Join us on Discord!

Rockies (13-28) @ Padres (22-22)

First Pitch: 9:40 PM at Petco Park

Team	Starter	TV	Radio
Rockies	Cal Quantrill (2-3, 3.94 ERA)	COLR	KOA
Padres	Dylan Cease (5-2, 2.19 ERA)	SDPA	KWFN, XEMO (ES)

MLB	Fangraphs	Reddit Stream	IRC Chat
Gameday	Game Graph	Live Comments	Libera: ##baseball

Line Score - Bases empty, 2 Outs, Bottom of the 9th

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	R	H	E	LOB
COL	0	0	0	1	0	4	1	0	0	6	10	0	5
SD	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0		3	11	1	8

Box Score

SD		AB	R	H	RBI	BB	SO	BA
2B	Arraez	5	0	2	1	0	0	.303
RF	Tatis Jr.	3	0	2	0	1	0	.259
1B	Cronenworth	4	0	0	0	0	2	.272
3B	Machado, M	4	0	1	0	0	0	.228
LF	Profar, J	1	1	1	0	3	0	.324
DH	Bogaerts	4	0	1	0	0	1	.213
CF	Merrill	4	1	1	0	0	2	.290
C	Campusano	4	1	2	1	0	0	.275
SS	Kim, H	4	0	1	0	0	1	.208

SD	IP	H	R	ER	BB	SO	P-S	ERA
Cease	5.2	5	3	3	1	8	98-64	2.45
Kolek	1.1	5	3	3	0	1	23-18	4.29
De Los Santos, E	1.1	0	0	0	0	3	19-14	3.24
Peralta, Wa	0.2	0	0	0	0	1	10-6	3.44

COL		AB	R	H	RBI	BB	SO	BA
DH	Blackmon	5	0	0	0	0	1	.238
SS	Tovar	5	2	2	1	0	1	.275
3B	McMahon	3	1	2	1	0	0	.308
C	Díaz, E	1	0	0	0	0	1	.299
C	Stallings	3	0	0	0	0	0	.304
2B	Rodgers	4	1	1	1	0	2	.267
CF	Doyle, B	4	1	1	0	0	2	.282
RF	Cave	4	1	1	1	0	2	.222
1B	Montero, E	3	0	2	1	1	1	.224
LF	Beck	4	0	1	1	0	3	.191

COL	IP	H	R	ER	BB	SO	P-S	ERA
Quantrill	6.0	6	1	1	3	5	91-55	3.66
Vodnik	1.0	4	2	2	0	1	21-15	2.59
Mears	1.0	1	0	0	1	0	18-9	4.86
Kinley	0.2	0	0	0	0	0	14-8	8.62

Scoring Plays

Inning	Event	Score
T4	Ryan McMahon homers (6) on a fly ball to right center field.	0-1
T6	Brendan Rodgers singles on a ground ball to center fielder Jackson Merrill. Ezequiel Tovar scores.	0-2
T6	Jake Cave singles on a ground ball to right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. Brendan Rodgers scores. Brenton Doyle to 3rd. Jake Cave to 2nd.	0-3
T6	Elehuris Montero singles on a soft ground ball to pitcher Stephen Kolek. Brenton Doyle scores. Jake Cave to 3rd.	0-4
T6	Jordan Beck singles on a line drive to right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. Jake Cave scores. Elehuris Montero to 2nd.	0-5
T7	Ezequiel Tovar homers (5) on a fly ball to left field.	0-6
B7	Luis Campusano singles on a ground ball to center fielder Brenton Doyle. Jurickson Profar scores. Jackson Merrill to 3rd.	1-6
B7	Luis Arraez singles on a ground ball to right fielder Jake Cave. Jackson Merrill scores. Luis Campusano to 2nd.	2-6
B7	Jake Cronenworth lines out to right fielder Jake Cave.	3-6

Highlights

Description	Length
Dylan Cease against the Rockies	0:07
Bullpen availability for San Diego, May 14 vs Rockies	0:07
Bullpen availability for Colorado, May 14 vs Padres	0:07
Bench availability for Colorado, May 14 vs Padres	0:07
Fielding alignment for Colorado, May 14 vs Padres	0:11
Ryan McMahon: Home Run Statcast Analysis	0:12
An animated look at Ryan McMahon's home run	0:11
Breaking down Dylan Cease's pitches	0:04
Dylan Cease's outing against the Rockies	0:22
The distance behind Ezequiel Tovar's home run	0:13
Visualizing Ezequiel Tovar's swing using bat tracking technology	0:11
Cal Quantrill's outing against the Padres	0:23
Fernando Tatis Jr. singles in the 1st	0:13
Cal Quantrill escapes the 1st inning jam	0:12
Ryan McMahon's solo home run (6)	0:29
Jake Cave throws out Jurickson Profar at 2nd	0:30
Cal Quantrill strikes out Jackson Merrill	0:08
Brendan Rodgers' RBI single	0:15
Jake Cave's RBI single pads Rockies lead	0:16
Elehuris Montero's RBI single	0:30
Jordan Beck drops in an RBI single	0:14
Dylan Cease strikes out Jordan Beck	0:08
Ezequiel Tovar's solo home run (5)	0:28
Dylan Cease eight strikeout outing	1:34
Luis Campusano's RBI single	0:15
Luis Arraez's RBI single	0:14
Padres score on a wild pitch	0:30
Rockies score four runs in the top of the 6th	1:23
Cal Quantrill's solid outing	0:59

Attendance	Weather	Wind
	62°F, Cloudy	9 mph, L To R

HP	1B	2B	3B
Lance Barrett	Mark Ripperger	Roberto Ortiz	Alfonso Márquez

Updated at 12:18 AM.
Remember to sort by new to keep up!

Rockies (13-28) @ Padres (22-22)

First Pitch: 7:40 PM at Petco Park

Team	Starter	TV	Radio
Rockies	Cal Quantrill (2-3, 3.94 ERA)	COLR	KOA
Padres	Dylan Cease (5-2, 2.19 ERA)	SDPA	KWFN, XEMO (ES)

MLB	Fangraphs	Baseball Savant	Reddit Stream	IRC Chat
Gameday	Game Graph	Strikezone Map	Live Comments	Libera: ##baseball

Line Score - Game Over

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	R	H	E	LOB
COL	0	0	0	1	0	4	1	0	0	6	10	0	5
SD	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	3	11	1	8

Box Score

SD		AB	R	H	RBI	BB	SO	BA
2B	Arraez	5	0	2	1	0	0	.303
RF	Tatis Jr.	4	0	2	0	1	0	.257
1B	Cronenworth	4	0	0	0	0	2	.272
3B	Machado, M	4	0	1	0	0	0	.228
LF	Profar, J	1	1	1	0	3	0	.324
DH	Bogaerts	4	0	1	0	0	1	.213
CF	Merrill	4	1	1	0	0	2	.290
C	Campusano	4	1	2	1	0	0	.275
SS	Kim, H	4	0	1	0	0	1	.208

SD	IP	H	R	ER	BB	SO	P-S	ERA
Cease	5.2	5	3	3	1	8	98-64	2.45
Kolek	1.1	5	3	3	0	1	23-18	4.29
De Los Santos, E	1.1	0	0	0	0	3	19-14	3.24
Peralta, Wa	0.2	0	0	0	0	1	10-6	3.44

COL		AB	R	H	RBI	BB	SO	BA
DH	Blackmon	5	0	0	0	0	1	.238
SS	Tovar	5	2	2	1	0	1	.275
3B	McMahon	3	1	2	1	0	0	.308
C	Díaz, E	1	0	0	0	0	1	.299
C	Stallings	3	0	0	0	0	0	.304
2B	Rodgers	4	1	1	1	0	2	.267
CF	Doyle, B	4	1	1	0	0	2	.282
RF	Cave	4	1	1	1	0	2	.222
1B	Montero, E	3	0	2	1	1	1	.224
LF	Beck	4	0	1	1	0	3	.191

COL	IP	H	R	ER	BB	SO	P-S	ERA
Quantrill	6.0	6	1	1	3	5	91-55	3.66
Vodnik	1.0	4	2	2	0	1	21-15	2.59
Mears	1.0	1	0	0	1	0	18-9	4.86
Kinley	1.0	0	0	0	0	0	15-9	8.44

Scoring Plays

Inning	Event	Score
T4	Ryan McMahon homers (6) on a fly ball to right center field.	0-1
T6	Brendan Rodgers singles on a ground ball to center fielder Jackson Merrill. Ezequiel Tovar scores.	0-2
T6	Jake Cave singles on a ground ball to right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. Brendan Rodgers scores. Brenton Doyle to 3rd. Jake Cave to 2nd.	0-3
T6	Elehuris Montero singles on a soft ground ball to pitcher Stephen Kolek. Brenton Doyle scores. Jake Cave to 3rd.	0-4
T6	Jordan Beck singles on a line drive to right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. Jake Cave scores. Elehuris Montero to 2nd.	0-5
T7	Ezequiel Tovar homers (5) on a fly ball to left field.	0-6
B7	Luis Campusano singles on a ground ball to center fielder Brenton Doyle. Jurickson Profar scores. Jackson Merrill to 3rd.	1-6
B7	Luis Arraez singles on a ground ball to right fielder Jake Cave. Jackson Merrill scores. Luis Campusano to 2nd.	2-6
B7	Jake Cronenworth lines out to right fielder Jake Cave.	3-6

Highlights

Description	Length
Dylan Cease against the Rockies	0:07
Bullpen availability for San Diego, May 14 vs Rockies	0:07
Bullpen availability for Colorado, May 14 vs Padres	0:07
Bench availability for Colorado, May 14 vs Padres	0:07
Fielding alignment for Colorado, May 14 vs Padres	0:11
Ryan McMahon: Home Run Statcast Analysis	0:12
An animated look at Ryan McMahon's home run	0:11
Breaking down Dylan Cease's pitches	0:04
Dylan Cease's outing against the Rockies	0:22
The distance behind Ezequiel Tovar's home run	0:13
Visualizing Ezequiel Tovar's swing using bat tracking technology	0:11
Cal Quantrill's outing against the Padres	0:23
Fernando Tatis Jr. singles in the 1st	0:13
Cal Quantrill escapes the 1st inning jam	0:12
Ryan McMahon's solo home run (6)	0:29
Jake Cave throws out Jurickson Profar at 2nd	0:30
Cal Quantrill strikes out Jackson Merrill	0:08
Brendan Rodgers' RBI single	0:15
Jake Cave's RBI single pads Rockies lead	0:16
Elehuris Montero's RBI single	0:30
Jordan Beck drops in an RBI single	0:14
Dylan Cease strikes out Jordan Beck	0:08
Ezequiel Tovar's solo home run (5)	0:28
Dylan Cease eight strikeout outing	1:34
Luis Campusano's RBI single	0:15
Luis Arraez's RBI single	0:14
Padres score on a wild pitch	0:30
Rockies score four runs in the top of the 6th	1:23
Cal Quantrill's solid outing	0:59

Decisions

Winning Pitcher	Losing Pitcher	Save
Quantrill (3-3, 3.66 ERA)	Cease (5-3, 2.45 ERA)	Kinley (1 SV, 8.44 ERA)

Game ended at 10:21 PM.
Remember to sort by new to keep up!

Colorado Rockies (13-28) @ San Diego Padres (22-22) Tuesday May, 14 6:40 PM

Pick-The-Stick Top 10

Sign up at Pick-The-Stick.com. Be sure to get your picks in before the first pitch.

Rank	User	Points	Total Picks	Position Change
1	Savvmcnasty	139	43	0
2	nickgarver	128	43	0
3	jsparbs	127	43	+4
4	kat	125	43	+5
5	Dagalag	125	39	-2
6	Lingererrrrrrr	124	43	-2
7	Edoz10	123	42	-2
8	enginedown	122	43	-2
9	Swarley	119	43	-1
10	Richrob619	117	44	+2

Team	TV	Radio
COL	Colorado Rockies	KOA 850 AM/94.1 FM
SD	San Diego Padres	KWFN 97.3,XEMO 860 (es)

Starting Pitchers

Team	Pitcher	Record	ERA	IP	H	ER	BB	SO	WHIP
	Cal Quantrill	2-3	3.94	45.2	42	20	17	31	1.29
	Dylan Cease	5-2	2.19	49.1	21	12	16	60	0.75

Starting Lineups - Season Stats

#	Player	Pos.	Avg	AB	H	2B	HR	RBI		#	Player	Pos.	Avg	AB	H	2B	HR	RBI
1	Charlie Blackmon	DH	.248	121	30	7	1	18		1	Luis Arraez	2B	.299	137	41	8	0	5
2	Ezequiel Tovar	SS	.272	162	44	10	4	16		2	Fernando Tatis	RF	.251	171	43	6	8	22
3	Ryan McMahon	3B	.301	153	46	9	5	21		3	Jake Cronenworth	1B	.279	154	43	10	7	27
4	Elias Díaz	C	.301	136	41	8	3	21		4	Manny Machado	3B	.227	154	35	5	5	22
5	Brendan Rodgers	2B	.267	131	35	6	1	8		5	Jurickson Profar	LF	.320	147	47	8	7	29
6	Brenton Doyle	CF	.283	145	41	9	4	12		6	Xander Bogaerts	DH	.212	170	36	6	4	13
7	Jake Cave	RF	.220	41	9	1	0	3		7	Jackson Merrill	CF	.291	134	39	4	3	17
8	Elehuris Montero	1B	.213	122	26	4	2	14		8	Luis Campusano	C	.268	127	34	10	3	23
9	Jordan Beck	LF	.186	43	8	1	0	0		9	Ha-Seong Kim	SS	.207	150	31	4	5	21

Line Score

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	R	H	E
Rockies	0	0	0	1	0	4	1	0	0	6	10	0
Padres	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	3	11	1

Box Score

Rockies Batters	AB	R	H	RBI	BB	K	LOB	AVG	OPS		Padres Batters	AB	R	H	RBI	BB	K	LOB	AVG	OPS
1 Blackmon DH	5	0	0	0	0	1	4	.238	.664		1 Arraez 2B	5	0	2	1	0	0	1	.303	.722
2 Tovar SS	5	2	2	1	0	1	1	.275	.758		2 Tatis Jr. RF	3	0	2	0	1	0	0	.259	.783
3 McMahon 3B	3	1	2	1	0	0	0	.308	.870		3 Cronenworth 1B	4	0	0	0	0	2	5	.272	.824
4 Díaz, E C	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	.299	.765		4 Machado, M 3B	4	0	1	0	0	0	3	.228	.636
Stallings C	3	0	0	0	0	0	2	.304	.867		5 Profar, J LF	1	1	1	0	3	0	0	.324	.936
5 Rodgers 2B	4	1	1	1	0	2	0	.267	.661		6 Bogaerts DH	4	0	1	0	0	1	3	.213	.579
6 Doyle, B CF	4	1	1	0	0	2	0	.282	.785		7 Merrill CF	4	1	1	0	0	2	4	.290	.739
7 Cave RF	4	1	1	1	0	2	0	.222	.583		8 Campusano C	4	1	2	1	0	0	2	.275	.741
8 Montero, E 1B	3	0	2	1	1	1	0	.224	.576		9 Kim, H SS	4	0	1	0	0	1	4	.208	.681
9 Beck LF	4	0	1	1	0	3	2	.191	.404
Totals	36	6	10	6	1	13	10				Totals	33	3	11	2	4	6	22

BATTING		BATTING
2B: Tovar (11, Cease).		TB: Arraez 2; Bogaerts; Campusano 2; Kim, H; Machado, M; Merrill; Profar, J; Tatis Jr. 2.
HR: McMahon (6, 4th inning off Cease, 0 on, 0 out); Tovar (5, 7th inning off Kolek, 0 on, 0 out).		RBI: Arraez (9); Campusano (24).
TB: Beck; Cave; Doyle, B; McMahon 5; Montero, E 2; Rodgers; Tovar 6.		2-out RBI: Arraez.
RBI: Beck (1); Cave (4); McMahon (22); Montero, E (15); Rodgers (9); Tovar (17).		Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Cronenworth 2; Campusano 2; Kim, H; Merrill.
2-out RBI: Rodgers; Beck; Montero, E; Cave.		GIDP: Arraez; Machado, M 2.
Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Blackmon.		Team RISP: 3-for-12.
GIDP: Stallings.		Team LOB: 8.
Team RISP: 4-for-6.
Team LOB: 5.		FIELDING
		E: Campusano (2, catcher interference).
		DP: (Kim, H-Arraez-Cronenworth).
FIELDING
Outfield assists: Cave (Profar, J at 2nd base).
DP: 3 (2 McMahon-Rodgers-Montero, E; Montero, E-Tovar-Rodgers).

Rockies Pitchers	IP	H	R	ER	BB	K	HR	ERA		Padres Pitchers	IP	H	R	ER	BB	K	HR	ERA
Quantrill	6.0	6	1	1	3	5	0	3.66		Cease	5.2	5	3	3	1	8	1	2.45
Vodnik	1.0	4	2	2	0	1	0	2.59		Kolek	1.1	5	3	3	0	1	1	4.29
Mears	1.0	1	0	0	1	0	0	4.86		De Los Santos, E	1.1	0	0	0	0	3	0	3.24
Kinley	0.2	0	0	0	0	0	0	8.62		Peralta, Wa	0.2	0	0	0	0	1	0	3.44
Totals	8.2	11	3	3	4	6	0			Totals	9.0	10	6	6	1	13	2

Scoring Plays

Team	Inning	Play	COL	SD
COL	▲ 4	Ryan McMahon homers (6) on a fly ball to right center field.	1	0
COL	▲ 6	Brendan Rodgers singles on a ground ball to center fielder Jackson Merrill. Ezequiel Tovar scores.	2	0
COL	▲ 6	Jake Cave singles on a ground ball to right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. Brendan Rodgers scores. Brenton Doyle to 3rd. Jake Cave to 2nd.	3	0
COL	▲ 6	Elehuris Montero singles on a soft ground ball to pitcher Stephen Kolek. Brenton Doyle scores. Jake Cave to 3rd.	4	0
COL	▲ 6	Jordan Beck singles on a line drive to right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. Jake Cave scores. Elehuris Montero to 2nd.	5	0
COL	▲ 7	Ezequiel Tovar homers (5) on a fly ball to left field.	6	0
SD	▼ 7	Luis Campusano singles on a ground ball to center fielder Brenton Doyle. Jurickson Profar scores. Jackson Merrill to 3rd.	6	1
SD	▼ 7	Luis Arraez singles on a ground ball to right fielder Jake Cave. Jackson Merrill scores. Luis Campusano to 2nd.	6	2
SD	▼ 7	Jake Cronenworth lines out to right fielder Jake Cave.	6	3

Highlights

Highlight	Duration
Ryan McMahon's solo home run (6)	00:29
Ezequiel Tovar's solo home run (5)	00:28
Dylan Cease eight strikeout outing	01:34
Padres score on a wild pitch	00:30
Rockies score four runs in the top of the 6th	01:23
Cal Quantrill's solid outing	00:59

