder, one strand of hair is all choppy. The hanging bow ribbons are also choppy around the edges. I like that you changed the earrings on this wig, but they’re not actually connected to the ears. They’re just floating in the wig. The recoloring and editing on the dress is perfect, but I have a few other issues with it. The darkness in the middle looks unflattering, especially when the bust has that same pattern, but lighter. The gradient on the skirt should have been reversed. While the pattern is very pretty, its a lot to have it all over. If the bust was solid, it would make the dress less busy, and make the patterning stand out more. The pattern on the bows especially doesn’t help with the busyness; the pattern is too small on them to really be effective so they just look blurry and weird. Another issue I have with this look is that the wig doesn’t work for this dress. I know the top and wig are part of a set (which I don’t love that you used them together), but the simplicity of the wig and the fact that its hanging down doesn’t work with the fullness of the dress. An updo would’ve worked better, and been more accurate for the time period. The idea was really great, and the execution was almost there, but these issues make the look feel unfinished, and the same goes for the other two looks as well.
Absynthe, your simple looks really wowed me. You are safe. You used the Golden Fig on yourself, but since you are high/safe, it has no effect.
Liz, challenge after challenge, you just keep amazing me. Condragulations, you are the winner of this challenge!
B*tch, you are safe.
Raven, your 1800s look was stunning, but the other two were not. I’m sorry my love but you are up for elimination.
Miz Erie, your ideas were great, but your execution was not. You… are safe.
That means, Mistress Anna Conda, I’m sorry my love but you are up for elimination. Now, it is time for you and Raven to looksync for your life!

This week's comp entry! Her name is Black Venom

Update Tuesday AH:
Slow intermediary ABC waves forming out still. I am still counting my primary as ending around 20-21 for wave 2, though I did FOMO into a few calls this morning as we could have been in a shorter C of C.
​
Either way we are getting close to a proper length for all the 'C' waves and a proper depth for a 2 retrace. It's about time to flip to full bull mode.
​
​
Primary Count - Extended 3rd
Primary Count - non extended 3rd.
Secondary count? Already in wave 3... this one doesn't seem right to me.
​

​
Update Monday AH:
Saw a nice pop today and a further drawdown. This was expected as a smaller ABC corrective wave. My current count is below. I'm expecting a small downside in the morning then rockets resume.
​
Alternate counts could take us a bit lower, but that is boring I won't show those charts. Lower liklihood, but possible 16-18. I'm eyeing a gap fill then return to moon. I'll be selling my puts I purchased around 26 today and buying OTM calls for this and next week. Safe plays are 30s, higher reward are going to be the 40s+.
​
Current ABC finishing.
​
Larger Count
​

What a crazy week SST saw last week. She is showing that the low float can push and pull the price very rapidly in either direction. I hope you all didn't fall too hard into the trap that was set Friday, we saw a rapid increase to +20% and ended the day deep in the red with a full impulsive wave down.
​
I'd love to say I see immediate upside and new ATH in our near future, but I can't say confidently that this is the case. The biggest issue I've had since our +117% run is that the correction never looked complete. That is more true now than ever.
​
I've plotted out what a complete correction for Wave 2 will look like, and an alternate count that could have us trending back up as my secondary count.
​
Of note ALL of these counts are invalide if we break the start of our wave 1 which is at around 14.89.
​
Once we have a fully confirmed wave 2, I'll be able to get the most likely targets for wave 3. I will try to keep this post updated this week as the waves progress.
​
​
Wave 3 Started? Secondary Count
Wave 2 of 3 projections.
Larger Wave 2 Projection. Timelines fit fib, but look odd.
​
My positions & plays:
I'm holding some high strike OTM Calls. They were cheap on Friday and I'm not 1000% confident we won't just rocket up. My gut is correction further before.
​
Watching RSI, volume, and MACD along with my wave projections will help me to identify decent entry points for 40C 2-3 weeks out safely, also I'll play closer dated 25C-35C as I feel we are approaching the end of wave 2.
​
Final thoughts:
Looking in the past at other de-spac squeezes we can get a rough idea of how waves MAY play out. Not a certianty, but an idea.
​
Here is HLBZ which squeezed in a similar fasion a while back. The first big squeeze actually dipped under the 'wave 1' consolodation area, but then a few days later we see these big waves. Expect RAPID moves similar to this when it does go. Lows and consolodation should be entry points for 1-2 weeks out. I'll expand my normal stop loss % for this play as the R:R is pretty insane even if I bleed out 40%.
2020 HLBZ Despac Squeeze.