Round 1, Pick 21 - Chop Robinson, DE, Penn State:
NFL: I see Miami using Robinson as a rotational player early on. An A+ athlete, Robinson is a developmental prospect with first-step quickness and explosiveness but needs more consistency.
CBS Sports: A. I love this pick for Miami. He has the best first step in this draft. With a little coaching, he will become a dominant pass rusher. They can also move him around as a joker on their front. Love it.
ESPN: At some point, the Dolphins may have a lot of money tied up in their outside linebackers room. But until then, this could end up being one of the better pass-rush rotations in the NFL. Robinson recorded fewer than 12 sacks in three collegiate seasons, but his physical traits jump off the tape. He has a powerful first step and will ideally fill the rotational role left by Andrew Van Ginkel's departure. Coach Mike McDaniel loves his pass-rushers and he gets an exciting one in Robinson.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: Wants his face mask to be one solid piece like Master Shredder.
Round 2, Pick 55 - Patrick Paul, OT, Houston:
NFL: With the offensive tackle ranks significantly thinned, the Dolphins jumped in on Paul after going defense in Round 1. He wasn't my favorite OT prospect this year, with Paul giving me some Josh Jones vibes. His mass and reach are impressive, and he has 44 college starts at left tackle. But if Paul is Terron Armstead's eventual replacement, getting a year to develop his craft, this pick might work out.
CBS Sports: C-. Strange fit because this is one of the least mobile blockers in the class. Mike McDaniel typically prioritizes athleticism along his offensive line. Absolutely enormous with supreme length. Hand placement is very inconsistent. Gets outside the shoulder pads. Very experienced. Hits on a need.
ESPN: Offensive tackle is not an immediate need with Terron Armstead and Austin Jackson set to reprise their roles at left and right tackle, respectively. But Armstead is expected to retire after this season, and Miami had no immediate successor on its roster -- until Friday night. Paul has enviable size for the position at 6-foot-7, 330 pounds and made 44 starts for Houston at left tackle. He also registered the longest arm length of any tackle at the combine -- a trait which the Dolphins' staff loves. He's not a finished product but the opportunity to develop behind Armstead for at least a year should prove invaluable for a player the Dolphins couldn't hide their excitement about when speaking to the media after the pick.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: Did not manage to escape being drafted by the Browns. Oof.
Round 4, Pick 120 - Jaylen Wright, RB, Tennessee:
NFL: The Dolphins love speed, and Wright has plenty of it. He might be able to develop into Raheem Mostert's eventual replacement and a good complement to De'Von Achane. Wright has a lot of tread left on his tires but must prove he can exercise better ball security to earn that role.
CBS Sports: B-. More speed to Miami’s offense. Weight ran through some gaping holes at Tennessee but has high-end acceleration once he’s in the open field. Elusiveness is good, not amazing. Slashing style as opposed to jump-cut back. Would’ve liked to see another position addressed here, but Mike McDaniel will be happy.
ESPN: The Dolphins love speed, and Wright ran the 40-yard dash in 4.38 seconds. He also averaged 7.4 yards per carry last season for the Volunteers. He is yet another home-run hitter on an offense that already features De’Von Achane, Tyreek Hill, Jaylen Waddle and Raheem Mostert. Wright also caught 22 passes for 141 yards last season, teasing potential as a pass-catcher at the next level.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: Is excited for the re-release of the 1999 classic, THE MUMMY.
Round 5, Pick 158 - Mohamed Kamara, DE, Colorado State:
NFL: The final player in my last top 100 list, Kamara will have to make it in spite of his poor length, but his hell-on-wheels style and ball-hunting ability make him a fun guy to root for. Watch the Colorado game for a sneak peek of how disruptive he can be.
CBS Sports: B. Smaller EDGE who converts speed to power consistently because of low center of gravity. Burst is there as is his dip/bend around the corner. Nice collection of pass-rush moves. Gets overwhelmed a lot because of his lack of size and length. Turns 25 in his rookie season.
ESPN: Kamara was highly productive in college with 29.5 career sacks, including 13 in his final season at Colorado State. He also recorded 45.5 tackles for a loss, proving he can be a disruptive presence in the front seven. The Dolphins needed to rebuild their depth at pass rusher and may have found a steal with Kamara in the fifth round.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: Has a large collection of mini farm animals made of cheese in his dorm.
Round 6, Pick 184 - Malik Washington, WR, Virginia:
NFL: He wasn't going to be for every team because of his smaller frame, but in my opinion, Washington should have been drafted prior to this. His speed makes him a perfect fit in Miami, as Washington could be an ideal fourth or fifth receiver and return threat.
CBS Sports: A+. Electric, short not small wideout who was the heartbeat of the Virginia offense after transferring from Northwestern. Wins underneath with explosion and powerful lower half gives him high-end contact balance. Won’t be huge separator on full route tree. Leaper who can find it in the air. Good, not great speed. Niche type but a lot of fun.
ESPN: Washington led the nation in catches last season with 110, turning them into 1,426 yards and nine touchdowns as the focal point of Virginia's offense. He won't quite play the same role in Miami, but he's a dynamic receiver who could earn reps with a strong summer. The Dolphins' third receiver job is up for the taking.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: He’s convinced he could play in the league today with a leather helmet.
Round 6, Pick 198 - Patrick McMorris, S, California:
NFL: McMorris opened eyes a few years ago with a four-INT season at San Diego State and finished with a solid final year at Cal, but his average traits could always hold him back from starting duty.
CBS Sports: C. Checks size and physicality boxes but doesn’t met normal athleticism or tackling-reliability requirements. Multi-positional usage in college will help him learn the playbook in the NFL. Surprising selection.
ESPN: The Dolphins signed Jordan Poyer this offseason after losing Brandon Jones to free agency, but McMorris adds depth to the position and a potential running mate for Jevon Holland in the future. McMorris recorded 90 tackles in two separate seasons at San Diego and Cal, and is a versatile defensive back who can play multiple positions.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: Shocked at how much it costs to rent a jet ski nowadays.
Round 7, Pick 241 - Tahj Washington, WR, USC:
NFL: Washington's small frame likely took him off some boards, especially after he ran in the 4.5 range in the 40. But his big-play production on offense and special teams value cannot be overlooked. Washington might be the type who finds a way to hang around in the league.
CBS Sports: B+. Another springy slot option for Tua Tagovailoa. Nifty after the catch and plays with fun lateral bounce although he doesn’t appear to be top-level athlete. Can uncover underneath and has solid hands. Tiny frame and little catch radius.
ESPN: The Dolphins doubled up on wide receivers and took Washington, who recorded at least 600 receiving yards in four straight seasons. He has a similar physical build as Dolphins wide receiver Jaylen Waddle at 5-foot-10, 175 pounds, and is a solid route runner. His best bet to make the team is likely by establishing himself of special teams.
NFL Absolutely Not Fake News: Thinks sneaker heads are crazy when you can get shoes at Target for like $15.

Billboard Hot 100 chart

Position	Title	Artist	▲/▼	Last week	Weeks Charting	Peak
1	Not Like Us	Kendrick Lamar	▲+100	[FRESH]	1	1
2	Million Dollar Baby	Tommy Richman	-	2	2	2
3	Euphoria	Kendrick Lamar	▲+8	11	2	3
4	Fortnight	Taylor Swift Featuring Post Malone	▼-3	1	3	1
5	A Bar Song (Tipsy)	Shaboozey	▼-2	3	4	3
6	Like That	Future, Metro Boomin & Kendrick Lamar	▲+2	8	7	1
7	Family Matters	Drake	▲+94	[FRESH]	1	7
8	Espresso	Sabrina Carpenter	▼-4	4	4	4
9	Beautiful Things	Benson Boone	▼-4	5	16	2
10	Lose Control	Teddy Swims	▼-4	6	39	1
11	Too Sweet	Hozier	▼-4	7	7	1
12	Meet The Grahams	Kendrick Lamar	▲+89	[FRESH]	1	12
13	Saturn	SZA	▼-1	12	11	6
14	We Can't Be Friends (Wait For Your Love)	Ariana Grande	▲+5	19	9	1
15	I Can Do It With A Broken Heart	Taylor Swift	▼-6	9	3	3
16	Down Bad	Taylor Swift	▼-6	10	3	2
17	Push Ups	Drake	-	17	3	17
18	Lovin On Me	Jack Harlow	▼-3	15	26	1
19	Stick Season	Noah Kahan	▲+4	23	32	9
20	I Remember Everything	Zach Bryan Featuring Kacey Musgraves	▲+4	24	37	1
21	Get It Sexyy	Sexyy Red	▲+11	32	8	20
22	Feather	Sabrina Carpenter	▲+7	29	23	21
23	I Like The Way You Kiss Me	Artemas	▲+3	26	7	12
24	Cruel Summer	Taylor Swift	▲+4	28	53	1
25	Greedy	Tate McRae	▲+2	27	34	3
26	Who's Afraid Of Little Old Me?	Taylor Swift	▼-13	13	3	9
27	Type Shit	Future, Metro Boomin, Travis Scott & Playboi Carti	▲+4	31	7	2
28	So Long, London	Taylor Swift	▼-14	14	3	5
29	Yeah Glo!	GloRilla	▲+9	38	13	29
30	But Daddy I Love Him	Taylor Swift	▼-12	18	3	7
31	My Boy Only Breaks His Favorite Toys	Taylor Swift	▼-15	16	3	6
32	Agora Hills	Doja Cat	▲+1	33	33	7
33	Florida!!!	Taylor Swift Featuring Florence + The Machine	▼-13	20	3	8
34	Austin	Dasha	▲+9	43	9	28
35	Guilty As Sin?	Taylor Swift	▼-13	22	3	10
36	Texas Hold 'Em	Beyonce	▼-11	25	13	1
37	Miles On It	Marshmello & Kane Brown	▲+64	[FRESH]	1	37
38	The Tortured Poets Department	Taylor Swift	▼-17	21	3	4
39	End Of Beginning	Djo	-	39	12	11
40	Wanna Be	GloRilla & Megan Thee Stallion	▼-6	34	5	11
41	Whatever She Wants	Bryson Tiller	-	41	12	19
42	Cowgirls	Morgan Wallen Featuring ERNEST	▲+59	--	21	40
43	Redrum	21 Savage	▲+3	46	17	5
44	Never Lose Me	Flo Milli	▲+1	45	21	15
45	Where It Ends	Bailey Zimmerman	▲+5	50	19	32
46	Good Luck, Babe!	Chappell Roan	▲+2	48	5	44
47	Act II: Date @ 8	4Batz Featuring Drake	▲+6	53	18	7
48	Gata Only	FloyyMenor X Cris Mj	▼-4	44	8	27
49	Carnival	¥$: Ye & Ty Dolla $ign Featuring Rich The Kid & Playboi Carti	▼-7	42	13	1
50	Illusion	Dua Lipa	▲+22	72	4	43
51	The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived	Taylor Swift	▼-21	30	3	14
52	Slow It Down	Benson Boone	▲+9	61	7	40
53	loml	Taylor Swift	▼-17	36	3	12
54	Fresh Out The Slammer	Taylor Swift	▼-19	35	3	11
55	Made For Me	Muni Long	▼-1	54	17	20
56	The Alchemy	Taylor Swift	▼-19	37	3	13
57	Wild Ones	Jessie Murph & Jelly Roll	-	57	31	35
58	FE!N	Travis Scott Featuring Playboi Carti	▲+2	60	27	5
59	Obsessed	Olivia Rodrigo	▲+8	67	7	14
60	Wildflowers And Wild Horses	Lainey Wilson	▼-5	55	15	48
61	Get In With Me	BossMan DLow	▲+12	73	14	49
62	imgonnagetyouback	Taylor Swift	▼-13	49	3	26
63	I Can Fix Him (No Really I Can)	Taylor Swift	▼-23	40	3	20
64	Bulletproof	Nate Smith	▲+6	70	5	64
65	So High School	Taylor Swift	▼-18	47	3	24
66	Tell Ur Girlfriend	Lay Bankz	▼-8	58	4	58
67	The Black Dog	Taylor Swift	▼-16	51	3	25
68	Back Then Right Now	Tyler Hubbard	▼-3	65	8	62
69	Hell N Back	Bakar Featuring Summer Walker	▼-1	68	5	53
70	Clara Bow	Taylor Swift	▼-18	52	3	21
71	Tucson Too Late	Jordan Davis	▲+20	91	10	71
72	Bandit	Don Toliver	▲+20	92	13	38
73	Mmhmm	BigXthaPlug	▲+6	79	20	63
74	Scared To Start	Michael Marcagi	▲+3	77	12	54
75	Enough (Miami)	Cardi B	▲+6	81	8	9
76	Halfway To Hell	Jelly Roll	▲+7	83	5	76
77	The Prophecy	Taylor Swift	▼-21	56	3	32
78	Cinderella	Future, Metro Boomin & Travis Scott	▼-2	76	7	6
79	Training Season	Dua Lipa	▲+22	--	10	27
80	Wind Up Missin' You	Tucker Wetmore	-	80	6	75
81	How Did It End?	Taylor Swift	▼-19	62	3	35
82	We Ride	Bryan Martin	▲+11	93	5	82
83	Dirt Cheap	Cody Johnson	▲+11	94	3	83
84	Belong Together	Mark Ambor	▲+3	87	2	84
85	Outskirts	Sam Hunt	▲+1	86	9	66
86	Si No Quieres No	Luis R Conriquez x Neton Vega	▲+15	[FRESH]	1	86
87	Tu Name	Fuerza Regida	▼-2	85	12	66
88	thanK you aIMee	Taylor Swift	▼-29	59	3	23
89	The Albatross	Taylor Swift	▼-25	64	3	30
90	23	Chayce Beckham	▼-2	88	19	45
91	Adivino	Myke Towers & Bad Bunny	▼-28	63	2	63
92	Wine Into Whiskey	Tucker Wetmore	▲+4	96	7	77
93	II Most Wanted	Beyonce & Miley Cyrus	▼-4	89	6	6
94	I Hate It Here	Taylor Swift	▼-28	66	3	34
95	Whatsapp (Wassam)	Gunna	▲+6	[FRESH]	1	95
96	Spin You Around (1/24)	Morgan Wallen	▲+2	98	15	24
97	One Of The Girls	The Weeknd, Jennie & Lily Rose Depp	▼-7	90	20	51
98	Let's Go	Key Glock & Young Dolph	▲+2	100	9	59
99	Take Her Home	Kenny Chesney	▲+2	[FRESH]	1	99
100	Chloe Or Sam Or Sophia Or Marcus	Taylor Swift	▼-31	69	3	36

Billboard Global 200 chart (most popular songs globally)

Position	Title	Artist	▲/▼	Last week	Weeks Charting	Peak
1	Not Like Us	Kendrick Lamar	▲+100	[FRESH]	1	1
2	Million Dollar Baby	Tommy Richman	▲+8	10	2	2
3	Espresso	Sabrina Carpenter	▼-1	2	4	2
4	Euphoria	Kendrick Lamar	▲+14	18	2	4
5	A Bar Song (Tipsy)	Shaboozey	▲+1	6	4	5
6	Fortnight	Taylor Swift Featuring Post Malone	▼-5	1	3	1
7	Beautiful Things	Benson Boone	▼-3	4	16	1
8	I Like The Way You Kiss Me	Artemas	▼-5	3	7	2
9	Too Sweet	Hozier	▼-4	5	7	1
10	Gata Only	FloyyMenor X Cris Mj	▼-3	7	13	4

Billboard 200 chart

Position	Title	Artist	Sales	Change	Last week	Weeks Charting
1	The Tortured Poets Department	Taylor Swift	285,505 (51,028 pure)	-36%	1	3
2	Radical Optimism	Dua Lipa	83,814 (52,788 pure)	--	[FRESH]	1
3	One Thing At A Time	Morgan Wallen	71,563 (1,483 pure)	+7%	2	62
4	We Don't Trust You	Future & Metro Boomin	62,293 (188 pure)	+4%	3	7
5	SEVENTEEN Best Album '17 Is Right Here'	SEVENTEEN	54,465 (50,790 pure)	--	[FRESH]	1
6	Vultures 1	¥$: Ye & Ty Dolla $ign	err	err	52	13
7	Dangerous: The Double Album	Morgan Wallen	42,315 (432 pure)	+7%	6	174
8	Cowboy Carter	Beyonce	42,201 (4,928 pure)	-19%	4	6
9	Stick Season	Noah Kahan	40,675 (3,588 pure)	+1%	5	76
10	SOS	SZA	39,353 (1,948 pure)	+3%	9	74

Frequently Asked Questions:
Q: Why is X artist higher than Y artist on the 200 chart, even though X artist sold less?
A: This is because of a discrepancy between Billboard's ranking and the ranking from the website that the sales data is scraped from
Q: Where do you get the sales data from?
A: https://hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming
Q: What does "err" mean on the 200 chart?
A: If you are seeing "err", that means that the bot I use to gather chart data couldn't identify sales data for a particular album because of a difference in album naming between Billboard and HitsDailyDouble

As the big fan of this kind of series, somehow I'm surprised how they kept almost all the main characters still alive.
Boyd - I don't see himdying, cuz he is the main main character and he shouldn't die in the next season, and cuz there are many mysteries about him (is Abby that he is seeing good or bad, that Martin/dungeon thing, worms are still not fully explained, grandkid, his disease...)
Jim - last Tabitha scene is maybe what is gonna keep him alive. When or if they reunite it's probablt going to be in last one or last two episodes, plus Julia thing
Julia - She actually might die, cuz of that sleeping thing, or she won't die cuz Boyd set her free of the curse. Either Julia, Mari, and that annoying guy dies or neither one of them will.
Annoying bald-drone-stupid guy - he actually might die just cuz he is stupid.
Ethan - I don't think he will die, he is too mysterious , maybe he disappears and reappears, just like Cal Stone from Manifest.
Jade - he is annoying but smart. He might die too but I don't think he will die before figuring out his paradox or chaos or whatever theory he has.
Donna - It's suspicious that we donzt know anything about her, when and how she got here, who is she, what brought her there. And i don't think she wants to figure out way out of there, she just wants to stay alive. The way out of there is not her biggest priority, that js suspicious too.
Kenny - he might be that kind of character that most of us loves, and that's why they will kill him off.
Sara - she could sacrifice herself for something or someone because she almost committed suicide
Ellis and Fatima - they probably still won't die, because the kid is on the way so we are curious about that
Kristi - she is too strong to die unlike Marielle
Tabitha - idk if she is alive or dead rn lol
I probably missed some, and sorry for this long post. Probably has some mistakes and bad theories. Tell me yours.
edit I forgot yo mention Victor - I don't think he will die soon, I wanna see his reaction when and if they find a way out of there.

With the EA Sports College Football 25 cover being released this Thursday, I thought it would be interesting to look back at all covers — and not just the EA covers, but the athletes featured on covers of rival games by Sony, Sega, and other competitors.
Competition is a good thing. Putting these in chronological order takes me back to the era where there were options (I bought my first game in the '90s, and played a lot of 2k2).
If you count the 2 players that are identifiable off of "College Football USA 96" there have been 36 cover athletes across 34 editions of college football games (plus an active coach, mascot, two band members, and an unidentified player)
This post is going to look cleaner in "old" view. You can swap the "www" with "old" in the URL or just click here.

Year	Publisher	Game Title (image)	Cover Athlete (wiki)	Heisman?	Formats	Notes
1993	EA Sports	Bill Walsh College Football	STAN Coach Bill Walsh	N/A	Sega Genesis, SNES, Sega CD	No licenses so generic names/logos
1994	EA Sports	Bill Walsh College Football '95	STAN Coach Bill Walsh	N/A	Sega Genesis	Schools licensed now
1994	Mindscape	NCAA Football	NCAA Logo over generic players	N/A	Sega Genesis, SNES
1994	Sega Sports	College Football's National Championship	ND Notre Dame Stadium	N/A	Sega Genesis
1995	EA Sports	College Football USA 96	KSU¦MICH¦FSU¦WIS¦USC "Generic" photos*	No	Sega Genesis	see below*
1995	Sega Sports	College Football's National Championship II	COL Folsom Field	No	Sega Genesis
1996	EA Sports	College Football USA 97	NEB QB Tommie Frazier	No	Sega Genesis, SNES	1st true cover athlete
1996	Sony	NCAA Football Gamebreaker	OSU RB Eddie George	HEISMAN!	PS1	1st Heisman winner on cover
1997	EA Sports	NCAA Football 98	FLA QB Danny Wuerffel	HEISMAN!	PS1, PC
1997	Sony	NCAA Gamebreaker 98	FSU RB Warrick Dunn	No	PS1
1998	EA Sports	NCAA Football 99	MICH CB Charles Woodson	HEISMAN!	PS1, PC	1st of 2 defensive players ever
1998	Sony	NCAA GameBreaker 99	NEB QB Scott Frost	No	PS1	1st future head coach
1999	EA Sports	NCAA Football 2000	TEX RB Ricky Williams	HEISMAN!	PS1
1999	Sony	NCAA GameBreaker 2000	UCLA QB Cade McNown	No	PS1
2000	EA Sports	NCAA Football 2001	ALA RB Shaun Alexander	No	PS1
2000	Sony	NCAA GameBreaker 2001	WIS RB Ron Dayne	HEISMAN!	PS1, PS2	1st 6th generation console game
2001	EA Sports	NCAA Football 2002	FSU QB Chris Weinke	HEISMAN!	PS2
2001	Sega Sports	NCAA College Football 2K2	PUR QB Drew Brees	No	DC
2002	EA Sports	NCAA Football 2003	ORE QB Joey Harrington	No	PS2, GC, Xbox
2002	Sony	NCAA GameBreaker 2003	MIA RB Clinton Portis	No	PS2	[Sony skipped 2002]
2002	Sega Sports	NCAA College Football 2K3	NEB QB Eric Crouch	HEISMAN!	PS2, GC, Xbox
2003	EA Sports	NCAA Football 2004	USC QB Carson Palmer	HEISMAN!	PS2, GC, Xbox, N-Gage	1st handheld on Nokia's disastrous system
2003	Sony	NCAA GameBreaker 2004	PSU RB Larry Johnson	No	PS2
2004	EA Sports	NCAA Football 2005	PITT WR Larry Fitzgerald	No	PS2, GC, Xbox
2005	EA Sports	NCAA Football 06	MICH WR Desmond Howard		PS2, Xbox	1991's Heisman
2006	EA Sports	NCAA Football 07	USC RB Reggie Bush	HEISMAN!	PS2, Xbox, 360, PSP
2007	EA Sports	NCAA Football 08	BOISE QB Jared Zabransky	No	360, PS3, PS2, Xbox
2007	Aspyr	Black College Football: BCFX: The Xperience	Generic player, cheerleader, drum major	No	PC, 360 (2009)	HBCU teams
2008	EA Sports	NCAA Football 09	CAL WR DeSean Jackson	No	PS2	Multi-cover
2008	EA Sports	NCAA Football 09	BC QB Matt Ryan	No	PS3	Multi-cover
2008	EA Sports	NCAA Football 09	WVU FB Owen Schmitt	No	PSP	Multi-cover
2008	EA Sports	NCAA Football 09	MSU mascot Sparty	No	Wii	Multi-cover
2008	EA Sports	NCAA Football 09	ARK RB Darren McFadden	No	360	Multi-cover
2009	EA Sports	NCAA Football 10	TEX LB Brian Orakpo	No	PS2	Multi-cover; 2 of 2 defenders
2009	EA Sports	NCAA Football 10	UTAH QB Brian Johnson	No	PS3	Multi-cover
2009	EA Sports	NCAA Football 10	USC QB Mark Sanchez	No	PSP	Multi-cover
2009	EA Sports	NCAA Football 10	TTU WR Michael Crabtree	No	360	Multi-cover
2010	EA Sports	NCAA Football 11	FLA QB Tim Tebow	HEISMAN!	PS3, 360, PS2, iOS
2011	EA Sports	NCAA Football 12	ALA RB Mark Ingram II	HEISMAN!	PS3, 360	Fan-vote cover athlete
2012	EA Sports	NCAA Football 13	BAY QB Robert Griffin III & OKST RB Barry Sanders	YES!	PS3, 360	Fan-vote for older athlete
2013	EA Sports	NCAA Football 14	MICH Denard Robinson	No	PS3, 360	Fan-vote cover athlete
2024	EA Sports	EA Sports College Football 25	TBD	TBD	PS5, Xbox Series X/S

*Photos on College Football USA 96 cover are USC Trojan drum major, a Wisconsin band member, unidentified Florida State player (zoomed in on helmet), but also easily identified K-State WR Kevin Lockett & Michigan RB Tim Biakabutuk (both played in '95 season after this came out)

Various developers:

EA Sports's developers:

• High Score Productions (1993: Genesis, Sega CD; 1994-96)
• Visual Concepts (1993: SNES)
• Tiburon Entertainment (1997-98), bought/renamed EA Tiburon (1999-2013), renamed EA Orlando (2024)
• Exient Entertainment (2003: N-Gage)

Sega Sports's developers:

• BlueSky Software (1994-95) [developers of Joe Montana series]
• Visual Concepts & Avalanche Software (2001-02) [NFL 2K & NFL Blitz, respectively]

Sony Computer Entertainment America's developers:

• Sony Interactive Studios America (1996-97), renamed Red Zone Interactive (1998-99), renamed 989 Studios (2000)

Aspyr Media's developer:

• Nerjyzed Entertainment (2007: Windows; 2009: 360)

Further notes:

Bill Walsh was picked because there was an early-theme of having big names on sports video games.

• EA actually started this back when they were the cool, bad boy of games in the 1980s (I'm that old, they packaged their games like records and put photos of their programmers that made them look like musicians on the back) with the pioneering PC game One on One: Dr. J vs. Larry Bird (1983), later updated to Jordan vs. Bird: One on One (1988).
• Nintendo got into it by localizing Punch-Out! as Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!! (1987) for NES. EA brought out John Madden Football (1988) for PC.
• Sega was wild about this when they launched the Genesis with Arnold Palmer Tournament Golf (1989), Tommy Lasorda Baseball (1989), Pat Riley Basketball (1990), Joe Montana Football (1991).
• 1993: Bill Walsh! There even was an EA Coach K college hoops game.

Bill Walsh may have got the cover curse:

• While he had retired from the San Francisco 49ers on top, after winning his 3rd Super Bowl, he had only returned to the Farm for a year when he was picked (he had a good first tenure in the 70s before jumping to the 49ers).
• In 1992 he took the Cardinal to a Blockbuster Bowl win and a #9 rank. Signed this deal for EA.
• After the first game came out he had two bad seasons and re-retired for good.

The progression of teams is fun to see.

• 1993: the top 24 college football teams from 1992 + 24 of the all-time greatest teams since 1978. The teams were unlicensed so they used city and state names, especially where similar to their real names (e.g. Michigan). But you got some fun results like a spirited game of "South Bend, IN" vs "Raleigh, NC"
• 1994: 36 Division I-A teams, but the bowls were still not included: Instead we get Maple Bowl, Palm Bowl, Pecan Bowl, and Redwood Bowl
• 1995: first version to feature all (108 at the time) Division l-A teams, the real bowl games like Orange, Sugar, Fiesta, and Rose. Includes older names but also the Pacific Tigers, which actually dropped football before the game was released.

The rights to the title "NCAA" license wasn't obtained by EA until 1998 (as you can see there was an earlier one-off by Mindscape). Its ability to use the NCAA's brands in the the football game was actually the secondary result of a licensing deal intended primarily for an EA "March Madness" basketball game.
Edit: I created this post after I had fun prepping for an episode on this topic for a podcast, if you like this stuff then this episode might be down your alley.

Commercials
Commercials. Commercials. 2 minute of SAS/Perkins. Commercials. Straight into tip-off. There is a massive difference between TNT and ESPN's half-time show, both in length and quality. The quality of Inside the NBA might be hard to replicate, but at least don't take after ESPN and run constant commercials.
Gambling
Watching the first quarter of game 2 between NYK-IND the other night, Kenny and Charles were promoting gambling in the middle of a game.
They minimized the game and had a small video in the feed of them. They spoke about spreads, something about Brunson scoring over or under 50pts in this game. Go ahead, place that bet guys.
I know it's not the first time they've promoted gambling while the game is going on but it's still shocking. It's one thing to see it on a jersey, on the floor or in a commercial between the games... but seeing it during the game from Kenny and Charles just makes me so sick to my stomach.
NBA player intros
We haven't seen players intro in around 10 years. I'm not sure exactly what year they stopped, but it was around 2014-16 or so. You might think; "Surely they run them during the finals right?" No and they haven't in ages, all in the name of greed.
The youngins' don't know what they're missing. So much hype comes out of those player intros. You get pumped up and they're incredibly important for the fans at home to get into the game. So many fun memories have been created because of the player intros. Jordan and Alan Parsons Project, Heatles and Seven Nation Army, Pistons and The Final Countdown are permanently linked for a lot of people.
97' Bulls intro
2005 Pistons intro
2008 Celtics intro
2013 HEAT intro
NBA your product is slipping and it's all in the name of greed. NBC please right these wrongs.

This post is the first of (at least) 3. I’ve been writing it for a few days now, so it’s pretty long. Some parts are a little repetitive, but this stuff is complicated (for a reason) and I really want people to understand how it works. Clarity is important to me because 1) I want to know when I’m wrong, and 2) obscurity and complexity are pretty much the only things supporting the House of Cards.
Oh and I hate to ask but - even if you just read the TLDR (or can’t read all) but think the post is at least worth looking at, please upvote. I’ve seen the power of the bots and all the words are scary to begin with. Save the award money for more GME 🚀🚀
//

TLDR:

APs, like Citadel, use ETFs to provide liquidity. When there are lots of buyers (GME in January), it’s their job to make sure those buyers have sellers to reduce volatility. Yes, stopping squeezes is a large part of their job. They do this by buying ETF shares and selling the GME inside. BUT the SEC has made a series of exemptions for APs that allows them to sell ETF shares up to 6 days before depositing the securities needed for creation. It’s selling before buying, and not locating shares to borrow. That’s naked shorting, up to 50,000 shares at a time. And the securities needed for deposit within 6 days, the ones naked shorted? They go unreported as part of bona fide market making. That’s where (some of) the shares are. In this post, I go looking for them.
//

ELIA:

ETFs trade on the market like stocks, but they actually represent some proportion of underlying securities. Authorized Participants (APs are big banks and Citadel) trade ETFs in groups of 50,000 shares called “creation baskets” - and these creation baskets can be exchanged with the underlying securities in the ETFs proportions. (lol it’s actually anyproportion, but more on that later)
For an AP: 50,000 shares of ETF = “creation basket” = 50,000 shares of underlying securities.
They’re interchangeable, for a small fee.
This process allows APs to profit from arbitrage: the process of creating or redeeming creation baskets to profit from differences in an ETF’s market price and the Net-Asset-Value (NAV) of the securities underlying it. A presentation given at Wharton (linked below) showed that APs can make higher and more “predictable” returns by exploiting an exemption that allows them to sell ETF shares that they do not own up to 6 days before purchasing the securities needed to create them.
This is effectively short selling via ETF, and they are legally exempt from locating a valid share to borrow. So it’s naked short selling via ETF.
Also, the shares deposited (short, naked, or otherwise) for ETF creation are not recorded on the APs books, so any short interest involved in arbitrage will not show up in FINRA numbers. Per the Securities Act of 1933.
However, as the presentation explains, evidence of this activity would include creation of ETF shares without redemption, particularly in ETFs that are more liquid than their underlying securities. cough, GME, cough
This would result in consistently increased ownership in the ETF, so evidence of this process can be found in ETF ownership anomalies.
I discuss this data and more, which ultimately suggest, in my opinion, overwhelming evidence of heinous levels of naked short selling across multiple securities, systemically linked through these ETFs and hidden by bona fide market making arbitrage provisions. Due to liquidity, or lack thereof, and GME’s 60+ ETFs, it was the perfect target for this activity. This is why GME is the black hole.
Whoopsie
I argue that Citadel and friends tried bankrupting GME with this system by hiding naked shorts and FTDs across these ETFs, hoping to dilute share price all the way to bankruptcy. I discuss mechanism behind this, HFT’s role, how BoA, GS, and JP got involved, how RC pretty much handed Citadel’s balls over to BlackRock, and what all the footprints left behind might reveal about the scope of this whole thing.
Spoiler, they’re fucked^fucked
//

Preface

(( I’m skeptical by nature. Like any tool, skepticism isn’t inherently good or bad - it’s just useful. In some cases more than others. ))
As a disclaimer, not only am I not a financial advisor. 6 months ago I had virtually no financial background whatsoever. The entirety of my relevant knowledge has come from months of independent research and personal interviews. I believe it’s fair to say I have a proficiency for puzzles and a nose for bullshit - and the dynamic between the two has served me well in the past.
I attempt to discuss an incredibly complex system here, the depth of which I’m certainly ignorant to. I decided the “Great Wall of Text” approach just was too much. Plus, I’ve been so close to putting things together for such a long time, I’m eager to have it reviewed. So I’d like present the story as soon as possible it to encourage more apes to dig deeper into this stuff.
I’m sure many of you have years of experience beyond me, but I’ve gone to great lengths in trying to understand the mechanics and regulations at a granular level - as well as their context in the events we’ve hodled through - so I hope you’ll at least give me a chance. I really hope you can correct me where I’m mistaken. I’ll try to answer all questions I can in the comments. I just like to figure stuff out.
It took months of notes and connecting dots to put this together, and I’ll eventually discuss mechanics and examples of arbitrage, creation/redemption, liquidity provisions, ex-clearing, synthetic options positions, gamma-delta hedging, disclosure laws, exemptions, Repos, RRPs, APs/MMs/BDs, FTDs, ETFs, ETNs, and all the regulations supposedly governing this whole fiasco. I try to stick to the official facts and documents, and I hope you glance at the sources I linked.
I’ll try keeping it to 3 chapters, though. This post will be the first - on ETF Arbitrage and it’s importance to GME.

Introduction

The true beginning of this story has been diligently and beautifully covered in the last few weeks by , , Dr. T, Wes Christian, and more. It starts with greedy and malicious short sellers making fortunes at the expense of companies, their employees, and their shareholders. This problem has existed for decades but was able to scale around 1990 - with the emergence of High Frequency Trading (HFT), Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and Options trading. Together, they allowed shares sold short and FTDs to essentially be scattered in various places, as this 2019 video and this 2013 SEC risk alert explain.
I urge you, at some point, to look closely at both of those. Based on everything we’ve seen, I believe they are very pertinent and I’ll be leaning heavily on them to explain my reasoning.
ETFs and options trading allow short positions in many individual securities to aggregate, roll forward, and be dispersed (and hidden) in index funds and derivatives. This is, effectively, refurbishing FTDs to manipulate the supply and drive price down. The potential consequences of this scheme was forewarned in 2006 by Patrick Byrne when his company, Overstock, was victimized by this process. Byrne worked with Wes Christian in 2006 to bring attention to the issue, but traction was soon lost in 2008 when a… more immediate disaster… popped up.
In the 2000’s, High-Frequency-Trading (HFT) began dominating the markets. Citadel, possibly the world’s largest HFT trading firm, AND FRIENDS got involved when realized that “predictable” returns can be made through ETF arbitrage.
Index funds like ETFs hold securities in certain proportions to track some index. To an Authorized Participant (AP) like Citadel, ETF shares are traded in baskets of 50,000, and they’re exchangeable with securities in the proportions of the ETFs holdings. This is called creation (buying shares and creating ETF) and redemption (redeeming ETF for shares inside).
If there are differences in an ETFs trading price and it’s Net-Asset-Value (NAV), even for a fraction of a second, this is a profitable opportunity for an AP. If NAV > ETF price, then the 50,000 underlying securities are worth more individually than as an ETF. APs can buy ETF, redeem ETF shares for its underlying shares, then sell for a profit. If NAV < ETF price, APs can create ETF shares by depositing the underlying securities into the ETF fund, which provides the AP with ETF shares to sell for profit.
APs are also allowed to sell ETF shares up to 6 days before creating them, as explained in the linked video. This is effectively a short position, and *because there is no supply limit for ETFs (and ETF creation/redemption has less regulation than in short selling equities) this can theoretically be repeated and hidden in perpetuity.
And they don’t even need a locate. This is essentially legal naked shorting renamed providing liquidity.
So, for example, if the AP has reason the believe the NAV will decrease within 6 days, they can redeem ETF shares and delay creation, hoping to profit from the decreased NAV. The video calls this “directional short selling” - basically a euphemism for legal naked short selling.
In most cases, this process is effective in reducing volatility by moving the “noise trading” into various ETFs. GME, clearly, is not most cases. I don’t think the system considered what happens when there are more shares owed than should be owned.
But does this really even happen? Or to a significant degree? From the Wharton presentation:
“ Directional short selling is the strongest indicator of both short interest percentage and FTDs in ETFs. “
This was likely practiced in a number of stocks. Or entire ETFs, such as XRT, which the presentation shows as having 77 million 13F (institutional) owners in 2017, despite only 11 million shares outstanding…
I argue that GameStop was the crux of Wall Street’s arrogance. I argue that existing data indicates naked short selling attempts to send GME into a death spiral by rolling at least double the number of outstanding shares in derivative short positions and FTDs, effectively diluting share price by inflating supply.
This would’ve been high-risk/high-reward with GME, because it’s 70 million shares outstanding is so small compared to other targeted companies. Blockbuster had 220 million. AMC has 450 million.
With such limited supply, these “refurbished” (rehypothecated, rolling) FTDs can be more effective in driving price down. However, if the “bankruptcy death spiral” fails, covering years worth of these positions gets very violent.
Why? Well the supply is comparatively low to begin with, and the creation/redemption process during the death spiralactually syphons real shares from GMEs float (I’ll explain how that works below). So the arbitrage process has moved a portion of the (already small) float into ETFs, and each share covered simultaneously increases demand and reduces supply. At some point, GME’s liquidity becomes bone dry because so many of it’s actual shares were converted into ETF shares.
Demand for GME keeps rising, but supply is already zero. Demand drives the price up, lack of liquidity drives the price up, APs scramble to find ETF shares, further increasing demand and decreasing ETF supply. However, this time, providing the GME to cover shorts adds no extra supply, so the price for anything containing GME goes vertical. The whole process starts feeding on itself in reverse, and I argue that this has already begun.

Chapter 1: ETF ARBITRAGE

The Game

Blackrock’s explanation
I’m the context of ETFs, arbitrage is simply profiting from the price difference of a security and an ETF containing that security. ETF shares trade on the market at market price, like an equity stock, but an ETF share actually represents an aggregate total of many stocks in a set proportion. The aggregate value of these equities in that proportion is called the Net-Asset-Value (NAV).
ETF shares don’t always trade at their NAV. When this happens, there is a potential for profit because 50,000 shares of the ETF == 50,000 shares of the underlying securities in price, but Authorized Participants (APs) can exchange them nonetheless for a small fee. APs are usually big Banks and Market Makers (MMs): JP, Goldman, BoA, oh and Citadel.
This “exchange” is done through a process called creation and redemption. APs, exclusively, are allowed to do this, and APs are usually big Banks and Market Makers (MMs): JP, Goldman, BoA, oh and Citadel. For example:
Blackrock’s ETFs (iShares) are generally rebalanced 4 times per year: at the end of February, May, August, and November. So if GameStop goes to $350 in January after being balanced around $16 in November, the list I mentioned above (and more) can buy IWM, IJR, IWN, IJT, and all the other ETFs that GME is a portion of, break them open into their individual shares (this is done in 50,000 share baskets called Creation Units) and sell the GME inside. Because the ETFs proportioned GME at a $16 dollar price, the ETFs trading price didn’t go up as much it would if GME were proportioned in real time. NAV =/= ETF trading price, so while GME is rising, 50,000 ETF shares are cheaper than the 50,000 shares they’re redeemed for, because of the GME inside.
Why are they allowed to do this?? According to the SEC, the answer is… Liquidity Oh, and somehow also efficiency and transparency.
//
Let’s take a step back for a second. So some portion of GME’s 70 million shares are purchased by ETF funds, like BlackRock’s iShares, in order to issue the first ETF shares. Then, APs come in and either 1) put some of those GME shares back or 2) take more out, based on the NAV of the ETF. Now, and this this important, because APs PROFIT from volatility through arbitrage, they have an incentive to favor creation over redemption.
If, as an AP, you buy the shares from the market (or just naked short them), and have them trade as ETF instead, you decrease supply of the security. This increases volatility, which creates more opportunity for arbitrage - i.e. more opportunity for profit. AND if you have more shares for creation/redemption, you have better control over the prices of both the ETF and it’s securities.
Did I mention that Citadel is the world’s largest HFT firm?
Anyway, there is a very strong incentive to take shares from securities and have them trade as ETF instead. And I’d argue that at some point, the “providing liquidity” excuse becomes void, because the AP was the one who diminished the liquidity in the first place.
//
Well what happens when an 7% of an ETF contains shares of a company you intend to bankrupt?
This 2019 Presentation at Wharton, as linked above, briefly talks about XRT. I’ve linked it a few times now, pleasewatch or save that video.
The presenter notes that the example is extreme, and I’d say it’s borderline heinous. The SPDR fund had issued ~11 million shares of XRT in 2017, but the 13F filings added up to 77 million shares. There had been 66 million shares created, but not redeemed. AP’s have the exclusive ability to create shares, and in 2017 the settlement period was 2 days instead of 6…
The presentation also discusses an AP’s exemption allowing them to sell ETF shares up to 6 days before depositing the required securities into the ETF fund to create the basket. The presenter discusses certain cases where ETFs are more liquid than their underlying securities, like GME, and the ETF shares seem to be continually created without ever being redeemed. This led to XRT.
So of those 77 million XRT shares, say 6 % were GME (not sure exactly what it was at the time but it’s 6.75% now). That represents 4.62 million shares of GME trading in XRT baskets. That represents almost 10% of GME’s reported float, from this one ETF alone.
And where are these shares reported, exactly? I’ll let BlackRock tell you:
** “any securities accepted for deposit and any securities used to satisfy redemption requests will be sold in transactions that would be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”).” **
As I’m sure you guessed, they’re off the books.
//
To recap:
When institutional investors and retail investors place bids for ETF shares, APs (banks and citadel) can sell ETF shares that they don’t have to “provide liquidity”. Then, within 6 days, the AP must deposit the sold securities into the ETF Fund.
BUT!
APs can (and have been known to) profit from expected decreases in the NAV of the ETF by waiting up to 6 days to deliver the shares. Until settled, this is a naked short position, and it’s not reported in the short interest. Oh and one more thing,
GME is in over 60 ETFs. Go to “Top ETF” under “Ownership”. 68 listed ETFs right now. An AP can short XRT today, and settle by shorting IWM next week, then GAMR, then XRT again, then IJR…. you get the picture.
//
And it keeps getting worse.
How exactly do you think this creation/redemption process is carried out in, say, Citadel? Is there a creation/redemption department with a few dozen people monitoring all these ETFs, the underlying securities, the NAV, and the incoming orders - looking for price discrepancies? A few hundred people? Just Ken-bo? Is Kenny G the Michael Jordan of arbitrage?
Nope. Citadel is all about HFT. It’s algos.
From Investopedia in 2020 -
“Another way these [HFT] firms make money is by looking for price discrepancies between securities on different exchanges or asset classes. This strategy is called statistical arbitrage, wherein a proprietary trader is on the lookout for temporary inconsistencies in prices across different exchanges. With the help of ultra fast transactions, they capitalize on these minor fluctuations which many don’t even get to notice.”
So, to be clear, Citadel, the world’s largest HFT firm by ~20x the AUM of second place - the very same firm that clears over 50% of RH’s trades and gets almost as much total trading volume as the entire NYSE, does the vast majority of that volume with lines of code, stuffed into thousands of black boxes in some fortress in the middle of nowhere… They buy yachts with this creation/redemption system. Do you think these lines of code secure a locate when they short shares to “provide liquidity”?
(( Side note on another gem from that link:
“HFT firms also make money by indulging in momentum ignition. The firm might aim to cause a spike in the price of a stock by using a series of trades with the motive of attracting other algorithm traders to also trade that stock. The instigator of the whole process knows that after the somewhat “artificially created” rapid price movement, the price reverts to normal and thus the trader profits by taking a position early on and eventually trading out before it fizzles out.”
So yeah, no wonder we’ve had dozens of days with insane swings that ended up within 2 percent of open. Those RH orders pile up on Ken’s computers and he can basically execute them however and whenever he’d like. I digress. ))
//

GameStop

Back to GME in January. Ryan Cohen stepped in and at one point, GME did almost 200 million volume in a day. As buy orders come in, market makers like Citadel had to add liquidity from somewhere. After all, GME’s 70m shares outstanding pales in comparison to most other stocks in XRT, and just in general. AMC has 450m. NOK has 4.7 billion.
So in a perfect world, these HFT algos buy ETF shares from the market, redeem them (often from BlackRock, who owns iShares, or StateStreet who distributes SPDR ETFs), and sell the GME. Remember - the number of ETF shares outstanding can fluctuate, but not GME (without shorts or moves from GameStop), so this would reduce the total number of shares of the ETF and restore the shares of GME that the process had originally depleted.
So unless I’m mistaken here, keeping in mind Citadel itself clears almost the same volume as the entire NYSE - to provide liquidity and decrease volatility as buying pressure go up (aka delay the MOASS), should be buying ETF shares to put the GME back. So ETF ownership should decrease as they’re bought up and broken apart. If the ETF ownership stays the same, the extra liquidity is more likely to be short positions, naked or otherwise (to be covered the next day or who knows when).
Well, somehow, from January 15-March 31, ETF institutional ownership went up.
//

Here they are

I did some math.
I used FINRA numbers and the official ETF issuer’s websites (SEC requires them to provide this) to find 1) total shares outstanding today in May (from issuer), 2) institutional ownership from Jan and March (FINRA), 3) the percent GME (issued), and 4) who bought shares (and who did NOT buy shares).
I looked at about 30 of GME biggest ETFs are picked out the ETFs with the most shares floating around. These account for the majority of total volume. Here are some of the standouts, as of, May 31:
IWM - (0.44% GME) - 300m shares outstanding and 345m institutional ownership.
345m IWM shares represents 1.5m GME shares.
IJR - (1.15% GME) - 629.7m shares outstanding and 444m institutional ownership.
1.15% of 629.7m shares is 7.24 million shares of GME.
FNDX - (1.01% GME) - 128.55m shares outstanding and 100.4m institutional ownership.
Another 1.3 million GME.
last but not least
Wedbush back at it again with GAMR - (1.42% GME) - 70.77m shares outstanding and 190,000 institutional ownership.
Another million.
Honorable mention goes to XRT, with 15 million institutional owners holding a total 1 million GameStop shares, though XRT has only 9m shares outstanding.
Adding up just the ETFs I looked at, there are over 20 million claimed owners GME via ETF
That 20m number doesn’t even include retail ownership in ETF, short interest, “family offices” (like Archegos) that don’t have to report their positions to the SEC, any shares from ivestco ETFs (they have many shares outstanding but no reported GME weight despite owning GME, per fintel), or any trades settled in ex-clearing.
It also excludes short positions extended by options and other derivative instruments, which I’ll talk about in the next post.
This is just the tip of the Glacier.
Even the at 20 million at face value means that, as of May, there is a float sized chunk of GME trading as ETF shares.
I’d estimate, just through the ways around regulation that an ape can find on the internet, the number is at least twice that. Byrne mentioned that it could be closer to 5x the reported numbers.
When Ryan Cohen simultaneously mapped GameStop’s future and gobbled up 9 million shares, I think shorts piled into ETFs, particularly BlackRock’s iShares. They got a glimpse. In light of this, I think it’s very telling that they hodled. Hodled Citadel, by the balls, that is.
Oh, and somehow, almost every ETF I looked at miraculously increased in shares outstanding and institutional ownership 2020-2021, even from Jan to March. Despite the fact that the NAV was consistently higher during those periods…
Among the buyers were Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs…
So who were the sellers?