The fashion industry is extremely complicated. There are not any standard fashion companies. they are available from a good spectrum of enterprises working within the apparel, footwear, home textiles, and accessories markets.The industry is comprised of several sorts of companies like retailers, design source and selling companies, companies with their own manufacturing facilities, and other companies that outsource production but retain control over parts of the assembly process.
​
https://preview.redd.it/k89crqlzorr61.jpg?width=1639&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1b860039a439da6170306b2214e76d560deba972
sky naite travel
Moreover, companies functioning within the haute couture segment often face a special quite pressure as compared to those functioning with commodity fashion goods.Most of those aspects combine to form the style industry one among the foremost complicated industry. Yet, various issues are often noticeably recognized as common across the industry.
.Consumers have the facility
.Supply chains are complicated
.Product launching and delivery takes time
.Companies must have the power to manage a product mix
.Inventory control maintenance is vital
.Impact of the newest technology on the style industry
.Copyright issues for fashion designs
Consumers have more power
Today's buyers have more purchasing power then ever before becouse fasion indusrey hire influencer like sky naite fashion and that they tolerant pressure in today's lifestyles.They are more aware of environmental and human rights issues and have superior quality demands. They demand an enormous variety and more frequent changes within the choices available to them. Moreover, they also expect immediate availability of perfect matching set of clothes and accessories within the ir preferred color and size combinations in the same store.
sky naite fashion
In terms of satisfying the consumer's needs, retailers are the primary in line, but all companies within the supply chain are driven by the prerequisite to anticipate the expectations and requirements of their customers. From design to production and to the ultimate sale, all members of the availability chain got to make sure stores are stocked the right requirements when the buyer must buy!
The companies that are quick to reply to the buyer requirements are people who will remain profitable in an environment of rapid global competition and increasing material and operational costs.
Supply chains are complicated
The fashion industry is distinguished by global supply chains and sophisticated logistics. Labor and transportation costs often determine where production takes place and outsourcing of all or a part of production is common. sky naite fashion Companies throughout the industry need to affect global sourcing problems and wish to regularly evaluate their sourcing strategies.
sky naite maldives
Production work is usually done across multiple places, which may be also located in several countries. fixing of cutting, sewing, subcontracting and transportation, and therefore the synchronization with staple supply, may be a very tedious process.
Product launching and delivery takes time
While working through the various pre production steps, including yarn or fabric selection, garment development, specification and sampling, the industry takes quite while to introduce a replacement product within the market.
sky naite blogger
Both, the complex nature of the availability chain and therefore the global nature of production increase the industry's long lead times. This arrangement of long time-to-market and long lead times doesn't correlate with the necessity to react immediately to changes in customers requirements. sky naite blogger
The ever changing seasonal and trend driven nature of the industry depicts that the merchandise life cycles are too short. Even for cyclic demands where the life cycle may continue further, there are often small changes to style , and color or size combinations could also be changed. The logistics of managing the massive number of designs and maintaining stock keeping units may be a difficult practice.
Companies must manage a product mix
Besides long lead times, fashion producers are stressed to constantly design and develop new product lines to take care of retailers'interest and increase consumer sales. Producers have noted that so as to take care of this speed, raised flexibility and quickness to satisfy changing customer demand, which is quicker than previously, it's very challenging for them to guage or begin with such sorts of products. Gone are the times when an ideal fashion sky naite tulum trend direction decided what consumers wore. at the present , many styles are available, and with rising globalization, consumers can approach fashion news through latest media tools.
Fashion products change frequently, from hosiery and basic underwear through medium-priced main street brands, to exclusive haute couture brands. Managing brand awareness and brand loyalty may be a serious task in retaining the position within the market. Margins in repetitive basic products are low, so neither a retailer nor a manufacturer can ever afford to be out of stock.
sky naite marrakesh
Shifting to the high-end fashion sector, margins increase and sales volumes are lower, but consumers demand an ever-changing range of choices, forcing the businesses to supply multiple collections per annum .
Many companies need to put in efforts to beat the added challenge of arranging a mixture of repetitive lines and collection-driven products, and a requirement to segment their product range and arrange the various segments during a suitable way. From design to demand planning, sourcing, production, distribution and sale, the demand of varied product segments must be separately tackled if companies got to perform well.
sky naite instagram
Companies require clarity about the world of the market they're targeting, and that they need to direct their business therein way.