Lifetime - Staked: 892.4u, Profit/Loss: +12.04u, ROI: 1.35%, Parlay Suggestions: 171-67 Dog of the Week: 13-16
2024 - Staked: 245.3u, Profit/Loss: -21.32u
As always, scroll down for UFC Vegas 92 Breakdowns. The following is just a recap of last event’s results.
~UFC St. Louis (PREVIOUS CARD)~
Staked: 15.75u
Profit/Loss: -15.75u
Parlay Suggestions: 3-3
I’m not really sure how to write a review of a card where you go 0-11 in bets and lose 15.75u. All I know is I’m currently going through an awful year and results have been shocking, and mentally it’s becoming quite taxing. The records are cool and all, but I’m obviously losing money here also and suffering that much of a loss just doesn’t sit well. Mentally I’ve taken a bit of a hit, I can’t lie. Thankfully I’d done most of my research for this upcoming card before UFC STL took place so it shouldn’t cloud my decision making too much. Grateful we’ve got a break week coming up, I need some time to lick my wounds after this one.
I’ll save characters and just direct you to last week’s post if you’d like to see the disasterpiece that was my betting slate for that card.

~UFC Vegas 92~
Bang average card, and even worse from a betting perspective from the looks of these money lines! Honestly I don’t even know why anyone would read this from someone who just took as many consecutive Ls as I just did, but thanks for sticking around if you did. It probably won’t be a massive slate for me here anyway.
(also all breakdowns were written before UFC STL so the self-loathing stops here)

~Edson Barboza v Lerone Murphy~
Full disclosure, all my betting life I have been very keen to fade British fighters, despite being from the UK myself. The talent pool is just objectively smaller, the lack of combat sports in our school curriculum means fighters have less overall experience and years in competition, as well as the media’s and the UFC’s infatuation with hyping up any fighter from this country overall means that fading has been a net positive investment over the years. When it comes to betting lines, the oddsmakers in this country always hang the UK fighters out at slightly shorter prices too, because obviously that’s where the money is almost always going to go. I know I always did that.
Whilst we’re talking about betting, I’ll take the opportunity to get in a quick victory lap about Edson Barboza, who I confidently bet as an underdog to Sodiq Yusuff. The reads I made in for that fight almost looked like I’d seen it before, and it was probably my best bet of 2023 from a pure analytical perspective. Good times.
Edson Barboza has managed to turn incredibly underrated in recent years, mostly due to the fact he’s old and has been mauled a few performances lately. The blueprint to beat him is very clear - you either to go balls to the wall, crowd/pressure him and finish him early, or you cardio-wrestle him for 15/25 minutes.
It sounds quite simple, but both of those lanes require quite specific skillsets. They are obviously skillsets that Khabib, Tony Ferguson, Bryce Mitchell, Kevin Lee and Gaethje possess naturally, which explains 5 of his eight losses in recent years. The losses to Dan Ige and Paul Felder were scored terribly and should have been wins for Edson…and the remaining loss was to Giga Chikadze, which is the only time I think he’s been outclassed in what could be called an “even” fight on paper. Another key thing to note is that Edson is so explosive and dangerous that he has also managed to still score wins against fighters that do fit the stylistic blueprint to be able to make life difficult for him. People like Benny Dariush, Shane Burgos and Billy Quarantillo. But he finished all three of them. Another thing to note is that the calibre of every single name mentioned is very high.
So how does Lerone Murphy measure up against these blueprints? Well right off the bat his record shows he’s capable of a KO win, but it’s not a super reliable method and isn’t particularly process driven (IE it doesn’t come from him smothering his opponent with suffocating pressure early). In fact, his finish of Ricardo Ramos came from some surprisingly effective ground and pound, and the knee against Amirkhani was a fortuitous impact, in a fight where he was expected to find the finish against a guy with the ‘1 round of resilience’ curse.
So how about the wrestling/top control route? Well as previously mentioned Murphy showed some dangerousness in the way he finished Ramos in a grappling position, and his performance against Josh Culibao also shows that it’s his best chance of beating Edson. I have been impressed with his grappling ability in the UFC so far. He’s not a pure takedown artist though, and has averaged just 1.29 takedowns per 15 minutes inside the UFC. In that Culibao fight he was keen to clinch up, but took advantage of Culibao turning his back in the second. The third round was dominant for Murphy in regards to the grappling, but it all stemmed from him landing a body shot that pretty much compromised Culibao and turned him into a ragdoll for more than three minutes in the round. If all you do is look at UFCStats for that fight, then Murphy looks like Khabib…but the tape shows a very different story. He also probably should have gotten the finish there if we’re being critical!
I understand that Lerone Murphy is undefeated (although if you ask me he lost that Tukhugov debut, not that it matters), and has shown good moments from top position, but does doing that against a compromised Josh Culibao and Ricardo Ramos really justify you being the favourite against Edson Barboza? Edson’s fought the cream of the crop in the UFC since day one – his three most underwhelming results were losses to Jamie Varner, Donald Cerrone and Michael Johnson…that’s how ELITE the competition he’s faced has been. And even though he’s a bit long in the tooth he’s showing that he can still hang with guys at this level, like he did with Sodiq. Personally I think Yusuff is a more dangerous fighter for him than Lerone, who doesn’t appear to have that kind of imposing and dangerous striking style.
I think this betting line is putting so much unwarranted faith in Lerone Murphy. Yes, he could turn out to be a great prospect that enters the top 5 of the division one day, but we have not seen him show anywhere near the level of competence to be expected to beat Barboza more times than not. Stylistically, he doesn’t have anything that gives an immediate advantage against Barboza (at least nothing I could trust him to lean on for 25 minutes), the only angle there is age. Yes Barboza is getting a bit old and shopworn, but he’s still beating younger guys consistently. Also, whilst we’re talking about intangibles, Barboza is very experienced in five round fights, and the extra two rounds allow him back into the fight should his weakness towards early pressure show itself.
I’d say Edson should be around -150 here. The line available feels unsubstantiated and purely based on the age dynamic, as I have not seen anything from tape that implies Lerone Murphy is up to the task. He barely got past Gabriel Santos last year.
I had a great time betting Barboza as a dog last time, so I’m doing it again. 1u on Edson Barboza to Win at +125 or better. The line looks to be moving in Lerone’s favour at the moment so I will wait to bet this.
How I line this fight: Edson Barboza -150 (60%), Lerone Murphy +150 (40%)
Bet or pass: 1u Edson Barboza to Win (+XXX)
Prop leans: None

Khaos Williams v Carlston Harris
Pretty awful Co-Main Event. It’s a fun fight but neither man is really considered one-to-watch and they’ve barely fought once each in the last year. You telling me they couldn’t have found a better fight to go on the poster for this one?
Anyway, both men are a little bit wild on the feet, but Harris is clearly the less technical and defensively sound of the two.
Williams kind of forged his path in the UFC with KO victories, but when forced to be technical across 15 minutes he gives a decent enough account of himself (I’ve tried to fade him twice in that type of bout, against Randy Brown and Matt Semelsberger). He’s clearly going to look much better when he can find finishes, but I think I still expect him to be the more eye-catching fighter if this one is a 15 minute kickboxing affair.
But that’s the problem here…Carlston Harris’ grappling game is the strongest skillset that either man possesses, and it’s whether or not he can get it going that will likely determine who wins this one. Unfortunately, we have only seen Williams taken down twice in the UFC, both times by Michel Pereira (who isn’t even much of a wrestlegrappler himself). To make matters worse, they both came in the 14^th and 15^th minutes of the fight and we barely got to see anything, so they really are low quality examples.
I’ve been watching MMA long enough to know that a guy like Khaos Williams probably isn’t a particularly amazing grappler, but of course that’s still a huge assumption to make. With no knowledge of how Khaos is going to fare working off his back, I really do not think this fight is one that you can have any degree of confidence in. The books had initially lined it around a pick’em, which could well imply that they feel the exact same way. It’s unfortunately a pass from me, because a Williams with great TDD and process on bottom could end up being -300…but white belt Williams could look +300.
How I line this fight: Impossible to line with any confidence, so a pick’em is fine.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: None

~Angela Hill v Luana Pinheiro~
After chasing it for quite some time, MMA bettors finally managed to catch the fade on Luana Pinheiro. When she entered the UFC she was discredited for her exclusively R1 finishes, with people predicting her cardio would not be up to scratch. Things got worse when she took the coward’s way to a win against Jessica Penne – seemingly blowing her gas and then milking the extent of the damage done from an illegal strike and winning by KO. As we know from the MMA community, doing stuff like that will make you one of the most hated fighters on the roster. She then moved to 2-0 with a split decision win as a favourite against Michelle Waterson…which many people think she lost. Basically, not a very impressive stint in the UFC so far.
Finally she went up against Amanda Ribas, who went on to expose that dodgy cardio of Pinheiro, melting her in the third round with a beautiful wheel kick when Pinheiro was death gassed. Now we know it’s possible, the third round of Pinheiro’s fight against Waterson-Gomez makes a bit more sense, seeing as Waterson took over and clearly won it.
Nothing kills a hype train quicker than realising that a fighter has bad cardio, and it’s safe to say that whatever hype there was on Luana (minimal) is dead…because she’s a +125 underdog to Angela Hill here.
In my opinion, Angela Hill has been an incredibly underrated fighter for such a long time and absolutely deserves her flowers as one of WMMA’s most respected journeywomen. She’s had 24 UFC fights, and she’s still showing up better than fighters much younger than her and doesn’t appear to even be slowing down.
The blueprint on Hill has been pretty clear for some time – if you want to beat her relatively easily, you take her down. Otherwise, you’re going up against technically impressive striker that has the durability, a sneaky bit of power and seemingly limitless cardio to keep you honest. Really, if you manage to have success against Angela Hill on the feet, the best thing you can really hope for is about 55% of dominance (typically where two judges score one way, and another goes the opposite).
As I often say, statistics for MMA are best used when comparing WMMA strikers, and the figures here are quite eye-opening. Hill’s strike differential is vastly superior, and their defensive rates are very close. In short, if they stay on the feet for 15 minutes I think Hill should be expected to out-volume her opponent. When you factor in Pinheiro’s cardio deficiencies, that’s even more likely.
Therefore, Pinheiro has two routes to success here in my opinion – her typical R1 finish, or by going the grappling route. Firstly, Hill has never been finished via (T)KO in 29 professional fights (most of which have come at a high level), so I think it’s fair to say she deserves trust in being able to stay safe. She’s also quite an intelligent fighter, so I assume she’s going to be aware that her success will come in the latter half of the fight.
In terms of the grappling, Pinheiro landed five takedowns in the opening round against Markos, and that’s what forced her to gas out…so I don’t really think she’s going to be comfortable enough to lean on that skillset for 15 minutes straight. Hill is defensively quite sound on the mat as well, so as long as she can avoid getting stuck in a position I think she’ll be fine.
So in short, the only skillset I think Luana Pinheiro deserves credit for at this level is her R1 explosiveness, and Angela Hill is one of the worst opponents to pit that style against. Hill’s last victory proves that, as she survived the early barrage of another R1 finisher and took over in R2/3. I think the exact same mission statement applies here, and I think Angela Hill should definitely be trusted to do that. I’d personally line Hill somewhere like -175 to -200 here, so the -137 available at the time of writing was an easy bet to make. Let’s go Angie! 2u Angela Hill to Win at -137.
How I line this fight: Angela Hill -188 (65%), Luana Pinheiro +188 (35%)
Bet or pass: 2u Angela Hill to Win (-137), 0.25u Angela Hill to Win by Decision (+125 or better)
Prop leans: Hill couldn’t finish her dinner, so the decision prop will be one to look out for.
Live Betting Leans: If Pinheiro wins R1 and goes a bit crazy in trying to find a finish, betting Hill on the stool before R2 is a good move as the cardio fall-off could be live.

~Adrian Yanez vs Vinicius Salvador~
This feels like a weird mismatch and I don’t know why it’s happening.
Adrian Yanez is a classy and technical striker that I feel has become a bit overrated. The fans love him and put him on a pedestal as some sort of elite fighter’s fighter – I get that he’s fun to watch and a good boxer, but I’d argue he’s had more underwhelming performances than good in the UFC. He got styled on by Font and Martinez, was competitive against Davey Grant and lost more minutes than he won against Randy Costa. There’s not much shame in that and I’m not trying to say Yanez is bad, but I don’t think those performances warrant him being regarded as one of the most popular unranked fighters on the roster.
He faces Vinicius Salvador, who looked like an exciting fighter from his DWCS victory, but there was always a suspicion that he would have very little to offer outside of barn burners and very early KOs. The UFC pissed away the chance for a fan-friendly prelim guy by putting him up against two of the scrappiest and most durable guys at Flyweight – Victor Altamirano and CJ Vergara. The path to victory for both men was very clear there, and they grinded out long-distance victories after Salvador had nothing to offer after five minutes.
The UFC should have instantly viewed Salvador the same as they do Trevor Peek. Someone who is hilariously flawed but scrappy and entertaining to watch nonetheless. His striking style is unorthodox and weird, which looks great when he’s the hammer but awful when he’s the nail. Against a fighter as scrappy and technical sound a boxer as Yanez, this obviously seems like a tall order.
But ironically, whilst this is the toughest opponent Salvador has faced so far in his career, it’s probably his most winnable fight too. Yanez will oblige him in providing a war for the fans, which will give Salvador his chance to land that early KO. Yanez also been pieced up twice in a row so durability could also be a bit more questionable. Yes there is a massive gap in technique and overall skill…but one clean right hand can trump all of that, and Yanez can be hit by one.
Yanez is a -350 favourite here, which is a very easy way to put that final nail in the coffin of considering betting him. Whilst I do think he probably deserves to be close to that number in terms of his overall winning probability, it really won’t take much for the tables to turn massively here, so risking -350 seems like a terrible idea.
A bet on Salvador on the return is too ugly to stomach though, because he could also get absolutely styled on. It’s an easy pass all round.
How I line this fight: Adrian Yanez -250 (71%), Vinicius Salvador +250 (29%)
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: FDGTD very likely but doubt the price is at all playable.

~Oumar Sy v Antonio Trocoli~
We’re all jealous of Antonio Trocoli, AKA Mr Mackenzie Dern. I’ve probably got more to say about her than I do about this fight.
I’m obviously not going to do any tape for this fight, so the only thing of note from their records is that Trocoli has regional loses to Dhiego Lima (pre-UFC) and Jacob ‘Christmas’ Volkmann (post-UFC), both of which are pretty concerning losses. He also popped for steroids on DWCS, so who knows how good he actually is when he’s clean.
Sy is a terrifying specimen of a man, with a 9-0 record by KO/SUB/DEC. I suppose this is a good time to remind you that William Knight also looked like a god.
Why would you bet this fight? Just pass and take the info we get here into their next appearances.
How I line this fight: I’d have more confidence in my ability to hook up with Mackenzie Dern than my ability to accurate cap this fight.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: Over 1.5 Mackenzie Dern sightings (-200)

~Emily Ducote v Vanessa Demopoulos~
Two very middle-of-the-road WMMA fighters that I am quite familiar with.
Demopoulos got to the dance via her grappling and submission ability, but has spent time honing her skills on the feet that she actually seems to have abandoned a grappling based approach entirely, having landed an average of 0.49 takedowns per 15 mins in her UFC/DWCS career so far. On the feet, she’s scrappy and actually does hit kind of hard, but the technique is still very much a work in progress. She makes up for the lack of finesse with pure enthusiasm and grit, and will stay in her opponent’s face and swing until the final bell. She’s also pretty durable too, having never lost by finish in 15 fights with striking that’s that sketchy.
Emily Ducote is kind of the polar opposite. She’s a dedicated striker that has decent enough grappling defence. She has little to no power in her hands, but she’s reliable to rack up decent volume and can keep it up across 15 minutes. She has landed 100+ significant strikes in 3 of her 4 UFC bouts, but she’s also absorbed 100+ in 3 too.
The summary of this one is that Ducote is just the cleaner striker of the two, but I think this -330 price tag is a bit ridiculous. Yes, comparing the stats makes it seem that Ducote will win easily, but Demopoulos has faced quite a few opponents that have wanted to grapple her, and her Strikes landed per minute figures are skewed as a result. Given that Ducote absorbs a similar number to what she lands, I think Demopoulos’ enthusiasm should see her land far more than she has done before. Also, Demopolous’ fight metrics are often inferior to her opponents in all of the fights she loses, so the stats do her a major disservice to how competitive she can be.
I always say that there’s a real ceiling in regards to how much you can favour a striking based WMMA fighter if they have no power or finishing ability. The judges do not score technique, so the 50+ pitter patter punches they land can easily be trumped by any instance where it looks like they get hurt on the return, so in this instance I think Vanessa’s power and forward pressure could be enough to make rounds closer than the odds suggest they should be.
In short, Ducote price is nuts but she should probably win so definitely deserves to be favoured. I wouldn’t bet anything here other than FGTD, which could be a decent parlay piece anywhere less than -400. I’d be interested to see what Ducote by Decision looks like because I do rate Demopolous’ durability and see it going the distance quite frequently…so +100 or better would get my money.
How I line this fight: Emily Ducote -250 (71%), Vanessa Demopoulos +250 (29%)
Bet or pass: 1u Emily Ducote to Win by Decision (+100 or better)
Prop leans: See above

~Ramiz Brahimaj v Themba Gorimbo~
Stylistically this is a very funny fight, because it’s between two guys whose strengths and weaknesses are exactly the same. They’re both aggressive grapplers with average to bad striking, and they’ll hunt for the finish from the opening bell…and fall off a cliff at the halfway point if they can’t find it.
Themba Gorimbo is unfortunately completely unbettable at this stage in his career, I think. He’s obviously got this narrative with The Rock going on, and it’s somehow managed to turn him from a sub-par, barely UFC quality fighter that can’t beat AJ Fletcher, to someone whose fame actually manages to transcend MMA a little bit. Just goes to show how important those post-fight interviews can be! That popularity obviously swells his betting line as he’s likely to garner more money and attention from bettors, whereas Brahimaj is a nobody unless you’re a hardcore with a good memory. Couple that with the fact Themba’s style is not sustainable across 15 minutes, and you’ve got a fighter with a very limited path to victory that you can rely on, who comes with an eye-watering price tag.
Whilst Brahimaj’s betting line would lean towards the value side due to Thema’s popularity, this is the first time we have seen him compete in over two years. He was a fighter that came in during COVID times, and immediately got thrown into the deep end when matchmaking was difficult. I bet Max Griffin against him due to Max’s durability (IE my bet was ‘Max to survive and turn the tables’), and it resulted in Griffin slicing Ramiz’s ear in half with an elbow (one of the more gruesome moments we have ever seen in the cage). Ramiz managed to hit is PTV against Micheal Gillmore (the runt of the litter in a season of TUF who had no right competing in the UFC. The only interesting thing about him was that his parents couldn’t even spell his own name ), as well as Sasha Palatnikov. When facing a veteran grappler like Court McGee, I also won a bet backing the experience and durability of a guy like Court (which is ironic given I’ve bet on Court to be KO’d in his last two).
So basically, my summary here is that Thembo deserves to be favoured simply by being more proven and in the better recent form. He’s got good enough grappling all round to be able to stop Ramiz from being so dominant as a round one buzzsaw, and unless Brahimaj has made some major changes in the two years off, Themba’s probably got the slightly superior cardio (by a bit) and therefore should still be around once his opponent fades.
The -275 betting line is absurd though, as I mentioned earlier, because there’s a likelihood that Themba gasses out himself too, and it could easily be Brahimaj that’s fresher in the latter stages, should we get there. Therefore, it’s a very easy pass. I will take a look at the round props as there could potentially be an angle on some sort of combination, but we will see.
How I line this fight: Themba Gorimbo -200 (67%), Ramiz Brahimaj +200 (33%)
Bet or pass: Fight to End in Rounds 2 or 3 (price dependent), or something like that
Prop leans: See above

~Tom Nolan v Victor Martinez~
I’m bored of saying it, but Jesus Christ the calibre of a ‘UFC Fighter’ is just so low these days. Tom Nolan just got knocked out in 63 seconds as a -350 favourite to Nikolas Motta (shoutout to me for sort of predicting that), and Victor Martinez’s UFC debut saw him get knocked out cold by JORDAN LEAVITT.
So what do you do, bet at -350 on an unproven fighter who shat the bed at the exact same price tag last time? Or trust a guy who got put to sleep by the hands of Jordan Leavitt?
Obviously, you pass. If I see a single parlay screenshot with Nolan in it this weekend I will lose all hope.
How I line this fight: I like my chances of pulling Mackenzie Dern for a second time, more than I like my chances of lining this fight accurately.
Bet or pass: Pass
Prop leans: See above

~Abus Magomedov v Warlley Alves~
Abus Magomedov needs to fire his manager. He started off his UFC career with a highlight reel KO inside 20 seconds, and had the world at his feet. Then he gets a main event spot against Sean Strickland. Fair enough taking an opportunity, but trying to speed run the rankings is a terrible idea when you consider all they want to do these days is play monopoly and generate stars. It’s much better to KO bums in the prelims and get paid a 50k bonus a few times than do what he did against Strickland…because look who he got for his third fight after losing in embarrassing fashion - Caio Borralho, who is lowkey one of the best prospects in the UFC at the moment in my opinion. Abus basically went from prospect to fodder when he lost to Strickland, and I wouldn’t expect him to stick around in the UFC for too much longer if he doesn’t start delivering early KOs again.
He should be able to get the better of Warlley Alves though. Alves looks hella old and shopworn, despite only being 33 years old somehow. He has ridden the coattails of having a win against Colby Covington on his record for his entire career, because he’s done nothing remarkable with it since. His loss to James Krause was the fight where it was apparent Alves was on the decline, and a ‘loser leaves town’ win against the equally old and frail Sergio Moraes was the only thing keeping him afloat. He scored a shock upset KO via body kicks against Mounir Lazzez (who turned out to be a bit of a fraud anyway), but the writing has been on the wall for Warlley for some time. Fast forward a few years and he's on a threefight losing streak again, having been beaten down pretty badly and finished in under 1.5 rounds in four of his last five losses.
That’s a key piece of info for this one, because we know Abus’ limitations revolve around him being a great early fighter with terrible and unsustainable levels of cardio. When looking at Abus’ fights, you need to decipher the chances of him winning early, and that will explain the rest.
Given Alves’ frailty, I think this is a pretty generous fight for Magomedov – possibly the most appropriate and tailor-made matchup they could have found for him!
His winning probability relies heavily on doing work early, so naturally betting Abus R1/2 KO would be the obvious go to. I’m not sure there will be any value on that prop though, because it’s a pretty obvious angle that everyone’s going to try and take. However, I’ve long known that Bet365’s Bet Builder product is broken when combining Winner + Total Rounds, especially before they release the rest of the props as it’s completely out of context…so Backing Abus to Win and Under 1.5 Rounds at the right time could produce a valuable price before it gets corrected. That’s all I’ll be looking to play for this fight, assuming those early Abus props are rubbish. Be careful what price is available if you’re considering this, it’s going to be much shorter than normal and it’s a very limited window to be betting on.
How I line this fight: Abus Magomedov -250 (71%), Warlley Alves +250 (29%)
Bet or pass: Abus Magomedov to Win & Under 1.5 Rounds (+125 or better)
Prop leans: See Above
Live Betting Leans: I’d take a look at Alves on the stool after R1, but I don’t think I could trust him really.

~Piera Rodriguez v Ariane Carnelossi~
Ariane Carnelossi returns after two years on the sidelines. I’ve always jokingly been a fan of her, because that fight against Na Liang (the first UFC Fight back with fans after COVID) was genuinely one of the highlights of 2021 and it was such a fun fight with a crazy energy. Also helps that I bet her heavily in that.
Carnelossi’s a decent striker that actually hung with Angela Hill back in the day, but her wrestling defence is a clear weak point. She got absolutely ragdolled in one of the best UFC performances I can remember when she faced Loopy Godinez, and even Na Liang had some success in that opening round. She’s not a fish off her back or anything, but if you can’t defend takedowns and your opponent has the cardio and ability to chain takedowns together…you’re going to struggle.
Piera Rodriguez is a pretty well-rounded fighter, she’s decent enough in the striking realm and has a diverse arsenal with kicks and a whole lot of feints, but she’s also a decent enough grappler that can commit to that multiple takedown approach. She’s landed three or more in each of her UFC/DWCS victories and just generally does a good job of showcasing herself to be a well-rounded mixed martial artist. My biggest criticism of her is that she does look to have slight signs of bad cardio, as her third rounds against both Hughes and Hansen were a bit laboured and slow.
So initially this fight was lined as a clear pick’em, which I didn’t agree with at all. Whilst Carnelossi should be able to show some competitiveness, her inability to defend takedowns should see her on the back foot for a fair bit of this fight, and her desire to land the knockout with every punch she throws could even see her lose moments on the feet to Piera’s kicking game and more technical style. Carnelossi does have a bit of a cardio advantage though, which Piera will have to navigate, but other than that I think the Venezuelan should be given the nod as a moderate favourite, probably around -175. Considering I got Piera at -120, I thought that was worthy of a 2u bet. If the line continues to move though, I may arb out as I think -175 is a very fair number.
How I line this fight: Piera Rodriguez -175 (64%), Ariane Carnelossi +175 (36%)
Bet or pass: 2u Piera Rodriguez to Win (-120)
Prop leans: Probably a decision win for Piera, Carnelossi is dedicated and Piera not much of a finisher.

~Alatengheili v Kleydson Rodrigues~
I write the same synopsis for Alatengheili because the guy never changes. Here’s a paragraph from his last fight that I wrote:
Alatengheili is one of the most frustrating talents I’ve seen in MMA in recent years. He was once the number three freestyle wrestler in China and looks to actually have a really promising wrestling game…but he just doesn’t fight like it! In his UFC debut, he faced a clearly superior striker and waited until round 3 to start shooting religiously (no attempts in R1 or 2, 7 attempts in R3). After that, he did exactly the same again in a split decision win against Ryan Benoit (1 TD attempt in R1, none in R2, and 12 in R3). He then faced Casey Kenny, who is a great defensive grappler…and decided not to attempt a takedown. Then he faced Gustavo Lopez, who took HIM down three times from eight attempts, and none from Alatenheili. He went on to beat Kevin Croom in under a minute on the feet, then went back to his regular style of waiting until R3 for takedowns when he beat Chad Anheliger. In the Gutierrez fight that followed, he attempted four takedowns and landed two. These all came in – you guessed it- round three.
So I think it’s fair to assume that we can’t call Alatengheili much of a wrestler anymore. When he’s striking on the feet, he’s clearly got some power in a big wind up shot, but other than that it’s quite flat footed and low volume stuff. Those aren’t particularly good qualities, as he’s hardly demonstrating a clear killer instinct that makes up for bad minute winning fundamentals.
Kleydson Rodrigues is a guy I was quite excited about when he got to the UFC. He looked great on DWCS, but immediately had a tough test against CJ Vergara in his debut. I do personally think he won that fight, but CJ’s pace, pressure and tenacity got the better of him down the stretch and made that fight close. He returned and obliterated Shannon Ross, before being steamrolled on the mat by Farid Basharat. A real mixed bag of results, overall.
The thing is, I don’t exactly think that the losses Rodrigues suffered are directly relevant here, as Farid’s topside grappling is way way better than Alateng’s. The Mongolian also doesn’t have the forward pressure or pace of CJ Vergara, due to how flat footed he is.
On the flipside, Alatengheili has struggled against fighters who technically outclass him on the feet, or those with good takedown defence. The Mongolian has proven to be a tough fighter to put away, which should give him a chance to take over at the midway point.
Comparatively, I think Kleydson Rodrigues has shown himself to be a higher calibre striker than Alatenheili, and clearly the more diverse one. Kleydson also throws a lot of low kicks, which are a key weapon when trying to nullify the grappling threat of the already flat footed power puncher.
In conclusion, I just think Kleydson Rodrigues outclasses Alatengheili in the striking, whereas I don’t think the Mongolian outclasses him anywhere on the return. The Mongolian has proven he is keen to stay on the feet for the majority of fights, which should leave the door wide open for Kleydson to win minutes. The cardio advantage does lie with Alateng, but I don’t think he pushes enough of a pace in the grappling or striking department to make Kleydson fade like he did against CJ (who is one of the more suffocating guys in the division). Also, Alateng’s grappling threat in R3 may well be nullified by the 10 minutes of leg kick investment that Kleydson has already made.
So as you can probably tell, I favour Kleydson Rodrigues in this one. I personally thought he should be a -200 favourite, so I was expecting to pass on this one…but it looks like the BetOnline moneyline is moving towards -150. For some strange reason the fight is barely available in the UK for now, but I’m hoping that -150 would be available for me to bet for 2u.
How I line this fight: Kleydson Rodrigues -200 (67%), Alatengheili +200 (33%)
Bet or pass: 2u Kleydson Rodrigues to Win (-160 or better)
Prop leans: None
Live Betting Leans: If it’s 1-1 going into the third and there’s been a pace…I’d recommend betting Alatengheili.

~Tamires Vidal v Melissa Gatto~
Melissa Gatto is a competent and well-rounded fighter. She went to competitive decisions with Tracey Cortez and Ariane Lipski. She is UFC quality.
Tamires Vidal is a plodding fighter that doesn’t appear to be very good at defensive grappling. She went to a competitive decision against Montserrat Rendon. She is not UFC quality.
Gatto is -400. It’s a very steep price to pay but I don’t think it’s too far off where it ought to be – she should be able to point strike on the feet and have very decent grappling success, where she can definitely fish for a submisison. I’d be interested in seeing what the price on Gatto by Submission is though, so I may be looking to play that.
How I line this fight: Tamires Vidal +300 (25%), Melissa Gatto -300 (75%)
Bet or pass: Xu Melissa Gatto to Win by Submission (+300 or better)
Prop leans: See above

Bets (Bold = been placed)
2u Edson Barboza to Win (+130)
2u Angela Hill to Win (-137)
2u Piera Rodriguez to Win (-120)
2u Kleydson Rodrigues to Win (-150)
Xu Emily Ducote to Win by Decision (+100 or better)
2u Abus Magomedov to Win & Under 1.5 Rounds (+130)
Xu Melissa Gatto to Win by Submmission (+300 or better)
0.25u Parlay Pieces (+699)
Parlay Pieces: Angela Hill, Emily Ducote, Abus Magomedov, Kleydson Rodgriguez, Melissa Gatto
Dog of the Week: Edson Barboza

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 04/02/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Jackson Holliday 1/4 -- [2B, 20, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .289 BA .481 OBP .171 ISO 76 AB 2 HR 3 SB 25 BB% 16 K%
Junior Caminero 1/4 BB 2K -- [3B, 20, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .312 BA .369 OBP .260 ISO 77 AB 5 HR 8 BB% 19 K%
🔥🔥​ James Wood​​ 2/4 2 HR BB -- [LF, 21, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .347 BA .437 OBP .256 ISO 121 AB 7 HR 9 SB 14 BB% 19 K%
James Wood 1/2 BB -- [LF, 21, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .347 BA .437 OBP .256 ISO 121 AB 7 HR 9 SB 14 BB% 19 K%
🔥​ Jonatan Clase​ 2/5 HR SB -- [CF, 21, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .247 BA .359 OBP .260 ISO 77 AB 4 HR 9 SB 15 BB% 27 K%
Jordan Walker 2/4 -- [RF, 21, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .300 BA .378 OBP .075 ISO 40 AB 1 SB 11 BB% 8 K%
Thomas Saggese 2/4 HR K -- [SS, 22, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .265 BA .354 OBP .186 ISO 113 AB 5 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 23 K%
Jacob Wilson 3/5 -- [SS, 22, PCL - OAK] - [F] [T] .368 BA .400 OBP .105 ISO 19 AB 5 BB% 5 K%
Drew Cavanaugh 3/4 -- [C, 22, PCL - SF] - [F] [T] .571 BA .667 OBP .000 ISO 7 AB 11 BB% 0 K%
Juan Brito 2/5 2B HR -- [2B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .189 BA .342 OBP .148 ISO 122 AB 4 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 18 K%
Curtis Mead 3/4 2 2B K -- [2B, 23, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .286 BA .412 OBP .143 ISO 14 AB 17 BB% 35 K%
Ryan Bliss 2/4 HR BB -- [SS, 24, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .381 OBP .195 ISO 128 AB 4 HR 19 SB 17 BB% 21 K%
Canaan Smith-Njigba 2/3 HR 2BB -- [DH, 25, INT - PIT] - [F] [T] .270 BA .393 OBP .122 ISO 74 AB 1 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 21 K%
Niko Kavadas 3/4 HR -- [DH, 25, INT - BOS] - [F] [T] .315 BA .456 OBP .404 ISO 89 AB 9 HR 16 BB% 28 K%
Matt Mervis 3/4 2 HR -- [1B, 26, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .314 BA .432 OBP .357 ISO 70 AB 7 HR 15 BB% 26 K%
Drew Millas 2/4 2 HR -- [C, 26, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .333 BA .373 OBP .396 ISO 48 AB 5 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 11 K%
Kameron Misner 3/5 2B 2 SB -- [CF, 26, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .252 BA .379 OBP .130 ISO 115 AB 3 HR 10 SB 15 BB% 31 K%
 

AA Standouts

Nelson Rada 1/1 -- [CF, 18, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .248 BA .310 OBP .027 ISO 113 AB 11 SB 7 BB% 23 K%
Samuel Basallo 1/3 BB -- [DH, 19, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .257 BA .303 OBP .168 ISO 113 AB 5 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 22 K%
Roman Anthony 2/5 2 2B K -- [CF, 20, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .227 BA .333 OBP .145 ISO 110 AB 2 HR 4 SB 13 BB% 31 K%
Harry Ford 2/4 2B BB -- [DH, 21, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .243 BA .404 OBP .196 ISO 107 AB 4 HR 8 SB 19 BB% 18 K%
Hao-Yu Lee 1/2 2BB -- [2B, 21, EAS - DET] - [F] [T] .255 BA .344 OBP .113 ISO 106 AB 1 HR 4 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
Alex Ramírez 3/5 BB SB -- [LF, 21, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .282 BA .370 OBP .107 ISO 103 AB 1 HR 14 SB 12 BB% 21 K%
Max Acosta 2/5 3B K -- [2B, 21, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .252 BA .325 OBP .093 ISO 107 AB 8 SB 8 BB% 16 K%
Kevin Alcántara 3/3 BB -- [CF, 21, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .245 BA .294 OBP .147 ISO 102 AB 4 HR 2 SB 6 BB% 27 K%
Petey Halpin 2/5 HR K -- [CF, 21, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .263 BA .323 OBP .149 ISO 114 AB 3 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 21 K%
Geraldo Quintero 1/3 HR -- [LF, 22, SOU - ATL] - [F] [T] .228 BA .314 OBP .054 ISO 92 AB 1 HR 11 SB 7 BB% 21 K%
🔥​ Alexfri Planez​ 2/3 2 HR BB -- [DH, 22, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .218 BA .274 OBP .172 ISO 87 AB 4 HR 6 BB% 31 K%
José Rodríguez 2/3 HR -- [2B, 23, EAS - PHI] - [F] [T] .214 BA .307 OBP .153 ISO 98 AB 3 HR 7 SB 10 BB% 17 K%
Brennan Milone 4/5 2B -- [2B, 23, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .265 BA .361 OBP .176 ISO 102 AB 4 HR 2 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
Alberto Rodriguez 3/5 2 2B -- [RF, 23, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .235 BA .298 OBP .071 ISO 85 AB 7 BB% 24 K%
Cooper Bowman 2/4 2B 2BB K SB -- [3B, 24, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .202 BA .304 OBP .143 ISO 119 AB 4 HR 11 SB 12 BB% 25 K%
Trei Cruz 3/4 2B HR -- [SS, 25, EAS - DET] - [F] [T] .191 BA .312 OBP .128 ISO 94 AB 3 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 29 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Ethan Salas 0/3 BB -- [C, 17, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .186 BA .302 OBP .072 ISO 97 AB 4 SB 14 BB% 27 K%
Sebastian Walcott 0/2 2BB -- [SS, 18, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .173 BA .289 OBP .112 ISO 98 AB 2 HR 1 SB 14 BB% 28 K%
Termarr Johnson 0/4 2BB -- [2B, 19, SAL - PIT] - [F] [T] .161 BA .368 OBP .065 ISO 93 AB 1 HR 4 SB 21 BB% 24 K%
Pedro Ramirez 3/4 2B 3B K -- [3B, 20, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .343 BA .393 OBP .127 ISO 102 AB 2 HR 5 SB 7 BB% 18 K%
Leonardo Bernal 2/3 2B -- [C, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .239 BA .314 OBP .120 ISO 92 AB 2 HR 2 SB 7 BB% 21 K%
Luis Baez 4/5 2 2B K -- [RF, 20, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .295 BA .342 OBP .188 ISO 112 AB 5 HR 3 SB 6 BB% 24 K%
🔥​ Henry Bolte​ 3/6 HR 2K SB -- [CF, 20, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .246 BA .364 OBP .169 ISO 118 AB 4 HR 13 SB 12 BB% 36 K%
Jheremy Vargas 2/4 2B K SB -- [LF, 21, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .194 BA .296 OBP .113 ISO 62 AB 2 HR 5 SB 11 BB% 21 K%
Nick Morabito 0/2 3BB K SB -- [LF, 21, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .214 BA .389 OBP .071 ISO 14 AB 2 SB 22 BB% 22 K%
Alex Mooney 2/5 K 2 SB -- [SS, 21, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .346 BA .387 OBP .269 ISO 104 AB 6 HR 9 SB 4 BB% 21 K%
🔥​ Brayan Buelvas​ 1/2 HR 4BB -- [RF, 21, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .235 BA .350 OBP .202 ISO 119 AB 5 HR 10 SB 15 BB% 20 K%
Jacob Gonzalez 2/4 2B K SB -- [SS, 21, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .302 BA .400 OBP .155 ISO 116 AB 3 HR 6 SB 12 BB% 9 K%
Yohendrick Pinango 2/3 2 2B SB -- [LF, 22, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .354 BA .466 OBP .281 ISO 96 AB 5 HR 3 SB 16 BB% 12 K%
Jack Hurley 2/4 2B HR -- [CF, 22, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .221 BA .299 OBP .189 ISO 95 AB 3 HR 5 SB 9 BB% 28 K%
Max Anderson 2/4 HR -- [2B, 22, MID - DET] - [F] [T] .276 BA .323 OBP .130 ISO 123 AB 3 HR 6 BB% 16 K%
Glenn Santiago 1/2 2BB 2 SB -- [1B, 23, NWL - TOR] - [F] [T] .360 BA .433 OBP .120 ISO 25 AB 1 HR 2 SB 13 BB% 16 K%
Douglas Hodo III 1/2 BB K 4 SB -- [RF, 23, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .167 BA .265 OBP .033 ISO 30 AB 7 SB 11 BB% 47 K%
 

A Standouts

Yophery Rodriguez 1/4 2B BB 2K -- [CF, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .230 BA .336 OBP .168 ISO 113 AB 3 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 32 K%
J.D. Gonzalez 0/1 3BB K -- [DH, 18, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .179 BA .382 OBP .026 ISO 39 AB 21 BB% 40 K%
Rafael Ramirez Jr. 1/4 HR 3K -- [SS, 18, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .160 BA .266 OBP .117 ISO 94 AB 2 HR 2 SB 12 BB% 36 K%
Juan Baez 2/5 -- [3B, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .291 BA .349 OBP .085 ISO 117 AB 5 SB 6 BB% 6 K%
🔥​ Kevyn Castillo​ 2/3 BB K 2 SB -- [LF, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .279 BA .377 OBP .087 ISO 104 AB 2 HR 6 SB 11 BB% 29 K%
Ralphy Velazquez 1/3 2B BB K SB -- [1B, 18, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .278 BA .350 OBP .213 ISO 108 AB 6 HR 2 SB 9 BB% 21 K%
Jesus Lopez 1/2 2B 2BB K -- [DH, 18, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .318 BA .385 OBP .118 ISO 85 AB 2 HR 10 BB% 20 K%
Josue De Paula 1/4 2B 2K SB -- [RF, 18, CAL - LAD] - [F] [T] .247 BA .340 OBP .135 ISO 89 AB 4 SB 10 BB% 27 K%
Jaison Chourio 2/4 2 SB -- [CF, 18, CAR - CLE] - [F] [T] .298 BA .442 OBP .128 ISO 94 AB 2 HR 11 SB 19 BB% 15 K%
Byron Chourio 1/4 SB -- [CF, 18, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .212 BA .280 OBP .137 ISO 80 AB 5 SB 9 BB% 30 K%
Jansel Luis 2/5 K SB -- [SS, 19, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .238 BA .290 OBP .066 ISO 122 AB 1 HR 4 SB 4 BB% 28 K%
Angel Mateo 2/4 2B BB 2K -- [RF, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .301 BA .387 OBP .204 ISO 93 AB 4 HR 4 SB 9 BB% 26 K%
Brandon Winokur 1/3 BB K SB -- [SS, 19, FSL - MIN] - [F] [T] .255 BA .317 OBP .145 ISO 110 AB 2 HR 7 SB 7 BB% 31 K%
Marcos Torres 1/3 BB K SB -- [1B, 19, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .157 BA .253 OBP .084 ISO 83 AB 1 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 35 K%
Jeffry Rosa 2/4 HR K -- [RF, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .385 BA .529 OBP .462 ISO 13 AB 2 HR 11 BB% 11 K%
Kevin McGonigle 2/5 3B -- [2B, 19, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] .318 BA .400 OBP .114 ISO 44 AB 5 SB 11 BB% 9 K%
Blake Mitchell 2/3 BB K SB -- [C, 19, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .229 BA .395 OBP .167 ISO 96 AB 3 HR 9 SB 20 BB% 35 K%
Aidan Smith 1/2 2B 2BB SB -- [LF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .255 BA .370 OBP .170 ISO 106 AB 3 HR 9 SB 14 BB% 23 K%
🔥​ Alfonsin Rosario​ 3/5 HR BB K -- [RF, 19, CAR - CHC] - [F] [T] .250 BA .278 OBP .231 ISO 52 AB 3 HR 5 SB 3 BB% 42 K%
Aidan Miller 1/3 HR BB -- [SS, 19, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .337 BA .411 OBP .241 ISO 83 AB 4 HR 9 SB 8 BB% 18 K%
Brenner Cox 3/3 2B BB -- [RF, 20, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .238 BA .336 OBP .168 ISO 101 AB 3 HR 8 SB 12 BB% 35 K%
Andy Lugo 2/3 2 2B BB -- [RF, 20, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .273 BA .411 OBP .117 ISO 77 AB 6 SB 14 BB% 27 K%
Guillermo Williamson 1/4 HR -- [1B, 20, CAL - SF] - [F] [T] .250 BA .346 OBP .221 ISO 68 AB 4 HR 12 BB% 34 K%
Will Bush 1/1 2B 2BB -- [C, 20, CAR - HOU] - [F] [T] .169 BA .306 OBP .042 ISO 71 AB 1 SB 12 BB% 38 K%
Raylin Heredia 2/4 HR K -- [RF, 20, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .293 BA .348 OBP .220 ISO 41 AB 2 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 34 K%
Derlin Figueroa 0/3 BB 2 SB -- [3B, 20, CAR - KC] - [F] [T] .235 BA .304 OBP .127 ISO 102 AB 3 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 20 K%
Yamal Encarnacion 0/4 BB 2 SB -- [RF, 20, CAR - HOU] - [F] [T] .215 BA .316 OBP .092 ISO 65 AB 2 HR 8 SB 13 BB% 7 K%
Jordan Viars 2/4 HR BB K -- [LF, 20, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .233 BA .333 OBP .205 ISO 73 AB 3 HR 13 BB% 29 K%
Miguel Briceno 2/4 HR SB -- [2B, 20, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .232 BA .257 OBP .159 ISO 69 AB 3 HR 8 SB 4 BB% 16 K%
Will Verdung 1/4 2BB K 3 SB -- [2B, 20, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .221 BA .379 OBP .059 ISO 68 AB 1 HR 7 SB 18 BB% 26 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Yassel Soler 2/5 2B 3B K -- [3B, 18, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .348 BA .400 OBP .261 ISO 23 AB 8 BB% 16 K%
George Wolkow 4/5 2 2B K -- [RF, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .438 BA .500 OBP .312 ISO 16 AB 1 HR 5 BB% 44 K%
Stiven Flores 2/5 BB K SB -- [C, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .417 BA .462 OBP .000 ISO 12 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 23 K%
Robert Calaz 2/3 3B BB K -- [RF, 18, AZL - COL] - [F] [T] .389 BA .522 OBP .333 ISO 18 AB 1 SB 17 BB% 26 K%
Jose Monzon 2/3 2BB 2 SB -- [3B, 18, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .467 BA .579 OBP .000 ISO 15 AB 3 SB 21 BB% 5 K%
🔥​ Andres Valor​ 2/3 HR 2BB K SB -- [CF, 18, GCL - MIA] - [F] [T] .278 BA .381 OBP .222 ISO 18 AB 1 HR 3 SB 14 BB% 33 K%
Filippo Di Turi 3/5 2B -- [DH, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .421 BA .560 OBP .263 ISO 19 AB 2 SB 24 BB% 16 K%
Javier Mogollon 1/3 2B 3BB K SB -- [2B, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .154 BA .421 OBP .308 ISO 13 AB 1 HR 3 SB 31 BB% 42 K%
Alfredo Alcantara 1/2 4BB K -- [2B, 18, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .200 BA .556 OBP .000 ISO 5 AB 44 BB% 33 K%
Yeiker Reyes 1/2 2B 2BB SB -- [CF, 18, AZL - COL] - [F] [T] .368 BA .478 OBP .105 ISO 19 AB 3 SB 16 BB% 12 K%
Yirer Garcia 2/4 2 2B BB K -- [C, 18, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .133 BA .278 OBP .133 ISO 15 AB 16 BB% 22 K%
Sheng-En Lin 2/5 3B BB K -- [3B, 18, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .429 BA .500 OBP .214 ISO 14 AB 1 SB 12 BB% 25 K%
Derek Bernard 2/5 2B 3B K -- [DH, 18, AZL - COL] - [F] [T] .118 BA .167 OBP .176 ISO 17 AB 5 BB% 50 K%
Larry Martinez 4/4 BB -- [1B, 18, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .556 BA .667 OBP .000 ISO 9 AB 8 BB% 0 K%
Anthony Gutierrez 1/3 2B 2 SB -- [CF, 19, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .333 BA .333 OBP .333 ISO 3 AB 2 SB 0 BB% 0 K%
Yanki Baptiste 1/2 HR BB -- [3B, 19, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .333 BA .444 OBP .467 ISO 15 AB 2 HR 16 BB% 38 K%
Alberto Barriga 3/3 2 2B 2BB -- [DH, 19, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .500 BA .550 OBP .125 ISO 16 AB 2 SB 15 BB% 15 K%
Sammy Stafura 4/6 2B BB K -- [SS, 19, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .412 BA .500 OBP .118 ISO 17 AB 15 BB% 20 K%
Yasser Mercedes 2/3 2BB K SB -- [DH, 19, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .389 BA .476 OBP .056 ISO 18 AB 2 SB 14 BB% 14 K%
Elis Cuevas 2/2 2B 3 SB -- [RF, 19, GCL - BAL] - [F] [T] .273 BA .467 OBP .364 ISO 11 AB 1 HR 3 SB 13 BB% 13 K%
Demetrio Crisantes 1/3 2BB 2K 3 SB -- [2B, 19, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .381 BA .480 OBP .190 ISO 21 AB 3 SB 16 BB% 12 K%
Juan Matheus 1/2 HR 2BB -- [SS, 20, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .286 BA .375 OBP .357 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 12 BB% 18 K%
Luis Ogando 2/3 HR SB -- [3B, 20, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .333 BA .417 OBP .333 ISO 9 AB 1 HR 1 SB 0 BB% 16 K%
Diego Guzman 3/3 2 2B 3B -- [2B, 20, AZL - KC] - [F] [T] .444 BA .500 OBP .556 ISO 9 AB 0 BB% 30 K%
 

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 04/01/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Jackson Holliday 1/5 BB 2K -- [2B, 20, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .292 BA .490 OBP .181 ISO 72 AB 2 HR 3 SB 27 BB% 17 K%
Junior Caminero 1/4 -- [3B, 20, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .315 BA .367 OBP .274 ISO 73 AB 5 HR 7 BB% 17 K%
Owen Caissie 1/2 3BB -- [LF, 21, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .248 BA .406 OBP .156 ISO 109 AB 3 HR 4 SB 19 BB% 28 K%
🔥​ Jonatan Clase​ 2/5 HR BB K -- [CF, 21, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .236 BA .356 OBP .236 ISO 72 AB 3 HR 8 SB 16 BB% 28 K%
Jordan Walker 1/4 2B -- [RF, 21, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .278 BA .366 OBP .083 ISO 36 AB 1 SB 12 BB% 9 K%
Luisangel Acuña 3/6 2B K -- [2B, 22, INT - NYM] - [F] [T] .236 BA .293 OBP .106 ISO 123 AB 1 HR 10 SB 6 BB% 20 K%
Colson Montgomery 2/4 2B 3B -- [SS, 22, INT - CWS] - [F] [T] .230 BA .360 OBP .230 ISO 113 AB 6 HR 3 SB 14 BB% 30 K%
🔥​ Coby Mayo​ 3/5 2B HR BB K -- [3B, 22, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .289 BA .366 OBP .317 ISO 142 AB 11 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 27 K%
Juan Brito 1/5 HR K -- [2B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .179 BA .340 OBP .120 ISO 117 AB 3 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 19 K%
Jhonkensy Noel 2/4 HR BB -- [LF, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .220 BA .286 OBP .294 ISO 109 AB 8 HR 4 BB% 24 K%
🔥​ Leo Jimenez​ 2/5 2 HR BB K -- [SS, 22, INT - TOR] - [F] [T] .247 BA .413 OBP .165 ISO 85 AB 4 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 18 K%
Victor Scott II 1/2 3B 2BB -- [CF, 23, INT - STL] - [F] [T] .185 BA .254 OBP .130 ISO 54 AB 1 HR 6 SB 8 BB% 18 K%
Ryan Bliss 2/5 2B BB SB -- [SS, 24, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .242 BA .374 OBP .177 ISO 124 AB 3 HR 19 SB 17 BB% 22 K%
Brennen Davis 3/5 HR K -- [RF, 24, INT - CHC] - [F] [T] .190 BA .333 OBP .143 ISO 42 AB 2 HR 16 BB% 25 K%
Eguy Rosario 2/3 2 2B BB K SB -- [3B, 24, PCL - SD] - [F] [T] .312 BA .421 OBP .188 ISO 16 AB 1 SB 15 BB% 15 K%
🔥​ Andrés Chaparro​ 3/5 2B 2 HR -- [DH, 25, PCL - ARI] - [F] [T] .333 BA .417 OBP .295 ISO 132 AB 9 HR 1 SB 11 BB% 17 K%
Billy Cook 3/5 2B 3B BB 2K -- [1B, 25, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .255 BA .400 OBP .149 ISO 47 AB 1 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 21 K%
 

AA Standouts

Samuel Basallo 1/3 BB -- [C, 19, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .255 BA .297 OBP .173 ISO 110 AB 5 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 23 K%
Moises Ballesteros 1/3 2B -- [DH, 20, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .310 BA .396 OBP .179 ISO 84 AB 3 HR 11 BB% 14 K%
Carson Williams 0/2 3BB -- [SS, 20, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .321 BA .383 OBP .193 ISO 109 AB 4 HR 8 SB 7 BB% 26 K%
Deyvison De Los Santos 2/4 2B K -- [1B, 20, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .370 BA .419 OBP .328 ISO 119 AB 11 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 21 K%
Harry Ford 0/3 2BB K SB -- [C, 21, TEX - SEA] - [F] [T] .233 BA .397 OBP .194 ISO 103 AB 4 HR 8 SB 19 BB% 19 K%
James Triantos 2/3 SB -- [2B, 21, SOU - CHC] - [F] [T] .318 BA .353 OBP .182 ISO 110 AB 3 HR 8 SB 5 BB% 11 K%
Joe Mack 2/4 2 2B -- [DH, 21, SOU - MIA] - [F] [T] .239 BA .288 OBP .134 ISO 67 AB 1 HR 4 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Eddinson Paulino​ 3/5 2B 3B K SB -- [2B, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .289 BA .385 OBP .229 ISO 83 AB 3 HR 4 SB 12 BB% 26 K%
Kala'i Rosario 2/5 2B BB SB -- [LF, 21, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .257 BA .347 OBP .181 ISO 105 AB 2 HR 2 SB 12 BB% 27 K%
Brock Wilken 2/5 HR K -- [3B, 21, SOU - MIL] - [F] [T] .250 BA .289 OBP .222 ISO 36 AB 2 HR 2 BB% 26 K%
Petey Halpin 1/5 HR 2K -- [CF, 21, EAS - CLE] - [F] [T] .257 BA .319 OBP .128 ISO 109 AB 2 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 21 K%
Nick Yorke 3/5 SB -- [LF, 22, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .270 BA .360 OBP .140 ISO 100 AB 3 HR 6 SB 11 BB% 15 K%
Kevin Parada 2/5 HR 2K -- [C, 22, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .185 BA .287 OBP .120 ISO 92 AB 3 HR 11 BB% 31 K%
A.J. Vukovich 2/4 HR K SB -- [LF, 22, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .261 BA .317 OBP .148 ISO 115 AB 4 HR 2 SB 6 BB% 29 K%
Jakob Marsee 1/3 HR BB -- [CF, 22, SOU - MIA] - [F] [T] .177 BA .360 OBP .156 ISO 96 AB 3 HR 13 SB 20 BB% 21 K%
Jaylen Palmer 1/2 HR 3BB K -- [3B, 23, EAS - NYM] - [F] [T] .200 BA .467 OBP .400 ISO 10 AB 1 HR 33 BB% 33 K%
Dominic Keegan 2/3 HR BB -- [C, 23, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .237 BA .371 OBP .194 ISO 93 AB 5 HR 15 BB% 21 K%
Wes Clarke 3/4 2 HR -- [DH, 24, SOU - MIL] - [F] [T] .289 BA .400 OBP .342 ISO 38 AB 3 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 20 K%
Matthew Dyer 3/3 3B HR BB -- [LF, 25, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .236 BA .304 OBP .153 ISO 72 AB 1 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 33 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Jefferson Rojas 3/5 -- [SS, 19, MID - CHC] - [F] [T] .286 BA .333 OBP .089 ISO 112 AB 2 HR 5 SB 5 BB% 14 K%
Jorge Ruiz 2/5 -- [LF, 19, NWL - LAA] - [F] [T] .200 BA .246 OBP .076 ISO 105 AB 1 HR 4 SB 5 BB% 17 K%
Wilfredo Lara 2/6 K SB -- [RF, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .194 BA .284 OBP .042 ISO 72 AB 4 SB 11 BB% 22 K%
Christopher Suero 1/3 2B BB -- [C, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .182 BA .375 OBP .091 ISO 11 AB 1 SB 25 BB% 25 K%
Sal Stewart 1/2 2B BB -- [2B, 20, MID - CIN] - [F] [T] .263 BA .383 OBP .141 ISO 99 AB 2 HR 2 SB 16 BB% 17 K%
Henry Bolte 1/2 2B 2BB -- [CF, 20, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .232 BA .358 OBP .152 ISO 112 AB 3 HR 12 SB 13 BB% 36 K%
Ryan Clifford 2/4 2BB 2K -- [DH, 20, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] .237 BA .441 OBP .097 ISO 93 AB 1 HR 1 SB 25 BB% 30 K%
Carter Jensen 1/4 2B BB SB -- [DH, 20, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .321 BA .472 OBP .165 ISO 109 AB 2 HR 11 SB 21 BB% 19 K%
Joshua Baez 1/2 K 2 SB -- [RF, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .263 BA .333 OBP .105 ISO 76 AB 2 HR 10 SB 9 BB% 36 K%
Roberto Campos 2/4 HR 2K -- [CF, 20, MID - DET] - [F] [T] .276 BA .345 OBP .153 ISO 98 AB 2 HR 8 SB 8 BB% 29 K%
Noah Miller 2/4 2B BB -- [SS, 21, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .267 BA .369 OBP .183 ISO 120 AB 5 HR 13 BB% 16 K%
Luke Keaschall 2/4 2 2B -- [DH, 21, MID - MIN] - [F] [T] .282 BA .423 OBP .175 ISO 103 AB 3 HR 11 SB 15 BB% 17 K%
Cole Carrigg 2/4 HR -- [CF, 22, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] .279 BA .350 OBP .186 ISO 86 AB 3 HR 14 SB 10 BB% 10 K%
Carson Roccaforte 2/5 3 SB -- [CF, 22, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .198 BA .252 OBP .143 ISO 126 AB 3 HR 12 SB 5 BB% 26 K%
C.J. Kayfus 1/3 HR BB -- [1B, 22, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .341 BA .422 OBP .295 ISO 88 AB 6 HR 2 SB 9 BB% 16 K%
Brennan Orf 2/3 HR BB -- [1B, 22, NWL - TOR] - [F] [T] .224 BA .361 OBP .209 ISO 67 AB 3 HR 16 BB% 22 K%
Nate Furman 2/4 2 HR -- [2B, 22, MID - CLE] - [F] [T] .273 BA .340 OBP .125 ISO 88 AB 3 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Mac Horvath 2/3 HR SB -- [3B, 22, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .198 BA .330 OBP .151 ISO 86 AB 2 HR 9 SB 16 BB% 17 K%
DJ Gladney 2/4 2B HR K -- [CF, 22, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .198 BA .274 OBP .198 ISO 106 AB 3 HR 3 SB 8 BB% 35 K%
Jared Sundstrom 1/4 HR BB -- [RF, 22, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] .275 BA .404 OBP .200 ISO 80 AB 3 HR 3 SB 15 BB% 24 K%
Jadiel Sanchez 2/4 2 HR -- [RF, 23, NWL - LAA] - [F] [T] .187 BA .283 OBP .143 ISO 91 AB 3 HR 1 SB 10 BB% 21 K%
Jack Pineda 3/4 2 2B HR -- [3B, 24, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .235 BA .356 OBP .141 ISO 85 AB 2 HR 5 SB 14 BB% 26 K%
 

A Standouts

John Cruz 0/2 BB K SB -- [RF, 18, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .121 BA .209 OBP .020 ISO 99 AB 2 SB 7 BB% 26 K%
Maykel Minoso 1/3 BB -- [C, 18, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .071 BA .133 OBP .000 ISO 28 AB 6 BB% 26 K%
Antonio Anderson 0/2 3BB -- [3B, 18, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .116 BA .287 OBP .011 ISO 95 AB 2 SB 18 BB% 25 K%
Juan Baez 1/4 K SB -- [2B, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .286 BA .347 OBP .089 ISO 112 AB 5 SB 7 BB% 6 K%
Kevyn Castillo 2/5 K SB -- [CF, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .267 BA .364 OBP .089 ISO 101 AB 2 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 29 K%
Myles Naylor 0/2 2BB K SB -- [SS, 19, CAL - OAK] - [F] [T] .157 BA .336 OBP .135 ISO 89 AB 3 HR 2 SB 21 BB% 30 K%
🔥​ Capri Ortiz​ 3/5 HR K SB -- [SS, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .218 BA .358 OBP .092 ISO 87 AB 1 HR 6 SB 16 BB% 29 K%
Braylin Tavera 2/5 2B -- [CF, 19, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .173 BA .264 OBP .041 ISO 98 AB 12 SB 10 BB% 20 K%
Randy De Jesus 2/4 2B BB -- [RF, 19, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .284 BA .368 OBP .194 ISO 67 AB 2 HR 1 SB 7 BB% 28 K%
Angel Mateo 1/4 HR K -- [CF, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .292 BA .376 OBP .202 ISO 89 AB 4 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 25 K%
Natanael Yuten 1/5 HR 2K -- [RF, 19, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .240 BA .327 OBP .167 ISO 96 AB 3 HR 2 SB 10 BB% 34 K%
Jeffry Rosa 1/4 HR -- [RF, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .333 BA .538 OBP .333 ISO 9 AB 1 HR 15 BB% 7 K%
Boston Baro 3/5 2 2B K -- [3B, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .281 BA .395 OBP .156 ISO 32 AB 3 SB 15 BB% 21 K%
Chase Jaworsky 1/4 2B SB -- [SS, 19, CAR - HOU] - [F] [T] .220 BA .360 OBP .110 ISO 82 AB 1 HR 13 SB 15 BB% 21 K%
Ricardo Gonzalez 1/1 2BB -- [DH, 19, CAR - TB] - [F] [T] .191 BA .277 OBP .056 ISO 89 AB 1 HR 4 SB 10 BB% 21 K%
Manuel Beltre 1/2 2B 2BB SB -- [2B, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .235 BA .331 OBP .098 ISO 102 AB 1 HR 9 SB 8 BB% 16 K%
Andy Perez 3/5 -- [3B, 19, CAL - COL] - [F] [T] .292 BA .331 OBP .192 ISO 120 AB 4 HR 2 SB 5 BB% 17 K%
Kenny Castillo 1/3 2BB -- [C, 19, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .311 BA .400 OBP .122 ISO 74 AB 1 HR 11 BB% 29 K%
Esmerlyn Valdez 1/3 HR BB K -- [DH, 20, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .273 BA .389 OBP .205 ISO 88 AB 4 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 30 K%
Ariel Almonte 2/5 HR K -- [DH, 20, FSL - CIN] - [F] [T] .198 BA .324 OBP .352 ISO 91 AB 10 HR 14 BB% 36 K%
Yamal Encarnacion 1/3 HR BB SB -- [LF, 20, CAR - HOU] - [F] [T] .230 BA .324 OBP .098 ISO 61 AB 2 HR 6 SB 12 BB% 8 K%
Johan Macias 0/3 2BB 2 SB -- [2B, 21, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .240 BA .316 OBP .100 ISO 50 AB 2 SB 7 BB% 17 K%
Jeremy De La Rosa 2/3 2 3B -- [LF, 22, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .556 BA .556 OBP .556 ISO 9 AB 0 BB% 11 K%
Colby Shade 2/3 2B HR -- [CF, 22, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .232 BA .344 OBP .085 ISO 82 AB 1 HR 10 SB 10 BB% 31 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Pablo Guerrero 2/3 BB -- [1B, 17, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .375 BA .412 OBP .062 ISO 16 AB 5 BB% 23 K%
Jeremy Rodriguez 1/4 3B BB K SB -- [3B, 17, GCL - NYM] - [F] [T] .333 BA .467 OBP .250 ISO 12 AB 1 SB 20 BB% 20 K%
Pedro Ibarguen 1/4 K 2 SB -- [RF, 17, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .118 BA .211 OBP .000 ISO 17 AB 2 SB 10 BB% 21 K%
Luis Merejo 1/3 2BB K SB -- [LF, 17, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .100 BA .357 OBP .000 ISO 10 AB 2 SB 21 BB% 50 K%
Brailer Guerrero 1/3 3B 3BB K -- [RF, 17, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .462 BA .632 OBP .538 ISO 13 AB 1 HR 2 SB 31 BB% 26 K%
Edgleen Perez 1/2 HR BB -- [C, 17, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .429 BA .600 OBP .714 ISO 7 AB 1 HR 20 BB% 10 K%
🔥​ Welbyn Francisca​ 2/4 3B BB SB -- [2B, 17, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .364 BA .417 OBP .182 ISO 11 AB 2 SB 8 BB% 0 K%
Jayson Bass 1/2 2B BB SB -- [LF, 18, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .308 BA .333 OBP .154 ISO 13 AB 1 SB 6 BB% 20 K%
Heribert Silva 2/5 2K 2 SB -- [C, 18, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .273 BA .273 OBP .182 ISO 11 AB 2 SB 0 BB% 36 K%
Andy Acevedo 1/3 2B BB K SB -- [CF, 18, GCL - WSH] - [F] [T] .222 BA .417 OBP .111 ISO 9 AB 2 SB 16 BB% 16 K%
Adrian Gil 3/3 HR -- [1B, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .364 BA .462 OBP .364 ISO 11 AB 1 HR 7 BB% 15 K%
Filippo Di Turi 3/4 2B BB SB -- [SS, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .357 BA .550 OBP .286 ISO 14 AB 2 SB 30 BB% 20 K%
Javier Mogollon 1/3 HR K SB -- [SS, 18, AZL - CWS] - [F] [T] .100 BA .308 OBP .300 ISO 10 AB 1 HR 2 SB 23 BB% 53 K%
Hendry Chivilli 2/2 2B BB -- [SS, 18, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .167 BA .312 OBP .083 ISO 12 AB 2 SB 18 BB% 12 K%
Yahil Melendez 3/3 2B SB -- [2B, 18, AZL - CHC] - [F] [T] .429 BA .467 OBP .071 ISO 14 AB 1 SB 0 BB% 26 K%
Dameury Pena 2/3 HR -- [DH, 18, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] .357 BA .438 OBP .286 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 0 K%
Jose Ortiz 2/3 BB 2 SB -- [CF, 19, AZL - SF] - [F] [T] .500 BA .600 OBP .000 ISO 12 AB 3 SB 20 BB% 6 K%
🔥​ Leandro Arias​ 2/2 2 HR BB -- [SS, 19, GCL - BAL] - [F] [T] 1.000 BA 1.000 OBP 3.000 ISO 2 AB 2 HR 33 BB% 0 K%
Juanfel Peguero 1/2 2B 3BB K SB -- [DH, 19, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .200 BA .385 OBP .100 ISO 10 AB 1 SB 23 BB% 46 K%
Elis Cuevas 1/1 HR 2BB -- [1B, 19, GCL - BAL] - [F] [T] .111 BA .333 OBP .333 ISO 9 AB 1 HR 16 BB% 16 K%
Yoffry Solano 2/3 2B 3B -- [2B, 19, GCL - MIA] - [F] [T] .267 BA .250 OBP .267 ISO 15 AB 0 BB% 6 K%
Esteban Mejia 2/3 2 2B BB -- [2B, 19, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .714 BA .733 OBP .571 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 6 BB% 20 K%
Ricardo Cova 2/3 2BB SB -- [LF, 19, AZL - SEA] - [F] [T] .417 BA .533 OBP .083 ISO 12 AB 2 SB 20 BB% 6 K%
 

Matchup: Rugby FC Los Angeles (1-6-1, 12pts, 6th in West) vs Dallas Jackals (4-5-0, 26pts, 4th in West)
Venue: Choctaw Stadium, Arlington, TX Weather: 77 F, 25 C, Partly Cloudy
Broadcast: The Rugby Network, Bally Sports SoCal
Kickoff: 8:30pm ET, 5:30pm PT

Los Angeles	Number	Dallas
Dane Zander	1	Liam Murray
Ben Strang	2	Dewald Kotze
Alex Maughan	3	Juan Pablo Zeiss
Ben Mitchell	4	Jerónimo Gómez Vara (c)
Theo Vukasinovic	5	Daemon Torres
Michael Amiras	6	Ronan Foley
Matt Heaton	7	Makeen Alikhan
Jason Damm	8	Sam Tuifua
Nial Saunders (c)	9	Juan-Dee Oliver
Dan Hollinshead	10	Martín Elías
Jack Shaw	11	Nic Benn
Jason Emery	12	Connor Winchester
James Stokes	13	Mitch Richardson
Andrew Coe	14	Tomás Malanos
Austin White	15	Vaughen Isaacs
Reserves		Reserves
Bruce Kauika-Petersen	16	Joaquín Horcada
Wilton Rebolo	17	Connor Grindal
Conor Young	18	Kyle Steeves
Max Katjijeko	19	Ronnie McElligott
Bruce Yun	20	Ronnie McElligott
Tas Smith	21	Cameron Nelson
Jordan Chait	22	Marques Fuala’au
Seth Purdey	23	Jason Tidwell

Referee: Kat Roche (USA)
Assistants: Juan Parra (USA) & Kahlil Harrison (USA)
TMO: Scott Green (USA)

Yesterday's Standout Pitchers

^{stats for games since 03/31/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

Cristian Mena 6 IP 2ER 4H 2BB 4K -- [RHP, 21, PCL - ARI] - [F] [T] 40.0 IP 3.83 ERA 1.38 WHIP 9.2 K/9 5.0 BB/9 1.9 K/BB 11.2 K-BB% 1.1 GO/AO
Joe Rock 5 IP 2H 6K -- [LHP, 23, INT - TB] - [F] [T] 31.0 IP 4.35 ERA 1.32 WHIP 9.3 K/9 1.7 BB/9 5.3 K/BB 19.1 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Nick Nastrini 6.2 IP ER 3H BB 6K -- [RHP, 24, INT - CWS] - [F] [T] 23.1 IP 5.84 ERA 1.52 WHIP 12.1 K/9 3.5 BB/9 3.4 K/BB 20.4 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
Brant Hurter 5 IP 5H BB 9K -- [LHP, 25, INT - DET] - [F] [T] 29.0 IP 4.34 ERA 1.38 WHIP 12.1 K/9 3.1 BB/9 3.9 K/BB 22.7 K-BB% 1.7 GO/AO
Chayce McDermott 5 IP 2ER 5H BB 8K -- [RHP, 25, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] 28.2 IP 3.19 ERA 1.52 WHIP 13.7 K/9 6.7 BB/9 2.0 K/BB 16.8 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Chad Patrick 6 IP ER 4H BB 5K -- [RHP, 25, INT - MIL] - [F] [T] 30.2 IP 3.58 ERA 1.16 WHIP 8.6 K/9 3.0 BB/9 2.9 K/BB 15.0 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
 

AA Standouts

Caden Dana 7 IP ER 4H BB 5K -- [RHP, 20, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] 37.1 IP 1.7 ERA 0.73 WHIP 7.8 K/9 2.4 BB/9 3.2 K/BB 15.9 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
🔥​ Angel Bastardo​ 5 IP ER 3H 3BB 10K -- [RHP, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] 27.0 IP 4.0 ERA 1.15 WHIP 10.3 K/9 4.7 BB/9 2.2 K/BB 14.8 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
Edwin Nuñez 4 IP H BB 5K -- [RHP, 22, TEX - STL] - [F] [T] 18.2 IP 4.95 ERA 1.43 WHIP 7.4 K/9 5.9 BB/9 1.2 K/BB 3.5 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Hayden Birdsong 5 IP ER 3H 3BB 6K -- [RHP, 22, EAS - SF] - [F] [T] 25.1 IP 2.51 ERA 1.08 WHIP 12.5 K/9 5.0 BB/9 2.5 K/BB 20.0 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
Julio Robaina 6.1 IP 2ER 6H 7K -- [LHP, 23, TEX - HOU] - [F] [T] 26.1 IP 1.72 ERA 0.92 WHIP 10.7 K/9 2.1 BB/9 5.2 K/BB 24.3 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Adam Macko 5 IP 2ER 4H 7K -- [LHP, 23, EAS - TOR] - [F] [T] 28.0 IP 4.5 ERA 1.29 WHIP 10.3 K/9 3.9 BB/9 2.7 K/BB 16.8 K-BB% 0.5 GO/AO
Trace Bright 4.1 IP 3H 2BB 5K -- [RHP, 23, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] 27.2 IP 2.98 ERA 1.54 WHIP 11.2 K/9 3.6 BB/9 3.1 K/BB 19.8 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
🔥​ Zebby Matthews​ 6.2 IP 3H 9K -- [RHP, 23, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] 6.2 IP 0.0 ERA 0.48 WHIP 13.1 K/9 0.0 BB/9 -- K/BB 39.1 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Chandler Champlain 6 IP 3H 7K -- [RHP, 24, TEX - KC] - [F] [T] 29.2 IP 4.32 ERA 0.99 WHIP 11.7 K/9 1.8 BB/9 6.3 K/BB 27.6 K-BB% 1.1 GO/AO
Wilkel Hernandez 6 IP ER 2H BB 5K -- [RHP, 25, EAS - DET] - [F] [T] 23.1 IP 3.12 ERA 1.21 WHIP 6.6 K/9 3.5 BB/9 1.9 K/BB 8.3 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
 

A+ Standouts

Carlos Marcano 5 IP ER 2H 3BB 5K -- [RHP, 20, MID - DET] - [F] [T] 27.0 IP 4.0 ERA 1.63 WHIP 6.3 K/9 4.3 BB/9 1.5 K/BB 4.8 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Luis Perales 4 IP 2ER 4H BB 8K -- [RHP, 21, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] 17.0 IP 3.71 ERA 1.53 WHIP 15.4 K/9 3.2 BB/9 4.8 K/BB 29.5 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Maddux Bruns 4 IP 3H 2BB 6K -- [LHP, 21, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] 8.2 IP 1.1 ERA 1.34 WHIP 15.4 K/9 6.6 BB/9 2.3 K/BB 21.6 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
Leandro Lopez 4 IP 3BB 6K -- [RHP, 21, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] 10.2 IP 4.41 ERA 1.37 WHIP 11.5 K/9 6.2 BB/9 1.9 K/BB 12.8 K-BB% 1.4 GO/AO
Estibenzon Jimenez 5.2 IP 2ER 6H 3BB 7K -- [RHP, 22, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] 29.0 IP 5.59 ERA 1.52 WHIP 9.6 K/9 3.4 BB/9 2.8 K/BB 15.3 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Chase Dollander 5 IP 2ER 6H 2BB 10K -- [RHP, 22, NWL - COL] - [F] [T] 24.1 IP 2.61 ERA 1.04 WHIP 16.1 K/9 3.7 BB/9 4.3 K/BB 32.7 K-BB% 0.6 GO/AO
Spencer Giesting 6 IP 3H BB 5K -- [LHP, 22, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] 27.0 IP 1.0 ERA 0.85 WHIP 8.0 K/9 2.7 BB/9 3.0 K/BB 15.5 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Shane Murphy 4 IP 2H BB 7K -- [LHP, 23, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] 8.0 IP 0.0 ERA 0.5 WHIP 10.1 K/9 1.1 BB/9 9.0 K/BB 28.6 K-BB% 2.0 GO/AO
Brandon Sproat 5.2 IP ER 2H 3BB 8K -- [RHP, 23, SAL - NYM] - [F] [T] 25.1 IP 1.08 ERA 1.12 WHIP 11.8 K/9 5.7 BB/9 2.1 K/BB 16.7 K-BB% 2.1 GO/AO
Spencer Schwellenbach 4.2 IP 2H 3BB 6K -- [RHP, 23, SAL - ATL] - [F] [T] 32.0 IP 2.25 ERA 1.09 WHIP 9.6 K/9 2.5 BB/9 3.8 K/BB 19.1 K-BB% 2.0 GO/AO
Bradley Brehmer 2.2 IP H 6K -- [RHP, 24, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] 13.1 IP 2.75 ERA 1.15 WHIP 11.0 K/9 4.8 BB/9 2.3 K/BB 16.7 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Duncan Davitt 6.1 IP 2ER 7H BB 7K -- [RHP, 24, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] 31.0 IP 4.06 ERA 1.06 WHIP 11.6 K/9 3.2 BB/9 3.6 K/BB 23.0 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Dylan Cumming 4.2 IP 3H 2BB 8K -- [RHP, 24, NWL - SF] - [F] [T] 26.2 IP 1.03 ERA 0.76 WHIP 13.1 K/9 2.7 BB/9 4.8 K/BB 30.6 K-BB% 2.0 GO/AO
 

A Standouts

Franklin Gomez 2 IP ER H 3K -- [LHP, 18, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] 12.1 IP 2.98 ERA 0.91 WHIP 13.4 K/9 3.7 BB/9 3.6 K/BB 27.1 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
Davis Polo 6 IP 3H 2BB 6K -- [RHP, 19, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] 20.1 IP 3.58 ERA 1.39 WHIP 7.2 K/9 3.6 BB/9 2.0 K/BB 9.3 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Daniel Corniel 6 IP 4H 3BB 5K -- [RHP, 19, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] 23.2 IP 2.33 ERA 1.21 WHIP 9.7 K/9 3.1 BB/9 3.1 K/BB 17.2 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Welinton Herrera 2.1 IP 2BB 6K -- [LHP, 20, CAL - COL] - [F] [T] 13.2 IP 3.41 ERA 1.06 WHIP 18.4 K/9 1.4 BB/9 13.5 K/BB 43.1 K-BB% 6.0 GO/AO
Jedixson Paez 5 IP 2ER 3H BB 6K -- [RHP, 20, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] 24.0 IP 2.62 ERA 1.17 WHIP 11.2 K/9 1.1 BB/9 10.0 K/BB 28.1 K-BB% 1.7 GO/AO
Carlson Reed 5 IP 2ER 3H 3BB 7K -- [RHP, 21, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] 25.2 IP 1.79 ERA 1.35 WHIP 11.8 K/9 6.1 BB/9 1.9 K/BB 14.8 K-BB% 1.7 GO/AO
Jojo Ingrassia 3 IP BB 8K -- [LHP, 21, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] 18.0 IP 2.0 ERA 1.06 WHIP 17.5 K/9 2.5 BB/9 7.0 K/BB 41.7 K-BB% 2.4 GO/AO
Kade Morris 5 IP 5ER 7H BB 9K -- [RHP, 21, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] 27.2 IP 4.96 ERA 1.47 WHIP 10.6 K/9 3.6 BB/9 2.9 K/BB 16.9 K-BB% 1.0 GO/AO
Marino Santy 5 IP 3H 2BB 9K -- [LHP, 22, CAR - CHC] - [F] [T] 19.2 IP 5.16 ERA 2.03 WHIP 11.7 K/9 7.0 BB/9 1.7 K/BB 10.4 K-BB% 4.0 GO/AO
Jose Atencio 6 IP 2ER 4H BB 6K -- [RHP, 22, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] 28.2 IP 3.19 ERA 1.42 WHIP 9.9 K/9 0.3 BB/9 31.0 K/BB 24.6 K-BB% 1.9 GO/AO
Kenyi Perez 3 IP 3BB 7K -- [RHP, 22, CAR - CHC] - [F] [T] 8.2 IP 14.27 ERA 3.29 WHIP 29.6 K/9 22.0 BB/9 1.4 K/BB 10.6 K-BB% 0.1 GO/AO
Jake Miller 4 IP 3H 7K -- [LHP, 22, FSL - DET] - [F] [T] 15.1 IP 0.0 ERA 0.93 WHIP 14.3 K/9 2.4 BB/9 6.0 K/BB 32.8 K-BB% 1.2 GO/AO
Grant Rogers 6 IP ER 5H BB 6K -- [RHP, 22, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] 24.1 IP 4.11 ERA 1.2 WHIP 11.6 K/9 3.7 BB/9 3.1 K/BB 21.0 K-BB% 0.9 GO/AO
Mitch Farris 5 IP 2H 6K -- [LHP, 23, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] 22.2 IP 2.43 ERA 1.4 WHIP 15.0 K/9 5.7 BB/9 2.6 K/BB 24.0 K-BB% 0.3 GO/AO
Ryan Brown 5 IP H BB 6K -- [RHP, 23, CAL - OAK] - [F] [T] 19.0 IP 1.89 ERA 0.74 WHIP 9.0 K/9 2.8 BB/9 3.2 K/BB 19.1 K-BB% 0.8 GO/AO
Kohl Drake 5 IP 2H BB 10K -- [LHP, 23, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] 15.0 IP 4.2 ERA 1.13 WHIP 14.4 K/9 1.8 BB/9 8.0 K/BB 34.4 K-BB% 1.6 GO/AO
 

Rookie Standouts

Miguel Cordero 3 IP 4K -- [RHP, 17, GCL - MIN] - [F] [T] 3.0 IP 0.0 ERA 0.0 WHIP 12.0 K/9 0.0 BB/9 -- K/BB 44.4 K-BB% 0.2 GO/AO
🔥​ Keyner Benitez​ 4 IP H BB 7K -- [LHP, 17, GCL - MIA] - [F] [T] 4.0 IP 0.0 ERA 0.5 WHIP 15.8 K/9 2.2 BB/9 7.0 K/BB 42.9 K-BB% 1.0 GO/AO
Jacob Bresnahan 4 IP ER 2H 6K -- [LHP, 18, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] 4.0 IP 2.25 ERA 0.5 WHIP 13.5 K/9 0.0 BB/9 -- K/BB 42.9 K-BB% 0.5 GO/AO
Luichi Casilla 3.1 IP 2ER 3H 2BB 8K -- [LHP, 19, AZL - COL] - [F] [T] 3.1 IP 5.81 ERA 1.61 WHIP 23.2 K/9 5.8 BB/9 4.0 K/BB 35.3 K-BB% -- GO/AO
Eliazar Dishmey 4 IP BB 8K -- [RHP, 19, GCL - MIA] - [F] [T] 4.0 IP 0.0 ERA 0.25 WHIP 18.0 K/9 2.2 BB/9 8.0 K/BB 50.0 K-BB% 4.0 GO/AO
Jordan Woods 4 IP H BB 7K -- [LHP, 20, AZL - KC] - [F] [T] 4.0 IP 0.0 ERA 0.5 WHIP 15.8 K/9 2.2 BB/9 7.0 K/BB 42.9 K-BB% 0.7 GO/AO
Wilkelma Castillo 4 IP ER H BB 9K -- [RHP, 24, AZL - SF] - [F] [T] 4.0 IP 2.25 ERA 0.5 WHIP 20.2 K/9 2.2 BB/9 9.0 K/BB 57.1 K-BB% 0.0 GO/AO
 

Yesterday's Standout Hitters

^{stats for games since 03/31/2024}
 

AAA Standouts

🔥​ Jackson Holliday​ 0/2 3BB 2 SB -- [2B, 20, INT - BAL] - [F] [T] .278 BA .475 OBP .181 ISO 72 AB 2 HR 3 SB 26 BB% 16 K%
Junior Caminero 3/5 K -- [3B, 20, INT - TB] - [F] [T] .333 BA .392 OBP .319 ISO 72 AB 6 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 17 K%
🔥​ James Wood​ 2/4 HR SB -- [LF, 21, INT - WSH] - [F] [T] .339 BA .432 OBP .212 ISO 118 AB 5 HR 9 SB 14 BB% 19 K%
Javier Sanoja 1/3 2BB -- [2B, 21, INT - MIA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .322 OBP .115 ISO 52 AB 10 BB% 3 K%
Jonatan Clase 0/3 BB SB -- [CF, 21, PCL - SEA] - [F] [T] .214 BA .341 OBP .200 ISO 70 AB 2 HR 8 SB 16 BB% 29 K%
Jacob Wilson 3/5 2 2B -- [SS, 22, PCL - OAK] - [F] [T] .300 BA .364 OBP .200 ISO 10 AB 9 BB% 0 K%
Juan Brito 3/5 2B K -- [2B, 22, INT - CLE] - [F] [T] .197 BA .354 OBP .120 ISO 117 AB 3 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 18 K%
Drew Romo 1/5 HR 2K -- [C, 22, PCL - COL] - [F] [T] .353 BA .358 OBP .167 ISO 102 AB 2 HR 2 SB 0 BB% 23 K%
Julio Carreras 2/5 HR SB -- [SS, 24, PCL - COL] - [F] [T] .173 BA .248 OBP .091 ISO 110 AB 1 HR 8 SB 8 BB% 34 K%
Miguel Vargas 1/3 2B 4BB -- [LF, 24, PCL - LAD] - [F] [T] .297 BA .420 OBP .271 ISO 118 AB 6 HR 8 SB 17 BB% 18 K%
Adrian Del Castillo 2/4 3B BB -- [C, 24, PCL - ARI] - [F] [T] .333 BA .373 OBP .254 ISO 126 AB 6 HR 5 BB% 20 K%
🔥​ Steward Berroa​ 3/3 2B HR SB -- [CF, 24, INT - TOR] - [F] [T] .385 BA .487 OBP .200 ISO 65 AB 4 HR 18 SB 15 BB% 22 K%
Austin Gauthier 3/4 2B HR 2BB K -- [RF, 25, PCL - LAD] - [F] [T] .455 BA .600 OBP .455 ISO 11 AB 1 HR 26 BB% 13 K%
Jeter Downs 2/5 3B HR K -- [SS, 25, INT - NYY] - [F] [T] .247 BA .327 OBP .271 ISO 85 AB 5 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 23 K%
Andre Lipcius 3/5 2 2B 2BB -- [2B, 25, PCL - LAD] - [F] [T] .310 BA .364 OBP .240 ISO 129 AB 7 HR 5 SB 7 BB% 22 K%
Logan Davidson 3/4 3B HR -- [3B, 26, PCL - OAK] - [F] [T] .319 BA .382 OBP .130 ISO 69 AB 2 HR 2 SB 7 BB% 35 K%
Hunter Feduccia 4/7 3B HR -- [C, 26, PCL - LAD] - [F] [T] .276 BA .385 OBP .211 ISO 76 AB 2 HR 1 SB 15 BB% 18 K%
 

AA Standouts

Nelson Rada 1/3 BB K -- [CF, 18, SOU - LAA] - [F] [T] .250 BA .314 OBP .028 ISO 108 AB 11 SB 7 BB% 22 K%
Carson Williams 1/4 2B BB 2K -- [SS, 20, SOU - TB] - [F] [T] .327 BA .374 OBP .196 ISO 107 AB 4 HR 8 SB 5 BB% 27 K%
Brady House 1/4 HR K -- [3B, 20, EAS - WSH] - [F] [T] .260 BA .364 OBP .221 ISO 104 AB 6 HR 1 SB 12 BB% 22 K%
Emmanuel Rodriguez 2/4 2B BB K -- [RF, 21, TEX - MIN] - [F] [T] .273 BA .472 OBP .299 ISO 77 AB 4 HR 9 SB 26 BB% 30 K%
🔥​ Marcelo Mayer​ 3/4 3 2B BB -- [DH, 21, EAS - BOS] - [F] [T] .294 BA .336 OBP .193 ISO 109 AB 3 HR 6 SB 6 BB% 21 K%
Wilfred Veras 1/5 HR 2K -- [LF, 21, SOU - CWS] - [F] [T] .337 BA .352 OBP .221 ISO 104 AB 5 HR 2 SB 1 BB% 33 K%
Max Acosta 2/3 2B -- [SS, 21, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .245 BA .324 OBP .071 ISO 98 AB 8 SB 9 BB% 16 K%
Brock Wilken 1/5 HR -- [3B, 21, SOU - MIL] - [F] [T] .226 BA .273 OBP .161 ISO 31 AB 1 HR 3 BB% 27 K%
🔥​ Zac Veen​ 4/5 HR K SB -- [DH, 22, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .342 BA .441 OBP .291 ISO 79 AB 5 HR 8 SB 13 BB% 22 K%
Alex Freeland 1/3 HR BB -- [SS, 22, TEX - LAD] - [F] [T] .333 BA .500 OBP .500 ISO 6 AB 1 HR 25 BB% 12 K%
Dylan Beavers 2/3 2B BB -- [1B, 22, EAS - BAL] - [F] [T] .297 BA .394 OBP .154 ISO 91 AB 3 HR 6 SB 14 BB% 18 K%
Cayden Wallace 1/3 HR -- [3B, 22, TEX - KC] - [F] [T] .297 BA .375 OBP .165 ISO 91 AB 3 HR 2 SB 7 BB% 17 K%
Jimmy Crooks 3/3 2 2B BB -- [C, 22, TEX - STL] - [F] [T] .364 BA .482 OBP .159 ISO 44 AB 1 HR 1 SB 17 BB% 12 K%
Wilderd Patiño 1/3 HR -- [CF, 22, TEX - ARI] - [F] [T] .244 BA .295 OBP .101 ISO 119 AB 2 HR 4 SB 6 BB% 34 K%
Daniel Mateo 2/3 BB SB -- [CF, 22, TEX - TEX] - [F] [T] .111 BA .273 OBP .000 ISO 18 AB 3 SB 18 BB% 31 K%
Sterlin Thompson 3/5 HR -- [LF, 22, EAS - COL] - [F] [T] .288 BA .357 OBP .144 ISO 104 AB 2 HR 3 SB 9 BB% 17 K%
Brennan Milone 1/2 HR 2BB SB -- [3B, 23, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .226 BA .336 OBP .183 ISO 93 AB 4 HR 2 SB 12 BB% 21 K%
Jose Mujica 3/4 2 2B -- [C, 23, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .429 BA .429 OBP .286 ISO 7 AB 0 BB% 14 K%
Colby Thomas 1/3 HR 2BB -- [LF, 23, TEX - OAK] - [F] [T] .304 BA .362 OBP .287 ISO 115 AB 8 HR 8 SB 5 BB% 19 K%
Carlos De La Cruz 2/4 2 HR K -- [RF, 24, EAS - PHI] - [F] [T] .179 BA .263 OBP .119 ISO 67 AB 2 HR 10 BB% 35 K%
 

A+ Standouts

Ethan Salas 0/3 2BB K -- [C, 17, MID - SD] - [F] [T] .191 BA .304 OBP .074 ISO 94 AB 4 SB 14 BB% 28 K%
Luis Lara 1/3 K SB -- [CF, 19, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .274 BA .361 OBP .062 ISO 113 AB 13 SB 9 BB% 17 K%
🔥​ Jorge Ruiz​ 2/3 2B BB SB -- [CF, 19, NWL - LAA] - [F] [T] .190 BA .239 OBP .080 ISO 100 AB 1 HR 4 SB 5 BB% 18 K%
🔥​ Luke Adams​ 1/2 HR BB SB -- [3B, 20, MID - MIL] - [F] [T] .213 BA .430 OBP .173 ISO 75 AB 3 HR 7 SB 16 BB% 20 K%
Leonardo Bernal 1/3 BB K SB -- [C, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .225 BA .296 OBP .112 ISO 89 AB 2 HR 2 SB 8 BB% 22 K%
Ahbram Liendo 0/3 2BB K 2 SB -- [2B, 20, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .200 BA .271 OBP .106 ISO 85 AB 2 HR 11 SB 8 BB% 36 K%
Luis Baez 2/5 HR -- [RF, 20, SAL - HOU] - [F] [T] .282 BA .333 OBP .184 ISO 103 AB 5 HR 3 SB 7 BB% 23 K%
🔥🔥​ Xavier Isaac​​ 4/4 2 2B 2 HR -- [1B, 20, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .250 BA .346 OBP .228 ISO 92 AB 5 HR 5 SB 12 BB% 28 K%
Xavier Isaac 1/1 2BB SB -- [DH, 20, SAL - TB] - [F] [T] .250 BA .346 OBP .228 ISO 92 AB 5 HR 5 SB 12 BB% 28 K%
Yeison Morrobel 3/4 2B -- [DH, 20, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .224 BA .315 OBP .092 ISO 98 AB 1 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Yeison Morrobel 2/3 SB -- [RF, 20, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .224 BA .315 OBP .092 ISO 98 AB 1 HR 1 SB 8 BB% 23 K%
Emaarion Boyd 3/5 2B -- [CF, 20, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .250 BA .337 OBP .050 ISO 80 AB 6 SB 6 BB% 15 K%
Thayron Liranzo 2/3 BB -- [1B, 20, MID - LAD] - [F] [T] .179 BA .324 OBP .131 ISO 84 AB 2 HR 16 BB% 35 K%
Joshua Baez 1/3 BB SB -- [RF, 20, MID - STL] - [F] [T] .257 BA .325 OBP .108 ISO 74 AB 2 HR 8 SB 9 BB% 37 K%
Gavin Conticello 2/5 SB -- [1B, 20, NWL - ARI] - [F] [T] .284 BA .361 OBP .147 ISO 109 AB 4 HR 7 SB 9 BB% 23 K%
Cameron Cauley 1/3 HR BB -- [SS, 21, SAL - TEX] - [F] [T] .241 BA .267 OBP .138 ISO 29 AB 1 HR 1 SB 3 BB% 36 K%
Daylen Lile 1/5 HR -- [CF, 21, SAL - WSH] - [F] [T] .267 BA .370 OBP .144 ISO 90 AB 1 HR 10 SB 10 BB% 12 K%
Estiven Machado 2/4 2 2B -- [SS, 21, NWL - TOR] - [F] [T] .178 BA .255 OBP .067 ISO 45 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 13 K%
Yiddi Cappe 2/3 2BB -- [3B, 21, MID - MIA] - [F] [T] .255 BA .342 OBP .104 ISO 106 AB 2 HR 4 SB 11 BB% 19 K%
Kristian Campbell 1/2 HR BB -- [DH, 21, SAL - BOS] - [F] [T] .276 BA .389 OBP .289 ISO 76 AB 5 HR 1 SB 14 BB% 30 K%
Brayan Buelvas 3/4 2B BB K -- [CF, 21, MID - OAK] - [F] [T] .232 BA .333 OBP .188 ISO 112 AB 4 HR 10 SB 13 BB% 21 K%
Leandro Pineda 2/2 2B 2BB -- [RF, 21, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .307 BA .394 OBP .182 ISO 88 AB 3 HR 10 BB% 23 K%
Jacob Gonzalez 2/4 2B BB -- [SS, 21, SAL - CWS] - [F] [T] .306 BA .409 OBP .157 ISO 108 AB 3 HR 5 SB 13 BB% 9 K%
Erick Brito 2/4 2B HR K -- [SS, 21, SAL - PHI] - [F] [T] .273 BA .333 OBP .127 ISO 55 AB 1 HR 4 SB 8 BB% 19 K%
Jared Dickey 2/2 2B HR 2BB -- [RF, 22, MID - KC] - [F] [T] .227 BA .352 OBP .250 ISO 88 AB 5 HR 5 SB 13 BB% 20 K%
Tavian Josenberger 2/4 HR K SB -- [2B, 22, SAL - BAL] - [F] [T] .218 BA .349 OBP .115 ISO 87 AB 2 HR 18 SB 15 BB% 14 K%
Scott Bandura 1/2 BB 3 SB -- [CF, 22, NWL - SF] - [F] [T] .160 BA .303 OBP .173 ISO 81 AB 3 HR 8 SB 15 BB% 30 K%
Jared Sundstrom 2/4 2 2B BB SB -- [RF, 22, NWL - SEA] - [F] [T] .276 BA .404 OBP .171 ISO 76 AB 2 HR 3 SB 14 BB% 25 K%
Rubel Cespedes 2/2 3B BB SB -- [3B, 23, MID - MIN] - [F] [T] .344 BA .429 OBP .271 ISO 96 AB 5 HR 1 SB 13 BB% 21 K%
 

A Standouts

Juan Flores 1/2 BB -- [C, 18, CAL - LAA] - [F] [T] .278 BA .356 OBP .156 ISO 90 AB 2 HR 5 BB% 20 K%
Yophery Rodriguez 1/2 3BB -- [CF, 18, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .236 BA .336 OBP .170 ISO 106 AB 3 HR 3 SB 12 BB% 33 K%
John Cruz 1/3 2B BB -- [RF, 18, FSL - MIA] - [F] [T] .124 BA .205 OBP .021 ISO 97 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 26 K%
Marco Vargas 1/2 3BB -- [2B, 18, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .312 BA .500 OBP .000 ISO 16 AB 4 SB 29 BB% 16 K%
Kenni Gomez 1/4 HR K -- [CF, 18, CAR - HOU] - [F] [T] .279 BA .339 OBP .163 ISO 104 AB 3 HR 2 SB 7 BB% 32 K%
Rosman Verdugo 0/2 2BB K SB -- [SS, 19, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .230 BA .318 OBP .203 ISO 74 AB 4 HR 3 SB 10 BB% 29 K%
Freili Encarnacion 2/3 BB -- [3B, 19, CAR - BOS] - [F] [T] .300 BA .349 OBP .025 ISO 40 AB 1 SB 6 BB% 41 K%
Aron Estrada 3/4 -- [SS, 19, CAR - BAL] - [F] [T] .232 BA .291 OBP .063 ISO 95 AB 8 SB 4 BB% 20 K%
Bryce Eldridge 2/3 2B BB -- [DH, 19, CAL - SF] - [F] [T] .242 BA .310 OBP .177 ISO 62 AB 2 HR 9 BB% 25 K%
Marcos Torres 1/3 HR -- [RF, 19, CAR - TEX] - [F] [T] .143 BA .239 OBP .091 ISO 77 AB 1 HR 2 SB 10 BB% 35 K%
Roderick Arias 2/4 3B -- [SS, 19, FSL - NYY] - [F] [T] .209 BA .356 OBP .145 ISO 110 AB 2 HR 7 SB 17 BB% 35 K%
Jonny Farmelo 2/4 2B BB K -- [LF, 19, CAL - SEA] - [F] [T] .259 BA .423 OBP .129 ISO 85 AB 3 HR 10 SB 18 BB% 23 K%
Boston Baro 2/5 2B SB -- [DH, 19, FSL - NYM] - [F] [T] .222 BA .364 OBP .111 ISO 27 AB 3 SB 18 BB% 21 K%
Manuel Beltre 2/5 2B SB -- [SS, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .230 BA .316 OBP .090 ISO 100 AB 1 HR 8 SB 7 BB% 17 K%
Edward Duran 1/2 2BB SB -- [C, 19, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .235 BA .384 OBP .059 ISO 68 AB 5 SB 17 BB% 18 K%
🔥​ Kenny Castillo​ 3/3 HR BB -- [C, 19, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .310 BA .388 OBP .127 ISO 71 AB 1 HR 10 BB% 31 K%
Anderdson Rojas 3/5 SB -- [CF, 20, CAL - ARI] - [F] [T] .306 BA .352 OBP .165 ISO 85 AB 6 SB 5 BB% 13 K%
Keiner Delgado 2/5 HR 2K -- [2B, 20, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .231 BA .231 OBP .462 ISO 13 AB 2 HR 0 BB% 30 K%
Elijah Green 1/3 2BB K 2 SB -- [CF, 20, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .168 BA .306 OBP .139 ISO 101 AB 3 HR 10 SB 14 BB% 45 K%
Omar Alfonzo 2/3 HR BB -- [C, 20, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .247 BA .354 OBP .141 ISO 85 AB 2 HR 14 BB% 31 K%
Miguel Briceno 1/4 HR SB -- [1B, 20, CAR - MIL] - [F] [T] .226 BA .254 OBP .129 ISO 62 AB 2 HR 7 SB 4 BB% 14 K%
Avery Owusu-Asiedu 1/2 2B 2BB -- [CF, 20, FSL - PHI] - [F] [T] .204 BA .302 OBP .129 ISO 93 AB 1 HR 9 SB 12 BB% 39 K%
Will Verdung 1/3 2BB K SB -- [1B, 20, CAR - ATL] - [F] [T] .226 BA .372 OBP .065 ISO 62 AB 1 HR 4 SB 16 BB% 26 K%
Solomon Maguire 2/4 3B HR -- [DH, 21, FSL - PIT] - [F] [T] .270 BA .289 OBP .189 ISO 37 AB 1 HR 1 SB 2 BB% 28 K%
Alexis Hernandez 1/2 3BB 2 SB -- [RF, 21, FSL - TOR] - [F] [T] .164 BA .320 OBP .033 ISO 61 AB 9 SB 14 BB% 33 K%
Marcus Brown 3/4 2 2B 2BB -- [SS, 22, CAR - WSH] - [F] [T] .462 BA .533 OBP .308 ISO 13 AB 13 BB% 20 K%
Nick Vogt 4/4 3B 2 SB -- [CF, 23, CAL - SD] - [F] [T] .222 BA .344 OBP .086 ISO 81 AB 10 SB 13 BB% 29 K%
 

Rookie Standouts

Edgleen Perez 2/3 2 2B BB -- [C, 17, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .400 BA .571 OBP .400 ISO 5 AB 14 BB% 14 K%
John Estevez 1/2 3B BB K -- [RF, 17, GCL - ATL] - [F] [T] .286 BA .500 OBP .286 ISO 7 AB 1 SB 30 BB% 20 K%
Welbyn Francisca 2/4 SB -- [2B, 17, AZL - CLE] - [F] [T] .286 BA .286 OBP .000 ISO 7 AB 1 SB 0 BB% 0 K%
Enmanuel Bonilla 2/4 3B -- [CF, 18, GCL - TOR] - [F] [T] .571 BA .571 OBP .571 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 1 SB 0 BB% 7 K%
Andruw Musett 2/3 2BB -- [C, 18, GCL - BOS] - [F] [T] .625 BA .769 OBP .000 ISO 8 AB 30 BB% 0 K%
🔥​ Eric Bitonti​ 3/5 HR BB SB -- [3B, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .286 BA .333 OBP .214 ISO 14 AB 1 HR 1 SB 6 BB% 26 K%
Angel Cepeda 2/3 3B K SB -- [DH, 18, AZL - CHC] - [F] [T] .455 BA .455 OBP .182 ISO 11 AB 2 SB 0 BB% 18 K%
Luiyin Alastre 2/5 BB SB -- [2B, 18, AZL - MIL] - [F] [T] .286 BA .333 OBP .000 ISO 14 AB 3 SB 6 BB% 26 K%
Sheng-En Lin 3/5 2B K SB -- [3B, 18, AZL - CIN] - [F] [T] .444 BA .500 OBP .111 ISO 9 AB 1 SB 10 BB% 30 K%
Felix Cotes 2/5 2B K SB -- [DH, 18, GCL - TB] - [F] [T] .375 BA .375 OBP .125 ISO 8 AB 1 SB 0 BB% 12 K%
Abdias De La Cruz 2/5 2 3B K -- [LF, 19, AZL - ARI] - [F] [T] .167 BA .214 OBP .333 ISO 12 AB 1 SB 7 BB% 42 K%
Esteban Mejia 3/3 2 2B -- [2B, 19, AZL - TEX] - [F] [T] .727 BA .727 OBP .545 ISO 11 AB 1 HR 0 BB% 27 K%
Abrahan Ramirez 3/4 HR -- [3B, 19, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .333 BA .333 OBP .333 ISO 9 AB 1 HR 0 BB% 22 K%
Josue Gonzalez 1/1 HR 2BB -- [1B, 20, GCL - NYY] - [F] [T] .625 BA .769 OBP .875 ISO 8 AB 2 HR 23 BB% 7 K%
 

Hi everyone,
Shipping from California to US only. Open to offers on multiples.
$5 unlimited shipping. $20 minimum to ship. Paypal Goods and Services only.
Grading is record/sleeve.
If interested, please comment and then send a message/chat. Would LOVE to trade, mostly looking for jazz and funky jazz type stuff. Trade list of wants is at the bottom.
Thanks for looking!
Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers - Les Liaisons Dangereuses 1960 STRONG VG/VG+ - $15
BadBadNotGood - Sour Soul Instrumentals NM/NM - $20 played once
Billy Harper - Black Saint VG+/VG+ - $60
Blue Mitchell - Blue's Blues VG+/VG - $12
Bobbi Humphrey - Dig This VG/VG+ - $20
Bobby Timmons Clifford Jordan John Jenkins - Jenkins Jordan and Timmons VG+/VG - $40
Chico O'Farrill NY Latin All-Stars - Latin Roots VG+/VG+ - with obi, occasional crackle $20
Dan Lissvik - Midnight NM/NM - $10
Dorothy Ashby - Dorothy's Harp NM/NM - $25
Freddie Hubbard - First Light VG+/NM with Obi - $20
Grant Green - Carryin' On STRONG VG/VG+ - $25
Harold Ousley - The Kid VG+/VG - $20
Howard McGhee - Maggies Back In Town VG+/VG+ - slight warp and occasional crackle $15
Human Highway - Moody Motorcycle VG+/VG+ - $15
Ian Carrs Nucleus - In Flagrante Delicto VG+/VG+ - $15
Jackie McLean Sextet - Fat Jazz VG+/VG+ (warp DNAP occasional crackle) - $30
Junior Mance - The Junior Mance Touch VG+/VG+ - $15
Junjo - The Evil Curse of the Vampires NM/NM SOLD
Kenny Drew Trio - Kenny Drew Trio VG+/VG+ - $15
Lee Morgan - The Sidewinder VG+/VG+ - $15
Mal Waldron - Les Nuits De La Negritude Quiet Temple NM/VG+ with obi - $70
Mal Waldron Sonny Grey Alain Hatot Kenny Clarke - Skippin' VG+/VG+ with obi SOLD
Mankunku Quartet - Yakhal Inkomo NM/NM SOLD
Masayoshi Takanaka - On Guitar VG+/VG+ - slight occasional crackle - $80
MF DOOM - MM FOOD NM/NM - $40 played once. No obi thing or stencil.
Miles Davis - Bitches Brew VG+/VG+ - Some light staining on cover, more apparent inside gatefold. No obi, insert included. SOLD
Miles Davis - Get Up With It VG+/VG (spine is all chipped up and some creases to sleeve, occasional crackle) SOLD
Milt Jackson - Sunflower NM/NM - with obi $20
Mister Heavenly - Out of Love VG+/VG+ - $20
Paul Desmond Quartet - East of the Sun Presumed M/M sealed - $15
Ramones - Subterranean Jungle VG+/VG+ SOLD
(name written on labels, small price sticker on top right front of jacket.)
Ramones - Too Tough To Die VG+/VG SOLD
(Name on label in pen, creasing and a little bit of sticker residue on cover.)
Rone - Tohu Bohu NM/NM - $25
Rusty Bryant - Fire Eater NM/NM - $25
Rusty Bryant - Soul Liberation STRONG VG/VG+ - $20
Sam Coffey and the Iron Lungs - Sam Coffey and the Iron Lungs - NM/NM - $10
Sonny Rollins - Now's the Time VG/VG - $15
Sonny Rollins - What's New? - VG+/VG+ with obi SOLD
Terumasa Hino Quintet - Hi-Nology STRONG VG/VG+ SOLD
Various - Funky Stuff: The Best of Funk Essentials Volume One VG+/STRONG VG - $12 (creasing on bottom right corner of sleeve)
Willie Nelson - Shotgun Willie VG+/VG - $20 SOLD
LOOKING TO TRADE FOR AND/OR BUY THESE:
Charles Kynard - Woga
Horace Silver Quintet - Cape Verdean Blues
Ike Quebec - Bossa Nova Soul Samba
Melvin Sparks - Akilah!
Neal Creque - Contrast!
Pucho & His Latin Soul Brothers - Jungle Fire!
Sadistic Mika Band - Black Ship
Teddy Edwards - Nothin' But The Truth!
Wavves - V
Yusef Lateef - Detroit
Primarily looking for Jazz/Funk type stuff, so if you have something along those lines let me know!